Three Post Office carriers charged in $24 MILLION fraud scheme

 

New "caravan" from Central America headed to the U.S, arriving just before the mid-terms

Trump has closed the southern border.  But for the first time in months, another migrant caravan from Central America is coming to the U.S, and should arrive two or three weeks before the mid-term elections.  It's not only coming, but reports say it's GAINING IN NUMBERS, despite the "hard close" on the southern border by president Trump.

Their plan is that if enough people scatter in different directions, most will be able to overwhelm border patrol with numbers, enabling thousands to escape into the interior of the U.S. where they know Democrats will conceal and protect them.

This comes at an interesting time, right before the mid-term elections.  If the Border Patrol arrests a few thousand, the Mainstream Media will scream that Trump is bein' cruel to doze po' wimmen an' chirren "refugees" (even though past "caravans" have been 95% fighting-age men).  And at the same time, if a few thousand get thru, the same Media will sneer that Trump has failed to do what he promised: to close the border.

Either way, Dems win--which was the whole point.
 

In elite DC suburb of Arlington, DA orders preferential treatment for non-U.S. citizens who drive drunk

September 28, 2026

Fourteen years ago emperor Obozo had a great idea: allow children of illegal aliens, brought to the U.S., to stay here forever.  The Media quickly gave that decree the utterly uninformative acronym "DACA," because no American knew what it meant.

(Out of curiosity, how many of you know?  If you're a college student, ask your parents.  If you're a parent, ask your 20-year-old "adult" kids.  No one will know.  It stands for "Deferred action for childhood arrivals."  Does that tell you anything useful?  Nope, which was the entire point.)

See, when illegal aliens entered the U.S. with kids, duh kidz din' have no choice, right?  So if we were to be so mean as to deport illegal-alien parents, Obozo and the Left wailed dat it wuz unfair to deport duh kidz with dere parents, since duh kidz could have spent years in duh U.S. an' din' know nuffin' bout dere home countries, right?  So it wud be unfair to deport duh kiddies!  So DACA wuz, like, totally compassionate, eh?

Sucker play: If you've got an IQ over 80 you realized right away that if a conservative congress or prezzy tried to deport just the parents, the Media would scream that the mean GOP was "separating families!  Ripping children from there parents!  It's SO unbelievably cruel, eh?"

Of course the solution is obvious: deport the whole family.  But WAIT, scream Dems:  Because of Obozo's executive order (decree), the children are NO LONGER ILLEGAL ALIENS, cuz duh emperor hath given 'em legal status forever, eh?  So since you have no legal justification to deport duh kiddies, yew cain't deport duh parents either, since that wud be...wait for it..."cruel."  Yep.

Obozo issued his order without asking congress, under the "presidential discretion" section of U.S. immigration law.  And before the Supreme Court was majority-"conservative" (quotes intentional), it ruled dat whatevah duh Emperor did, no later prezzy could undo!

Sweet, eh?  It's called a ratchet, meaning the rule only swings one way--to do what the Democrat Partei wants.  You may wonder why, eh?

Of course if you're over 25 or so, you don't need to wonder because the answer is obvious: kids of illegals will vote Democrat, since that not only supports their continued presence here, but also ensures that eventually the Dems will give them U.S. citizenship without their having to ask, or pass any of the civics tests!  

Is that cool or what?  So instantly 800,000 foreigners were given essentially permanent residency in the U.S.

Now, as you've seen over the past two years, Democrat brownshirts have been rioting in the streets of all Democrat-ruled shithole cities to prevent ICE from deporting any illegals, even those who've committed serious crimes.  Dems demand that ALL illegals who've entered the U.S. be allowed to stay, since they'll vote Democrat.

But while Obozo's DECREE allowed DACA recipients to stay here forever, it did NOT give 'em permission to break any other U.S. laws, like drunk driving.

But as everyone knows, rules are only useful to the extent that those responsible for enforcing 'em do just that.  And in corrupt, Dem-ruled Arlington County, Virginia, that's the job of the equivalent of the DA, called the "Commonwealth's Attorney."

And in Arlington that absolute power rests with a woman born in...Iran: Democrat Parisa Dehghani-Tafti.  

And the Commonwealth’s Attorney--the chief prosecutor, who *alone* decides what laws will be enforced--is determined to keep DACA winners who drive drunk from being deported.

So she sent her staff prosecutors a memo, saying if a DACA person is charged with drunk driving, they should "consider" reducing that charge to something trivial, to prevent the DACA winner from losing their protected status and being deported. 

Her office sent prosecutors a written memo with that instruction.

This officially documents what we've seen for years: today there are effectively two different sets of laws--a harsh one for conservatives, and a totally lenient set for anyone the Dems favor.  Democrat prosecutors simply refuse to prosecute a crime committed by a person the Democrat party favors. 

The Founders had a novel idea: The law was to apply equally to all citizens.  No one was "above the law," whether due to wealth or power.  And for 200-odd years it worked.  Then the Democrats realized that they could rig the system simply by refusing to charge certain people with crimes.

And there ya go. 

Former leftist (Naomi Wolf) discovers Fauci funded Chinese research to insert genes into bat corona-viruses 8 years before the covid pandemic

(Heavily edited from an article by Naomi Wolf, May 2, 2026)

The "Freedom of Information Act" was designed to make the government accountable to the people, by requiring government officials to release documents bearing on any specific question.  But *from the beginning* the corruptocrats--the wannabee dictators, Democrats--knew they could get away with totally ignoring that totally reasonable law--because they knew the Democrat DeepState, leftist judges and leftist U.S. Attorneys wouldn't prosecute 'em.

So a week ago Politico reported that a former aide to Fauci has just been charged with conspiring to evade FOIA records requests related to National Institutes of Health funding of "gain of function" research in a Chinese lab. 

The Democrat-fellating, Trump-hating Media and virtually all Democrats went ballistic: "Nonsense!  Dis beez *totally* fake newz!  A 'right-wing conspiracy story,' created to distract Americans from the fact that the U.S. is losing BADLY in Iran!  After all, we've been involved there for NINE WHOLE WEEKS (when this story broke) and Iran hasn't surrendered!  It's another Trump eternal war!  He's a warmonger!  Oh, and he hates 'immigrants' and trannies!"

Utter horseshit, but all Dems believed it.

Former Fauci "advisor" David Morens is accused of concealing emails about risky virus research. He's been indicted on obstruction of justice and conspiracy charges for allegedly hiding federal records about research designed to make viruses that were *not* harmful to humans, lethal--like covid-19.

Organizations like Science Magazine and Judicial Watch filed at least eight FOIA requests for records about funding "gain of function research."  But the cunning conspirator Morens ensured they didn't get any such emails--even though we already had them, via friendly sources in the NSA (which has copies of everything).

And again, in case you missed it earlier:  Morens was a senior advisor to Tony Fauci.

So “two weeks to stop the spread,” eh?  Americans were ordered to stay indoors, to not go to funerals or church or weddings.  Everyone ORDERED to wear useless masks.  Ordered to stay six feet apart.  All useless horseshit, used to get Americans accustomed to total control by the Democrat government.

All these draconian rules were ordered by a tiny handful of people, supported by a billion-dollar marketing campaign.  And the face of that campaign was Tony Fauci, supported by Deborah Birx.

*What you never heard about* was a group of top virus researchers who noticed that Covid-19--though *almost* a perfect match for a normally-harmless bat virus--differed by four genes, which had clearly, obviously been inserted in the gene sequence of the spike protein.

The four insertions were perfect matches for genes in the HIV virus, and were in the spike protein to make it bind more tightly to cells in the human airway--specifically "ACE-2 receptors."  The four inserted genes clearly and unequivocally showed the bat virus had been modified to make it lethal to humans.  

In other words, Fauci's top virus experts instantly realized Covid-19 had clearly, obviously NOT evolved naturally.  They knew this just days after the first case was confirmed in the U.S.--by comparing the gene sequences of the closest matching "natural" bat virus with Covid-19.

*We have the email from the lead researcher (Kristian G. Andersen, with Scripps Research), telling Fauci this.*  But just one week after Andersen told Fauci the Chyna virus did NOT evolve by "natural mutation," *Fauci directed Andersen's group to write a technical paper **saying exactly the opposite.* 

Seriously.  Literally.  So just ONE WEEK after Andersen and his group of Fauci grant recipients told Fauci the virus did NOT evolve naturally, he told 'em to write a paper saying the exact opposite.

If you don't understand how utterly corrupt that was, read it again.

Why would Fauci order Andersen et al to write a paper stating exactly the opposite of their real (and obvious) conclusions?  Had Fauci researched the virus's genetic code on his own?  Of course not, since if he had, he would have said so.  If he had information that would support his position, he would have told Andersen.  But he didn't.

Fauci is single-handedly responsible for the lie that the virus *"could not possiblly have been modified in a lab to make it lethal to humans*--when he knew that is exactly what happened, *because he funded the research and surely read the tech papers published by the Wuhan lab.* 

Fauci seems to have arranged to have the "debunking paper" (titled "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2") published in the March 2020 issue of the prestigious journal "Nature Medicine."  The lead author was Kristian Andersen--who you may recall wrote the email telling Fauci the virus was NOT natural.  Wow.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

Fauci "asked" Andersen to write the debunking paper during the first week in February of 2020.  Two weeks after Andersen emailed Fauci that the virus had NOT "evolved naturally," Andersen submitted to Fauci the draft of his group's paper saying the opposite, for Fauci's approval.  As Fauci ordered, the paper claimed Covid-19 had evolved by natural mutation--exactly the opposite of what Andersen had told Fauci just two weeks earlier.

