How soon people forget, eh? Attention span of weeks, if that

A few of you may have heard that New York gov Andrew Cuomo ordered nursing homes to accept patients infected with duh Chyna virus.  Because almost all older people have weaker immune systems (so are more vulnerable to infection), Cuomo's order resulted in an estimated 35,000 deaths.  (The 17,000 figure below is way off.)

What you didn't hear about was that five other governors gave the same order--with the same result.  All were Democrats, cuz...um...dey way smaahhhtah den yew.

 

And no one made the connection, eh?

Democrat Socialists of America win 4-for-4. Dem party response?

Citizens, may I present...Gavin Newsom, the man the Democrats are all salivating over.  Fawning over.  Slobbering over, to be the next prezzy.  Cuz he's led his huge, resource-rich state to SO MANY "firsts," eh? 

 

Now here's the worry for Democrats like Newsom:  The Democrat Socialists of America are challenging regular Democrats for control of the Partei [sic].  This puts Dems in a bind:  If dey don't support socialism/communism, they'll get primaried--and recent election results say they'll lose to the DSA candidate.  Ooohhh.

And even if they manage to win the primary, they need duh votes of duh Socialists (communists) to win the general election.  Ooohhh again.  What to dooo, eh?

Are you smart enough to figure it out?  Sure ya are!  Cuz the number-one priority of pols is to be re-elected, always.  So ALL Dem pols will quietly promise to be good socialists.  Some will openly embrace socialism, others will do it quietly, only in small meeting organized by socialist supporters--with no reporters allowed, so non-DSA voters will never know about the candidate's suck-up to the DSA.  

Nice to have friends in the Media, which will nevah report that they were barred from attending the meeting, eh?  

So what does this mean to you, eh?

Nuffin'.  Well, aside from a barrage of platitudes and rationalizations from Dem politicians: "We Dems have a Big Tent, so we welcome a diverse [ooohh, nice] array of viewpoints!"  "We iz duh Big-Tent party!"

"Why yew skeered of socialism, citizen?  After all, ebrywun loves Social Security, right?  An' "social welfare"!  An' government-owned, government-run public housing has been a HUGE success!  So yew shouldn't fear socialism cuz yew akshully NEEDS it!  It beez unfair to force some pipo to work fo' a livin'!"

The result is as predictable as the sun rising.  Starting last week, Dem candidates known they can't win unless they support socialism/communism.  The challenge is to let the socialist know you support 'em, yet keep that knowledge hidden from non-DSA Dem voters.

But thanks to the corrupt, Democrat-fellating Media it's easy, since no one outside the DSA ever hears or sees about Dem candidates supporting socialism. 

Democrat-ruled legislature of California raises state tax on gas AGAIN

As ordered by the Democrat-ruled California legislature, that state just raised its state tax on gasoline.  It's now 63.5¢ per gallon.  But with all the other taxes--and cunningly named "fees" which are equivalent to taxes but cleverly not called that--drivers in that Dem-ruled shit-hole are paying $1.20 per gallon just in taxes and "fees."

Democrat voters and every single Mainstream Media propagandist: "Dis beez guuuud, citizen!  We gots t' have deez taxes an' fees on gas, cuz we do SO much total guuuud wif duh money raised!  Yep yep yep!"

"Dis crucial revenue enables ouah faaabulous skoolz to rent Gavin Newsom's wife's pro-trans videos!  An' fund dat faaabulous 'high-speed rail' dat will soon connect duh booming populations of Bakersfield with Merced.  Ouah experts say 50,000 people a day will ride it, cuz it'll cut travel time by 20 minutes compared to driving!

"But of course duh reeeel benefit iz dat it'll fight Grobal Worming Climate Change!  An' dat beez worth it no mattah how much it cost!

"Next up: paying millions to tear down a dam.  Cuz why would we wanna store water or prevent floods if it offends native tribes, eh?

"See, we Dems beez smaaht like dat!  Yew need to keep electing us to rule Cali, cuz all ouah policies are absolutely faaaabulous!

Source: 

 

Deputy mayor of Paris blames U.S. for heat deaths in the EU

In the SOooo advanced nations of Europe, more people die each year from heat than the number of firearms deaths in the U.S.

There's a solution, of course: let people have air conditioning in their homes.  But EU rulers recoil in horror!  "NOOooo, we cain't allow dat!

Rational adults: "Why?  Cuz all high officials in the EU have it in their homes, and it's in all your government buildings.  So you must think it's a good thing for some pipo.  So why do many cities in your oh-so-sophisticated [sarc] "union" ban it in private homes?"

