How the entire western world got to this point

How it started: 

* Muslims:  "We want to pray in your park."
   Americans: "Of course.  The park is for everyone to enjoy, and in our country anyone is allowed to pray anywhere.

* Muslims: "Our religion says dogs are unclean, so dogs in the park would prevent us from praying there--which you admitted is our absolute right.  So would you keep your dogs at home during our prayers?
   Americans:  Okay, I guess we can walk our dogs somewhere else or at different times.

* Muslims: "Our religion says women of all ages are beautiful, and we're sure you wouldn't dispute that!  We are attracted to all women--including pre-teens.  So would you tell your women not to walk alone, and your daughters not to play in the park?"
   Americans:  "Uhh...I guess so, though that seems to be quite a reach because it means you demand that American women defer to your religion.  This seems to be getting out of hand."
   Democrats: "Ignore the stupid deplorables.  Do whatever your religion says, because we liberals LOVE religion!  Well, unless it's Christianity."

* Muslims: "The park is too far away for some of our pipo, so we want to pray on your sidewalk."
   Americans:  "Well its only for a few minutes so i guess its okay."

* Muslims:  "Our religion is so popular that we need more space than the sidewalk, so we will be praying in the street for half an hour or so.  And you must allow that because 'Freedom of religion'!"
   Americans:  "No.  'Freedom of religion' doesn't give you the right to block streets!  You have mosques large enough for all your followers."
   Democrats: "Ignore the deplorable.  We run the city and we say that's totally fine, because 'Freedom of religion' is right there in the Constitution!  We Democrats luuuve religion!  Except Christianity, of course, becuz lotsa Christians don't support sex-change surgery for 13-year-olds."

* Muslims: "Our religion requires us to pray five specific times a day, and sometimes we're in airports or public buildings at those times.  So we demand that you give us prayer rooms in every public building, including universities. 
   Americans: "Our Constitution doesn't allow the government to use public funds just for one religion, but I guess as long as the rooms are open to ALL religions, we can provide those."
 
* Muslims:  "We've built a faaabulous 'Islamic cultural center' that explains our religion, so we'd like all your schools to spend a day every semester visiting our center, so your students will learn the joys of Islam.  Our center will show men and women praying together, to show that Islam supports the total equality of the sexes.  
   Americans:  "But that's a lie!  In your religion it takes the testimony of four women to equal the testimony of one man.  Islam demands that women cover their hair, and often their entire face.  Some Islamic branches don't allow women to leave the home unless a male relative is with them.
   Muslims:  "If you refuse our 'request' we will tell the Media you're Islamaphobic.  You don't want that, right?"
   Liberal Americans:  "Ignore the deplorables!  American children need to learn about ALL the great religions of the world (except one, of course), so we will bring them to your Cultural Center every semester to ensure they learn the wonders of Islam.
   Americans: "So will you Dems--who run the school boards--also bring students to day-long visits to great cathedrals?"
   Liberal Americans:  "You're kidding, right?"

* Muslims:  "Your tyrannical Orange King has banned Muslims from seven nations from entering the U.S.  Obviously this is both Islamophobic and intolerable!  Freedom demands that everyone in the world has the absolute right to visit the U.S.  It's right there in your Constitution!  So we've ordered our supporters in congress to pass a law overturning this.  After all, one of the favorite sayings of one of your political parties is 'No kings!," right?
   If that fails we'll use our judges (like Boasberg, Sotomayor, Kagan or Ketanji Brown-Jackson) to overturn it.  Because any anti-Muslim order must be overturned.  It's only fair, citizen.
   Americans:  "Wait...EVERY other nation controls who is allowed to enter.  But you don't want to allow the U.S. to have that same right, and instead to allow people from uneducated nations, whose cultures believe in sexualizing children, abusing women and animals and supporting violent revolution ("jihad") and lying ("taqiyya") to enter the U.S?   Sounds like you're a lying, two-faced, hypocrital shithead!"
   Liberal Dem: "Ignore the deplorables, beloved members of a different but totally equal religion!  We will do whatever you ask, because unlike the deplorable conservatives, we liberal Democrat are 'woke'!  When members of your wonderful faith come here we will support them and allow them to build mosques wherever they want, because we need to take back the country from doze awful Christians!  
  We will give 'em free housing, food, medical care and college tuition.  We'll get our Media friends to publish 'Opinion pieces' in prestigious magazines like the Atlantic and NYT Magazine claiming Jesus was Muslim."

This is where the U.S. and all western nations are today.  Democrats have chosen to support Islam, after quietly (for the most part) opposing Christianity for decades. 

WHY do Democrats so strongly support both Islam and illegal immigrants?  See any pattern there? 

Nah, if you're a Democrat, you don't.
 

Another attempted murder of a U.S. woman by an illegal--and he thought he'd killed her

A week ago an American woman was walking along a popular Florida beach at night.  A man passed her walking the other way.

A few minutes later the man walked up behind her, struck her, grabbed her by the throat, dragged her into the ocean and held her underwater, trying to drown her.

