Democrat socialist senator Mark Kelly says AI companies should have a special tax

Democrat senator Mark Kelly (Arizona) says he’s introducing a bill ordering AI companies to pay unspecified billions to a "government-managed fund" to "support workers displaced by AI."

Washington Post, 1911--Today Democrat socialist senator Foghorn Kelly noted that the sale of the awful horseless new "motor-cars" threatens to displace thousands of workers who build carriages, make harnesses and buggy whips.  
   Since senator Kelly is a man of the people, always looking out for the working man, he said he's introducing a bill that will require makers of these newfangled "motor-cars" to pay a portion of their revenue to a government-run fund that will "support workers displaced by the motor-car." 
   When asked to define "a portion of their revenue" the senator was coy:  "Not too much, of course.  Probably just five percent.  But it might possibly increase a bit if the government commission running the program finds that more workers have been displaced than first thought."
   "For example, if Americans buy fewer horses, that would reduce the sale of oats, so some farmers would surely be 'adversely impacted.'  And of course if fewer horses are sold, that would obviously impact people who breed and sell horses."
   "In fact, no one can possibly know all the potential impacts of unleashing this scary new technology on ouah great horse-loving nation!  So that's why the bill doesn't limit the tax...er, 'worker-impact fund' rate."
   When asked how an unlimited tax could possibly be constitutional, Kelly replied "Don't be dense, deplorable.  We in congress are reeeally smaht, and know what's best, so we'd nevah set the tax rate too high.  
  "For example, the senate is now considering a tiny one-percent federal tax on all income, but a few right-wing extremists are screaming that if such a bill becomes law, the tax rate could eventually double, or even soar to five or even ten percent!
   "What nonsense!  It's just a right-wing scare story to try to keep this excellent bill from passing!  Next thing you know they'll be screaming that the tax rate could be even more absurd, like 30% of all income!  It's nonsense--we're far smahtah den dat!"

For young Americans--and older ones who don't know history (spoiler: not one American in 10,000 knows fuck-all about history), the bill ordering Americans to pay a federal tax on most income became law in 1913.  It ordered earners to pay just one percent, and only on incomes above what today would be the equivalent of $101,000 per year.  So low earners didn't revolt, eh?
   By 1944 the top tax rate on high earners had jumped to 94%, and stayed above 90% from 1944 through 1963, thus following the Iron Law of Taxes which says once you allow corruptocrats to pass any tax, they keep raising the rate.

For reference, when the tax law was passed, the maximum tax rate on the highest incomes was 7 percent, and only applied to incomes over the equivalent of $15 million today.  But the tax rate rose to 94%, and the income when that rate kicked in kept dropping.  Hmmm...

Most of you aren't stupid, just uninformed.  Some of us thought the internet might help that...but it hasn't.  And in ten years or less, Democrats will pass a law requiring a government license to post any fact or political opinion on the Net, so that once-promising avenue for information will go dark.

Mark Kelly is a Democrat, and the Democrat-fellating Media totally loves every word out of his mouth.  He's also a socialist moron. 

The FDA and CDC knew the "vaccine" was harming thousands, but lied about it

And when a top-quality researcher showed 'em how they were "missing" the signal, the agencies told her to shut up.

Obviously by now Covid is almost ancient history, so why should you care about this, eh?

Because something just like this will happen again.  Guaranteed.  Once the corruptocrats find something that works, they don't stop using it until everyone revolts.  SO...

What made a harmless-to-humans bat virus lethal to humans (though far less than one percent of those who got the Chyna virus died from it) was a crucial change in the genetic code of the part of the virus that locks the virus onto one specific cell in the human airway.

That crucial locking mechanism was the "spike protein."  And by chance, just two days after the first case of duh Chyna virus was confirmed in the U.S, I stumbled on the gene sequence of that  crucial "spike," sequenced by Indian researchers in December of 2019 from a blood sample smuggled across the border with China.

That gene sequence clearly, unequivocally proved the virus had been modified in a lab.

So for the next four years I watched, astonished, as every agency in the bribem regime brazenly lied: Fauci was the lead liar, repeatedly claiming the virus could not possibly have been modified in a lab, but instead "evolved naturally" to make it lethal to a tiny fraction of the people who got it.

It was all brazen horseshit, and all officials with a tech background had to have known it.  The ones who knew the truth and told their supervisors were told to keep quiet.  And now we see yet another instance of this deliberate suppression of the truth--this one involving the "vaccine adverse effects reporting system"--VAERS.

That system was supposed to log any "adverse effects" following a vaccination.  If the effects were both serious and several times the rate seen in unvaccinated people, that would be grounds for pulling that vaccine off the market.

It was a noble idea but had two fatal flaws.  The first was that very few people who experienced adverse effects after taking the "clot shot" knew about VAERS, and that they could report the adverse effect themselves. 

The second was that while all doctors knew about the system, reporting an adverse effect was totally voluntary.  So since reporting an adverse effect wasn't mandatory, and would increase "vaccine hesitancy," and since most doctors believed the fatality rate for Covid was frighteningly high, they wanted everyone to take the jab, eh?  So they didn't want to report adverse effects.  In any case investigators found many doctors didn't report.

So the voluntary reporting system depended on doctors being unbiased.  And most were totally biased because Fauci and "experts" (shills) in the FDA, CDC and NIH had convinced 'em the Chyna virus was way deadly--far deadlier than the common flu--even though that wasn't true.  

("IFR" is the percentage of people who are infected by a pathogen and die from it.  Since many cases are mild or totally asymptomatic, the incidence is estimated from people who tested positive but had no symptoms.  Here are the median pre-vaccination IFRs by age for Covid: 
0–19: ~0.0003% (about 1 in 330,000)
20–29: ~0.002% (about 1 in 50,000)
30–39: ~0.011% (about 1 in 9,000)
40–49: ~0.035% (about 1 in 2,800)
50–59: ~0.123% (about 1 in 800)
60–69: ~0.506% (about 1 in 200)
  70+: Rises steeply past 5% to over 15% for older groups 

By stark contrast, the IFR for seasonal flu is between 0.05% to 0.1%  As you see, for people under 50 the IFR is far lower for Covid than for the flu.  But you never heard a single word about that, eh?)

So...the mass vaccination of Americans started on December 14th, 2020.  Immediately, reports started coming in about myocarditis, pericarditis and "thrombosis" (clots) in people who'd taken the clot shot.  All three conditions are normally very rare.

But Fauci, the FDA and CDC all insisted that there was no "signal" from the reports.  This was medical jargon for "NO statistically significant increase of ANY adverse effects from the jab.

The latest discovery is yet another confirmation of what we've known all along: that not only was the "no signal" claim a brazen lie, but also that the top members of the bribem regime KNEW it was horseshit, yet knowingly parroted the lie to get Americans to take the ineffective, unsafe jab (since taking the jab didn't prevent people from getting or spreading the virus).  This latest comes from an FDA medical officer and statistics expert named Ana Szarfman.

In late February of 2021--just ten weeks after the first vaccinations--CDC and FDA officials on a "vaccine safety committee supposedly "received notice" of a large number of VAERS reports of myocarditis and pericarditis.  This alone ("received notice") is a careful, deliberate mislead, since both organizations have direct access to all VAERS data, so they knew all along.  They want you to think they had no idea.

Both conditions aren't trivial: In Israel, two out of 77 vaccinated people with those conditions died.

Szarfman showed her bosses at the FDA why their statistical analysis--the one they used to claim there was NO "signal"--was utterly wrong. 

The FDA committee shrugged.

The next week, the committee heard the Pentagon's "Defense Health Agency" report a "cluster of cases" of myocarditis among members of the military who'd taken the jab.

The committee just shrugged.  "We not seein' no signal," eh?

You might think that if you have a so-called "vaccine" that doesn't work, and kills some of the people who take it, the FDA would rescind its crucial "Emergency Use Authorization" that was legally required to allow the barely-tested "vaccine" to be given to 280 million Americans, eh?

By May of 2021, hundreds of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis after covid vaccinations had been reported to VAERS, so the CDC began alerting healthcare professionals.  But the agency didn't say the "adverse effects" were caused by the "vaccine," alerted physicians through a "clinical considerations" web posting.  No urgency there, eh?  Cuz "no signal!"

In June of 2021, in a public presentation the deputy director of CDC's Immunization Safety Office (Tom Shimabukuro) admitted that for young males (age 12-24), VAERS showed between 29 and 347 times more myocarditis and pericarditis reports than the for unvaxxed. 

Can't have that, eh?  So to avoid "vaccine hesitancy," in a public statement the same day the CDC called myocarditis an "extremely rare side effect."  Well yes, but the fact that it was seen "up to 347 times more often" in males who got the jab sound like one hellofa signal, eh? 

Enter Peter Marks, director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.  Marks was the agency's top covid vaccine regulator, and a total pro-vax shill.  He emailed CDC director Rochelle Walensky, claiming the data didn't reveal any "safety signal" in the data.  So despite the far higher incidence of potentially lethal myocarditis and pericarditis, Marks adamantly refused to change the FDA's "no signal" ruling.  FDA officials didn't warn either doctors or the public that Ana Szarfman had found "safety signals" the FDA had missed. 

When Szarfman continued to press the matter she was told--diplomatically--to shut up.  On May 7th, 2021 the "associate director for medical policy for the FDA's Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology," Craig Zinderman, emailed Szarfman:

"Thank you again for talking with us back in March about your work exploring new data mining approaches.  We are writing to kindly ask you to please hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses using covid-19 vaccine AE [adverse event] data."

The email didn't contain a single word of substantive critique ("We believe your analysis is flawed because...")  Just told her "please hold off."

For anyone with experience in government bureau-babble that's a clear order: 'If you persist, your career will be over.'

Challenging Szarfman's work by making a mathematical or scientific argument would be totally reasonable.  But the email didn't say the FDA bosses thought Ana's work was flawed.  Clearly "the fix was in:"  The bribem regime was about to order almost every American to take the jab, and the regime's lackeys knew they were not to allow any contrary evidence to reach the public.

How much more evidence will it take for most Americans to realize they were conned?  Scammed.  The regime forced you to get your children jabbed, even though the risk from duh Chyna virus for people under 19 was one in 330,000.

