Communism is slowly taking over the U.S.--and has been for decades

Most Americans have only a vague idea of what communism is.  That includes most of the so-called "cool kidz" in U.S. universities on the coasts who say they prefer communism to capitalism, because their "knowledge" is pretty much limited to this:

"It's like, TOTALLY UNFAIR that some people have to work at jobs they don't like, to have a nice apartment and be able to go out to eat every night, while other pipo have rich parents who give them lots of money, so they have whatever they want without having to work!" 
  "So I feel oppressed, and demand that "society" give me whatever I want without working!  Or I might agree to work--but only in a job I reeeally like, like, um...writing reviews for video games!  Yeah, dat's it!  That should pay $150K a year, eh?"

The flaws in that "reasoning" are obvious and too numerous to list here.  Instead a summary:

During a meeting of the Communist League in London in 1847, the League asked Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to write a "platform" describing the League's position.  For the next 70 years not much happened.

Then in 1917 the communists took over Russia, overthrowing the czar and murdering him and his entire family--including four innocent daughters, a son and four loyal staffers.

Charming rat-bastards, those communists.

This was the Bolshevik revolution, and gave the communists their first base for taking over the world.  And in 1920 they came up with a plan to do that.  

Even before 1848 the communists were sure communism was a far better system than capitalism, so they saw it as their job to "set other nations free," eh?  But they felt they were being prevented from doing this by eeeebil "capitalist exploiters."

So beginning way back in 1920 they started sending really bright communists to the U.S. to infiltrate every institution of influence: universities, newspapers, magazines, radio networks, Hollywood, labor unions, school boards, public schools and the government--particularly the State Department.

After WW2 the U.S. was able to decipher coded messages to and from the USSR and its spies in the U.S. (the Venona Project).  Those messages uncovered 349 Soviet spies working in every government agency, including our atomic-bomb project.  And because Venona was only able to decode a fraction of the recorded Soviet messages, it's likely that the number of spies was actually greater.

One of the many goals of communism in the U.S. has been to destroy the "traditional nuclear family."  The stated reason was that communists viewed the traditional family as "an economic unit tied to capitalism and private property," where children were treated as the private property of parents--thus as exploited, unpaid workers.

In "The Communist Manifesto" (1848) Marx and Engels literally called for the "abolition of the family."

But cutesy rhetoric about "an economic unit tied to capitalism" was just a smokescreen:  The real reason was that the Bolsheviks (communist) leaders feared that traditional nuclear families might teach their kids individualist (i.e. freedom-loving) values to children.  If parents didn't like communism, letting the parents raise their children risked the parents telling their kids communism was shit.  Thus in "Principles of Communism" Engels demanded that all children be raised in government institutions. 

One of the clearest indicators of the communist hate for traditional families is that while western nations believe orphans adopted into loving families have a far better chance at happiness and success than otherwise, the communist rulers abolished adoption altogether, decreeing that orphans were to be raised by the warm, caring communist state--"to avoid exploitation, comrade!"

Starting to understand yet?

By 1926, roughly seven MILLION orphans roamed towns and countryside, because government didn't have the resources to house and feed them all.  An adopted child cost the state nothing, but feeding and housing seven MILLION consumed a LOT of resources.  So once again communist policies turned out to be shit.  Not only that, orphans--lacking any parental teaching and values--often turned out to be "difficult" adults.  

Ring any bells?  It should: Beginning in 1965, programs rammed thru by Democrats in congress--programs that replaced black fathers with "free" government dollars--led to the destruction of the black family in the U.S., followed by all the murders we've seen since then. 

So communists viewed the traditional "nuclear family" (husband and wife) as a danger to communist rule--and acted accordingly.  And since 1965 or so, the U.S. Mainstream Media and the "entertainment industry" have taken every opportunity to ridicule "traditional nuclear families."

The utter debasement of American culture since 1965 or so has been totally intentional.  

Our society has been so utterly debased that today, not only do mentally ill men claim to be women, the Media and the Democrat party demand that everyone agree that such mentally ill wackos ARE women.  And employees have been fired for refusing to go along with that lie.

Government employees never dare to refuse, because it's instant termination.  "Your refusal to use that pyrsyn's preferred pronouns was 'hate speech' and a violation of xir's human rights!" 

When a society has been so utterly debased, it should come as no surprise that large numbers of citizens don't believe that society is good.  If you point out to 'em that if their claim is true, why do millions of foreigners trek thousands of miles to get here, while no American citizen tries to sneak into another nation, they just scream and put their fingers in their ears.

It's a standard technique of people who hold ideas that are unsupportable: they refuse to let you speak, or scream over you.

The communists realized they didn't need to invade the U.S. with troops to destroy us.  Instead they knew how to get Americans to commit cultural suicide.

One subtle technique is to order that certain terms are now banned, replaced with anodyne terms that disguise what's really happening.  Thus Democrats now demand that prisoners convicted of ghastly murders be referred to as "justice-involved individuals."  

The Democrats/socialists/communists/proggies have decreed that the term "reproductive healthcare" now includes abortion.  Of course there's nothing "reproductive" about it, and yet the Democrat-fellating Media has parroted that label without a critical word.  

The Left has decreed that cutting off a child's reproductive organs is "gender-affirming surgery." 

Newpapers in Democrat-ruled cities never identify attackers, shooters or stabbers as black, even when they are.  By contrast, white criminals are identified as such.  The NY Times "stylebook" even demands that "black" be capitalized, while "white" isn't, even though "black" isn't a race but just a color, just as white is.  But don't you dare complain about lack of intellectual consistency!

The communist propagandists who infest the Media also know that feelings always overcome facts.  Thus 15 years ago the masculine qualities that have protected us since the 1770s suddenly got a new adjective added: "toxic." 

Soviet defector Yuri Bezhmenov warned us (ironically in 1984) that the communists explicitly planned to "demoralize" young Americans.  In English and the military "demoralize" means to make people believe there's no hope, but to the communists it means to so thoroughly debase morals and language that people can no longer distinguish truth from lies, good from evil.  

"Exposure to true information does not matter anymore.  A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information.  Facts tell him nothing.  Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it.  That is the tragedy of demoralization.
  This is why the bolshies [communists] exude unabashed ignorance: they're literally incapable of realizing they're wrong.  Instead they're certain anyone who resists communism is wrong.

If you were wondering why your purple-haired, moronic in-law is a violence-loving miscreant, Bezmenov says the communists encourage such crazies, motivate 'em and unleash them on civil society.  And when you study videos of big socialist/communist/DSA marches, you see the same sorts of creatures every time, purple hair and all.

Today the Left/Democrats claim facts are meaningless.  They claim even words they don't like are violence.  And anyone who disagrees with 'em is a Nazi and should be imprisoned or worse.  They even cheer the assassination of people they don't like, like Charlie Kirk.

Hundreds of food-stamp fraudsters own Ferraris and Maseratis. Here's how

Democrats constantly expand welfare programs that give your tax dollars to Democrat voters--many of whom are fraudsters.

Example: food stamps.  Because corrupt Dem-ruled shithole states don't even TRY to detect fraud, even rich fraudsters can now get taxpayer-subsidized food stamps (EBT cards)--often under several different names.  The industrious ones use  the cards to buy food that they sell for cash.  They lazy sell the benefits for 50 cents on the dollar.

This lucrative grift was enabled by the Democrat-ruled congress when Democrat Bill Clinton was president, and the Obozo regime supercharged it.

The federal government gives the states cash for a dizzying arrary of programs, including "food stamps" (cunningly disguised as "SNAP"), Medicaid and dozens of other welfare programs.

