The alleged total U.S. presidential popular vote by party is...interesting

Study the numbers below for a minute.  (Don't worry about the details because *official sources* have number differing by Millions from the numbers below.) 

 Democrat                   Republican

65,788,564     2016    62,984,828  (Trump-Hilly)
81,283,501     2020    74,223,975  (Trump-bribem)
75,019,682     2024    77,303,568  (Trump-Cackles)

To say there are "anomalies" in the above claimed numbers is a vast understatement: Hilliary was far more popular than the moronic serial liar Joe bribem, and Joe's VP, Cackles, was a total nutter compared to Hilliary's not-quite-as-moronic Tim Kaine.  So you'd think just considering candidate attractiveness, the Dems should have gotten fewer votes in 2020 than in 2016, eh? 

Instead the official tally shows the Dems got 23.6% MORE votes with the moronic duo of bribem/Cackles than with Hilliary/Kaine.  So a good question is, How likely is it that bribem/Cackles got 23.6% MORE legitimate votes in 2020 than Hilly/Kaine got four years earlier?

Yeah, I know, the fucking Media began lying about Trump on Day 1 of his first term: first it was the total fiction that "Trump colluded with Putin to steal the election frum ouah beloved Hilliary!"

The whole notion of "Trump-Russia collusion" was utterly absurd: Trump was pro-military and pro-capitalism.  Seemingly a big supporter of free markets, thus anti-communist.  By sharp contrast, Hilliary was thoroughly, astonishingly corrupt and hated the military (as did her pussy-obsessed husband).  If you were Putin, would you rather have Hilly or Trump as commander-in-chief of your only rival power?

Obviously you'd want the corrupt, military-hating Hill-beast. 

So now let's look at some numbers that show something about the official number is WAY off.

Note the total votes for R and D combined for 2020: 155,500,000.  Compare this to the National Conference of State Legislatures, which reported (estimated) 159 million total votes.  Wiki [yeah, I know] reports 159,738,337 votes cast.  How can there be a difference of 4,238,000 between the two reported total votes cast--numbers that should be specific, verifiable, unequivocal?

No one has ever tried to explain.  No member of the Lying Mainstream Media has ever even asked that question!  That alone should tell you something.

Now consider Statista, which claims that in 2020 (bribem v. Trump) there were 168.31 million registered voters in the U.S.  If we accept that 155,500,000 total votes were cast in 2020, out of 168.31 million registered voters, that would mean that in 2020, 92.39 percent of registered voters voted.  That seems to be unbelievably high.

(But then you have websites like the "U.S. Election Assistance Commission"--which has a dot-gov URL--claiming "In 2016 states reported 214,109,360 million citizens as registered to vote."  This is SO far off the consensus number from other sources that it's hard to take 'em seriously.  But these sorts of discrepancies are everywhere in voting data.  I note this because this is supposedly a government agency, and yet this supposed "federal agency" has a figure for registered U.S. voters that disagrees with other sites by roughly 46 MILLION people!  This is outrageous--but typical.) 

To compare:  Wiki [yeah, I know] says that in 2020 (bribem v. Trump), about 161 million people were registered to vote and 158,427,986 ballots were counted.  Wiki says that was 96.3% of registered voters--much higher that the 92.39% shown above by Statista's numbers.  But even more unbelievably, if we take Wiki's claim of "about" 161 million registered voters in 2020, and 158,427,986 total votes counted, that would mean 98.4% of those registered supposedly voted.

Horseshit.  You couldn't get 98.4% of any big group of Americans to get off their asses to collect a free Lexus (or other luxury car of their choice).  It's not just horseshit, it's brazen, screaming, obvious horseshit.  And yet no one in the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media batted an eye--because they wanted bribem to win.

Wiki and Statista differ by 2.9 MILLION in the number of votes actually counted, and by about 7 million in the number of registered voters:Wiki says "about" 161 million while Statista says 168.31 million.  Obviously both those are huge differences, in a figure that should be a matter of unequivocal public record.  

In 2016--the VERY hotly contested race between Hilliary and Trump--136,669,237 ballots were officially totaled, out of 157,596,000 registered voters (86.72% of registered voters).  By comparison, in 2020 a total of 155,500,000 votes were counted, out of 168,308,000 registered voters--92.39%.  So the percentage of votes counted compared to registered voters rose 5.67%.  This can be seen as an indication of voter enthusiasm--though there are other possible explanations.

Now consider that in 2016 (Trump-Hilly) the total, official Dem vote was 65,788,564.  But just four years later (2020, Trump-bribem) the Dems were officially credited with a staggering 81,283,501 votes--23.6% MORE votes than just four years earlier.  

Given how high Democrat enthusiasm was for Hilliary in 2016, how reasonable is it for the Dems to have actually gotten 23.5% MORE votes in 2020 than just four years earlier--especially since the faaabulous Hilliary was cruising to be the first female prezzy and was far more popular than the totally undistinguished bribem?

Now consider that in 2024 (Trump v. Harris/Walz), despite a record number of anti-Trump, pro-Harris articles in the Mainstream Media, and 3% more Americans of voting age, and record Dem spending, the official total Dem vote dropped by 6.2 MILLION votes from just 4 years earlier. 

That huge drop from the claimed 2020 Democrat vote is extremely curious.  Many Democrats have bleated that the reason was that in 2024 minorities who voted in 2020 were prevented from voting in 2024 due to "voter suppression," caused by GOP states purging their voter rolls close to election day, preventing would-be Dem voters from voting.  That claim is total horseshit.  

A far more plausible explanation is that even Democrats realized Cackles was a horrible person--and that her insurance policy, Tampon Timmy Walz, was equally bad.  But even so, after four years of non-stop anti-Trump stories in the Media ("Trump colluded with Putin to steal the 2020 election!" "Trump and Epstein were close friends!" "Trump hates immigrants!" etc) you'd think everyone who'd voted Dem in 2020 would have done the same four years later, eh?  

After four years of a non-stop barrage of anti-Trump stories, and a chance to vote for the party's hand-picked, historic "first black female" presidential nominee, you'd think everyone who voted Democrat in 2020 would have done the same in 2024, eh?

And with 3% more registered voters, you'd think the total Dem vote would be *roughly* 3% higher than four years earlier, eh?  Yet in 2024 the total Dem vote *dropped* 7.7% from 2020.

The only way such a huge drop makes sense is if bribem didn't get nearly the 81,283,501 votes officially reported in 2020.  A far more plausible number of Dem votes in 2020 would be 75,000,000, which would be 14% higher than 2016 (due to the huge wave of anti-Trump Media stories for four years).  Then the fact that in 2024 Cackles got virtually the same number--75,020,000--also makes more sense, because the 3% increase in registered Dem voters would be offset by the slight drop in voter enthusiasm, NOT because Dem voters didn't love Cackles and Timmy but because some were angered by the fact that Cackles was handed the nomination by Pelosi, without winning (or even entering) a single primary.

So apparently in 2024 the Democrat party didn't attempt the massive vote fraud that gave the utterly corrupt bribem the presidency in 2020.