Pause for a moment:  today's college students weren't born on 9/11/2001, so obviously have no way to know about it unless they're taught.  And of course the corrupt public schools refuse to teach anything true.  So they'll never know.

By the same token, few Americans today know how utterly the Democrat sons of whores conned your parents, and were able to ORDER lockdowns for a virus only half as lethal as the flu.

I'll try to keep telling you and your kids about this ghastly death sentence/con-job as long as I live.

It's clear that Democrats hate Trump, but if you trust a Democrat with power again, you deserve every bit of what you're gonna get.  After all, it won 'em an election in November of 2020.

The "Great Replacement" method of conquest

About fifty years ago the communist party realized they could destroy all "western" (liberal) nations without firing a shot.  That notion may strike most Americans as too convoluted to be real, which is one way the Left gets otherwise smart people to refuse to believe it's real.

Does the line below ring any bells? 

"Yew silly deplorable conservative!  How can yew be dumb enough to believe such a crazy right-wing scare-theory?"

Let me start with the experience of Europe, because if I start with the U.S. you'll simply refuse to believe it:  For the last 15 years, leftist parties in most European nations have gotten their governments to import millions of illiterate, unskilled Muslims.  In some nations the argument was "Deez pipo iz po' 'refugees,' so compassion demands that we welcome them into ouah nation, where dey will become guuud citizens!  Cuz dey iz po' refugees!  SEE?"

In Germany the government of former rising star of the East German communist party, Angela Merkel, cunningly claimed Germany needed foreign workers to come to Germany to keep the economy running, since native Germans weren't having enough kids to keep jobs filled.

It was a brilliant argument because it was superficially plausible, and because the leftist Media embraced it without a single critical word.  So it worked:  German voters kept re-electing the partei led by the treasonous former communist Merkel, keeping her in power for a record-long time.  And under her partei's rule Germany imported millions of Muslims.  Most eventually became citizens--and they ALL vote for the left, since the Left promises more free shit.

And as anyone could have predicted, the Left has won all elections since then (until this year when the country's only conservative party--"AfD"--won in one German state).

The Left used both arguments--welcoming "refugees," and needing foreign worker--in all other European nations.  So for example in once-peaceful Sweden, the conservative party was conned into allowing unlimited Muslim immigration.  Gave 'em voting rights even if they weren't citizens, cuz..."If dey live here dey shud be able to vote, even if dey not citizens!!"

Sound familiar?  Damn straight it does.  That's been the argument by the U.S. Democrat Partei for decades.  

So in Sweden, the conservatives were guilted into giving invaders the vote--and predictably, the invaders all voted for leftist parties.  So now, after the election a week ago, Leftists will form a left-ruled government, which will keep the borders wide open, forever.

Can anyone predict the result?  Sure: Sweden, like Germany, France, Belgium and the Netherlands, will be leftist essentially forever.  In all EU countries all types of crime are increasing, almost all by "immigrants."  Native Swedes can no longer walk safely after dark in several Swedish cities.

Germany's far-left "interior minister" bleats that "asylum-seekers" must be given voting rights if they've been in Germany for just six months.  Think that's a good idea?  Do they have a sense of what's best for Germany after six months?  Not only no, but hell no.

You'd think the left-wing Media would complain about this.  Nope, not a single word--because the entire Mainstream Media is leftist, so they totally support anything the Left wants.  Hmmm...

Now follow me here, cuz this is the future:

If you asked hard-working blue-collar Americans if they want our government to invite millions of foreigners into the country to replace them, most would say hell no.  So instead the Media takes a far different approach, changing the question to "Do you believe America should have compassion for po' refugees, an' invite 'em to enter the U.S.  And don't fret about what that will do to our elections, cuz dey aren't citizens and know they can't vote, since dat not legal."

"See, dat why we don't need that silly photo ID for voters act, cuz non-citizens know dey not allowed to vote!  So all the "SAVE Act" would do iz suppress minority votes!  Yep yep yep!  An' yew don'  wanna suppress minority votes, right?"

Wake the hell up: Just like the populations of all European nations, you're being conned by the Left and their Media allies into going along with surrendering control of what was once your country.  

You'd think at least a few Media shills would see where it's going and would switch sides, eh?  But not one does, because they rationalize that it isn't happening: "Surely all pipo love freedom, so the immigrants now enjoying the freedom we have will nevah give it up and support Sharia law or any of the dozens of Democrat schemes to gain more power and control (packing the Supreme Court, abolishing the Electoral College, making DC and Puerto Rico states, having congress appoint the president, ramming through "free" college for all, "free" medicare for all, "free" child day-care, free drugs for junkies, and on and on.)  

It's already working: the first Amendment of the U.S. Constitution says we have "freedom of speech," so Americans believe it.  But in fact, in Dem-ruled cities the Left has already nullified that, by staging violent riots whenever a conservative is invited to speak at an event.  Leftist college "adminishits" do absolutely nothing to prevent the Left from shutting down conservative speech, and in fact actually order the event shut down "to preserve peace."

If you don't believe that it's because you get all your newz from the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media.  It's already happened several times at Cal-Berkeley.  The Media just didn't want you to know.  So you never heard about any of it.

Leftist nuts try to assassinate Trump, and the Media yawns.  A leftist tranny-lover did assassinate Charlie Kirk, and since that was too big to ignore, the Mainstream Media did report it, but without a word of condemnation.  They essentially shrugged that Kirk was a "right-wing extremist" and a raaaacist, so....  

And on the one-year anniversary of that murder a leftist "female" at that same college taunted conservatives with a cake saying "Happy Kirkaversary."  Someone took a pic, and the university adminishits were on the verge of expelling NOT the student who celebrated Kirk's assassination, but the student who took the pic!

If you were an adult twenty years ago, you never imagined these things happening.  But slowly--so slowly that you didn't even notice--the Left has taken over all universities.  Not just on the socialist coasts but even in flyover states, like "Utah Valley university." 

So now the U.S. has Muzz-ruled cities, Muzz congresswhores, Muzz mayors, and the Media loves 'em.  Mamdani, Chitcongo's Brandon Johnson and L.A's ghastly Karen Bass are all unabashed communists, and you'd think the Media would have a few skeptical words about that...but nope, not a single critical word.

Michigan is about to elect the nation's first Muzz senator--Abdul El-Sayed.  The Left is delighted.

On January 17th of this year a female Democrat/socialist piece of shit named Abigail Spanberger took office as governor of Virginia. On July 30th, without a single word of notice to voters, Spanberger cancelled a policy of the prior conservative governor that biological males would no longer be allowed to compete against females in sports. 

Spanberger's ordeer was just revealed two days ago--still without any public announcement. Some private citizen just stumbled on the cancellation on one of the state's websites.

Mainstream Media: "Why yew so upset, deplorable?  Yew voted fo' ouah faaaabulous Abi and all her wonderful Dem/socialist/"progressive" policies.  SEE??  So yew must have wanted this too.  So sit down and shut up!"  

How many of you heard about that, eh?  You didn't.  And that was intentional.  The Democrats know a huge majority of voters believe men should not compete against girls in sports, so announcing that the previous policy was now void would lose the Democrat partei votes, eh?  So they did it quietly, without a word of public notice.

Clever, eh?  One almost thinks "cunning."  Oh yes.

But don't worry, deplorables: your kids won't have any recollection of how the U.S. was before the Left took over, so they won't miss it. 

If the woman who strangled her 3 kids had looked like Sydney Sweeny...

Someone else came up with this, but from what I've seen it seems pretty accurate:

"If Lindsay Clancy looked like Sydney Sweeny, all the Angry White Female Urban Liberals would have voted for the death penalty." 

 

You know it's true. 

CBS deliberately misleads readers/viewers, example # infinity

Watch how deftly the communist sons of whores at CBS "Newz" (lies) write a cunning story to totally mislead readers.  Here's what CBS wrote:

 

The clear implication: "Duh eeeebil Orange Hitler's Gestapo shoulda deported dis po' boy to hiz home country--where he'd be right at home, eh?  But instead, being the cruel Nazis they are, Trump's Gestapo deported him to Africa, to a place he'd never been, and didn't know a single soul!  SEE, voters?  Orange Hitler is just totally mean and cruel!"

What Trump-hating, Democrat-fellating CBS refused to tell ya was that the illegal alien was from Venezuela, and stood in front of an immigration judge and said he did NOT want be sent back to that nation.  The judge granted his request.  Big difference, eh?

This is one of the ways propaganda works: the propagandists tell just part of the story, enabling readers or viewers to draw the wrong conclusion.  So later they can say "What we wrote or broadcast was absolutely true!"  Yes, but deliberately misleading.

Virtually everything political, or bearing on world events, that the left-wing Media prints or broadcasts is slanted like this.

"We hated bribem like you hate Trump...but for a totally different reason"

 

Actually, writing "because You hate America" may be a bit too harsh:  Cuz surely most Democrats don't hate America.  Okay, it's true that they 

• support open borders
• block deportation of illegal aliens who rape and murderer Americans
• support giving hundreds of millions to NGOs to support gay pride parades in Sri Lanka
• support releasing known murderers back onto U.S. streets without requiring bail
• support people who defraud billions from government programs
• cheer when conservative figures like Charlie Kirk are assassinated
• cheered the psycho who almost killed Trump at Butler even as the shooter killed an innocent spectator;
• support candidates who openly support socialism
• support communist mayors like Mamdani and Chitcongo's Brandon Johnson;
• openly support sex-change operations on kids under 16;
• openly support de-funding both the police and military;
• support EVERY waste of taxpayer money, whether stolen by NGOs or spent on insane boondoggles like Gavin Newsom's "high-speed rail to nowhere;"
• support giving free drug works to druggies--not just free needles, but also crack pipes;
• vote to remove "shot spotter" systems that quickly pinpoint gunshots, "cuz doze systems record mo' shots in neighborhoods of pipo of color!";
• support disarming law-abiding citizens with gun confiscation, and outrageous taxes on ammunition, ignoring that thugs will just steal guns at will;
• support school counselors secretly urging 15-year-old students to "transition" without informing the kid's parents;
• support laws and mere "rules" allowing "child 'protective' services" to remove a child from the home if either parent refuses to support the kid changing genders;

Wow, maybe "because You (Democrats) hate America is true after all. 

Anyone see a pattern here?

