sf says...

CNN posts a piece "pre-debunking" Trump's speech for tonight

Trump is slated to give a speech tonight, and the betting is that it will involve massive election fraud by Democrats in 2020. SO...CNN has already written the "pre-bunking" article:

President Donald Trump is expected to use his televised address Thursday to press what he will frame as new information on foreign efforts to influence US elections – the latest in what election observers have warned is a campaign to sow mistrust and try to undercut [?] his 2020 loss.
Trump has faced criticism for seeking to undermine faith in elections and denying results, and state elections officials told CNN they are watching closely, fearful he might use the prime-time speech to do so again.
The US intelligence community released a report assessing that the Russian government meddled with an influence campaign “denigrating” President Joe Biden and “supporting” Trump.
Some say worry that Trump might sow doubt about future elections. [sic; either "say" or "worry" shouldn't be there]

Ohh, absolutely, morons: Given a choice between "denigrating" either Trump or bribem--meaning tacitly supporting the other--CNN wants you to believe Putin would rather support America-first Trump instead of the known bribe-taker bribem?

It is to laugh. Utterly absurd horseshit. Ask your Dem friends who is more pro-military, pro-America, Trump or bribem? Then after they say Trump, ask which one Putin and Xi would rather have running the U.S. Easy answer, but too hard for Democrats.

The secretary of state for the Democrat-ruled shithole state of Washington, Steve Hobbs, told CNN. “We can assume that he’s gonna say crazy things.”

Oh, y'mean like claiming tens of thousands of fake ballots were counted?

Y'mean like claiming tens of thousands of mail-in ballots were counted that didn't have signatures matching those on file? Or any sigs at ALL? Those kinds of fraud? Cuz we wouldn't want Americans to think there was any fraud in ouah presidential and congressional elections, right?

Iowa's secretary of state told CNN he hoped to tune out the speech.

The next Dem counter-move will be to bleat that IF there wuz any election fraud, it wuz done by the eeeebil Rethuglicans, by "suppressing minority votes!" Yep yep yep! See, actual U.S. citizens who weren't white were skeered into NOT dropping their ballot into a mailbox! Cuz duh Rethuglican KKK might see 'em!

Not the real KKK, of course, which was founded and composed of Democrats. Dat KKK is long gone, citizen, an' haz been replaced by Rethuglicans! The SPLC haz all duh proof!

Srsly y'all. Look at the hundreds of sworn affidavits from 2020 alleging Rethuglican vote fraud! Oh wait, there aren't any. "Oh but there must have been! Doze affidavits musta' been seized and shredded by pro-Rethuglican court officials! Yep yep yep!"

AI sez in the 2008 election, Obozo got 69,498,516 votes, while in 2012 he got 62,611,250 votes. By contrast, in 2020 bribem was credited with 81,283,000 votes.

For the maff-challenged that would mean bribem got almost 12 MILLION MORE votes than the wildly popular "first black president" got in hiz first election, and a staggering 18.5 MILLION more than barky got in his second election. But dat perfekly reasonable, deplorable, cuz duh faaabulous Joe was SO much mo' popular den duh first black prezzy, right? Joe was SO articulate an' smaht, so it totally reasonable dat he got so many mo' votes than barky. No fraud needed!

In 2020 Trump had dozens of rallies that drew over 50,000 attendees, while bribem stayed in his basement. When he timidly ventured out, it wasn't to crowds, but to literally 25 friendly Dem reporters who sat inside white circles 8 feet apart (bribem's staff wuz extra-careful).

Dems claim bribem could have had rallies of 50,000-plus, but just chose not to--cuz he "believed duh Science," eh?

Ah, not to worry, citizen! Duh Media an' duh Dems haz spoken, an' dey say dere wuz NO fraud in 2020! So it does NOT mattah whut any investigation may find. In fact duh Dems have tried to block EVERY investigation seeking to examine ballots for obvious fakes.

