An oddity in a video interview

Last week Fox aired an interview with a retire vice-admiral on the Iran situation.un-edited full interview on Fox with retired vice-admiral Robert Harward.

Here's the entire Fox interview, unedited. 

The real Harward is on the right. 

Notice the curious dark rectangle just above the vee of his shirt of the man on the left.  Democrat commenters quickly assured viewers that this was "simply a shadow," but were unable to say what was blocking the light to make such a sharply-defined and...interesting... shadow.  For example, when "Harward's" mouth moves, both the upper and lower edges of the "shadow" move in sync, as if the "shadow" was an inverted image of his mouth--less teeth.  But no one explained how that could happen.

Nevertheless, Democrats absolutely assured everyone that such "shadows" were, like, totally normal, happened all the time!  "Just an artifact of the compression software used to make digital TV use less bandwidth," eh?  Sure.  Except no one has shown any evidence of such an "artifact" appearing before.

The most common claim was that the person on the left was NOT retired vice-admiral Harward, but someone else wearing a mask, and that the "shadow" was the bottom edge of the mask.  As to why the alleged impersonation crew would be so totally sloppy, the conspiracy-minded explained it as "they *want us to know,* as a means of intimidation."

Now, I have no idea if this is the real guy or an impersonator, or why anyone would want to impersonate Harward.  But I did notice one thing in the enlarged pics: the eye color.  The real Harward has blue-gray eyes, while the guy on Fox clearly has brown eyes.

Beats me what's going on.  But from the clear difference in eye color, seems we're back to "Why would a skilled agency be that sloppy," eh?  What's the motive?

Source:

The only official admission that Obozo paid the Islamic regime $1.7 BILLION in cash 5 months before he left office

For Americans who don't believe this ever happened, here's CBS Newz, August 24, 2016--just five months before the end of Hussein Obozo's godforsaken 8 years in power: 

U.S. paid $1.3 billion to Iran two days after cash delivery

August 24, 2016 

The Obama administration said Wednesday it paid $1.3 billion in interest to Iran in January to resolve a decades-old dispute over an undelivered military sale, two days after ordering $400 million in cash flown to Tehran.  [CBS said "allowing" instead of "ordering" because it makes Hussein look less responsible and corrupt.]

State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau wouldn't say more about the Jan. 19 payments "because of diplomatic sensitivities."  The Obama administration made 13 separate payments to the mullahs, each of $99,999,999.99, and a final payment of about $10 million.  The president's Treasury Department refused to explain why each of the individual payments [CBS said "transactions" to blur the issue] was just one penny under $100 million.

The money settles a dispute over a $400 million payment made in the 1970s by the U.S.-backed shah’s government for military equipment. The equipment was never delivered because of the 1979 Islamic Revolution that overthrew the Shah and ended diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Iran.

Two days before the Jan 19th payments, on Jan. 17 the Obama administration paid Iran the $400 million principal--in pallets of actual banknotes: euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currency, raising questions about the unusual payment.  Then two days later the Obama administration paid an additional $1.3 billion as interest on the $400 million over the decades.

The deal has faced increased scrutiny since the administration’s acknowledgment this month that it used the money as leverage to ensure the release of four American prisoners.

Republican critics accuse the administration of paying a “ransom​,” but president Obama denies that claim, though no one has been able to explain why the U.S. paid the $400 million in cash.  President Obama said it was because the U.S. and Iran didn’t have a banking relationship after years of nuclear-related sanctions, but that wouldn’t have prevented using intermediary banks that do business with both countries.

Briefing reporters last week, a senior U.S. official involved in the negotiations said the interest payments were made to Iran in a “fairly above-board way,” using a foreign central bank. But the official, who demanded anonymity, wouldn’t say if the interest was delivered to Iran in cash, as with the $400 million principal.>>

CBS sucks Democrat cock, always, so for the corrupt network to admit the above is an "admission against interest."  If you're a reasonably well educated adult you know this means the admission is the barest admission of the truth that the network felt they could get away with.

Some of us heard about this when it happened.  You almost certainly did NOT hear about it, because the Mainstream Media almost completely ignored it.  This one brief mention was all I could find.

In Germany, 13-year-old school-kids told to design "diverse brothel

You don't live in Germany, so nothing that happens there has any relevance for you, right?

And of course the U.S. Lying Mainstream Media won't ever show you the story below cuz..."Dis not newsworthy!  No relevance to Americans!  NopeNopeNope!"

So you'll never realize what's going on...which is the goal of the leftist/communists who have even taken over Catholic schools.  

At Kardinal von Galen school in Kevelaer, Germany, 13–year-old students were given a "wokie" assignment: to design a "diverse brothel."

See, there's no need to design a regular brothel, cuz it doesn't take any wokie imagination to do dat, eh?  But a "diverse brothel" is FAR more interesting: gotta take into account all of the 128 "genders" the Left insists exist!  So now we're talkin' innovation, eh? 

SO...how to design an "inclusive" brothel--including floor plans!  The worksheet was titled ‘The New Brothel For All!’ and asked students to consider key areas of a "modern house of sexual pleasure.”  Topics to be addressed included

• “What sexual preferences need to be addressed and catered to?”
• “How should a brothel be designed so it can be visited and desired by all kinds of people?” and
• “What should an advertisement for such a brothel look like?”

When the headmistress of the school was called out on this insanity, she bleated the usual justification when moonbats are called out:  Cunningly getting children accustomed to depravity and degeneracy was simply “deliberately designed to be provocative in order to stimulate discussion.”

Of course the headmistress would never even imagine ordering students to suggest how Germany might defend its borders from mass "migration," cuz the Catholic church is totally in favor of that.

Now: You don't live in Germany, and you're not Catholic, so why should you care about this, eh?

