U.K. cops scramble to respond to latest emergency
The leaders of the Democrat party have decided we don't need honest elections. The motto of Virginia is "Sic semper tyrannis," and it shows a pic of Lady Justice standing on a dead tyrant. A fair translation is "Death to tyrants." Of course that was then. We're...more evolved now.
The Democrats have mastered the art of destruction. Latest example: If you pay attention to events outside what you can see around you (spoiler: you don't) you may have stumbled across a story about an illegal alien from Guyana who came to the U.S. on a student visa in 1999. When it expired, he simply stayed here.
Not a citizen. No green card. Yet somehow ends up being APPOINTED by the corrupt school board of Des Moines, Iowa as fucking superintendent of that city's school system--at the princely salary of $305,000 per year, plus car and expenses.
This next part was discovered by ace researcher Laura Powell: In 2020 the school board of Millcreek, Pennsylvania, somehow wanted to hire Roberts as their superintendent. The wokie board members were totally slobbering over dis faaabulous black man, and were ready to sign him, cuz...wokiez jus' loooves black superintendents, eh? Shows dey iz woke. But then one member noted that Roberts couldn't provide proof that he'd received the doctoral degree he claimed. Nor was there any evidence of a required FBI background check.
But never fear, citizen! Cuz when wokiez run things, rules, policies and procedures that were always required before are casually ignored--in the interest of "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion," of course. So his attorney said "Yew don' reeeally need dat stuff, cuz rule 486(b) sez yew kin hire him provisionally, and he kin provide any documents later. We cool?"
Laura says there is no record in any minutes of the school board meetings showing either that Roberts submitted the missing info, or that the board ever revisited the matter with him. In other words, the "provisional" hiring was permanent, without the missing information being submitted. Nice!
Roberts is quoted in 2020 referring to Guyana as his birthplace and saying that his father immigrated to the United States in the 1980s and his mother in the 2000s. But in a 2024 local news story, he claims he was born in Brooklyn and raised by a single mother. His Facebook lists two secondary schools in Guyana as alma maters--which isn't consistent with his claim of being born in Brooklyn. He's quoted as giving three different years for his birthdate. No one could possibly take this scammer seriously.
In a 2012 grant application submitted to the U.S. Dept. of Education Roberts listed himself as "Dr." But he didn't finish his doctoral dissertation (from an online university with a 100% acceptance rate) until 2021. Hmm...
In five evaluations by the Millcreek school board Roberts was rated "meets expectations"--the equivalent of a C grade on the board's five-point scale. He left Millcreek after just two years, moving seamlessly into the position in Des Moines. The "search firm" that recommended him to Des Moines either didn't think to ask Millcreek how they rated Roberts, or else they knew and just didn't say anything to their client (Des Moines).
Of course the Mainstream Media has ignored the "irregularities" at both school boards...cuz it makes the Democrat-run school boards look corrupt or incompetent, and makes Americans wonder how many other illegals are burrowed into our power structure. Cuz make no mistake: school boards and superintendents have LOTS of power over what your kids are taught.
The current president of the Des Moines school board (called "chair" cuz it sounds so much more egalitarian, eh?) is a totally corrupt Democrat POS named Jackie Norris. And guess what her previous position was.
She was chief of staff for the America-hating Michelle Obama.
She wasn't president of the board when they hired the illegal alien fraudster, but was a board member in 2023 when the board began looking for a new superintendent. She voted for the illegal from Guyana for superintendent, despite the official, written policy saying the city's school system couldn't hire anyone with a criminal record.
Oh, did we forget to mention that? Apparently either the search
firm *paid by city taxpayers* couldn't find that, or just ignored it. Or--worst--the firm DID tell Jackie and her wokie board scum, and they simply ignored it. You decide.
In July of 2023, after a *closed-door meeting* (illegal by state law) the all-female school board (yes, every damn one of 'em was a Democrat female) voted to hire the fraudster as superintendent "effective July 1, 2023."
And then on October 5, 2023--just three months after the board hired him as superintendent of the city's school system--*Roberts proposed to rescind the school system's longstanding, written policy of not hiring anyone with a criminal record, so the schools could now hire people with a criminal record!*
See how neatly the corrupt Democrat-ruled system works? Or do you think his proposal was just an accident?
Wait...it gets worse.
Even though Jackie Norris wasn't president of the board when they hired the illegal, she didn't lift a finger to demand Roberts actually be vetted. So she's either incompetent, or actively helping the non-citizen be appointed--*appointed*, by six female Democrat morons--as superintendent of Iowa's largest school system. And now the corrupt or merely incompetent Jackie Norris is now running for the U.S. senate, where she can bring the same level of corruption and/or incompetence to our nation that she brought to the Des Moines school system she became ruler of.
How many thousands of other corrupt Democrats have burrowed into school boards and wrought havoc on our schools and other institutions that we just haven't discovered?
As an aside: Democrats gush that Roberts has a "doctorate." That degree is from an outfit called "American Intercontinental University"...a "diploma mill" that touts that it has a 100% acceptance rate, and lost its accreditation after it was found to have enrolled illiterate students who hadn't graduated from high school.
Watch this story vanish like fog. The Mainstream Media doesn't want any attention give to it. And "their will be done," eh?
Portland, Oregon, has been turned into a lawless shithole by Democrats--not just the Trantifa thugs who've been throwing fireworks and banging drums and garbage-can lids until 3 a.m. every night since June 7th, but also by the socialists politicians and judges who rule the place.
Trantifa organized a 24-hour protest which includes shifts and a tent encampment just outside the ICE facility. The site has seen near-nightly clashes between federal law enforcement officers and black-clad agitators for 100 days.
Finally a person who lives a few hundred feet from the Federal building Trantifa is attacking got tired of the constant noise until 4 a.m. or so every night, and called the cops and asked why Trantifa protesters weren't being arrested for violating a longstanding city ordinance against excessive noise after ten p.m.
Cops--who serve at the pleasure of the communists who run the shithole--said they wouldn't take action unless ordered to by the mayor. Interesting: laws can be disregarded unless the mayor personally orders cops to enforce 'em. Wow.
And of course it gets worse: after the cops essentially told the citizen to get fucked, the citizen sued the city, asking the local court to order the city to enforce its own laws. That's called a "writ of mandamus" and is well known.
But as you already predicted, the court was rigged: Multnomah County judge Ellen Rosenblum, the former Democrat Attorney General of the whole state, ruled against the citizen plaintiff, decreeing that police are not required to enforce laws against demonstrators outside the ICE facility.
This is...interesting, because the violation is both obvious and has continued for three months, and the city ordinance is clear. So just like cops refusing to act, the corrupt judge is likewise saying, in effect "You don't have the right to quiet at night, because I say you don't. I simply refuse to accept your claim that there's noise, and I think the city ordinance has an implied exception for noise produced by peaceful citizens peacefully protesting against Orange Hitler's policies. So go fuck yourself."
Now Portland's Dem mayor--a guuud Democrat lackey named Keith Wilson--and a coalition of Democrat mayors from across Oregon have drafted a letter laying out a coordinated resistance strategy among mayors in the Portland metro area. The mayors say their local governments will provide direct legal support for protesters--including members of the designated terrorist organization Trantifa.
Sources in the Portland government also said Wilson intends to contact Portland hotels and urge them to prevent federal officers and military personnel from sleeping there.
A 28-year-old Somali woman in Minneapolis has been charged for defrauding a state fund of $14 million--money meant to help children with autism.
Asha Farhan Hassan, who ran a therapy business, was indicted on charges of wire fraud. Prosecutors allege she fraudulently billed Minnesota’s Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention program, which was created to help children with autism. But instead of delivering services, Hassan allegedly pocketed the funds.
Charging documents state that Hassan hired unqualified individuals, including her teenage relatives with no formal education beyond high school. Prosecutors also allege Hassan recruited children, particularly from the Somali community, *even if they did not have autism,* then billed Medicaid for millions, and paid parents kickbacks of more than $1,000 per child to keep them enrolled.
U.S. Acting Attorney Joe Thompson also announced charges last week against eight people accused of defrauding a Minnesota housing program. He explained that the investigation found individuals were defrauding several systems at once.
Here's the hoot: The same thieving bitch Hassan has also been charged in Minnesota’s largest COVID-era fraud case, the Feeding Our Future scandal, where she received $465,000. The total cost of that fraud to federal taxpayers was almost $250 MILLION.
The U.S. attorney's office said in a press release. “This is not an isolated scheme. From Feeding Our Future to Housing Stabilization Services and now Autism Services, these massive fraud schemes form a web that has stolen billions of dollars in taxpayer money. Each case we bring exposes another strand of this network.”
