White population is dropping as white women decide to have 1 or none

I've posted many times about the fact that white women in modern nations are having so few children that white populations are actually shrinking.

Of course you didn't believe me, since the Mainstream Media never says a word about dat, eh?

Well finally ONE Mainstream source confirms it--but the focus of the story is NOT the U.S. but...Spain.  The first mention of the U.S. is in the 8th paragraph, and most Americans won't read that far in an article seemingly about a small Spanish village.

The website is Politico, which is a Democrat-fellating leftist rag masquerading as neutral.  And to avoid angering the "die-versity is ouah strength" Dem party, and the "We need a female president like Kamala" wing, Politico can't approach this problem from the perspective of "white populations are dropping," but making the focus "the Social Security system."

That's *really* clever.  The problem is that LOTS of white women are deciding not to have kids--or to have just one.  

You may well wonder why that is, eh?  Of course you already know, cuz every TV show and movie has been blasting the message to women and girls for decades: "Having and raising children is hard work, expensive, and compared to the excitement and power of the business world, BORING!  Women should be running companies and countries!  They should be police chiefs, CEOs, generals, all those exciting jobs!" 

"See, if women were police chiefs or the head of Homeland Security we could take care of all doze poor refugee kids from all over duh world!  Now *that* would be exciting!  We give the orders and someone else does the work!"

And once a 15-year-old bites on *that* hook, the prospect of being a Hilliary or Cackles or a governor or senator is SO seductive compared with a boring, useless husband and whiny kids, right?  Kids always need something, whereas in the corporate world rich, sophisticated, well-dressed *powerful* men are always wanting you to join the team to negotiate deals in exciting foreign countries!

Girls see Hilliary Clinton and Cackles and governors like Hochul and Mikie Sherill and Abigail Spanberger and think "I want to boss people around!  Including men!  Cuz dat whut corporate execs DO, right?  That's what I see on TV and the movies, so it must be true.  No changing diapers or washing dishes for THIS stronk, powerful woman!  Nope nope nope!"

Also: the Globull Warmers have convinced young American women that having children is bad for duh climate, cuz children require heating and electricity, and drive cars and take plane trips across the Atlantic to receive fawning awards in Cannes for "saving duh Erf."  So this is yet another reason why American women are having no more than one child, and sometimes none.

So with the "why" established, let's look at the numbers.  I'll be using a number called "TFR"--the total fertility rate.  In the past that's been hard to find, probably because it's an easy concept to understand, and the last thing western pols want is for you to understand this.  [Don't confuse TFR with "fertility rate," which is almost useless: it's the number of births per 1,000 women in a year.  Doesn't tell you anything about whether the number shown is above or below replacement rate, so is much less informative.]

TFR is the *average* number of children a woman has in her lifetime.  It doesn't take a PhD to realze that if each female has 2 children, that would keep the population level (steady).  The actual number needs to be about 2.1, because a small percentage of children die before reaching child-bearing age.  So less than 2.1 and the population of that group steadily drops.

The farther below 2.1, the faster the drop.

In 2024 the average TFR for Europe was 1.34--way below the "replacement rate."  Spain's TFR is just 1.1--the lowest of the large nations.

The CDC reports that in Q3 of 2025 the TFR for the U.S. was 1.594--again, far below replacement.  But that number conceals a far more disturbing truth, because that's the number for *all women in the U.S. regardless of race or citizenship.*

The CDC also claims the TFR for whites is 1.54, for blacks is 1.465, and for Hispanic, 1.893.  But I'm really skeptical, because everywhere I go it seems that black women have lots more kids than whites.  Have you noticed?

https://x.com/BirthGauge/status/2014824763516977591?lang=en

Also, all three TFRs are below replacement, yet the population of the U.S. keeps increasing every year.  How can that be happening?  Of course: millions of "migrants" every year.  

So for the TFR for all women in the U.S. to be 1.626, the rate for whites is *highly likely* to be less than the 1.544 number claimed by the CDC. 

And sure enough, even though there are more white women in the U.S. than non-white, in 2024, for the first time in U.S. history there were more non-white births in the U.S. than white births.

You already have at least an idea of what that means, but what you don't know is how fast it's coming.  So to give you an idea let's use a simplified example: Suppose we assume the vast majority of all births are to women between the ages of 16 and 46.  Now assume we replace that 30-year cohort of women having 2.1 TFR with the same number of women with a TFR of 1.05.  In 30 years it means *half as many births* to this group.

Certainly a simplified example, since white U.S. women are likely at 1.3 instead of 1.05, so over the 30 years needed to completely substitute the new cohort, white births wouldn't be cut in half, but would be down perhaps 40% compared to today.

Liberals and Democrats: "We don't see a problem with that.  Sounds great to us!"
 
Imagine every big city mayor is a Mamdani or a Brandon Johnson or Karen Bass.  Imagine a congress composed of Maxine Waters, Ilhan Omar, AOC.  Imagine every state legislature is majority-minority and majority-Democrat.

It's coming, sooner than you can imagine.  

Top Democrat: 'Requiring proof of citizenship to vote is RAAaaacist!'

