Maine passes law taking the U.S. a step closer to electing president by winner of the national popular

In my previous post I told you about how fast and completely the Democrats were trashing the Constitution.  Of course you just shrug, cuz that was just about allowing duh po' widdle boys who claim to be girls to use girls' locker rooms.  Of course it was far more than that but you don't care.  But here comes another wound you may care more about:

If you know fuck-all about the Constitution you know it explicitly lays out how we are to elect the president and VP--called the "electoral college."  The Founders hammered out this method instead of by the winner of the total national vote because they knew that if we elected presidents by the winner of the national vote, all presidents would come from the most populous states.  

Democrats: "SO???  Dat totally guuud!  An' it jus' coincidence dat we rule all duh big cities an' all but two of duh big-population states!  So naturally we support this!"

The electoral college method was designed to prevent this, because even though the big states still have far more electoral votes, all states have two senators.  So the EC does a tiny bit to allow less-populated states to occasionally play a role in electing the president.

So it's no surprise that the Dems want to abolish the electoral college and instead elect the president by the winner of the national popular vote, since that would guarantee that virtually all presidents would be from the big Dem-ruled states, giving them more power.  

SO...for decades the Dems have demanded the electoral college method by abolished.  But this has never gotten far because of another safeguard in the Constitution: for an amendment to pass, it must be "ratified" by two-thirds of the states.  And logically, no small state would vote to cut their throat, eh?

Oh wait...small states ruled by Dems already have.  The Democrats are within a hairs-breadth of abolishing the electoral college, and yet you've never heard about it--because the Lying Democrat-run Mainstream Media does NOT want you to know that the Dems are within a year or so of replacing that method by the winner of the national popular vote.

Stop right here and try to recall if you ever heard about any of this before this moment.  If you haven't (and 99.5% of you haven't), it shows you how totally the Democrats control the Lying Mainstream Media.

So...back in 2006 two Democrat "strategists" found a way to abolish the Electoral College without having to bother with trying to amend the Constitution.

Let the cunning rapacity of that sink in for a moment: obviously the bastards knew the EC is explicitly specified in the Constitution, and that it would be essentially impossible to get small states to ratify an amendment abolishing the EC since that would cut their own throats.  But they found a way to abolish the electoral college without having to amend the Constitution. 

The cunning plan relied on the fact that the Constitution specifically allows states to form "interstate compacts" for any purpose (presumably a *legal* purpose, though the Constitution is silent on that point, since the Founders never imagined states would form a compact to do anything NOT allowed by law, eh?)  Once such a "compact" is approved by congress, it has the effect of law.

The cunning Dem strategists realized that nothing in the Constitution require a state's "electors" to cast their electoral votes for the candidate who won their state's vote.  (That's the twist used by Hillary supporters in 2016 to try to get "electors" to cast their vote for Hilliary even if their state voted for Trump.  Yet Hilliary and the Dems were never charged with "election interference," eh?  Funny how that works.)

So 18 years ago (2006) the two cunning rat-bastards created a thing called the "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact."  It provides that states that join the compact (by passing a state law to do so) agree that when states with a total of 270 electoral votes have passed such laws, all members of the "compact" agree to order their electors to vote for the winner of the national popular vote--even though their state voted for the other party!  The Democrats call this "defending our precious democracy"!

Now, this is so outrageous that many normal Americans think it has to be horseshit--a "right-wing violent extremist conspiracy story."  It's just too "on the nose" to be true, eh?

If that's what you think, look it up yourself, you ignorant POS.  Not only is it real, the bastards have now gotten 17 states, with 209 electoral votes, to agree to join it.  So they only need states with 61 more EVs to join for the Democrats to win every presidential election forever.  

Here's the quote from the compact's own damn webpage:

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.  It has been enacted into law by 17 states and DC with 209 electoral votes (Status in the states). It needs an additional 61 electoral votes to go into effect.  
   Take Action Now – Tell Your Legislators to Pass National Popular Vote!

If you think that's a fake, here's the Wiki page.

This massive assault on the Constitution has been happening right under your nose for 18 YEARS, and yet you've never heard a word about it, eh?  Now how do ya suppose such a *massive assault on the "supreme law of the land" can have been going on for 18 years without you hearing a word about it until now?

Answer: the Mainstream Media hasn't wanted you to know.  Obviously they know all about it, and totally support it.  But neither the Media nor Democrat strategists want you to know--until the moment the rat-bastards get states representing 61 more electoral votes to pass a law joining the "compact."

And if being just 61 votes short of going into effect doesn't alarm ya, consider that lawmakers in Dem-ruled states with another 79 electoral votes have passed bills to join the thing, but the bills haven't been signed into law by the governor.  Thus if those states elect a Democrat as governor, and their legislature stays Democrat, those states will join the compact--which would instantly create a Constitutional crisis.

So here's a slobbering story by some dipshit foreigner at ABC who wants the electoral college to be abolished:

Maine just passed a law bringing the U.S. closer to electing presidents by the winner of the national popular vote.

Earlier this week Maine governor Janet Mills allowed a bill to become law that would take effect once the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is able to gather pledges for at least 270 electoral votes -- the number of delegate votes needed to elect a president.

Seventeen states, with a total of 209 electoral votes, have now voted to join the compact, which would abolish the electoral-college method of electing presidents, without having to amend the Constitution.  The compact would automatically take effect when states with a total of 270 electoral-college votes pass a law to join it.
 
Democrats argue that under the current system not every vote is equal, and claim the compact will make elections fair by giving every vote equal weight regardless of where a voter lives.

The NPVIC's website says

"Under the current system a small number of votes in a small number of states regularly decides the Presidency. All-or-nothing payoffs fuel doubt, controversy over real or imagined irregularities, hair-splitting post-election litigation...and unrest."

Now, I've been warning y'all about this for years, but of course... And normal Americans (i.e. not Democrats) believe it's absurd to think that the Supreme Court would allow the electoral college to be abolished without a Constitutional amendment.  But a few of you may recall that when Texas sued Pennsylvania for violating their own election laws in the 2020 election (after the Dems stole the presidency), the Supreme Court dismissed that lawsuit, in an unsigned one-page opinion--without offering a single bit of legal reasoning.

They simply didn't want to risk stopping everything to investigate claims of election fraud, almost certainly reasoning that allowing the Democrat Party to get away with the steal was less risky than throwing the election into limbo for three months.

If you think that won't happen again, you're too damn dumb to breathe.

Source for the utterly pro-Democrat ABC story
 
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/state-law-takes-us-step-closer-popular-vote/story?id=109437887