Friday, September 29

Farewell to the idea of "the rule of law," "a country of laws, not men," etc.

That is no longer true:  The political class has--with the total support of the Lying Media--quietly replaced the rule of law with the Rule of Power:  If you're a Democrat politician, or a big contributor to that party, you can break any law with no consequence.

Naturally you think this is hyperbole--tinfoil-hat stuff.


Obama broke federal immigration laws, and ordered federal employees to do the same.  Was he punished in any way for doing so? 

I'm waiting for your answer, Democrats and Lying Media.

"C'mon, that wasn't a big deal." 

Really?  Doesn't the Constitution say that the president "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed...." or doesn't it?  (Hint: try Article 2, Section 3)

When the actual, y'know, words of the ghastly mess called the Obamacare law said people could only receive taxpayer subsidies for health insurance if they joined a "state health-insurance exchange," and the Democrats only belatedly discovered this (since not a goddamn one of 'em ever made the effort to actually read their ghastly bill before voting for it!), and realized that outcome wouldn't buy 'em the votes they were counting on, did Obama pressure the Supreme Court to rule that the plain, clear words didn't mean what they said?

Why yes, he did.

Is that "taking care that the Laws be faithfully executed"?

Really, take all the time you like to answer that one, Democrats.  I can wait.  As we all can.

When a couple of thousand residents of Baltimore rioted and looted, were they prosecuted for breaking the law? 

Not exactly:  Instead the Democrat mayor said the government needed to give them "room to destroy."   See?  Not a big deal....if you're a member of a conected group.

If some poor enlisted man had totally, unapologetically violated the laws governing the security of beyond-Top-Secret classified information, would he have been jailed?   Yes, happens every few years.  But when the Democratic party's presidential nominee was proven to have done exactly that, was she jailed?


Not only was she not punished, she was allowed to continue as the party's nominee.

After all, "What difference, at this point, does it make?"

 H/T Chris Jamison at Belmont

Saturday, September 23

Berkeley faculty implies Constitution doesn't protect speech that "disrupts the university's mission"

Back in the ancient days, universities encouraged free speech.  Sadly, the United States has fallen far from those glory days:

Faculty members at UC Berkeley have written a letter calling for a campus-wide boycott of all classes to protest the visits of conservative speakers to the campus.  The letter acknowledged that the university is "bound by the Constitution to allow all viewpoints on campus," but added 
However, there are forms of speech that are not protected under the First Amendment," the letter said. "These include speech that presents imminent physical danger and speech that disrupts the university's mission to educate."
Uh, what??   These overpaid idiots think speech that "disrupts the university's mission to educate" isn't allowed by the Constitution's first amendment??  What a crock.  Nothing in the Constitution allows free speech to be infringed under that excuse.  They just lied, period.

But of course, the precious snowflakes have only the haziest idea of what the Constitution actually says.

In their supreme arrogance, the Left decrees goals or principles -- such as the above, totally fabricated, limit on free speech -- which they then claim is "settled."  Within days every good Leftist knows about the new goal or demand and will slavishly push to get everyone else to submit. 

In a style totally familiar to former citizens of communist regimes, the Left presents the new goal using the "bandwagon technique," making it seem as though all decent, rational, right-thinking citizens have already agreed on it.  The telltales are the abundant use of expressions like "undeniably...," "unquestionably...," "as everyone knows...," "all decent people agree ..."

Recently we've seen new equivalents, like "The science is settled" and "This is not who we are."  All these phrases are designed to push listeners to accept as a given what would otherwise have to be proven.  If listeners believe the Left's assertion represents a consensus, the natural human desire to be accepted by peers--to be a valued member of the group--makes them far more willing to accept whatever goal the Left is pushing.

Friday, September 22

Crazy Nancy Pelosi praises illegal-alien parents who brought their kids into the U.S. illegally

At a recent press conference that brain-dead Democrat Nancy Pelosi praised the illegal-alien parents who brought their kids into the U.S. illegally.

That is, she praised them for breaking U.S. law.

You absolutely have to see this video clip.  It's barely 20 seconds long.  Well worth your time.

Of course Nancy, like all Democrats, is totally fanatical about giving U.S. citizenship to as many illegals as possible, since it means millions more Democrat votes forever.

Astonishing to think that this bat-shit-crazy creature was once Speaker of the House.  Good Lord.

Companies selling obamacare insurance in one state requesting 35% rate increases!

In Illinois, companies selling health insurance under that ghastly crap pile called Obamacare are seeking to raise premiums by an average of 35 percent next year, according to the state's insurance commissioner.

If the price of gasoline, or electricity, or milk, or meat jumped 35% in a year, the media would be screaming bloody murder.  Democrats would be calling for a special counsel to investigate possible price-fixing, or Russian interference.  They'd be submitting bills to tax what they'd be calling the "excess profits" at a 95% rate.

