Did Chitcongo mayor Brandon Johnson really say this?

 

Checking to see if this is real.  Certainly something we'd expect this communist piece of shit to say. 

Why are the Dems blocking the SAVE Act?

 

Which is why Democrats in the senate have been blocking it. 

CBS "Newz" (i.e. total bullshit) has an "expert" on to bleat that "Neither side controls the Strait of Hormuz

Imagine a kid who loves throwing rocks at cars passing under a bridge.  Does that kid "control the Interstate"?

According to the scum-sucking communist whores at CBS, he would.

In a minute you'll see the relevance. 

Trump understandably understands "negotiation" in the way he's familiar with: When one side is holding a losing hand, but sees an offer of a better result, they take the latter, eh?  But Trump has never studied war, and his advisors control the briefings he gets.  So when the doves and pro-muzz advisors urged him to stop beating the hell out of Iran's military forces and to negotiate, he understandably agreed--because in business, it's a totally normal, familiar thing.

Unfortunately in war (which, again, Trump has understandably never studied) against a totalitarian regime, an offer by the far stronger side to negotiate is ALWAYS seen as a sign of lack of resolve to win--i.e. as weakness.

If you don't believe that, go study war for a decade or so and get back to me.  It's an area you almost certainly know NOTHING about, and neither does CBS nor 95% of the morons in congress.  Seriously, other than historians, who bothers to study war, eh?

Rational leaders of a NON-totalitarian regime, seeing they're badly over-matched militarily, reason "Let's take whatever deal the other side is offering.  After all, look how well it worked out for Germany and Japan, eh?"  

By contrast, the rulers of a totalitarian regime have a far different calculus: They lose NOTHING by ordering their troops to keep fighting for as long as possible--because the leaders risk nothing by doing so.  By contrast (!), surrendering gets them killed by their own people, if not hanged by the victorious opponent.  (If you need examples try Mussolini, or the Ceausescus.) 

So if totalitarian rulers have NO motive to surrender, but every motive to order their people to fight til the end, there's only one solution: demand unconditional surrender, as we did with Nazi Germany and imperial Japan.  

But because Trump has (understandably) never studied war, AND because his closest  advisors seem to be similarly unaware, they thought the mullahs would eagerly jump on a U.S. offer of a "negotiated settlement."  Plus Trump's advisors stupidly believed offering a ceasefire while the settlement was negotiated would get Democrat leaders and the Dem-fellating Media to lighten up.

How well has that worked out for you dumb sons of bitches, eh? 

Here's what doesn't work: You DON'T tell the mullahs "If the IRGC attacks shipping, we'll bomb X," because whatever X is, it's not hitting the IRGC decision-maker, eh?  So you end up sending million-dollar "drone boats" (literally, that's the reported cost) to blow up a single $50,000 pier.  Stupid.

Instead you announce that unless they surrender unconditionally, their entire infrastructure will be destroyed--all the bridges, rail, powerplants.  Will this make things fairly miserable for the civilians who now support the regime--as it sure as hell did for citizens of Germany and Japan in WW2?  Of course--which is the whole point--because as long as the people of Iran support the regime's leaders, those leaders will order the nation to keep fighting, eh?

It was and is obvious to everyone who pays attention the Democrat partei hates Trump and will oppose everything he proposes or undertakes--including any effective action against the mullahs ruling Iran.  (As the joke goes, if Trump found the cure for cancer, the next day Democrats would be organizing protests to defend cancer and impeach Trump.)  So the mullahs knew (and know) that if they can manage to hold on thru the mid-term elections, if the Dems win control of congress they'll force Trump to surrender.

Imagine if in late 1944 one U.S. political party had announced to the world "We are totally against continuing this pointless, cruel, costly war against the innocent people of Germany and Japan, and if we win the election we promise to negotiate a settlement to end this awful war."

Do ya think that would encourage the rulers of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan to keep ordering their troops to fight on?

If you have to think about that, you're too damn stupid to breathe without help, and the perfect Democrat voter.

So now, because of his several prior offers to negotiate (likely pushed by advisors) Trump is now in a corner: Today is July 14th, and with the elections on Nov. 3, if the mullahs haven't surrendered by roughly October 1st it'll be too late--because voters have heard Trump say "We have a peace deal" too many times now, only to see the Iranians keep attacking ships, or demanding tolls or saying "But Iran controls the Strait, now and forever."  Any of that sound familiar?

