The FDA and CDC knew the "vaccine" was harming thousands, but lied about it

And when a top-quality researcher showed 'em how they were "missing" the signal, the agencies told her to shut up.

Obviously by now Covid is almost ancient history, so why should you care about this, eh?

Because something just like this will happen again.  Guaranteed.  Once the corruptocrats find something that works, they don't stop using it until everyone revolts.  SO...

What made a harmless-to-humans bat virus lethal to humans (though far less than one percent of those who got the Chyna virus died from it) was a crucial change in the genetic code of the part of the virus that locks the virus onto one specific cell in the human airway.

That crucial locking mechanism was the "spike protein."  And by chance, just two days after the first case of duh Chyna virus was confirmed in the U.S, I stumbled on the gene sequence of that  crucial "spike," sequenced by Indian researchers in December of 2019 from a blood sample smuggled across the border with China.

That gene sequence clearly, unequivocally proved the virus had been modified in a lab.

So for the next four years I watched, astonished, as every agency in the bribem regime brazenly lied: Fauci was the lead liar, repeatedly claiming the virus could not possibly have been modified in a lab, but instead "evolved naturally" to make it lethal to a tiny fraction of the people who got it.

It was all brazen horseshit, and all officials with a tech background had to have known it.  The ones who knew the truth and told their supervisors were told to keep quiet.  And now we see yet another instance of this deliberate suppression of the truth--this one involving the "vaccine adverse effects reporting system"--VAERS.

That system was supposed to log any "adverse effects" following a vaccination.  If the effects were both serious and several times the rate seen in unvaccinated people, that would be grounds for pulling that vaccine off the market.

It was a noble idea but had two fatal flaws.  The first was that very few people who experienced adverse effects after taking the "clot shot" knew about VAERS, and that they could report the adverse effect themselves. 

The second was that while all doctors knew about the system, reporting an adverse effect was totally voluntary.  So since reporting an adverse effect wasn't mandatory, and would increase "vaccine hesitancy," and since most doctors believed the fatality rate for Covid was frighteningly high, they wanted everyone to take the jab, eh?  So they didn't want to report adverse effects.  In any case investigators found many doctors didn't report.

So the voluntary reporting system depended on doctors being unbiased.  And most were totally biased because Fauci and "experts" (shills) in the FDA, CDC and NIH had convinced 'em the Chyna virus was way deadly--far deadlier than the common flu--even though that wasn't true.  

("IFR" is the percentage of people who are infected by a pathogen and die from it.  Since many cases are mild or totally asymptomatic, the incidence is estimated from people who tested positive but had no symptoms.  Here are the median pre-vaccination IFRs by age for Covid: 
0–19: ~0.0003% (about 1 in 330,000)
20–29: ~0.002% (about 1 in 50,000)
30–39: ~0.011% (about 1 in 9,000)
40–49: ~0.035% (about 1 in 2,800)
50–59: ~0.123% (about 1 in 800)
60–69: ~0.506% (about 1 in 200)
  70+: Rises steeply past 5% to over 15% for older groups 

By stark contrast, the IFR for seasonal flu is between 0.05% to 0.1%  As you see, for people under 50 the IFR is far lower for Covid than for the flu.  But you never heard a single word about that, eh?)

So...the mass vaccination of Americans started on December 14th, 2020.  Immediately, reports started coming in about myocarditis, pericarditis and "thrombosis" (clots) in people who'd taken the clot shot.  All three conditions are normally very rare.

But Fauci, the FDA and CDC all insisted that there was no "signal" from the reports.  This was medical jargon for "NO statistically significant increase of ANY adverse effects from the jab.

The latest discovery is yet another confirmation of what we've known all along: that not only was the "no signal" claim a brazen lie, but also that the top members of the bribem regime KNEW it was horseshit, yet knowingly parroted the lie to get Americans to take the ineffective, unsafe jab (since taking the jab didn't prevent people from getting or spreading the virus).  This latest comes from an FDA medical officer and statistics expert named Ana Szarfman.

