A tale of two outrageously expensive, wokie Democrat bribes to their supporters

Before the mid-term elections last November, Democrats were looking for ways to bribe college students and recent grads to vote, since 90% of'em vote Democrat.

They hit on a way to bribe every student who'd taken out a studen loan.  It was cunningly, misleadingly described as loan "forgiveness," but like everything the Democrats do, that wasn't accurate.  The actual details were, your parents would repay the loans of other college students.

But don't worry, citizen.  It's not a huge amount.  A paltry $10,000 for white borrowers, $20,000 for "special protected classes."  So SETTLE DOWN, deplorables!

Wait...HOW many people have open loans?  Y'say tens of millions.  Ooohhh, dat may cost some serious change, eh?  In fact duh Congressional Budged Office estimated the naked bribe to win votes would cost taxpayers $400 BILLION.  

And young student borrowers be like, "SO?  Not my problem how much it cost, cuz I beez gettin' ten large (or 20 large if you belongs to duh protected class, eh?).

At that point your parents, along with everyone who either worked their way thru school without borrowing, or who repaid their student loans, OR who didn't go to college, should be screaming bloody murder!

I mean really, do you think it's fair to force some gal making $600 a week waiting tables at Olive Garden to repay ten grand of student loans for a kid from a wealthy family who majored in lesbian studies?  I mean, really...

Because of course loan "forgiveness" is a deliberate mislead: the *banks* don't just write off ("forgive") the loans.  Instead the $10,000 or $20,000 payments will be made by your parents.  

Whoa, y'say no one told ya about *that* li'l twist?  Yeah, I know.  Cunning, eh?  But hang on, cuz it gets worse:

See, since almost every dollar of the annual government deficit--the amount the gruberment has to borrow to cover what it greedily demands to spend to continue to bribe voters for campaign contributions--is borrowed from China, you yourself will be repaying the cost out of your future earnings.

Yeah, you didn't see that one coming either, eh?

But of course the biden regime doesn't care that the bribe is paid by you and your parents.  All they care about is that the bribe worked: exit polls showed huge majorities of college students and recent grads voted for Porridgebrain and Cackles in 2020.

Democrat pols would sell their mothers to sex traffickers without a second thought if it would win them control of the gruberment.  All that matters to 'em is power.  How they get it doesn't matter.

Of course a dozen conservatives states immediately said "This is pure bribery, and can't be allowed.  There is no Constitutional authority for this whatsoever!"  And they sued to prevent the bribe from proceeding.

A court of appeals agreed that the scheme was indeed unconstitutional, and ordered the regime not to proceed.  But since your parents' taxes pay the salaries of entire battalions of government lawyers, the biden regime always appeals.  (Nice work, eh?)  So the case is now being heard by the Supreme Court.  I'll keep you posted on the result.

But meanwhile, wokie politicians in San Francisco noticed how popular this sort of bribe was, and decided to try it themselves.  So they formed a..."panel," and asked that panel to recommend a dollar amount to pay former slaves for having been slaves.

Problem was, no one living today was ever a slave, and no San Francisco taxpayers ever owned slaves.  So the committee decided instead to pay "reparations" NOT for long-ended slavery, but for "policies" that disadvantaged blacks.  

The panel said the money would make up for “the public policies explicitly created to subjugate Black people in San Francisco by upholding and expanding the intent and legacy of chattel slavery.”  No one asked any questions, cuz dey din' wanna be accused of bein' raaaaacis.

The wokies agreed that any rationale the panel settled on was just fine, and said when you brilliant folks settle on a number we'll ORDER taxpayers to gibs dat much cash to anyone claiming to be black who was born in San Francisco.

Totally reasonable, eh?

So for the next two years the 15-member panel worked hard to calcuate the right number, meeting several times a year at posh resorts with five-star hotels.  See, since the figure was sure to be very large, the panel couldn't just pull a number out of its ass.  Instead dey had to work hard to find the right formula.

Dat required lots and lots of "maff."  And since duh wokies done assured us dat maff be raaaacist, it maybe took duh panel a li'l longer den some folk thought.  Cuz five-star hotels, eh?

But after months of laborious calculations the panel arrived at a number.  And astonishingly, all those careful calculations came out to be exactly $5 million--to be paid by city taxpayers to every black person born in San Francisco between 1940 and 1996 and who'd lived in the city for at least 13 years.

Of course many of the panelists thought those requirements were too tough, so they added another way to cash in: if a black person had been in prison at any time, or was a child of anyone who'd been imprisoned.

Ah, much bettah.

Also, the 1996 cutoff would mean that blacks under 27 wouldn't qualify--unless they'd been in prison.  Insiders say this was an oversight and will be changed in the final report to include every black person born up to the minute the ORDER is approved by the woke "Board of Supervisors."

But surprisingly, on closer "questioning," committee chair Eric McDonnell revealed that the $5 million cash payment did NOT result from a careful calculation.  Instead he told the totally woke Washington Post
  >>“There wasn’t a math formula.  Instead it was a journey for the committee towards what could represent a significant enough investment in families to put them on this path to economic well-being, growth and vitality that chattel slavery and all the policies that flowed from it destroyed.”

We put this explanation through our latest AI program and it responded, "WTF?"

After the Reparations Committee releases its final report in June, the city's Board of Supervisors will vote to approve the cash payment.

Meanwhile the biden regime has offered the members of the Reparations Committee a dozen high-level jobs in federal finance.  Jake Sullivan said "This is the kind of brilliant thinking we need more of.  Janet Yellen added, "The members of this committee will fit right in with our administration."

Source.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/san-franciscos-reparations-committee-really-is-just-making-it-up-as-it-goes-along

More govt agencies *quietly* admit Fauci lied, and duh Chyna virus was indeed modified in a lab in Wuhan

In the past, whenever a deadly new disease emerged, scientists were eager to discover where it came from and how it evolved to become deadly to humans.

In the past that has always been true.  And when covid hit the world in January of 2020, mainstream scientists quickly announced--without a shred of evidence--that the deadly virus evolved totally naturally, from a bat virus.  They said that bat virus made the jump to humans when a resident of Wuhan ate an infected bat, purchased at the "wet market" there.

Or maybe it wasn't an infected bat.  Maybe it was a "pangolin."  Since not one American in a thousand knows what a pangolin is, this made The Narrative sound even more exotic, thus believable by naive people.

But when a handful of curious Americans asked where the evidence was to support that explanation, scientists suddeny clammed up.  No one could explain.  The Lying Mainstream Media slavishly parroted the Party Line that it evolved "naturally" from a bat virus, with the infected bat eaten by a resident of Wuhan.

Or maybe a "pangolin."  

And as far as the Mainstream Media was concerned, "the Science was settled!"  (Does that phrase ring any bells for any of ya?)  And anyone who questioned the Narrative was screamingly denounced as a raaaacist.  

If you paid attention back when the Chyna virus shut down our economy and killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, you may recall that early-on Trump said it came from a lab in China--and every single Mainstream Media outlet went nuts, calling Trump a raaaaacist for DARING to say such a thing!  Fauci and his minions repeated the Narrative, which was dutifully parroted by the lying, corrupt Mainstream Media, and that was the end of the discussion.

Skeptical scientists--and there were lots--quickly got the message that if you questioned the Narrative, your grants would vanish.  Users of Fakebook and pre-Musk Twatter had their accounts cancelled if they posted anything that questioned The Narrative.

All the talking heads on CNN and MSNBC and the alphabet networks either sneered at Trump or laughed at what they said was the gullibility of stupid "science deniers" who questioned The Narrative.  Late-night "comedians" constantly laughted at how anyone who questioned The Narrative was a tinfoil-hat-wearing "conspiracy theorist."

Any of that sound familiar?

One problem:  All of it was a lie, carefully spread by Anthony Fauci and his minions, then spread by the corrupt, Trump-hating Mainstream Media.

The source of most of the Narrative lies was Fauci, because he had personally approved a grant of taxpayer funds to a "cutout" which forwarded most of that money to the Chinese military lab in Wuhan to support research into...wait for it...modifying bat coronaviruses to make them lethal to humans.  Those experiments were so dangerous that congress had passed a law making it illegal to perform them in the U.S.  But Fauci knew how to get around that.

So obviously Fauci would have done anything to keep that from being discovered.  And he went to great lengths to mislead the public, to keep the secret hidden.

