Dems have their panties in a twist about the UFC thing, but LOVED trannies on the lawn

Just for the record, I'm not a UFC fan, so wasn't a fan of the show on the White House lawn.  But before all you fucking brain-dead, Trump-hating, America-hating, wokie Democrats start whining about "desecrating ouah sacred White House," don't forget that you totally, utterly, completely, slobberingly, fawningly loved THIS shit when the Vegetable was prezzy.  So go fuck yourselves.

And by the way: Not a single Mainstream Media outlet said one critical word about bare tranny boobs on the White House lawn when bribem and the tranny mafia were running things.  But NOW the Media is in full outrage mode.

Shows ya yet again that the Media is a totally Democrat-fellating crew.  As if we hadn't known that for decades. 

More evidence Fauci directed the lie that Covid could NOT have been modified in a lab

June 13, 2026

For three years I've been showing you emails--released by the House Oversight Committee--to and from the corrupt piece of shit Anthony Fauci proving that in the first week after the Chyna virus reached the U.S, all the "independent expert virologists" who depended on Fauci's NIAID for grant money, and studied the genetic code of the virus said it did NOT appear to have "evolved naturally." 

For those unfamilar with virology:  All known coronaviruses have long ago been gene-sequenced--and this was quickly done for the Covid-19 virus.  Turns out it's almost an exact copy of a bat coronavirus that was known to be harmless to humans.  But Covid-19 differed from the harmless bat virus in a VERY curious way: it contained four genes not found in the closest matching bat virus.  Moreover, instead of random letters in the genetic code of the closest bat virus being hit by high-energy particles and turned into different letters, the genetic code had clearly been cut, and the new, fully functioning genes inserted into the "spike protein" of the virus.  

The reason that's obvious is that all the letters of the code on both sides of the inserted genes are identical between Covid-19 and the closest bat virus.  The new genes were clearly inserted.

Finally: all four of the inserted genes made Covid-19 able to "bind" to cells in the human airway far more efficiently than the harmless bat virus.  This ability--alone--is what made Covid-19 lethal to humans.

Without getting too technical, genes are specific combinations of "base pairs" that perform certain functions.  But the odds of getting the code for a functioning gene by random mutations are like the odds of getting a straight-flush in two consecutive poker hands at Vegas.

The odds of getting viable code sequences in four places, just in the spike protein, and with each of the functioning genes making the virus better at killing humans, by random mutations, are virtually zero.

None of Fauci's experts speculated on who did it, and I don't know if any of 'em knew the Chinese army was operating a bio-lab in Wuhan--the known origin of the outbreak.  They simply concluded the obvious: The virus had NOT "evolved naturally."

Unless you're a dumb sumbitch, if it hadn't "evolved naturally" that only left one option.

Fauci knew he'd sent U.S. taxpayer funds to the CCP's Wuhan Institute of Virology, via a cunning "cutout"--Peter Daszak's "Eco-Health Alliance."  And Fauci knew that if this became known, he'd likely be torn limb from limb by enraged crowds of Americans whose beloved family members were soon gonna be killed by the damn thing.

Obviously Fauci would have done anything to avoid that fate.  So something like two days after his lead grant-recipient (Kristian Andersen) emailed Fauci that the virus did NOT appear to have "evolved naturally," Fauci emailed him back, saying he wanted Andersen and his peers to write a paper saying exactly the opposite of what Andersen and colleagues had concluded, and had just told Fauci two days earlier.

This isn't speculation: The House Government Oversight Committee released the fucking email from Fauci directing Andersen to write the paper.

Of course Fauci couldn't literally order Andersen to write the paper Fauci wanted--a paper that would directly contradict what Andersen had told Fauci that Andersen and his peers had concluded.  But since Andersen and his group depended on Fauci for millions of dollars in grant money, the implied threat of losing that funding was obvious.

So the new news is from senator Rand Paul, announced June 11: that then-director of the National Institutes of Health--a truly goofy sumbitch named Dr. Francis Collins, admits that around the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, he knew about and secretly assisted with the drafting of a paper for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, claiming the virus that caused COVID-19 "is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus"--even though Fauci's expert virologists, led by Andersen, had told him the opposite. 

The first email from Andersen to Fauci was in the first week of February, 2020, just days after the first case was confirmed in the U.S.  Fauci replied to Andersen days later, and the team immediately began drafting the paper.  In an email to NIH officials dated March 6, 2020, Collins takes credit for "helping" with the paper:

"This is work that Tony, Jeremy, Larry, and I helped with, but are appropriately not mentioned explicitly in the paper."

"Tony" is Anthony Fauci. 

The first cases of COVID-19 appeared in Wuhan, China, in the fall of 2019, near a laboratory that was conducting enhanced experiments on coronaviruses--experiments funded by Fauci's NIAID (one of five divisions of the NIH).

The paper from Kristian Andersen et al was titled "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2."  It was published on March 17, 2020, in Nature Medicine, and concluded--quite carefully--that "there is no evidence that the virus was modified in a lab."  