The paper was published in Nature on March 20th, just five weeks after Andersen submitted his draft to Fauci--surely a record short time.  The conclusion: 
 >>"Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.">>

<<But in the very next sentence we have this:
  >>SARS-CoV-2 appears to be optimized for binding to the human receptor ACE2; and the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has a functional polybasic (furin) cleavage site at the S1–S2 boundary through the *insertion of 12 nucleotides.*>>

Wait..."the insertion of 12 nucleotides"??  And all those supposedly evolved totally naturally?

And even goofier: 
  >>"*This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is NOT the product of purposeful manipulation.*>>

How does the insertion of 12 "nucleotides" in exactly the right places become "strong evidence that [it] is NOT the result of] purposeful manipulation??  

The conclusion stated by the authors does not follow.  It's utter horseshit--as Anderson surely knew.  But he and his co-authors decided they needed to obey Fauci, contradicting his and his group's real opinion.  Why?

After Andersen emailed Fauci saying Covid-19 had almost certainly NOT evolved naturally, what research did Andersen and his co-authors, Andrew Rambaut, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward C. Holmes and Robert F. Garry do  that persuaded them to totally reverse their original conclusion?

None.  Literally.  They wrote the paper Fauci wanted because *every one of the authors was getting huge, continuing taxpayer-funded grants from Fauci's NIAID.*  They were surely concerned that if they refused to do as Fauci directed, the grants almost certainly wouldn't continue to be funded. 

But lots of other virologists weren't on the Fauci grant gravy-train, and they wrote letters to journal editors about the vast improbability that the "furin cleavage site"--a site not found in ANY natural bat virus--had just evolved naturally to make the virus more lethal to humans.  (And again, that was just one of FOUR inserted genes.)

Fauci and his allies responded NOT by claiming the site wasn't there (since Andersen's own paper admitted its existence), but by calling anyone who suggested the "furin cleavage site" was inserted instead of evolving naturally "conspiracy theorists." 

Even respected publications like The Lancet wrote articles supporting Fauci’s claim that any differences between the closest matching bat virus and covid-19 had evolved totally naturally. 

What do ya think the odds are of being dealt four pat straight-flushes in the same evening at a poker table in Vegas, eh?  The probability of the closest bat virus "naturally evolving" the four inserted genes is millions of times smaller.

Andersen's paper was also the first mention that the jump to humans could have been due to a Wuhan resident eating an infected bat or pangolin from Wuhan's "wet market" where exotic animals were sold for human food.

Those details made the Narrative sound totally believable, and the Mainstream Media repeated them endlessly.  Virtually everyone who watched network TV heard Fauci and the media talking heads say covid-19 almost certainly jumped to humans because a Wuhan resident ate an infected bat or pangolin.  

It didn't matter that not one American out of a million had ever heard of a pangolin before, because it sounded so exotic that it simply HAD to be true, eh?  Cuz it made perfect sense, eh?  Eat weird animals, get novel diseases, right?

A few people noted that five years *before* covid emerged, the head researcher at the Wuhan lab, Shi Zhengli--dubbed the "bat lady" for her work with bat viruses--had presented a paper at an international conference on viruses, saying her team had successfully inserted a single gene into a bat coronavirus, and that the virus was still able to infect host cells and reproduce.  

This was indeed a breakthrough, and the author of the paper specifically thanked Fauci for supporting her research with a grant from his NIAID.

No one except virologists paid much attention to Shi Zhengli's paper--because this was five years before the Chyna virus started killing millions.  Why would anyone make the connection, eh?

Skeptics noted that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had had lots of lab accidents and was just seven miles from the city's "wet market."  And that it was suspicious that the Institute had been studying and modifying bat coronaviruses--which clearly matched blood samples from patients (except for the four inserted genes).  

Hell of a coincidence, eh?

But the "cartel" of Fauci and the leftist, Trump-hating Mainstream Media had their story and are still sticking with it even after Fauci refused to answer a single question when he was compelled to testify under oath--live and televised.   

The few dissenters were quickly labeled "xenophobic," or "conspiracy theorists."  Everyone who questioned the Narrative was marginalized and intimidated into silence.

Why was Fauci SO determined to ensure that Americans believed the virus evolved naturally--so much so that he ordered his grant recipients to write a paper contradicting what they'd already deduced?  Because he knew he'd funded the Wuhan lab to do the research that modified a harmless coronavirus that made it lethal to millions of people.

One recipient of huge Fauci-directed grants was Dr. Ralph Baric at the U of North Carolina.  One of Baric's research assistants was another PhD named Eric Donaldson.  Here's his CV:  
>> “I'm a research assistant for Dr. Ralph Baric.  I'm funded by the NIAID, Dr. Fauci’s agency, to conduct a study looking at the viruses in bats and studying how viruses cross the species barrier to emerge into new populations. In addition, I’m working with Dr. Baric to resurrect [sic] bat coronaviruses to determine the cross-species transmission potential of a variety of novel coronaviruses identified in bats.”>>

<<This was on-line in 2019, before covid hit.  And thanks to a recording device called the Wayback Machine, everything that WAS on the Net at one time has been saved--or was, until that trove of information was destroyed in a fire in 2028.  Oh wait...

Whoops!  Whoopsie!  "No one evah warned us dat someone could save duh stuff we posted!  An' since we weren't warned, showing ouah old posts is, like, TOTALLY unfair!  We deny we evah sed any of dat stuff!  An' we gon' find a frenly judge who'll ORDER dat yew caint use any of dis in court!  Nope nope nope!  Cuz...reasons!"

Research assistant Donaldson was also looking at how to create vaccines for the bat virus they were trying to modify--again this was in 2019, months before the Chyna virus escaped.  This was the blueprint, the plan--explained by one of Baric's researchers a year before covid was unleashed.

All this information has been available for years.  But understandably, you had no idea where to look for it.  And the Mainstream Media totally refused to ask a *singe question* that would have exposed Fauci's utter bullshit.

This puts the lie to Fauci’s claims that he and his agency did not fund gain-of-function research, which dates back to 2009. 

All the elements of the industry that became the COVID virus, the COVID test, and the COVID vaccine, are all in embryonic form in this CV dating back to 2009, all funded by Fauci's NIAID using your tax dollars.

And now things get even hotter.

Baric and Donaldson were studying "cross-species transmission" of viruses--specifically bat coronaviruses.  What made 'em think a bat coronavirus might make the jump to humans, eh?

“Cross-Species Emergence of Coronaviruses from Bats” is the name of one grant from Fauci, before covid was unleashed.  The resulting research showed how to make a harmless bat virus fatal to humans.  The Wuhan Institute just got there first.

2008: Authors Dr. Eric Donaldson and Dr. Ralph Baric: “Synthetic reconstruction of an infectious bat SARS-like coronavirus."  

So a dozen years before Covid was unleashed, they were looking at the spike protein and how it could be changed.  See, what made covid-19 lethal to humans were changes made to the spike protein to make the virus better able to "bind" to specific cells in the human airway called "ACE-2 receptors." 

Fauci knew for over a decade that Baric and Donaldson were modifying bat coronaviruses to see how they could cross over from animals to humans; and that they had identified the spike protein as the key to lethality in humans.

“Mechanisms of zoonotic severe acute respiratory syndrome” — that means you can’t breathe, your lungs are shutting down, after being infected with a virus that somehow managed to become lethal to humans.  Hell of a coincidence, eh?

“Coronavirus host range expansion in human airway epithelium.”  So they’re experimenting on how animal-based coronaviruses affect cells in the human airway.

Hell of a coincidence, eh?

And here we have coronavirus vaccine development way back in 2005--a full 15 years before the plandemic hit.  So what you’re seeing there is that the virus modification experiments and studies of *vaccines* against exactly this virus were going on exactly at the same time.

You roll out the virus, and you’ve already got the vaccine. They’re the same researchers.

So where is Dr Eric Donaldson now?  Why hasn't he been subpoenaed to testify before congress?

According to LinkedIn, for the last 12 years he's been at the FDA, working on virology.

And would ya look at this!  The FDA reviewed remdesivir--THE treatment pushed by Fauci four times in a single press conference in May of 2020, standing beside Trump and Birx.  Review to get "Emergency Use Authorization" for remdesivir, May 2020 lists the "Clinical Virology Reviewer" reviewer: “Eric F. Donaldson, Ph.D.”

Hell of a coincidence.  And even more amazing that no FBI agents have ever showed up at his house with recorders.

Then there's a *second* FDA remdesivir review, on Sept. 17, 2020.  “Reviewer: Eric F. Donaldson, Ph.D.”

What is Donaldson now doing at the FDA?  Could congress ask him about these things, under oath?  Hahahahaha!  Just kidding!  All Democrats in congress love the power they seized through the plandemic scam, and will never seriously investigate the con artists who unleashed the Chyna virus on the world. 

Pediatric ICU doctor stabbed to death in his home by a man out on "cashless bail"

Another murder for the "We shouldn't have to live like this" file:

Two days ago in Pittsburgh, just after midnight a crazy or drugged-out man broke into the home of an ICU doctor and his family and began stabbing both the doctor and his wife.

After stabbing for minutes, the man ran off.  The ICU doctor died at the hospital, and his wife remains in critical condition. 

Unless you live in Pittsburgh you'll never see a word about this except on the net.  The alphabet networks and Mainstream "newzpapers" never say a word--"local interest only."  Local TV stations would look complicit if they ignored the murder but still refuse to show you a photo of the alleged killer because it's against their policy.  Actually it's against the policy of the Democrat Partei, which they've eagerly adopted.  Same result.  But here ya go:

Murder victim, and alleged murderer Elijah Hemingway

Now for the kicker: the alleged murderer was arrested in July on felony burglary and theft charges--but was immediately released without being required to post bond.  It's what the Left wokies call "cashless bail."  Wait, if the accused isn't posting cash, why call it "bail," eh?

