CNN has a weather warning: We're all gonna DIE! And you know who to blame?

 CNN, Jan 20, 2026-- A terrible winter storm is set to lash the eastern half of the United States with damaging ice and heavy snow this week, fed by a brutal blast of Arctic air that will hit minorities hardest.

The Weather Prediction Service said the storm "would produce brutal swaths of heavy snow, sleet and treacherous freezing rain all over the east half of the U.S.  The horrible snow, sleet and freezing rain could stretch more than 1,000 miles from Oklahoma and northern Texas to North Carolina and Virginia.

A spokespyrsyn for the union representing employees of the National Weather Service said "We've been trying to warn the public for a week now but we're still understaffed after the cruel government shutdown caused by the awful Rethuglicans.  The only pyrsyn who had the password to unlock the official computer used to alert the nation still hasn't come back from the shutdown, so we were forced to make do with last-century methods, like telephones."

"We tried to warn Orange Hitler but he was too busy trying to invade Greenland and didn't take our frantic calls.  So if any American dies from this terrible storm, you know who to blame!"

"One thing certain: Brutal cold is on the way for millions.  We tried to warn the nation about this deadly cold, but everyone thought we were kidding--mumbled something about 'Global Worming.'  We don't understand why they don't believe us!  

Demons should be returned to their boss.

Democrats: "Enlightened humans know men are awful, so no enlightened pyrsyn would want to be one.  So we must protect the right of pyrsyns "assigned male at birth" to be female at any time.     
     "Notice we carefully did NOT say 'to become female,' cuz obviously these pyrsyns have really been female all along, right?  Right??!!"

In plumbing there are male and female fittings.  The first type goes into the second, never vice-versa.  Same with electrical connectors.  But allowing the continued use of these terms would conflict with the Democrats' demands, eh?  SO, to predict the newest demand from Democrats: "We want a law making the use of those terms a 'hatecrime' (note the trendy new term, all one word, like Orwell's "thoughtcrime"), because they "perpetuate gender stereotypes."

Oh, I hear my Democrat friends laughing, saying "Dat couldn't possibly happen!"  

Really?  In 2010 did you think it was possible that by 2020 states would be using tax dollars to pay doctors to perform sex-change operations on minors without parental consent?

Yeah, didn't think so. 

Trade deficit is...uhh...tell us, Oh Mainstream Media! An' what does it MEAN? [crickets]

If you're a typical American adult, you probably don't know much about the "trade deficit."  Not how much per month or year, not what it's been in the past 20 years, not whether high or low is good or bad.

And of course the Mainstream Media is delighted to continue either lying to ya or just saying nothing about it.  When Obozo or the Vegetable were in office, the Media didn't worry about the trade deficit.  Economists knew it was hurting our economy because we were throwing, oh, $100 billion a MONTH to other nations instead of keeping it here in our economy, but the Media didn't say even a mildly critical word, cuz when Democrats have the presidency the Mainstream Media doesn't allow any bad news, eh?

Now that Trump is prez, the monthly trade deficit has fallen to about one-third of what it was when he took office.  Economists consider that good news, but you'd never know it by reading the NY Times or any other Lying Mainstream Media rag.  Instead they claim what a dramatically lower trade deficit REALLY means is...wait for it..."Americans can't afford to buy imported goods, like cars or computers or TVs!!"  

And why can't they afford those things now?  Why, Trump's eeeebil tariffs, of course!

Three hours ago the NYT posted this article:

U.S. trade deficit fell to lowest level since 2009

Immediately--as if responding to a talking point--357 commenters on Fakebook alone popped up to claim "Dis beez BAD NEWS!"  Or merely not good news.  Anything to make voters recoil from anything Trump does--like deporting murderers and arresting the corrupt head of the drug-centered nation of Venezuela, eh?

SO one commenter wailed,
    "Gee, sounds like our population cannot afford to purchase imported goods, electronics, household appliances, vehicles, clothing, furniture, lumber, steel, shoes etc."

Another: "An indicator that Americans have less money."

Another: "So commerce has contracted."  Really, ya lyin' bastard?  GDP is WAY up--something close to 4 percent, a figure never remotely approached under either bribem or Obozo.

 Another: "Trade deficit is not an economic indicator of anything and never has been."  

Really?

Another: "So Americans just stopped buying more expensive items.  I'm sure it has nothing to do with the overall downtown of the economy."
    Again, GDP way up, but these lying sons of whores say economy is down.  And of course no Mainstream Media rat-bastard tries to set the record straight.

Finally: "But at what cost to integrity & respect?"

Ohhh, absolutely!  "We haz lost ouah integrity and respek!  By importing less!  It's an offense to guud pipo everywhere!"

I could go on for another 300 comments but you get the idea.  But keep in mind all duh comments in duh Times are from Democrats, who mus' be smaaaht cuz dey read duh Times, eh?  

This is how socialist Muslims like Momdani get elected by NYC voters. 
 

Democrats and DEI types destroy everything they touch

Ahh, I see you don't believe that.  I get it.  Well, read on:

California’s main state retirement fund is called "CalPERS," and it just hired a new exec to head its office of "diversity, equity, and inclusion."

The "official" duties of that wallah include "integrating DEI principles into investment practices, and recruiting staff for DEI-informed proxy voting and ESG investing…"

Got it?

And like all DEI bureaucrats, with such grueling duties she'll be VERY well paid: $221,580.  (And of course you already guessed it would be a female.)

The job was given to Shari Slate.  Not surprisingly, neither the CalPERS news release nor Slate's Linkedin profile say she has any experience in the finance industry.  This is no surprise, since the this position doesn't require expertise in finance or evaluating a company's prospects for profitability, but simply deciding whether a company the finance experts suggest investing in checks all the DEI boxes.

Where moonbats rule, the issue is never the issue; the issue is always moonbattery.

CalPERS’ job posting for the position says responsibilities include “collaborating with investment groups to integrate DEI into financial decision-making, advocating for equity-driven investment strategies, and ensuring that CalPERS’ investment portfolio reflects its commitment to sustainability, social responsibility, and equitable outcomes.”

Wow.

So the objective is to use retirement funds as a weapon to force companies to adopt DEI policies.

And following DEI principles CalPERS has invested almost half a BILLION dollars in a category they call "clean energy and technology."  Cuz dat soun' reeel socially responsible," eh?  So how's that been working out, eh?

Last year sleuths found CalPERS had lost 71% of the $468 million it put into that fund.

"Eh, deez jus' nummers, citizen.  Dey don' mean nuffin'!  In fack, all maff beez raaaacis!"

But that's just the tip of the iceberg.  The real figure is a LOT worse:  See, there are people called "actuaries" who predict how long people will live.  Then others take your number of employees, their promised pension amounts and lifespan, and tell you how much the state's retirement system needs to invest to have enough money to cover the calculated cost of all public pensions you've promised.

Last month the Reason Foundation found that CalPERS is a bit short: $166 BILLION.

Unless you're in the biz, you have no idea what this means.

See, no politician will cut the pensions of retired state employees.  So they can either raise taxes, or borrow more money.  It's almost always the second option.  The bonds pile up, burdening the future, but almost no one pushes back because the kids of the future haven't been born yet so obviously can't object, eh?  And voters now alive don't think about the future burden, cuz it's no problem to THEM, eh?

Happens every time, going back millenia.  And it works...every time.  Until it doesn't.

Democrats:  "Whut??  Dat crazy!  It's always worked!  So it always will.  Has to.  Simple logic, deplorable!"

So as the state gets further buried by the cost of servicing its massive debt, the state will have to pay higher interest on its bonds.  Debt service costs will rise even more.

Can anyone predict how that ends?

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/dei-applied-to-retirement-fund-in-california/#disqus_thread 

Somali Muslim member of congress Ilhan Omar calls U.S. "the United goddamn States"

Ilhan Omar and Pramila Jayapal both hate the U.S.  Two days ago in a public hearing in Minnisomalia, Omar referred to the U.S. as "the United goddamn States."  It was caught on video by many cameras.

Oh, I see my Democrat friends think this is fake news...AI, no doubt.  Well take a look: 

 

Here's a link to a much longer version, which shows the same final statement. 

Sure glad these communist muslim motherfuckers aren't "fanning the flames," eh? 

Newest Democrat idea

Everyone knows that when you fly into the U.S. from overseas, you have to present a passport.  That seems to be true in every country.

But now, since faaaabulous leftist judges have ruled that states are not allowed to require anyone to show proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections, Dems have taken this logic to its next logical step:  They claim the same logic should apply to entering the U.S:  If a person simply claims to be a citizen, that should be good enough, right?  Much like when a male claims to be a woman: Dems say you're not allowed to question that claim, cuz "Trans women ARE women," eh?  No further discussion allowed.

Again, since lower courts have ruled that people seeking to vote in federal elections can't be required to show proof of citizenship to vote, that same reasoning should apply to entering the U.S:  If someone says they're a legal resident of the U.S, why should the government make them prove it by presenting a passport? 

The newest target of the control freaks: fertilizer and feces. Seriously

Politicians are among the dumbest sons of bitches on the planet--and VERY dangerous.  Here's example #5,408,485:

In the Netherlands last week, pols in the province of North Brabant ORDERED that residents would no longer be allowed to walk with their dogs in the local forest.  

And why?  You'll never believe the stated reason given by the moronic pols:  They claim "dogs increase Global Warming."  Wait, do they drive cars?  Heat their doghouses?  Fly across the ocean to attend award ceremonies for themselves?