Say, anyone know who the attorney-general of Minnesota is? Couldn't be the corrupt Muslim Keith Ellison, could it?
Source.
https://thepostmillennial.com/somali-woman-charged-in-multi-million-dollar-autism-fraud-scheme-in-minnesota
#1: "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."
#2: "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them, for this is the law and the prophets."
#3: "You shall neither take revenge from nor bear a grudge against the members of your people; you shall love your neighbor as yourself."
#4: "What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow.
Quote 1: Quran (8:12)
Quote 2: the Bible, Matthew 7:12
Quote 3: the Bible, Leviticus 19:18
Quote 4: Rabbi Hillel
Now, under which of these creeds would you rather live?Like all Democrat-fellating Media outlets, "People Magazine" carefully conceals any part of a "news story" from readers. Latest example:
On Sept 8 in Washington state a girl--Victoria Aparicio Cruz--broke up with a demon named Marvin Ortiz-Montecinos. An hour or so later fatally stabbed his girlfriend and her female roommate.
He apparently killed the female roommate because she dried to defend Victoria. The demon stabbed the female roommate 43 times, including what appeared to be an effort to saw off her head.
He stabbed Victoria countless times, including what the medical examiner said were a dozen times after she was dead. Her wounds are too awful to list.
Now: nowhere in the story do the Democrat-fellating shitheads who run People Magazine tell readers that the maniacal killer was an illegal alien from Guatemala, where he had a wife and kids.
Like all Democrat media shitheads, the ones at People don't want you to know such things. And if any such uncomfortable (for Democrats) facts DO get printed or broadcast, the national media are right there to bleat that "undocumented Americans" (the soothing term the Democrats use for illegal alien invaders) commit fewer crimes per capita than American citizens.
"SEE, citizen? So yew mus' support our 'undocumented friends.' And continue to vote Democrat, because allowing 11 million of 'em into the U.S. in Biden's four years was really a good thing.
No matter how much you may hate the Mainstream Media, it's not enough.
Source: People mag
https://people.com/woman-roommate-brutally-stabbed-death-ex-boyfriend-killer-11812106
You have no idea how utterly "woke" and anti-American most school boards are, even in smaller cities in flyover country--in Republican states where you'd think "wokies" weren't running the school system..
That's because the Mainstream Media rarely tells you how bad it is. Reason: The Media slobbers over the Democrat partei, which runs every school board. So when the boards knowingly hire gays, trannies, communists and illegals to teach, the Media ignores it.
The school board of flyover city Des Moines went one better: they hired an illegal alien invader not just to teach, but as Superintendent of their city's school system--at a staggering $305,000 per year.
The alien would have held that post for 20 years, after which he'd get a lavish, taxpayer-paid pension for the rest of his life.
And he would have, except ICE arrested him for overstaying his 1999 student visa (thus now illegally in the U.S.) and no green card. And you can bet he'll hire an attorney to "force" [hahahaha] the wokies who control the Des Moines school board to give him $200,000 in "earned pension" for the two years he was in office. Count on it.
The headline in the Des Moines Register:
Des Moines Public Schools Superintendent arrested by ICEToday [Sep 26] the superintendent of the entire Des Moines public schools system was arrested by ICE agents for being in the United States illegally, according to federal officials.
In May of last year a court had issued a "final order of removal" to deport Ian Roberts, a native of Guyana and a longtime U.S. resident.
When agents approached Roberts in his city-owned car, identified themselves and asked if he was Ian Roberts, he floored the accelerator and fled. He abandoned the car and continued to flee on foot into a wooded area.
With help from a police dog and local officers he was soon found. He was carrying a loaded Glock semiautomatic handgun, $3,000 in cash and a large hunting knife.
At a news conference, school board president Jackie Norris said "We had no idea Dr. Roberts would be persecuted by Orange Hitler. As everyone knows, states don't have to obey federal law, especially immigration laws. We kin hire anyone we want!"
[Of course she might not have used those exact words, but Jimmy Kimmel set the standard on national TV for all to see, which is that liberals can lie with impunity, so we'll play by the same rules, eh?]
DHS says Roberts has prior charges for weapon possession from February of 2020. The school board said "Dr. Roberts has a previous firearm charge related to a hunting rifle, which he disclosed to the board during the hiring process."
However, that charge was from 2021 in Pennsylvania. The Des Moines Register has no information about the charge from 2020 and it was too much trouble to look.
[Of course the article in the Register may not have said exactly that, but the Kimmel rule is still in force--and always will be. Thanks, Democrat assholes!]
In its written statement the school board said that before naming Roberts as superintendent it hired a third-party to do an extensive background check on him, and that all potential hires are required to verify that they're eligible to work in the U.S.
The board appointed Roberts superintendent of Des Moines Public Schools in July 2023.
The statement adds that "When we hired Dr. Roberts in 2023, the Biden administration must not have known he'd overstayed his student visa from 1999, since if they'd known they would have told us, since everyone who worked for the Biden government was, like, totally honest and trustworthy. So we relied on that to mean he was a U.S. citizen, thus was entitled to work here. Plus he submitted the required documents. So we dindoo nuffin wrong! We iz totally competent!"
[Kimmel rule still applies.]
DHS says Roberts entered the U.S. on a student visa in 1999, and that visa expired when Roberts finished his studies.
School board president Jackie Norris said Roberts had a valid license from the Iowa Board of Educational Examiners in 2023, just before the Des Moines school board named him superintendent, "So that was good enough for us."
[Kimmel rule.]
Norris added "We're furious that the tyrant in the White House would have his Gestapo thugs arrest our beloved superintendent. In a free county we should be able to hire whoever we want, without regard to whether they're here legally. As the dreamy Gavin Newsom says, states can do whatever they want, regardless of federal law. So it's likely that our State Board will pay Dr. Roberts' legal fees when he sues Orange Hitler for arresting him!"
[Kimmel rule.]
"We run the schools, so no one can tell us what to do, regardless of federal law. So we'll continue to let transgender "girls" compete in girls' sports and use girls' dressing rooms because...fairness! If any of you deplorable parents object, put your girl in a private school. I don't care because I'll get paid the same regardless."
[Kimmel rule.]
Roberts's equally woke replacement summed up the controversy by saying, "In the words of the great Abraham Lincoln, 'If you paddle together you'll survive the tide. but if you paddle alone you'll probably drown.' And as we learn more, we chose to paddle together."
Our reporter asked what that meant but didn't get a response.
Superintendent Roberts' supporters react
A group of several black-owned nonprofits said "Dr. Roberts is totally dedicated to diversity and equity. We stand with him during this uncertain moment."
Alison Hoeman, founder of a local nonprofit called "Des Moines Refugees Support," said her phone “blew up” with texts from friends already looking for ways to support Roberts.
“The Black and brown kids are terrified," she said. "If the Trump regime wants to deport our dear Dr. Roberts, students of color are scared they may be next."
Mazie Stilwell, head of a liberal group called "Progress Iowa," wailed "No one is safe! We’re living under a fascist regime because every Iowa Member of Congress has been in lockstep with the MAGA administration that is terrorizing our communities. Orange Hitler has weaponized immigration laws by enforcing them against anyone who disagrees with him, even if they're U.S. citizens!
Remember, Gavin Newsom said state law overrides federal law! And since he's a Democrat and governor, he should know!"
[Kimmel rule.]
Ian Roberts, superintendent of schools for Des Moines, 1999 and today |
Three days ago a group of 25 armed blacks rushed into a jewelry store in San Ramon, California, armed with hammers and pickaxes. In barely two minutes they'd cleaned out the display cases, ran out, jumped in six late-model cars and escaped.
Cali Democrats (all Newsom supporters): "Dis did NOT happen! Dis FAKE NEWS! All done by AI! Cuz under the faaaabulous leadership of our Democrat-ruled state, our faaaabulous policies make dis impossible!"
SO...did this really happen? You didn't see it on the national newz, which is the only way most Americans learn whether something happened. And not a single reporter bothered to ask Newsome for a comment, cuz reporters want Newsom to be the next president, cuz he's made Cali such a paradise, eh? Wait, maybe not. For most reporters all that matters is that Newsom is a Democrat and has faaabulous hair! "And that endearing shoulder/head rocking thing--SO cute!"
No matter how much you may hate the Lying Mainstream Media it's not nearly enough.
https://x.com/i/status/1970724231043318137
Y'all have probably heard about the 29-year-old wacko who opened fire with a long rifle on an ICE facility in Dallas. Fired many rounds, killing a "detainee" and wounding two others.
Initial news stories claimed the shooter was targeting ICE agents.
But then the Left got their propaganda machine going: "NOOooo, dis guy wuz NOT trying to kill ICE agents! Nope nope nope! He was trying to kill po' immigrants! Which means he was akshully MAGA, jus' like duh guy who shot Kirk! Yep yep yep!