But now, slowly, more and more gruberment agencies--total toadies for the biden regime--are very quietly issuing reports or conclusions saying that the virus did NOT evolve naturally, but was deliberately modified in a Chinese level-4 bio-lab in Wuhan.

The key here is that word "quietly."  The agencies don't want to admit that Trump (and those of us who independently examined the genetic sequence to learn the truth) was right all along, because they don't want people asking "Why were you bastards so utterly incurious back when the Left was brazenly lying in pushing The Narrative, eh?"

Another reason for the quiet release is that biden has taken tens of millions from the communist government of China, so biden and his handlers are trying to conceal Chinese culpability.  Oh wait, I forgot: You don't believe biden has bagged tens of millions from China.

We have copies of the bank wire transfers to Hunter's many companies.  But no big deal, right?

Anyway, if you'd like to watch a great compilation of 5-second clips of TV talking heads spouting the bullshit Narrative and sneering at anyone who claimed the virus was modified in a Chinese military lab in Wuhan, click here.  Tucker Carlson's folks are SO good at finding Dem talking heads lying on video.

If you're short on time, the part about yet another government agency admitting that the official Narrative--the false cover story--about the origin of the Chyna virus starts at 3:15.

And just for the record: Trump was right.  Fauci and the Dems and the Mainstream Media were lying.

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/tucker-carlson-the-origins-of-covid-was-never-a-secret/

VP brazenly lies, claiming she and Dear Leader have *reduced* cost of heating and electricity for families!

In the clip below (link here) the moronic female selected by Porridgebrain to be VP absurdly claims she and Dear Leader have LOWERED the cost of heating and electricity for American families "so they have more money to buy a new dishwasher."

This is such a brazen, outrageous lie that it should offend every American with an IQ high enough to know the difference between paying $100 per month and $200 per month for electric service.  Same for gas for heating.

SURELY even as dumb as she is, she must know her claim is utter horse-shit, yet shy bleats it anyway, confident that not one viewer out a a thousand knows enough to know she's utterly lying.

This, folks, is the core of the rotten Dem regime:  Up is down, evil is good, men are women and vice-versa, sex mutilation is faaabulous, inflation is down, elections are honest...lots more.  They say whatever they think voters wanna hear, confident that the Mainstream Media will never call out their lies.  Wow.

"Whut dis?"

You're not in the oil business, nor in any support industry, so I suspect the graph below will be new to ya:  Certainly you won't see it in the Lying Mainstream Media cuz it cuts against the Dem party:

As you see, it shows U.S. oil production since 1920.  It's from duh gruberment's own EIA website so you can verify it's authentic for yourself.  

This graph is hugely significant, as you'll understand in a moment.

You quickly see that in 1970 U.S. oil production peaked at about 300 MILLION barrels per month, or about ten million barrels per day.  But after 1970 production began a 37-year decline.  The reason is simple: When you extract oil from a "reservoir," less remains to be produced (duh), and what remains is far more reluctant to BE produced.  This is called "exponential decay," and it's not just a theory but has been exhaustively tested and confirmed for a century.

But beginning around 2007 something unpredictable--almost magical--happened: U.S. oil production began to increase again, astonishingly rapidly.  And by 2016 U.S. oil production had recovered to its previous peak in 1970.

This doesn't impress most of you because you have no reason to think it's unusual.  But it's actually totally unlikely.  Somehow U.S. oil companies were able to more than offset the problem of "exponential decay."   How did they do that?

Innovative ideas and lots of money, both private and from those awful, icky oil companies, invested in developing and testing new technology.

Had oil companies.not done this, gasoline would cost over eight bucks a gallon, and the U.S. would be paying an extra BILLION dollar per DAY to import the oil you use.

If you're a liberal and skeptical, feel free to ask me where that number comes from, cuz I can easily show ya.  Point is that while y'all are watching fake newz, hard-working people are working hard to provide you with the things you need or want at a lower cost.  But of course you never hear a word of that, only bleats and screams demonizing capitalism and free markets.

If y'all knew even one percent of what it takes to produce oil from, say, two miles below the ocean floor, you'd be absolutely staggered.  But you don't, so you just shrug and go back to watching network "newz".and voting Democrat.

 I'm gonna enjoy watching the next few years.

Ghastly, brutal attack: 270-pound, six-foot-six monster pummels 57-year-old female teaching assistant

The pic below shows a 6-foot-6-inch, 270-pound student brutally beating a 57-year-old female assistant teacher unconscious inside a Florida high school, then repeatedly stomping on her.

The ghastly attack happened at a high school in Volusia, Florida, and was captured on what one media outlet delicately called "a disturbing video."   And it's horrible to watch.  But whatever you do, media, be diplomatic with this, eh?

The student attacked after the assistant teacher took a  video game away from him in class.  You just don't do that to a member of a class known for violent rages and no impulse control.

The video shows the 17-year-old sprinting toward the female, hitting her at full speed and understandably knocking her to the floor.

The 270-pound student then repeatedly stomps on the unconscious female, then punches her 15 times.

Other staffers were finally able to pull the monster off the victim, undoubtedly saving her life.

The rampaging student later yelled at cops that he was “going to kill her” when he returned to school.  Because in our current joke of a system of woke injustice, he will be returned.

The wokie Media walk on eggshells with this, with one media outlet calling the 270-pound, 6' 6" attacker a "boy."  Of course for wokie reporters--who invariably call tranny men "her" in their stories--calling this hulking attacker a "boy" isn't a stretch at all.

If you think law enforcement personnel would be furious about this ambush attack by a 270-pound raging monster on a 120-pound female, think again.  The county sheriff diplomatically said "“We hope the victim will recover, both mentally and physically, from this incident.”

Wow, that's nice of ya to say you hope she recovers, sheriff.

Below is what the Lying Mainstream Media is calling a "boy" who brutally beat the 57-year-old woman, who is lucky to have survived. 

This kind of brutal attack by blacks on whites happens every single day.  You just never hear about it if you rely on the Lying Mainstream Media for your "newz."  And of course almost everyone does.  Silly sheep!

You're being played.  Gas-lighted.  Scammed.  And you have no idea.  

But don't worry, citizen, cuz what you don't know can't hurt ya, right?

CDC revised toxicity "fact sheet" just before train disaster, deleted "How can vinyl chloride affect children?"

Vinyl chloride is all over the environment--all made by humans.  It's about as nasty a chemical as we've allowed into frequent contact with humans.

"Your" faaaaabulously corrupt, incompetent Center for Disease "Control" put out a "toxicity fact sheet" on the stuff back in 1987.  They updated it three times since then, with the next to last being in 2006--17 years ago.

Then in a faaaabulous coincidence, the CDC updated the tox sheet just two weeks before the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio.  

Wow, quite a coincidence, eh?

But even more interesting is that the revised version deleted two key sections, "How can vinyl chloride affect children?" and "How can families reduce the risk of exposure to vinyl chloride?"

Wow, how...convenient for duh biden regime, eh?  And especially for that incompetent moron Buttigeig.

Oh wait...you don't believe any of this.  And why?  Because you get all your "newz" (i.e.fake news) from the Lying Mainstream Media.  Since they didn't tell you this, it must not have happened, eh?  Yeah, well, take a look at the side-by-side pics below.  On the left is the version before mid-January, and on the right the "after" version.  Notice anything different?  (Pic may expand if you click it.)

Now: I don't think this was done deliberately.  But after thousands of "odd coincidences" surrounding this installed regime I'm starting to question a lot of things. 

If you're still skeptical, here's the link to the current version.

The section the CDC removed on "How can vinyl chloride affect children" said "studies in animals suggest that vinyl chloride might affect growth and development. Animal studies also suggest that infants and young children might be more susceptible than adults to vinyl chloride-induced cancer.” You'd think this would be extremely important information in the event of a spill.  If so, why would the the wokies at the CDC remove this vital info?

Finally, if you want to know a LOT more about what the CDC really knows about vinyl chloride, click here.  

Hidden on page 86 of this document's 293 pages of mostly impenetrable bureaubabble.are a few key  paragraphs admitting that yes, this stuff causes not just cancer but a huge range of health problems, especially in children.  If the biden regime had anyone competent in it, they would have ordered the CDC and EPA and HHS to warn everyone in the town about the effects, and get them out until everything had been tested.  Recover the cost of hotels and meals and loss of income from the railroad.

