RFK Jr. and Dr. Oz say over a MILLION people enrolled in Obamacare don't have SS numbers.

Democrats:  "NOooo, dis not true!  Dis FAKE NEWZ!  And of course if it turns out to be true, it's Trump's fault!"

Oz is head of the "Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services," which is under "Health and Human Services," headed by RFK.  So both arguably have full access to the agency's records, and know far more about what's going on there than any reporter. 

For young Americans and Dems who haven't dealt with either Medicare or Medicaid: Neither agency pays money to patients/citizens.  Instead when a "medical provider" claims to have treated a covered person, the provider submits a claim to Medicare or Medicaid and collects whatever reimbursement is current.

But what prevents a corrupt MD or medical practice from submitting claims for treatment never provided?  All that's needed is a match between a patient's data and their Medicare number. 

And an even more lucrative scam has also been happening: Obozocare promised to give low-income people free health insurance--policies identical to those issued to paying customers, but the insurance company would bill Obamacare for the premium.  
 
Fraudsters are submitting applications for fake people, enrolling stolen identities or non-existing "people" to collect millions of dollars in fees from the government (i.e. taxpayers) for selling insurance plans that were never actually sold!  And since "people" who don't exist never get sick, and don't make claims against the never-issued "health insurance," it's all pure profit to the fraudsters.

“The Obamacare marketplace is plagued by fraud, in large part because the Biden administration dismantled basic program integrity guardrails.”

“Records show more than a million people who are enrolled in Obamacare don't have social security numbers on file. That is a huge warning sign of fraud.”
 
“If even a single person was on Obamacare with no social security number, we should have found out why taxpayers are paying companies to insure people who probably don't exist.”

“Shady insurance agents and other bad actors have been getting paid to enroll unsuspecting Americans in health plans they never signed up for.”

“Thanks to this aggressive enforcement strategy we've already eliminated thousands of fraudulent policies and we're just getting started.”

“We’re also working with insurers to cancel every policy that should never have been issued and recover every tax payer dollar that was fraudulently paid out.”

There IS a solution: get the fucking federal government out of the "bribes-for-votes" business.  But of course that will never happen, because the ability to bribe stupid people to get their votes is a mainstay of both parties.

You deserve what you vote for. 

The letter Kirk's assassin left for his tranny lover

Yet another "confession" from Kirk's assassin--this one in a hand-written note, compared to a dozen text messages establishing the same thing.  Cuz leftists claim duh eeeebil conspirators tryin' t' frame po' TyTy have faked the text messages:

 

Read the note.  "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I took it.

The defense will try to get the fearful judge to prevent it from being introduced as evidence, because "Luna" (as in "Dear Luna") is not a name that can be officially linked to anyone.  Of course the prosecution can try to establish that "Luna" is Robinson's pet name for his tranny lover, Twiggs, and then try to use handwriting experts to prove po' deluded Tyler wrote this note.

Good luck. 

I'm gonna go out on a limb and predict that despite this note and half a dozen texts from TyTy confessing to his lover, this case won't go to trial.  Yes, it's clear that prosecutors have a slam-dunk case, since TyTy admitted shooting Kirk several times in texts to his tranny lover, and now the note.  So why would the state NOT go to trial, eh?

Because the prosecutors don't wanna get shot by tranny freaks outraged at duh "oppression" of po' TyTy.  So when TyTy's attorneys propose a plea deal--agreeing to plead guilty if the state agrees to no death penalty and a sentence of XX years--prosecutors will agree.

The stated reason will be that prosecutors worried that one or two jurors would vote to acquit, since a) dere wuz no video of TyTy actually pulling the trigger!; and b) "Duh State can't prove TyTy was on duh roof (which they can't), and one or two jurors will ignore ALL the confessions and other evidence (rifle known to belong to his grandfather recovered in the woods 200 yards from the campus) cuz..."massive conspiracy to frame dis po' innocent boi!"

It's hard to imagine how many mental contortions a stupid juror would have to undergo to ignore all the confessions.  But note how easily corrupt black jurors in the trial of O.J. Simpson ignored all the red flags pointing to his guilt, eh?  Jurors are easily swayed by pressure from dominant jurors.  Psych-101. 

Eager to see if I'm right.

Former US diplo-moron Dennis Ross says strikes unlikely to deter Iran

When your side has massive military superiority, one of the keys to getting the other side to surrender is to NOT have moronic liberal shitheads in your govt bleating that our side is doomed to fail "because...reasons."