The attacker held her underwater until she lost consciousness.  Thinking she was dead, he released her and walked away.  To repeat: he only released her because he thought he'd succeeded in killing her.

When the woman regained consciousness she was half in and half out of the water.  She then walked over a mile to nearby Stuart beach where she found a sheriff’s deputy. 

Two days later (Feb 15), after someone reported a male claiming to have killed someone on a local beach, officers arrested a 26-year-old Venezuelan national, Said Alexander Hernandez Gonzalez.

The attacker--unprovoked attempted murder: Venezuelan illegal

Unprovoked murders or attempted murders of innocent American women by illegal alien invaders happen several times a week in the U.S.  You just almost never hear about it--and never on the alphabet networks or in the NY Times, WaPo or any of the other shit-liberal, Democrat-fellating rags that infest this country.

This isn't an accident.  It's intentional.  They never tell you about any of the murders because they don't want to arouse Americans to anger.  It's not that the Media and "elites" oppose deportations--as long as they were done by Emperor Hussein Obozo, who deported three MILLION illegals, and bragged about it.  The shit-lib Media only started screaming that deportations were AWFUL after Trump made it a priority after closing the border--which bribem had said he couldn't do without congress passing a law.

Like every other issue, the Mainstream Media decides what to scream about based on whether it helps the Dem party and hurts the GOP.  And finally you start thinking, Why does the Mainstream Media love the Democrat party so much?

I think it's because the Media and "elites" wanna destroy the U.S. as we've known it.  I don't know whether they're just consumed by anti-white hate, or guilt, or if they're all communist agents.  But they're sure one-sided as hell.

Source.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illegal-immigrant-allegedly-ambushed-woman-florida-beach-random-attempted-drowning-attack-police 

 

Mexican immigrant sneers at the U.S.--"just here for the money"

You need to see this short video.  It's a Mexican woman who hates the U.S., but came here for the money.  She trashes the U.S. with every word. 

Is this the kind of person we should want here?  Sneers at the U.S.  Do you think she'll vote based on what's BEST for this country, or for what's likely to destroy the nation we've known so her race can take over?  

 

https://x.com/i/status/2023970731906736267 

Beautiful memorial to a white girl murdered by...[ ]...is vandalized by thugs

The average American has a memory span of about two days.  The Lying Mainstream Media and the Democrat party count on that, cuz that's what allows 'em to lie so brazenly.

(It worked even better for the liars before everyone had the Internet, cuz back then the good guys had no way at ALL to post videos showing the lying rat-bastards were lying.)

Of course you're not average.  You're WAY above average, so surely you remember Iryna Zarutska, right?

Sure: pretty 23-year-old blonde refugee from Ukraine, sitting on a light-rail tram in a Democrat-ruled city, looking at her phone, minding her own business, when a black career criminal sitting behind her stood up and stabbed her in her neck three times, striking so hard it knocked off her hat.

It was caught on surveillance video, in high resolution, and there's a photo of her curled up in her seat, her hand to her mouth, trying to understand what just happened.

She bled to death in two minutes.

Of course you remember, right?  Cuz it was on all the alphabet new broadcasts.

Oh wait...it wasn't, because the producers of those propaganda events decided "Hey, what's one more murder of a white girl by a black career criminal?  'Local interest only!'"  So no one outside city government has seen the actual video.  

And you only saw the photo on the handful of conservative websites on the Net--cuz the big Dem-run sites like CNN, MS-DNC and the alphabet nets didn't want you to see it...cuz it undermined their Narrative.

So with that background: A couple of wealthy guys believed Iryna needed a memorial, so they commissioned artists to paint 4 or so on the sides of buildings in NYC and LA.  They were well done and just paintings of her face, with no slogans.  Cuz anyone who knew the story, knew.

The mural bore no slogans like "Get tough on crime" or "Liberal judges did this."  But clearly the mere presence of the face of the innocent murder victim angered the shithead thugs of NYC, as one piece of shit so-called "human" spray-painted "Please vandalize this" over her face.  

These sub-humans are so evil, so consumed with hate, that they refused to permit a beautiful memorial to a beautiful, innocent murder victim.  To shithead leftists, even the face of a young, innocent victim of a black killer was somehow offensive. 

 

 

This is how residents of Democrat-ruled cities think.  And these shitheads are the voting base of the Dem party. 

Yet another tranny murderer: trans "dad" shoots wife and child at a hockey game

If you don't think trannies are mentally ill, check out this killer. 

Tranny mafia: "NOOooo, dis FAKE NEWS!  See, your link iz to duh Daily Mail, which is in London!  If dis had reeeeally happened, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, MS-SHIT et al wudda tol' ya.  But did yew see a single word about dis on any of 'em?  NO yew did NOT!  So it must not have happened!  So shut up, h8ter!"