And of course if Democrat pols and election workers had nothing to worry about, why not welcome all investigations, to reassure Americans that there was no fraud, eh? Cuz now CNN just claimed Trump is trying to "sow doubt about future elections," which wouldn't be possible if the Dems hadn't blocked ALL investigations into fraud after 2020, eh?

Not to worry, ~~comrade~~ deplorable: Logic can't be allowed into this debate. Dems an' duh Media haz decreed, an' yew will accept dere ruling.

Source: CNN

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/07/16/politics/trump-primetime-election-speech-debate

NY Times blasts "profit" and capitalism for success of foreign EVs

The leftist, Democrat-fellating rat-bastards at the NY Times absolutely HATE capitalism, and profit--if made by an American company.

Profits made by foreign companies don't bother 'em. And there you see the telltale: it ain't that the bastards hate profits, just profits made by American companies. What does that tell ya?

SO...yesterday the Times ran a LONG piece wailing about the U.S. auto industry. The piece starts by wailing that U.S. companies are realizing that Americans aren't dazzled by doze faaaabulous 'lectric cars, so U.S. companies have been losing money on each one they sell. As a result, they're bailing out.

"OMG, dis beez absolutely AWFUL!" wails the Times propagandist.

Hey cupcake, EVERY automaker outside of Chyna has been scrapping faaaabulous EV projects. But you refuse to publish THAT, instead choosing to blame capitalism, and "duh crazy focus on profits." Cuz profits beez eeeeebil!

Oh wait, only profits by American companies, eh?

Fuck you, you communist sons of whores.

Now, I'm not at ALL a fan of big corporations: Like ALL bureaucracies they're full of incompetent suck-ups who can barely spell "cat." The execs are good at telling the boss whatever they think he wants to hear, so innovation is rare.

SO...starting around 1970 or so, Japanese car makers started making huge inroads into U.S. car sales. Why? Because they made great products that got good fuel economy and cost a bit less. And the smaller size (4 passengers) matched the smaller size of younger American familes.

*No one saw that coming.* Japan built small cars because Japanese families rarely had more than two children--which is why they've been below the "replacement rate" for decades. They made what worked in Japan, and it happened to match an emerging U.S. trend that's now become almost universal.

[Ask AI "What was the first U.S. car-maker to make electric cars?" AI answer:
>>General Motors (GM) made the first modern, mass-produced electric vehicle (EV) from a major U.S. automaker. They released the two-seater GM EV1 in 1996. Drivers could only lease these cars in specific states. GM ended the EV1 program in 2003.]
[AI says Tesla sold its first EV five years later, in 2008.]

The NY Times quotes a communist "auto reporter" named Martin Padgett, about U.S. automakers cancelling EVs: "We did a U-turn while the rest of the world was pushing forward.” “It was blinkered thinking, of course. It was an attempt to maximize profits.”

There ya have it again: duh nutty U.S. companies wanted to make a profit! How crazy, right?

Let's review: according to [propagandists], in 2025 a quarter of all cars sold around the world was electric. Okay, fine. But thanks to high union wages, U.S. carmakers can't make EVs as cheaply as foreign makers, including Chyna. So as long as the imports are praised by "reporters"/reviewers, what do ya think happens, eh?

Of course: Americans buy the less-expensive imports. Anyone shocked? Yeah, didn't think so.

Now follow me here: "Be it ever thus!" This is how everyone in the world benefits from innovation. Excellent for the world, but challenging for high-skilled, high-cost societies like ours.

Imagine "auto reporter" Martin Padgett's employer emailing him: "Marty, baby, we're having to compete with foreign reporters, so we'd like you to take a ten percent pay cut to help out. You're fine with that, right?"

Hahahahaha! Of course not. And U.S. carmakers are in the same situation: not only will the unions refuse to take a pay cut, they continue to demand annual raises. Totally understandable. And because they'll strike if they don't get their way, the employer caves--and all the others do too.

Where does this leave us? Chyna's "BYD" carmaker makes tiny cars for far less than unionized U.S. companies can. Those cars match the smaller U.S. family size (now averaging just 1.4 kids per white female over her lifetime). Can anyone predict the outcome?