Nope, the pols claim the ban is due to "nitrogen emissions" from dogs.

And at this point rational people who paid at least a bit of attention in highschool recall that 80% of the atmosphere is relatively inert nitrogen, so how can nitrogen be a problem--let alone what makes the pols think dogs can have any effect on nitrogen in any case, eh?

Turns out the problem isn't nitrogen per se, but rather a molecule of nitrogen and that deadly poison oxygen, called nitrous oxide (N2O).  The Warmies are now screaming that N2O is an even worse greenhouse gas than the dread poison CO2.

Dog owners: "So how are dogs emitting N2O?"

Greenie/wokie politician: "All animal waste contains nitrogen compounds, and those decompose into N2O.  So dogs are making Global Warming worse by their feces."

Dog owner thinks a minute: "Don't all animals produce the same type of waste, including cows and humans?  If so, why are you blaming just dogs?"

Politician: "Uh...well...uh...we're not just blaming dogs.  We've now passed a law ordering all dairy farmers to cull half their milk cows to reduce nitrous oxide emissions.  So SEE, deplorables, we're being equally dictatorial to everyone!"

Farmer: "Wait...by 'cull' you mean 'kill,' right?  So you're gonna force dairy farms to kill half their cows?  Are you stupid?  You know that's gonna make the price of milk and cheese explode, which is gonna piss off a LOT of voters. 
    Fortunately we wheat farmers don't raise cows, just nutritious, non-polluting food crops.  So it's good that your new LAW isn't gonna put US out of business!
    See, we're guuuud pipo, so we only use --NO3, not that climate-destroying N2O.  We've used nitrates for decades as fertilizer, to increase crop yields, so everyone knows it's safe.  So it's a relief to know you smaht politicians aren't blaming US for the dread N2O, right?  Are you?"

Pol: "Uh...well...uh...actually nitrates ALSO decompose into N2O, so our new law will require farmers to cut their use of nitrate fertilizer in half too."

Farmer: "Wait...do you morons realize that will cut crop yields about 40%?"

Pol: "We don't believe that'll happen, and we've hired a VERY smaaht PhD professor as a consultant, and he's assured us that crop yields will only drop 30% at most."

Farmer: "Ahh.  And how long did this professor farm for a living before getting a PhD?"

Pol: "Oh he's never actually been a farmer.  He just knows all about farming because he's got a PhD in Agricultural Management--from one of Europe's TOP universities!  You wouldn't try to argue with someone who has a PhD, would ya?"

Dog owner: "So you've ORDERED that dogs can't go into the forest.  But how does that stop their waste from turning into this gas you claim is gonna fatally warm the planet?"

Pol: "Uh...well...uhh...it doesn't.  So we're working on a law that will make people who own dogs pay the government for the damage their dogs do to Erf's climate.  We've studied how to do this, and the consensus is something along the lines of the U.K's TV license, $250 a year or so."

Farmer: "But if you tax dog owners for their dog's waste, why wouldn't you tax humans for their waste?  Will you tax people an extra $250 per person per year for their feces?"

Pol: "Actually since people make far more waste than small dogs, the tax we're discussing will be closer to $2,000 per year.  So we expect most couples will have fewer children--which all guuud pipo know is a Good Thing."

Farmer: "What about 'immigrants' who are already living on welfare paid by taxpayers?  If they're already on welfare where would they get the money to pay your new waste tax?"

Pol: "That's a dumb question:  Of course immigrants won't have to pay the new tax.  That's just silly.  Or I suppose we could give 'em another $2,000 a year per family member that they could use to pay the tax.  Of course we'd have to hire another 5,000 government employees to administer that, so that's a really good idea.
   "Also, our scientists are working on a chemical toilet that will turn N2O into harmless nitrogen gas.  It looks like in mass production it could cost as little as $23,000.  But we'd give people three years to replace all their existing toilets with the new type." 

Farmer: "Are ALL you politicians this crazy?"

Pol: "That's HATE SPEECH, deplorable!  You are hereby sentenced to three years in prison!"

[Sound of gunshot.  Large hole appears in Politician's head.  Everyone in the hearing room looks at each other in astonishment.]

Dog owner: "I saw nothing."

Farmer: "Same here."

Other audience members: "Absolutely."
===

SOooo...I gather most of you think this is fantasy.  Horseshit.  Impossible.  I get it.  It's just TOO far-fetched, eh?  Well you hapless morons need to get your heads out of your video games or your TVs or your phones and open your damn eyes, cuz the new boogeyman by duh exspurts at dat faaabulous U.N. an' duh equally fabulous EU iz now "nitrogen pollution."  

Here are the communist pencil-dick tyrants at the U.N. on the threat to damn near everything posed by "nitrogen pollution:"

We must take action NOW to #BeatNitrogenPollution, to mitigate climate change! It's an issue we can't afford to ignore a moment longer!  If we don't limit nitrogen pollution right away, we'll face a cascade of negative impacts that will threaten the environment, the economy, our well-being and livelihoods--from degraded ecosystems to polluted soil, water and air, and species loss."

Any of those screaming, wailing bleats sound familiar?  Sure, that's the same horseshit they were spouting about Global Warming--which, as you may have noticed, has now been replaced by "climate change," since it has slowly become apparent that the planet is NOT overheating the way the control freaks screamed it would.  But their grift has become SO profitable that instead of saying "Ah, guess we were wrong on that one!" they just changed the name but kept the same controls in place.
   So now regardless of what the weather does (yeah, I know: weather isn't climate), the control freaks can claim "SEE? We WARNED YA!"

More UN crap:

Nitrogen pollution contributes to the triple planetary crisis of climate change, nature and biodiversity loss, pollution and waste.

EVERY time "nitrogen" is mentioned in that UN propaganda piece, the next word is "pollution."  Sorry, your fearmongering long ago lost its power over rational adults, assholes.
  
Here's what the U.N. screams under the heading "Biodiversity and ecosystems:"

Together with habitat destruction and climate change, nitrogen pollution is one of the biggest drivers of biodiversity loss on the planet today.

Ahhh, "biodiversity loss," y'say?  Oh, I see in this faaaabulous U.N. report there's a button you can click if ya wanna "read more," eh?  So let's see the explanation, eh?  And here's the "read more" explanation in its entirety:

According to a recent study, ecosystems such forests, heaths and surface waters are more sensitive to atmospheric nitrogen pollution than previously thought.

Wait...that's not even remotely an explanation.  It's an assertion.  Big damn difference.  But to totalitarians masking as saviors, the two are identical.  So they go on:

"Earth system scientists say that the world’s planetary boundaries for interference with the nitrogen cycle have already been surpassed, meaning that there is a high risk of irreversible changes to ecosystems and biodiversity."

"Interference with the nitrogen cycle," y'say?  Wow!  One could as easily say humans are "interfering with the energy cycle" by generating electricity, or heating dwellings in winter, eh?  

There's only a small step from here to ordering humans to live in caves and eat grubs, because anything else is "interfering" with some natural cycle, eh?  It's brazen fear-mongering.

So, experts, do tell us:  What fraction of global warming do you declare is caused by nitrous oxide, compared to, say, water vapor, eh?

And if we use your model, how much do you claim the average temp will rise by 2050 at current concentrations of nitrous oxide, eh?  Now how much temperature rise if we assume that concentration were to double?  Publish the computer program of your model so people who know how to analyze what programs are actually doing can see where you're making assumptions to support your conclusions (a.k.a. bullshitting).

Source for dogs banned from forest  

https://brusselssignal.eu/2026/01/dutch-dog-owners-shock-at-forest-ban-while-wolves-roam-free/

Source for astonishing U.N. bullshit about "nitrogen pollution"

https://unece.org/media/environment/Air-Pollution-Convention/press/372350 

CNN posts a total hit-piece on Trump, disguised as a poll

Two days ago (1/16/2026) CNN posted a total hit-piece "poll" on Trump.  Title:

CNN poll finds majority of Americans say Trump is focused on the wrong priorities

Virtually every alleged "result" published is exactly what the lying bastards in the f'n Mainstream Media have been pushing for the past year--and all during his first term as well.  I've edited the hit-piece for length:

Public opinion on nearly every aspect of Trump’s first year back in the White House is negative, with a majority of Americans saying Trump is focused on the wrong priorities and doing too little to address cost of living.

Wait...Is this the same Mainstream Media that tried to totally ignore ten percent inflation under bribem?  Why yes, yes it is.  And of course under DJT inflation is now 2.7%.  But watch how often this bullshit survey claims "dis economy is awful!"

58% say the first year of Trump’s term is a failure.

There’s hardly any good news in the poll for Trump or the Republican Party entering a critical midterm year, with the president’s handling of the economy as the defining issue in key midterm races.

Asked to choose their top issue, Americans chose the economy by almost two-to-one over any other topic.  The poll suggests Trump is struggling to prove that he’s addressing it.  And it finds broad concerns over Trump’s use of presidential power and his efforts to put his stamp on American culture. 

Views of economic conditions have remained stable — and largely negative — for the past two years, with only 3 in 10 rating the economy positively.

Wait..."for the past TWO years," y'say?  How long has Trump been in office?  Yeah, ONE year.  So this is a cunning way of equating today's economy to bribem's last year in (nominal) office--which was awful.  To take just one example, the price of gasoline between Jan 15 of 2024 and today has dropped by 30 percent.  Eggs are affordable again.  The only reason electricity is up in the northeast is that Democrat-ruled state and city governments are piling huge taxes on it, and forcing plants to shut down.