Example: After the U.S. blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off Iran's income stream, the Iranians pretended to make nice by declaring the Strait open--knowing that would stop the U.S. attacks.  But just a day later they said "But we still OWN it, so we'll charge tolls or make ship owners buy insurance from us."

Trump said (in so many words) "Go to hell."  So the mullahs struck two ships.

Trump responded by authorizing airstrikes on 80 Iranian defense targets.  No civilian targets.

Two days ago the mullahs hit another ship.  Trump authorized 90 more airstrikes.

Yesterday the mullahs struck yet another ship, and Trump unleashed 140 more strikes.

So now we have this either stupid or treasonous piece of shit Dennis Ross going public, saying the U.S. strikes won't keep Iran from continuing to attack ships in the Strait--*because they want everyone to believe they control the thing.*

Think about that.  Imagine members of a black gang in DC murdering one innocent person a night and then *announcing* "We're gonna keep doing this until you give us what we demand" (whatever that is).  How many brain-dead, moronic, dipshit Democrats would squeal "We needs t' surrender DC to deez pipo, cuz nuffin we do kin possibly take back the city from 'em!"?

How many DC Democrats would bleat "Any action we take to wipe out this gang is *doomed to fail,* cuz...reasons!  Like, dey iz way smahtah an' stronger den we iz."

SO:  Yesterday former US Middle East envoy Dennis Ross said the latest US military strikes on Iran were unlikely to deter Tehran from future attacks, because the mullahs and the IRGC are confident that attacking ships shows they control the Strait of Hormuz.

Here's Ross in his own words:

“Our military strikes will produce very little against Iran.  If they are meant to show the Iranians the cost of attacks against ships, [our strikes] will fail.  Iran’s leaders think they gain more from their attacks since they show control of the Straits.”

Fire this treasonous (or perhaps merely terminally stupid) piece of shit immediately.  Charge him with treason.  Put him on trial.  No rational government would put this kind of treasonous shit.  He's welcome to give U.S. leaders his brilliant analysis in private, but when he goes public, that's a firing offense.

Democrats and the Media: "NOOooo, dis is jus' perfect, cuz he trashin' Trump and Hegseth an' duh military!  It's win-win fo' us and the partei we so eagerly fellate.  After all, if we surrender control of dat waterway an' let Iran charge $2 million per ship, what difference does it make, eh?  It just raises the price of oil a bit, an' no one cares about dat, right?"

Oh wait...we've been bleating since March 1st that Trump's "endless war" haz made Americans pay four bucks a gallon for gasoline!  But now we're fine with a bit more, cuz we know most voters aren't smart enough to discover the contradiction!"

"Jus' like we Media folks convinced Americans Iran wuz NEVAH tryin' t' build an atomic bomb, despite them admitting to have 60%-enriched uranium!  Cuz we know Americans DON'T know there is NO known use for enriching uranium past ten percent EXCEPT to make a bomb.  But if you poll Dems today, barely one percent believe Iran was working on a bomb.  

"Mission Accomplished!  Damn, we're SO good!"

"See, we Media elites have known for over a century that the average American doesn't know jack-shit about anything they can't reach out and touch.  And because they don't, they'll believe whatever we tell 'em.  The really dumb ones believe anything right away, but even the smarter ones get on-board when they see all their Dem friends nodding in agreement.  'Get on the bandwagon or be called un-cool, citizen!'

"You're one of the 'cool kidz,' right?  So yew don' want your frenz t' think yew not cool, eh?  So be smaht, citizen!  Get on-board wif' yo' cool frenz, like Iran, an' dat dreamy Momdani!  An' those cool DSA folks!"

Like taking candy from a baby.

Oh, and fire Dennis Ross.  Now.

Was Lindsey Graham really a Trump supporter?

When someone becomes prez, almost everyone in your party says nice things about ya, cuz that's how you shake the federal money tree.  But now, thanks to the eternal memory of the Net, we can find out how you REALLY felt:

 

Lindsey Graham was never a conservative, and never really a Trump supporter--which made him a darling of the Media and the never-Trump wing of the GOP.  Graham was an affable glad-hander who knew how to get re-elected every time.

Two hit-pieces on Christianity in the Atlantic: gonna "destroy the secular state"!

Last week The Alantic published a hit-piece titled "The Demons of Maryville," about a portion of Christianity called "charismatic Christianity." 

If you're familiar with the politics of the leftist socialists who run The Atlantic you know they constantly sneer at Christianity--and anyone who claims to be Christian.  It seems to be hard-wired, as with all leftist, "woke," "sophisticated" groups--I think in part because virtually all Christians are fairly "ordinary" folks, lacking the "sophistication" of the wokies at the Atlantic. 