Cuz that would make the absurdity obvious: if everyone called it just "We lets erryone out wifout no bond.  Dey jus' gots t' promise to show up fo' trial," more people would see the stupdity of it for serious crimes.

Leftists: "Neither burglary nor robbery nor theft are serious crimes, deplorable!"

Do we really have to live like this?

Source: Gateway Pundit blog 

x 

In Canada, Muslim man attacks child, caught on video. Female judge acquits

September 19, 2026, Canuckistan--

In Toronto a Muslim "man"--Ahmed Baig--left his home wearing only a towel, which fell off as he chased a family he encountered.  He scooped up the couple's 7-year-old daughter, threw her to the ground, punched and choked her, then ran off.

The entire attack was captured on video.

That was three years ago.  But because Canadian courts are so busy jailing citizens for "hateful comments on social media," they didn't get around to trying the attacker until last week.

He pleaded not guilty, but his attorney didn't deny the prosecution's claim that he committed assault causing bodily harm and assault by choking.  And of course it was on video.

But because it's Canuckistan and the attacker was Muslim, a female judge named Mara Greene ruled the Muzz attacker was NOT guilty of...anything.  Not assault or battery or lewd exposure or battery of a child.  Nothing.  Cuz...woke Canadian "judge."

I'll repeat that because it seems so impossible that your mind might have rejected it the first time: the female judge ruled the Muslim who choked and punched the 7-year-old girl--while nude--was NOT guilty of...anything.

The female judge ruled that he because the Muslim said he'd been "vaping" marijuana, he wasn't guilty of anything at all.  She decided he'd experienced a “psychotic episode,” something like temporary insanity, when he attacked the girl.  She wrote that the attack was a result of a "nonmental disorder automatism.”

A "non-mental disorder automatism," y'say?  As best I can translate that, she's saying he was high on weed.  So, off ya go, good citizen!

The female judge wrote 
>>“He ran into the driveway and picked up a seven-year-old girl. He threw her to the ground, punched her and strangled her. He then abruptly left the driveway, and a short time later was arrested by police. At the time of arrest, he wore only a T-shirt.”>>

<<So the judge admits the crimes, but just waves it all off:  "No problem, valued Muslim immigrant."<<

The judge said Baig didn’t dispute that he attacked the 7-year-old girl, but argued that he should be acquitted of the charges "because his actions were involuntary as he was suffering from a cannabis induced psychosis at the time of the attack.”

She went on to make excuse after excuse for the attacker: “Home alone, Mr. Baig decided to consume cannabis to help with his feelings of anxiety.  He used a form of cannabis recommended by the store, but in vape form. Instead of relieving his anxiety, he felt more anxious.”

We don't have to live like this.

Oh wait, it's Canada, so they DO have to live like this, every day.

Oh wait...we here in the U.S., and citizens of France, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia and all western nations, are suffering under the same plague.  We've been sold out by treasonous, leftist judges and politicians.  If a murderer or rapist or mere strangler is a member of a group favored by the Left, the attacker can now kill, rape or merely attack children at will, and the courts will let him go without so much as a harsh word. 

And it's gonna get worse.  A LOT worse.  The rate of these attacks--and worse--is increasing fast. 

Source. 

https://thepostmillennial.com/judge-acquits-toronto-muslim-man-of-strangling-7-year-old-girl-while-shouting-allah-because-he-was-psychotically-high-when-he-did-it 

A few weeks ago the national debt hit $40 Trillion.

That doesn't even register with most Americans, because you don't have a handle on how big that is.  So consider this:

It took 240 years and five wars for our national debt to reach $20 trillion.  But it only took ten more years to add another $20 trillion.

Seriously, the debt doubled in just ten years.  And it's forecast to increase by another ten Trillion in just 3 years, so in ten years it's almost certain to increase by another $33 Trillion, compared to increasing by a mere $20 trillion in the previous ten years.

Part of the huge increase is due to the skyrocketing cost of the interest we have to pay on the debt.  Most Americans--and most candidates for high office--don't have the faintest idea how much that is.  And if you're a young American, chances are you don't have any idea either.  Turns out interest payments alone are over a Trillion dollars a year.

Until recently we spent way less than a Trillion a year for defense.  Now we have to spend a Trillion a year on...interest payments.

Are you starting to understand compound interest yet?  

Probably not.  But you will.  And of course congress will do absolutely nothing to avert the inevitable, because that requires making hard decisions, which is something the shitheads in congress (and those running for congress) refuse to do.

I could tell you what will happen, but you wouldn't believe it. 

Fauci has an interesting defense!

 

Old news shows the fraud--but no one cares, because "it's in the past"

Another American mother murdered by yet another illegal alien invader

Fairfax county, Virginia is a Democrat-ruled cesspool.  The DA is a corrupt leftist who routinely dismisses charges against illegals who have committed serious crimes, and ignores ICE "detainer" requests, instead releasing illegals back onto the streets to victimize Americans again.

SO...last month in that county a mother of a young daughter was jogging on a wooded trail when a man stabbed her to death.

Of course you never heard about it...and won't, because the suspect is an illegal alien invader, "Alexis Antonio Cedillos-Campos," who entered the U.S. in April of 2024, during the bribem regime.  He was caught by the Border Patrol but was ordered released by the bribem lackeys.

He immediately went to northern Virginia because it's a sanctuary state, and all illegals know the corrupt DA will protect 'em even if they're charged with serious crimes. 

Democrats: "It's really too bad about this woman being murdered, and her young daughter being orphaned, but ouah undocumented neighbors are hard-working, so we can't allow yew deplorables to deport 'em!  
  "And of course we have to consider 'root causes,' right?  Dis po' boy probably just needed money to feed his fambly, an' the American mom didn't hand it over fast enough.  So really she bears much of the blame for being stabbed, eh?"

This shit happens virtually every day in the U.S.  You just never hear about it, because the Lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media doesn't want you to know.

NOW...watch as the corrupt leftist Fairfax county DA slow-walks the prosecution, or pleads it down from murder to "negligent manslaughter" or whatever the Virginia equivalent is.  And at the end of the day this cold-blooded murderer won't serve a day in prison, because the corrupt DA will agree to let him be deported instead of going to trial.  And the Trump administration can't insist that he be tried, because murdering anyone other than a federal official is not against U.S. law, but is left to the states.

Amazing, eh? 

The alleged illegal alien murderer

This will keep happening, forever.  There IS a solution: start execute those convicted.  Of course the Left won't allow that. 

"I am FURIOUS dat we haz t'pay an extra $1.50 per gallon fo' gas, so I'm votin' Dem!"

 

"Would yew like lotsa free stuff, po' exploited young American?"

 

Communism/socialism is SO attractive, eh?  Marx laid out the rationale beautifully:  "Bad Pipo--exploiters, greedy owners, fat-cat capitalists, beez oppressin' all duh po' workin pipo!"  

It made perfect sense, because almost every working person has felt put upon at one time or another by the boss or owner, eh?  Of course.  It's irritating as hell to have to do X or risk being fired, eh?  Of course in a free market you can always quit and get another job where your faaabulous skill-set is valued, right?

But at heart, communism/socialism is an appeal to peoples' desire for "free shit:"  You don't have to be lazy, stupid or corrupt to wanna be paid LOTS of money for nothing.  It's like being king, or a child of rich parents.  I get it.  We all get it.

Problem is, if lotsa pipo demand to get free shit without working, who's gonna produce all that free stuff being demanded by the commies, eh?  

Think about that for a minute.   

Democrats/socialists: "Why I care 'bout dat?  Dat not my problem!  Gummint will order some pipo to produce whatevah I want!"

Startin' to see the flaw in Marx's faaaaabulous theory yet?

If you're a typical U.S. college student, you don't.  You would have spotted the flaw, but your professors conned you into NOT spotting it--because they were either socialists or communists. 

Democrat parents: "NOOooo!  Dat not possible!  My kid goes to a $50,000-a-year Ivy League skool!  How could an Ivy League skool hire communist professors?  It don't make no sense!"

Well it might not to stupid Democrat parents, but it's totally deliberate.  You don't believe it but most elite universities are totally run by communists or socialists.  They just don't boast about it. 

SO...Marx and Engels laid out a seductive story: "Yew iz all bein' exploited by duh greedy owners!  Eeeebil capitalists!"  And with that setup, at least 40% of people totally agree.

And the result is...polls show 60% of students at coastal universities say they prefer socialism (communism by another name) over capitalism (free markets).

Seein' the future yet? 

Newsom says he supports the constituents who elected him

 

Poll shows record number of Americans favor socialism. Seriously

A new Gallup poll shows that a record high 43% of Americans now have a favorable view of socialism.   It's the highest support for socialism since Gallup started asking the question.

This is a huge warning sign, because Democrat candidates see this result and quickly begin supporting more socialist policies--because failing to do so costs 'em socialist votes.  And as more DSA candidates win, all Democrat politicians--both candidates and incumbents--will quickly move to the left, since the only thing that matters to candidates and virtually all incumbent politicians is being re-elected, forever.

So...the 43% who favor socialism will vote Dem, and if we assume another 15% or so of Dems who don't favor socialism will still vote for Dems, that's way over half.  So barring a last-minute miracle I predict the Dems will flip 10 GOP seats in the House, to win a five-seat majority, and will win control of the senate 51-49.  

Obviously this means congress won't pass ANY pro-America bills for the last two years of Trump's term.  Instead they'll continue to block things like the "SAVE Act" that would reduce election fraud, and block deportations and efforts to prosecute Medicare and Medicaid fraud.  Wow.  And as the Dems always do, they'll slip devastating policies into "must-pass" laws.