EU rulers: "Cuz a/c beez eeeeebil!  Duh devil's work--or would be if we believed he existed."

Rational adults: "Wait...if you claim it's eeeeebil, why do your rulers have it in their homes, and why do all government buildings have it?"

EU rulers: "Wow, look at the TIME!  I'd love to answer that but gotta go catch my government jet to get to the next international conference on Global Warming Climate Change!"

Cut to: Paris.  Office of the deputy mayor for egg production.  Just kidding--it's the "deputy mayor for international relations."

Ahh, you think I'm kidding.  Meet Audrey Pulvar, "deputy mayor for international relations" for Paris.

If you think that's absurd, consider that Paris has 36 deputy mayors.  And as you already guessed, every one of 'em is a batshit-crazy leftist--experts in taxing, RULING, and increasing the amount of their too-generous lifetime pensions after leaving office.  (Pensions?  For a fucking deputy mayor?  But of course, deplorable citizen.  "We are not savages!")

Other than those skills, they can't spell "cat."

But Audrey has one invaluable skill: she blamed the number of heat deaths in France on...wait for it...Americans.

Yes, you read that right.

Of course she didn't say that directly, because until recently no current politician ever says things directly, cuz it's too easy to refute their bullshit.  Instead she said this:

As the second-largest emitter of greenhouse gas emissions in the world, [America] bears a significant amount of responsibility for global warming and the consequences we in France are experiencing.  Your cities, which are 90 percent air conditioned, are not unrelated to this.”

Notice how brilliantly nuanced her statement was.  She claims that because U.S. cities are "90 percent air-conditioned," this increases the number of heat-caused deaths in France.  How?  Why, by worsening Grobul Worming, of course!  

If U.S. Democrats and socialists passed LAWS banning all a/c in U.S. homes (but of course allowing it in "public housing"--hmmm) and ordering all units removed, the next demand would be to ban gas-powered cars.  Then ban domestic air travel--take duh train instead, deplorable, like the sophisticates in Europe do!

Point is that NOTHING will please the Left/Dems for long.  Cuz if you haven't noticed yet, every surrender is always followed by the next demand.

Nevermind.  Democrats are too dumb to understand any of this--which is why the Democrat Socialists of America are taking over your party.  Utterly predictable, and I'm lovin' it.  

Source: Moonbattery 

In the UK a baby died after four months of sexual abuse. Not newsworthy here cuz...

Here's yet another ghastly story you'll never see in the U.S. media--because it shows the results of yet another Democrat policy:

In the ghastly, leftist-ruled UK, two homosexual men (one of whom was a school teacher) met, and as the leftists at Wiki soothingly describe it, "became a couple and planned to start a family."

SO reassuringly normal-seeming, eh?

Wiki writes this as if this is totally normal and fine--because of course Democrats insist that it IS fine.  Not only that, but if you say it's not, Democrat pols call you a "hater" or "homophobe."

The homosexual pair were approved to adopt by a leftist, pro-homo company called "Adoption Now," which Wiki says "provided services to local authorities."

Oh I wouldn't doubt that the company did "provide services to local authorities," absolutely. 

So on 1 April, 2023 "the couple" adopted a healthy ten-month-old baby boy, Preston Davey.  Four months later (27 July 2023) the baby died--from four months of sexual abuse.

In the months before his death the baby had been taken to the hospital three times with traumatic injuries.  The hospital trips triggered multiple visits to the home by the UK's "social services," but as you already guessed, those visits didn't find anything to be concerned about.  All bruises and injuries were easily explained away, both to "social services" and to doctors.

Cuz in the UK, as in many U.S. Dem-ruled cities, no one--either government or ordinary citizen--is allowed to report anything critical about homosexual parents.  Simply not allowed, citizen.

I'll spare you a description of the 40 "internal and external injuries" reported at the autopsy.  As the notoriously pro-pedophile BBC delicately euphemized it, "there was evidence of abnormality of his anatomy."

Ahh, "evidence of abnormality in his anatomy," eh?  Roll that around for a minute.  The BBC refuses to be straight with its millions of viewers.  Hmmm... Just as with illegal immigrants, can't let deplorable citizens know the truth, cuz that might anger 'em.

Leftists: "Doze all jus' aksidents, citizen!  An' if yew claim otherwise, ouah hate-speech police will arrest yew, hater!"

"Accidents," eh?  Except the court found what it described as "indecent images and videos" of the baby on the phone of one of the men.