The avoided claiming the only alternative: that the virus evolved its ability to kill humans by totally random mutations, because every virologist would have instantly recognized the obvious absurdity of that claim. 

But claiming "Dere's no evidence it was modified in a lab" was no problem.

The problem is, if Covid-19 had "evolved naturally" from a bat virus, there should be an animal "reservoir" containing the "evolved/lethal" version found in human samples.  You won't be surprised to learn that no animal reservoir has been found.

In 2024 Collins told congress he is not a virology expert.

Significantly, early drafts of the paper had the authors saying it was possible that the virus had been modified in a lab. And in private messages--found and released a year later--the authors said "characteristics of the virus" indicated it was man-made.  Both statements were removed before the paper was submitted, and the authors have defended those removals as being "driven by evidence."

No one has thought to ask them what the alleged evidence was--because Fauci et al want this buried.

Andersen has said his team's paper was "prompted by" Collins, Fauci, and Farrar.  That's designed to muddy the waters, because again, the House released an email from Fauci to Andersen in the first week of Feb 2020 unambiguously asking him to get a team together to write a paper claiming the virus could not have been modified in a lab--exactly the opposite of the team's actual conclusion.  There's no indication that Collins or Farrar had any role in asking Andersen to write the paper. 

In an email previously released, from Collins to Fauci in April of 2020, Collins asked whether the NIH could to more to "help put down this very destructive conspiracy" that the virus had been modified to make it lethal to humans.

"I hoped the Nature Medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this," Collins wrote. "But probably didn't get much visibility. Anything more we can do?" 

Four years later, when the congressional committee asked Collins about the email, he said "I meant we should do what we can to get the truth out there, as opposed to statements that were reckless and speculative that were not based on evidence."  This is ironic since Fauci directed Andersen to write a paper--for publication--that not only totally ignored the astronomical improbability that the virus had "evolved naturally," but concluded just the opposite of what Andersen and company had actually concluded.

Fauci has angrily denied charges that he directed Andersen to write the "Proximal Origin" paper to totally discredit the clear evidence that the virus had been modified by humans.  

But on multiple occasions in 2020 and 2021 he met with U.S. intelligence officials.  This past May James Erdman III, a CIA operations officer, told Rand Paul and other senators that Fauci gave the CIA a list of experts to the intelligence community (IC) should interview, and that the list included the authors of the "Proximal Origins" paper.

Fauci briefed the National Security Council on the virus.  One of the emails just released shows Fauci writing to a National Security Council official the day after he took part in that briefing.

Fauci cites the "Proximal Origin" paper, saying it had just come out in "pre-print," "written by a group of highly qualified virologists," and that it would confirm what Fauci had said in his briefing--that the virus was NOT modified by humans.  He asks the official to "Please show it to your team."

The new emails simply confirm what should already be widely known: that Fauci lied about everything, to hide the fact that he gave money to the Wuhan lab to fund the research that modified a harmless bat virus to make it lethal to humans, ultimately killing over seven million people world-wide.  (Other sources say 15- to 20-million.)

Source:

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/former-nih-head-secretly-helped-paper-dismissing-theory-covid-19-came-lab 

A novel approach

If you had a decent education, even if you didn't take "statistics" you know the name of the curve below: 

 

If you know what this curve means, that's a good start.  If not, you can either keep reading to learn, or go watch "Dancing With the Stars" or some similar shit.

It's called a Gaussian distribution, a.k.a. a "standard normal distribution," or less formally, the "bell curve."  From it we can calculate the percentage of the population that's within a certain number of "standard deviations from the mean," either above or below.

What this curve tells us is that one percent or so of the population is far smarter than the mean.  But the same percentage is far less smart than the average.  So what does that mean?

Well, "smarter" isn't necessarily good, since people can obviously use their intelligence for purposes most Americans would deem as harmful or bad.  (Somalis and other natives of shithole nations don't make that distinction: to them, being able to successfully steal is a sign of superior intelligence.)

For now I'd like to direct your attention to the Left side of the curve.  Specifically, in nature what happens to animals who are either stupid or refuse to learn, eh?

Democrats and socialists: "Wha?  Why wud yew espek anything unusual to happen to such animals, racist?  Dey no different den all duh uddah animals, so why yew tink dey fare any diff'rent den duh uddah animals, eh?"

And there you have it--because in nature animals who can't learn from patterns are often easy prey for predators.

But in advanced countries, governments devote entire sectors of the economy to helping people survive despite low IQ.  So Democrat-ruled cities give free syringes to I-V drug users, cuz if taxpayers don't give free needles to druggies, dey wud share needles wif infected pipo, an' den taxpayers would haf'ta spend FAR more to treat more infected pipo.  See?

The logic is flawless:  Democrats believe society must protect people from the consequences of their own choices, eh?

I wonder: in China and Russia, does the government give free syringes to I-V drug users?  Bet you've never asked that, nor heard anyone else ask it.  What's the rate of HIV or Hep-C infection in those nations?  I have no idea.  You'd think someone would have some idea, but you've never heard a word about it.  Now ask yourself: why haven't you ever heard that asked?