I suspect very few Media types or fashion designers or university professors or Broadway producers are Christians, cuz it's just SO un-hip, eh?  I'd love to be wrong about that, so if you know any hip New York City "elites" who are Christians I'd love to hear about it. 

SO...the hit-piece (by Stephanie McCrummen) starts by introducing Mike and Andrea Brewer, who the author suggests check every possible box for being unsophisticated, un-hip, not bright : in the first sentence of the third paragraph he's introduced "by his own account" as "an exhausted factory worker and a lapsed Pentecostal addicted to pornography."  

The couple have started a kind of church--an "apostolic hub"--in eastern Tennessee.  And now the topper: they believe in demons.  LOTS of demons, and to prove her point the author names a dozen or so.

The author notes that the Brewers attend conferences on demons, and claim to see angels and "manifestations."  Classic.  

You can't get less sophisticated and hip than this, eh?  Cuz all guuud liberals--all totally sophisticated, of course--are sure demons don't exist.  This isn't surprising because most liberals (did we mention they're all "sophisticated"?) seem to believe God and Jesus don't either.

After introducing the Brewers the author sets up their opponent: Lisa Misosky owns a bookstore  and bar across the street from the "apostolic hub."  Lisa comes across as a level-headed, well spoken, totally sympathetic lesbian who "sometimes" hosts drag shows in her bookstore/bar.

So the battle lines are drawn:

On [one side] were the forces of Satan—legions of demons with names, ranks, and personalities that could inhabit people, geographical regions, and entire nations. In India, the Brewers claimed to have battled Shiva, Brahma, and Kali. In Haiti, Python and Mami Wata. There was Marduk, Osiris, Ra, Horus, Diana, Artemis, Shesha Naga, and so on—a whole pantheon of demons that represented ancient religions and civilizations, and whose earthly expressions were essential to understanding current events.

As noted above: classic.  On the one side, the thoughtful, level-headed lesbian bookstore/bar owner, and on the other the deplorables who believed in scores of demons, all named, all said to be playing a unique role in current events.

The author of the piece claims this modern demonic pantheon was identified by a group called the "New Apostolic Reformation," the NAR, which claimed "a wave of Holy Spirit power was surging around the globe."  While the historic biblical view has held that Christians were supposed to retreat from the world and wait for the Second Coming, the NAR pushed a different approach: that Christians were to establish God's kingdom "right now, on Earth." 

The author notes that this would essentially mean the end of life as libs and Dems have known it:

The Kingdom would have limited government, free markets, two genders, one kind of marriage, and one kind of God.

One imagines liberals and Democrats recoiling in utter horror: "Limited government and free markets"?  What manner of eeebil witchcraft is this?  "One kind of God"??  

A logic puzzle for Democrats:  If you postulate that there's one Supreme Being who created the whole shootin' match, how do ya get more than one kind of God from that?  

What I think she means is that people are free to argue over what God wants or supports: the author implies "Yew deplorables think He's male, only made two sexes, and that Jesus is his son.  But we here at the Atlantic--like all smaht people--know he's 'non-binary,' and that there are 48 or 54 or 65 "genders," depending on which network you watched that morning.  And that everyone can change as desired.  Oh, and Jesus isn't God's son, but just a human prophet with lots of good PR and special effects."

I won't bore you with the rest--read the link if you like.  https://archive.ph/4aW88

Instead let's go back to an earlier hit-piece The Atlantic published just before Trump was sworn in for his second term.  Published January 9, 2025 by the same writer (Stephanie McCrummen), titled "The army of God comes out of the shadows."

Sub-title:  Tens of millions of American Christians are embracing a charismatic movement known as the New Apostolic Reformation, which seeks to destroy the secular state.

Trump wouldn't be sworn in for 11 more days, but the leftists were already lobbing propaganda pieces to prep the battle-space.  They wanted a meme that would be as effective as "Trump colluded with Putin to steal the 2016 election from Hilliary" that they kept in front of voters for almost all of Trump's first term--and which most Dems still believe to this day.

The first paragraph sets the tone:

On the Thursday night after Donald Trump won the presidential election, an obscure but telling celebration unfolded inside a converted barn off a highway stretching through the cornfields of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The place was called Gateway House of Prayer, and it was not exactly a church...."  Instead "Gateway House of Prayer, it turned out, was a kind of war room.

Ahh, "a kind of war room," y'say?

