August 30, 2025

The best minds in the Democrat party lay out the Partei's position

One of the finest minds of the Democrat party has summed up the party's position perfectly:

The only way we can overcome systems of oppression is not to subvert verbal norms but to have radical transparency in all dialog, so stakeholders can speak truth to the existential threats of the patriarchy and save us from the environmental violence that surrounds us, and thereby show true allyship via dialoguing with LGBTQ+BIPOC people, undocumented Americans, the un-housed, birthing persons, those oppressed by the carceral system and all other victims of the privileged.

Of course.  Should be obvious.

 

 

 

For those who didn't get it: yes, obvious sarc, but it's exactly how Democrats bleat.  This was edited from a brilliant paragraph by Cynical Publius.

August 29, 2025

Mortgage fraudster--and governor of the Federal Reserve Bank--Lisa Cook claims she can't be fired

UPDATE in the fraud case against Lisa Cook:  On Thursday night, Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte dropped a second criminal referral against Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook based on evidence that she entered into a 15-year mortgage on a third property which she listed as her "Second Home." 

On an ethics form signed with the government, however, Cook noted it as an "investment/rental property."

Why is this bad and not simply a 'clerical error'? As Pulte notes, "Representing the property as a second home may have allowed Cook to secure a lower “Second Home” mortgage down payment and rates, as investment properties typically carry higher down payments and higher rates due to increased risk."

This new criminal referral follows an initial referral Pulte made after Cook listed two properties as her 'primary residence' in 2021 - ostensibly reaping manifold benefits on tax treatment and interest rates, which Cook hasn't denied. 
About that Clerical Error...

Earlier Thursday, Cook filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after President Donald Trump fired her on Monday 'for cause.' Among the excuses contained in the lawsuit for listing two properties as her primary residence was a possible clerical error. 

Except, Cook described herself in her 2023 nomination hearing as having "significant experience in banking and finance, as is evidenced by my service on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and of a Community Development Financial Institution in Michigan, in addition to my employment at an investment bank and a large commercial bank." 

SO...corrupt Cook claims she's a *banking expert,* and anyone in the banking business knows you get a lower interest rate on your primary residence, higher on other property. 

To repeat: if she claims to be an "expert" in banking, she absolutely, positively knew this.  And yet she now claims her listing two residences as her "primary residence" (while quickly renting out one) "may have been a simple clerical error."

"May have been" is a total mislead, designed to shape public opinion by blacks and liberals that the fraudster must not be fired, cuz..."she din' know!"

Bull-fucking-shit.

If Cook was found to have committed fraud in an area having to do with interest rates, over which she has authority, that taints every decision she makes.  Had this been known during her confirmation hearings, would bribem's handlers still have nominated her?  (Answer: probably.)  Would the senate--which had a tie vote on confirming her before the moronic, corrupt Cackles broke the tie as VP (the only time a VP is allowed to cast a vote in the senate), would Cook have been confirmed?  (Answer: probably, since Democrats always vote with the party.)  She should never have been confirmed. 

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/28/trump-fed-lisa-cook-lawsuit-powell.html

The 24-page complaint in Cook's lawsuit doesn't deny the allegations of mortgage fraud (the filing says nothing about how two applications stated both properties were her "primary residence") but instead claims that even if the claims are true, any false statement she "may have made" to get a lower interest rate would NOT be 'cause' for firing because...wait for it...dis happened before she was confirmed as a governor of the Federal Reserve Bank. 

In the section of the 24-page lawsuit complaint titled "Factual Allegations," point 32 notes the utterly irrelevant fact that Cook is the first black woman on the board.  Of course plaintiffs are entitled to recite any fact they like, but you'd think they'd stick to the relevant ones.  This isn't, but instead is code to all judges not to support her firing.

Point 50 says "The claims made in Director Pulte’s referral letter are unsubstantiated allegations that about [sic] conduct that predates her Senate confirmation..." 

Ahh, "predates her confirmation."  That's relevant how?  The documents she signed clearly show she declared two properties to be her "principal residence," and her own subsequent actions make it clear that she bought one property specifically for rental income.  Fraud.  The fact that the alleged fraud happened before she was confirmed is totally irrelevant.

Point 55. "The unsubstantiated mortgage fraud allegations that allegedly occurred  prior to Cook’s confirmation do not amount to “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” nor has the President alleged that they do."

So according to Cook's hotshot Democrat attorney, however deez statements got onto her mortgage app, she can't be fired.

Wait...it gets worse!  The lawsuit was immediately been assigned to a DC judge--supposedly totally at random, right?  The judge--Jia Cobb--is a black female appointed by bribem.

Anyone wanna bet on how the black female Democrat will rule?

The Deep State protects its own.

Source.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/feds-lisa-cook-sues-keep-job-amid-mortgage-fraud-fiasco

Cook lawsuit randomly assigned to totally unbiased black female judge Jia Cobb

 

Who encouraged the Minneapolis church killer?

 

August 28, 2025

Elizabeth Warren claimed to be Native American. No big deal?

Elizabeth Warren is a Democrat senator.  It's astonishing because she's a total, chronic liar.  Young Americans have no idea that for her entire career she's claimed to be a Native American.  The card below is her registration for the Texas Bar, and you see on the bottom that she claims to be "American Indian."  

 

She also claimed that to get hired by Hahvahd, and for the next nine years that university listed Warren as Native American on its federal diversity forms.  Warren said she was never aware of this--but clearly she TOLD Hahvahd she was Native American.  Hmmm...

Finally Warren was pressured into taking a DNA test, which showed she has roughly one percent N.A. DNA, which is quite common among Americans.  Doesn't remotely qualify someone as Native American.

 I mention the above because young Americans think Warren is reasonably honest, and know nothing about her lifetime of lies.  And of course Democrats don't bat an eye:  "Well she BELIEVED it, so it's not really a lie!"

Multiply those statements by ten-thousand and you get where we are today: Ten thousand false statements by Democrat "elites" and their fellators in the Mainstream Media, never corrected.  "Socialism is good."  "Diversity is our strength."  "The U.S. is the world's worst aggressor."  "The U.S. has always been raaaacist."  You get it.

But you are ordered to ignore all that.  As TV character George Costanza said on Seinfeld, "It's not a lie if you believe it."  Hmm....  

"The Hills" publishes an "opinion piece" by two professors who claim the Left rules academia by fear

"The Hill" is a Democrat-fellating propaganda site masquerading as neutral "newz."  In all the years I've followed it I've never seen an article that didn't totally, fawningly, slobberingly push the policies of the Democrat partei [sic]--until this morning.

Yesterday the Hill published an "opinion piece" by two researchers in psychology at Northwestern University, and I've edited it extensively below.  Their theory is that universities may not be as far Left as they appear.  [Spoiler: they are, but let's see what the psych researchers say]:
>>

When we wrote recently on student self-censorship, professors from state flagships to the Ivy League wrote to thank us for saying what they couldn't.  They said they disagreed with the leftist policies [the authors didn't actually say "leftist" but wrote "progressive" cuz it sounds better than "leftist"] that have ruled American universities for decades, *but felt they had pretend to agree to keep their jobs.*

Our survey of 1,452 undergrads at Northwestern and the University of Michigan showed that more than 80 percent of students admitted they'd falsely said they agreed with Leftist positions to avoid clashing with a professor.

That was shocking enough, but what was even more surprising were the responses we received *from faculty members,* which show that non-leftist professors *also pretend to agree with the Left,* fearing that disagreeing with the Left on any point could trigger a coordinated campaign to get them fired or demoted.  [Some department heads fire a warning shot by merely removing a professor's "travel budget" for those who stray from Leftist orthodoxy.]

But if both students and faculty are just pretending to agree with the Left's rule, why does every faculty keep supporting the Left? 

Again, fear—of losing professional friends, of official reprisal and professional ruin.

As all dictators know, it doesn't take a majority to enforce fear:  A minority with power can create an llusion of consensus,* which is all it takes to keep a regime in power.  Even if someone in power isn't Leftist, they continue to do what they believe is a powerful mob demands.

If our hypothesis is correct, it's a tragedy, as good people with good ideas have been (and continue to be) fired or discredited for oppposing the mob.

Humans have always relied on group acceptance for survival, and it's long been recognized that adolescents--most of whom lack a strong sense of self--are especially susceptible to peer influence.  The surprise is that so many *adults*--particularly in academia--roll over.

You only get good decisions if those who make the decisions are skilled at weighing opposing arguments.  But universities have shut that door: students are never exposed to any arguments NOT explicitly leftist, so they lack the ability to weigh opposing policies.

In almost all universities a small, zealous minority enforces conformity through intimidation.

That's not merely metaphoric:  In the late 1960s and ‘70s Marxist theory surged on college campuses, spawning terrorist groups like the Weather Underground (originally the Weathermen), which carried out 25 bombings, including at the Pentagon, the State Department, and the U.S. Capitol. Several members later killed police and security personnel.

You might think those who did those bombings and murders would be jailed for life, but in 1991 Northwestern hired the co-founder of the Weather Underground (Bernardine Dohrn) to head its Children and Family Justice Center.  Kathy Boudin, another member who served 23 years in prison for her role in three murders, joined the social work faculty at Columbia University and co-founded its Center for Justice. 