 

Senate leaves for a month without passing voter-ID bill

 

Fauci wanted the EUA, and to get that he had to claim no existing treatments worked

Most Americans are sick of hearing about Fauci, since a) "You can't change the past"; and b) "It's clear that as long as the Democrat party insists on protecting him, he'll never be punished for his crimes against humanity, so why waste time trying?" 

I get it.  Really.  And I *really* wanna change that.  I want you to be as furious as his many crimes deserve, so that maybe our useless congress will send this monster to prison. 

SO...you probably think you have an idea about what a ghastly monster, liar, murderer Fauci is.  But you've barely scratched the surface.  It takes a bit of background to understand how carefully plotted the entire covid thing was.

The so-called "vaccine" was approved under a section of U.S. LAW (yeah, I know, law ain't shit to Democrats) called "Emergency Use Authorization" (EUA).  As the name implies, if a new epidemic were to hit, this emergency provision allows developers to cut corners to rush a *possible* treatment to the public--but ONLY if there's no existing treatment for the disease.

Since Fauci got the EUA approved, by LAW that must mean no known, approved treatment was effective against covid.  But was that true?

In 2005 Asia was struggling with a coronavirus closely related to Covid-19, called "SARS-CoV."  It used the same type of spike protein to bind to the same target cells in the human airway ("ACE-2 receptors").  

The NIH has a publication called "Virology Journal," described as "an official publication of the National Institutes of Health.  In August of 2005 that journal published an article titled "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread."  

Chloroquine was field-tested by the U.S. Army around 1943 and has been used for decades.  It's safe when used at recommended dosages, and astonishingly inexpensive.  It was tested "in-vitro" against SARS-CoV at various concentrations, and found to kill the virus's ability to infect the ACE-2 receptor cells.  At micro-molar levels it killed all the virus.  Nice!  

And if that wasn't impressive enough (and this is a really big deal), it was treat not only effective in treating cells after infection, when given before infection it was found to *prevent* infection entirely! 

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1232869/

[If you click on the link to read the 2005 paper, don't be misled by the first sentence, which says "No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available."  The authors mean that chloroquine had not been approved for use against SARS-CoV *at that time.*
  This is confirmed in the conclusion: "Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection."]

Hydroxychloroquine ("HCQ") is a less-toxic derivative of chloroquine.  It was first used in 1955.  It's widely used to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, and the VA dispenses roughly *a million pills of it a month for those conditions.*

On March 28, 2020, the FDA gave "Emergency Use Authorization" to both chloroquine and HCQ for use in treating Covid-19.  Interestingly, AI says "No, the FDA did NOT *formally approve* HCQ."  But if you keep reading, the FDA did grant EUA.  That's sure as hell an approval ("Authorization"), even if with restrictions.

During February, March and April of 2020 the VA purchased more than 6.3 million tablets of HCQ.  But if the "normal" use for lupus and arthritis was a million tabs a month, why did the VA buy more than twice the normal use during that three-month period?

And IF the VA gave HCQ to patients with Covid-19, are there any records of the outcome?

On June 15 of 2020 the FDA rescinded the EUA "after clinical data showed the drugs were unlikely to be effective."  I've read a couple of papers reporting the results, and they're FULL of crap.  It's as if they wrote the "no help" conclusion first and plugged in numbers to support it. 

In any case, as the head of one of the five divisions of NIH for decades, Fauci had to know that BOTH CQ and HCQ were known to be effective "in vitro," BOTH in preventing infection AND in treating existing infection.  And yet he repeatedly claimed--during daily news conferences--that both were dangerous and didn't help.  And of course no Dem-fellating "journalist" ever asked him what papers supported his claim.

That would have exposed Fauci as a liar.  Ooohh, can't have dat, eh?  Even though his diary shows he lied *constantly,* about *everything.*

Fauci was determined to get the "vaccine" approved--though carefully AFTER the election that saddled us with the vegetable bribem.  To get it done without taking another year to do all the long, costly, normal trials meant an EUA.  And to get the EUA required showing that no other effective treatment existed.

That obviously meant discrediting the two drugs above, plus ivermectin.  So the question to ask Fauci is "What studies do you cite as support for your claim that none of those three totally safe, already approved, low-cost drugs were NOT effective?"

Having been given federal immunity, Fauci should be forced to testify.  And since the DOJ will have time to review the "studies" Fauci is likely to cite, their flaws can be easily shown. 

Who dis? An' why should you care?

The woman below is Jackie Stepp.  She beez duh po-leece chief of a beautiful tourist attraction called Asheville, North Carolina.  Her role will be explained below. 

 

If you're a typical American you don't pay attention to anything outside your immediate arm's reach.  Fair enough: it takes all your time and energy to keep food on your kids' table, a roof over their heads and trying to keep 'em off drugs.  

You've got your hands full.  I get it.  Really.

With that said: If you refuse to "step up your game" and fight, you're gonna lose more and more of the country you grew up with.

It's been happening for decades, but slowly.  But in the last decade the pace of conquests by the forces of evil has tripled.

Of course unless you live in one of the shithole cities (formerly beautiful and quaint), you never see it.  And in truth, most Americans wouldn't care, since if residents of a city losing to the demons--the orcs--don't care enough to do what needs to be done, why should you care, eh?