But of course the biden regime has chosen to ignore the situation.  Shitforbrains (wait, which one?) Buttigeig wouldn't even answer questions from reporters--certainly because he doesn't want to be exposed as not knowing a thing about it.  Or not wanting to tell the truth.

Eh, who cares, right?  You don't live there, nor do any Hollywood stars or politicians or other elites, so it doesn't matter to DC.

Besides, the cancers won't appear for 20 years or so.  And childhood disabilities?  "Experts" can be found to testify any such are due to poor nutrition, or global warming or any desired bullshit.  The only important thing is to keep anyone from connecting the Democrat regime to any ill effects.

ONE DAY after Hunter Biden laptop story broke, NPR sneered that it was merely a "distraction"

Back in my younger, more naive days, I listened to NPR.  Thought it was pretty cool and well-informed.

Didn't know enough to realize it was utter leftist horse-shit from top to bottom.

Oh, you say you're skeptical?  That NPR really produces "quality journalism," unbiased, accurate?

Yeah, well...can't blame ya cuz that's what I thought for years.  But they lie...routinely, casually.  That's what the Left is, what it does, how it breathes.  They can't win on the facts of anything, so they either ignore the facts, or lie and make stuff up.

Example: The New York Post is one of the few Media outlets that doesn't embrace the Left.  Two weeks before the 2020 presidential election the Post broke a story on a broken laptop that Hunter Biden had left at a repair shop in Delaware.  Being a total crack-addict he forgot about it.  After the shop owner repaired it he called the phone number Hunter gave him to say it was repaired and ready for pickup.

Hunter never answered, and didn't return the call or pick up the laptop, so after 90 days--per the normal terms of computer repair shops everywhere--the shop owner took possession of it and began browsing the tens of thousands of emails and images.

What the shop owner found stunned him:  The son of the president was arranging huge payments to his various companies in exchange for...well, what expertise did Hunter bring to deals, eh?  It was purely that his father had been Obozo's vice-prez.

The laptop was also filled with pics of Hunter smoking crack and cavorting with prostitutes.  But that was trivial compared to selling the office of the nation's VP for tens of millions of dollars.

The Post broke that story on October 19th or so.

The FBI had warned Twatter, Fakebook and the rest of social media that they had info that a "Russian disinformation operation" was about to be unveiled tarring the faaabulous Democrat candidate, and that the media companies should censor any mention.  And they did, banning any account that tried to mention it.

NPR joined that censorship.  The very next day the rat-bastard leftists who run NPR had a story ready to go: "Why we're not covering the Hunter Biden laptop" or some such.  Take a look:

"Driven by ex-Hannity producer," eh?  And to NPR listeners that automatically discredits the scoop--as NPR intended.  "Red flags abound," eh?  "Provides fodder for Trump and his allies," y'say?  All designed to get NPR listeneral to ignore the story.

The WaPo and NY Slimes and the rest of the Lying Mainstream Media all took the same tack, claiming the entire thing was "Russian disinformation."  But where did all those media outlets GET that bullshit Narrative, eh?

From the FBI.  But the thoroughly corrupt FBI had had the laptop itself for over a year.  Either they'd examined it and knew it was authentic, and lied about it, or they had intentionally NOT taken a look--which unequivocally shows the agency's total corruption on behalf of the Democrat Party.

Six months after the stolen election--after their lies had done their job--the WaPo and NYT finally admitted that the laptop was NOT Russian disinformation but was authentic.  But having admitted that, all Media outlets have steadfastly ignored the actual proof that Hunter was the "bag-man" getting tens of millions of dollars from the Chinese communist party and other foreign governments, with a big chunk of those millions going to Joe.

And NPR helped spread the lie--the Narrative--that kept that truth from voters just long enough to pull off the steal.  Polling now shows that about a third of biden voters say they wouldn't have voted for him if they'd known the laptop was authentic.

Now: How much of the above did you know about?  Do ya think the pic of the tweet from NPR above is fake?   Here's the tweet on own damn twatter account.

"We don't want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories," y'say?  "Stories that are just pure distractions," y'say?  You lying sons of whores.

You have helped kill this country--and not through mere incompetence and stupidity, but intentionally.  May you burn in hell for eternity. 

Oh, and NPR has never admitted to listeners that they lied.  Never apologized.  And why would they, eh?  Cuz not one of their listeners knows jack-shit about the truth.

Pic below is Terence Samuel, VP and "executive editor" at NPR.  His CV on NPR's website says he's  "responsible for leading all of NPR's newsgathering teams."  Study his expression.  Do you think he's honest?

 

Former member of the "elites"--now a has-been gasbag--bleats that Fox News should be "closed down"

A decade or so ago Keith Olbermann was one of the darlings of the Left.  Had his own late-night conservative-bashing show on some dip-shit "major" broadcast network.  And that was back when broadcast television was a big deal!  So you can appreciate that KO was one of the self-styled "elites."

The tweet above is from three days ago.  As you see, Nazi KO wants to "de-platform" (the kool kidz word for "cancel") and "close down" Fox News.

Wait...when some old guys a couple of centuries ago allegedly founded some long-vanished country on the basis of some goofy thing called "freedom" have as one of the pillars of that nation a thing called "freedom of speech"?

Why yes, I vaguely recall they did.  But when I try to find where and how and what country, all I get from Google is "This situation is rapidly changing, so check back later after we've had time to delete all the newz you shouldn't be reading."

So KO's clear hatred of free speech is bad enough.  But the details make it worse: It was widely known that the biden regime had 14,000 hours of surveillance video from a thousand or so cameras in the capitol building.  But as you surely guessed by now, the regime would only release an hour or two of it.

Through their scribes and parrots in the Media they conveyed that they were refusing to release the rest because "it would compromise security."  This was never explained, and no so-called "reporter" for the Mainstream Media (more accurately "parrot" or "scribe" or "gauleiter") ever asked why that would be true--because the regime didn't want to explain.

The explanation vaguely hinted at by Talking Heads of MSNBC, CNN and the alphabets was that seeing thousands of hours of video would enable bad people to locate all the cameras, and thus presumably to calculate safe spaces the cameras weren't watching.

This is about as implausible as the regime Narrative that the Russians blew up their own Nord Stream pipelines.  

The real reason the regime refused to release the video was that it would be more likely to show far more FBI infiltrators and inciters--the folks who made the stroll thru the "Peoples' House" into the worst threat since Pearl Harbor, or some such.  

In any case, Fox asked incoming Speaker Kevin McCarthy to release all the video, which he finally did.

Of course the video will show nothing, even if it originally caught unequivocal evidence of FBI conspiracy and entrapment--because the sons of bitches have had over two years to examine every frame and sanitize whatever they needed to.

Nevertheless, KO claims the release of the vids to Fox will allow Tucker Carlson to "gaslight the coup" and "provide a roadmap past detection."

Now this is funny, since "gaslight" means to lie to induce people to believe something untrue.  That's exactly what the allegations of a "coup" are: an effort by the Dems and Lying Mainstream Media to tar Donald Trump by blaming his supporters for an alleged "attempted coup." 

Second: "A roadmap past detection"?  If anyone believes Fox now has the vid of every security camera in the capitol building I've got some oceanfront property in Wyoming I'll sell ya at a bargain price.  Also, nothing prevents the regime from adding more cameras to eliminate any blind spots.

Point is, in wanting to silence/erase/delete people and viewpoints he doesn't like, KO is showing he's actually a wannabe Nazi or commissar, or CCP toady.  Totalitarian son of a bitch.  And it's hugely significant that the regime still loves him. 

Source.

9-year-old girl and two others shot to death in Orlando, suspect in custody, no motive known

In Orlando on Wednesday morning somone fatally shot a 38-year-old woman.

At 4pm, as several reporters on the scene were preparing to do video clips on the shooting, a man walked up to a car where two reporters were sitting and opened fire, killing one.  The other is in critical condition.

The killer fled to a home about a block away, where he proceeded to fatally shoot a 9-year-old girl and wound her mother, who is in critical condition.  The motive for that attack is unknown, as there is no known connection between the killer and either the mother or daughter.

The sheriff's office arrested 19-year-old Keith Melvin Moses for the murders of the journalist, the girl, and the 38-year-old woman whose murder the journalists were reporting on.