Anyone see a pattern in the pics below? 

 

All Democrats, leftists, ugly and angry.  This is the face of the Democrat party--and the hoot is that half of Americans actually vote for these monsters. 

Democrat/leftist school board of Fairfax county issues orders to teachers about 9/11

Yesterday I posted a long piece on how American leftists and Democrats are bowing to Islam. They want that because it weakens Trump, even though it will ensure an eventual surrender to Islam.  Bizarre, eh?  Below is a specific example that proves the point.

The pic below is from a six-page "instructional guide" given to every teacher in the county's public schools.  For those who don't speak school-board-bullshit, "instructional guide" means orders from the communist/Muslim sons of whores who run the public schools of Fairfax county.  Deviating from it is a career-ending move. 

College students today weren't born in 2001, so have no direct knowledge of the suicide attacks in which Muslim hijackers flew three hijacked jet airliners into both Twin Towers and the Pentagon.  A fourth jet may have been headed for either the White House or the Capitol.  So what do the commies of Fairfax county say about that attack, eh?

"Many families of military personnel and first responders experienced loss and hardship."

"Hardship," eh?  Is that what you sons of whores are calling "being killed" now?  

The entire purpose of the school board's orders was to ensure that no teacher would tell students the truth about the attacks, lest a few American students learn that every one of the hijackers was Muslim.  Cuz if students knew that, they might get the silly notion that hijacking four loaded airliners and flying the planes into the skyscrapers was an attack by (shhhh!) Islam on the U.S, since it was done entirely by Muslims. 

Whoa!  Can't have that, right? 

The "guide" does make dozens of references to Islam and Muslims--but always in the context of ensuring there's no "anti-Muslim racism," "anti-Middle Eastern" or "Islamophobic rhetoric." It includes a bulleted list of "critical considerations" to ensure the 25th anniversary of the attack avoids any anti-Muslim thoughts.  Note the points in the red rectangles.

The "guide" shows how effectively a network of powerful Muslim organizations have inserted their agents into school boards over the past 25 years.  It ordered teachers not to link the attacks to Islam in any way.  Of course all the instructions to be careful to avoid hurting the feelings of Muslim students show the board knows the truth.  It just doesn't want your children to know.

Can you imagine the outrage if, after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the Fairfax county school board had issued orders saying "You must avoid blaming Japan for this attack"?  And yet today, that's what the school board is effectively doing.  

And you can't stop 'em--cuz leftist Democrats gots all duh power, eh?

Source. 

The Left has made white American women not want to have children

If you're a rational adult (so not a mentally ill tranny or tranny supporter) you quickly learned as a child that females have a unique ability that men don't have: they can conceive and bear children.
 
If you're rational, this shouldn't be controversial.

Now if you know anything about math you also know that to keep a population level, women of any race must have an average of about 2.1 children apiece.  If they have fewer, that race will steadily decrease in population.

If you don't know that, do some research.

Here's another obvious truth: Leftists in the U.S. want whites to die off.  They openly scream that whites should be killed--and they do that as often as possible.  But there's an easier way:  Get lots of white American women to not want to have kids.

And it's working: Not only do the so-called "elites" and their leftist followers hate America, the nuclear family, straight men, Christianity and anything remotely conservative, they hate the notion of children being raised by a husband and wife.

If you don't believe that, you're stupid.

(By contrast, U.S. leftists support Islam, Hamas, Paleswine, open borders, trannies and homosexuals.) 

Until fairly recently most Americans prized children.  But over the past two decades or so the idea of having children has been denigrated by feminists, who've convinced women that having a corporate career is more exciting and rewarding than being a stay-at-home mom.

And of course many beta males support this, since having children is expensive.  When the choice is having a child or buying a new car, or a vacation home in a trendy city, leftists choose luxury.

And it's working:  the average number of children per white American female is now around 1.5--far below the replacement level of 2.1.  So instead of keeping the white population level, we're being replaced by third-world leeches--who all have lots of kids.  It's civilizational suicide for white Americans.

The Left has taught American women that the normal joy of having and raising children really a terrible burden...one that interferes with the carefully-sold "joys" of a more luxurious car and home, or a corporate career.

The Left sneers at the notion of a cis-gender hetero couple--the classic family--raising children, and denigrates women who want that.  And the results are all around you.  It's working just as the Left planned.

I'd say "Do some research," but of course you won't...because you don't wanna know.  Cuz if you're white and conservative, what you find will upset you--as it should if you're rational.

Here's another survival-positive truth: Leftists in the U.S. want whites to die off.  They're quite open about it, screaming that whites should be killed--and they do it as often as possible.  (They celebrated the anniversary of Charlie Kirk's assassination, and wail that po' li'l Tyler din' hab nuffin' to do wif it.)  

But murder is risky, so there's an easier way:  Get lots of white American women to not want to have kids.

And it's working:  The so-called "elites" and their leftist followers hate America, the nuclear family, straight men, Christianity and anything remotely conservative, they hate the notion of children being raised by a husband and wife.

(By contrast, Dems support Islam, Hamas, Paleswine, open borders, trannies and homosexuals.) 

Until fairly recently most Americans prized children.  But over the past decade or so the idea of having children has been denigrated by feminists, who've convinced women that having a corporate career is more exciting and rewarding than being a stay-at-home mom.

And of course many liberal males support that, since having children is expensive.  When given the choice of having a child or buying a vacation home in a trendy city, lots of liberals choose luxury.

And it's working:  the average number of children per white American female is now around 1.5--far below the replacement level.  So the white race is  being replaced by third-world denizens who have lots of kids--because they still believe kids are a good thing.  It's civilizational suicide for whites.

Leftists and Democrats: "Dis guuuuud!  Dere too many pipo on duh Erf, so we'll fix dat by not havin' kids.  So obviously it GUUUD to not have kidz!  See, whites iz baaaaad!  Udder races beez guuuud!  So we needs t'leave duh Erf to dem.  See, dey smaaaht"

It doesn't take a PhD to see how self-destructive that is.  And yet leftists love it: "We gots t'save duh Erf!  An' duh only way to doodat is fo' white pipo to disappear!"   

The Left has turned what was once the unequivocal joy of having and raising children into a perceived burden...one that interferes with the carefully-sold "joys" of having a more luxurious car, a vacation home, a corporate career.

Virtually every Leftist/Dem sneers at the notion of a cis-gender hetero couple--the classic family--raising children.  The vulnerable link there is women: years ago most would have wanted children, but the Left and the leftist Media have succeeded in pressuring them to decline it.  (Of course most leftists/Dems deny that.  They see women deciding not to have more than one child as sophisticated.  And the results are that whites are becoming a minority.  

It's working just as the Left planned.

"Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it."

Last year (2025) marked the 80th anniversary of the end of World War 2.  Both Germany and Japan recovered fairly quickly, and are both fabulous societies today--and have been since the war ended. 

But for the first year or so of WW2, Nazi Germany and Imperial Japanese forces won almost every battle against the U.S. and our allies.  Their troops and officers were well equipped and knew what they were doing.  By contrast, after the end of WW1 U.S. politicians had essentially dismantled our military.  So we went in under-trained and poorly equipped, and the results showed it.  But after heroic efforts for nearly four years, with virtually every American supporting the war, the allies won.  

And in the 81 years since 1945, both Germany and Japan have been model nations, and solid allies.

But it should be obvious to all rational adults that today doesn't in any way resemble 1941 to 1945:  Today Americans are equally divided between leftists, who believe America is evil, awful...and those who love this country.  Mull that over for a bit.

In 1941 every American rallied around FDR.  Today American leftists--half of the public--fiercely hate Trump.  "Orange Hitler," eh?  "No kangs [sic]"

In 1941--after the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor that killed 2,500 Americans and sank every American battleship--not a single American media outlet supported either Germany or Japan--as you'd expect.  By huge contrast, today the Left and their Dem-fellating Media allies repeatedly bleat that the U.S. is eeeevil and that Iran has defeated the U.S.  And all leftists believe it, even though it's utter horseshit--at least militarily.

But American Media rooting for Iran is only part of the difference.  There's another huge difference: In 1941 Germany and Japan didn't have a huge presence in the U.S.  But today--on the 25th anniversary of the most devastating attack on the U.S. since Pearl Harbor, Muslims have dozens of strong supporters in congress and the Media, and mosques in every state.

Point is, since 1990 or so Islam has been at war with the U.S.  But before Trump, no U.S. political leader admitted it.  If you're not willing to admit you've been attacked, you can't realistically expect to defeat your attacker, eh?  

SO...predictions:  Because Dems in congress, the Media and about half the American public refuse to support Trump's efforts to defeat the current combatant Islamic nation, future presidents will be even less willing to stand up to Islamic attacks--cuz the Media will scream that the president is Hitler.  And because we've refused to unleash our full power on Iran, they have no reason to surrender.  If that's true (and it clearly is) there's only one way to stop the conflict: the U.S. pulls our forces out--which is what the Democrats and Media have been demanding.

That's coming, because this November--just 54 days from now--the Dems will win a majority in at least one chamber of congress.  The Dems, the Media and the left will gloat, and will pass an appropriations bill demanding that no more funds be used for military operation is the mid-east.  Other Islamic nations will be emboldened to attack U.S. assets, either overseas or here in the U.S.  Democrats will win every presidential election because a majority of voters will refuse to pay an extra dollar a gallon for gasoline.  The Media will wail and scream that the U.S. must not retaliate.  And week by week, the west will lose ground.

Of course there's a solution, but leftist Americans and Democrats in congress will always block it.  Always.

As every American should know, on December 7th, 1941, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, killing 2,500 Americans and sinking every American battleship.

Every.  Battleship. 

If the same pack of Democrats, leftists and Media shitheads we have today had been running things on December 7th, 1941, the Media would have wailed that it wasn't reasonable to go to war over "just" 2,500 Americans killed, and "a few ships" sunk.  Dem "leaders" would have agreed, bleating "We just need to understand the 'root causes.'"  (For young Americans: After the Twin Towers were destroyed and the Pentagon seriously damaged on 9/11/2001, Dem leaders said the same thing: "We need to understand the 'root causes.'"  Seriously, the Democrats said that about 9/11.)  