Now, you don't live in the UK, so why should you be concerned, eh?

I get it.  Really.  It happened overseas, and you weren't the victim, so really, why even mention this tragic, outrageous death?  

Because the Democrat party eagerly embraced adoption by homosexual couples 20 years ago.  Dem-ruled cities made it mandatory.  You just never heard about it because the Mainstream Media never reported it.  You may be a tiny bit curious as to why.

Dems: "Dat not true!"  Yes, it IS true.  In fact many cities and states removed Catholic adoption agencies from the list of agencies authorized by the shitty state to place kids for adoption, when they said they wouldn't place kids with same-sex couples.  The agencies were barred from placing any foster kids for adoption until they caved and promised to place children with gay couples.  And if you wanna challenge that, be my guest.  I've got the cases.

Dems: "Yew jus' a hater, deplorable!  Cuz 'Love is love!'"  An' abuse happens wif' hetero adoptive parents too!"

Ahhh, well, there ya go.  That's the same argument used by pro-illegal-immigrant orgs that demand "Yew cain't complain about...um..."alleged" crimes allegedly committed by 'undocumented Americans' because U.S. citizens rape and murder too!"

Actually I can, and will--because we don't need to invite any MORE rapes and murders in this country.  Let the UK and other shitholes wallow in it.

Fuck the liars at the BBC--and NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR et al.

Source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Preston_Davey 

Man strangles woman, dies while trying to dispose of her body

If you're a fan of Karma, the story below is for you:

On June 10th someone called a sheriff’s office in Alabama after finding a truck parked in the middle of a forested rural road, engine running, driver's door open.

In the woods nearby, deputies found the bodies of a man and woman.  The coroner later determined the woman had been strangled to death, and that the man had died of a heart attack.

Drag marks from the tailgate of the truck to the location of the bodies, and mud on the woman's body, suggest she'd been strangled elsewhere and that the man had dragged her body into the woods to dispose of it.

The pair were identified as 47-year-old Jessica Folds and 44-year-old Daniel Robbins, who had been dating.

For those who believe the soul lives after death, one can only imagine the encounter between the two spirits minutes after the man died while trying to dispose of the body of the woman he'd been dating: 

"How...interesting...to see you again.  Unfortunately you won't be staying, because the demons will be here in just minutes to take you to your eternal home.  If I get a chance I'll send you a message to see how you're getting along there."

Ohhh, man!  What a shock.

Source.

https://people.com/man-strangled-girlfriend-died-heart-attack-moving-body-woods-12008766

 

The excuse NGOs and Dems always use when threatened with an audit

 

Texas Board of Ed votes to remove Revolutionary War from HS, replacing it with...

Even in states with a thin conservative majority, the communists have their wholly-ruled enclaves.  In Texas, as in most states, it's the State Board of Education.

The American Revolution is arguably one of the most consequential events in human history, since winning it gained our independence.  For 240 years American students have learned about the battles of Lexington and Concord, the opening shots of the war that led to our freedom.

Thus some of you may be surprised to learn that last week the collection of mentally-challenged whores who rule the Texas State Board of Ed voted to remove the American Revolution from 11th-grade U.S. history.  

Three "wokie" RINO members of that board--Will Hickman, Kevin Ellis, and Pam Little--voted with the Democrats to pass this and dozens of other ill-conceived amendments.

Now follow the...interesting..."reasoning:"  "We only gots room fo' so many test questions, an' we thought it was mo' impo'tant dat ouah kidz learned somepin' else."

So what did the Board believe was more important for students to learn about than the American Revolution, eh?  Turns out the battles of Lexington and Concord were removed to make room for--brace yourself: Oprah.

See, to wokies it way mo' impo'tant to know 'bout Oprah Winfrey den 'bout dat silly war dat happen so long ago.  After all, ain't nuffin' special 'bout dis country.  Jus' aks Joy Reid.

Let that sink in.

This is called "progressive social studies," and it's what schools are teaching your kids in place of real history.

Update: After a Dallas paper revealed this utter, ghastly, wokie horseshit, the state board voted to "postpone rewrites to U.S. history, world history, geography and government."

Now if you know anything about politics, you know one of the absolutely routine tactics of leftists/Democrats/sons of whores is "Postpone the final vote until the uproar dies down, and then we'll pass it when no one is watching."  I predict that's what will happen here.

If this is happening in Texas, imagine what state school boards are doing in Democrat-ruled shitholes like New York, California, Virginia, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Washington state, Oregon, Illinois, Minnesomalia, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Mexico and the like.