But when obozocare premiums jump by the same percentage, do you hear a single critical word from the lying bastards?

You do not.  Not a peep from the Lying Mainstream Media or the Democrats.  It's like a news blackout.

Gee, wonder why they don't seem to care about that, when the same hike in oil prices would have 'em all howling for blood?

Oh that's right: The Dems passed this piece of crap without a single Republican vote.  They own it, completely.  So no wonder.

In fact, Dems are fighting tooth and nail to keep this piece of crap, even as insurers have hiked premiums by an average of 30 percent every year, and millions of people have been forced to drop their super-swell health insurance due to those increases.  Why, it's almost like the Dems don't want Americans to hold them responsible for the horrible results of this disaster.

But the Dems sure were shrieking in triumph when they rammed this disaster down our throats, remember?  Cuz, "we're giving the poor and immigrants FREE health insurance, and that's totally wonderful!"  Remember? isn't free.  Nothing ever is.  Taxpayers paid a huge chunk of the cost, and Obozo's people borrowed the rest from China.  Wheeeeee!  Look, Ma, FREE HEALTH INSURANCE!

Idiots.  Morons.  Children--who've managed to run this nation into the ground in less than 70 years.

How corrupt politicians can destroy a culture

A Portuguese man living in the capital, Lisbon, wrote to alert readers to an alarming event in his country:

Lisbon has one mosque, but according to the writer, the city's socialist mayor has announced plans to build a second one this year.  But oddly, the socialist mayor has announced that the $4.5 million cost of the mosque will be paid with public funds(Source, in Portuguese)

The writer found this extremely strange.  By what bizarre logic should taxpayers pay to build a mosque (or any other religious building)?

Then he mentioned a big clue:  the socialist mayor of Lisbon is a strong supporter of using public funds to build the mosque.

Ah, now it makes sense.

The writer was irritated that the mayor and city council had unilaterally decided--without asking city residents--to use public funds for a mosque, and he found it odd that he hadn't seen anything in the media about anyone opposing this, or asking by what insane rationale the mayor had decreed that taxpayers should fund construction of a mosque.  Even Catholic politicians had said nothing.

Then something else odd happened, almost simultaneously:  Portugal's national government changed that country's immigration laws to make it much easier to obtain a legal permit to stay in the country.  In just the first week since the new law went into effect, the number of requests for residency soared 1300%, to 4,037 in a single week!  (Source in Portuguese)

The writer wondered if these two events were somehow connected.  He found it odd that neither opposition politicians nor anyone in the media had spoken out against either event.

Then another citizen of Portugal added the final piece of the puzzle, saying the country has a communist, Trotskyist, socialist federal government.

There is no legitimate reason for the mayor of Lisbon to commit taxpayer funds to build a mosque.  On the other hand there are two obvious illegitimate reasons he might have done this:  a bribe, or if he's a socialist, as part of a calculated effort to weaken the nation--and eventual destroy the Portuguese culture.

"Wait," I hear you saying, "It's ridiculous to think anyone born in a nation would want to wipe out their own culture!  You must be a wingnut!  A tinfoil hatter!"

Ah, I see you haven't been in this country long, stranger.  Because if you read the comments at Democrat Underground or HuffPo or ANY of the "social justice warrior" websites you'll see hundreds of comments from sick, twisted whites calling for an end to both white culture and America's current role in the world.  It's a sick, sick, twisted worldview.

But then again, consider that the people we're talking about have virtually no moral compass, no values other than nihilism and self-hate.  Strange, strange people.

The corrupt mayor should be shot, as a lesson to other traitors.  Do that just half a dozen times and pols would decide no bribe was worth it, and that doing things that killed your own national culture was a fatal proposition.

Thursday, September 21

Would-be armed robber foiled by customer says he's gonna SUE guy who intervened !

Back in July, 30-year-old Ryan Flores walked into a Starbucks carrying a gun and a knife.  He approached the employee at the register and demanded cash.

A 58-year-old customer--nearly twice Flores' age--saw what was happening, picked up a chair and hit the thug over the head with it.  Unfortunately it didn't knock Flores out, and the two fought for about a minute.  The customer was stabbed in the neck but finally managed to wrestle the knife away from the thug and stab Flores several times.

Now the would-be robber has said he's gonna sue the good Samaritan who foiled his attempted robbery.

While police called the customer a hero, the suspect's mother said her son is a victim.

"He has 17 total stab wounds, lacerations and defensive wounds," said mom.  "The guy went from a good Samaritan to a vigilante. Stabbing somebody that many times, it doesn't take that many stab wounds to get somebody to succumb to you," she said.

Oh NO!  Poor baby!

So mom is making excuses for her lawbreaking 30-year-old son.  Mom, has it ever occurred to you that if your li'l darlin' hadn't tried to rob the store, he wouldn't have been stabbed? 

