AI can do some funny stuff after all

https://x.com/i/status/2006445562405728269

Somebody did some good AI work here. 

 

Five Somali fraudsters in Minnesota tried to bribe a juror in a fraud trial; all five have pled guilty

Democrats in Minnesota are wailing “We investigated these raaaacist, absurd, ridiculous charges of fraudulent billing by daycare centers, autism treatment centers and housing-aid centers way back in 2022 and found there was no evidence at ALL!  So the recent video by some RAAAACIST right-wing hotshot claiming there’s fraud is just RAAACISM by Trump!  Yep yep yep!

Well, lying Democrat rat-bastards, consider this:  In April of 2024 a group of Somalis being tried for fraud by the scammers at Feeding Our Future conspired to try to bribe a juror to vote Not Guilty.

The Somalis left a bag containing $200,000 on the juror’s porch.

Think about that for a second: The fraudsters not only stole from the state and feds, but had $200,000 in CASH sloshing around to try to bribe a juror to acquit them of the fraud.

The juror reported finding the bag, and the federal government unraveled the plan and charged the defendants with attempted bribery.

In August of 2025 the DOJ announced that FIVE of the lawless sons of bitches had pled guilty to taking part in the bribery scheme.  Think about that: People plead guilty when they know the government has ‘em dead to rights, believing the plea might win ‘em a lighter sentence.

Point is that the fraudsters were SO contemptuous of our laws--understandably-- that they didn’t hesitate to pay $200,000 to try to fix the jury.

On April 22, 2024, seven defendants went on trial for their roles in the Feeding Our Future fraud.  Five of those defendants were charged in the juror bribery case, and all five have pled guilty.  Sentencing dates have not yet been set.

The plotters recruited co-conspirator Ladan Ali to deliver the bribe money.  Ali agreed to deliver the bribe money to “Juror 52” in exchange for a $150,000 cash payment.  That is, the mere courier was demanding $150,000.  Wow.

On June 1, 2024, Ali told Nur—falsely—that she had approached Juror 52 at a bar and that Juror 52 wanted $200,000 to vote “not guilty.”  None of that was true: Ali never spoke with Juror 52.

Nur then met Ali and gave her a box containing the $200,000 in cash.  Nur instructed Ali to meet Abdulkarim Farah who would accompany Ali to Juror 52’s house and record her delivering the bribe.

Later that night, Sayed Farah received the video of Ali delivering the bribe money.  Farah later deleted the video to conceal his involvement in the bribery scheme.

Is it just me or are the Somalis beginning to look like the old Mafia?

Ohh, but you must believe Timmy Walz and the Democrats that dey dun’ investigated duh few baseless claims of fraud in the three programs--which appear to have had NO audits or oversight whatsoever.  An’ dey din’ find no fraud at ALL, citizen.  And would nevah have found the attempted bribe if not for the feds.

Back when Elon was running DOGE, he said he believed fraud in government was stealing roughly a TRILLION dollars a year.  That’s beginning to look pretty close.

Democrats: "Dis FAKE NEWS!  Dey wudn't no bribe!  Dis all jus' MAGAt conspiracy tales!"

Really, cupcake?  Read the DOJ press release for yourself.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/fifth-juror-bribery-defendant-pleads-guilty-scheme-bribe-feeding-our-future-juror 

In Baltimore in 2023, 40% of city highschools didn't have ONE student who scored proficient

Here's something you almost certainly didn't see:  In the Democrat-ruled city of Baltimore, in the Dem-ruled shithole of Maryland, 33 high schools took the congressionally-mandated national test for proficiency in reading and math.

In 2023, in 13 of those schools not ONE student scored "proficient" in math--despite millions of dollars in national funding.  

And that's not the surprising part, which is:  When this was reported, not ONE national Lying Mainstream Media outlet reported it.  Not one.  Seriously.  Do a search for "In 2023 40% of Baltimore high schools had ZERO students who tested proficient in math." 

The story broke in October of 2023, and while two local Baltimore TV stations ran it, the Lying Mainstream Media totally ignored it --until four days after Trump was sworn in (Jan 25, 2025), when NPR finally did a hand-wringing story NOT about the crappy results in the Dem stronghold of Baltimore, but about national performance on the proficiency test.  

As you could have guessed, the shitheads in the Dem-fellating Media didn't want Americans to hear about this utter disaster while bribem was prezzy and Cackles was being stupid, cuz dat wudda cost the Dems a few thousand votes in November of 2024.  So the bastards waited. 

Lessons: 1) stop throwing tens of millions of dollars at "superintendents," adminishits and consultants, cuz it's like aid programs in Minnesota: totally wasted.  

2) When a story would hurt Democrats, the Lying Mainstream Media ignores it.  By contrast, anything Trump does, they scream about, including deporting illegals and closing wasteful Democrat grift agencies.

3) No matter how much you may hate the LMM, it's not nearly enough. 

The Democrats cry real tears over deaths. Well, over *some* deaths

 

Unnamed migrant in Paris stabs three defenseless women; government and media shrug

Last Friday (Dec 26, 2025) in Paris, "a man" with a knife stabbed three defenseless women in the Paris metro.  He was caught.

Turns out the never-named man--from Mali-- had "been detained" way back in January 2024 "for aggravated robbery and sexual assault" and was "obligated to leave France."  But of course that didn't happened.

Of course, citizen.

The Interior Minister said "I regret that it has not been possible to remove the suspect," with some bullshit excuse about his lack of identity papers.  So what do you think the stupid assholes who run France did, eh?

Of course: after being convicted of sexual assault and aggravated robbery almost two years earlier, the French *released the man under house arrest.*

Let's review: The son of a bitch has already proven to have no regard for French laws at ALL, and you think he'll abide by "house arrest"?  You people are dumber than our Democrat congress-creeps.

The only good news here was that none of the victims died or had an eye gouged out, as happened in Seattle just two weeks ago when a black nutcase well known to cops bashed the head of a 67-year-old woman, from behind, with no interaction or provocation.

The Seattle demon will be released again, as has happened every other time he's attacked someone.  Just like the demon who stabbed three innocent women in Paris.  This is what leftism has brought us to.  No one is safe under leftist, criminal-coddling rule.

Yet that's who leftist voters keep electing, time and again.  And all big-city residents just shrug.  "Nothing can be done," they bleat.  “It wud be mean to put demons in a cell, just because they stab or brutalize innocents time and again.  We must be nice to such pipo!”

One is reminded yet again of that old definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over, but expecting a different result.  It’s literally crazy.  

https://www.euronews.com/2025/12/26/knife-attack-on-paris-metro-three-women-injured-suspected-attacker-arrested  

Democrat hypocrisy at its most visible

 

The House voted on a bill called the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act.

All Republicans voted to pass it.  206 Democrats--all but two--voted against it.

And yet the rat-bastard Democrats CLAIM they support women!  Fuck you, you lying, scum-sucking rat-bastards.  You support trannies over real girls, and expect your stupid voters to continue to vote for you.  

And of course since they're Democrats, they do.  Wow. 

Commie union puts a "ballot initiative" before Cali voters to tax billionaires 5% more

Shit just keeps getting crazier and crazier.

Many states have a thing called a "ballot initiative," which allows citizens to put proposed laws on the ballot.  If they're approved by a majority of voters, they become law.

Wait, dat not quite right: Duh initiative ballot measure becomes law UNLESS it's a law that would declare that marriage was between a man and a women--in which case it was overturned by a homosexual chief judge on the state Supreme Court.  So ballot measures only become law if the rulers agree, eh?

Which brings us to a ballot initiative put on the ballot by a communist group, the "Service Employees International Union," called the "2026 Billionaire Tax Act."

If passed by voters, this initiative would impose a 5% tax on "all forms of personal property and wealth, whether tangible or intangible” of billionaires in the state.

But yew not a billionaire, so why would you NOT vote fo' dis, eh?  Especially cuz duh stated purpose wud be to fund state healthcare programs fo' duh po'!

The other kaboom is "whether tangible or intangible."  What the hell is "intangible personal property"? 

Well, citizen, we'll need a new state agency to decide that, eh?  Say, five respected bureaucrats paid  $250,000 a year to decide this crucial, weighty question.  Three of the five would be respected officials of the Service Employees International Union, eh? 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom hasn't said whether he supports the measure, meaning either way the vote goes, he'll win.  Let me explain:  If the initiative passes, the Democrat party will bleat that Newsom actually quietly supported it--behind the scenes, of course.  And if voters don't pass it, the Party will bleat that the reason it failed is that Newsom didn't support it.

Win-win, eh? 

And that's not the funny part, which is: No matter whether the thing is voted up or down, the national Mainstream Media will totally swoon that Newsom did the right thing.  

Count on it. 

Of demons and stupid liberals

A demon named "Malik Farrad Muhammad"--who describes itself as a "Palestinian pansexual Muslim anarchist antifascist"--is a violent BLM-Pantifa militant who wants to kill anyone who disagrees with him.

I get that you don't believe that, cuz it's so utterly bizarre, off-the-charts crazy.  Really, I get it.