All "woke" Western governments are committed to protecting people from the consequences of their own choices, even when those choices are abysmally stupid.  I totally understand: it's a choice.  But everyone should realize there's a price for that choice: you get LOTS of addicts surviving and having kids.  That drags down the average IQ of the nation AND costs billions.  Wokiez believe that trade-off is totally worth it.  I understand, but everyone should be aware of the price paid--and not just economically.

I suggest there's a middle ground: why not execute all drug dealers? 

Of course Democrats would never allow that, cuz...uh...reasons. 

How much can smart people learn from just one graph?

Here's the graph.  How much can we learn from it?

Note that the numbers plotted above have always been freely, publicly available to anyone.  Smart people instantly see what it means.  But people who want to see the U.S. (as we've known it) destroyed--i.e. most Democrats--either refuse to grasp the lessons, or are too dumb to understand it.  Take your pick.

Oh wait, there's a third option: They don't believe the numbers are real.  Like Dems refusing to believe bribem and Obozo allowed 16 million foreigners into the U.S. (11 million for bribem, 5 million net for Obozo).  "We refuse to believe numbers we don't like," eh?  Yes, always.

SO...what can smart people learn from this one graph alone?

1. Whatever this "oil" stuff is, does the steady increase in demand suggest humans find it VERY useful?

2. Since it's so useful, then with world demand increasing at a near-constant rate, unless world-wide production increases at the same rate, what do ya think that will do to the price of oil?

3. If world supply and demand are perfectly matched, and a few nations produce far more oil than they use, and grow rich by exporting billions of barrels per year to the rest of the world, how long before one of those nations tries to control, say, 30% of the world market for oil, demanding "fees" of a million dollars per tanker to use "their" waterway?

4. If the woke, moronic leftist politicians who rule most countries refuse to slap the shit out of the nation that demands those "fees" to carry oil to the world, what will happen to the world price of oil?

5. If oil is indeed necessary to the world economy, what will a huge price hike do to the world economy?

6. The U.S. has roughly five percent of the world's people but is the world's largest economy.  We also use more oil per person than other nations.  Do you think those two things are related? 

7. If an opponent/rival/enemy of the U.S. wanted to destroy the U.S. economy, would they try to get American voters to hate oil and natural gas?

8. If a very few U.S. politicians (two, to be exact) supported increasing domestic oil and gas production ("Drill, baby, drill), how do you think members of the Democrat party would react?  Would they support increasing U.S. oil production, or would they sneer "Dat not possible!  We CANNOT drill ouah way to energy independence!"?

9. Because using oil and natural gas produces carbon dioxide, could you predict that leftist scientists would begin claiming CO2 was gonna wipe out all life on Erf by making duh Erf too hot to support life (i.e. global warming)?

10. Would it be easily predictable that "international organizations" (the U.N.), totally controlled by rivals of the U.S, would totally support the theory of Global Warming? 

I could do this all day.  All of this was (and is) entirely predictable.  The twist is that China  consumes far more oil than it produces, so has to import a few million barrels per day.  So you'd think the Chinese communist party would support efforts to keep Iran from raising the price of oil, eh?  But they don't.  Instead they support the Islamic Republic of Iran, selling 'em drones and all manner of weapons. 

You'd think that would be counterproductive, eh?  But the CCP hates the U.S. way more than they care about paying a a bit more for oil, so if China can force Trump to withdraw from the Straits, they win a HUGE PR victory.

That's the game plan.  And with the help of Trump-hating Dem shitheads, and the Trump-hating Mainstream Media, they're on the verge of winning.

Here's a prediction: No matter how many concessions the mullahs make, the U.S. Media and the Democrats will spin it as a win for Iran.

Absolutely guaranteed.  Anti-Trump outlets like Reuters and top Dem congresswhores have already bleated that Trump's "deal" gives the mullahs and IRGC everything they want, while getting nothing in return.  After all, that's what the mullahs are claiming--and we know they nevah lie, right?

Guess we'll see.  Except you won't, because the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media will lie as they always do.

Another prediction: IF an agreement is actually signed, the mullahs and IRGC will claim its terms are totally different from what was actually agreed to.  They can get away with that because they'll post their version of the "agreement" and claim the U.S. agreed.  And the Mainstream Media won't say a critical word.  So Americans will be left to believe...whatever the Media bleats, eh? 

Need a break from the constant barrage of bad news from Dems?

Need a break from the constant barrage of bad news from leftists and Democrats?  Here ya go. 

 

Predictably, shithead leftists/Democrats/destroyers are already bleating that this is AI.  "Cud not be possible!"  Yeah, well, go fuck yourselves you miserable bastards.  

Ethanol--or, how the Dems and Greenies spent billions to do nothing

As almost everyone knows, ethanol is drinking alcohol, and it burns.  A gallon of ethanol produces about 30% percent less heat energy per than a gallon of gasoline.

