Predicting the future re: Iran

As expiration of cease-fire nears, Iran refuses to send negotiators to Pakistan 

Trump wants Iran to agree not to build an atomic bomb, to surrender the 950 pounds of highly enriched uranium needed to make one, and to stop building ICBMs. 

The mullahs have refused all three demands, and  Trump has said bombing will resume if they continue to refuse.

But the mullahs, generals and IRGC thugs ruling Iran don't believe they're in any danger from that threat, because they believe Trump won't follow through.  From watching U.S. Democrat leaders like Chuck Schumer and Chris Murphy on TV, and seeing total agreement from our Media, the thugs ruling Iran believe the Democrats will succeed in getting the courts to force Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from the area, leaving the Islamic regime in power.

So all the mullah have to do is "run the clock out:" They see Trump's approval numbers plummeting, so their plan is to drag out negotiations for another month or so, and U.S. Democrats will force Trump to withdraw. 

And unfortunately I think they're probably right. 

Chuckie Schumer and all top U.S. Democrat pols are blasting Trump.  When an Iranian propagandist tweeted that 26 Iranian ships had gotten through the U.S. blockade (a lie), Democrat senator Chris Murphy posted on X "Awesome."  The Dems are actively rooting for Iran to win.

Every single day the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media broadcasts stories about Americans wailing about how AWFUL the price of gasoline is--even though it's lower than it was under bribem.  Cuz NOW it's a big deal, eh? 

So Trump is feeling pressure to make any sort of deal.  The Media say he's "desperately searching for an 'exit ramp.'"  And now he says he's extending the ceasefire.

I think that offer sends exactly the wrong signal to the mullahs because it'll encourage them to redouble their delaying efforts.  And eventually Trump will have just two options: either order the massive bombing that should have started today, or the Democrats will force him to withdraw.

Iranian citizens aren't allowed to own guns, so they can't overthrow the heavily-armed thugs of the IRGC and basij--something that was horribly proven when those groups executed 40,000 Iranian citizens at point-blank range on January 8th thru 10th.  And without an armed civilian overthrow, we can't force the IRGC and basij to surrender, so the war ends in a stalemate. 

So the mullahs will be left in power--and the Democrats will gloat and crow that Trump's war wasted a billions of dollars and accomplished absolutely nothing--deliberately failing to note that we destroyed Iran's ability to further enrich uranium to build an atomic bomb.
 

Mainstream Media: "The U.S. is losing to Iran, badly! Doom and defeat are imminent!"

I'm watching NBC and the other treasonous, anti-Trump, pro-Iran Mainstream Media organs bleat about what they think the U.S. should do, with Iranian leaders threatening to unleash new "cards" on the battlefield.

Funny shit.  Here's what to do: Announce "We totally understand that the Islamic rulers of Iran are unwilling to surrender, since that would result in them being torn limb from limb.  We fully appreciate that dilemma.   So even though we'd like to have an end to this, because we can't change their minds, we welcome their sending out more thousands of their loyal troops to take on the U.S. military.  After all, that's worked SO well for you in the past."

"Lather, rinse, repeat.  We're prepared to do this until you either run out of loyalists or decide to stop sacrificing your supporters.  Your call.  Just keep in mind that the more people you sacrifice in your selfish attempt to maintain power, the worse for you when your people take over.  But hey, we're fine either way you wanna go."  

NY Times: "Some experts say most of the beaches on east coast will be gone in 25 years"

Ahhh, the New York Times!  The leading voice of the U.S. left.  Every Media outlet slobbers that the Times folks are reeeeally smaht!  Totally honest and unbiased!  So...here's what they published: 

 

"Some experts say most of the beaches on the east coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years."  Note the date that was published: September 18, 1995.  We're now over 30 years later, and last time I looked not a single beach has vanished.   

Moreover, the Times says beaches "are already disappearing at an average of 2 to 3 feet a year."  So now they should be chopped by 60 to 90 feet, eh?  Anyone notice that?

The reporters and editors at the Times know as much about atmospheric physics and thermodynamics as my dog.  So they find some leftist PhD looking to make a name for itself by offering up a scary scenario, which the Times is eager to print.  Dem party jumps on it, and Barack Obozo green-lights an EPA RULE forcing half the coal-fired generating plants in the U.S. to either be extensively altered or closed.  Electricity prices skyrocket. 

Years down the road, Democrat politicians and the Media blame Trump for high electricity prices. 

But you can trust the Times.  Really.  And their faaabulous "experts."

"Mom, what's a 'contradiction'?"

 

Boston faces $40 million deficit this year, so female Dem mayor gives $500 "wellness allowances" to...

Boston has a current-year deficit of almost $50 million.  So what does the corrupt, stupid female Democrat mayor Michelle Wu do?

 

This is how Democrats stay in power in Dem-ruled shithole cities and states--by giving away taxpayer money to favored groups.  In this case "wellness allowances for LGBTQs--99% of whom vote Democrat.  

This is insane.  If you'd known the future in 1990 and had told people this would be THE strategy of Democrats, and that in just 36 years cities that couldn't pay their costs would be giving $500 "freebies" to queers, no one would have believed it.  And yet here we are.

Worse yet, all the polls are predicting that *because Trump had the balls to stand up to the terrorist Islamic state of Iran and end their atomic bomb program, Dems are almost certain to win control of at least the House in November, and possibly the senate.

Lesson for Democrat pols: keep giving taxpayer money to queers and trannies, and voters will reward ya with even more power.  

Source.

Ever heard this at a Democrat rally?

 

It wouldn't surprise me!

 

Where the EU, U.K. and U.S. seem to be headed

My dad was in the international oil business, and for 18 years my American parents lived in London, 100 yards from Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park.  If you're familiar with London you know that area.

I visited many times, and loved it.  Sadly, what was once "Great Britain” has become a Muslim caliphate. Islam has a long history of conquest, and they're clearly determined to rule the U.K.--and all of the EU.

U.S. Democrats: "Nonsense, deplorable!  How can yew possibly believe that?  After all, after 9/11 even Republican G.W. Bush repeatedly assured us "Islam is THE religion of peace," right?  Why would he have said that after 9/11 if it wasn't true, eh?  So you're just a paranoid conservative who hates brown pipo!"

I watch most of the EU nations becoming Muzz-ruled, and marvel at the utter stupidity of their citizens--who clearly know nothing of history--and apparently have no desire to learn.

Because from the outset, Islam has always been an engine of conquest disguised as a religion.  The Koran itself says when Muslims take power, citizens of conquered nations have just three choices: either convert to Islam, or pay a special tax--the "jizya"--on non-Muslims, or...be killed.

If you don't believe it, look it the fuck up.

It seems unlikely that just 80 years after WW2 most Europeans (Euro-peons) have become too stupid to live.  Instead the problem seems to be that with the electorate evenly divided between conservatives and idiots, European politicians have chosen to support Islam to win election.

So EU politicians are quietly sacrificing their native populations to the invaders.  And if you don't believe that you're clearly either uninformed, or too stupid to breathe without assistance.  Seriously.

74 members of the U.S. House and 25 senators are firmly in the pro-Muzz, pro-paleswinian camp.  It's how they vote, every time.  That's why the Dems have blocked every effort to reinstate funding for DHS.

The Lying Mainstream Media (Democrat fellators) have spun this battle as "conservatives hate brown pipo!"  But that seems to be a deliberate, cunning move to get Hispanics and blacks to support Democrat policies designed to advance Islam.

And the amusing part for me is that if Islam takes over all of Europe and the U.S, it won't hurt me a bit:  My life has been far better than I could ever have imagined, and I don't have kids, so when the rulers of the Democrat party turn everything to shit--as they inevitably will--it won't affect me a bit.

But if you're young, or have kids, it will sure as hell affect you and yours.

Of course you don't believe that, because you believe lying pieces of shit like Chuckie Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Hakeem Jeffries, Cory Booker, AOC, Liz Warren, Chris van Hollen, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Ayana Presley, Gavin Newsom, J.B. Pritzker, Zohran Mamdani and dozens of other Democrats, and all late-night talk-show hosts, all of whom absolutely assure you that open borders and socialism are faaaabulous.

If you studied a bit of history you'd learn that they're brazenly lying.  But you can't be bothered.  Too busy, eh?

Did you hear?  Tay-tay has a new album!

Did you hear?  Netflix has a great new series! 

Did you hear?  Democrat Chris van Hollen said the U.S. is 'losing badly' against Iran! 

Have you seen the price of gas?  It's higher than it's evah been before!  An' all because Orange Hitler wants to be a king!