So because they've succeeded in stringing Trump along for months, after 1 October or so, voters understandably won't believe any claims that "we've got a peace deal"

The "Iran conflict" offers many lessons.  Unfortunately the only one Democrats will. learn is to welcome the DSA into their "tent," confident that with the DSA's help the Dems will win in November and ever afterward.

When Democrats re-take the presidency and congress, if the mullahs sent an atomic bomb to New York harbor on a container-ship and detonated it, the Democrat prezzy would refuse to retaliate in ANY way--because "There's no way to know which container held the bomb, or who sent it."  If you doubt that, look at the thousands of leftist/pro-tranny commenters who claim there's no way to prove that Tyler Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk because there is no video of him firing the fatal shot.  Yes, despite four confessions from TyTy, they're seriously claiming that.

They wouldn't retaliate even if the mullahs claimed they did send the bomb, because two or three cunning Dems would say "NOooo, dey iz jus' kiddin'!  Dey din' reeeally bomb New York, jus' like bin Laden didn't do 9/11!  (It wuz an inside job, y'know?)  Dey jus' sayin' they did it to make us react!  Yeh, dat's it!"  

And so it goes.  I think Trump's advisors will probably succeed in convincing him to take the inevitable next offer of "negotiation" from the lying mullahs, which will ensure a Dem win in November--which in turn tips over LOTS of other dominoes.  See, it's well known that weakness triggers war.  What's less widely known is that just the perception of weakness often does the same thing.

Can't wait to see what happens. 

Totally real

 

Dems: "Can't we all just co-exist?"

 

Democrats "elites": "Dat iz a VERY Islamophobic thing to say, deplorable!  Only a quarter of Muslims polled said murdering infidels and raping their children was fine.  The rest are like, totally peaceful!"  

"It's really tragic that only a quarter of the world's 1.6 Billion Muslims give all the rest a bad name.  An' we're sure the rest would speak out against killing infidels, but unfortunately that would be against the teaching of the Holy Koran, which would mean a death sentence.  But they would if not for dat.  Really."

Democrat pols and Media elites are still bleating that Iran wuz NEVAH working to build an atomic bomb, despite the mullahs' own admissions that they had "60%-enriched uranium."  (If you don't understand what that means, look it up.) 

This is in the UK, so it can't possibly be relevant to us here, right?

 

Oh wait...Obozo and bribem opened our borders to between 15 and 25 million illegal aliens (11 million just during bribem's four years), which now cost us around $200 Billion a year to support.  

But don't worry, deplorable: dis not costin' yew any money, cuz we jus' borrow it from Chyna!  See?  An' if you went to a public school you know borrowed money is FREE!  Yew don' evah hafta pay it back!  At least dat whut duh gummint implies, eh?

So SHUT UP, deplorables!  Leave the bidness of government to your betters, like Chuckie Schumer, Nanzi Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Bernie Sanders, AOC, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Cory Booker, Chris van Hollen, "DaNang Dick (Richard Blumenthal), Hank Johnson, Al Green (do ya even know who he is?), Rosa Delauro, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and the rest.

See, yew can't believe numbers, cuz "maff beez raaaaaacis'!"  The Democrat communists who run the Washington state skoolz literally said that, so mus' be true, eh?  Yew don't need maff to build St. Peter's, or the Eiffel Tower, or the Pantheon, or Hoover Dam, or a Boeing 747.  Yew jus' smoke dope, get a $100-million gummint grant, and voila!

An' if yew can't get a six-figure salary for teaching DEI or "wimmins studies" or African studies or "interpretive dance," yew iz bein' oppressed, citizen!  Find your local EEOC rep and get 'em to sue for ya!  (Wait, now dat TrumpHitler is kang, duh EEOC not doin' dat no mo', so now yew gotta get duh ACLU to sue fo' ya.) 

See, Amerikkka beez oppressive an' raaaacis' an' sheeit!  Dat why all doze liberal white wimmen got on MSNBC or MS-GFY an' tol' ya celebratin' duh 250th birthday of duh country made 'em all sick!  Don' aks 'em why dey still here instead of livin' in a socialist paradise.  See, dey iz makin' a huge sacrifice fo' duh cause of destroying America by continuin' to live in dis awful country!

This is the new Democrat partei.  It's whut all duh "cool kidz" are voting for! 