Latest example: Asheville, North Carolina.  Tourist town.  Lovely.  Surrounded by what pass for mountains for easterners.  (Just kidding--it's lovely.)

Well: Asheville is a university town, and like every other university town it's been ruled by liberals, Democrats, socialists and communists for decades.

And for decades that was only a tiny problem.  But then something happened.

Black gangs discovered that Asheville was run by Democrats.

Democrat voter: "Why would that be a problem?"

Because Democrat DAs refuse to punish black thugs *in any meaningful way.*  As in, any way that makes 'em stop robbing and murdering. 

If you don't already know that, you're a brain-dead liberal and deserve what you're getting.

Let me explain: when a thug murders someone, and the DA offers a "plea bargain" in which the killer pleads guilty to "felon in possession of a firearm" and is sentenced to 3 months in jail (usually DAs in Dem-ruled shitholes don't demand prison time for "felon in possession"), does anyone with a functioning brain think that deters the thug from doing it again?  And then again? 

With that, let's return to Ashville:  Three weeks ago [Dems: "Dat old newz!  Why you care bout old newz, boomer?"] at 2:30 a.m. a group of "pipo" (never further described) fired 80 shots, hitting seven, killing two.

Typical Democrat: "Dat nuffin'!  In Chicago or NY or LA that wouldn't even make the news!  So go away, whiny deplorable!  Hater!"

Except Asheville has a population of 94,000.  If you widen the borders to the entire metro area, 422,000.  For a population this size, this fatal shooting should have been a big deal.

But if you listen to the female police chief, Jackie Stepp, it's a nothing: NOT gang-related at ALL, citizen!  Wait, Jackie, you liberal tool: How the fuck do you KNOW that, since you haven't arrested anyone and don't know anything a about who did the shooting, eh?

Oh, got it: Asheville is a popular tourist attraction, so Jackie can't admit her city has murderous gangs, eh?  Cuz dat would cut the number of tourists, eh?

She admitted to the local TV station that the city "has gang activity," since she knew the networks would never pick that up--but quickly said the murders were NOT "traditional gang activity."

Ahh.  Jackie, would ya tell us what you mean by "traditional," and how that reassures your city's residents?

Wow, that's a huge relief, eh?  Of course she doesn't know who did it or why, but will parrot  that it's "not gang-related" regardless, cuz... well, we cannot let potential visitors thinking ouah city beez gang-infested.

And so it goes.  NYC gang members and LA gang members found easy pickins in Asheville: ruled by liberal Democrats, soft on crime, liberal female police chief.  So...Asheville it is, eh?

This is the future, folks.  Enjoy.  And the comments are a hoot!  Over 2,400 right now:

You can't solve problems that you refuse to recognize.

The chief is hoping the problem will go away if she just keeps denying it exists.  News flash, it won’t, but it will get worse. Once again, the problem isn't "guns," but failure to imprison killers.

Asheville is run by Democrats.  Quaint town but absolutely Democrat in every respect. While the rest of NC is Republican, Asheville is just another high-rent, socialist-leaning blot on the Appalachian mountains. They've pushed for reparations, green tyranny and freezing rents.  Classic.

San Francisco of the East.  Pro-Hamas signs everywhere.

First the city's Dem rulers let the homeless take over the downtown, now they let the gangs take over.  And then rush to the cameras to deny it's happening.

Lived there.  Bunch of "progressives" running and ruining the place. 

How many of these shootings involve people with criminal records?  I notice they're never put in prison.  Why not?  Oh, got it.

[Then we have the inevitable Democrat shill, posting...] "Sounds like maga." 

Democrats absolutely assured us that removing Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima from rice and syrup bottles would end black violence.

Asheville native here: Liberals have taken over city and county leadership and ruined what was once a unique, charming southern town.  Higher taxes, non-existant policing, no prosecution...you know the agenda. Don't take your family to downtown "Little Chicago" after dark. Sad.

No city can reduce crime unless it's led by pols willing to do what's needed.  Instead, voters keep electing Dems who are unwilling to lock up thugs for long terms.  You get the same result when parents never require anything of their children and provide no discipline...Asheville will regret the way the city ends up.

Downtown Asheville is full of people openly casually smoking crack, because they know the cops won't arrest 'em.  Every thug sees, and knows exactly what that means: city rulers won't prosecute.

Sounds like downtown Denver.  Dem-ruled cities always turn into shitholes.

What used to be a sleepy little mountain town has become a southern California transplant haven.

Grew up in Asheville [born 1953] with church bells ringing on Sunday morning and able to safely walk downtown at any hour.  Somehow it's turned into a shithole.  How did that happen?  Next up: Muslims blaring their call to prayer five times a day thru loudspeakers, then DEMANDING that churches be prohibited from ringing *their* bells on Sunday morning.  And the Dem rulers will scurry to comply!

Wokie Democrats scream that enforcing laws is RAAaacist!  SO much nicer when anyone can smoke crack on the sidewalk.

Our beautiful town began turning into a liberal Mecca 15 years ago when Obozo was running the U.S. into the ground.  Liberals took over hundreds of formerly safe towns all over the U.S.