Authorities say Moses has a lengthy criminal history, including assault with a deadly weapon, burglary and grand theft.

Murder suspect Keith Melvin Moses

Unprovoked murders like this happen every single day.  You just almost never hear about 'em unless they happen in your city.

But if a white man fatally shot two women and a 9-year-old girl the story would be national news--and you know that's true.  

If you doubt that, recall how long the unprovoked shooting of a black jogger by a white man in Georgia led the evening news.  And justifiably so: it was outrageous.

So my question to you is this: in Orlando yesterday the killer killed three people, including an innocent 9-year-old girl, but these outrageous, unprovoked murders are ignored by the national "media."  Yet the same crime by a white man would be national news.  Why the double-standard, in which one killing is national news for two weeks while the other is deemed "of local interest only"?

Think about that, and let me know if you have an idea about why.

Source.

https://www.fox35orlando.com/news/keith-melvin-moses-what-we-know-about-suspect-in-deadly-orlando-mass-shooting
 

This happens *every day now*--yet you never hear a word about it. Why do you think that is?

Jack Snyder was a highschool senior in Battle Creek, Michigan.  Good athlete, good grades, nice guy.  

Around midnight on Feb 17 Jack was driving home from his girlfriend's birthday party when he saw two young teens walking.  It was 12 degrees outside, so Jack stopped and offered them a ride.

And with only that brief lead, you already know what's about to happen, right?  You know. That shows how far into the pit this country has fallen, that every one of you reading this already knows what's about to happen..

Minutes later the teens--13 and 14--pulled a gun and ordered Snyder out of the car.  When he resisted, they shot him, twice.

Two hours later cops found the 14-year-old shooter hiding in a parked car near the scene.  The other turned himself in a day later.

Every single stupid Democrat: "You know what will fix this?  If our leaders ban civilians from owning guns!  Yeh, dat's it!!!"

Now: You'll never see this in the national news because they say it's of "local interest only."  And the local TV stations are always very careful not to give any clues to the identity of the killers.  Newzpapers don't give any names of the killers cuz dey too young, eh?

This happens literally every day now--but you'll never hear about it if you rely on the Lying Mainstream Media for your "newz."  You know, the same Media that never asks Democrats hard questions but salivates over indicting Trump.

The media that fawns over 15-year-old trannies but ignores the murders of straight white males.

The media that blythely ignores the disaster in East Palestine, Ohio, because even a moment of actual investigation will show the biden regime refusing to offer any help, despite the clear screw-up in burning 600,000 gallons of toxic chemicals.

Hey, look!  Your Dear Leader flew to Ukraine!  And the media are comparing this bravery to General George Washington and Lincoln!  Isn't Dear Leader absolutely faaaabulous?

Source 

Along the Panama invasion corridor with Mike Yon

Mike Yon is a former Green Beret who understandably doesn't trust the Mainstream Media, so he goes to conflict zones and reports what he sees.  I've read his dispatches for a decade or so, and he seems to be a straight-shooter.

Here he's reporting from Puerto Limon in Panama, at what's called the Darien Gap, mingling with and interviewing so-called "migrants."  Or as the Lying Mainstream Media calls 'em, "refugees."

Interestingly, very few of the so-called "refugees" are women or children.  Instead  most are young men of military age.  Ah, so they're fleeing persecution because they supported freedom in their home countries, tried to oppose despotic regimes, eh?

Hahahahaha!  No.  Oh, all the regimes are certainly "despotic," but these so-called "refugees" were never persecuted, because they never openly opposed the government in their countries, never pushed for freedom-- because they saw what happened to anyone who opposed the regime in Venezuela.  So they're pouring across our border for far different reasons.  And we'll get to that.

One constant among all of them:  They all say they came because "everyone knew" that biden had announced that all "migrants" were welcome to enter the U.S.  And staff with so-called "religious organizations" told them that if they claimed to be "refugees" they were guaranteed to be allowed to stay.

Yon says many of the so-called "refugees" are from Afghanistan and China.  He says about a thousand men from over a hundred countries go through the Darien Gap every day on their way to New York and L.A. and Dallas and Denver.

The "migrants" (or as the Lying Mainstream Media always calls them, "refugees") are reasonably well dressed and well fed.  Many have new Nike sneakers and iPhones.  So if they were "poor," how did they pay for their iPhones and clothes and travel?

Turns out the "refugees" are funded mostly by Americans, either the U.S. government or the UN/IOM, World Food Program, Red Cross, and various U.S. religious groups.  Many also pay smugglers: Some  Indians said they paid $20,000 U.S. dollars each, while some Chinese said they paid 7k.

Yon is blunt in claiming this is an obvious invasion force. He says this would be obvious to anyone who interviewed a few hundred of them.  But the U.S. Media will never say that, for two reasons:  First, everyone who works for the Lying Mainstream Media is "woke," so would never write anything that would tell Americans the truth about the invaders.

Second, the U.S. Media is completely, totally devoted to the Democrat party, and since biden has completely stopped enforcing longstanding U.S. immigration law, telling the truth about the invaders would cost the Dems a few thousand votes.

Yon says most of the invaders likely have no idea that they're going to be fighting.  But being a former Green Beret who's spent lots of time studying history, Yon believes fighting--total war--is inevitable.

He thinks most of the invaders won't assimilate, but will be indoctrinated to hate both whites and Asians, and anyone else who isn't wildly racist against whites.  And there are almost endles historical examples.

Because so many Americans are familiar with Ukraine, let's take that country:  When Stalin was solidifying his grip on the USSR, he pushed the communist idea of "collective farming," in which all farmers would work for the benefit of the State.  Diligent, skilled farmers would earn no more than stupid slackers, cuz that's how "collective" anything works.

Successful farmers in Ukraine opposed this, for what should be obvious reasons.  They were called "kulaks."

Stalin, like biden and other dictators, didn't care what the population wanted, so began a propaganda campaign claiming the kulaks were greedy and selfish, and wanted to extort money from non-farmers by charging more for food.  To communists that meant they were "enemies of the State," "counter-revolutionaries."

Every State media outlet labeled the kulaks as evil people, prompting most non-farmers to hate them.  This is a common tactic throughout history.  In America, people the regime wants to crush are called "racist" or "transphobic" or "greedy."

With the "battlespace"--the uncontradicted "opinion" of all good Soviet citizens--thus prepared, Stalin sent soldiers to Ukraine to confiscate all food--including seeds.  The result was a huge famine in which millions died of starvation.

Those who survived never forgot who killed their families.

Propagandists know it's easy to fan the flames of hate, and to direct that hate against any selected target group. Yon believes that after the invaders have been induced to hate whites and Asians, free government food (EBT cards) will be cut off.  The government will blame whites and Asians, and the invaders will see this as a green light to take everything they can.

Yon believes the invaders will kill and torture out of hate,  and because many were raised in savagery to begin with. If you think that's absurd--just "inflammatory right-wing rhetoric"--and you do--look at how many members of the violent MS-13 gang have brutally hacked American teens to death with machetes in Maryland and Virginia.  It's staggering--and the convicted killers are not merely totally unapologetic, but actually *smug.*

Of course the biden regime will completely ignore Yon's piece.  Ordinary Democrats will try to discredit Yon and other critics of open borders by claiming opponents of unlimited illegal immigration are "raaaacist."  But Yon claims this is a recurring pattern throughout history, and I think he's right.  

While Democrat pols will sneeringly try to dismiss this as a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory, it's actually a constant of history.

Yon says early in 2020—before the corrupt FDA approved the first Pfizer fake-vax for "emergency use"--he warned readers not to take it.  I don't know if that's true but if it is, it suggests he's a perceptive guy.

So now he warns that war is coming.  Of course being right about the fake jab has no bearing on whether Yon is right about the disguised invasion too.  But it's interesting.

Source.

https://michaelyon.com/dispatches/this-is-an-obvious-invasion-force/

Porridgebrain last year: "We can't send tanks to Ukraine! That would lead to World War 3!" Wait...

Hey, remember when ol' "totally non-corrupt Joe" said sending tanks to Ukraine would lead to WW3?  

Nah, you probably don't.  No matter.  They count on the fact that no one will bother to check to see what the hell they said before last week.

If "the Narrative" keeps changing,  you should realize you're being scammed.