You may have heard some propaganda from the Trumpies that Iran was working on an atomic bomb.  That's just silly!  Pure fear-mongering.  The Trumpies throw out numbers like "60% enrichment" to make gullible people believe anything they say, cuz it sounds sciency.

Did you hear?  Jake Tapper says Putin helped Trump steal the 2024 election from the faaabulous Kamala! 

Did you hear?  All the "cool kidz" are flocking to a new social media app called Blue Sky!  It's the coolest! 

Did you hear?  Nancy Pelosi says Trump fired Christy Noam and Pam Bondi cuz he's intimidated by strong women! 

Did you hear?  Democrats say they'll impeach Orange Hitler again after they win the midterm elections in November!

It never ends.  Enjoy the Dem shit-show.

What does today's Democrat party support?

 

A brief review of modern politics in California

For decades California voters were roughly equally split between the two major parties.  But because Dems owned the big labor unions--which totally support the Dems, and could get the Dems to give 'em tons of plums like forcing all employees in fields having a union to belong to that union and pay hefty dues--that brought great riches to the Dem party leaders, and the vast campaign wealth allowed the state to gradually tip to Dem control.

Then starting around 1970 we began seeing huge waves of "migrants" entering the state across the southern border.  Most of those who gained citizenship voted Democrat.

Then Democrats in congress got a faabulous idea on how to get far more votes: they passed a law with a provision called "motor voter," which demanded that everyone who applied for a driver's license would automatically be registered to vote.

But since you didn't have to show proof of U.S. citizenship to get a DL, Republicans objected that if this bill became LAW it would result in tens of thousands of non-citizens being automatically registered to vote--which, of course, was the goal.

So Democrats piously added a provision that non-citizens could "opt out" of registration by telling the brilliant employees at the DMV "I'm not a U.S. citizens so I don't want to be registered to vote."

Of course as anyone with an IQ over 80 could have predicted, virtually no non-citizen knew they had to announce to the DMV person that they didn't wanna be registered to vote cuz they weren't U.S. citizens.  Hmmm....

And guess how many DMV people--all Democrats, of course--advised all applicants that they had to check a tiny box on the back of page 3 of the app if they didn't wanna be registered.

The result appears to be that about 900,000 non-citizens were registered.  We have a good estimate of that because court clerks mail summonses for jury duty based on voter rolls, and about ten years after motor voter they were get back thousands of responses with the box checked "I decline to serve because I'm not a U.S. citizen."

Wait...in that case how did they get on the voter rolls?  Of course: motor voter automatically registered 'em.

So the state is now totally Dem-ruled, and will never change back.  But the Dems weren't satisfied, so state lawmakers passed a law changing the rules for state elections for all offices 

Like all states, California's primary system let each political party nominate a candidate for the fall general election.  Since the Dems had a 60-40 advantage in voters (thanks to the corrupt motor voter law), that always ensured a win.  But top Dems realized that if their candidate was known to be a corrupt, woman-assaulting loser (like Eric Swalwell), their advantage advantage in voters might not be enough to win: enough voters might stay home to hand the election to the Republican.

So they came up with a plan to make their lock on power even tighter: they passed a LAW changing the rules for primary elections.  So now, instead of the top vote-getting candidates from each party facing off, from now on the general election would be between the two candidates getting the most votes *regardless of party.*

For all practical purposes this meant both candidates would be Democrats.  So if one was found to be a crook before the election, the Dems would still win.  

That's brilliant--some real Chinese communist party thinking.

SO...a dozen candidates had filed for governor, and just two Republicans.  And because lots of low-income white residents are disgusted with Gavin Newscum, many didn't vote.  So according to a poll by "Berkeley IGS (March 9–15), the two top vote-getters were Republican Steve Hilton
at 17%, and Chad Bianco at 16%.

Swalwell was tied with the ghastly, moronic Katie Porter at 13%.  Billionaire socialist Tom Steyer--who wants taxpayers to pay off student loans and give free sex-change surgery to illegals, so is a perfect match for the party--was around 11%.

So the Partei [sic] needed to get some Dems to drop out.  So when Swalwell's accusers appeared, the Partei didn't have their fellators in the Mainstream Media spin the story into oblivion, but simply shrugged and allowed top Dems to admit they'd known for years that Swalwell "had a problem."

As a result the latest SurveyUSA poll (April 8–10): shows socialist Steyer at 21% and Steve Hilton
at 18%.  Mission accomplished!

Newly-elected female governor of Virginia signs bill joining the NPVIC

Ever hear of a thing called the NPVIC?

Chances are you haven't, and if so it's because a) the thing is a huge threat to our nation; and b) because the Mainstream Media has said almost nothing about it--because it hugely benefits the Democrat Partei [sic].

Here's what's up: Way back in 1789, when our Founders were struggling to create a viable nation, everyone was captivated by the novel notion that "the majority rules.'  The Founders loved the idea, but congress members from the smaller states realized that in a "pure Democracy" (based only on population) the high-population states--new York, Virginia and Pennsylvania--would always be able to control the presidency.

To adopt the new "Constitution" it had to be ratified by two-thirds of the 13 states.  So to get enough of the low-population states to ratify, the Founders hit on a brilliant compromise: the Electoral College, in which the high-population states got more electoral votes via their greater number of representatives in the House, but now all states got the votes of both their senators, which gave the smaller states fractionally more influence than if electing the president was based solely on the popular vote.     

SO...that compromise worked nicely for about 220 years.  Yes, there have been two elections where the system mandated by the Contitution resulted in the election of the man who lost the popular vote, but still...eight presidents have come from Virginia, while seven came from Ohio, five from New York and four from Massachusetts.  Those states account for over half of our presidents, so as the founders guessed, population is important.

But Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska and New Hampshire have each produced one president, while tiny Vermont has produced two.  So the compromise seems to have worked pretty well, in that many of our presidents have come from less-populated states.

But for decades, Democrats have been grumbling about the electoral college system--the compromise that enabled our Constitution to be adopted.  But since it was mandated by the Consitution itself, they knew they'd never be able to get two-thirds of the states to ratify an amendment that would cause even more presidents to come from the high-population states.

Then finally, in 2006 a couple of cunning Democrats realized: "Constitution?  That outdated rag you MAGA morons call 'the supreme law of the land'?  It doesn't apply to us, so we've found a way to change it to anything we like."  And they claim they've found a way to utterly, totally nullify the Constitution's *mandate* for electing presidents, instead handing the office to the winner of the national popular vote--which the Founders explicitly rejected, to get enough small states to ratify the new Constitution!

It seems outrageous: How can the Democrats claim they have the power to utterly reverse a *fundamental principle, mandated by the Constitution,* without having to go thru the difficult process of amending it?

Enter the NPVIC--"National Popular Vote Interstate Compact."  The Dems cite Article 1, section 3, clause 9, which reads as follows:
>>No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State...">>

Democrats: "SEE, citizen?  It's right there!  It's such a huge power that the Founders put it in their precious (though outdated and useless) document!"

If you missed it, I understand: "Compact" is referred to only in the negative, implying that states can enter into "compacts" with other states, and that the only thing needed is the consent of congress.

Now you'd *think* that if the Constitution *unequivocally specifies* that our president is to be chosen by the electoral college, it would take a constitutional amendment to replace that with the winner of the popular vote.  But the cunning Dems claim that since the Constitution clearly recognizes "compacts" between the states, contingent only on "consent of congress," and never attempts to limit the *scope* of such compacts, a compact to elect the president by the winner of the national popular vote would be constitutional if approved by a one-vote majority in both chambers of congress.

Now: the Democrat shitheads have ruled the Virginia legislature for decades, and were salivating to join the compact.  But they knew the previous Repub governor would veto.  But now that the Dems in VA have elected the corrupt communist Abigail Spamberger [sic], on March 2nd the state legislature passed the bill and she immediately, eagerly signed it.  So VA has joined NPVIC.

Moron say: "Dat jus' Virginia.  Why yew so upset, bro?"

Because I pay attention.  The NPVIC laws passed by each corrupt Dem-ruled state say the compact will automatically go into effect when states with 270 total electoral votes have signed on.  With Spamburger's signing, states with a total of 222 EVs have joined the compact.  So they're 48 EVs away.

And Dems say they're on track to win in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

All those states are ruled by Democrats, so it's just a matter of time before the rulers are brave enough to pass the bill and the gov to sign it into law.

So if supporters can get just 48 more EVs, the "compact" says the U.S. president will be selected by the winner of the national popular vote.