Oh wait, I forgot:  The new "law" in liberal, Democrat-ruled California is, robbery, rape, murder, mayhem, selling drugs and molesting kids is just fine.  But God forbid that the State or any of its citizens should try to actually try to stop people from breaking the law.  Cuz Dems are all about holding hands and singing Kumbayah. 

And "It's society's fault! This person was forced to commit crime because he didn't get a six-figure job."

But the really scary thing about this story is that since it's the Peoples' Republic of California, chances are some dip-shit idiot judge will actually allow the lawsuit to proceed, and thug jurors will find for the thug.

Any society that puts up with crap like that has serious problems.

Monday, September 18

Newsweek buries the story of Seattle's Democrat mayor being forced to resign because...

In a barely-covered story, the Democrat mayor of hugely-liberal/Democrat Seattle managed to dodge and deflect claims from 4 unrelated males that the mayor sexually assaulted them when they were under-age.

The mayor strongly denied all 4 charges and refused to resign--and why should he if the charges were false?  But after #4 he made what he apparently considered a big concession:  He said that after his term expired in November, he wouldn't seek re-election.

Then someone discovered a sealed case file in neighboring Oregon, confirming that 33 years earlier, one of the boys had sought counseling after claiming that the guy had indeed sexually assaulted him.

Then just recently a 5th accuser came forward--this time a family member.  And finally the mayor resigned.

That's all just background.  The crazy story now is how Newsweek covered this:  As the former "fake news" magazine saw it, the real story wasn't the Democratic mayor's child abuse and lying denials, but the fact that Donald Trump junior used the mayor's case to "bash Democrats."  Yep.  The mag tweeted
"Donald Trump Jr. has used the resignation of Seattle's mayor over sex abuse allegations to bash the Democrats."
Now, I doubt anyone is surprised that Newsweek would so utterly twist the story from "Democrat mayor sexually assaults 5 underage boys, then falsely denies it when confronted" to an anti-Trump tweet.  I think we've all seen that absolutely nothing is off-limits when it comes to Liberal Democrats using "fake news" to either attack Republicans or cover for damaging acts by Democratic politicians.

So the hoot here isn't Newsweek's twisting the story---but the comments from Americans who caught 'em doing it!  Here are a few, and I suspect they'll delete the thread in minutes:

  * You mis-spelled CHILD abuse.  (Newsweek's headline omitted "child" entirely)
  * Democrat mayor screws kids and you made the story about Trump Junior??  Really??
  * Wow, you guys totally lack self-awareness!  (Oh I think they're aware, just trying to deflect anger.)
  * Definitely the most important part of the saga of the Dem mayor is Trump Junior's reaction.
  * Shouldn't Newsweek be joining Trump Junior in bashing child abuse?  How many now?
  * You're actually blaming DJT jr for condemning a pedophile?  Wow, the Left is truly evil.
  * And yet you wonder why people think the media is biased or goes for fake news...
  * Democrat mayor assaults 5 underage boys and you make the story about Trump junior?
  * Thanks for standing up for pedophiles against the bigots who criticize them, Newsweek!

There were probably a hundred comments along these lines.  And a lot of "This is why we elected Trump."

Okay, in the grand scheme of things this isn't a big deal, but I thought it was amusing that so many readers caught Newsweek doing the "Look!  Squirrel!" thing with this story.

Illegal alien kids sue Trump to bar him from ending the emperor's unconstitutional DACA decree

Let's see here:  A bunch of people who entered the U.S. illegally--yes, I know they were brought in by their illegal-alien parents and didn't have a choice, but still illegal--were given de-facto amnesty by imperial decree (from emperor obozo), in violation of settled U.S. law.  That was not just illegal but was actually an unconstitutional act--which, had it been done by a Republican president, would have resulted in his impeachment.

The emperor's decree--cunningly and deliberately uninformatively named "Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals" (instead of, say, "Amnesty for Children of Aliens in the U.S. Illegally") provided the kids brought in illegally with work permits and protection from deportation.

So now that Trump has ordered an end to the emperor's unconstitutional decree, the illegal aliens who were brought in illegally by their illegal parents are outraged! at the prospect of an American president who--gasp!!--wants to enforce American law.

How dare he!

So you can guess what they've done:  Last Thursday they sued the president to block recission of obozo's decree. 

They claim the Trump administration didn’t follow proper administrative procedures when deciding to end the program and that officials "violated due process by revoking an enforcement promise."

Let that sink in for a minute:  When the socialist Muslim emperor obozo issued his decree--without following any "administrative procedures"--letting 'em stay temporarily, the illegal community and the media were deliriously happy.  But when the next president rescinds the same decree, the illegals demand that he follow "administrative procedures."  Even though obozo wasn't bothered by any constraints by such procedures when he issued his decree.

Same argument confounds the illegals' claim that Trump "just can't do that" because it's a violation of due process--let alone by "revoking an enforcement promise."