Mainstream U.S. Media: "Absolutely!  No reason at all for any concern!  See, duh Catholic church in Germany has NOTHING in common with the Roman Catholic church in duh U.S, right?  It's a totally different thing, citizen!  Oh sure, stupid deplorables squeal that they're the same thing, but that's just nonsense, comrade!"

In nature, animals that refuse to learn, or are slow, are killed and eaten by stronger, smarter animals.  Where does that leave you? 

Yes.  And sadly for you, you deserve your fate--not because you're technically stupid, you're just uninformed.  "Pig-ignorant."  You trusted the Mainstream Media to tell you what you needed to know to survive, not realizing they lied to you about everything.   

Now, societies (like everything else) have "trend lines," and a kind of momentum.  And by all indications I see, the chances of the U.S. surviving in anything like the form you've always known are on the order of one percent.

EVERY country in western Europe is lost: France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands.  Purists will bleat that the U.K isn't part of western Europe, and I won't quibble, but it's lost too.  Eastern Europe is hanging on by a thread, but even stalwart defenders of western freedoms like Hungary and Czechia are under pressure from their subversive leftists.

See, the Left works just like Muslims: when they're trying to look cute and harmless they're like "We're just asking for equal rights!  We wud NEVAH dream of trying to impose ouah values on you, cuz we're all about "freedom of religion!"  In ouah religion women kin wear whutevah dey want!  Reeeally!  An' we iz all about 'free speech,' cuz we're 'duh Religion of Peace,' eh?  Your own Media tells you that all the time, so it must be true, right?  Cuz why wud dey lie to ya?"

"So when your Media sez Iran haz defeated duh U.S. military, yew should definitely believe 'em--cuz dey nevah lied to you before, right?  An' when "your" Media accepts the mullahs' claim dat Iran was NEVAH working on an atomic bomb--despite Iranian negotiators admitting to having 447 kg of 60%-enriched uranium--and "your" media never bothering to tell ya that the ONLY known reason for enriching uranium past ten percent is for a bomb...yew should believe duh Media, cuz...reasons.

You're not stupid, you're just uninformed.  You expected the U.S. media to tell you the truth, but they're Democrat-fellating shills, so that was naive.  So we're back to what happens in nature to slow animals, eh?

And for the hundredth time: I don't have kids, and my six nieces and nephews are all Democrats, so I don't care.  Don't have a dog in this hunt.  If the Democrat partei [sic] and their corrupt Media allies have decided what they want the U.S. and the world to be, more power to ya.  By a near-infinite number of carefully calculated lies, they've almost certainly made the future inevitable.

There was a time when everything was still up for grabs--when informed Americans might have been able to change the outcome.  Perhaps that's still possible, but everything I see says the chances of recovering are slim and dropping by the day.

The tipping point was when Bribem and the Dems allowed about 11 MILLION illegal aliens to waltz into the U.S.--and then flew 'em at taxpayer expense to U.S. cities far from the Mexican border.  Trump tried to deport 'em but was quickly blocked by leftist (Democrat-appointed) judges. supported by a million leftist demonstrators.  They refuse to allow even those who've raped and murdered here in the U.S. to be deported.  What message to ya think that sends to other foreigners wanting to come here, eh?

And the hoot is, Democrats claim what we REALLY need is what they cunningly call "immigration reform," meaning changing our laws to allow the Democrats to admit millions a year legally.  And the Mainstream Media totally supports that.

Half of Americans buy the Dems' bullshit.  They're on display every night on what's passed off as "Newz"--and almost no one pushes back.  Hence my prediction.

Oh well... 

 

As Memorial Day draws to a close...

...I remember classmates who died in training, flying single-pilot jets at 400 mph down narrow valleys on moonless nights--in training.  Young men I teamed with to train incoming freshmen at the Academy who died in plane crashes in Vietnam.  

Those men were the best men I've ever known--the best on the planet.  And those who fought in our other wars knew that feeling.  My father commanded a B-17 for 35 missions...at age 24.

Too many memories of good men lost.  Sadly, it's beginning to look as if it may all have been for nothing: the thugs and morons and druggies and grifters and corrupt pols are throwing it all away, as fast as they can.  As long as they get theirs, they don't care.

Ah well...it was a great, wild ride.  I wish you luck.

 

Did Obozo say this?

I don't know if Saint Obozo actually uttered the quote below but am trying to find out. 

 

Surely this must be a hoax, just like the claim that bribem allowed 330,000 illegals into the U.S. every MONTH.  Too outrageous to be true, right?

Just like the cunning Dem op that 51 former U.S. intel agents said Hunter Bribem's abandoned laptop was a fake--a Russian intelligence op to help Trump defeat the much more pro-defense Bribem.  Just too outrageous to be true, eh?  Cuz duh FBI had seized the thing and knew it was authentic, but carefully said nothing.

Oh wait, y'say you've forgotten all about those? 

A sad reality--and you all know it's true

 

"We're the media now"

Saw an interesting discussion of where we can get at least fairly reliable, unbiased news today.  And one commenter noted that because of the Internet, "the people have replaced the the Media now.  And those long established former monopolists don’t like that one bit." 

Before the Internet, if something wasn’t reported, as far as most people knew, it didn’t happen. That gave the media a staggering amount of power, which was probably the goal.  

Your local radio and TV stations covered local outrages, and put the big ones on the AP wire or the network feeds.  But the editors and producers who controlled what made it to national news were all liberal Democrats, if not outright leftists.  So anything that make socialism or communism look good, or made capitalism look bad, made it, while any news that went the opposite way didn't. 

Today, if something happens anywhere in the country--even if it's ignored by the local stations and papers--we find out in an hour or so.

And that allows us to compare notes--and names. And we start seeing the same names popping up again and again.

Iranian shills claim "Trump is backing away from the peace deal we agreed to"

Sunday, May 24, 2026, 8pm eastern time: The rats are hitting the newswires with their latest propaganda bullshit: "Trump is backing away from the Iran peace deal!!!"