The poll shows pessimism about the future: Just over 4 in 10 expect the economy to be good a year from now, down from 56% just before Trump took office last January.

55% said Trump’s policies have worsened economic conditions in the country, with just 32% saying they’ve improved. 

64% said he hasn’t done enough to reduce the price of everyday goods.  Even within the GOP about half say he should be doing more.

Just 36% said Trump is "prioritizing their interests."  Only one-third say they believe Trump "cares about people like them." 

Just 37% said Trump puts the good of the country above his personal gain, and only 32% agreed that he’s "in touch with the problems ordinary Americans face in their daily lives." 

CNN includes a quote from an alleged independent:  "He comes across very self-seeking and not caring about the common good of our citizens.”  SEE?  Dat wuz an independent, so "they" iz, like, totally unbiased!

If you don't yet realize the entire CNN piece is total horseshit, consider this next bullshit:

 Fewer than half said Trump had the stamina and sharpness to serve effectively.

Wait...is this from the same Lying Media that bleated to us every day for four interminable years that the moronic, brain-dead vegetable bribem was "sharp as a tack"?  Why yes, yes it is.

Only 35% said they were proud to have him as president.

Public opinion on nearly every aspect of his presidency is negative. His ratings dropped within the first 100 days of his second term and have stayed in the low 40s or high 30s since then.

Trump does retain robust support with Republicans, with nearly 9 in 10 approving of Trump’s performance.  But just 29% of independents approve, and virtually no Democrats support him. Only 30% of Latinos and adults younger than 35 now approve.

Let's review: after that utterly corrupt piece of shit bribem wailed that he didn't have the authority to close the border, Trump did it in one month.  Trump ordered our military to sink high-speed drug-smuggling boats--which the Lying Media the heart-rendingly claimed were just poor Venezuelan fishermen.
   He leveled the playing field in world trade by imposing the same tariffs on foreign nations that those nations imposed on U.S. goods.  Liberals screamed dat dis wuz UNFAIR to doze nice nations.  Fuck you, shitheads. 
   When Iran started enriching uranium to bomb grade and continued to refuse to allow inspections of their centrifuge lines, Trump authorized a daring attack that put those enrichment facilities out of business--without losing a single aircraft or crewmember!
   When chuckie Schumer sneered that Trump hadn't done anything about Maduro during his first term, and then Trump had our troops arrest the son of a bitch (Maduro, not Schumer) a couple of weeks ago, Schumer then bitched about that!  Pick a lane, asshole.

"Most respondents say Trump’s use of power has gone too far.  While most Americans say the economy is their top concern, Democrats said our democracy is their top issue.  It's also the top reason Americans disapprove of the president’s performance.  About a quarter of those who disapprove of Trump say they do so because of his misuse of presidential power or treatment of American democracy.

The communist sons of whores at CNN know that most people have three "hot button issues:" the economy, democracy, and "fairness"--all of which are quite logical.  So every Mainstream Media hit-piece will scream about one or more of those three--as this hit-piece does with every sentence.

58% say Trump has gone too far in using the power of the presidency.

CNN tips its hand when it adds that at the beginning of Trump's second term polls claimed 52% of Americans already agreed with that statement.  That is, before he'd taken a single action.  If that's true, it shows an obvious irrationality, since it was before any presidential act.  Also, for CNN's pro-Democrat "poll" to claim 52% already thought Trump had "gone too far" as he took office, it's odd that Trump won the popular vote, eh?

57% say he's gone too far in cutting federal programs.  About half say he’s gone too far in changing the way that the US government works.

Who defends massive, fraud-ridden, wasteful federal programs, eh?  Sure: not only fraudsters, but also federal workers in the agencies that handle those gargantuan wastes and theoretically should have quickly caught massive fraud.  [In your dreams, eh?]  Try turning the question around: Ask Americans "What dollar amount of fraud and waste in federal programs should taxpayers be willing to tolerate?"

Now: the cunning wording of the article shows it's  pro-Democrat bullshit.  But no conservative should dismiss it--because propaganda like this is totally effective on low-info voters, who don't know a thing about fraud and corruption in fed programs--and don't want to know.  So the Mainstream Media pay almost no attention to massive fraud and waste, as we've seen in Minnesota, Maine, Ohio and Washington state.  
   Low-info voters don't believe any of that is real.  And ironically, one of the main reasons they don't believe it happened is because they believe that "If it were true, the Media woulda tol' us!"  What they don't understand is that the Mainstream Media always covers for Democrat fraud.  Yes, always.  Every time.  Because exposing massive fraud (literally BILLIONS of dollars) by Democrat supporters, looting Democrat-demanded programs, might make a few voters less likely to elect Democrats, eh?
   What low-info voters CAN understand--and easily believe--is: "What do most Americans (the 'cool kidz' they've always wanted to be) think of Trump and conservative policies?"

This phenomenon is so well known that it was identified a century ago:  It's called "the bandwagon effect."  If that term is new to ya, look it up.

Of course low-info voters won't--because they are totally impervious to any information that contradicts what they've been taught to believe.

SO...based on hit-pieces like CNN's, I predict the Dems will win a majority in the House in the mid-terms in November.  And of course that's all they need to block ALL efforts to pass laws to cut waste and fraud in government programs.  And the irony is, the Mainstream Media will be positively orgasmic over the Democrat win, exalting that the Dems are now able to block any conservative laws from being passed.

Of course the Media won't say it that way:  their endless gloats will say "Congress can now prevent any further abuses of power by Orange Hitler and his band of 'maggats.'"

Source:  CNN 

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/01/16/politics/trump-economy-first-year-cnn-poll 

Why do we have mail-in voting?

 

How could Trump help the Iranian people overthrow the mullahs without destroying vital infrastructure?

Hey, how about that situation in Iran, eh?  The supreme Islamic leader has ordered the IRGC and assorted junior lackeys to murder unarmed Iranians protesting in the streets.  How many?  Well the mullahs have cut off the internet, so hard to know, but some estimates are 12,000 or so.

SO two questions:  First, can Trump do anything to help the Iranian people overthrow the mullahs?  And second:  IF a military action can be identified as both helpful and likely to succeed, should it be done?  Keep in mind that as the reaction of U.S. Democrats and the Mainstream Media to our astonishingly successful capture of Maduro showed, no matter how successful any U.S. military action was, Dems and the Media would attack it as "interventionist," "undemocratic," "bullying" and so on.  And it would obviously be met with screaming outrage from the world Media and all other Islamic regimes.

Now, if you've been paying attention for the past year, you're beginning to get an idea how competent military leaders think.  We have no indication that Trump is a student of military history, but unlike the corrupt leftist sons of bitches bribem and Obozo, Trump listens to his military experts.  And they've suggested an old, well-known military tactic: misdirection.  Bribem's handlers never asked the military for options, because the communist motherfuckers in the White House were on the payroll of the Chinese communist party.  Fortunately Trump isn't a Democrat communist lackey.

Mis-directing an opponent is hardly a novel military tactic.  Students of WW2 may recall that before D-day (June 6, 1944) the Allies used all manner of deception to encourage the Nazi defenders to believe the Allied invasion would come at Calais--just 18.2 miles from England--when the invasion actually came ashore 190 miles away at Normandy, with a channel crossing of 150 miles instead of 18.  It didn't make sense--which helped it work.

For a more recent example of classic misdirection, think back to last year:  As the Islamic regime became increasingly belligerent about building an atomic bomb, the White House approved a military plan to send a flight of our powerful B-2 Stealth bombers west, to a staging base in the Pacific far closer to Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities.  As anyone could have predicted, the ENTIRE U.S. Mainstream Media reported on the launch from the U.S. base in Missouri, including the number of planes and their stated destination.  Cuz the Media always wants to be sure our enemies know everything the Media can find out.

And as those bombers sat on the ground at the staging base in the Pacific, presumably waiting for the go order, a different group flew EAST from the U.S. and destroyed Iran's nuclear enrichment sites.  See, the mullahs knew the Media would tell the world if the B-2s took off from their staging base in the Pacific, which would give the Islamic regime ten hours to get ready to shoot down the force.

*Surely* you remember that, right?  *Surely you heard the Media congratulating Trump and the U.S. Air Force on that classic, totally effective mis-direction, right?*  Because it was an operation for the history books.  (But it won't be in the history books because the Democrats publish 'em, and will ensure it doesn't happen--because it was a huge success for both the U.S. and for Trump.)

So returning to the present:  The White House announced that because a lot of our Navy ships were sitting off the coast of Venezuela, we didn't have enough assets off Iran to carry out an attack.  So the Pentagon announced that it was ordering a carrier battle group to sail from the Philippines to just 1,500 miles or so from Iran, and that it was gonna take the group seven days or so to arrive.

The Mainstream Media--which hate Trump with a passion unequaled in history--dutifully reported this.  And because all opponents of our nation have gotten used to relying on the U.S. Media to reveal any movements of U.S. forces, they're confident that no attack can be launched for a week or more.

Now: If I were a member of the JCS I would have suggested something like this:

No one with any sense would order strikes on Iran's infrastructure--electricity generating plants, water treatment, rail lines, ports, et cetera-- because all those will be needed if the regime is deposed.  So what (if anything) would the U.S. attack to be helpful?

The mullahs are kept in power by the armed troops in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), who have all the guns.  Take the IRGC out and the mullahs will flee.