In late February of 2021--just ten weeks after the first vaccinations--CDC and FDA officials on a "vaccine safety committee supposedly "received notice" of a large number of VAERS reports of myocarditis and pericarditis.  This alone ("received notice") is a careful, deliberate mislead, since both organizations have direct access to all VAERS data, so they knew all along.  They want you to think they had no idea.

Both conditions aren't trivial: In Israel, two out of 77 vaccinated people with those conditions died.

Szarfman showed her bosses at the FDA why their statistical analysis--the one they used to claim there was NO "signal"--was utterly wrong. 

The FDA committee shrugged.

The next week, the committee heard the Pentagon's "Defense Health Agency" report a "cluster of cases" of myocarditis among members of the military who'd taken the jab.

The committee just shrugged.  "We not seein' no signal," eh?

You might think that if you have a so-called "vaccine" that doesn't work, and kills some of the people who take it, the FDA would rescind its crucial "Emergency Use Authorization" that was legally required to allow the barely-tested "vaccine" to be given to 280 million Americans, eh?

By May of 2021, hundreds of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis after covid vaccinations had been reported to VAERS, so the CDC began alerting healthcare professionals.  But the agency didn't say the "adverse effects" were caused by the "vaccine," alerted physicians through a "clinical considerations" web posting.  No urgency there, eh?  Cuz "no signal!"

In June of 2021, in a public presentation the deputy director of CDC's Immunization Safety Office (Tom Shimabukuro) admitted that for young males (age 12-24), VAERS showed between 29 and 347 times more myocarditis and pericarditis reports than the for unvaxxed. 

Can't have that, eh?  So to avoid "vaccine hesitancy," in a public statement the same day the CDC called myocarditis an "extremely rare side effect."  Well yes, but the fact that it was seen "up to 347 times more often" in males who got the jab sound like one hellofa signal, eh? 

Enter Peter Marks, director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.  Marks was the agency's top covid vaccine regulator, and a total pro-vax shill.  He emailed CDC director Rochelle Walensky, claiming the data didn't reveal any "safety signal" in the data.  So despite the far higher incidence of potentially lethal myocarditis and pericarditis, Marks adamantly refused to change the FDA's "no signal" ruling.  FDA officials didn't warn either doctors or the public that Ana Szarfman had found "safety signals" the FDA had missed. 

When Szarfman continued to press the matter she was told--diplomatically--to shut up.  On May 7th, 2021 the "associate director for medical policy for the FDA's Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology," Craig Zinderman, emailed Szarfman:

"Thank you again for talking with us back in March about your work exploring new data mining approaches.  We are writing to kindly ask you to please hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses using covid-19 vaccine AE [adverse event] data."

The email didn't contain a single word of substantive critique ("We believe your analysis is flawed because...")  Just told her "please hold off."

For anyone with experience in government bureau-babble that's a clear order: 'If you persist, your career will be over.'

Challenging Szarfman's work by making a mathematical or scientific argument would be totally reasonable.  But the email didn't say the FDA bosses thought Ana's work was flawed.  Clearly "the fix was in:"  The bribem regime was about to order almost every American to take the jab, and the regime's lackeys knew they were not to allow any contrary evidence to reach the public.

How much more evidence will it take for most Americans to realize they were conned?  Scammed.  The regime forced you to get your children jabbed, even though the risk from duh Chyna virus for people under 19 was one in 330,000.

Pause for a moment:  today's college students weren't born on 9/11/2001, so obviously have no way to know about it unless they're taught.  And of course the corrupt public schools refuse to teach anything true.  So they'll never know.

By the same token, few Americans today know how utterly the Democrat sons of whores conned your parents, and were able to ORDER lockdowns for a virus only half as lethal as the flu.

I'll try to keep telling you and your kids about this ghastly death sentence/con-job as long as I live.

It's clear that Democrats hate Trump, but if you trust a Democrat with power again, you deserve every bit of what you're gonna get.  After all, it won 'em an election in November of 2020.