But because it does burn--and because dumb greenies hate oil and gas with a passion--Democrats and Greenies joined forces to ORDER oil companies to buy billions of gallons of ethanol and "blend" it into the gas you buy.  That's why every gas pump you see carries the sticker "Contains up to ten percent ethanol."

So like magic, they passed LAWS ordering this--and patted themselves on the back, positively glowing with virtue.

Problem is, before the shitheads passed the law it was well known that the cost of a gallon of ethanol (made by letting yeast turn corn syrup into alcohol, then using huge amounts of heat to distill the mash into ethanol) was WAY more than the cost of a gallon of plain gasoline. 

Of course the Greenies and Dems knew this, and knew that voters would revolt if they had to pay more at the pump than they'd been paying before the LAW that gasoline be adulterated with ethanol passed, eh?  But nevah fear, citizen: duh Dems knew how to hide that price increase from dumb voters!  

Yes, citizen, the Democrats knew that through the magic of undecipherable 2,000-page laws that no one ever reads, they could order oil companies to buy billions of gallons of far more expensive ethanol without making the price of gasoline go up! 

See, when you run congress you can hide shit like this.  The answer?  They quietly wrote into their shitty LAW that the EPA would use your tax dollars to pay refining companies to offset the higher cost of the ethanol the Dems ORDERED the companies to buy.  For those unfamiliar with the term, that's called a "subsidy," and in the 1980s and 1990s the gummint paid billions of dollars in these subsidies.

So by the gummint quietly using tax dollars to pay the difference, drivers/voters didn't see any increase!  Is that cunning or WHAT?  But today, with higher oil prices, blended gas is actually bit less expensive than pure gasoline.  So at least there's that, eh?

WAIT...it gets better!  Obviously corn can be used to feed people or livestock--or used to make ethanol, by law.  Turns out 35 to 40% of all U.S. corn production is used for ethanol--which obviously means it's not available for food.  And following the well-known (but not by Democrats) laws of supply and demand, that makes the world price of corn go up a bit. 

Dem/Greenie: "Dat okay, citizen!  World price only go up a tiny bit, an' since we gibs ouah corn to po' third-world nations anyway, it don' mattah much."

Okay Greenies, you got us there.  Then consider that water is getting more scarce in the southwest U.S.  So how much water does it take to make a gallon of ethanol compared to gasoline?

Of course the average Green/Dem hasn't a clue, cuz dey don' doo no research, an' dere masters don' tell 'em...cuz it turns out making a gallon of corn ethanol requires about 990 gallons of water, compared to 5.6 gallons for a gallon of gasoline.

Dem/Greenie: "Uh...wuh...I...uh...Okay, we'll only make dat faaabulous ethanol in the midwest, not in the dry southwest!  Yeh, dat's it!"

See how neatly they pivot, citizen?

Finally: the amount of energy in ethanol is far less than the energy needed to produce it: To produce a thousand liters of ethanol requires about 9.9 million kcal, nearly double ethanol's energy yield of 5.1 million kcal.  [Pimentel et al., 1996] 

In other words, ethanol is a net loss, in both energy and food.  But you can't do shit about it now, cuz BOTH the Democrats and the conservative corn-growing states love the stuff.

Ain't congress great?  And when the Dems win back total control of duh gummint, they're gonna tax oil and gas like crazy, "to save duh Erf!"  Yay!
 

Democrats: "DIE-versity is ouah strength, so we needs mo' foreigners here"

Someone noticed a recurring problem. 

But to be more accurate: It's not "the society" that submissively welcomes the invaders.  It's the politicians who rule that society--whether due to corruption or stupid virtue-signaling.  The pols make the laws (or merely "rules"), then use those laws/rules and their cops to fine or imprison any citizens who dare to balk at accepting the fate decreed by the pols.

For the last 23 years I've been saying "Wake up, ya dumb bastards," but now it's probably too late, because the Left has become thoroughly entrenched as the rulers of almost every western nation.  Here in the U.S. it's Democrats.  Even with Trump as president, leftist RINOs in both chambers of congress vote with the Dems, so the Dems continue to rule.  Amazing, eh? 

Leftist judges block every attempt to deport illegal alien invaders even after they commit violent criminal acts in the U.S.  Fraud by illegals steals billions of dollars every year from Americans and sends the money overseas, where it can't be recovered.

Interesting.

If I had kids I'd be really angry about this.  You probably have kids, but the Dems and the Lying Mainstream Media have convinced you there's no problem.  Nice work. 

Every picture tells a story, eh?  Click to enlarge.

 

Democrats:  "None of the above pics are real!  All were created by AI!" 

Politicians in the UK and Europe have killed their nations

 

"Cultural enrichment," EU-style

 

Democrats refuse to learn any lessons from WW2, demand U.S. accept Iran's terms

In Iran "Mehr News," which is closely aligned with the goofy IRGC, has published what it claims are details of a draft understanding between Iran and the U.S.  Here are those claims:

1. Immediate and permanent halt to fighting on all fronts, including Lebanon.

2. U.S. agrees not to interfere in Iran's internal affairs and to respect the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

3. The full lifting of the naval blockade within 30 days.

4. U.S. will withdraw forces from "areas surrounding Iran."

5. The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days *under arrangements set by Iran.*

6. U.S. agrees to end "sanctions" on the sale of Iranian oil and derivative products, and to give Iran full access to all resulting revenue.