In other words, the Left that ran those institutions rewarded its footsoldiers.

More recently Northwestern hired Mkhaimar Abusada, a Gaza-based professor with ties to Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.  That hire followed pressure stemming from an illegal student encampment, one of many anti-Israel campus demonstrations after Hamas’s massacre of more than 1,200 Israeli civilians (and 47 U.S. citizens) on Oct. 7, 2023.

Universities have put people who support dismantling American institutions into top positions, and they have advanced that agenda with growing success.>>

<<All rational adults know that low-level members of organizations get ahead by doing what those higher in the hierarchy want.  So no one should be surprised that rational students will continue to parrot whatever their professors say they believe.  And as long as professors fear losing their jobs if they disagree with the Left, a tiny few committed leftists will continue to control higher education.

Problem is, there's no way to replace the leftists at the top of almost every university.

The authors don't have any suggestions on how that can be done, and neither do I.  But I think it's fair to conclude that our future as a free society is at stake.

The only surprise here is that the Democrat-fellating rag The Hill would post an opinion piece like the one by the two researchers.

Finally: The piece by the two Northwestern professors had LOTS of soft weasel-words in it, because they're academics and don't wanna be fired.  I can't be fired, so I replaced the bafflegab with more accurate terms.  Any change in meaning is unintended and entirely my fault. 

Source.

https://thehill.com/opinion/education/5470550-fear-is-the-only-thing-keeping-campus-radicalism-afloat/amp/ 

After tranny murders two children in a Catholic church in Minneapolis, ABC "newz" says "Trump's name on weapon." Mislead."

 As some of you may have heard, on Wednesday a mentally-ill tranny shot up a Catholic church in Minneapolis during Mass, killing two children aged 8 and 10.

SOoo...the Mainstream Media got right on it, eh?  Democrat shill Aaron Katersky reported on the air, not mentioning that the killer was a tranny, but that he had the word “Trump” scratched onto the stock of one of his weapons. 

 but did not explain that he had written, “Kill Donald Trump,” rather than just his name.

“We’ve also been going through it, and I can tell you...the name of President Trump [is]written on the guns.  There are also racial slurs."

A reasonable viewer would interpret this as the killer being a Trump supporter, but the truth is exactly the opposite: the phrase that included Trump's name said "Kill Donald Trump."

[If you watch the tranny's ten-minute video of his arsenal you see "Kill Donald Trump" was actually written in white paint on one of his mags.  Every surface of every weapon and mag was covered with carefully-painted sayings, in white paint.  Guy was obviously crazy, but then again we knew that from the fact that he was a tranny.] 

If you think this was just an accident--sloppy "reporting"--I've got some oceanfront land in Nebraska to sell ya, cheap.

This was absolutely intentional.  How do we know?  Because after thousands of viewers caught the mislead and lit up the Net with comments blasting ABC, the network never apologized.  The rule for dictators and their lackeys is "Never admit anything, because admitting it makes more people notice it."

And here's the topper: in the press conference by the shithead liberal mayor of Minneapolis, Frey noted right up front that citizens must NOT conclude that the murders had anything to do with the killer being trans.  Nope nope nope. 

Source.

https://dnyuz.com/2025/08/27/abc-news-journalist-ripped-to-shreds-online-over-misleading-claim-linking-trump-to-trans-shooter/

August 27, 2025

What the Lying Mainstream Media won't tell you about dat AWFUL "gerrymandering"

 

August 26, 2025

The Democrat Partei [sic] demands that you ignore what you see with your own eyes

If your kids haven't read "1984" you should give 'em a copy.  If you haven't read it, you need to.

Orwell knew communism (socialism by a different name).  And he distilled it into two sentences: 

 

The Democrats and the entire U.S. Left wants Americans to ignore the evidence they see.  "Crime?  Not a problem, deplorable!  Crime in duh U.S. is NOT a problem, deplorable!  Yew jus' THINK it iz!  Cuz yew is stupid an' gullible!  Yew need tuh believe whut we an' duh Media tell ya!  Cuz we iz smaht."

Ring any bells?

"What yew see iz NOT real, deplorable!  Yew jus' THINK yew know whut's up, but dat only cuz yew iz STOOPID!"

Starting to ring any bells YET?

Listen to Timmy Walz for ten minutes.  Listen to AOC, or Hakeem Jeffries, or Chuckie Schumer, or Nancy Pelosi, or mayor Brandon Johnson, or Muriel Bowser.  They absolutely SNEER at you and everything you believe in.

And the Media totally fellates those lying, sneering bastards.

Wake the hell up.  

August 25, 2025

Who dis?

Who dis'?

 

If you pay attention to national politics you recognized the deranged, angry bitch above as the Attorney-General of New York, Letitia James. 

Letitia was elected for her good looks and delightful personality.  Wait, maybe not.  Oh, dat right: she campaigned on a vow to target Trump, calling him an "illegitimate president" and vowing to "use every area of the law" to investigate him and his businesses.   And once elected, that's what she did.

Trump used some of his real estate properties as collateral for a loan.  The loan application wanted an estimate of their value, and Trump (or more likely his attorneys) entered what he thought they were worth.

But James was able to find Democrat appraisers who were willing to say the collateral properties were worth less than Trump thought.  

Now: The banks looked over the numbers and didn't see anything amiss.  Trump got the loan and paid it back on time, with interest.  But that didn't sway James a whit.  Using her years of experience in commercial real estate, she agreed with her hand-picked Democrat appraisers that Trump had overestimated the value of the properties.

Wait, James has had no experience at all with commercial real estate, but decided that her hand-picked group of Democrat appraisers was right...and she charged Trump with fraud. 

Now the hoot here is: Suppose someone just paid $100 million for a painting that looks like it was done by a 3rd-grader on meth, and which last sold for $30 million.  Suppose further that the buyer pledges the painting as collateral for a big loan, valuing it at $100 million.  But James comes along and says no, it's only worth what someone paid for it 20 years ago, so you've just committed fraud.

See how that works?

The case ended up in before a totally nutso leftist judge name Arthur Engoron.  In a non-jury trial Engoron  ruled for James, and fined Trump $340 million.  With interest from the day the application was submitted, the fine came to over half a BILLION dollars.

   

Neat how that worked, eh?

Trump appealed, but was ordered to post a bond for the entire amount until the appeal court issued its ruling.  Ironically, posting a bond is like borrowing money--you pay interest. 

Two  days ago an appeals court in New York allowed the conviction to stand, but  ruled that the $515 Million-dollar fine violated the Constitution's ban on "excessive fines."

Which it clearly did.   

NOW...if you thought that would end the matter, you clearly just arrived on the planet.  Do enjoy your stay.  Cuz James--who get to use virtually infinite taxpayer dollars for anything she decides to do--has appealed to an even higher NY court, which is likely to take another year to issue its ruling in the matter. 

She and Engoron actually thought a $515 MILLION-dollar fine for a difference of opinion was reasonable.  And if that pair would try to crush the president like that, imagine how they laugh when they torture ordinary working people. 

Democrats SCREAMING about Trump sending troops to DC! "How dare he cut OUR crime?!"

 Dems are organizing protests, carrying signs reading "End the occupation!"  "Hands off our city!"  "No dictators!"  It looks so...organic! 

 

They chant and scream in unison "Whose streets?  OUR streets!"  It's so...inspiring!

You may think it's dumb, but their lies are convincing stupid voters.  Independents may not like Dem policies, but when Dems scream that Trump is "occupying their city," a LOT of people fall for it.

I'm seeing a lot of so-called "experts" saying voters are tilting to the GOP.  I'm really skeptical. 

Sure hope I don't have to say "I told ya so" after the midterms. 

August 23, 2025

Top Dem donor and Gavin Newsom backer charged with $250 million "carbon credit" fraud

Adapted from an article by Luke Rosiak at the DailyWire.com.  His piece is worth reading.

This story checks so many boxes on the "SOooo typical" list that my first thought was that it had to be a spoof.

A California Democrat who donated millions to Gavin Newsom--and wailed about the corruption of Wall Street banks--started a company to sell "carbon credits." For young Americans that's a legal scam created by Democrats bleating that "Globull Worming" is killing the planet.  The grift works like this:
  After Democrats convinced Americans that carbon dioxide was a poison gas that was fatally warming the planet, they were able to *pass a law fining companies millions of dollars for emitting more carbon dioxide (such as by using gas furnaces to melt metal) than duh Dems thought was right.  But if that company's product depends on melting metal, you can't very well stop and still stay in business.
  But don't worry, deplorable!  Cuz here comes Company B--run by Democrats, of course--which claims to be doing something that absorbs CO2.  Yay!  So the gruberment gives Company B a "carbon credit.

With me so far?  Now,  the company that actually makes a product, like cars or pipe or gutters, buys Company B's "carbon credit" for less than the fine the first company would have had to pay.  So the company that actually makes useful stuff saves some money by paying the Dem/grift company B for something that only exists because of a Democrat-rammed law.

Neat grift, eh?  And we haven't even gotten to the good part yet!  Which is: Company B gets its "carbon credit" by promising to plant trees--which soak up CO2.  So where do they plant those trees?  

