There's a difference between an "opponent" and an "enemy." Dems don't agree

As all American teens should know, Hakeem Jeffries is the "minority leader" in the U.S. House of Representatives.  He's also a thug.  Watch the short video below, in which he tells a friendly leftist audience that the Democrat plan re MAGA supporters is to "break their spirit." 

 

x 

The murderous face of mental illness, or is it something worse?

Are we in the End Times, when evil and insanity run roughshod over the world, or are we just seeing more examples thanks to cell phones and body-cams?  Hard to know, but here's an example (from April) of a demon seemingly about to murder a 3-year-old child.  Happened outside a Wal-Mart in Omaha.

The demon had stolen the knife in the store, scared off the child's caretaker and left the store with the child in the cart.  When cops arrived she'd already slashed the child in the face and seemed determined to do worse.  By incredible luck she/it was stopped by simultaneous shots from two police officers.

 

Is this caused by drugs?  Mental illness?  Possession?  Could anyone tell the difference? 

The demon had a history of violent behavior, including slashing a neighbor with a knife and setting her father's house on fire.  Last year her public defender had her plead not guilty by reason of insanity, and a leftist judge allowed her to remain free to haunt the streets, which is the only "treatment" liberals will accept.  She was "under a supervised treatment plan."

Those work SO well, eh?  Liberal judges keep letting demons roam free, and eventually they kill some innocent.  At least in this case the demon was unalived and sent back to hell instead of being released again, as happened with Iryna's killer in Charlotte.

Okay, some state mental hospitals were grim, but at least the demons couldn't get hold of knives or kidnap kids.  But liberals forced states to close 'em all, cuz..."unfair," eh?

 

Certainly unfair to their victims.  

City council in Massachusetts orders "shot spotter" system removed, cuz.."unfair!!"

City councils are goofy--magnets for crazy leftists who wanna run things.  In Dem-ruled states most city councils seem to be dominated by crazy leftist Democrats who are experts at wasting tax dollars and opposing anything that would reduce crime.

Latest example:  For the past 12 years the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts has had a "shot spotter" system--microphones on top of poles that detect gunshots.  If 3 mikes detect the sound of a gunshot, the location can be calculated within seconds.

Rational adults might think this would help cops find victims of gunshots and get an ambulance to 'em faster, or maybe even arrest shooters, eh?  But Cambridge is a "we love illegal aliens" shithole.  And illegals and blacks complained that the system "could lead to over-policing of minority communities."

Seriously, leftist residents wailed exactly those words on video at a city council meeting.

Wait, let's review:  Where are most violent crimes committed, eh?  Sure: low-income neighborhoods, because thugs don't wanna have to travel to a wealthy 'hood to rob or kill, cuz...too much work.

But the logic of trying to make high-crime neighborhoods safer doesn't faze leftists, who wail that they're being spied on--because even though the system is only activated by loud sounds (gunshots, eh?), leftists wailed that the system could potentially record conversations.

Of course this could easily be tested and proven to be false, but that wouldn't accomplish the goal of the Left--which wanted the system gone.  No tests needed, eh? 

So last Monday the city council ordered the entire "shot spotter" system removed.

Here's an example of what passes for intelligence among members of city councils, from member Ayah Al-Zubi, chairman of the public safety committee:

“We shouldn’t frame safety only through surveillance or policing. We have to be expansive."

"Expansive," y'say?  This is "word salad."  A.k.a. Kamala-level horseshit, a smokescreen designed to sound thoughtful while removing one more tool used to reduce crime.  And it worked.

Next up in Cambridge:  "De-funding the police."  Cuz "duh po-leece beez arrestin' too many 'undocumented Americans' an' shee-it."  And the proof is right there in the stats: Six percent of the population account for 60% of arrests!  Gotta be cuz of raaaacism, eh?  No other possible explanation. 

Source 

How to end U.S. involvement in Iran--by letting the Democrats have their wish

I see the lying sons of bitches ruling Iran are continuing to try running out the clock on Trump, counting on U.S. Democrats in congress to force him to withdraw U.S. troops from the Straits.  And of course the mullahs are too clever to ask for yet another delay directly, so they get their former Islamic allies to ask Trump on their behalf.

Cuz "we're reeeally close to a deal, just need a few more days."  Sure.  And then a few more after that.

Problem is that the mullahs are using the repeated delays in resuming bombing to make their people believe they've defeated the U.S.  Seriously.

Now think: if you lived under a ruthless dictatorial regime, and you believe it defeated the most effective military in the world, would you wanna try to overthrow the regime that defeated that force?  Don't think so.

Trump may be a good negotiator in business (I don't know), but he clearly doesn't know military history--how you win wars.  Hint: in business deals the execs know when it's time to quit.  They can call it quits because that doesn't involve personal risk.  

By sharp contrast, the rulers of the murderous, dictatorial regime ruling Iran have NO incentive to surrender.  For one thing, no matter if ordinary Iranians are starving in the dark, the rulers always live well: plenty of great food and luxury.  Why would they give up that luxury and power by surrendering?

Trump clearly doesn't realize any of that, so he's treating the negotiations with Iran as if he was dealing with American businessmen.  And if he finally gets tired of the regime's endless bullshit delays and resumes bombing, I guarantee top U.S. Democrat pols and their Media lapdogs will scream that he's being "vindictive," just as they're ALL now screaming "Trump chickened out!!"  

The Media has even parroted the cutesy Dem acronym for it: "TACO"--Trump always chickens out.  So they have him either way, eh?

