Democrat propaganda site Axios reveals the Partei's game plan: violence, but blamed on voters

"Axios" is a Democrat propaganda site posing as a "newz" source.  Its only value is that it lets us know what the Democrat partei is "thinking" and planning.  So here ya go, from July 7th: 

Democratic members of Congress are facing growing *demands [from Dem votersw] to break the rules and fight dirty. Democrat members tell Axios they see a growing anger among their base....

Like, riots?  Burning cars and buildings?  Shooting ICE agents?  Hmm...

Unnamed House Dem #1:  "This idea that we're going to save every norm...isn't resonating with voters anymore."
    Unnamed House Dem #2:  "A sense of fear and despair and anger among voters puts us in a position where we can't keep following norms of decorum."

Do you detect any plan there?  Asshole Dem congresswhores--accustomed to total, corrupt power and getting everything they wanted under Obozo and bribem--are shocked that they're now (temporarily) the minority, and they're fighting back by claiming Trump is "acting like a king."  And Americans hate that--as the Dem whores know quite well.  The claim was carefully chosen to inflame stupid Dem voters--the kind who burn defenseless cars.  And it's working.

 "People desperately want us to do something... and no matter what we say, they want [more]," said the Dem chair of the center-left New Democrat Coalition."

Democrat congresswhores and their Media lackeys inflame their base, then claim they're totally at the mercy of the people they inflamed.  Nice bullshit.  "We cannot imagine where ouah base got duh idea to burn cars and throw chunks of concrete at ICE agents!  We wud nevah suggest dat, cuz we iz all guuuud, law-abidin' Merkans.  Yep yep yep!"

According to Axios (the Dem talking-point sheet),

House Dem #3: The grassroots wants more. "Some of them have suggested ... what we really need to do is be willing to get shot" when visiting ICE facilities or federal agencies.  Our base is telling us there needs to be blood to grab the attention of the press and the public."

Starting to understand yet?  No, you're probably not, because a) you don't believe they really said this; b) you don't understand that it's a call to war; and c) you can't believe they really mean this.  Dream on, cupcake.

House Democrat #4: "Constituents say our civility isn't working, and to prepare for "violence ...a  fight to protect our democracy."
   Nearly every Democrat lawmaker cited examples of voters' panic and fury fueling demands to adopt brute force tactics.
   House Democrat #6: "It's like the Roman coliseum. People just want more and more of this spectacle."
   [Dem congressman] Schneider, like other Democrats, said efforts to impeach Trump are extremely popular with their voters.

Imagine that. 

Dem Rep. Ro Khanna (#7)--a high-profile progressive--said he believes "the most effective pushback to Trump's unconstitutional actions is to model a reverence for the Constitution and the rule of law."

This is classic propaganda:  By posting Khanna's quote verbatim, without a word of pushback, the author gets readers to unconsciously accept Khanna's claim that Trump has been violating the Constitution.  Classic.

Many lawmakers [all Democrats, but that's carefully omitted] said these voters [the ones demanding violence] tend to be white, well-educated and live in upscale suburban or urban neighborhoods.

That's another masterpiece of propaganda, implicitly suggesting that those who demand violence are NOT thugs and communists, but instead are the "elites." The "cool kidz."  Well educated.  Smart.  Probably schooled in the Constitution and "nuance."  Which makes the pro-violence group much more attractive to people who don't know which way to jump.  Nice.

Now, why is all the above significant?

Because once an idea spreads and captures supporters, it can't be deleted.

Dem strategists don't believe there will be more than scattered violence--no wide war--so they're perfectly happy to push violence--which they then blame on Trump's policies--like deporting illegal invaders.

If you haven't heard Karen Bass and other Dems bleat "Everyt'ing wuz perfekly under control until Trump ordered [anything]!" you haven't been paying attention.

Imagine today's Democrats in WW2: "If duh preznit just hadn't declared war on doze nice pipo in Germany and Japan, we wouldn't be having all deez awful things happening!"  It's what we have here.  Just not as obvious.

But don't feel bad: Your ignorance isn't your fault.  The Mainstream Media totally supports the Dems, so if you get all your "newz" from them, you never see the real story.  Also, the first time you DO see a piece showing you the real story, you don't believe it because it clashes with everything you've been conditioned to believe.

Contradictory information triggers what's called "cognitive dissonance," which is intensely uncomfortable.  The brain wants to end the discomfort by rejecting one of the two contradictory narratives.

Clever propagandists keep people on the reservation (i.e. avoid being rejected) by using emotional examples that tug at the heartstrings.  Thus you see endless stories claiming "Trump is separating families!" because that's an emotional argument that always wins.  Similarly, the Mainstream Media (an arm of the Democrat Partei) always describe Kilmar Abrego Garcia--a wife-beating human smuggler--as "a Maryland dad."

You know this is true, but you just never noticed before.

Similarly, the New York Times demands that illegal aliens be called "undocumented Americans," cuz then they can claim Trump is "deporting Americans."  And because you unconsciously accepted their bullshit assertion before, it doesn't occur to you to question it now, eh?