Look, if you folks have a problem with how this is going, complain to the emperor.  Let him tell the American people how he was perfectly within his rightful powers to issue an edict which totally violated U.S. law.  Let the so-called "professor of Constitutional law" tell American voters how his unilateral decree that his administration would no longer enforce existing law wasn't barred by a teeny provision of the Constitution that reads "He shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed..." [Article 2, Section 3]'d think that any judge hearing this absurd lawsuit would issue a directed verdict against the illegals.  But given all the crazy, unconstitutional crap decisions issued by various federal judges in the last couple of decades, and the brilliant choice of filing the suit in San Francisco--home of the incredibly bad 9th Circuit Court--President Trump's effort to rescind his predecessor's imperial decree will never be allowed to take effect.

The self-serving bastards in congress--interested only in re-election and lining their pockets--will pass full amnesty.  And they'll lard it up even more by providing that the newly-amnestied kids can then bring in every relative they have--who can then repeat the process.

You'd think republicans would use their majority in both houses to prevent this, but they won't--because almost half of the so-called Republicans in both House and senate are really closet Democrats.

Sunday, September 17

Easily-offended snowflake student freak out over...a cotton centerpiece??

The president of a small private college invited some black students to his home.  Apparently there's now a decor trend that uses cotton stalks as a table centerpiece, and that was the case in the president's home. charmless female was outraged!  and expressed her outrage on social media.  Seems she was offended or triggered by the cotton, cuz it reminded her of how one-and-a-half centuries ago, her ancestors were among the many people--of all races--who picked cotton.  But because some of her ancestors may have been slaves, she saw the centerpiece as offensive.

Here's a pic of the offensive centerpiece, and her reaction:

So I attend Lipscomb university and as most of you know that is a predominately white school. Tonight AFRICAN AMERICAN students were invited to have dinner with the president of the school. As we arrived to the president's home and proceeded to go in we seen cotton as the center pieces. We also stood and ate dinner, there were no seats to sit in and it felt very uncomfortable. We were very offended, and also the meals that were provided resembled many "black meals" they had mac n cheese, collard greens, corn bread etc. The night before Latinos also had dinner at his house and they had tacos. They also DIDN'T have the center piece that we HAD tonight. A couple of minutes went by, the president was coming around and asking for our names and what our major was. He finally got to our table and  my friend @kay_cyann asked why there was cotton on the table as the center piece. His response was that he didn't know, he seen it before we did, he kind of thought it was " fallish", THEN he said " it ISNT INHERENTLY BAD IF WERE ALL WEARING  IT " then walked off. Later on all of us that were there were invited into the home, and we had the impression that we were coming to speak about how us as Black people feel about Lipscomb. The whole entire time we were in their home they only talked about themselves( how they met, got married and ended up at lipscomb) & the ONLY question that we were asked was our transformation coming to lipscomb. A couple of women answered the question but they sugar coated it. They said any other questions that we may have can be emailed to the advocate for the Latinos and that a second meeting may be held. Also we don't have an advocate on campus, the only African American advocate we had, no longer works here. The only advocate available to us is the advocate for the Latinos. They claim to have funding for minorities, BUT you have to live up to the expectations of a typical Black family to even get the 1000$.There is NO FUNDING for just us black students. #share
A post shared by Nakayla🦋🌻🥀 (@nakaylayvonne) on

Ah, well...certainly.  Triggered by cotton.  How could the college president have been so insensitive?

Do you suppose this same snowflake is triggered by the cotton ball used to package bottles of aspirin and other over-the-counter pills?  How long before companies are pressured by snowflakes to put warning labels on those bottles reading
"TRIGGER WARNING:  To prevent damage during shipping this product is packed with a cotton ball.  If you are triggered by the sight of cotton DO NOT OPEN THIS BOTTLE, but call this telephone # and we'll ship you a special container without the cotton ball."

And of course the next step will be for the snowflakes to demand that companies substitute polyester for cotton.  In which case the trigger warning will still be needed, but will read
"TRIGGER WARNING: The packing inside this bottle strongly resembles cotton, which may trigger emotional reactions in certain people.  However, the material is NOT cotton."
One wonders how such easily-offended people can bring themselves to wear cotton clothes without having a fit.  Which suggests that the next step will be trigger warnings on cotton clothes.

Saturday, September 16

Right on the money

Friday, September 15

Sixteen years after 9/11, Americans still don't want to believe we're at war

It's been sixteen years since 19 Muslim men flying on 4 commercial airliners took over those aircraft, killed the aircrew and flew their planes into the World Trade Center, killing 2,700 or so.  Another plane was flown into the Pentagon, killing 200 or so in that building.  