How can you fix a problem if city "leaders" refuse to recognize there IS one?

Same thing happened years ago in Minneapolis: everyone saw the beginnings of gang violence but mayor and governor refused to acknowledge it or address it.  By the time it got out of control--so they could no longer deny it--by then it was too late.  Democrat pols were afraid of losing the black vote, and of being accused of racism by white libs.

Work forces me to go to downtown Asheville every day.  I call it “Little Portland."  Open drug use everywhere--syringes thrown into gutters, broken crack pipes, the smell of weed everywhere.

Nine people are shot and two died.  In the Dem-ruled city is anyone surprised that Dem city rulers deny gangs were involved?

Dems bleat that it's a "gun problem," and that the obvious solution is to confiscate all guns from civilians.  But of course it's NOT a "gun problem."  Not one of my guns has driven downtown at midnight and shot anyone.  No, the problem is wokie pols who refuse to prosecute and jail murderers and mere thugs.

Asheville needs to apply for a federal grant to erect a hundred signs downtown saying "It's against the LAW to shoot people."  Cuz the average thug jus' din' know.  Signs will solve this, cuz thugs always obey signs and laws, right?

Democrat plan for reducing crime: "Don't call murders and robberies 'crimes.'  Instead call 'em 'incidents' by 'justice-involved individuals,' or 'disenfranchised youth groups.'"

Source. 

Movable goalposts

The utterly corrupt, thieving government of New York City is paying $43 Billion of taxpayer dollars to "educate" K-12 students this year.

That's $44,000 per student per year.

And "educate" is a *very* amorphous word--like Cackles Harris, it means anything the speaker wants it to mean.

Dems believe what the teachers' unions have always said: if you want better results, ya gotta pay top dollar, right?  The average state spends way less than half that (poor Oklahoma City spends $13,200 per student per year), but duh gummint of NYC believes that spending mo' cash gives top results, right?

C'mon, moronic Democrats!  Let's hear it:  "Spending more gives top results, RIGHT?"

Democrats: "Yeah.  Reeeally."

Me: "Thanks.  So how did NYC students do on, say, reading proficiency exams this year, eh?"

Dems:  "Uh...sorry, can't chat.  Got a plane to catch!  Later, MAGAt!"

So typical: turns out less than half of 3rd, 4th and 5th-graders passed the basic "English Language Arts" test.

Democrats: "Tests beez RAAAAaaacist!  Ebrywun know dat!  Aks 'em sumpin *useful,* like 'Who Cardi B?  Or "Who Lizzo?"  Or 'Which political party gibs yo' mom mo' free stuff?"  Or "Say you got a chance to score 500 ballots fo' duh November elections.  How much kin yew get fo' sellin' em?' See, *useful shit* like dat!"

This is the future:  The black "chancellor" of NYC schools is Kamar Samuels.  I haven't even bothered to look up his salary yet, but I'll predict it's $400K per year, before "benefits."  That's Fauci-level grift.  But he has all the qualfications needed, right? 

A VP of the United Federation of Teachers union (yet another teachers' union to have to placate, after NEA and AFT) blamed terrible test scores on "changes in curriculum and teaching strategies," one of which allows students to graduate *without passing a single standardized test!*  "Dis beez SO cool, comrade!  We don' like standardized tests, so we simply invented a workaround that will let ouah students granulate [sic] wifout passin' no dumb test!"

If Dems don't like a goal post, move it. 

Source: New York Post

https://nypost.com/2026/05/12/us-news/nyc-dumping-record-43b-into-public-schools-at-whopping-44k-per-pupil-despite-plummeting-enrollment-poor-test-results/ 

Sometimes evil doesn't bother trying to look normal

Most of the time evil is hard to recognize.  But sometimes, when it's just toying with humans, it doesn't bother. 

 

Can you guess who?  Sure ya can, citizen. 

Y'know that thing that nevah happens? Well it happened again

Hey, y'know that thing that the Democrats say never happens?  Well, it happened again:  In a town near Cincinnati three total mental cases brutally tortured a 7-year-old boy--severe beatings, burning, choking, and water torture.  Finally the nutters killed him.  

 

Now here's how four Lying Mainstream Media outlets lied about it:

 

Notice that all four of these Democrat-fellating outlets identified the three killers as "three women."  Nope.  Flat-out lie, uttered to protect Democrats, who have pushed the whole tranny mania on us.  Cuz two of the four are males pretending to be women.

Supreme Court moron Katanji Brown Jackson: "No, dey iz all reel women!  At least, dey say are, an' since I have no idea how to tell what a woman is, I has t' believe em!  Which means you do too, since I'm sometimes the deciding vote on close decisions!" 

Do we really have to put up with this shit? 

Either of these two look familiar? Yeah, didn't think so

The person on the left is a leftist monster.  It's kinda ironic cuz she looks so harmless, eh?

She's Vy Lyles, the first black female mayor of Charlotte, North Carolina.  EVERY local media outlet--all Leftist, of course--positively swooned over Vy, cuz...obvious.

Okay, so why did I just call her a monster, eh?  Because of the girl on the right.