Since this is "free money," Democrat states devised ways to increase what they were given.  The most widespread is a thing cunningly shortened to "BBCE."  Unless you're a government official you have no idea what that means--which is intentional.  

It stands for "Broad-based Categorical Eligibility."  Does that help tell you what it means?  Of course not, and that's also intentional.  What it means is that while "standard law" says you can only get food stamps ("SNAP benefits"--the EBT card) if you pass strict asset tests, like bank balances and income below a certain level.  BUT "BBCE" allows states to give federal SNAP dollars to anyone who's getting benefits from any OTHER welfare program.

This allows people with $50,000 in the bank and a Maserati in the garage to get food stamps.

Currently 43 states and DC use BBCE to bypass federal eligibility limits on income, assets or both to get food stamps.  And Dem-ruled states have decreed that if someone is given something as minimal as a brochure describing welfare benefits, or a telephone number to the welfare agency, that qualifies as getting a welfare benefit.

That person is then treated as being “categorically eligible” for food stamps—making even wealthy fraudsters eligible.  Own a Lambo or Maserati?  No problem, noble citizen!

Welfare fraud isn’t an accident. It is by design. The more welfare (tax dollars) Democrats give to their base, the more power they achieve by enlisting an ever-larger army of freeloaders--and the faster the U.S. reaches inevitable bankruptcy.

How widespread is the abuse?  The Foundation for Government Accountability found that 14,000 EBT recipients bought new luxury vehicles like Maseratis or Ferraris in just one corrupt state.

Another invitation to fraud--eagerly exploited by fraudsters--is that Democrats ordered that people applying for food stamps ("SNAP benefits") don't have to confirm their identity in any serious way.  Something as flimsy as a library card will so.  And as a result, many SNAP recipients claim benefits from several states--or even from overseas, as shown by IP addresses.

A foreign fraudster can get food stamps faster than you can get through to the IRS helpline.

But congress refuses to close the BBCE loophole. 

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/maserati-food-stamp-moochers/#disqus_thread

If you're skeptical, search "meaning of bbce in welfare" 

"The barbarians are at the gates."

There's an old metaphor to denote a life-threatening emergency: "The barbarians are at the gates."

In the U.S. in 2026 the barbarians aren't just AT the gates, they are inside the gates.

• They have lifetime jobs in universities.
• Lifetime appointments as federal judges at every level.
• They control the Mainstream Media--virtually every television network, cable-TV channels and all newspapers.
• They control what's amusingly known as "the entertainment industry:"  movies, television and the music industry.
• They've used congress to wangle hundreds of billions in government (taxpayer-funded) grants, with no effective oversight as to how they spend the money.  Example: billions spent in California on "the homeless" with nothing to show for it except wealthy pols and directors of NGOs.
• Without exception, all the above organizations support the Democrat Partei and socialism.
• They control elections--registration and vote counting--in virtually every big city, even if the governor and legislature are conservative, because virtually all big cities are Democrat-run.
• They control what's known as the "permanent bureaucracy" of the federal government--the Deep State--civil service employees who essentially can't be fired, and who cunningly sabotage any efforts at reform, as with Fauci and his lackeys.
• They block all efforts to prosecute massive fraud in government programs like Medicare and Medicaid, because grifters kick back millions to Democrat officials.
• They've even gotten their people elected as "nominal" Republicans--RINOs--who routinely vote with the Democrats to block all but the most trivial reform.

If you've ever been puzzled by how clearly-guilty people like Fauci or Eric Swalwell or Nancy Pelosi or the Somali grift machine in Minnesotastan are never tried and imprisoned for their corruption, everything you just read explains it.

The same things explain why policies favored by a huge majority of Americans--like photo-ID to vote--never pass, even when nominal Republicans have a majority in both chambers of congress: fake Republicans (RINOs) vote with Dems to defeat the reforms.

Are you starting to understand yet?

(H/T Thomas Sowell)


 

Mamdani's corrupt NYC to *give* NON-citizens up to $100,000 from taxpayers to buy homes

Young Americans born in the U.S. can’t afford a starter home, so the mayor of NYC plans to give 'em $100,000 for a downpayment.

Just kidding!  Instead the communist Muslim mayor of New York City has unveiled a plan to give yet more tax dollars to NON-citizens--including illegal aliens.  And this time it's a whopper: up to $100,000 in taxpayer dollars to non-citizens for a downpayment and closing costs to buy a home.  And the city agency won’t even ask if applicants are here legally. 

Mamdani's lackeys made sure to tell non-citizens they don’t need a Social Security number--and no traditional credit check, but instead a thing called a "municipal credit check," at least initially.

The scheme will use federal as well as state tax dollars.  It's supposed to be a loan, but just like student "loans" as the Dems would have it, the borrower won't have to repay a dime if they stay in the home long enough.

Summary: it's an explicit plan to give the money to non-citizens, including those here illegally.

While you mull that over for a minute, consider that much the same thing was set in motion by Bill Clinton and his Democrat thieves in congress way back in 1992:

If you're under age 45 or so you probably don't remember the "mortgage meltdown" of 2008.  It was set in motion by Democrats (led by Bill Clinton) in 1992, when congress forced banks to make low-interest mortgage loans to people who had no income, no job and no assets.  As you could guess, once loafers learned about the new rule, such loans became so common that people in the lending biz gave 'em a catchy name: "Ninja loans:"  No income, job or assets.

Cute, eh?

Normally no bank would loan $200,000 or more to an applicant who seemed overwhelmingly likely to NOT be able to make their mortgage payments.  But Democrats are very cunning, so they passed a law or rule saying lenders could sell the loan to either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (the two giant federal home loan agencies), which were required to buy it.  So the fed agencies would repay the entire loan amount to the originating bank, and would then supposedly receive future payments, just as the originator would have.

One small problem: the pipo who applied for "ninja" loans rarely made more than a few payments (out of 240 or so) because they didn't have the income.  And they'd heard that even if you stopped making mortgage payments, because the borrower got free legal help from NGOs, evicting delinquent borrowers would take the federal agencies at least three years. 

That meant "ninja borrowers" got three years rent-free, with free legal provided by NGOs.  

As a result of this moronic plan, both federal lending agencies ended up losing tens of billions of dollars.  It was SO predictable--and SO dumb--that books were written about the stupidity.  There was even an acclaimed movie, "The Big Short." 

Worse yet, when the government agency finally succeeded in evicting the deadbeat borrowers, many of the homes were so torn up that investors would only pay a fraction of their original value.  In many cases copper pipes had been ripped out and sold for cash, along with all the appliances.  

These foreclosed, trashed homes became the notorious "HUD homes," as the fed lenders signed 'em all over to the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development.  So even auctioning off the foreclosed (trashed) homes only recovered a fraction of the loan amount the agencies paid the original lenders.

Such a deal, eh?  This is what passes for brilliant government policy, eh?  And now Mamdani is doing essentially the same thing: giving $100K to illegals.  Wow.

So once again the socialist/commie Muslim mayor panders to illegal aliens, giving $100K to each applicant, no questions asked.  But only to non-citizens.

"White privilege," huh?

https://moonbattery.com/illegal-aliens-to-be-handed-100000-to-buy-home-in-new-york/

Via Independent Sentinel:

https://www.independentsentinel.com/nyc-to-give-100k-city-federal-tax-dollars-to-noncitizens-for-1st-homes/
 

31 days til the elections

After the U.S. blew up some more air-defense radars far from big Iranian cities (meaning no Iranian citizens even hear about it), the cunning Democrats have once again demanded Trump STOP BOMBING, to give those totally sincere mullahs yet another chance to negotiate. 
   