"An' duh proof iz dat cops found ammo next to his body that had "anti-ICE" written on it! SEE? Dat proves he was a right-winger, cuz Leftists would NEVAH write somethin' like dat on ammo! Jus' like duh guy who shot Kirk--cops said he wrote stuff on ammo found IN the gun, but no Leftist wud EVAH do dat! Cuz ouah side beez WAY too smaht to do dat!
"So when yew see somethin' touted as incriminating liberals, it should be obvious that it's fake, planted by the Trump regime to make the left appear responsible! See?
"Same with the Dallas shooting: pics of ammo with "anti-ICE" written on it is obviously a plant by Trumpies to blame the Left! But you, dear readers, are way too smaht to fall for such an OBVIOUS fake, right?"
Okay, sarc off. The Leftist Mainstream Media are actually pushing this cunning bullshit Narrative that both the Dallas shooter and Charlie Kirk's assassin were MAGA. And the shithead Kimmel kicked that off on national TV. Wow. And now some dipshit "former FBI agent" went on CNN to claim the Dallas shooter was NOT a leftist trying to kill ICE agents, and the CNN gal just slobbered over it. No pushback at all.
And of course Americans get their "newz" from the Mainstream Media, so...
Below are just six out of hundreds of studies that found "a link" between taking acetaminophen during pregnancy and an increased incidence of autism in the child. These studies go back to 2017, and the left had nothing to say. But when the CDC studied all the studies and concluded that by far the majority of those studies found there was a link, suddenly Democrat supporters screamed bloody murder.
But they went utterly nuts when Trump repeated the CDC conclusion. Suddenly pregnant Democrat women started *videoing themselves popping acetaminophen!*
So the party that bleats "Yew must OBEY the SCIENCE!!" is suddenly denying the studies showing a link--NOT because the women have studied the issue, but simply because Trump said "It's probably a good idea not to take it if you're pregnant."
Wow. Peak TDS.
"We are a nation of laws."
Ever heard that? Sounds like a great principle, eh? But when one party repeatedly, consistently *ignores explicit court orders to comply with a law,* what effect does that have?
Fulton County is most of Atlanta. It's totally Democrat-ruled, 43%black (39% white) and has been totally corrupt for decades. That corruption is ensured and protected by corrupt pieces of shit like district attorney Fani Willis, who decides who'll be prosecuted and who--despite all evidence--won't be.
The current case involves the 2020 presidential election: The "official tally" reported bribem won by 11,800 votes. Problem was that "images" of 17,852 ballots are missing.
Many Americans vote by using a black marker to fill in boxes on a paper ballot, and believe that ballot is counted. Nope: that paper ballot is fed into a "scanner" that takes a picture of it, determines which marks represent which candidates, and counts its interpretation.
But don't worry, deplorable! Most state election laws require that both the images and the paper ballots be saved, usually for at least two years, to allow close elections to be "audited" to detect fraud. Got it?
But in corrupt, Democrat-ruled Fulton county 17,852 images are missing. And a far larger number of paper ballots can't be found.
Recall that bribem was *officially declared to have won* by 11,800 votes.
Fulton County was sued for election fraud. The county election board admitted they were unable to find the missing images, and had no explanation for why those particular images were missing. But the Dems on the county election board just smiled big shit-eating grins and shrugged. "Hey, stuff goes missing all the time, deplorables!"
Okay, if the *images* are missing let's find the original paper ballots. "Those are missing too. Prolly just mis-filed, and that's certainly reasonable with almost 538,000 votes cast in ouah faaabulously honest country, eh?"
And now the county election board has *illegally refused to "seat" two Republican members--despite the specific order of one of the few honest judges in the county.
To this day, Dem-controlled Fulton County has never explained how 17,852 images of ballots in the 2020 election vanished.
And wait...it gets worse:
In every election some percentage of mail-in ballots are rejected for various reasons: In most states absentee ballots must be signed, and the signatures are supposed to be compared to the one on file when a person registers to vote. Lots don't match. Some states also require witnesses to sign the ballot, and sometimes those are missing. In any case, the *percentage* of rejected ballots stays pretty constant from year to year because the voting population doesn't suddenly get smarter or less smart, eh?
Well...between the 2016 and 2020 elections Georgia experienced the sharpest drop in the rejection rates for absentee ballots of any state in the country. If the 2020 election had had the same rate of rejection of invalid absentee ballots, there would have been 78,000 fewer votes counted. Again, bribem's "official" margin of "victory" was a tad under 11,800.
Now: Fulton County is the largest and most Democrat county in the state. And its rejection rate for absentee ballots *was only 1/7th as high as the state average.*
Big groups follow a thing called a "normal distribution," in which most data points are fairly tightly grouped around the average. The probability of Fulton County's rejection rate only being 1/7th of the state average--by far the lowest in the state for large counties--happening by chance is less than one in a BILLION.
It took four *years after the election--and hundreds of hours of court-ordered witness testimony--before we finally learned why Fulton County's absentee-ballot rejection rate was so implausibly below that of the rest of the state: *No one ever checked to confirm that signatures on the ballots matched the ones on file in the precinct.* In April of 2024, Mark Wingate, a member of the 2020 Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections, made the following statement under oath:
>> I asked (Fulton Co. election personnel), ‘What did we do for signature verification?’ They replied, ‘We didn’t do any.’>>
Wingate also identified another major problem: “I and other Board members asked the department [?] for chain-of-custody documentation [for ballots]. Nnone of that was ever delivered.”
The lack of chain of custody could easily explain how 17,852 ballots were *tallied* but no images have been found, and no paper ballots.
Other elements of this illegal election have been identified by VoterGA: So far we've called attention to 17,852 missing images of *absentee ballots* in Fulton County alone. VoterGA claims a staggering 380,458 images of *in-person ballots* are missing.
[Since Fulton reported 537,000 total votes this seems impossible and I'll try to track this down.]
None of those allegations has been refuted. Just silence and shrugs. 'Tough. We rule, so we do as we like, even if a judge orders us to comply.'
A huge telltale of guilt is that the Dems who totally rule Fulton County have repeatedly refused to allow investigators to examine either the absentee or in-person ballots to compare them to the images on file. In December of 2020--just a month after the clearly corrupt election--six witnesses independently testified that many of the absentee ballots appeared to be fake. Absentee ballots are mailed twice, first to the voter and again when they're returned. The envelopes require the ballots be folded, yet none of the ballots showed the creases necessary if they'd been folded.
Moreover, some appeared to be on a different paper stock from authentic ballots, and/or appeared to be printed with toner instead of ink. As a result, VoterGA sued, demanding to examine the mail-in ballots. After nearly five years of litigation, the ballots are no longer under court seal, and thus should be open to examination via a standard open records request. Yet Fulton Dems refuse to allow that.
The Democrat party knew that *because they control all levers of power in Fulton County, they could block all efforts to discover fraud.* Further, they knew that if bribem/harris won, the federal DOJ would never investigate--which is exactly what happened.
Here what leftist Wiki says:
>>As in other states, Trump had an early lead on election night due to the state counting in-person votes on that day, then counting mail-in ballots over the next three days. Biden gradually cut into Trump's lead as mailed-in ballots were counted, eventually pulling ahead on Friday morning."
Biden got a far greater share of votes than Hilliary Clinton in the three highly-populated Democrat urban counties containing metro Atlanta. Fulton County alone tallied 380,000 votes for bribem compared to 297,000 for Hilliary four years earlier:
County Hilliary, 2016 bribem, 2020
Fulton 67.7% 72.57%
Gwinnett 50% 58% of the tallied votes
Cobb 48% 56%
Henry 50% 60%
Wiki ignored the astonishing--and totally unlikely--vast increase in Fulton county, *83,000 more votes than the faaabulous Hilliary four years earlier.* Based on adjacent counties we might have expected that in Fulton, bribem would get 8 or 10% more votes in 2020 than Hilliary got four years earlier, so about 30,000. Instead the "official" total showed bribem getting 83,000 more votes than Hilliary. That's a huge outlier.
A reasonable question is, If there was no massive fraud, why won't the Dems who rule Fulton allow any investigators to compare paper ballots against scanned images?
A second question: Since the Democrats got clean away with it in 2020, does anyone seriously think they won't do the same thing in both the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election?
Source for "Dems defy court order"
Source for 2020 election results in Georgia
Source for 2016 election results, GA
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/09/georgia_democrats_defy_court_order.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election_in_Georgia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Georgia
The CDC examined a hundred studies on whether the risk of autism in kids increased if the mother took acetaminophen while pregnant.