It's cunning, because there never was a deal.  The mullahs demanded to keep all their enriched uranium, demanded reparations, demanded to control the Strait (implicitly the "right" to demand tolls for allowing costly tankers to transit), and demanded that the U.S. un-freeze billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets.  

Just so there's absolutely no misunderstanding: No one in the U.S. government agreed to ANY of those things.  Ever.  Not even close.  

What happened was that the mullahs had their proxies in Pakistan say nice things, which Trump believed, and thus told Americans that progress was being made toward a deal.  This had been repeated many times over three weeks.  But now the mullahs sprang the trap: "SEE, both sides had a deal that was totally agreed to, but at the last second that warmonger Trump refused to sign it!  And the reason Trump balked was because we'd included a ceasefire in Lebanon (home of Hezbollah), and Netanyahu vetoed that!  So because Trump supports Israel, he's refusing to sign the peace deal the U.S. agreed to!"

It's all lies.  Every word of it.  There's never been any agreement on any of the points noted above, so Trump was ready to unleash the next round of "persuasion" last Monday.  But Muslim countries who claim to be our friends (but secretly support Iran) said "We're really close to a deal, so would you hold off for a few more days?"

Taking them at their word, Trump postponed renewed strikes--which was the entire point of the "We're SO close to a deal" charade.

Problem now is how Trump and company can convince voters that it's all lies, that there was never a deal because the mullahs refused every demand.

It's long been a principle of war that defeated nations don't get to "demand" jack-shit.  Surrender unconditionally and live.  Otherwise you'll be killed.  Simple.  Easy to understand.  

At least it used to be well understood and supported, back when Democrats were pro-America.  Today the Democrats are happy to say and do anything to defeat Trump and re-take all power instead of just most. 

So now that the rats have utterly lied and claimed a deal was reached, and that Trump is backing out because Israel objects to one provision, the rats have Trump trapped regardless of which way he goes: If he blasts the mullahs back into the stone age--a place they richly belong--he'll be called a warmonger, while if he signs the deal actually proposed by the mullahs, the Republican party will be dead for 20 years or more.  

Of course part of this is indeed Trumps fault: He believed the smooth talkers who assured him that "progress was being made" on a peace deal.  Either no one in his inner circle said "Don't believe a word any of 'em say," or else the warnings by people who had experience with the obvious weren't passed along to the boss. 

Anyone with a lick of sense could have seen this ploy coming.  Anyone who studied the political events around the war in Vietnam could have predicted the same game plan: all the North had to do was hold on until the Democrats were able to mount enough pressure to force Nixon to withdraw.  Same thing now.

But there's one significant difference: Back in 1973 the internet didn't exist, so the communists didn't have a good platform to gloat to Americans about defeating the so-called superpower.  But in the last hour I've seen 200 comments from Muslim sympathizers and Trump-hating Democrats gloating that "America lost the war to Iran."  

Wow.  Total delusion.  Trump agreed to a ceasefire to give the Islamic regime time to consider whether they wanted to continue having their launchers and infrastructure obliterated.  They used that ceasefire to claim they won.  And commenters around the world believe them. 

One source, of hundreds: 

Source 2: a moron named Brett Erickson 

The Mainstream Media is carefully covering for the Democrat leader in the race for governor of Cali

Xavier Becerra has been a star of the Dem party for decades, but you'd never know it from the Media articles, most of which only note that Bribem named him to head his HHS.

Becerra got his start in the 1980s as an administrative assistant for a state senator, then as a deputy attorney general of California.  Then in 1990 he was elected to the state Assembly.  

In 1992--after just two years in the state Assembly--he was elected to the U.S. congress, where he stayed for almost a quarter-century: 24 years.  He chaired the congressional Hispanic caucus from 1997 to 1999 and then chaired the House democratic caucus from 2013 to 2017.  Prestigious, powerful posts.

Now, it's been well documented that as long as an incumbent member of congress--particularly a Democrat--chooses to stand for re-election, the success rate is well over 99%.  Even if dogged by serious scandal, they almost never lose.  So it's not unreasonable to wonder why incumbent Becerra resigned from congress in November of 2016--just two weeks after Trump was elected to his first term.

The usual reasons a member of congress resigns is either poor health or "to spend more time with my family."  But in Becerra's case there were no reasons cited.  No offer of a better-paid post as a CEO of a health-insurance company. 

Instead, barely two weeks after Trump was elected in 2016, Becerra resigned and the Democrat governor of Cali appointed him attorney-general of that state, replacing the moronic Cackles after the latter was DEI-lected to the fucking U.S. senate.  And of course after just four years as a senator, Bribem would name Cackles as his VP.  Between that and the steal, the win was ensured.

Certainly an attorney-general has lots of power, but I suspect rational adults would agree that being a state A-G doesn't have remotely as much power as a 24-year congress-creep--particularly one who spent his last four years as chair of the House Dem caucus.  

In other words, we're asked to believe Becerra voluntarily gave up what was almost certainly a lifetime position as a congressman--to be the A-G of California?  That doesn't make sense.

CNN promptly bleated a smokescreen, claiming that "While the move will take Becerra out of congressional leadership, it also sets him up to be a major voice against the Trump administration."

Horseshit.  As the #4 Dem in congress, and a son of Mexican parents, Becerra would have been *far more influential* in opposing Trump had he stayed congress--as the CNN propagandist surely knew.  The bullshit line almost certainly came from Becerra's staff, and the CNN propagandist included it even though everyone knew it was horseshit.

Becerra served as California's A-G for four years.  In 2021 Bribem appointed him to head HHS. 