Africa.  Where in Africa?  Uhhh...don't ask.  And of course back when Obozo and bribem were running things (well, bribem's handlers), the EPA never bothered to even *ask the company where they were planting tens of thousands of trees--let alone check to see if trees were actually being planted.  I mean, ebrywun know dat Democrat bidnessmen nevah lie.  Dat only dun by duh eeeebil Rethuglicans, eh?

SOooo...the head grifter here is named Joe Sanberg--a top "Democrat activist."  He and other high-profile Democrats started a combination "carbon-credit" and online banking app called "Aspiration Partners."  Their business was planting trees--in Africa--for which duh Dem gruberment would give 'em precious, valuable "carbon credits."  And then for the bargain price of six figures a year dey wud sell those credits to other companies.

The company instantly became a star of the “environmental, social, and governance (ESG)” movement beloved by the Left, giving good ratings to companies that pushed leftist policies.  Actors like Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert Downey Jr. were said to be investors.

But it was all horseshit.  The Department of Justice said Sanberg created fake customers for his tree-planting services to try to dupe investors into a $2 billion valuation.  Sanberg promised his company would pay third parties in Africa to plant trees there to offset CO2 emissions here.  But apparently that never happened.

Sanberg and his partners were able to get banks to loan 'em tens of millions based on the value of their stock in the company.  He faces up to 40 years in prison after pleading guilty to two counts of wire fraud, according to the Department of Justice.

Sanberg has been a big player in California politics, a Gavin Newsom donor who personally spent $11 million backing a ballot initiative to raise the state’s minimum wage to $18 an hour. 

Sanberg also faces civil Securities and Exchange Commission charges that he created fake customers to make his scam appear profitable and popular.  SEC charged that Sanberg recruited friends, associates, small businesses and religious organizations and presented them to Aspiration as bona fide customers who were fully committed to paying large sums of money for the tree-planting services.

In reality Sanberg funded initial payments himself, making them appear to be from the fake customers.

Sanberg was able to raise more than $300 million from investors who believed the company was a thriving business, based on the hip goal of environmental sustainability.  Sanberg owned 30% of the company and was able to get a staggering $100 million in loans backed by the alleged value of his shares.  Wow!

One of Sanberg's co-founders was Andrei Cherny, who worked for Bill Clinton and Al Gore and headed the Arizona Democratic Party.  The SEC complaint said Sanberg texted Cherny in 2020 saying, “if you don’t get me the money tomorrow we are all f…ed. Get me the money. Your turn to figure it out like I have for so long.  If you don’t then [the lender] will foreclose." 

In 2021 Sanberg tried to take the company public, via a device called a "special purpose acquisition company"--essentially an existing shell.  He told prospective investors his revenue was “up 584%” due in part to “enterprise sustainability services.”  That was "trendy" enough to keep people from asking, lest they look un-cool. 

In January of 2022 the board gave him an $8 million cash bonus, “despite having low cash reserves.” That year, Aspiration reported $104 million in fictitious revenue.  Its outside auditor resigned due to “characteristics of fraud.”

The effort to go public collapsed in 2023, but not before taking $300 million from investors, including former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer.

Things started to unravel after Sanberg and another investor, board member, and high-profile Democrat donor, Ibrahim Alhusseini, stiffed a lender. When the lender sued, documents revealed in the discovery process showed that Alhusseini had gotten huge loans based on fake financial statements.

The FBI says Alhusseini sent investors falsified bank statements that made it seem like he had assets “worth between $80 million and $200 million…. In fact, AlHusseini’s brokerage account during this period held between $2,000 and $15,000.” 

One tip that something was off: All the amounts on the fake bank statements ended in 43 cents.

The Daily Wire reports AlHusseini, who is from Saudi Arabia and was a board member for the far-left anti-Israel group Code Pink, was arrested last October and held in jail until December, when wealthy Democrat environmentalists, including Code Pink founder Jodie Evans, put up their homes as $3 million bail.

Prosecutors said AlHusseini was a flight risk as he transferred $300 million to Saudi Arabia, and put his Venice mansion in his brother’s name. A New York civil court found him in contempt of court for avoiding paying the lender he stiffed.

Meanwhile he donated to leftist Dem politicians like Cori Bush and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Source: The Daily Wire 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/california-anti-poverty-activist-and-dem-mega-donor-pleads-guilty-to-massive-carbon-credit-scam
 

"A green, unspoiled paradise!" Well at least it *was* pristine til the city put homeless there

Behold:  Once-lovely Olympia, Washington:

 

This video seems to go on forever, but actually barely over a minute.  City residents say the city bought this land a couple of years ago as a place the homeless could camp that wasn't on city sidewalks.

BTW, Washington state is totally Democrat-ruled.   

Foundations give grants to wokie school boards to find: "Maff beez raaaacis!"

From: San Francisco Board of Ed
To: Parents of public-school students

Ten years ago we who run the San Francisco Board of Education realized that black and Latinx students were struggling with math, and had even more trouble with algebra.

A few critics said the problem was that our struggling students had never been taught basic math.  But student records confirmed that all students had passed earlier math courses with a grade of C or better, so that claim was wrong.  Instead we correctly concluded that the tests for maff math proficiency were raacist. 

As compassionate liberal rulers of our city's public education system, we knew we had to do something to fix this.  So after much debate we decided the best remedy was to move algebra from middle school to the 9th grade, so students would have an extra year to become proficient in math.

We won dozens of awards from the NEA and AFT for this kind of breakthrough thinking, and all board members and school principals got well-deserved raises.

But for some reason delaying algebra a year didn't seem to help either student performance or anxiety.  Finally, after another two years of study--funded by millions of dollars in grants from liberal think-tanks and foundations and President Biden's Dept of Education--we think we've found the problem: 

It's those silly numbers.

Seriously.  We found that students were confused by problems like "There are 17 students in the class.  If we want each student to get five cookies, how many cookies would we need?"  By contrast, if we replaced the numbers with "social justice" answers, like "Many boxes of cookies," every student passed.

Our early evaluations suggest this will result in all students passing algebra, which will win us many more awards.

If our full-scale trials this fall don't confirm that, we have a backup plan: We'll delay algebra until grade 12.

Source.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2025/08/19/billionaires_backing_woke_math_doesnt_add_up_amid_dei_rollback_1129311.html 

NY Times re-writes history, claims Lisa Cook was simply "targeted" by Trump for being black

The Lying Mainstream Media does one thing very well:  It lies.  Constantly, about everything.  Consider an article written by the chief economics correspondent for The Times, Ben Casselman, about a black female governor of the Federal Reserve, Lisa Cook.

In 2022 bribem appointed Cook to the *very* powerful Fed board of governors, which would make her the first black female on that board.  Every Democrat in the senate voted to confirm her, while all Republicans voted against.  She was only confirmed by the senate due to the tie-breaking vote cast by bribem's brilliant, carefully selected VP, Cackles.

Now, three years later, Cook is in the news because she appears to have committed mortgage fraud, by claiming on a mortgage app that two homes were her "principal residence." 

As Cook very well knows, you get a lower interest rate on a mortage if the property you're buying will be your principal residence.  But on closing the deal, Cook promptly rented out the new property.

Two days ago the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Bill Pulte) made a "criminal referral" to the DOJ charging Cook with the apparent fraud.

Now watch how the Times's "economic writer" spins it:

>>In an interview, [a black female doctoral student in economics--at ooohhh, Hahvahd!] bleats that it was "striking" that...Mr. Trump and Mr. Pulte had *chosen to target the Fed’s only Black female governor.*>>

<<Oh, absolutely, bitch.  Cuz any entity that tries to enforce a law or rule or regulation on a black female *must* be "targeting."  You bet.  Some of us still believe the Founders' great principle that "The law applies equally to all."  You obviously don't.  Fuck you, communist bitch.<<

>>[Black female doctoral student says] it's "notable that the attacks on Ms. Cook focused on her property ownership, since black Americans were nearly 40 percent less likely than white Americans to own homes.">>

<<You bet, bitch.  Pointing out her apparent mortgage fraud is an "attack," and noteworthy NOT because she's a f'ing governor of the Fed but because a smaller percentage of blacks than whites own homes.  No.  And if you think I'm being unfair to the black female being quoted, consider this next bleat from the student:

>>“[They're] attacking the perception of who builds wealth in this country...and essentially making an example out of her. They’re trying to paint this woman of color as someone who is unworthy of wealth.”>>

<<What *utter* horseshit.  Your fellow liberals love it when you play dat victim card, but the rest of us are less moved.  Either the law applies to everyone, or else we have two much different sets of laws, with special "protected groups" allowed to get away with violating laws the rest of us are punished for.

In a written statement Cook said she refused to "be bullied."  Ahh, playing the victim card again, eh?  And the real hoot was that she claimed that the mortgage applications happened before she was appointed to the board of governors--as if that makes everything fine.

So to hear the Times "economics writer" tell it, the current dust-up has NOTHING to do with mortgage fraud.  In fact the word "fraud" never appears in the article, and "mortgage" only appears once.

If you believe a single thing published by the Lying Mainstream Media you're an utter fool.  The Media's main function is to lie to support the Democrats.