Most of the studies found a correlation, so a medical panel issued a warning against it.
The studies weren't done by Trump, nor was the decision made by him. Yet CNN wails
Trump says Cuba has ‘virtually no autism.’ That’s news to Cuban doctorsNow look at how--in the very first 'graf-- CNN cunningly implies that Trump said there was NO autism in Cuba (which is NOT what Trump said) :
Despite what you may have heard recently, and contrary to what US President Donald Trump apparently believes, there is autism in Cuba.
For years the island’s state-run medical system has operated clinics to treat Cubans with autism and carried out campaigns to raise awareness of the neurological developmental disorder. Cuba even offers specialized autism therapies such as swimming with dolphins for foreigners seeking treatment who can pay in badly needed hard currency.
But even though information about how Cuba’s healthcare system treats autism is available to anyone savvy enough to write “Cuba” and “autism” into Google, Trump made the bizarre and false claim that the island’s poverty has spared Cubans from the condition.
Once again the bastards at CNN lie, brazenly: "Trump...made the bizarre and false claim that poverty has spared Cubans from [autism]." In other words, that Trump claimed there was NO autism in Cuba.
Finally the quote from Trump:<
“There’s a rumor [that] they don’t have Tylenol because they don’t have the money...and they have virtually no autism."
Ahh, "virtually no autism."
CNN went on to say Trump "claimed, despite a lack of scientific evidence" that Tylenol could cause autism in their unborn children." But of course there IS evidence of a correlation. Not all the studies found a correlation, but most did.
Cuban officials have yet to respond to Trump’s false claims...
Not false in the slightest.
Finally, after a dozen 'grafs slobbering and fawning over how utterly faaaabulous communist Cuba's medical system is, in the 23rd 'graf CNN finally gets around to telling you some numbers:
Cuba has reported much lower instances of autism than many developed countries – 0.36 cases per 10,000 people."
[And] according to the World Health Organization, in 2021 about 1 in 127 people had autism [apparently world-wide].
Ahh, finally some numbers, eh? So how do those numbers compare to the U.S.--where Americans gobble billions of acetaminophen (Tylenol) every year, eh?
The latest U.S. figure (from last year) is one child out of 31 displays signs of autism.
For the math-challenged, the figure CNN itself admits for the incidence of autism in Cuba works out to one out of 27,700.
Do ya think CNN just doesn't know how to do the maff? (Recall that the Left bleats that maff beez raaacist.) Or did they know and hope readers didn't?
So let's review: U.S. incidence, 1 per 31. World average: 1 in 127. Cuba's? 1 in 27,700. So Trump was totally right: Autism is extremely rare in Cuba. The U.S. incidence of autism is 893 times higher than Cuba's.
I hope y'all are starting to see how brazenly the Mainstream Media will tell the most brazen lies to try to discredit Trump.
Source. CNN
https://lite.cnn.com/2025/09/23/americas/trump-autism-cuba-intl-latam
You don't read the Boston Globe, so you never get to see the absolute best examples of stupid liberals demonstrating their famous double-standards.
The Globe tells the story of coastal residents of Massachusetts--all liberal, of course--who absolutely LOOOOove dat "green energy," eh? And what could possibly be greener than wind, right? Doesn't produce any of that deadly, Erf-killin poison "carbon dioxide," eh? Totally Erf-friendly.
But now they're bitching about their view, expecially at night, complaining that the constantly-flashing red "obstacle lights" are ruining their formerly idyllic view.
And liberals used to love whales, an' saving 'em. Totally agree. But when dead whales started turning up around "wind farms," suddenly LOTS of unidentified letter writers said "Dere is NO scientific evidence that wind farms kill whales!" And after all, what are a few dead whales compared to saving ALL life on Erf by making electricity from anything other than oil, gas or the dread coal, right?
And of course when you make that the choice, no one would ever disagree. Except it's a false choice.
And it's amazing how fast liberals threw the whales under the bus, eh?
What's next, Massachusetts libs? Outlawing motorized fishing boats? Cuz if you hate "fossil fuels," as you say, that's the inevitable step--the only way to be "logically consistent!"
Hahahahaha! That's a joke: Expecting liberals to embrace "logical consistency" is like expecting AOC or Jazzy Crockett (who claims to have a law degree) to know what the Constitution says.
"Wait...why not just get our faaabulous Democrat rulers to pass a LAW that all motorized boats in Massachusetts must be powered by electric motors? After all, the smaht Democrats who rule California and New York passed LAWS ordering that after 2035 no one would be allowed to sell piston-engine cars in those states, so...why not for boats too?"
The real hoot will be watching how the billion-dollar AI companies will convince liberals to eagerly embrace nuclear power! Libs have hated nuclear power for 50 years, thanks to skeery events like "Three Mile Island" (zero deaths or injuries) and skeery Hollywood dramas like "The China Syndrome" (Jane Fonda, look it up). Totally opposed, eh?
But AI centers being developed will use more electricity than entire cities. Liberal Dem: "Why should that matter to me, deplorable?"
Cuz if demand skyrockets, but no new generating plants are allowed, what do you stupid bastards think that'll do to the price of electricity? Yup, it'll skyrocket. So the AI companies--even including Google--have already signed contracts for "small" nuclear powerplants. But they have to get permits to run 'em, which means they have to overcome the decades-old opposition of liberals.
The companies will do that NOT by admitting that each AI center being built (which the companies and their media shills are coyly, cutely, deliberately calling "campuses") will gobble up more electricity than Pittsburgh, but the opposite: the AI companies will claim they're your friends because they'll offer a way to cut your electricity costs!!! And that touted secret is by building their own nuclear plants. But just small ones, so...
No electric "utility" could get liberals to buy that lie, but because AI is being pushed as "the Wave of the Future!"--something we're constantly told we simply must do to keep from losing to the Chinese--liberals will slowly be propagandized into supporting the nuclear plants.
Ah, I hear my liberal friends saying they don't believe that. Just watch. It's as certain as the sunrise, because when companies have spent billions on buying land and drawing up blueprints, they don't just give up when faced with obstacles. See, electric utilities have to get permission from politicians to do anything, and only a few utilities were allowed go nuke because state politicians blocked dozens of other nuke projects going back decades, obeying the demands of mobs of screaming liberals.
But because AI is new, it's not yet totally controlled by the pols, so the companies can pay tens of millions in bribes to get what they want--as long as liberal voters don't call their mobs out to object. Hence the brilliant propaganda campaign you'll soon start to see to convince libs that the AI companies will "cut your electric bills." Clever.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/09/22/metro/red-light-no-delight-nantucket/
After Charlie Kirk was assassinated (by a male whose own family says was a leftist!), the U.S. House introduced a resolution in his honor.
58 Democrats voted against it, including AOC and Jazzy crockett. Another 60 either didn't vote, or voted "present."
So the expert Democrat-fellators at CNN had Jas on for 30 minutes of total Dem bullshit, during which she said Kirk "believed that the Civil Rights Act that granted black Americans the right to vote was a mistake."
Astonishingly, Jas has a law degree. And AI says "She opened her own law firm, where she focused on...civil rights. Like, y'know, the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And apparently never bothered to read the Supreme Law of the Land. (Ask your highschool-age kids if they were taught that in school or learned it some other way.)
Ahh, "she focused on civil rights," y'say? In that case you might think she'd be totally familiar with the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And Jas thinks that's when black Americans were given the right to vote.
No, Jasmine, that right was granted almost a century earlier, by the 15th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1870.
Lawyer, huh? Yet she believes black Americans were only given the right to vote in 1964, instead of nearly a century earlier, after it became a Constitutional amendment. Wow.
Hopefully Jas isn't your typical black female lawyer. Surely most are far better educated--like the brilliant Fani Willis. Or bribem's Supreme Court appointment who can't define "woman."
So what did the stupid, hateful Jas find so objectionable about the resolution, eh? Here's the text:
Now, therefore, be it resolved that the House of Representatives—
(1) condemns in the strongest possible terms the assassination of Charles James Kirk, and all forms of political violence;
(2) commends and honors the dedicated law enforcement and emergency personnel for their tireless efforts in finding the suspect responsible for the assassination of Charlie Kirk and urges the administration of swift justice to the suspect;
(3) extends its deepest condolences and sympathies to Charlie Kirk’s family, including his wife, Erika, and their two young children, and prays for comfort, peace, and healing in this time of unspeakable loss;
(4) honors the life, leadership, and legacy of Charlie Kirk, whose steadfast dedication to the Constitution, civil discourse, and Biblical truth inspired a generation to cherish and defend the blessings of liberty; and
(5) calls upon all Americans—regardless of race, party affiliation, or creed—to reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect one another as fellow Americans.