Given the foregoing the logical question is, Since the past obviously can't be changed, why bother to cite evidence suggesting the Democrats engaged in truly  massive, brazen vote fraud in 2020, eh?  After all, after six years it's obvious no one will be charged, any more than Obozo will be charged for the infamous Oval Office meeting in which he directed his FBI to spend the next four years of undermining Trump. 

The reason is to prevent this from happening again.

Turns out there are *at least*  a dozen easy ways to rig an election in the U.S. 
  1. Scanning the same stack of known 99% Dem ballots multiple times.
  2. Mail carriers (99% Democrat) trashing mail-in ballots addressed to high-income neighborhoods (likely to vote GOP).  This was proven;
  3. Dem operatives paying up to $50 apiece for blank mail-in ballots.  Proven;
  4. Dem operatives "harvesting" ballots from nursing-home residents, filling 'em out for Democrat candidates and submitting em without a matching sig, or witness sigs.  Proven;
  5. Democrat poll workers telling voters their scanners were broken, so "to help workers," GOP voters were instructed to put their ballots in bag #1, while Democrats are told to put their ballots in bag #2.  One of those bags doesn't make it to the counting center.  Since polling places don't publish the number of votes cast (even though that number is known) no one ever compares it to the number of votes totaled by the counting center, so the discrepancy is never detected.
  6. Printing thousands more ballots than the number of registered voters, for the stated purpose of having extras in the central warehous in case unusually high turnout occurs at a few precincts, causing poll workers to ask the central authority for more ballots.  Ballots sent to a precinct are logged, but tens of thousands of the "reserve ballots" aren't logged in at the central warehouse since they haven't been sent to a precinct yet.  Thousands can be stolen by election workers.
  7.  Fake mail-in ballots:  For the elections office to mail ballots to voters, those ballots must be folded to fit in the envelope.  But surveillance cameras in counting centers show stacks of supposed mail-in ballots with no creases.  If they were mailed to voters, then back to the state, how can they not show any creases (folds)?
  8. Democrat-owned and -staffed commercial printing companies are paid by Dem state govts to print millions of mail-in ballots--legitimate contracts.  But after the "state run," they print an extra 50,000 or so that are never given to the state and never show up on any inventory.  
   Some election workers claim that these extra ballots are sometimes printed on thinner, lighter-weight paper that lacks the authenticating "watermark" on the official ballots.  Experienced paper experts claim they can tell the weight difference at a touch, but poll workers aren't told to check this, or look for watermarks.
  9. Voter impersonation: this was always the easy/obvious way: Someone shows up to vote claiming to be [name].  If there's no record that the  person they claim to be has voted, they're waved right thru.  But if the precinct received a mail-in ballot from person X, the fake who shows up in person is allowed to cast a "provisional ballot" which is only counted after an investigation to verify that the person who showed up in person was who they claimed to be.
   And in some Dem-ruled shithole states like Minnesomalia, provisional ballots are scanned and counted right away, so can never be removed from the total count even if the person is found to have lied about being eligible to vote.
   But in practice, few such investigations are made.  *At worst* for the fraudsters, both legal and fraudulent ballots are accepted, meaning either 2 Dem votes, or 1 of each, in which case the imposter has offset a GOP vote.  Win-win.

  10. Drop boxes:  If you show up to vote in person, workers can't (and don't) ask for photo ID, since duh Dems haz sed dat wud be raaaaacis'!  But in most states you still have to sign in on some type of log book.
   In theory the precinct has the signature of the real voter on file, and in theory the two can be compared to determine if the person showing up to vote was who he or she claimed to be.  Problem is, by the time that can be done, that person's ballot has already been anonymized and scanned, so it's been counted. 
   Further, the Democrats DEMANDED hundreds of unattended, unguarded "drop boxes," so obviously there's no sign-in sig that can be compared.
   Of course ballots in drop-boxes are identical to mail-in ballots, and in theory workers at the counting center are supposed to check that signatures on mail-in ballots match the sig voters gave when registering.  But surveillance videos of the computer screens of the workers supposedly comparing sigs show that thousands of sigs were okayed even if they didn't remotely match the one on file.  
   This is how you wind up with ten or 20% more votes counted in a precinct than registered voters.
The Dem-fellating Media never ask Dems how that happened.

  11:  In Fulton County, Georgia, officials said they were halting vote counting, and everyone was to go home.  The alleged reason was a "water main" broke in a bathroom of the counting center.  
  Three problems with this: first, the alleged "water main" was actually a leaking 3/8ths-inch line feeding a single urinal, so wouldn't have been a threat in any case.  Second, maintenance logs show the leak was reported at around 8 a.m. and fixed by 9 a.m, so wouldn't have been causing any problem at 8 p.m. that night.
  The third problem is that after Democrat election officials supposedly stopped counting and told everyone to leave, surveillance video shows at least three workers kept scanning ballots for several more hours.  Two of these workers were Ruby Freeman and her adult daughter.  The latter was a supervisor at the counting center, and the two were seen feeding stack after stack of ballots into scanners for another hour or so after everyone else had been ordered to leave.  One of the two was seen feeding the same stack into a scanner at least three times, without making any new control inputs.

All of the above points are why simply re-adding counted votes is useless to detect fraud:  The problem is that if ballots themselves are fraudulent, simply counting 'em won't reveal the fraud.  Only a "forensic examination" of counted ballots will have any hope of identifying fraud--which is why Democrats have fought any attempt to do such examinations.

The Dems bleat that examining ballots will "violate voter privacy," and that they're heroically fighting to "protect the secret ballot!"  Horseshit.  The identifying info used to authenticate mail-in ballots is separate from the ballot itself, and once the voter info is supposedly authenticated it's separated from the ballot, in which case there's NO way to identify who cast that ballot.

So by lying, Democrats are able to pose as heroically defending ouah sacred right to a secret ballot, when in fact they're using the claim to defeat efforts to discover vote fraud!  

Wokie "influencer" on a NY Times-owned podcast urges pipo to steal from companies

Last April a leftist "influencer" named Hasan Piker appeared on a podcast owned by The New York Times, called "The Opinions."

Piker explicitly, literally urged people to steal from corporations.  He and the two smirking females with him used the cutesy hipster neologism "microlooting" to describe stealing from big companies taking small items, rationalizing it as merely a form of social protest--"a response to perceived structural injustice."

(Clever readers may notice Piker's cunning use of "perceived" there: so the issue isn't whether there actually IS any injustice, just that the thief feels there is.
    Fortunately looters only "perceive" "structural injustice" on days ending in "y."
 
In the too-cutesy hipster-bleat of all leftists, Piker also said he was "pro-piracy," saying he would even "pirate" (i.e. steal) a car "if it were technologically possible."  Of course that's done hundreds of times every day: car theft or even carjacking.  And this communist motherfucker is urging it.

But lest you think this piece of shit is "unethical" or some such for urging people to steal from high-end grocery stores like Whole Foods, Piker piously bleated that he would NOT steal from Mamdani's proposed city-owned grocery stores because those stores will use union labor and public funds.

For those who might have wondered: the communist-loving NY Times did NOT publish a critical word about what its wholly-owned podcast shat out.  Because they're stupid communists who actually support every bit of leftist/Cemocrat horseshit like Piker and his two female suckups spewed.