 

Back in the day there used to be "drag races." But now we're more...woke?

 

It's interesting that so-called "independent fact-checkers" ALWAYS support Democrat claims, eh?

 

Sesame Street tells American kids how bills become laws, leaves out one crucial step...

 

"The unvaccinate pose a huge danger to you and Cuzyour children! Cuz, see..."

Cuz, see, it's "A Pandemic of the Unvaccinated!  And you can trust us!"

 

Things I trust way more than a "vaccine" from bill gates...

 

It's probably not a good idea to trust people who said they wanted you to die. Just a guess...

 

"We're running out of Narratives to cover for Hunter biden and Pfizer! What should we do?"

 

Alien scientists: "Subject is a human male..." Subject: "But I identify as female..."

 

"Gas stoves must be banned cuz they kin hurt your lungs. But burning vinyl chloride? No problem.

 

We really should wait a few more years before mounting a serious resistance to tyranny

 

When you show people the evidence that the biden regime blew up the pipeline, and you get "that look"

 

Meanwhile in East Palestine, Ohio....

 

Wife and mother of two fatally shot in the back after argument in parking lot

On Valentine's Day 26-year-old Alexandria Borys was loading groceries into her car at a grocery store in Irmo, South Carolina, when a woman she didn't know began arguing with her about something.

After the argument seemed to be over, the other woman, later identified as 23-year-old Christina Harrison, allegedly pulled a gun and shot Alexandria in the back, killing her.

Alexandria's husband told local news outlets that his wife, who worked enrolled in nursing school, was "the best wife you could ever ask for" and "a great mother."

Alexandria leaves behind a husband and two very young children.

The police chief described the "incident" in soft tones, careful to avoid offending the killer: "Unfortunately this is a situation where tempers flared and someone let anger get the best of them."

He described the "incident" as "senseless."  

Ah yes..."senseless."  Certainly that's true, but there's vastly greater lesson here for any who are interested:  Because of the determination of Soros-elected DA's not to prosecute, and to offer lenient plea-bargains, and thanks to goofy judges and parole boards releasing killers after serving half their sentence, and thanks to Democrat pols ordering that killers be released from jail without even having to post bail, no one seems to even think before murdering another person.

Note that this was NOT self-defense by the killer.

Young people learn from what they see, not from words.  In a sane society, people would be taught from age 5 or so that unless the killer is certifiably crazy, intentionally shooting someone without provocation would--with total certainty--result in the death penalty or life in prison.  They'd learn.  But as things stand now, they don't learn not to do that--and don't care.

RIP, Alexandria, and prayers for your husband and young children.  Prayers for those who would have been so grateful for your caring touch as a nurse.  You didn't deserve to be murdered...on Valentine's Day or any other.  And for *nothing.*

Wife, mother, murder victim Alexandria Borys, and her killer, Christina Harrison

Source.

More on the Dems' options for getting rid of both Porridgebrain and Cackles for 2024

Democrat websites report that Dems are "privately whispering" about Joe Biden's age, and the Party's dilemma if he wants to run again in 2024.  The U.S. has never had a president who was 82 on taking office.

Biden's age is a topic in every focus group.  Voters say they can't really believe he's going to run.  But don't worry, the White House doctor just said he's fine.

To repeat: a real medical expert--just like Fauci--just said that a clearly cognitively challenged man is perfectly fit.

Wait...isn't that what the alleged "experts" also said about John Fetterman?  So with an expert saying he's okay, why would anyone be concerned, eh?

As I noted a few days ago, I think the Dems already have a plan to "discover" around September that Joe has a medical condition that will make it impossible for him to perform the duties of the office.  So that will solve that problem.

But that raises a second problem for the Dems: if Porridgebrain doesn't run, Cackles almost certainly will consider it.  Astonishingly ( ), a few critics claim Harris is totally unqualified for the job.  But that wouldn't be a concern for the Dems cuz Democrats love to nominate blatantly unqualified people for even the highest offices in the government (see biden, joseph; Blinken, Buttigeig, Yellen, Richard "Rachel" Levine, Deb Halland, etc.).  So the problem isn't that she's totally unqualified, but that she's so hugely unpopular.

As a result, CNN and Politico say that if Porridge decides to run, rather than risk a Cackles nomination high-level Democrats are beginning to support the idea of supporting biden.  

Dem leaders also fear that if he doesn't run, the "brownshirt army" of core Dem voters will demand that Cackles be the nominee.  And at that point the Party would really be in a bind, since they fear that supporting their unrivaled favorite--the ghastly but slick Gavin Newsome--might alienate many blacks and females, who comprise a huge Dem voting block.

So if the Dems nominate Cackles, they lose.  And nominating Newsome would likely cause just enough black and female Dem voters to stay home to likely lose then too (although they could always cheat enough to win, as in 2020).  That leaves their only plausible option as getting Cackles to "accept a better offer."  

Now, the Democrats have enough power that they could easily offer her, say, $20 million not to run.  And they could arrange an offer of any powerful position to persuade her not to run.  But only a few posts would be prestigious enough to enable her to decline to run without losing face.  

Can you imagine Cackles being offered, say, Secretary of State in a Newsome cabinet, as Obozo is reported to have promised Hilliary in return for Hilly not revealing certain of Obozo's birth or passport records?

The nightmare scenario is if a supreme-court "justice" announces plans to retire while Porridgebrain is still in office, and joe nominates Cackles.  Since the senate is Democrat-ruled, the nomination would go to a floor vote.  Only takes a simple majority to confirmed, and every Dem would vote for her to solve the otherwise-certain loss in 2024.

In fact, if this happened I predict at least half of the shitty RINO republicans would vote to confirm, since they'd fear being voted out of office if they didn't.

SO...despite biden's ghastly record and advanced age, there's a path for the Democrats to get both him and his incompetent, widely-disliked VP to step aside, allowing them to nominate Newsome.  In which case the Dems will win, because the Dem-fellating Media absolutely swoon over Newsome. 

Newsome might even draw enough votes that the Dems wouldn't have to cheat again.
 

The Left has been trying hard to destroy American society for the past 20 years. Oh, y'say you're skeptical?

The Left has been busily destroying American society for the past 20 years. Anyone with a functioning brain can easily see it: The woke, LGBT shit--relentlesslly pushed by the damn *public schools*--and the sexual grooming of children.

This post isn't about LGBTs and child grooming, but recognizing those trends helps you spot another.

Among the many destructive "wins" by the Left (liberals and Democrats), they've convinced Americans--especially young people--that America's use of carbon fuels is causing the planet to warm, both unusually and fatally.  

Obviously, if good people can be convinced that something they're doing is killing the planet, it's totally understandable that they'll be willing to make literally any sacrifice to prevent that.  

So because the Left succeeded in its bullshit claim that Americans' use of carbon fuels was "fatally" warming the climate, most Americans are now understandably eager to do literally *anything* the Left demands to (allegedly) "save the planet from Global Warming."

At this point so many Americans believe the Left's claim that "global warming, caused by Americans burning carbon fuel, is killing the planet that they support the biden regime's war on all carbon fuels.  That policy is designed to destroy our economy, and is succeeding.

Barring an unlikely turnaround in attitudes, for all practical purposes the Dems/leftists have won the war.  Now for the "why:"

Communists/socialists have known for decades that they couldn't out-compete (relatively) free economies.  But around 30 years ago they realized they didn't have to.  Instead, if they could convince Americans (and the citizens of other western nations) that our use of carbon fuels was killing the planet, Americans would eagerly support politician who would support policies that would destroy our economy--ostensibly to save the planet.

The "global warming" scam was so totally riddled with inconsistencies and contradictions that it should have been ridiculed by all rational adults.  For example, in the 1970's Time Magazine screamed that the world was about to enter a new Ice Age.  Really.  But then when that didn't happen, they changed the scream to "Global Warming!!!" caused by "greenhouse gases"--specifically CO2.  But after four years of record-cold winters in the U.S. and Europe, surveys showed people were beginning to doubt that the planet was actually warming.  

"Eeek!  Can't lose our huge hammer to destroy the West, right?  How can we recover without looking like obvious scammers?"

So overnight, without missing a beat, the entire scientific community switched from "global warming" to "climate change," which had the infinite advantage that regardless of what the climate did, the Left could scream that the problem was "climate change."

It was brilliant.