Source: New York Lying Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/23/business/lisa-cook-fed-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.gU8.Bdim.EveDMa_PNJtE&smid=url-share 

In the Muzz-ruled U.K. a man gets arrested for saying "We love bacon." Seriously.

In the Muslim-dominated U.K. two days ago, Brits held a protest demonstration at a mosque.  During which a young Brit was arrested.

The alleged offense?  He shouted "We love bacon!"

Seriously.

He was promptly marched off by the cops--who eagerly obey their Muz masters or they're fired.  Just like in American cities run by Democrats.

And the shocker is, if you think that's not coming here, you haven't been paying attention.  It won't be imposed by Trump or Vance or conservatives, but by "hate-speech" laws in Democrat-ruled cities, enforced by leftist judges.

Laugh if you want.  Won't change what's coming.  Reason: the Supreme Court has yet to take a "hate speech" case, and almost surely won't.  So we're left with local leftist judges--appointed for life by bribem's handlers--prosecuting any speech the Left doesn't like--like "We love bacon."

Even if no more leftist judges were appointed--for life--by Dem presidents, it'll take over 40 years for the leftist judges ruling Dem states to retire.  As long as they're in power, free speech in those states and cities doesn't exist--as the hapless U.K. protester found out.

Can't even say "We love bacon," eh?  Next to be criminalized?  "We love dogs."   Cuz Muzz believe dogs are "unclean."

https://x.com/i/status/1958147629839188277   

August 22, 2025

Obama-appointed leftist judge orders "Alligator Alcatraz" shut down

If the Deep State doesn't like something the president does, they can always find a leftist judge to order that move undone or blocked on some pretext, no matter how insane.  And sure enough, leftist judges have blocked every effort to deport illegal alien invaders.

Example: The day Trump and Desantis announced the emergency construction of a detention center for illegals, built next to a 10,500-foot paved runway in the middle of the Everglades, leftists sued.  And yesterday (Aug 21) federal judge Kathleen Williams--appointed by Obozo in 2011--ordered the administration to shut down the detention facility in the Florida Everglades--which NBC "Newz" cunningly calls a "migrant center" instead of a facility for detaining "illegal alien invaders"--within 60 days.

She also DECREED that during that time it not be expanded *and that no new detainees be brought in*--which was the goal, and which alone would quickly put it out of business regardless of any other ruling.

The DECREE was based on claims that the government violated the National Environmental Policy Act.

She also ordered that within 60 days the government must remove “all generators, gas [??], sewage, and other waste and waste receptacles installed to support this project.” 

She also ordered the removal of all lighting installed for the facility, claiming illegal "light pollution"  violated...uhhh...the Light Pollution Act of 1964.  Yeh, dat's it!  Interfered with nearby astronomical telescopes.

(Just kidding on both those statements.)

See, duh Constitution say "After 1962 no one is allowed to install any lighting over 50 watts wifout written permission from duh EPA."  Well maybe duh Constitution don't zackly say dat, but judge Kathleen beez reel smaht, so she know whut duh Founders meant, even if dey jus' din' know how to say it in modern English.  See, dey din' know English very well.

The cutesy leftist shitheads at NBC write "It’s unclear how the facility will remain operational if those resources (generators and lighting) are removed."  See, dat why duh "reporters" at NBC iz paid duh big bucks, cuz dey kin figger out stuff like dat.

She also DECREED dat duh government must also remove temporary fencing, to allow members of a Native American tribe  the same access to the site dey had before the facility was built.  As you'll see later, a tribe rep admits the facility is TWO MILES from the nearest tribal land, but duh tribe demanded fencing be removed, an' leftist judges jus' LOVE dat, so...  

A spokesperson for DHS noted that the land has already been developed for a decade.  (Actually the 10,500-foot paved runway was built almost 50 years ago, but who cares, eh?)

The judge had previously issued a restraining order declaring that building the detention facility had "skirted environmental laws."  "Skirted" is the weasel-word used by NBC.  Haven't read the DECREE yet but if the government had actually violated environmental laws I suspect duh judge would have said dat, an' NBC would have parroted it.

Next heading from NBC is "A 'major victory'"

The environmental groups that sued celebrated the ruling as “a major victory for Florida’s imperiled wildlife and fragile ecosystems which are threatened by the detention center.”

The groups said the center posed "a threat to the Everglades ecosystem, endangered species, clean water and dark night skies."

The leaders of the Miccosukee tribe praised the ruling. 

The tribe's chairman said “We will continue to fight to ensure that the government does not dodge its legal requirements for environmental review on seized public lands, sacred to our people.”

Kinda amusing that NBC--like all Lying Mainstream Media--only supports "sacred" stuff when it's associated wif' a native culture.  Otherwise they always sneer at "sacred."  Churches in Europe desecrated by "youths"?  No big deal.  But don't you DARE say a critical word when a native population claims its land or artifacts are "sacred."  Context, citizen!

NBC again: "Environmental groups and Native Americans had protested the construction of the site, which is part of the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration, because..."

Wait, you lying sons of whores at NBC: the Trump admin is cracking down on WHAT?  Not "immigration," but...  "Illegal immigration."  Illegal alien invaders.  Get that through your thick skulls. 

...because of the Everglades’ delicate and unique ecosystem, which is home to endangered and threatened species.

The lawsuit said that the center was "built without ecological reviews required under the National Environmental Policy Act and without public notice or comment, and that the government failed to comply with other state and federal statutes, including the Endangered Species Act."

The director of water resources for the Miccosukee Tribe told the court the entrance to the jetport where the facility is located is a quarter-mile from the tribe's land.

So you may be surprised to learn that the "jetport" is NOT on the tribe's land.  BUT like all Dem-favored groups, the tribe claims dominion over everything nearby, because...reasons:  Doze planes will scare off duh animals we hunt!  And "Light pollution" could disturb telescopes!   

You may also be surprised to learn that way back in the 1970s when the runway was built, the tribes and enviros didn't say a critical word.  But when the Democrats and leftists wanted to force a center to detain illegals shut down, suddenly they come out of the woodwork.

The tribes "director of water resources" said the Everglades must be protected from airplanes an' lights an' things cuz “It’s written into the constitution because the Everglades protected our tribe when they were hunted by the government.”

"The Constitution"?  You'd think the NBC propagandists would ask her to clarify that statement, but of course it's more powerful if they let voters believe that's in the U.S. Constitution.  

The director of water resources admitted that the big runway had been there for nearly two decades, but with “minimal activity."  But that changed in July with the quick construction of the detention facility.

The tribe's director of fish and wildlife testified that the airstrip is "a couple of miles from the tribe's sites."

Wait...the "director of water resources" said "about a quarter-mile from tribal lands.  The fish official says two miles.  Which is it?  And again, if the airstrip isn't on tribal land, what privity do they have?
  And the payoff pitch: Did the tribe complain about ANY of this when the big runway was built?  No, not a word.  It only became an issue when Republicans started deporting illegal alien invaders.
   Coincidence?
   And you'd think native Americans would be really keen on keeping out invaders, eh?

Asked about the impact the detention facility had on hunting on their land, the tribe's fish and wildlife director said members of the tribe are "concerned the wildlife they formerly hunted are no longer in that area.” There’s also "concern that medicinal plants are affected."

The airstrip and detention facilities aren't on your land, so piss off.

Source: NBC "newz"

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-rules-alligator-alcatraz-florida-no-new-detainees-rcna224550 

Another sterling bribem choice--this time as a governor of the powerful Fed

The Federal Reserve Bank is arguably one of the most powerful entities in the nation.  It has seven "governors."  So being one gives that person huge power.

So...just as bribem promised before he was nominated that he'd choose a black female VP, and later that he'd appoint a black female to the nation's highest court, in 2022 the utterly corrupt, senile, moronic bribem nominated a black female named Lisa Cook as a governor of the Federal Reserve Bank.

See, another historic "first" for the Dems: Cook is the first black female governor of the Fed.

Turns out that before being appointed, Cook lied on applications for a mortgage loan, claiming two homes she was buying were BOTH her "primary residence."  (Hint: not legal.)

So...clearly none of bribem's White House handlers bothered to do any background checking to catch such.  Or they did but didn't care, since bribem wanted a black woman in the post.  And the gaggle of wokiez running the place were, like, totally excited to do dat.

The hoot is Cook's response to the fraud claim:  In a damn written statement--giving her ample time to review it--Cook wrote 

“I learned from the media that FHFA Director William Pulte posted on social media that he was making a criminal referral based on a mortgage application from four years ago, before I joined the Federal Reserve."

AHH, that's totally different and peachy, cuz mortgage fraud committed before someone is appointed as a governor of the Fed doesn't count.  At least that's the opinion of Cackles Harris and Katanji Brown Jackson (who infamously said she couldn't define "woman" during her senate confirmation hearings.)  

You'd have to be a moron to claim that fraud two years before being named a governor is a defense--and in a written statement, no less. 

She also plays the victim, bleating that she won't be "bullied" into resigning.  Cuz she knows blacks will rally to her defense.

A more likely defense is to claim she didn't know mortgage applicants can only have one "primary residence."    

So another faaaabulous bribem appointment, like the tranny he appointed to head the "Health" branch of the Department of Health and Human Services--who then, by law, became the first allegedly female 4-star admiral.  Sure.  And the panderthon rolled on. 