This is the doomed future under "woke" hipster Democrats who totally rule shitholes like NYC, Chitcongo, L.A., Portland, Seattle, Denver, Philly, Baltimore, Albany, Trenton, Oakland and a dozen other disasters.

Of course wokie hipster Dems like Piker won't be hurt by the famine and destruction, cuz they'll be safely burrowed into government, university and Media positions.  And "influencers" like Piker will still be stealing from the few remaining non-government-owned stores. 

They "influencers" and government employees and university profs and Media "experts" will eat steak.  Unfortunately most of us won't be similarly insulated, so you and your kids will be eating dried mealworms--because after you pay your taxes to support the government hipsters, that's all you'll be able to afford.
  
But don't worry, cuz every single day the Media will run a new story saying how totally healthy mealworms are.  And MSDNC will publish a tasty new recipe for mealworms every week. 

The "tranny mafia"

For years the trannia mafia told us we shouldn't worry about kids under 18 being given puberty blockers, then cross-sex hormones, then what was cunningly called "gender-affirming surgery," because they assured us all these things were vanishingly rare.

Puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, they assured us, were reserved for a tiny number of children carefully assessed by experts to be afflicted with "severe and persistent gender dysphoria."  And that if treatment wasn't started immediately, this would almost certainly lead to suicide.

But when new data start showing that such "treatments" were actually far more common than we'd been told, the tranny mafia suddenly changed their argument:  the new, larger numbers were actually even more reassuring--because now they were large!

Seriously, deplorable!  Cuz having more children asking to get "gender-affirming surgery" means children who were previously suffering but were too scared to ask for "help" finally felt safe enough to ask for the "gender-affirming care" they'd always needed!

Yep yep yep!  Flawless logic, eh?

The latest example comes from Oregon:  A new study analyzed insurance claims for about 869,000 Oregon adolescents ages 8 to 17 over a seven-year period.  They found that by age 17, roughly one in 240 insured Oregon girls was taking testosterone, and about one in 630 boys was taking estrogen. 

Across all ages in the study, about 1.5 percent of insured Oregon girls had been officially diagnosed with some level of "gender dysphoria."

Now, Oregon is FAR from a typical state: it's a total "progressive" Democrat-ruled shit-hole that forces insurance companies to cover all types of claimed gender dysphoria.  So as you could guess, the pro-tranny mafia have turned the state into a cash cow.  

Oregon shows us what happens when supporters of sex-change for children under 18 get virtually no pushback.  It becomes an industry, complete with lobbyists.

The study’s authors don’t view the numbers as alarming in any way.  They still describe "transitioning" as rare, and claim "access remains limited.”  They even suggest that “structural and systemic barriers” may still be holding "treatment rates" down.

So they support "transitioning" your kids, regardless of the data.  As the number of kids being "treated" for "gender dysphoria" rises, they see this as proof that "stigma is declining." 

In other words, they see more kids being "transitioned" as an unequivocal good.  

The tranny mafia claim puberty blockers are harmless and the effects are fully reversible.  That's a lie, and they know it. 

Studies show that if kids who complain that they were "born in the wrong body" are left alone, most outgrow that by age 21 or so.  But giving a kid puberty blockers increases the probability that the child will "fully transition" to more than 97 percent.

These numbers suggest that giving a child puberty blocking hormones makes permanent what would otherwise have been an ephemeral complaint.

We see the same effect when a judge or school demands that parents address their kid by a cross-sex name and agree to buy the child cross-sex clothes.  Both vastly increase the probability of "full transition."

All these are initial steps on a path ending with full "gender-affirming surgery"--as the pushers well know.  But they claim not to see any causal connection.  

The tranny mafia cite studies of patients an average of 2.4 years after "gender-affirming surgery" showing most had no regrets.  The tranny mafia claim this proves that concerns about regret are overblown.  But you'd expect that at just 2.4 years post-op, eh? 

At some point, defenders of "transitioning" kids should be forced to answer several simple questions:  What evidence, if any, would make you reconsider your demands?  What rate of patients "de-transitioning" would you think is too high?

Do you still claim "transitioning" reduces suicidal ideation and mental health?  How many honest studies showing that the evidence of benefit is extremely weak while the risk of serious harm is significant would it take for you to reconsider your demands?

We should have demanded answers long ago, before governments ever started allowing the tranny mafia to perform these medical experiments on children.  But of course no one insisted—because the mafia claimed such treatments were so rare.

Falsifiability is a basic principle of science.  When pushers of a theory claim that no possible outcome can refute their position, they're fraudsters.

Source: City Journal

https://www.city-journal.org/article/oregon-study-pediatric-gender-medicine-transition 

VP of school board in NY arrested on child sex charges

 In New York, the vice-president of a school board--  who bragged that he was the first drag queen elected to a public school board--was arrested on charges of receiving and possessing child pornography.

Travis Barr Longo, 46, faces four counts.

In most places school board members are elected.  Wow, if only there'd been some tiny hint that maybe something wasn't quite right about Travis, eh?

Just kidding.  It's New York, so the guy could have gotten elected even if he'd bragged about being a big distributor of child porn or drugs or being a militant tranny or...well, almost anything.  Except being a Republican.  That wouldn't have worked well in NY.  

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/drag-queen-school-board-vice-153122020.html

One of Momdani's 3 communist DSA candidates who's headed to congress

Meet Darializa Avila Chevalier, a communist who reportedly co-founded a "coalition" at Columbia U called "CUAD"--Columbia University Apartheid Divest.  It summarizes its goals below, and note the first one: "the total eradication of western civilization."

 

She's pro-Paleswinian, converted to Islam three years ago.  As evidence of how woke they are, the "coalition" uses the tag phrase "biplob cholbe," which the "coalition" helpfully tells you is Bengali for "the revolution must continue"--a rallying cry among leftists and revolutionary student groups in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India.

See, the apex of revolutionary chic is to have a slogan that outside of Bangladesh and West Bengal, India, is only known to the Comrades, eh?  The ultimate insider password. 

But really, you had us at "We're fighting for the total eradication of western civilization."  Cuz while "biplob cholbe" may make the comrades' hearts beat faster, it won't win you the votes of ordinary working-class Democrat voters like "...fighting for the total eradication of western civilization," eh?

I'm thinking of union workers who have 200-horsepower bass boats, big new pickup trucks and 65-inch flat-screen TVs.  Yeah, there's a group that'll surely vote for your platform, cuz they're obviously oppressed and suffering under the tyrannical rule of Orange Hitler! 

BTW, if you think the card above, with CUAD's logo and stated goals, is fake--that no communists Muslims in the U.S. could possibly be so dumb as to openly, brazenly admit that they're "fighting for the total eradication of western civilization," check CUAD's X account here.

The thing to note is that these communist Muzz are so totally convinced that they can't be touched (being protected by friendly Democrat judges), even by the DOJ, that they're willing to admit--in writing--exactly what their goal is.  And as the old saying goes, when someone tells you who they are (if it's an "admission against interest") you're prudent to believe 'em.  Post below is from her former X account, which she deleted.

 

Europe coping with heat wave--but no a/c allowed!

As happens almost every summer, Europe is experiencing a major heat wave.  And as always, the pols are blaming "climate change" for this thing that happens every summer. 