The author says it's "an alluring, charismatic movement that has little use for religious pluralism, individual rights, or constitutional democracy.   It is mystical, emotional..."

"Little use for...individual rights or constitutional democracy," y'say?  Wow.  And no proof needed, eh? 

The NAR ["New Apostolic Reformation"] is supplying the ground troops to dismantle the secular state.

Constructing the Kingdom meant destroying the secular state with equal rights for all, and replacing it with a system in which Christianity is supreme.

The first hoot here is that this is precisely what Islam demands: everyone must either convert to Islam, or pay the special "jizya" tax on non-Muzz, or be killed.  But neither the author nor the editors       of the mag recognized it.  Kind of an obvious blind spot, eh?  "NOOooo, we nevah herd dat 'bout Islam!  We don' think dat true!  We think dat jus' a 'right-wing, Trumpist conspiracy story.'"

The second hoot is that the author doesn't give a source for the "destroying the secular state with equal rights for all" assertion--because to liberals it's unnecessary, cuz jus' obvious: "See, Trump thinks he's a kang an' iz completely junking the Constitution!  So dat means no more equal rights!"  To liberals, case closed.

 

The author cites an analyst with Political Research Associates, "which tracks antidemocratic movements" and has been watching the rise of the NAR for years and warning about its theocratic goals.  The author says the analyst sees the NAR as "a profound threat to democracy."

It’s a movement that has continued to rise, gathered political strength, attracted money, built institutions. And the broad center-left doesn’t understand what’s happening.”

Wow, same thing as the DSA, eh?  But the Atlantic isn't worried about the DSA cuz it's socialist.  It's never been concerned about Islam, because "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," eh?  But Christianity is a huge threat.  "Theocracy."  Wait, Iran is a theocracy, but the Atlantic sees no problem at all with that theocracy.  Just the one they've made up.

“It’s the synchronization with Trump that is most alarming,” he said. “The agenda now is Trump. And that’s how populist authoritarianism works. It starts out as a coalition, as a shotgun marriage, and eventually the populism and authoritarianism takes over.”

In another sense, the movement has never been about policies or changes to the law; it’s always been about the larger goal of dismantling the institutions of secular government to clear the way for the Kingdom. It is about God’s total victory.

This is a total inversion of reality.  In other words, total horseshit.

She fawningly, approvingly quotes a dipshit named Matthew D. Taylor, noting he's written a book titled "The Violent Take It by Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy."

Violent take it by force, y'say?  You mean like assassinating Charlie Kirk?  Trying to assassinate Trump, only missing by a quarter of an inch?

And at the end of the web version of her article is an ad for...Taylor's book.  What a coincidence.  And in tiny print an inch or two below, the Atlantic admits they get a commission.  Nice. 

In summary: Like all liberals, they don't see their own internal contradictions, like bitching about what they claim Christianity is pushing, while turning a totally blind eye to what Islam explicitly, openly demands in that cult's official book.
  

Who do ya think *this* is?

Some of you may remember the actress on the left.  She starred in "The Devil's Advocate."  Now the question is, who's the woman on the right?  Study the pics for as long as you need.

 

They're both Charlize Theron.  So does she have cancer?  AIDS?  The latest mutation of Fauci's deadly virus?

Certainly seems like one of those, but there hasn't been any announcement.  Instead the problem seems to be...big doses of Ozempic.

But why would anyone dose themselves so heavily to look like this?  Most of us would think they're clearly mentally ill, but the truth is that the people around them constantly tell 'em they look really fabulous now.   

In NYC, two churches firebombed by crazy illegal alien

Alternate Headline: “NYC gets more of what the Democrat partei wants.”

He's yet another foreign mental patient--or as the Democrat-fellating communist media call him, "a New York City man."

NYPost:
    Crazed maniac hurls Molotov cocktails at two NYC churches -- then goes on profane rant in shocking courtroom outburst

A mentally ill native of Guyana, invited in by Obozo, was arrested for allegedly firebombing two Queens churches late Wednesday.

Yogesh Sayrange, 36, admitted tossing firebombs at two churches, and other locations.

The crazy told investigators "Yeah, I f--king firebombed them," adding "They're Muslims, scum and terrorists."

No, he did NOT target Muslims.  The targets were churches, not mosques.  But keep in mind, the guy is crazy.

When cops found the nutcase they found two more firebombs in his bag.

"You're protecting them, you dumb c--t," Sayrange seethed at prosecutor Ashlyn Miranda.  "The government is a criminal syndicate." 

When judge Lara Eshkenazi asked the nutter if he understood his rights, the nutter snapped "I don't stand under you, you stand under me."