This is how the Mainstream Media controls what you see, hear, and think you know is true:  They hide things they don't want you to see, and lie about things they want you to believe that are utter bullshit.  For example, here's what ABC broadcast a day or two after the murders, meaning they had time to know the shooter was a tranny.  They never mention the word, instead near the end calling the murders simply a "family dispute."

See, they don't want to mention the killer was tranny cuz that would make people wonder if trannies were maybe...oh, a bit mentally off or somethin'.

In Dem-world, up is down, evil is good, sweet is sour, murder is loving, on and on.  Okay, not all Dems support this, but they all vote Dem regardless, so...

The murderous tranny: 

 

Predictably, the New York Times avoided any mention that the alleged murderer at the Rhode Island hockey rink shooting was a tranny.

For years the leftist, Dem-fellating Media has been shoving tranny supremacy down our throats, but when trannies murder innocent victims, the Mainstream Media is ruthless in NOT telling viewers and readers the truth.

Many TV stations--including Fox affiliates--called the shooting a "family dispute." No mention that the perp was a transgender lunatic.

You can't hate the media enough. 

Dem-ruled states introducing bills to charge you for miles driven

Democrats have been fighting to outlaw gasoline-powered cars for years, passing laws ORDERING that no more gas-powered cars could be sold in their dictatorial states after a specified date.

But banning gas-powered cars was only the "nose of the camel:"  The eventual goal was to replace all private cars with dat faaabulous public transit!  Cuz ebrybuddy luuvvves dat public transit, right? 

Of course the kingly pols would still have their state cars (and state-paid drivers), cuz dey iz way too impo'tant to have to travel by dat faaaabulous public transit, right?  You, on the other hand...

But an unexpected thing happened: even after the Democrats rammed thru a LAW paying car makers $7,500 per EV (thus lowering the price buyers would have to pay), most car buyers told the gummint to shove EVs up their ass.  Now billions of dollars worth of EVs sit un-sold on dealers' lots.  Plus, the batteries rarely last over five years, and replacing 'em costs a fortune.

Something else happened: we elected a Republican president and congress, and they stopped forcing taxpayers to pay car makers the $7,500 subsidy.  So now EVs got less attractive.

Democrats (i.e. leftists, socialists, communists) hated all the above, so Democrat-ruled states immediately started plotting to make ownership of gas-powered vehicles way more expensive...by taxing residents on how many miles they drive each year.

Rational adults quickly ask "How the hell would they know?"  Easy: the electronics in modern cars report damn near *everything* to the makers, so it would be easy for the Dems to order the car makers to give the gummint those numbers.

For example, a bill in Massachusetts--introduced by Democratic state senator Cynthia Stone Creem--would require state bureaucrats to set "goals" to reduce the total number of miles driven statewide.

And how, you may ask?  Simple: ORDER a limit to miles each person drives, and tax every mile over that.  And how much?  Whatever dictatorial Democrat rat-bastards ORDER, eh?

Because this is such an unpopular idea, Democrat politicians in Massachusetts are trying to fool voters by naming this bill the “Freedom to Move Act.” 

"SEE, citizen? Dis faaaabulous bill would GIBS yew 'freedom' to drive anywhere yew want!  Dere izn't a single mention of "tax" or "penalty" in dis bill at ALL, deplorable!  Nope nope nope!  Dis bill beez all about FWEEDOM!"

"Of course as you'd expect, there are a few minor...details.  Obviously.  For example, low-income groups wouldn't have to pay the penalty, cuz dat wud be unfair!" 

Voter: "What's the cutoff for 'low income'?

Democrats:  "Well that will depend on if you're a member of a 'historically disadvantaged group.'  Cuz dat wud only be FAIR, comr...citizen." 

Meanwhile in Democrat-ruled California--where EVERY state-wide officer is a Democrat (literally)--the state Assembly (legislature) has now approved a bill to “study the implementation of a mileage tax." 

The bill--introduced by a Democrat Assemblymember--creates a study of "pricing programs" [taxing schemes], *and whether certain groups should be given exemptions.

Starting to see the pattern yet?

The NBC propaganda outlet in San Diego found a “transportation expert” who suggested the mileage tax might even be progressive, providing an opportunity for redistribution of wealth: “Maybe, based on people’s income, there would be ways for the state to give them some money to compensate them partly for the extra driving they have to do. So we just need to be more creative and to address equity problems as they arise.”

Of course good liberals in Cali are totally giddy about dis great plan!  ORDER a tax of say, 50 cents per mile for every mile you drive over 8,000 per year.  Since the average now is 15,000 miles per year, most people would cut way down.  But if you drove just 12,000 per year and weren't a member of a "favored group, you'd have to pay an extra $2,000 in "use tax."

And yet the dumb voters in Cal keep voting for these rat-bastard Democrats.

Source.

https://spectator.org/blue-states-are-moving-legislation-forward-to-restrict-how-much-you-can-drive/ 

Did the Dems steal the 2020 election? New evidence

In 2020, bribem was officially deemed to have won Georgia by 11,779 votes.

