New Year's Eve car burnings in France: the insanity continues

For the last decade or so immigrants in France have marked New Year's eve by burning cars.

Not just a dozen or so.  Lots of cars.

This year the French government reported that total was lower than last year:  A mere 940 cars were destroyed.

Significantly, the French government considers this good news, since it's a hundred or so less than last year.  Yay!

Imagine a four-lane roadway with cars stopped almost bumper-to-bumper.  Now walk down this parking lot for 4/5ths of a mile.  That's 940 cars.  Or former cars.  Now scrap.

Ya know, as much as Greenies like to bitch about "carbon pollution" you'd think one of 'em would complain about turning 940 cars and their tires and upholstry into smoke.  But you've never heard a single complaint about that, have ya?

That's because the car-burners are Muslim "youth."  Well, that and the fact that Leftists and "watermelons" (green on the outside, red underneath) are delighted to destroy any private property.

And just for the record:  The carnage isn't limited to New Year's eve, but goes on year round.  In 2013 a total of 40,000 cars were set afire in France.

Who are these kids?

Take a look at the 21 faces of school kids below:

Now imagine five more panels like this one, but with different faces.  That entire group is fewer than a Taliban terror group killed in the school in Pakistan two weeks ago.

What kind of insane cult of death methodically kills 132 defenseless school kids and a dozen teachers?

Ah, wait...I hear the answer from the Left now:  "This unfortunate event had nothing whatsoever to do with Islam."  Well, the Taliban sure as hell *think* they're Muslims, and that they're following the commands of their prophet.  By what bizarre perversion of logic do you claim there's no connection?

Wait, I know:  All seven of the attackers were simply "lone wolves" who just happened to have the same idea at the same time.  Yeh, dat's it.

France continues downward spiral

Dateline-- France:  More than 1000 French supermarkets, including major chains, have been selling Islamic books that openly call for jihad and the killing of non-Muslims.

Gosh, ya sorta wonder how on earth the French government could let 'em get away with that.

A well-known Islamist website created a poster that read:

To our lone-wolves in France, assassinate the president of disbelief and criminality, terrify his cursed government, and bomb them and scare them as a support to the vulnerable in the Central African Republic.

Let's do a mental exercise:  If the head of the French Nationalist Party sold books calling for holy war on Muslims, and for the killing of Muslims, how many minutes do you think it'd take before he was jailed on charges?

So why is there a different standard for Muslims?  By what insane perversion of reason can a Muslim website openly call for followers to assassinate the president of France, and not be jailed?

Can you say P-R-O-T-E-C-T-E-D  C-L-A-S-S ?   Can you say "Political Correctness by spineless liberal politicians"?

Nah, it's probably just Bush's fault.

Oh, and watch how the French government has mastered the art of rationalizing crimes committed by Muslims:

On January 1 [2014], Interior Minister Manuel Valls announced that 1,067 cars and trucks were burned in France on New Year's Eve.  Now here's the rationalization:  This figure was a "significant reduction" from the 1,193 vehicles that were burned on the same day in 2013.

It's estimated that 40,000 cars are torched every year in France.

But don't worry, citizen.  These acts are NOT representative of Islam.  They're just ...um... "Hey, this year was Soooo much better than last year!"

Can you say "Dhimmi"?

And keep in mind, gentle reader:  This isn't some goat-muzzle country in the middle of nowhere.  This is France, fer cryin' out loud--home of some of the clearest exponents of freedom.  And they are absolutely, totally dead.  At this point nothing short of a bona fide miracle can save them from becoming Muslim-ruled.

Hey, no big deal, right?  The sidewalk cafes will still be there.  They just won't be allowed to serve wine.  But...no big deal.

On June 8 of this year a 28-year-old man in the northeastern city of Reims was attacked on a train by two Muslims who said they were upset that he was eating a ham sandwich in their presence.  But no big deal, citizen:  You probably don't eat ham sandwiches very often, so what does it matter if your Muslim rulers ban them?

Ever seen the Eiffel Tower?  Heard of the world-famous museum called the Louvre?  Ever thought about seeing it?  Well, better hurry:  On July 9, it emerged that 29-year-old Algerian living in France was plotting with a "senior member" of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb [AQIM], to blow up the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre Museum.

But no need to be concerned, citizen:  They were merely "lone wolves."  Which means...um...their explosives can't destroy...wait, that's crap.  Nevermind.