Have ya evah noticed that no one ever flees TO a socialist paradise?

 

Democrats: "NOOooo, dis fake newz!  Americans and Europeons constantly flee to Socialist utopias like Cuba and China cuz life is SO much bettah there!  Reeeally!  Duh proof iz in duh numberz!  Every flight from the U.S. to Cuba was totally full of Americans seeking a far bettah life there!  Dat why duh eeeebil TrumpHitler regime ordered flights stopped, cuz duh full planes wuz makin' Trumpies look bad!  Reeelly! 

"See, ebry year a million young Americans flee to China, cuz dey gits ebryt'ing free there, wifout havin' to slave away in some 9-to-5 slave job!  In China if yew wanna start a bidness puttin' on 'Drag Queen Story Hour' at the local library, yew don' get no pushback frum local homophobes!  If yew wanna provide 'gender-affirming healthcare' to Chinese kids, duh gummint will support dat!  At least all my frenz say dey will!  

"See, duh U.S. is oppressive, repressive, built on stolen land, built wif slave labor!  Socialist countries don' haz none o' doze problems!  An' dey got free housing an' free healthcare!  Yep yep yep! 

 

Just coincidence, citizen

 

Joe Rogan: "Do ya think it's just a coincidence that the loudest, most furious anti-ICE protests were happening in the capital city of the state with the multi-billion-dollar fraud?"

Liberal run in terror as...

 From the Babylon Bee.  Those people are good! 

If you don't like what you see Muslims doing every day, you're "Islamophobic"

 

Democrats:  "NOOooo!  All cultures are totally equal!  Islam is duh religion of peace!  Reeeally!  Yew may have heard dat dere holy book sez dey mus' rule duh world, but dat probably just a bad translation.  Yeh, dat's it. 

"An' some Islamophobes claim Muslim men throw acid in the faces of women.  Dat not true!  But if it is, yew know American Christian men do that too!  Yep yep yep. 

"An' yew may have seen stories about Muslim dads or moms killing their daughters for dressing like slutty American girls.  Dis also fake newz!  Nevah happen!  Jus' a right-wing conspiracy story!

"An' yew may have heard dat Muslims hate dogs.  We don' know nuffin' bout dat.

"An' yew may have heard dat in duh Islamic Republic of Britain, 250,000 white girls were 'groomed' and used for sex by gangs from Pakistan.  Dat absolutely fake!  Made up by UK conservatives to get 'em to vote for right-wing parties!  Yep yep yep!

"An' yew may have heard dat some nice Muslim pipo in Minnesota got a few dollars to fight hunger or autism or start daycare centers or take po' pipo to doctors offices, or elect Keith Ellison as the state attorney-general.  Duh Trumpies are jus' pickin' on 'em cuz dey Muslim, an' din' file paperwork right!  Yep yep yep! 

"Yew deplorables are jus' xenophobic!  And Islamophobic.  Yep yep yep!  Dat's it. 

And they have. Great job, Democrats!

 

Childhood: has it changed? If so, who changed it?

 

But we were too un-woke to notice that we were being "deprived" of childhood fun!  

Interesting--nevah noticed dat befo'

 

Good question

 

SURELY even a total commie would nevah actually SAY dis, right?

 

Irony, or "stupidity meets reality"?

 

Huge numbers have a kind of "inertia"

Even if you haven't taken physics, you probably have some idea of the concept of "inertia."  It's the tendency of moving objects to keep going in the same direction, and how much work it takes to get 'em to change speed or direction.

For example, a 140-car freight train can weigh between 15,000 and 20,000 TONS, and takes over a mile to stop.  A loaded super-tanker can weigh over 600,000 tons and has lots more inertia.

But non-physical things, like societies, have a kind of inertia too.  Like fads or "TikTok challenges" or sex-change surgery for minors.  Or people deciding it's more fun to live off welfare than to work.  And that's what I'd like to examine here.

For the last 60 years the percentage of U.S.-born working-age (16 to 64) men not working or looking for work has increased almost every year. 

In April of 1960 it was 11.3 percent.

In April of 2000 it was 16.9 percent--up 5.6% in 40 years.

In April of 2024 it was 22.1 percent--up another 5.3% in just 24 years. 