Georgia was one of the many states where election officials mailed absentee ballots to EVERY registered voter.  Problem is, many of the addressees had moved, so some ballots likely ended up in other hands.

More damning is that many "absentee ballots" that were scanned lacked any creases from folds.  For the terminally stupid, mail-in ballots are sent in envelopes smaller than the ballot, so must be folded to fit in the envelopes.  Same for when they're mailed back--unless they were put in illegal "drop boxes." (Georgia law didn't provide for those, but they somehow appeared all over Democrat cities.)  But even then, the ballots would have been creased to fit in the envelopes when mailed TO registered voters, eh?

Now a court case in Fulton County, GA, claims 150,000 mail-in ballots in that county were likely "fake" because they had no creases.  Also, they didn't appear to have been marked by hand.

By the official count, bribem got over 70 percent of the votes in Fulton county--the first Dem since the hugely more popular Franklin Roosevelt did it in 1944. 

Meanwhile Democrats are blocking all efforts to investigate.  New York congresswhore Dan Goldman has filed an amendment to block the Trump administration from investigating election records, ballot boxes and voting machines in any state in the country. 

In most states, elections are run by the Secretary of State.  In Georgia that's Brad Raffensburger. Cleta Mitchell, who advised President Trump when he contested the Georgia election results, noted that on the morning of election day, 2020, Raffensperger announced that Trump was ahead by 103,000 votes with only 94,000 ballots left to count.  And since his job was to run the election, you'd think he'd know.  

Yet somehow, four days after declaring that only 94,000 ballots remained to be counted, Raffensberger NOW claimed there were over 300,000 more ballots to count--including 148,000 absentee ballots from Fulton County alone. Hmm...

Investigators found that over 133,000 ballot images--which by law had to be saved--had been deleted.  NONE of 148 Fulton County tabulators had the required verification tapes.  Nearly 7,000 fake ballots were accepted as genuine, and Fulton County election officials just smiled.

Finally: According to Grand Jury testimony just unsealed, Kemp told the chief of Georgia Bureau of Investigation not to investigate allegations of fraud in the 2020 election.  Saying he was a "team player," the chief of the GBI stopped investigating.

Now: bribem officially won the 2020 election by 306 to 232 electoral votes--a margin of 74, so a swing of 37 would have tied the election, and 38 would have reversed the result.  Georgia has 16 electoral votes, so putting just that state into the Trump column obviously wouldn't be enough to change the result.  

But in four other states--Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, with elections run by Democrats, bribem's alleged margin of victory was so close that it could easily have been due to fraud.  Here's the official margin for bribem in each:
                       margin         EVs
   Arizona         10,500         11 
   Georgia        11,779         16 
   Wisconsin     20,682         10
   Nevada         33,000          6
   Pennsylvania 81,660        20 

As the investigation into Georgia's results shows, all these margins are well within the likely number of fraudulent votes in Fulton County, Georgia alone. 

Recall that moving 37 electoral votes into Trump's column would have produced a tie (sending the decision to the House), while 38 would have reversed the outome.  The top three states above, alone, would change 37 EVs.  So the question is, is it *plausible* for the Dems to have created enough fake votes to match the totals for the first 3 states above. 

The Lying Mainstream Media has constantly bleated that in every case where the GOP sued for election fraud in the 2020 election, judges heard all the evidence and ruled against the GOP.  That's horseshit--a flat, blatant, brazen lie.  The truth is that 99% of the lawsuits filed were dismissed by leftist judges on the grounds that the judges RULED that the plaintiffs lacked "standing"--a recognizable legal interest--to sue for election fraud.

This is absurd: If a candidate can't sue for obvious vote fraud, *no one could.*  Yet the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media always bleated that judges had examined all these facts and allegations and found them meritless. 

That's a brazen lie.  Leftist judges dismissed all the lawsuits without ever examining the allegations, on the grounds of alleged "lack of legal standing to sue" or similar bullshit.

Then three weeks ago a funny thing happened: the Supreme Court ruled (7-2) that candidates in elections DO have legal standing to sue for fraud--
like absentee ballots either not having required signatures, or those signatures not being checked to see if they matched the sig on file; or signatures clearly NOT matching the one on file--indicating fraud.

(If you're curious, the two dissenting votes were from bribem-appointed moron Katanji Brown-Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor (who proclaimed herself a "wise Latina.")

So at least the next time the Democrats try to steal a presidential election, the SC has ruled that the conservative candidate can sue. 

Politicized science

* Politicized Scientists told us global warming was man-made and would result in no ice in the Arctic by 2015, and Martha's Vineyard being underwater by 2025.

* Politicized Scientists tell us that winters with record cold mean nothing, that the planet is really warming.

* Politicized Scientists told us the Chyna virus came from people eating infected bats, or maybe pangolins, ignoring the four inserted genes in the spike protein.

* Politicized Scientists told us the "vaccine" would keep us from getting Covid, and were totally safe.