And the mullahs are delighted to negotiate--endlessly.  They're just not serious about making a deal except on their terms.  They keep insisting that they control the Strait (they don't), and demand that they be allowed to "continue" that non-existent control.  So they'll keep playing this game as long as the Iranian people don't kill 'em, counting on "White House advisors" who know NOTHING about military history to get Trump to fall for this same fake for a just a few more days.  

History shows that after October 14th or so, NO revelation--no matter how damning--will change the minds of voters.  Look at the revelation on October 14th of 2020 that Hunter bribem had abandoned a dead laptop at a computer store, and that it contained thousands of emails showing Hunty was collecting millions from foreign governments for his father, good ol' "Uncle Joe."

That bombshell had no effect at all, in part because the Dems simply lied and said "Dis iz a classic Russian intel operation, designed to hurt ouah faaaabulous Democrat nominee and help Trump!"

Of course it didn't make sense that either Russia or China would want the "America-first," pro-military Trump as president instead of the corrupt bribem, but logic didn't enter into the thoughts of voters.  Duh Dems an' Media sed Hunty's laptop wuz a "Russian intelligence op"--even though NO intel official had examined the thing--and that was all Dem voters needed to hear.

Wait...if it was a Russian fake, how did the Democrats explain the hundreds of pics of Hunty nude, seemingly doing lines of coke with what appeared to be hookers?

They didn't have to, because the corrupt FBI pressured Twatter and Fakebook to spike (kill) links to the New York Post's cover story, so most Americans never saw the pics.  

But the Democrats had another deflection all ready too, and you're gonna love it: "Mr. Hunter Biden is not a government official."

Ahhh, so he can collect bribes (thinly disguised as "investments"), as long as he's not on the gummint payroll, eh?  And collecting bribes totally wifout his dad's knowledge, eh?

Utter horseshit, but it worked.  After bribem took office, one survey supposedly found that about a third of Dem voters surveyed said if they'd known  about the laptop story they wouldn't have voted for bribem.  Ahhh.
  
We're now 31 days from the mid-term elections, and all the polls show Dems leading.  Yes, I'm well aware that the polls are rigged to give Dems the lead, which makes it plausible when they steal just enough votes to win by a few hundred out of millions in a state.

Hoping for a miracle, but I've lived through way to many stolen elections to believe in one. 

Something very bad has been happening in the U.S. for the last few years--and it seems to be getting worse.

In Massachusetts in January of 2023 a married mother of three young children was struggling with postpartum psychosis.  She was briefly committed to a psych ward, but like most glib women she was able to talk 'em into releasing her.  She returned home, and days later when her husband went out to bring home dinner, she took her three young children--ages 5, 3 and 8 months--to the basement...and one by one, strangled them to death.

*She admitted killing her children,* saying a voice in her head ordered her to do it.  Her attorney didn't contest the admission of her confession--and if he believed it was invalid for some reason, he was obligated to say so at trial.  In any case, as everyone has surely heard, the trial ended in a hung jury after one juror refused to join the other 11 and find her "not guilty by reason of insanity."

The problem with the insanity defense was that all her actions showed careful planning and calculation.

But surprisingly, this story isn't about her.  It's about hundreds of American women posting videos on TikTok screaming that their astrological signs told 'em the husband had done it--even though the defendant *admitted killing all three of her children.*

Her crazy female supporters claim the husband did it, or somehow hypnotized his wife into killing their children.  They've been posting videos on TikTok screaming that the mom is innocent, even after she admitted killing her kids.  How the hell do you deal with people so totally untethered from reality?

If this was the only unhinged mass psychosis in the U.S. I wouldn't be too worried.  But it's far from it.

Tony Fauci funded the research that created Covid, then lied about it and deleted emails showing his lies.  Gavin Newsom locked his state down "to prevent the spread of covid," but then had a birthday dinner with friends at a fancy restaurant--maskless, of course.  He locked you down, but he's free to do whatever the hell he wants.

Newsom's lackeys ordered cops to arrest a man paddleboarding alone in the ocean--but when 500,000 people rioted in the streets, shoulder to shoulder, in the summer of 2020, with duh Chyna virus in full swing, Fauci didn't say a critical word--at exactly the same time Dem-ruled cops were arresting solo paddle-boarders in the ocean. 

"Cuz viruses don't spread during marches for social justice!  See, deplorable?"

Look at how many leftist "Americans" are openly celebrating murders of those they hate:

In NYC Luigi Mangione ran up behind a healthcare CEO and shot him in the back--and leftists fawned over him.  Slobbered over him.  Leftist women gushed over him--even after he pled guilty.  What does that tell you about them?

Watch a video of 60,000 African men (yes, 60,000) invading a Spanish city on the coast of Africa, and you see a crazy western woman gleefully waving the invaders in.  Is she crazy?  Absolutely.

The craze sweeping American women--and yes, almost entirely women--is called "suicidal empathy."  More U.S. women than ever are childless, so the empathy normally used to keep women from killing their kids is now used to fawningly support murderers, illegal invaders, 
drug addicts--the worst monsters on the planet.

Tens of thousands of depraved monsters celebrate the comrade who shot Charlie Kirk, demonizing a grieving widow, inventing all manner of insanity to explain how the killer was anyone except the goofy guy who did it--and confessed to buddies on social media.  And wrote his tranny lover roommate a note saying he was driving 3 hours up the road to kill Kirk. 

Some teachers have sneeringly mocked Kirk's assassination. Drag queens have put on assassination fashion shows.  What kind of monsters celebrate the assassination of a loving father?  

Who are these demons? 

Monsters have started celebrating murders of innocent people they hate.  That's us.

You have two choices: Do nothing, and die when they decide, or fight back and defend those you love.

I used to care.  But after watching so many so-called Americans ecstatic over the murder of innocents, I'm beginning to believe roughly a quarter of the people in this country are demons.  And because our so-called "democratic republic" has slowly morphed into merely a democracy (majority rules), and stupid Democrats will vote for anyone with a D on the ballot, they're about to win again. 

I don't think there's any way to recover short of civil war.

If anyone would care to debate this with me, have at it. 

A brief summary of the Iran conflict

[Posting pieces I wrote months ago but they got buried cuz too much else going on:]

Last January hundreds of Iranian citizens posted video of men with rifles, shotguns and handguns, riding on motorcycles, shooting citizens on the siddewalks in Iran.

Initial reports said 30,000 were murdered over two days.  Scores of videos showed different locations with hundreds of body bags at each, and relatives going from one to another hoping to learn the fate of their missing son or daughter or parent.
 
Democrat commenters sneered: "Trumpies claimed the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and cops killed 30,000 Iranian protesters, but that's, like, totally unconfirmed.  Only a few hundred bodies were found, and why should anyone in the U.S. be upset at that?  

"See, the only good protests are the ones our party members do to protest against Israel and support Palestine, and transgender kids, and ouah precious undocumented Americans!  The crazy young Iranians wanted to overthrow their own government!  So it's totally reasonable for the mullahs to...uh...restore order, right?" 

To all you rat-bastard, scum-sucking Democrats who claim the mullahs and basij and IRGC were just fine, and that tales of 30,000 civilians being killed by their own rulers are false: Watch this video (assuming the Left hasn't gotten corrupt YouTube to remove it).

https://youtu.be/l9l6_gqELII 

Many Democrats claim all the videos were faked.  "AI," right?  Or that if only a thousand people were murdered, we shouldn't be concerned.  Watch again.  Really, assholes?

The mullahs and their lackey thugs have been killing Iranians for years.  No one outside Iran had the balls to take out the thug rulers.  In fact Barky Obozo did the opposite: gave 'em a billion dollars or so to use as they wished.  That cash funded tens of thousands of murders by the Islamic regime.

