In Italy: a Muzz from Morocco brutally assaults ten women--ruled mentally incompetent to stand trial

Psychiatrists are masters of rationalizing brutality.  "It wudn't hiz fault!" they bleat.  "Duh po' migrant wuz rejected by an Italian girl, so he wuz forced to take out his hurt feelings by beating and slashing other Italian girls, SEE?  Perfectly understandable!"  

Do I need to add that all psychiatrists are leftists?  

There is NO brutality they can't rationalize. Unprovoked murders of strangers?  Setting innocent women on fire in subways?  "Chill, citizen!  Yew jus' need to be mo' tolerant!"  And the classic: "Dey don' know beating women is against our law, cuz in dere country it  beez perfekly normal!" 

The suspect reportedly told his psychiatrist that he had been rejected by an Italian woman.  Shrink: "SEE?  How kin yew possibly blame him!"

The piece of shit demon--a 20-year-old Moroccan demon, Mohamed Amine Elouardaoui--violently attacked ten women in two months--yet the suspect was repeatedly neither expelled nor formally arrested because he had previously been declared mentally unfit.

Let's pause for a second: There have always been demons on Earth.  You can leave 'em free to continue brutalizing innocents, or you can jail 'em for LIFE, or kill 'em.  Personally, when guilt is beyond doubt I think the best choice--beyond doubt--is the last one.

In the first attack the demon punched a young woman in the face without warning as she shopped.  Fractured her jaw, cheekbone and eye socket.  He fled, only to resurface later at another supermarket, where he allegedly struck a woman in the back of the head.  Later he was accused of punching another woman in the ribs and crushing her hands against a checkout counter.

Lefty psychiatrist: "But it not hiz fault!  He not competent to stand trial, nor be deported!  Oh sure, he ran away after the attacks, an' yew deplorables claim that show he understands that what he did wuz wrong, but we professionals say he still 'mentally incompetent,' SEE?  We professionals calls dis "selective incompetence," an' dat beez somethin' way too nuanced fo' yew stupid deplorables to unnerstan."

On Dec. 4 the demon attacked a 64-year-old woman, breaking her arm. The next day he slashed a woman with a broken bottle.  A female police officer arrested the demon, and reported that the demon said “You can’t do that, you’re a woman."

Despite the number and severity of the attacks, a leftist judge RULED that the suspect wasn't  capable of understanding his actions and was unfit to stand trial.  But instead of ordering the demon jailed until trial, the dipshit leftist judge ordered him into "psychiatric care."  He was placed in a hospital ward, from which he promptly escaped. 

Now, class:  In nature, what happens to prey animals that are too dumb to recognize danger?

Sure: they're killed by predators.  That's exactly what's happening now.  Only difference is that in nature you don't have members of the prey group ORDERING that group to submit to their own injury or death, eh?  But human leftists iz mo' "enlightened," eh?  Every time a demon kills or merely injures, they release the predator with soothing, loving words.

So: Demons have always been here, and will always BE here.  Rational judges could imprison 'em for life, or order their execution, but instead do neither.  So how can that be fixed?

Leftists and Democrats neither know nor care.  And never will, unless a demon grievously injures or kills one of their family members.  The demons can murder innocents on public transit in the U.S.  Or their parents, as Nick Reiner did.  And morons just shrug.

Leftists: "We must not put deez pipo in prison cuz it not dere fault!  Reeeally!" 

Finally: the Lying Mainstream Media doesn't tell you about even one percent of the brutal attacks in the U.S., and none of those in Europe.  If you wanna see how bad it is there, go to "rmx.news"  Demonic attacks every day.  And if you think that's not coming here, you're too stupid to breathe.

https://rmx.news/article/moroccan-misogynist-who-beat-10-women-in-separate-attacks-in-italy-ruled-mentally-incompetent-to-stand-trial-and-sent-for-hospital-treatment/ 

California's Democrat rulers refuse to repay $20 BILLION federal loan, instead force employers to repay it

Ahh, Democrat-ruled California!

Back when Dem rulers shut down most businesses in their states during the Chyna virus, the federal government loaned dozens of states money to cover the huge increase in unemployment claims.

All the states but one have now repaid those loans.  But not California, where the Democrat legislature decided to spend the money on other things.  And the Dem-ruled assembly still hasn't paid off a dollar of a massive $20 billion federal loan.

And for some bizarre reason, under federal rules the state doesn't have to pay.  Instead employers are forced to repay the huge amount--which is rising every year due to interest.

Most other states paid their Covid debts using federal stimulus money, but California officials used the haul for infrastructure, homelessness and "other priorities."  It’s now the only state that hasn’t paid back the money.

This is such a classic Democrat move: get a loan from the feds, spend it on anything *other* than the stated purpose, then stick employers with the bill.  You and I couldn't get away with that, but Democrat legislators can and will.

And really, what better lesson could Dems teach their kids about how to "succeed" in the modern world, eh?  "Borrow lots of money, spend it any way you like and then don't repay!  It's how California Democrats rock!"

https://nypost.com/2025/12/22/us-news/california-hasnt-paid-20b-loan-for-covid-unemployment/ 

3rd quarter GDP grew a whopping 4.3%, much more than predicted. Bet you didn't hear that

From CNBC, Dec 23, 2025:

The U.S. economy grew at a much greater-than-expected pace in the third quarter.

The gross domestic product rose 4.3% in the July-September period, per the Commerce Department.

Economists polled by Dow Jones had expected a gain of 3.2%.

Now: readers who aren't fans of math think "Eh, 3.2 to 4.3 is barely over one percent difference, so dis no big deal."  Except it's a miss of about 26%, like predicting your income this month will be $4,000 and it turns out to be $3,000, except this time the "experts" missed by guessing 26% LOW.  

GDP growth of 3.2% is a great number, and under bribem or Obozo 4.3% would have been breathless headline news, with the Media swooning.  So two questions:  First, did you hear about this?  And second: how did the "experts" miss by 26%--in a way that make voters believe the economy wasn't doing as well as it is?

If you think this was just an accident, you're naive.  Going into the 2024 election Americans strongly favored Trump on the economy, something like 80-20.  And sure enough, today inflation is way down, the average national price of gasoline is under $3 (yesterday I paid $2.25), tax cuts have already passed, foreign investment is pouring into the U.S.  

But with the help of the Lying Mainstream Media and Democrat economists the Dems have managed to get Americans to believe exactly the opposite:  CNN recently reported a poll showing voters viewing the Trump economy UNfavorably by 80-20. 

Now pollsters say the "generic ballot" for the midterms show the Dems ahead by about seven points.

If GDP had grown 4.3% under bribem or Obozo it would have been headline news.  And no economist would have lowballed the estimates of THAT performance.  But with Trump as president all economic news is either spun as awful, or if it can't be twisted to fit "awful" it's ignored.  

See if you hear this today or tomorrow in the Media. 
 

Say hello to the next president of the U.S. Happy? This is the best the Dems can do

 

The next president of the United States--because of his great governance, eh?

 

Typical California voter has had enough of govt fraud, waste and incompetence! Wait...

 

Totally true

 

If you still think Wikipedia is unbiased, you're stupid

 

How the Democrat party managed to get taxpayers to pay for sex-change operations

When Democrat "leaders" have a law they want passed, or a policy adopted that benefits 'em, nothing deters 'em.  If they're warned that the law or policy they want will have an obvious bad effect, they just smirk:  Their reasoning is simply, entirely "If it helps our party, we want it, regardless.  We simply don't believe there will be any bad results."

It's as if they don't believe in the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Then the next domino falls, then the next. 

Example: Most Democrats totally support what they've cunningly called "gender-affirming surgery" for kids under 18--in which doctors cut off healthy body parts of kids to give 'em the illusion of becoming the opposite of the sex they were born with.  Wow!

And since not all families could afford these hugely expensive procedures, Democrat pols 
rammed thru a policy change that forced insurance companies to pay for those costly procedures.  And of course this caused the price of health insurance to rise.

But because some families didn't have insurance, the Dems rammed thru another policy change:  they forced taxpayers to pay for sex-change surgery, thru Medicaid--the program designed to give free medical care to low-income families.  

You knew that, right?  No?  Ah, of course not.

And because voters didn't push back on the Democrats for doing that, the Dems made another demand: they sued to force states to pay for sex change operations for people over 65, under Medicare.  And once again the Dems got their way.  

You knew that too, right?  No?  Ahh, of course not.

And since voters STILL didn't vote the sons of bitches out of office, the Democrats made yet another pro-tranny demand: they sued to force states to provide sex-change operations to prison inmates.  See, it jus' wudn't FAIR dat prisoners lacked the money to pay fo' dere own "gender-affirming surgery," eh?  And leftist judges in Cali and other Democrat-ruled states agreed.

Of course once the inmate looked female, it jus' wudn't FAIR to keep 'em in a male prison cuz they'd be assaulted, eh?  So leftist judges in California and other Dem states forced their prison systems to transfer trannies to female prisons.  Wow, faaaabulous, eh?

The next demand was that after Obozo ordered the military to allow openly-trans people to join, the military was now forced to pay for sex-change surgery for hundreds of trannies--who then could not be deployed to forward bases because those locations didn't have the hormones the trannies had to have to keep the charade going.

And STILL voters didn't push back, cuz duh Media constantly tells Americans dat it's only FAIR that you should pay fo' deez wunnerful operations!  So California Dems made one more demand: they forced the state to use tax dollars (Medicaid) to give "free" sex-change surgery to...can you guess?  Sure: to illegal aliens.

So...Democrat policies, pushed one after another, thanks to leftist presidents and judges, forced on a population that never hears the truth from the Mainstream Media and wouldn't be able to block the Dems in any case.  The Democrat party wanted it, and rammed it through.  And surely the total cost is now in the billions.