Now let's look at the race for governor of Cali: As every rational adult American surely knows, a huge majority of Cali voters are Democrats.  So if the election pits a Democrat against a Republican, the result is a sure win for the Dems.  Repubs haven't won a statewide office in years.

But because Cali has been so totally fucked up by decades of Dem rule, this year the two men at the top of the polls for governor were both Republicans.  This is important because a few years ago the greedy Dems cunningly rammed thru a change to election laws to benefit their party:

From the founding of the state, the winners of each party's primaries would face off in the general election.  But the clever, cunning Dems rammed a law thru the Dem-ruled legislature abolishing that!  The new Dem-imposed rule was that the two top finishers in the primaries--regardless of party--would go on to the general election.

This ensured even if the Dem who won the primary was later found to have been involved in a fatal scandal before the general election, a Democrat would still win!  It was brilliant--exactly the type of thing communist leaders do to win elections with a reported 99% of the vote.

With two Republicans at the top of the polls, Democrat rulers were worried that by their own rules, only the two Repubs would advance to the general election.

Oooohh, can't have THAT, eh?  So they pulled out all the stops to get a Dem to displace at least one of the Republicans.

The top-polling Democrat at the time was billionaire Tom Steyer.  Smart guy, articulate.  But Dems worried that their base might not turn out to vote for a billionaire.  So they started boosting Becerra, who had the immigrant vote in the bag--both parents of Mexican origin, one born in Mehico.

And sure enough, Becerra is now either #1 or 2 in the polls.  And #2 is fine, cuz in the general all low-info and "migrant" voters will vote for the Dem regardless.

"This is what democracy looks like," eh? 

"Woke" training replaces merit at our service academies, thanks to Democrats

Very few civilians know that every candidate nominated for general or admiral must be personally approved by the president.  The relevance will be clear in a bit.

Since Obozo was elected in 2008, he and bribem and congress-creeps have been pushing DEI.  In fact if you recall, Obozo campaigned on a promise to "fundamentally transform this country," and during his 8 years in the White House he and his lackeys only promoted generals who totally supported woke DEI policies. 

This was brilliant, because once installed as commanders, the "woke" generals understandably promoted only officers who were equally "woke," and so on right on down the line.

Cuz what better way to "totally transform this country" than to cripple our military by forcing all service members to support DEI principles to win promotion, eh?

The Air Force Academy has an Association of Graduates, and asked 'em about this. Here's how Academy grads responded:
>>
"So-called 'critical race theory,' woke policies, and DEI have no place in the military, let alone at our nation's service academies.  And since no generals are willing to do the right thing, the last remaining defense of meritocracy falls to organizations like the [Association of Graduates]." 

“Supporting meritocracy and fidelity to the US Constitution are a large part of what's made America uniquely great.  But now it seems our entire military--including the Academy--has replaced those great ideals with political correctness--DEI and similar.  This is why I no longer recommend young people join the armed services.
   If a company wants to embrace DEI, fine, because failure of that company won't hurt the nation.  But if the military continues to promote based on woke ideology instead of merit, the nation will eventually pay a ghastly price.” 

“3 sons, but I can't recommend the Academy to them. When this institution gets back to high standards, removes woke ideology and political correctness, great.” 

“When I first heard about the woke agenda permeating all the service academies, my first reaction was “This is going to get a lot of young people killed.” Why?  Because eventually our military will have to fight against warriors who aren't crippled by political correctness.  Once Obama started promoting only generals who supported DEI, it was all over.” >>

<<DEI was imposed at all the service academies because corrupt Dem presidents Obozo and bribem only promoted officers to general if they embraced DEI.  Those who didn't, didn't make general.  Didn't take long for the word to spread.
   In turn the "woke" generals promoted officers under their command who enthusiastically supported the same woke policies.  Keep this up for years, and today almost the entire officer corps is totally woke.  Those who disagree with DEI have learned to keep quiet and simply parrot the "politically correct" line.)<<

>>“Agree that political correctness and DEI have replaced combat readiness as the sole objective of the Academy and the Air Force. And like the entire government, the service academies followed the orders of Democrat presidents.  We need to return to our original and intended purpose.  We fought long and hard against Marxism but it seems the top brass is supporting the dark side.”

“Woke ideology must be eliminated from our entire culture, but ESPECIALLY from the service academies! Anyone who thinks DEI is a good idea should be FIRED.”

“Mandating 'politically correctness' is contra to the ideals and purpose of the Air Force Academy. The institution exists to create the next generation of leaders, warriors, and defenders of the Constitution and its rights. You can either do the job, or you can't.”

"Meritocracy is paramount to an effective force.  This DEI stuff has eroded the warrior mentality and needs to stop.”

“Eliminate the DEI Marxist political ideologies, propaganda and policies that are fundamentally anti-American. Stop the social engineering policies that have nothing to do with making the Air Force more lethal and effective at defending America.  Educate cadets on why America has been great and unique in history, and why it's worth fighting to defend the U.S.”

“I've been disappointed by the decision of the commanders at the Academy to advance their careers by promoting political correctness and social engineering, force "woke" training on cadets and young officers.  Our military needs to be based on merit and excellence, not political correctness.”

“I was outraged to learn that during orientation cadets were urged to avoid using terms like “mom” and “dad.”” 

“Pushing DEI is killing the AFA as it has so many other organizations.” >>

<<We'll see what happens.  Problem is, colonels are submitted for promotion by higher-ranking officers, not by the president.  So even with Trump as president, they can nominate just "woke" candidates for promotion to general, so Trump may not be able to reverse the rot. 

EU rules that a Hungarian law barring the media from pushing LGBT crap to minors is illegal

The dictators ruling the EU--headed by the ghastly Ursula von der Leyen--are hell-bent on imposing homosexuality and transsexualism on European kids, pushing even harder then Democrat politicians here in the U.S.  The question is why?