Federal Reserve governor Lisa D. Cook

 

August 20, 2025

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

The best takedown of communism ever written is arguably George Orwell's "Animal Farm"--a short allegory in which animals able to speak decide it's just not fair that they have to work or produce to earn their keep.

So when the day is over they start having meetings planning the upcoming revolution, inspired by the stirring motto "All animals are equal!"

Sounds faaabulous, eh?  

You need to know that in from 1920 on, communism was *the* Hot New Thing among "elites," and in the U.K. both government and universities were absolutely filled with communists and their supporters.  But Orwell was a fierce opponent of communism, so his journalism was relentlessly censored by British communists and their fellow travelers.

The censorship forced him to resort to fiction.  The inspiration for Animal Farm came from a pre-war children’s book called "The Adventures of the Little Pig"  published by the ‘Left Book Club’ to get children to hate capitalism and love communism, as the little pig grapples with various threats said to characterize rapacious capitalism--like having to work.

Orwell wrote a story about pigs and other farm animals mimicking the Bolshevik revolution, which had promised liberation but instead ushered in a far harsher tyranny than before.

Despite never mentioning the USSR or communism in his animal fable, anyone familiar with the Bolshevik revolution and the subsequent history of the USSR knew exactly what Orwell was talking about--which meant that British Communists rushed to suppress it, warning that it was a threat to national security, the war effort and would ruin relations with Moscow.

Orwell had often fought with a U.K. entity called the Ministry of Information, which was like bribem's "Disinformation Governance Board."  Infested with Communists and leftists, that ministry did everything possible to keep Animal Farm from being published.  In his later novel "1984" Orwell would name this leftist-run ‘Ministry’ the "Ministry of Truth," with the job of lying, "doublespeak," "doublethink" and torture of dissidents.

Animal Farm was finally published in the summer of 1945.

One of the hallmarks of leftists--inheirited from their communist leaders--is the constant inversion of language to describe things as the opposite of what they really are.  One of Orwell's greatest legacies was to make the Left's constant inversion of language into an adjective.  Ask you highschool and college kids if they've heard the term ‘Orwellian,’ and if they know what it means.

Communism professes to champion freedom, but in fact punishes dissent.  So in the book, the pigs who constantly bleated "All animals are equal!" turn out to be the new rulers. 

Today Animal Farm’s perfect allegory of the Bolshevik (for young Americans: communist) revolution goes right over the heads of most young Americans.  Leftist labels for the different classes--both on the farm and in society, like "proletariat"--mean nothing to young Americans.

Ask your kids (over 15 or so) if there's a difference between "equality" and "equity."  Pay close attention to their explanation (if any).

As a writer and political analyst, Orwell paid close attention to political language, such as the way the Left makes voting in an all-powerful leftist government seem like liberation: “All animals are equal," right, comrade?

But at the very end someone changes the slogan by adding "...but some animals are more equal than others.” 

You'd think the utter hypocrisy would be obvious to all, but the leftist pigs blandly, soothingly insist that *someone must rule* or else we'd have chaos, right?

Orwell also lampooned the compulsion of communist lackeys to create inspiring slogans, coining pig-slogans like “Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad” to demonize the farmer (oppressor).  In "1984" he'd immortalize these with the three slogans of the Party of Oceania: “War is Peace,” “Freedom is Slavery” and "Ignorance is Strength."

All those seemingly sarcastic (to us) slogans are slowly explained in "1984" in classic Leftist "baffle-gab," and you see how it *kind of makes sense* if you limit the scope of the discussion.

From here it's an easy segue into logical inversions like "doublespeak" and "doublethink."  The latter is definded as "The ability to hold two totally contradictory ideas in mind at the same time...and to believe both."

Leftists always claim to champion the oppressed, because at least half the population can feel oppressed about *something*, eh?

The brilliance of Animal Farm is showing, in simple language, how revolutions purportedly made to "liberate the oppressed" invariably devolve into tyranny.

80 years later, Animal Farm mocks the Left's notion that "liberation movements"--determined to always stay in power--could ever be other than totalitarian.  It offers a warning to contemporary American and European liberals who, like their counterparts in Orwell’s day, allowed themselves to be hijacked by Communism.

Orwell warned readers to be suspicious of the slogans and rationales deployed by those in power to justify their rule.  But of course that was a long time ago, right?  There's no way any lessons from so long ago could have any relevance today, eh?

“All animals are equal" always becomes "...but some animals are more equal than others.”

Two sets of laws, eh?

Source.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/animal-farm-turns-80/ 

August 17, 2025

Nailed it

 

August 16, 2025

Five years after wrongly discrediting the "lab leak" theory, one Media asshole confesses

Glenn Kessler had the awesome title of "fact-checker" for the Democrat propaganda rag the Washington Post.  In reality Kessler was a member of the corrupt, Trump-hating Media cartel.  Now at last, five years after Kessler changed a headline on a Post story he was supposedly "fact-checking,"  he  finally admits "Dat wuz a mistake."

Except it was deliberate, designed to discredit the Dems' top enemy, Trump.

In May of 2020--just three months after the Chyna virus arrived in the U.S, --the utterly corrupt Washington Post published a story on the theory that the virus had been modified in a Chinese lab to make it deadly to humans, and the virus had gotten out via an infected worker at the lab.

The original headline was "Was the New Coronavirus Accidentally Released From a Wuhan Lab?"

Alleged "fact-checker" (in reality a Democrat propagandist) Kessler changed the headline, adding "It's Doubtful."  Really, Sparky?  Neither he nor any member of the Lying Mainstream Media had any rational basis for that claim.  Instead every member of the Lying MSM was using their outlets to sneer at Trump for suggesting that's how the Chyna virus was unleashed on the world.

This week--five years too late--Kessler finally admitted he was wrong to change the headline to discredit the theory that a harmless bat virus had been modified in a Chinese military lab to make it lethal to humans, and then "escaped."

The Post was among the first mainstream outlets to reject this "lab-leak theory," labeling it a "conspiracy theory" and constantly claiming--in every story the paper published--that the theory had been "thoroughly debunked."

Except..."thoroughly debunked" was utter horseshit.  Even the experts who Fauci asked to analyze the virus days after the first case was confirmed in the U.S. said it had been modified from a harmless bat virus, and that the changes (inserted genes) were obvious and were intended to make the virus lethal to humans.

Fauci was determined to prevent the public from learning this, because he'd sent U.S. taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan lab to do exactly the kind of research needed to modify viruses.  So he instructed his experts to write an article for a British medical journal saying exactly the opposite of what they'd actually concluded.

The Chinese refused to allow inspectors into the Wuhan lab.  The Media covered that up too.

Finally, three years after the plandemic began--and after the sneer campaign against Trump had done the intended damage--the FBI and the Department of Energy reported that a lab leak was the "most likely" origin.

Of course all the damage had already been done: Stories like those in the Post had made Americans skeptical of Trump's statements.  Mission accomplished.

Then during Trump's first term Kessler also repeatedly promoted the hoax that Trump had "colluded with Putin to steal the 2016 election."  We're now seeing newly-discovered emails among the conspirators proving they concocted the hoax just five weeks after Trump won (but before he took office) to cripple Trump's presidency. 

Then more recently, in the months before the 2024 election, as the Democrats tried to cover up bribem's senility, Kessler would sneeringly claim that dozens of videos showing the corrupt Democrat vegetable Biden appearing confused were "misleading," saying the videos used "deceptive framing."  You bet, Glenn.  All "cheap fakes" by Rethuglicans, eh?

Glenn Kessler is a lying piece of shit whose entire career was built on helping the Post publish lies to discredit Trump.  Now as those lies are being steadily exposed, he tries to claim it was just a mistake.

Yeah, you lying Democrat sack of shit--a "mistake" like everything else you supposedly "fact-checked" for the Post.

Source: Washinton Free Beacon

https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/ex-wapo-fact-checker-glenn-kessler-admits-he-was-completely-wrong-to-dismiss-covid-lab-leak-theory/

August 15, 2025

"Diversity is our strength." Horseshit

 

Success of Mamdani and other socialists forces Democrat leaders to decide which way to jump

Zohran Mamdani is a Muslim communist.  He supports increasing taxes on "the rich" to make more services--like public transit and daycare--"free" to his base.  But surprisingly, this post isn't actually about him, but about the Democrat party.

Mamdani's win in NYC's June mayoral primary has put the leaders of the Democrat party on the spot:  Do they endorse the guy and trust that their Media allies will assure voters outside NYC that the Partei [sic] does NOT actually endorse his ideas and policies (i.e. lie to cover for 'em), or do they stay quiet?

Partei leaders see their voters are starting to embrace socialism, because it gives 'em lots more free shit, so embracing Mamdani would keep all his supporters on the Dem plantation.  But Dem leaders also know that embracing socialism risks losing a big chunk of independents who know how awful socialism really is.

Ooohhh, what to do, eh?  To see which way the Dems will jump, let's see what the most experienced, cunning Dem consultants and strategists--Obama's people--are saying.

Media outlets report that in June Obama himself called Mamdani to congratulate him on his victory and offer advice about governing.  Other Obama insiders like Jon Favreau and Dan Pfeiffer have also shown a keen interest in Mamdani.