And the Media will celebrate wildly.

Source: Gallup

https://news.gallup.com/poll/714653/socialism-positive-rating-tops-first-time.aspx 

For the first time in 112 years, no Atlantic hurricanes this late in hurricane season

For 20 years Warmies have been wailing that global warming would cause more and stronger  hurricanes.  So whenever a hurricane hit the U.S, the Lying Mainstream Media bleated dat dis was absolute proof dat duh Warmies wuz right, so we needed to ban gas-powered cars, and air conditioning, an' diesel trains, an' hot water!

But so far this hurricane season, for the first time in over a century the U.S. has had NO hurricanes this far into the season.

For years "warmies" have been screaming that because Americans drive big SUVs and heat their homes, the CO2 produced wuz causin' duh Erf to get way too warm--as in, scary, fatal warming.  Worse yet, they claimed duh rate of increase wuz gonna get faster an' faster--a "tipping point."  
 
And as duh Erf got warmer every year, we'd be getting LOTS more hurricanes, cuz hotter oceans.  And way more of 'em would be monster "Cat-5" storms, cuz of all that heat energy, eh? 

So since the Warmies knew the problem was CO2, produced by Americans, then allegedly to "save all life on Erf" the magic Negro president, Obozo--a man the Media often declared wuz duh smaahtest prezzy EVAH--had his EPA declare CO2 a "dangerous pollutant."  By law, that declaration gave the duh gummint the authority to do the kind of "emergency rulemaking" usually reserved for deadly plandemics like Covid.

An' sure enuf, duh EPA (with Obozo's approval) ORDERED all American electrical utilities to reduce the amount of CO2 their coal-fired powerplants emitted.  See how easy dat is, comrade?  Duh beeg boss jus' pick up his pen an' order it!  Who knew savin' duh Erf wuz so easy, eh?

One tiny problem: burning any fuel unavoidably produces a fixed amount of CO2.  So the only way to obey the ORDER was to either stop using coal to make electricity, or else to "capture" CO2 and bury it.  That was so expensive that it would turn all coal plants into money losers.  But if the utilities refused to comply, they'd be sued into bankruptcy!

(It's worth noting here that while campaigning for his first term, Obozo promised a group of donors in California that he would bankrupt coal-fired powerplants.)

The only choice left for utilities was to close the plants.  And at last count utilities had closed 187 coal-fired powerplants.

Problem is, coal was by far the lowest-cost way to make electricity.  So closing 187 coal-fired powerplants raised the price of electricity a lot.  And if you live in the northeast, you may have noticed your electric bill has doubled since Obozo's decree.  In California (no coal-fired power) electricity costs double the national average.

Oh, y'say ya never noticed?  But you sure as hell noticed paying an extra $1.50 a gallon for gasoline, eh?  Let's compare: The average driver buys about 600 gallons of gas a year, so the extra $1.50 a gallon would cost $900 a year.  But if you live in the northeast, and saw your electric bill jump from $250 a month to $500 a month, that costs ya an extra $3,000 a year.  

The Democrat-fellating Media has screamed endlessly about the price of gas, but has been pretty quiet about electricity--since that increase is due to Obozo's decree.  So voters blame Trump, not Obozo or bribem.  Hmmm...   

Mainstream Media: "Don't worry, Dem buddies, we got ya covered: we'll blame Trump for higher electricity bills!  Voters have no idea what caused it, so they'll believe us!  Instead we'll scream about gasoline prices due to Trump starting a war with Iran.  Voters can't do maff, so dey think higher gasoline prices cost 'em way mo' den higher electric bills!  Problem solved!"  

So back to Globull Worming and hurricanes:  You'd think "no hurricanes this season for the first time in 112 years" would be fabulous news, eh?  Should make all the newspapers and evening propaganda broadcasts, eh?

Guess again: the mainstream Media is ignoring it.   And you may well wonder why.

Answer: the Democrats have been all-in on the Global Warming hoax (now renamed "climate change") since about 1995, so they can't allow voters to see ANY evidence that contradicts the screams and wails of the warmies.

See, if no hurricanes this season--for the first time in 112 years--that would strike most rational people as showing that the warmie theory is wrong, eh?  And if CO2 was NOT increasing the global temp by an unusual amount, people might realize that Obozo having his EPA declare CO2 a "dangerous pollutant," forcing utilities to shut down the lowest-cost way to make electricity, made the average electric bill double needlessly.

But don't worry, Democrats!  There's a solution that will keep voters from realizing the Democrats and Warmies have screwed 'em for decades: We in the Media just won't report the great news about no hurricanes this season!  SEE?

And of course the season has another five weeks to go, so that's enough time for one or two to form.  And hoo boy!  Will the Media ever SCREAM that "global warming is causing all doze hurricanes!" 

No matter what happens, the Media won't allow the Dem Narrative to be damaged.  

Muslims in congress introduced resolution calling for reparations to Muslims for 9/11

In the last general election (2024) a Muslim "activist" named Lateefah Simon was elected as the first Muslim congress-creep from California, becoming the 4th Muzz in congress.  All Democrats, of course. 

Less than a year later, on the anniversary of the Islamic terrorist attacks of September 11, Simon  joined the three other Muslim reps in congress-- Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Andre Carson--in sponsoring a resolution calling for...*reparations to Muslims for 9/11.*

Seriously.

You may be curious about that, since if you were over 16 or so on 9/11/2001 you may recall that 19  Muslim terrorists hijacked four loaded jet airliners and flew 'em into both of the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.  (After passengers on the 4th were hijacked, and learned about the other 3 suicide crashes, and tried to re-take control, the Muzz flew their plane into the ground, killing everyone.)

So why would the four Muzz congress-creeps introduce their outrageous resolution calling for reparations to Muslims *specifically for 9/11?*

Glad you asked.

The resolution bleated that “After September 11, 2001, Muslims experienced hate and were targeted by the government on account of their faith, race, national origin and immigration status,” and demanded “various forms of relief to support those affected.”

The resolution demanded that America acknowledge the “climate of hate” suffered by Muslims, create a commission to work with Islamist groups to *dismantle national security, allocate funds to Islamist groups, create “alternatives to law enforcement” to work in Muslim communities and use the National Institutes of Health to study the “impact of hate” on the health of Muslims.*

Seriously.

If these four shit-heads were real Americans, instead of Americans in name only, they would have helped commemorate the anniversary of the attacks by condeming them.  But of course they did exactly the opposite: "WEeee iz duh victims of duh 'events' of 2001!  So yew mus' pay US fo' victimizin' US!!"

Fuck you, Muslim shit-heads.  Even though you're members of congress, you're clearly not real Americans.  You're invaders, who applauded the attacks of 9/11.  You seem to have no desire to be real Americans, so you can't possibly be surprised if *real Americans* see you and your co-thugs as invaders bent on taking over our nation. 

For the record: Lateefah Simon (who has bragged about being the first Muslim congresswoman from California) was endorsed by another moronic, pandering Democrat: the charmless socialist governor of California, Gavin Newsom--who wants to be president.

The insulting premise of the resolution--that Muslims had been harmed after 9/11, and thus should be paid reparations, was based on a series of lies. The Muslim reparations resolution claimed that the fact that Waqar Hasan in Dallas, Texas, and Adel Karas in San Gabriel, California, were killed on September 15, 2001, was evidence of an American campaign of revenge against Muslims for the attack four days earlier.

Adel Karas and Waqar Hasan were killed in attacks by criminals on stores.  And Karas was a Christian.

Muslims insisted that the Karas murder was Islamophobic because his store was a block away from a mosque.  In reality Karas was a Coptic Christian who had fled Egypt because of the Muslim persecution of Christians.  Homicide detectives believed Karas was targeted in an extortion attempt and identified the killers as Latino gang members who had previously threatened him.  Despite that, the murdered Christian store owner’s name continues to be falsely listed as evidence of an American “climate of hate” after September 11.

Source.

https://www.danielgreenfield.org/p/california-gets-2-muslim-congresswomen 

"Y'know all those things you thought Democrats did before? Nope."

 

See, you just think we threw the southern border wide open!  You just think we supported the president (of undetermined political party) using taxpayer dollars to fly illegal immigrants from border towns to cities far from the border at 3 a.m!  Nope.  No way.

You stupid deplorables really think we forced medicaid funds to be used to pay for sex change operations for 15-year-olds?  Ridiculous!  Absurd!  All in your mind!

Some of y'all even think an unnamed president--who yew claim was a Democrat--gave Putin quiet permission to invade Ukraine, by saying "As long as it's only a small incursion."  Dat jus' a ugly rumor!  No Dem would EVAH do dat!

Some of y'all even think a Democrat prezzy gave billions to California to build some sort of train that's now three times over budget.  Nonsense!  We wud NEVAH do such a silly thing!  Cuz ouah partei iz VERY careful wif' tax dollars!

Some of y'all have been spreading outrageous rumors that Dems had something to do wif' immigrants defrauding Medicare and Medicaid out of hundreds of millions of dollars with fraudulent daycare centers, or autism treatment centers, or covid payroll reimbursement.  Yew iz jus' xenophobes!  Foreigners would NEVAH try to defraud the country that welcomed 'em and gave 'em food, housing, free medical care, free college and...  Wait, we din' doo dat either!

Some of y'all even think ouah partei supports election fraud, by allowing pipo to vote without any identification at all, let alone photo ID.  Dat jus' a "right-wing conspiracy story"!  We iz all about honest elections.  We keep tellin' y'all dat dere ain't no vote fraud!