In March of 2022 Muhammad pleaded guilty to 14 state felony charges. He later pleaded guilty to two federal counts of having unregistered destructive devices.  He pled guilty due to a sweetheart plea deal that made his federal sentence vanish!  In the legal parlance, it "runs concurrently with the state sentence."  See how dat work, comrade?

By his own admission Muhammed is a violent revolutionary.  He's a tranny-lover, and while personal preference is faaaabulous, he views anyone who doesn't totally support trannies as a direct threat to him--meaning he feels totally justified in killing you.

Ol' Malik is in the Oregon State pen, but that hasn't stopped him from continuing to fight the oppressive Patriarchy!  No sir, not at all!  Because our oppressive system of incarceration (sarc) allows inmates to watch TV, lift weights, have sex as desired and--most damaging to civil society--to write people on the outside who'll post his shit (which it is) on the Net. 

So being in prison merely allows revolutionaries like Malik to keep doing what they love to do--because we're dumb enough to let 'em.

Here's Malik in his own words:

“Charlie Kirk was a direct threat to us, and he has been dispensed.”

Classic communist word-games: "He has been dispensed," y'say?  Absolutely classic.  Might as easily have said "has been re-educated."  Equally misleading, eh?  But that's how revolutionaries rock.  It's how they have to operate, because if they were honest, 90% of their support would vanish.

See, most people love to root for underdogs:  It's fun to watch some tiny cow-college team come out of nowhere to beat powerhouse Ohio State, eh?  Same wif "duh oppressed," eh?  People buy into the wail of "We beez oppressed, comrade!" even if it's utter bullshit.

What they really mean is "We feel oppressed, since we're a weird sexual fringe group!  So we gon' kill yew if we can, cuz dat jus' FAIR, comrade!"

Ahh, I see my lib friends and siblings don't believe that.  Okay, dumbshits, click on the links below and read Malik's own damn words!\  Unless you totally support his cause, he wants to kill you.

Literally.

Read what his comrades say are his own words--which they eagerly support--and then tell me how you would spin those words to mean anything other than their clear meaning.  Here's the summary:

“We’ve had the ballot since the ’60s and it hasn’t changed a thing. The bullet is much quicker and more effective — gratifying, too.”

My liberal friends and siblings will bleat "He duzn't reeeally mean dat!  He jus' angry cuz he in prison--fo' no gud reason!  He jus' oppressed by Orange Hitler!  Yeh, dat it!"

Say, when was Malik tried and convicted on multiple state and federal charges, including attempted murder, riot, assault, unlawful firearm possession and possession of destructive devices, dumbshits?  Wuz dat under Trump, or bribem?

Source:

Source 2: 

Source 3: 

Most of you people really are too damn dumb to survive without help, because when the evidence of a threat is right in your face--in the perp's own words--you refuse to believe it.

A final question:  In nature, what happens to animals who are too stupid to react to mortal threats?

They get killed and eaten.

Liberal Democrat: "Hahaha!  Dat can't happen to me or my family, cuz duh po-leece will protek us!  Ouah political rulers will protek us!  Reeeally!  See we obey laws an' pay ouah taxes, so duh rulers simply must defend us against demons!  Not that we believe in demons, of course!  Nope nope nope!

"See, all cultures are equal!  So-called 'undocumented Americans' are totally faaabulous!  Dey all jus' guuuud pipo who wanna have a slice of duh American dream, deplorable!  Reeeally!"

Remember the question above, about what happens to animals who don't learn?

Democrats: "Dat not true!  We not animals!  Duh poleece will protek us!  So we will NOT be killed by stronger predators-- even if we refuse to learn.  Cuz...reasons!"

My siblings totally believe that. 

Say, how'd that work out for the dead at Bondi Beach, eh?

Democrats: "Whut?  Did somethin' happen dere?  Dat don' mean nuffin'!  Duh female head of duh Australian poleece sed dat wuz absolutely NOT due to religious differences.  So yew MUST NOT draw ANY conclusions from dat!  Nope nope nope!  I mean, yew absolutely MUST believe duh female head of duh Aussie poleece!  Cuz she female!  Yew kin always trust wimmins!"

With this much stupidity, at some point I may have to start rooting for the demons.  At least they're mentally competent.  Can't say the same for liberals. 

https://thepostmillennial.com/andy-ngo-reports-convicted-portland-antifa-bomber-praises-charlie-kirk-assassination-urges-more-killings-in-prison-blog-posts

https://malikspeaks.noblogs.org/

https://malikspeaks.noblogs.org/post/2025/09/26/on-charlie-kirk/

Dems scream Trump is "acting like a king!" But when FDR confiscated all gold from Americans...

Democrats have been wailing and screaming about Trump using "a state of emergency" to impose matching tariffs or blow up drug-smuggling powerboats.

But amusingly, when the Democrats' hero Franklin D. Roosevelt ORDERED Americans to surrender their gold coins and bullion to the government or face a fine of up to $10,000 (equivalent to a staggering $250,000 in today's currency) "or" ten years in prison, "or both,"  Dems didn't utter a peep of protest.

Democrat: "NOOooo, dat a LIE!  Dat jus' a right-wing scare story!  Ouah beloved FDR wud NEVAH have done dat!
    "Maybe he signed a LAW, passed by a bipartisan congress, to do something sort of like that.  But Orange Hitler has imposed tariffs and ordered the military to blow up drug boats by Executive Order, like a king!  At least FDR got congress to pass a LAW..."

Eat shit and die, lying scum.  Or maybe just stupid--I'll go either way you like.

The facts: On April 5, 1933, Roosevelt signed "Executive Order 6102" ordering Americans to turn all their gold coin and bullion over to the government, for $20.67 per ounce.

If that doesn't strike you as outrageous enough, the son of a bitch gave Americans just 25 DAYS to comply or be prosecuted!  He knew if he gave them six months to comply, some rebellious Americans would sue the son of a bitch.  Or start a business turning gold coins and bullion into gold chains or other jewelry, which weren't subject to the ORDER.

You think I'm kidding about this order.  Democrats: "Dat not possible!  Cud nevah happen in dis 'Land of duh Free,' citizen!!!"

Well certainly not under a Republican president.  Only a New York Democrat could get away with it.

Roosevelt claimed he had the power to unilaterally order this under a WW1 law called "The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917," even though WW1 (which had triggered that law) had ended 15 years earlier.  To make it fly, the Dems cunningly amended that 1917 law just one month earlier with the "Emergency Banking Relief Act," which FDR signed on March 9th of 1933--just 29 DAYS before Roosevelt issued his confiscation order!

And if you think that wasn't the Democrats' plan all along you're too stupid to breathe.

The reason FDR ordered all gold coins and bullion owned by American citizens seized was that at the time the dollar was backed by gold, which limited the amount of paper money the government could spend to just 2.5 times the amount of gold the government owned.

Ordering an end to gold backing would likely have caused havoc in the stock market--already reeling from the crash of 1929.  So instead the Dems planned to confiscate gold at $20.67 an ounce, and then a few months later declare that gold was NOW worth $35 per ounce--increasing the amount of worthless paper dollars Roosevelt could spend by 69%.  

Seems almost impossible to believe Americans would put up with that crap.  But because Roosevelt was a Democrat, and the Media--then as now--were devoted fellators of the Democrat party, Americans just shrugged and did as the Dems ordered.

Just like the Soviet Union or China, eh?

The Media ran with the meme that the crash of 1929 and ensuing depression had caused "hoarding" of gold.  Just ONE DAY after Roosevelt issued his ORDER, the damn New York Times ran a slobbering, fawning piece supporting it, under the headline "Hoarding of Gold:"

"The Executive Order issued by the President yesterday amplifies and particularizes his earlier warnings against hoarding. On March 6, taking advantage of a wartime statute that had not been repealed, he issued Presidential Proclamation 2039 that forbade the hoarding 'of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency', under penalty of $10,000 fine or ten years' imprisonment or both."

For young Americans: Before being elected prez, FDR had been governor of New York, so the NY Times and all other NY newspapers, and the hugely influential national radio networks, all supported him in everything.

Here's part of the text of his Executive ORDER.  Note the cunning techniques used to make morons support this:

I, Franklin Roosevelt, President, do declare that said national emergency still continues to exist, and do hereby prohibit the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States...and hereby prescribe the following regulations for carrying out the purposes of this order:

Section 1. For the purposes of this regulation, the term "hoarding" means the withdrawal and withholding of gold coin, gold bullion or gold certificates from the recognized and customary channels of trade.

Notice how just owning something has now been unilaterally declared, by the Democrat hero/messaiah, to be "hoarding."  "Withholding of gold coin."  And notice the Jupiter-size loophole for FDR's wealthy friends: "...within the continental United States..."   Wonder how many tons of gold were quietly shipped to England or France before the May 1 deadline, eh?

Section 2. All persons are hereby required [sounds SO much nicer than "ordered" or "commanded," eh?] to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, to a Federal Reserve Bank or a branch or agency thereof or to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System all gold coin, gold bullion and gold certificates now owned by them or coming into their ownership on or before April 28, 1933...

Again note Americans were given just 25 days to obey the ORDER or be harshly prosecuted, so no time to mount effective lawsuits challenging the thing.  (Today the left's law firms have every lawsuit ready to go before Trump makes a move.) 