For those keeping score at home, the five states listed above have a total of 61 electoral votes.

From a purely legal standpoint, this brazen scam violates a well-known provision of contract law that says if a contract specifically says the parties agree that neither will do [something], one party can't come in later and say "By interpreting the word 'is' in a certain way, clause 134 b (3) allows us to do exactly the thing we explicitly agreed was prohibited on page one."

And normally the Dem subterfuge would fail on that basis alone.  And in any case, the winner of the presidency has only lost the popular vote twice in our history, so it might be years before the NPVIC would be tested.  Problem is, historically the Supreme Court has rarely been willing to take cases that haven't yet caused damage, so might decline to rule on the constitutionality of the "compact" before an election where the winner of the electoral college vote lost the popular vote.

Unfortunately there's another, rarely used principle called "fait accompli," which holds that some things are to hard to unravel and change.  The court would invoke this to uphold, say, massive vote fraud stealing an election if the justices felt ordering the party that benefitted from the fraud to vacate the office and the victim to be installed.

For those who claim this could nevah happen: See "claims of massive fraud in 2020 election."  
 

NYC's communist Muzzlim mayor orders a "Plan" to...um...

Last year communists, socialists and Muslims in NYC elected the Muzz communist Zohran Mamdani as mayor.  He promptly ordered his lackeys to draft a Racial Equity Plan.  As you could have guessed, this was a 375-page monument to grievance politics and DEI that blames every gap in wealth, health, and achievement--on “systemic racism.” 

This is an absolute classic, right out of the Marxist playbook: "Dat guy over dere haz a big condo an' a zillion dollars!  Dat not FAIR!  Yeah, he a heart surgeon or somethin,' an' he gradulated [sic] frum highschool an' Hahvahd, while I dropped out of HS, so SEE?"

Oh you bet, sparky.  Now no one denies that people who have wealthy parents have a HUGE head start in life.  But for every child of wealth who goes on to do well, a huge number choose NOT to study hard and work, and end up in bad circumstances.  Moreover, many people who were NOT born to wealthy parents do well.  So even though wealth is a huge advantage, it isn't the sole determinant.

But don't bother trying to explain that to a Momdani voter--to whom all success is pre-determined by race, eh?

Read the whole thing in City Journal. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/new-york-city-mamdani-racial-equity-plan 

Democrat lies

One of the most common lies by Democrats to argue that unlimited open borders are guuud is "FAR more Americans are murdered each year by U.S. citizens than by 'undocumented Americans [the precious, lying term Dems use for illegal alien invaders].

You've always shrugged and accepted that brazen lie, because you had no way to counter it. And under the bribem and obozo regimes, the lying FBI did everything possible to hide the truth by bleating "We don't keep records on that."

Really??  The truth is the FBI has had those records all along, but bribem and obozo didn't want yew to know, so they quietly slipped word to the corrupt Dem head of that agency to NOT publish those.

So finally, under an honest president, they've published those stats.  See below:  

 

ALL governments have the power to control what stats they release.  But Republican presidents know if they try to conceal statistics, the Dem-fellating Mainstream Media will gleefully expose the coverup.  By contrast, Democrats know they can get away with literally ANYTHING  because the know the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media will cover for 'em, so they simply refuse to release any statistics that would reveal how shitty their policies are...for Americans.   

But great for Democrats, eh?  Cuz as Dems see it, the ONLY thing that matters is power--winning presidential elections and control of both chambers of congress.  If Democrat policies like open borders, releasing thugs without bail, allowing sale of addictive drugs by minorities, pushing minors to get "sex-change surgery," allowing homeless to camp on sidewalks in downtown areas, allowing thugs like the Islamic state of Iran to control a waterway they do NOT own, to hold the world hostage, or allowing Iran to build an atomic bomb--if those policies hurt ordinary Americans, Democrats don't care.  "Fuck 'em." 

My Dem siblings and friends don't see it.  "We simply MUST do [fill in the blank] becuz dat beez duh compassonate thing to do!  Dere are only a few million po', oppressed refugees in the world, so duh compassionate thing iz dat we MUST let 'em all into the U.S., eh?  And of course once they're here we MUST give 'em food and homes and free medical.  And free college tuition.  And free sex-change surgeries, and boob jobs!  Cuz  all doze things iz, like, totally FREE, right?"

Starting to get it yet?

If you're a Democrat, probably not.  So...1: the number of people in the world who would LOVE to come to the U.S. is virtually infinite.  2:  All the things listed above that you Dems bleat are "free" are NOT free, but must be paid for by taxpayers.  And since the fed gummint always spends more than it takes in, those so-called "freebies" are paid for by borrowing money.  And for young Americans and Democrats, that must be paid back WITH INTEREST.

Starting to get it yet?

Nah, if you're a Democrat you still aren't.  You never will.  But 30 years from now most of your kids will.  Wish I could be around to watch that.

 

Leftist/Democrat judges *repeatedly* release rapists and killers if they're "undocumented"

 

Ohhhh, absolutely, comrade.  Dis beez guuud!  Cuz it keeps duh cost of maids an' lawn-care down!  An' so what if a few Democrat-ruled states (California) spend $9 billion a year giving free sex-change operations to illegals, eh?  It's a small price to pay fo' cheaper maids, lawn care an' drugs, right?  Win-win!  

If you vote Democrat, this is what you're voting for. 

In nature, what happens to animals that either can't learn, or refuse to?

Consider this: In nature, what happens to animals that are unable to learn from experiences and their surroundings--or refuse to?

If you said "Those animals are ki**ed and e*ten by predators," congratulations: you passed the first test.  [X-mods: Do your rules forbid say that happens to *animals*?]

Democrat: "Wait...WHUT?"  

Ahh, I hear my Democrat siblings bleating that's un-possible.  In that case, take a quick test:

• Do you believe the Islamic rulers of Iran were trying to build an atomic bomb?
• Do you believe leading Democrats are telling the truth when they bleat that they had NO IDEA that Dem congress-creep Eric Swalwell was a serial predator?
• Do you believe bribem and Mayorkas and Cackles were all telling the truth when they bleated (innumerable times) that "the border is totally secure" or "safer than it's ever been"?
• Do you believe math is raaacist?
• Do you believe Trump actually said people infected with the Chyna virus should "inject bleach?  
• Do you believe the claim of TOP Democrat congress-creeps that "the U.S. is losing the war with Iran...badly"?
• Do you believe it's "voter suppression" to require people who want to register to vote to have proof of U.S. citizenship, and to have photo ID?
• Do you believe there's ANY use for enriching uranium to 60% other than to build an atomic bomb?  
• Do you believe the bribem regime ordered the centers for Medicare and Medicaid to provide free sex-change operations for everyone--retirees and kids under 18?
• Do you believe the bribem regime never took bribes from China, disguised as "investments" in a Hunty bribem fund?
• Do you believe the bleats of all Dems and the Media that Joe bribem was "sharp as a tack"? 
• Do you believe Nancy Pelosi--who knew bribem was gonna lose badly--had the absolute right to delete him as the Dem nominee and substitute a moron who never won a single primary and didn't even put her name on a primary ballot?  (Cuz dat beez a fundamental principle of "democracy," eh?)
• Do you believe sex-change surgeries reduce the rate of suicides among tran knees?  Cuz dat beez whut duh Dems and Media claim.
• Can a government (fed or state) constantly (year after year) spend more than it takes in without eventual bad consequences?
• Do you believe leftist judges upheld an Obozo-era EPA RULE that allowed citizens to be fined for catching and storing rain falling on their own roof?  (Federal case, upheld by a corrupt leftist judge, in which a citizen of Washington state was fined for exactly that.)
• Do you believe state laws in half a dozen Democrat-ruled shitholes allow minor children to get taxpayer-funded sex-change surgery without parental consent?   
• Do you believe a government should force taxpayers to pay for sex-change surgeries for illegal aliens, or for inmates, or for illegal aliens?
• Do you believe parents shouldn't be responsible for their children, since "it takes a village to raise a child"?
• Do you know who said that? 
• Do you believe getting a blowjob from a 21-year-old subordinate is NOT "sex"?  (Bill Clinton made exactly that claim, under oath, when denying he'd every "had sex" with Monical Lewinsky.  The Media bleated dat "everyone lies about sex!"  But of course dat wuz years ago, so Democrats have ordered yew to ignore it!) 

I could do this all day.  If you haven't already figured it out, the Democrat party controls the Mainstream Media, which slavishly parrots anything the Democrat partei [sic] wants.  So the Media constantly bombards us with Dem "talking points" (i.e. total bullshit) around the clock.  So it's no surprise that half of Americans believe what they constantly see and read from the Dem-ruled Mainstream Media.  Duh.