And we're about to see another Dem demand: "universal basic income"--a "hot" new policy in Democrat circles that would pay half the people in the country $2,000 a month, forever.  No need to take their precious time to go to a gruberment office and apply.  Instead, like those faaabulous mail-in ballots sent to every voter even if not requested, the state would just send a monthly check to every resident below a certain income level.  

Say, no chance for massive fraud there, eh?  And what party do ya think pipo who get those checks would vote for, eh?

Rational people might wonder why government would take even more tax dollars from workers to pay slackers, eh?  Uhh...reasons, citizen!  Actually the reason is to get more people to vote for Democrats, but no one will admit that.  And of course once the Dems start winning more elections due to the monthly checks, the GOP will start voting for the same thing, cuz dey don' wanna lose their high office, eh? 

Falling birthrates, poorer education for kids--Democrat policies in action

The leaders of the Democrat party believe Americans should have fewer children.  The stated reason is "global warming."  Excuse me: "Climate Change."  

See, Dems are convinced that Climate Change is caused by CO2, from burning carbon fuels.  And since Americans use more carbon-based fuel per person than residents of other nations, they quietly urge Americans to have fewer children.

(By contrast, Democrat pols are totally fine with Africans (Somalians, etc) having as many kids as they want, cuz dey use way less energy--at least until they emigrate to the U.S. or Europe, where liberal politicians spend thousands of dollars per month giving 'em welfare and free housing.)

Since at least the 1970s Democrat "elites" have denigrated traditional wives, pushing "smaht" women to enter the "far more exciting world" of corporate America.  "Why would you want to waste your skills on raising kids, eh?"  Or if a female wanted kids, CBS pushed chosing to have children without being married.  Show those stupid deplorables how strong and independent you are!"  And now all those years of indoctrination are bearing fruit for the Dems:  Democrat/liberal women are now pushing avoiding marriage.  

See, for at least two decades Democrat elites and politicians have pushed the idea that men are useless, because Democrat rulers offered to give women everything they needed.  Why have to put up with an icky man when those faaaabulous Democrat politicians would give you whatever you needed, eh?

Naturally you don't believe any of that.  "Dat jus' right-wing lies," eh?  

Really?  The Institute for Family Studies analyzed birth rates against voting in 2024, and reports that in the 20% of counties that voted for Harris by the highest margin, the "total fertility rate" was 1.37 children per adult female.

Democrat: "Whut dat mean?  And if it's not guud fo' my party I won't believe it."

Of course, cupcake.  I wouldn't expect that to mean anything to ya.  To keep the population level, on average each female needs to have 2.1 children (slightly over 2.0 because some children die before reaching adulthood).  But in 2024 the national average TFR was 1.63, and that includes ALL births, not just to native-born Americans.  Since illegals have a TFR well above 2.2, that means Americans aren't having enough kids to keep the population from falling.  

In the 20% of counties where Trump had the highest margin, the TFR was 1.76--still below the replacement rate but WAY above the 1.37 noted above for the counties with the highest Democrat vote.  So what does this show?

The most logical conclusion is that Democrat policies have a huge downward effect on birthrates, as any unbiased analysis of those policies would predict. 

And that brings us to education.  Rational people would think Americans would want to support education policies that would produce the best-educated children in the world, eh?  In theory that was the rationale for the creation of the laughably-misnamed federal "Department of Education"--which was immediately captured by Democrats.

So how has that worked out?  Turns out every policy pushed by the Democrats who ruled the DoEd has not only NOT resulted in better-educated kids, but the reverse:  every year, year after year, schools produce kids who are less well educated.  Turns out the DoEd is really about indoctrinating your children to be good socialists and Democrats.

Think that's hyperbole?  Wake the fuck up, sheep.  Back in the 1960s researchers developed a test of basic proficiency in both math and reading, called the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).  Over the HUGE objections of the teachers' unions, conservatives got more and more states to have their students take that test every four years, in the 4th, 8th and 12th grades.

In 2024, only 31 percent of fourth graders and 30 percent of eighth graders met or exceeded proficiency in reading.

In that same year only 39 percent of fourth graders and 28 percent of eighth graders were proficient in math.  NAEP test scores have fallen almost every year.  So naturally the unions bleated that testing should be abolished. 

In 2024, the average ACT score was 19.4 on a scale of 1–36.  It was the lowest average since the test’s redesign in 1990.  More than 40 percent of middle school teachers say they work in schools where there are no penalties for late work, no grades of zero are allowed for work not submitted, and there are unlimited test retakes.

The unions claim the problem is teachers aren't paid enough.  But between 1999 and 2021 the average state increased spending per student by 37 percent more than the rate of inflation.

The federal government has thrown over $189 billion to state educational agencies since 2020 through its “Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief” (ESSER) program to combat learning deficiencies.

The two biggest teachers unions in the U.S. are the NEA and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT).  Each has a political action committee.  In 2024 the NEA gave $27 million to its PAC--nearly all of which went to Democrat candidates and causes.  The AFT’s PAC spent around $13 million--again mostly given to Democrats.

There are lots of good, dedicated teachers.  Problem is that Democrat-ruled school boards tend to hire liberal Democrats, who quickly join one of the unions--both of which exclusively support Democrat politicians because they agree with Dem policies.  How's that working for ya?

Doesn't matter, because the unions run the system and will always block any reform because it reduces Democrat power.  Union leaders have one goal, and it's not improving education, but winning more members and higher salaries for themselves. 

Chicago rams thru $1.5 BILLION in new taxes, and will borrow another Billion to cover spending

When a system passes a certain level of corruption, there's no peaceful way back.  And the city of Chitcongo--Democrat-ruled for 50 years or so--passed that point some years ago.

City employees--Dem voters, hired by Dem department heads--are lavishly paid, can't be fired, get generous pensions and pay little for their health insurance.  They keep getting pay raises, even though the city is deep in debt and facing a budget deficit of over a BILLION dollars this year.  

So how do ya think the socialists who rule that miserable shithole respond, eh?  Did they lay off city workers?  Stop automatic raises?  Trim benefits?  Close poorly-performing schools?  

Hahahahaha!  Not a chance!  Instead they just passed a budget that increased taxes on city businesses and residents by $535 million.  And an additional new tax of one BILLION dollars, cunningly disguised as "TIF" (explained later).  And  there's not a thing you can do about it except leave--which few can do.

So what taxes did the brilliant Democrat who rule Chitcongo raise?   

They slapped a 15 cent tax on every shopping bag.  Raised the tax on video games (presumably in businesses).  Raised taxes on "sports betting."  Added a new city fee if owners of a vacant building apply for a new mortgage.  Where's the extra cost for the city that justifies that?  What's the logic?

They don't need logic or reasons.  They do it because they want more money, and because they can impose any tax they want.  The courts never block any tax increase by Dems.  Anything the Dems can think of to tax, they tax.  They increased the tax on liquor, and "ground transport," which probably means taxis, Uber, Lyft and limos.

$416 million of the new tax revenue Chitcongo is counting on is titled "Increase in cloud computing taxes."  If I were a business owner I'd set up an office in an adjacent state, let it do all the comms with "the cloud," and have my office in Chitcongo only communicate with my out-of-state office.  It'd be amusing to watch the thieves who run Chitcongo sue to tax intra-corporate communication--as they surely would.

But the bulk of the new taxes--a whopping one BILLION dollars--is slated to come from "TIF."  Specifically a "one-time TIF sweep."  Since you never heard about it, it can't apply to you, right?

TIF is "Tax  Increment Financing"--another in the endless list of cunningly disguised tax cities use to take more money from developers.  It's the hot new money-grabbing measure for city rulers because it doesn't raise ALL property taxes, just on certain areas.  And because it's only on certain areas it doesn't have to be approved by voters.  Nice, eh?

But even $1.535 Billion in new taxes won't cover all the money the Democrat rulers of Chitcongo DEMAND to spend, so they plan to borrow even more money: $450 million.  This is the time-honored way all Democrat politicians (and many RINOs) operate, since they never worry about repaying the borrowed money.

Because bond underwriters know the city will eventually default on all debt, the city's bond ratings are almost at junk levels, and the new plan to borrow yet another $450 million will see those ratings drop even lower since the problem of overspending is chronic, just as it is with federal spending.

One thing the rulers didn't do (yet) is adopt the proposal by the city's black socialist mayor Brandon Johnson to tax every company with 500 or more employees $400 per employee every year.  But you can see that one coming, because back in 1973 the city imposed a head tax of $48 per employee per year.  They repealed it 11 years ago under a Dem mayor who thought it was a "job killer."  
  But no one saw businesses leaving, so the communist Johnson thought "Why not bring it back--with a tiny bit more bite, small enough that large businesses won't leave?"  And he proposed $250 per employee per year on companies with over 100 employees.  Now that's been changed to $400 per employee per year, but only on companies with 500 employees.

Democrat policy: tax everything.  If some things become uneconomical, screw 'em.  Let 'em go on welfare, cuz the state covers that, eh?  Masterful policy, cupcake.  Keep taxing productive people so you can keep giving pay raises to city employees.  Makes perfect sense.

Source:
 
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/chicago-adopts-16-6b-budget-adds-535m-in-taxes/

 

In 27 departments at Yale, not a single conservative professor

Wanna know why virtually all graduates of "elite" universities are Leftists? 

A recent report from the Buckley Institute found that there are no Republican faculty members across 27 departments at Yale University. 

"For the third year in a row, our research has highlighted the significant political and ideological imbalance among Yale’s faculty," said Lauren Noble, founder and executive director of the Buckley Institute. 

This is not an accident, and not limited to Yale.  All the so-called "elite" universities are totally dominated by leftist faculty members.  It's totally deliberate-- and is virtually impossible to undo because leftists control who gets hired. 