Even foreign companies that had gold in the U.S. for business purposes had their gold confiscated and were forced to accept paper money in exchange.  A Swiss banking company (the Uebersee Finanz-Korporation) had $1,250,000 in gold coins--$30 million in today's dollars--for business use.  The Swiss were stunned to find that Roosevelt and his merry band of grifters confiscated their gold (but of course paid 'em $20.67 per ounce in paper money).  The Swiss company appealed, but FDR-loving judges ruled against them.

And here's the topper: The leftist, Democrat-fellating pieces of shit who run Wikipedia have an article on this.  But instead of being titled "FDR ordered Americans to surrender all gold coin and bullion" or similar informative title, they titled it "Executive Order 6102."

Now for all the leftists who claim "The government would NEVAH confiscate private firearms!  Dat jus' not possible!" consider how lightning-fast FDR and his band of Democrat thieves moved to seize ALL gold coins and bullion legally owned by Americans:  First Amending the 1917 law on March 6, 1933 with a new law titled "Emergency Banking Relief Act," then just 30 days later (April 5, 1933) dropping the hammer with the executive ORDER.  

Then just months later, de-valuing the dollar by decreeing the "price" of gold was now $35 per ounce.  Brilliant.  Cunning.  Typical of Democrat rule.

How many of you would have thought ANY of that was possible, eh?  But then, how many of you thought bribem would have the power to ORDER your employer to fire you if you didn't take the bullshit "vax" for the Chyna virus, eh?  Of course the Supreme Court later decided that order was illegal--that he did NOT have that power after all.  But of course by then it was too late, eh?  You had to take it or be fired, leaving your family destitute.

SO classic. 

Source: Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102 

Washington Post starts to criticize UK's National Health "Service," then backs off

Following is an edited version of a piece in the Washington Post from two days ago.  The first few 'grafs look like the Post has finally come to its senses about how crappy socialism and government-run anything is, but then we see a U-turn.

Every winter in the U.K. their notorious National Health Service wails that it's on the verge of collapse.  They tell citizens who are sick to stay home and tough it out.

Hospital hallways overflow, and routine procedures get canceled due to a catastrophic event commonly known as “winter.”  Despite demanding and getting annual funding increases, nothing ever improves, so the wallahs who run the ghastly system hit the airwaves begging the public to seek other forms of treatment for “less serious” injuries and ailments. 

Instead of being critical, the British press doesn't say a critical word, because the top priority is to “protect the NHS” against criticism.

As of the end of October 6.24 million people were waiting to get treatment.  

This is the dark reality of what's cunningly called "single-payer health-care systems"--a clever way to avoid saying "government run," and you'd think it would educate the third of Americans who believe having the government run medical care ("Medicare-for-all") is a good idea.  Because it brings not only outrageously high costs, but also rationing care.

For Democrats, that means patients with serious health problems are forced to wait months or years for treatment, hoping they don’t die before then. 

Last year "junior doctors" went on strike, so the socialist Labour government gave 'em a 22 percent pay increase over two years.  Now they've gone on strike again, this time demanding another 26 percent increase.  Hmmm...

Reform is impossible because of a near-religious devotion to the NHS by immigrants, low-income citizens and layabouts.  See, once politicians create an "entitlement"--no matter how costly or inefficient--no later pol has the balls to undo it.

As I read the Post editorial I thought, wow, maybe the "elites" are starting to get it.  Maybe there's hope yet.  But then the Post pulled the U-turn:

This is why practically every developed country except the U.S. has adopted the principle of universal access to health care— yet almost no other country has adopted an NHS-style system. The pitfalls are too obvious.

Demands on the service are too great to be competently handled by the central government.

Wait...if the government guarantees "universal access" to non-emergency health care you're right back in the same fix--the only difference being that govt pay would be paying hundreds of billions directly to several health providers instead of hiring the docs and nurses directly.  The only effect of that would be to add another layer of costly bureaucracy.

So instead of the Post's editorial-board piece being a watershed moment, it's just socialized medicine disguised to look more capitalist--but still funded by taxpayers, with the inevitable result.

And to be clear, I realize taxpayers will still cover emergency treatment of the indigent, but at only a fraction of the cost of the government running everything.  Also, it would prevent one greedy union from constantly striking and forcing the wallahs to capitulate to an endless series of demands for more raises. 

Source: WaPo

https://archive.is/IPTGD#selection-309.0-441.144

Head of federal cops in Oz ASSURES ya that the murders at Bondi were NOT motivated by religion

 

Look at the smug smirk on the face of this lyin' bitch.  She knows she's lying, but she's confident that Australians won't call her on the lie.

There were two killers, both Muslims.  They went to where a group of Jews were celebrating a Jewish holiday and opened fire for ten to 20 minutes.  But Officer Krissy absolutely assures you the massacre "was NOT motivated by religion."

So if not motivated by religion, Krissy, what do you claim the motive WAS, eh?  You smug lying bitch.  And all the male politicians in Oz are just as bad.

Islam is a violent political ideology disguised as a religion

 

Muzz strategy depends on whether the opponent is weak or strong

Muslims when victim groups are defenseless:

 

Ohhh yes, habibi!  When we iz killin' an' rapin' defenseless women we iz REEEally tough sons of bitches!  Human rights?  Hahahaha!  Fuck 'em.  By contrast, when we iz gettin' ouah asses kicked, bein' blown to smithereens, we cry out to duh world "Yew mus' respeck ouah human rights!  Duh UN mus' proteck us!!  It's inhumane to kill defenseless pipo!  

Well at least it's inhumane when Muslims are gettin' killed!  An' ouah Media allies will ensure yew forget about whut happen' on Oct 7, 2023."

"It's SO helpful to have every western Mainstream Media outlet supporting us!  An' college students at elite U.S. universities!"

Three unprovoked attacks (of hundreds) on defenseless white women. Five patterns. Can you find 'em?

 

Black attacker well known to Seattle cops.  Hit her full-force with a 2-by-4, in the end of which the demon had inserted a 3-inch-long bolt.  He had the board gripped so the bolt struck first.  Her right eye was gouged out.

 

Ashley Wasielewski, 46, was walking in a park in Savannah when a demon walked up behind her, and without any interaction or provocation at ALL, poured concentrated hydrochloric acid on her head, burning her scalp to the bone and grievously damaging her face.  She turned in time to see that her attacker was wearing the distinctive hoodie shown in the pic at right. The demon then scampered off, but was recorded on security video.  Identity unknown.  "Local interest only," deplorables.

You may have seen reports about the totally unprovoked murder shown below--but you never heard a WORD about it until weeks later.  Yep, all the Media crapholes listed below totally ignored the murder--until they could no longer ignore it after word got out that the killer had dozens of convictions for assault, yet had been repeatedly released without punishment.  AND that the female Democrat mayor of Charlotte had asked "our media friends" NOT to air video footage of the ghastly, unprovoked murder.  So the "0 AP stories" etc were all true UNTIL the Mainstream Media was forced by the scandal to cover it. 

 

SO...several patterns here:  First is the obvious: all the attackers were black.  Second: all the victims were  defenseless white females.  Third: all the attacks were unprovoked--no interaction whatsoever.  Fourth: all the attackers had long rap-sheets, but had repeatedly been released by moronic leftist judges with little or no punishment.

And finally: that the entire Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media go out of their way to NOT report these attacks and murders, unless the internet breaks the story and the outrage is so great that the Media can't continue to ignore it.

Make of this what you will.  Yes, there are mentally-ill white males who attack and kill--but only once.  Judges put 'em away, and good on those judges.  And I have yet to hear of a mentally-ill white male attacking a black female.  And you know if that ever happened it would be front-page news for two weeks. 

No matter how much you may hate the Lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media it's not nearly enough.  They cheerfully shrug as white women are heinously attacked and often murdered by blacks.  Why? 

"If the justice system actually worked..."

 

Credit to George Vassey. 

The Lying Mainstream Media don't want you to know

In Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 65-year-old Rita Loncharich was Christmas shopping in a bookstore when, with no interaction or provocation, she was stabbed in the back by a mentally ill man.  She died in minutes. 

If a mentally-ill white male had fatally stabbed a black female, it would have made national news.  But in this case...not a word from the Associated Press.  Not a peep from the NY Times.  Or PBS, or NPR, or CNN, or the WSJ, or whatever MS-GTFO now calls itself.  See if you can figure out why:

 

It is a telling sign of our times, and the state of our cringing, spineless, cowering society that today this atrocity is so damn common that the Lying Media just ignores it.  "Dat jus' local interest only," they bleat. 

Judges should lock up mentally ill people.  But leftist judges don't.  And innocent women are murdered. 

There are two patterns in the photo below

One is obvious.  The second is the stupid rat-bastard judges in shithole cities who let people with numerous felony convictions out again and again, until they finally kill an innocent person for no reason--or merely set them on fire. 

 

How the Mainstream Media and their university lackeys define "fairness"

Decades ago a leftist named Walter Cronkite anchored the CBS evening news.  He was revered by our "elites" as an icon of truth, even though he wasn't.  But it didn't matter--because the people who had (and have) the power to declare what's true and what you're allowed to see and hear declared him to be an icon.  See how neatly that works?