If you want a good look at the Left in bullshit mode, search wiki for "When did "global warming" become "climate change."  It's hysterically funny to watch the scammers dodge the question, while claiming to have answered it.

In January of 2018 a pencil-neck moron at the totally Democrat-fellating WaPo wrote
  >>"The gradual change in preferred terminology from “global warming” to “climate change” among scientists and politicians began about a decade ago because that’s what their institutions called for.

That's disingenuous:  "The institutions" didn't call for anything.  Instead the warmies at those universities changed to "climate change" because they'd been getting millions of dollars in government grants to show the results the Left/Democrat party supported--global warming.  When the string of record-cold winters seemed to suggest to more Americans that "global warming" might be a hoax, scientists at these universities realized that if they couldn't keep the public alarmed, those millions of dollars would soon diminish.  So they changed, virtually overnight, to the impossible-to-disprove term "climate change"--which their Media allies dutifully echoed.

But interestingly, the scientists who piously bleat that the problem is "climate change" are actually only concerned about one direction of change: warming.  That's why all the push to cut CO2, methane and now *nitrogen fertilizers, as they're all "greenhouse gases."  Meaning they could theoretically increase warming.

Reduction of these gases will kill virtually all advanced economies.  This shows that the fast switch to the term "climate change"--in the normal sense they were trying to get people to imagine, meaning either warming OR cooling--was nothing but a bullshit ruse to get voters to keep supporting the scam.  And it worked.

Next:  If the warmies claimed it was so *awful* and *climate-destroying* for the U.S. to generate electricity from coal-fired plants, why didn't the Left ever bitch at the government of China for opening an average of one new coal-fired plant *every week*?

Don't ask, citizen.

If it was absolutely *awful* and *climate-destroying* for people to cause more than X pounds of CO2 to be emitted per year, why were ALL the so-called "elites" still flying private jets across the Atlantic several times a year to attend conferences and "awards ceremonies," eh?

And the data!  A number of sleuths found that NASA and NOAA--the two government agencies that published the "official" U.S. temperature records--had literally changed readings from decades ago, from all over the country--and ALWAYS by reducing the *measured* older temps to make it appear that the climate was warming.  

They were repeatedly caught doing this, and when asked what their rationale was for changing actual measured temperatures the agencies blathered and denied and deflected, and said it was all done by a "computer algorithm."  But interestingly, they refused to show critics the code of this alleged program.

In other words, their story that "We din' change nuffin'.  Any changes wuz done by a computer" was horse-shit.

Other researchers noted that beginning around 1760 explorers of Alaska's coast had drawn maps of the where the ends of glaciers in the bays they explored were, relative to other topographic features.  Every later expedition--without exception--mapped those same glaciers steadily retreating.  By 1900 some had retreated over 20 miles from when they were first mapped.

But the amount of CO2 added to the atmosphere by human activity between 1780 and 1900 was microscopic.  So if, as the Left claimed, global warming was due to rising CO2, what was causing all those glaciers to retreat before 1900, eh?

"Uh...oh...well...you know...uh..."  They didn't have an answer.  The communists/leftists pushing the scam refused to respond.  They simply ignored the question, hoping no one would notice.  And of course virtually no one *did* notice.

In Antarctica scientists discovered that "cores" from ice sheets thousands of feet thick could be dated by counting thin layers of dust that appeared each summer.  The ice also contained trapped air bubbles that allowed scientists to determine the abundance of CO2 when the ice was formed.

The ice also contained dust that contained thousands of microscopic sea creatures called diatoms--which still exist today.  The detailed shape of those diatoms gave us a proxy for temperature.

At that point the U.S. and USSR began drilling and taking "cores" of ice down to the bottom of the ice-pack, up to 14,000 feet deep--a record of 800,000 years.  The cores were analyzed, and both the percent of CO2 and the temperature were plotted on the same time scale.  And WOW!--the two plots matched SO well--ostensibly proving that increases in CO2 caused temperatures to increase.

Papers were written and published.  The warmies were certain that this proved their claim that CO2 caused the climate to warm.  Yay!

But then other scientists looked at the results more closely.  Turned out that the two plots were indeed parallel, rising and falling together over 800,000 years.  But when plotted more carefully, turned out that instead of temperature changes *following* the CO2 changes, it was the reverse: CO2 was found to increase around 200 years AFTER temperature increased.

And of course you know what that means, right?

If CO2 follows temperature, obviously rising CO2 levels can't possibly be causing temperature to increase.

Bottom line: As long as you believe CO2 and methane and nitrogen fertilizers are causing a dangerous, unprecedented amount of Global Warming--oh wait: climate change, it's perfectly understandable that you'll support killing our way of life to achieve the greater goal of "saving the planet."  But their entire premise is horseshit--just like the Media's bleat that the Chyna virus could not possibly have been modified in a Chinese lab in Wuhan.  

Just like the Democrats' bleat--slavishly echoed by their Media supporters--that duh fake "vaccine" was "safe and effective."

Just like the biden regimes' ORDER--fully supported by Democrat pols--that every working American had to take the jab or be fired.

Just like the Democrats' bleat that crime is DOWN under the regime, but even if it's not, what we need to do is let rapists and carjacker and muggers and drug dealers walk out of jail within hours of arrest--cuz dat make us all safer.  Yep yep yep.

Of like the Democrats' bleat that airlines must hire a certain percentage of diversity hires, regardless.

Whenever the Dems--or any party's leaders--demand that you do or not do something, before you obey, CHECK YOUR PREMISES.  Do your research.  They lie...constantly, to line their own pockets and win re-election.
 

Anyone hear about some sort of rail incident that spilled a few gallons of 'stuff' a week or so ago?

A few of you may have heard that some sort of railroad mishap happened in some little town in Ohio, a mile from the Pennsylvania line.  If you're like most Americans you didn't pay much attention because the New York Times and WaPo and CNN and MSNBC and the alphabet networks (ABCCBSNBC) didn't seem to think it was a big deal, and the biden regime totally ignored it, and that goofy gay Petey Buttigeig--who heads the Transportation Department when he's not on maternity leave--didn't mention it, so you understandably didn't think it wasn't important.

See, bad things only make national news if they happen in New York, northern Virginia (cuz the DC suburbs) or California.  The Media claims anything else is "local interest only."

What happened was, 20 "tank cars" of a 140-car train derailed.  

Now: you should probably know that the biggest gasoline-hauling semi-trailer you've ever seen held maybe 10,000 gallons.  A tank car holds about 31,000 gallons.  So 20 tank cars would carry as much liquid as 60 big semi's, or about--well that's already way too much math for a news story, but our supercomputer says it's north of 600,000 gallons of "stuff."

Oh, you'd like a bit more detail on "stuff"?  Yeah, well...they've admitted to about five chemicals so far, two of which are vinyl chloride and butyl acrylate.  Those are bad--very flammable and cancer-causing, but I'd be equally concerned about the stuff they didn't disclose--cuz if the other chemicals had been harmless--say whiskey or perfume--the Powers would have led the list with those, and thrown in the two mentioned earlier at the end of the list where fewer people would have noticed.. 

So...several of these tank cars were punctured in the wreck, and those leaking chemicals caught fire.  Those fires heated other cars that were intact, raising their internal pressure.  And here's where the DOT and EPA start really amping up the lying:  They claimed that unless they took fast action, the intact cars could blow up, "sending deadly shrapnel a mile away."

Problem with that is, by RULE every tank car must be equipped with a pressure-relief valve that's there precisely to keep the things from blowing up due to pressure.  The lie about "blowing up," and "shrapnel" was to get the rubes--that's us--to support what the railroad wanted to do, which was...they poked holes in the intact tank cars and drained something over 500,000 gallons of highly flammable, toxic chemicals into a ditch, and...lit it on fire.

The real reason they did that was to make most of the toxic liquids vanish, which would reduce the amount of contamination of surface water.  It was merely fortunate chance that the burn would also reduce the amount of waste the railroad would have to pay to clean up.  That's normally done by dumping tons of tiny clay pellets--like kitty litter--on the stuff, soaking it up.  And in this case it would have taken thousands of tons of the stuff.

Once the clay has soaked up the liquids it's scooped up with front-loaders, dumped in big dump-trucks and hauled away, all at an enormous cost. 