Solutions: deport, execute or lock up for life.  But of course the Democrats--who still utterly control every aspect of our lives, even when a Republican is president and the GOP has a tiny majority in both chambers of congress--block all those.  They only outcome Democrats will accept is: release him back onto the streets.  Cuz..."New York City man," eh?  "Undocumented American, so entitled to every right of actual citizens."

Mayor Zohran Mamdani: "Immigrants are our strength.  These are my people, so the eeevil white-ruled courts must leave him alone.  I will hold the police accountable for detaining this pillar of our strength and causing him stress." 

Source. 

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=420489 

"Irish socialist magazine" shows how all socialists "think"

From the Irish socialist mag "Rupture" comes this bizarre, moronic rationalization about supporting Russia's invasion of Ukraine:

How we respond to this crisis is important NOT in relation to how socialists can contribute to ensuring a just peace in Ukraine, but because we are likely to see more conflicts with a similar character in the coming years. 
  Getting it ‘right’ is important because it will enable us to take principled positions in the inter-imperialist conflicts to come. 
  For all who define ourselves as revolutionary Marxists, a common point of understanding is an appreciation of the disastrous consequences of the betrayal of the vast majority of socialists supporting their ‘own’ side with various justifications in World War I.

What the everlasting FUCK?  What kind of drug-fueled insanity is this?  This moron rationalizes Russia's invasion of Ukraine as being caused by World War ONE?  Jesus!  

This is a word-salad worthy of our nearly-faaabulous-prezzy Cackles.  If you want a total glimpse into the mind (if we can call it that) of these shitheads, read the whole thing by clicking here.

https://rupture.ie/articles/imperialism-today 

Tales of the inner city, part #596,059

Late at night in the Bay Area transit system a young female (race unknown) tried to save $2.55 by crawling under the gate.  Got stuck halfway through.  

One transit workers--apparently black--walks by, out of frame, and says "Have a good night."  When the stuck gal asks another transit worker--apparently black--who's videoing, "Can you get me out?" the worker says "Sorry, we can't open the gate without risking injuring you, so...sorry!" 

 

Comments were a hoot: 

"If you wonder how people in California could be dumb enough to vote for Gavin Newsom, here's the proof." 

"These are the low-IQ types who support the DSA."

"Normal Americans literally can't imagine how people with an IQ of 80 'think'." 

"The irony here is that this person almost certainly votes Democrat. If California Democrats allowed massive fraud in welfare and medicaid, and hadn't stolen the few millions that weren't taken by fraud, public transport could probably be free."

"No stereotypes were damaged in the production of this video."

"In Panama City (Panama, not Florida) the subway system is clean and safe.  It also costs just 35 cents a ride.  How do they manage all three of those things?  Oh, yeah."

"This is why not everyone should be allowed to vote."

"When people are stealing literally BILLIONS thru fraud, po' pipo be like 'Surely I can dodge a lousy $2.55 without anyone bein' upset, right?"

"And these people seriously claim they BUILT America?"

"Eloi versus Morlocks.  Wait, no one has the faintest idea what that's about."

    

Wisconsin judge who helped an illegal alien escape arrest is finally sentenced

Meet Hannah Dugan.  Until recently she was a county judge in Wisconsin.  She overtly helped an illegal alien avoid being arrested by ICE, by ordering the ICE agents to wait at the front door of her courtroom, then guiding the illegal to a back-door exit.

 

Now, U.S. law doesn't require anyone--including shitty, corrupt state judges--to help federal agents enforce valid U.S. immigration law.  That's a stupid ruling and should be changed instantly, but the Dems would filibuster to keep it from being passed.

But U.S. law ALSO says that it's illegal to "aid" an illegal in evading arrest--which is exactly what this fat bitch did.  If a white Christian male helped a white illegal avoid arrest during bribem's ghastly reign of terror, he'd be in prison.  But Hannah is a Democrat, and local judges are Dems, so she got NO jail time, just a $5,000 fine.

And note that she was convicted last December--over six months ago--but only sentenced today.  Why the long delay?  Simple: people have short memories, so lots fewer remember a THING about what she did.  So the lenient sentence won't stir as much anger at the corrupt, Dem-fellating legal system. 

Now watch how the communists who run the Associated Press spun this story:

(AP) — Former Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan was spared from prison Wednesday for ushering a Mexican defendant out of her courtroom to evade U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. A federal judge fined her $5,000 and cited her otherwise law-abiding life in issuing the sentence.