Seeing a majority of voters against going to war after Pearl Harbor, the U.S. wouldn't have declared war on Japan in 1941.  And since the only reason we declared war on Germany was because that nation and Japan had declared themselves allies, we wouldn't have gone to war with Germany either!

A smart philosopher once said "Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are condemned to repeat it."  [Okay, that's slightly re-worded but you get the point.]  The lesson of WW2 was "Sometimes you have to go to war to keep things right--even if you know it's gonna involve spending trillions and cost thousands of American lives."  (WW2 killed about 400,000 American troops.)  But in WW2 we had a Dem president, and the Media loved FDR, so he could declare war and congress would vote to support his declaration.

But today the Media and Democrats in congress automatically scream bloody murder and block everything Trump does.  Everything.  Example: Iran had been spending hundreds of billions to "enrich" uranium to build an atomic bomb.  As anyone who knows fuck-all about WW2 knows, two atom bombs ended the war with Japan.  

Democrat: "Don't worry, citizen!  Even if Iran got an atomic bomb, they don't have a missile able to get a bomb to the U.S.  SEE?  So ain't no threat!  Orange Hitler is jus' tryin' t' get ya scared about nuffin' so he can seize mo' power!  Really!"

People who know how about atomic bombs are made (me, seriously):  "If Iran gets atomic bombs, they'll soon claim "groups unknown" stole one or two."

Democrats: "So?  Why dat a problem, deplorable?" 

You're idiots.  Surely everyone knows about "container ships," right?  A bomb hidden in one of the 8,000 to 12,000 containers on such a ship, slowly moving up-river past NYC--would take out most of Manhattan.  It would make 9/11 look like a picnic.

Democrats: "Iran wud nevah doodat, cuz we could wipe that country off the map!" 

Yeah, but here's the question: Would Democrats retaliate?

No.  Not even close, because the Left and Media would wail "Even if we could prove dis was one of Iran's bombs, how can we possibly justify retaliating?  Cuz dey tol' us it wuz stolen, SEE?  So Iran din' doo dis!  Nope nope nope!  It wuz some mysterious third-party!  SEE?  So we can't possibly retaliate against dis innocent nation, killin' all doze innocent pipo!  We just have to accept the cleverness of the attackers, as we did wif 9/11."

Of course we did NOT accept 9/11, but we also didn't mercilously bomb the hell out of Afghanistan.  Or Saudi Arabia.  So...no deterrence at all against future attacks.

If you think the Muslims didn't notice that, you're too dumb to breathe without assistance. 

If Iran gets a bomb, the scenario above is almost inevitable--because the mullahs know Dems won't retaliate!  (But just to be safe, the top mullahs would be out of the country for a few weeks.) 

Let's review:  Most Americans know virtually nothing about nuclear weapons.  By contrast, folks my age entered college just 16 years after the end of WW2, when most Americans knew at least something about the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  But to almost all Americans under about 60, atomic bombs are an abstraction--a concept as alien as neutrinos or black holes.  They have only a vague idea about 'em--and that's perfectly understandable.

I can't fix your lack of understanding.  I can tell you the truth, but you won't believe it.  The only thing that can make you understand it is viewing dozens of hours of the two devastated Japanese cities.  But you won't.  And I get it.  Cuz dat beez 'ancient history,' eh?

"Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history..." 

So where does that leave us?

"Your" Mainstream Media has told you Iran wasn't trying to build an atom bomb.  And you believed the Media, cuz...dey nevah lied to us before, eh?  You believe the Media even after the Iranian negotiators casually smirked to our negotiators that they had 447 kg of 60%-enriched uranium.  But because most Americans have no idea what that means, they simply ignore it.  You have to know nuclear physics.  Understandably, relatively few people do.

As a result, Americans believe the Democrat-fellating, Trump-hating media.  I get it.  Really.

"Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history..." 

Short answer: If Iran gets an atomic bomb, they'll claim one or two were stolen, and put one on a container-ship bound for New York, after several intermediate stops.  A fair chunk of lower Manhattan will be vaporized.  Dems will block ANY retaliation--"Cuz we can't be sure Iran is responsible!"

And I get it, really.  We can't in good conscience kill tens of thousands of innocent Iranians who had no say in killing tens of thousands of Americans, eh?   Except that's exactly what we did to end WW2, and it worked.  Sucks, I know, but it also likely saved 400,000 lives--250,000 Americans and another 150,000 Japanese.  

Is that worth doing?  Depends on your party.

"Those who refuse to learn from the lessons of history...." 

Because when the Democrats/leftists/socialists refuse to retaliate--and they will--that won't be the end of it:  The Iranians will spread the rumor that they arranged the whole thing to get the Great Satan to leave the mid-east and stop supporting Israel.  How many other national leaders, seeing the results on NYC and fearing the same for any other nation that bucks Iran, will support any U.S. policy, eh?

Here's the hoot:  I don't care.

I'm an old guy, and don't have any kids.  So if it happens exactly as I've laid out above, it won't affect me a bit.  And if you live far from NYC you'll think it doesn't affect YOU, cuz all the destruction was in NYC, right?  And the Lying Dem-fellating Mainstream Media and the Dems will repeat that endlessly, to justify the Dems refusing to retaliate.  And in some ways that's true: If you don't own real estate in Manhattan, why should you care if much of it was destroyed, eh?

Are ya starting to see why Trump bombed Iran's enrichment cascades?

No, probably not, cuz not one American out of a thousand knows what that means.

"Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it." 

Either we destroy the mullahs, or NYC will be destroyed.  Frankly I don't care either way. 

In Minnesotistan a Democrat candidate for the U.S. senate cunningly dodges a question

When a candidate for high office is asked a straightforward question about his or her position on a key issue and repeatedly dodges, refusing to answer the question and instead spouting some canned talking-point, what does that tell ya, unequivocally?

As should be screamingly obvious to everyone, it tells you the candidate KNOWS most voters don't like that party's true position on the issue.  So the candidate repeatedly refuses to answer the question.  And most of the time the "reporter" doesn't press the point, since the Media loves Democrats and hates conservatives.

Example # infinity: In the Dem-ruled shithole of Minnesota a communist dipshit named Peggy Flannigan is running for the U.S. senate.  Peggy's a loyal Democrat who embraces every lunatic policy of that totally fucked-up party.  Like, Minnesota law does not set a minimum age for a kid to get sex-change surgery.

So...a friendly female CNN talking-head interviewed Peggy on live TV, and the friendly female from normally-Dem-fellating CNN asked Peggy a simple, straightforward question.  Now watch Peggy's eyes as she refuses to answer:

Interviewer:  "Minnesota law does not set a minimum age for gender affirming care. Do you believe there should be one?"

Right away you know the female CNN interviewer is pro-Dem because she uses the phrase ordered by the Partei--"gender-affirming healthcare"--instead of "sex-change surgery."  Here's how Dem candidate Peggy responded:

"I mean, I believe what we need to do is make sure people have access, uh, to health care.  Frankly that's one of the reasons, you know, why I've run so hard on Medicare for all, uh, and making sure that gender-affirming care is available to all.

Note that phrasing again: "gender-affirming health care."  It is neither.

CNN: Should there be an age limit?

Peggy: Uh, I think gender-affirming care is part of health care. People need access to it for health care.  I think our law as it stands [i.e. no minimum age limit to chop off healthy body parts], uh, is, is a good law I've supported in the past.  But I think the real question...

Note Peggy insists that viewers agree with her that sex-change surgery is "health care," and that "people need access to health care."  No one argues with the second part.  The argument is whether sex-change surgery is "health care." What Peggy did was to change the attention of viewers away from the actual question asked to one that voters clearly agree with.

...uh, that people are struggling with is, if I go to the doctor, how am I going to pay that bill?  Um, you know, when folks have $16,000 deductibles, it's untenable for people. So that is the issue, uh, surrounding healthcare I hear from Minnesotans all across the state.

CNN:  "Okay, so you support the law as is, no limit.  So if a 10-year-old wanted it, you would be okay with that."

Peggy did NOT expect to get that follow-up question! 

Peggy: "Let me be clear. I want to be...I want to be clear that these, you know, medical decisions absolutely should be made between a, a family and their doctor.

This is a classic:  The position of the Democrat Partei [sic]--which is the law in every Dem-ruled shithole state--is that there's no minimum age for chopping healthy body parts off a mentally ill child.  Since this strikes most adults as clearly insane, Democrat candidates have been coached to avoid answering that question, by instead saying something most people agree with: that "medical decisions should be between a family (presumably parents?) and 'their' doctor."

SO let's chase down this bullshit Dem "logic" and see where it leads, eh?  Suppose 12-year-old Susie says "I feel uncomfortable having breasts, cuz I could get breast cancer.  I want to have mine removed."

If the family found a doctor willing to perform that operation, is that reasonable?

Democrat logic: "Absolutely!  Bravo to the girl for having the courage to eliminate a source of anxiety!"

Conservative: "Obviously breast cancer is scary and can be fatal, but the incidence is 132.5 per 100,000.   For those who can't do math, that's 1.325 out of a thousand, or a bit less than the chances of dying in a car accident.  You haven't stopped riding in cars, right?  But you're okay with having your kid's breasts removed?  Seems pretty irrational to me.

Back in the 1950s to 1960s, when older women demonstrated unusual mental behavior, a chunk of the "medical community" decided that could be "fixed" by a simple procedure called a "lobotomy," which involved inserting a hooked cutter thru the corner of the eye and cutting a connection between the "frontal lobe" and the rest of the brain.
   For those who don't get it: "Life-dysphoria, citizen?  The cure is simple: cut off the parts that make you feel dysphoria."
   Ring any bells?
   The patient immediate calms down--totally.  The body still lives but no one's really "in there" any longer.  And yet for years this was a totally accepted procedure by "the medical community."  Until rational people realized it was insane.
   Sex-change surgery is the new lobotomy--and the insanity will only end when the cost to settle the lawsuits overcome the profits.

Most Democrats strike me as totally disconnected from reality.  Fucked in the head.  Their refusal to answer simple questions tells you they know the Partei's position is insane.

Imagine the average IQ of a person who would vote for Peggy--and those just like her.  And yet in Minnesotistan Peggy will win--because most voters are hard-core Democrats. 