Now, chances are you don't know jack-shit about nuclear physics, so here's a quick summary: Uranium comes in several different "isotopes."  Only one will make a bomb.  Over 99% of "natural" uranium is useless.  To make a bomb you need to get rid of most of that, raising the explosive one percent to about 90%.  To make electricity from a nuclear reactor you only need 10% of the "useful" isotope.  The only known use for enriching uranium above ten percent is to make a bomb.

Iran' negotiators admitted to ours that they had 447 kilograms (about 1,000 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60% fissionable.  As noted immediately above, the only known use for uranium enriched above ten percent is to build atomic bombs.  

The Mainstream Media totally ignored that.  "Too technical for readers to find interesting."  And since you never saw it on the alphabet nets, or in the Washington Post or the NY Times, you don't believe it.  Try asking the great AI.

Trump doesn't know nuclear physics either, but has advisors who do.  They alerted him, and instead of giving the mullahs another billion dollars, like Obozo, Trump said "Stop it."  

The mullahs immediately contacted their Democrat friends in congress and asked "Trump has threatened us.  Should we be worried?"  Their Dem buddies said "Nah, we won't approve any strike, and only congress can declare war, and we have enough fake Rethuglicans who will vote with us against attacking you, so no worries."

And as anyone other than a Dem could have predicted, the mullahs kept enriching uranium.  So Trump ordered a precision midnight strike on their uranium-enrichment facilities.

You'd think rational leaders would say "That strike took out a billion dollars worth of gas centrifuges. Maybe this Trump infidel isn't bluffing.  Maybe we should stop enriching uranium past ten percent."  

But of course the mullahs had been assured by treasonous Democrats and elites that congress would prevent Trump from ordering another strike.  So the mullahs and the IRGC immediately started rebuilding their enrichment facilities.  After all, the enrichment facility was a hundred miles from Tehran, and no Iranian civilians and only a handful of regime lackeys had been killed, and the State-controlled media had only reported a "failed strike," so the mullahs believed they could do anything they wanted without any risk, eh?

Wow, exactly the same mentality as thugs in Democrat-ruled American cities like Chitcongo and Philly, where you can carjack or mug someone and be let out without posting bail, and have charges plea-bargained down to jaywalking.  Hmmm...

So as anyone could have predicted, the mullahs ignored this warning too, and started re-building.  Trump warned 'em, but they refused to listen.  So now the entire regime apparatus is a target, including the leadership.

Dems: "Those videos of pipo dancing in the streets that the MAGAts are claiming are pipo rejoicing about the U.S. attacks, but they're actually protesting against the U.S. attacks!"

Really?  They protest by dancing, Democrats?  That's...unusual.  You Dems may wanna re-think that, Sparky.

Dems later: "Okay, maybe a few dozen showed up to wave flags, but dey wuz paid by Trump and his band of war-mongers, and had no idea what they were there for."

Other Democrats:  "We support the totally legitimate, fairly elected government of Iran, against deluded troublemakers and thugs who are being paid by the Trump regime to create a diversion from the Epstein files!"

Yeah, dat's it.

Other Democrats: "The rational, peace-loving leaders of Iran were negotiating in good faith to open the Strait of Hormuz, so it's a crime for Trump to attack them.  He's made such unfair, oppressive demands, like insisting that Iran not charge a $2 million toll on every tanker that uses that waterway."

Besides, Iran was no threat to the U.S.  All that nonsense about them trying to build an atomic bomb is just a right-wing scare story!  Every nation has the right to have atom bombs!  And even if they do get the bomb, they'd nevah use it against US, right?  After all, they're not suicidal!"

"Okay, there are unconfirmed reports that maybe a few hard-core extremists have blown themselves up with suicide vests years ago, or may have flown a few jet airliners into some buildings, but not often!  So we're pretty sure most of 'em iz NOT suicidal!  Yep yep yep."

Other Democrats: "Even if they got the bomb, their missiles won't reach the U.S.  Oh sure, their missiles are powerful enough to reach Israel, but that's not ouah problem, right?  We should let Israel defend itself!  So in taking out Iran's ability to make atomic bombs, Trump wasn't saving Americans at all, but was working to save Israel--sending our precious American sons and daughters to die to help the Jews!  We Dems don't want that!  Instead we want Israel to give half its land to form a Palestinian state!  Yep yep yep!  So simple!" >> 

<<Everything above is the kind of horseshit "reasoning" that has allowed the Democrats to control the White House for 20 of the last 34 years.  The bastards are too dumb to breathe without assistance, so they throw out fake "logic" like all the above, and count on their Media allies to never question 'em.

And it almost always works for 'em.  And barring a miracle, they'll win control of at least one chamber of congress in 34 days.
 

Hit-and-run crash by illegal alien kills mother and 2 sons

Yet another illegal alien is accused of causing a deadly hit-and-run crash that killed a mother and her two young sons, as new details emerge about his background and criminal history.

Victor Napoleon Reyes, 33, has been charged with three counts of negligent homicide in connection with the crash.  His attorney said he believes his client is in the U.S. illegally, counting on him being deported instead of convicted and imprisoned here.

Reyes crossed the centerline and ran head-on into the car driven by the mother.  He then immediately fled the scene on foot, prompting a two-day search before he was arrested.

According to legal records Reyes has a history of impaired driving. In 2016, he pleaded guilty to DWI in the first degree. In 2023, he pleaded guilty to DWI in the second degree, along with driving on a suspended license.

Happens literally every day: An illegal alien, repeatedly released by shit-head leftist judges after multiple DUI convictions instead of being imprisoned or ordered deported, finally kills an American--sometimes a whole family.

But yew mus' NOT blame Democrats, deplorables!  It's true that they made these thousands of fatal car accidents, murders and rapes inevitable when they voted for obozo and bribem (both of whom opened our borders), but yew mus' not blame Democrats!

See, no one could possibly have predicted that pipo who break our laws by entering the U.S. illegally might break other laws, like driving drunk, or without a license or insurance, or fleeing from a fatal accident they caused.  Totally impossible to predict!  Plus yew cain't blame 'em cuz it beez part of dere culture, citizen!  

An' as liberals always insist, "All cultures are equally noble and valid," comrade.  An' if yew don' agree den yew iz RAAaaaaacist!

The original story (from May) said Reyes was scheduled to appear in court again on July 1st.  Predictably, not a single news story covered his court appearance.  I suspect that's because he was ordered released by a corrupt leftist judge and fled back to Mehico.

Source.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/man-charged-crash-killed-mother-two-young-sons-has-ice-detainer-prior-dwi-convictions 

Black professor denounces white paint as RAAAaacist

Like all minorities in this great nation, Blacks have done very well in the supposedly raaaacis' U.S:  a black preznit, scores of blacks in congress, several black governors.  But professional victims are never happy since being a successful victim requires you to be perpetually miserable.

To perpetual victims (and most Democrat "leaders"), white people are offensive merely by being white.  In fact the hate for "white" is so intense that it spills over from skin color to anything white—including paint.

And naturally, liberal "foundations" and NGOs are eager to support and reward this insanity.  Latest example:  A book by a black professor at Columbia titled "A Dead White: An Argument Against White Paint."

At first you'd think this had to be satire, but apparently author Wendy Walters is totally serious.  And worse yet,  the leftist National Book Foundation has shortlisted Wendy's raaacist screed for its nonfiction award!