Democrats: "What's duh problem, bro?  See, we Dems are smaht, while yew izn't, so naturally we should control what your kids learn, right?  Cuz dat will guarantee a bettah future!" 

Ah.  So in your "smaht" analysis, what system of governance works best, ensuring the most freedom?

Democrats: "Why, socialism, of course!  It's not even debatable!  Duh principle of enlightened governments must be 'From each, according to his, her, their or xir's ability, to each according to his, her, their or xir's needs!'  Dat's duh only fair, rational way of governing, citizen!  If someone wants to be paid $2,000 a month for sitting around doing whatevah dey want all day, that's their absolute right!  

"An' it's totally reasonable fo' ouah Democrat gruberment to give doze pipo dat money!  Cuz dat money did NOT come from taxing hardworking citizens!  Perish the thought, citizen!  All of your taxes are used to feed hungry chirren and treat Somali kidz fo' autism, and !  Yep yep yep!  Duh money used to pay ouah supporter a 'guaranteed income' is borrowed, which means it's free.

"Plus we gon' save billions by de-funding cops an' outlawing gunz, so cops won't be needed cuz dere won' be no crime!  SEE??  Ouah way will ensure ebrywun beez happy!"

"Duh only crime would be if workers din' pay tax on dere income.  But we don' expect dat cuz duh law makes all employers take money frum ebry workerz paycheck an' send it to us!  (One of ouah mos' brilliant laws EVAH!)  Plus, ouah Media allies will tell citizens it's their DUTY to pay taxes so their gruberment will be able to run, and give ouah voterz $2,000 a month!  SEE?" 

How a guy touted in 1999 as L.A.’s richest man went bankrupt

"How L.A.’s Richest Man Went From Billions to Bust"
  (adapted from an excellent, much longer WSJ piece by Katherine Clark, Dec 18, 2025)

Gary Winnick was once the richest man in Los Angeles.  Owned lavish homes in Bel-Air, Malibu and New York City.  Only after his death did the world learn that the empire was built on borrowed money and gullible investors.

In the late 1990s he donated millions of dollars to the Los Angeles Zoo and rubbed elbows with Bill Clinton.  He would soon buy the most expensive home in the U.S.

In 1999 Winnick--a former protégé of junk-bond king Michael Milken--was estimated to be worth $6.2 billion, making him the richest man in L.A.  His main source of money was from founding a company called Global Crossing, which promised to lay undersea fiber-optic cable around the world.

This may not strike most people as a hot idea for a company.  That's because you're either too young to know, or never knew, that when the Internet became The Hot Thing, people realized there would be a huge increase in the demand for high-capacity data connections between the U.S. and Europe.  Existing wire cables couldn't satisfy that demand, but fiber-optic cables could.  So Global Crossing became The Hot Stock, making Winnick a billionaire on paper in less than two years--a faster rise than Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates.

But after Winnick’s death two years ago, at the age of 76, a very different financial picture has come to light.  For all his stunning possessions—a stunning Bel-Air estate, a Malibu beach house, a fabulous New York condo and a pricey art collection—he was deeply in debt.  Everything he owned had been pledged as collateral for an ever-increasing series of loans that kept the charade going.

Lenders didn't worry about Winnick's ability to repay huge loans because everyone knew he was the richest man in Los Angeles, eh?  And the loans were secured by specific assets.  So no problem, citizen!  And the lavish lifestyle continued unabated. 

His crown jewel was an eight-acre estate and a 40,000 square foot 1930's mansion in Bel-Air called Casa Encantada.

Winnick's demise reveals a disturbing truth about modern wealth:  Despite all the fawning headlines, the finances of the super-rich are--as the WSJ writer Katherine Clark diplomatically puts it--"often opaque."  Oh yes. 

In the 1970s and early ’80s Gary worked for Michael Milken, the Wall Street mover who amassed a fortune pushing what are diplomatically called "high-yield bonds"--meaning high risk.  You may have heard the term "junk bonds."  Gary was part of Milken's inner circle, working on leveraged buyouts and trading convertible securities.

In 1977 Gary founded Global Crossing--a plan to lay fiber-optic cable across the Atlantic.  Like faaaabulous electric cars, the idea seemed sure to be the next Hot Thing, and investors eagerly poured billions into the stock.  What started as a single undersea cable linking the U.S. and the U.K. quickly turned into a pitch for a global network.  One analyst covering Global Crossing said "The hype was off the charts.”

Sound familiar?

Money poured in to Global Crossing, and the stock went exponential.  Gary cashed out a billion dollars worth of stock, using the money to buy luxury homes and art. 

In 2000 Gary bought Casa Encantada, a 40,000 square foot mansion on 8.5 acres overlooking the Bel-Air Country Club, for $94 million.  It was the most expensive U.S. home-sale on record at the time.  Experts estimated that just maintaining its vast gardens and grounds cost millions of dollars a year. 

Gary then spent tens of millions of dollars and 2.5 years renovating the mansion.  A portrait of George Washington that hung in the wood-paneled study was commissioned by Benjamin Franklin. 

Around the same time he bought the Bel-Air mansion, the Winnicks bought a two-bedroom condo in New York City and hired a star architect to completely remodel it. 

The fall of Global Crossing in the early 2000s was one of the signature implosions of the dot-com era.  The project had cost billions, but income fell far short of projections.  Part of the problem was that lots of new internet companies would raise money, spend $10 million buying capacity from Global Crossing, but then would go bankrupt.  Satellite communications also sealed Global Crossing's fate.

Between 1999 and 2001 alone, Winnick sold roughly $730 million in GC stock.  In January 2002 the company filed for bankruptcy, vaporizing tens of billions in market value.

Some former employees, pension funds and shareholders sued Gary and his fellow executives, claiming the company had misled them about the its financial condition.  Two years after the company collapsed, Gary personally agreed to pay $55 million to settle shareholder lawsuits.

The demise of Global Crossing didn't seem to dent Winnicks’ lifestyle.  Gary became one of L.A.’s best-known philanthropists, contributing more than $100 million to causes like the Special Olympics and the L.A. Zoo, and to Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

In 2014 he invested in T+Ink, a developer of patented “thinking ink” products, where he was briefly CEO.  One of the founders of T+Ink said Gary "probably got five or six billionaires to invest along with him.”

In 2016 Gary invested $4 million in a company called Qello, which planned to deliver streaming content to Asian media markets.  Four years later the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.  Gary and his partner in the project were sued by investors who claim to have been misled.

Following the collapse of Global Crossing Gary was facing several lawsuits—and in need of cash, so in 2020 he turned to his friend Richard Ressler, a co-founder of real-estate development and investment firm CIM Group.  CIM loaned him $100 million. 

CIM says about $60 million of this loan would be used to repay a previous loan he'd gotten from HSBC.  The rest would be used for Gary's businesses.  Like the HSBC loan, the bigger CIM loan was backed by Casa Encantada and the Winnicks' seven-bedroom Malibu beach home, plus art and jewelry.

In June of 2023, with legal fees mounting, Gary put Casa Encantada on the market for $250 million.  That fall he was negotiating a fourth amendment to the CIM loan to borrow even more.  Then on Nov. 3, 2023 Gary died.

His wife Karen says only after his death did she learn that all of the couple's assets had been pledged as collateral for various loans.

The Winnicks had failed to make payments to CIM on the amended loan, and that debt was now roughly $155 million. On Sept. 26 of this year CIM formally notified the Winnick family that it was foreclosing on Casa Encantada and the Malibu home, which was now owned by their three sons. 

An auction was set for this week. 

In court documents Karen's attorneys say being forced to repay the loan will leave her “effectively destitute.” 

The foreclosure auction for Casa Encantada and the Malibu home was scheduled to take place last week.  But the two luxury homes never came up for bidding:  Karen’s lawyer got a judge to issue an emergency stay until the case can be reviewed by a court of appeals.

Now, students, what can we learn from this?

You can't really blame someone for pushing a company whose sole product--cables under the ocean--was quickly obsoleted by satellites.  Advances in technology do that several times a year.

It's more reasonable to blame Gary for selling a billion dollars of stock in Global Crossing in the two years before it collapsed.  As the co-founder he clearly knew the trend line on the company's finances--classic insider trading.  But of course he was never charged, cuz...reasons.

What we can sarcastically conclude is that Gary's mistake was that he didn't offer top members of congress shares in his company at the outset, then urge them to pass a LAW decreeing that U.S. companies were barred from using satellites to send data overseas--leaving his company's fiber-optic cables as the only legal means.  Yeah, dat's it.

https://archive.is/Oblz8 

Dem-run Fulton County admits "ballot tapes" for 315,000 votes in 2020 without required poll workers’ signatures were still counted

--The Federalist, December 17, 2025 

Georgia law requires that to be certified as valid, every scanner "tabulator tape" must be signed by three election workers.  If that's not done, state law says the votes on those tapes can't be certified.

In March of 2022 a man pushing for honest elections sued the state election board, claiming scanner tapes for 36 "early voting" locations in heavily-Democrat Fulton County weren't signed by anyone.  The county election board tried every legal dodge possible, but finally a hearing was held:

Ten days ago (Dec. 9) Fulton County officials finally admitted that tapes counting approximately 315,000 early votes from the 2020 election didn't have the required signatures--but were still certified.

For clueless Americans: Georgia's corrupt Secretary of State officially declared Democrat Joe bribem to have "won" the state by about 13,000 votes. 

The admission by Fulton County officials came during a Dec. 9 hearing before the Georgia State Election Board (SEB), following a legal challenge filed by David Cross, a local election integrity activist. 

An attorney for the Fulton County Board of Elections finally admitted that 36 totalizer tapes showing 315,000 votes weren't signed by even one poll worker, as required, and thus shouldn't have been legally certified--but were.