No state lets kids under 16 drive, buy tobacco or alcohol or get a tattoo, yet in Democrat-ruled shitholes state law allows doctors to mutilate a kid's healthy body.  To repeat: sex-change surgery at any age has the full support of Democrat-imposed law in that moronic (but oh-so-woke) state.

So Peggy dodges, dodges, dodges, then bleats "Let me be clear, I want to be clear."  Bitch, no one tried to stop you from being clear.  You were the one who changed the subject, refusing to answer the simple, direct question.  Like all Democrats you blew a cloud of smoke to hide your refusal to answer the question asked.  But good Democrats never noticed--because they agree with you and your insane Partei [sic].  

"Gender-affirming health-care" is a perfect example of Orwellian 'newspeak.'"  (If you're not familiar, look it up.)

If your genitalia doesn't affect your gender, how is cutting 'em off "gender affirming care"? 

Spoiler: In November the insane Democrat shitheads will win a majority in the House, and likely a tie in the senate.  But because the senate is full of shithead RINOs who support Dem policies, that will give the Dems an effective majority in that chamber as well.

At that point the only laws congress will pass will be those that benefit the Democrat Partei.  It won't be possible to pass any law that will benefit the United States. 

As the marvelous Douglas Adams wrote decades ago: "So long, and thanks for all the fish."

(For young Americans: google "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Universe."  Fabulous spoof of absurd rulers.) 

A brief look at the future

By 2036 every record had been destroyed or falsified.  Every history book had been rewritten, every historical photograph and critical date had been altered.  Every statue, every street, every building had been renamed.  All that existed was an endless present in which the Party was always right."    (--edited from George Orwell's "1984")

By 2028, thanks to millions of Democrat voters, the Democrat Socialists of America controlled...everything.  At first the Democrats had bleated that most Americans considered the DSA's policies far too radical to support.  But once DSA candidates started defeating Dem incumbents, and the Democrats realized they couldn't win without DSA votes, every Democrat politician had rushed to embrace the same policies they'd claimed to oppose only weeks earlier.

Funny how that works, eh?  Power easily wins over foolish consistency, right?

As a result most analysts were stunned to see how fast the combined votes of DSA supporters and "regular" Democrats won...everything.  And as they'd openly promised on their webpage in 2026, they'd quickly made DC and Puerto Rico states, which instantly gave 'em control of the senate (which they'd effectively had anyway because of the filibuster).  

Next they got four more Dem-ruled states to join the "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact," which abolished the Electoral College and elected the president by the winner of the national popular vote.  (If you haven't heard of that, google "NPVIC.")  They'd openly promised to do that in 2026.

Next, as they'd openly promised in 2026, to avoid the Supreme Court rejecting their plans, the DSA/Dems added 12 new "justices," all appointed by a committee of congressional Democrats.  So the Court was now a rubber-stamp for any DSA policy.

With the Court now controlled by the DSA, the DSA-controlled congress abolished the senate--as they'd openly promised in 2026. 

Next--as they'd openly promised in 2026--they had the DSA president issue an Executive Order that all future presidents would be appointed by members of the House.  In the past such a huge change to the Constitution would have required a Constitutional amendment, but because the new, expanded, DSA controlled the Supreme  Court, the new justices agreed that amending it wasn't necessary, cuz...reasons.  Pick anything you like: "National emergency"?  "Climate change"?  "Saving the poor"?

Next, as part of their openly-stated promise in 2026 to de-fund the military, the DSA cut the military budget in half, and ordered all U.S. troops out of the mid-east.  Iran instantly re-took control of the Strait and charged every non-Iranian oil tanker two million dollars per load.  The price of oil surged to $120 a barrel--but since they DSA government had banned gasoline cars, that only hurt the few U.S. voters who hadn't junked their gas-powered car for a faaabulous new EV.

Iran also resumed developing an atom bomb, which enabled the mullahs to intimidate every EU nation into doing as they demanded.

Next the DSA--as they'd openly promised in their published platform in 2026--enacted "Medicare for All," free daycare and free college for everyone who wanted to go.  Of course none of it was free, and it increased federal spending by $3 trillion a year.  But the Washington Post and the alphabet networks gushed that this was absolutely the most faaabulous thing EVAH! 

Next the DSA-ruled congress increased the minimum wage to $50 an hour, and banned electric utilities from using natural gas to produce electricity.  Cuz "global warming," eh?  But of course since the total U.S. demand for electricity was far more than wind, solar, nuclear and hydro could produce, and no one wanted to lose their electricity, within three months the price of electricity had tripled--once again proving the old laws of "supply and demand."

With the huge increase in the price of electricity, "advocates" for the poor sued, so the DSA-ruled congress quickly, effortlessly passed a law that anyone who claimed to make less than $50,000 a year--including "undocumented Americans"--would now be given "free electricity."

Of course a few deplorables and editors realized the electricity wasn't really "free," just paid for by the gruberment--meaning taxpayers, meaning money borrowed by the federal gruberment.  And because no one was required to actually verify their income (which wud be raaaacis'),  instantly half of Americans got "free" electricity.

And since even today 47% of Americans don't pay any income tax, they weren't paying indirectly either. 

Then in one of those unpredicted effects, tens of thousands of people who now got electricity for free realized they could make tens of thousands of dollars a year by quietly installing hidden chargers for electric vehicles, and charging neighbors who had to pay for their own electricity $20 for three hours.

ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS and MS-NOW gushed that "free electric fo' duh po'"--and all of the other DSA policies--were duh mos' faaaabulous ideas EVAH--because the top priority of the Mainstream Media is supporting the Democrat Partei.

Of course all those programs combined cost six trillion dollars a year, and with the national debt over $50 trillion no other country wanted to buy U.S. T-bills unless the interest rate was over ten percent.  And for awhile the DSA put up with that.  Soon the annual deficit was $4 trillion a year--and we had to borrow even more money just to pay the interest.

Many DSA members of congress were surprised to learn that even huge nations had to pay interest on borrowed money.  Since they'd never taken Econ-101 (which obviously wasn't required for a women's-studies major) they'd always thought governments could simply print as much cash as they wanted.  "Why not," eh?  So the DSA came up with what seemed an obvious, brilliant solution: if you have to pay interest on borrowed money, but don't want to, just don't borrow any more.  Instead, just print whatever you need. 

It's SO obvious, eh?

A few "journalists" with at least a spoonful of economics knew history had proven again and again that this was a bad idea, but the DSA's daily talking points (just as the Dems used) said "Dis iz a faaabulous idea, so don't say anything bad about it."

So the Media didn't.

So the DSA cranked up the printing presses.  And just as happened to Weimar Germany and modern Venezuela (if you don't know, google both), inflation quickly jumped to 5%...per WEEK.  A staggering 260 percent annually.  And that was just for starters.

Soon a dozen eggs cost over $100.  (In Venezuela two eggs cost a day's salary.)  Even worse, savings carefully built up from years of work were now worth only 5 or 6 percent of their earlier value.  Voters screamed bloody murder.  But never fear, because the DSA was run by brilliant leaders like AOC and Kamala Harris--who quickly devised what seemed to be an obvious "solution" to complaints about high prices.  Can ya guess?

Of course you can, citizen!  They ordered price controls imposed on a hundred common agricultural products, including meat, milk, cheese, butter and--oddly--alcohol.

Since the max price the DSA rulers allowed producers to charge was less than what it cost to produce those items, producers couldn't make a profit by selling at the government-ordered price, eh?  So can ya predict what happened?  

Sure ya can!  The supply of those items did just as Econ-101 said it would (as proven again and again): they quickly vanished from store shelves.  Producers still made 'em, but only sold a small number at the DSA-commanded ceiling price.

Whoa!  So whaddya think happened to the rest of the production, eh?

It vanished into the "black market."  (If you're not familiar with the term, google it.  Happens whenever gruberments try to command people.  If you're a young American, ask your parents to explain "black markets."  If they don't know, look it up.)

Faced with continued shortages of critical products, how do ya think the DSA-run government responded?  Wow, you already guessed!  They sent armed agents from the Treasury Department to seize farms and factories that claimed to be producing less than before the decree, and prosecuted the owners.  The Washington Post and the alphabet networks fawned over this, saying the DSA move was faaabulous cuz the companies and farmers were "profiteering" by selling on the black market.  

And note the term "profiteering" instead of "making a profit."  The Media chose the former word carefully, cuz not all Americans yet thought "profit" was a bad thing.  But "profiteering" sounded bad, and by then 70% of Americans agreed that socialism was preferable to eeeebil capitalism.  (Polls show that even today 60% of Democrats--not just DSA members--believe socialism is preferable to capitalism.) 

And of course with "profit" and capitalism demonized by the DSA and their Media parrots, who do ya think was courageous enough to defend either?  No one. 

Then to re-start the seized factories, the DSA-controlled gruberment hired illegal aliens as government employees--with lavish salaries and pensions.

And as anyone who's ever had to deal with the Department of Motor Vehicles knows, that worked exactly as you could have predicted.  Crippled by gruberment red tape and govt-employee-union rules, output actually DEcreased, and soon only government officials could buy once-common products like meat and butter.  But just as members of congress exempted themselves from taking the jab for the Chyna virus, government officials were deemed "critical employees" and special government shops were created to let them buy things no longer on the shelves of other stores.  Instead ordinary citizens learned to plant "victory gardens"--a term from WW2.  

The alphabet networks and the Washington Post started running 2 or 3 articles a week gushing over how "victory gardens" were making Americans more healthy by avoiding pesticides and chemical fertilizers.  They gushed that the trendiest parties hosted by "the elites" in DC and NYC were now serving tasty dishes made from the hottest new food craze: mealworms.  "Absolutely fabulous!" gushed the Post.  "A taste sensation," fawned ABC.

Of course the elites weren't really eating dishes made from mealworms, but the DSA paid "influencers" to rave about it (just as the Dems already pay influencers to rave about Dem policies), and college kids instantly heard it was cool, so they did it--and then bragged about it to their frenz.  

After four years of DSA policies, 30 million new illegals had become U.S. citizens, and all voted for the faaabulous DSA.  The U.S. economy collapsed, and China bought a third of the most productive farmland in the U.S.  All totally legal, of course.