So now, 16 years after his death, every year the University of Southern California gives “Cronkite Awards” for “demonstrating fairness” in the Media.

Read that again: "Fairness," eh?

Recently the leftists who run USC gave these awards to Rachel Maddow, Jon Stewart and Scott Pelley. 

Those three have one thing in common: they loathe Donald Trump, Republicans and conservatives.  And today prestigious universities and media "elites" call that “fairness.” 

Starting to see how things work yet?

Nah, probably not.  But I hear "Dancing With The Stars" has a great season on tap!  And Jon Stewart, Steven Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel are still on, so your late nights will still be loaded with what the Media claims is comedy, eh?  

"Bread and circuses" as America slouches toward its end.  But don't worry, it won't happen for another 15 years or so.  You'll barely notice.  If you have kids who know history, they might notice.  It's why schools don't teach history anymore.  And in any case, "You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs," eh? 

Remember this pic? If you're a Democrat, you don't

 

Members of the Texas National Guard laid razor wire on our side of the river to TRY to keep the illegals from waltzing into the U.S.  In response, joe bribem ordered a forklift to raise the wire to let them waltz in, along with 11 MILLION others during his reign of madness.  

The Mainstream Media ignored this event.  The Internet showed it.  The Democrats don't want you to see it.

A decade from now Democrats will claim this never happened, that's it's a fake by AI.  

19 Dem-ruled states SUE after HHS says they could lose fed money if they perform sex-change surgery

A group of 19 Democrat-led states and D.C. has sued the Trump administration over a warning it issued to doctors that they could be excluded from getting federal tax money if they continued to perform "gender transition treatment"--which the Media and Dems call "gender-affirming surgery"-- on minors.

This is who the Democrats are.  It's what they demand.  They will sue to demand NOT just that we allow them to perform sex-change surgery on minors, but that taxpayers pay for those operations!  And dis iz NOT sexual mutilation, citizen!  Nope nope nope!  Instead it beez jus' "gender-affirming surgery."  Yep yep yep!

Deplorable:  "Doesn't that surgery make them unable to have children?"

Democrat:  "Uhhh...maybe.  But that's not a problem, citizen, since they din' want kids anyway, so actually we're helping 'em with that too.  Besides, American kids contribute SO much more to Climate Change because they use so much more energy!"

Deplorable: "Do you really think that at 13 kids understand what they're getting into when getting these so-called "treatments"?

Democrat:  "Ohh, totally, citizen!  We counsel 'em for at least an hour to ensure dat dey totally unnerstand every aspect of their decision--which dey make totally on dere own, of course!  

Deplorable:  "If cutting healthy body parts off kids is such a great idea, seems like some rich NGO like a Democrat PAC or a foundation would be eager to donate a couple million bucks or so to pay you for this, and then you wouldn't need public money.  Why not do that instead of suing?"

Democrat: "Well, uh...sure, we could do that, but it's just not FAIR!  After all, when Obama and bribem were in office, patients had the right to get gender procedures paid by Medicare and Medicaid.  So why should we have to use private funding now?  As we say in the biz, once something's a 'right.' it's a right forever, eh?"

Deplorable: "So do you think your doctors should be liable when minor who have had these surgeries 'de-transition,' claiming they weren't told about the effects, like having to take hormones for life?"

Democrat: "Of course we categorically deny that any patients who have 'transitioned' have ever sued.  But speaking purely hypothetically, we would claim the proper defendant is the government, since it approved every procedure."

Deplorable: "Of course since 'government' gets its revenue from taxpayers, wouldn't that mean taxpayers would pay any awards?"

Democrat: "Again, we don't admit that anyone has regretted transitioning, let alone has sued.  But speaking hypothetically, we're confident that any informed, enlightened DC jury would agree with us that all patients gave informed consent.  And that the government must pay any award since it approved the procedures when Obama and bribem were in office."
    
Deplorable: "That's really slick: You people make millions performing sex-change surgeries, but if any of your patients sues, you claim you're not liable.  That's really clever!"

Democrat: "That's why we're running things and you're not, even though you have a majority in both chambers, and a GOP prezzy.  It's why we'll get the premium subsidies for Obamacare extended for another three years after we Dems passed a law saying they'd expire at the end of 2025.  We're just that much smarter than you pipo."  

2-year-old murdered in Denmark. Mainstream Media: "Dat is NOT worth reporting!"

Does the Lying Mainstream Media carefully, cunningly lie to ya about...well, everything?  Take a look:

Here's the Copenhagen Post:

A 32-year-old man has been arrested and charged with the murder of a two-year-old boy who died after falling from a high-rise building near Copenhagen.

"Died after falling," eh?

Only ONE U.S. media outlet reported this, and here's what they said:

Emergency services were called after reports that a small child had fallen from a great height.   Officers confirmed that a two-year-old boy had fallen from the seventh floor.

"Fallen," y'say?

The facts:  A Somali man threw the 2-year-old off the 7th-floor welfare apartment.  But the kicker is that the same man stabbed his own mother to death in 2014--but was released by moronic leftist judges.  Cuz that's how leftists rock, eh?  Your public defender pleads insanity and you're sent to a "treatment center" without bars or supervision.  You walk out and no one cares.

The Lying Media didn't breathe a word that the killer was Somali--let alone that he'd stabbed his own mother to death--"cuz we don' wanna 'stigmatize the community.'"  That's an actual quote from Danish "law non-enforcement."

Any reprimand for the moronic leftist judges who let this demon loose after he killed his own mother?  Of course not.  And you're not allowed to say anything about that.

So...an outrage.  And how many U.S. lying mainstream media outlets told you about this, eh?

NY Times?  Nope.  WaPo?  Nope.  LA Times?  You're kidding, right.  Only one U.S. media cesspool said a word about it--and it doesn't publish a paper or have more than a dozen readers on its cable channel.  It's mainly on-line.

Media editors: "We shouldn' tell ouah readers about dis, cuz it'll jus' arouse opposition to bringing in more Somalis, and to leftist judges who keep releasing killers back onto the streets!  We can't tell 'em any of that!"

And so it goes, deplorables.  

If some new mosquito or flying worm is getting close to our border, the Media is all over it, screaming about the danger.  Clickbait, citizen!  More eyes, more ad revenue!  And of course a story about this murder would get even more clicks--but for some reason the U.S. Media almost never tells Americans about outrages like THIS.

Now why do ya suppose that is, eh?  Oh, dat right: "We don' wanna stigmatize duh community."  It's why the Media is fighting so hard to make the story of billions of dollars of welfare fraud by Somalis in Minnesota vanish.

Source:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/outrage-in-denmark-as-man-throws-two-year-old-boy-from-7th-floor-to-his-death/ar-AA1SVdRV 

Muslim man ties up and drowns his teen daughter in swamp for refusing to wear headscarf; yet another "honor killing"

U.S. liberals and Democrats shrug.

In the Netherlands (which 30 years ago was a very civil nation) a Muslim father and his two sons tied the hands of his 18-year-old daughter, gagged her so she couldn't scream for help, and threw her into a swamp to drown.

If you're a normal human your mind intuitively rejected what you just read because it's so ghastly to western minds, so you need to read it again to believe it.

Liberals and Democrats: "NOOooo, dis fake newz!  Dis not true!  No one haz been convicted yet, so we'll claim it nevah happen!  All lies!"

In May of 2024 the body of 18-year-old Ryan Al Najjar was found in a swamp, her hands tied behind her back, ankles taped together, a gag in her mouth.  Her father--accused of ordering the murder--has fled back to Syria, from which he can't be extradited.  Hmmm..."fled," y'say.  Wonder why.

The girl's brothers--Mohamed, 23, and Muhanad Al Najjar, 25--are finally on trial for drowning her.  With classic propaganda spin, Islamists and liberal politicians and the U.S. media all call it an "honor killing."

Prosecutors told the court the killing appears to have been triggered by a TikTok video showing the girl...brace yourself...without a headscarf and wearing makeup.

Investigators found her father's DNA under Ryan's fingernails, which is consistent with her trying to defend herself against her father.  But prosecutors don't know whether he or her brothers actually killed her.

And there you have the defense strategy: the brothers will claim dad killed her, and prosecutors have no witnesses to prove otherwise.  Dad's DNA under her fingernails?  Eh, dat don' prove nuttin'.  Plus, dad is happily beyond the reach of Dutch law, safe in his homeland of Syria.  Neat how that worked out, eh?  Well, unless you're the murdered daughter.

Of course Americans learn nothing from dis.  First, it happened in the Netherlands--a place few Americans have been to.  Second, the jury will acquit, since no witnesses.  "Oh, we iz sorry duh girl iz dead but we cain't know whedder duh brudders or duh dad murdered her, so we haz t' let duh brudders off.

So, just another day ending in Y, eh?

Americans: "Why dis newz?  It not happen here, right?  So why dis newz?"

Ohhh, absolutely, sparky.  Yew cain't learn anything frum dis.  Nope nope nope!  Democrats absolutely assure you no lessons at all can be gleaned from this.  And yew mus' believe 'em cuz dey way smahtah den yew!  Dey went to Hahvahd or Yale or Stanford or Columbia or NYU or Berkeley!  So yew mus' believe 'em.  