Clever, cunning Democrat motherfuckers!  May you all burn in hell for eternity.  Wait, how about this: Trump should announce that because the Dems have repeatedly *assured* Americans that Iran was never trying to build a bomb, he'll concede to the Democrats' demand to withdraw U.S. troops--providing Dems sign a key portion of the agreement, below:

"We, the undersigned Democrat members of congress, absolutely assure the American people that we believe Iran's claims that they have no intention of building an atomic bomb, and never did.  We believe their claim that there IS a use for the 1,000 pounds of 60%-enriched uranium they've produced, and we urge that the U.S. allow them to recover all of it, with no restrictions on its use and no inspections or conditions, because we believe Iran's leaders.
  Further, because we undersigned Democrats are totally sure we're right that Iran has no intention to build an atomic bomb, we promise that our party will never allow a future U.S. president to take action to try to prevent any such efforts--because we believe Iran's leaders.
  We believe them over Trump, because they've always been honest in the past.  Also, the CIA assures us we're right. 

  Signed, (all congressional Democrats)

Wonder how many Democrats would sign this, eh?
 

Why has the U.S. offered to send Cuba $100 million in aid when Cuban leaders are demanding "conditions"?

You may have heard that now that Venezuela is no longer supplying Cuba with free oil, Cuba is out of oil, money to buy it, and short of food and medicine.  So now I see the brain-trusts at State are pressuring Trump to give Cuba's corrupt, thieving rulers $100 million in humanitarian aid despite the fact that those same rulers are imposing "conditions."

Here's a great response to that:  "Drop dead."  Socialist systems always go broke, and after they run out of money and exports to cover their imports, for decades they're supported by larger socialist states, like Russia or China, which don't want the world to see a socialist state fail--cuz it makes socialism look like the insane system it is.

For 60 years first the USSR and then Russia supported communist Cuba.  Then when Russia started to reduce its support, Cuba made a deal to send doctors and communist troops to Venezuela in exchange for oil to keep the generators running.

Venezuela had lots of oil, and both Chavez and Maduro needed both doctors and troops, so it was a perfect match.  But when Trump ordered the U.S. military to "extradite" dictator Maduro to the U.S. to stand trial, the other leaders of VZ suddenly saw reason, and ended the deal with Cuba.  Hmmm... 

So with electricity off in most of Cuba, and food and medicine short and terribly expensive, why in the hell would Marco Rubio push to send $100 million to that nation's corrupt commie rulers--especially when they're DEMANDING conditions, eh?

Easy: Because Rubio is of Cuban descent, and understandably wants to "help the po' starving pipo."  I get it, really.  Unfortunately, this just prolongs the misery: the only solution is to totally replace every member of the current regime.  Let 'em go to Russia or China or Buttfuckistan and live on their stolen loot.

Even better, offer every commie apparatchik in the Cuban regime this deal: forfeit half your assets, and you can leave and take the rest with you, without prosecution.  Or you can stay and take your chances.

Any bets on how many will accept the offer to exit? 

Great Democrat ideas

As many of you have probably noticed, once the Left latches onto some goofy idea they never give up on it, even after it's been repeatedly shown to fail at whatever the stated goal was.

For example, if you're old enough you may recall a Dem-pushed program called "midnight basketball."  The claim by Dem pols was that "young men" didn't go out robbing and killing because dey wuz bad, but cuz dey jus' din' have nuffin' else to DO.

Seriously.  So robberies and murders were really your fault, citizen!  But for a just few hundred million dollars or so--almost nuffin'--Dems could fix this, by putting lights on basketball courts, to give deez bored young men something else to do. 

So almost every Dem-ruled city got federal money (i.e. taxpayer dollars) to put up lights on bakkabaw courts.  

And just as the Dems predicted, crime by young males plummeted.

Just kidding.  

Inspired by this huge success, Dem-ruled cities looked for other ways crime could be reduced without having to, y'know, arrest, try and jail offenders.  Dem-ruled Minneapolis led the way, by announcing that city cops would no longer arrest anyone for selling illegal drugs.  Oregon went that one better by legalizing ALL recreational drugs for two years.

And as the Dems predicted, in both states drug crimes disappeared. 

Amazing, eh?

California's Dem-ruled Assembly allowed a "ballot measure" to be approved, saying anyone who stole less than $950 worth of goods in one trip would no longer be charged with a felony, but instead would be given the equivalent of a parking ticket. 

And again the Democrats were right: the number of thefts reported by businesses dropped--since business owners quickly realized no action was ever taken to prosecute and recover stolen goods.

This response by politicians is, of course, absurd. But Democrat pols have found their voters love it. 

The sequence is always the same:
1. When a type of crime committed by "favored groups" becomes widespread, 'Democrats declare that prosecuting that crime is racist, classist or whatever.
2. As that crime becomes more widespread, Dem pols propose to change city or state law or just "policy" so that the crime is now officially ignored.
3. Democrats declare victory.

Thus dozens of big Dem-ruled cities now spend tax dollars to give "free" syringes to I-V drug users.  Of course instead of calling the plans "free syringes" they always call the programs "needle exchanges."  Of course that's nonsense: users don't exchange anything, because admitting you're spending tax dollars to give junkies free needles doesn't play well with normals.

But that's just the start: now Dem-ruled cities are proposing taxpayer-funded "shooting galleries" where junkies can get high in total comfort and safety.  Taxpayer-funded nurses will be there around the clock in case of overdoses.