"For ushering a Mexican defendant out of her courtroom," eh?  She totally enabled him to escape arrest, but you'd never know that from "ushering him out."  (And yes, I see the next phrase, but the point remains that the AP is trying to soothe readers.)  And "Mexican defendant," eh?  He was an illegal alien, but the AP doesn't want readers to know that, because that lays bare the whole scam by which corrupt Democrat judges break the law to help their party win.

“I think this is a situation where an otherwise good person, upset by immigration policies in this country, made a bad decision in the moment,” U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman said.

Ahh, so as long as I'm "upset" by a valid U.S. law I can escape most punishment for breaking it, eh?  Is that the new legal standard?  It is for Democrats--but not for conservatives.  (Lynn Adelman was appointed by Slick Willy Clinton, so totally liberal Democrat.)

Dugan, 67, was convicted of felony obstruction in December. Her lawyers argued during her trial that President Donald Trump’s administration sought to “crush” Dugan in an effort to ensure judicial compliance with the ICE strategy of targeting immigrants as they showed up for court hearings.

Dugan resigned the county judgeship she held for nine years amid threats of impeachment from Republican state lawmakers who labeled her an activist judge. In her resignation letter she said her prosecution threatened “the independence of our judiciary.” 

Brazen horseshit: she bleats that "Her prosecution threatens the independence of our judiciary"?  Bitch, judges are supposed to uphold the law, not break it when they don't like it.  She was charged (or as she claims, "threatened") and convicted of "felony obstruction" because she knowingly, calculatingly broke U.S. law and was furious that she was forced to resign for doing so.  She's lucky she's not in prison. 

If charging a judge for breaking the law is "a threat to their independence," I'm for lots more such "threats." 

Two Marquette University law professors spoke on her behalf, including a former state Supreme Court justice and a Jesuit priest who read a statement describing Dugan as a defender of oppressed people and saying he didn’t believe there was a need for punishment.

Next thing you can expect to see: illegal alien murders a 15-year-old American girl and is found guilty by jury, but corrupt Dem judge sentences the killer to just 90 days in jail "because dis po' boy haz been oppressed, and I am a defender of oppressed people and I don't believe there is a need for punishment!"

It worked for Hannah, and the Media hasn't said a critical word, so... 

Wokie Massachusetts city council votes to remove shot-spotter, cuz...raaaaacis'!

Category: stupid wokie bullshit, part 945,943.

Cambridge, Massachusetts.  One of the top hotspots of wokie stupidity.  For the last 12 years they've had a "shot-spotter" system, but two months ago the commie city council voted to remove it.  Not just turn it off, but to spend extra money to remove all the pole-mounted microphones so it can't ever be turned back on again.  Classic. 

The system is paid for by federal tax dollars and was working as designed.  Obviously it doesn't prevent someone from shooting someone, but at least the cops are alerted essentially instantly and can send a car to the location to see if there's a victim and render aid if there is.  So it could sometimes save a life by getting medics to the victim fast.

So why did the woke council turn the system off?

The ACLU argued that the system is inaccurate, intrusive, and incompatible with Cambridge’s surveillance and sanctuary-city ordinances.

Cambridge police began using ShotSpotter in 2014, and since then only 35 percent of the notifications sent through the system were confirmed as gunfire. 

There could have been lots more gunshots but if no one was hit, and no witnesses were willing to come forward, how would you know it wasn't a gunshot?  And note the Harvard Crimson leftist propagandist cunningly refused to ask how many gunshots have been detected by the system.

The lead sponsor of the move to order the removal of the system [Muslim city council commie Ayah A. Al-Zubi --a Hahvahd grad, born in Jordan] said the city should evaluate surveillance technologies against “measurable standards” — including accuracy, cost, or resident input, before adopting them.

Yeah, bitch, but this was already in place, paid for, and working as specified.  The real reason you and your commie comrades in the ACLU demanded it be removed is that you're pro-shooting, as long as it's your allies doing the shooting.  All your bleating about "invasion of privacy" and "surveillance" is utter horseshit--camouflage to make you look reasonable.

You and your ACLU allies claim the color-blind system is raaaacist cuz guess where most gunshots are detected?

She continued, “It’s got a higher false positive rate here and in cities across the U.S., in which case I believe the benefit does not outweigh the risks of situations where our police department might be misled.”

What utter horseshit!  Even the company that sells the system says it alerts for anything that sounds like a gunshot, so car backfires and firecrackers, but how is that a RISK for cops, communist bitch?  And most rational people would believe that if the system enables cops to find and save even one victim a year, it's a good idea. 