See, dey iz smaht!  Yew iz deplorable!  Hilliary sed dat, in exactly doze words!  So mus' be true, eh?  Cuz Hilliary smaht!

G*ddamn...you people are too stupid to breathe without assistance.  You believe Muslims are like Methodists or Lutherans or Catholics, just another religion, when in reality their own damn book orders good Muzz to lop off your head.  Seriously.

Because I don't have kids, Islam conquering the U.S. a few years after my death is only of academic interest to me.  If you have kids it's probably of interest to you--except you don't believe it's possible.  Unfortunately the demons who want to conquer you are out-breeding you--and that's not gonna change.  

For the past 75 years no American has been concerned about being conquered because we've been protected by our nuclear defense: other nations knew if they started a world war they'd be destroyed.  So the people who want to conquer you found another strategy: take over one of the two political parties, and replace all the top generals with toadies--men who would do as the party ordered.

Obozo completely revamped the military, promoting only generals and admirals who would do as the Dems ordered.  And many are still in command.  Bribem continued that policy.

The significance is that no matter how well trained and motivated your captains and majors, no counter-force can be launched unless the president so orders.  If you think a Cackles or AOC or Newsom would order our nuclear forces launched in the event of nuclear attack, you're dreaming.

Wishing you luck, cupcakes.

Source:  Daily Mail (U.K)--you'll never hear about it in U.S. papers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15341253/Teenage-girl-tied-drowned-swamp-honour-killing-upset-father-refusing-wear-Islamic-headscarf-using-social-media.html 

South Africa: 1992 vs. today--and the newest, most profitable grift

One of the great advantages of a world in which information is freely exchange is that different theories of governing, tried by different nations, can be compared for their effectiveness--or utter failure.

So if a particular experiment fawned and slobbered over by leftists and communists implodes, in theory the people of other nations could learn from that mistake and avoid repeating it, eh?  

Of course that's only possible if the Media of other nations show their people the results of the disastrous failure.  But in all western nations the Mainstream Media--which controls what people in those nations are allowed to see--all support the liberals, so voters ever hear about ghastly, destructive failures in other nations.  Hmmm...

Think for a bit about the three innocuous paragraphs above.  Just four sentences!  There's a stunning truth there for those who have the ability to comprehend it.

Just four simple, declarative sentences.  No flowery bullshit word-salad, as from Cackles and AOC and Hakeem and Chuckie Schumer and their merry band of leftist destroyers.  Just four simple sentences.  So with that background, let me present...South Africa:

If you're a young American--or most older ones--you don't know jack-shit about South Africa.  But 40 years ago American liberals had their panties in a twist about that nation.  At the time it was as advanced as any in Europe: Huge, well-functioning cities, good schools and universities, a safe, slick national airline, even nuclear weapons.  

And then it all went *poof.*

Back in the 1980s the problem--according to western liberals--was that SA had been colonized and developed by whites.  As a result, whites ran things.  This was called "apartheid"--like segregation in the U.S. before WW2.  And liberals demanded that whites turn the country over to the black majority.

Western liberals had huge help from a totally predictable source: communists, who saw the entire African continent as a battleground they could almost certainly win--which turned out to be correct. 

The purpose of this post is not to defend apartheid, but to show how neatly western liberals--with the crucial help of the communists--forced the whites to give total control of that country to blacks, and what predictably happened after that.

The main problem was that because SA had a booming economy with lots of jobs, blacks from surrounding nations migrated there to get jobs (and welfare).  And the government welcomed 'em in.  Sound familiar?

After decades of all-black immigration, blacks ended up being 90% of the population--but still things ran smoothly: repairs to streets and water lines and powerplants were made just as in the U.K. or the Netherlands--because that's who still ran the country.

Of course western liberals were outraged that whites ran things in SA, and demanded that the whites turn control of that nation over to blacks.  And the same western liberals organized boycotts demanding that South African teams not be allowed to compete in the Olympics, and similar pressure tactics.

And it worked: On March 17, 1992, white South Africans voted on the question of ending Apartheid, meaning giving control to blacks.  And 68% of the whites voted to turn control of the country over to blacks.  Blacks were given the vote, and two years later Nelson Mandela was elected as that country's first black president. 

After that election the Washington Post's Mary McGrory wrote “Nelson Mandela has won what the Post calls ‘one of history’s sweetest victories over racial subjugation’ and he is going to keep it clean and beautiful so that newspaper readers will think they are reading scripture when they read dispatches from South Africa."

So how'd that work out for ya, Mary?

I don't have time to list all the ways SA has turned to shit: streets have potholes that are never repaired, water doesn't work, power blackouts every day, massive theft--but want to acquaint you with just the newest theft:  Because the black government doesn't prosecute black crime, more than 5,000 buildings across the Johannesburg, Pretoria, Durban and parts of Cape Town have been “hijacked” by black gangs, which lock out the owners and collect all rent in cash.

Of course the gangs don't pay tax on the income, reducing government revenue.  You'd think the government would bitch about taxes not being paid, but the corrupt black government just smirks.  The gangs string electricity cables from nearby buildings, and threaten the owners of those buildings if they're disconnected.  Water is siphoned from neighboring buildings or municipal pipes. 

The grift is generating billions of rand a year for the gangs--by far the most profitable scam around.

Across South Africa’s major metros such as Johannesburg, Pretoria, Durban and Cape Town, criminal syndicates have seized control of thousands of residential and commercial properties.  Estimates from property owners and urban researchers put the number at around 5,000 buildings nationwide, with roughly 1,100 in Johannesburg’s central business district alone. Anyone who resists is threatened into silence.

A group moves in, often posing initially as security guards or caretakers.  Soon the real owner is locked out.  Just as in the U.S. with squatters, the hijackers often turn the tables on the owners, saying they own the building.  The courts never rule against the hijackers.

Doors are welded shut. Armed “bouncers” are stationed at entrances. Tenants are told they must now pay rent to a new authority.  Ironically, anyone who refuses is thrown out or threatened. Owners who attempt to enter are warned they will be killed. 

Hundreds of people are crammed into buildings never designed for such density. Rooms are subdivided with plywood; fire escapes are blocked; water and sanitation systems collapse under the strain. Maintenance stops entirely.

And yet the criminals continue to collect the rent--all of it untaxed and largely invisible.  As another owner involved in a multi-year legal battle to reclaim a property put it, “No maintenance, no taxes, no compliance. Pure profit.”

Under South African law, evicting unlawful occupants is governed by the Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act.  In addition to requiring evictions to be approved by judges, that law crucially DECREES that the landlord must find other accommodation for evicted residents.  Owners say this makes it almost impossible to reclaim hijacked buildings.

Court cases drag on for years. Sheriffs refuse to act without police protection. Meanwhile, owners remain liable for taxes, even when they have no access to their properties and no income from them.

Several owners described being driven into hiding after receiving repeated death threats. Others have abandoned properties altogether, not because they are negligent “slumlords”, they say, but because the personal risk is intolerable. And that's what the syndicates want – to put so much fear into the owners so that they never return, leaving the hijackers to run the buildings with impunity and raking in the millions.

The next domino to fall is totally predictable:  Unlike legitimate landlords, the gangs spend nothing on maintenance, so buildings deteriorate, city governments rule them unsafe and the neighborhood declines, all while criminal groups keep collecting millions.

Owners argue that the state has the tools to prosecute the hijackers, but refuses to do so.

For the syndicates running this criminal empire, business has never been better.

More than 31 years after McGrory absolutely assured us that SA under black rule would be a paradise, one marvels at the total failure--of both the liberal prediction and the reality of South Africa. 

It took a century for whites to build the sophisticated urban infrastructure that was South Africa by 1992.  The decay began in 1994, and it's taken barely over 30 years most of SA's cities to become barely habitable--under the total, unhindered rule of blacks in South Africa.

The black-run national government chose to stop protecting private property rights--the right of building owners to keep black crime syndicates from taking over their buildings--because in today's SA the government refuses to take on the crime syndicates.  Think a few dozen palms are being greased?

Papers like the Washington Post--people like Mary McGrory and her leftist bosses--assured Americans that if blacks were given control of South Africa, things would be fabulous.  How'd that work out, Mary?

Say, how's Oakland doing today?  How about Atlanta?  Detroit?  Cleveland?  Chitcongo?  

In Italy: a Muzz from Morocco brutally assaults ten women--ruled mentally incompetent to stand trial

Psychiatrists are masters of rationalizing brutality.  "It wudn't hiz fault!" they bleat.  "Duh po' migrant wuz rejected by an Italian girl, so he wuz forced to take out his hurt feelings by beating and slashing other Italian girls, SEE?  Perfectly understandable!"  

Do I need to add that all psychiatrists are leftists?  

There is NO brutality they can't rationalize. Unprovoked murders of strangers?  Setting innocent women on fire in subways?  "Chill, citizen!  Yew jus' need to be mo' tolerant!"  And the classic: "Dey don' know beating women is against our law, cuz in dere country it  beez perfekly normal!" 