Not one American in 10,000 will recognize her.  That's because of monsters like Vy and her Left/liberal/Democrat friends, who have worked SO hard to try to ensure that no one  would know about the girl on the right.

 

The girl on the right is Iryna Zarutska--a refugee from Ukraine, living in Charlotte.  On August 22 of last year Iryna boarded a streetcar/tram in Charlotte.  Sat down by herself, for what would be the last two minutes of her life. 

One minute later a black career criminal and schizophrenic sitting behind her stood up, pulled a knife and stabbed her three times in the throat.  She had just enough life left to look up at him before collapsing and dying.

So how does the monster mayor come into this?  It's because the tram had high-resolution video, which caught the unprovoked fatal stabbing close-up.  No obstruction, totally sharp and clear.  Transit workers had it right away--and because the fatal stabbing was so totally unprovoked, they released the vid to local TV stations.

Mayor Vy asked the stations NOT to broadcast the video or any parts of it--because she already knew the killer had been repeatedly released by wokie, soft-on-black-crime DAs and cops in her city.  And since all Media is run by woke leftists, ALL the stations agreed not to show the video.  And a few days later mayor Vy actually thanked the stations for doing as she demanded.

Not a single local TV station broadcast a single frame of the video for TWO WEEKS after the murder--and then only because the Internet was already showing it, so the local TV stations didn't wanna look like the corrupt fools they were and are. 

So that's how Vy earned the richly-deserved title of "monster:"  She made the corrupt decision to try to prevent voters from seeing the clear video of the brutal, unprovoked murder because her regime was utterly negligent in allowing the career-criminal schizo to be released again and again, so he was free to murder.   

Making progress in anything requires that those in charge admit what doesn't work.  But just as Tony "Doctor Science" Fauci was determined to do anything to avoid being found responsible for the entire covid disaster, mayor Vy was determined to prevent voters from seeing the horror of the unprovoked ambush-murder...to preserve her career.  Just like Fauci.

Now:  Imagine how the mayor and local TV stations would have reacted if the races had been reversed, eh?  But people have a hard time imagining that because white schizophrenic career criminals are quickly jailed or institutionalized for life.

Hmmmm...it's almost like we have two wildly different sets of laws in this country, eh?

London, then and now

My parents are from Flyover Country, but due to business (international oil) they lived in London's posh West End for 19 years.  A hundred yards from Speaker's Corner, Hyde Park.  Loved visiting 'em.  

But this was back from 1966.  And things have changed a lot since then.  If you're white and Christian, it hasn't changed for the better.  The city has been taken over in the same way New York City has.

In London thru around 1990, streets with lots of elegant stores were called "high streets."  Think Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills.  No longer.  The brief passage below is from a current London resident:

Walking down what was once one of London's "high streets" now is totally depressing:  Barely any local businesses left, just endless vape shops, tacky nail salons, dodgy phone shops and the obligatory Turkish barbers, most of which never see a single customer and barely even bother to maintain the pretence [author used the Brit spelling] of being legit anymore.
   A palpable atmosphere of quiet despair and resignation amongst the trickle of shoppers wandering aimlessly around.  It's like living in a country that just lost a war without firing a shot.  Never seen anything like it in my lifetime. 

Of course you don't care, any more than you care about what happened to New York City.  Why would you?  You don't live there, and you don't see any connection to anything you can do something about, so..."not my problem."  I get it.

Of course there IS something you can do, but almost no Americans see the connection. 

For the terminally stupid, for the hundredth time: "Import the third world, become the third world."  Leftist/Dem/communist politicians want to import a million Somalis and another million random third-worlders because a) they know eventually they'll be able to make 'em citizens, thus voters, and they'll vote Dem; and b) long before that, illegals are useful as "street muscle" to show alleged support for Dem politicians like Karen Bass, Brandon Johnson, Zohran Mamdani, AOC and the like.  

When Paleswinians block highways, or masses of Muzz block streets to pray, who would try to object when you get attacked--and the cops, at the orders of the pols, don't arrest the attackers?  

This is an everyday occurrence in big Dem-ruled cities, but it's happened slowly enough that few Americans noticed.  And now the three largest cities in America--NYC, L.A. and Chitcongo--all have communist mayors.  "Dat democracy, deplorable.  Duh pipo haz spoke, so yew cain't object."  "Ohh, an' duh nex time duh Dems take control of everything, we're gon' demand dat taxpayers in flyover states gibs us $100 billion or so to bail out the budget deficit in duh cities we rule!"

When Trump was prez, Dems hated the vaccine. A week after the election that totally changed

Many people have noticed that before the 2020 election (so Trump was still president in his first term), Democrats said they'd never take "Trump's "vaccine."  All the late-night talk-show whores said that.

Then as the election approached, Fauci conspired with the FDA to delay that agency's approval of the supposedly awful "vaccine" until just after the election. (The FDA approved "Emergency Use Authorization on or about December 1st, 2020.)

Then something amazing happened: Suddenly all the Democrat cock-sucking sons of whores who had been squealing that they'd NEVAH take "Trump's vaccine" did a total 180: now they not only loved it, they DEMANDED that you and your kids take it.