7. U.S. agrees to present plans for giving Iran at least $300 billion for reconstruction.

8. U.S. agrees to a 60-day negotiating period aimed at reaching a final agreement covering nuclear issues and the complete removal of US sanctions.

9. Iran agrees not to produce nuclear weapons (which they say they've already done under the old Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).

10. During the new 60-day negotiation period, the U.S. agrees to not deploy additional forces to the region or impose new sanctions.

11. Before the 60-day negotiation period starts, the U.S. agrees to release $12 billion in frozen Iranian funds, with the remaining $12 billion to be released during the negotiations.

12. [filler]

13. United Nations Security Council shall approve the final agreement.

14. Final negotiations would only begin after the release of the $12 Billion of Iran's blocked funds, the suspension of Iran's oil sanctions and the lifting of the U.S. naval blockade. The final agreement would focus exclusively on the fate of enriched material and enrichment activities, sanctions relief and plans to rebuild Iran's economy.  There will be no discussion regarding Iran's missile program or its support for "resistance groups."
===

Now: Imagine it's April of 1944.  Hitler's air force and navy have been wiped out.  His army has been forced to retreat to defend the German capital, Berlin.  Now imagine Hitler's lackeys broadcasting their *demands* for ending the war--along the lines of the 14 points above, substituting Germany for Iran.

How do you think the U.S. would have responded?

Now imagine it's a few months later, say August 1, 1944.  Japan's air force and navy have been wiped out and all their conquered territories have been re-taken by the Allies, who are now planning to invade Japan.  But with no allied troops having yet set foot on Japanese soil, Japanese hard-liners issue a list of "conditions" for ending the war--along the same lines as the 14 points above.

How do you think the U.S. would have responded?

Young Americans--your highschool-age kids--have *no idea at all,* because the shitty, Democrats-run skool system has refused to tell 'em.  It could have, but refused.  The leftists thought it was WAY mo' important to teach 'em the joys of transgenderism, eh?

*ASK YOUR KIDS* how they think the U.S. and its allies would have responded to the 14 demands above, if Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan had issued those demands in 1944.

Democrat teachers:  "Wuh...wuh...both Germany and Japan DID demand conditions--just like the 14 demands by Iran--to end the war.  And the U.S. agreed to all those conditions, cuz all gud pipo luvs peace, right?  An' it wuz duh U.S. agreeing to those demands that has paved the way for Germany and Japan to become model nations today!  Yep yep yep!"

Hahahahahaha!

Now tell your kids what REALLY happened between April and September of 1944:  In April the Allies forced Germany to surrender unconditionally.  You'll need to explain that this means "without trying to negotiate ANY conditions.

In Japan, on August 6 and 9th, 1944 the U.S. Air Force (yeah, I know) dropped two atomic bombs on two Japanese cities.  A single bomb obliterated square miles of each.  The Japanese surrendered unconditionally.

Now: Iran's navy and air forces have been utterly destroyed.  The U.S. controls the Strait.  Yet the mullahs and hard-liners have the gall to issue 14 DEMANDS to end the fighting.

So why the total difference between the Iranian situation today and that of Germany and Japan in 1944?

The Iranians refuse to surrender unconditionally entirely because of the Democrat partei in the U.S.

The Iranians are confident that the Dems will win the mid-terms, in which case the Dems will DEMAND that Trump surrender and agree to all of Iran's demands.  

We are at a fork in the road of history, folks.

In 1944 everyone knew Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were aggressors bent on taking over as much of the world as possible.  They were advanced nations and *formidable* foes.

The Allies were forced to choose between allowing both nations to continue to take over their regions (i.e. to surrender) or war.  They chose war, led by the U.S.  It was long and hugely costly in both lives and money, but fortunately someone had the balls to make the decision to fight instead of surrender.  And the result is what you see today: both German and Japan are model nations.

But today something's different:  The U.S. is still "the arsenal of the free world," but now the Democrat Partei, fueled not by what's best for the world but by their hatred of Trump, want to force Trump to accept Iran's terms--to surrender to the militarily-devastated mullahs.

If you don't believe that (spoiler: if you're a Democrat, you don't), watch the top Democrat thug in the House, Hakeem Jeffries, claim Iran is winning, and stronger today than before the start of fighting.

You can't believe this shit-head can possibly believe what he's spouting, but the Mainstream Media broadcasts his horseshit without a word of pushback, so the average viewer has no idea what the truth is.

SO...there are two choices: either accept the demands of the Democrat partei and surrender to the demands of the IRGC, or...wipe them out--totally, completely, utterly.  Make the dumb, cunning sons of whores stop this horseshit of playing Trump for a fool.  Bomb one powerplant at a week, forcing Tehran to endure rolling blackouts (like Los Angeles will experience again this summer) to show them reality.

The alternative is the one demanded by Democrats: surrender.