Yeah, thought ya could. And yet the NY Times--and crack "auto reporter" Martin Padgett--blame capitalism and the profit motive. Cuz duy Times won't blame rapacious unions, nor high taxes, nor absurd workplace rules. Jus' "profits."

But just profits by *American companies.*

The Times quotes a "senior economist with a Washington-based nonprofit (Stephen Ezell) as estimating that as of 2024 only one-third of all new cars bought in the U.S. were built by the Big Three." No surprise there. But then the Times preaches this:
>>The EV revolution was seen as a way to reverse that trend--an opportunity for Detroit to rediscover its capacity for ingenuity and to re-establish credibility.>>

SEE, stupid capitalists? Yew had dis faaabulous opportunity to "re-discover credibility," but instead yew cancelled yo' faaabulous EV projects! Shame!

And then comes the predictable knife from the Times: They bleat that the cancellations come at a time "before the chaos in the Strait of Hormuz helped push the price of unleaded gasoline to a four-year high."

SEE, stupid U.S. car makers and voters? It's all Trump's fault!

The rest of the Times piece fellates Obozo and the Democrats for their fawning support for EVs--almost entirely driven by their goal of killing U.S. oil and gas production. The Times credits the vegetable bribem for the $7,500 taxpayer-funded "credit" paid to EV makers to cut the sale price of their cars--meaning if you never buy an EV you still pay for the "credit" for those who do.

Are Democrats great or what? See, it's perfectly fine for Democrats to subsidize (distort) markets to get what they want. Conservatives aren't allowed to do that, of course, but dat perfekly fine wif Dems an' duh Media, eh?

Just another day ending in Y, eh citizen?

Source: shitty NY Times communists

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/magazine/electric-cars-american-evs.html

DSA posts their list of demands (which they call a "program")

The DSA released their newest propaganda piece last night. Highlights of their demands/programs:

Bills: you don’t really have them anymore. You have no debt. You don’t need health insurance. You don’t pay a mortgage or have a landlord, because comfortable housing is a human right. Your retirement is publicly funded. Food, education, energy, medicine, and transportation are no longer for-profit businesses; they are common goods and utilities.

By "common goods" the communists mean "free to you." Problem is, no good or service is really "free." As even the dimmest moron should be able to grasp (!!), it always costs something to produce any "good" or provide a service. Goods and services don't just reproduce themselves, like illegal invaders.

If you don't understand that obvious concept, the DSA or communist party or Democrat party is the ideal home for you.

If the "no bills or rent at all" didn't suck in readers, the DSA is just gettin' started!

What if you were free to spend your time how you like, without worrying about the cost, or dreading going back to work? What if you didn’t have to think about paying rent or loans at the end of the month, or saving for college, or affording groceries? What would that be like?

Wow, it's heaven on Erf! Of course commies don't believe in heaven, but they have no trouble at all imagining getting absolutely everything they want for free, eh?

Think over half the American public--and every illegal--would instantly sign up to get all this faaabulous "free" stuff? Damn right they would.

The world is in chaos. But for the bosses, it’s all according to plan. The billionaire class is dividing workers against each other, making us desperate and miserable.

Ohhh yew bet, cupcake: Plumbers and electricians are making six-figure incomes and own bass boats. About 90% of American homes have air conditioning, there are so many new cars on the road that you can't believe so many people are that well off--and yet the DSA claims Americans are "desperate and miserable."

Really? If you're a hard worker but not in a high-skill field, don't try to live in high-rent cities where the price of everything is astronomical. But the DSA wants you to live in their big cities...because you're their foot-soldiers.

Rather than fixing our broken healthcare system, [billionaires] push snake oil and circulate conspiracy theories.

Ahh, you mean "conspiracy theories" like hundreds of billions of dollars defrauded from Medicare and Medicaid, in dozens of Democrat-ruled states? And can you give us an example of what you claim is "snake oil"? Do you claim getting states to stop letting food stamps be used to buy sugary snacks and sugary drinks instead of healthy food is "snake oil"? Do you claim kicking able-bodied people who simply refuse to work off food stamps is "snake oil"?

