Liberal woman who was gang-raped refused to report the crime, because...uh...

For the last year we've been seeing liberal women demanding that illegal aliens not be deported.  Conservatives ask "Even if they're rapists and killers?"  The response--always-- is "Most undocumented immigrants are fine." 

But many aren't, and since most of the victims are women and girls, screaming to keep ALL of them here--including the rapists and murderers--seems highly irrational, eh?

Then you realize: a huge percentage of liberal women are totally irrational.

Ah, you think that's an absurd claim?  Keep reading:

In 2021 a female PhD candidate--Anna Krauthamer--was gang-raped--but didn't report the attack because (wait for it)...she doesn't believe the rapists should go to prison.  Seriously.

She even published an essay explaining her decision, saying she didn't report it because she wished it had never happened [how is that a rational reason?], and believed imprisoning her rapists would do nothing for her.

Obviously prosecuting her attackers and sending 'em to prison for a decade wouldn't change the fact that she'd been gang-raped, but putting the thug rapists in prison for a decade would obviously prevent them from attacking some other unfortunate female for that period, eh?

But Krauthamer either refuses to see the logic of that, or doesn't see any benefit.  'Why should I care if these same thugs gang-rape some other girl?  After all, that doesn't affect ME.'

She wrote, "How silly and strange it would be to have a group of people incarcerated when that would do nothing to fix the damage they've already done."

Obviously can't change the past, but putting her rapists in prison would obviously prevent 'em from raping other girls while they were locked up.  But Krauthamer refuses to do that.  Reminds me of DA's who refuse to prosecute, or judges who release known thugs instantly, without bail.  "He a guuud boy, surely won't hurt anyone while he's free on the streets!"

Moronic liberals.  Thugs don't change overnight.  It takes years for 'em to see the error of their ways.  And some clearly never do.

Krauthamer--who's been a "prison abolitionist" for years--said friends urged her to report the assault, arguing that sending her rapists to prison would protect other women, but she refused.

She wrote "I don’t want to ruin the lives of my rapists, and I don’t know if they have children."  Very noble, eh?  So you're perfectly willing to give your rapists the freedom to do the same to some other woman.  

This woman is a perfect Democrat:  If she had her way, and prisons were abolished, rapists, murderers and muggers would be able to attack as they wished, with no fear.  Krauthamer makes no exceptions, even for murder or child rape?  Is there any outrage this wacko believes would warrant prison?

Apparently not.  So does Krauthamer believe her "enlightened," "progressive" policy will have any effect on crime?   The journalist who reported this story carefully didn't ask.

Here's an idea: Sociologists should send teams to prisons and ask the prisoners two questions:

1. "If you had known *before doing whatever you did to be sent here* would cause you to be sent to prison, would you still have done it?"

(Men who killed for revenge or attacked a cheating partner or similar are likely to say the possibility of prison wouldn't have deterred 'em.)

2. "After you're released, would you be more likely to consider committing a crime if you knew there was no penalty for doing so?"

The answer to the second question should be clear proof that abolishing prisons will result in an exponential increase in crime.  But of course nothing will deter the insanity of irrational liberal women like Krauthamer--or liberal DAs or judges or politicians.

Source:

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/why-i-didnt-report-my-rape/