The attorney told the state board that "the county does not dispute that the tapes were not signed,”and that this was a violation of the law. 

Democrats immediately bleated that even though the tapes lacked the signatures needed to have them be legally certified, the law was merely a "technicality" and that Fulton County DA Fani Willis assured the board they could count all ballots if marked for Biden. 

Even higher up the chain, the office of Georgia’s Secretary of State--the position charged with ensuring election integrity--investigated the lack of signatures and “substantiated” the findings that Fulton County “violated official processes" when it certified the votes on the 36 unsigned tapes.

The Secretary of State's office also found that that officials at 32 polling sites failed to verify tapes that showed vote totals were at zero before voting started.

Georgia law requires poll workers to begin each day of ballot scanning by printing out and signing a “zero tape” showing that voting machines are starting with no votes on their counters.

If there is no record of whether the tabulator was set at zero at the start of polling, there is no way of telling whether ballots from a previous election or from a test run were still on the memory card, meaning they'd be counted.  This was proven to have happened in Montana, where officials discovered more votes were counted by the scanners than were cast.  

Activist David Cross spent almost $16,000 to obtain 77 megabytes of election records from Fulton County through an open records request.  A painstaking review revealed the unsigned tabulator tapes representing 315,000 votes.  Each signature block on these tapes was blank, Cross said.

Cross also highlighted additional irregularities, such as polling locations being open at “impossibly late hours, like 2:09 a.m.” Cross also said that he found “duplicated scanner serial numbers, where the memory devices were removed from one scanner and printed on an alternate scanner.”

“These are not clerical errors. They are catastrophic breaks in chain of custody and certification,” Cross said.  Because no tape was ever legally certified, Fulton County had no lawful authority to certify its advanced voting results to the secretary of state. Yet it did.”

Cross added that “Secretary Raffensperger accepted those uncertified numbers and added them in to Georgia’s official total without questioning them."

Kevin Moncla, an election integrity activist who has been at the forefront of these challenges, estimates the real number of illegally certified votes is likely higher than 315,000.

Cross admitted that backing out 315,000 illegally certified ballots--90% of which were for bribem--obviously wouldn't undo bribem's ghastly presidency, but said it was important that the record reflect the illegality.

The Federalist inquired with the Georgia Secretary of State’s office as to who was responsible for accepting Fulton County’s tabulator tapes despite there being no signatures at all.  No one from that office responded.  

Obozo said he wanted to "fundamentally change the U.S." The Democrat party is doing it

As Obozo infamously said, he wanted to fundamentally change the U.S.  The Democrat party has never stopped wanting to do that.

But doing that means taking control and destroying the current system.  Since that doesn't sit well with most Americans, the Dems have to find ways to convince voters that their goals are really good ones for voters who are NOT poor or communists. 

Example: black males make up something like 6% of the population, but roughly half of prison inmates.   Leftists and Democrat pols use this as "proof" that the police are raaaacist.  So they push to defund the police.  

If you buy that, you'll also believe the Dem claim that prisons are racist, for the same reason. The Dem "solution" is to abolish prisons.  Seriously.  This is disguised as a term they invented: "decarceration."  Or the even more arcane "decarceral policies."

But every study shows that a large percentage of inmates, if released, go right back to committing the same crimes that earned 'em a prison sentence in the first place.  That's so well known that it's got a name: recidivism.  So if prisons are closed and the criminal inmates released, crime will increase, which will help the Dems topple The System.  Same result if police are defunded.  Dems know this, but they count on the fact that the average voter doesn't.

Most adults know addicts will rob, steal and even murder to get the money to support their habit.  So you'd think the idea of legalizing all addictive recreational drugs would be insane.  But because legalizing all drugs increases the number of addicts, thus the amount of crime they commit to feed their habits, illegal drugs are a great way to topple the system.

Democrat leaders know this, so you wouldn't think they'd push to legalize all drugs, since that will lead to more addiction and crime.  But that's exactly what the Dems push, bleating that "it's a free country" so everyone should be allowed to use any drug they want.

The other Democrat argument for legalizing all drugs is that most drug sellers are black, so naturally more blacks are charged with selling.  So that's another "disparate impact," and leftist judges have said that's illegal even if no racial animus can be shown!  Seriously, Dems argue that drugs should be legalized because laws against illegal drugs put more blacks in prison than whites.  So they demand we legalize drugs.  

Instead of legalizing all drugs, wouldn't it be better to just tell blacks to obey the law by not sell illegal drugs?  If you accept the notion of legalizing all drugs to reduce the number of blacks in prison, why wouldn't the same logic work for abolishing laws against murder or robbery?  Dems: "NOooo, we cain't doo dat, cuz...reasons!!"

Legalizing drugs also wins Democrats votes from all the drug addicts and drug pushers.  Win-win, eh?

Democrats push for "free" health insurance for pipo making six times over the federal poverty level--Obozocare.  Of course that "health insurance" is NOT free, but costs taxpayers about $100 billion dollars a year--a cost hidden among several agencies in the 1,200-page ghastly monstrosity called the "Affordable Care Act."  Obozocare is now going to illegal aliens too, after solemn promises from Obozo, Pelosi and other Dems that this would NEVAH happen!  Point is that every penny has to be borrowed from somewhere, increasing our national debt and interest on same.

Congressional Democrats ALWAYS vote to give more free shit to voters, and the RINOs know that if they don't go along they'll be targeted next election as being cruel to duh po pipo.  So passing laws demanding more and more spending will hasten our end through rapidly increasing interest payments on our debt.  

Eh, don't know why I'm telling you this, cuz no one will actually vote the Dems out of office, so our fate is pretty much sealed.  But it's okay--reeeally.  The end will come so gradually that you and your kids won't even notice.

New drug hits a dozen Democrat-ruled states; ER visits rise 300% for *withdrawal symptoms*!

Start here:  The NY Times is a leftist, Democrat-fellating rag.  If you disagree, you're a Leftist and thus it's pointless to try to have a rational discussion, so stop reading.

Second: The Left and the Dem party love deadly, addictive, illegal drugs, and addicts.  Some may claim this isn't true--and certainly every state has some illegal drug use.  But the proof is that the sale and use of dangerous, deadly, addictive drugs absolutely flourishes in Democrat-ruled cities and states:  Philly, NYC, Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, LA, Chitcongo, Atlanta, Baltimore, most of New Jersey, many others. 

It flourishes becauses corrupt Democrat politicians in those cities and states tolerate it.  The reasons for this are never discussed, and we'll leave those for another time. 

So if the Democrat-fellating NY Times admits there's a problem with a new drug in a Dem-ruled city and state, that's called an "admission against interest," and because it IS against the admitter's interest the law gives it extra weight as being true. 

SO...two days ago (Dec 15, 2025) the Times ran a long piece on a new drug that appeared in Philly and other Dem-ruled shitholes in the middle of 2024.  And in the past year its use has exploded to a dozen other Dem-ruled states. 

It's called medetomidine and it's a large-animal tranquilizer--a relative of xylazine (street name "tranq") but about 200 times more powerful per gram.  Both are often mixed with fentanyl.  The federal government hasn't declared either xylazine or medetomidine to be a controlled substance, so it's not a crime to be caught with either.  Convenient, eh?

The reason sales of medetomidine have exploded so fast is that it costs less than xylazine to get the knockout dose.  And as everyone knows, lower costs mean higher sales and more profits.  Ahhh...

Philly regularly submits samples of seized drugs for testing, and medetomidine has now been found in 90 percent of seized street drugs in that city. 

But the real kicker for medetomidine is that withdrawal symptoms are reportedly really painful--so terrible that the user wants to get back on it to make the pain go away.  The effects of withdrawal are so awful that users go to hospital emergency rooms.  In 2023 Philly reported about 2,800 ER visits for withdrawal symptoms, but in the first 9 months of this year there were 7,250.  For the full year they expect ER visits for withdrawal to be three TIMES higher than two years ago, with most of those being for medetomidine.

And these admissions are just for withdrawal symptoms:  super-high heart rate and blood pressure.

The Times says that immediately after snorting, injecting or smoking medetomidine,  users go unconscious and collapse.  There's no mention of any feeling of euphoria, no "high," just out like a light.  And interestingly, even though the new drug blocks nerves in the central nervous system, the antidote for fentanyl and opioid overdose--"Narcan"--doesn't work, because the new drug's bio mechanism is different.

Not sure why it's addictive if there's no euphoria, but then much of what druggies do to get high doesn't seem rational by normal standards.  In fact druggies seem pretty crazy--as Nick Reiner's parents learned.

So the huge increase in hospital admissions (after ER visits for withdrawal symptoms) has Philly hospitals seeing a huge increase in the cost of treating withdrawal symptoms from the new drug.  And because users are so addicted, a week after they're released they're back in the ER and hospital again.  And again.  

So what would you guess the city's Democrat rulers are doing to fix this problem?  Rational leaders would be pushing to pass a law to mandate executing drug sellers.  But Democrats are going the other direction, handing out more "safe drug injection" works: syringes, crack pipes and the like.  Of course druggies don't need anything to ingest the drug cuz' it can simply be snorted.  No needles or crack pipes needed make it a drug-dealer's dream drug.

You might think that the non-addicted citizens of Philly would get tired of this and vote the Dem pols who refuse to crack down on drug sales out of office.  But of course that never happens: The population of the city is 70% Democrat, and even if conservatives had a small majority, the Dem Machine is too powerful.

So returning to the Times piece: The reporter didn't suggest any solutions, because Dems won't support any policy that might actually work.  Instead they use NGO's--funded by city, state and federal taxpayers--to give drug addicts syringes and crack pipes so they can get high on other drugs that don't have the painful withdrawal symptoms.  But the druggies don't want that.  The Times story quotes several users who say they don't want to go to rehab.  