The suspect reportedly told his psychiatrist that he had been rejected by an Italian woman.  Shrink: "SEE?  How kin yew possibly blame him!"

The piece of shit demon--a 20-year-old Moroccan demon, Mohamed Amine Elouardaoui--violently attacked ten women in two months--yet the suspect was repeatedly neither expelled nor formally arrested because he had previously been declared mentally unfit.

Let's pause for a second: There have always been demons on Earth.  You can leave 'em free to continue brutalizing innocents, or you can jail 'em for LIFE, or kill 'em.  Personally, when guilt is beyond doubt I think the best choice--beyond doubt--is the last one.

In the first attack the demon punched a young woman in the face without warning as she shopped.  Fractured her jaw, cheekbone and eye socket.  He fled, only to resurface later at another supermarket, where he allegedly struck a woman in the back of the head.  Later he was accused of punching another woman in the ribs and crushing her hands against a checkout counter.

Lefty psychiatrist: "But it not hiz fault!  He not competent to stand trial, nor be deported!  Oh sure, he ran away after the attacks, an' yew deplorables claim that show he understands that what he did wuz wrong, but we professionals say he still 'mentally incompetent,' SEE?  We professionals calls dis "selective incompetence," an' dat beez somethin' way too nuanced fo' yew stupid deplorables to unnerstan."

On Dec. 4 the demon attacked a 64-year-old woman, breaking her arm. The next day he slashed a woman with a broken bottle.  A female police officer arrested the demon, and reported that the demon said “You can’t do that, you’re a woman."

Despite the number and severity of the attacks, a leftist judge RULED that the suspect wasn't  capable of understanding his actions and was unfit to stand trial.  But instead of ordering the demon jailed until trial, the dipshit leftist judge ordered him into "psychiatric care."  He was placed in a hospital ward, from which he promptly escaped. 

Now, class:  In nature, what happens to prey animals that are too dumb to recognize danger?

Sure: they're killed by predators.  That's exactly what's happening now.  Only difference is that in nature you don't have members of the prey group ORDERING that group to submit to their own injury or death, eh?  But human leftists iz mo' "enlightened," eh?  Every time a demon kills or merely injures, they release the predator with soothing, loving words.

So: Demons have always been here, and will always BE here.  Rational judges could imprison 'em for life, or order their execution, but instead do neither.  So how can that be fixed?

Leftists and Democrats neither know nor care.  And never will, unless a demon grievously injures or kills one of their family members.  The demons can murder innocents on public transit in the U.S.  Or their parents, as Nick Reiner did.  And morons just shrug.

Leftists: "We must not put deez pipo in prison cuz it not dere fault!  Reeeally!" 

Finally: the Lying Mainstream Media doesn't tell you about even one percent of the brutal attacks in the U.S., and none of those in Europe.  If you wanna see how bad it is there, go to "rmx.news"  Demonic attacks every day.  And if you think that's not coming here, you're too stupid to breathe.

https://rmx.news/article/moroccan-misogynist-who-beat-10-women-in-separate-attacks-in-italy-ruled-mentally-incompetent-to-stand-trial-and-sent-for-hospital-treatment/ 

California's Democrat rulers refuse to repay $20 BILLION federal loan, instead force employers to repay it

Ahh, Democrat-ruled California!

Back when Dem rulers shut down most businesses in their states during the Chyna virus, the federal government loaned dozens of states money to cover the huge increase in unemployment claims.

All the states but one have now repaid those loans.  But not California, where the Democrat legislature decided to spend the money on other things.  And the Dem-ruled assembly still hasn't paid off a dollar of a massive $20 billion federal loan.

And for some bizarre reason, under federal rules the state doesn't have to pay.  Instead employers are forced to repay the huge amount--which is rising every year due to interest.

Most other states paid their Covid debts using federal stimulus money, but California officials used the haul for infrastructure, homelessness and "other priorities."  It’s now the only state that hasn’t paid back the money.

This is such a classic Democrat move: get a loan from the feds, spend it on anything *other* than the stated purpose, then stick employers with the bill.  You and I couldn't get away with that, but Democrat legislators can and will.

And really, what better lesson could Dems teach their kids about how to "succeed" in the modern world, eh?  "Borrow lots of money, spend it any way you like and then don't repay!  It's how California Democrats rock!"

https://nypost.com/2025/12/22/us-news/california-hasnt-paid-20b-loan-for-covid-unemployment/ 

3rd quarter GDP grew a whopping 4.3%, much more than predicted. Bet you didn't hear that

From CNBC, Dec 23, 2025:

The U.S. economy grew at a much greater-than-expected pace in the third quarter.

The gross domestic product rose 4.3% in the July-September period, per the Commerce Department.

Economists polled by Dow Jones had expected a gain of 3.2%.

Now: readers who aren't fans of math think "Eh, 3.2 to 4.3 is barely over one percent difference, so dis no big deal."  Except it's a miss of about 26%, like predicting your income this month will be $4,000 and it turns out to be $3,000, except this time the "experts" missed by guessing 26% LOW.  

GDP growth of 3.2% is a great number, and under bribem or Obozo 4.3% would have been breathless headline news, with the Media swooning.  So two questions:  First, did you hear about this?  And second: how did the "experts" miss by 26%--in a way that make voters believe the economy wasn't doing as well as it is?

If you think this was just an accident, you're naive.  Going into the 2024 election Americans strongly favored Trump on the economy, something like 80-20.  And sure enough, today inflation is way down, the average national price of gasoline is under $3 (yesterday I paid $2.25), tax cuts have already passed, foreign investment is pouring into the U.S.  

But with the help of the Lying Mainstream Media and Democrat economists the Dems have managed to get Americans to believe exactly the opposite:  CNN recently reported a poll showing voters viewing the Trump economy UNfavorably by 80-20. 

Now pollsters say the "generic ballot" for the midterms show the Dems ahead by about seven points.

If GDP had grown 4.3% under bribem or Obozo it would have been headline news.  And no economist would have lowballed the estimates of THAT performance.  But with Trump as president all economic news is either spun as awful, or if it can't be twisted to fit "awful" it's ignored.  

See if you hear this today or tomorrow in the Media. 
 

Say hello to the next president of the U.S. Happy? This is the best the Dems can do

 

The next president of the United States--because of his great governance, eh?

 

Typical California voter has had enough of govt fraud, waste and incompetence! Wait...

 

Totally true

 

If you still think Wikipedia is unbiased, you're stupid

 

How the Democrat party managed to get taxpayers to pay for sex-change operations

When Democrat "leaders" have a law they want passed, or a policy adopted that benefits 'em, nothing deters 'em.  If they're warned that the law or policy they want will have an obvious bad effect, they just smirk:  Their reasoning is simply, entirely "If it helps our party, we want it, regardless.  We simply don't believe there will be any bad results."

It's as if they don't believe in the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Then the next domino falls, then the next. 

Example: Most Democrats totally support what they've cunningly called "gender-affirming surgery" for kids under 18--in which doctors cut off healthy body parts of kids to give 'em the illusion of becoming the opposite of the sex they were born with.  Wow!

And since not all families could afford these hugely expensive procedures, Democrat pols 
rammed thru a policy change that forced insurance companies to pay for those costly procedures.  And of course this caused the price of health insurance to rise.

But because some families didn't have insurance, the Dems rammed thru another policy change:  they forced taxpayers to pay for sex-change surgery, thru Medicaid--the program designed to give free medical care to low-income families.  

You knew that, right?  No?  Ah, of course not.

And because voters didn't push back on the Democrats for doing that, the Dems made another demand: they sued to force states to pay for sex change operations for people over 65, under Medicare.  And once again the Dems got their way.  

You knew that too, right?  No?  Ahh, of course not.

And since voters STILL didn't vote the sons of bitches out of office, the Democrats made yet another pro-tranny demand: they sued to force states to provide sex-change operations to prison inmates.  See, it jus' wudn't FAIR dat prisoners lacked the money to pay fo' dere own "gender-affirming surgery," eh?  And leftist judges in Cali and other Democrat-ruled states agreed.

Of course once the inmate looked female, it jus' wudn't FAIR to keep 'em in a male prison cuz they'd be assaulted, eh?  So leftist judges in California and other Dem states forced their prison systems to transfer trannies to female prisons.  Wow, faaaabulous, eh?

The next demand was that after Obozo ordered the military to allow openly-trans people to join, the military was now forced to pay for sex-change surgery for hundreds of trannies--who then could not be deployed to forward bases because those locations didn't have the hormones the trannies had to have to keep the charade going.

And STILL voters didn't push back, cuz duh Media constantly tells Americans dat it's only FAIR that you should pay fo' deez wunnerful operations!  So California Dems made one more demand: they forced the state to use tax dollars (Medicaid) to give "free" sex-change surgery to...can you guess?  Sure: to illegal aliens.

So...Democrat policies, pushed one after another, thanks to leftist presidents and judges, forced on a population that never hears the truth from the Mainstream Media and wouldn't be able to block the Dems in any case.  The Democrat party wanted it, and rammed it through.  And surely the total cost is now in the billions.