I thought you bastards always bleated "Even if it saves just one life, it's worth it!"  Oh wait, that's only when you're trying to confiscate all civilian-owned guns!  Otherwise you don't give a shit: you oppose anything that would save lives taken by your ghastly thugs.

Source.

Try asking AI "Is Ayah A. Al-Zubi a U.S. citizen" and you get hundreds of hits--not ONE of which answers the question.  How odd.  Almost as if someone doesn't want you to know. 

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2026/5/20/cambridge-council-ends-shotspotter/ 

German intel report: "Muslims are infiltrating government institutions"

Democrats and most Germans: "NOOooo, dis FAKE NEWZ!  Dis un-possible, citizen!  Next you're gonna be claiming that the mayor of London is Muslim!  And next that the mayor of America's largest city is Muslim!  How silly!

Wait...whut?  

 

Some wag noted that those "intel" guys are really perceptive, eh?  Cuz no one else ever suspected a thing, right?

Except for the "Visegrad nations," Europe is lost.  The U.S. is only a decade behind.  Of course you don't believe that, because...uh..."reasons," eh?  See, if dis wuz true, you're  sure the totally honest, unbiased Mainstream Media would tell ya, eh?

Hahahahahahaha!  Y'mean jus' like duh Media tol' ya bribem was a vegetable?  (Clue: they never did tell ya.)  Or that he was using Hunty to collect bribes?  (Clue: they nevah tol' ya that either.)

Or do ya mean duh way duh totally honest Media tol' ya Israel was a repressive nation cuz dey din' allow Muslims dere?  (About 2 million Israeli citizens are Muslim--18 to 21% of that nation's population.)  Or that Israel invaded Gaza for no reason at all?  (Clue: Israel invaded after 1500 missiles were fired from Gaza into Israel, and despite endless warnings from Israel to stop or face retaliation.)

 Y'mean how the Mainstream Media tol' ya Iran was NOT trying to build an atom bomb?  (Clue: Iran's negotiators have admitted having 1,000 pound of 60%-enriched uranium, and there is NO known use for uranium to be enriched beyond ten percent *except* to build an atom bomb.)

THAT Mainstream Media?

If you rely on the Mainstream Media for ANY information, you're a damn fool who deserves what's coming.  The sons of whores would lie about whether the sun was shining without a second thought.  Their job is to help Democrats win elections, period.

So you think Islam is "the religion of peace," eh?

 

Of course you don't believe this is how Islam works.  Try reading their "holy book" sometime.  You'll be surprised.

Democrats: "NOOooo, dis fake newz!  Duh Holy Koran don't say nuffin bout Muslims killin' NO ONE!  See, dey iz 'The religion of peace!'  Reeeeally!"

Clearly you've never bothered to read the damn thing for yourself.  Islam gives everyone in the world three choices: either 1) convert; or 2) pay the "jizya"--a special tax paid to Islam to be allowed to live in a Muzz-ruled caliphate; or 3) for those who refuse the both the preceding choices, be killed.

Democrats: "Dat fake newz!  A mis-translation of 'We love ebrywun!'  Or on the off chance it's real, duh Koran din' reeeally mean dat!  Dat language wuz jus' a 'hook' back in the 7th century to get pipo to join!  Yep yep yep!  Jus' done to get pipo to join.  Dey din' reeeally mean it wud apply today!"

Nice try, habibi.  Show me a SINGLE Muslim mullah who repudiates those three choices.  You can't, because there has never been even one.  They ignore it, refuse to answer any questions about it, because contradicting even a single teaching of Mohamed is a death sentence.  So the Mainstream Media simply doesn't put 'em on the spot by asking the direct question.

Ahhh, former Democrat--who almost won control of Florida

Unless you follow politics closely (spoiler: virtually none of you do) you probably don't remember Andrew Gillum.  Black Democrat who was the mayor of Tallahassee for four years.

(For young Americans "educated" in public skoolz, Tallahassee is the capital of Florida.)

Gillum was a huge star in the state's Democrat partei [sic], so the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media LOVED him.  Clearly a model Democrat.  So in 2018 he won the Democrat nomination for governor, facing Ron DeSantis.

Gillum lost, but just by 30,000 votes.  The Dems were that close to taking over Florida.

Then just two years later, in 2020, Gillum and another man were found dazed and confused inside a room at a Miami hotel, with drugs--including meth--everywhere.

But hey, no problem, citizen:  Prosecutors never charged Gillum or the other man in the room because the drugs were not found actually in their hands or with their names on the drugs.  As the prosecutors artfully said, "the drugs were not on their persons."