What do you do with people like that?  Dems shrug: Let's keep using taxpayer dollars to keep 'em alive.  Maybe  some of 'em will become doctors or astrophysicists.  You bet, sparky.   

It's crazy.  But unless you live in Philly, you don't get any say in the policy.  You just have to pay for it, thru Medicaid and a dozen other federal programs.  And even if conservatives ever won the mayor and a majority of the city council, Chuck Schumer's senate Democrats will use the filibuster, and leftist judges their DECREES, to prevent the federal government from cutting Medicaid to Dem-ruled states even when they do absolutely nothing to cut drug use.  So Dems win again.  Perfect.

In fact congressional Democrats are now muttering about impeaching Trump for doing the only thing that seems likely to reduce the supply of these drugs: blowing up drug boats. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/15/health/medetomidine-withdrawal-symptoms-treatment.html?unlocked_article_code=1.808.FgB3.XVb6SMUXg6qb&smid=url-share 

Liberal DA in Minneapolis lets double-rapist skate: no prison time. And guess what happpened next?

If you don't think liberals are insane, consider the following:

Minneapolis ranks right up there with NYC, California and Illinois in having some of stupidest or most corrupt judges on the planet.  In Minneapolis a demon named Mohammed kidnapped and raped two women--one just 15 years old.  

In May of 2024 he was arrested and charged for raping a woman at his Minneapolis apartment. The victim said Mohamed strangled her and threatened to shoot her if she did not have sex with him. 

His DNA then positively tied him to the 2017 rape of the 15-year-old.

In May of this year the demon was sentenced to three years in prison for the rape of the 15-year-old, but for some bizarre reason the judge in the case "stayed" the sentence for five years, meaning he served no time in prison. 

For the 2024 rape the demon was "sentenced" (fiction) to 14 months in prison--but again, didn't serve any time. 

Seriously.  The moronic leftist "justice" ('just us') system in Minneapolis offered the rapist a plea deal:  Plead guilty two counts of forcible rape and we'll sentence you to years in prison--on paper.  But that "sentence" is fake--a fiction to make the sheep believe the leftist judges and DAs are actually doing something to punish rapists, murderers, muggers, men who set fire to innocent women on public transit (as happened a month ago--perp had 77 arrests) and other criminals.

In reality the judge--with the full approval of the leftist DA--"stayed" the prison sentences. So in reality the sentences were an illusion--a cunning, deliberate Narrative.  A fable.  The demon who raped a woman and a 15-year-old got off with "time served"--364 days--for two rapes.  

See, dis is how liberals handle serious crime.  "Dis iz reeeally an appropriate sentence," bleated the DA's office.  "Reeeally!  Dis po' boy iz jus' misunderstood!  It's reeally society's fault dat he was absolutely driven to do this incident."

Oh you bet, sparky.  So just four months after the dumbshit "justice" system in liberal-ruled Minneapolis gave the multiple-rapist an outrageous joke of a plea deal that released him after 364 days, what do you think happened?  Use everything you know about demons and whether you think "stayed sentences" are a deterrent to future crime.  Take all the time you like. 

 

If you guessed the demon went right back and raped yet another victim just four months later, you win the prize. 

He's now been accused of kidnapping a woman in September, holding her captive at a Bloomington, Minn., hotel and repeatedly raping her over a period of almost a week, just four months after the liberal morons gave the rapist the insane plea deal.  Cuz dis iz how liberals fight crime.

Here's the hoot: The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office justified not sending the demon to prison.  Seriously.

“Due to circumstances that cause difficulty in many criminal sexual conduct cases, these charges were the available and appropriate ones to secure a felony conviction,” said an assistant spokesdemon.

If you didn't get the crisp lib logic in that statement, read it again.  It won't make any more sense the second or third time.  These corrupt morons have decided the proper role of DAs and judges is to give rapists and murderers sentences that sound good but end up releasing 'em with little actual punishment.  Cuz this is how liberals rock--everywhere.

Source: local TV station in Minneapolis 

 

AI is dangerous--for more reasons than you think.

Virtually all AI systems now used by the public are based on some variation of "large language models" (LLMs), in which the AI program learns how to parse written material, and then how to string words together to plausibly answer questions.

And indeed, the output looks totally plausible--polished.  Let's examine that:

When an article is loaded with mistakes in spelling or grammar, people understandably discount whatever point the writer is trying to make.  Conversely, perfection in spelling and grammar is more convincing, even if the content is nonsense.  And AI output is always polished in spelling and grammar. 

The second thing that makes people defer to AI output is that it's produced by a computer, and citizens of advanced countries have been conditioned to believe computers are unbiased and don't make mistakes.  Needless to say (but we have to because of the conditioning), that's horseshit.  AI output simply looks plausible, like an impeccably dressed con-man.  Because he looks wealthy (plausible), most people don't bother looking behind the facade.  Bernie Madoff and Barack Obama come to mind.

AI isn't designed to find truth, but to create a coherent, plausible Narrative.  It's perfectly happy to quote fictitious court cases, with authentic-looking legal citations, to produce the desired result.  You may have read about this: several attorneys have used AI to help write briefs and find court decisions that support their case, only to have a law clerk for the judge discover that the cases cited don't exist.

The people who programmed AI were trying for "intelligence," but the actual result is simply creating plausible, polished language.  The result makes bad conclusions convincing.

Large language models--AI--aren't programmed to say "I don't know."  When there are opposing viewpoints on a topic, AI almost always backs the one with more cites in newspapers and tech journals--a process very similar to politicians or companies hiring "influencers" to give the impression they have a huge fan base.  AI gives the reader the consensus view, but rarely does it say "Many experts disagree." 

As a result, when AI gives an answer it sounds confident, ignoring flaws in whatever the popular article count supports.  The programmers may not have intended this, but users interpret confidence as truth.  We shouldn't need to point out that just because a conclusion is uttered with conviction doesn't mean it's right. 

Unfortunately, humans are hard-wired to judge things by appearance--and the more polished something looks, the less likely people are to question it.  In fact, even questioning what a computer prints out often prompts waves of derision from people: "Who do you think you are to challenge a computer?" 

"How dare you question a recognized 'authority,' dude?"  Anyone who does so is automatically branded arrogant, subversive.  It's like claiming bribem's FBI was corrupt!  Just not done, sport.  

This isn't just speculation.  Hundreds of experiments, going back 70 years, confirm that humans tend to believe anyone who has the trappings of authority, no matter how absurd their statements or orders may be.  And today, AI has become the ultimate authority to people who don't understand how it works. 

That phenomenon is where the danger lies.  If an "authority" sounds sure of itself, people defer.  But if the "authority"--whether a human or AI--sounds uncertain, people often step back and do some thinking for themselves.  And as noted earlier, AI is always confident, never uncertain.  So unless some human authority counters, AI's error isn't discovered--until the system is stressed.

A couple of months ago in Minneapolis an illegal alien driver hit a 6-year-old girl in a crosswalk, and AI reversed the names of the driver and the six-year-old girl because of a sloppy comma in a post on the website of a local TV station.  AI didn't consider any other sources to confirm its bizarre claim, just the literal inference from the misplaced comma. 

One attraction of AI is that it reaches conclusions fast--which of course makes it seem more authoritative.  But again, is speed an advantage if the conclusions are wrong?  

Errors slip through without being discovered because they look reasonable.  Normal human skepticism is turned off or ignored.  "Authority" saying plausible things wins every time.  And at this point in time, people who know nothing about the real workings of AI consider it to be the authority. 

Obama's White House counsel had over 50 meetings with Epstein AFTER he'd been convicted. Why?

Kathy Ruemmler was White House counsel to Barack Obama.

The just-released Epstein files reveal that Ruemmler had over 50 meetings with Epstein in just 5 years after he was convicted as a sex offender.  She exchanged over 100 emails with him over that period. 

Why would Obama's White House counsel have had over 50 meetings with Jeffy AFTER he'd been convicted?

Let's guess:  Planning fundraisers for Obozo, eh?  We need to see those emails.  Something's not right about this.  CNN has posted some of the emails, in which Jeffy praises Kathy as his "great defender."  But WHY?  What was her motive for defending Jeffy?  Was she just bored and looking to virtue-signal?  Or was there another, less lofty reason?

Not only will we never learn, no reporter will ever ASK--because The Precious shall be protected at all costs.

Source: CNN

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/11/politics/kfile-kathy-ruemmler-epstein-emails-epstein-files-invs-vis 

"Why can't you be more tolerant?"

 

How the Democrat party wins votes

How many of the things below ring bells?

1. "Trump 'colluded with Putin' to steal the 2016 election from Hilliary!"

2. "If you don't vote for more welfare--including giving big 'tax credits' (cash) to low-income pipo and illegal aliens to cover dere Obamacare premiums--you're a raaaacist!"

3. "Anyone who supports Orange Hitler or any of his raaacist policies is a NAZI!!!  And a fascist."

4. "Trump and Epstein were friends!  Dat means Trump is a pedo!  Of course some Dems were frens wif' Jeffy too--but none of the Democrats who were friends with Epstein were pedos!  See, dat's called 'logic!'"

5. "If you claim Islam wants to take over the world, you're obviously Islamophobic!"

6. "If you claim men shouldn't be allowed to compete against women in sports, you're obviously transphobic."

7. "If you complain about congressional staffers having 'homosexual sex' in a capitol briefing room, you're obviously homophobic."

8. "Obamacare was a fabulous, well-planned, near-perfect law!  Now we jus' need a few more tax dollars frum yew taxpaying sheep to make it work.  (Okay, 'a few more' is akshully a trillion dolla' over ten years, but c'mon man, dat jus' a number!  You can't put a price on free healthcare, deplorable!)"

