The end of western nations?

If you're an American who pays attention to things other than the absurd crap on television and Hollywood crap, and the breathless avalanche of PR releases of the "elites"--the "bread and circuses" that keep people distracted and occupied--you know what this graph shows without being told.  Take a guess, and you might impress yourself:

 

It's the "total fertility rate" in the U.S.--the average number of children born to all women.  And as you may have guessed, to keep the population level, on average each woman would need to have 2.02 children.  That's called the "replacement rate."

Warning:  Not one politician or "elite" member of the Media wants to talk about what I'm about to explain--because it predicts the inevitable death of...something.  Seriously. 

You note that the last number shown (2020) is less than 2.0.  And the average Democrat thinks "Dat guud, cuz pipo drive cars and heat their homes and hot water, an' fly in jet airplanes!  An' all doze things emit duh dread poison gas CO2, which beez killin' duh climate by Global Warming!  (S'cuse me: "Climate Change")  So havin' fewer kids than the replacement rate is guuuud! cuz it means fewer CO2 emitters killin' duh Erf."

Ooohhh YES, geniuses!  That's SO totally woke!

Just a couple of tiny, tiny concerns:  First, the most recent number (2025) is WAY less than the replacement rate.  Second: the number you see is an AVERAGE, and the people who publish this stuff NEVER break it out by race.  And the truth is that the TFR for whites is WAY less than the average.  In fact it's about 1.4.

Democrat moron: "Dat jus' cuz dey don't have doze numbers!  Hospitals don't record the race of newborns, so how cud anyone know, eh?"

And of course Democrat voters believe that.  But that's horseshit: the data on birth by race is known.  The "elites" who run the Mainstream Media, and the politicians, just don't want YOU to know--because the TFR for whites is WAY below the average, at about 1.4.  The only thing that keeps the overall TFR at about 1.7 today is that most other races are way over 2.0, which pulls the national average up to 1.7. 

Now: if you know just a bit of math, there's an easy equation called "exponential growth" that also works for exponential decay.  (If you don't know it, google it.)  If you plug in the numbers you'll see that in 40 years or so, whites will comprise roughly ten percent of the U.S. population.  So let's look at that society--which is inevitable.

Democrats: "Dat faaaabulous!  See, lotsa' whites like dat AWFUL capitalism, an' 'duh Patriarchy' (male dominance), which is oppression!  So duh sooner we gets rid of whites, duh sooner society will be fair an' equitable, SEE?  It'll be 'from each according to his, her or their ability, TO each according to his, her or their NEED!"  It'll be SOoo faaabulous!" 

(Bonus points if you know who popularized essentially that slogan--updated to reflect tranny demands.) 

Ahh.  Tell us, brilliant Democrats: If you have a system that offers every resident (not just every citizen, but anyone) $3,000 a month for doing nothing, how many will choose that instead of working for a living, eh?

Think hard before you answer.

Soon 90% of the population will be getting stoned all day and playing video games or watching TV, cuz dat SOoo much mo' fun den' workin' fo' duh Man to earn money, eh?

For young Americans: Margaret Thatcher was the first female Prime Minister of the UK, and a brilliant opponent of socialism (communism).  She coined a famous phrase: "The only problem with socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other peoples' money."

So to summarize: We started by noting a number "set in concrete" (i.e. has so much inertia due to 340 million people that barring war, it's not likely to change much in the next 20 years) that predicts essentially the end of the white race.  Then we note that Democrats push every other race, and hate capitalism (yes, they actually say that).  And that inevitably leads...where?

The U.S. ceases to be the leading economy, but simply continues to borrow increasing amounts of money to support the "Universal Basic Income" schemes of the Democrats.  Collapse is inevitable.

(If you're not familiar with "Universal Basic Income," look it up.  It's a Democrat policy.  They just go quiet about it when they're not in power.)

Now: I don't have kids, so as the saying goes, I don't have a dog in this hunt.  If the Democrat morons wanna install socialism it won't have any direct impact on me.  I'll drink a toast to the loss of that last beacon of freedom--that "shining city on a hill," as Reagan said--but I'll be fine.

By contrast, if you have children, and understand economics, there's a slight chance you may realize the current future won't be happy for them under socialism.  

If you don't realize that, may your kids realize what you've condemned them to. 

Meanwhile, consider this:  Why is the white birthrate so low?  What's caused white women to have fewer children?  There are several factors, but the common thread is that they're all pushed relentlessly by the anti-American Mainstream Media: "Men are pigs!"  "Women are powerful so dey don' need a husband!"  ("don't need a husband" is true if gummint gives women everything they need, which it now does).  "Whites are oppressors!"  "Other races are cool, whites are clumsy and to be ridiculed."

How many of those things sound familiar from the Mainstream Media?

This is not an accident.