Not sure if they'll blow up Notre Dame--normally they don't want those cathedral thingies competing with their mosques, right?  Wait, I know:  They'll turn it into a mosque.  Brilliant!

Imagine a world without music, wine and dancing.

Don't worry, you'll get used to it.

Let me guess: You think I'm just being facetious.

Of course you know that "Islam" literally means "submission."  In theory it's submission to the will of Allah, but there's some uncertainty as to how one determines what that will is.  Wait, it's whatever some dickhead ayatollah says it is.  So hey, no problem!

Of course there IS a solution.  It's just that no one in western nations wants to consider it.

Makes no difference to me, since I'll be dead before the Muzz take over the U.S.  But if you have kids, you might have second thoughts.  Also, you might take a look at how much the Muzz have already taken over in this country.  Your emperor is the prime mover.

You think I'm just being facetious.  But you'll figure it out.  Eventually.

Postscript:  in Columbus, Indiana, three churches were vandalized on the same night. The words most frequently spray-painted were "Infidels!" and "Koran 3:151," which says "We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve....  And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers."

But of course, it can't happen here.

Mark Steyn, cowbirds, demographics

No one wants to face facts when they're scary or harsh.  Far more fun to "eat, drink and be merry" until the last possible moment.  Yes, certainly.

Unfortunately that course of action ensures the feared (and never discussed) outcome is far more likely to occur.

If that outcome is something simple like paying a bill or having a needed operation, avoidance might not be fatal.  But what if the scary fact involves death of your civilization?  Because that outcome is so...fatal...one might think a handful of that culture's members might want to shake off the paralysis and try to act like adults--as in, doing something to try to avoid it.

Just got through reading a few pages of Mark Steyn's "America Alone" (subtitled "The end of the world as we know it").  Steyn looks at how Muslims are interacting with Brits and Europeans.  He presents a few of the violent and totally unprovoked attacks by Muslims on non-Muslims in Europe, and extrapolates.  Finally he looks at birth rates for Muslims and everyone else, and sees that in just 30 years virtually all of Europe will be majority Muslim. 

Example: The fertility rate for native Italian women is 1.1 child per woman.  For Muslims it's between 3.5 and 6, depending on country and survey.

The difference between these numbers doesn't sound like much, but consider that if a population grows 4% a year, it will double in 17 years.   By contrast, a level of 1.1 is below the replacement level.

But birthrates are only part of the problem:  Muslims immigrants are flooding into virtually every European country, because they immediately start drawing generous social welfare benefits, sometimes including free housing.

And that's only the tip of the problem:  In some European countries merely asking the question "Should we keep immigration from Somalia as high as it is now?" is enough to get you charged by the government with one of the many variants of "hate speech."  Politically-correct politicians at all levels are hell-bent on keeping the influx as high as possible, and no one seems to know why.

One popular theory is that in Europe pols are overwhelmingly liberal, and many seem to be afflicted with a fatal case of white guilt, but the literal cause doesn't matter a great deal except to historians.

If you read European analysts you've seen that almost every nation over there has at least a couple of cities with sections that are almost exclusively Muslim immigrants.  In many cases police won't enter these areas for fear of starting a riot.

Leftists and liberals: Do you think that can't or won't happen here?  If so, would you be so kind as to state your reasons for that conclusion?  Because it sure ain't "Because Muslims in the U.S. are just so much more into freedom and democracy and interfaith outreach and coexistence and..."

Spare us.  That argument is basically wishful thinking.

The day after Christmas I met four of my nieces and nephews for a late lunch.  All of them are late 20's, incredibly smart, college grads, good career starts.  I found myself wondering what loss of freedom--whether of speech or worship or just the choice of what they could eat or drink or see at the movies--could make them angry enough to take up arms to stop an invasion.

Sadly, the answer seemed to be:  nothing.  They've been so cunningly conditioned by their schools (and most private ones are no better) to believe that all ideas, all religions and all cultures are equal and that anyone who denies this is raacist and a hater.  They're adamant on this point.

Not wanting to ruin a pleasant lunch I didn't press them on the logic of that position.  Female genital mutilation?  Making women wear the burqa?  Banning alcohol?  Banning music?  Even banning people from watching the World Cup?  "Oh, none of those things is representative of real Islam."  (One wonders where they got that conclusion.  MSNBC?  Jon Stewart?  Obama?)