And we're about to see another Dem demand: "universal basic income"--a "hot" new policy in Democrat circles that would pay half the people in the country $2,000 a month, forever.  No need to take their precious time to go to a gruberment office and apply.  Instead, like those faaabulous mail-in ballots sent to every voter even if not requested, the state would just send a monthly check to every resident below a certain income level.  

Say, no chance for massive fraud there, eh?  And what party do ya think pipo who get those checks would vote for, eh?

Rational people might wonder why government would take even more tax dollars from workers to pay slackers, eh?  Uhh...reasons, citizen!  Actually the reason is to get more people to vote for Democrats, but no one will admit that.  And of course once the Dems start winning more elections due to the monthly checks, the GOP will start voting for the same thing, cuz dey don' wanna lose their high office, eh? 

Falling birthrates, poorer education for kids--Democrat policies in action

The leaders of the Democrat party believe Americans should have fewer children.  The stated reason is "global warming."  Excuse me: "Climate Change."  

See, Dems are convinced that Climate Change is caused by CO2, from burning carbon fuels.  And since Americans use more carbon-based fuel per person than residents of other nations, they quietly urge Americans to have fewer children.

(By contrast, Democrat pols are totally fine with Africans (Somalians, etc) having as many kids as they want, cuz dey use way less energy--at least until they emigrate to the U.S. or Europe, where liberal politicians spend thousands of dollars per month giving 'em welfare and free housing.)

Since at least the 1970s Democrat "elites" have denigrated traditional wives, pushing "smaht" women to enter the "far more exciting world" of corporate America.  "Why would you want to waste your skills on raising kids, eh?"  Or if a female wanted kids, CBS pushed chosing to have children without being married.  Show those stupid deplorables how strong and independent you are!"  And now all those years of indoctrination are bearing fruit for the Dems:  Democrat/liberal women are now pushing avoiding marriage.  

See, for at least two decades Democrat elites and politicians have pushed the idea that men are useless, because Democrat rulers offered to give women everything they needed.  Why have to put up with an icky man when those faaaabulous Democrat politicians would give you whatever you needed, eh?

Naturally you don't believe any of that.  "Dat jus' right-wing lies," eh?  

Really?  The Institute for Family Studies analyzed birth rates against voting in 2024, and reports that in the 20% of counties that voted for Harris by the highest margin, the "total fertility rate" was 1.37 children per adult female.

Democrat: "Whut dat mean?  And if it's not guud fo' my party I won't believe it."

Of course, cupcake.  I wouldn't expect that to mean anything to ya.  To keep the population level, on average each female needs to have 2.1 children (slightly over 2.0 because some children die before reaching adulthood).  But in 2024 the national average TFR was 1.63, and that includes ALL births, not just to native-born Americans.  Since illegals have a TFR well above 2.2, that means Americans aren't having enough kids to keep the population from falling.  

In the 20% of counties where Trump had the highest margin, the TFR was 1.76--still below the replacement rate but WAY above the 1.37 noted above for the counties with the highest Democrat vote.  So what does this show?

The most logical conclusion is that Democrat policies have a huge downward effect on birthrates, as any unbiased analysis of those policies would predict. 

And that brings us to education.  Rational people would think Americans would want to support education policies that would produce the best-educated children in the world, eh?  In theory that was the rationale for the creation of the laughably-misnamed federal "Department of Education"--which was immediately captured by Democrats.

So how has that worked out?  Turns out every policy pushed by the Democrats who ruled the DoEd has not only NOT resulted in better-educated kids, but the reverse:  every year, year after year, schools produce kids who are less well educated.  Turns out the DoEd is really about indoctrinating your children to be good socialists and Democrats.

Think that's hyperbole?  Wake the fuck up, sheep.  Back in the 1960s researchers developed a test of basic proficiency in both math and reading, called the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).  Over the HUGE objections of the teachers' unions, conservatives got more and more states to have their students take that test every four years, in the 4th, 8th and 12th grades.

In 2024, only 31 percent of fourth graders and 30 percent of eighth graders met or exceeded proficiency in reading.

In that same year only 39 percent of fourth graders and 28 percent of eighth graders were proficient in math.  NAEP test scores have fallen almost every year.  So naturally the unions bleated that testing should be abolished. 

In 2024, the average ACT score was 19.4 on a scale of 1–36.  It was the lowest average since the test’s redesign in 1990.  More than 40 percent of middle school teachers say they work in schools where there are no penalties for late work, no grades of zero are allowed for work not submitted, and there are unlimited test retakes.

The unions claim the problem is teachers aren't paid enough.  But between 1999 and 2021 the average state increased spending per student by 37 percent more than the rate of inflation.

The federal government has thrown over $189 billion to state educational agencies since 2020 through its “Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief” (ESSER) program to combat learning deficiencies.

The two biggest teachers unions in the U.S. are the NEA and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT).  Each has a political action committee.  In 2024 the NEA gave $27 million to its PAC--nearly all of which went to Democrat candidates and causes.  The AFT’s PAC spent around $13 million--again mostly given to Democrats.

There are lots of good, dedicated teachers.  Problem is that Democrat-ruled school boards tend to hire liberal Democrats, who quickly join one of the unions--both of which exclusively support Democrat politicians because they agree with Dem policies.  How's that working for ya?

Doesn't matter, because the unions run the system and will always block any reform because it reduces Democrat power.  Union leaders have one goal, and it's not improving education, but winning more members and higher salaries for themselves. 

Chicago rams thru $1.5 BILLION in new taxes, and will borrow another Billion to cover spending

When a system passes a certain level of corruption, there's no peaceful way back.  And the city of Chitcongo--Democrat-ruled for 50 years or so--passed that point some years ago.

City employees--Dem voters, hired by Dem department heads--are lavishly paid, can't be fired, get generous pensions and pay little for their health insurance.  They keep getting pay raises, even though the city is deep in debt and facing a budget deficit of over a BILLION dollars this year.  

So how do ya think the socialists who rule that miserable shithole respond, eh?  Did they lay off city workers?  Stop automatic raises?  Trim benefits?  Close poorly-performing schools?  

Hahahahaha!  Not a chance!  Instead they just passed a budget that increased taxes on city businesses and residents by $535 million.  And an additional new tax of one BILLION dollars, cunningly disguised as "TIF" (explained later).  And  there's not a thing you can do about it except leave--which few can do.

So what taxes did the brilliant Democrat who rule Chitcongo raise?   

They slapped a 15 cent tax on every shopping bag.  Raised the tax on video games (presumably in businesses).  Raised taxes on "sports betting."  Added a new city fee if owners of a vacant building apply for a new mortgage.  Where's the extra cost for the city that justifies that?  What's the logic?

They don't need logic or reasons.  They do it because they want more money, and because they can impose any tax they want.  The courts never block any tax increase by Dems.  Anything the Dems can think of to tax, they tax.  They increased the tax on liquor, and "ground transport," which probably means taxis, Uber, Lyft and limos.

$416 million of the new tax revenue Chitcongo is counting on is titled "Increase in cloud computing taxes."  If I were a business owner I'd set up an office in an adjacent state, let it do all the comms with "the cloud," and have my office in Chitcongo only communicate with my out-of-state office.  It'd be amusing to watch the thieves who run Chitcongo sue to tax intra-corporate communication--as they surely would.

But the bulk of the new taxes--a whopping one BILLION dollars--is slated to come from "TIF."  Specifically a "one-time TIF sweep."  Since you never heard about it, it can't apply to you, right?

TIF is "Tax  Increment Financing"--another in the endless list of cunningly disguised tax cities use to take more money from developers.  It's the hot new money-grabbing measure for city rulers because it doesn't raise ALL property taxes, just on certain areas.  And because it's only on certain areas it doesn't have to be approved by voters.  Nice, eh?

But even $1.535 Billion in new taxes won't cover all the money the Democrat rulers of Chitcongo DEMAND to spend, so they plan to borrow even more money: $450 million.  This is the time-honored way all Democrat politicians (and many RINOs) operate, since they never worry about repaying the borrowed money.

Because bond underwriters know the city will eventually default on all debt, the city's bond ratings are almost at junk levels, and the new plan to borrow yet another $450 million will see those ratings drop even lower since the problem of overspending is chronic, just as it is with federal spending.

One thing the rulers didn't do (yet) is adopt the proposal by the city's black socialist mayor Brandon Johnson to tax every company with 500 or more employees $400 per employee every year.  But you can see that one coming, because back in 1973 the city imposed a head tax of $48 per employee per year.  They repealed it 11 years ago under a Dem mayor who thought it was a "job killer."  
  But no one saw businesses leaving, so the communist Johnson thought "Why not bring it back--with a tiny bit more bite, small enough that large businesses won't leave?"  And he proposed $250 per employee per year on companies with over 100 employees.  Now that's been changed to $400 per employee per year, but only on companies with 500 employees.

Democrat policy: tax everything.  If some things become uneconomical, screw 'em.  Let 'em go on welfare, cuz the state covers that, eh?  Masterful policy, cupcake.  Keep taxing productive people so you can keep giving pay raises to city employees.  Makes perfect sense.