>>When she saw the walls of her children’s school, she felt apprehension, and wrote, “I could not stop thinking about the walls. I said to myself: They are so very white.”>>

For Wendy and those similarly afflicted (paranoid) let's review:  white walls have been popular for well over a thousand years, even in locations that never hosted black people, because white reflects far more light than dark colors, so makes interiors brighter and larger.  If you doubt that, try painting your living room all black.  (I had an ex-wife who demanded that we re-paint the ceiling of a big living room "eggplant," since that was a trendy color that year.  Disaster.)  White on exterior walls make interiors cooler.

But to raaaacists like Wendy, better to paint a room dark, because Wendy claims “White paint represents something beyond itself.”  Really, Wendy?  Are you sure it's not just that you associate fucking PAINT with the skin color of people you hate?

After trying to convey her “disapproval of the new school’s white walls” to another black parent, only to have her brilliant analogy dismissed out of hand by a fellow black woman, Wendy writes that she “had a sense of foreboding, as if some kind of betrayal was imminent.”

"Betrayal"--for bright, reflective wall paint.  Wow.

Wendy makes good money by finding white paint oppressive:  In 2020 Wendy, who already had a Ford Foundation fellowship, was given a $100,000 grant to write a “book-length polemic against the use of white paint in both interior and exterior spaces.”  Nice, eh?  Of course you'll never read about white people complaining about dark paint, cuz dat beez SO un-woke, eh?  No $100,000 grants from wokie leftists to write those books, eh?

Racists like Wendy will never run short of material, because our "wokie" pols and elites have decided that anything white can be denounced as racist.  And sure enough, a professor at equally goofy NYU (Arthur Caplan) has now bleated that milk is a symbol of white supremacy.  Wait, not ALL "milk."  Just...white milk.

“As a student of the history of fascist regimes I am suspicious,” he writes. “Milk drinking is political. Drinking whole white milk has played a big role in racist and far-right thinking.”

This is insanity.

“Fascists have used milk as a rallying cry for white supremacy since the days of Mussolini’s public health campaigns in Italy,” Caplan wrote in The American Journal of Bioethics. “The Nazis were enamored of whole white milk as well.  In America, drinking whole milk has for years been a part of alt-right, white nationalist messaging in tweets, memes, and videos.”

Total insanity.  Imagine how many students this racist moron will poison with his insanity over his long career--in a place where tuition averages almost $63,000 per year.

Democrat pols: "Don't worry 'bout dat, noble citizen, cuz when we re-take control of gummint we gon' get gummint to 'forgive' all your student loans--at least to pricey universities like NYU and Columbia!  Okay, it's true dat when we say "gummint" will "forgive" student loans, it's true that we'll really be using tax dollars to do that.  But why would you care?  If we din' spend it on such a woke, noble cause as "forgiving" loans, Rethuglicans would just waste it on something useless, like trying to prevent Iran from having atomic bombs, eh?"

Source 1.

Source 2. 

https://moonbattery.com/scholar-denounces-white-paint-as-racist/

https://moonbattery.com/nyu-professor-denounces-milk-as-white-supremacist/ 

Faculty members at elite universities are almost 100% liberal Democrats

In a survey of faculty at Ivy League universities, forty percent of faculty members admitted they would vote against hiring any Trump supporter seeking an academic post, regardless of that candidate's scholarship or teaching ability. 

Keep in mind that this 40% is just those professors willing to admit to such bias.

Jonathan Turley writes of a Harvard Law professor who expressed disbelief that I expected him to vote for qualified faculty applicants who held views  contrary to his.  When Turley noted that he regularly votes for faculty candidates who hold opposing views, he just shrugged, saying if he doesn't like a candidate's views, he wouldn't vote for those views to be taught to students.

Law school faculties have now been almost completely purged of conservative voices, due to a biased hiring and promotion system.  Leftist professors ensure that students only hear liberal viewpoints.

Source:  

How the Mainstream Media got voters to believe the U.S. lost to Iran

As everyone with an IQ over 80 who's not a brain-dead Democrat knows, the Lying Mainstream Media absolutely hates Donald Trump and the U.S. military, and will say/write/broadcast absolutely anything to hurt or discredit both.

Thus no one should be surprised that just a month after the "conflict" with Iran started, the Lying Mainstream Media already, unequivocally DECLARED that Iran defeated the U.S.

Seriously.  The leftist-ruled Media knew the best way to win Democrat control of congress in November--the top goal of the Democrat Partei right now--was to get voters to believe Iran had defeated the U.S, because that would make Trump look weak and stupid.  And because the media will never give President Trump credit for, or support on, any issue, they've spent months attacking the war. Let's take a look at some of the reporting from earlier this year to see exactly what the Lying Media was saying: 

June 28, the Wall Street Journal: Op-ed titled "Iran is Winning the Battle of Hormuz"; 

June 3, CNN: "'Their new nuclear option': Why Iran's influence over the Strait of Hormuz is here to stay";

June 30, Washington Post: "Iran's leverage over Strait of Hormuz snarls Trump's push for a deal"; 

May 19, Associated Press: "Trump's tough-talk foreign policy is hitting a wall with Iran as it grips Strait of Hormuz"; 

March 18, Bloomberg: "Iran Moves Its Own Oil Through Hormuz as It Chokes Other Traffic"; 

April 8, Reuters: “As Trump claims victory, Iran emerges bruised but powerful with leverage over Hormuz” 

April 6, New York Times: "The War Is Turning Iran Into a Major World Power."

On September 28, however, it became clear that oil exports from the Persian Gulf had returned to near pre-war levels while Iranian exports have, quite literally, hit zero. 

Mainstream Media: "Hey, did you guys see how faaaabulous Iran is doing?  Their economy is doing SO well, despite Orange Hitler ordering his fascist troops to bomb schools, hospitals and food depots!  An' a few of ya may have seen stories claiming that thanks to the U.S. Navy, oil exports thru the Straits were back to 95% of pre-war levels.  This is nonsense:  This number is almost certainly fictitious!  We have no idea where that number came from, but we're sure it's wrong!  Cuz if it was right, duh U.N. an' duh BBC would have confirmed it!  An' dey din' doodat, so we know the claim is wrong!

We know dat cuz if dey had contradictory info dey wud have said so!  Cuz duh Media iz, like, totally committed to honest, totally unbiased, responsible journalism! 

"See, since duh U.S. cannot possibly defeat the superior military strategy and will of Iran's rulers, duh only way we can end the 'conflict' is to surrender to Iran an' pull all U.S. troops out of the Mid-east!  Dis will make the world safer and bettah!  Yep yep yep!   

Watch how "The Science" evolved from 2020

 

Three Post Office carriers charged in $24 MILLION fraud scheme

 

New "caravan" from Central America headed to the U.S, arriving just before the mid-terms

Trump has closed the southern border.  But for the first time in months, another migrant caravan from Central America is coming to the U.S, and should arrive two or three weeks before the mid-term elections.  It's not only coming, but reports say it's GAINING IN NUMBERS, despite the "hard close" on the southern border by president Trump.

Their plan is that if enough people scatter in different directions, most will be able to overwhelm border patrol with numbers, enabling thousands to escape into the interior of the U.S. where they know Democrats will conceal and protect them.

This comes at an interesting time, right before the mid-term elections.  If the Border Patrol arrests a few thousand, the Mainstream Media will scream that Trump is bein' cruel to doze po' wimmen an' chirren "refugees" (even though past "caravans" have been 95% fighting-age men).  And at the same time, if a few thousand get thru, the same Media will sneer that Trump has failed to do what he promised: to close the border.

Either way, Dems win--which was the whole point.
 

In elite DC suburb of Arlington, DA orders preferential treatment for non-U.S. citizens who drive drunk

September 28, 2026

Fourteen years ago emperor Obozo had a great idea: allow children of illegal aliens, brought to the U.S., to stay here forever.  The Media quickly gave that decree the utterly uninformative acronym "DACA," because no American knew what it meant.