I was raised in the southwest U.S, and summer temperatures of 105 or more were common, way back before Global Worming was a thing.  So when a couple of European cities have highs in that range I don't regard that as unusual.  But Europeans can't deal with it.

According to the corrupt, leftist, Chinese-ruled "World Health Organization, summer heat has killed 200,000 Europeans just in the past four years.  That's an average of 50,000 per year.  I'm skeptical, but it's what the WHO claims.  By comparison the United States--where many parts are much hotter than Europe--has had 20,000 heat-related deaths in the past 25 years--an average of 800 per year. 

Why would Europe have 62 times more heat-related deaths than the U.S, eh?

Euro Media recommend dozens of obvious things to survive.  But what they DON'T recommend is turning on the air conditioner--because almost no European houses or apartments have one. 

Euro weenies sneer at the U.S. for the fact that most homes south of D.C. have a/c.

But Europe couldn't support wider use of a/c even if people were willing to pay for it--because they simply don't have enough electrical power to handle the load.  So the governments sneer at Americans for having it, in the hope that their citizens won't demand it for fear of being compared to "wasteful, climate-denying Americans."

Europe can't produce more electricity because the eco warriors refuse to permit it.  So rather than anger the leftists/greens, European pols do as the left demands, which is...nothing.

As with all problems in Europe, the answer is to accept your position as a controlled subject and merely hope your parents and grandparents don't die because they can't cool off. 

Even the average Chinese family has air conditioning--powered by coal-fired powerplants. But European pols refuse to add capacity to allow a/c, due to "decarbonization" and "climate change" and "progressive government." 

The pols claim there's just nothing that can be done to produce enough electricity to prevent heat deaths.  "We just can't do that. That would be acting American, and we won't allow that."

Source: CBD at Ace of Spades

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=420274 

Socialists' sweep in New York puts the leaders of the Dem party in a bind. Just kidding.

As you probably heard, all 3 hard-left socialist candidates backed by the communist Muslim mayor of NYC won their Democratic primaries for U.S. House.

Of course you don't live in NYC so why should you care, eh?  Well consider their positions:

Darializa Avila Chevalier demands that the U.S. abolish prisons, abolish ICE, abolish borders, defund the police, and end deportations even for violent criminals. She has called the U.S. an "effing disgrace", and said in a prior social media post "I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me."

This creature is so stupid: She claims if someone is convicted of murder in the US they can't be deported--because that would be "double jeopardy," which is prohibited by the Constitution.  And most people have heard about that.  But of course the Constitution's ban on "double jeopardy" means the government can't try someone twice for the same crime.  So she's either stupid or lying, take your pick.

But because 90% of NYC voters are Democrats, she's sure to win in November.

Claire Valdez demands citizenship (thus voting rights) for ALL illegal aliens, demands governments use taxpayer funds to pay for all sex-change procedures, and wants "free" (i.e. taxpayer-funded) health care for all.

Brad Lander demands ICE be abolished, that all student loans (almost $2 trillion worth) be paid off by taxpayers, and that Dems pack the Supreme Court (to erase the current slight conservative majority).

The DSA sweep puts the leaders of the Democrat partei [sic] in a dilemma: Do they support the DSA and risk losing thousands of Dem voters, or do they keep quiet and risk losing a primary to the radical left?  So now all attention turns to Chuckie Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries:  

The betting is that Jeffries will embrace the radical demands of the hard-left Dem Socialists, because he knows if he doesn't, he's likely to draw a DSA challenger in 2028.  And based on Tuesday's sweep, he'd likely lose to the DSA candidate.  So he won't oppose any DSA demand.  Instead he'll tell New York voters he supports the DSA, and will count on the Mainstream Media NOT to broadcast those speeches to the public since that would lose votes outside New York.

Of course his speeches will be videoed, but because you get all your info from the Mainstream Media you'll never see those speeches.  Nice for the Dems, eh?

By contrast, because Schumer is much older and far richer than Jeffries, he's far less concerned about losing a primary, so will almost certainly avoid supporting the DSA, to avoid losing Dem votes across the country.  He'll avoid answering any questions about whether the Democrat party supports the radical positions of the DSA candidates, but privately he'll promise the DSA not to block any of their demands.  Cunning.

The Media would never let a Republican get away with that, but of course the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media will play along, refusing to ask Schumer any questions about his party's position on the totally radical DSA demands--because the Media want Dems to continue to win nationwide.

Almost no Americans will notice that no "reporter" ever asks Schumer about whether he supports the DSA demands--because most Americans get all their info from what you believe is the totally unbiased Mainstream Media.

It's a hoot.  Like taking candy from a baby. 

New Illinois/Democrat LAW says it will tax websites per USER

Last week the ghastly Democrat who rules Illinois, JB Pritzker, signed a $56-billion budget that includes a new tax.  (For young Americans, a govt budget is a law, and usually very long, so cunning dictators can bury LOTS of bad demands in its 1,600 pages.)

While all levels of government constantly devise new ways to tax their long-abused citizens, this one may be overturned, because it's on publishers.  And the Supreme Court has been striking down such taxes for ninety years.

The new law--buried in a seemingly innocent "budget" would impose a state tax on companies that publish on the Internet, according to the size of their audience.  They call it a “social media platform fee,” paid every month based on “the number of Illinois users from whom the social media platform collects data within a month.”

The bigger the audience, the bigger the tax.

Pritzker expects the new tax to bring in $200 million a year.  

Defending the tax, Pritzker said it “requires companies to pay for the mental health and educational degradation they’ve caused.”  So by his own admission the state is charging internet platforms for the effects of the posts and comments they publish.

But speculating on the exact effects of every post and comment is impossibly complex.  So how it would end up working would be a government committee (majority Democrat, of course) that would score every large publisher and social media website by some subjective guess of "harm."

Short answer: totally subjective.  And if that's accepted, it's the end of any speech the government doesn't like.  

Taxing publishers because they are publishers is one of the oldest tools a state has used against the press, going back to the 1765 Stamp Act on pamphlets and newspapers that helped light the fuse for the Revolution.

Taxes on profits are supposedly uniform.  Taxing inventory is a far goofier concept.  Taxing news-print and ink?  The Supreme Court has said that's a tax explicitly on publishing, and has overturned that and similar laws again and again, including a law that taxed some publications while exempting others, which the new Dem law would do.

The Supreme Court says states can tax income, but that taxes that target speakers for their speech aren't allowed.

The cunning Democrats did find a way to avoid having to define "reader" or "user" of social media platforms, by wording the law to cover the number of users on which the platform "gathers data."  That's brilliant, because every click on a website is recorded and the data sold in some way.  It's a determinable number.  See, Democrat rulers iz reelly clever when they smell money.

But they can't avoid the core issue, which is: If any level of government can charge you for the effects of what you publish, it has implicity seized the power to *evaluate the effects of what you publish.*

Ahhhh.

From there the certain next step is for "the committee" to RULE that posts and comments on liberal websites like BlueSky do no harm at all, so they wouldn't owe any tax, while ruling the opposite for conservative publishers.  

"See, it's totally FAIR, citizen: all based on the harm each publisher causes.  And of course that's determined by totally unbiased Democrat rulers."