At the time, very few Americans noticed the sudden reversal.

So did the "vaccine" change, even a tiny bit?  Of course not--not by so much as a molecule.  What changed was that to Leftists, Democrats and communists, everything is political.  So what was bad, terrible, AWFUL yesterday can become good today (or vice-versa) IF duh leaderz of The Partei decide they'd benefit from changing their position.  

Need another example?  Did you notice how fast Teslas went from being totally fawned over by the Left to being vandalized daily?
  Before Elon bought Twatter from the drug-addled leftist Dorsey, every leftist and Democrat absolutely adored Teslas!  Cuz "Doze faaabulous EV's don't use dat AWFUL oil stuff, so dey gon' save duh Erf!"

But the moment Musk started supporting Trump, suddenly every fucking, retarded leftist in the country started keying Teslas, spray-painting 'em, setting 'em on fire.  Throwing rocks thru dealership windows.

Did the car change, even a tiny bit?  Obviously not.  What changed was that the founder and CEO of the company supported the arch-enemy of the Left/Dems/communists.  So virtually overnight a car Dems slobbered over was now a target of vandals.

And the Democrat party didn't bat an eye.  When a Dem Minnesota state employee was caught on camera keying a Tesla in Minneapolis, he wasn't fined or jailed--much less fired.  Oh no.  In fact about six months ago the piece of shit was promoted--because the Dems who totally rule that utterly corrupt state approved of his vandalism--as long as it wasn't their car, eh?

To Dems, communists and leftists, everything is political. 

Never let these rat-fucking bastards forget what they DEMANDED

 

A milestone (of sorts) is approaching

If you pay attention to things outside your immediate reach (spoiler: ...eh, nevermind) you may have heard that in two weeks the U.S. will pass a milestone of sorts.  So if you get your news from duh Mainstream Media you surely know what that is, right?  Cuz duh Mainstream Media is THE source of info for 98% of Americans, eh?  So is it

• the 10,000th U.S. citizen murdered by an illegal invader?
• Democrats introducing a record third motion to impeach Trump?
• the five-thousandth time a talking head on the network news said Jan 6th was "the most terrible threat in our nation's history"? or
• our national debt will reach $40 trillion?

If you guessed the last one, congratulations.  But even more troubling (if you know math) is that our nation's debt has literally quadrupled since 2008. 

Ask any kid under 25 "Who sets government spending?"  Chances are they'll say the president.  Of course adults know it's actually congress--the biggest waste of oxygen and money on  the planet.  At least half are corrupt and useless--a den of thieves.  And if that bunch of morons doesn't reign in spending, what year do ya think the national debt will explode from $40 trillion to a staggering $80 TRILLION?

Sure: At the current growth rate, a mere nine years from now.

For the maff-challenged, that's 2035.  You might wanna make a note of that.

So if you're detecting a tiny hint of problems now, when we're "only" paying a TRILLION dollars of interest on this debt every year--and having to borrow every dollar of that trillion just to PAY THE INTEREST--what do ya think things will be like just nine years from now, eh?

Been tryin' t' warn ya for years.  No one listened--least of all your so-called "leaders."  

"Numbers?  Maff?  Nah, bro, dat stuff beez jus' a tool used by oppressors!  We don' believe maff--at least if it don' support whut we wanna doo!"

These are the same morons who bleat that Iran was nevah trying to build an atomic bomb because...well those faaabulous Democrats Joe and Mika on MS-SUX said dey weren't!"

Then you ask 'em "Did Iran's negotiators brag to U.S. negotiators about having 1000 pounds of 60%-enriched uranium?  And do you know why they'd do that?"

And the morons go "Uhh...whut?  We nevah herd dat.  Besides, dat number don' mean nuffin', yew right-wing warmonger!  Wait...it doesn't, does it?  Whut do 'isotopes' have to do wif atomic bombs?  Whut IS an 'isotope,' anyway?"

And all I can do is shake my head and walk away.  They refuse to learn, and the Lying Mainstream Media refuses to educate 'em.  And in any case it would take a couple of days to give 'em enough background to explain it.

Ah well...I don't care.  I've had a great life, been everywhere, done everything, loved often, and been loved often--and probably way more than I deserved.  Way luckier than I deserved.

I regret that I'll never be able to thank everyone who so wonderfully, generously made my life a fabulous experience.  I look forward to thanking you all when we meet again after this life.  I hear the next one is even more fabulous. 

I can't wait! 

Democrat candidates who lost primaries to DSA all supporting DSA

SO...yew like the DSA, do ya?  Support their goals, eh?  And because they have the word "Democrat" in their name, and won the Democrat primary, you Dems will vote for 'em without a second thought, eh?  "Cuz duh mos' impo'tant thing is to win back both chambers of congress," right? 

Okay, what changes do they demand that you support?  Any of the ones below?

 

This is where the clever Dem "leaders" are all gonna end up. 

FBI intentionally misspells the name of their corrupt investigation of Trump

Chances are you haven't heard about this yet.  And if you get all your "newz" (i.e. bullshit Democrat-fellating propaganda) from the Mainstream Media, you never will.