SO...does the U.S. know the exact location of every IRGC barracks?  Of course.  Would three Tomahawk cruise missiles on each one kill almost everyone in those barracks?  Yes.

Of course the Tomahawks can't be launched until the carrier group arrives in about a week, right?

Oh wait...a couple of U.S. ballistic-missile subs--converted Ohio-class boomers--have been modified to carry cruise missiles--reportedly 154 of 'em.  (Skeptical?  Do a Net search for "Can U.S. subs carry cruise missiles?  Keep reading until you see "Ohio-class.")

Mainstream Media: "Wuh...wuh...buh...how long would it take for one of these mythical U.S. subs you claim exist to sail from its U.S. port to within range of Iranian targets?"

They're already there, cupcake.  So IF Trump decided to take out the IRGC barracks in Iran's 30 largest cities, the clever plan would be to do that before the carrier group got within a thousand miles of Iran, so the members of the IRGC would still be returning to their barracks every night, secure in the belief that any attack wouldn't be possible for another couple of days.

Just like the B-2s deployed to the Pacific staging base last year as decoys--and as Media attention was totally focused on those planes, the actual strike force was taking off and flying east to carry out the mission.

If one of the converted subs launched 90 cruise missiles, that would put three warheads on each of 30 barracks.  Hmmm....

But I don't know nuffin'.  Really. 

They've toppled statues of Washington and Jefferson, so...

 

 Would anyone be surprised?

Best of luck to the Iranian people--and even if you win, you've got another battle on your hands

Info below is from a website called "irannewsupdate.com"  I don't know who runs that, but they're clearly not in Iran.  And while they're clearly against the theocratic regime, about 8 'grafs down you'll see the well known slogan of the communist MEK: "Neither Shah nor mullahs."  The article repeats that slogan is twice more, so it isn't an accident.
===

For years the "Islamic state of Iran" regime and its supporters have constantly warned Iranians “If your government falls, the country will collapse.”

They constantly invoked fears of civil war, national breakup, or “becoming another Syria.”  Since everyone knew Syria was a total disaster, this threat was effective in scaring Iranians into passivity:  Any oppression by the mullahs was better than turning into Syria!

So predictably, the mullahs framed any protests as a dangerous step toward chaos. "Do you want to become like Syria, citizen?  Of course not!"  So no matter how oppressive the regime got, most Iranians saw it as better than the alternatives.

But as the regime became more oppressive, and the economy worsened, that began to change. 

Slogans such as “Neither Shah nor Mullahs” made this clear. Society was rejecting both forms of authoritarianism: monarchy and religious rule. Protesters were not looking backward; they were pointing toward a new idea—citizens governing themselves.

Of course this is the siren song of communists: "We ALL agree that we can and should govern ourselves, citizens."  And if freedom-loving people did govern, that would be great.  Problem is, when freedom-lovers partner with communists to overthrow a brutal regime, after the revolution the communists almost always take over the government.

Experience shows that when a regime responds to protests with force, it's a sign of declining legitimacy.

Slogans like “Death to oppressors, whether Shah or Supreme Leader” began appearing.

Another clue that the people running this website are probably communists.

While the regime's IRGC still holds all the weapons, the old fear stories that regime change will guarantee chaos are no longer persuasive.

What's emerging is a firm “No” to inherited power, religious rule, and authoritarianism in all its forms. 

"A firm No to inheirited power" is clearly a sneer at the son of the late Shah, which again suggests that this website is run by communists.

If you're trying to overthrow a repressive regime, should you ally with people who, if you succeed, are determined to seize total power?  Cuz history shows that the communists almost always win post-revolution power struggles because they're totally organized to do that.

By contrast, the idealistic believers in freedom naively believe that other citizens who helped depose the tyrannical government believe in the same thing they do--freedom--so they're always unprepared for how fast and totally the communists seize control--because the communists are organized.

The naive freedom-lovers aren't, so they're easy pickins' for the disciplined, organized communists.  And once the communists have flooded the new government with their True Believers, there's absolutely no way to ever get 'em out.  They use the courts to protect fellow members.

So...best of luck to the people of Iran.  Hope you win your freedom!  Unfortunately, if you do succeed in overthrowing the ghastly, murderous, totalitarian mullahs, you're in for another fight with demons equally determined to rule.  And if they win, you're in for another 40 or 50 years of oppression.

Ahh, I see American Democrats don't believe that.  You ignorant bastards: look at what happened to eastern Europe after WW2.  Any questions?

Actually you don't have the faintest idea what really happened in eastern Europe after WW2, cuz your schools never taught you history (by design) and you never thought to study it on your own.  Why am I not surprised?

SO...search "Solidarity" in Poland.  Search "Hungarian uprising 1956."  Search "1989 Czech uprising."  "Vaclav Havel."  Search "Romanian revolution."  If you don't know about all those, you're too uninformed to be voting.  

Of course it's not your fault: "Your" schools and Mainstream Media have deliberately made those communist takeovers vanish--intentionally.   

But why worry, eh?  There's no threat here, citizen!  No problem at all.  Go back to your favorite TV programs!  I hear "Dancing with the Stars" is good this season, as is "Nashville 9-1-1."  Yep yep yep.  Everything is just fine, tovarisch.  Excuse me: "citizen."

Source:  

https://irannewsupdate.com/news/insider/the-january-2026-uprising-when-protest-turned-into-a-break-with-the-system/

Chitcongo Teachers' Union sees "huge tax on billionaires in Cali" and perks right up!

Recently the Democrats and communists who run the SEIU proposed to put an "initiative" on the November ballot to levy a "one-time" tax of five percent on the net worth of all billionaires in the state--and to include all of the person's assets world-wide.  

Not just taxing one year's income, since the wealthy can easily be arrange to have just a nominal income in a given year if needed, but on the person's net worth.  

WELL...the communists who run Chitcongo's teachers' union saw that and immediately started salivating!  Cuz they realized--as Cali Democrats did--that 99% of Democrats are NOT billionaires, so would eagerly vote YES on the measure, for the state to seize ALL assets of billionaires and gibs dat to Democrats.  SO...duh rulers of duh teachers' union immediately sent out a colorful poster to members telling 'em to support the same kind of billionaire tax that Democrats in California proposed.  Cover page is shown below.  Notice anything?

 

Of course you noticed, cuz you paid at least normal attention in school, right?  Sure!

SO...Where can you find the story of this obvious incompetence by the officers of the Chicago Teachers' Union, eh?  Maybe at the "We Loves teachers' unions" fan club at the NY Times?  The WaPo?  Politico?  The Hill?  All super liberal, an' dey LOoooves teachers' unions, right?  So do ya really think they'd point out to their reader the misspelled word in the TITLE of the flyer emailed by the union execs to members?  

Of course not.  The only place I could find this story was in a London paper--not in a single U.S. Mainstream Media outlet.

But you must continue to TRUST the Mainstream Media, citizen.  Cuz if you stop believing the Mainstream Media, we'll have total anarchy!  It will be "The End of Ouah Democracy!"

Source. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15463049/Chicago-teachers-union-spelling-error-schools.html 

Any idea how much interest the govt will have to pay this year? Way more than they thought

The graphic below is totally misleading--and that's deliberate.  The low-info voter looks at these numbers and thinks "Those aren't actually that bad!  Fed spending on defense is WAY down, just $267 Billion!  And here I thought I'd heard $750 billion or so!  Wow, nice!"

"And LOOK, Marge, interest on the debt is WAY down, just $270 billion!  I thought last year we heard it was $750 Billion or so.  Nice!" 

 

Then you realize this can't possibly be for the whole year, since 2026 just started.  And sure enough, it's just from the start of each FY to the current date in each of the years. 

So multiply everything by four and you're getting close.

Now I wanna call you attention to a couple of things:  First is that thanks to the massive federal debt ($39 TRILLION or so) "your" government will be forced to pay over $1.2 TRILLION this FY just in the interest on that debt.  Second, as you see, the interest is more than our TOTAL defense spending.  And since the Left has always screamed bloody murder that military spending is always WAY too high, you might think the sons of bitches would be screaming just as loudly about interest payments too, eh?

Not a chance.  Not a word of concern.  Reason is, Democrats WANT to spend way more than we take in, but only on welfare and related "free shit" for their base.  Defense spending doesn't help that, so..."defense spending bad, welfare guuuud!"

Third, I want you to note how stunningly fast interest costs are rising:  In August of 2024 the Congressional Budget Office estimated interest costs in the next year would be $870 billion, rising to one TRILLION in FY 2026.  By August of 2025 the current estimate had risen to $970 billion, and the CBO is now estimating $1.2 TRILLION this FY.  

So the "experts" were a staggering 20 percent BELOW the current estimate just months later.  This is either incompetence or intentional, and I'll go either way you want.

So what does this mean to you, eh?

If you're a typical American, the answer is "No idea."  Or "Nothing."  It's too huge, too distant, too...arcane.  Most people don't see the relevance.  I get it.  And that's intentional, because if you knew what these numbers mean, most of your lives would change radically.  

Here's how it works:  If you invest money in an interest-bearing account, there a thing called the "rule of 72" that lets you estimate the time it'll take for your investment to double in value.  You divide 72 by the interest rate in percent.  So at 4%, the amount in the account should double in around 18 years.