Source.

https://reclaimthenet.org/pritzkers-social-media-tax-a-200-million-bet-against-the-first-amendment
 

It's all starting to make sense

 

Oregon judge orders fence around Eugene Federal Building removed, lying that fence violated protesters' speech rights

In the communist shithole of Eugene, Oregon, after Antifa rioters broke all the windows in the Federal Building and repeatedly set fires during anti-ICE, pro-illegal protests, in late April the feds very prudently put a fence around the building to prevent further damage from attacks.

Then last Monday--as most of you could have predicted--a federal judge named Mustafa Kasubhai--appointed by bribem (of course) ordered the federal government to remove the fence within 48 hours--thus clearing the way for more damaging attacks by the communist rioters.  (Wiki (I know) says he was the first Muslim fed judge in the U.S., but I'm skeptical.)

Now, can you guess the anti-American Muslim judge's reasoning for ORDERING the feds to remove the fence?  Was it that...

• the feds didn't get a permit from the city?  or...
• they didn't submit an environmental-impact statement? or...
• they didn't get permission from the native-American tribe that claims the land; or...
• the judged ruled that the fence "violated protesters' free-speech rights"? 

All those are totally plausible in this era of Democrat horseshit, but it's the last one:  Antifa "activists" claimed the fence violated their First-Amendment right to protest, by preventing them from getting to a plaza they had often used as a place to "peacefully" protest.  And of course Democrat judges routinely rule that for shithead commies, "peaceful protests" include torching buildings, breaking windows, burning cars and so on, and that they have the right to protest wherever they want, even in the middle of interstate highways, the Golden Gate Bridge, on airport runways or in the control rooms of nuclear powerplants.  Cuz dat right dere in duh Constitution, deplorable!



Civil war--it's the only option that remains, since the Democrats and their leftist judges have taken over the law and created "Two Sets of Laws."

Source. 

https://thepostmillennial.com/oregon-judge-clears-way-for-antifa-to-attack-eugene-federal-building-rules-their-1a-rights-were-violated-when-fence-was-installed

Third-world judge blocks feds from verifying that voters in fed elections are U.S. citizens

Judge Sparkle Sooknanan (yes, her first name really is Sparkle) is the daughter of immigrants from Trinidad.   She was appointed--for life--by Bribem.  And it's just a total coincidence that she was chosen to hear a lawsuit filed by Democrat plaintiffs demanding that the federal government must not be allowed to try to verify that only U.S. citizens vote in federal elections.

Note that the plaintiffs didn't claim non-citizens are legally allowed to vote in federal elections, but merely that the government must not be allowed to try to verify that only U.S. citizens do so.

And again, it's just a total coincidence that she was selected to RULE on this lawsuit, deplorable!  Reeeeally!

No it's not.  Dems knew exactly where and how to file their lawsuit so it would be heard by a judge known to be a "judicial activist" on issues involving foreign nationals in the United States. 

SO...two days ago this totally unbiased (/sarc) judge issued a 75-page RULING for the plaintiffs and against the federal government, ruling that the govt will not be allowed to verify that voters in federal elections are U.S. citizens.  Of course her ruling cunningly doesn't explicitly say that, because that would anger American voters against the Democrat partei--but that's exactly the effect of her DECREE. 

The principle she claimed supported her ruling was that trying to determine if a voter is a U.S. citizen violates the voter's privacy.

Seriously.  You'd think the question of whether someone was a U.S. citizen would be critical for LOTS of issues, and wouldn't be a secret.  Ruling that the government isn't allowed to determine the answer is like claiming the government can't use DMV registration data to determine who owns a car used in a drive-by shooting.

In her 75-page ruling she wails that "voting rights" are threatened.  No.  For young Americans (and Democrats), non-U.S.-citizens do NOT have the right to vote in federal elections.  Are we clear here?

Democrat pols: "NOooo, dat not true!  Cuz duh Constitution say duh states gits t' run dere elections any way dey want!  So if we wanna let 14-year-olds vote (the way their liberal parents do, of course), dat beez perfekly legal!  It's right dere in duh Constitution!"

If not overturned on appeal, this ruling could open the door to unlimited voting by non-citizens, because the reasoning used would bar the government from using ANY means to determine citizenship--because of the possibility of error.

All databases contain errors (like officials in Wisconsin in 2020 claiming hundreds of the state's active voters were 120 years old).  The plaintiffs--the League of Women Voters, a totally Dem-fellating outfit--claimed using Social Security numbers or any other data could result in some U.S. citizens being flagged as non-citizens.  Of course the plaintiffs weren't required to prove this had actually happened, since the process hadn't started.  All they needed to show was that it could happen.

And of course anyone erroneously flagged as a non-citizen could be given a month or so to prove citizenship before being removed.  No harm done.  But this wasn't good enough for Sparkle--because the entire purpose of suing was to enable non-citizens to vote Democrat.

Now consider the inevitable consequences of accepting the "reasoning" in Sparkle's RULING:  Since virtually every database has errors, if we accept her logic that the government can't use THIS data (whatever it is) to confirm citizenship, then NO data can be used to verify that all voters are U.S. citizens...which was the goal of the lawsuit, and the legally-specious ruling.  But the Mainstream Media carefully avoids that obvious conclusion.

If this ruling isn't overturned, Democrats will win all future elections--because it'll mean non-citizens will be permitted to vote in all elections.

Democrats: "We're not seeing a problem here."

 

This is how a brilliantly-begun nation is gradually subverted. 

Source.

Link to her 75-page decision 


https://www.frontpagemag.com/third-world-judge-forbids-verifying-citizenship-of-voters/ 

Virginia Democrats vote to spend $100,000 to honor corrupt judge

The Democrat Partei is far more corrupt than you can imagine.  Latest example (although it's early in the day so they can likely top this by tonight):

In 2019, in the Dem-ruled shithole of Virginia, a "young man" (age and race a mystery, apparently), Timothy Church, beat a 60-year-old white man to death with a baseball bat, also beating his wife and daughter with the bat. Police found the murderer standing over the manager's wife and daughter, who suffered fractured bones and a concussion.

Becuz his momma knew her son wuz reely a guuud boy, before his trial she hooked up with a popular black city judge in Roanoke--Onzlee Ware--asking for legal advice.  

The catch was that the judge demanded sex from her before every meeting.  And after a few such "meetings" the corrupt judge promised to "intervene" with the trial judge to ensure a lighter sentence for her son.

So...utter, total corruption, eh?  But that's just background for the story today, which is...the Democrats who rule the Virginia legislature have just passed a budget earmarking a tidy $100,000 to pay for a statue to this piece of shit, to be the "centerpiece" of a plaza renamed for him last year.
 
Seriously.

Let's review: Just 3 years ago the killer's mother, Grace Church, filed a court document claiming everything noted above.  Key phrase in the filing: "Before he would offer advice, I had to have sex with him first each time we met." 

The accusation prompted the state "Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission" (i.e. the "We Protect Democrats" commission) to place Ware on paid suspension and start an investigation.  So it's not like the charge was unknown, eh?