Of course you think that's just a "right-wing scare story."  Too outrageous to be true, eh?  Then consider a recent example;  The government of Hungary passed a law barring the media from pushing LGBTQ-related content to minors.  Last month the laughably mis-named EU "Court of Justice" (as opposed to the usual courts of "Injustice," eh?) decreed that the Hungarian law "violated EU law and the bloc’s core values."

So it's clear not only that the top court in the EU supports letting the media push pro-LGBT propaganda to kids, but also that the rulers of the EU have written laws pushing pro-LGBTQ crap.  

So why would the rulers of the EU be pushing LGBT crap so stridently?

A bit of research finds that the EU's rulers drafted the union's "LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2026–2030," which has the brazen goal of pushing "gender identity recognition" (rules to avoid offending trannies) and bans "conversion therapy" which helps young people shake off their delusion that boys can become girls.  

Several Democrat-ruled U.S. states have already banned "conversion therapy."  So schools and the Media are free to convince captive students about the faaabulous wonders of tranny life, but it's illegal for anyone to try helping 'em shake off the delusion, eh?

So the question remains: why have the rulers of the EU been pushing LGBTQ so hard?

There are two answers, and they're so obvious even a Democrat could figure 'em out.  But if you're a citizen of an EU country and try to talk about either one, you'll be charged with a "hate crime."

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/eu-throws-lgbtification-into-overdrive/ 

There's a difference between an "opponent" and an "enemy." Dems don't agree

As all American teens should know, Hakeem Jeffries is the "minority leader" in the U.S. House of Representatives.  He's also a thug.  Watch the short video below, in which he tells a friendly leftist audience that the Democrat plan re MAGA supporters is to "break their spirit." 

 

x 

The murderous face of mental illness, or is it something worse?

Are we in the End Times, when evil and insanity run roughshod over the world, or are we just seeing more examples thanks to cell phones and body-cams?  Hard to know, but here's an example (from April) of a demon seemingly about to murder a 3-year-old child.  Happened outside a Wal-Mart in Omaha.

The demon had stolen the knife in the store, scared off the child's caretaker and left the store with the child in the cart.  When cops arrived she'd already slashed the child in the face and seemed determined to do worse.  By incredible luck she/it was stopped by simultaneous shots from two police officers.

 

Is this caused by drugs?  Mental illness?  Possession?  Could anyone tell the difference? 

The demon had a history of violent behavior, including slashing a neighbor with a knife and setting her father's house on fire.  Last year her public defender had her plead not guilty by reason of insanity, and a leftist judge allowed her to remain free to haunt the streets, which is the only "treatment" liberals will accept.  She was "under a supervised treatment plan."

Those work SO well, eh?  Liberal judges keep letting demons roam free, and eventually they kill some innocent.  At least in this case the demon was unalived and sent back to hell instead of being released again, as happened with Iryna's killer in Charlotte.

Okay, some state mental hospitals were grim, but at least the demons couldn't get hold of knives or kidnap kids.  But liberals forced states to close 'em all, cuz..."unfair," eh?

 

Certainly unfair to their victims.  

City council in Massachusetts orders "shot spotter" system removed, cuz.."unfair!!"

City councils are goofy--magnets for crazy leftists who wanna run things.  In Dem-ruled states most city councils seem to be dominated by crazy leftist Democrats who are experts at wasting tax dollars and opposing anything that would reduce crime.

Latest example:  For the past 12 years the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts has had a "shot spotter" system--microphones on top of poles that detect gunshots.  If 3 mikes detect the sound of a gunshot, the location can be calculated within seconds.

Rational adults might think this would help cops find victims of gunshots and get an ambulance to 'em faster, or maybe even arrest shooters, eh?  But Cambridge is a "we love illegal aliens" shithole.  And illegals and blacks complained that the system "could lead to over-policing of minority communities."

Seriously, leftist residents wailed exactly those words on video at a city council meeting.

Wait, let's review:  Where are most violent crimes committed, eh?  Sure: low-income neighborhoods, because thugs don't wanna have to travel to a wealthy 'hood to rob or kill, cuz...too much work.

But the logic of trying to make high-crime neighborhoods safer doesn't faze leftists, who wail that they're being spied on--because even though the system is only activated by loud sounds (gunshots, eh?), leftists wailed that the system could potentially record conversations.

Of course this could easily be tested and proven to be false, but that wouldn't accomplish the goal of the Left--which wanted the system gone.  No tests needed, eh? 

So last Monday the city council ordered the entire "shot spotter" system removed.

Here's an example of what passes for intelligence among members of city councils, from member Ayah Al-Zubi, chairman of the public safety committee:

“We shouldn’t frame safety only through surveillance or policing. We have to be expansive."

"Expansive," y'say?  This is "word salad."  A.k.a. Kamala-level horseshit, a smokescreen designed to sound thoughtful while removing one more tool used to reduce crime.  And it worked.

Next up in Cambridge:  "De-funding the police."  Cuz "duh po-leece beez arrestin' too many 'undocumented Americans' an' shee-it."  And the proof is right there in the stats: Six percent of the population account for 60% of arrests!  Gotta be cuz of raaaacism, eh?  No other possible explanation. 

Source 

How to end U.S. involvement in Iran--by letting the Democrats have their wish

I see the lying sons of bitches ruling Iran are continuing to try running out the clock on Trump, counting on U.S. Democrats in congress to force him to withdraw U.S. troops from the Straits.  And of course the mullahs are too clever to ask for yet another delay directly, so they get their former Islamic allies to ask Trump on their behalf.

Cuz "we're reeeally close to a deal, just need a few more days."  Sure.  And then a few more after that.

Problem is that the mullahs are using the repeated delays in resuming bombing to make their people believe they've defeated the U.S.  Seriously.

Now think: if you lived under a ruthless dictatorial regime, and you believe it defeated the most effective military in the world, would you wanna try to overthrow the regime that defeated that force?  Don't think so.