The hoot (for me) is, I don't care.  I don't have any kids, so I've got no dog in this hunt.  If Democrats wanna throw away everything that made this nation great, it won't affect me one bit.

By contrast, it WILL affect your children.  But if you're a Democrat you're like, "Ouah policies beez faaaaabulous, an' will make duh U.S. prosperous again!  We demand that taxpayers pay fo' sex-change operations on minor kids!  We demand that 'undocumented Americans' be allowed to vote.  We demand that doze awful ICE agents be put in PRISON fo' enforcing some silly 'law' passed by some stupid congress decades ago!  Cuz pipo who enter duh U.S. illegally din' reeeeally break U.S. law!  Nope nope nope!  We Dems decree dey din' break no law, so yew are not allowed to deport deez po' pipo!  An' if anyone tries, we demand dey be charged an jailed!"

The Dem demands are mind-boggling: who would trash our free-market system for cheaper lawn care and similar trivia?  But Dems claim it's NOT for cheaper lawn care, but cuz it beez duh right thing to do.  Then you realize the Democrats' real goal in pushing for unlimited "immigration" is to win total control by winning all future elections.

As many have noted, if Democrats believed most illegal invaders would vote Republican, they would have slammed the border shut tight in days. 

At this point let me confess that I get a kick out of watching people reap the consequences of their stupidity.  It's a rare person who, when their demands result in disaster, admits "Wow, I made a terrible decision!"  And I say that as someone who's made LOTS of really bad decisions.

Now: could all the Democrat policies listed above actually be good for our nation?  Guess we'll have to watch it unfold, eh?  Cuz you will, cuz they haven't abandoned even one of 'em.

Dem congress-creeps have already introduced "resolutions" demanding Trump stop U.S. military operations in Iran--i.e. to surrender.  You might think that since the GOP has a majority in both chambers, such measures would never pass.  But the GOP majority is only about 4 votes, and there are dozens of "RINOs," so chances of such a "war powers resolution" passing both chambers of the shitty congress are high.

Democrats: "Dat wud be reeely faaabulous!  Cuz duh Islamic State of Iran beez reeeeally gud pipo!  See, ALL cultures are like, totally equal, right?  An' duh mullahs did NOT murder 40,000 of dere own citizens in the street over three days in January!  Oh sure, some cunning Republican sources claim dat happen, but it din't!  Cuz ouah faaabulous Media nevah reported it, right?  So dat mean it nevah happen!"

See how neatly that works?  Gullible Dems believe that if duh NY Times an' WaPo din' report somethin', it nevah happen.  But if you think for even a moment you'll realize there's no logic there: If the Mainstream doesn't wanna report some event, why would you think they'd report it, eh?  Do you think they're honest?  Unbiased? 

Democrats: "Cuz dey iz, like, totally unbiased an' honest!  Dey report duh troof!"

Hahahahahaha! 

Fucking meow.  No, they don't.  Never have, never will.  They only publish or broadcast what  their editors (all leftists) want you to see. 

So where does that leave us?

If, before the November elections, the price of gasoline drops to essentially what it was before the U.S. struck Iran, the Mainstream Media will print endless stories NOT on the fact that gas prices were now the same as before Feb 28, but on how much extra the average American family was forced to pay for gas because of Trump.

Seriously.  Just like the Media breathlessly reported on high egg prices (due to the industry having to kill millions of hens due to "avian flu"), but the Media never reports on the fact that the price of eggs has dropped back to normal levels.  So the average reader is left with "Trump bad."

Mission accomplished, eh? 

Democrat "logic"

Of course not a single Democrat will remember this.  Brutal, totally unprovoked murder of the innocent 23-year-old girl, by a career criminal in a Democrat-ruled shithole city.  Female Democrat mayor asked local media NOT to post the surveillance video the public transit agency recorded, cuz...um...reasons.

The murderer has now been ruled (by a Dem judge) "ineligible to stand trial" due to mental illness.  They legal system knew that before he murdered the girl, but didn't give a flying fuck, so they released him--again and again and again.

Democrats: "But dis do NOT mattah, cuz non-psychos kill WAY mo' innocent pipo den duh mentally ill, jus' like American citizens kill WAY mo' pipo den "undocumented Americans" (i.e. illegal aliens allowed into the U.S. by Democrat regimes), so shut up!"

Marvel at what passes for "logic" by Democrats: "It's useless to be upset about unprovoked murders of innocents by psychos, cuz non-psychos commit mo' murders!  SEE??"

By that logic we shouldn't try to prevent murders by one group if others murder more people.

This is their actual position.  Wow. 

Need a laugh? Watch as thieves who believe they're "entitled" to your stuff meet FO

As package delivery services like Amazon have gone exponential, it's triggered a horde of morons who follow the trucks around and steal the packages off your porch as soon as they're delivered.

Maybe it's just me, but this irritates me a LOT.  And after lots of people had their stuff repeatedly stolen, a few dozen decided to...um...turn the tables on the thieves.  And the results are absolutely hysterical!

What's even funnier is to watch how some of the thieves scream at the doorbell camera that they're gonna SUE the owner for luring 'em to steal an Amazon package. 

Porch pirates #1 

Porch pirates #2 

Porch pirates #3

Porch pirates #4

Video from Iranian expats tells of thousands of young Iranians who have been "disappeared" by the regime

 

In early January hundreds of thousands of young Iranians took to the streets to protest their dictatorial rulers.  The mullahs were furious, so over three ghastly, bloody days (Jan 8-10) the dictators of the Islamic regime of Iran gave their brownshirt thugs--the IRGC--permission to kill anyone on the streets.

The thugs were bloodthirsty monsters unleashed on defenseless lambs.  Scores of cell-phone videos are on the Net of the thugs running up to women on the sidewalk and shooting them in the face with a shotgun at point-blank range.

In three bloody days the thugs killed 35,000.  That's not a typo.  And another 10,000 are missing.  The regime refuses to tell their families if they're alive and imprisoned, or murdered.

The video above is an effort by Iranian expats to bring this to the world's attention.  But the U.S. Mainstream Media ignores it--because "your" corrupt Media is ruled by Democrats, who desperately want the regime to win, since that will cost Trump and Republicans votes in November.

So instead of telling you how murderous the Islamic regime is, the Democrat-fellating Media are eagerly parroting Dem pols who bleat that "The U.S. is losing the war...BADLY!"  The treasonous Media never tell you that Iranian negotiators bragged to our negotiators that they had 440 kilograms of 60%-enriched uranium, nor has a single lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media outlet told you that the ONLY use for enriching uranium to more than ten percent is to make a bomb.  Or that 440 kilos of uranium is enough to make about 11 atomic bombs.

Cuz if they told Americans those crucial pieces of information, voters would realize the Islamic regime was indeed working on a bomb, which would make Trump would look better.

Oooohhh, can't have that, eh?  

The Mainstream Media will get you killed, and laugh about it.  "What suckers!"  Same for Democrat politicians.  Of course you don't believe a word of any of this, just like no Democrat believes the Iranian regime would really murder 40,000 totally unarmed citizens in just three days, eh?  It's literally beyond belief.  "See, duh Mainstream Media din' say nuffin'!  An' if dis had really happened, duh Media wudda tol' us!  I mean, imagine if Canadian cops had murdered even 5,000 unarmed Canadian citizens over three days, eh?  The Media would have screamed bloody murder, right?  But dey din' say nuffin'!  Dat mean it din' happen!  Cuz errbody know duh Media beez totally honest and unbiased, right?"

Geez, talk about "suckers."  

SO...congressional Democrats--and ALL the Dem talk-show hosts, like Joy Reid and Jimmy Kimmel and Seth Myers and Steven Colbert and Scarborough and CNN are screaming about how Trump is crazy and needs to be removed from office.  They're demanding the U.S. surrender and withdraw from the middle east.  Of course they carefully don't SAY "surrender," but that's what they're demanding.

They literally want the U.S. to lose to prevent Trump from getting a win.  Demented leftist NY Times shithead Tom Friedman said exactly that on CNN yesterday. 

Leftist/Dem judges are already salivating over being the first to find Trump guilty of "war crimes."  So it goes.  

 

We need more mental-health care for...um... Wait, there's not enough money in the world.

 

x 

Newsom's wife is a total moonbat

Gavin Newsom's wife is--to put it mildly--totally disconnected from reality.  As is Gavin.