Just after the hijackers took over control of the 4th plane, one of the passengers learned about the attack on the WTC by airphone.  Guessing that the hijackers of their plane planned the same suicidal end, the passengers rushed the cockpit, and the Muslim at the controls flew the plane into a field in Pennsylvania.

September 11, 2001, should have become "a day of infamy," with Americans uniting to defeat an enemy who has openly vowed to take over the world.  Instead, 16 years later young Americans are totally unaware of any threat, and tens of thousands of Muslims continue to enter the U.S annually.

College students under 20 years old have no direct memory of the event, and in many cases what they think they know about it--from lying liberal media--is hopelessly muddled.
Even after President Trump ordered a ban on Muslim entry to the U.S. frm seven nations, two idiot federal judges blocked that order from going into effect.

Most Americans think the attack on 9/11 was the opening salvo of the war by Islamists against the west.  They've forgotten that on February 26th, 1993, a group of Muslims tried to destroy the same World Trade Center by detonated a van filled with explosives in a basement parking garage.  Their plan--as revealed by one of the bombers at his trial--was to place the bomb under a corner of one of the towers so it would collapse into the other.  The terrorist said they hoped to kill as many as 250,000 people.
But by all means, Democrats and judges and liberals and snowflakes, do keep screaming that we *need* open borders, *need* that wonderful, marvelous poison called "diversity."  Demand that your congress-whore keep blocking funding for the Wall.  Just don't cry or whine when the next attack comes.

Just keep saying "9/11 was an isolated incident."  And "Islam is the religion of peace."  
And "Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer will protect us."

And "It's really our fault."

Yeah, that last one is especially irritating.

Someone dug up some numbers about illegals

I don't know the source of these numbers, but if

Liberal moonbat claims arresting looters is... "white supremacy" ??!

Right after hurricane Irma hit Miami, a bunch of looters hit a few stores, stealing everything of value.  Miami cops caught a few, and to discourage that sort of thing the cops tweeted a pic of the perps in a jail cell, with the text "Thinking about looting? Ask these guys how that turned out."

That tweet and pic outraged! liberal blogger Sarah Jaffe, who responded by tweeting this:
the carceral state exists to protect private property and is inseparable from white supremacy.
In other words, Jaffe is implying that arresting looters is...white supremacy??

I know many liberals who are nice people, but far too many seem as unhinged as Sarah.

Most of the responses to Jaffe's comment were along the lines of "So, you'd be fine if someone stole all your valuables while you were out of town sheltering from the hurricane?"

Tellingly, Jaffe didn't reply to that question (gee, wonder why?) but simply screeched that anyone who disagreed with her assessment was a Nazi.

Far too many liberals seem to be as crazy--and hypocritical, and impervious to logic, and as hyper-emotional--as Sarah.  But amazingly, liberal Democrats and their allies are running the country.

Oh, you thought Trump was running the federal government?

Ah, welcome to Earth.  I see you just arrived on the planet.

Portland cops scrap list of gang members, cuz...

For 20 years, police in Portland, Oregon have compiled a list of local guys with "gang affiliations."  But this week they made a "command decision" to increase public safety by...deleting the list.

Oh wait, my bad:  They're not deleting the list to make the public safer, but because a reporter discovered the shocking fact that 81 percent of the guys on the gang list were minorities.

Of course residents of Portland were outraged!  The discovery that 81 percent of the guys on the list were minorities was totally unexpected!  And clear evidence of raaaacism by the cops!
Not a single person at the police press conference bothered to ask "Um, is it possible that the reason 81 percent of the guys on the list are minorities is percent of gang members really are minorities?"

Hmm...yes, that sounds pretty accurate.  But the fact that it's probably true doesn't matter.  What's important today is that cops not keep lists that would reflect badly on minorities.

The cops said they decided to scrap the list because being on a list of guys with gang connections has led to "unintended consequences'' for those who have quit the gang and tried to get jobs.  Well yeah, I can see that.  Kinda like being convicted of, oh, murder or grand larcceny has "unintended consequences."

And certainly lots of honest, hard-working citizens would agree that it's far more important to kill the list-- in case a gang member decides to leave the gang and get a "real" job--rather than be more efficient in busting gang activity.  I mean, emperor obozo's "Just Us" department, under attorney-general Loretta "Tarmac" Lynch, ruled that employers aren't even allowed to ask prospective employees if they've been convicted of larceny or murder.  Cuz...raaacis'.

Next on the list of concessions to alleged racism:  Deleting records of felony convictions.

Down.  The.  Tubes.

Thursday, September 14

Swedish cops not even investigating rapes of 12-year-olds, claiming too many rapes to cope

Back in July a 12-year-old Swedish girl was dragged into a restroom by an older man, who beat her, raped her and threatened to kill her if she reported the attack.

The girl and her mother both knew the rapist and immediately reported the rape to police, giving them his name and address.
According to journalist Joakim Lamotte the girl is still being confronted and taunted by the rapist on the streets of the town.