The corrupt judge admitted to the sexual relationship and to providing legal advice, BUT... the "We Protect Democrats" commission said there was no evidence that he offered help--including "intervening" with the trial judge--in exchange for sex, and no evidence that he actually "intervened" with the trial judge. 

So...perfectly acceptable.  Just sex between consenting adults, eh?
 
The Commission did put the judge on a 12-month supervision agreement.  He died of cancer a few weeks later.

In ordering that $100,000 of taxpayer funds be spent on a statue to honor dis totally ethical, non-corrupt judge, Democrat legislators praised him as a "great statesman," "a great gentleman," and a "treasure to the General Assembly."  Seriously.

You can't make this stuff up.

Now: you don't live in Virginia, so they're not using your money, eh?  So you don't care.  In which case you've totally missed the point, which is that Democrat pols don't just *tolerate* corruption, they actively honor it.  Up next: a statue of Timmy Walz to honor him for his efforts to fight fraud. 

Source.

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/virginia-democrats-earmark-100000-for-statue-honoring-late-judge-accused-of-trading-sex-with-convicted-killers-mother-for-legal-advice/ 

AHH, the Mainstream Media! We really need to listen to these pipo!

The Washington Post says this is a girl.  And since they claim to be "reporters" they wouldn't knowingly lie about anything so...basic, would they? 

 

When the liberal press calls day night, calls communists "principled," calls Iranians rational--all of which they routinely do--can you trust ANYTHING they bleat?

For example, ALL the mainstream media have eagerly swallowed the liberal lie that boys can become girls simply by declaring it so.  Thus when a male commits a crime, but claims to be female, the professional liars and propagandists at the NYT and WaPo eagerly, fawningly, slobberingly parrot the liberal lie that the person really is a girl.

Take this headline from the WaPo that appeared this morning: 
   She got eight years for plotting to kill Kavanaugh

It's a lie from the very first word of the title, and it's reinforced 87 more times in the shit-liberal propagandist "reporter's" use of female labels.

The Mainstream Media will NEVER stop lying to support the demand by the Democrat Partei [sic] that boys can become girls.  And in time, weak-minded people start to believe it--which was the plan, eh?

Point is, if they defy reality SO BRAZENLY, how can you trust ANYTHING they print or broadcast?  For example, how often have you read or heard any of the things below in the Media?

• "Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz." 
• "Iran has defeated the U.S. military."
• "Iran is stronger now than before Trump attacked."
• "Iran was only enriching uranium to fuel nuclear powerplants, not trying to build a bomb."
• "Women in Islamic countries love wearing the hijab."
• "Islam is 'THE religion of peace.' "
• "President Biden was sharp as a tack at all times."
• "Kamala Harris is brilliant--the kind of leader we need!"
• "China is our friend." 
• "Gavin Newsom is brilliant--and handsome!"
• "Global Warming (climate change) is caused by Americans driving SUVs that emit millions of tons of CO2!"
• "Billionaires like Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Tom Steyer and others are good.  Only Elon Musk is bad."
• "China is our friend." 
• "The border is totally secure!"
• "Republicans hate immigrants!"
• "We need to stop all deportations!"
• "No one is illegal on stolen land!!"
• "Socialism is better than free markets!"
• "Medical care should be free for all--which means it won't cost anyone anything!"
• "China is our friend." 
• "Math is raaaacist!"
• "Diversity is ouah strength!"
• "Standardized testing is unfair to minorities!"
• "All recreational drug use should be legalized!"
• "Trans women should be allowed to play on girls' teams!  Dat's only FAIR!"
• "Assigning sex at birth is oppressive and unfair!"
• "China is our friend." 
• "There was no unusually high Medicare or welfare fraud in MN or CA or OH.  And if there was, Democrats had NOTHING to do with it!"
• "The only thing preventing Cuba from being a paradise is the U.S. ordering other countries not to sell them food or medicine or oil!"  [for young Americans, that's a lie]
• "The U.S. military is incompetent.  It was okay when Barack Obama was president, but was destroyed by Trump during his first term, and it's even worse under Hegseth!  It's why Iran defeated us!"
• "Trump should never have ordered our incompetent military to kidnap Maduro!  They only did it because they got lucky!"
• "China is our friend." 
• "The U.S. was built by slave labor!"
• "The electoral-college method of electing presidents is unfair--a plot by rich white landowners!  Our president should be elected by the winner of duh popular vote!"
• "When Democrats regain control of congress, they need to 'expand' the Supreme Court from the current 9 judges to 20 or so!"
• "Democrats need to make DC and Puerto Rico states.  Dat only FAIR, citizen!  Cuz...reasons!"
• "China is our friend." 
• "AI is great!  Well, unless it's a 'data center' owned by Musk, in which case it's gonna make your electricity bills go way up!  But other AI centers are fine."
• "All voting should be by mail.  And we don't need any of that silly signature-matching, cuz voters are honest."
• "All grocery stores should be owned by city or state governments, as Zohran Mamdani has proposed.  Eliminating the huge profits from private ownership would reduce the cost of groceries.  Or we could just give EBT recipients twice as much in food stamps each month."
• "The U.S. has been defeated by Iran."
• "China is our friend." 
• "The person in the pic at the top is a girl." 

But you can trust the Mainstream Media.  After all, have they ever lied to you before?

https://archive.ph/xMRSk 

"Scientists make scary discovery *Deep in the ocean"*

That's the latest scare headline from some click-bait outfit on the Net.  See if you spot the pattern as I explain what happened:

Scientists are worried after discovering troubling evidence deep in the North Atlantic that suggests a critical ocean circulation system may be on the verge of collapsing, with devastating global consequences.

Researchers have identified a growing area of unusually cold water near Greenland that appears to be linked to the weakening of a circulation system called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)--a vast network of ocean currents that helps regulate global weather.

The discovery is fueling warnings that the Earth could be approaching a dangerous tipping point for our climate--with far-reaching consequences.

Did you see it?  "OMG, we're all gonna DIE!"

The AMOC moves warm water north through the Atlantic and carries colder water back south. Scientists say the system plays a vital role in regulating weather across North America and Europe.  And new evidence suggests this vital circulation is slowing, which is scaring real scientists. 

 Ahh, like Anthony Fauci?

Researchers warn that the growing cold blob could be a warning sign that larger disruptions are already happening.

Scientists warn that a weakening of the AMOC could trigger dramatic shifts in global weather patterns, producing stronger storms, changing rainfall patterns and triggering more extreme weather events across the world.  Some regions could face significantly colder conditions, while others could experience hotter temperatures, worsening drought and water shortages.

While most smart researchers agree that the AMOC is weakening, debate continues over what's causing it.  But most agree that the cause is Climate Change (the phenomenon formerly known as Global Warming).

For young Americans: In the late 1970s Time Magazine published a cover story warning "New Ice Age?"  SMAAhht scientists (today we'd call 'em "wokies") agreed that global temperatures were dropping, and that a new Ice Age was approaching.  Not sure when.

But just six years later the Powers That Be decided there wasn't any way to make money from Global Cooling, so they totally switched, claiming the REAL threat was Global Warming!  And that was caused by...not a billion Chinese burning coal, but by Americans driving SUV's!  Seriously.