Source:
 
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/chicago-adopts-16-6b-budget-adds-535m-in-taxes/

 

In 27 departments at Yale, not a single conservative professor

Wanna know why virtually all graduates of "elite" universities are Leftists? 

A recent report from the Buckley Institute found that there are no Republican faculty members across 27 departments at Yale University. 

"For the third year in a row, our research has highlighted the significant political and ideological imbalance among Yale’s faculty," said Lauren Noble, founder and executive director of the Buckley Institute. 

This is not an accident, and not limited to Yale.  All the so-called "elite" universities are totally dominated by leftist faculty members.  It's totally deliberate-- and is virtually impossible to undo because leftists control who gets hired. 

Democrats: "What's duh problem, bro?  See, we Dems are smaht, while yew izn't, so naturally we should control what your kids learn, right?  Cuz dat will guarantee a bettah future!" 

Ah.  So in your "smaht" analysis, what system of governance works best, ensuring the most freedom?

Democrats: "Why, socialism, of course!  It's not even debatable!  Duh principle of enlightened governments must be 'From each, according to his, her, their or xir's ability, to each according to his, her, their or xir's needs!'  Dat's duh only fair, rational way of governing, citizen!  If someone wants to be paid $2,000 a month for sitting around doing whatevah dey want all day, that's their absolute right!  

"An' it's totally reasonable fo' ouah Democrat gruberment to give doze pipo dat money!  Cuz dat money did NOT come from taxing hardworking citizens!  Perish the thought, citizen!  All of your taxes are used to feed hungry chirren and treat Somali kidz fo' autism, and !  Yep yep yep!  Duh money used to pay ouah supporter a 'guaranteed income' is borrowed, which means it's free.

"Plus we gon' save billions by de-funding cops an' outlawing gunz, so cops won't be needed cuz dere won' be no crime!  SEE??  Ouah way will ensure ebrywun beez happy!"

"Duh only crime would be if workers din' pay tax on dere income.  But we don' expect dat cuz duh law makes all employers take money frum ebry workerz paycheck an' send it to us!  (One of ouah mos' brilliant laws EVAH!)  Plus, ouah Media allies will tell citizens it's their DUTY to pay taxes so their gruberment will be able to run, and give ouah voterz $2,000 a month!  SEE?" 

How a guy touted in 1999 as L.A.’s richest man went bankrupt

"How L.A.’s Richest Man Went From Billions to Bust"
  (adapted from an excellent, much longer WSJ piece by Katherine Clark, Dec 18, 2025)

Gary Winnick was once the richest man in Los Angeles.  Owned lavish homes in Bel-Air, Malibu and New York City.  Only after his death did the world learn that the empire was built on borrowed money and gullible investors.

In the late 1990s he donated millions of dollars to the Los Angeles Zoo and rubbed elbows with Bill Clinton.  He would soon buy the most expensive home in the U.S.

In 1999 Winnick--a former protégé of junk-bond king Michael Milken--was estimated to be worth $6.2 billion, making him the richest man in L.A.  His main source of money was from founding a company called Global Crossing, which promised to lay undersea fiber-optic cable around the world.

This may not strike most people as a hot idea for a company.  That's because you're either too young to know, or never knew, that when the Internet became The Hot Thing, people realized there would be a huge increase in the demand for high-capacity data connections between the U.S. and Europe.  Existing wire cables couldn't satisfy that demand, but fiber-optic cables could.  So Global Crossing became The Hot Stock, making Winnick a billionaire on paper in less than two years--a faster rise than Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates.

But after Winnick’s death two years ago, at the age of 76, a very different financial picture has come to light.  For all his stunning possessions—a stunning Bel-Air estate, a Malibu beach house, a fabulous New York condo and a pricey art collection—he was deeply in debt.  Everything he owned had been pledged as collateral for an ever-increasing series of loans that kept the charade going.

Lenders didn't worry about Winnick's ability to repay huge loans because everyone knew he was the richest man in Los Angeles, eh?  And the loans were secured by specific assets.  So no problem, citizen!  And the lavish lifestyle continued unabated. 

His crown jewel was an eight-acre estate and a 40,000 square foot 1930's mansion in Bel-Air called Casa Encantada.

Winnick's demise reveals a disturbing truth about modern wealth:  Despite all the fawning headlines, the finances of the super-rich are--as the WSJ writer Katherine Clark diplomatically puts it--"often opaque."  Oh yes. 

In the 1970s and early ’80s Gary worked for Michael Milken, the Wall Street mover who amassed a fortune pushing what are diplomatically called "high-yield bonds"--meaning high risk.  You may have heard the term "junk bonds."  Gary was part of Milken's inner circle, working on leveraged buyouts and trading convertible securities.

In 1977 Gary founded Global Crossing--a plan to lay fiber-optic cable across the Atlantic.  Like faaaabulous electric cars, the idea seemed sure to be the next Hot Thing, and investors eagerly poured billions into the stock.  What started as a single undersea cable linking the U.S. and the U.K. quickly turned into a pitch for a global network.  One analyst covering Global Crossing said "The hype was off the charts.”

Sound familiar?

Money poured in to Global Crossing, and the stock went exponential.  Gary cashed out a billion dollars worth of stock, using the money to buy luxury homes and art. 

In 2000 Gary bought Casa Encantada, a 40,000 square foot mansion on 8.5 acres overlooking the Bel-Air Country Club, for $94 million.  It was the most expensive U.S. home-sale on record at the time.  Experts estimated that just maintaining its vast gardens and grounds cost millions of dollars a year. 

Gary then spent tens of millions of dollars and 2.5 years renovating the mansion.  A portrait of George Washington that hung in the wood-paneled study was commissioned by Benjamin Franklin. 

Around the same time he bought the Bel-Air mansion, the Winnicks bought a two-bedroom condo in New York City and hired a star architect to completely remodel it. 

The fall of Global Crossing in the early 2000s was one of the signature implosions of the dot-com era.  The project had cost billions, but income fell far short of projections.  Part of the problem was that lots of new internet companies would raise money, spend $10 million buying capacity from Global Crossing, but then would go bankrupt.  Satellite communications also sealed Global Crossing's fate.

Between 1999 and 2001 alone, Winnick sold roughly $730 million in GC stock.  In January 2002 the company filed for bankruptcy, vaporizing tens of billions in market value.

Some former employees, pension funds and shareholders sued Gary and his fellow executives, claiming the company had misled them about the its financial condition.  Two years after the company collapsed, Gary personally agreed to pay $55 million to settle shareholder lawsuits.

The demise of Global Crossing didn't seem to dent Winnicks’ lifestyle.  Gary became one of L.A.’s best-known philanthropists, contributing more than $100 million to causes like the Special Olympics and the L.A. Zoo, and to Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

In 2014 he invested in T+Ink, a developer of patented “thinking ink” products, where he was briefly CEO.  One of the founders of T+Ink said Gary "probably got five or six billionaires to invest along with him.”

In 2016 Gary invested $4 million in a company called Qello, which planned to deliver streaming content to Asian media markets.  Four years later the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.  Gary and his partner in the project were sued by investors who claim to have been misled.

Following the collapse of Global Crossing Gary was facing several lawsuits—and in need of cash, so in 2020 he turned to his friend Richard Ressler, a co-founder of real-estate development and investment firm CIM Group.  CIM loaned him $100 million. 

CIM says about $60 million of this loan would be used to repay a previous loan he'd gotten from HSBC.  The rest would be used for Gary's businesses.  Like the HSBC loan, the bigger CIM loan was backed by Casa Encantada and the Winnicks' seven-bedroom Malibu beach home, plus art and jewelry.

In June of 2023, with legal fees mounting, Gary put Casa Encantada on the market for $250 million.  That fall he was negotiating a fourth amendment to the CIM loan to borrow even more.  Then on Nov. 3, 2023 Gary died.

His wife Karen says only after his death did she learn that all of the couple's assets had been pledged as collateral for various loans.

The Winnicks had failed to make payments to CIM on the amended loan, and that debt was now roughly $155 million. On Sept. 26 of this year CIM formally notified the Winnick family that it was foreclosing on Casa Encantada and the Malibu home, which was now owned by their three sons. 

An auction was set for this week. 

In court documents Karen's attorneys say being forced to repay the loan will leave her “effectively destitute.” 

The foreclosure auction for Casa Encantada and the Malibu home was scheduled to take place last week.  But the two luxury homes never came up for bidding:  Karen’s lawyer got a judge to issue an emergency stay until the case can be reviewed by a court of appeals.

Now, students, what can we learn from this?

You can't really blame someone for pushing a company whose sole product--cables under the ocean--was quickly obsoleted by satellites.  Advances in technology do that several times a year.

It's more reasonable to blame Gary for selling a billion dollars of stock in Global Crossing in the two years before it collapsed.  As the co-founder he clearly knew the trend line on the company's finances--classic insider trading.  But of course he was never charged, cuz...reasons.

What we can sarcastically conclude is that Gary's mistake was that he didn't offer top members of congress shares in his company at the outset, then urge them to pass a LAW decreeing that U.S. companies were barred from using satellites to send data overseas--leaving his company's fiber-optic cables as the only legal means.  Yeah, dat's it.

https://archive.is/Oblz8