Druggies listen up: never be alone with illegal drugs!  Cuz as long as someone else is in a hotel room with scads of drugs, and none of the drugs has your name on 'em, you can't be prosecuted!  See?  

(That's "defendants' drug rule #2."  Rule #1 is to stay in Democrat-run jurisdictions, where the DAs won't charge.)

See, even though Florida is majority Republican, Miami (Dade County) is totally controlled by Democrats, so prosecutors knew not to charge their recent candidate for fucking governor with anything.  And of course the Lying Mainstream Media circled the wagons, and the story quickly disappeared.

It's so great that the Dems rule the Media, eh?

Of course druggies almost never stop using, and last week Gillum was arrested in Alabama for "drug  offenses" (no details).

Now: this dude didn't just get into drugs after running for governor.  And top members of the Democrat partei in Florida knew he was a druggie and likely homosexual.  But they ignored both, cuz...power, citizen.  Cuz after all, Colorado has a gay governor living with his husband in the governor's mansion--and the voters of Colorado said "We are totally happy wif dat!"

SO...top Florida Dem partei officials eagerly embraced Gillum--drugs and all--because he offered them a chance of taking total control of the state.  Meaning corrupt election workers wouldn't be fired.  And it was a good bet, since he came within 30,000 votes of winning.

Fast-forward to Graham Platner:  Some Dems in Maine surely knew about his abusive past.  But the party shrugged and bleated "Rape is NOT a character flaw, deplorable!  Dis man wud make a GREAT senator--a perfect leader for ouah partei!  See, we "believe all women"--unless dey accusing ouah candidates!  So we're perfectly willing to overlook a few...allegations!  After all, none of us is perfect, right?"

The Democrat partei will eagerly embrace any candidate, regardless of character, if the Partei believes he or she has a good chance of winning.  They've sold their souls--or would have, if they believed in a soul--for power.

Say, how's that workin' out for ya?

California Dems: "Great!  Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass are amazing!  Dey iz runnin the state and L.A. jus' faaaabulously!"

How's that workin' out for ya, Chitcongo?  Illinois?

Dems: Chicago is faaabulous, thanks!  Mayor Brandon Johnson is duh BEST!  Totally dreamy!  So is governor JB Pritzker!"

Of course yew don' believe ANY of dis, cuz yew nevah heard it in duh Mainstream Media. 

Andrew Gillum, almost governor of Florida

 The more ya know, the more you wanna grab a weapon. 

Ah, Germany is changing, eh?

The world is changing, eh?  American liberals say "We don't see any problem at all.  All cultures are absolutely equal, bigot." 

 

x 

Us vs. them

 

What do Democrats support?

 

Trans DSA communist running for congress in Wisconsin

Two days ago I posted a short piece about a tranny (male claiming to be female) in Wisconsin going by the name Teha, who openly urged friends to "kill your local Republican."

We are doing trans jihad,” says the tranny, threatening “the oppressor, the bigots, the animals that make up MAGA.” The tranny says the goal of its group is to make opponents (us) live in "a permanent state of dread."  That's a quote.

Turns out Teha and other mentally ill creatures are supporting yet another tranny who's running for congress in Wisconsin.  This one goes by the name of Katrina deVille, who admits to being a communist and member of the Democrat Socialists of America.

If you want to look insanity in the face, watch this clip of Democrat congressional candidate deVille:  Every expression, every gesture, every facial tic screams insanity.

You can't believe it til you actually see it.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1937090040522008 

Dog as guardian angel

Watch this short 15-second video: The vigilant dog guarding the baby sees it move toward the edge of the couch, and makes a brilliant "guardian angel" move. 

 

Now: almost every Democrat and Media "elite" will sneer that this is fake:  "Couldn't possibly be real!   Cuz if it was, that would suggest...'disturbing conclusions,' citizen.  Cuz dere iz no such thing as angels, or 'guardian angels'...or God.  Dat all jus' 'Magic Sky-friend' nonsense!  Only stupid deplorables believe stupid stuff like dat!"   

"We haz spoken!  An' when we Democrats re-take control of both chambers congress, an' the White House, we'll pass a LAW saying you can't post fakes like dis on duh Net!  We'll set up a Democrat-appointed 'disinformation board' and will require every post be approved by dis faaabulous, totally unbiased, totally fair board before it can legally be posted!  

"We haz spoken!" 

Happy 250th to the greatest nation ever!

 

Hope everyone has a glorious time celebrating this great nation.