(Out of curiosity, how many of you know?  If you're a college student, ask your parents.  If you're a parent, ask your 20-year-old "adult" kids.  No one will know.  It stands for "Deferred action for childhood arrivals."  Does that tell you anything useful?  Nope, which was the entire point.)

See, when illegal aliens entered the U.S. with kids, duh kidz din' have no choice, right?  So if we were to be so mean as to deport illegal-alien parents, Obozo and the Left wailed dat it wuz unfair to deport duh kidz with dere parents, since duh kidz could have spent years in duh U.S. an' din' know nuffin' bout dere home countries, right?  So it wud be unfair to deport duh kiddies!  So DACA wuz, like, totally compassionate, eh?

Sucker play: If you've got an IQ over 80 you realized right away that if a conservative congress or prezzy tried to deport just the parents, the Media would scream that the mean GOP was "separating families!  Ripping children from there parents!  It's SO unbelievably cruel, eh?"

Of course the solution is obvious: deport the whole family.  But WAIT, scream Dems:  Because of Obozo's executive order (decree), the children are NO LONGER ILLEGAL ALIENS, cuz duh emperor hath given 'em legal status forever, eh?  So since you have no legal justification to deport duh kiddies, yew cain't deport duh parents either, since that wud be...wait for it..."cruel."  Yep.

Obozo issued his order without asking congress, under the "presidential discretion" section of U.S. immigration law.  And before the Supreme Court was majority-"conservative" (quotes intentional), it ruled dat whatevah duh Emperor did, no later prezzy could undo!

Sweet, eh?  It's called a ratchet, meaning the rule only swings one way--to do what the Democrat Partei wants.  You may wonder why, eh?

Of course if you're over 25 or so, you don't need to wonder because the answer is obvious: kids of illegals will vote Democrat, since that not only supports their continued presence here, but also ensures that eventually the Dems will give them U.S. citizenship without their having to ask, or pass any of the civics tests!  

Is that cool or what?  So instantly 800,000 foreigners were given essentially permanent residency in the U.S.

Now, as you've seen over the past two years, Democrat brownshirts have been rioting in the streets of all Democrat-ruled shithole cities to prevent ICE from deporting any illegals, even those who've committed serious crimes.  Dems demand that ALL illegals who've entered the U.S. be allowed to stay, since they'll vote Democrat.

But while Obozo's DECREE allowed DACA recipients to stay here forever, it did NOT give 'em permission to break any other U.S. laws, like drunk driving.

But as everyone knows, rules are only useful to the extent that those responsible for enforcing 'em do just that.  And in corrupt, Dem-ruled Arlington County, Virginia, that's the job of the equivalent of the DA, called the "Commonwealth's Attorney."

And in Arlington that absolute power rests with a woman born in...Iran: Democrat Parisa Dehghani-Tafti.  

And the Commonwealth’s Attorney--the chief prosecutor, who *alone* decides what laws will be enforced--is determined to keep DACA winners who drive drunk from being deported.

So she sent her staff prosecutors a memo, saying if a DACA person is charged with drunk driving, they should "consider" reducing that charge to something trivial, to prevent the DACA winner from losing their protected status and being deported. 

Her office sent prosecutors a written memo with that instruction.

This officially documents what we've seen for years: today there are effectively two different sets of laws--a harsh one for conservatives, and a totally lenient set for anyone the Dems favor.  Democrat prosecutors simply refuse to prosecute a crime committed by a person the Democrat party favors. 

The Founders had a novel idea: The law was to apply equally to all citizens.  No one was "above the law," whether due to wealth or power.  And for 200-odd years it worked.  Then the Democrats realized that they could rig the system simply by refusing to charge certain people with crimes.

And there ya go. 

Former leftist (Naomi Wolf) discovers Fauci funded Chinese research to insert genes into bat corona-viruses 8 years before the covid pandemic

(Heavily edited from an article by Naomi Wolf, May 2, 2026)

The "Freedom of Information Act" was designed to make the government accountable to the people, by requiring government officials to release documents bearing on any specific question.  But *from the beginning* the corruptocrats--the wannabee dictators, Democrats--knew they could get away with totally ignoring that totally reasonable law--because they knew the Democrat DeepState, leftist judges and leftist U.S. Attorneys wouldn't prosecute 'em.

So a week ago Politico reported that a former aide to Fauci has just been charged with conspiring to evade FOIA records requests related to National Institutes of Health funding of "gain of function" research in a Chinese lab. 

The Democrat-fellating, Trump-hating Media and virtually all Democrats went ballistic: "Nonsense!  Dis beez *totally* fake newz!  A 'right-wing conspiracy story,' created to distract Americans from the fact that the U.S. is losing BADLY in Iran!  After all, we've been involved there for NINE WHOLE WEEKS (when this story broke) and Iran hasn't surrendered!  It's another Trump eternal war!  He's a warmonger!  Oh, and he hates 'immigrants' and trannies!"

Utter horseshit, but all Dems believed it.

Former Fauci "advisor" David Morens is accused of concealing emails about risky virus research. He's been indicted on obstruction of justice and conspiracy charges for allegedly hiding federal records about research designed to make viruses that were *not* harmful to humans, lethal--like covid-19.

Organizations like Science Magazine and Judicial Watch filed at least eight FOIA requests for records about funding "gain of function research."  But the cunning conspirator Morens ensured they didn't get any such emails--even though we already had them, via friendly sources in the NSA (which has copies of everything).

And again, in case you missed it earlier:  Morens was a senior advisor to Tony Fauci.

So “two weeks to stop the spread,” eh?  Americans were ordered to stay indoors, to not go to funerals or church or weddings.  Everyone ORDERED to wear useless masks.  Ordered to stay six feet apart.  All useless horseshit, used to get Americans accustomed to total control by the Democrat government.

All these draconian rules were ordered by a tiny handful of people, supported by a billion-dollar marketing campaign.  And the face of that campaign was Tony Fauci, supported by Deborah Birx.

*What you never heard about* was a group of top virus researchers who noticed that Covid-19--though *almost* a perfect match for a normally-harmless bat virus--differed by four genes, which had clearly, obviously been inserted in the gene sequence of the spike protein.

The four insertions were perfect matches for genes in the HIV virus, and were in the spike protein to make it bind more tightly to cells in the human airway--specifically "ACE-2 receptors."  The four inserted genes clearly and unequivocally showed the bat virus had been modified to make it lethal to humans.  

In other words, Fauci's top virus experts instantly realized Covid-19 had clearly, obviously NOT evolved naturally.  They knew this just days after the first case was confirmed in the U.S.--by comparing the gene sequences of the closest matching "natural" bat virus with Covid-19.

*We have the email from the lead researcher (Kristian G. Andersen, with Scripps Research), telling Fauci this.*  But just one week after Andersen told Fauci the Chyna virus did NOT evolve by "natural mutation," *Fauci directed Andersen's group to write a technical paper **saying exactly the opposite.* 

Seriously.  Literally.  So just ONE WEEK after Andersen and his group of Fauci grant recipients told Fauci the virus did NOT evolve naturally, he told 'em to write a paper saying the exact opposite.

If you don't understand how utterly corrupt that was, read it again.

Why would Fauci order Andersen et al to write a paper stating exactly the opposite of their real (and obvious) conclusions?  Had Fauci researched the virus's genetic code on his own?  Of course not, since if he had, he would have said so.  If he had information that would support his position, he would have told Andersen.  But he didn't.