Some of y'all even think a dozen states run by Democrats have passed laws allowint the State to take kids away from parents if a parent doesn't support their child "transitioning."  This is just a rumor.  We checked with every Dem governor and they all swore they nevah signed any such law!

In conclusion:  ALL the things the right-wing smear machine has said we did, we nevah did!  It's all lies!  If yew think any of it is real, your memory is faulty an' yew need to get medical help!  Seriously!

So in November you can all vote Dem wifout a fear in the world. 

Odds and ends from all over

If you've never lived in a coastal town, your mental model of immigration is air travel, in which all international arrivals are processed thru government facilities to ensure travelers are either U.S. citizens or have visas.

But most coastal towns have harbors, and any boat can enter and dock.  Ahh.

A few days ago a boat carrying a lot of "pipo" of unknown origin docked at elegant Newport Harbor in California--cuz there's no way to stop that.  And the moment the boat docked, scores of pipo on-board jumped off and vanished among the surrounding million-dollar mansions.

They do this because there's no significant punishment for doing it.  The illegals have a good chance of vanishing into the immigrant population, never to be found or deported.  Cool, eh?

This won't stop unless the government starts getting really tough--not just deporting, not just jail time.  But of course leftist judges will nevah allow dat, eh?  So it will continue until the end of America as you've known it.

For the n-th time: In nature, what happens to animals who refuse to learn?  (Hint: it's not good.)

Meanwhile, what the leftist/Democrat-fellating Media describe as “spontaneous” anti-ICE protests in Austin are reportedly being organized by a coordinated network of far-left socialist and communist groups, including the Democratic Socialists of America.  The protests are intended to inflame voters against Trump.  And it's working.  Socialists are about to take over Texas--both the senate seat and the governorship.  How do ya think that's gonna work out, eh?

In other news, a nurse in Ceuta said after the invasion by roughly 30,000 African "migrants," her emergency room is treating between one and three victims of rape by "migrant" invaders every day.  Yet prosecutors say there are far fewer rapes.  Who d'ya think 's lying, eh?  Why would "prosecutors" try to deny the truth, eh?  Cuz they're part of the leftist machine that wants this.  Of course the nurse could be imagining it, right?  Or lying.  Sure.

Leftists: "Wuh...wuh...duh wimmens who iz goin' to duh emergency room are lying!  See, dey make up rape stories cuz dey wants duh attenshen!  Yep yep yep!"

One more time: In nature, what happens to animals that either can't learn, or refuse to?

Most Democrats are dumb as dog-shit:  you're losing your  societies to invaders and you don't even realize it.  Most conservatives aren't much better.

Democrat socialist senator Mark Kelly says AI companies should have a special tax

Democrat senator Mark Kelly (Arizona) says he’s introducing a bill ordering AI companies to pay unspecified billions to a "government-managed fund" to "support workers displaced by AI."

Washington Post, 1911--Today Democrat socialist senator Foghorn Kelly noted that the sale of the awful horseless new "motor-cars" threatens to displace thousands of workers who build carriages, make harnesses and buggy whips.  
   Since senator Kelly is a man of the people, always looking out for the working man, he said he's introducing a bill that will require makers of these newfangled "motor-cars" to pay a portion of their revenue to a government-run fund that will "support workers displaced by the motor-car." 
   When asked to define "a portion of their revenue" the senator was coy:  "Not too much, of course.  Probably just five percent.  But it might possibly increase a bit if the government commission running the program finds that more workers have been displaced than first thought."
   "For example, if Americans buy fewer horses, that would reduce the sale of oats, so some farmers would surely be 'adversely impacted.'  And of course if fewer horses are sold, that would obviously impact people who breed and sell horses."
   "In fact, no one can possibly know all the potential impacts of unleashing this scary new technology on ouah great horse-loving nation!  So that's why the bill doesn't limit the tax...er, 'worker-impact fund' rate."
   When asked how an unlimited tax could possibly be constitutional, Kelly replied "Don't be dense, deplorable.  We in congress are reeeally smaht, and know what's best, so we'd nevah set the tax rate too high.  
  "For example, the senate is now considering a tiny one-percent federal tax on all income, but a few right-wing extremists are screaming that if such a bill becomes law, the tax rate could eventually double, or even soar to five or even ten percent!
   "What nonsense!  It's just a right-wing scare story to try to keep this excellent bill from passing!  Next thing you know they'll be screaming that the tax rate could be even more absurd, like 30% of all income!  It's nonsense--we're far smahtah den dat!"

For young Americans--and older ones who don't know history (spoiler: not one American in 10,000 knows fuck-all about history), the bill ordering Americans to pay a federal tax on most income became law in 1913.  It ordered earners to pay just one percent, and only on incomes above what today would be the equivalent of $101,000 per year.  So low earners didn't revolt, eh?
   By 1944 the top tax rate on high earners had jumped to 94%, and stayed above 90% from 1944 through 1963, thus following the Iron Law of Taxes which says once you allow corruptocrats to pass any tax, they keep raising the rate.

For reference, when the tax law was passed, the maximum tax rate on the highest incomes was 7 percent, and only applied to incomes over the equivalent of $15 million today.  But the tax rate rose to 94%, and the income when that rate kicked in kept dropping.  Hmmm...

Most of you aren't stupid, just uninformed.  Some of us thought the internet might help that...but it hasn't.  And in ten years or less, Democrats will pass a law requiring a government license to post any fact or political opinion on the Net, so that once-promising avenue for information will go dark.

Mark Kelly is a Democrat, and the Democrat-fellating Media totally loves every word out of his mouth.  He's also a socialist moron. 

The FDA and CDC knew the "vaccine" was harming thousands, but lied about it

And when a top-quality researcher showed 'em how they were "missing" the signal, the agencies told her to shut up.

Obviously by now Covid is almost ancient history, so why should you care about this, eh?

Because something just like this will happen again.  Guaranteed.  Once the corruptocrats find something that works, they don't stop using it until everyone revolts.  SO...

What made a harmless-to-humans bat virus lethal to humans (though far less than one percent of those who got the Chyna virus died from it) was a crucial change in the genetic code of the part of the virus that locks the virus onto one specific cell in the human airway.

That crucial locking mechanism was the "spike protein."  And by chance, just two days after the first case of duh Chyna virus was confirmed in the U.S, I stumbled on the gene sequence of that  crucial "spike," sequenced by Indian researchers in December of 2019 from a blood sample smuggled across the border with China.

That gene sequence clearly, unequivocally proved the virus had been modified in a lab.

So for the next four years I watched, astonished, as every agency in the bribem regime brazenly lied: Fauci was the lead liar, repeatedly claiming the virus could not possibly have been modified in a lab, but instead "evolved naturally" to make it lethal to a tiny fraction of the people who got it.

It was all brazen horseshit, and all officials with a tech background had to have known it.  The ones who knew the truth and told their supervisors were told to keep quiet.  And now we see yet another instance of this deliberate suppression of the truth--this one involving the "vaccine adverse effects reporting system"--VAERS.

That system was supposed to log any "adverse effects" following a vaccination.  If the effects were both serious and several times the rate seen in unvaccinated people, that would be grounds for pulling that vaccine off the market.

It was a noble idea but had two fatal flaws.  The first was that very few people who experienced adverse effects after taking the "clot shot" knew about VAERS, and that they could report the adverse effect themselves. 

The second was that while all doctors knew about the system, reporting an adverse effect was totally voluntary.  So since reporting an adverse effect wasn't mandatory, and would increase "vaccine hesitancy," and since most doctors believed the fatality rate for Covid was frighteningly high, they wanted everyone to take the jab, eh?  So they didn't want to report adverse effects.  In any case investigators found many doctors didn't report.

So the voluntary reporting system depended on doctors being unbiased.  And most were totally biased because Fauci and "experts" (shills) in the FDA, CDC and NIH had convinced 'em the Chyna virus was way deadly--far deadlier than the common flu--even though that wasn't true.  

("IFR" is the percentage of people who are infected by a pathogen and die from it.  Since many cases are mild or totally asymptomatic, the incidence is estimated from people who tested positive but had no symptoms.  Here are the median pre-vaccination IFRs by age for Covid: 
0–19: ~0.0003% (about 1 in 330,000)
20–29: ~0.002% (about 1 in 50,000)
30–39: ~0.011% (about 1 in 9,000)
40–49: ~0.035% (about 1 in 2,800)
50–59: ~0.123% (about 1 in 800)
60–69: ~0.506% (about 1 in 200)
  70+: Rises steeply past 5% to over 15% for older groups 

By stark contrast, the IFR for seasonal flu is between 0.05% to 0.1%  As you see, for people under 50 the IFR is far lower for Covid than for the flu.  But you never heard a single word about that, eh?)

So...the mass vaccination of Americans started on December 14th, 2020.  Immediately, reports started coming in about myocarditis, pericarditis and "thrombosis" (clots) in people who'd taken the clot shot.  All three conditions are normally very rare.

But Fauci, the FDA and CDC all insisted that there was no "signal" from the reports.  This was medical jargon for "NO statistically significant increase of ANY adverse effects from the jab.

The latest discovery is yet another confirmation of what we've known all along: that not only was the "no signal" claim a brazen lie, but also that the top members of the bribem regime KNEW it was horseshit, yet knowingly parroted the lie to get Americans to take the ineffective, unsafe jab (since taking the jab didn't prevent people from getting or spreading the virus).  This latest comes from an FDA medical officer and statistics expert named Ana Szarfman.

In late February of 2021--just ten weeks after the first vaccinations--CDC and FDA officials on a "vaccine safety committee supposedly "received notice" of a large number of VAERS reports of myocarditis and pericarditis.  This alone ("received notice") is a careful, deliberate mislead, since both organizations have direct access to all VAERS data, so they knew all along.  They want you to think they had no idea.