And of course bringing up any of those topics would kill the pleasant conversation in a hurry.

Plus, for the first 20 years the loss of freedoms will be so incremental as to be barely noticeable:  Cab drivers in Minnesota refusing to carry passengers with dogs or liquor, for example.  "Who cares?"  "Tempest in a teapot."  "A local problem, doesn't affect us a bit."

You see how the reasoning goes.  Some of us would be quick to peg that as rationalizing.  But to leftists, all such concerns are merely the fevered nightmares of conservatives or Jesus-freaks or similar.

Ever heard of a cowbird?  It's about the size of a crow and has a very unique nesting behavior:  They don't build nests.  Ever.  Instead the cowbird finds a nest painstakingly built by another bird species, waits til both members of the mating pair that built that nest are away, then slips in and lays its egg.

Then it rolls one of the eggs laid by the pair that built the nest out of the nest.  When the mating pair return they don't notice anything amiss.

When the eggs hatch, the cowbird chick--larger and more aggressive than the others--competes with them for food.  As if that isn't enough, nature photogs have tons of footage of cowbird chicks actually throwing the chicks of the nesting pair out of the nest.

It's a brilliant strategy--at least from the cowbird's standpoint.

If you think that's an absurd analogy I'd be glad to elaborate.  But for now, have a happy new year. 

All ideas, all cultures, all religions are equal?

"All cultures, all ideas and all religions are equal."

At least this is what the Left tells us.  What do you think:  True or not?

Is slavery as good an idea as freedom?

Is forcing women to wear a black head-to-toe covering as "good" as letting them dress as they wish?

Is banning music as good as being able to listen to music?

Is beheading bound captives as good as building them soccer fields and cooking them religously approved food?

But wait...the Left keeps telling us all cultures, all ideas and all religions are equal.  Are they lying, or have they simply never thought about the questions posed above?

Is it reasonable to believe Leftists are totally unaware of the examples above?

Maybe there's some other explanation for the apparent contradiction.  Wait, I know:  They'll tell you that none of the above acts represents "real" Islam, and in fact have nothing whatsoever to do with Islam.

Count on it.

Terrible story to start the day--you may want to wait

A new video from the Muslim terror group Boko Haram shows gunmen killing civilians lying face down in a dormitory.  One of the executioners announces to the camera that the people are being killed because they are 'infidels' or non-believers.

Don't click on the link if you're queasy.

"We have made sure the floor of this hall is turned red with blood, and this is how it is going to be in all future attacks and arrests of infidels," the group leader says.  "From now, killing, slaughtering, destruction and bombing will be our religious duty anywhere we invade."

The story is from the U.K. "Daily Mail."  You won't see it in any U.S. paper because it doesn't fit the emperor's narrative.  Because the emperor says this group has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam.

Gosh, if that's true I wonder what religion the group's leader meant when he said "From now, killing, slaughtering, destruction and bombing will be our religious duty anywhere we invade"?

And yes, I realize only a few tens of thousands of Muslims are executing people in cold blood, and one doesn't want to tar the whole religion for the acts of a few tens of thousands.

Oh wait...their prophet told 'em to kill non-Muslims--the ones they call "infidels."  Now what?

Muslim terrorists kill 130 school children--Muslim school children, no less--in Pakistan.

In Peshawar, Pakistan last Tuesday Islamic terrorists entered a school and methodically killed at least 130 school children and 46 adults, going from one classroom to another killing anyone they found.

Here's a link.

I can hear my liberal relatives now, whining that this story is from a nutty right-wing rag like Faux News.  (Lord, that cracks me up every time I see it!)  Turns out the story was in the decidedly LEFT-wing, Democrat-loving, liberal "Daily Beast."

But not to worry, people--that does NOT mean the world is ending.  By tomorrow they'll have found a way to blame it all on the U.S.  Indeed, the comments are full of just those sentiments.

I mean, it's common knowledge among liberals that all those members of the terror group Boko Haram only kill all those Christians in Nigeria because of the horrible devastation the U.S. inflicted on that poor nation near the end of the VietNam war...  Wait, I'm pretty sure American troops haven't ever been in Nigeria.

But what difference does it make?  Why bother with facts?  To the left and liberals it's always our fault.

Frankly I'm about ready to say "In for a penny, in for a pound."  If they're gonna blame us when we've never been there, I suggest we give 'em something to really light 'em up.