This is another iteration of the same basic premise as all the other Dem ideas:  By giving junkies a safe place to shoot up, Dems say, your kids will be less likely to find used and dropped needles on beaches or in parks.  

Of course even with needle "exchanges" and shooting galleries, needles still litter the sidewalks and junkies still shoot up in parks--because they know they won't be arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned or otherwise institutionalized. 

Junkies don't take the time to go to the city-run "safe house" to shoot up, they just want to shoot up now.  Violent teenagers and young adults don't take to the streets and beat people up and destroy property because they're bored and lack places to socialize, they assault and rob and kill because they want to--but also because they know they won't be arrested or prosecuted or imprisoned.

As should be obvious, legalizing crime or refusing to prosecute it doesn't make it go away.  Needle "exchanges" don't reduce drug use. Neither did "midnight basketball." 

None of these ideas doesn't work.  Never has and ever will.  But the Left will never stop trying new versions.  So long as there are protected groups the Left wishes to insulate from consequences for crime, some form of this idea will always resurface. It's as predictable as the sunrise.

Source: Ace

Tens of thousands of illegals living in "free" fed housing, despite this being illegal

Because the GOP only has a tiny majority in congress, and 20% of supposedly-GOP congresscritters are really Dem plants ("RINOs"), the Repubs always have to compromise to get enough Dems to pass *anything.*

As a result, Democrats ensure that every law congress passes is chock full of opportunities for fraud.

For example: there's a 3000-page fraud sinkhole called the "Housing and Community Development Act."  Among its seemingly endless pages is a provision establishing a program to give "free" housing to low-income Americans.
   But DeepState bureaucrats realized they could get kickbacks by giving "free" housing (i.e. paid for by tax dollars) to illegal aliens and other ineligible foreigners--some of whom have used the scam for decades. 
   This is illegal:  A 1996 law bars public welfare benefits from going to illegal aliens *and requires HUD housing programs to verify immigration status at the point of application.*  

But official HUD rules have systematically refused to do this verification.  One such rule was written 15 years ago under the Obama administration, and tells fed employees not to require anyone 62 or older to verify their eligibility.  That rule has NOT basis in federal law.  

This has been going on for over 30 years.  But the DeepState is so powerful--and can't be fired--that no one has been able to shut down the massive fraud.

That may be changing.  Under new leadership HUD has identified 25,000 deceased tenants still living in taxpayer-funded housing units, and another 6,000 living confirmed ineligible people getting free housing, and another 200,000 whose eligibility has never been verified.

So *by law,* illegals weren't allowed to get "free" (taxpayer-paid) housing.  But in reality tens or hundreds of thousands are getting this.  And have been for decades.  But because no one ever checked eligibility, no one except the DeepState traitors (and the illegals) ever knew.  Wow.

Source: Ace of Spades

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=419806 

The Democrats and Media oppose more attacks, claiming "a peace agreement is near"

I've always wondered if the Democrat-fellating leftists who run Axios are cunning, lying, scum-sucking, pro-Iranian sons of whores, or merely stupid.

Just kidding: no one could possibly be that stupid.

Axios is totally in favor of endless "peace negotiations" with the Islamic regime because they know the regime is hoping to "run out the clock" to the midterms.  And if the Islamic regime succeeds, and is still in power at the midterms, the GOP will be soundly defeated, and the new Democrat majority in congress (spit) will force Trump to withdraw all troops from the region.  

All the regime had to do to win was to refuse to surrender after the resounding defeat by our extremely skilled military.  If you doubt that, review how the loudly the Dem-fellating Media screamed that our military was "incompetent" when we had to destroy our own planes that were axle-deep in mud after landing in a field to rescue downed pilots.

Instead of being proud of the skill at the rescue, the Dem-fellating media cunningly chose to play up the fact that we had to destroy the stuck planes.

(For those who no virtually nothing about airplanes: no fixed-wing plane has enough power to get out of axle-deep mud.) 

So...Axios and the other lying leftist Media sons of whores are support endless delays, bleating that the Islamic regime is reeeeally trying to "make a deal" for peace.  The truth is that the Islamic regime is confident that with the help of the U.S. Media they can convince voters to vote Dem, and that the Democrat partei [sic] will force U.S. withdrawal--with the mullahs still in power.  

I suspect the Dems are laughing their asses off, because they know they've found a winning strategy: every time Trump gets tired of the Islamic regime's refusal to give up plans to build an atomic bomb, and demands that they be allowed to control the Strait of Hormuz and charge million-dollar-a-ship tolls on tankers, the Media trots out the same bullshit: "Ouah Muslim frenz say duh regime is reeeally close to a peace deal, but dey jus' needs another week or two!"  And if Trump doesn't agree, he's a "warmonger."  "Killing innocent chirren!"  "Doing the bidding of his Israeli masters!"  

Every day that Trump bows to the Dems' and Media's demands by not forcing the regime to surrender unconditionally--by resuming bombing--is a win for the Iranians, the Democrats and their Media fellators.

Bowing to demands by the Media (and Dems) for endless delays will lead to certain defeat for the GOP in November, with the Dems winning control of one or both chambers.  On the other hand, if Trump resumes attacks and is able to force Iran's rulers to surrender, the Media and Dems will bleat that he's a murderous warmonger and a puppet of Israel, so voters may give the Dems control either way.  But at least that path offers a chance of the U.S. winning.  Unfortunately I don't see any indication that any of Trump's advisors realize this.