A couple of conservative orgs tried suing, but both lawsuits were thrown out by leftist judges because of "lack of standing"--the same way all lawsuits about election fraud are usually dismissed.  Conservative voter: "How can you claim I don't have 'standing' to sue for election fraud?"  Leftist judge: "Because I can.  Now shut up or I'll jail you for contempt." 

By 2050 the "old, unfair, capitalist" U.S. was only a distant memory.  Only gummint officials were allowed to fly--because by definition they were important.  (And of course by that time jet fuel was so expensive that average Americans couldn't afford the fares even if they'd been allowed to.)  The Washington Post and the alphabet networks gushed that this was actually a great thing: "The DSA is saving the Erf from fatal globull worming!"

By 2070 smart young Americans realized the U.S. was doomed and began emigrating to freer nations like China, Qatar and Iran, where smart, creative people could still buy steak, homes and cars.

By 2050 no American believed that back in 1970 four Air Force pilots making $25,000 a year could buy a single-engine Cessna airplane to fly to college football games, or that plumbers and electricians could buy 150-horsepower bass boats for pleasure.  Or that almost any American could easily afford to fly to Europe.

As a famous author wrote 90 years ago, that world was "gone with the wind."  (Hat tip to Margaret Mitchell, 1936, writing about a time as far removed from 1936 as 2050 will be from 1970.)

Sadly, almost no one reading this will have any idea what I'm talking about.  And fair enough: all your time is taken by trying to keep your family fed and keep a roof over their heads.  I get it.  That's your top priority--as it should be.  You don't have the spare time to spend worrying about what's happening to the country.  By great luck, I do.  and I understand that most adults don't.

By huge contrast, angry, childless socialist liberal women have all the time in the world to demonstrate and organize.  Their beta-male counterparts are the editors of Mainstream Media rags, and producers of all the network "newz."  Without kids (or for highly-paid Media editors) such people can effortlessly afford to give the DSA $5,000 campaign contributions.  You and I can't afford to do the same for the few genuine conservative candidates out there.  I totally understand.

Not to despair, citizen:  Everyone knows all great things must eventually come to an end, and we've had a great run.  And really, in the long term what difference does it make whether the end comes in 2030 or 2050, eh?  And besides, it'll all turn to shit so slowly (mostly) that most people won't notice.

"We're only particles of change...orbiting around the sun."  --Joni Mitchell

My sincere thanks to the wonderful women I've known who have put up with my ramblings.  May you be richly blessed.  And if I sometimes seemed preoccupied, distant or clueless, I deeply apologize, and look forward to apologizing in the next life as well.  Your love and devotion enabled me to do...whatever the hell this is.

And for men who may have some idea of what's happening here: some vestige of grace and hope will still be possible even as life in the DSA-ruled future turns much more difficult.  Won't be easy, but still possible.

Sanctuary state city orders that illegal aliens can be police

Connecticut is a Democrat-ruled shithole sanctuary state.  Yes, it's pretty as a picture, with lots of rich residents.  But the bad guys own it.  So let's see how that's working:

Being a "sanctuary state" the place is loaded with illegals, so ICE arrested a few in Danbury.  Duh mayor din' like dat, so he got hiz frenz on duh totally Dem-dominated city council to introduce a rule change to...wait for it...allow non-citizen migrants to serve as city police officers.

It was common knowledge that the odd rule change was proposed and approved as a fuck-you to the Trump administration after the arrests of several illegals in the Dem-ruled town.

The mayor was smug: “It’s legal.  It’s allowed.  It’s been recommended.  It’s timely, and sends a message to "our immigrant community that you are welcome in Danbury.”  

Wait..."Our immigrant community?  I think you left out a crucial word there, shithead: "illegal immigrant community."

Duh mayor accused ICE agents of "sowing fear" and making local businesses a “ghost town” in the wake of the raids.

SO...illegals can now be cops in Danbury.  Big win for illegals, eh?

Now if you're a Democrat you probably don't see any problem.  But there's a huge problem:  Does  anyone think illegal-alien cops will enforce laws against other illegals?  Not a chance. 

Now for the twist: The mayor of Danbury--Roberto Alves, the guy who urged his Dem-ruled council to change the city's rules to allow illegals to be cops--was an illegal alien himself when he first came to the U.S.  

Starting to see how it works yet?

Sure: Illegals flock to sanctuary states and cities, knowing they'll get everything for free, and soon elect a former illegal alien as mayor, who then does everything in his power to advance other illegals.  Perfectly understandable.  He's playing for his team.  Not for ours.

And Democrats love it.

You richly deserve what you're gonna get.  Question is, will your children deserve the fate you've inflicted on them?  Obviously they had no say in what you did.  But that won't make a bit of difference.  

Eh, their problem, not yours, right? 

Female Dem governor of Oregon signs bill removing all math and English requirements for HS grads

 

 

Great idea, eh? 

Michigan Dem candidate for governor says voting Democrat is more important than our lives

If you don't live in Michigan you probably don't know who Dana Nessel is.

She's the state's attorney-general, responsible for enforcing laws, serving under that state's utterly moronic governor, Gretch Whitmer.  Because Nessel is a hard-core corrupt Democrat, she has no interest in trying to ensure honest elections.  But it gets worse: she's running for governor, to succeed the term-limited Gretch Whitmer.

Now you'd think most people would prefer to be governed by sane rulers, eh?  If a candidate for governor bleated that the "needs" of murderous thugs should be prioritized above our own lives, would you think that was rational?  How dumb would you have to be to vote for that person?

Nessel is Jewish, and was invited to address an event for Jewish Democrats in Michigan--where she said this: 

“We have a moral imperative to place the needs of the world above even our own self-interest and, yes, even our own survival.”

Yes, she actually said that.  She went on to say that this so-called "moral imperative” required Jews to vote for Democrat candidates--presumably including the Democrat Partei's nominee for the U.S. senate, Abdul El-Sayed.

El-Sayed is a Muslim communist who made excuses for a Muslim terrorist attack on Jewish children in the preschool of a Michigan temple.  But because he's a Democrat, Nessel says Dems have a "moral imperative" to vote for him--even though he defends terror attacks on Jewish kids.  Does that seem rational to ya?

Now I'm not Jewish, and have no dog in that hunt, but it should be obvious to even stupid people that a Jewish Democrat urging citizens to vote for Dem candidates who support killing Jews seems insane.

Nessel isn't technically insane.  Instead she's a classic Democrat: they believe nothing is more important than winning power for The Partei.  It  outranks everything--and Dana claims to believe that's more important than survival of fellow Jews.

Actually that does seem insane.  But that's the Dem party in a nutshell.  And Muslim communist Democrat candidates like El-Sayed LOVE that irrationality.

Now the wrap: Because Michigan is majority-Democrat, both Nessel and Abdul will win--because Dem voters would vote for a serial killer if he or she had a D after its name.

Partei above all, comrade!

What we should have learned from 9/11, but didn't

For young Americans: Next week will mark the 25th anniversary of the attack on the U.S. by 19 Muslim hijackers that killed 2,980 innocent Americans and destroyed the two tallest buildings in New York City, and hit the Pentagon.

If you're under 35 years old that death and destruction makes no impression at all on you cuz you were 10 or younger in 2001.  So for 43% of the U.S. population, the attacks are as distant as 1970 was from the end of WW2--a total abstraction.  Meaningless.

I need to fix that for ya--because it literally means the difference between life and death.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 Muslim terrorists hijacked four jet airliners full of Americans.  They killed the pilots and flew each plane into the two tallest buildings in NYC.  The fires started by 20,000 gallons of jet fuel burned furiously, and after a few hours they softened the steel in the towers enough to cause both towers to collapse.

The terrorists flew the 3rd plane into a side of the Pentagon.  But in the last plane, passengers using cell phones had learned about the hijackings, and realized their only chance to live was to try to re-take control from the hijackers.

They almost did.  Unfortunately the hijackers flew the jet straight into the ground in Pennsylvania.

SO...what did we learn from the death of 2,980 innocent Americans, eh?

Apparently nothing.

After the attacks the rational thing to do would have been to close the borders to all Muslims, and deport all Muslims here on visas.  Then investigate Muzz who were U.S. citizens and deport all who had terrorist ties.

You won't be surprised to learn that your stupid, corrupt rulers--G.W. Bush, Obozo and bribem--did none of that.

(Immediately after taking office for his first term, Trump issued an EO prohibiting citizens from seven majority-Muslim nations known to support terrorism from entering the U.S.--but the Left immediately sued, screaming that the order was illegal.  And not surprisingly, leftist judges agreed.)

In the 25 years since the mass destruction by the Muslim hijackers, hundreds more Americans have been murdered by Islamic terror attacks just in the U.S.  In Europe Muslims murder a dozen non-Muzz every WEEK--and the ruling pols do nothing at all.  So now the mayor of the largest city in the U.K, and its capital city--is a Muslim.

You may have noticed that the mayor of the largest U.S. city--the city that saw the most destruction in the hijackings of 2001--is Muslim.

Starting to see a pattern yet?  No, you're not.

So instead of our president in 2001 instantly banning Muslims from entering the U.S, then deporting any found to have ANY ties with terrorist organizations, your rulers have done exactly the opposite, welcoming in millions more Muzz.  Seriously: The number of Muzz in the U.S. has gone from 1.8 million in 2001 to 4.5 million. 

In New York City, where most of the destruction of that day took place, the Muslim population has almost doubled, from 400,000 to over 700,000.  That's why NYC now has a communist Muslim mayor.

Islam bleats that they're "The religion of peace."  That's pure bullshit--pure propaganda.  Their own "holy book" has dozens of passages ordering good Muzz to kill non-Muslims.  Seriously.

And they do.  Multiple mosques in New York City openly preach hatred and terrorism in weekly sermons.  The videos are posted on social media for anyone to see, but the corrupt Muzz mayor just grins and laughs.  "Free speech, stupid deplorables!"

Non-muzz American Leftists and Dems eagerly parrot this.  "Why yew upset, citizen?  It beez totally legal to urge devout believers [Muzz] to do as the Koran commands!"  Americans refuse to believe that "the religion of peace" would command followers to kill non-Muslims, so you meekly, stupidly allow yourself to be muzzled rather than take the only action that will save your life.

Still not getting it?  Consider Darializa Chevalier, a Muzz communist in New York City who won the Democrat primary for New York's 13th congressional district.  Her most telling bleat is that when she couldn't find a napkin for her filthy hands, “I just wiped my hand on the American flag.” 