Fauci is single-handedly responsible for the lie that the virus *"could not possiblly have been modified in a lab to make it lethal to humans*--when he knew that is exactly what happened, *because he funded the research and surely read the tech papers published by the Wuhan lab.* 

Fauci seems to have arranged to have the "debunking paper" (titled "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2") published in the March 2020 issue of the prestigious journal "Nature Medicine."  The lead author was Kristian Andersen--who you may recall wrote the email telling Fauci the virus was NOT natural.  Wow.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

Fauci "asked" Andersen to write the debunking paper during the first week in February of 2020.  Two weeks after Andersen emailed Fauci that the virus had NOT "evolved naturally," Andersen submitted to Fauci the draft of his group's paper saying the opposite, for Fauci's approval.  As Fauci ordered, the paper claimed Covid-19 had evolved by natural mutation--exactly the opposite of what Andersen had told Fauci just two weeks earlier.

The paper was published in Nature on March 20th, just five weeks after Andersen submitted his draft to Fauci--surely a record short time.  The conclusion: 
 >>"Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.">>

<<But in the very next sentence we have this:
  >>SARS-CoV-2 appears to be optimized for binding to the human receptor ACE2; and the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has a functional polybasic (furin) cleavage site at the S1–S2 boundary through the *insertion of 12 nucleotides.*>>

Wait..."the insertion of 12 nucleotides"??  And all those supposedly evolved totally naturally?

And even goofier: 
  >>"*This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is NOT the product of purposeful manipulation.*>>

How does the insertion of 12 "nucleotides" in exactly the right places become "strong evidence that [it] is NOT the result of] purposeful manipulation??  

The conclusion stated by the authors does not follow.  It's utter horseshit--as Anderson surely knew.  But he and his co-authors decided they needed to obey Fauci, contradicting his and his group's real opinion.  Why?

After Andersen emailed Fauci saying Covid-19 had almost certainly NOT evolved naturally, what research did Andersen and his co-authors, Andrew Rambaut, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward C. Holmes and Robert F. Garry do  that persuaded them to totally reverse their original conclusion?

None.  Literally.  They wrote the paper Fauci wanted because *every one of the authors was getting huge, continuing taxpayer-funded grants from Fauci's NIAID.*  They were surely concerned that if they refused to do as Fauci directed, the grants almost certainly wouldn't continue to be funded. 

But lots of other virologists weren't on the Fauci grant gravy-train, and they wrote letters to journal editors about the vast improbability that the "furin cleavage site"--a site not found in ANY natural bat virus--had just evolved naturally to make the virus more lethal to humans.  (And again, that was just one of FOUR inserted genes.)

Fauci and his allies responded NOT by claiming the site wasn't there (since Andersen's own paper admitted its existence), but by calling anyone who suggested the "furin cleavage site" was inserted instead of evolving naturally "conspiracy theorists." 

Even respected publications like The Lancet wrote articles supporting Fauci’s claim that any differences between the closest matching bat virus and covid-19 had evolved totally naturally. 

What do ya think the odds are of being dealt four pat straight-flushes in the same evening at a poker table in Vegas, eh?  The probability of the closest bat virus "naturally evolving" the four inserted genes is millions of times smaller.

Andersen's paper was also the first mention that the jump to humans could have been due to a Wuhan resident eating an infected bat or pangolin from Wuhan's "wet market" where exotic animals were sold for human food.

Those details made the Narrative sound totally believable, and the Mainstream Media repeated them endlessly.  Virtually everyone who watched network TV heard Fauci and the media talking heads say covid-19 almost certainly jumped to humans because a Wuhan resident ate an infected bat or pangolin.  

It didn't matter that not one American out of a million had ever heard of a pangolin before, because it sounded so exotic that it simply HAD to be true, eh?  Cuz it made perfect sense, eh?  Eat weird animals, get novel diseases, right?

A few people noted that five years *before* covid emerged, the head researcher at the Wuhan lab, Shi Zhengli--dubbed the "bat lady" for her work with bat viruses--had presented a paper at an international conference on viruses, saying her team had successfully inserted a single gene into a bat coronavirus, and that the virus was still able to infect host cells and reproduce.  

This was indeed a breakthrough, and the author of the paper specifically thanked Fauci for supporting her research with a grant from his NIAID.

No one except virologists paid much attention to Shi Zhengli's paper--because this was five years before the Chyna virus started killing millions.  Why would anyone make the connection, eh?

Skeptics noted that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had had lots of lab accidents and was just seven miles from the city's "wet market."  And that it was suspicious that the Institute had been studying and modifying bat coronaviruses--which clearly matched blood samples from patients (except for the four inserted genes).  

Hell of a coincidence, eh?

But the "cartel" of Fauci and the leftist, Trump-hating Mainstream Media had their story and are still sticking with it even after Fauci refused to answer a single question when he was compelled to testify under oath--live and televised.   

The few dissenters were quickly labeled "xenophobic," or "conspiracy theorists."  Everyone who questioned the Narrative was marginalized and intimidated into silence.

Why was Fauci SO determined to ensure that Americans believed the virus evolved naturally--so much so that he ordered his grant recipients to write a paper contradicting what they'd already deduced?  Because he knew he'd funded the Wuhan lab to do the research that modified a harmless coronavirus that made it lethal to millions of people.

One recipient of huge Fauci-directed grants was Dr. Ralph Baric at the U of North Carolina.  One of Baric's research assistants was another PhD named Eric Donaldson.  Here's his CV:  
>> “I'm a research assistant for Dr. Ralph Baric.  I'm funded by the NIAID, Dr. Fauci’s agency, to conduct a study looking at the viruses in bats and studying how viruses cross the species barrier to emerge into new populations. In addition, I’m working with Dr. Baric to resurrect [sic] bat coronaviruses to determine the cross-species transmission potential of a variety of novel coronaviruses identified in bats.”>>

<<This was on-line in 2019, before covid hit.  And thanks to a recording device called the Wayback Machine, everything that WAS on the Net at one time has been saved--or was, until that trove of information was destroyed in a fire in 2028.  Oh wait...

Whoops!  Whoopsie!  "No one evah warned us dat someone could save duh stuff we posted!  An' since we weren't warned, showing ouah old posts is, like, TOTALLY unfair!  We deny we evah sed any of dat stuff!  An' we gon' find a frenly judge who'll ORDER dat yew caint use any of dis in court!  Nope nope nope!  Cuz...reasons!"

Research assistant Donaldson was also looking at how to create vaccines for the bat virus they were trying to modify--again this was in 2019, months before the Chyna virus escaped.  This was the blueprint, the plan--explained by one of Baric's researchers a year before covid was unleashed.

All this information has been available for years.  But understandably, you had no idea where to look for it.  And the Mainstream Media totally refused to ask a *singe question* that would have exposed Fauci's utter bullshit.

This puts the lie to Fauci’s claims that he and his agency did not fund gain-of-function research, which dates back to 2009. 

All the elements of the industry that became the COVID virus, the COVID test, and the COVID vaccine, are all in embryonic form in this CV dating back to 2009, all funded by Fauci's NIAID using your tax dollars.

And now things get even hotter.

Baric and Donaldson were studying "cross-species transmission" of viruses--specifically bat coronaviruses.  What made 'em think a bat coronavirus might make the jump to humans, eh?

“Cross-Species Emergence of Coronaviruses from Bats” is the name of one grant from Fauci, before covid was unleashed.  The resulting research showed how to make a harmless bat virus fatal to humans.  The Wuhan Institute just got there first.

2008: Authors Dr. Eric Donaldson and Dr. Ralph Baric: “Synthetic reconstruction of an infectious bat SARS-like coronavirus."  