Which option worked to make Germany and Japan into model nations, eh?

Your highschool kids don't know.  Americans under 30 don't know.  Democrats of all ages have no idea.

Let's review: in nature, what happens to animals that refuse to learn, eh? 

African "migrant" to UK pins Irishman to ground, stabs out his eye and tries to behead him. UK gov't response?

They "instruct" "journalists" on how NOT to report what really happened, lest the truth upset people.

For those who didn't see it (i.e. most Americans), a Sudanese "immigrant" to the UK, living in Belfast, Northern Ireland (part of the UK) attacked a local resident, pinned him to the ground with his knees on the victim's arms and proceeded to stab out one eye.  The victim screamed and struggled as the Sudanese attacker stabbed him again and again, and finally started trying to behead him.

The entire attack was caught on video.  The victim is alive but with gruesome injuries.

The noteworthy thing here isn't the brutal, ghastly attack by a man armed with a knife against an unarmed victim; that's just "a day ending in Y."  Happens every day in the UK or Europe, and always the same story: the attackers--armed with knives--are immigrants from Africa or the Mid-east.  Corrupt Labour pols allow 'em to remain in the UK cuz...reasons.  

The noteworthy thing here isn't the attack, but the response of the government of Northern Ireland, which has instructed all media outlets that they should NOT report what really happened, because that could cause residents to be upset at the staggering number of murderous "immigrants" the government has allowed to stay in the UK. 

As we see here in the U.S, the Real Crime isn't that a member of a Favored Minority gouges out a victim's eye and tries to cut off his head.  Nay, to Democrats the Real Crime is noticing the actual, brutal knife attack.  Such a deft inversion of the truth, eh?

"Yew pipo needs t' show some understanding and empathy!  Above all, yew must "Remain Calm" and not make a fuss.  An' to ensure yew don't, we have ordered X and other social media sites NOT to post the actual video of the eye-stabbing and attempted be-...uhh...the 'resolution of the dispute.'  Yeh, dat's it!"

Of course the Labour government carefully avoids saying it will censor stories of attacks.  Heaven forbid!  The Left is FAR to savvy to try that.  Instead they propose to only censor reporting--both by Media outlets AND by citizens on social media--"in times of crisis."

And instantly, half the public is now backing the government, cuz after all, duh guv'mint needs t' be able to change the rules "in times of crisis," right?

"Technology secretary" Liz Kendall has unveiled plans to amend "online safety laws" to allow regulators to "crack down at times of heightened social and political tension."  This would force both Media and social media to "take tougher action on material that could 'incite violence or disorder'."

Sounds so utterly reasonable, eh?  See, govt doesn't want pipo to get upset by reading or seeing details about some "dispute" between a Favored Minority and a local that results in...um..."injuries," eh?

And now the heart of the new move: "It follows growing anger among ministers about Elon Musk's ability to 'amplify' public concern over incidents like this one, or the stabbing murder of student Henry Nowak by another immigrant.

In a statement posted on X site, Ms Kendall identifies the REAL problem:  Not the attempted beheading, but 'Those who use social media to incite violence and disorder."

So not a critical word about the knife attack by the immigrant, but threatening to arrest Elon Musk for not blocking the video that shows the actual attack.

Another shitty leftist Karen--the Minister for Northern Ireland--tips the real problem, saying "I wish people hadn't seen that video."

Of course.

Government sources said the new order would apply to "any material which [the government] considers might incite violence or disorder." 

So what do ya think defines "a time of crisis," eh?

Sure: anytime the consequences of the Labour government's importing millions of barbarians from third-world shitholes results in an attack on citizens.

One prominent Reform UK politician urged ministers to focus on dealing with the causes of public anger rather than trying to police social media.

But Labour Party chair Anna Turley said Musk should stay out of "sensitive political events" like the brutal Belfast attack.  "Everyone in public and civil life has a responsibility to call for calm and not to stoke grievance or hatred or division or tension that puts vulnerable people and our communities at risk."

Staggering: "Let's not worry about the attack, but on demanding that people stay calm and "not stoke grievance or hatred or division...that puts *vulnerable communities* at risk."

Other leftist, open-borders governments accused Musk of being the problem:  Australia's state-owned ABC News accused Musk of ''inciting racial tension'' in Belfast because he didn't censor footage showing the Sudanese attacker gouging out the Irish resident's eye and attempting to behead him.

Amazingly (but predictably) leftist government shitheads are more angry at Musk than at the stabber.

And while the non-elected members of the left seethe and howl about it, leftist Brit politicians just refuse to answer the question of whether they believe beheading is normal:  Labour MP and Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Hilary Benn was asked FOUR TIMES if beheading people is an alien culture.  He refused to answer.

Source: Ace of Spades

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=420095 

School adminishits send student home for wearing T-shirt saying...

Can a corrupt, leftist, Democrat-ruled school system ban a student from wearing a T-shirt bearing an undisputed truth?

The U.S. Supreme Court gave its implied approval to that ban.  