As of this month there are 38 million U.S.-born men who are not working AND not looking for work.  With the exception of a tiny few who do self-employed pickup work or are living off mom and dad, most of those not "in the workforce" are likely either living on one of the many welfare programs, or thru criminal activity.

What do ya think the annual COST to the U.S. is of both parts of this group is to the economy?

Over this same period the number of immigrant men in the labor force INcreased by 14.1 million. 

Note that "unemployment" doesn't count people who aren't working AND not looking for work. 

The tie to "inertia" is that barring war or another Chyna virus, the preferences of tens of millions of people take a long time to change.  And a huge factor in that estimate is the rate of increase of the "Not in workforce" group: it increased by 5.6% in the 40 years between 1960 and 2000, but then by another 5.3% in just 24 years.  So in recent years it's increasing at a faster rate, which suggests that this particular attraction is drawing people faster than before.

So what do ya think is driving it?  Dems wail that workers are "discouraged" cuz so many couldn't get generous salaries with a degree in womens' studies or similar.  While that could be a minor factor, I think the far bigger one is that welfare and various Social Security disability scams have made grifting so much more attractive.

Example: 26 years ago I briefly dated a very smart, attractive gal who preferred getting stoned all day to working.  But so personable--could charm the birds out of the trees.  She found a Social Security guy and claimed she had ADD or ADHD or whatever the trendy qualifying disability was, and he instantly "awarded her" $2,000 a month for life--with cost-of-living increases.  And this was back in 1999.

She told me the story 16 years later--still cashing those monthly "disability" checks.  Proudly showed me all her SS paperwork.

Multiply that by 38 million. 

Source.  

https://cis.org/Report/WorkingAge-Not-Working-1960-2024 

Tim Walz pardoned non-citizen child rapist to shield him from deportation

Conservatives keep noting endless examples of Democrat rulers doing everything they can to prevent illegals and non-citizens invited to stay by Dem prezzies from being deported, even after they've been convicted of raping a child, or murder.

Democrats claim that's fake newz--just another "right-wing conspiracy story," eh?

Well here ya go:  An example from ten days ago, in the Peoples' Republic of Minnesota. 

A 42-year-old Laotian national convicted of repeatedly raping a child was given a total pardon by Minnesota's Democrat governor--and former Dem VP nominee--Tim Walz.

It started with Minnesota's utterly leftist, Dem-ruled "Clemency Review Commission," which voted 4-2 to grant a pardon to Laotian national Tou Lue Vang after he was convicted in 2006 of repeatedly raping a girl for 2 years, beginning when she was 10 years old.

Lest you think he was framed by eeeebil conservatives:  He admitted it.

Due to his conviction Vang was ordered deported in October 2006.  But because Laos at the time refused to accept returns of its deported nationals from the United States, Vang got to stay in the U.S.

However, under pressure from the U.S, last year Laos finally began accepting a limited number of deportees from the United States.

Uh-oh.  All moonbats on deck!  The Dems on the "clemency review commission" worried that duh po' child rapist might be deported.  Heaven forbid!  So they recommended the child rapist be pardoned by the governor due to...wait for it..."immigration concerns."  

Lest you think I made that up: documents show that each of the four members who urged he be pardoned actually wrote that they were worried that he might be deported.

Next stop was the state's "Board of Pardons."  If you naively think this is an actual "board" composed of ordinary citizens, guess again: The "board" consists of the utterly goofy communist Walz, the Muslim attorney-general Keith Ellison, and the chief justice of the state's supreme court, Natalie Hudson.  Apparently all three voted to give Vang a full pardon.  

For young Americans: This is how leftist-ruled states work: everything signed off by Dem-ruled boards, with the goal of protecting ALL illegals in the U.S. from being deported.  All perfectly legal, citizen!

Vang entered the U.S. in 1994 and was granted permission to stay by the Clinton administration. Between 2002 and 2004, when Vang was between 18 and 20 years old, he had sexual intercourse with the victim four to six times, beginning when the victim was ten years old.

After he was arrested, the family of the by-then 12-year-old victim pressured her not to cooperate with law enforcement.

A jury sentenced Vang to 12 years in prison.  But in yet another instance of never-identified forces intervening to release Democrat criminals, that seemingly reasonable sentence was..."stayed," meaning vaporized, replaced by ONE year of "local confinement" and 30 years of "supervised probation."

But then in yet another of those mysterious gifts to  non-citizen rapists, Vang ended up serving just eight months. 