Trump may be a good negotiator in business (I don't know), but he clearly doesn't know military history--how you win wars.  Hint: in business deals the execs know when it's time to quit.  They can call it quits because that doesn't involve personal risk.  

By sharp contrast, the rulers of the murderous, dictatorial regime ruling Iran have NO incentive to surrender.  For one thing, no matter if ordinary Iranians are starving in the dark, the rulers always live well: plenty of great food and luxury.  Why would they give up that luxury and power by surrendering?

Trump clearly doesn't realize any of that, so he's treating the negotiations with Iran as if he was dealing with American businessmen.  And if he finally gets tired of the regime's endless bullshit delays and resumes bombing, I guarantee top U.S. Democrat pols and their Media lapdogs will scream that he's being "vindictive," just as they're ALL now screaming "Trump chickened out!!"  

The Media has even parroted the cutesy Dem acronym for it: "TACO"--Trump always chickens out.  So they have him either way, eh?

Clever, cunning Democrat motherfuckers!  May you all burn in hell for eternity.  Wait, how about this: Trump should announce that because the Dems have repeatedly *assured* Americans that Iran was never trying to build a bomb, he'll concede to the Democrats' demand to withdraw U.S. troops--providing Dems sign a key portion of the agreement, below:

"We, the undersigned Democrat members of congress, absolutely assure the American people that we believe Iran's claims that they have no intention of building an atomic bomb, and never did.  We believe their claim that there IS a use for the 1,000 pounds of 60%-enriched uranium they've produced, and we urge that the U.S. allow them to recover all of it, with no restrictions on its use and no inspections or conditions, because we believe Iran's leaders.
  Further, because we undersigned Democrats are totally sure we're right that Iran has no intention to build an atomic bomb, we promise that our party will never allow a future U.S. president to take action to try to prevent any such efforts--because we believe Iran's leaders.
  We believe them over Trump, because they've always been honest in the past.  Also, the CIA assures us we're right. 

  Signed, (all congressional Democrats)

Wonder how many Democrats would sign this, eh?
 

Why has the U.S. offered to send Cuba $100 million in aid when Cuban leaders are demanding "conditions"?

You may have heard that now that Venezuela is no longer supplying Cuba with free oil, Cuba is out of oil, money to buy it, and short of food and medicine.  So now I see the brain-trusts at State are pressuring Trump to give Cuba's corrupt, thieving rulers $100 million in humanitarian aid despite the fact that those same rulers are imposing "conditions."

Here's a great response to that:  "Drop dead."  Socialist systems always go broke, and after they run out of money and exports to cover their imports, for decades they're supported by larger socialist states, like Russia or China, which don't want the world to see a socialist state fail--cuz it makes socialism look like the insane system it is.

For 60 years first the USSR and then Russia supported communist Cuba.  Then when Russia started to reduce its support, Cuba made a deal to send doctors and communist troops to Venezuela in exchange for oil to keep the generators running.

Venezuela had lots of oil, and both Chavez and Maduro needed both doctors and troops, so it was a perfect match.  But when Trump ordered the U.S. military to "extradite" dictator Maduro to the U.S. to stand trial, the other leaders of VZ suddenly saw reason, and ended the deal with Cuba.  Hmmm... 

So with electricity off in most of Cuba, and food and medicine short and terribly expensive, why in the hell would Marco Rubio push to send $100 million to that nation's corrupt commie rulers--especially when they're DEMANDING conditions, eh?

Easy: Because Rubio is of Cuban descent, and understandably wants to "help the po' starving pipo."  I get it, really.  Unfortunately, this just prolongs the misery: the only solution is to totally replace every member of the current regime.  Let 'em go to Russia or China or Buttfuckistan and live on their stolen loot.

Even better, offer every commie apparatchik in the Cuban regime this deal: forfeit half your assets, and you can leave and take the rest with you, without prosecution.  Or you can stay and take your chances.

Any bets on how many will accept the offer to exit? 

Great Democrat ideas

As many of you have probably noticed, once the Left latches onto some goofy idea they never give up on it, even after it's been repeatedly shown to fail at whatever the stated goal was.

For example, if you're old enough you may recall a Dem-pushed program called "midnight basketball."  The claim by Dem pols was that "young men" didn't go out robbing and killing because dey wuz bad, but cuz dey jus' din' have nuffin' else to DO.

Seriously.  So robberies and murders were really your fault, citizen!  But for a just few hundred million dollars or so--almost nuffin'--Dems could fix this, by putting lights on basketball courts, to give deez bored young men something else to do. 

So almost every Dem-ruled city got federal money (i.e. taxpayer dollars) to put up lights on bakkabaw courts.  

And just as the Dems predicted, crime by young males plummeted.

Just kidding.  

Inspired by this huge success, Dem-ruled cities looked for other ways crime could be reduced without having to, y'know, arrest, try and jail offenders.  Dem-ruled Minneapolis led the way, by announcing that city cops would no longer arrest anyone for selling illegal drugs.  Oregon went that one better by legalizing ALL recreational drugs for two years.

And as the Dems predicted, in both states drug crimes disappeared. 

Amazing, eh?

California's Dem-ruled Assembly allowed a "ballot measure" to be approved, saying anyone who stole less than $950 worth of goods in one trip would no longer be charged with a felony, but instead would be given the equivalent of a parking ticket. 

And again the Democrats were right: the number of thefts reported by businesses dropped--since business owners quickly realized no action was ever taken to prosecute and recover stolen goods.

This response by politicians is, of course, absurd. But Democrat pols have found their voters love it. 

The sequence is always the same:
1. When a type of crime committed by "favored groups" becomes widespread, 'Democrats declare that prosecuting that crime is racist, classist or whatever.
2. As that crime becomes more widespread, Dem pols propose to change city or state law or just "policy" so that the crime is now officially ignored.
3. Democrats declare victory.