Both conditions aren't trivial: In Israel, two out of 77 vaccinated people with those conditions died.

Szarfman showed her bosses at the FDA why their statistical analysis--the one they used to claim there was NO "signal"--was utterly wrong. 

The FDA committee shrugged.

The next week, the committee heard the Pentagon's "Defense Health Agency" report a "cluster of cases" of myocarditis among members of the military who'd taken the jab.

The committee just shrugged.  "We not seein' no signal," eh?

You might think that if you have a so-called "vaccine" that doesn't work, and kills some of the people who take it, the FDA would rescind its crucial "Emergency Use Authorization" that was legally required to allow the barely-tested "vaccine" to be given to 280 million Americans, eh?

By May of 2021, hundreds of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis after covid vaccinations had been reported to VAERS, so the CDC began alerting healthcare professionals.  But the agency didn't say the "adverse effects" were caused by the "vaccine," alerted physicians through a "clinical considerations" web posting.  No urgency there, eh?  Cuz "no signal!"

In June of 2021, in a public presentation the deputy director of CDC's Immunization Safety Office (Tom Shimabukuro) admitted that for young males (age 12-24), VAERS showed between 29 and 347 times more myocarditis and pericarditis reports than the for unvaxxed. 

Can't have that, eh?  So to avoid "vaccine hesitancy," in a public statement the same day the CDC called myocarditis an "extremely rare side effect."  Well yes, but the fact that it was seen "up to 347 times more often" in males who got the jab sound like one hellofa signal, eh? 

Enter Peter Marks, director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.  Marks was the agency's top covid vaccine regulator, and a total pro-vax shill.  He emailed CDC director Rochelle Walensky, claiming the data didn't reveal any "safety signal" in the data.  So despite the far higher incidence of potentially lethal myocarditis and pericarditis, Marks adamantly refused to change the FDA's "no signal" ruling.  FDA officials didn't warn either doctors or the public that Ana Szarfman had found "safety signals" the FDA had missed. 

When Szarfman continued to press the matter she was told--diplomatically--to shut up.  On May 7th, 2021 the "associate director for medical policy for the FDA's Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology," Craig Zinderman, emailed Szarfman:

"Thank you again for talking with us back in March about your work exploring new data mining approaches.  We are writing to kindly ask you to please hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses using covid-19 vaccine AE [adverse event] data."

The email didn't contain a single word of substantive critique ("We believe your analysis is flawed because...")  Just told her "please hold off."

For anyone with experience in government bureau-babble that's a clear order: 'If you persist, your career will be over.'

Challenging Szarfman's work by making a mathematical or scientific argument would be totally reasonable.  But the email didn't say the FDA bosses thought Ana's work was flawed.  Clearly "the fix was in:"  The bribem regime was about to order almost every American to take the jab, and the regime's lackeys knew they were not to allow any contrary evidence to reach the public.

How much more evidence will it take for most Americans to realize they were conned?  Scammed.  The regime forced you to get your children jabbed, even though the risk from duh Chyna virus for people under 19 was one in 330,000.

Pause for a moment:  today's college students weren't born on 9/11/2001, so obviously have no way to know about it unless they're taught.  And of course the corrupt public schools refuse to teach anything true.  So they'll never know.

By the same token, few Americans today know how utterly the Democrat sons of whores conned your parents, and were able to ORDER lockdowns for a virus only half as lethal as the flu.

I'll try to keep telling you and your kids about this ghastly death sentence/con-job as long as I live.

It's clear that Democrats hate Trump, but if you trust a Democrat with power again, you deserve every bit of what you're gonna get.  After all, it won 'em an election in November of 2020.

The "Great Replacement" method of conquest

About fifty years ago the communist party realized they could destroy all "western" (liberal) nations without firing a shot.  That notion may strike most Americans as too convoluted to be real, which is one way the Left gets otherwise smart people to refuse to believe it's real.

Does the line below ring any bells? 

"Yew silly deplorable conservative!  How can yew be dumb enough to believe such a crazy right-wing scare-theory?"

Let me start with the experience of Europe, because if I start with the U.S. you'll simply refuse to believe it:  For the last 15 years, leftist parties in most European nations have gotten their governments to import millions of illiterate, unskilled Muslims.  In some nations the argument was "Deez pipo iz po' 'refugees,' so compassion demands that we welcome them into ouah nation, where dey will become guuud citizens!  Cuz dey iz po' refugees!  SEE?"

In Germany the government of former rising star of the East German communist party, Angela Merkel, cunningly claimed Germany needed foreign workers to come to Germany to keep the economy running, since native Germans weren't having enough kids to keep jobs filled.

It was a brilliant argument because it was superficially plausible, and because the leftist Media embraced it without a single critical word.  So it worked:  German voters kept re-electing the partei led by the treasonous former communist Merkel, keeping her in power for a record-long time.  And under her partei's rule Germany imported millions of Muslims.  Most eventually became citizens--and they ALL vote for the left, since the Left promises more free shit.

And as anyone could have predicted, the Left has won all elections since then (until this year when the country's only conservative party--"AfD"--won in one German state).

The Left used both arguments--welcoming "refugees," and needing foreign worker--in all other European nations.  So for example in once-peaceful Sweden, the conservative party was conned into allowing unlimited Muslim immigration.  Gave 'em voting rights even if they weren't citizens, cuz..."If dey live here dey shud be able to vote, even if dey not citizens!!"

Sound familiar?  Damn straight it does.  That's been the argument by the U.S. Democrat Partei for decades.  

So in Sweden, the conservatives were guilted into giving invaders the vote--and predictably, the invaders all voted for leftist parties.  So now, after the election a week ago, Leftists will form a left-ruled government, which will keep the borders wide open, forever.

Can anyone predict the result?  Sure: Sweden, like Germany, France, Belgium and the Netherlands, will be leftist essentially forever.  In all EU countries all types of crime are increasing, almost all by "immigrants."  Native Swedes can no longer walk safely after dark in several Swedish cities.

Germany's far-left "interior minister" bleats that "asylum-seekers" must be given voting rights if they've been in Germany for just six months.  Think that's a good idea?  Do they have a sense of what's best for Germany after six months?  Not only no, but hell no.

You'd think the left-wing Media would complain about this.  Nope, not a single word--because the entire Mainstream Media is leftist, so they totally support anything the Left wants.  Hmmm...

Now follow me here, cuz this is the future:

If you asked hard-working blue-collar Americans if they want our government to invite millions of foreigners into the country to replace them, most would say hell no.  So instead the Media takes a far different approach, changing the question to "Do you believe America should have compassion for po' refugees, an' invite 'em to enter the U.S.  And don't fret about what that will do to our elections, cuz dey aren't citizens and know they can't vote, since dat not legal."

"See, dat why we don't need that silly photo ID for voters act, cuz non-citizens know dey not allowed to vote!  So all the "SAVE Act" would do iz suppress minority votes!  Yep yep yep!  An' yew don'  wanna suppress minority votes, right?"

Wake the hell up: Just like the populations of all European nations, you're being conned by the Left and their Media allies into going along with surrendering control of what was once your country.  

You'd think at least a few Media shills would see where it's going and would switch sides, eh?  But not one does, because they rationalize that it isn't happening: "Surely all pipo love freedom, so the immigrants now enjoying the freedom we have will nevah give it up and support Sharia law or any of the dozens of Democrat schemes to gain more power and control (packing the Supreme Court, abolishing the Electoral College, making DC and Puerto Rico states, having congress appoint the president, ramming through "free" college for all, "free" medicare for all, "free" child day-care, free drugs for junkies, and on and on.)  

It's already working: the first Amendment of the U.S. Constitution says we have "freedom of speech," so Americans believe it.  But in fact, in Dem-ruled cities the Left has already nullified that, by staging violent riots whenever a conservative is invited to speak at an event.  Leftist college "adminishits" do absolutely nothing to prevent the Left from shutting down conservative speech, and in fact actually order the event shut down "to preserve peace."

If you don't believe that it's because you get all your newz from the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media.  It's already happened several times at Cal-Berkeley.  The Media just didn't want you to know.  So you never heard about any of it.

Leftist nuts try to assassinate Trump, and the Media yawns.  A leftist tranny-lover did assassinate Charlie Kirk, and since that was too big to ignore, the Mainstream Media did report it, but without a word of condemnation.  They essentially shrugged that Kirk was a "right-wing extremist" and a raaaacist, so....  

And on the one-year anniversary of that murder a leftist "female" at that same college taunted conservatives with a cake saying "Happy Kirkaversary."  Someone took a pic, and the university adminishits were on the verge of expelling NOT the student who celebrated Kirk's assassination, but the student who took the pic!

If you were an adult twenty years ago, you never imagined these things happening.  But slowly--so slowly that you didn't even notice--the Left has taken over all universities.  Not just on the socialist coasts but even in flyover states, like "Utah Valley university." 

So now the U.S. has Muzz-ruled cities, Muzz congresswhores, Muzz mayors, and the Media loves 'em.  Mamdani, Chitcongo's Brandon Johnson and L.A's ghastly Karen Bass are all unabashed communists, and you'd think the Media would have a few skeptical words about that...but nope, not a single critical word.

Michigan is about to elect the nation's first Muzz senator--Abdul El-Sayed.  The Left is delighted.

On January 17th of this year a female Democrat/socialist piece of shit named Abigail Spanberger took office as governor of Virginia. On July 30th, without a single word of notice to voters, Spanberger cancelled a policy of the prior conservative governor that biological males would no longer be allowed to compete against females in sports. 

Spanberger's ordeer was just revealed two days ago--still without any public announcement. Some private citizen just stumbled on the cancellation on one of the state's websites.