The journalist recorded his interview with the cops and uploaded it to the Net.
When Lamotte expressed shock that the cops had done nothing, the female police officer replied “Do you know how many rapes we have?”

“No, I don’t.  But [you were given] his name, address, and you haven’t even interrogated him yet. Isn’t that remarkable?” asked Lamotte.

“Well, you might think so," said the officer, "but we have so many similar issues and so few people available that we cannot cope with the workload.” 

“That sounds unbelievable. A 12-year-old girl who's raped, it’s just a child,” said Lamotte.

“We have 3-year-old children that get raped,” the officer said.

When Lamotte asked if they were not able to prosecute even a man who raped 3-year-old, the female officer responded, “Yes….these are the realities and it’s terribly regrettable. That’s all I can say about it.”
The rapist was what the papers cunningly call simply "an immigrant" or "a refugee."  As such he has the special protection of Sweden's top politicians.  Knowing this, lower-level government munchkins like cops don't want to bother investigating crimes by Muslim immigrants because doing so brings down the heat from above.

But of course that could never happen in more-civilized countries like the U.S., right?

Oh, Army major who was known for years to be in contact with Islamic terrorist leaders was carefully ignored by his fellow officers and superiors--until he shot 43 unarmed soldier at Fort Hood, killing 13.

The emperor himself airily dismissed this attack as merely "workplace violence" rather than Islamic terrorism.  So it's already happening here.

If you think U.S. pols and cops are immue to "the Swedish disease" you're too dumb to breathe.

And probably a Democrat.

Harvard names traitorous twisted snowflake to prestigious post--because twisted snowflake

As readers might have deduced, I love this country.  And it saddens me to see socialists, communists, anarchists and assorted idiots driving the nation headlong into destruction.

Every day brings new and more ghastly examples.  Here's one from yesterday, courtesy of the leftist academics and adminishits at Harvard:

Harvard University has named convicted felon Bradley ("Chelsea") Manning as a visiting fellow at its Institute of Politics.

I'm serious.  When I first saw this I thought it had to be satire, but it's real.

For those under 20 or so, or who have short memories (and that's a big damn club), Manning was an Army private--and a seriously twisted snowflake--who landed in a job where he handled Top Secret communications in a war zone.  Being a twisted snowflake, Manning copied 750,000 of these Top Secret cables and gave 'em to Wikileaks.

For this act of treason the Left praised him lavishly.  The Army court-martialled him, and he was sentenced to 35 years in prison.

The day after he was sentenced, he ensured his elevation to saint of the Left by announcing that he'd decided he was really...a woman.  And wanted to be called "Chelsea Elizabeth."

The Left promptly had yet another orgasm of delight.

Less than four years into his supposed 35-year sentence, Manning was pardoned--by the asshole emperor, obozo.

Interesting:  If you're a transgender who reveals 750,000 Top Secret cables, and are pardoned by the emperor, the Fake News outlets are just giddy with praise over the pardon.  If you're a Republican president who pardons a former Arizona sheriff who was trying to enforce valid U.S. immigration laws, the Fake News outlets scream about what a HORRIBLE abuse of power that is.

So, with all the background, let's see how the Leftists at Hahvahd rationalized naming the traitorous son-of-a-bitch Manning as a "visiting fellow":

Harvard's announcement touts Manning as the program's "first transgender fellow."  Clearly that's a very important accomplishment for the university.

They describe Manning as "a Washington, D.C. based network security expert."  Really?  When did he acquire this expertise?  Maybe they're referring to the fact that he was able to breach a Top Secret network--because the Army gave him the job.  Yeh, dat must be it.

In point of fact, Manning's only qualifications to be a Harvard fellow are that he is a traitor and a gender-changer — which means appointing him would give the finger to every decent American. That’s enough reason for the leftist scum at Harvard to fall over themselves to do it.

And indeed, a sentence or two later we see the real attraction Harvard has for Manning: "As a trans woman, she [sic] advocates for queer and transgender rights...on Twitter."

Well there ya go!  That's certainly a fine achievement, warranting appointment as a "visiting fellow."

Harvard also mentions Manning's sentence for leaking hundreds of thousands of classified U.S. documents, but immediately, airily waves away this treason by coyly calling the guy merely a "whistleblower."

Harvard's press release also specifically notes that Manning has used social media to call for "abolishing the presidency"--yet another attraction for Harvard's leftists.

Harvard also added a final, breathtaking lie to all the others:
"Broadening the range...for students to hear from and engage with experts, leaders, and policy-shapers is a cornerstone of [Hahvahd]. We welcome the breadth of thought-provoking viewpoints on race, gender, politics, and the media."
Oh really?

This is total bullshit.  Would Harvard welcome an Ann Coulter to their university?  How about someone advocating a strong military?  Or gun rights?  Think they'd invite Sheriff Clarke to tell students what works and what doesn't in the "real world" in which he operated?