This is a quick way to estimate a VERY well known math formula called "exponential growth."  And if you're investing, it's great.  Problem is, the same growth rate works against you if you borrow money and don't pay down the debt.  That's where we are, because the morons in congress keep passing laws requiring the federal gruberment to ALWAYS spend more than it takes in, every year.  As a result the government always borrows more money every year, and never pays the debt down by a single dollar, so the debt keeps growing..."exponentially."

Now: the current rate on ten-year "Treasury bills" (T-bills) is 4.18%.  Shorter-terms are around 3.56%.  So if we wag 4%, it means that if congress only makes the government spend $500 billion a year more than it takes in, by 2040 the national debt will be $80 TRILLION.  And we'll be having to pay about $2.5 TRILLION per year in interest.  

https://www.pgpf.org/programs-and-projects/fiscal-policy/current-debt-deficit/#cumulative-federal-deficit 

Senator to female doctor: "Can a woman get pregnant?" Female doctor: [silence]

The very short, 29-second video below is a total hoot.  A female doctor (Verma) is appearing before a senate committee as a witness, and a female senator asks her "Can a man get pregnant."

Long, long pause.  The female doctor sits there with her mouth open, frozen, not saying a word.  You can almost hear the fuses blowing in her brain, since a "no" puts her in the crosshairs of the tranny mafia, while a "yes" opens the door to lots of questions related to what she learned in med school.  After ten seconds of frozen silence from the female doctor, the senator give up and goes to the next witness.

 

This is the corner the Democrat party has painted themselves into.  In their headlong rush to sterilize U.S. children and drive them into the Dem party, Democrats toppled the first domino, and all the rest inevitably followed.  One of the early hoots was watching Ketanji Brown-Jackson tell senators during her confirmation hearing that she couldn't define "woman"--because I'm not a biologist.  

And finally, here we are with a female doctor--who presumably got at least a bit of biology in  med school--and she utterly froze.

If the Democrats and the tranny mafia were to win either of these cases (which appears unlikely at this point but ya never know), the next hill the Dems would be forced to defend would be girls forced to share locker rooms and showers with males pretending to be girls, because IF you buy the foundational lie that men can become real women simply by declaring it and taking cross-sex hormones, there's no legal reasoning you can use to keep them out of girls' locker rooms and showers.

Democrats: "Why yew so upset, deplorable?  Your daughter should be okay wif' dat if she wants t' play girls' sports!  Yew deplorables get so upset about trivia!" 

TSA has been finding about $700 MILLION per year in CASH being flown out of MN

Democrats: "Dere iz NO fraud by Somalis in Minnesota!  An' if yew claim dere iz, yew iz a RAAAaacist!"

Ahh, really, sparky?

If you've flown commercial in the last 20 years you may have noticed that TSA requires you to open all carry-on luggage for inspection.  And checked baggage is X-rayed.  And TSA has found that Somali couriers have taken something like $700 MILLION per year in CASH from Minneapolis in checked and carry-on luggage.

The destination of the cash couriers was usually Amsterdam, then to Dubai, at which point the cash became untraceable.

Here's the hoot: Taking massive amounts of cash out of the U.S. is perfectly legal, as long as you declare it--which the couriers did.

So what was the source of these hundreds of millions of dollars in CASH, eh?  Always moved by Somali couriers.

They're not required to say.  And TSA's job isn't to find where the cash came from.  That's someone else's job, eh?  Cuz surely since they declared the cash, the source must have been legal, eh?  (No.)  And the businesses that generated those vast profits surely declared that income and paid federal and state taxes on it, right?  (Let's find out, eh?)

The bribem regime didn't care.  And apparently the reports never made it to Trump's desk during his first term, thanks to DeepState agents intercepting 'em.  And of course before that, Obozo wouldn't have lifted a finger.

TSA has been reporting this curious export of hundreds of millions in cash up the chain, but the bribem regime did nothing, had no interest at all.  So it continued.

Now investigators have found another link in the chain: A cool $100 million flown from Columbus, Ohio, to Minneapolis, then overseas.

Democrats: "Chill, deplorables!  Duh cash din' have nuffin' to do wif' Somalis!  Dey wuz jus' duh couriers--a totally legit business!  No, dey don' have t' tell ya who duh cash belonged to--and good luck tryin' to haul 'em before a grand jury in Minnesotistan, eh?  Cuz dat iz a guaranteed acquittal, cuz "Deez pipo iz ouah trusted neighbors, who dun' built ouah great state!"

Democrat mayor of Minneapolis Jacob Frey: "We will protect ouah totally honest, hardworking citizens against dis awful persecution by Orange Hitler!  All dis talk about daycare centers wif' no kids, or autism centers dat paid parents to enroll dere kids, or lies about Somali translators billing $800 a day to sit wif' Somali patients who couldn't speak English, are all RAAAcist!  Plus, it wrong to blame a whole community fo' duh alleged acts of a few--which nevah happened!"

The hoot is, Dems will never believe the hundreds of millions of dollars in CASH openly declared by the Somali couriers as they headed overseas came from fraud.  Nope nope nope!  All came from real daycare centers, eh?

Source.  

https://justthenews.com/somali-suitcase-stash-feds-says-130-million-moved-ohio-airport-minnesota-way-overseas
 

Supreme Court finally hearing two cases on whether "Trans women ARE women"

As you may have heard, the Supreme Court is finally hearing two lawsuits seeking to overturn laws passed by two states saying only girls can compete in girls' sports.

For years a leftist named Amy Howe has had a blog about the Supreme Court, and she's extensively written about these cases.  If you're totally bored, here's a good way to see how the Left views the issue.

And to the Left/Dems the issue is: "If a male declares he is a female, he's a female."  The Left shortens that to "Trans women ARE women," because that makes the obvious logical lie less obvious.  What a surprise.

Amy devotes a thousand words to the arguments by both sides.  But the issue--which is almost never addressed directly--always comes down to the assertion above:  Shall U.S. law agree with the Democrats that a male who claims to be female shall by law be DECREED to be female? 

Seriously, that's the exact issue, and watching these attorneys and SC "justices" dance around it to avoid addressing this fundamental question is a hoot.  

"Can lead become gold if a really good attorney can make a persuasive enough case?"  That's the level of logic at play here.

In hindsight (always 20/20, eh?) the Dems would have had a better case if they had NOT claimed "trans women ARE women," but rather that if a person has less than some percentage of muscle mass, and is less than the height and weight of the tallest, heaviest real female, they had no advantage over real girls in sports.  But they didn't go that route...because by all indications the Democrats believed they'd win with their claim.  They believed they'd prepared American opinion--the battle-space--so perfectly that Americans (normal as well as justices) would accept their claim that males could become real women simply by declaring it to be so. 

Now, most court observers believe the SC will support the laws banning males from competing in girls' sports, by a 6-3 vote.  The betting is that the three liberal females will vote to overturn the state bans--thus in favor of allowing males to compete against girls, and implicitly supporting the tranny claim.

And note that if one supports the lunatic notion that males can be "real girls," the unavoidable corollary is that schools MUST allow such "real girl" males to use female locker rooms and showers too.  "Dat is NOT a problem, deplorables!  Girls need to get with the program!" 

You might have thought female justices would support the rights of girls not to have to compete against males in sports, eh?  But the three are liberal Democrats, and to Democrats the most important thing is to support The Agenda, not the rights of girls, eh?

Can't wait to see how they vote.

Source: "scotusblog" by Amy Howe  

https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/01/supreme-court-appears-likely-to-uphold-transgender-athlete-bans/ 

A brief history of Venezuela's oil production

Communists (and all totalitarians) are one-trick ponies:  they have one tool in their toolbox, which is to threaten to imprison or fire anyone who doesn't obey them.

This always has...interesting...results.  Meaning disastrous.  But in a few years the communist sons of whores in the Mainstream Media will have re-written history to erase the blunders of the communist rulers, eh?

It's a really well-functioning scam--if you're a communist. 

Example: In 2003 thousands of workers for Venezuela's national oil company went on strike against the communist government of Hugo Chavez.  Chavez responded by firing over 18,000 skilled, experienced oilfield workers for participating in the strike, replacing them with 20,000 unskilled but obedient political loyalists.

See, people who don't know jack-shit about oil and oil wells think "All you have to do is drill a hole in the ground and oil comes out, forever!  How hard can it be, eh?  And if an American oil company has already spent the money to drill the hole, it's even less work, as I'll explain below.

Drilling most oil wells is staggeringly expensive, so for over a century oil companies have offered to drill wells at their sole expense in areas they felt might produce oil.  If the well did  produce commercial quantities--and in a new area that usually only happened about once out of ten tries--the terms of the agreement gave the oil company one-eighth of the value of the oil produced, with the rest (7/8ths, 87.5%) to whoever owned the mineral rights.

That's been a standard deal that's made thousands of formerly poor farmers and ranchers in Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas and North Dakota millionaires--without their having to invest a dollar.

So...American oil companies, under that standard agreement, drilled virtually every oil well in Venezuela.  Those wells made that nation the 4th richest in the entire world in 1980 or so, and the richest in all of Latin America.

Seriously.

But communists, like U.S. Democrats, are notorious for ignoring any law or contract they suddenly don't want to honor.  (If you're a Democrat and would like to argue with me about that, give it your best shot.  The examples are legion.)  Chavez saw a way to increase his oil revenue with the stroke of a pen, by simply DECREEING that the contracts his nation had signed were now void, and that his government was seizing all the rigs and incredibly expensive, sophisticated equipment used to keep the wells flowing.

That's called "nationization," which sounds much better than "stealing" or "seizing," eh?  Sounds harmless, which is why it's the term used.