Oh, and about the jury sentence of 30 years of "supervised probation"?  That was mysteriously vaporized early in 2019.  Nice to have unseen frenz in govt, eh?

None of this is by accident.

After he was arrested, Vang told police, "I made a mistake, but this is a minor thing.  It's a cultural thing in Thailand to marry and have sex with girls as young as 12." 

Note how Vang throws in "to marry," to win over moonbats who claim "all cultures are equal."

Vang also said the victim should ALSO be arrested..."because she was as much at fault."

Despite this, several commissioners noted that the victim was reported to support a pardon for Vang.  No pressure from the family, eh?

Commissioner Nadine Graves--who voted for the pardon--wrote, "The victim supports this pardon.  [Vang’s] wife stayed and has forgiven. He also [has] immigration concerns. He has remorse and was discharged from probation."  

Who ended his probation, and why?  Ooohhh, sorry, no record of dat--at least not that you'll be allowed to see, deplorable.

Graves wrote that Vang "retracted his prior statement about this being a result of culture. He admits this was wrong then and will always be wrong."  Ahhh, "retracted" his earlier real belief in favor of saying what he needed to say, eh?

In his application for a pardon, Vang wrote that he  was facing a final order of removal from the U.S. He said he was worried that because he left southeast Asia at age 12, if he was deported he "would be sent to a place entirely unfamiliar to me, with no family, no home, and no future."

Classic move: portray the rapist as victim if duh mean ol' oppressors deport him.

Vang wrote, "My fear is that if deported, my children will grow up without a father, like I did" and "I will do all I can to be here and to protect them from the outcomes of my deportation."

Ahh, even more heart-wrenching: if he's deported, his children will be victims.  Yes, we get it.  And after the midterm elections I predict the ACLU will sue the Trump administration for depriving dis po' man of his constitutional rights for not allowing him to take another 20 years to appeal his deportation. 

The ACLU would have sued already, except defending a child rapist might cost the Dems a few dozen votes.  Or would have if the story was widely known.  

Fortunately the Dems don't have to worry about that.

Source. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exposed-docs-reveal-why-tim-walz-board-awarded-repeat-child-rapist-pardon-no-future 

Black activist in Minnesota suggests making white cemeteries into dog parks

Those of you who pay attention may remember when a horde of leftist moonbats invaded a church in Saint Pau, MN during a service.  One of the invaders was a Minneapolis-area BLM organizer named Chauntyll Allen. 

After the Minneapolis Park Board voted to close a city dog park because it was adjacent to supposedly sacred Indian land, Chauntyll had a suggestion:

“Why don’t we just make dog parks at white Christian cemeteries?  Leave indigenous land sacred and piss on the white corpses.”

Note that Chauntyll Allen was elected to the St. Paul School Board in 2020.  People like her control what teachers are hired or not renewed at public schools--thus influencing what children are taught in school.  

Minnesomalia is insane.  But residents of both Minneapolis and St. Paul seem fine with it.

Source: Moonbattery 

Who dis?

If you're a fan of Hollyweird you know all about what I'll be telling ya.  But being totally unconcerned about anything coming out of the shit-hole since 2010 or so, I had no idea. 

The person below is Ellen Page--an attractive, seemingly average actress.  IMDB says her most recognizable role was in "Inception" with DiCaprio.  (Had to look that up.)

 

So...Try doing a search for "Ellen Page."  Vanished, totally.  And of course you Hollyweird fans already know why: Ellen decided to became "Elliot."

Literally every search for "Ellen" gives "Elliot."  It's hard to find a pic of Ellen.  But one thing for sure: every "cool kid" article on Elliot positively gushes over how faaabulous the decision to "transition" was.  See, tons of men declare they're women, but far fewer women claim to be men, and none as prominent as Ellen.  And while well over 90% of those gushing over Ellen's sex-change are female, a few of the fawners are male.  Hmmm...

So how'd it work out for Ellen, eh?  Why just faaaaabulously, dahling! 

This is NOT Rachel Maddow

 

And as proof, she got cast in a bit part in the faaaaabulous remake of The Odyssey--the one that stars a black female as Helen of Troy, who legend says was "the face that launched a thousand ships."  See, that director knows how to CAST, dude.  And ALL the critics are absolutely GUSHING over the thing, cuz it beez SO woke!  So brave! 

End times, folks.  End. Times.