Same with the Media claiming "Duh po' immigrants iz all 'refugees'!"  99% are NOT, but have been coached by NGOs (who make shit-tons of taxpayer cash for each illegal they help) to claim refugee status because that wins 'em admission into the U.S. for over a decade as their cases are "processed" by liberal/Democrat operatives of the DeepState.

None of this is an accident.  It's all part of a careful plan by the Dems to win all future elections, by giving all illegals citizenship and the right to vote.  Of course you don't know that and don't believe it, because it seems too brazen, eh?  

So try researching "automatic registration to vote when applying for a driver's license in california."  Roughly 400,000 illegals were automatically registered to vote in California alone because the Dems who run the DMV cunningly rigged drivers' license applications so applicants would be registered to vote unless they checked a box saying "I am not a citizen of the U.S."  Apparently most DMV employees didn't mention this feature to applicants.  Hmmm...

You've been sold down the river by the cunning Democrats--all so they could control the government for the next 50 years.

Source: Axios

https://www.axios.com/2025/07/07/democrats-trump-resistance-violence-congress
 

Leftist writer tells Dems 'The key claim you cite for doing sex-changes on minors is a lie'

Democrats have always called sex-changing drugs and surgery "gender-affirming medical care."  The theory is that by some twist kids can be "born into the wrong body."  So mutilating their healthy bodies, first with puberty blockers, then so-called "cross-sex hormones" and finally with surgery to remove offending parts, is merely...wait for it..."affirming" the child's alleged "real" gender.

Dems and Leftists have claimed that there's a key piece of "evidence" showing sex-change operations are totally necessary: they claim if kids do NOT get this surgery, they're more likely to commit suicide.

But now a writer at The Atlantic blows up that claim, telling the mag's readers it's entirely fictitious.

And the Left/Dems always bleat that everyone should "believe the science," right?  So what are they gonna do now?

ABC news featured a pro-tranny doctor saying "We often asked parents, 'Would you rather have a dead son than a live daughter?'"  Variations on the phrase crop up in innumerable media articles and public statements by influencers, activists, and LGBTQ groups.

Biden's solicitor general made the same claim before the Supreme Court last year, when the court heard the Left's lawsuit against Tennessee's law prohibiting the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on minor children.

It's a heart-wrenching claim--by design. Just one problem:  It's a lie.

You think that can't possibly be right, because the Left got away with the claim for over a decade.  Because the claim went unrefuted for so long, I understand your skepticism.  So take a look at how the ACLU's top, hotshot tranny attorney, "Chase Strangio," handled questions from SC justices:

When Justice Samuel Alito challenged ACLU lawyer Strangio for evidence to support the claim, first Strangio dodged the question, saying research shows that blockers and hormones reduce "depression, anxiety, and suicidality"--that is, suicidal thoughts.

But when Alito cited a systematic review conducted in England, Strangio conceded that "There is no evidence...that this treatment reduces completed suicide."

The U.K. study found that suicide rates for patients who did NOT get sex-change ops did NOT result in higher suicide rates.  
 
Here was the ACLU's foremost pro-tranny attorney, in front of the nation's highest court, admitting that what the Left had always claimed as the strongest argument for sex-change surgery on minors was, in fact, not supported by the evidence.

How much more clear does it get, eh?

But even that admission didn't convince the three dissenting female liberal justices. Sonia Sotomayor claimed in her dissent that "access to care can be a question of life or death."  Ahh, "can be."  But clearly delaying sex-change operations for minors is NOT one of those times.

Most liberals are unaware of this because they get all their info from the Mainstream Media, where talking heads repeat lies without a care in the world.

Strangio--who works for what was once a free-speech organization--once tweeted that [she] would like to ban Abigail Shrier's book Irreversible Damage, a skeptical treatment of youth gender medicine. Strangio declared, "Stopping the circulation of this book and these ideas is 100% a hill I will die on."

The former head of the most prominent organization pushing sex-change for minors has compared opponents of sex-change operations for kids to Holocaust deniers.

Strangio apparently expected the Supreme Court justices would be just as eager to swallow horseshit as the Media, and when it became clear that the conservative justices had done their research--and had some questions--the jig was up.

Pro-tranny activists have spent the past decade telling children that anyone who tries to keep them from getting puberty blockers and hormones is trying to kill them. As Strangio's answer tacitly conceded, that was false.  It was also irresponsible.

Source.

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=415521

Ever wonder how Democrats started thinking rioting and arson were the answer?

 

In case the quotes are too hard to read, Nancy "Nazi" Pelosi said "I just don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country.  Maybe there should be."  Nancy was the damn Speaker of the House! 

And for those who don't pay attention: the lunatic in the upper-right is Cackles Harris, who the leaders of the Democrat Partei [sic] nominated for president after Nanzi pressured the Vegetable to step down. 

See, dis beez how democracy works, Democrat-style:  The Partei's Media lackeys absolutely assure voters that Joe is "sharp as ever,"  But when polling shows voters know that's a lie, the Dems ignore the primary results and install Cackles--a total incompetent whose only "assets" are a) female, and b) claims to be black.

How that moron ever got elected f'n attorney-general of California, and then senator, boggles the mind.  But it's totally understandable that after bribem promised that if nominated he'd select a black female as his VP, he'd pick Cackles, since that ensured he'd nevah be impeached.