Now, you never heard this next part from either the EPA, DOT or any branch of gruberment, but...when vinyl chloride burns, it makes a gas called phosgene, which was a deadly poison used in WW1.  

"Wait...say WHAT?"

And if that wasn't enough, burning could cause the other unknown chemicals to combine to make all manner of strange toxic products, because burning chemicals can cause them to react with each other in unexpected ways.

Of course the EPA and DOT wanted the problem to disappear as fast as possible, so burning the stuff was a quick "fix".  But the federal agencies wanted the governors of both Ohio and downwind Pennsylvania to sign off on the proposal so if there were complaints, the feds would be able to say "Hey, wasn't OUR idea."  

So on February 14, Ohio's Repub governor Mike DeWine revealed that both he and Pennsylvania Dem governor Josh Shapiro had signed off on the decision to conduct what the feds told them would be a "controlled release" of the chemicals from the wreck.

Here's Shapiro: ""The vinyl chloride contents of five rail cars are currently unstable and could potentially explode, resulting in deadly shrapnel and toxic fumes," Shapiro said. "As Governor DeWine and officials in Ohio just announced, to alleviate the risk of uncontrollable shrapnel Norfolk Southern Railroad is planning a controlled release of the vinyl chloride."

Toxic fumes, ya say?  Ya mean like those huge, billowing black clouds of toxic fumes produced by the uncontrolled burn?  Yeah.  "See, doze weren't toxic.  Oh sure, lotsa chickens and birds and house pets died, but doze not toxic!  Jus' coincidcence."

They think you're stupid.  And they KNOW you won't defy 'em.  Cuz if you object, duh FBI be breakin' down yo' door at the crack of dawn tomorrow.  You "domestic violent extremist."

DeWine later said there were no good options, and that "We then made the decision to go ahead with the second option, which was to control release."

Ah, a "control release," y'say?  Hmmm...that seems odd, since once they lit the thing, there was no control whatsoever.  Literally.  They couldn't stop it or slow it or anything.  "Control" was a lie, spread by the Media to fool the rubes, to give someone cover to do what they wanted to all along.

And now that it's a done deal, I guarantee you won't be able to find ANYONE at EPA or DOT who will admit to agreeing to it.  Every official will be pointing at some other agency.  Or the two shmuck governors they convinced to sign off on the thing. 

DeWine said that when it became clear that an explosion could occur, he spoke with railroad representatives, bringing Shapiro into the conversation of the next steps and weighing the risks of leaving the train to explode, or setting the chemicals on fire.

Stop.  DeWine doesn't know fuck-all about tank cars or vinyl chloride--nor should he.  So where did he get the notion that there was a non-negligible risk that the tank cars might explode?

From railroad execs, totally supported by morons in the EPA and DOT.

Now: There may well be a good reason for creating a vast cloud of toxic combustion products, by burning 500,000 gallons of toxic chemicals (I'll assume 100,000 or so had already burned in the wreck).  But the line about "Oooooh!  We GOTS to do dis cuz if we don't, duh cars are gonne blow up and shoot shrapnel fo' a MILE!"  

That claim was utter horseshit, due to the pressure-relief valves in EVERY tank car.  And one thing you should all know by now is, if duh gruberment is spewing horseshit, they're doing something they KNOW is very, very bad.

Here's DeWine again: "The concern was that this would be... what was described as a catastrophic explosion of the car, which would result in shrapnel going out up to... close to a mile. We also looked at what the danger was from a controlled release which is what the railroad felt should be done."

And Shapiro again: "The... contents of five rail cars are currently unstable and could potentially explode, resulting in deadly shrapnel and toxic fumes.  To alleviate the risk of uncontrollable shrapnel, Norfolk Southern is planning a controlled release of the vinyl chloride."

"Is planning"?  Sounds like the burn was the railroad's idea, and that it's already set in concrete.  Hmmm...

And...it sounds like they're reading from a script, eh?  Who do ya think wrote that script?

Now: Had either governor refused to sign off on the burn, the feds would probably have overridden the governors and burned the stuff anyway.  And you're like, "Wait, can some dipshit federal employee ORDER something dangerous to be done in a state, over the objections of the governor?

Ah, I see you just arrived on this planet.  Do enjoy your stay.  But be sure to avoid toxic clouds.

I just wanted to show y'all, for the thousandth time, what corrupt morons are ruling you.

 

SO...let me predict the Democrat nominee for 2024--and how the Dems will get rid of Joe and Cackles

I love to try to predict future events.  So herewith I'd like to predict who the Democrats will nominate for president in 2024, and how the Powers will maneuver the people they must get off the stage to leave it.

By now I think everyone has heard about the polling that shows something like 60 percent of Democrats polled don't want biden to run again.  Of course we all know that whoever pays for a poll can get any result they want, so one poll would be suspect.  But several others have found about the same numbers, so more likely accurate.

The people who actually make the decisions that run the Dem Party have no shortage of people wanting to run. The Party's problem is how to dump Joe and Cackles.

I suspect the people who run the Party have already devised have a way to keep Joe from running: They'll get the White House physician to announce that biden's last physical revealed that biden has a medical condition (dementia would be perfect because totally true) that would make him unable to handle the stress of the office for another four years. 

Of course he could protest, but once the doctor has spoken, only a few diehard supporters would support biden in a primary challenge.  The rest of the party would--with greatest regret and only out of concern for Dear Leader, of course!--look to another candidate.

 

Plus, as a 40-year veteran of DC--where the Fix is always in--if biden has any sense left he has to realize that once the Powers That Be decide you're out, you're finished.  The Powers will seal the deal by telling him that if he were to win the nomination and lose the general election, the Repubs would then investigate his and Hunter's and Jim's corruption, and everyone would go to jail, whereas if he retires and supports the Party's nominee (of course), they'll win and be able to protect the biden family long enough to ensure all the evidence is destroyed.  

 

Those are some convincing arguments.

The "sad medical discovery" will be announced at the start of the campaign season.  But even though his doctor has said he's not medically qualified to run again, obviously the Dems won't push to 26th-Amendment him, since that would put Cackles in.

After Harris's dismal showing in the 2020 primary--where she barely got one percent of the vote in her own home state!--she's unlikely to think she could win the nomination, let alone the presidency.  But she'll be surrounded by accolytes who'll be telling her that she has huge advantages: black, female, and the current VP.  They'll try to convince her that the Party could not possibly nominate anyone else, since doing so would alienate blacks and women, which the Party would be too scared to do.

 

That's a seductive argument.  And lacking Joes 40 years of DC experience, Cackles may not realize that when the Party says don't run, that's the end of it.  And if she decides to run, it's gonna be delicious to see how the Dems rig things.  I can't wait to watch Gavin Newsome (the almost-certainly already-selected nominee) trying to "debate" Cackles without being accused by the Media of offending blacks and women.

 

That wasn't a problem in 2020 because back then Cackles was a non-entity, one of the 18 or 22 Dem candidates.  So biden only had to exchange a couple of questions with her to win the nod.  But if she runs in 2024 the Dems will have an interesting time fixing the "debate" so as to avoid offending their core supporters.

 

So...definitely Newsome.  Extremely slick, power-hungry, totally unprincipled--and he's the Dems' shining star?  Wow.

 

But the Mainstream Media will positively gush over him, just as they did with biden, and Hilliary before that.

 

Just...wow.

Democrat-ruled state proposes a law to give syringes and crack pipes to minors

Of course you don't believe this could possibly be true.  "Democrats would NEVAH do dat!  Dems LOVE kids!"

Yeah, well, except...it IS true.  Washington state.  Senate bill 5536.  You're welcome to read it for yourself.  But don't stop after the first 20 paragraphs, because when rulers want to pass an absolutely outrageous bill that they know most people won't support, they bury the outrageous stuff under 20 pages of inspiring, innocuous stuff, to fool the rubes.

For example, in the introduction the Dem drafters parrot reasonable things like "we wanna prevent overdoses and improve the health of those served."  Fabulous.  But then you read a bit farther and find
   "Harm reduction involves safer use of supplies..."

Wait..."safer use of supplies"?  You'd think even a Democrat-ruled government would want to stop the use of illegal drugs, eh?  And yet this bill is talking about "safer use."

I'll get back to the evil parts of this POS bill in a minute.  But first:  If you don't live in Washington state--as you almost certainly don't--you probably think "This law from another state can't have any relevance to me."