Thus dozens of big Dem-ruled cities now spend tax dollars to give "free" syringes to I-V drug users.  Of course instead of calling the plans "free syringes" they always call the programs "needle exchanges."  Of course that's nonsense: users don't exchange anything, because admitting you're spending tax dollars to give junkies free needles doesn't play well with normals.

But that's just the start: now Dem-ruled cities are proposing taxpayer-funded "shooting galleries" where junkies can get high in total comfort and safety.  Taxpayer-funded nurses will be there around the clock in case of overdoses.

This is another iteration of the same basic premise as all the other Dem ideas:  By giving junkies a safe place to shoot up, Dems say, your kids will be less likely to find used and dropped needles on beaches or in parks.  

Of course even with needle "exchanges" and shooting galleries, needles still litter the sidewalks and junkies still shoot up in parks--because they know they won't be arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned or otherwise institutionalized. 

Junkies don't take the time to go to the city-run "safe house" to shoot up, they just want to shoot up now.  Violent teenagers and young adults don't take to the streets and beat people up and destroy property because they're bored and lack places to socialize, they assault and rob and kill because they want to--but also because they know they won't be arrested or prosecuted or imprisoned.

As should be obvious, legalizing crime or refusing to prosecute it doesn't make it go away.  Needle "exchanges" don't reduce drug use. Neither did "midnight basketball." 

None of these ideas doesn't work.  Never has and ever will.  But the Left will never stop trying new versions.  So long as there are protected groups the Left wishes to insulate from consequences for crime, some form of this idea will always resurface. It's as predictable as the sunrise.

Source: Ace

Tens of thousands of illegals living in "free" fed housing, despite this being illegal

Because the GOP only has a tiny majority in congress, and 20% of supposedly-GOP congresscritters are really Dem plants ("RINOs"), the Repubs always have to compromise to get enough Dems to pass *anything.*

As a result, Democrats ensure that every law congress passes is chock full of opportunities for fraud.

For example: there's a 3000-page fraud sinkhole called the "Housing and Community Development Act."  Among its seemingly endless pages is a provision establishing a program to give "free" housing to low-income Americans.
   But DeepState bureaucrats realized they could get kickbacks by giving "free" housing (i.e. paid for by tax dollars) to illegal aliens and other ineligible foreigners--some of whom have used the scam for decades. 
   This is illegal:  A 1996 law bars public welfare benefits from going to illegal aliens *and requires HUD housing programs to verify immigration status at the point of application.*  

But official HUD rules have systematically refused to do this verification.  One such rule was written 15 years ago under the Obama administration, and tells fed employees not to require anyone 62 or older to verify their eligibility.  That rule has NOT basis in federal law.  

This has been going on for over 30 years.  But the DeepState is so powerful--and can't be fired--that no one has been able to shut down the massive fraud.

That may be changing.  Under new leadership HUD has identified 25,000 deceased tenants still living in taxpayer-funded housing units, and another 6,000 living confirmed ineligible people getting free housing, and another 200,000 whose eligibility has never been verified.

So *by law,* illegals weren't allowed to get "free" (taxpayer-paid) housing.  But in reality tens or hundreds of thousands are getting this.  And have been for decades.  But because no one ever checked eligibility, no one except the DeepState traitors (and the illegals) ever knew.  Wow.

Source: Ace of Spades

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=419806 

The Democrats and Media oppose more attacks, claiming "a peace agreement is near"

I've always wondered if the Democrat-fellating leftists who run Axios are cunning, lying, scum-sucking, pro-Iranian sons of whores, or merely stupid.

Just kidding: no one could possibly be that stupid.

Axios is totally in favor of endless "peace negotiations" with the Islamic regime because they know the regime is hoping to "run out the clock" to the midterms.  And if the Islamic regime succeeds, and is still in power at the midterms, the GOP will be soundly defeated, and the new Democrat majority in congress (spit) will force Trump to withdraw all troops from the region.  

All the regime had to do to win was to refuse to surrender after the resounding defeat by our extremely skilled military.  If you doubt that, review how the loudly the Dem-fellating Media screamed that our military was "incompetent" when we had to destroy our own planes that were axle-deep in mud after landing in a field to rescue downed pilots.

Instead of being proud of the skill at the rescue, the Dem-fellating media cunningly chose to play up the fact that we had to destroy the stuck planes.

(For those who no virtually nothing about airplanes: no fixed-wing plane has enough power to get out of axle-deep mud.) 

So...Axios and the other lying leftist Media sons of whores are support endless delays, bleating that the Islamic regime is reeeeally trying to "make a deal" for peace.  The truth is that the Islamic regime is confident that with the help of the U.S. Media they can convince voters to vote Dem, and that the Democrat partei [sic] will force U.S. withdrawal--with the mullahs still in power.  

I suspect the Dems are laughing their asses off, because they know they've found a winning strategy: every time Trump gets tired of the Islamic regime's refusal to give up plans to build an atomic bomb, and demands that they be allowed to control the Strait of Hormuz and charge million-dollar-a-ship tolls on tankers, the Media trots out the same bullshit: "Ouah Muslim frenz say duh regime is reeeally close to a peace deal, but dey jus' needs another week or two!"  And if Trump doesn't agree, he's a "warmonger."  "Killing innocent chirren!"  "Doing the bidding of his Israeli masters!"  

Every day that Trump bows to the Dems' and Media's demands by not forcing the regime to surrender unconditionally--by resuming bombing--is a win for the Iranians, the Democrats and their Media fellators.