Mainstream Media: "Why yew so upset, deplorable?  Yew voted fo' ouah faaaabulous Abi and all her wonderful Dem/socialist/"progressive" policies.  SEE??  So yew must have wanted this too.  So sit down and shut up!"  

How many of you heard about that, eh?  You didn't.  And that was intentional.  The Democrats know a huge majority of voters believe men should not compete against girls in sports, so announcing that the previous policy was now void would lose the Democrat partei votes, eh?  So they did it quietly, without a word of public notice.

Clever, eh?  One almost thinks "cunning."  Oh yes.

But don't worry, deplorables: your kids won't have any recollection of how the U.S. was before the Left took over, so they won't miss it. 

If the woman who strangled her 3 kids had looked like Sydney Sweeny...

Someone else came up with this, but from what I've seen it seems pretty accurate:

"If Lindsay Clancy looked like Sydney Sweeny, all the Angry White Female Urban Liberals would have voted for the death penalty." 

 

You know it's true. 

CBS deliberately misleads readers/viewers, example # infinity

Watch how deftly the communist sons of whores at CBS "Newz" (lies) write a cunning story to totally mislead readers.  Here's what CBS wrote:

 

The clear implication: "Duh eeeebil Orange Hitler's Gestapo shoulda deported dis po' boy to hiz home country--where he'd be right at home, eh?  But instead, being the cruel Nazis they are, Trump's Gestapo deported him to Africa, to a place he'd never been, and didn't know a single soul!  SEE, voters?  Orange Hitler is just totally mean and cruel!"

What Trump-hating, Democrat-fellating CBS refused to tell ya was that the illegal alien was from Venezuela, and stood in front of an immigration judge and said he did NOT want be sent back to that nation.  The judge granted his request.  Big difference, eh?

This is one of the ways propaganda works: the propagandists tell just part of the story, enabling readers or viewers to draw the wrong conclusion.  So later they can say "What we wrote or broadcast was absolutely true!"  Yes, but deliberately misleading.

Virtually everything political, or bearing on world events, that the left-wing Media prints or broadcasts is slanted like this.

"We hated bribem like you hate Trump...but for a totally different reason"

 

Actually, writing "because You hate America" may be a bit too harsh:  Cuz surely most Democrats don't hate America.  Okay, it's true that they 

• support open borders
• block deportation of illegal aliens who rape and murderer Americans
• support giving hundreds of millions to NGOs to support gay pride parades in Sri Lanka
• support releasing known murderers back onto U.S. streets without requiring bail
• support people who defraud billions from government programs
• cheer when conservative figures like Charlie Kirk are assassinated
• cheered the psycho who almost killed Trump at Butler even as the shooter killed an innocent spectator;
• support candidates who openly support socialism
• support communist mayors like Mamdani and Chitcongo's Brandon Johnson;
• openly support sex-change operations on kids under 16;
• openly support de-funding both the police and military;
• support EVERY waste of taxpayer money, whether stolen by NGOs or spent on insane boondoggles like Gavin Newsom's "high-speed rail to nowhere;"
• support giving free drug works to druggies--not just free needles, but also crack pipes;
• vote to remove "shot spotter" systems that quickly pinpoint gunshots, "cuz doze systems record mo' shots in neighborhoods of pipo of color!";
• support disarming law-abiding citizens with gun confiscation, and outrageous taxes on ammunition, ignoring that thugs will just steal guns at will;
• support school counselors secretly urging 15-year-old students to "transition" without informing the kid's parents;
• support laws and mere "rules" allowing "child 'protective' services" to remove a child from the home if either parent refuses to support the kid changing genders;

Wow, maybe "because You (Democrats) hate America is true after all. 

Anyone see a pattern here?

Anyone see a pattern in the pics below? 

 

All Democrats, leftists, ugly and angry.  This is the face of the Democrat party--and the hoot is that half of Americans actually vote for these monsters. 

Democrat/leftist school board of Fairfax county issues orders to teachers about 9/11

Yesterday I posted a long piece on how American leftists and Democrats are bowing to Islam. They want that because it weakens Trump, even though it will ensure an eventual surrender to Islam.  Bizarre, eh?  Below is a specific example that proves the point.

The pic below is from a six-page "instructional guide" given to every teacher in the county's public schools.  For those who don't speak school-board-bullshit, "instructional guide" means orders from the communist/Muslim sons of whores who run the public schools of Fairfax county.  Deviating from it is a career-ending move. 

College students today weren't born in 2001, so have no direct knowledge of the suicide attacks in which Muslim hijackers flew three hijacked jet airliners into both Twin Towers and the Pentagon.  A fourth jet may have been headed for either the White House or the Capitol.  So what do the commies of Fairfax county say about that attack, eh?

"Many families of military personnel and first responders experienced loss and hardship."

"Hardship," eh?  Is that what you sons of whores are calling "being killed" now?  

The entire purpose of the school board's orders was to ensure that no teacher would tell students the truth about the attacks, lest a few American students learn that every one of the hijackers was Muslim.  Cuz if students knew that, they might get the silly notion that hijacking four loaded airliners and flying the planes into the skyscrapers was an attack by (shhhh!) Islam on the U.S, since it was done entirely by Muslims. 

Whoa!  Can't have that, right? 

The "guide" does make dozens of references to Islam and Muslims--but always in the context of ensuring there's no "anti-Muslim racism," "anti-Middle Eastern" or "Islamophobic rhetoric." It includes a bulleted list of "critical considerations" to ensure the 25th anniversary of the attack avoids any anti-Muslim thoughts.  Note the points in the red rectangles.

The "guide" shows how effectively a network of powerful Muslim organizations have inserted their agents into school boards over the past 25 years.  It ordered teachers not to link the attacks to Islam in any way.  Of course all the instructions to be careful to avoid hurting the feelings of Muslim students show the board knows the truth.  It just doesn't want your children to know.

Can you imagine the outrage if, after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the Fairfax county school board had issued orders saying "You must avoid blaming Japan for this attack"?  And yet today, that's what the school board is effectively doing.  

And you can't stop 'em--cuz leftist Democrats gots all duh power, eh?

Source. 

The Left has made white American women not want to have children

If you're a rational adult (so not a mentally ill tranny or tranny supporter) you quickly learned as a child that females have a unique ability that men don't have: they can conceive and bear children.
 
If you're rational, this shouldn't be controversial.

Now if you know anything about math you also know that to keep a population level, women of any race must have an average of about 2.1 children apiece.  If they have fewer, that race will steadily decrease in population.

If you don't know that, do some research.

Here's another obvious truth: Leftists in the U.S. want whites to die off.  They openly scream that whites should be killed--and they do that as often as possible.  But there's an easier way:  Get lots of white American women to not want to have kids.

And it's working: Not only do the so-called "elites" and their leftist followers hate America, the nuclear family, straight men, Christianity and anything remotely conservative, they hate the notion of children being raised by a husband and wife.

If you don't believe that, you're stupid.

(By contrast, U.S. leftists support Islam, Hamas, Paleswine, open borders, trannies and homosexuals.) 

Until fairly recently most Americans prized children.  But over the past two decades or so the idea of having children has been denigrated by feminists, who've convinced women that having a corporate career is more exciting and rewarding than being a stay-at-home mom.

And of course many beta males support this, since having children is expensive.  When the choice is having a child or buying a new car, or a vacation home in a trendy city, leftists choose luxury.

And it's working:  the average number of children per white American female is now around 1.5--far below the replacement level of 2.1.  So instead of keeping the white population level, we're being replaced by third-world leeches--who all have lots of kids.  It's civilizational suicide for white Americans.

The Left has taught American women that the normal joy of having and raising children really a terrible burden...one that interferes with the carefully-sold "joys" of a more luxurious car and home, or a corporate career.

The Left sneers at the notion of a cis-gender hetero couple--the classic family--raising children, and denigrates women who want that.  And the results are all around you.  It's working just as the Left planned.

I'd say "Do some research," but of course you won't...because you don't wanna know.  Cuz if you're white and conservative, what you find will upset you--as it should if you're rational.

Here's another survival-positive truth: Leftists in the U.S. want whites to die off.  They're quite open about it, screaming that whites should be killed--and they do it as often as possible.  (They celebrated the anniversary of Charlie Kirk's assassination, and wail that po' li'l Tyler din' hab nuffin' to do wif it.)  

But murder is risky, so there's an easier way:  Get lots of white American women to not want to have kids.

And it's working:  The so-called "elites" and their leftist followers hate America, the nuclear family, straight men, Christianity and anything remotely conservative, they hate the notion of children being raised by a husband and wife.

(By contrast, Dems support Islam, Hamas, Paleswine, open borders, trannies and homosexuals.) 

Until fairly recently most Americans prized children.  But over the past decade or so the idea of having children has been denigrated by feminists, who've convinced women that having a corporate career is more exciting and rewarding than being a stay-at-home mom.

And of course many liberal males support that, since having children is expensive.  When given the choice of having a child or buying a vacation home in a trendy city, lots of liberals choose luxury.

And it's working:  the average number of children per white American female is now around 1.5--far below the replacement level.  So the white race is  being replaced by third-world denizens who have lots of kids--because they still believe kids are a good thing.  It's civilizational suicide for whites.

Leftists and Democrats: "Dis guuuuud!  Dere too many pipo on duh Erf, so we'll fix dat by not havin' kids.  So obviously it GUUUD to not have kidz!  See, whites iz baaaaad!  Udder races beez guuuud!  So we needs t'leave duh Erf to dem.  See, dey smaaaht"

It doesn't take a PhD to see how self-destructive that is.  And yet leftists love it: "We gots t'save duh Erf!  An' duh only way to doodat is fo' white pipo to disappear!"   