Source: Dem shill site Axios 

https://www.axios.com/2026/05/20/trump-netanyahu-call-iran-peace-plan 

Mainstream Media TOTALLY avoided any mention of CIA whistleblower testimony re Covid

A week ago a CIA whistleblower named James Erdman III testified before congress that his agency supported the corrupt, lying scum-sucking piece of shit Fauci in the latter's bullshit claim that the Chyna virus evolved totally naturally, by random mutation, instead of being modified at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to make it lethal to humans.

That should have been a devastating revelation.  So how many stories did ABC, CBS and NBC broadcast about that shocking testimony, eh?

Try asking vaunted, totally unbiased (horseshit) AI "How many stories have abc, cbs and nbc broadcast on James Erdman III testimony before congress?"

The answer?  Zero. 

Back in 2020 and 2021 the motherfucking sons of whores who run ALL the alphabet nets slavishly parroted every word uttered by the corrupt gnome Fauci--as did the Washington Post and the New York Times.  ALL of 'em supported every lie he told, including "I never funded ANY so-called gain-of-function research."  So naturally they don't want you to see even a tiny hint that they supported Fauci's brazen lies.

It's a hoot.  The alphabet networks not only supported Fauci's lies, they also made BILLIONS of dollars in ad revenue from Pfizer, Moderna, J&J et al pushing their clot-shots, and are determined that you never see any testimony or read a single story suggesting they were either stupid suckers or willing collaborators.

If you bother to compare the closest "natural" bat coronavirus to covid-19 it's immediately obvious that the are four genetic insertions to the genetic code of the spike protein--all of which make the previously harmless-to-humans bat virus lethal to humans. 

The probability of four perfectly-functional genes--all of which are from the HIV virus and enable the bat virus to "bind" far more effectively to human airway cells--being inserted at precisely the right places into the crucial spike protein of covid-19  is essentially zero.

Less than one week after the first case of the Chyna virus was confirmed in the U.S, a team of Fauci grant recipients (all viral experts) led by Kristian G. Andersen who knew the genetic sequence emailed Fauci to tell him that the virus had almost certainly NOT "evolved naturally."  But less than a week later Fauci replied to Andersen via email, instructing him to write a paper--with a dozen prestigious co-authors--saying exactly the opposite: that the virus HAD evolved naturally.  

Fauci said he'd get it published in a prestige U.K. medical journal.  And sure enough, barely a week after the paper ("The proximal origins of SARS-covid-19") was submitted, it was published in "Nature."

Because we have Fauci's email to Andersen (published by the House Government Oversight Committee), an honest media would demand that Fauci explain why he instructed Andersen to write a paper saying exactly the opposite of what Anderson and his peers had concluded.

But of course the Mainstream Media has done no such thing.  "See, we din' know 'bout dat email!  Nope nope nope!  We din' hear nuffin' 'bout it!  See, we don' pay no attention to nuffin' dat Rethuglican congressional committees say.  Nope nope nope!  We iz WAY to busy makin' duh Democrat Partei look good!"

Y'all have been played for fools.  Fauci used the Lying Media to feed you a bullshit Narrative, and because you (understandably) knew nothing about that field, you ate it up without a moment of skepticism.  And it's not your fault, cuz you don't know fuck-all about genetic codes or viruses or whether the things can "evolve naturally" to make 'em kill humans.

I get it.  Really.  It's not your area of expertise, so you understandably trusted the lying whores of the Mainstream Media--who were determined to support Fauci's lies because he was the highest-paid government employee.  Seriously.  WAY more than the president's salary.

And for the Media, wealth means truth, eh?  (Well, unless a wealthy person is conservative, like Elon.)  The dumb bastards believe everything Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg say, cuz--"dey iz billionaires so dey mus' be honest, eh?"  Amusing.

Of course billionaires are no more trustworthy than your average person.  And the Media is hugely selective in which billionaires it unhesitatingly supports:  witness its fawning coverage of leftist fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried, even after the latter was convicted.  Conversely, look at how the Media buried emails showing that pre-Musk Twatter and Fakebook cooperated with the DeepState-run FBI to delete posts and accounts from users who reported anything that contradicted the Official Narrative that duh "vaccine" was, like, totally safe and effective.  

Mainstream Media: "Oh, you read on a thing called 'the Internet' that a Pfizer researcher said they knew the vaccine caused clots and heart attacks and miscarriages?  No, we assure you that we couldn't find ANY evidence to confirm any of those things."

"Oh, y'say you read that after critics pointed out that 'vaccines' prevented people who took 'em from getting the disease, and that the covid shot didn't do that, the CDC literally changed the definition of a "vaccine" to enable the bribem regime to keep calling the covid shot a 'vaccine'?  We haven't been able to confirm that!"

How much more proof do ya need, eh?  If you're a Democrat, no level of proof will ever be sufficient.  

Now the next coverup: the "vaccine" will be found to cause the long, white, rubbery clot-like structures found in the arteries and veins of heart-attack victims.  The only good news is that if you haven't had problems by now, you're less likely to.  And because the number of people taking the so-called "vaccine" is plummeting, the problem will eventually vanish.

Already the same people who covered for Fauci are claiming these novel, white, rubber structures--carefully named "anomalous intravascular casts" to avoid alarming the public--have always been found during embalming.  It's a lie, but how would anyone outside that specialty know, eh?  The coverup artists fool ya by calling 'em "clots," which are well known and often found.  These new things are totally different: no red cells or platelets, and totally different atomic composition from normal clots.   