We know complete victory will require building a new society from the ground up.

Or as one DSA bitch famously WROTE (so she can't deny it), "The total eradication of western civilization"? The whole thing reads like a child's fantasy: "You can have all the candy you want, free! And no buzz-kill parent telling you you can't have any before dinner!"

They demand "feminism for all" (what the fuck does that even mean?), "de-fund the department of war (the military)," "Free Palestine," "nationwide rent control," "free college for all," "abolish ICE." The list of demands is almost endless. And of course free healthcare, including "reproductive and gender-affirming care." For young Americans, "reproductive healthcare" is Democrat bafflegab for "free" (i.e. taxpayer-funded) abortion.

"Abolish the senate." And don't just abolish the electoral college method of electing the president (a scam pushed by Democrat states for years, to elect the prez by popular vote), but abolish presidential elections altogether! Instead the prez would be chosen by congress. Congress would also appoint all Supreme Court "justices," meaning packing the court with communists.

If that wasn't radical enough for ya, they demand a ghastly piece of shit election RULE called "ranked-choice voting," which is an open invitation to fraud. It demands that voters vote for five or six candidates (though that could be expanded) in order of the voter's preference. Then if your first choice wasn't one of the top three vote-getters, invisible, unaccountable "poll workers" assign all your votes to the person you ranked second. Repeat as often as needed. So your vote may be "awarded" to the person you ranked last. But dat beez democracy, commie style! The system is so convoluted that no one would EVER be able to prove massive fraud--which is why the DSA (and many state Democrat parties) support it.

De-fund police "as steps towards fully abolishing the police and prisons." Ahh, so if there's no punishment for committing any type of crime, what do rational people think will happen, eh? But the commies bleat that cops and prison and judges "protect the rich and jail the poor." Ahh, so ya claim po' pipo are forced to steal, and are jailed simply for being poor? Sure. It's easier to steal for a living than getting a job, right, communists?

Hey you dumb sons of bitches, are there still cops in Russia and China? DO tell us! Wait, let us guess: You're gonna claim Russia and China aren't REAL communism, eh?

The DSA is like a university where all the professors are 12 years old. They understand nothing real, but can string words together well enough to convince other dumbshits that a) everything can be free; b) no one needs to work if they don't want to; and c) there's no such thing as "cause and effect," or "the laws of supply and demand."

It's not just that the LIST of demands is endless, but also that the communist rat-bastards demand that all of it be FREE! Except nothing is free. Communists just throw that word around because that's the thing that makes their scam irresistible to leftist dumbshits.

Think they're done yet?

Not even close: They demand that the government take over "the largest corporations and essential industries to ensure democratic control." But notice how cunningly they camouflage how that would be paid for: "Establish public ownership..."

"Establish," eh? Just wave the communists' magic wand, right? "And we said 'Let there be light!' And there was light." No buyout, just...confiscation. Of course "confiscation" may strike a few Americans as kinda harsh, so totalitarians never call it that, but something that sounds way bettah: "Nationalization." Ahh, so much nicer!

"Enact aggressive wealth taxes on the richest individuals and corporations, and spend on public goods and infrastructure." Note the proposed tax isn't on income, but on wealth. And the inevitable result is what happened decades ago in the UK: owners of fabulous castles and estates signed up with the socialists to put their property into "the public trust" forever, and now they continue to live there but the cost of maintaining the faaabulous home and grounds is paid by...the government. With money collected from taxpayers. Wow, nice.

Except gradually people begin to realize that under the DSA, you don't need to work to continue to eat and live in your free housing. People stop working, cuz under the DSA you can get paid for not working. Plus you don't need much money when housing, food, medical care, electricity, water, gas, cable TV and internet are all FREE, eh? Just need enough cash for a couple of liters of booze and a box of weed a week.