Source: The Dallas Express

https://dallasexpress.com/opinion/opinion-texas-just-voted-to-erase-the-american-revolution-that-is-not-a-typo/

These people are demented. Power-mad. Insane. So question is...

 

Democrats: "Of course, because all four are great analysts of complex issues!  'Perceptive!'  Rational.  Even better, ouah great leaders (the four above are among ouah best) do NOT have huge egos--unlike Orange Hitler."

I'd ask conservatives for their answer but there's no point, cuz after all Democrats start voting for Democrat Socialists of America, conservatives won't win any more national elections.  That'll begin around 2032, so...enjoy the next six years.

Ah, I hear y'all saying that's crazytalk.  Just un-possible!  So let me explain:

For decades white Americans have been split roughly equally between R and D.  The flood of 11 MILLION illegal immigrants during bribem's ghastly 4 years didn't change that much because virtually none of those illegals became citizens.  Most apparently elected to wait until a Democrat prezzy and congress simply gifted all of them citizenship, with no effort. 

But they have far higher birthrates than whites, and all their children will be U.S. citizens.  So as soon as six years from now the first of their citizen-kids will be voting.  That and the black vote should decisively tip the balance to the Dems. 

But wait, it gets worse--cuz for the past 20 years the "total fertility rate" (TFR)--the average number of children born to each woman over her life--for white women has been steadily dropping.  You need an average of 2.15 or so children per female needed to keep any population level.  (The fraction over 2.0 is needed because a small percentage of females don't survive to childbearing age.) 

For white women that rate is now about 1.4--FAR below the level needed to keep the number of whites from decreasing. 

But illegals and Muslims have a far higher TFR--roughly 3.5 for Hispanics and 4.4 for Muslims.  So the percentage of whites will fall even faster in the future.  

The much higher TFR for Muslims and Hispanics is partly offset by the fact that on average, conservatives seem to be having more children than liberals.  I've never been able to find published numbers, and I suspect that's because no large study has been done--or even proposed, since it would almost certainly confirm the point here.  My guess is that the TFR for liberals is about 1.2, compared to about 1.6 for conservatives.  That certainly helps, but not nearly enough to keep the percentage of whites from continuing to fall.

One other note on that:  The Media, Dems, communists and pro-illegal groups will try to fool you by pointing to census numbers showing that the actual number of whites is NOT dropping.  Yes but what matters in elections is what percentage of the population is on each side.  When your percentage falls, you lose almost every election.   

People who study demographics for a living have long had a saying: "Demography is destiny."  What that means is, if you invite foreigners into your country who want to take over, they can do that simply by waiting, because having more kids than the native population means eventually the faster-breeding foreigners end up in the majority.

In the past, when almost all immigrants to America wanted to assimilate instead of rule, this wasn't a problem.  But in the last 40 years the Dem-ruled school establishment has lied to students SO thoroughly and deviously that most American students now say they believe socialism is better than capitalism--despite never having lived under communism!  It's obviously irrational: the rational answer would be "I can't answer that since I've never lived under communism."  But as happened when the transgender craze hit, only a tiny fraction of kids can resist the social pressure to be one of the "cool kids." 

The communists call the belief that communism is superior to free markets "demoralization," and by that they don't mean mass drug use and perversion.  Rather,  young people become demoralized in the same sense as troops who believe their situation is hopeless.

People in that mental state are far less likely to vote, since they believe it won't (can't) help.  And who would ever fight for a country they've been taught was evil from its very founding?  We saw hints of this last part around 1970, with huge protests against continued U.S. involvement in Vietnam.

So there are ample historic examples for every point that's coming. 

Now for the hundredth time, I don't have kids, and my six nieces and nephews were raised by liberal Democrats, so while I'll be sorry for them being forced to suffer, I can't save 'em.  So as the old saying goes, I've got no dog in this hunt.  

The loss of freedom of speech or the right to bear arms won't bother 'em a bit.  Yes, Democrat-ordered taxes will be higher, but good party members will know how to sign up for more "free stuff" to offset the higher taxes.  Yes, steak will cost $40 a pound, so will be a once-a-year treat for working families, but Bill Gates will be selling a delicious meat-substitute, and "reporters" at the NY Times will gush that it tastes every bit as good as the best steak they ever had!  And everyone will nod and agree.

Yes, it too will cost $40 a pound, BUT it'll reduce Global Wa Climate Change. 

Because everyone they know will be in the same boat, my nieces and nephews won't realize their lives are less free.  And in any case, it's because their liberal Democrat parents supported whatever happens.  