Seems pretty unoffensive. CNN didn't ask Jas which part she disagreed with.
As a kid I always wondered how long "indefinitely" was. Now the Disney empire and ABC have settled the question: After "suspending Kimmel indefinitely" last Wednesday, Disney and ABC have announced he'll return to his regular show tomorrow, Sep. 23rd, after being suspended for six days.
ABC had announced they were suspending his show days after Kimmel made a vile comment on the air clearly implying that the alleged assassin of conservative activist Charlie Kirk was a MAGA supporter.
Kimmel was ecstatic about returning to the air, telling a group of adoring fans
"This is a huge win for the right of Americans like me, who have network TV shows, to say whatever we want on national television without having to worry about losing our jobs. I mean, what good are public airwaves if I can't tell brazen lies to viewers by claiming those lies are 'comedy,' right? Even being suspended from four shows is a huge insult because it violates my absolute right of free speech. Of course ordinary people aren't allowed to tell lies about ME, because 'freedom of speech' is carefully reserved for leftists like me, not for little people."
See, leftists like Kimmel can tell brazen lies on the air with impunity, but "little people" can't tell lies about HIM, cuz he's a leftist and has lots of money to hire attorneys.
Millions of Democrats and Leftists cheered the murder of Charlie Kirk. They hated him and wanted him dead because his message was the opposite of theirs--and they quickly realized most young Americans were beginning to see whose ideas were better.
So they're cheering his death--and are now are hell-bent (accurate term) on convincing Americans that the assassin was NOT a fellow leftist in love with a tranny. Instead they're hell-bent (again accurate term) on convincing you that the killer was either a) a Republican/conservative; or b) your typical confused young man who was simply (isn't it always "simply"?) trying to defend his Juliet. Either way, 'Duh po' young man who confessed to shooting the raaaacis' hater with his grandfather's 30-06 rifle was NOT the killer!! Nope nope nope!'
There are a few scattered moments in history when "the veil is lifted" and the true nature of a political movement is exposed for all to see. Kirk's assassination was one of those moments. While good, moral Americans mourned the murder of a good father and a voice urging dialog and discussion, millions of Dems and Leftists cheered.
Kirk's assassination isn't an anomaly, but the logical endpoint of modern western liberalism: a death cult that demands that western nations commit suicide.
Ahh, I see many libs disagreeing, so let's go down the list: I don't know of any conservative who argues that abortion to save the mother's life shouldn't be allowed, or abortion in the case of rape or incest. But what kind of ideology calls abortion “reproductive healthcare” and demands that it be allowed on demand?
Society has long barred young people under a certain age from drinking alcohol or driving cars, even getting married, on the theory that kids under a certain age aren't mature enough to make those decisions. But today's Democrats demand that kids as young as ten be allowed to be chemically and surgically mutilated, hoping to become the opposite sex.
Several Democrat-ruled states have even passed LAWS threatening to take away children from parents who don't consent to such mutilation--or even use the "wrong pronouns" to refer to their child.
Democrats demand that public schools teach children as young as 5 about the joy of homosexuality, and scream bloody murder if state lawmakers bar that.
Back in the days of segregated schools, a crowd of whites blocked black teens from entering a public school. The governor of one state stood in the schoolhouse door to block it. A Republican president responded by sending in the National Guard to clear the way. But during bribem's reign, when Paleswinian students blocked other students from getting to class, the Democrat-ruled government didn't lift a finger.
Now Dems and the Left celebrate political assassination.
This is the logical endpoint of the policy of convincing people they have special rights, and that anyone who prevents the "special snowflakes" from doing whatever that alleged "right" entitles them to do is worse than Hitler--and thus can be murdered with impunity.
This result is both predictable and predicted--and repeatedly demonstrated. It's what the Dems and the Left want, what they believe.
Charlie Kirk was a threat to them because he stood for the America the Left has been trying for decades to erase. But now good Americans are beginning to see you as you really are--your hate, your emptiness, the hollowness of a movement that offers nothing but destruction. And a LOT of Americans who didn't pay much attention before are now...more motivated. Many are likely to continue his work and will remember the moment when your death cult showed its true face to the world.
The Left's death cult disguises its policies with bleats of "progressiveness" and compassion, but we see the results everywhere: fatherless homes, crushing drug addiction, mental illness on an epidemic scale, and a culture that produces young people so crazed that they cheer murder.
They can't create beauty so they topple statues of past heroes, paint vulgarities on monuments and even ordinary buildings. They revel in riots, chaos. They defend every manifestation of death. Their worldview is built on a foundation of envy and resentment. It glorifies decay.
Now we need to realize that the same faith that helped overturn the empire that once ruled world is still there, even if overcome by layers of weakness and compromise. It's time to rediscover it.
What might be called "classic liberalism"--freedom of speech and thought, freedom to make choices--is good. Unfortunately it's been used like a skinsuit by the Left to demand surrender and death. We must offer life.
"Hey citizen, didja know duh Erf iz bein' killed by "fossil fuel pollution"?
Well, actually duh deadly poison gas "carbon dioxide," but close enuf, eh? So since yew awful Americans keep drivin' your awful gasoline-powered cars, spewing mo' of duh deadly poison into duh air, it always gets hotter, eh?
(Let us quickly note that Hollywood celebrities who fly to Europe five times a year in dere private jets do NOT cause any Global Worming, cuz dere jets is run by electricity! Or magic pixy dust. Or unicorn farts, or something that make THOSE fuel-burners NOT produce CO2. We knows dat cuz if it wudn't true, our beloved stars wudn' fly private jets across duh ocean five times a year, right? Cuz dat wud make 'em hypo... hippo... some fancy word dat's not in the liberal language.)
So to see how brazenly the Warmies are playin' ya, here's the hair-on-fire Wormies at CNN:
Hurricane Gabrielle has rapidly intensified in warm water in the central Atlantic...becoming the second major hurricane of the 2025 season.
Gabrielle is a category-3 hurricane with 120 mph winds and is expected to get even stronger, potentially reaching category 4 status by Monday afternoon.
Gabrielle’s winds have increased by 55 mph in 24 hours, far exceeding the baseline for rapid intensification, which has become far more common in recent years as the planet warms due to fossil fuel pollution.
"SEE, you climate-denying deplorables? We at CNN just explicitly told ya this hurricane is: "due to fossil fuel pollution"! Couldn't be any more clear. An' we've nevah lied to ya before, right?"
Gabrielle could also cause life-threatening surf along the US East Coast through the early part of this week.
Even though Gabrielle isn’t a direct threat to land, the storm might have some company in the coming days, as two storms in the Atlantic are being tracked by the National Hurricane Center for potential to become the next named storm.
Now that CNN has scared its dozen viewers into believing death-from-hurricane is imminent, "due to fossil fuel pollution," how about showing us where this monster is, and where it's headed, eh? Ahh, finally we see a map! (Not from CNN)
Wait...that's over 660 MILES from the nearest U.S. land, AND headed EAST. For the map-challenged that's away from us, so not even remotely a problem, right?
Okay, but what about those other two storms, eh? Doze cud still kill us, cuz of dat awful "fossil fuel pollution," right?
One is described as "steadily organizing" and has a high chance of becoming a tropical depression or tropical storm later this week.
September is the traditional peak of the hurricane season and activity often ramps up quickly this time of year. But this season has had a much slower start than anticipated. Normally by this date we've had four or five hurricanes, but so far this year there have only been two: Erin and Gabrielle. Both have been major hurricanes, but Gabrielle’s arrival as one today is also a little late for the second major hurricane.
Wait...if CO2 is always increasing, which you Warmies claim steadily makes the planet warmer, and that added ocean warmth both causes hurricanes AND makes 'em stronger, you'd think we'd get MORE hurricanes every year, eh?
Wait, I got it: Democrats (Warmies) are gonna say duh Russians have been using a big machine
to suppress hurricane formation, and now are gonna threaten to turn the suppression machine OFF unless Trump removes all sanctions on
Russia's economy. So we would have had more hurricanes dis year except fo' duh Russians using their weather-control weapons to temporarily prevent it. Yeh, dat's it!!!
https://lite.cnn.com/2025/09/21/weather/hurricane-gabrielle
The girl in the pic above has just been brutally knifed in her neck--THREE TIMES--by a schizophrenic who had 14 prior convictions. She has one minute left to live, and can't understand why her killer would have attacked her, since she hadn't done a thing to deserve to be killed.
Her face should haunt Democrats for life. But of course it won't. They couldn't care less. In fact the corrupt female Dem mayor of Charlotte cunningly asked her "media friends" to NOT share the surveillance video--controlled by the city--of her murder. Cuz dat wud hurt duh mayor's party.
A schizophrenic with 14 priors never should have been walking the streets.