In the Peoples' Republic of Massachusetts, leftist comrades in a public school banned a student from wearing a T-shirt saying "There are only two genders."  The school wailed that such a horrible statement on the shirt could "be distracting" to other students, even if true.

The same student later wore a version of the shirt with the word “censored” taped over “two genders.”  The pro-tranny mafia running the school ordered him to change that shirt too or go home.  See, the tranny mafia wouldn't even allow the student to wear a shirt saying just "There are only..."--because of the implication, eh?  This is how paranoid and dictatorial leftist skool shitheads are.

The student's parents sued, but the Boston-based 1st Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the school, noting federal courts have ruled schools can restrict messages that can be reasonably interpreted to "demean a person’s identity" and are reasonably expected to be "disruptive." 

So..."free speech"?  Only speech the Democrats who rule the First Circuit like, eh? 

The parents appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.  The stunner is that effin' Supreme Court refused to hear the case.  Which means schools across the U.S. now have the power to ban students from wearing any shirt that states a fundamental truth.

Democrats:  "NOOooo, dere iz 12 or 37 or maybe 45 'genders,' depending on which Democrat group you ask!  So we skool adminishit can't let a student wear a T-shirt that says dere are only two genders, cuz dat would be 'hate speech'!  An we Dems cain't allow dat, cuz we Dems always believes duh Science!  An' duh Science sez dere are 19 or 42, or maybe 57!  Depends, eh?  Yep yep yep!" 

So the school can flood its halls with rainbow flags and signs declaring it is a “Proud friend/ally of LGBTQ+,” but the school adminishits will ban any student from wearing a T-shirt with a rational counter to the pro-57-gender message.  Got it.  But "free speech," eh comrade?

Jesus.  This is totally insane--and now this stupidity been implicitly supported by the Supreme Court of the United States, by its refusal to take the case. 

If you think the notion of skool admini-shits being in the tank for the tranny mafia is a right-wing conspiracy story, consider this: the article in the shit-left USA-Today rag doesn't mention Boston until the 34th 'graf.  Cuz USA-Today doesn't want the shit-Left dictators to be criticized for being...well,  shit-Left dictators, eh?    

Source: USA Today 

Despite record high spending on skoolz, reading proficiency continues to drop

No one should be surprised that the huge, powerful teachers' unions totally support the Democrat Partei [sic].  And since the Mainstream Media also supports that Partei, it's no surprise that the Mainstream Media is never critical of teachers.  It's like lawyers don't sue other lawyers, eh?  

But amazingly, somehow conservatives were able to create a thing called the National Assessment of Educational Progress.  You never heard about it, cuz...Media.

And in this case "educational progress" is a joke.

Last year the 2024 reading assessment results were released.  And you'll NEVAH guess what they showed!  They showed that 12th grade reading scores were at the lowest level since the yearly assessment began 34 years ago. 

Democrats:

"Dis' mus' be a typo!  Ouah skoolz iz faaabulous!  New York spends $23,000 per student each year, so dat must mean ouah skoolz iz doin' great work, right?

That depends on how you define "great."  Turns out nearly a third of 12th-graders scored "below basic level" in reading, meaning they "likely cannot draw conclusions based on concepts presented explicitly in a text.”  

And it's even worse for lower grades: a recent report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation found that 70 percent of 4th-graders can’t read at a level considered "proficient."

Democrats:

Dis FAKE NEWZ!  Ouah skoolz iz doin' jus' FINE, deplorable!  Dey gotta be great cuz almos' ebry skool an' skool board iz run by Democrats!  We be turnin' out egzackly duh kind of students (and voters) duh nation needs!  Well, at least duh pipo WE need.  So SHUT UP!

Now: Most readers believe the story here is crappy Democrat-run schools and a ghastly waste of tax dollars.  No:  The real story is that you never heard a word about this in the Lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media--and never will.

That should anger you.  But not a single Democrat will be angry or dismayed--because they don't believe it's true.  Cuz as they reason it, IF it were true, duh Mainstream Media wudda sed so, eh?  An' Mainstream Media din' say nuffin'.  And a core belief of stupid people is that "If duh Mainstream Media din' say it, it mus' not be true--cuz duh media's job is to tell us whut's happening, right?"

No, dumbshit, duh Media's job is to support the Democrat partei, period.

Source:

https://futurism.com/future-society/college-students-losing-ability-read 

Every picture tells a story

 

Democrat wailer: "Dis mus' be fake!  Too perfect to be real!  Mus' be AI!  Yeh, dat's it." 

After the job was done, Trump invited ALL the workers to the White House, gave 'em all MAGA hats, and autographed every one of 'em.  From his extensive building experience Trump knows these guys are what make the economy thrive, and he was delighted to show his personal appreciation! 

 

But surely bribem and Obozo invited construction crews to the White House to show their appreciation for... Oh wait...

Nation shocked as jury rules...

 

Every picture tells a story, eh?

 

Cuz it IS ouah strength, right?  I mean, dat's whut duh  Democrats an' Media tell us, every day, 24/7, right?  So MUST be true!  Cuz why wud dey lie about dat? 