SO...Decades ago three U.S. oil companies signed leases with the Venezuelan government, making the country fabulously wealthy.  Then in 2006 Chavez saw a chance to steal the oil companies' 1/8th share.  And like all totalitarian dictators, he couldn't resist.

And there you see communism, socialism and all totalitarian regimes laid bare, eh?  "We'z gonna take dat, cuz we gots duh gunz, an' yew oil companies don't," eh? 

So how'd that work out for the communist son of a bitch?

The Media won't try to tell ya cuz they wanna devote all their news to bashing Trump, so I'll do it:  Most people understandably don't know jack about what's involved in producing oil.  And to understand what Chavez's and Maduro's stupidity caused, you need to know at least a tiny bit about what's involved.  So here's an analogy: 

Suppose you wanna replace a sparkplug on your car.  (For beta males who have no idea what that is or how the hell to do it, never mind.)

For guys who aren't betas, now imagine trying to replace that sparkplug using a wrench at the end of a mile-long handle...blindfolded.  And if you make a mistake,  high-pressure gas blasts out of the hole and turns into a 300-foot-tall torch, turning your drilling rig into a melted steel pretzel.

Until you've seen it, as I have, you have no idea how powerful the forces are. 

SO...Chavez's replacement of over 18,000 skilled professionals with untrained but politically reliable workers and managers was like asking a first-year med-school student to do heart surgery.  Even though Chavez still had all the equipment he'd seized from the U.S. companies, his people didn't have the training needed to use it in any but the simplest operations.  

The result was that Venezuela's oil production dropped like a rock:  before the communist asshole's mass firings, Venezuela was producing about 3.5 million barrels of oil every DAY.  Today AI says Venezuela has a grand total of "about 2" [sic] active oil rigs.  Which means they can't even begin to keep their wells producing.  

As a result, production has plummeted to about 650,000 bopd.  At today's prices the drop of about 2.8 MILLION barrels per day represents a loss to that country of around $150 million per DAY, or just under half a BILLION dollars per month.

Think that might have a negative effect on your economy?

Now: I'm getting a kick out of watching the stupid, clueless, Democrat-fellating, Trump-hating Mainstream Media speculate on what the capture of Maduro will do to oil prices.  Half the "experts" say oil prices will rise, the other half say they'll fall.  From which you can correctly deduce that it's a big mystery.

One relief is that almost nothing will change for the next year at least, because it's gonna take a year for U.S. companies to make new agreements and start reviving wells.

Democrats and leftist Media rulers: "Whut all dis stuff about 'maintaining' oil wells?  Once yew drill duh well, duh oil always keeps comin' out duh ground all by itself, citizen!"

Your statement shows you know nothing about oil production, so better to stick with bashing the U.S. for arresting Maduro, eh?   

American oil companies obviously have the expertise to restore Venezuela's oil production, but after the communists seized ("nationalized") U.S. company assets and equipment twice, I suspect the companies won't be rushing to pour billions into Vz until the commies who still run that country show what they wanna do. 

And despite all the Democrats and Mainstream Media outlets screaming "regime change!" the communists are still running Venezuela.  They control every post in government.  The acting president, Delcy Rodriguez, is a hard-line communist.  Her brother--another hard-line commie--runs the National Assembly.

A novice would say "It's up to the people of Venezuela to decide who they want to rule them."  But like the people of Iran, the people of Vz were disarmed by the commies years ago.  And as the most recent stolen election there showed, the communists have no qualms about stealing elections.  So it's unlikely the commies will lose control for many years.

Meanwhile U.S. Democrat congress-critters have vowed to ask the International Criminal Court to order the U.S. to return Maduro to power in Venezuela.

And so it goes. 

Truth

 

Are 99% of "gender dysphoria" cases organic (i.e. authentic), or spurred by...popularity?

 You should be able to click the pic below to enlarge it.  Notice anything?

 

16 fairly influential parents above, 19 kids, all trans.  I'm mildly curious as to the percentage of trans kids in the entire population, versus the kids of "influential parents."  

A decade ago, a study in the U.K. compared the incidence of self-declared trans kids at two highschools about two miles apart, but with nearly identical demographics--race, income, food sources, water supply and so on.  In one school something like 40% of the girls said they identified as male, while in the other only about two percent said they were.

If "gender dysphoria" (or whatever the current in-group term is at the moment) were a "natural" phenomenon, one would expect the percentages in schools with the same demographics would be pretty close.  For one school to have 20 times more trannies than the other, with the same population characteristics, strongly suggested being trans was NOT organic, but was triggered by...something else.

The researchers found that in the high-percentage school, two of the most popular girls said they were now male, and that seemed to trigger an avalanche of trend-followers.  By contrast, in the low-incidence school the first girl to declare she was male was NOT popular, which seems to have made other girls uninterested in joining her.

The tranny mafia immediately sneered that the study was flawed, and it vanished from the Media.  See, just like the girls in the study, people who run the Media wanna be popular with the Cool Kids, eh?  

"My generation is gonna start a revolution!!"

 

If you raise a foreign flag on U.S. soil, this is how your day should end

 

BF of founder of MN food scam keeps mysteriously skating for crimes you and I would be jailed for

 Sept. 30, 2025:
 In the Dem-ruled shithole of Minnesotistan, one of the first massive frauds to be discovered was called "Feeding Our Future," headed by a leftist woman named Aimee Bock.

Woman founder of "Feeding our Future" scam, and her then boyfriend Watson

Under the scam Bock enlisted scores of Somali fraudsters to claim to be serving meals to hungry chirren.  They didn't, but bilked taxpayers for a cool $250 million over several years.  A typical Somali "feeder" that served an average of 40 meals per day would bill for serving 2,500 meals per DAY--which state employees paid with no questions or verification.  And when a few employees reported this seemed shady, they were told to shut up.

Bock was raking in so much cash that she paid her black boyfriend, a six-time convicted felon with the odd name of "Empress Malcolm Watson Jr." (yes, "Empress," and now her "former" bf) lavishly:  Investigators say that between 2020 and 2022 Bock paid Watson over $1 million for work he did for Feeding Our Future, as well as work that his remodeling company did for the so-called non-profit.

Watson is accused of spending over $680,000 on travel, jewelry, and vehicles.

So in the early days of the $250 MILLION fraud called Feeding Our Future, Empress Watson was described as founder Aimee Bock's live-in boyfriend.  He was never charged in the Feeding case and his name soon disappeared from the public eye.  Until last August.

Police were summoned to a residence and found Watson at the home of his new girlfriend (no longer Aimee Bock).  He's accused of assaulting the girlfriend and a neighbor to whom she had fled for safety, accused of threatening to kill both the girlfriend and the neighbor.  Also with causing significant damage to the new gf's home. 

He's also being held on two unrelated felony counts arising from a DUI-related car crash last July.  On July 15 a state trooper arrived at the scene of a single-car rollover crash on I-35.  The trooper found Watson in the vehicle and reported that he was “hysterical, screaming, and flailing around.” Witnesses at the scene claimed the car had been traveling 80 to 100 MPH just before the crash.

Just two weeks before that accident, on July 2, Watson was convicted of a misdemeanor DWI. That case was from two YEARS earlier when Watson tested a blood-alcohol level of  0.125, far over the limit.

In that case the wokie leftist judge "sentenced" Watson to 90 days--but then suspended the entire "sentence."  Watson was ordered to pay a $136 fine, but has never paid it to this day.  If the woke judge had done his job, Watson would have had his license revoked.  But of course... 

When Watson refused to pay the fine, was a warrant automatically issued for his arrest?  Hahahaha!  Of course not.  It's Minnesotistan, where Dems rule supreme and there's hardly any official crime, eh?

June 28, 2024: Watson had been convicted in Ramsey County court of two misdemeanor counts of assault.  The charges were originally felonies, but in a plea deal both were pled down to misdemeanors.

With the sweetheart plea deal, Empress was again sentenced to 90 days--and AGAIN the leftist judge suspended the entire joke of a sentence.  He was also fined $61--and as you could guess, he never paid it--cuz he speshul, deplorables.

A 2023 traffic case in another county indicates that Watson’s driver’s license had been revoked.  But for special people, DWIs, assaults and unpaid fines are no hindrance to getting a new DL, eh?

Think you could get away with any of the crap that Empress Watson pulled?  This demon seems to be protected for some reason, so I suspect he'll skate on the tax charges too.

Source.

https://www.americanexperiment.org/feeding-our-future-figure-charged-with-8-unrelated-felony-counts/ 

Another murder that will never make the news outside one city

Around Jan 8th in Ocala, Florida someone called 911 to report a suspicious person.  The caller reported seeing the suspect chamber a bullet in a silver handgun. 

A minute later neighbors on that street called 911 to report that 64-year-old Harold Harper--a white male--had been shot in his front yard.  The victim died from a single gunshot wound to the back of his head.

Officers found the suspect, Isaac Toye, 29, casually strolling a short distance away.  He had a loaded 9mm pistol in his hoodie, and two magazines, each loaded with 13 rounds of ammunition.

Police found a 9mm shell casing next to the victim's body.  That casing was later found to match the pistol Toye was carrying.

The murdered man's family told officers the victim was in his front yard gardening when he was murdered.  Neighbors said his passion was gardening, and that he was "a very, very nice man."  Now this "nice man" is dead, murdered by a demon for no rational reason.  

