How the Democrat party managed to get taxpayers to pay for sex-change operations
When Democrat "leaders" have a law they want passed, or a policy adopted that benefits 'em, nothing deters 'em. If they're warned that the law or policy they want will have an obvious bad effect, they just smirk: Their reasoning is simply, entirely "If it helps our party, we want it, regardless. We simply don't believe there will be any bad results."
It's as if they don't believe in the Law of Unintended Consequences.
Then the next domino falls, then the next.
Example: Most Democrats totally support what they've cunningly called "gender-affirming surgery" for kids under 18--in which doctors cut off healthy body parts of kids to give 'em the illusion of becoming the opposite of the sex they were born with. Wow!
And since not all families could afford these hugely expensive procedures, Democrat pols
rammed thru a policy change that forced insurance companies to pay for those costly procedures. And of course this caused the price of health insurance to rise.
But because some families didn't have insurance, the Dems rammed thru another policy change: they forced taxpayers to pay for sex-change surgery, thru Medicaid--the program designed to give free medical care to low-income families.
You knew that, right? No? Ah, of course not.
And because voters didn't push back on the Democrats for doing that, the Dems made another demand: they sued to force states to pay for sex change operations for people over 65, under Medicare. And once again the Dems got their way.
You knew that too, right? No? Ahh, of course not.
And since voters STILL didn't vote the sons of bitches out of office, the Democrats made yet another pro-tranny demand: they sued to force states to provide sex-change operations to prison inmates. See, it jus' wudn't FAIR dat prisoners lacked the money to pay fo' dere own "gender-affirming surgery," eh? And leftist judges in Cali and other Democrat-ruled states agreed.
Of course once the inmate looked female, it jus' wudn't FAIR to keep 'em in a male prison cuz they'd be assaulted, eh? So leftist judges in California and other Dem states forced their prison systems to transfer trannies to female prisons. Wow, faaaabulous, eh?
The next demand was that after Obozo ordered the military to allow openly-trans people to join, the military was now forced to pay for sex-change surgery for hundreds of trannies--who then could not be deployed to forward bases because those locations didn't have the hormones the trannies had to have to keep the charade going.
And STILL voters didn't push back, cuz duh Media constantly tells Americans dat it's only FAIR that you should pay fo' deez wunnerful operations! So California Dems made one more demand: they forced the state to use tax dollars (Medicaid) to give "free" sex-change surgery to...can you guess? Sure: to illegal aliens.
So...Democrat policies, pushed one after another, thanks to leftist presidents and judges, forced on a population that never hears the truth from the Mainstream Media and wouldn't be able to block the Dems in any case. The Democrat party wanted it, and rammed it through. And surely the total cost is now in the billions.
And we're about to see another Dem demand: "universal basic income"--a "hot" new policy in Democrat circles that would pay half the people in the country $2,000 a month, forever. No need to take their precious time to go to a gruberment office and apply. Instead, like those faaabulous mail-in ballots sent to every voter even if not requested, the state would just send a monthly check to every resident below a certain income level.
Say, no chance for massive fraud there, eh? And what party do ya think pipo who get those checks would vote for, eh?
Rational people might wonder why government would take even more tax dollars from workers to pay slackers, eh? Uhh...reasons, citizen! Actually the reason is to get more people to vote for Democrats, but no one will admit that. And of course once the Dems start winning more elections due to the monthly checks, the GOP will start voting for the same thing, cuz dey don' wanna lose their high office, eh?


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home