The future is determined by actions today. Wait...

 

Of course if you're a Democrat you sneer at that notion: You believe all the illegal invaders ("undocumented Americans") make the U.S. better.  But how, specifically, do you claim the nation better off for bribem allowing 11 million illegals to enter the U.S. during his four years in the White House?  

Typical Democrat: 

>>"Well, ouah government needed to spend money on something other than duh military an' police!  An' woke, enlightened wimmen know dere are too many white children.  An' dey know frum movies an' TeeVee dat raisin' chirren iz not only hard, but slows their rise to bein' CEOs, an' dat wud be AWFUL!  So woke wimmens don' wanna have any, or maybe one at most.  

So SEE?  We NEED all doze immigrants to keep wages down an' rents high!  Dat jus' basic economics, citizen!  Duh "Laws of Supply and Demand," eh?

Besides, today, thanks to ouah Partei's faaabulous policies, wimmen don' need to put up wif' men!  See, gummint gibs wimmens ebrything dey needs, so why would any woman put up wif' a man?  It's so obvious, deplorables!>>

<<Thanks, Democrats!  Now that you explained it to us, it makes perfect sense.

 

As fatal stabbings increase in the UK, the leftist govt tells citizens how to respond

As the number of UK citizens being fatally stabbed by immigrants mounts each day, Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government tells Brits how to respond:

 

Like Obozo and bribem, UK Labour [sic] pols have admitted millions of "immigrants" from Africa and the Middle-east, cuz the pols knew the "immigrants" would vote Labour, and wanted those votes, just as Obozo and bribem did.

If you keep up with events in the UK and all of Europe, you know how well this has worked out, eh?  Wait, y'say you have no idea?  That you've never heard anything about fatal stabbings in the UK and Europe?

Oh that's right: you only get your "newz" from the alphabet networks and lying liberal rags like the NY Times and WaPo.  Now it makes sense. 

America and "oppression"

 

Yet another example of how leftist DA's in crime hell-holes ensure more murders

Democrats are morons who deserve the future they've already created.  Latest example: 

Philadelphia is a Democrat-ruled shithole of crime.  Since 1952 the mayor of that crime-ridden cesspool has been a Democrat.  For the math-challenged (i.e. most Democrats) that's the last 74 years.

Last Saturday night (June 6) a 22-year-old white Penn State student left a bar near his home, on foot, when--as the shithole pro-Democrat propaganda agency CBS spins it--two "people" approached him and stole his phone.

Surveillance video shows that the two "people" were black, but CBS refuses to tell you that in what they bleat is their "reporting" of the story.  That's not an accident or an oversight: Just like the network's flagship propaganda mill "60 Minutes," their job is to NOT report any news that might damage the Democrat Partei [sic]. 

By contrast, even though the story should have been about the murder of the unarmed, innocent white student, CBS chose to fawn over Democrat DA (former public defender, corruptocrat elected by Soros money) Larry Krasner:

While District Attorney Larry Krasner was talking about an increase in his office's budget to make Philadelphia safer, CBS News asked about the tragic circumstances of what happened to Schmidt.

"It resonates with me, too," Krasner said. "Crime is going to continue in human existence.  The real question is, how do you manage it?  Are you managing crime, reducing victimizations?"

Ah yes: "How do you manage it?"  What does Krasner actually DO about "victimizations"?  He repeatedly releases known thugs back on the streets without making 'em post bail.  Repeatedly offers plea-bargains reducing serious crimes to time served (days).  He sees his job as letting black thugs off.

If the races were reversed--if two white thugs killed a black man during a robbery--Krasner would put a max effort into finding and prosecuting the killers.  But here--with blacks murdering a white college student after stealing his phone?  Crickets.

This is how all Democrats approach black-on-white crime: yawns.  Excuses.  Rationalizations.  "The victim shouldn't have been out at night."  Or "That 66-year-old grandmother on the Atlanta light rail at noon probably did something to provoke her assailant."  (She was murdered--stabbed repeatedly.)

Or "It's sad that that poor 23-year-old blonde girl in Charlotte who 'lost her life' after a black career criminal stabbed her in the throat three times, from behind was just in the wrong place at the wrong time." [Iryna Zarutska never said a word to her murderer.  There was no interaction until the moment he fatally stabbed her three times.]

Even AI softens its description of her murder to protect the female Democrat mayor (who did her own damage control by asking local media NOT to air thek ghastly, sickening surveillance-camera video that captured the entire murder):  But AI refuses to call it "murder," instead substituting "...tragically lost her life."  Like losing your car keys, eh?

This is the life Democrats--helped by leftist judges and DA's--have created for all Americans.  And the entire Mainstream Media--the alphabet networks, NY Times, WaPo, all big-city papers--cover for the Democrats.  They bleat words of concern, but actually support every Dem policy.  You know that because not a single Mainstream Media outlet ever prints or broadcasts a single word of criticism of the clearly stupid, moronic, shitty, pro-thug policies of the Democrat Partei.

Source: CBS


https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/billy-schmidt-shooting-penn-state/