 

 

Fraud in Los Angeles

If you don't pay attention to things outside your immediate reach, you may not have heard that intrepid citizen journalist Nick Shirley went to Los Angeles and chased down the addresses of hundreds of phantom "hospices" bilking Medicare for billions.

He found 42 of 'em were supposedly operating in one strip mall.  No patients, but 42 small offices with mailing addresses.  Even the most superficial investigation by the state--or by local Media (all leftist Democrat-fellators) would have discovered this.  But of course no one did until Nick.

 

(For young Americans: "hospice" is where nursing staff care for the terminally ill, meaning recovery was highly unlikely.) 

Nick knocked on every door claiming to be a "hospice."  Most were empty, locked.  Of the ones that were occupied, the occupants claimed not to know anything about a hospice.  Others simply refused to say anything.  Nick got it all on video.

Brazen, in-you-face, fuck-you fraud.  So did the state instantly shut 'em down?

Hahahahahahaha!  I see you just arrived on Earth, so enjoy your stay!

Of course they weren't shut down, cuz some state employees were either negligent (not doing their job of verifying that payees were legit) or on the take.  Your choice.

But don't let anyone claim the Democrat-ruled state assembly (legislature) didn't take action!  No no no, citizen!  Duh Democrats passed a LAW to prevent citizens from investigating corruption.  The local Democrat-fellating Media--without a trace of irony--quickly nicknamed it the "Stop Nick Shirley Act."

How the scam worked: Grifters would get the names and SS numbers of older people who'd recently been hospitalized, and would pay a corrupt doctor to sign a form recommending the patient be sent to hospice.  The places can be expensive, and the fraudsters weren't shy about billing Medicare for top-notch care.

But there wasn't any.  No patients in these places.  In fact some of the fake hospices billed taxpayers for patients who'd died months earlier.

Now rational people would think that before sending ANY check for, say, $3 million a month to an alleged hospice, the state would verify that the company was indeed on file with the Secretary of State and licensed by whatever passes for medical licensing in that shit-hole.  But of course no one did, either because no agency head or manager had enough sense to, or because state lackeys were on the take.  Your choice.

After Nick uncovered the obvious massive fraud, state computer experts cross-checked their data and found one doctor who claimed to have personally examined something like 300 elderly patients in a single day and recommended hospice care for all.  (For young Americans: Assuming an 8-hour workday that would mean examining each alleged patient for about 90 seconds.) 

Now the question is, how many of the fraudsters have fled to Mehico or Somalia or China, thus effectively putting 'em beyond reach of U.S. law.  

And in the midst of the billions of dollars in fraud, the unasked question is: is the hastily-passed law barring citizens from investigating fraud still on the books?

Say, citizen, that Gavin Newsom has done such a fine job of running California, so he'd make a perfect Dem nominee for president in 2028, eh? 

(hat tip to "basicoptimism") 

America-hating leftist Joy Reid: "Nobody I know is excited about the 4th of July"

Joy Reid is a no-talent racist hack.  MSDNC gave her an hour-long TV show every day to spew venom and anti-white, anti-America hate. 

Her father is a migrant from Congo.

Her mother is a migrant from Guyana. 

Average salary in Congo is $449.  Average salary in Guyana is $5,200.

If not for the U.S. Reid would be starving in a mud hut. 

So you'd think that having had her own hour-long TV show every weekday, making ten million a year or so, she'd be totally grateful for what the U.S. has given her, eh?

Guess again.  Reid bleats "Nobody I know is excited about the 4th of July."

 

Like almost all leftists, Joy Reid is a monster.  Truly an evil being.  Instead of being grateful to the nation that gave her a fortune--for NO talent--she embraced her true mission, which was and is to help destroy this nation--and white civilization.  She and Momdani and Darializa Avila Chevalier are all on the same team.

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2069082190042767429 

Democrats think they're using Muslims to drag the U.S. to socialism. But...

 

x 

Leftist shit-heads at the NY Times turn pregnancy into a political plot.

In a sneering article in the "style" section and disguised as a piece on style (or the absence thereof), Times chief fashion critic Vanessa Friedman sneers that three women connected to the White House were recently pregnant...at the same time!

Must be a cunning plot, eh?  Absolutely:  three conservative women having children at almost the same time--and this in an age where declining birthrates for Americans are SO much more fashionable, eh?  And of course American kids just add to the ravages of Climate Change!