The pic below is from an official FBI memo that opened a treasonous investigation into claims that Trump was colluding with Russia to steal the 2016 election from Hill-beast.

If you're over 40 or so--back when the public schools actually taught things more useful than the joys of changing your sex--you've heard the phrase "Oxford comma."  Corrupt FBI director James Comey posted that he loved it, so...all the lackeys took note.  So as everyone with a functioning brain surely noticed, the official FBI declaration of war on Trump misspells "Oxford" as "Oxferd."  

 

Now for Democrats who aren't totally brain-dead:  FBI employees--like those in most heirarchies--are extremely aware of the quirks of their superiors.  So after corrupt FBI director James Comey posted his love of the "Oxford comma," no agent with a functioning brain would be so careless as to misspell it as "Oxferd," right?  

Do ya really think the official memo to the entire agency announcing the most crucial investigation in the agency's history would have let this go out with this error?

Of course not.  It was intentional, so that if the FBI or DOJ ever got a FOIA request for all documents with the words "Oxford comma" the agency could truthfully say "We didn't find any documents with the terms you specified."

So yes, intentionally deceptive, and whoever ordered it should be tried--and if found guilty, executed as a warning to future would-be traitors. 

But how many of you recognized that using "Oxferd" itself a head-fake?

Didja catch it?  Sure ya did, but only because I blew it way the hell up: Notice the almost imperceptible difference between the "O" in Oxferd and the "O" in the word "comma."  That's not a sloppy printer: the O in "comma" is NOT an O but a zero.

But because everyone's attention was caught by the misspelling of "Oxford," not one person in 100,000 would catch the use of a zero in "comma."  So if clever investigators were ever to file a FOIA searching for "Oxferd comma," it would still return NOTHING. 

If you think this was an accident you're too dumb to breathe.  Making you a perfect Democrat voter.

Say, have you stupid Democrats joined the DSA yet?  Y'all on-board with abolishing the senate and the Electoral College, packing the Supreme Court, abolishing the police, ICE and the military?  Free college?   Cuz the DSA demands ALL of those, and more.  

Your "leaders"--Chuckie Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, AOC, Mamdani, Rashida Tlaib, Abdul El-Sayed, Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, Pocohantas Warren, JB Pritzker, Brandon Johnson et al are ALL eagerly fellating the DSA to get the votes of young, stupid communists who demand to live in the high-cost "cool cities" on a barista's income. 

Enjoy your future.  You richly deserve it. 

Florida’s no-children-at-drag shows law upheld by federal appeals court

In Florida, the same bunch of insane leftist Democrats who pushes taking your kids away if you don't "affirm" their totally un-influenced decision to get sex-change surgery at 16 decided they wanted to hold "drag shows" for kids.

And not in some clubs at ten pm, but at hamburger joints at noon.

So they did.  But amazingly, a few parents objected.  

If this had been any other state, parents would have been too cowed to object, cuz...uh... "Kids are perfectly equipped to know what's what from age five, right?  So if we wants dis, yew cain't stop us!"

The Florida legislature thought about that.  We don't let kids drink before age 18, so the precedent for restricting kids from some things is universally recognized, eh?  So they passed a law barring businesses from staging drag shows for kids.

Can you predict what happened next?  Of course you can!  A hamburger joint called "Hamburger Mary's" sued.  Cuz they wuz makin' bank from all the freaks bringin' dere kids to drag shows, eh?  

Just kidding: the ACLU or some other communist front group offered to sue FOR them.

The first federal judge agreed with the drag-show entrepreneurs that barring kids from the shows was an absolutely intolerable infringement on duh freaks' free-speech rights.  The state appealed, and a 3-judge panel from the 11th Circuit upheld the lower court, 2-1. 

The state appealed again, this time to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sent the case back to the Circuit Court for re-hearing.

This time the full 11th considered the case, and voted 8-5 to uphold the Florida law. 

Now unless you're a leftist con-artist, you admit that legislators have established that adults have the right to establish different rules for kids.  You may not agree with that, but it's settled law.  You're welcome to junk it if you like.  But the freaks argued that the law was "unconstitutionally vague," and that flew with the first two courts.  

What's funny is how the leftist judges who dissented objected to the majority opinion.  Obama-appointed judge Robin Rosenbaum ignored the notion the long-standing idea that adults can establish different rules for kids, instead pushing the opposite notion, that since we have "freedom of speech" we must let kids watch sex shows.  

Surely Rosenbaum knew this was horseshit, but she did it anyway, wailing that the law was a “Titanic-sized iceberg of chilling power” against freedom of speech.

No, leftist shill, no more than laws against underage drinking restricts adults, eh? 

She went on to argue that citizens could only learn whether a law prohibits their speech "by taking a wild guess, presenting their speech, and then seeing if they get arrested and face imprisonment, thousands of dollars in fines, and loss of their business license.”

Utter horseshit: just don't do drag shows for kids.  Not a tough concept, even for a leftist.

Wait, maybe it IS too tough for leftists to grasp.   

When someone comes to your country and DEMANDS...

 

"Incident" at Trump golf course in California

Get ready for another round of deliberately contradictory disinformation from the Mainstream Media--this time about a person claiming to be named "Jeanine John Taele," allegedly male, purportedly "of" Downey, California.  