Wow, how much more contempt can you show for America than that, eh?

You really need to search for videos of this communist Muslim bitch to really appreciate how openly she shows her hatred for America, and how much she wants her comrades to take over America for communists and Muzz.

The political ascension of Islamists who openly despise us reflects our hatred for ourselves.

Mamdani, Abdul El-Sayed, Avila Chevalier and dozens of others agree with millionaire communist "influencer" Hasan Piker that America deserved 9/11.  Right after 9/11 the wailed and whined that Muslims were innocent, had nuffin to do wif' duh hijackings.  They bleated that the hijackings were NOT representative of Islam but were done by a "tiny minority of extremists."   

But today people like Hasan Piker, Mamdani, El-Sayed and other Muzz grin at us and bleat that "American deserved 9/11."  It's an in-your-face "fuck you."  And most of you never hear about it, and wouldn't believe it if you did because it's so outrageous.

And it’s a justified pride. Muslim terrorism killed thousands of New Yorkers and now run the city.

Hours after the Twin Towers collapsed, Muslims in New Jersey celebrated by passing out sweets, and today they claim we deserved it, just as they bleat that Israel deserved the massacre of Oct 7, 2024.  

And their warped religion commands that non-Muzz must either convert, or pay a special tax to their Muzz rulers, or--be killed.  That’s why they keep killing us.  You don't believe that--because you only know what the corrupt, lying Mainstream Media and Dem pols tell ya.

If you refuse to actually investigate to find the truth, do you deserve whatever happens to you and your family?

After 9/11 the U.S. Left--and all Democrat pols--demanded that we embrace our killers.  They demanded that we look to "root causes."  Ring any bells?

It didn’t have to be this way, any more than we had to suffer lockdowns during the Chyna virus scam.  But your rulers bleated that we just needed to "understand Islam."  "See, duh problem is NOT Islam but...tribalism!  So what we need to do is teach the populations of Muslim nations the magic of 'democracy.'  Yeh, dat's it!"

So we sent thousands of our best, most unselfish young men to Afghanistan to bring elections to a culture that could only think in terms of tribal power.

The results were predictable.

Finally a few Americans learned that contra to all the bullshit propaganda, they really did hate us-- because their religion teaches them from the earliest age to hate "infidels"--their term for non-Muzz.

First we blamed the attacks on the lack of democracy in the Muslim world.  Then we blamed our own intolerance.  We blamed Israel, global warming, "workplace stress," mental illness.

Everything except Islam.

Democrat pols and the Mainstream Media soothingly assured you that we could absolutely co-exist with Islam.  Both went to great lengths to avoid the one fact no one was allowed to utter:  Islam demands that all non-Muslims either convert, or submit and pay the "jizya" tax.

No one dared to raise the possibility that we couldn’t--let alone what to do if that was true.

25 years later, Democrats and the Mainstream Media are still blaming US for the attacks--not just 9/11 but all the others.  Many even suggest that the U.S. would be better off under Islamic rulers.  Former conservative Tucker Carlson noted that there's far less crime in Islamic nations than here.  (Carlson carefully avoided noting that the Koran orders devout Muslims to cut off the hands of thieves, because that would anger the U.S. Left, which praises theft as "reparations" or "re-distribution of wealth.")

So by obeying your rulers and refusing to say the thing they order us no to say, we've ended up accepting one outrageous thing after another.

Americans refuse even to consider the possibility that the only way to co-exist with Islam is to either convert or submit.

Instead Americans have learned to keep quiet. 

A people who forgive the killers of their children won't survive long.  "Suicidal empathy," anyone?

U.S. Democrats and leftist "elites" eagerly embraced Islam just as they embraced communism.  It's the "cool, woke" thing, eh?

The lesson of 9/11 is simple: you cannot co-exist with people who want to kill you.  The only way to survive is to make them realize that trying to kill you will result in their own death.  It IS that simple.

Hat tip to Front Page Magazine  

https://www.frontpagemag.com/what-we-never-learned-from-9-11/ 

Is the western world returning to medieval times?

Victor Davis Hanson is a historian and a great writer.  If you're not familiar with his writing you're missing a huge education--because those who refuse to learn from the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it, eh?

(For purists, Santayana actually wrote "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.")  

I've extensively edited VDH's piece below, and I encourage you to read the original, at this link.

In summary, Hanson says western technology has made fabulous societies possible, but socialists, communists and the Left are working like crazy to destroy it all, taking us back to the faaabulous middle ages.
===

For most people, the story of the medieval world was one of crowded cities, constant violent crime and occasional outbreaks of deadly plagues—the result of unclean urban conditions, rotting food, fouled water, open sewage, and unchecked rats, fleas and lice. 

Modern technology gave us the means to solve all those problems--and western societies did solve 'em--but only temporarily.  Because as anyone with a functioning brain can easily see, most big, Leftist-ruled cities are returning to medieval conditions.  You just didn't notice, in part because the Lying Mainstream Media refuses to tell ya.

Touring the magnificent cathedrals or "basilicas" (basilicae?) of Rome, Cologne, Paris, Florence, Milan and Seville you can see the emergence of brilliance starting in roughly 1400 A.D.

Oh wait...the Left demands that you not use that abbreviation today!  In another decade almost no one will know what that means.  The approved term is...do you know?  If you're an academic you sure as hell do, cuz if you use "A.D." you won't be given tenure.  Wow.

You think I'm kidding.

Go back farther:  The Romans built aqueducts that brought water 80 miles from mountains to Rome without a single pump.  Rome ruled the world--and yet was eventually destroyed by barbarians and collapsed around 450 A.D. 

No worry, citizen, cuz a mere 900 years later advanced societies had recovered the knowledge of Roman engineers and politicians.

900 years.  No big deal, eh?

We're now about 600 years after that recovery, so you'd think we'd have progressed a LOT, eh?  And for decades we did: western cities became jewels.  But somehow, starting about 1970, big cities in western nations started to resemble medieval ones: rampant crime, filth, disease and total dysfunction.

Unlike the rulers of medieval times, our rulers (soothingly called "officials" to disguise the truth) know how to stop disease, crime and filth--but have clearly chosen not to.  And you may wonder why.  You should ask why, and should be mad as hell by the answer.  (Spoiler: you'll never get an answer; the leftist bastards aren't that stupid.)

The deliberate mis-rule by your rulers stems from leftist ideology, which divides the world into “oppressors” and the blameless “oppressed.”  Leftists bleat that thugs, murderers, drug addicts, rapists and other demons are victims, and that the top priority of society must be to reward the killers and rapists--cuz dey iz "victims," eh?

Now, if Democrat/leftist rulers (pols) really believed their bullshit, they'd share their homes and elite islands (Martha's Vineyard) with the demons, eh?  But of course they don't: They live in clean, crime-free enclaves.  

For the terminally uninformed, the case of Martha's Vineyard is immensely instructive here: That island is totally inhabited and ruled by leftist/liberals/Democrats, who bleat that we MUST open ouah borders to duh whole world.  So a few years ago, to make a point, Florida's conservative governor flew two planeloads of invaders to Martha's Vineyard. 

And because the leftists/Democrats who live there are totally NOT hypocrites, they warmly welcomed the arrivals, built housing for 'em, and gave 'em food and money to live like regular folks, eh?

Hahahahahaha!  Just kidding.  The hypocritical leftists sons of whores picked up the phone and called the leftist shithead governor of their state and demanded that the governor get the invaders the hell off their faaaaabulous, crime-free enclave!

And like magic, that happened just 48 hours after the illegals arrived!  Wow!  Leftist rule in action, eh?

If you never heard about that it's because you're uninformed.

So: Obozo and bribem threw open our southern border to the whole world.  Not surprisingly, the U.S. was invaded by roughly 20 million unskilled, illiterate foreigners--9 million under Obozo and 11 million under bribem.  The Democrats then demanded that we house and feed the invaders, give 'em medical care and free college tuition.

Democrat governors ORDER their cops not to help arrest and deport the illegals.  Bribem even ordered the federal gruberment NOT to use the term "illegal aliens," but instead to use "undocumented Americans."  See how cunning that is?

It's against the law for people to camp on public sidewalks or someone else’s property—and yet the rulers of EVERY (yes) Democrat/leftist-ruled city ignore those laws.

Defecation, urination and drug injection are now routine on the sidewalks of Democrat-ruled cities.  And Dem pols totally ignore it--not a single critical word.  Not only that, they've ordered their cops NOT to arrest anyone for those crimes.  And when a city's rulers allow its streets and sidewalks to become medieval, should we be surprised by outbreaks of deadly medieval diseases like typhus--or that the storm drains now wash raw sewage from sidewalks into the ocean without treatment?

The priority for today’s leftist/Dem mayors and council-whores is to consider proposals for taxpayer-funded “sexual-relief facilities,” to give homeless people “private sexual relief through masturbation.”  That's not hyperbole--it's an actual proposal to the city council of LA.

Instead of arresting sidewalk campers, Dem rulers pay city workers in hazmat suits to wash "politically correct" feces, urine, blood and needle into storm drains. These modern marvels carry the mess out to pollute the ocean--cuz dat make it someone else's problem, eh?

Democrat/leftist rulers fine the law-abiding for emitting one part per billion of X in their waste--while allowing the "oppressed" to do as they wish.

Let's look at another area (and I can do this all day):

To deliver everything everyone needs requires trucks.  These have evolved from simple horse-drawn wagons to 80,000-pound semi's running at 70 or 80 miles per hour.  Got it?

It shouldn't surprise you that it takes a lot of skill and training to drive one of those big rigs, so states *originally* established fairly strict rules for giving people licenses to drive these things. 

Originally you had to pass a background check, including drug screening, and then pass a written test, then a thorough two-hour, in-person test of their driving skills.  And it worked to weed out the incompetent.

Except years ago the shitty leftist-ruled states began giving such licenses to illegal aliens who couldn't read road signs.

Say, that'll work well, eh?

And you think, What *possible* motive could states like Cali and NY have for giving commercial driver's licenses to illegals who couldn't read road signs, eh?  Where was the payoff?

Ohhh, dat it: duh payoff.  Fake "schools" took cash to give illegals certificates, and DMV workers took bribes (or obeyed orders from superiors) to give the illegals commercial licenses without testing.