Fashion critic Friedman implies that because almost all immigrants are leftists, the only way Republicans can get more votes is to have kids, who'll obviously be raised to vote conservative.  The horror!  Echoes of "The Handmaid's Tale."  

To the leftists at the NY Times, babies born to Republicans are simply propaganda tools.  Count on the leftist shit-heads at the NY Times to turn pregnancy into a political plot.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/24/style/usha-vance-maga-pregnancy-style.html 

Minnesota law allows any registered voter to "vouch" for up to 8 unregistered people (who don't show proof of citizenship) to allow em to vote the same day

After a certain number of laws or rules in a state all lead to fraud, at some point you have to start thinking it may be intentional:  

A controversial Minnesota election law allows any registered voter to enable up to eight other people to register on election day, and without showing any proof of citizenship and vote the same day. 

Under this incredibly stupid law--passed by Democrats and confirmed by the Secretary of State--the registered voter simply signs an oath saying he or she verifies the address of the person being registered.  This is called "vouching."  

To keep the scam from being too obvious, those being vouched for still must provide one form of identity verification, which can be a driver's license from any state, a utility bill or a high school or college ID.

Of course utility bills don't have photos of the addressee, so if that was the only item used to satisfy identity, obviously anyone could claim to be the person whose name was on the bill.

The SecState website says this info is then used to verify that the person being registered--and voting the same day--lives in that precinct.  And again, no proof of citizenship needed.

Minnesomalia is one of 23 states that allow same-day voter registration, meaning the newly-registered person casts his or her vote before anyone tries to confirm that the voter lives in that precinct.  So in most of those states, ballots cast by late-registering voters are "provisional," meaning not counted until eligibility is confirmed.  And if a thousand people in a precinct registered on election day, it could easily take a week to verify everyone's residence.

Problem is, in Minnesomalia there are NO "provisional ballots," meaning all ballots are counted immediately instead of being held back until the voter's residence can be confirmed.  And since ballots have no way of being tied to a specific voter, once a ballot is counted it can't be later identified and removed even if the same-day voter is found to have lied about residing in that precinct. 

In other words, once the ballot is cast, it's impossible to remove it from the count.

Realizing the lucrative opportunity for fraud, last March a GOP state rep introduced a bill that would make ballots cast on the same day a voter registered "provisional," meaning they wouldn't be counted until residency was confirmed.

And of course you can guess what happened:  Since the Dems control the state legislature, the bill didn't get out of committee.

Critics have also noted that three years ago Gov. Tim Walz pushed a bill called "Driver's Licenses for All," giving applicants licenses without checking immigration status.  And since state licenses don't show citizenship, anyone can use those to register to vote.  

Gosh, you don't think anyone would actually DO that, do ya?

Elon Musk summed up the state's system: "It was made for fraud." 

Which brings us to another Minnesomalia fraud: the billions stolen by fake Learing Centers, autism "treatment centers," transport services billing for 50 trips a day of 100 miles or more, and the like.  Every service paid for by Medicaid or Medicare, the Somalis looted.

SO...you can't afford another kid because childcare is so expensive, but Somali fraudsters effortlessly stole millions of your taxpayer dollars for child care centers that only existed on paper. 

You can’t afford a home--but 100 Somalis spent $100 million of your taxpayer dollars on luxury villas overseas. 

You’re paying $30K a year for high-deductible health insurance--while they got millions of your taxpayer dollars for health care centers that never treated a single patient." 

They robbed us blind for years, screwing over hardworking Americans--and having the GALL to smear anyone who complained as racist. 

So much good could have been done for Americans with all the billions stolen by the Somali fraudsters--as whistleblowers in the Minnesomalia government  were threatened if they said anything.  Thank a Democrat.

Democrats: "Pipo in third-world countries iz jus' like us. Reeeally"

For the past 60 years western "elites" have operated under the naive delusion that the Third World is full of faaabulous freedom-loving people with vast untapped potential, and that the only reason they're not as fabulous as the west is because of...past oppression.

The truth is that Third World nations are shit because those nations are full of shitty, lawless thugs.  Not all, of course.  Just the powerful, wealthy ones.  Warlords.  Cartel kingpins.

(edited from a post by @crushmarxismnow) 

A mom posts about her new baby--an' duh Left iz screamin'

 

I added "liberal" to Katie Miller's post because conservatives think having kids is a good thing.  By huge contrast, leftists and Democrat sneer that having kids is NOT good--at least not for Americans.  Totally fine for other nationalities, of course, just not for "us."

Now why do ya suppose that is, eh? 