Oh well.  Not my problem.  Hopefully not yours either.

 

Gotta love Climate Change experts

The very smaahht PhD below is Guy McPherson.  He is a high-level priest in the Church of the Deadly Global Warming.  And in 2014 he went on the air with the same interviewer below warning that the planet was doomed due to runaway heating.

So in 2016 the same interviewer had the expert professor on again, and asked if he had any updates for listeners.  That is, had the intervening two years of new data given him and the other expert Global Warming experts [intentional] a more-accurate estimate of how long we had til we were all gonna die of heat.   

 

And the expert prof DID have new data, and he made an Expert Prediction: he said "I can't imagine there'll be a single human on the planet in ten years."  

Then he got even more specific, saying "Within that span [ten years] we're headed for a temperature that's at or near the highest temperature on Earth in the last two BILLION years."

Wow, that's gotta scare LOTS of Democrats and Leftists so much they might even stop flying around the world to conferences on Climate Change, or to the Cannes Film Festival.  Nah, just kidding.  See, they can do stuff like that and it doesn't hurt the climate.  You, on the other hand, will have to eat bugs and give up your car and cooling and heating your home.  

Now, once upon a time I was fairly good with numbers, and I think ten years from the time this Expert made this prediction in 2016 would be...this year.  And unless I missed it on the Newz, almost all 7 billion of us are still here.  In fact I haven't even heard any reports of New York City or Miami or Honolulu being underwater.

Of course we're only five months into the year, so anything's possible.  I'll try to remember to follow up on this at the end of the year--if anyone's still alive.

The Democrats keep saying I need to Follow the Science.  And every time I do, Science ends up at the bank.  

"Follow the Science," they said. So I did

I didn't believe Global Warming was a threat.  And when cooler weather forced 'em to change the name of the thing to "Climate Change," I didn't believe that either.

But the Democrats screamed that I was uneducated. "Follow the Science," they said. 

In the genetic code of covid's spike protein I saw clear evidence that it had to have been modified in a lab.  But Fauci and the Dems and the Media said that was impossible.  "Follow the Science," they said.

So I followed the Science.

It led to the bank.  

Democrats on how to tell if a presidential election is honest

 

See, when Trump won in 2016, that simply wasn't possible!  Had to be stolen!  But in 2020, when bribem was credited with six million MORE votes than the sainted Obozo, "Elections are, like, totally foolproof." 

Then when Trump won again in 2024, they bounced right back to "Had to have been stolen!" 

You have to see this: Cackles tells how Dems plan to win control of entire govt again

(...as opposed to just control of virtually every government agency, which they've always had) 

No one should be surprised to learn that the Dems want to re-take control of both chambers of congress this fall.  After all, control of congress means they'll be able to control what bills are introduced, and which won't be allowed to be considered.

Thus no one will be surprised to learn that the last Democrat nominee for president--Cackles harris--has announced her party's strategic for winning control again!  SO...does Harris admit that maybe... 

• open borders are bad?  
• that maybe a huge chunk of Americans don't want taxpayers to fund "free" breast implants for illegal trannies?
• maybe lots of voters don't want males to compete in female sports?  
• that maybe voters don't want the government to force taxpayers to pay for sex-change operations for illegal aliens and inmates? 
• that perhaps most Americans DO want voter-ID to be able to vote?   

 

Don't be silly.  Democrat leaders are totally determined to accomplish all of the above.  So in the vid below--just one and a half minutes!--Kamala "Cackles" Harris describes exactly how the Democrat partei [sic] plans to re-take control of duh government this fall:  She calls it the "No Bad Ideas Brainstorm," and here's what she proposes: 

• abolishing the "electoral college" method of electing the president, and instead using the winnah of the national popular vote, which would usually produce a Dem president;
• "reforming" the Supreme Court--which Cackles describes as "expanding" it.  Cuz who could possibly oppose dat, eh?  But of course that's Dem gobble-speak for adding nine liberal Dem judges to the court, which would ensure all rulings would advance the Dem/socialist/communist agenda;
• declaring DC and Puerto to be states.  But as everyone should know, both are 95% Democrat/socialist/communist, meaning the Dems would instantly get FOUR new Dem senators and at least four members of congress.  Hmmm...
• "We've got to neutralize these red states from cheating."  Just how Cackles claims "these red states" have supposedly been cheating is never explained--because for Democrat voters it doesn't have to be explained.  Keep in mind that 42% of Democrat voters think the assassination attempt at Butler PA that killed an audience member was staged.  To people this stupid, no claim needs to be supported, no matter how insane.  The dumb bastards want to believe insane claims, so no proof is needed.

By contrast, look at the repeated bleats by bribem's Cuban communist DHS chief, Alejandro Mayorkas, that "Duh southern border iz, like, totally secure!"  Or "more secure than ever before," even as Americans watched tens of thousands of illegals waltz into the U.S.--and promptly get flown by the bribem regime--at taxpayer expense--to dozens of U.S. cities over a thousand miles from the border--at 3 a.m. in the morning! 

Dems didn't need proof for Mayorkas's obvious lies, cuz the Mainstream Media repeatedly aired Mayorkas's lies but never contradicted 'em!  Never even uttered a cautionary word.  So what would you expect the average Dem would think, eh? 

 

 

Dem influencer who writes blog on Supreme Court weighs in to make Dems look bettah

If you're a normal, hard-working, non-communist American you have absolutely no idea how many powerful forces are arrayed against us, hell-bent on destroying this nation as we've known it.