Of course you think that's just partisan snark.  Sure.  Understandable.  So watch this video of her talking about interviewing inmates at San Quentin (for young Americans that's a big prison on the San Francisco bay in California).  She mentions that when she was seven, she killed her sister in a golf-cart accident.  Because it was an accident, she (understandably) wasn't punished.  But watch her conclusion: "Their sentences were probably due to accidents too."

 

Now think about it: her "affect" in the vid shows she clearly feels guilty about killing her sister.  Of course.  Totally reasonable.  But her conclusion--"their sentences were probably due to accidents too"--is totally disconnected from reality.  But to Jennifer, the convicted murderers in San Quentin are surely just as innocent--thus undeserving of punishment--as she is.

This, of course, is irrational.  But her affect shows she needs this to assuage her guilt.

Problem is, this coping mechanism isn't harmless--because the next predictable move is to demand the release (parole) of the convicted killers.  And now the problem is that her husband--the governor of that poor Dem-ruled shithole--can do just that.

Source. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/newsoms-wife-san-quentin-convicts-crimes-were-probably-accidents/ 

Iranian leaders pull the "Bait and switch"

If you're an adult American you're probably familiar with the term "bait and switch:"  A store or on-line business offers what seems to be a faaaabulous deal, and you jump in, only to hear "Ohhh, sorry, that's not the actual deal."

The Islamic Republic of Iran was getting clobbered, and everyone knew it--including them.  They knew they couldn't win on the battlefield, so what was their only option?  Sure: find a way to delay:  String the U.S. along by demanding a ceasefire, using the two weeks to re-arm.  Then repeat, hoping to put off defeat until the mid-terms, when you hope Dems will win and thus block Trump from doing anything. 

Of course because the "bait" was perfect, Trump and company had to give it a try.  Surely they realized the mullahs would use a ceasefire to brag to their abused people that "We have forced the United States to beg for a ceasefire, because we're winning!" while actually re-arming and consolidating their rule over their angry citizens. 

So now Democrat shitheads--who yesterday were SCREAMING that Trump DARE NOT unleash the military to bomb Iran's powerplants--are NOW screaming that "Trump chickened out!"

• Joy Reid: "Donald Trump just caved, backing down from his fake deadline."
• Jimmy Kimmel: "It was the taco Tuesday of all taco Tuesdays."  ["taco" is cute Dem-crap for "Trump always chickens out."] 
• Jake Tapper: "It was obvious that the president was looking for an off-ramp."
• Dem senator Chris Murphy: "We just can't accept a president who wants to murder literally [literally?] hundreds of thousands of human beings."
• Dem senator Chris van Hollen: "We have a completely unhinged president who is thretening massive war crimes. 

Murphy, you lying, pig-ignorant motherfucker.  Blowing up bridges and powerplants might kill a dozen people, and if any aren't regime toadies, of course I sympathize.  But did you wail when the Islamic dictators' murderous IRGC gunmen murdered 40,000 thousand innocent women and men on the streets at point-blank range? "Literally" 40 THOUSAND innocent Iranian citizens--and neither you nor any of your lying Democrat comrades or media assholes said a fucking critical WORD.  

You and all the members of your ghastly partei [sic] and your Media allies and late-night propagandists posing as "comedians" all kept silent because the murders proved Trump's point: The mullahs are demons.  And you're a piece of shit, a demon, for supporting them.  Like all Democrats you're grotesquely ignorant, and apparently happy to be so.  

The only "logic" to be found in Dem minds is "If Trump wants to do anything, we're against it." 

Now for the "bait and switch:"  The Islamic regime knew they couldn't survive much longer if the "war" continued, so they did what you'd expect: ask for a ceasefire, promising to open the Strait of Hormuz and to stop firing missiles if Trump would agree.  And because he was being excoriated as a warmonger by U.S. Democrats in congress, and pilloried in the U.S. Media, Trump took the bait.

Then the instant switch, as the Islamic regime bleated "Ah, the U.S. has agreed to ALL our demands, which are:  1) We demand to continue enriching uranium; 2) that Israel cease all military operations in Lebanon; 3) that all sanctions be immediately lifted, not only on Iran but also on all its proxies. 4) that the U.S. promise no future military action, regardless.

Of course the U.S. didn't agree to any of that.  But the Democrats and Dem-fellating Mainstream Media will claim we did--and will use that lie to claim that "Trump broke the agreement."

You lying, pig-ignorant motherfuckers know the truth, but refuse to support it due to your hatred for Trump and your lust to win control in November, and again in 2028. 

So:  Done.  You and your Democrat comrades have chosen to defend the Islamic regime and demand that Trump be removed from office.  I'm not an unalloyed Trump supporter, but your choices have made you and I mortal enemies.  It is as if, after the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec 7, 1941, you'd not only sided with the Nazis in WW2 and demanded the U.S. not enter WW2, but also demanded the impeachment of FDR for entering the war.  Your demands are that insane, and show that we cannot coexist, period.

Here's what you've enabled:  The Islamic regime now sees a ray of hope, by getting Democrats to force Trump to quit with them still in power.  They've already broken the deal by re-closing the Strait, claiming the agreement with the U.S. included Israel being barred from taking military action against Hezbollah in Lebanon.  Your partei and the Media will carefully remain silent on this point, which will make the U.S. left believe it's true.

With the midterms barely over six months away, and public opinion--whipped by your portraying the U.S. as evil--turning against U.S. military action, the Islamic regime knows it can continue to propose one "ceasefire" after another, and that U.S. Dems will force Trump to accept each or be portrayed as Hitler.  And like magic, the Islamists (and Democrats) will gloat that they've "defeated the U.S."

Just watch. 

Your demands set all this in motion, Democrats, whether you realized it or not.  And now you've gotten what you demanded.  You've enabled a the leaders of a regime that's on a par with the Nazis to not only survive, but to claim to have defeated the U.S.  And worse, some of you knew this, and deliberately intended it.  

Hope you enjoy what you've set in motion.  

Think you really understand the progress in computer performance? Take a look

In 1976 the Cray company introduced the world's first supercomputer.  The Cray-1 weighed 10,500 pounds and had a 115,000-watt power supply.  It was by far the fastest computer in the world.  

It cost over $40 million in 2024 dollars and used $35,000 of electricity per month.

Twenty-two years later (1998) the same company built a supercomputer that could perform one *trillion* "floating-point math operations per second," which techies shorten to "1 teraflop."

Unless you're a techie you have no idea what that means, but in 1998 it was really impressive.

Just four years later (2002) Cray rolled out the follow-on, which was 50 times faster.  So, a 50-fold increase in performance in just four years.  But the cost in today's dollars was still over $40 million.

Today a top-end desktop computer can do 80 to 100 teraflops, and costs maybe $2,000.  So it's about twice the speed of a multi-million-dollar supercomputer of 2002 and costs not just one percent of the price of the supercomputer of 2002, but less than one one-hundredth of one percent of that price.

Most of us are accustomed to leaps of computer technology, but such a huge improvement in the performance-to-cost ratio is stunning.  

That was a year ago. Today a single-board computer just 2.2" wide, weighing just three ounces, using five watts of power--is 4.5 times faster than the Cray 1.  It sells for $100.

Now let's look at storage:  Back in 1978 most personal computers stored data on 5-inch flexible disks, coated with the same material as magnetic recording tape.  These so-called "floppy disks" could typically store 360,000 characters.

Today a chip just over a quarter of an inch on a side can hold 256 BILLION characters--the equivalent of 700,000 floppies.

What does this mean to you?

We're slowly finding out. 

In January Iran murdered 40,000 of its citizens. Democrats said nothing. But NOW...

Office of the Speaker of Iran's parliament: "The U.S. has just 20 hours to surrender."

When the leaders of a murderous, thuggish regime see the Good Guys closing in, their usual response is a fascinating psychological coping mechanism:  "Actually we iz winning!  Yep yep yep!  We gots the other side on the ropes!  They'll be defeated in a matter of hours."

For young Americans (for whom nothing that happened before 1990 is useful): in the 1970s psychiatrist Elisabeth Kubler-Ross identified this as the first of five stages of coping mechanisms when someone starts to realize the end is near:  Denial.

Since virtually none of us has ever ruled a nation, it's hard to imagine how intensely thuggish assholes utterly refuse to accept that the end is approaching, with their overthrow and possible death--possibly being ripped apart by bereaved citizens finally getting their revenge.  So the leaders simply...deny there's a problem!

Thus in Iran: probably the highest-ranking survivor of the regime's leadership is the Speaker of Iran's parliament--a blowhard named Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.  As you'd guess, Ghalibaf is a hard-line thug who is perfectly happy executing women for showing their hair under the mandatory hijab.