But after four consecutive years of record-cold winters in the U.S. and Europe (Niagara Falls froze), rational folks started becoming skeptical: "Y'say the planet is warming, fatally, so how do you account for what we're seeing with our own eyes, eh?"

The Powers though about that for a week and then hit on the perfect answer:  They simply renamed "Global Warming" as "Climate Change," which held that if one part of the globe got cooler, it was simply because another part had gotten WAY hotter, eh?  But yew jus' didn't notice cuz it din' happen where you lived.

It was brilliant, because now no matter whether the temperature rose or fell where you lived, the problem was still caused by (did you guess?) Americans driving those gas-hog SUVs!

Now all that remains is to wait a year, and the Powers will have some dipshit professor claim that the fatal weakening of the AMOC is due to--wait for it--Global Warming...uhh, "Climate Change," which, as always, is America's fault for driving big SUVs way too many miles!

See, dat why we needs doze faaabulous 'lectric vehicles, citizen!

Here's a fun prediction: Suppose Democrats passed a LAW ordering everyone who owned a gas- or diesel-powered car in the U.S. to scrap their vehicles and buy a faaabulous new EV.  Think that would stop Democrats and Leftists from blaming Americans for "Climate Change"?

Not a chance.  The next thing they'd demand be eliminated would be air conditioning in homes.  Unless you had a permit, of course.  Wait, how do you get a permit to keep air conditioning your home?  Why, you just have to be Important, citizen.  Like Gavin Newsom or AOC or Elizabeth Warren or Kathy Hochul or Chuckie Schumer or...you get the idea.

Oh, and for young Americans who think Dems would never DARE to order Americans to scrap good cars and buy new ones:  You never knew that back when the Muslim communist Obozo was prezzy, Dems passed a LAW called quickly nicknamed "Cash for Clunkers."  (Actual name: the "Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009" --the CARS Act.  Cute, eh?  Democrats always give their shit laws cutesy names to make the laws sound warm and fuzzy.  The specific scrappage and payoff rules were known as the Car Allowance Rebate System--CARS again, eh?).

The reasoning behind this was that older cars burned more gas per mile than new ones, so Obozo and the Dems passed a LAW to pay Americans up to $5,000 to turn their perfectly useful old cars over to the gummint and buy new ones.  Taxpayer funds, of course.

That consumed $3 BILLION tax dollars, back when that was a big chunk of cash.  But Americans with older cars loved it.  And because newer cars got better gas mileage, it appeared to "fight Global Warming" (back before the Democrats renamed it Climate Change).

Buying new cars also helped companies like GM, which had declared bankruptcy.  Ohh, dat right, yew din' know 'bout dat either.

The Obozo regime then destroyed the perfectly good old cars--by pouring sand into the engines and running 'em until they were destroyed.

Seriously.  Not kidding.  This is Democrat "thinking" at its best, eh?

Source.

https://slaynews.com/scientists-alarming-discovery-deep-ocean/ 

Hey, didja see Cole Allen on "Dancing with the Stars" last night?

You didn't?  It was faaabulous!

Wait...why does that name sound vaguely familiar?  Anybody know who that is?  No?

Surely all of you MUST know, right?  After all, the guy's performance dominated all the broadcasts for three weeks!

Sure: Cole Allen is the nutty leftist who ran thru the metal detector in the hall leading to the ballroom where they were holding the annual White House correspondents' dinner, shooting a shotgun at Secret Service agents as he went.

Turns out a conservative web sleuth ("KanekoaTheGreat") has found hundreds of hastily deleted posts by the would-be assassin, who turns out to have re-posted damn near every Democrat talking point, first on X, then moved to Trump-hating Dem-run BlueSky.  A sample:

He compared Trump's win to “Nazis getting elected,” 

Allen seems to have believed every insane Democrat talking point--those repeated every day by Democrats, often on BlueSky (created by Democrats after Musk bought the heavily censored Twatter from crazy Jack Dorsey).

Leading up to the 2024 election, Allen repeatedly shared posts by Kamala Harris and similar that "Trump's Project 2025 would eliminate the independence of the DOJ" 

Allen shared posts by mainstream Democrat politician like AOC, J.B. Pritzker, Elizabeth Warren and others:  "Trump is already breaking the law."

   "Prepare for a tsunami of plunder and corruption" 

Re-posted mainstream Democrats comparing Trump to Hitler.

   WaPo propagandist Jennifer Rubin: "Trump is instigating a pogrom. This is what fascists do." 

After the 2024 election Allen parroted the mainstream Democrat narrative that a “fascist convicted felon” had become president.

He shared Bill Kristol’s claim that “the Trumpist authoritarian project of personalized, concentrated, and arbitrary power is proceeding.” 

He shared popular Democrat conspiracy theories, including claims that Trump staged the attempted assassination at Butler, PA, and posts on BlueSky claiming Elon Musk’s Starlink stole the 2024 election for Trump.

He shared posts claiming Tulsi Gabbard was a "Russian asset" (presumably meaning working for Russia?).

@anders_aslund "Tulsi Gabbard appears a pure Russian asset"

   "Russia's... nakedly lobbying in favor of Tulsi" [Really?  If that were true, the NYT would have had it on the front page for a week.]

   "Only way Tulsi gets confirmed is for the U.S. Senate to wholly abdicate its responsibility to maintain the safety and security of U.S. citizens."

He re-posted comments calling Trump's cabinet "rapist, spy, zealot, and antivaxer."

He claimed Americans wouldn’t be able to get vaccines under HHS head Robert Kennedy Jr.

   @TVietor08 "BANNING the vaccines" [Tommy Vietor was a van driver and organizer for Obozo]

   @ProjectLincoln "Get your family vaccinated, *while you still can.*" 

He re-posted many comments claiming "Trump is nominating the most corrupt, ethically compromised,... incompetent cabinet"

Claimed "Trump was openly supportive of rioters ransacking the US Capitol."  Claimed we're in "a constitutional crisis"

Now, no one would be surprised to read this sort of untethered nonsense from a druggie or wokie raised by a single mom who could barely keep her kids fed.  But Allen appears to be from a reasonably well-to-do family.  (Caltech grad. Master’s degree.)

While his posts (and presumably his beliefs) are goofy and based on lies and propaganda, it's vital to note that his claims are those made by mainstream Democrat talking-points every day.

Calling conservatives fascists is how the Left justifies violence against Trump, Charlie, or any of us.  And it’s escalating.  The “Luigi left” is growing.

Allen reposted LOTS of apocalyptic comments, like
"We'll either have the first woman president or the end of America."  And stupid people believe it.

Before the 2024 election Allen said if Trump lost the election someone should "ground Trump's planes and confiscate his passport."

Another: "Truly fascist."

Just after the election "Biden should nullify the election to save our democracy."

And: "THERE. IS. NO. LAW. ANYMORE."  (Ironically, Allen got this one right, as three weeks after the Dems lost the 2024 election (December 1, 2024) bribem signed an unprecedented "blanket pardon" for his son Hunty.  The vast majority of federal pardons are highly specific and target individuals who have already been convicted of, or charged with, specific, named federal offenses.  By contrast, the sweeping "blanket pardon" bribem gave his son Hunty is unprecedented, covering "any federal offenses that Hunter Biden committed *or may have committed*" at any time during the eleven years between January 1, 2014, and December 1, 2024 (the date Joe signed the pardon).
   This outrageously broad pardon, including for crimes that "may have been committed," was buried by the Mainstream Media after about three days.  