* Politicized Scientists told us if our kids went thru an anxiety of wanting to be the other sex, caring parents would agree to have them sexually mutilated and sterilized.

* Politicized Scientists told us men had no more physical strength than women.

* Politicized Scientists told us our diet should be based on starch and sugary fruit, with minimal protein.

To hell with Politicized science.

There is value in science. There is no value at all in Politicized science, which will tell you all manner of lies if those lies advance the agenda of the politicians.  

Obama gave four "presidential medals of freedom" to four sex predators; total planning

 

Negotiating handbook: Rule #1

 

Yep #2

 

Yes

 

Democrats suddenly reverse themselves on ICE wearing bodycams, cuz....

This is a total hoot:  Anyone recall Dems in congress demanding that ICE agents wear body cameras?  Anyone?  Sure.  They were all irate, furious, demanding, as they always do.

But wait!  What's this??  Suddenly the rat-bastards have TOTALLY reversed position, because they realized cameras could help identify protesters!

Seriously!  The shit-leftist, Democrat fellating propaganda rag Politico explains it.

So they reversed course--reversed DEMANDS--in what...a week?

So utterly typical.  "We DEMAND that Orange Hitler order his Gestapo to wear body-cams!!  Wait!  We DEMAND they NOT wear body-cams! 

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/07/democrats-fear-body-cameras-could-be-ices-new-mass-surveillance-tool-00769363 

Will Democrats ever be held accountable for ANYTHING?

 

Gavin Newsom and the "train to nowhere"

If you're a Democrat, you probably think Gavin Newsom is faaaabulous!  You're probably already pushing your partei [sic] to make him your nominee for prezzy in 2028.  Yay!

Oh sure, you may have heard a couple of derogatory stories about him, like him having a birthday party at a faaabulously expensive restaurant during the covid lockdown; his cops would arrest or fine you for breaking the lockdown rules, but he broke 'em with total nonchalance--cuz he's special, eh?  Two sets of laws, citizen.  Wuzn't dat one of the main principles of the Founders? 

But dat story about a dinner wuz prolly jus' a right-wing conspiracy tale, eh?  He wudn't do dat, cuz he a guuuud Democrat, eh?  And as for dat picture of him dining with 20 of his supporters?  You know people can do anything with AI now.

See, if dat had reeelly happened, duh Media would'a tol' us, right?  Duh Media is honest!  So since dey din' say nuffin,' mus' be a lie. 

Of course the awful lies by doze awful right-wingers could be cleared up if some reporter asked him if that happened.  But there's no need for a "reporter" to ask him, cuz we Dems KNOW it's a lie.  Cuz duh faaaabulous Newsom wouldn't break his own commands to the peons deplorables ordinary people  hardworking, taxpaying citizens of his state, right?

And if you search the Internet (which everyone knows totally lies, unless it's something that hurts conservatives, in which case it's always true!), you may see some crazy story about him banging the wife of one of his top aides when he was mayor of San Francisco.  

But that's prolly a lie too, cuz such a dreamy, totally upstanding guy wud nevah do such a thing.  I mean sure, sex is a commonplace--no sophisticated adult so much as bats an eye.  But banging the wife of one of your aides seems like an abuse of power.  But that's gotta' be another right-wing conspiracy story--cuz duh Mainstream Media nevah sed nuffin' about it.

So now that we (the Dems and Mainstream Media) have easily disposed of those two right-wing lies, Newsom can run for prezzy without any worries about his record.

And now that he's running for president, he wants to show you his excellent management skills and character!  To do that, he just made a video of him bragging to viewers about laying the first foot of rail of California's "high-speed train."

If you haven't heard about this piece of shit project, you won't believe it.  It's the most expensive boondoggle in the history of the world. 

Way back in 2007 some clever hucksters promised California's Dem politicians lotsa cash if they'd support a faaaabulous high-speed rail line from Los Angeles to San Francisco.

The pitch was, European countries have high-speed rail, which automatically makes it cool.  An' California is the capital of cool in the U.S, right?  So the hucksters said "We can be like Europe, with a high-speed rail line:  San Francisco to Los Angeles, 520 miles in 3 hours!  All for a paltry $33.6 billion."  

But to get statewide support, the hucksters quickly proposed extending this faaabulous line to San Diego.  And north to Sacramento (the state capital).  Nice.

Powerful politicians and companies stood to make a fortune, so the key was to get voters to approve a modest few billion to get started, so that when it became obvious the project was gonna cost three times more than the original pitch, the hucksters would wail "We've already spent X billion, so you don't wanna that money to be WASTED, right?"

So for months the airwaves were FULL of ads with glittering animations of sleek silver trains going reeeel fast.  Republicans were skeptical, but Dems were totally giddy.  And because gullible Democrats outnumber Republicans 60/40, the flood of faaaabulous animated ads worked, and in November of 2008 voters approved a $10 billion bond issue to get things rolling.

And once that money was spent, it would be hard to pull the plug, eh?