(American Lying Mainstream Media: "NOOooo, dat not true!  Dat fake newz!  Islam beez duh religion of peace, an' totally respeks wimmens!  So dey would nevah doo dat!  ALL the hundreds of stories from citizens of Muslim nations saying dat happened are lies!  We knows dat cuz we iz smaaaaht!  Not like you dumb deplorables!  See, duh nice pipo running duh Islamic regime of Iran sed it nevah happened, so...dere ya go!
   "Okay...dey din' exactly say it din' happen, but dey assured us 'Islam iz "the religion of peace," right?  An' a peaceful religion would nevah execute a woman for merely showing her hair, right?  Right??"

Ohhh absolutely, cupcake. 

SO...now that you understand how the Islamic regime MUST lie as the end nears, consider: An adviser to the Speaker of Iran’s parliament--Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, a total thug and regime kingpin--said Iran is winning the war, and that Trump has "about 20 hours to submit to Iran” or face devastating consequences for US allies.

Mahdi Mohammadi wrote on X, “Trump has about 20 hours to either submit to Iran or his allies will return to the Stone Age.  Iran has clearly won the war and will only accept an ending that [we want.]  We will not back down.”

Now, for young Americans: way back before you were born--thus before the beginning of history (2003)--as American tanks rolled into Baghdad, on the other side of the city Iraq's "Minister of Information" (Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf) was being interviewed by a dozen journalists from all over the world.  He's famous for the resulting videos in which he proclaims there were no American troops in Baghdad--when they were actually just ten miles from the minister's location.

If you don't believe it, google "Baghdad Bob." 

This is where the "Islamic regime of Iran" is right now.  A hundred of so of the leaders of the regime have been killed in air-strikes, and the rest are beginning to sense that the end is near.  But human psychology--the coping mechanism--compels them to believe the reverse: that their regime is not only winning, but that the U.S. will be forced to surrender in just 20 hours or so.

Ohh, you bet, cupcake.

See, the regime rulers know that if they give up and try to flee, they could be ripped apart by citizens whose loved ones were murdered by the Islamists.  (For Americans who don't pay attention: in 3 days in January (8th thru 10th) the IRGC murdered 40,000 Iranian citizens.  Shot 'em in the streets with rifles, shotguns and automatic handguns.

Shooting fish in a barrel, as they say.  If you bother to look, you can find hours of video of those executions.  It's utterly chilling--almost beyond belief.  But there are SO many cell-phone videos that at some point even stupid Democrats are finally forced to realize "It would have cost a fortune to stage all this."

So why didn't Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf himself make the bragging, bullshit claim that Iran has the U.S. on the ropes, eh?

Cuz like all the top regime leaders, Ghalibaf is too busy trying to find a way to flee to...uh...Russia?  China?  Cuba?  Venezuela is out.  Life in Cuba sucks.  Leaves Russia and China, eh?

But in China, Muslims are "persona non-grata," eh?  Of course other Muzz-ruled nations are a possibility, but you need money to bribe the rulers to take you in.  And we've frozen the regime's bank accounts.

 Of course all the smaaaht regime kingpins have squirreled away as much gold and as many Euros as they could.  But getting either of those to the ruler of a Muzz nation you're trying to bribe takes planning, eh?  But don't worry, you've got time, right?

But if Iranian citizens (a.k.a. "deplorables") start to capture weapons, and the IRGC flees, that time expires.  So the most important thing for regime leaders is to keep the IRGC "imperial guard" and the public believing their lies that the U.S. will lose the war.

Now, most rational observers know the Islamic regime is on the ropes.  But the regime has an ace in the hole: U.S. Democrats and their Media allies.

If you've been paying attention, you know a dozen or more congressional Democrats have accused Trump of committing war crimes and are demanding that he be removed as president.

Think I'm kidding?  Click here.

Today is April 7th.  Yesterday the first Iranian member of the U.S. House--a Democrat--called for Trump to be removed via the 25th Amendment, and announced she was filing articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth.  And the U.S. Mainstream Media parrot this without a critical world: "War crimes." 

The mullahs and IRGC are totally confident that if they can just hold out for another few weeks, congressional Democrats and their Media allies will have enough public support to force Trump to end the war, leaving the mullahs and IRGC in power.  Hence the bluster from the new "Baghdad Bob:" "Duh U.S. is only 20 hours from surrendering!"

Wow.  The U.S. Media will win the war for the IRGC and their Democrat allies--ensuring the continued rule of the mullahs.  

Inmates in Cook County jail were dying with no signs of trauma. Mystery solved.

In the Cook County jail, inmates are dying from new drugs soaked into the pages of letters, books and legal documents

New York Times, March 21, 2026

How far have we fallen as a country?  Take a look below.  If the article is accurate, it should have been on national newzcasts, but I'll bet you never heard about this before now.

In January of 2023, in Chitcongo's Cook County jail, inmates began turning up dead in their cells, with no signs of trauma.  All investigators found were scraps of singed paper scattered on the floor.

For months, jail inmates had been "falling ill" with no known cause.  Officials said they'd heard rumors that deadly drugs were being smuggled in, but they didn't know how.

Finally officials concluded inmates were heating the scraps of paper and smoking the vapor.

Suppliers would spray a mix of drugs onto the pages of totally legal items like books, letters, legal documents, even photographs.

Inmates would then tear the drug-soaked sheets--worth thousands of dollars a page--into strips and use cigarette lighters to smoke the vapors.  The Times says inmates who smoked the stuff "went into crazed, exorcistic fits, as if possessed."

(Ever seen the word "exorcistic" before?)

To block the drugs the jail added 24-hour surveillance, searched more cells and beefed up the mail room, inspecting every item by hand.

But as always in competitions between drug smuggers and authorities, the smugglers had countermeasures for every move authorities made.  When officials began checking regular mail more closely, smugglers began delivering the drugs on "privileged" legal correspondence.  Officials began finding drug-laced books in sealed packages that appeared to have been shipped directly from Amazon.

Naive investigators claimed to be baffled that anyone would spray so many different--and potentially deadly--drugs onto a single piece of paper.  You have to know druggies: They'd inject goat urine if a friend claimed that would produce a high.  Druggies are not like the rest of us: they'll do literally anything for a high, no matter the risk.  You have to have known one to understand how obsessed they are.

I had a sister who was a druggie.  High IQ, law degree, high position in the courts.  Got into drugs and couldn't let go.  Or perhaps didn't want to.

Addictive drugs have been around as long as humans.  The opium trade goes back thousands of years.  As recently as the 20th century, officials still focused on three substances derived from plants: marijuana, cocaine and heroin.

Today, far more powerful "designer drugs" dominate the market.  And that shows up in the death toll:  In 1971 just under 7,000 Americans died of overdoses. Now, over 70,000 Americans die from overdoses each year.

An arms race for potency is underway.  Stronger drugs mean one kilogram can reap as much profit as 100 kilos of heroin. 

And the consequences aren't just death of the user:  Many drugs cause psychosis and unprovoked violence.

In prison, paper is a lifeline to parents, partners and children outside the walls.  After officials realized drugs were coming in on paper, the sheriff of Cook County (Tom Dart) called other jail officials grappling with the same problem. Some had decided to ban paper outright.

Sheriff Dart--being a good Democrat--refused, bleating that taking paper away from inmates would rob them of what they missed most:  connection to loved ones.  That seemed too harsh to the Democrat, and the Times says the reason is that most inmates in the jail hadn't been convicted yet, but were simply in jail awaiting trial.

As the death toll mounted in 2023, the jail taught inspectors to identify what unadulterated  paper smelled like and felt like, hoping to catch drug-laced paper.  But the drugs were so novel that even dogs couldn't detect them.

One official bleated “Inmates use paper for everything.  The schools inside use paper, the staff uses paper, and the inmates get paper in the mail every day.”  This is an excuse, designed to maintain the "We cain't do nuffin' about dis" status quo.

Almost everything the jail did seemed to spur more innovation by the smugglers.  “Every time we discovered a new trick, they’d make a change.”

The jail put up posters warning of the dangers of smoking drug-soaked paper.  “Don’t die in jail,” the posters warned.

But as anyone who's known a hard-core drug user knows, they're not worried about dying. 

As one former inmate put it, “A lot of us are facing life in prison, so you just want to leave that behind, even for a minute.  “Inmates think, ‘Just ’cause that guy died doesn’t mean I’m going to die. He was probably just weak.’”