And as you could have predicted, those forces don't want you to realize they exist, because if most normal Americans knew, they'd fight back.  So one of the top goals of these forces is to keep you in the dark and feed you horseshit.  In fact this has been so well known that the intel community coined an amusing metaphor for the average American: 

"Mushrooms."  

"Keep the gullible American public in the dark and feed 'em horseshit."  And with the help of the Lying Mainstream Media, it works--every time.  The people who really run this country know that, and count on it.  It always works, because the people who really run things know human psychology, and the power of the Mainstream Media to mold what's amusingly called "public opinion." 

It's amusing because what's laughably called "public opinion" is ordered and created by the folks who really run things, working thru the Mainstream Media.  And I fully realize you won't and can't believe that--cuz it's just TOO crazy, eh?  Sure, I totally understand.

And with that preamble, here's episode #6,405,596.

One of the many influences on "public opinion" is a blog called "Scotusblog," which reports on Supreme Court cases.  As some of you may have heard, the corrupt Dem-ruled state of Virginia recently hosted a "ballot measure" to amend the state constitution to allow the Dem-controlled legislature to re-draw the borders of congressional districts to change the current House seats from 6-5 Democrat to 10-1 Dem, despite Virginia being just 53-47 Dem.

Winning control of the U.S. House is so crucial to the Dems that National Democrats dropped millions into this "ballot measure."  And it passed--from memory, something like 52-48.  The Dems were giddy!  But a couple of Republicans appealed to the VA supreme court, pointing to a number of violations of the state constitution.

Unexpectedly, the state SC agreed with the appellants.

The Democrats weren't gonna have that, so they filed an "emergency appeal" with the state SC, stating that the Dems were appealing to the US SC, asking the state SC to delay certifying their ruling until the US SC could rule on the Democrats' appeal.

As an indicator of their utter competence (yes, that's sarc), the notice to the VA SC had two typos in the top two inches of the first page:  they misspelled "Virgina" and "senator."  It was a perfect indicator of the incompetence of the Dem regime under attorney-general Jay Jones (who is on record as wishing for someone to put "two bullets in the head" of one of his Republican opponents.  Seriously.) 

SO...Democrat revolutionary moron Jones signed off on the appeal, and after deliberating for all of 15 minutes, in an unsigned opinion the US SC declined to hear the appeal--for the obvious reason that no federal or Constitutional issues were involved.  

Now let's see what Amy Howe--the one female who owns Scotusblog--wrote about this:

The Supreme Court on Friday evening turned down a request by Virginia’s attorney general and other Virginia Democrats to allow the state to use a new congressional map, which would have been expected to strongly favor Democrats, in the 2026 elections.

The denial came in a brief, unsigned order sent to reporters at 6:30 p.m. EDT on Friday – just 15 minutes after the court’s Public Information Office distributed the reply filed by Jay Jones, the Virginia attorney general, and Democratic legislators.

Not that it changes things, but what Amy Howe calls a "reply" was no such thing: it was the formal APPEAL by the Dems asking for relief from the ruling of the state's supreme court.  But describing it as a "reply" trivializes it--which was the entire point of using that word. 

The effects of the court’s order are likely relatively minimal, because Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger had already indicated earlier this week that the state would not use the 2026 map in the upcoming elections.

Absolute horseshit.  This is a face-saving measure created by Amy Howe to trivialize the US SC ruling:  She says "likely relatively minimal because" the new, corrupt female Dem governor, Spanberger, said the state would NOT use "the 2026 map" in the coming elections."

Utter horseshit:  If the US SC had ruled FOR the Dems, do ya think Spamburger would still have declared "We not gon' use deez new district boundaries which a majority of voterz has definitely approved"?  So the SC ruling was crucial.  But Howe wants to trivialize it, to minimize the damage to Virginia Democrats.  Cuz otherwise they look like the dumb, corrupt, partisan sons of bitches they are.  

Jones and the other Virginia Democrats came to the Supreme Court asking the justices to block a May 8 ruling by the Virginia Supreme Court that invalidated an amendment to the Virginia Constitution allowing the state’s Legislature to enact a new congressional map.

The Virginia General Assembly had adopted the new map in February. [Amy omits to say that the adoption by the majority-Democrat Assembly violated the state constitution.]  But before the state could actually use the map, it needed voters to approve an amendment to the state constitution that would give the General Assembly the power to draw a new congressional map outside of the normal cycle following the decennial census. 

In April, voters approved an amendment to the state’s constitution that gave the Assembly the power to do so. Nevertheless, a divided Virginia Supreme Court struck that amendment down on the ground that the Legislature had not followed the correct procedures when it put the new amendment on the ballot. The majority explained that under the state constitution, the Legislature must approve a proposed amendment to the constitution during two different legislative sessions, which must be separated by an election to the General Assembly’s House of Delegates. Although the Legislature had voted on the proposed amendment for the first time on Oct. 31, 2025, the majority said, more than 1.3 million votes had already been cast by then – and, therefore, “the General Assembly passed the proposed constitutional amendment for the first time well after voters had begun casting ballots during the 2025 general election.”

In their [appeal to the US SC] Jay [sic] and the Democrats argued that the Virginia supreme court’s ruling “overthrows [a] democratic outcome just days before the Commonwealth must begin its preparations to administer the 2026 midterm election.”

"Days before [the state] must begin preparations" sound like no problem, eh? 