But it does...because this is what the Democrats want to do on a national level.  The White House has already floated the idea of "safe injection sites" around the country.  And once it goes national it's too late to stop it--because as you may have noticed, for some incomprehensible reason horrible laws never get repealed.

So...page 26 of this 30-page POS bill orders the creation of "health engagement hubs," allegedly to  "provide harm reduction services and supplies" and "Is open to youth as well as adults."  

"Supplies"?

And finally, on page 28 of 30: the bill orders a "safe supply work group" to be established, to evaluate "safe supply services" that would "provide a tested supply of controlled substances to [anyone]."  The bill's Democrat drafters and sponsors want the state to give illegal drugs to addicts.  Cuz...reasons.

Notice the cunning placement, in the last four pages, of the provisions that would presumably outrage most normal citizens.

Source.
https://mynorthwest.com/3812309/rantz-democrat-law-syringes-crack-pipes-kids/
 

"U.S. on track to add $19 Trillion in new debt in next 10 Years"-- New York Times ??!

A couple of days ago I posted about our $32-TRILLION national debt, showing that the biden regime's official budget figures about the amount of interest we're having to pay are brazen lies.

Now we have a new handle, from the office that officially forecasts budget items:
 
Today the Congressional Budget Office announced that the federal government will add nearly $19 trillion to its national debt in the next ten years.

That's $3 trillion *more* than recently forecast, due mainly to rising costs for...wait for it...interest payments!

Just for the record, I posted that the prior official figures were crap before the CBO report.  Eh, no matter, cuz the national debt doesn't mean anything, right Democrats?

The NY Times bleats that other causes of the staggering increase in the debt are veterans’ health care, retiree benefits and the military.  Certainly those costs are going up, but at about the rate of inflation.  And those increases are negligible compared to trillions in higher interest payments.  But the Times blames it on the military--cuz they absolutely refuse to blame the pork-laden multi-TRILLION spending bills rammed through by the totally Dem-ruled congress and signed by Porridgebrain.

Just in this year alone, the government is projected to spend $1.4 TRILLION more than it takes in (mostly from taxes).  And in the next decade the CBO says the deficit will average $2 trillion a year, "as tax receipts fail to keep pace with the rising costs of Social Security and Medicare benefits for retiring baby boomers."

Notice the selective blame:  Money is fungible, so one could as easily (and more logically) blame the recent "social equity" pork-fests of the Democrats.  Nah, can't have that!

But certainly the cost of both Medicare and Medicaid are skyrocketing, due in part to wildly increased medical costs in all sectors--because of government over-regulation.

Buried deep in the long Times piece is this gem: The CBO also says the U.S. economy will barely grow this year, after adjusting for inflation.  (i.e. higher numbers will be due almost entirely to inflation.)

Wait, isn't the economy booming?  Dat whut all duh Media been sayin' evah since dey hepped duh Dems steal duh 'lections.  So mus' be true, eh?  So why would duh CBO say "barely grow this year," eh?  Maybe dey dumb.

The CBO says the near-zero growth is due to the Federal Reserve’s campaign to tame inflation.  You know, that inflation that biden and the Dems claim is almost non-existent.  Or wait..."If it exists, it's merely... what's the term?  Ah yes: "Transitory."  Besides, biden assured you "inflation is a good thing."  We've got that on video.  But the media has ignored it, cuz...reasons.

Oh, and CBO also predicts unemployment will rise above 5 percent before easing again next year.  But dat a gud thing.  Democrat mayors and governors gonna put dem folks on duh "guaranteed annual income" dat duh Dems been braggin' 'bout.  So wif' dat an' unemployment, dey be makin' mo' den befo'.

The Times says the above projections--which should shock every American into consciousness for a day or so--"could supercharge a partisan debate between biden and House Republicans over spending," and the nation’s hysterically-misnamed "debt limit"--which of course is no limit at all, since Republicans always cave to Democrat screams and threats of disaster and vote with them to raise it.

Oh but WAIT!  The Times says this time the GOP is refusing to raise the limit unless biden agrees to unspecified spending cuts.  The Times then screams out this warning:
    "The GOP refusal threatens to set off a financial crisis and recession if the government is unable to pay all of its bills on time."

Didja get that?  "You awful Rethuglicans better not balk at voting with the Dems to raise the [fake] 'debt limit', cuz if you do it will set off a financial crisis and start a recession!!!!  How DARE you!" 

The Times again:

"Raising the stakes of that standoff, the CBO said in a separate report on Wednesday that such a crisis could occur as soon as July — and possibly even earlier — if lawmakers do not agree to raise the $31.4 trillion limit, which the government technically hit last month."

Wait...if the gruberment hit the debt "limit" last month, how can they be spending money since then, eh?  Oh, dat right: duh GOP caved as always, and voted to increase the limit.  So like I said earlier...no limit on spending.

While Republican lawmakers have blamed Mr. Biden and Democrats for the rising deficits, the CBO report makes clear that..." it's all Trump's fault.  Or it could be Rethuglicans' fault for refusing to block the gargantuan Dem spending bills when the Dems controlled the House, the senate AND the White House. 

Oh wait, Dem control of all three mean the Repubs couldn't block anything.

The Times crew then write a long paragraph blaming military benefits and higher defense spending--neither of which is significant, but they gotta blame the GOP.

And then this gem:

In contrast, the budget office said biden’s signature climate, tax and health care bill, which passed with only Democratic votes, would modestly reduce deficits over the next decade. That’s because the bill’s spending and tax credits were more than offset by its tax increases on corporations and high earners, along with its efforts to reduce the government’s spending on prescription drugs for retirees.

Can you spot the weasel-word in that last sentence?

 The report also showed the degree to which the Fed’s campaign to tame high inflation, by quickly and sharply raising interest rates, will drive up federal borrowing costs in the coming years. The Fed has raised rates to a range of 4.5 percent to 4.75 percent from near-zero a year ago and is expected to continue increasing borrowing costs over the next few months.

With inflation skyrocketing last year, the biden regime needed to cut it before the mid-term elections.  The fix was for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates.  Is there anyone who didn't see that one coming?  But the White House team HAD to drop inflation or they feared getting wiped out.  Since the budget office last issued forecasts in May, the government’s short- and long-term borrowing costs have grown significantly. The budget office now predicts that federal interest costs will total $10.4 trillion over the next decade, up from $8 trillion in May.

Wow, just nine short months after last May's forecast, interest costs have risen by a staggering $2.4 TRILLION!  Who's running that outfit, Pete Buttigeig?

If any of us normal folks made a major calculation that just nine months later turned out to be wrong by $2.4 TRILLION--a 30 percent error--we'd be looking for a new job.  But for regime folk, errors like this are totally expected.

Now here's the topper, from the Times:

There were no indications in the report that the size of the federal debt is dragging on economic growth or will any time soon. But officials warned that in the long run, policymakers will need to change the nation’s fiscal course, which could come from raising taxes, cutting spending or both.

Today biden was preparing to hit back at Republicans on the debt, highlighting the new House majority’s plans to extend expiring tax cuts signed into law under Mr. Trump and repeal tax increases on high earners and corporations that Mr. Biden signed into law last year.

“Let’s be crystal clear about what’s happening,” Mr. Biden planned to say at an event in Maryland, according to advance speech experts released by the White House. “If you add up all the proposals that my Republican friends in Congress have offered so far, they would add another $3 trillion to the debt over 10 years.”<<

Notice how deftly the Times blames Trump and the Republicans for the literally trillions of dollars of pork-filled laws passed by the fucking Democrats and signed into law by the corrupt "president."

Mainstream Media running true to form.  And most of my Democrat friends are totally fine with all of this.  (If you're a Democrat I love, I know you are as upset about this as I am.)

But for those Dems who are fine with it, you deserve exactly what you've consistently voted for.  The people I feel sorry for are your kids:  Unless they voted Democrat too, they're innocent victims.  And this debt bomb will explode during their lifetimes. 

You could join us and try to help, but you'd rather vote to help Joe and Cackles welcome another two MILLION illegal invaders every year.  Yeah, that'll help.  You'd rather kill oil and gas, naively believing our economy will do just fine without it.  Yeah, keep bleating that.  You'd rather believe what the Media and the regime tell you, because it makes you feel good about your choices.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/15/business/national-debt-biden.html