9. "Hamas iz innocent victims of Israeli aggression!  Hamas dindoo nuffin' wrong, yet doze mean ol' Israelis started bombin' 'em fo' no reason!  Whut?  October 7th?  Did somethin' happen?  Nah, we din' hear nuffin'."

10. "On Jan 6, 2021 a mob of 'armed insurrectionists' stormed the Capitol to try to overturn the results of duh mos' fairest election EVAH!  Dey wuz armed wif' lotsa gunz--cuz it wuz a 'insurrection,' right?  I mean, how kin yew haz an insurrection wif'out gunz, eh?  Okay, we din' akshully find any gunz, but we know dey had to be dere!  Cuz it wuz a 'insurrection,' right?
    So we Dems held a big hearing about it.  Lasted three months, called hundreds of witnesses!  An' dey all tol' exackly duh same story!  Duh evidence proving a insurreckshun wuz SO clear dat right after we announced our findings we destroyed all the evidence an' videos of all those hundreds of witnesses who testified!  See, dat called 'transparency,' deplorable!  Dat how democracy work."

11. "By ordering his Gestapo thugs (ICE) to deport innocent Americans, an' kill po' innocent fishermen who were definitely NOT tryin' t'smuggle drugs to...somewhere..., Orange Hitler is acting like a king!  Americans hate kings!  So don't worry about whether Orange Hitler's orders are making life bettah in his fascist dictatorship!  Just keep repeating 'We HATE kings!'"

12. "Gavin Newsom is reeeally smaht and dreamy!  He gon' be duh best president EVAH!  And anyone who disagrees is a Nazi!"

13. "Jasmine Crockett is reeeally smaht, and pretty!  She don' take no shit from Orange Dragon Hitler!  She gon' be duh bestest senator EVAH!

14. "Dere is no significant vote fraud.  So if some random county--say, Fulton County, Georgia--heavily Democrat and Dem-controlled--refuses to produce 80,000 ballots needed to support the "official" reported vote total, it does NOT mean those ballots never existed, deplorable!  Perish the thought!  Instead it means the totally honest, non-partisan officials who run elections in dat county iz merely "protecting the sanctity of ouah secret ballot!"  Cuz if we wuz to produce duh missing ballots, doze cunning Rethuglicans would know who voted fo' who!  We not sure how dey'd know, since mail-in ballots removed frum envelope don' haz no way of tyin' 'em to a voter, but if we sez we iz protektin duh secret ballot, pipo believe it--so we win!  Dey ain't no vote fraud.  Dat jus' crazy-talk! 

Any of those things sound familiar?  They should, cuz the Mainstream Media have been bleating all those things for years!  But most people--and most Americans--have a memory span of about two weeks, tops.  So as far as most people know, almost none of the things noted above evah happened.

See, dis beez how democracy works, deplorable.  Whatevah duh Mainstream Media say, yew iz eager to believe.  Cuz dey nevah lied to ya befo,' right? 

NY Times finally admits bribem ordered open borders...but AGAINST the wishes of the Democrat Party!

Amazing.  Utter horseshit.  The Times is trying to rewrite history to help the Democrat party win control of congress in 2026 and the presidency in 2028.  All prior statements by Dem leaders are being deleted, and four months from now no Democrat will remember what really happened--thanks to the Lying Mainstream Media.

The Times has created a new, fake Narrative, in which no Democrat leader EVAH supported open borders!  Nope nope nope!  In fact the Times now claims Dem "leaders" (and potential candidates) actually warned bribem NOT to throw the border wide open!  Yep yep yep!

Here's the headline from the lying whores at the Times:

How Biden Ignored Warnings...and Lost Americans' Faith in Immigration

Notice just "immigration."  Omitting the crucial word "illegal," as liberals ALWAYS do.

The Democratic president and his top advisers rejected recommendations that could have eased the border crisis that helped return Donald Trump to the White House.

The Times claims unnamed "leaders" of the Democrat Partei warned bribem and his "top advisers" NOT to throw open the borders, warning that such a move would plunge the country into chaos.  But the Times now claims bribem--and only bribem--demanded open borders, and that all other Democrat leaders heroically tried to resist what they knew would be disaster.  SEE?

In the weeks after Joe Biden was elected, advisers delivered a warning: His approach to immigration could prove disastrous.

Wait...in their first 'graf the Times claims bribem's advisers ignored warnings.  Look back up: "...his top advisers rejected recommendations...." But in the very next 'graf the Times claims "advisers delivered a warning."  Which is it, lying assholes?  Did his advisers warn him, or reject a warning?  You neither know nor care, because your whole Narrative and is a lie: the entire leadership of the fucking treasonous Democrat party embraced open borders.  You just want that inconvenient fact to disappear, so your stupid base will keep voting Dem in future elections.

Mr. Biden had pledged to treat unauthorized immigrants more humanely than Trump, who generated widespread backlash by separating migrant children from their parents.

You lying whores would never say "illegal immigrants."  They're always "unauthorized" or "undocumented Americans."  And you lying whores KNOW that separating children from parents was ORDERED by leftist judges during Obozo's reign, but that doesn't help the Democrats, so you simply...omit that inconvenient fact, eh?  SO classic!

...in the final weeks of 2020 experts advising his transition team warned that his positions threatened to drastically increase border crossings.

Notice how neatly the Times gets readers to accept the brazen lie that open borders was just bribem's position, rather than being eagerly supported by every leader of the rat-bastard Democrat party: simply by use of the possessive "his positions."  Masterful!  You didn't even notice.

That drastic increase, they said, could provoke a political crisis.  Advisers used the word "chaos" in a memo during the campaign, and they offered a range of options to avert that crisis, by better deterring migrants.  
   Mr. Biden seemed to grasp the risk, but he and his top aides failed to act on those recommendations.

The new Narrative--the lie to win the Dems more votes--is now obvious.  But how can we know it's a lie?  Because the Times doesn't cite sources or emails or any evidence.
   Times whores: "Dat quite reasonable, deplorable!  Cuz ouah sources understandably don't wanna be named!"
   They don't wanna be named because they don't exist.  If they existed, you'd think they'd want credit for having been right, eh?

The warnings came true, and then some.  After Mr. Biden became president, migrant encounters at the southern border quickly doubled, then kept rising. New arrivals overwhelmed border stations, then border towns, and eventually major cities like New York and Denver.

We note you cunningly didn't mention Chitcongo, Memphis, Nashville, Phoenix or San Diego.  Nor that the bribem regime *flew thousands of illegals from Texas to Westchester county (a few miles north of NYC) at 3 a.m.  We have the radar tracks, and the videos of illegals getting off the planes at 3am, protected by bribem "ice agents" from being questioned by the rare curious American.  But the Times and other Lying Mainstream Media never said a word--because you supported this policy all along.  And still do. 

Anger over illegal migration [due to open borders] helped return Mr. Trump to the presidency, and he has enacted even more aggressive policies than those Mr. Biden first campaigned against. Mr. Trump has drawn outrage from Democrats by sending masked agents to target immigrants, often aided by National Guard soldiers.

Notice how quickly the Times pivots from "Leaders of the Partei warned bribem but he refused to listen" to "Dis all Trump's fault!  Trump mean!  ICE BAD cuz dey wears masks!  By contrast, protesters [rioters] who wear masks iz guuuud."
   Open borders was solely due to Biden, citizen!  He was the only Dem who demanded that, and the sole cause of the chaos (their word).  And now that he's out, the Democrat Partei is Perfect!
   The Times calls itself "the paper of record," and their piece writes a fake version of "history" so future voters will only know the Democrat-fellating version of events.

Former Biden administration officials told The Times that Mr. Biden and his circle of close confidants -- including Ron Klain, who was chief of staff during the president's first two years, Mike Donilon, Jennifer O'Malley Dillon and Anita Dunn -- made two crucial errors.
    First, they underestimated the scale of migration that was coming.  Second, they failed to appreciate the political reaction to that migration, believing a "border surge" [you mean ten million new illegals, assholes?] would not be an important issue to most voters.

See, the Democrat party NEVAH supported open borders!  Nope nope nope!  Just bribem and his top advisers.  
   Oh wait:  in the Democrat primary presidential debate of 2016--cunningly scheduled by Hillary Clinton for Christmas Eve so that almost no one would see it--both Hillary and Bernie Sanders vowed that if elected they wouldn't deport a single illegal alien.
   And Gavin Newsom just bragged on X that he got California to give "free" healthcare to illegal aliens.  Seems like that's supporting illegal immigrants/open borders, eh?  So how will the Times spin that one into "Dis not ouah policy"? 

Democrat voters will believe everything the Times bleated, and will vote Dem forever--because they automatically believe anything printed or bleated by the Mainstream Media.  And they're totally unable to connect cause and effect.

When American girls are raped and murdered by "men" whose home nation is carefully never named by the Lying Mainstream Media, the Media have a ready excuse:  "American citizens commit rape and murder at a higher rate than 'immigrants.'"  How often have you heard that horseshit?

As Hitler and his propaganda minister discovered, lying works.  And the more brazen the lie, the more supporters believe it.  Dem voters believe anything the Lying Mainstream Media tells 'em, which is why the Media keep lying: it works!  But only for Dems, because the Media quickly attacks any effort by conservatives to lie.

Several easy logic tests will show the reality: If the rest of the Democrat party didn't support open borders and unlimited illegal alien invasion, why are ALL Dems now fighting so hard to prevent ICE from deporting ANY illegal--even ones who have committed crimes in the U.S.?

The obvious answer is that all Democrat leaders have always supported open borders.  If any opposed open borders they cunningly said nothing, for fear of being cancelled by the Partei.

Source: Ace of Spades

Original NY Times revisionist history here. 