Obama's chief campaign strategist, David Axelrod, went to Mamdani's campaign headquarters to meet the candidate, later saying "He's asking the right question, which is how do we make the country work for working people?"

Ahhh yes, the familiar line that "Democrats are *really concerned* about the average working stiff," eh?  Except that's utter horseshit.  The Dem party
 * supports open borders
 * has sued to block all deportations
 * urges members to "demonstrate" to block ICE agents;
 * wants to raise taxes
 * wants taxpayers to pay for sex-changes for prisoners, school kids and retirees;
 * demands that males be allowed to compete against girls in sports;
 * demands more trannies in the armed forces;
 * wants to defund the police and
 * increase welfare.

None of which working Americans want the government to spend tax dollars on.  But Axlerod ignores that and instead spouts the soothing lie that "Democrats are the party of the working class."

Axe says Mamdani inspires young Americans "who feel economic uncertainty acutely," and that the Democrat party needs to do the same.

The gush of approval by top Obama insiders suggests that the Partei is likely to embrace Mamdani and his policies, counting on the Media to spin that as "Democrats are NOT endorsing his policies!  Nope nope nope, not at all, so don't worry about it."

Think any member of the Mainstream Media will ever ask a Democrat politician (other than Mamdani) if he or she supports socialism?  Not a chance, because there's no answer that won't cost the Dems votes.

So instead Democrat pols are *quietly* pushing for more socialism, more profanity, more political violence, more sex changes for minors--and for not deporting any illegal aliens.

You'd think most Dem voters would reject all those policies, but the wokiez who rule the Dems embrace 'em, so that's the end of the matter.  (I initially wrote "...of the discussion," but of course there *is no discussion.*  The rulerz decree the policy, and that's the end of the matter.)

The problem for conservatives is that even after nominating the least-qualified, least-likeable candidates in modern memory, the Dems only lost by about 1.5%  Several reasons for this:
 *The number of hideous citizens--many of whom are mentally ill--is huge and growing, and they flock to the Dem party;
 *The idea of rioting to demand that an illegal alien rapist be freed is irrestible to such people and gives 'em a feeling of belonging that they crave;
 *Leading Democrats are on TV every day screaming that Trump is Hitler and is destroying ouah precious democracy--you know, the kind of "democracy" that selected Cackles.  The more people hear that bleat, the more believe it;
 *Lots of poorly-educated Dems don't wanna work in the only kinds of jobs they qualify for, so they love things like "universal basic income" that pays able people who prefer not to work;

So I'm afraid conservatives who believe the Democrat Partei is unpopular heading into next year's midterms are in for a huge shock.

Former Dem presidential candidate Robert Francis ("Beto") O'Rourke shows the Partei's new strategy perfectly: at a rally in support of Texas Democrats who fled the state to avoid having to vote on a bill to redistrict, said "Fuck the rules!  Whatever it takes, we are going to win."

O'Rourke famously flamed out of the 2020 primary after promising to confiscate privately-owned guns.  He now says that when Democrats reclaim power they would "drive that car like we stole it" to end all deportations and approve a sweeping amnesty bill for illegal aliens (whom he calls "undocumented Americans").

Mamdani has the same position, vowing to prevent federal immigration agents from operating in the city.  He has described his efforts to secure taxpayer-funded benefits for illegals as one of his "greatest victories." Omar Fateh, another radical socialist running for mayor of Minneapolis, recently said one of his top priorities would be protecting "our undocumented residents" from a "hostile federal government."

Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett--a shrieking diva who's become a rising star thanks to her public tantrums, claims illegal immigration is "not a crime."  She most recently went viral for calling Donald Trump a "piece of shit" on her nationwide publicity tour.

They're insane...and they're gaining support from wackos.

A tale of Dem hypocrisy: When Florida flew 50 "migrants" to Martha's Vineyard

For those with short memories: A few years ago the governor of Florida sent a ONE planeload of 50 illegal immigrants to Martha's Vineyard--a totally liberal/left enclave whose residents had totally supported open borders. 

You will never guess what happened!

Within 24 hours the leftist/Democrat residents--who had firmly, virtuously bleated dat dey LOVED open borders and "immigrants"--got the state government to remove EVERY illegal to a former Air Force base on the mainland.  Within 48 hours not one of the 50 "immigrants" remained on that elite island.

 

And here we see how "virtue-signaling" works for Democrats:  Piously bleat dat you LOVE open borders, but when you get a dose of what you claim you LOVE, use your political clout to get rid of every last one of 'em within 48 hours.

Democrat/leftists are hypocritical pieces of shit.  "We LOOOOVES open borders!  Yep yep yep!  Just as long as the "immigrants" stay somewhere else!"

Just-released email shows James Clapper demanding other intel chiefs ignore normal standards to push "collusion hoax" before Trump took office

On Dec 16, 2016, the heads of Obama's intelligence agencies--including FBI director James Comey--met in the Oval Office to discuss Hilliary Clinton's idea that Trump might have "colluded with Russia" to steal the presidential election.  In this first meeting a plan was hatched to get intel agencies to support this claim, and the heads of the intel agencies were told to find evidence to support that conclusion.

Just six days later--on Dec 22--the head of the National Security Agency--which wiretaps damn near everything--sent an email to the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, saying the NSA wasn't convinced there was any collusion, and raising alarms over being told to support a story that was beginning to look like a deliberate hoax.

Two days ago Tulsi Gabbard released two previously-classified emails: In the first email, sent at 7 a.m. on Dec 22, the head of the NSA (Admiral Mike Rogers) says he's uncomfortable rushing to such dangerous conclusions on such feeble evidence--and on such a rushed schedule.


Rogers notes that Clapper is asking all the intel agencies to ignore normal safeguards and to rush to what Rogers implies may be a politically directed conclusion.
 
The second email is Clapper's reply to Rogers, sent at 7:43 p m that evening to Mike Rogers, John Brennan (head of the CIA) and James Comey (director of the FBI). 

Understand your concern.  It is essential that we (CIA, NSA, FBI, ODNI) be on the same page and are all supportive of the report--in the highest tradition of "that's OUR story and we're stickin' to it."
  This evening the CIA has provided to the NIC [?] the complete draft generated by the *ad hoc fusion cell.*  We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible *as we complete the report, but more time is not negotiable.
  We may have to compromise our "normal" modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule.
  This is one project that has to be a team sport.

This is the smoking gun.  Neither Rogers nor Comey had seen even a draft of the  report, which had only been sent from CIA (co-conspirator John Brennan) to Clapper.  And yet Clapper is telling them they must sign on to it despite any disagreements, and we don't have time to debate this.
  Also note Clapper says "We may have to compromise our 'normal' modalities since we  must do this on such a compressed schedule."  This sounds like an admission that they'll be expected to ignore normal safeguards.

The "report" Clapper refers to will claim that the "Russia-collusion" story--a hoax that all but Rogers know was crafted by the Clinton campaign to distract from her email scandal--is real.

The plotters cooked up this hoax after the December 16, 2016 meeting with Obama, in which Obama ordered them to write a finding supporting the Narrative that Trump had "colluded with Putin to steal the 2016 election from Hilliary."  They had to get that done before Trump took office.

With such a tight deadline Clapper couldn't have Rogers slowing things down, or refusing to agree with the not-yet-written but predetermined "report."  With Trump due to take office in just 35 days there wasn't time to do things by the book.

Clapper's email to Rogers, Comey and Brennan makes it clear that there was no honest evidence supporting the claim of collusion.  Instead the only "evidence" was the Steele dossier, which was paid for by Hilliary's campaign and later found to be fabricated.

But Obama was determined to cripple Trump's presidency, and knew that with the help of the Dem-fellating Mainstream Media, this hoax would do it.

Keep in mind that Clapper wrote this email on December 22, 2016, just 29 days before Obozo would be out of office and the plotters would likely be out as well.  They didn't have time to use "normal procedures" to check out the claim.

Note Clapper's statement that he will attempt "as much mutual transparency as possible."  

"Mutual transparency"?  WTF does that mean?  I'd love to see him explain that on live TV, before congress.  My guess is that he's telling Mike Rogers that he can't tell Rogers what Clapper claims the other agencies know, so Rogers will have to just take Clapper's word for it.

Of course the *entire* basis for the claim is Hillary Fucking Clinton's paid, fabricated dossier--paid for to distract the public from her email scandal.

Note that Clapper is demanding that everyone sign off on the report before it's been finished.  Indeed, Rogers hasn't even seen the *draft,* which Clapper helpfully admits his co-conspirator (CIA head Brennan) only sent him "this evening."

Clapper also helpfully adds "...more time is non-negotiable."  That's a command.

Clapper helpfully admits we have to "compromise on our 'normal' modalities."

"Modalities" seems to be baffle-gab for "procedures," used because it sounds so lofty and opaque.  I'd love to see him explain what he meant--which was, violate all of our normal methods and standards and safeguards for intelligence collection and assessment.  

Clapper knows they have no evidence that hasn't been paid for by Democrats.

This is treason. This is a coup.  If they get away with this (and they will), you can expect similar attempts by Democrats whenever a Republican wins a presidential election.