By November of 2011--just THREE years after the $10 BILLION bond was approved, and before a single mile of rail had been laid--the projected cost had ballooned to between $65 and $75 BILLION.  That should have been a fatal warning sign, eh?  But the hucksters were SO adept at hyping, always touting duh faaaabulous benefits.  One of which was reducing car miles, cuz...you know, Climate Change! 

By the start of 2018--ten years after voters were conned into approving the $10 BILLION expense, they still hadn't laid a single piece of rail, but the hucksters proudly said the cost had now DROPPED to $64.2 BILLION.

Wait...wasn't the original cost estimate $33.6 billion?  Yes, but the hucksters said--and published--that the cost had *"dropped again"* to $64 BILLION.  Cuz that was down from $65 to $75 B in 2018, eh?  And the hucksters knew no Mainstream Media outlet would ever tell voters that the original cost was touted to be $33.6 Billion.

Brazen, lying sons of bitches, eh?  "Dropped again," huh?
 
So how did the cost "drop" from to $64 billion, eh? The hucksters simply cut the length of the route from 520 miles.  Then cut it again.  Forget San Diego and Sacramento.  Then forget San Francisco.

What they ended up with was a goal of--not 520 miles, but just 171 miles, linking the towns of Bakersfield and Merced.  And in 2016 the "official" plan said service would start in...2025.

The combined population of Bakersfield and Merced is roughly 500,000.  And there's a great divided highway between the two.  So how many people do ya think will ride the train per day, eh?  But what does that matter, citizen?  Cuz we'll have high-speed rail, just like Europe!

Newsom took office in January of 2019, so he didn't come up with this scheme, but he's totally supported it, even after it became obvious that the cost was gonna be three times the original bullshit pitch--unless they cut the route, which they did. 

So here we are, ten years after the 2016 prediction that service on the much shorter 171-mile route would start in 2025.  So did we miss the grand opening?  Ohh no.  Instead that's been "pushed back" just a bit.  The new estimated date is...wait for it...2033. 

Here's the update:  After spending $30 billion or so, they're finally getting ready to lay the first mile of track.  And Gavin Newsom instantly made a video to announce this faaabulous victory.  To show it, he stood beside a line of freight cars (which won't run on the high-speed line) on a conventional track, cuz..."SEE, citizen?  It's a train!"

If you listen to Newsom you'd think they've already started laying rail.  But if you ask AI/google/Grok "Has any rail actually been installed on the California high-speed rail line?" here's the reply: 

As of early February 2026, major progress has been made, with the Southern Railhead Facility in Kern County completed, marking the beginning of the track-installation phase for the California high-speed rail. While construction focuses on 119 miles of infrastructure, actual track installation is now commencing. 

Wait...I don't think "commencing" means "has started," eh?  And next we have this:

Track Installation Starts: The California High-Speed Rail Authority announced that the Southern Railhead Facility in Kern County is complete, enabling the start of track-laying operations.

"Enabling the start of" is not "has started."  AI continues:

• Infrastructure Status: Over 119 miles of construction are underway in the Central Valley, with nearly 60 structures completed.

Again, "construction underway," but construction of WHAT?  Structures.  That's not rail.

• Key Structures: Significant progress includes the nearly completed Hanford Viaduct and the finished Poso Creek Viaduct.

The question "Has any rail been laid?" should be easy to answer: Either they've started laying rail or they haven't.  But for some strange reason AI is spouting lawyerly bullshit like a politician: It's clearly implying to the unwary that they've started laying rail--but carefully avoids saying that. 

The explanation is simple:  Notwithstanding the hype, "AI" is not "intelligent" at all.  It gets its info by parsing every word in newspapers and books and...press releases by corruptocrats.  And that language above is essentially cut-and-pasted from bullshit press releases by the "California High-Speed Rail Commission," who are being paid extravagant salaries for spending billions. 

But if you "dive deeper" into the AI explanation you finally see this:

As of February 2026, no actual high-speed rail tracks have been installed on the main line yet. However, the project has just reached a major turning point to begin that process.

So since they're almost prepared to think about laying the first length of track, when can we expect dis faaaabulous high-speed train to begin service between two small-ish cities?  Uhh...2033.  And now the completed cost is projected to be $128 billion.  And there are still uncompleted environmental assessments and challenging tunnels through the mountains.

A competent chief executive would have pulled the plug on this crap a month after taking office.  Yes, leftists and contractors and the highly-paid members of the Commission would have been mad, but in the long run state taxpayers would have saved $100 billion or so.  And that's even before including the annual operating losses.

But don't worry, Democrats: Vogue magazine's Maya Singer knows just how to spin this to make Gavin look great, since he's been the front-runner for the Dem nomination.  Here's Maya:

He is embarrassingly handsome, his hair seasoned with silver, at ease with his own eminence…

Whoa!  Would you like a napkin to wipe your lips, Maya?  Newsom is counting on this type of fawning, swooning coverage from the media--and he's never been disappointed.  Who needs to be a competent manager when you're "embarrassingly handsome," with fabulous hair and “eminence,” eh?