How was he allowed to do so? Because a black "magistrate judge" in Charlotte, North Carolina--a female with no law degree, NOT elected, but appointed by the corrupt Dem government that runs that city--released him to a "mental health service" she works for. And the "service" company bills the city and county for "treating" the schizo.
Wow, nice grift, eh? SOOoo nice that Dem "judges" can make money by ordering "offenders" to be treated at for-profit companies they work for, eh?
This is what happens when one party wins total control over...everything.
Democrats: "NOOooo, citizen! Trump is prez, so duh Rethuglicans control things!"
Not on the city and county level. Hell, not even on the national level, as members of the Deep State and corrupt judges keep blocking every effort by Trump to reduce crime.
Democrats welcome the blocking moves, because their voters never connect crime to Dem policies. Some even believe tolerating crime is reasonable--a form of "reparations."
You will absolutely get more of this by continuing to vote for Democrats at any level.
Democrats: "Dis not true!" Sure, sparky.
Imagine if, after Martin Luther King jr. was assassinated, the U.S. House had introduced a simple resolution condemning his murder--and 58 members of congress voted NO on that resolution.
Think every so-called "reporter" in the Mainstream Media would have asked the No voters why they voted No on that simple, reasonable resolution? Damn right they would have.
SO...after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, a resolution was introduced in the U.S. House condemning that murder. Seems totally unobjectionable, eh? Who supports assassination, right?
58 Democrat "members of congress" (hereafter shortened to "congresswhores") voted against that seemingly rational resolution.
If we had an honest Mainstream Media, reporters would ask every one of those bastards why they voted No on a resolution condemning an assassination. But of course not a single leftist "journalist" will ever ask a Democrat congresswhore why they voted against it.
And the Dems will never answer that question if asked by a conservative reporter.
Thus is the perfect defensive circle closed: Democrat congresswhores will refuse to condemn assassination, or vote against God or children or America, or do whatever the hell they want, knowing they'll never have to answer for it--because their devoted followers will continue to vote for 'em forever.
The neon sign in the pic of the drag show with kids says "It's not gonna lick itself."
Democrats: "Dat don't mean nuffin! Dey mean...uh...stamps! Yeh, dat it! Self-sticking stamps!"
[X restricted an earlier version of the post below, without specifying the reason and no link to appeal the restriction, so I'm forced to guess what triggered X's bots. Trying again with some strong epithets deleted. What I said earlier was "Surely Jimmy is NOT [series of strong epithets]. Kimmel flat-out lied, explicitly stating that "the MAGA gang" was "desperately trying" to claim Charlie Kirk's assassin was "other than one of them. That's a lie, so using his own logic I should be able to say "Surely he's NOT a [series of strong epithets]" with impunity, eh? If he can say what he said, all of us should be able to lie about HIM with the same impunity. Hmmm...]
Let's review, Democrats: Your hero, Jimmy Kimmel, used his show on ABC to say something most rational people regarded as outrageous:
"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them..."
"...desperately trying to characterize" the assassin "as anything other than one of them."
Owners of ABC affiliated stations were outraged (as were most rational people) and called the network to demand an apology, threatening to stop carrying the show. ABC execs told Kimmel to apologize. Kimmel refused, so they "suspended" him.
We're not to the good part yet. The Democrats screamed bloody murder: "Dis beez duh end of ouah nation!" they wailed. "It violates his freedom of speech!" they screamed. "NO ONE should be fired for anything they say, either on the air or off! It's right dere in duh Constitution!"
But of course it's not. As anyone who's actually read the thing knows, the first Amendment demands that congress shall make no law restricting speech. Companies aren't subject to any such order.
Hmmm...So after reading the Constitution for the first time, the Dems tried a different approach: "The Trump regime threatened ABC if they didn't fire Kimmel, an' dat's illegal." AHHhh, so if some other comedian made an offensive remark, and ABC fired 'em, Kimmel would bravely, resolutely defend that other person, right?
Cuz SURELY Jimmy's not an [epithet deleted], [epithet deleted], [epithet deleted], scum-sucking, hypocritical POS, right?
Wait...do you think I implied some bad things there? Not at all, Dems: I clearly wrote "Surely he's NOT..." all those things. Cuz according to Kimmel and you Dems, dat beez perfectly legal and not actionable. So eat shit, Kimmel. And here's the topper: Seven years ago female comedian Roseann Barr made a late-night tweet in bad taste, about Barack Obama's closest advisor, Valerie Jarrett.
Within hours, ABC cancelled Roseanne's VERY popular weekly show. So let's see how the hypocritical POS Jimmy Kimmel responded back then, eh? Is this guy in the pic below you, Jimmy?
What say you now, you hypocritical POS? How's Karma taste, Jimmy? Of course you've already hired high-powered lawyers, who've assured you that a NYC jury will award you hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. So you'll come out smelling like...the hypocritical POS you are.
Whoops, sorry! That headline was written by Jimmy Kimmel's so-called "comedy" writers.
The man who showed up outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home in DC in 2022with a bag of duct tape, zip-ties, a crowbar and other breaking-and-entering tools--and who told cops he wanted to kill three justices--actually turns out to be (wait for it!) another tranny!
Of course when the Leftist Media gets thru rewriting the history of bribem's ghastly reign, the story will have changed very subtly, to say he just "claimed to be trans." See, that way we can't ever know for sure, eh?
The would-be killer, 29-year-old Nicholas Roske--who pled guilty--now goes by "Sophie" and demands that other people use she/her pronouns when referring to him.
And the power of the tranny mafia is so great that in one of the motions filed with the court, his defense team tells the judge that "out of respect" for their client (!) they will exclusively use she/her pronouns in court.
Out of respect for Ms. Roske, the balance of this pleading and counsel's in-court argument will refer to her as Sophie and use female pronouns."
"Respect"--for a wanna-be assassin caught minutes before.
The Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media has written thousands of scare stories about the grave dangers of "right-wing extremism"--which bribem, in speech after speech, called "the greatest threat to our democracy!" But the Media hasn't written a single story on the danger posed by leftist killers.
When there's a murder by a leftist and the Media has to cover it, they always portray the killer as "a lone wolf," never mentioning the cunning, deliberate incitement the gullible, malleable killer by Dem pols and their media allies.
By stark contrast, any act by a conservative wacko is always attributed to "the violent Right-wing." See the difference?
Democrat: "Yew LIE! Dere hazn't been ANY leftist killers! All duh shootin' is by crazy right-wing 'violent domestic extremists!' We know dat!"
Really, asshole? We've had two different school shootings by trannies murdering helpless, innocent children--the Christian school in Nashville, and the two children killed by the tranny shooting into a church service in Minneapolis. Or have you forgotten?
Then there's the wacko who's merely in love with a tranny, who's confessed to assassinating Charlie Kirk.
Oh, and there was a transgender murder cult, called the Ziz cult, that killed at least six people.
Here's PBS pasting a piece from the utterly communist Associated Press "explaining" all about the Ziz murder cult. The lede 'graf:
Note how the AP and PBS think the most important thing to tell readers--even before giving the cult leader's name--is that he (or is it "she"? or maybe "they") was "a blogger." Cuz dat's reeelly important to the story, eh? Subtle! See, to the pro-tranny lackeys at the AP and PBS the most important part of the story is NOT that the tranny cult has murdered six people, but that their leader is...wait for it!...a blogger.
And not until the 20th paragraph do they finally tell readers that the leader claims to be a transgender. Not "...IS transgender," but merely "...claims to be..." That way no one can actually say trannies are insane killers cuz PBS isn't sure "it" IS a tranny, eh? Merely "claims to be." So we can't possibly know for sure!
The Democrat bastards at PBS--every one of 'em--also fail to mention that all the cult members are tranny. Or perhaps they also merely claim to be too, eh?
And the topper: At the bottom of the PBS piece where they ask for donations, the heading is "Trusted news that you can count on."
Trusted by who? Hunty bribem and Karine Jean-Pierre? Of course, and all stupid fucking Democrats.
No matter how much you hate the Mainstream Media, it isn't enough.
Source1: Ace of Spades Source 2: PBS
https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=416558
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/leader-of-zizians-cultlike-group-linked-to-6-killings-ordered-held-without-bail-in-maryland
As usual the Babylon Bee nails it.
Democrats never fail to live down to what we've come to expect: The same ghoulish assholes who cheered the assassination of Charlie Kirk screamed bloody murder over the ghastly shithead Kimmel being suspended.
Fat CNN potato Brian Stelter--among many other leftist talking heads--screamed that this was the end of the nation, because the Trump administration had ended freedom of speech.
Of course the same shitheads were absolutely giddy with delight when Cackles tweeted that Trump should be banned from Twitter. These people are such shits.