"Jeanine" was spotted walking around Trump's golf club in Rancho Palos Verdes California, carrying a 2-way radio.  Lots of weapons found in his car.  He was already under investigation for a robbery in El Segundo.

People have found three different pics purporting to be Jeanine.  Two are below.  Do they look like the same guy to you?

 

So why the confusion?  Leftist/Democrat commenters are all over the Net claiming there's nothing odd about this at all, because they don't want voters to side with Trump after prior attacks.  And if this guy is who I think he is, his handlers will work like the devil to convince Americans this is a nothing.

Wonder what we'll find--if anything. 

Apocalypse now

The cartoon below is amusing.  Problem is, half of Americans are so utterly uneducated (or maybe just stupid) that they support ALL the policies on the signs and shirts in it.

 

And because Democrats, socialists and communists totally control all public school systems, they teach your kids to love all Dem/socialist policies before your kids are 14. 

I don't have kids, so I only care as one would morn if a hammer-swinging crazy destroyed a fabulous statue.  By contrast, if you do have kids, and you're not a brain-dead Democrat, you might want a better outcome for them, eh?

All the Democrats need to do to win is to pick up three seats in the House or two in the senate.  As things stand now, they'll win control of the House, and will then force the U.S. to surrender to Iran, by passing a "Defense Authorization Act" that bars any government funds from being spent in the mid-east. 

Oh, y'say you don't believe that?  Well, ya didn't believe me when I told ya Fauci funded the creation of the Chyna virus in the Wuhan lab, either, eh?  And now it's all coming out.  You didn't believe even when I showed you the four genes inserted into a harmless bat virus to make it kill humans.  So...you can't be taught.  Refuse to learn.

Tell us, Democrats:  What happens to animals who refuse to learn?

Democrats: "We Dems iz smaaht, so nuffin' will happen to US.  See, duh Media haz tol' us Fauci is Doctor Science, Iran wudn't tryin' to built an atomic bomb, massive debt is a gud thing an' can't hurt us, China is ouah fren, bribem was honest and "sharp as a tack" to the very end; that Cackles wuz duh very best presidential candidate EVAH; that Trump is Hitler; that men can become girls by declaring they are; that the U.S. is eeeebil an' RAAaacist; that requiring people to show proof of their identity, and citizenship, to vote is 'voter suppression'; that Newsom and Bass are faaabulously competent; that up is down, black is white, good is evil.  You get it.

The Media hits you with an avalanche of this shit every hour.

Enjoy your remaining time.  

For Democrats, who still believe the virus was deadly, here ya go:

If you get all your newz from the Mainstream Media and the Democrat partei, you know almost nothing true about "duh Chyna virus."  For example: "It's way more deadly than the flu, citizen!"  No, it's way LESS likely to kill ya.  And if you were under 30 and didn't have any "co-morbidities," your chance of dying from Covid was almost ZERO.

Of course you don't believe that...because CNN and MS-SUX and the alphabet nets and the lying piece of shit Fauci all told ya--constantly--dat dis wuz duh mos' deadly virus EVAH, an' if yew din' take duh faaaabulous, safe and effective jab, yew wuz gon' DIE!  An' worse yet, yew wuz gon' infect yo' fambly!

It was all utter horseshit, as those of us who could read have known all along.  But since you don't believe me, maybe you'll be convinced by the table below.  It's a running total of covid cases, hospitalizations and deaths at 50 big universities.  And you'll note that out of 69,444 verified cases, how many deaths?  ZERO.

How many hospitalizations?  THREE.  Out of 69,444 confirmed cases.  

Democrats/leftists/morons: "Whu...whu...whu...Dis wuz cuz almost all college students took that faaaabulous "safe and effective" vaccination, SEE?  So it didn't keep 'em from gettin' the virus but it kept 'em from gettin' sick!  SEE?  We TOLD ya!  Yew stupid deplorables jus' din' believe duh SCIENCE!"

Really, moron?  Take a look at the date of this data.  See it?  October 5, 2020.  Does that mean anything to ya?  Remember when the faaabulous jab was approved for public use?Think hard.

Essentially December 1, 2020.  So not one of the 69,444 students who got the virus could possibly have taken the jab.   And yet not only no deaths, only three were even hospitalized.  "But...but...but Fauci--Doctor Science!--told us dis virus wuz way more lethal than the flu!  Killed a huge percentage of people who got it!  So how could there not be a single death and only three hospitalized out of 69,444 infections?  That's a death rate of...um...ZERO percent!" 

Starting to get it yet?  You've been totally conned.  Lied to, by Fauci, Birx, Walensky and every lying shithead in the CDC and FDA.  They bleated that ivermectin was simply a "horse de-wormer" that had no effect at all on Covid.  That was a brazen lie.

EVERYTHING Fauci and his lackeys told you was a lie.  And yet the Mainstream Media is STILL defending this total, lying piece of shit.  

Smart people will consider all the information and will learn from the nightmarish experience.  Democrats will learn nothing, and will continue to call conservatives "science deniers" and deplorables.  

And so it goes.