Moreover, they contended, the dispute implicates “two critical issues of federal law:”  the meaning of the term “election” under federal law, and the idea that the state court so “impermissibly transgressed the ordinary bounds of judicial review” that its ruling should be reversed.

Soon after the filing was submitted on Friday, the court denied the request by Jones and the Virginia Democrats without comment.

"Soon" is right: 15 minutes.  Apparently the SC decided there were no issues worth considering.  Meaning the appeal was ridiculous on its face.  Meaning the Dems (like the utterly incompetent DEI place-filler Jay Jones) either knew they were grandstanding with an appeal that raised no federal issue--but was useful to save face, eh--or else were too dumb to realize it.

Now: I suspect most readers consider Amy Howe to be a neutral, unbiased "reporter."  As the above quotes show, she's not.  She's a total Dem shill and always has been, but pretends to be unbiased.  And she's one of literally hundreds of "influencers" of what's amusing considered "public opinion."

And as noted at the beginning: Americans have no idea how many of the Media articles and blogs and influencers they read are really bleating the "talking points" that help the Dem party look superficially competent.

Of course you don't believe a word of this.  Makes no difference to me.

People who believe horseshit like this goofy appeal are the same ones who believe "Iran was NEVAH trying to build an atom bomb!"  Which requires 'em to explain what use there is to go to the great expense of "enriching" uranium to 60% fissionable.  (Spoiler: there is NO known use for enriching uranium past ten percent except to make a bomb.) 

Source: Amy Howe's "Scotusblog"

 

Gavin Newsom spent $189 million tax dollars to give inmates free "digital tablets" they're using to view porn

(And later: Minnesota House fraud report claims Walz helped facilitate the massive fraud there) 

Chris Rufo reports that Cali governor Gavin Newsom has dismantled San Quentin prison's death row and turned the prison into a therapy center, with art, classrooms, a café and podcast studios.

Cuz prison inmates need to be able to do podcasts!  Cuz dat's a "basic human right," eh?

As part of this wokie push, the Newsom administration signed a $189 million contract to provide free digital tablets--generic versions of iPads--to every inmate in the state prison system.

The administration claimed this was "a step toward digital equity for justice-impacted individuals."  The Narrative was that inmates could use the devices to contact their families, "access educational content" and "learn new technology."

But Rufo's organization contacted dozens of death-row inmates who said inmates are actually using the free iPad knockoffs to watch pornography and have explicit sexual conversations.  Some top corrections officials say inmates are using the things to groom minors. 

The state claims inmates can't access porn, but inmates told City Journal that users can easily evade detection.

Asked to comment, the state Department of Corrections replied with pious boilerplate, claiming the tablets were "tightly controlled" and "education tools" that provided inmates with "access to the Bible, education, and reentry resources that actually reduce crime."

Standard political bullshit Narrative.  "We've got Procedures that prevent all the things you claim."

But one inmate said the Newsom regime is lying to voters and taxpayers.

Newsome has put a "moratorium" on the death penalty--ending it without a vote--so the phrase "death row" is just a lie to keep conservatives from revolting.  But one inmate on the former death row--Robert Maury--says he's used his taxpayer-funded iPad knockoff to view porn. Maury told Rufo inmates can receive nude pictures from women and watch pornography through their devices. 

And if the $189 million waste didn't faze ya: The state's new contract with the vendor of the devices allows for four one-year extensions, which could push its total cost to $315 million. 

Wokie state governments: bullet-trains to nowhere and free computers for every inmate.
===

Now to Minnesota: State report on the $9 BILLION fraud doesn't blame Dems but just a 'culture of tolerance.' 

The Minnesota legislature is Democrat-ruled, so you'd expect it to avoid blaming the Dem-ruled government for any role in failing to detect or stop the massive fraud in "providing free meals," free housing, fake "child-care" centers and fake "autism treatment" clinics.  And as expected, the report released by the legislative committee investigating fraud doesn't blame anyone, but rather "a culture of tolerance" under Gov. Tim Walz that it says allowed thousands of fraudsters to fleece taxpayers for billions of dollars.

The report claims state government malfeasance, incompetence and the active suppression of whistleblower warnings.

Latest estimates are that up to $9 billion has been stolen in Medicaid fraud alone.  The report claims the total amount stolen across multiple programs, including food stamps ("SNAP") is significantly higher than previously believed.

In one case Walz blamed his failure to act to stop a known and ongoing fraud on a state judge Walz claims ordered the state to resume payments to fraudsters.  But the judge in that case says he never ordered the state to resume payments, and that the Walz administration did so without prompting.  Someone is clearly lying.  Seems like the written court record would easily show whether the judge issued such an order, but the report avoids digging into that.

Investigators described a recurring "business model" used by fraudsters, involving low barriers to entry, the use of shell companies and the payment of kickbacks to enroll recipients. 

The report claims Democrat Walz created a culture that enabled fraud by failing to hold officials accountable despite years of credible whistleblower reports and audits. It claims the administration "ignored and consciously downplayed" shocking levels of fraud across more than a dozen Medicaid waiver programs, but then gave away the store by concluding that the Democrat regime "prioritized compassion over compliance."

For those who didn't get it: every liberal and Democrat will applaud "prioritizing compassion," meaning no damage to the Democrat brand from failing to prevent fraud.

Republicans on the committee were constantly opposed by Democrats, including earlier this month when Democrats on the committee blocked an effort to subpoena Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar for information on her alleged ties to the convicted fraudsters in the Somali community.