The Left has turned what was once the unequivocal joy of having and raising children into a perceived burden...one that interferes with the carefully-sold "joys" of having a more luxurious car, a vacation home, a corporate career.

Virtually every Leftist/Dem sneers at the notion of a cis-gender hetero couple--the classic family--raising children.  The vulnerable link there is women: years ago most would have wanted children, but the Left and the leftist Media have succeeded in pressuring them to decline it.  (Of course most leftists/Dems deny that.  They see women deciding not to have more than one child as sophisticated.  And the results are that whites are becoming a minority.  

It's working just as the Left planned.

"Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it."

Last year (2025) marked the 80th anniversary of the end of World War 2.  Both Germany and Japan recovered fairly quickly, and are both fabulous societies today--and have been since the war ended. 

But for the first year or so of WW2, Nazi Germany and Imperial Japanese forces won almost every battle against the U.S. and our allies.  Their troops and officers were well equipped and knew what they were doing.  By contrast, after the end of WW1 U.S. politicians had essentially dismantled our military.  So we went in under-trained and poorly equipped, and the results showed it.  But after heroic efforts for nearly four years, with virtually every American supporting the war, the allies won.  

And in the 81 years since 1945, both Germany and Japan have been model nations, and solid allies.

But it should be obvious to all rational adults that today doesn't in any way resemble 1941 to 1945:  Today Americans are equally divided between leftists, who believe America is evil, awful...and those who love this country.  Mull that over for a bit.

In 1941 every American rallied around FDR.  Today American leftists--half of the public--fiercely hate Trump.  "Orange Hitler," eh?  "No kangs [sic]"

In 1941--after the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor that killed 2,500 Americans and sank every American battleship--not a single American media outlet supported either Germany or Japan--as you'd expect.  By huge contrast, today the Left and their Dem-fellating Media allies repeatedly bleat that the U.S. is eeeevil and that Iran has defeated the U.S.  And all leftists believe it, even though it's utter horseshit--at least militarily.

But American Media rooting for Iran is only part of the difference.  There's another huge difference: In 1941 Germany and Japan didn't have a huge presence in the U.S.  But today--on the 25th anniversary of the most devastating attack on the U.S. since Pearl Harbor, Muslims have dozens of strong supporters in congress and the Media, and mosques in every state.

Point is, since 1990 or so Islam has been at war with the U.S.  But before Trump, no U.S. political leader admitted it.  If you're not willing to admit you've been attacked, you can't realistically expect to defeat your attacker, eh?  

SO...predictions:  Because Dems in congress, the Media and about half the American public refuse to support Trump's efforts to defeat the current combatant Islamic nation, future presidents will be even less willing to stand up to Islamic attacks--cuz the Media will scream that the president is Hitler.  And because we've refused to unleash our full power on Iran, they have no reason to surrender.  If that's true (and it clearly is) there's only one way to stop the conflict: the U.S. pulls our forces out--which is what the Democrats and Media have been demanding.

That's coming, because this November--just 54 days from now--the Dems will win a majority in at least one chamber of congress.  The Dems, the Media and the left will gloat, and will pass an appropriations bill demanding that no more funds be used for military operation is the mid-east.  Other Islamic nations will be emboldened to attack U.S. assets, either overseas or here in the U.S.  Democrats will win every presidential election because a majority of voters will refuse to pay an extra dollar a gallon for gasoline.  The Media will wail and scream that the U.S. must not retaliate.  And week by week, the west will lose ground.

Of course there's a solution, but leftist Americans and Democrats in congress will always block it.  Always.

As every American should know, on December 7th, 1941, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, killing 2,500 Americans and sinking every American battleship.

Every.  Battleship. 

If the same pack of Democrats, leftists and Media shitheads we have today had been running things on December 7th, 1941, the Media would have wailed that it wasn't reasonable to go to war over "just" 2,500 Americans killed, and "a few ships" sunk.  Dem "leaders" would have agreed, bleating "We just need to understand the 'root causes.'"  (For young Americans: After the Twin Towers were destroyed and the Pentagon seriously damaged on 9/11/2001, Dem leaders said the same thing: "We need to understand the 'root causes.'"  Seriously, the Democrats said that about 9/11.)  

Seeing a majority of voters against going to war after Pearl Harbor, the U.S. wouldn't have declared war on Japan in 1941.  And since the only reason we declared war on Germany was because that nation and Japan had declared themselves allies, we wouldn't have gone to war with Germany either!

A smart philosopher once said "Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are condemned to repeat it."  [Okay, that's slightly re-worded but you get the point.]  The lesson of WW2 was "Sometimes you have to go to war to keep things right--even if you know it's gonna involve spending trillions and cost thousands of American lives."  (WW2 killed about 400,000 American troops.)  But in WW2 we had a Dem president, and the Media loved FDR, so he could declare war and congress would vote to support his declaration.

But today the Media and Democrats in congress automatically scream bloody murder and block everything Trump does.  Everything.  Example: Iran had been spending hundreds of billions to "enrich" uranium to build an atomic bomb.  As anyone who knows fuck-all about WW2 knows, two atom bombs ended the war with Japan.  

Democrat: "Don't worry, citizen!  Even if Iran got an atomic bomb, they don't have a missile able to get a bomb to the U.S.  SEE?  So ain't no threat!  Orange Hitler is jus' tryin' t' get ya scared about nuffin' so he can seize mo' power!  Really!"

People who know how about atomic bombs are made (me, seriously):  "If Iran gets atomic bombs, they'll soon claim "groups unknown" stole one or two."

Democrats: "So?  Why dat a problem, deplorable?" 

You're idiots.  Surely everyone knows about "container ships," right?  A bomb hidden in one of the 8,000 to 12,000 containers on such a ship, slowly moving up-river past NYC--would take out most of Manhattan.  It would make 9/11 look like a picnic.

Democrats: "Iran wud nevah doodat, cuz we could wipe that country off the map!" 

Yeah, but here's the question: Would Democrats retaliate?

No.  Not even close, because the Left and Media would wail "Even if we could prove dis was one of Iran's bombs, how can we possibly justify retaliating?  Cuz dey tol' us it wuz stolen, SEE?  So Iran din' doo dis!  Nope nope nope!  It wuz some mysterious third-party!  SEE?  So we can't possibly retaliate against dis innocent nation, killin' all doze innocent pipo!  We just have to accept the cleverness of the attackers, as we did wif 9/11."

Of course we did NOT accept 9/11, but we also didn't mercilously bomb the hell out of Afghanistan.  Or Saudi Arabia.  So...no deterrence at all against future attacks.

If you think the Muslims didn't notice that, you're too dumb to breathe without assistance. 

If Iran gets a bomb, the scenario above is almost inevitable--because the mullahs know Dems won't retaliate!  (But just to be safe, the top mullahs would be out of the country for a few weeks.) 

Let's review:  Most Americans know virtually nothing about nuclear weapons.  By contrast, folks my age entered college just 16 years after the end of WW2, when most Americans knew at least something about the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  But to almost all Americans under about 60, atomic bombs are an abstraction--a concept as alien as neutrinos or black holes.  They have only a vague idea about 'em--and that's perfectly understandable.

I can't fix your lack of understanding.  I can tell you the truth, but you won't believe it.  The only thing that can make you understand it is viewing dozens of hours of the two devastated Japanese cities.  But you won't.  And I get it.  Cuz dat beez 'ancient history,' eh?

"Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history..." 

So where does that leave us?

"Your" Mainstream Media has told you Iran wasn't trying to build an atom bomb.  And you believed the Media, cuz...dey nevah lied to us before, eh?  You believe the Media even after the Iranian negotiators casually smirked to our negotiators that they had 447 kg of 60%-enriched uranium.  But because most Americans have no idea what that means, they simply ignore it.  You have to know nuclear physics.  Understandably, relatively few people do.

As a result, Americans believe the Democrat-fellating, Trump-hating media.  I get it.  Really.

"Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history..." 

Short answer: If Iran gets an atomic bomb, they'll claim one or two were stolen, and put one on a container-ship bound for New York, after several intermediate stops.  A fair chunk of lower Manhattan will be vaporized.  Dems will block ANY retaliation--"Cuz we can't be sure Iran is responsible!"

And I get it, really.  We can't in good conscience kill tens of thousands of innocent Iranians who had no say in killing tens of thousands of Americans, eh?   Except that's exactly what we did to end WW2, and it worked.  Sucks, I know, but it also likely saved 400,000 lives--250,000 Americans and another 150,000 Japanese.  

Is that worth doing?  Depends on your party.

"Those who refuse to learn from the lessons of history...." 

Because when the Democrats/leftists/socialists refuse to retaliate--and they will--that won't be the end of it:  The Iranians will spread the rumor that they arranged the whole thing to get the Great Satan to leave the mid-east and stop supporting Israel.  How many other national leaders, seeing the results on NYC and fearing the same for any other nation that bucks Iran, will support any U.S. policy, eh?

Here's the hoot:  I don't care.

I'm an old guy, and don't have any kids.  So if it happens exactly as I've laid out above, it won't affect me a bit.  And if you live far from NYC you'll think it doesn't affect YOU, cuz all the destruction was in NYC, right?  And the Lying Dem-fellating Mainstream Media and the Dems will repeat that endlessly, to justify the Dems refusing to retaliate.  And in some ways that's true: If you don't own real estate in Manhattan, why should you care if much of it was destroyed, eh?

Are ya starting to see why Trump bombed Iran's enrichment cascades?

No, probably not, cuz not one American out of a thousand knows what that means.

"Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it." 

Either we destroy the mullahs, or NYC will be destroyed.  Frankly I don't care either way.