For years, so-called "elites" in the U.S. have sneered that being a mom hurts your career.  And it's oppressive.  And more American kids hurts duh Erf, cuz Americans use more energy per person than other nations.  Plus, white couples having more kids just keeps the problem of "white privilege" boiling.  Other races having lots of kids is fine.  The "elites" just bitch about whites having kids.

Now here's the hoot: a pencil-dick "influencer" named Bryan Tyler Cohen quoted Katie's post (above) to try to discredit it, claiming U.S. "elites" have NEVAH sneered at white motherhood!  Nope nope nope!  "You dumb conservatives just imagined it!" 

Seriously, this pencil-dick, Cohen, bleated that the notion that motherhood is "oppressive" was totally made up by conservatives.  So all those stories you think you saw and read about women claiming corporate careers were FAR more rewarding than motherhood, or that congress needed to give "free" (taxpayer-funded) child-care to all (reason, never ever stated: so women could work outside the home, leaving raising kids to strangers or the government)...you totally imagined it!  Duh Mainstream Media (like the NYT and WaPo) never even hinted at such things, citizen!

To help the pencil-dick get his point across better, another commenter helpfully added this cute pic:

 

But hey, if you're one of duh Kool Kidz you gots t' listen to Bryan Tyler Cohen, cuz he gots 618,000 followers, deplorable!  Dat mean errybuddy believe whut he bleat.  He kool.  Hey, y'know what else is popular wif' duh Kool Kidz in the U.S.?  

Communism.

Hey citizen, remember when bribem and the Dems hired 87,000 armed IRS agents?

 

Except it did.

"No kings," eh?

Democrat shitheads keep bleating that Trump wants to be king, an' "We don' haz no kangs!"  Really, dumbshits? 

 

When a Dem president DEMANDS that you obey or get fined or fired, Dems don't bat an eye.  "Dis perfekly fine!"  By contrast, Trump tried to enforce valid U.S. immigration law, by deporting people who had entered the U.S. illegally--and Democrat pols screamed that he was tryin' t' be a KANG! 

It was a brilliant strategy: Americans don't like being ruled by a king, so claiming Trump was tryin' t' be a KANG was a sure-fire winning strategy for the Dems.

By contrast, Obozocare and bribem's order that all employees of firms with 100 or more employees MUST take the jab, even if young and healthy and with no "co-morbidities" (i.e TOTALLY overriding you health preferences), Dems just smiled and smirked.

It's how Democrats roll, comrade.  Another example: Your local library hosts "Drag queen story hour" for children.  You don't get to vote on it.  Democrat excuse: "If yew don' like it, yew don' hafta go!"  But when a Christian group wants to use the same library to discuss political issues, library communists won't allow it.  Ohh, double standards?  Tough shit: dey iz kangs.  Yew don' get to vote on it.

Oh, y'say dat not true?  Dat too brazen, too much of an obvious double-standard?

Try it.  The American Library Association is totally run by communists.  And don't be fooled by a response that says "fine."  A week before the planned meeting they'll renege.  "We checked with the city attorney and 'they' told us this would be unconstitutional, violating the First Amendment."  It doesn't, and no real attorney would claim otherwise.  But your objections will get nowhere.

Consider this: government builds roads with tax funds.  If your library refuses to allow a Christian group to use the library--a facility build with taxpayer money--what's the rationale for denying Christians use of library meeting rooms?  It's like barring Christians from using roads.  And yet "drag queens" are welcome to use the library to host "drag queen story hour," eh?  

Double standards, always.

 

The alleged total U.S. presidential popular vote by party is...interesting

Study the numbers below for a minute.  (Don't worry about the details because *official sources* have number differing by Millions from the numbers below.) 

 Democrat                   Republican

65,788,564     2016    62,984,828  (Trump-Hilly)
81,283,501     2020    74,223,975  (Trump-bribem)
75,019,682     2024    77,303,568  (Trump-Cackles)

To say there are "anomalies" in the above claimed numbers is a vast understatement: Hilliary was far more popular than the moronic serial liar Joe bribem, and Joe's VP, Cackles, was a total nutter compared to Hilliary's not-quite-as-moronic Tim Kaine.  So you'd think just considering candidate attractiveness, the Dems should have gotten fewer votes in 2020 than in 2016, eh? 

Instead the official tally shows the Dems got 23.6% MORE votes with the moronic duo of bribem/Cackles than with Hilliary/Kaine.  So a good question is, How likely is it that bribem/Cackles got 23.6% MORE legitimate votes in 2020 than Hilly/Kaine got four years earlier?