Allen shared a post by Trump cousin Mary Trump:    "Democrats: Stop playing by rules that no longer exist."  (She didn't name any.)

Allen re-posted “The Supreme Court just made him king.  Immediately hires Himmler, Goebells, and Heydrich."  [For young Americans: all 3 were top Nazi officials.]

Re-posted: “This is what an oligarchy looks like.  [Most young Americans couldn't define that, but Bernie Sanders rails against it, so Dems will too.

On Nov. 7, 2024, the Dem gunman tweeted:
  "The positive of having elected someone who will *accelerate climate change* AND either give putin america's nukes or set them off randomly."

The insanity of the Left: claiming Trump would "either" give Putin America's nuclear weapons OR "set them off randomly."  Thing is, LOTS of Leftists and Democrat supporters seem to believe this crap. 

Researchers discover new treatment for "schizo-affective disorder"

New York City (AP)-- Experts at Columbia University have announced their research has discovered a way to treat "schizoid-affective disorder," the condition formerly known as schizophrenia.  Patients afflicted with this 'condition' report hearing voices in their head, which often order them to cut the throat of someone near them.

Of course enlightened judges realize the person with the condition must not be allowed to stand trial because of "impairment," so the person is allowed to go free, on the condition that he or she or xe or xir takes medication to reduce the voices.

Formerly, psychiatrists worked to convince patients that the voices in their head were hallucinations, not real, and so should be ignored.  But the new research by the Columbia team claims patients report feeling much happier when doctors tell them just the opposite: that the voices they "hear" are actually real, coming from a higher astral plane, and that the patient should do what the voices tell them.

When one science-denying fake journalist from a right-wing organization asked the  researchers how their new "treatment" would reduce the number of murders committed by schizophrenics, they admitted it probably wouldn't decrease the number of murders by their patients, but that the patients will be happier.  And after all, isn't that what matters?

Former president Biden's head of mental health, Richard "Rachel" Levine, was enthusiastic about the new study, saying it should win a Nobel prize.  "After all," said Levine, "this is how our society responds to people who were assigned the wrong gender at birth, and later realize this and change genders.  This works perfectly, except that a few stubborn deplorables refuse to agree that the people really are women--or men, if it's the other way 'round.  

Levine continued, "Democrats need to pass a law making it a hate crime to call a person with male genetalia and XY chromosomes a man.  Oh wait, advanced, enlightened, Democrat-ruled states already have!"

Lawmakers in New York, California, Washington state, Illinois and Oregon are considering bills that would make this the new "standard of care," meaning doctors could be sued or jailed for failing to "affirm" to patients that the voices they hear are real.  "After all," said one lawmaker, "the most important thing is to affirm that what the patient believes is true, is true.  That's been confirmed by our experiences with transgender teens: society must affirm whatever they think is true, or else they'll be unhappy."  

How today's press would have reported WW2

Berlin, May 1945 (Associated Press)-- Hours ago Nazi HQ broadcast the following:  "We now control all of Germany.  The invaders have ten days to withdraw all troops, and to agree to pay $300 billion in reparations, or we will utterly destroy the U.S. with our super-weapons!" 

-->U.S. Democrat leaders respond: "We believe you, and will try to force our aging, ill, warmongering president to obey!  Cuz you've nevah lied to us before!  Plus our voters are sick of this endless war, and rationing!  We got sucked into this endless war because some tiny nation wailed that it was about to be invaded.  So ouah warmongering president got us into this ENDLESS war!  Americans have had enough!" 

Berlin, May 1945 (Associated Press)-- In response to Nazi demands, the Nazi high command says all Allied forces are retreating.  Our reporters haven't been able to confirm this but we believe it's true because the Nazi high command has never lied to us before.

Berlin, January 1945 (Associated Press)-- A pro-war political party in the U.S. claims the Nazis have been operating a "death camp" called "Auschwitz."  Nazi sources say Auschwitz is a peaceful farming community.  But being experienced reporters we asked the Nazi government to let us see for ourselves.  Our editors in New York asked us to investigate this outlandish claim that the town is a "death camp."  So our Nazi colleagues took our reporters to Auschwitz, and sure enough, it was a peaceful farming community with no sign of barbed wire or smoking chimneys.

    U.S. skeptics claim the town we saw wasn't the real Auschwitz, but a sign at the edge of the town said "Auschwitz," and the dozen residents we spoke with said they were all farmers, and had been so forever.  We conclude the claim of "death camps" is false."

Tehran, June 2026 (Associated Press)-- Iran has re-asserted control over the Strait of Hormuz and has declared that waterway closed, unless vessels pay a toll to Iran for safe passage.  The Iranians also claim the U.S. Navy has been defeated and forced to withdraw from the region, in a huge defeat for the Trump regime.

   U.S. Democrats were jubilant.  Chuck Schumer said "Iran was never working on an atom bomb, so there was no reason for Orange Hitler to attack them.  We've finally defeated Orange Hitler and the totally incompetent U.S. military.  In fact ouah partei has introduced a bill to make June 20th a national holiday called "No Kings Day."

What Democrat/leftist code really means

Democrats and Leftists always wanna give money away, usually to illegal immigrants undocumented Americans, ...cuz, like, y'know, duh gummint prints the stuff, so dey kin give away hundreds of billions to, uh...'deserving folks' like illegal immigrants undocumented Americans, eh?

Conservatives: "Seems like that always results in billions of dollars lost to fraud, and creates a permanent class of people who's rather collect welfare than work for a living.  But if it's your money you can do as you like with it...

Dem/Leftists: "Stupid deplorable!  a) Dere iz no fraud.  b) Well sure, a tiny bit, but not enough to avoid giving money... and c) What fraud dere iz happens in Republican-ruled states, cuz Rethuglicans are dumb and don't know how to manage billion-dollar programs!

Conservatives: "Really?  So far massive fraud has been uncovered in Minnesota, California, New York and New Jersey--all Democrat-ruled for years.  Care to retract you stupid, predictable slander?"

Dem/Leftists: "Not a word of it.  All the charges of billions in welfare fraud are FAKE, pushed by right-wing agents trying to distract from the Epstein files!  Everyone knows that Democrat leaders like Gavin Newsom, Tim Walz and Kathy Hochul would NEVAH allow fraud, cuz dey reeeally smaht!  Yew kin jus' look at 'em and see dey're smaht!"

"And Kamala Harris and Joe Biden would nevah have allowed massive fraud, cuz dey even smahtah!  So we wanna give mo' billions to pipo who deserve it!

Conservatives: "How much of your money do you plan to give away? 

Dem/Leftists: "You don't understand...   

 

Reparations, eh?

AHHHhhh, "reparations"!  Exactly like the reasoning below: 

 

Doesn't make ANY sense.  But when you dangle a six-figure payday in front of potential recipients, what do you expect 'em to say, eh?  So...no.

Democrats: Photo ID? AWFUL! Raaacist! Well, except for duh Messiah's museum