The CDC knew the jab for the Chyna virus was unsafe--but said the opposite

The first so-called "vaccination" for duh Chyna virus was administered on December 14, 2020.  By the end of 2020 only a few tens of thousands of people had taken the thing. 

The CDC had long had a totally voluntary system called "VAERS"--Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System--to monitor vaccine safety.  But reporting was totally voluntary.  And now, curiously, the agency outsourced the handling of reports from that system to a company called General Dynamics Information Technology.

The contract expected a maximum of a thousand "adverse effect reports" per day.  But on Jan 15, 2021--just a month after the first vax shot, and when the numbers of people who'd gotten the shot was quite low--GDIT wrote a memo to the CDC:

“The number of incoming COVID-19 reports has significantly exceeded the estimated maximum of 1,000 reports per day.  As a result, GDIT is unable to meet processing and other time-frames (data processing, telephone inquiries, clinical inquiries, etc.)."

Interesting.  Should have been a warning sign, eh?

The "vaccine" should have been pulled right then, for all Americans, as was done with previous vaccines that killed people.  But because of Fauci, that wasn't done. 

The CDC got the GDIT memo on Jan 15.  There's no indication that anyone did anything about it--cuz Fauci arranged with bribem to require almost all Americans to take the jab.
On February 19, 2021, two months after the first jab, with over 100,000 VAERS reports received (vs. a max of 60,000 in the contract), the contractor had only processed about 7,000 of the reported "adverse effects."

The CDC has a weekly newsletter called the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).  And on Feb 19, the CDC released its first MMWR on the jab. 

The primary author was Julianne Gee, an epidemiologist in the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office.  The senior author was Tom Shimabukuro, currently deputy director of the Influenza Division in the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases.  

After examining 6,994 reports of the 107,000 received, the pair concluded: “Monitoring...indicates reassuring safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines.”

Problem is, of the 107,000 reports of adverse effects, the authors of the report had only examined 6 percent of those.  And General Dynamics had told the CDC a month earlier that they could not process more than the stated “worst-case scenario” of 1,000 reports per day.  With tens of thousands of reports that hadn't been investigated, how complete was the picture?

It should be obvious that the conclusion of "reassuring safety profiles" couldn't be supported from the processed reports.  Yet the CDC report said "Monitoring...indicates reassuring safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines.” 

A few telltale weasel-words helped: “The initial... safety profiles of the two COVID-19 vaccines in current use did not indicate evidence of unexpected serious adverse events.  These data provide reassurance and helpful information regarding what health care providers and vaccine recipients might expect after vaccination.”

So how many "serious adverse events," eh?  They didn't say.  And how serious were the effects?  Any deaths?  They didn't say, even though the indications were that hundreds had already died days after taking the jab.  But at least it's vaguely reassuring that any "serious adverse events" weren't unexpected.  Reassuring as defined by bureaucrats, eh?

Even from the small number of reports analyzed, the official report says 90.8% were not of serious injury.  Of course that suggests 9.2% did cause serious injury, eh?  And if that figure held for 107,000 reports, that would mean that on the day the MMWR was released, over 9,000 Americans had likely been seriously injured from the jab.  This is from CDC data, from a voluntary reporting system known by follow-up to under-report adverse effects by a factor of five or so. 

We now know from VAERS data alone that by mid-February of 2021 about 966 people had died, apparently from the shot.  But somehow the MWWR says "available information…did not suggest any causal relationship between vaccination and death.”

The MMWR also says “[From] December 14, 2020–January 13, 2021…VAERS received 6,994 reports.”  That’s not true, but is just what the report's authors say they evaluated. General Dynamics had already notified them that there had been far more reports than the contract's worst-case estimate of 30,000. 

There have now been over 2.74 million reported adverse effects, including 39,000 reports of death shortly after taking the jab, and countless debilitating injuries.  The data were so ghastly that CDC decided to only count "deaths of vaccinated persons" if a person who took the jab was decreed to be "fully vaccinated."  And since the CDC alone decided when that was, they decreed that people who took the jab would ONLY be declared "fully vaccinated" 14 days after taking the booster shot.

If you have an IQ above 80 you already realize that if a person died one day after taking the first shot, or the second, or any time less than 14 days after taking the booster shot, the CDC would NOT count that death as being caused by the jab! 

What do ya think that does to the official tally of vax-caused deaths, eh?

That decree by the CDC is part of the public record.  It's an undeniable truth, and yet you never heard of it until now.  That's because the bribem regime and the Lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media didn't want you to know.

The reports of injury and death only slowed once lots of Americans began hearing about the deaths, and the fact that the Chyna virus was less lethal than the normal seasonal flu.  So Americans started deciding NOT to take the jab.  So what happened next?  Bribem had his Dept of Labor order that everyone who worked for a company with more than 100 employees HAD to take the jab, or the company would be ordered to fire the refusing employees.

Hell of a hard decision, eh?  Take a jab that could kill or injure you, or lose your job and be unable to feed your family or keep up with mortgage payments or rent.  Sons of bitches!

(Yes, there was a "workaround" for employees who refused the jab: they had to take a weekly covid test, at their own expense.  No idea how many employees chose that route.)

I have yet to see a figure on how many Americans were fired because of bribem's order.  What we do know is that about 9,000 members of the military were kicked out for refusing to take the jab.

If just a few dozen jab victims had died, and the fatality rate for the chyna virus was, say, ten percent, the bribem decree might be understandable.  But jab deaths were in the tens of thousands, while the death rate from duh Chyna virus was less than a tenth of one percent!  (For your reference, that's about one-third of the death rate for the flu.)  So bribem's order can't be justified by "duh public health."  It's pure totalitarianism--which the Democrat partei loves.

In all this, keep in mind that the HHS admits that VAERS captures only a “small fraction” of actual injuries. 

The CDC never admitted that the number of adverse reports received just one month after the jab was released was twice the number their contractor could process and evaluate.

But instead of warning the public, the CDC said exactly the opposite--that nothing unusual was happening, that the shots were safe, that all reports were reassuring.  

And everyone who had a hand in crafting those lies still works there.

Source: Brownstone 

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-the-cdc-lied-about-shot-injury/