In his dark novel "1984" George Orwell wrote, “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.  It was their final, most essential command.”  Americans have heard an endless series of lies by the hucksters about this project, and a good manager would have pulled the plug in 2019, instead of stringing it out until 2033 and spending another $100 billion--to connect two small cities 171 miles apart.

 

How the Lying Mainstream Media spins leftist lawbreaking

When a local TV station naively broadcasts a story that shows Leftists/Dems/communists doing something that would make normal Americans furious, here's how the Mainstream Media spins it:

1. "It's not happening.  It's just another right-wing scare story!"
2. "It might be happening, but it's nothing to be worried about.  Chill, citizen!"
3. "It's happening, and it's really guuuud!"
4. "Congress should pass a law making it mandatory!"
5. Mainstream Media write editorials implying that "Smaht pipo realize      the real problem is conservatives who object to this obvious good!"

Happens every time. 

California Attorney General sues childrens' hospital for ending sex-change procedures on children

You won't see or read about this story in the national Mainstream Media, because every MM outlet supports this. 

California Attorney-General Rob Bonta--a total leftist piece of shit--has sued Rady Children’s Hospital, claiming the hospital violated conditions his office placed on that hospital's 2024 merger with Children’s Hospital of Orange County.

Now if you're familiar with the law, you may wonder what law gave the A-G the power to put conditions on mergers.  Usually that's part of an anti-trust concern imposed by the Federal Trade Commission or a related agency, but Bonta decided "If the feds can do this, so can we."

One of the conditions Bonta demanded was that both hospitals continue to provide a list of 36 medical services for the next 10 years.

You may think, "If he could demand that, what would prevent him from demanding they do it for, say, a century?  Why not demand they provide the list of services for free?  This corrupt asshole is just throwing his weight around--and no judge in the state (all leftists) wants to stop him.  Classic.

So...one of the "services" on the piece of shit's list of demands is...wait for it...“gender-affirming care”—which is the Democrats’ Orwellian name for sex change procedures.  Bonta has ORDERED the merged hospitals to perform sex-change operations on their patients--who are minor children.

If you doubt that, consider the astonishing detail Bonta's "conditions" demanded:  that the long list of "services" be maintained “at no less than their current capacities, types, acuity levels, licenses and certifications.”

The hospital says it stopped so-called "gender-affirming procedures and prescriptions,” while continuing to offer supportive services such as counseling and offering mental health care resources.

Bonta promptly sued--because he and the leaders of the Democrat party *demand* that minor children who want to be the opposite sex be permanently sterilized.  The Democrat party's leaders and Democrat members of congress have supported child gender mutilation for years, and continue to do so.

Dem leader: "Dat's a LIE!  We don' support sterilizing children!  How DARE you suggest we do!"

Ahh.  So can boys who've had their genitals removed father a child?  Can girls who've had part of their vagina turned into a penis have children?  The obvious answer to both is no.  So you're sterilizing children, and lying by claiming you don't support it.  Merely a trivial side-effect, eh?

The Democrat party will do anything the LGBT agenda demands.  And they'll accuse you of "hate speech" if you utter a single word against their policies.

And here's the hoot: a girl who was "transitioned" by a hospital, at the urging of a deluded, corrupt shrink who told her mother that her daughter would likely kill herself if mom didn't agree to have her mutilated.  And a jury just awarded her $2 million.  

Whoa!  This is the first hint of an avalanche, which heralds thousands of similar lawsuits.  When hospitals in California are sued, will they claim they're not liable because that piece of shit Bonta ORDERED the hospital to do the op?

And if the plaintiff wins, who pays the award, eh?

Of course: taxpayers.

You dumb bastards voted for this.

What happens to stupid, slow animals in nature, eh?  Think about it. 

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/california-attorney-general-sues-hospital-to-inflict-sex-change-procedures-on-children/#disqus_thread

Leftist female judge in DC blocks Trump's order ending Temporary Protected Status for Haiti

Anyone know what "TPS" means?

Temporary Protected Status.  And what does that mean?

It gives presidents the authority to ignore U.S. immigration laws, by ORDERING that a country has TPS, which allows anyone from that country to come to the U.S.--supposedly temporarily, eh?  Unlimited number.  No vetting needed!  How cool is that, eh?

Sixteen damn YEARS ago, after a big earthquake in Haiti, Barack Hussein Obama DECREED "temporary" protected status" for Haitians.  But instead of being temporary, the TPS status for Haiti was extended, over and over, under various excuses.  "Too much violence."  "Shortage of housing."  And thanks to Obozo's DECREE, as of March of last year about 350,000 Haitians were living in the U.S, with most on welfare.  

During Trump's first term, after 8 years of "temporary" protected status, Trump ordered it to end.  But as you already guessed, the ACLU sued, and a shithead left-wing judge overturned the president's order, instead ordering the program to continue as before while the case worked its way through the courts.  