August 14, 2025

The three types of people who support communism ("one-world government")

If you haven't been paying attention you haven't noticed the faaaabulous rising stars of the Democrat Partei [sic] are Marxists.

For young Americans, "Marxists" means communists, after the cunning grifter Karl Marx, who realized that half of the people on the planet would rather take from well-off people than work for a living.  So if those people see a politician who promises to do that for 'em, they're all in.

Governments can be divided into two types: Representative, and Authoritarian.  In the first type, if the people don't like the ruling party they can change rulers by a simple vote (at least in theory; some political parties like to rig elections).  By contrast, while people can vote IN Authoritarian regimes, you can't vote 'em out.  And since they control the cops and military, there's no way (short of civil war) to throw 'em out.

Communism--regardless of what cunning disguise it takes on to win power--is authoritarian.  They rule, and the people obey or are imprisoned (or worse).  The leaders believe they know what's best, and citizens (a.k.a. "deplorables") are advised not to complain.

Of course even in representative governments the leaders believe they know better than ordinary citizens, but at least the latter can peacefully throw the bastards out if the policies of the leaders don't work. 

Which brings us to the self-styled "elites" who run the World Economic Forum (WEF).  If you're over 30 or so you've surely heard of the WEF.  Its members believe the world needs saving, and that they're the only ones who know how to do that.  They co-opt stupid national governments by claiming there's a crisis that requires all nations to submit to One-World Government.  They stopped calling it that 20 years ago because too many people started to realize it was communism under a new name.

The particular "crisis" doesn't matter:  Two centuries ago it was the possibility of global famine, then running out of water, then nuclear war, then a coming Ice Age, then "global warming" and finally the catch-all of "climate change"--which can be used to control every activity on the planet, since everything can be claimed to have some effect on climate.  And it has the advantage that there's no way to disprove it.

Point is, the particular crisis doesn't matter: If the climate stopped warming for 30 years, the rulerz would bleat that a) "It hasn't really stopped!  The satellites are giving us wrong info!" and b) the lack of warming for 30 years merely means it's a pause, not a real stop.  It's a religion.

SO...the "elites" of the WEF have proposed dozens of policies to save the world from the latest crisis.  For example, eating meat puts more CO2 into the air than getting the same number of calories from plants or "mealworms," since much energy goes into keeping the cattle alive.  The WEF "fix" is that you should eat mealworms.  Of course *they* won't, because...reasons.  Like John F'n Kerry on why he flies a private jet to Europe and back: "Some of us are important."

American homes are too big, so all new housing will be in state-owned apartments.  As one WEF member put it, "You will own nothing--and you'll love it."

The WEF has also proposed doing away with private cars.  This requires re-designing cities into "15-minute cities."

A 15-minute city is an urban planning concept where residents can access most of their daily needs, like work, shopping, education, and healthcare, within a 15-minute walk or bike ride. The goal is to create more vibrant, self-sufficient, and walkable neighborhoods, reducing reliance on cars and promoting a healthier, more sustainable lifestyle  

Of course just planning and zoning will cost hundreds of billions for a nation the size of, say, Germany.  (Klaus Schwab, founder of the WEF, is German.)  But "We've got to do it, because of [crisis X]."

Say, how well do 75-year-olds bike?  "Don't worry about that, citizen!  We'll take care of that!"

What if I want to visit another city 200 miles away?  "Simple: you just apply for permission to travel.  Of course there will be a lifetime mileage limit on your travels, so plan well!"

So who's riding in those big black luxury cars we see on the roads?  "Government officials, doing important work."  Why aren't *they* biking?  "Obviously because they're important people.  Elites."

So...below meet one of the members of the WEF.

August 13, 2025

Gallup poll shows Dems leading by 3 points, down from 4-point GOP lead in Q4 of 2024

Democrat pols, elites and their lying lackeys in the Mainstream Media have been demonizing Trump for a decade.  And they're really good at it, so much so that a recent poll shows that after voters leaning Republican during bribem's rule, we're now back to more Americans saying they favor Democrats.

That may strike you as unlikely because CNN keeps reporting that the Dems favorability rating is around 35%--a 30-year low.

I think the explanation is that voters don't like most Dem *policies,* like open borders, more free shit for people who refuse to work, blocking deportation of illegals who've committed serious crimes, pushing more tranny operations, letting males compete in girls' sports, letting thugs out of jail without posting bail, raising taxes (while denying they're raising *your* taxes), blocking photo ID to vote, allowing everyone to vote by mail, with no witnesses needed, blocking all efforts to reduce federal employees in bloated agencies and so on.

But most people have trouble following those proposals.  By sharp contrast, when Dems scream dat "Trump is Hitler!" or "power-mad" or "acting like a king" or "hiding the Epstein files cuz he was one of Epstein's clients," everyone instantly understands those claims.  Doesn't take any careful analysis.

The Dems know they can't win on policies, so they switch to ad-hominem attacks that don't require listeners to be informed or do the work of analyzing policies.  Smart move.

For most of 2023 and last year, more Americans identified themselves as either being or leaning Republican. but because of the constant avalanche of Media stories comparing Trump to Hitler--or more recently to a king--that's now reversed.  

Take a look at this plot for the same survey for the past 2.5 years.  Specifically note the huge swing between Q4 of last year and Q2 of this year: Went from a four- point GOP advantage to a three-point Dem advantage.

 

Now, if this poll had been done by one of the known Dem-shill push-polls, I'd ignore it.  But this is from Gallup, which doesn't seem to be an obvious Dem shill, and it's a large poll--3,000 people.

Next data-point: The Democrats are paying companies like "Crowds-on-demand" to create demonstrations for national TV, such as a recent one in DC.  Problem is, the average low-info viewer doesn't even know such companies exist, so they think the anti-Trump movement is really rolling.  So more morons turn out for the next demo.

Conclusion: There's no reason to believe any of the scandals like Schiff's and Letitia James's mortgage frauds will actually be prosecuted, and even if they were, it wouldn't seem likely to dent the Dems' chances of winning the mid-terms.  Based on current *trends* my guess is that the Dems will win at least the House next year--in which case congress won't pass anymore Trump policies unless Trump and Republicans agree to huge concessions on Dem policies.

Hate to be a downer but I have to call 'em as I see 'em.

Source: Gallup poll

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/8145959/7392303999663955506

Newsom proposes his state somehow "withhold federal taxes" to pressure Trump. How?

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/06/newsom-floats-withholding-federal-taxes-00393386

"Politico" is a lying shit-site, always supporting Democrat lies.  So when Trump  talked about withholding federal gifts to California after the state defied his EO barring males from competing against girls in sports, we got this headline:

>>Newsom floats withholding federal taxes as Trump threatens California>>

Now: I'm just some nameless citizen, whereas duh *faaabulous* Gavin Newsome and his party have ruled California for decades.  So dey smaht.  Reeel smaht.  I can't be as smaht as dey are, cuz dis sonofabitch is duh *governor of f'ing California,* eh?

So when dis mofo bleats dat *he* gon' "withhold fed taxes from duh fed gruberment," an' duh equally reeel smaht Democrat rat-bastards who run Politico don't laugh at Newsom, the *clear* inference is that the Democrat-fellating leftists at Politico think that idea is, like, totally plausible!

For Democrats, let me slow that leap down for ya: When a pol sez somethin' really dumb, an honest media outlet would point that out to readers who might not know.  Conversely, if a "media outlet" *doesn't say the pol's idea is ludicrous, what does that show about their intent, eh?

I suspect that's still to subtle for most Dem voters to grasp, but we'll see.

SO...when you pay your federal income tax, do you mail your check to the state?
No, it goes directly to the IRS.  So how does Newsom propose to intercept those checks to "withhold" those amounts from the feds, eh?

Some Dems counter that "Oh, what ouah faaabulously smaht gubnur really meant wuz dat duh state would withhold all federal gasoline taxes!  Yeh, dat's it!
 
Gosh, that was SO imaginative!  Reeally!  But of course it's horseshit: that tax is *paid by refineries directly to the federal government.*  So again, how does Newsome think he's gonna intercept and withhold those amounts?

Democrat: "Well duh state gubment collects LOTS of federal taxes from citizens and businesses and sends dat money to duh feds!  Yew jus' aren't smaht enuf to know!'

Okay sparky, tell us--specifically--what taxes you claim states collect for the feds.  Really.  Take all the time you like.

But of course you won't, cuz federal law sees to it that taxes claimed by the feds go directly to 'em, NOT thru the corrupt states.

"Whu...whu...buh...buh ouah faaabulous gubnur SED dat if Orange Hitler cut fed funds to Cali, Newsome wuz gunna "withhold tax dollars from duh feds!!"  

Ahh..."Politico"--totally unbiased, honest "journalists," right?  And naturally you believe 'em.

So apparently it's totally true, cuz if had been horseshit, duh honest reporters at Politco would have sed so, eh?

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Gavin Newsom has suggested California consider withholding tens of billions in federal tax dollars, after reports that Trump is preparing to cut some federal funding to the state.

Newsom’s suggestion came after CNN reported the president was considering ending federal grant funding to the state’s universities.

On X Newsom said “Californians pay BILLIONS more in taxes than we get back, so maybe it’s time to cut that off."