Of course the DSA believes ebrywun will keep working. Ol' Karl Marx said it: "From each according to his ability..." See, under communism they don't pay you more for working harder, but you win medals and paper awards. The only people who get vacation homes and cars are higher-ranking Partei members.

Think that gets a lot of power-hungry hard-chargers to join the Partei? Damn right it does.

Eh, read the whole "program." It'll only take you ten minutes, and you really need to know what these communist rat-bastards are up to.

How in the hell did this happen?

How indeed? Answers:

40% of the residents of NYC are aliens; and
A huge majority of ALL NYC residents are Democrats.

They're so fucking dumb that the Democrat-ruled NYC city council has proposed an 18% pay raise for both themselves and the mayor--and no one has the power to stop it!

Did Chitcongo mayor Brandon Johnson really say this?

Checking to see if this is real. Certainly something we'd expect this communist piece of shit to say.

Why are the Dems blocking the SAVE Act?

Which is why Democrats in the senate have been blocking it.

CBS "Newz" (i.e. total bullshit) has an "expert" on to bleat that "Neither side controls the Strait of Hormuz

Imagine a kid who loves throwing rocks at cars passing under a bridge. Does that kid "control the Interstate"?

According to the scum-sucking communist whores at CBS, he would.

In a minute you'll see the relevance.

Trump understandably understands "negotiation" in the way he's familiar with: When one side is holding a losing hand, but sees an offer of a better result, they take the latter, eh? But Trump has never studied war, and his advisors control the briefings he gets. So when the doves and pro-muzz advisors urged him to stop beating the hell out of Iran's military forces and to negotiate, he understandably agreed--because in business, it's a totally normal, familiar thing.

Unfortunately in war (which, again, Trump has understandably never studied) against a totalitarian regime, an offer by the far stronger side to negotiate is ALWAYS seen as a sign of lack of resolve to win--i.e. as weakness.

If you don't believe that, go study war for a decade or so and get back to me. It's an area you almost certainly know NOTHING about, and neither does CBS nor 95% of the morons in congress. Seriously, other than historians, who bothers to study war, eh?

Rational leaders of a NON-totalitarian regime, seeing they're badly over-matched militarily, reason "Let's take whatever deal the other side is offering. After all, look how well it worked out for Germany and Japan, eh?"

By contrast, the rulers of a totalitarian regime have a far different calculus: They lose NOTHING by ordering their troops to keep fighting for as long as possible--because the leaders risk nothing by doing so. By contrast (!), surrendering gets them killed by their own people, if not hanged by the victorious opponent. (If you need examples try Mussolini, or the Ceausescus.)

So if totalitarian rulers have NO motive to surrender, but every motive to order their people to fight til the end, there's only one solution: demand unconditional surrender, as we did with Nazi Germany and imperial Japan.

But because Trump has (understandably) never studied war, AND because his closest advisors seem to be similarly unaware, they thought the mullahs would eagerly jump on a U.S. offer of a "negotiated settlement." Plus Trump's advisors stupidly believed offering a ceasefire while the settlement was negotiated would get Democrat leaders and the Dem-fellating Media to lighten up.

How well has that worked out for you dumb sons of bitches, eh?

Here's what doesn't work: You DON'T tell the mullahs "If the IRGC attacks shipping, we'll bomb X," because whatever X is, it's not hitting the IRGC decision-maker, eh? So you end up sending million-dollar "drone boats" (literally, that's the reported cost) to blow up a single $50,000 pier. Stupid.

Instead you announce that unless they surrender unconditionally, their entire infrastructure will be destroyed--all the bridges, rail, powerplants. Will this make things fairly miserable for the civilians who now support the regime--as it sure as hell did for citizens of Germany and Japan in WW2? Of course--which is the whole point--because as long as the people of Iran support the regime's leaders, those leaders will order the nation to keep fighting, eh?

It was and is obvious to everyone who pays attention the Democrat partei hates Trump and will oppose everything he proposes or undertakes--including any effective action against the mullahs ruling Iran. (As the joke goes, if Trump found the cure for cancer, the next day Democrats would be organizing protests to defend cancer and impeach Trump.) So the mullahs knew (and know) that if they can manage to hold on thru the mid-term elections, if the Dems win control of congress they'll force Trump to surrender.