So apparently a Democrat president can order "temporary" protected status for any nation at any time, but a subsequent Republican president can't end that "temporary" status!

WTF?  If the president can't end it, who the hell CAN, eh?  It's insane.

In any event, before the case reached the Supreme Court the Democrats stole the 2020 election, and the corrupt, senile, Chinese puppet bribem ordered "temporary" protected status to continue without limit. 

While the corrupt bribem was in the White House there was so much fraud by TPS-protected Haitians that even the Deep-State-run DHS quietly paused the program.  But then in August of 2024--with bribem still prezzy--the program was re-started.

So last year (Trump's first year in office for his second term)--16 damn YEARS after the initial Obozo DECREE creating "Temporary" protected status for Haiti--Trump ordered that to end last year.  But predictably, attorneys (paid by??) sued to force the government to keep the status going on for more decades.  So Trump ordered it to end today (2 Feb).

Then equally predictably, one DAY before the new date TPS status for Haiti was to end, a goofy leftist female federal judge in the lowest fed court in DC ordered the status continued indefinitely.  The leftist judge, Ana C. Reyes, cunningly phrased her ORDER that the status be continued indefinitely as "pending judicial review."

Lawyers for the Haitians bleated that it jus' wudn't FAIR fo' duh prez to end "temporary" status for dere clients, cuz Haiti was a dangerous place, with rampant disease, lack of access to clean drinking water and the absence of a functioning government.  Yeah, well, go back to your shithole and fix it.

In her order Monday, the leftist judge said the government hadn't provided a reason TPS for Haitians should end.  So the idea that it was supposedly "temporary," and that the president should have the authority to end it at any time, wasn't enough?

Source: Dem-fellating NBC

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/federal-judge-postpones-trump-admins-termination-tps-haitians-rcna257105 

Corrupt California DA *gloats* about the state allowing people to vote without ID

Federal LAW says you have to be a U.S. citizen to vote in federal elections.  But Democrat-ruled states have blocked EVERY effort to ensure that non-citizens don't vote in federal elections, by passing LAWS making it illegal to require would-be voters to show either photo-ID or proof of citizenship. 

The Dems are so bad that when the politicians who run Huntington Beach passed a law saying you had to show proof of citizenship to vote, the city was IMMEDIATELY sued by the fucking, corrupt attorney-general of the state, on the ground that the state law (no proof needed to vote) overruled local laws.

Of course federal law also takes precedence over state laws too, but every Democrat pol in California just give the feds the finger: "We'll do whatever we damn well please, so fuck off."

Hmmm...so the state can overrule local laws, and ALSO federal law?  Don't think so, cupcake.  It's right there in the Constitution, called the "supremacy clause."  

Note how the attorney-general of California--a corrupt leftist named Rob Bonta--gloats about overturning the voter-ID law passed by Huntington Beach--but will ignore his state's refusal to honor federal law!  Fuck you, communist traitor.

 

So let's be VERY clear here: California's corrupt Democrat government--like those of New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Michigan, Colorado, Oregon, Washington state and other Dem-ruled states--doesn't care if non-citizens vote.  We know that because they've passed LAWS that allow anyone to vote without presenting a photo-ID.   

Think about that. 

Leftist "protesters" in shithole Minnesomalia break every window in 70 parked cars

In the lawless Democrat-ruled, fraud-addled shithole of Minneapolis yesterday, some thugs broke EVERY driver's side window in a line of 70 civilian cars parked on the street.

(different video): Liberal commenters from the shithole claimed it never happened--FAKE NEWZ, eh?  But the local CBS station aired footage that seemed to show the line of cars, and several individuals posted their own vids of the line of cars.  So yes, this really happened.

 

So the obvious question is, how can the Mainstream Media blame this on Trump?

Just kidding: the question is, who did it?

A couple of leftist commenters inadvertently offered a clue when they claimed this never happened, because you'd only deny it happened if you knew your side was gonna get blamed, eh?  

Another couple of clues:  There's a huge downside for ICE agents to be the perps, cuz if they'd been caught, ICE agents would be fired and prosecuted.  By contrast, pAntifa thugs wouldn't have any risk of either being prosecuted or fired, since many don't have jobs.  Also, ICE agents couldn't be sure they weren't being videoed by a civilian, while leftist thugs would be confident that if anyone was filming they wouldn't turn the video over to authorities, since Frey and Walz support the protests and hate ICE. 

SO...the average cost of replacing a power window is $200 to $350.  Using 70 cars and $300 gives $21,000 in damages, not to mention the time and inconvenience to the owner.  Of course these are the same leftist assholes who burned 40 square blocks of Minneapolis during the 2020 BLM riots, so they clearly don't mind doing hundreds of millions of dollars of damage.  

Leftist, socialists, antifa and Democrats CANNOT be reasoned with.  They do whatever they damn well please, regardless of illegality, and in Democrat-run shitholes like Minneapolis they're never prosecuted anyway.  So looks like there's only one way to stop them.