How about inviting retired black conservative Lt.Colonel Alan West to speak?

Never happen.  Cuz Harvard is lying.  Full of crap.  Bullshitting the public.

Here's a little thought experiment:  Look at all the emphasis Harvard gave to Manning's decision to change genders, then ask yourself:  Would the university have named Manning a "visiting fellow" if he'd been a muscular, no-nonsense straight conservative?

Yeah, that's what I thought.

Now, one Bradley Manning more or less won't materially hurt this nation.  But the actions of the left-wing asshole adminishits at prestigious universities in honoring twisted snowflakes who leak Top Secret cables shows the "trend line."

Much like student activists calling for destruction of statues of that horrible Thomas Jefferson.

UPDATE:  After a huge outpouring of anger--including demands to end federal funding to Harvard--the university rescinded the appointment.  But they've already shown their true agenda.

Not that we had any doubts.

Members of so-called "religion of peace" in Pakistan murder two teenagers for...

Another day, another pair of so-called "honor killings," brought to you by members of what far too many western pols and fake-news "journalists" absurdly call "the religion of peace."

In Pakistan two teenagers--ages 15 and 17--committed the ghastly crime of falling in love, and made plans to elope.  When their families found out, they convened a tribal council, which quickly determined that their cult demanded that the pair be killed, to preserve some insane Muslim definition of "honor."

On different days the families tied each of the teenagers down and...electrocuted them.

Now liberals will airily dismiss this by claiming that "Everyone knows that a certain percentage of every population is bat-shit crazy, so you simply cannot draw any negative conclusions about Islam on the basis of these two murders, no matter if heinous."

It's true that every population has a small percentage of nutters.  But there's a huge difference here...because this execution wasn't the work of one crazy nutter but was a carefully-considered punishment --a decision made by dozens of tribal elders and family members.

In other words, this execution of the two teens for wanting to elope was what the rat-bastard family and council members believed--and thoroughly believe--their cult wants them to do.

And the Democrats--like the moronic pols in most of Europe--want to import hundreds of thousands more of the members of this cult into the U.S.

Utter insanity.

Wednesday, September 13

Alleged "feminist" group claims Starbucks is "funding white supremacy in the White House"

Everyone needs to see how so-called feminist organizations have thoroughly welded themselves to socialism, Democrats, the Left--and amazingly, to supporting Islam.  Latest example:  A group claiming to be "a leading national women’s organization" is claiming that Starbucks is "funding white supremacy in the White House."

Since Starbucks is famously pro-Left it's really hard to believe they'd "fund white supremacy" anywhere on the planet, let alone in Trump's administration.  But the jerks making the claim are...well I won't call 'em morons but will simply say logic isn't their strong suit.  So here's how they explain the connection:

Starbucks leases store space in most high-end hotels.  And among their 24,000 stores, they have one in Trump Tower and one in the Trump Hotel in D.C. 

See the connection?  Sure!  So by offering folks staying in those hotels the convenience of getting their favorite coffee (which actually isn't very good, IMO) right there in the hotel, Starbucks is funding white supremacy in the White House!!!

It's so obvious!

So the self-styled "feminist" group has started a petition demanding that Starbucks take their stores out of those locations.

Naturally you can't believe such a dumb-ass move, right?  Too dumb for words, eh?  Well (sigh), click the link and see for yourself.

These people are...unhinged.

Tuesday, September 12

Students chalk memorial to 9/11 victims; hours later, university adminishit orders it erased

A student group at Cleveland State University wanted to recognize the 16th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center and damaged the Pentagon, killing 2,700, so on Sunday evening they chalked an American flag on the sidewalks of the public university’s campus, with the words “No day shall erase you from the memory of time” under it.

But just hours after they created the memorial, the university removed it with a power-washer.
 When the students asked why he was destroying the tribute to the victims of 9/11, the employee said he had been ordered to do so by Shehadeh Abdelkarim, director of facilities maintenance for the university.

The employee also said the memorial was being erased because “there is no chalk allowed on campus.”

This, of course, is utter bullshit--nothing but a lie.  Every snowflake group on campus writes slogans in chalk on the sidewalks.  The university has never gotten upset before.  I'm betting the REAL reason is that Shehadeh Abdelkarim didn't want American kids remembering 9/11, or reminding any *other* students about that atrocity.

Hell, half of all Americans under 30 already believe the horrible leftist/Democrat lie that the 19 hijackers attacked us because Bush invaded Iraq or Afghanistan.

Florida liberal: "Texas went for Trump so no sympathy for 'em. Karma!" Then "Oooh, Irma!"

The following pair of tweets is too astonishing a demonstration of karma not to go viral.  So please do consider forwarding this to every hateful liberal you know:

Oh, and in a particularly ironic karma-note, check out the smiley at the end of the top tweet versus the
ooooh-not-so-smiling-now face at the end of the second one.