Trump has threatened to cut federal funding to force California school systems to comply with his EO banning "transgender" athletes from competing against girls in sports.

Democrat Assembly speaker Robert Rivas also floated the notion of withholding federal taxes Friday, shortly before Newsom raised the issue.  

“We’re the nation’s economic engine and the largest donor state, and deserve our fair share,” Rivas wrote. “I’ll use every legal and constitutional tool available to defend CA — we must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes.”

Just one small problem wif' dat faaabulous notion, asshole: just like personal income taxes, ALL businesses that pay quarterly or monthly witholding to taxes to the IRS make those payments *directly* to the feds.  How do you think you can intercept those payments, eh?

SURELY the Dem speaker of the whole f'n assembly (legislature) must know this, eh? He can't *possibly* be so uninformed or dumb as not to know.  But *if he knew that,* why would he suggest such obvious horseshit?

But this *obvious* horseshit has now spurred copycats in other blue states.
Here's more from the Dem-fellating brainiacs at Politio:
>>Two New York mayoral candidates, former state Assembly member Michael Blake and current state Sen. Jessica Ramos, similary suggested withholding NY City's federal tax dollars.>>

Ahh, "withholding the city's federal tax dollars," eh?  Hey Politico, try asking those two morons what tax money the *CITY collects for the feds.*  Really.  Taxes on booze?  Nah, *federal* taxes on booze are paid by the maker.  But DO take as much time as you like.

So...*none* of this is do-able.  The Dems bleat it to fire up their moronic base, and attract independent voters by making 'em think Trump is Hitler.  And all because California's corrupt Dem governor refuses to comply with the totally reasonable order to keep biological males from competing against girls in public-school sports.

No matter how much you may hate the lying left-wing Mainstream Media, it's not enough.

Source: Politico

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/06/newsom-floats-withholding-federal-taxes-00393386
 

August 12, 2025

Media claims DC murder rate is nuffin to get excited about, to blast Trump for "takeover!"

Democrats and the Lying Mainstream Democrat-fellating Media are screaming bloody murder about Trump sending National Guard troops to DC and federalizing DC police!  "It's a TAKEOVER," they scream. 

Then they bleat that duh crime rate in DC is reeeally DOWN last year, which is what makes it obvious (to them) that "It's a TAKEOVER!!"  SEE?   Orange Hitler is actin' like a KANG again!

Then someone did something the mainstream media REALLY hates: they did some research.

New York City is a legendary hellhole for murder, right?  Well you may be surprised to learn that DC's murder RATE is almost six times higher than NYC's.

Los Angeles is a murderous shithole.  You'll be surprised to learn that DC's murder rate is almost FOUR TIMES HIGHER than murderous L.A.'s.

DC thugs killed more people per-capita than Atlanta, Chitcongo, Newark, Compton (da hood) and Oakland.  So once again the Mainstream Media is pushing a lie (that the murder rate in DC is down) to justify screaming that Trump is being jus' AWFUL for sending the Guard to DC and federalizing the cops.  Absolutely typical.

But yew shud believe duh Media, cuz...um...uh...dey support Democrats!  Yeah, dat's it!


August 10, 2025

Tell me again: Which party are the fascists determined to break all the rules to win?

What political party leader just addressed a convention of Dems and said "We're gonna punch first, and punch harder.  Fuck the rules, we're gonna win!  Don't wait for Texas to re-district first. Who's with me on that?"

That would be former Democrat presidential candidate and cheerleader Beto O'Rourke.

"We're gonna punch first and punch harder," eh?  And "Fuck the rules"??

Tell me one more time: which party is led by ruthless fascists again?  

August 09, 2025

New U.N. rule will force nations to take any number of refugees the U.N. demands

Totalitarians love to fool subjects by using acronyms, because no one outside the regime and their NGO lackeys knows what any given acronym means, and don't wanna take the time to find out.

If you've been paying attention (spoiler:   ) you may have heard that all the illegal alien invaders are now being coached by their NGO supporters to claim "amnesty," which essentially allows 'em to remain in the U.S. forever.  Not legally, of course, but that barely matters, since they get to stay for at least a decade or so while their cases work their way thru endless appeals.  And by that time they've vanished into the protection of "sanctuary cities" and states.

SO...in the next year you're gonna be hearing a new acronym:  RSD.   In the context of immigration, "RSD" stands for Refugee Status Determination. 

The vaunted "AI" says that's "a legal process used to determine if a person seeking protection qualifies as a refugee under international, regional, or national law.  The loophole is that the f'ing United Nations, via the left-ruled "High commissioner for refugees" (UNHCR) may do so if it decides a nation "lacks a fair national asylum procedure."
 
Lofty, eh?  And who d'ya think makes the determinaton of what's "fair," eh?
 
Of course: the f'ing United Nations high commissioner for refugees.
 
Y'say you don't believe it?  Click on the link above and look it up for yourself.
 
What this means is that the next time Dems elect a president, and the U.N. sez "Yew gots t'take in two million po' asylum-seeking refugees every year," the Dem president will bow and say "Your will be done, oh great United Nations commissioner."  Republicans will object, but duh Dem prezzy will say "We don't haz no choice!  Cuz we iz a member of duh U.N. an' mus' doo as dey say!
 
And that will be the end of that. 

 

Number of Social Security numbers issued to non-citizens during bribem's four years

 

Stupid Dem voter: "Whut dis mean?"

Answer: bribem and his Dem lackeys opened the border floodgates the day the son of a bitch was sworn in.  But they hadn't had time to tell all the invaders to get Social Security numbers, so in FY 2021 the number of SS numbers issued to non-citizens was barely over 240,000.  Trivial, eh?

But then they started getting the word out to 'em to sign up, so the number more than doubled in FY 2022, then over three times that in FY2023.  But the REAL coup was in FY 2024, when the number was EIGHT TIMES MORE than in bribem's first year in office.

Think this is fake?  Try asking the Social Security Administration.

Democrats: "Nah, bro, dis jus' fake newz.  Nevah happened!  Jus' duh ol' 'right-wing conspiracy story!"'  

August 06, 2025

A dozen Democrat-ruled states SUE to force taxpayers to continue funding sex changes for MINORS

If you've been paying attention (spoiler: ) you may know that Trump issued an Executive Order that no federal funds be used to perform any aspect of sex-change operations on children under 18.

Let's repeat that for Democrats:  If someone is over 18 and can find a way to make taxpayers pay for your sex-change (which is legal under both Medicare and Medicaid), that's still legal.  And if you're under 18 and can find someone other than federal taxpayers who's willing to pay for your sex-change, that's also still legal.

The EO just says no taxpayer money will be used to pay for sex changes for minors. That's all.

But that outrages Democrat rulers, so last Friday over a dozen Democrat-ruled states sued the Trump administration in an attempt to block that order and force taxpayers to continue to fund transgender "medical interventions" for minors.

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in the liberal shithole of Boston, where it's impossible to empanel a jury not ruled by Democrat supporters.

The lawsuit is larded with hysterical horseshit like this:

“Since taking office...Trump and his administration have relentlessly, cruelly, and unlawfully targeted transgender individuals.  [He] has sought to deny their very existence, banish transgender residents from the public square, and refuse them medically necessary healthcare.”

Every word of that is utterly false--and the lying sacks of shit who wrote it know it.  The only restriction in the EO is that doctors are barred from using federal money to pay for their sex-change procedures for minors.  Got it?

Trump’s EO bans federal funds from being used to "transition" minors, period.  And Dems hate that.

Every state joining in the lawsuit--and the shithole of Washington, D.C.--is Democrat-ruled.

The lawsuit accuses Trump of “creating an atmosphere of fear and intimidation" among transgender individuals.  "Fear and intimidation," y'say?  Because it bars you from using taxpayer dollars to fund sex-change procedures for MINORS?   Again, the EO only applies to federal funding of sex-change procedures on MINORS.

From 2019 to 2023, U.S. hospitals and doctors billed taxpayers nearly $120 million for transgender-related procedures on roughly 14,000 minors.

The lawsuit is just the latest clash between Democrat-ruled states and the Trump administration over transgender policy. In July the Trump administration sued California for allowing males to compete against women in sports.

Now here's the hoot: congress never found it necessary to pass a federal law ordering that "Males cannot compete in women's sports or use girls' locker rooms," because before the Dems ordered both, those ideas were so absurd that no one ever even considered one political party would order both,   So no one thought we needed a federal law prohibiting it.

For the slow-witted: It's like saying "Dere iz no LAW saying elephants can't be linemen in college football, so we iz gon' do dat!"

You still don't realize how you're being conned.  Cunning Democrat leaders will always find vulnerabilities in the law that they can exploit.  And in demanding that males be allowed to compete in girls' sports, they've found one of those vulnerabilities.  And dey bleat an' whine dat "It jus' not FAIR dat yew awful conservatives don't allow deez authentic, real girlz to "play highschool and college sports!!!  Cuz 'Trans women ARE women, right"?  We haz sed it. so shall it be!

And Democrat voters smile and nod and believe it.

Democrats are cunning and relentless, and have elevated "lawfare" to an art form.  And their base loves it.  

Source.

https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2025/08/01/blue-states-suing-to-block-trump-admin-from-cracking-down-on-child-mutilation/