So a dozen years before Covid was unleashed, they were looking at the spike protein and how it could be changed.  See, what made covid-19 lethal to humans were changes made to the spike protein to make the virus better able to "bind" to specific cells in the human airway called "ACE-2 receptors." 

Fauci knew for over a decade that Baric and Donaldson were modifying bat coronaviruses to see how they could cross over from animals to humans; and that they had identified the spike protein as the key to lethality in humans.

“Mechanisms of zoonotic severe acute respiratory syndrome” — that means you can’t breathe, your lungs are shutting down, after being infected with a virus that somehow managed to become lethal to humans.  Hell of a coincidence, eh?

“Coronavirus host range expansion in human airway epithelium.”  So they’re experimenting on how animal-based coronaviruses affect cells in the human airway.

Hell of a coincidence, eh?

And here we have coronavirus vaccine development way back in 2005--a full 15 years before the plandemic hit.  So what you’re seeing there is that the virus modification experiments and studies of *vaccines* against exactly this virus were going on exactly at the same time.

You roll out the virus, and you’ve already got the vaccine. They’re the same researchers.

So where is Dr Eric Donaldson now?  Why hasn't he been subpoenaed to testify before congress?

According to LinkedIn, for the last 12 years he's been at the FDA, working on virology.

And would ya look at this!  The FDA reviewed remdesivir--THE treatment pushed by Fauci four times in a single press conference in May of 2020, standing beside Trump and Birx.  Review to get "Emergency Use Authorization" for remdesivir, May 2020 lists the "Clinical Virology Reviewer" reviewer: “Eric F. Donaldson, Ph.D.”

Hell of a coincidence.  And even more amazing that no FBI agents have ever showed up at his house with recorders.

Then there's a *second* FDA remdesivir review, on Sept. 17, 2020.  “Reviewer: Eric F. Donaldson, Ph.D.”

What is Donaldson now doing at the FDA?  Could congress ask him about these things, under oath?  Hahahahaha!  Just kidding!  All Democrats in congress love the power they seized through the plandemic scam, and will never seriously investigate the con artists who unleashed the Chyna virus on the world. 

Pediatric ICU doctor stabbed to death in his home by a man out on "cashless bail"

Another murder for the "We shouldn't have to live like this" file:

Two days ago in Pittsburgh, just after midnight a crazy or drugged-out man broke into the home of an ICU doctor and his family and began stabbing both the doctor and his wife.

After stabbing for minutes, the man ran off.  The ICU doctor died at the hospital, and his wife remains in critical condition. 

Unless you live in Pittsburgh you'll never see a word about this except on the net.  The alphabet networks and Mainstream "newzpapers" never say a word--"local interest only."  Local TV stations would look complicit if they ignored the murder but still refuse to show you a photo of the alleged killer because it's against their policy.  Actually it's against the policy of the Democrat Partei, which they've eagerly adopted.  Same result.  But here ya go:

Murder victim, and alleged murderer Elijah Hemingway

Now for the kicker: the alleged murderer was arrested in July on felony burglary and theft charges--but was immediately released without being required to post bond.  It's what the Left wokies call "cashless bail."  Wait, if the accused isn't posting cash, why call it "bail," eh?

Cuz that would make the absurdity obvious: if everyone called it just "We lets erryone out wifout no bond.  Dey jus' gots t' promise to show up fo' trial," more people would see the stupdity of it for serious crimes.

Leftists: "Neither burglary nor robbery nor theft are serious crimes, deplorable!"

Do we really have to live like this?

Source: Gateway Pundit blog 

x 

In Canada, Muslim man attacks child, caught on video. Female judge acquits

September 19, 2026, Canuckistan--

In Toronto a Muslim "man"--Ahmed Baig--left his home wearing only a towel, which fell off as he chased a family he encountered.  He scooped up the couple's 7-year-old daughter, threw her to the ground, punched and choked her, then ran off.

The entire attack was captured on video.

That was three years ago.  But because Canadian courts are so busy jailing citizens for "hateful comments on social media," they didn't get around to trying the attacker until last week.

He pleaded not guilty, but his attorney didn't deny the prosecution's claim that he committed assault causing bodily harm and assault by choking.  And of course it was on video.

But because it's Canuckistan and the attacker was Muslim, a female judge named Mara Greene ruled the Muzz attacker was NOT guilty of...anything.  Not assault or battery or lewd exposure or battery of a child.  Nothing.  Cuz...woke Canadian "judge."

I'll repeat that because it seems so impossible that your mind might have rejected it the first time: the female judge ruled the Muslim who choked and punched the 7-year-old girl--while nude--was NOT guilty of...anything.

The female judge ruled that he because the Muslim said he'd been "vaping" marijuana, he wasn't guilty of anything at all.  She decided he'd experienced a “psychotic episode,” something like temporary insanity, when he attacked the girl.  She wrote that the attack was a result of a "nonmental disorder automatism.”

A "non-mental disorder automatism," y'say?  As best I can translate that, she's saying he was high on weed.  So, off ya go, good citizen!

The female judge wrote 
>>“He ran into the driveway and picked up a seven-year-old girl. He threw her to the ground, punched her and strangled her. He then abruptly left the driveway, and a short time later was arrested by police. At the time of arrest, he wore only a T-shirt.”>>

<<So the judge admits the crimes, but just waves it all off:  "No problem, valued Muslim immigrant."<<

The judge said Baig didn’t dispute that he attacked the 7-year-old girl, but argued that he should be acquitted of the charges "because his actions were involuntary as he was suffering from a cannabis induced psychosis at the time of the attack.”

She went on to make excuse after excuse for the attacker: “Home alone, Mr. Baig decided to consume cannabis to help with his feelings of anxiety.  He used a form of cannabis recommended by the store, but in vape form. Instead of relieving his anxiety, he felt more anxious.”

We don't have to live like this.

Oh wait, it's Canada, so they DO have to live like this, every day.

Oh wait...we here in the U.S., and citizens of France, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia and all western nations, are suffering under the same plague.  We've been sold out by treasonous, leftist judges and politicians.  If a murderer or rapist or mere strangler is a member of a group favored by the Left, the attacker can now kill, rape or merely attack children at will, and the courts will let him go without so much as a harsh word. 

And it's gonna get worse.  A LOT worse.  The rate of these attacks--and worse--is increasing fast. 

Source. 

https://thepostmillennial.com/judge-acquits-toronto-muslim-man-of-strangling-7-year-old-girl-while-shouting-allah-because-he-was-psychotically-high-when-he-did-it 

A few weeks ago the national debt hit $40 Trillion.

That doesn't even register with most Americans, because you don't have a handle on how big that is.  So consider this:

It took 240 years and five wars for our national debt to reach $20 trillion.  But it only took ten more years to add another $20 trillion.

Seriously, the debt doubled in just ten years.  And it's forecast to increase by another ten Trillion in just 3 years, so in ten years it's almost certain to increase by another $33 Trillion, compared to increasing by a mere $20 trillion in the previous ten years.

Part of the huge increase is due to the skyrocketing cost of the interest we have to pay on the debt.  Most Americans--and most candidates for high office--don't have the faintest idea how much that is.  And if you're a young American, chances are you don't have any idea either.  Turns out interest payments alone are over a Trillion dollars a year.

Until recently we spent way less than a Trillion a year for defense.  Now we have to spend a Trillion a year on...interest payments.

Are you starting to understand compound interest yet?  

Probably not.  But you will.  And of course congress will do absolutely nothing to avert the inevitable, because that requires making hard decisions, which is something the shitheads in congress (and those running for congress) refuse to do.

I could tell you what will happen, but you wouldn't believe it. 

Fauci has an interesting defense!