The result?

Thousands of incompetent drivers. Many cannot distinguish a yield sign from a stop sign, and most cannot read a word of English. They drive as they please—racing, swerving, and veering, 80,000-pounds of kinetic energy.

But what was the payoff for leftist pols?  It let 'em feel "virtuous"--"woke."  Morally superior to the rest of us.

Let's go to a different indicator:

In December of 2024, in the shithole of NYC, Luigi Mangione ran up behind the CEO of a health-insurance company and shot him.  Straight-up assassination.

A few weeks ago he pleaded guilty to federal charges stemming from the assassination--yet thousands of young leftist females (?) continue to  fawn and slobber over him--cuz the they regard the assassination as "politically correct violence," thus a good thing.  Just as the Left crowed about the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Many on the Left not only celebrated over Kirk's assassination but also mocked those who mourned him. 

When Lindsay Clancy strangled her three helpless small children, leftist/Dem women fawned over her, claiming she was actually the victim. 

Still think we've advanced?   

Our ancestors determined that actually enforcing laws reduces crime--not because the prospect of being caught, charged, convicted and sentenced to prison deters thugs (hint: it doesn't) but because it takes 'em off the streets for up to decades.

Yet Marxism (leftism, socialism) opposes this as "unfair."  The rationalization is that the thief or killer grew up in poverty so didn't know right from wrong."  Seriously.

Leftists ("wokies") insist that the thugs they champion must never suffer the consequences of their destructive ideology.  "Cuz dey wuz 'oppressed.'"

The Left can get away with this because they have the power to ensure that no homeless druggies are camping on the lawns of leftist Malibu celebrities, eh?

Similarly, shit-head leftist pols like Karen Bass and Gavin Newsom never worry about being mugged or stabbed in their "progressive, crime-ridden cities because they have 24/7 personal security details.

Nice, eh?
 
Leftist/socialist/Dem pols are taking our big cities back to medieval conditions.  And no one seems to be a bit concerned.

And there's a reason: the progressives, socialists, and Marxists bleat that they “care.”  They've decreed that the rape victim of an illegal alien is a nothing--just collateral damage that you must accept to ensure that the illegal alien remains free to stay in the U.S, unquestioned.

Today's leftist--a medievalist--demands that the 30-year military veteran be thrown out of the military for refusing the experimental mRNA vaccine—while at the same time welcoming the unvaccinated, COVID-infected illegal alien who, even as we were locked down and prohibited from attending funerals or church, strolled across the Rio Grande without a word from your leftist rulers.

The Left is all about virtue-signaling—at someone else’s expense.

Thus we arrive at the racist, white-hating murderer Decarlos Brown—now deemed “too incompetent to stand trial” after stabbing unarmed 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska in the throat three times, from behind, unprovoked, on a tram in a Democrat-ruled shithole.  Brown could be the poster child of our modern medievalism.

Source: American Greatness blog

https://amgreatness.com/2026/09/01/progressive-regression-and-the-new-medievalism/ 

Message for Democrats

 

x 

Atlantic prints a second LONG piece by a trans CIA officer/presidential briefer

The Atlantic is a leftist shit-mag.  Always has been.  They eagerly fawn over every Democrat and socialist and tranny policy.  Free country (well, at least for Democrats).  So carry on, leftists.

The problem is, all their readers eagerly eat up everything they print.  And the Lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media fawningly, slobberingly parrots it all.  Latest example: a story SO gripping and heart-wrenching that the Atlantic published a preview of their upcoming October issue--in August!  Cuz it's SO gripping and heart-wrenching.  And blasts Trump and conservatives.

It's a LONG piece by a tranny CIA officer who was a member of bribem's National Security Council.  Despite Trump issuing an EO saying "only two sexes," the tranny was kept on after the 2016 election and was tasked as the regular personal briefer of Mike Pence--among many other exalted posts.

The piece makes it quite clear that the author LOVES Pence and hates Trump--because it's a leftist hit-piece on Trump, as you expected cuz it was in the Atlantic, eh?

Tranny author/CIA agent and Pence

Every paragraph in the piece drips with angst and trauma and emotional struggle.  Well of course!  Understandable, cuz every tranny's life centers around that struggle, eh?  So the recurring theme of the piece is the author constantly noting the praise showered on him/her/it by other members of the intel community and the pols they briefed.

And let me make clear that I don't doubt the ability of a homosexual or tranny to digest intel cables and produce a briefing sheet.  Even AI could do that.  My concern stems from this: If someone who's clearly born male claims to be a "real woman," is that a rational conclusion?

No.  Hell no.  Obviously no.  So when he continually insists that he really, reeeeally IS a woman, what else is he gonna spin to make it work with his unreal version of reality?

Consider that 99% of snakes are totally harmless.  Suppose your local eco-freak said "We want you to let this unidentified species of snake live in your home.  Not in a cage, of course, since dat wud be cruel.  So it gotta be free to roam anywhere in your house."

Odds are the snake isn't poisonous.  But would you risk it?

Same with trannies: they're clearly "off," but as I admitted earlier, chances are they could do the job competently, honestly.  And if the CIA was short of talent, and had to put a tranny into the key briefing position, okay.  But that is NOT the case.  The CIA shouldn't keep trannies on the payroll, any more than they should keep drug users on--even if the person is competent.  Why?  Cuz it's a risk we don't need to take.

So here's just one of a hundred examples of what bullshit propaganda the Atlantic piece is:  The author writes

When Trump was inaugurated for his second term, he declared “As of today it will be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders: male and female.” 

Sounds like a true statement.  But the tranny could not resist lying, writing "The president signed an executive order banning me from restrooms in all federal buildings."

Horseshit.  The order said "two sexes," and that was later clarified to say people had to use the bathroom of their biological sex, not the one they arbitrarily claimed.  Is that "banning you from restrooms in all federal buildings"?  Of course not--but lying about it makes it seem SO cruel and oppressive, eh?  Which was the entire point.

Let me make this clear:  If someone wants to claim they're a dinosaur, that's their privilege.  I don't have ANY problems with that.  But when they DEMAND that all the rest of us agree with their clearly unreal claim, I've got a big problem with that.

Leftists: "Why yew so upset, deplorable?  Dis don' doo no harm!  If dis faaaabulous pyrsyn wants t' be female, how duz dat hurt YOU, eh?"

Glad you asked.  You won't like my answer, because you won't understand it.  That answer is that when cunning leftists enact either laws or mere "rules" endorsing any lie, reality gets junked:  If you accept that up is down, male is female, every definition is now up for grabs.  Reality becomes whatever some lunatic claims it is.

Democrats/socialists/communists: "SO??  Whut duh problem wif DAT?"

Told ya you wouldn't understand.

The Atlantic piece goes on for 4,000 words.

After Trump-2 was inaugurated:

I was now the senior intelligence official in the White House. For the incoming Trump administration, the trans woman would man the gates.

The author doesn't mention his/her/its exact job title, but "THE senior intel official at the White House" seems pretty powerful.

For as long as I can remember I’ve carried two dreams. The first came true in 2007, when I raised my hand, standing on the agency’s marble seal, and became a CIA officer. The second dream, I didn’t dare speak aloud; it came from ­an unexplainable conviction that I should have been born a woman. The longing, like homesickness, grew into an unbearable darkness.

Y'know what else is often described as an "unbearable darkness"?  Mental illness.  Now on a cosmic scale, this one isn't necessarily totally debilitating.  But it's still pushing "real" into second place, under "whut I *feel*"  Reality is shoved aside by the pyrsyn's feeeewings.

The author again:

in 2017, I wrote in these pages [the Atlantic--so he's been a total shill for 9 years] under the pseudonym Jenny Hall about how being openly trans at the CIA *made me a better officer.*  CIA recruiters used the essay on college campuses, and new officers—­not realizing they were talking with the author—told me that it had inspired them to apply.

Note the last part: In other words, slobber, fawn, praise: "My essay inspired 'them' to apply" to the CIA.  Who's "them," eh?  Trannies.  Do we want more trannies in the CIA?  Do we want ANY?  That depends almost entirely on your political party.  

Trannies deny reality.  More particularly, they claim reality is their reality, not reality as the rest of us know it.  And in an intel "analyst" that sets off my alarm bells.  And it should set yours off too. But of course if you're a Democrat, you're fine with it.  "Chances are that snake we insist you let live in your home is perfectly harmless."

There's a war going on.  (Spoiler: there's always a war going on.  You just never see it or read about it.)  It's between free societies and totalitarian ones.  To put it in more specific terms, between socialism and freedom.  The free group says "If you choose to be socialists (communists), it's your choice."  By contrast, the first group insists that every nation should be communist.

Of course you don't believe dat, eh?  That's because you know nothing about history.  Google "Hungarian revolution 1956" and get back to me.  Young people of Hungary were sick of being ruled by the communists, so they revolted.  In response, the USSR (the former Soviet Union) sent in hundreds of tanks.  Young Hungarians fought the good fight, but eventually were defeated by Soviet tanks, at the cost of thousands of lives. 

Young American: "Dis can't be true!  If true, my skool wud have taught it!"

Well there ya go, comrade.

Google "Chinese protest Tien an Minh square."  Same exact thing: young Chinese hated being ruled by fat commies, so they staged a beautiful but short-lived revolt, crushed by army tanks.

The example are damn near endless.  So how do these events tie to the Atlantic articles by the tranny CIA officer?

Because the Left never stops trying to defeat free nations.  Never.

"Julia" may not be a leftist, but he/she/it is definitely a tool of the Left--even if unknowingly.  But the editors of the Atlantic DO know.

"NOOOooo!  We iz NOT leftists, citizen!  We iz jus' defending ouah po' oppressed transgender sisters!  It gots nuffin to do wif' politics!  Nope nope nope!  Nuffin' at ALL!  We iz jus' tryin' to get ebrywun to accept dat appointing transgender comrades to duh highest positions in duh CIA and NSA iz reeeally guud fo' duh U.S!"

To conclude, let's review: in nature, what happens to animals that either refuse to learn, or are merely too stupid to learn, eh?

Think about that.

Of course you won't, cuz dere's a new Taylor Swift song out, eh?  Or something equally distracting.

There always is, eh?