Imagine if in late 1944 one U.S. political party had announced to the world "We are totally against continuing this pointless, cruel, costly war against the innocent people of Germany and Japan, and if we win the election we promise to negotiate a settlement to end this awful war."

Do ya think that would encourage the rulers of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan to keep ordering their troops to fight on?

If you have to think about that, you're too damn stupid to breathe without help, and the perfect Democrat voter.

So now, because of his several prior offers to negotiate (likely pushed by advisors) Trump is now in a corner: Today is July 14th, and with the elections on Nov. 3, if the mullahs haven't surrendered by roughly October 1st it'll be too late--because voters have heard Trump say "We have a peace deal" too many times now, only to see the Iranians keep attacking ships, or demanding tolls or saying "But Iran controls the Strait, now and forever." Any of that sound familiar?

So because they've succeeded in stringing Trump along for months, after 1 October or so, voters understandably won't believe any claims that "we've got a peace deal"

The "Iran conflict" offers many lessons. Unfortunately the only one Democrats will. learn is to welcome the DSA into their "tent," confident that with the DSA's help the Dems will win in November and ever afterward.

When Democrats re-take the presidency and congress, if the mullahs sent an atomic bomb to New York harbor on a container-ship and detonated it, the Democrat prezzy would refuse to retaliate in ANY way--because "There's no way to know which container held the bomb, or who sent it." If you doubt that, look at the thousands of leftist/pro-tranny commenters who claim there's no way to prove that Tyler Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk because there is no video of him firing the fatal shot. Yes, despite four confessions from TyTy, they're seriously claiming that.

They wouldn't retaliate even if the mullahs claimed they did send the bomb, because two or three cunning Dems would say "NOooo, dey iz jus' kiddin'! Dey din' reeeally bomb New York, jus' like bin Laden didn't do 9/11! (It wuz an inside job, y'know?) Dey jus' sayin' they did it to make us react! Yeh, dat's it!"

And so it goes. I think Trump's advisors will probably succeed in convincing him to take the inevitable next offer of "negotiation" from the lying mullahs, which will ensure a Dem win in November--which in turn tips over LOTS of other dominoes. See, it's well known that weakness triggers war. What's less widely known is that just the perception of weakness often does the same thing.

Can't wait to see what happens.

Totally real

Dems: "Can't we all just co-exist?"

Democrats "elites": "Dat iz a VERY Islamophobic thing to say, deplorable! Only a quarter of Muslims polled said murdering infidels and raping their children was fine. The rest are like, totally peaceful!"

"It's really tragic that only a quarter of the world's 1.6 Billion Muslims give all the rest a bad name. An' we're sure the rest would speak out against killing infidels, but unfortunately that would be against the teaching of the Holy Koran, which would mean a death sentence. But they would if not for dat. Really."

Democrat pols and Media elites are still bleating that Iran wuz NEVAH working to build an atomic bomb, despite the mullahs' own admissions that they had "60%-enriched uranium." (If you don't understand what that means, look it up.)

This is in the UK, so it can't possibly be relevant to us here, right?

Oh wait...Obozo and bribem opened our borders to between 15 and 25 million illegal aliens (11 million just during bribem's four years), which now cost us around $200 Billion a year to support.

But don't worry, deplorable: dis not costin' yew any money, cuz we jus' borrow it from Chyna! See? An' if you went to a public school you know borrowed money is FREE! Yew don' evah hafta pay it back! At least dat whut duh gummint implies, eh?

So SHUT UP, deplorables! Leave the bidness of government to your betters, like Chuckie Schumer, Nanzi Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Bernie Sanders, AOC, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Cory Booker, Chris van Hollen, "DaNang Dick (Richard Blumenthal), Hank Johnson, Al Green (do ya even know who he is?), Rosa Delauro, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and the rest.