Now try this thought experiment:  If the races were reversed, and a white male had deliberately executed a 64-year-old black man with a shot to the back of the head as the victim was on his knees tending his garden, do ya think that would have outraged the national Mainstream Media?

Of course.  Remember Daniel Penny--the former Marine in NYC who overpowered a drugged-up black male who was threatening to kill everyone on his subway car?  That was on EVERY Mainstream Media outlet for a month--and in that case Penny was neutralizing a man who was threatening to kill other passengers on the subway car.  But in Ocala there was no such threat--no rational reason for the black killer to murder the 64-year-old white man tending his garden.

Yet one of those deaths was national news for a month, while the other has gotten no national airtime at all, nor will it--because these murders have become so totally routine.  Normal.  Expected.  Tolerated by Dem rulers in Dem cities, and by the national Media.

Think about that for a bit.  Of course you won't, because that would cause you to realize what's been happening in the U.S. for over 50 years.

Eh, never mind.  Go back to watching the Golden Globes or some other warm, fuzzy crap.  Or wailing about ICE deporting illegal alien invaders.

In nature, animals that can't or won't learn--and fast--are killed and eaten by predators.  But of course you're smaaaht, eh?  Got a degree in "gender studies" or law from Columbia or Hahvahd or Stanford.  So as far as you know, there's nothing at all to be learned here, eh?

You won't be a victim, evah, cuz you smaaaht.  Your highschool and college taught yew dat all cultures are equal!  An' cuz dey tol' ya that, it mus' be true, cuz why would dey lie, eh?

Democrats: "Dis can't be true, cuz who could possibly benefit from the weakening of the United States?  No one!  So it makes no sense for the Mainstream Media to ignore black-on-white murders!  Po' Isaac wuz jus' tryin' t' feed his fambly!" 

And of course you'll never be murdered or mugged, because the Law of Big Numbers will protect you.  That's what protects (!) fish that swim in big schools and are NOT eaten by predators.  Cuz the odds are 1000 to 1 that it'll always be some other fish that gets eaten, eh?  

And as long as it's some other fish being eaten, why worry, right?  And you're not worried.  Not your problem.  You're protected...by the Law of Big Numbers.  Seriously.

It may not have occurred to you that NONE of the victims thought they'd be murdered either, eh?  After all, we know people die in car wrecks too, and no one worries about that, right?

Murder suspect Isaac Toye, 29

 Source.

Venezuela and the re-discovery of the Monroe Doctrine

Re: Venezuela

In 2020 Chuckie Schumer wailed that Trump hadn't taken out Maduro.

Within hours of the U.S. military capturing Maduro--on Trump's orders, of course--Schumer was bleating the equivalent of "How DARE Trump do dis to such a fine, upstanding national leader?"

That reversal perfectly illustrates the Democrat Party's approach to any U.S. policy: bitch about Trump not solving it, then if he does, bitch about him solving it.

One of the biggest Democrat "victories" has been to force the U.S. to abandon the Monroe Doctrine: Dems have resolutely opposed almost every U.S. effort to keep communists out of the western hemisphere.  I suspect that's why the White House didn't brief congress about the coming operation to arrest Maduro.

Fifty years ago 100,000 Americans weren’t dying of drug overdoses every year. Cuba and Venezuela weren’t emptying their prisons and mental institutions into the U.S.  Unvetted foreigners weren’t streaming across our border, killing, raping and robbing Americans.  

Fifty years ago the region’s main exports were things like coffee, oil and sugar. Today they're cocaine and fentanyl.  And Venezuela was among the worst offenders, sending tons of drugs to the U.S.

Vice President Kamala Harris was tasked with getting to the “root cause” of illegal immigration from Latin America. It turns out the “root cause” is Latin Americans.

Since U.S. troops captured Maduro and sent him to the U.S, Democrat leaders have put out the word to their Mainstream Media allies that the arrest is "starting a war in Venezuela."  It's to be compared to the U.S. invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.

We captured Maduro and brought him to the U.S. for trial because he'd been repeatedly indicted in U.S. courts for trafficking drugs that have killed a quarter of a million Americans.
 

Demon executes six people--including a 7-year-old girl. NBC refuses to run demon's photo

In Mississippi a 24-year-old demon murdered six people, including a 7-year-old girl.  NBC "newz" had what they tout as "the story."  Click here to read it, and then see if you noticed anything...odd.

Every media outlet had the killer's photo, but NBC chose not to show it.  Hard to know why NBC "newz" chose not to show the demon's pic.  Really, it's a total mystery.

NBC: "We used up all our allotment of pixels for the month.  Wait...we didn't want to show the pic cuz he hazn't been convicted!  Yeh, dat it.  Jus' like dat po' Tyler Robinson."

Of course people of any race can go crazy (or sometimes be known crazy for a decade).  But if a white male had executed six people--including a 7-year-old girl!--and all Mainstream Media organs had a pic of the perp, do ya think NBC would have posted a pic of the white killer? 

 

How many examples will it take for you to realize the Mainstream Media hates white men, Christians and conservatives.  Of course Democrats (and even lots of conservatives) don't believe that because it's just TOOooo impossible, eh? 

Remember that crazy white male--Ryan Routh--who was in a firing position as Trump was golfing in Florida?  He hadn't even gone to trial, yet NBC had no qualms about publishing HIS photo, eh?  Same with Tyler Robinson.  It's not an accident, it's NBC's policy.

As millions of disarmed Iranians fight for their freedom, someone asks...

As millions of Iranians fight for their freedom from Islamic tyranny, Eyal Yakobi asks "Why isn't this picture on the front page of the NY Times?"

 

Answer: The NY Times loves Islamic and communist tyrants. 

Two competing business ideas in Somalia

 

Imagine, if you will...a government so corrupt...

 

Leftist website screams that ICE is now "monitoring your phones"--like FBI did on J6!

Two days ago (1/8) a Democrat-fellating leftist website called "404media" published a breathless, screaming piece titled

Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods

The author says ICE has purchased two "surveillance systems" that can "track phones without a warrant and follow their owners home...or to their employer!"

The use of the word "monitor" is very carefully chosen, because your average Democrat voter will think it means ICE will listen to your calls.  That's deliberate, and false.  But Dems will get their panties in a twist thinking it's true.

Then the hoot, because this is exactly what the FBI did on January 6th, 2021.  You remember: that so-called "insurrection where not a single person other than govt thugs was armed, eh?  The one where the only people killed were two women with the protesters--one fatally shot by a capitol cop and the other beaten to death by a female capitol cop.  (Officer Brian Sicknick was NOT hit in the head or anyplace else by a fire extinguisher, or anything else, and was found to have died from natural causes.)

SO...back to the breathless 404 piece: 404 was founded in 2023 by four former staffers for the leftist website Vice, which filed for bankruptcy.  Author Joseph Cox was one of the co-founders.  So did Cox write an equally breathless piece about bribem's DOJ and FBI using exactly the same tech to arrest J6'ers in 2021 who merely walked BY the Capitol without going in?

If he did I haven't found it.  I'll go out on a limb and guess he didn't.  Anyway, here's the short answer:  the software doesn't listen to calls, but to the handshakes between cell phones and towers.  Cell towers give a bearing to the phone, and with crossing bearings from two towers the system can determine the location a that phone within a few hundred feet. 

This is exactly what bribem's FBI and Merrick Garland's DOJ did in 2021.  "Wait!  We at 404 ALSO tol' ya ICE could do dis wifout a warrant!"  Yeah, well...no was needed when bribem was doing it in 2021 either.

Cox breathlessly notes that the ability to track phones is "alarming civil liberties experts and raising questions on what exactly ICE will use the system for."  Well, Joe, how about exactly what bribem's dictators did in 2021, eh?  And did you and Vice breathe a critical word?  No?  I'm shocked.  Not.

Cox quotes "Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy project director of the "Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project" for the ACLU, bleating “This is a very dangerous tool in the hands of an out-of-control agency.  This granular location information paints a detailed picture of who we are, where we go, and who we spend time with.”  

Ohhh absolutely, sparky!  And I was SO impressed with all those articles the ACLU wrote criticizing bribem's and Garland's DOJ and FBI for using this same tool (different seller) to arrest J6 protesters!

Oh wait...the ACLU didn't write a single word of criticism of the DOJ and FBI when bribem's people used the same technology THEN.  No wails about privacy THEN.  Oh the ACLU did do some things concerning cell phone tracking: they used FOIA requests to find out what conditions the FBI imposed on state and local governments for using either "simulators" or actual catchers.  And they bitched about the use of non-disclosure agreements that kept cops from disclosing all the capabilities of the technology.
   Again, not the same thing as complaining about "invasion of privacy."  But NOW that Trump is prez, suddenly "dis iz absolutely AWFUL!" 

At this rate I expect Cox will write a piece wailing that license-plate readers are unconstitutional, despite having no concerns at all when bribem was allegedly president.

Of course no one today is surprised by Dem double-standards.  Just like that lying rat-bastard Chuckie Schumer wailing back in 2020 that Trump hadn't taken any steps to remove Maduro, then screaming after Trump removed Maduro in twenty minutes, with no loss of U.S. life.  

Like all Democrats, Chuckie thinks we don't know how to search the Internet for his past bleats.  That's a technology he hasn't needed to master, since he has staff for that.  So he forgets that it works on everyone--including corrupt Democrat leaders.