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=417663

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/07/us/politics/biden-immigration-trump.html
 

Thugs dodge death penalty for ghastly crimes

If you're a liberal snowflake, don't read this post.  It not only describes horrible crimes that will upset you, but shows how stupid liberals absolutely ensure these horrible crimes will happen over and over, since liberals have this insane love-relationship with murderers and rapists.

According to liberals, the murdering, raping piece of shit below is a woman.

Seriously. The murderous piece of shit--original name Steven Hayes--now claims to be a woman.  And because of that claim, foolish liberal morons have allowed the POS to change its name to "Linda Mai Lee" and to demand that taxpayers fund an endless list of demands related to making its dreams of being female more plausible.  

This POS claims to be female...and libs agree!

 

In 2007, in the normally-peaceful town of Cheshire, CT, this POS and a younger POS he met in prison raped and murdered a mother and two daughters, ages 11 and 17.  Hayes tied the daughters to their beds, strangled the mother, then poured gasoline on the daughters as they were tied to their beds, and set them on fire.

Hayes and his younger POS partner in crime were on parole--the liberal shithole state's first mistake, which continues to this day.  They deliberately targeted the mother and 11-year-old daughter as they were shopping, followed them home, and raped them and set them on fire.

As the two murderous pieces of shit fled the burning home in the victim's car, they crashed into a police cruiser and were arrested.  DNA proved beyond doubt that Hayes had raped both mother and the 11-year-old.

Both pieces of shit were convicted and sentenced to death.  But as you already guessed, both managed to dodge the richly-deserved death penalty.  Reason is that two years AFTER the mother and both daughter were raped and burned alive, the liberals who run Connecticut's state legislature passed a law outlawing the death penalty for any crime.   

Seriously, that's how dumb liberals are.  But because the ghastly crimes described above were committed before the liberals who rule the legislature outlawed the death penalty, rational people would think those sentences would still be carried out, since the law allowed the death penalty when the thugs murdered the mother and daughters, eh?

But of course in liberal/Dem-ruled states, the story always gets worse.  Because in liberal Connecticut, moronic liberals rule EVERYTHING, not just the state legislature.  So even though the death penalty was allowed--and richly deserved--when the pieces of shit murdered the mother and both daughters, two years after the legislature outlawed that penalty, the state's supreme court RULED that outlawing the death penalty really meant murderous pieces of shit sentenced to death before the law was changed couldn't be executed! 

And it gets worse: Hayes has now been moved to a prison in equally liberal shithole of Oregon, where he has demanded that taxpayers pay for him to get fake boobs.  And the morons of Oregon obeyed.

Now Hayes is demanding that the state pay for him/her/it to get hair transplants so it no longer looks like a fat, balding male.  And of course makeup and female hormones.

Hayes also says he/she/it is "happy to be alive."  This is galling since during the sentencing phase 15 years ago, as a ploy to avoid the death penalty Hayes's attorney said his client wanted the death penalty as atonement.  That was a lie, and a ploy.  Didn't deter the jury, but liberal morons in the legislature and the state's supreme court spared both killers.

So to summarize: thugs rape and murder a mother and two daughters--one just 11 years old.  They're sentenced to death by a jury, but liberals in both the state legislature and the state supreme court act to overturn that.  Now one of the trannies is living his/her/its best life as a self-declared woman, demanding taxpayers pay for an endless series of "gimmees."

Democrats: "Dis beez guuuud, citizen!  'If abolishing the death penalty saves the life of just one innocent person, it's worth it!'"

Me: "So if leaving the DP in place saves the life of just one innocent victim, why is that not worth it?"

Democrats: "Uhhh...ummm...cuz we're smaht and you deplorable!" 

Now here's the absolutely predictable result: In January of this year (2025) Newsweek posted a story by a shithead liberal about this case.  But instead of outrage, by the 4th 'graf the piece was wailing about "trans rights" and how trannies were victims of assaults.

Wait...how did this shithead manage to twist the ghastly rapes and murders by tranny Hayes from rape and murder of three totally innocent females to "trans iz victims"? 

Ah, I see you're not familiar with liberal lies.  Newsweek's employees know what their goal is--and it's not justice or protecting you or your family.  They're following the Democrat party line.

Now: obviously nothing can undo the past, but rational people could ensure that evil people don't get released by moronic judges and Dem politicians.  But that won't happen, because the Democrat party demands that people who commit crimes be released without having to post bail, and be released after serving only a fraction of the time to which they were justly sentenced.  Made to wear useless ankle monitors.  (Yeah, dat helps.  Not.)

Democrats are selling out you and your families, to be nice to the people the "true victims:" murderers, rapists, drunk drivers, drug smugglers, drug sellers and the like.  It makes libs feel virtuous.  And if a few hundred innocent Americans a year are killed or raped, liberals just shrug: "Bad things have always happened, citizen!  None of it is ouah fault!  Ouah policies din' have nuffin' t'do wif your daughter being raped or murdered!  Nope nope nope!  So shut up."   

Hayes strangled the mother and burned the daughters alive after raping both

 

The Media...doing their job of trashing Trump and praising all Democrat policies

When bribem was occupying the Oval Office, if the stock market set a record high that almost always led the nightly "newz," eh?

This year the Dow-Jones "industrials"--the number that leads all the market reports--has set a new record high not just once or twice, but 18 times.  New records are so routine that the Lying Mainstream Media barely mention it.  If they mention it at all it's way down in the "newz" broadcast.  

Hmmm...wonder why record highs for the DJ-30 are no longer nearly as newsworthy to the Lying Media today as they were when bribem was vegetable-in-chief?

It's a total mystery.  Of course duh Media explains that they would have treated record DJ-30 numbers the same as befo', but that under Orange Dragon dere iz SO much mo' impo'tant stuff dey haz t'tell ya: Trump ordering drug-smuggling boats blown up, endless footage of ICE agents arresting sweet, innocent "immigrants" as women scream obscenities and Dem pols scream dat it's a CRIME to deport illegal immigrants!  Cuz Dems bleat "No one is illegal," eh citizen?

The Lying Media always leaves out that crucial word "illegal."  They want you to believe illegals have as much right to be here as U.S. citizens.

Because the Mainstream Media is doing such a great job of trashing Trump and fellating Democrats for their crappy policies, I'll be absolutely shocked if Dems don't win control of the House 11 months from now.   

Price of gasoline is at lowest since before bribem took office. By coincidence, U.S. oil production...

In June of 2022--with Joe bribem having been the nominal president for over a year--the average nationwide price of gasoline was $5.20 per gallon.

Today--with Trump as president for less than a year--the same average nationwide price of gasoline is $2.95 per gallon.

Residents of NYC don't care cuz they don't drive much, and they're not smart enough to realize that the price of gasoline and diesel affects lots of other prices.  But if you live in the southwest it's a big deal.  (When I lived in a small west Texas town we often drove 60 miles each way to go to dinner at a different restaurant.) 

And here's the kicker: As you may have heard, a big chunk of the price of gasoline is the price of...oil.  So how's that doing?

Well on January 15 of this year--a week before Trump took office--the price of the benchmark "West Texas Intermediate" crude oil was $80 a barrel.  Today it closed just under $59--down a whopping 26 percent from bribem's last week in office.  And it's undoubtedly just a total coincidence that U.S. oil production just hit an all-time high.

Democrats: "Whut?  Why would yew claim producing more oil would make duh price fall?  Dat jus' crazy-talk!  Everyone know dere ain't no connection between price and supply!  Duh oil companies jus' set any price dey want, an' we gots t'pay it!"

There's a great field of study called "economics."  You might look into it sometime.

 

For more on oil, click here. 

SecWar says fentanyl is deadly enough to be considered a "chemical weapon." True?

The Left (Democrats) are wailing that the Trump administration is killing drug smugglers.  In response, the head of the military (SecWar Hegseth) noted that drugs like fentanyl are so lethal that they could be considered chemical weapons.

That led me to do a bit of research:  When determining how deadly a poison is, there's a benchmark called "LD50"--the dose calculated to kill half of those exposed to it.  

Two of the most deadly chemical weapons known are Sarin, and a thing called "VX."  Both are "nerve agents," variations of organophosphates.  They kill by causing muscles to go into constant contraction.  Death occurs by suffocation because you can't breathe.

Turns out for a 70kg (154-pound) person the LD50 for Sarin  is 25 to 30 milligrams.  (If you have no idea how much that is, one of those little yellow packets of Splenda weighs 1,000 milligrams.)

VX is even more powerful:  The LD50 for VX is just 5 to 10 milligrams.

Anybody have even a vague idea what the LD50 is for fentanyl?  Take a guess, out loud.  Then highlight the line below to show the answer.
  Two milligrams.

The Left (Democrats) wail that the cartel drug boats are "only" smuggling cocaine (which they imply, but cunningly do NOT explicitly claim, is no big deal, eh?), and no doubt that's most of their cargo.  But if just one boat carries just one 20kg bag of fentanyl, that could potentially kill five million Americans if divided into ten million pills.

Democrats: "You can't prove what they're carrying, so no big deal, deplorable!  So you mus' stop bombing deez po' fishermen jus' cuz dey happen to have enuf dinero to buy a boat wit $100,000 just for the four 300-horsepower Merc engines!"

Okay Pete, here's a free idea for how to solve a whole bunch of problems: replace the exploding missiles now being used to blow up the drug boats with a plain ol' 200-pound chunk of solid iron with a laser guidance system--the ones that can fly thru a small window.  Obviously not as fast as a missile but if you drop from overhead it'll work fine.  

Drop a couple of those and they'll not only put a couple of big damn holes in the boat but will probably break a gas line and start a small fire.  So the boat's out of action.  Then after a day or so, U.S. Navy leisurely motors up to the stopped boat and says "Hey, if ya like, we'd be glad to let y'all use our radio to call your boss and tell him what happened, and ask him to send someone to pick you up."