See, yew can't believe numbers, cuz "maff beez raaaaaacis'!" The Democrat communists who run the Washington state skoolz literally said that, so mus' be true, eh? Yew don't need maff to build St. Peter's, or the Eiffel Tower, or the Pantheon, or Hoover Dam, or a Boeing 747. Yew jus' smoke dope, get a $100-million gummint grant, and voila!

An' if yew can't get a six-figure salary for teaching DEI or "wimmins studies" or African studies or "interpretive dance," yew iz bein' oppressed, citizen! Find your local EEOC rep and get 'em to sue for ya! (Wait, now dat TrumpHitler is kang, duh EEOC not doin' dat no mo', so now yew gotta get duh ACLU to sue fo' ya.)

See, Amerikkka beez oppressive an' raaaacis' an' sheeit! Dat why all doze liberal white wimmen got on MSNBC or MS-GFY an' tol' ya celebratin' duh 250th birthday of duh country made 'em all sick! Don' aks 'em why dey still here instead of livin' in a socialist paradise. See, dey iz makin' a huge sacrifice fo' duh cause of destroying America by continuin' to live in dis awful country!

This is the new Democrat partei. It's whut all duh "cool kidz" are voting for!

Have ya evah noticed that no one ever flees TO a socialist paradise?

Democrats: "NOOooo, dis fake newz! Americans and Europeons constantly flee to Socialist utopias like Cuba and China cuz life is SO much bettah there! Reeeally! Duh proof iz in duh numberz! Every flight from the U.S. to Cuba was totally full of Americans seeking a far bettah life there! Dat why duh eeeebil TrumpHitler regime ordered flights stopped, cuz duh full planes wuz makin' Trumpies look bad! Reeelly!

"See, ebry year a million young Americans flee to China, cuz dey gits ebryt'ing free there, wifout havin' to slave away in some 9-to-5 slave job! In China if yew wanna start a bidness puttin' on 'Drag Queen Story Hour' at the local library, yew don' get no pushback frum local homophobes! If yew wanna provide 'gender-affirming healthcare' to Chinese kids, duh gummint will support dat! At least all my frenz say dey will!

"See, duh U.S. is oppressive, repressive, built on stolen land, built wif slave labor! Socialist countries don' haz none o' doze problems! An' dey got free housing an' free healthcare! Yep yep yep!

Just coincidence, citizen

Joe Rogan: "Do ya think it's just a coincidence that the loudest, most furious anti-ICE protests were happening in the capital city of the state with the multi-billion-dollar fraud?"

Liberal run in terror as...

From the Babylon Bee. Those people are good!

If you don't like what you see Muslims doing every day, you're "Islamophobic"

Democrats: "NOOooo! All cultures are totally equal! Islam is duh religion of peace! Reeeally! Yew may have heard dat dere holy book sez dey mus' rule duh world, but dat probably just a bad translation. Yeh, dat's it.

"An' some Islamophobes claim Muslim men throw acid in the faces of women. Dat not true! But if it is, yew know American Christian men do that too! Yep yep yep.

"An' yew may have seen stories about Muslim dads or moms killing their daughters for dressing like slutty American girls. Dis also fake newz! Nevah happen! Jus' a right-wing conspiracy story!

"An' yew may have heard dat Muslims hate dogs. We don' know nuffin' bout dat.

"An' yew may have heard dat in duh Islamic Republic of Britain, 250,000 white girls were 'groomed' and used for sex by gangs from Pakistan. Dat absolutely fake! Made up by UK conservatives to get 'em to vote for right-wing parties! Yep yep yep!

"An' yew may have heard dat some nice Muslim pipo in Minnesota got a few dollars to fight hunger or autism or start daycare centers or take po' pipo to doctors offices, or elect Keith Ellison as the state attorney-general. Duh Trumpies are jus' pickin' on 'em cuz dey Muslim, an' din' file paperwork right! Yep yep yep!

"Yew deplorables are jus' xenophobic! And Islamophobic. Yep yep yep! Dat's it.