Using is not cheap. A piece of drug-laced paper the size of a driver’s license can cost $800.  A whole sheet of such paper can reach $10,000. Inmates tell of begging family and friends for thousands of dollars over the years they spent in jail, to pay for drugs.

On the street, synthetic drugs are often far cheaper than traditional ones.  But inside jail the price reflects the well-known laws of supply and demand.

Oh wait, I forgot:  Democrats don't believe in those laws.  Oh well...

Since 2023 officials have arrested dozens of staffers and visitors for sneaking in drug-soaked paper. One corrections officer was caught with 48 pages in her home.

The team ran back through everything for new leads — and finally caught a break.

An inmate had been caught with drug-soaked paper, so investigators reviewed hours of video recordings of his visits to try to discover how he got it:  When his girlfriend came to see him, she slipped him a packet of papers while someone distracted officers.

She had been searched before visits, but no one realized drugs could be delivered on paper.

When the girlfriend was finally questioned, she told investigators everything.

At last, investigators began to map the outlines of a network. A dealer in the Chicago area seemed to be working with eight inmates and their girlfriends to bring in drug-laced paper.

They also discovered the dealer was in contact with inmates around the country, sending paper to correctional facilities all over the U.S.

In 2024 investigators presented their evidence to federal officials, hoping they would join the fight.  A few weeks later, they did.

By the end of 2024 several dealers were competing to get drug-laced paper into the jail.

“We don’t have dogs that can smell it, we don’t have test strips for it, we don’t have field test kits,” Mr. Murphy said. “So if we find paper on a guy, we have to send it to the lab, wait five to six weeks for it to come back and then say, ‘OK, now we’re going to arrest him.’”

By then the guy would be gone.


On a blustery evening in March 2025, Mr. Wilks was leaving the jail for the day when he spotted a beat-up sedan parked next to his car.

The driver got out, holding three small puffy packages that looked like they came from Amazon. The man did not speak much English, but was on the phone with a woman who did.

“I’m trying to make sure the book I’ve mailed to my husband gets to him,” the woman told Mr. Wilks over the driver’s cellphone.

The woman explained that the driver was supposed to take the packages to a shipping dock at the jail reserved for deliveries by Amazon, UPS and FedEx.

Suspicious, Mr. Wilks said he would take care of the packages himself.

Once inside, he opened the packages and found three books, one with pornography, and two others with the sticky texture he had learned to associate with drug-saturated paper.

It was a brazen scheme. People were sneaking in drug-laced paper by sending official-looking packages to the shipping dock used by UPS, Amazon and FedEx.  By dumb luck Wilks had stumbled on a driver who couldn't find the shipping dock.

Wilks and his team had always assumed that anything in an Amazon box or pouch had come from an Amazon warehouse and was therefore clean.

Now Wilks and his team got a tip that anyone could sign up with Amazon as "third-party booksellers."  Dealers would coat pages of a book in drugs, then offer it for sale on Amazon, complete with official-looking packaging.

Amazon claimed it hadn't found any information confirming that third-party sellers were in fact shipping drugs into Cook County correctional facilities.

The Times propagandist writes that Wilks and other investigators were "astounded" at this display of creativity by the drug sellers, implying that investigators didn't know Amazon and FedEx shipped packages to inmates without any inspection!

Clues were popping up that drug-soaked paper might be catching on outside jail. Tips had circulated that gas stations around the Chitcongo suburbs Illinois were selling gift cards soaked in drugs.

Finally in August of last year, after the tip from the imate's girlfriend, agents raided a house in the Chitcongo suburbs and found ONE of the wholesale operations making the drug-soaked paper.

Law enforcement had been surveilling the owner for months, and had intercepted shipments to jails in North Carolina, Indiana and Illinois. 

When authorities searched the trash for the house they found 14 sheets of printed labels addressed to inmates across the country, some with return addresses of *law offices.*

After the arrest, Wilks said "This is not going to stop.”  And of course he was right. Corrections officers kept finding drug-laced paper in the jail.  In the month after the bust, authorities confiscated 277 suspicious pages.

Of course this could be easily fixed: confiscate all matches and lighters from inmates.  But it's absolutely certain that some dipshit leftist judge would wail that that was "cruel and unusual punishment" and would block it.  See, the Founders believed inmates should have the same rights as non-criminals.  At least Democrat believe that's what the Founders wanted.  And for Democrats, "feelz" overrides all history, every time.    

Source: New York Times 

Democrats would rather let Iran build an atomic bomb than prevent that by force

 

Of course they don't literally say that, because most Americans would instantly recognize that the Dem policy is stupid.  So instead Dem "leaders" bleat "Dey wuzn't reeeeally tryin' t'build an atomic bomb!  Y'say they admitted to having 440 kg of uranium enriched to 60%?  Is dat suppos'ta mean somethin'?  Dat jus' math, which ebrywun know beez raaaaaacis!  So begone with your right-wing math tricks!  

"No, we don't know how much a 'kg' is.  Why does that matter?  And yew seem to think '60%' is significant.  Why do you mention that like that should worry us?  Dey sed dey jus' wanted to use duh stuff to make electricity!  Whut wrong wif dat?  

"No, we don't know whut percent of 'enrichment' is needed to do dat.  Why does that matter?  How can you order that peaceful pipo like those running Iran can't have nuclear powerplants?  Yew iz jus' tryin' to use your raaacist maff to justify going to war!"

Democrat stupidity knows no bounds.  They believe (or pretend to) that there's a use for 60%-enriched uranium other than atomic bombs.  There isn't.  Nuclear reactors only need 10%.  The Media could explain that to viewers/readers, but they never do, because that would show the enormity of the Dem lie that "Iran wuz nevah tryin' t'build an atomic bomb."

The next Democrat lie--obediently parroted by their allies in the Mainstream Media--is "And even if they had been working on an atomic bomb, that's no threat to the U.S. because they don't have missiles big enough to get it here!"

The flaw in that reasoning is that anyone can ship an atomic bomb into, say, New York harbor, or Jacksonville or Los Angeles or Oakland or Seattle on a container-ship, hidden among 12,000 other containers.

Democrats don't want you to even consider that.  They could bleat "NOOooo, dat not possible, cuz we inspek all duh containers befo' dey iz loaded!"  No, cupcake, we don't, and neither does anyone else.  Dems don't wanna discuss this because the truth would quickly destroy their bullshit claim that "we" inspect the contents of all or even most of the 12,000 containers on a big container-ship.

You'd think at least some reporter would have asked about this--and may have, but their Media bosses will never do an article about it because it would show that leading Democrats are totally full of shit about this being impossible.

Bottom line: Trump was right to say "We will not permit you to build a bomb."  But of course the Lying Mainstream Media will never admit Trump was right about anything. 

Small Minnesota town shows America’s awful future. Thanks, Democrats

Faribault, Minnesota:  Population 23,352.  In 1990 it was 98% white.  Virtually no crime.  Decent school.  No crime there either.  Good graduation rate and student proficiency.

Faribault's only misfortune was that it was just an hour from Minneapolis, at a time when that Democrat-ruled shithole was being made the destination of 200,000 Somalis--entirely due to Democrat policies.  

Somalis invaded Minneapolistan, and Faribault became the epicenter of a $2.6 million Somali Medicaid-ride fraud, in which 8 Somalis stole hundreds of names to bill taxpayers for rides, interpreters and acupuncture services that never happened.

Somalis in the town were also part of the $250 million "Feeding Our Future" "free meals" scam--the first of the massive leftist/immigrant frauds in the state that are now estimated to have stolen about $9 BILLION--all of which was immediately moved to Somalia so is now unrecoverable.

To repeat: Somali fraud in Minnesota alone has likely cost taxpayers at least $9 BILLION. (And yes, I know one liberal white "female" was the nominal head of Feeding Our Future.) 

The ease with which Somalis stole tax dollars led to other fraud: because the purpose of the Democrat party is to give money to all immigrant fraudsters, somehow the tiny Faribault school system managed to snag a cool $1 million grant to "stop Somali drug abuse."

That grant was solicited by Lul Bashir Ali, initially identified only as a Somali mother.  Now investigators are trying to figure out where that million went, as it seems to have vanished without having done anything other than paying Lul Bashir Ali and family.

Today Faribault is 65% white, down from 98% in 1990.  Democrats: "Dis beez guuud!  Dis need t' happen all ovah duh country!  Cuz white iz bad!  Only Black and brown--and liberal whites, of course--are guuuud!"

Today 60% of the town's school students are Somalis. 

