Next on the Democrat demand-list: drug-dispensing machines that *give free opioid pills to government-approved addicts*

One Canadian province has been doing this for two years. 

Wait...I hear my Dem friends say "Dis not true!  Dis FAKE NEWZ!  No rational nation would give free addictive drugs to people on welfare!  Dat's nuts!"

 Of course you'd say that, sparky.  So google "MySafe biometric machines."  Here ya go:

The MySafe program uses ATM-like machines that dispense doctor-prescribed opioids to registered users. The machines are in locations *such as* "supportive housing buildings and overdose prevention sites" in Vancouver and Victoria, British Columbia.

"Participants" [note: NOT "addicts," cuz the Canadian gruberment has banned that word cuz it's "stigmatizing"] use a palm scan to confirm the user is authorized, before giving that user their daily dose of hydromorphone tablets.  This system allows users to get their drugs at any time of day without staff supervision, making it a less stigmatizing way to get medication.

Ahh yes: In "enlightened, progressive" nations addictive drugs are no longer called that, but are called "medication."  See?  Cuz who could possibly object to giving someone "medication"?
     All communists and socialists know that if you control the language you control all outcomes.

"The program aims to reduce overdose deaths by providing a clean, safe supply of opioids as an alternative to the increasingly toxic illicit drug market."

Tell us, Democrats:  If a policy "reduces stigma" of, say, child rape, do ya think you'll get more of whatever you just "destigmatized"?  Think really hard about that.

For example: If a state passes a LAW to stop charging thieves with crimes as long as they don't steal more than a thousand dollars worth of goods per person per day--"destigmatizing crime"--do ya think the result of that policy will reduce crime, or increase it?

Democrats: "Dat silly!  Letting po' pipo "re-distribute wealth" of a thousand bucks a day per person is a brilliant policy!  It's "reparations" wifout havin' to pass a law!  Besides, duh law sayin' yew cud steal up to $950 wifout no big charge was passed by a vote of duh pipo of California, by "referendum," an' we Dems totally honor duh will of duh voters in referenda!
   Yep yep yep!  Well, except for duh Prop-8 vote dat sed marriage is between a man and a woman.  Yeh, it passed by a wide margin, but us Dems quickly had to override dat, cuz...we din' like duh vote.

SO...just as U.S. Democrats who rule so-called "progressive" cities adopted socialist policies of establishing taxpayer-funded "shooting galleries" to give junkies a safe, soothing place to inject drugs under medical supervision, the Dems who rule almost every big U.S. city are sure as hell gonna adopt this Canadian policy of having machines give FREE drugs to addicts.

Notice how utterly smoothly, seamlessly, almost unnoticed, the Dem demand went from "We MUST allow pipo to use any drug they want, without penalty" to "We MUST use taxpayer dollars to create nice places fo' doze po' pipo (who just happen to vote Dem) to shoot up."  And the utterly predictable next step is: "We MUST use taxpayer funds to place machines to GIVE addictive drugs to addicts--cuz dey iz extremely productive pipo, doin' cancer research an' sheeit.  Well maybe not, but we don' want 'em to overdose!
   Note that one goal of duh machines is to remove any "stigma."  Plus it reduces drug overdose deaths!  Keeps 'em alive so dey kin' keep workin' on curing cancer an' stuff.  Oh wait...they're all on welfare.  What, yew gon' be mad at pipo fo' bein' on welfare?
  And if we sign 'em up fo' free drugs at 20, an' can keep 'em alive, they'll be voting Democrat for another 40 years!"  
  Win-win, eh?"

The Chinese and Russians must be laughing their asses off. 

Source.

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=does+british+columbia+have+drug-vending+machines