Think the gal who posted this is fun to be around?  A joy at parties? 

Sadly she seems to be an all-too-typical liberal hypocrite.

Karma, baby.

Monday, September 11

A Brit sums up the situation in Europe re: "refugees"--and it's not good

A Brit by the name of Pat Condell has been putting videos of short monologs on YouTube for years now, warning westerners about the danger posed by idiot, virtue-signalling politicians who have thrown the gates wide open to welcome hundred of thousands of bloodthirsty parasites into their homes.

He's talking about Europe, where the German foreign minister just said that the so-called "refugees" loved to come to Germany because that country offered the most welfare benefits.

So at last, has some "elite" cabinet minister figured out that the key is to stop dangling a pot of gold before uneducated African males?  Uh, no.  The minister concluded his talk by urging the other nations of Europe to increase their benefits so more "refugees" will pick their countries instead of Germany.

Europe's mainstream political parties seem hell-bent on replacing their native populations with Muslims, so much so that they'll give them $3000 a month for life just for showing up with wives--plural--and kids in tow.  Not working, of course, because--well, why work when you get welfare?

But listen to Condell on the clip below.  He doesn't pull any punches.

Message from Osama bin Laden on goals of Islam

Do you believe the idea that Islam wants to conquer the entire world is paranoia?  A scare-story pushed by the paranoid?  Tinfoil-hat stuff?  After all, how often have you heard that "Islam is the religion of peace"?  Shouldn't you absolutely believe your betters in the media world when they print that?

I mean, it's just un-possible that the New York Times would lie to you, or would have an Agenda, right?

But we don't have to depend on the f'n NY Times to tell us the truth.  Remember al-Qaeda strategist Osama bin Laden?  Well here's what Osama himself said about the aims of his cult:
“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination.  It is, Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority?

Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: either [1] willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live.

The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.”

–Osama Bin Laden
(The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 42)
"Wait, wait!" I hear the idiots at the Times and the DNC screaming.  "You can't believe Osama bin Laden, cuz he isn't really a Muslim!"

That's what U.S. liberals and Democrats have told you over and over about ISIS, right?  "They're not TRUE Muslims!"  It's what they say about the Nigerian killers in Boko Haram:  "They're not really Muslims."  It's what the emperor and all his minions said about the mass murders at Fort Hood, in San Bernardino and the gay nightclub in Orlando.

But when Osama was alive every Muslim looked to him as their most cunning leader.  So if Osama himself said it, can we regard that as authentic policy?  Or do you liberal assholes wanna claim even Osama wasn't a real Muslim?

Sunday, September 10

First transgender person is competing for Miss USA

Just when you think you've seen it all, life in the U.S. gets stranger.

You may have noticed that "transgender people" are the new darlings of the ghastly mainstream media and the so-called "elites" who dictate the crap that passes for "news."  The traitorous Bradley Manning, sentenced to many years for giving secret cables to Wiki but pardoned by the emperor obama.  The guy formerly known as Bruce Jenner.  Lots more.

Well now we have a transgender faux-woman compete to be named Miss Montana USA.

The media is just delighted by that.  The "story" to them is that he/she has "revealed what motivated him/her to enter the pageant."  But we'll save that "real" news for a bit later.

Anita Green, 26, "made history last year by becoming the first openly transgender person elected as national delegate to a nominating convention."

The story doesn't tell you what type of nominating convention, so can you guess which party?

Should be dead-easy: Green is on the executive board of the local County Democrats.

You did guess that, right?

Green thought about entering the competition in the past, but never felt ready until the past presidential election.  So now the "real" (according to the Lying Media) news:  Whatever could have possibly motivated him/her to enter a female beauty contest?

That's right:  the election of President Trump.  Because...well, absolutely everyone knows Trump is a brute who is just ruining life in the U.S. for anyone who isn't a white male and a Rethuglican and a billionaire, dahling!

Gosh, lying media, thanks for reporting that vital, vital piece of anti-Trump information.  That was SO f'ng critical to the story, eh?

The Lying Media:  the folks who are propagandizing your kids and grandchildren, every single day.

Is it any wonder this nation has lost its bearings?  And no, it ain't Trump's fault, since the only thing he's managed to do (because the RINO Republicans are joining the Dems to block every single initiative) is order that trans-genders won't be permitted in the U.S. armed forces.

Wait, I'll bet you think he stopped obozo's totally unConstitutional executive order granting de facto amnesty and eventual citizenship to children of illegal aliens--the cunningly-uninformatively acronmymed order creating "DACA," right?

No, he did try, but signalled congress that if they want that to continue--and they absolutely do--they can pass a law and he'll sign it.

So obozo's policies continue. 

If elections could actually change anything, the elites wouldn't let them be held.
Anita Green, 2nd from left