Democrats: "Wuz yew not lis'nin to whut we sed befo'?  Dis guuuud, citizen!"

Somali parents have been complaining about the possibility of their offspring becoming “English-dominant,” wailing that “parents and children might no longer share a common language, "weakening communication and cultural connections within families.”  So the town's school board--all liberal Democrats--is considering hiring Somali teachers to teach science, health and social studies in the Somali language.  

Wait...how many Somali teachers are certified in those subjects?  Virtually none.  Ooohhh.  So how can we do as ouah precious Somali neighbors demand?  Sure: we'll just get a state waiver from the normal requirements to teach.  Since Timmy is duh guv'ner, no prob!

See how neatly that works?

Why do ya think Democrats have imported millions of Somalis, eh?  Because they vote Democrat.  How the hell do ya think that POS Ilhan Omar continues to win elections, eh?  Or Minnesota's corrupt Muslim attorney-general Keith Ellison?

Today the town's graduation rate, attendance, test scores and every other metric are far below state standards:  Proficiency tests show less than 14% of students were proficient in math.  Just 30% were proficient in reading.

Note these results well, citizen: this is your future if the Dems continue to control immigration via their DeepState parasites.  Faribault is the "new normal" for Democrats.

Welfare dependence among Somali colonists is stratospheric.  One Somali interviewed by the Minnesota Post bragged “Faribault has become our city.”  And all the numbers confirm it.
Of course some "ordinary" Democrats may be rational.  But clearly the goal of leading Dem politicians--from Tim Walz up to Chuckie Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries--is to continue the policies that have essentially destroyed once-placid Faribault.

At that point Democrats won’t have to cheat to win every election.  That’s why they demonize border control and deporting illegals.

Source:

https://moonbattery.com/conquered-faribault-minnesota-shows-the-way-to-americas-fundamentally-transformed-future/ 

Comments on Artemis launch show lots of Americans *claim* they don't believe it's real

I watched the launch on a YouTube stream, and was stunned when scores of commenters on the stream claimed it was all fake.

Wait...tens of thousands of people in Florida were watching within a few dozen miles of the launch.  Were they fooled by Special Effects?  Or paid by mysterious conspirators to claim they'd watched a massive rocket launch?

Many commenters claimed it was done with "AI"--which could be done one video feeds but not for those watching live. 

The leftist critics claimed the "alleged" launch was a cunning distraction from their claim that "the U.S. is losing the war in Iran--BADLY!"  (That's an actual quote from a shithead Democrat senator.)  Or to distract from their claim that planet’s magnetic field is dying, or from alleged deadly new germs discovered buried in Antarctica, or from the Epstein files, or...something.

Some commenters even named a specific Hollywood studio as the real stage of the mission.  Made the claim totally believable, eh?

All the above strikes me as troubling:  More and more Americans are believing obviously absurd Narratives instead of accepting obvious facts--and I think that's a really bad sign.

Of course we've always had a lunatic fringe--folks who deny things that have massive proof, simply because denial gives them a political advantage.  For example, the WW2 Nazi concentration camps killed and cremated millions.  Once this became widely known, more people began to sympathize with the Jews.  Antisemites were eager to counter that, so began denying the Holocaust actually happened.

If your grandfather was with the U.S. Army in Germany at the end of the war and personally saw the starving prisoners, the piles of shoes, the tons of ashes, professional liars will claim that he was either lying, or repeating a Narrative told by an agent, or that he'd been shown an expensive, elaborate hoax.

If you try to counter that thousands of American soldiers saw the horrors of the death camps, or that Life Magazine ran pages of photos, the saboteurs counter that Life was in on the fake.  The saboteurs don't care that there's no rational motive.  That missing piece simply doesn't occur to the credulous--the gullible.

Same for the series of successful moon landings by Americans beginning in July of 1969 and continuing with five more landings over 3.5 years.

For young Americans: American men are the only humans to have EVER walked on the moon.  In the 57 years since we did it, no humans from any other country have been there.  And we did it 57 years ago..and not just once but SIX times.

It only took the communist/leftist saboteurs a few years to realize they could get morons to believe it never happened, by concocting the stunning claim that all six of the American moon landings were fake.

Now think: Who benefits from getting Americans--and citizens of other nations--to believe such a claim?

Sure: communists.  Several objectives: Most obvious is to make Americans believe their government would do anything, spend hundreds of millions on an elaborate fake, to make the U.S. seem more powerful.  And the secondary goal is to make people all over the world believe the beacon of freedom and free markets isn't as good as they make people believe--which makes communism seem more attractive by comparison.  Hmmm...

I'm a total cynic and skeptic, and well understand that governments lie--some rarely, others routinely.  And most adults have heard Hitler's maxim that if you tell a really big lie, people are MORE likely to believe it because it's so brazen that they think no one would be that bold, eh?

Example: the Chyna virus.  Fauci and bribem absolutely assured Americans that a harmless bat virus could not possibly have been modified in a Wuhan lab to make it lethal to humans. .  Yet we have the genetic code that shows it was unquestionably modified.

The saboteurs quickly countered that it was modified by the U.S. as part of a bio-warfare program.

Except I've read with my own eyes a paper given at an international conference in 2015, in which the female "bat lady" in charge of the Wuhan lab reported on their success in inserting a single gene into a bat coronavirus.  The last page of that paper thanked the U.S. NIH--specifically Fauci and his NIAID division--for funding the research.

This was in 2015, five years before the Chyna virus hit the world.  Yet Fauci has never been charged with lying to everyone.  Brazen, eh?

People are right to distrust authority. Years of media lies, government coverups, Narratives and stolen elections have conditioned people to assume they are being misled at least part of the time.  And when people feel lied to enough, they become cynical, and more likely to believe the most outrageous lies as a counter to what they understandably feel are lies by the Establishment.

The result is that lots of Americans deny the most basic facts, like whether the Earth is spherical.  And the Holocaust, and the six American moon landings.  They believe the World Trade Center was demolished by planted charges rather than by hijacked jetliners full of jet fuel.  

"Wait...what about the video from hundreds of pedestrian cell phones showing at least the second jet crashing into one of the towers?"  Easy: doze wuz all faked!  Computer graphics made to look like cell phone vids!

The sowers of lies and doubt have an answer for everything, no matter how absurd.

Way too many Americans believe vapor trails--condensed from cooling the water vapor produced by jet engines flying in -50 degree air--are really "chem-trails"--government planes spraying mysterious chemicals on helpless citizens below!  No idea what those mysterious chemicals might be, but it doesn't matter, eh?

And finally, too many believe the huge rocket NASA and the Media claim was just launched from the Cape was an elaborate, staged fake.

And the gullible, credulous morons are allowed to vote, and there are millions of 'em.
 

Democrats: "Maybe a few Americans are killed by thugs we release w/o bail, but so what?"

Leftist judges--all appointed by Democrats--kept letting the thugs out of jail without making 'em post bail--cuz dat beez duh Democrat demand.  See, it jus' beez TOTALLY unfair to keep thugs in jail until trial, eh?

Their victims--the innocent people they murdered in cold blood--would probably disagree.

Democrats: "So what?  We gets t'do what we wants, an' we wants liberal judges!  Deez pipo wuz jus' 'collateral damage.'  Not ouah fault!  It's like gettin' killed by plane crashes, eh?  Jus' their bad luck!  Not ouah fault!  We don't ban flying cuz some pipo get killed in crashes!  Got it?  Cuz whut mattahs is dat we don't keep deez po' men in jail til dere trials!" 

"No kings" demonstrators awaiting their next orders

 

Democrat *lawmakers* in Pennsylvania introduce resolution to honor women. Hilarity ensues...

Democrat lawmakers in Pennsylvania's Democrat-controlled legislature proposed a resolution to make March "national women’s month."

But after a Republican rep introduced an amendment to define "woman," the Dem fucktards withdrew the resolution.

That wasn't confusion.  Instead, the request to define "woman" revealed "the glitch in the Matrix" (if you saw that movie).

See, the Democrat script requires that no one question the Democrats' definition of "woman," which is "anyone who claims to be one."  That's obviously horseshit, but it's what the Democrats demand.

Hmmm.....

Asking 'em to define "woman" exposes the charade (which is exactly what it is).

Their script--their scam--can't survive the question.

Democrats in the PA legislature withdrew the resolution because having to define "woman" would have exposed the lie that's the core of "transgenderism."

One question and the hoax--the deliberate lie--was exposed.

The Democrats withdrew their resolution NOT because they suddenly no longer wanted to honor women.  They withdrew it because they were never talking about women at all.