Source: Ace of Spades

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=419713 

Democrat pols wail about high gas price--but opposed Trump's idea to lower it

An amusing minor battle:  Top Democrats--including the ghastly hypocrite Chuckie Schumer--were screaming that gas prices were too high...of course caused by the Iran skirmish.  Of course the price of gas was still lower than the price when bribem was prezzy, but Dems obviously never said a harsh word about gas prices then, eh?

Then Trump floated the idea of temporarily suspending the federal gasoline tax to give motorists a slight break from high gas prices.  And how did the top Democrat in the senate--who'd been wailing that gas prices were too high--react?  

He said he and his party were totally against it.  And the Dem-fellating Media have quoted trucking associations as being against it, claiming the loss of two months of revenue will delay needed highway repair. 

Okay, delayed for two months.  Not a pressing problem.  So you'd think they'd support Trump's idea--as they would have if bribem or Cackles were president.  But after Trump proposed it, they're totally against it, because...Trump.  Classic.  

A brief summary of Leftist demands, and how they're doing

Leftism is a religion of hate masquerading as "progressive" and compassionate.  It demands...
   *that white people hate their race
   *that American boys believe masculinity is "toxic"
   *that girls believe marriage is slavery and dumb
   *that people believe sex can be changed just by declaring it (and maybe) being surgically mutilated
   *that having children is killing the planet--but only white conservative children; oddly, other children don't harm the planet *at all*
   *that Americans believe our nation is evil while socialism/communism are faaaabulous
   *that residents of ALL Western nations believe our values are oppressive and dumb
   *that Western nations MUST allow any foreigners to waltz in and be supported by taxpayers
   *that stealing is perfectly fine, simply another form of "reparations"
   *that taxpayers must give money to druggies and scammers, and sex-change operations to illegals, cuz...reasons
   *that Christianity is bad, and only Islam is good
   *that every effort to defend classical American values, or Christianity, or the nuclear family, is a form of "oppression" 

If you pay attention, you've seen the alphabet networks (all leftists) and Democrat politicians demanding one or more of the above every day.  One of the many reasons the Left hates Trump so much is that he opposes all these demands.

We're on the brink, folks.  Three assassination attempts on Trump--compared to zero on bribem and Obozo--should be a clue.  The Left is determined to win power, including illegally.  They trivialize and excuse assassination attempts on Trump--and actual assassinations, as on Charlie Kirk--claiming their *constant screams and demands* had nothing at all to do with motivating the perps.

If you pay attention you KNOW all the above are true.  But most of you ignore what you see, cuz you're too busy trying to make a living and feed your family to worry about stuff you've been conditioned to think can't be changed (like massive, systemic, tolerated fraud).

That's totally reasonable--and the Left knows you feel that way, and counts on it.

In 1776 the Left (as we know it) didn't exist.  What we had were people who loved being free, and those who supported the king--"monarchists." Fortunately, freedom-loving Americans won the Revolutionary War. 

Of course your schools no longer teach history.  They're too busy encouraging your kids to go tranny, which helps destroy the nuclear family (among other things).  

While the Networks distracted you with the faaaabulous Lizzo and Cardi B and Pete Davidson (who?) and Jimmy Fallon and John Stewart and Steven Colbert, the Left was eating your lunch, taking over your schools, almost every big city, and 24 state governments.  You didn't pay attention cuz...um...the late-night network talk-shows were SO hip, right?  "Great comedy!"  At least that's what the New York Times repeatedly wrote, so it must be true, right?

So when a female student in Dem-ruled, "woke" Loudoun County, Virginia, said she was raped in a school bathroom by a male student claiming to be female, and the school board squirted out a smokescreen of equivocations and non-denial "denials," and the Mainstream Media didn't bother to investigate, you automatically discounted it. 

You assumed the Media would report honestly, and when they parroted the wokie school board's bleats, you assumed what they reported was the truth.

The girl reported the rape right away.  By contrast, the mental case "E. Jean Carrol" waited *30 years* to claim Trump raped her in a dressing room at a NYC department store.  She wasn't sure what year, but the Media eagerly publicized the story.  And unsurprisingly a Democrat jury in NYC convicted Trump.  You believed it because a jury convicted, and the Media didn't push back.  But you discount the contemporaneous claim from the female student.  Why the difference?  The Mainstream Media convinced ya.

A recent poll found 42% of Democrats believed the assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, PA--in which one audience member was killed and two were seriously injured--was staged.  It's insane--totally irrational.

The Democrats' biggest current battle is to try to force Trump to withdraw all U.S. forces from the Straits of Hormuz, with the Islamic regime still in power.  If they succeed (as appears likely) that'll be a huge telltale about the future. 

The most critical war going on right now isn't in the Straits.  It's here in the U.S.  

Democrats leaders know how to "save our precious Democracy"

 

Independent investigator exposes massive op selling H1B visas to Chinese

An honest independent journalist discovers a massive fraud in Texas: a closed "daycare center" owned by a Chinese national who's made a fortune from fake PPP payments and is now selling H-1B visas.  The guy appears to be connected to the Chinese communist party.

Eleven minutes of video.  The guy is SUCH an obvious con-man that you think the whole thing must be a spoof--it's that outrageous.  But reporter Sara Gonzales has copies of all the federal forms and payouts.  Infuriating.

https://x.com/SaraGonzalesTX/status/2049134316173574491 

Bet you never heard a critical word about Obozo's project to "clean" the reflecting pool