Bowing to demands by the Media (and Dems) for endless delays will lead to certain defeat for the GOP in November, with the Dems winning control of one or both chambers.  On the other hand, if Trump resumes attacks and is able to force Iran's rulers to surrender, the Media and Dems will bleat that he's a murderous warmonger and a puppet of Israel, so voters may give the Dems control either way.  But at least that path offers a chance of the U.S. winning.  Unfortunately I don't see any indication that any of Trump's advisors realize this.

Source: Dem shill site Axios 

https://www.axios.com/2026/05/20/trump-netanyahu-call-iran-peace-plan 

Mainstream Media TOTALLY avoided any mention of CIA whistleblower testimony re Covid

A week ago a CIA whistleblower named James Erdman III testified before congress that his agency supported the corrupt, lying scum-sucking piece of shit Fauci in the latter's bullshit claim that the Chyna virus evolved totally naturally, by random mutation, instead of being modified at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to make it lethal to humans.

That should have been a devastating revelation.  So how many stories did ABC, CBS and NBC broadcast about that shocking testimony, eh?

Try asking vaunted, totally unbiased (horseshit) AI "How many stories have abc, cbs and nbc broadcast on James Erdman III testimony before congress?"

The answer?  Zero. 

Back in 2020 and 2021 the motherfucking sons of whores who run ALL the alphabet nets slavishly parroted every word uttered by the corrupt gnome Fauci--as did the Washington Post and the New York Times.  ALL of 'em supported every lie he told, including "I never funded ANY so-called gain-of-function research."  So naturally they don't want you to see even a tiny hint that they supported Fauci's brazen lies.

It's a hoot.  The alphabet networks not only supported Fauci's lies, they also made BILLIONS of dollars in ad revenue from Pfizer, Moderna, J&J et al pushing their clot-shots, and are determined that you never see any testimony or read a single story suggesting they were either stupid suckers or willing collaborators.

If you bother to compare the closest "natural" bat coronavirus to covid-19 it's immediately obvious that the are four genetic insertions to the genetic code of the spike protein--all of which make the previously harmless-to-humans bat virus lethal to humans. 

The probability of four perfectly-functional genes--all of which are from the HIV virus and enable the bat virus to "bind" far more effectively to human airway cells--being inserted at precisely the right places into the crucial spike protein of covid-19  is essentially zero.

Less than one week after the first case of the Chyna virus was confirmed in the U.S, a team of Fauci grant recipients (all viral experts) led by Kristian G. Andersen who knew the genetic sequence emailed Fauci to tell him that the virus had almost certainly NOT "evolved naturally."  But less than a week later Fauci replied to Andersen via email, instructing him to write a paper--with a dozen prestigious co-authors--saying exactly the opposite: that the virus HAD evolved naturally.  

Fauci said he'd get it published in a prestige U.K. medical journal.  And sure enough, barely a week after the paper ("The proximal origins of SARS-covid-19") was submitted, it was published in "Nature."

Because we have Fauci's email to Andersen (published by the House Government Oversight Committee), an honest media would demand that Fauci explain why he instructed Andersen to write a paper saying exactly the opposite of what Anderson and his peers had concluded.

But of course the Mainstream Media has done no such thing.  "See, we din' know 'bout dat email!  Nope nope nope!  We din' hear nuffin' 'bout it!  See, we don' pay no attention to nuffin' dat Rethuglican congressional committees say.  Nope nope nope!  We iz WAY to busy makin' duh Democrat Partei look good!"

Y'all have been played for fools.  Fauci used the Lying Media to feed you a bullshit Narrative, and because you (understandably) knew nothing about that field, you ate it up without a moment of skepticism.  And it's not your fault, cuz you don't know fuck-all about genetic codes or viruses or whether the things can "evolve naturally" to make 'em kill humans.

I get it.  Really.  It's not your area of expertise, so you understandably trusted the lying whores of the Mainstream Media--who were determined to support Fauci's lies because he was the highest-paid government employee.  Seriously.  WAY more than the president's salary.

And for the Media, wealth means truth, eh?  (Well, unless a wealthy person is conservative, like Elon.)  The dumb bastards believe everything Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg say, cuz--"dey iz billionaires so dey mus' be honest, eh?"  Amusing.

Of course billionaires are no more trustworthy than your average person.  And the Media is hugely selective in which billionaires it unhesitatingly supports:  witness its fawning coverage of leftist fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried, even after the latter was convicted.  Conversely, look at how the Media buried emails showing that pre-Musk Twatter and Fakebook cooperated with the DeepState-run FBI to delete posts and accounts from users who reported anything that contradicted the Official Narrative that duh "vaccine" was, like, totally safe and effective.  

Mainstream Media: "Oh, you read on a thing called 'the Internet' that a Pfizer researcher said they knew the vaccine caused clots and heart attacks and miscarriages?  No, we assure you that we couldn't find ANY evidence to confirm any of those things."

"Oh, y'say you read that after critics pointed out that 'vaccines' prevented people who took 'em from getting the disease, and that the covid shot didn't do that, the CDC literally changed the definition of a "vaccine" to enable the bribem regime to keep calling the covid shot a 'vaccine'?  We haven't been able to confirm that!"

How much more proof do ya need, eh?  If you're a Democrat, no level of proof will ever be sufficient.  

Now the next coverup: the "vaccine" will be found to cause the long, white, rubbery clot-like structures found in the arteries and veins of heart-attack victims.  The only good news is that if you haven't had problems by now, you're less likely to.  And because the number of people taking the so-called "vaccine" is plummeting, the problem will eventually vanish.

Already the same people who covered for Fauci are claiming these novel, white, rubber structures--carefully named "anomalous intravascular casts" to avoid alarming the public--have always been found during embalming.  It's a lie, but how would anyone outside that specialty know, eh?  The coverup artists fool ya by calling 'em "clots," which are well known and often found.  These new things are totally different: no red cells or platelets, and totally different atomic composition from normal clots.   

Oh well.  Not my problem.  Hopefully not yours either.