Source: 404

Same source, different URL 

https://archive.is/HYbBG

https://www.404media.co/inside-ices-tool-to-monitor-phones-in-entire-neighborhoods/ 

Minnesota auditor tells congress her office discovered massive daycare fraud 11 YEARS ago

Minnesota state workers say they began warning their supervisors and the federal government about massive fraud in Somali "daycare centers" as early as 2015.  They described a complex system of fraud where owners of fake "daycare centers" paid mothers to register children for child care.  

Because the state would only pay the "daycare center" 100% of its stated billing if the mothers were working, the mothers would be listed as being employees of a different business located at the same address. 

Other mothers reported being told that unless they were working at the daycare their children wouldn't be fed.  Since the mothers had no other job, staying with their children at the center was never a problem.  

Investigators heard many stories of mothers with 8 or 10 children who found different daycare centers  offering them more money to register those children at their center, because of the lavish payments they would generate.”

Later the centers stopped requiring either mothers or children to come in, but continued billing taxpayers--because no one at the state seemed to investigate.

The Minnesota state auditor published these clear findings of fraud in April 2019.  The chair of the legislature's fraud committee says they found FOUR state whistleblowers who say they were told they would not be allowed to investigate fraud, just "overbilling."  “In the summer of 2019 we were told, ‘You can’t do search warrants or criminal investigations anymore’.” 

Wow.

Sadly, investigations and charges take SO long that there will be NO trials before the 2028 elections.  Not one.  And if the Democrats win the White House there will never be any trials.

By 2028 Tim Walz will be long gone.  The Mainstream Media will never mention him, or that he was governor and knew all about this massive, organized fraud--one that cost taxpayers billions.

But it could have been way worse, eh?  That freaky, corrupt communist-lover came close to being VP of the whole damn country.  If not for Trump being miraculously missed by a quarter of an inch in Butler, Pennsylvania...where turning his head an inch either way would have been fatal.... 

A demon from hell perfectly demonstrates the classic Democrat double-standard

Does the name Ashli Babbitt ring any bells?

On Jan 6th, 2021, a black capitol cop named Michael Byrd fatally shot Ashli from a distance of about ten feet.  She was unarmed, lacking even a 4,000 pound SUV to attack with.

Byrd wasn't charged, nor demoted, nor censured, nor fired. 

Keith Olberman is a certifiable demon from hell.  For years Keefums had an hour-long show every weeknight on one of the shit cable networks.  No idea what set him off, but three years after Byrd murdered Ashli, the demon posted the first post below:   

 

By contrast, hours after Renee Good was killed in Minneapolis, here's Keefums again:

 

This, folks, is called a "double-standard," also known as "Democrat nuance."  And it's how the Dems ALWAYS operate:  When a Democrat shoots Republican congressmen at a baseball practice, or comes within a fraction of an inch of killing the Republican presidential nominee, or assassinates a conservative speaker, or an unarmed conservative woman (Ashli), Dems shrug, or worse.  Many smirk.  

Keefums positively GLOATS: "She got justice, now she's in hell."

But when a pro-illegal, anti-deportation female turns a 4,000-pound car on an ICE agent, who fires in self-defense, Keefums has a change: It's now "the Kent State of our time."

Keefums is an amoral piece of shit.  A demon straight from hell.

Today's Democrat party wants to control *everything*

Leftist Democrats call themselves liberal, or progressive, because "communist totalitarian" --which they are--tends to put off normal people.

Leftists use soothing labels ("progressive," etc) to hide their real goal: to dominate and control everything.  They use soothing, anodyne labels because most Americans accept those soothing labels at face value.

Democrats want you to believe they're civil, reasonable.  And a large percentage of 'em--the followers, not the leaders--really believe they're reasonable.  But the leaders are bent on ruling.  You will obey or be punished--perhaps fired, maybe jailed.

During bribem's reign the ruling Democrat Partei [sic] taught conservatives lessons you would never have imagined: "Yew vill take ze experimental jab or yew vill be fired.  And your children vill take ze jab or zey vill not be allowed to go back to school." 

You witnessed this:  hospitals refusing to allow children to be in the same room with their dying parents and grandparents.  If it hadn't happened, you could not imagine it happening here.  Yet it did, and the bribem regime just shrugged.  "Dis perfekly legal, deplorables.  Duh hospital staff are do-ink exackly ass vee instructed, becoss duh virus iss zo deadly!  If vee did not doo diss, a million Americans vould haf died!" 

But you've already forgotten.

They lying bastards claimed that if you got the jab, you couldn't get duh Chyna virus.  That's why they called it a "vaccine," cuz "vaccines" used to be defined as things that prevented you from getting the disease, eh?  But with the covid jab it was a brazen lie--and they knew it.  Hell, you don't know that in the fall of 2021 the CDC was even forced to change the formal definition of a "vaccine" after being sued because the jab was known NOT to prevent the jabbed from getting covid.  They wanted to be able to continue calling the jab a "vaccine," so changed the definition.  

George Orwell would have instantly understood.

But Dems and "independents" have already forgotten.

Having voters with a memory span of two weeks is a huge benefit to tyrants, eh?
 

Long-time NPR host and liberal Ira Glass got a pit-bull...and demonstrates "suicidal empathy"

 
Ira Glass was host of a regular NPR program called "This American Life."  He was married to...well we'll leave that for a bit.  

Glass's wife had a pit bull that died just before the pair married, and the new wife wanted another one.  Glass agreed, and what happened for years after that says everything you need to know about liberals.

The dog had mysterious eating problems.  Glass hired dozens of experts, and ended up feeding it kangaroo, ostrich and rabbit, then bison, tuna, venison.  They started spending more time cooking for the dog than for themselves.  Since fresh kangaroo meat is rare, Glass began taking daily, hour-long trips get fresh kangaroo meat for the dog.

And making excuses for the many times it bit people.  With characteristic liberal dismissal of attacks by demons, Glass always called these "nips," even though they drew blood.  People couldn't come over to his apartment or they'd be attacked.

"Nips."  Keep that in mind as we continue.

He also put the dog on Prozac and Valium, again because "the experts" said to.  To reduce the "nips," eh?

Nancy Updike was an NPR producer who had known Glass for 17 years.  She realized that Ira saw his pit bull as "helpless, dependent and precious, rather than as a vicious dog that was forcing him to throw his time down the drain."

Updike didn't understand why the seemingly intelligent Glass would allow the dog to take over his life, and she said her lack of understanding seemed to offend Glass, who responded,
>>It's really sweet to have this animal that trusts no one, and is alone in this world except for us.  And he trusts us.>>

There's a name for this: "suidical empathy."  Keep that in mind, as we'll return to it later.

Updike quotes one of Glass's efforts to get some of his life back: "I feel like, let's just put him in [a boarding facility] overnight so we can have a dinner party.  But Anaheed [his wife] isn't into that."

If Glass is starting to sound like an abused wife, you're on the right track.

Ira and Anaheed eventually divorced, and later he confirmed that the dog contributed to his marriage failing.  Ah, the beginnings of waking up, perhaps?

Hahahahaha!  No.

Ira and his wife adopted this animal in part because they wanted to defy the perception that pit bulls were bad.  They wanted to show that smart, compassionate people could take a dog other people believed was vicious and unpredictable, raise it well, and have everything turn out fine.

Ira and Anaheed were addicted to the 'feel-good' notion that they were protecting an underdog, saving and protecting this sweet, loving animal from a world that didn't understand it.

Starting to see where this is going yet?



It is genuinely shocking to read through these interviews and this story and to see that a man who is genuinely insightful about so many topics could show such a pathological level of self-sacrificial adoration for a monstrous animal

NPR producer Updike says the last time she saw Anaheed in the office, the dog was with her.  Updike went to hug Anaheed, who warned 'No, don't come near me.  Don't look at the dog.'  So we stood there, chatting, ten feet apart."

The person who posted this (not Updike) concludes
>>Don't be delusional about pit bulls. Don't sacrifice your life for something that can't even begin to love you. Don't become indignant toward others for disliking your evil dog.

One couldn't ask for a better example of "suididal empathy:"  Liberals like Glass and his wife support letting an unlimited number of unvetted foreigners to enter the U.S. and remain forever, regardless of past criminality.  Because libs are totally convinced that if a po' "refugee" raped or murdered anyone in their home nation it must be that they were wrongly accused, or oppressed, or forced to rape or kill.  If only we would welcome 'em to the U.S. they'll be fine, upstanding citizens!  Yep yep yep!

And no power on the planet can dislodge that irrationality from their brains.  No number of murders or rapes or Americans killed by imported deadly drugs will do that.  And I totally get it: it's because liberals almost always support those they see as misunderstood victims--underdogs.  It's why liberals support and defend Luigi Mangione, Tyler Simpson, Hamas killers who brutally tortured and murdered 1,200 people on Oct 7, 2023 and kidnapped another 250 and held them underground for two years.

Yet liberals like Glass side with the killers, since libs bleat that the killers are really victims.  Seriously.

"Suicidal empathy" is when the po' misunderstood, oppressed pipo the libs embrace turn around and kill them.  Of course it's never exactly them, but always some really innocent person like nursing student Laken Riley who never invited 'em into the country, never insulted or injured the po' oppressed demon who murdered 'em.

If Renee Good had been killed by an illegal alien, it would never have made news, and Leftists would have ignored it.

Ira Glass's ex-wife, Anaheed

Source 1 

Source 2 

https://web.archive.org/web/20151229103946/https://www.petful.com/pet-health/ira-glass-dog-piney/

https://newsweek.com/ira-glass-rescuing-pit-bull-dog-ridiculous-diet-64551