"So this is how Democracy dies," one attendee was heard saying. "America will never recover from this."
Jimmy Kimmel's show was pulled from the air after he made a blatantly false statement about the murder of Charlie Kirk, saying MAGA republicans were "desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of their own."
Unfortunately for Kimmel, the political points he scored from his comment, and the raucous laughter of his leftist studio audience were not enough to keep his show on the air. Network execs told Kimmel to apologize for the comment but he refused, leading network execs to suspend him--an action Democrats quickly called "a violation of his Constitutionally-guaranteed freedom of speech.
"Our Constitution says anyone in the U.S. can say whatever they want without taking a hit in their TV ratings. That's what free speech means," Kimmel said before a crowd of tearful supporters. "It violates my rights to be suspended, no matter who's offended by what I say or how mad advertisers get or how low my ratings fall. Our Constitution guarantees it."
When any government is corrupt, the amount of blatant, brazen, obvious fraud skyrockets, because the fraudsters know the corrupt officials can't go after them without raising questions about their own corruption.
In this case, the governor of Minnesota is the absurdly corrupt and incompetent Tim Walz, and the state's attorney-general is the equally corrupt Keith Ellison--who happens to be Muslim. And you're about to find that ALL of the 8 fraudsters who stole over $xx million from a federal fund--administered by corrupt state officials--are Muslim.
>>Feds charge 8 in 'massive fraud' tied to Minnesota housing stabilization program"
On Thursday acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson announced that eight people have been charged with a "massive" fraud tied to Minnesota's *federally funded* housing stabilization program.
That program, which used *federal Medicaid money,* was intended to pay for housing for people with disabilities find and maintain housing. But instead, the fraudsters acquired the names of eligible people from facilities like treatment centers and used that information to submit false and inflated reimbursement claims.
Thompson said “The level of fraud in these programs is staggering. The fraud has overtaken the legitimate services.”
Four of the defendants ran a "service provider" (a corrupt NGO) called "Brilliant Minds." Between 2022 and 2025 they submitted claims totaling $2.3 million for assisting clients with housing. Prosecutors say few of those services were actually offered.
Prosecutors claim the four defendants in the Brilliant Minds alleged scheme stole
between $300,000 and $400,000 apiece.
Charged were
Moktar Hassan Aden
Mustafa Dayib Ali
Khalid Ahmed Dayib
Abdifitah Mohamud Mohamed >>
<<Here's the topper: The Minnesota legislature was scheduled to hold a hearing on massive fraud in this program, just two days before the charges were announced. Just two *hours* before that hearing was to begin, the Republican rep who chaired that hearing was told that the head of the *state* DHS office responsible for "overseeing the program" was no longer employed.
The corrupt Deep-State that runs Minnisota's government had managed to NOT have this key guy scheduled to testify--in a hearing about fraud in the program he was supposedly overseeing. But they either fired him or pressed him to resign anyway, just so he couldn't be called to reveal how long they'd known about the fraud.
And if you're curious, take a look at the graph below, and the huge explosion in claims in just 3 years. Say, anyone remember who was prezzy from Jan of 2021 to Jan of 2025, eh? Of course I didn't ask "Who was running the country" over that period cuz we'll never know.
Adding insult to injury, the acting "commissioner" of the state office refused to say whether the departed "commissioner" had resigned or been fired--because Minnesota says taxpayers don't be told if an employee has been fired for corruption, eh? At least that's the policy of the corrupt Democrat Farmer-Labor Partei. SO open and transparent, eh citizen?
As everyone should know, it's damn near impossible to fire a government employee, so this one must have been *obviously* corrupt. Or if he resigned, it must have been with lots of pressure from bosses. Gosh, why?
DHS Temporary Commissioner Shireen Gandhi said the program was providing "important, needed services." Of course, sparky, aren't they always "important and needed?" She goes on to say those services were so important and needed that her agency "set low barriers to entry for new providers and beneficiaries."
And people with normal intelligence think "That's stupid, crazy. You have criteria for applying and being given money, and shouldn't waive those criteria just to get more pipo to sign up. But recall this is a Dem-ruled government.
Federal prosecutors also charged Christopher Adesoji Falade and his son Emmanuel Oluwademilade Falade with submitting fraudulent claims totaling more than $2.2 million
Also charged were Asad Ahmed Adow and Anwar Ahmed Adow. Related?
Now watch the BIG fraudsters like state A-G Keith Ellison scurry to make it appear that *they* aren't culpable but have been diligently working to root out fraud!
Spare me, lying assholes. In statements following the charges, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and the Minnesota Department of Human Services said their investigators worked with federal prosecutors to root out the alleged fraud.
According to the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office, based on the number of disabled, the state DHS had initially predicted the "housing stabilization program" would only cost taxpayers about $2.6 million a year.
But even in the first year the program paid out $21
million in claims--eight times more than the estimate. Then DOUBLE that amount--$42 million--in 2022, $74 million
in 2023, $104 million in 2024 and $61 million in the first six months of
this year.
Democrats: "See, in 2021 dere wuz a covid epidemic,
so gibbin housin' to all duh newly disabled cost nine times mo' den
predicted. Then in 2022 a meteor hit, an disabled thousand of needy
pipo! So goin' frum $21 million to $74 million in two years din' set
off any alarms fo' us. Nope nope nope! See, yew deplorables are
skeered by big numbers, but us gummint "offishuls" aren't, cuz we iz
'professionals.'"
Thompson said most of the spending turned out to be fraudulent.
“Despite
the hundreds of millions of dollars in payments that have gone out from
the federal government to Minnesota for housing stabilization services,
most of the applicants didn't get the money they needed,” Thompson
said. “The money was simply stolen.”
Fraud in federally-funded
programs run by Minnesota has been a problem before: Three years ago
Ethiopian fraudsters stole over $200 million or so by submitting fake
invoices to the "Feeding Our Future" program. Almost all the fraudsters
managed to flee back to Ethiopia, avoiding arrest and restitution.
Thompson, the federal prosecutor, said Minnesota was “drowning in fraud.”
What
else did the dumb Dem voters of Minnesota expect? You elect a governor
who loves communist China and lies about everything, and an A-G who
refuses to prosecute Muslims, and whose son is a constant lawbreaker,
and a legislature totally dominated by Democrats.
Minnesota Democrats: "Don't worry, it's not state money. All federal.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2025/09/18/feds-charge-8-tied-to-massive-minnesota-housing-fraud
There have been several press conferences on the arrest of the Utah assassin, Tyler Robinson. And in every news story on the assassination there are HUNDREDS of comments that give you an idea of how utterly fucked up millions of leftist/Dem Americans are. Here's a sample from the Dem shithole site BlueSky:
On other sites lots of comments screaming "Free palestine!", lots of wailing about Israel, blaming Mossad for killing Kirk, blaming Trump, lots of screaming "Release the Epstein files!" LOTS of commenters blaming Charlie for saying trannies are mentally ill. And as in the BlueSky/Dem screenshot above, TONS of commenters praising the assassin. Those are the folks who really need killing.
Ken Kaniff: "WE LOVE YOU TYLER" (killer) [Ken repeats this several times]
"Valhalla awaits"
"The MSM triggered this!"
"Notice that after the assassination of the leader of the conservative movement, there was no rioting or looting. No cities burned. Interesting difference."
"This is what TRUMP has sown; DIVISION!"
[Ahh, you stupid leftist Democrat: So bribem screaming that Trump supporters were fascists and "duh greatest threat to our nation" was NOT "divisive"?]
"This is the nail in the coffin for Democrats."
[No, it's not: Some Democrat pols instantly started claiming they're totally opposed to violence! Well they are NOW, eh, cuz the smart ones are scared that conservatives will wanna settle the score. Of course OUR side doesn't do that, but a few Dems are scared someone might.]
"You don’t even know if the Dems did it. Remember the guy who shot at Trump was a Republican!"
[Really? What you're using for evidence is a voter registration form. How do you know it wasn't altered?]
"When he jumps down from the building, where is the rifle? Did you see it?"
[Look closer: He's clearly carrying something wrapped in a black towel.]
"Give [the killer] a medal." [A comment repeated hundreds of times]
"Karma is a bitch" [Another Dem shithead blaming the victim.]
There are hundreds more comments, but you get the idea. And based on the hundreds of comments from Dems and trannies cheering Kirk's assassination, seems to we have...a fork in the proverbial road. It's this:
All Dems, the Dem-ruled Mainstream Media and most conservatives want our side to just shrug and move on. Dems are bleating "Ouah side din' have NUFFIN' to do wif dis 'incident'! [assassination? murder? Nah...'incident' is so much more soothing!] Dis wuz jus' one po' lone wolf, an' we haz NO IDEA how he got so radicalized! Nope nope nope!