Of course we know that won't happen, so after another day or so our guys say "We'd be happy to take you to the U.S.  There the Democrats will give you money and fly you home.  But y'gotta tell us who's in charge of your op."  And then split 'em up for interrogation.

Much better. 

Democrat corruption in Minnesota explained in 40 seconds

1. Of the 5 million people in Minnesota just 110,000 or so are Somalis, and only half or so of the Somalis are U.S. citizens.  So the Democrat party (operating in Minnesota as the "Democrat Farmer-Labor party") doesn't need their votes to win every election.  

2. Given that math, there's no reason Minneapolis and the state government should have turned a blind eye to the staggering fraud that has stolen at least a billion dollars from state aid programs (most of the money for which came from the federal government).  And yet by all accounts the state ignored reports from state workers claiming massive fraud as it was occurring.

3. Almost all the fraud came in three programs: "Feeding Our Future," pushed thru by Ilhan Omar; a program with the stated purpose of finding housing for favored groups; and a program intended to treat children with autism.  All three programs were looted by Somalis.  State employees who reported likely fraud say they were threatened with being called racists if they persisted.  

4. During last November's presidential election, the Mainstream TV Media inflicted endless hours of video of Tim Walz on long-suffering Americans.  Anyone over age 20 or so could instantly see this guy wasn't playing with a full deck.  Total screwball.  And since when he was running for governor, his advisors knew he didn't need Somali votes, why pander to the Somalis, eh?  Sure: guy was getting huge donations from various Somali groups.  And I suspect we'll eventually find that groups taking part in the massive fraud accounted for a lot of it. 

5. You'd think brazen thieves would lay low until the attention died down.  But in much of Africa, theft is not only normal but is expected.  And for what it's worth, TikTok is now awash with videos by Somalis laughing that they now OWN Minnesota--because the biggest scammers fled back to Somalia before they could be arrested.  And of course they can't be extradited back to the U.S. to stand trial.

6. All these scams happened while bribem occupied the White House, but national Democrats know the Mainstream Media won't ask 'em about it.  They don't have to say a word about the fraud.  All they have to do is let the news cycle move on to bowl games and Christmas and New Years Eve, and 90% of Americans will have totally forgotten about the whole thing.  And no one will pay attention to the other ten percent.  Is this a great country or what?

Trouble in the UK...and what it means

The UK, Ireland, Sweden and all of Europe except the Visegrad Four are on a trajectory that bodes poorly for the native populations.  The Marxists and the Muzzies will unite in vying to take over--at which point the cradle of Western Civilization, the Reformation, the Enlightenment, the Renaissance and the Industrial Revolution will fall into a second Dark Age--which may last for a couple of centuries.

After the united Commies and Muzzies take over, they’ll turn on each other for ultimate power.  That’s exactly what happened in Iran in the 1980s. 

Of course Iran was already Muslim, but my guess is that in non-Muslim countries the Muzz will defeat the commies because they breed so much faster than everyone else.

You’d hope Americans would watch the takeover happening before our eyes in France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and Austria, and would learn from it, and some will.  But the leaders of the Democrat Partei [sic] will never learn:  They’ll continue to believe Islam is peaceful--and great Dem voters!  So they’ll actually try to help the Muzz win power, believing they’ll be good Democrats.  Hahahahaha!

My parents were U.S.-born but world travelers.  Dad got an engineering degree, then at age 23 was aircraft commander of a B-17 for 35 missions in WW2.  In 1945 he became an instructor at the Air Force test pilot school.  One of his classroom students was Chuck Yeager, who was already an ace.  My dad just taught him engineering--and flew jets with him and other students.  He taught me to fly at 10, and I soloed at 15. 

Later my dad got a law degree and got into the international oil business.  For 20 years my parents lived a few yards from Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park, London.  Both my sisters had law degrees.  My brother and I were both military pilots.

I mention all this because otherwise y’all may think I’m just as clueless as most of the folks you see on the Net.  But by total good luck (and lots of hard work), and great parents, I’ve been all over the world and have done things you wouldn’t believe.  I’ll put my experience and expertise up against anyone’s.  So when I say “There’s a problem...,” you can be damn sure there’s a problem. 

So with that long intro: One of the blogs I follow has lots of highly-educated world travelers--many with former military experience--as commenters.  Lots of readers have been stationed in Europe or the UK, and have traveled there later.  One post dealt with the dire straits the UK finds itself in, due to the ghastly socialist Labour ruling majority (460 seats in Parliament, vs. 130 or so for conservatives).

That post triggered hundreds of comments from readers who'd lived in London or had been stationed in the UK.  I’ve copied a few of those below.  None of the quotes below are mine.  Let me know if any of their comments rings a bell.

* “Unless the Brits awaken from their slumber, they’re doomed.”  Indeed.  But there’s no awakening: cops are arresting and jailing Brits for making social media posts that merely criticize Islam.  All the pols are in the pockets of the Muzz.

* It's not just the UK, unfortunately. It's almost the entire western world.
   I’ve spent years traveling around the world and the direction the west was headed was obvious *over a decade ago* to anyone who was paying attention.  That direction isn’t a conspiracy theory or some cosmic coincidence, it's a plan.  And except for the U.S. its been wildly successful. 
   Darkness is descending on much of the world.  Normally the U.S. would be expected to help, but now the Democrat party blocks that, just as they got their leftist judges to force Trump to pull the Guard out of Dem-ruled shithole cities; just as they’re demonizing deporting illegal aliens.  What do you think that portends for the future?

* The liberal, globalist elites who run Europe erupted in fury this week after the Trump administration released its new national security strategy, which called for less immigration.
  The head of the EU parliament’s globalist Renew group blasted the U.S. plan, calling it “dangerous.” She even went so far as to brazenly label the Trump administration “an enemy of Europe” for questioning the EU’s failed progressive agenda and increasingly authoritarian policies.
   Pro-immigration activist Gerald Knaus hysterically declared the U.S. a “direct threat to European democracy and peace.” He absurdly accused Washington of plotting to break up the EU and NATO.

*Industry and the British economy are collapsing as an insane obsession with NetZero by Ed Milliband is causing English electricity prices to skyrocket--now the highest in Europe.  As a result England is deindustrializing and working class jobs are disappearing forever. As industry vanishes, the economy gets weaker and weaker.

* One of the reasons the UK never does anything to stop illegal immigration is that the leaders of the powerful Labour party see immigrants as natural Labour voters, and workers to replace the falling native-Brit birthrate.  Sound familiar?

* In Venice recently I was sitting next to a young couple from the UK, maybe 30 years old.  Both had that perfect high-class brit accent.  Somehow we started talking about london, and I mentioned how Islam seemed to be taking over.  The girl said "Oh, no problem, they are lovely people."  Wow.

* Illegal immigrants to the UK are lavishly supported by UK taxpayers, per the orders of their “wokie” government.  Given that lavish support, illegal immigrants will never leave, and the Labour party won’t try to make ‘em, because Labour needs the invaders’ votes.
  One might think native Brits of the “working class” could rally enough votes to force Labour pols to change policies, but modern authoritarian regimes (and the UK absolutely is) have learned how to isolate, marginalize and destroy dissident movements before they can get going.  The rulers just keep charging the dissidents with “hate speech” and jailing ‘em for a year or two at a time.  Viz Tommy Robinson.

* The socialist media in the UK constantly tell readers/viewers that a) all immigrants are fleeing oppression; b) they’re all law-abiding and just want the same thing native Brits want; and c) they’re all hard-working taxpayers and are needed to keep the National Health Service operating.  Sound familiar?

* All the people in power in the UK are leftists, so they totally lack the ability to link cause and effect.

* Before we’re too hard on the Brits, consider the Democrats here, and their reaction to the news that Somalis in MN stole billions in “aid” dollars: the Dems are *furious at us for noticing and saying anything!*  Dems bleat that “Duh Somalis are duh real victims here.”
  It’s the same as British leftists who didn’t bat an eye at Muslim “grooming gangs” who raped young British girls, because “It’s their culture, and all good, enlightened people agree that all cultures are equal!”  And if you object to “grooming” the leftists call you a racist or “Islamophobe.”

* Most Brits--like most Europeons [sic] haven’t the faintest idea of what our Second Amendment does, or why it’s a great idea.  So if their politicians decide to confiscate civilian guns--as SO many have--they have no defense.  UK citizens have been charged with assault for *picking up an umbrella in their own home to defend against armed robbers.*

Lots more comments but you get the idea.  The point is that this is happening NOT in some African or middle-east shithole, but in the damn UK, home of the Magna Carta.  (For young Americans: that document was the first to claim everyone, even the king, was subject to the law.  Huge paradigm shift, eh?)

London is 15% Muslim, and for the last nine years has had a Muslim mayor.  He’s been elected three times and is the longest-serving.  You’d think that even if the 85% of residents who are NOT Muslims split, either Labour or Tories would have enough votes to win for their candidate, but for some reason....

Then you realize the same thing is happening here, as New York City residents elected an openly socialist Muslim as mayor of the largest U.S. city. 

So a good question now is, Does it matter?

In London, under Khan, knife and machete attacks have skyrocketed in the last nine years.  Like shootings or stabbings in NYC, most of these attacks only last a minute or two.  Almost no one is ever arrested because the attacker flees before cops arrive, and “no one saw nuffin’.”  Cops are useless, and residents seem resigned to the constant attacks, much like subway riders in NYC just shrug when another unfortunate woman is pushed into the path of an oncoming train by a druggie or schizophrenic and killed.

They just shrug: “Whut can be done?  Nuffin’.”

Welcome to the future--cuz as elections both here and in the UK show, soon you won’t be able to vote your way out of this.