"Again, we had NUFFIN' t'do wif dis! So if any of yew stupid deplorables kills one of OUR fine, upstanding Democrat leaders, den YOU are the bad guys! We iz, like, totally innocent!See, when AOC and ouah dear V.P. Kamala and Pelosi called for violence in the streets after Saint George Floyd [and they explicitly did], dey wuz actually callin' fo' peaceful protests, but duh Media jus' left dat out! So it's not dere fault that leftists burned three square miles of Minneapolis! Or looted hundreds of stores in NYC."
With this sort of screaming from the Dems (calling for violence against conservatives), seems to me the chances of civil war are about 95%, and it's just a matter of when. Reason: Dem "leaders" and the Mainstream Media don't seem inclined to stop inciting leftist dumbshits to kill conservative leaders, because the Dems tell their followers they're fighting for some great principle like "trans rights," or "free palestine," or "stopping Global Worming," or "we need to assassinate health-care executives" (Saint Luigi), or "we need to defeat fascism." The list of "causes" that can be used to incite Leftists is endless.
So let me clearly say that war is terrible and shouldn't be started lightly. And one can make the case that even if unhinged leftist assassins were to murder four or five conservative leaders every year, our side should simply tolerate it. I get it.
But with that said, if just two or three leftist talk-show hosts were murdered in a year, I'm absolutely certain that leftist Media and pols would stop inciting their unhinged base--because the Media and Dem pols are actually cowards who rationally, understandably don't want someone to shoot them. Totally rational response.
This Dem self-interest (survival) explains why so many Dem politicians are NOW saying "We need to tone down the rhetoric." You've probably heard that dozens of times. That's not because they care about Charlie's assassination or any other conservative being murdered, but due to pure self-interest: they don't want a furious conservative to do kill them. Again, totally rational.
I suspect that if even two or three leftists were killed, the Left would wail "We had NO IDEA yew deplorables were so upset! Ouah Media allies nevah told us yew wuz upset by 'lone wolves' killin' deplorables, so we never guessed! An' when Saint Barack sed "If they bring a knife to a fight, you bring a gun!" he wuz NOT bein' divisive or inflammatory! Nope nope nope! [And yes, young Americans, Obama actually said that.]
See, every Democrat knew he wuz jus' bein' metaphorical y'know? An' if a few unhinged guys like Tyler or Crooks or Routh decided to take President Obama literally, it's NOT ouah fault if yew don't understand 'nuance' an' metaphors! So yew deplorables should jus' 'move on!'"
Care to bet whether we'll hear that wail? It's absolutely guaranteed. Not a single Leftist/Democrat believes our side will ever start retaliating, cuz if they did, they'd tell their fellow inciters--AOC, Hakeem Jeffries, Nanzi Pelosi, Chuckie Schumer, Tlaib, Omar, Ayana Presley and a hundred others--to shut the hell up. But no Dem does, because they don't believe they're at risk of ending up dead.
So Democrat pols will keep fanning the flames of hate. They don't need to tell their base to kill conservatives, because if they demonize conservatives and convince their followers they're fighting for a faaabulous cause (like trans "rights") that's the logical end-point. Dem pols and media "elites" don't believe Karma will ever find them.
If Karma does come calling, I'm gonna have a drink and laugh my ass off at how stupid you were/are to think you could incite your unhinged supporters to kill without pushback, and how richly you deserve the result of your stupidity. As the ancient saying goes, "You sowed the wind, and you shall reap the whirlwind.
For young Americans that means "If you encourage violence, it often comes back with a vengeance." But again, the Media--and evil morons like Jimmy Kimmel--stupidly don't believe they're inciting violence.
But of course the Dems and Media morons don't believe there's ANY risk that our side will EVAH retaliate, no matter who their followers assassinate or how public that assassination is--like Butler, PA, or Utah.
Does anyone believe it would EVER occur to a Tyler Robinson or Thomas Crooks or Ryan Routh to stop and think "Wait, is assassinating either Charlie Kirk or Trump really a good idea? Could killing this conservative trigger some deplorable to retaliate?"
Of course not. They don't stop even for a moment to consider that possibility. And absent the kind of crushing defeat that ended WW2, incited, unhinged leftists will keep killing conservatives tell hell freezes over.
Rational American 40 years from now: "That's crazy--how could Democrat pols and the leftist Media seriously believe they could keep encouraging their followers to hate conservatives (though not explicitly saying they should kill) and rationally expect those who supported their victims wouldn't finally say "That's enough" and start retaliating?"
That flawed reasoning is so common that it's got a name: "normalcy bias," the belief that if something has never happened (or essentially never), it won't. Very common reasoning, obviously invalid.
Democrat pols and Media "elites" reason "Deplorables won't retaliate *no matter whut we do,* cuz dey haz such short memory spans dat dey cain't remember who's been killed, so dey don' see duh pattern!"
Maybe they're right: Maybe conservatives don't see a repeated pattern, or are willing to tolerate one or two murders of our leaders per year (in the last year just one, and the year before a leftist shooter came with half an inch of killing the president in Butler, PA). Beats me. But I do know that if our side doesn't retaliate, unhinged leftists will continue to do as they did on Sept 10th--and then gloat about it. It's who they are. Read their damn comments.
One Canadian province has been doing this for two years.
Wait...I hear my Dem friends say "Dis not true! Dis FAKE NEWZ! No rational nation would give free addictive drugs to people on welfare! Dat's nuts!"
Of course you'd say that, sparky. So google "MySafe biometric machines." Here ya go:
The MySafe program uses ATM-like machines that dispense doctor-prescribed opioids to registered users. The machines are in locations *such as* "supportive housing buildings and overdose prevention sites" in Vancouver and Victoria, British Columbia.
"Participants" [note: NOT "addicts," cuz the Canadian gruberment has banned that word cuz it's "stigmatizing"] use a palm scan to confirm the user is authorized, before giving that user their daily dose of hydromorphone tablets. This system allows users to get their drugs at any time of day without staff supervision, making it a less stigmatizing way to get medication.
Ahh yes: In "enlightened, progressive" nations addictive drugs are no longer called that, but are called "medication." See? Cuz who could possibly object to giving someone "medication"?
All communists and socialists know that if you control the language you control all outcomes.
"The program aims to reduce overdose deaths by providing a clean, safe supply of opioids as an alternative to the increasingly toxic illicit drug market."
Tell us, Democrats: If a policy "reduces stigma" of, say, child rape, do ya think you'll get more of whatever you just "destigmatized"? Think really hard about that.
For example: If a state passes a LAW to stop charging thieves with crimes as long as they don't steal more than a thousand dollars worth of goods per person per day--"destigmatizing crime"--do ya think the result of that policy will reduce crime, or increase it?
Democrats: "Dat silly! Letting po' pipo "re-distribute wealth" of a thousand bucks a day per person is a brilliant policy! It's "reparations" wifout havin' to pass a law! Besides, duh law sayin' yew cud steal up to $950 wifout no big charge was passed by a vote of duh pipo of California, by "referendum," an' we Dems totally honor duh will of duh voters in referenda!
Yep yep yep! Well, except for duh Prop-8 vote dat sed marriage is between a man and a woman. Yeh, it passed by a wide margin, but us Dems quickly had to override dat, cuz...we din' like duh vote.
SO...just as U.S. Democrats who rule so-called "progressive" cities adopted socialist policies of establishing taxpayer-funded "shooting galleries" to give junkies a safe, soothing place to inject drugs under medical supervision, the Dems who rule almost every big U.S. city are sure as hell gonna adopt this Canadian policy of having machines give FREE drugs to addicts.
Notice how utterly smoothly, seamlessly, almost unnoticed, the Dem demand went from "We MUST allow pipo to use any drug they want, without penalty" to "We MUST use taxpayer dollars to create nice places fo' doze po' pipo (who just happen to vote Dem) to shoot up." And the utterly predictable next step is: "We MUST use taxpayer funds to place machines to GIVE addictive drugs to addicts--cuz dey iz extremely productive pipo, doin' cancer research an' sheeit. Well maybe not, but we don' want 'em to overdose!
Note that one goal of duh machines is to remove any "stigma." Plus it reduces drug overdose deaths! Keeps 'em alive so dey kin' keep workin' on curing cancer an' stuff. Oh wait...they're all on welfare. What, yew gon' be mad at pipo fo' bein' on welfare?
And if we sign 'em up fo' free drugs at 20, an' can keep 'em alive, they'll be voting Democrat for another 40 years!"
Win-win, eh?"
The Chinese and Russians must be laughing their asses off.
Source.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=does+british+columbia+have+drug-vending+machines