Yeah, I know, the fucking Media began lying about Trump on Day 1 of his first term: first it was the total fiction that "Trump colluded with Putin to steal the election frum ouah beloved Hilliary!"

The whole notion of "Trump-Russia collusion" was utterly absurd: Trump was pro-military and pro-capitalism.  Seemingly a big supporter of free markets, thus anti-communist.  By sharp contrast, Hilliary was thoroughly, astonishingly corrupt and hated the military (as did her pussy-obsessed husband).  If you were Putin, would you rather have Hilly or Trump as commander-in-chief of your only rival power?

Obviously you'd want the corrupt, military-hating Hill-beast. 

So now let's look at some numbers that show something about the official number is WAY off.

Note the total votes for R and D combined for 2020: 155,500,000.  Compare this to the National Conference of State Legislatures, which reported (estimated) 159 million total votes.  Wiki [yeah, I know] reports 159,738,337 votes cast.  How can there be a difference of 4,238,000 between the two reported total votes cast--numbers that should be specific, verifiable, unequivocal?

No one has ever tried to explain.  No member of the Lying Mainstream Media has ever even asked that question!  That alone should tell you something.

Now consider Statista, which claims that in 2020 (bribem v. Trump) there were 168.31 million registered voters in the U.S.  If we accept that 155,500,000 total votes were cast in 2020, out of 168.31 million registered voters, that would mean that in 2020, 92.39 percent of registered voters voted.  That seems to be unbelievably high.

(But then you have websites like the "U.S. Election Assistance Commission"--which has a dot-gov URL--claiming "In 2016 states reported 214,109,360 million citizens as registered to vote."  This is SO far off the consensus number from other sources that it's hard to take 'em seriously.  But these sorts of discrepancies are everywhere in voting data.  I note this because this is supposedly a government agency, and yet this supposed "federal agency" has a figure for registered U.S. voters that disagrees with other sites by roughly 46 MILLION people!  This is outrageous--but typical.) 

To compare:  Wiki [yeah, I know] says that in 2020 (bribem v. Trump), about 161 million people were registered to vote and 158,427,986 ballots were counted.  Wiki says that was 96.3% of registered voters--much higher that the 92.39% shown above by Statista's numbers.  But even more unbelievably, if we take Wiki's claim of "about" 161 million registered voters in 2020, and 158,427,986 total votes counted, that would mean 98.4% of those registered supposedly voted.

Horseshit.  You couldn't get 98.4% of any big group of Americans to get off their asses to collect a free Lexus (or other luxury car of their choice).  It's not just horseshit, it's brazen, screaming, obvious horseshit.  And yet no one in the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media batted an eye--because they wanted bribem to win.

Wiki and Statista differ by 2.9 MILLION in the number of votes actually counted, and by about 7 million in the number of registered voters:Wiki says "about" 161 million while Statista says 168.31 million.  Obviously both those are huge differences, in a figure that should be a matter of unequivocal public record.  

In 2016--the VERY hotly contested race between Hilliary and Trump--136,669,237 ballots were officially totaled, out of 157,596,000 registered voters (86.72% of registered voters).  By comparison, in 2020 a total of 155,500,000 votes were counted, out of 168,308,000 registered voters--92.39%.  So the percentage of votes counted compared to registered voters rose 5.67%.  This can be seen as an indication of voter enthusiasm--though there are other possible explanations.

Now consider that in 2016 (Trump-Hilly) the total, official Dem vote was 65,788,564.  But just four years later (2020, Trump-bribem) the Dems were officially credited with a staggering 81,283,501 votes--23.6% MORE votes than just four years earlier.  

Given how high Democrat enthusiasm was for Hilliary in 2016, how reasonable is it for the Dems to have actually gotten 23.5% MORE votes in 2020 than just four years earlier--especially since the faaabulous Hilliary was cruising to be the first female prezzy and was far more popular than the totally undistinguished bribem?

Now consider that in 2024 (Trump v. Harris/Walz), despite a record number of anti-Trump, pro-Harris articles in the Mainstream Media, and 3% more Americans of voting age, and record Dem spending, the official total Dem vote dropped by 6.2 MILLION votes from just 4 years earlier. 

That huge drop from the claimed 2020 Democrat vote is extremely curious.  Many Democrats have bleated that the reason was that in 2024 minorities who voted in 2020 were prevented from voting in 2024 due to "voter suppression," caused by GOP states purging their voter rolls close to election day, preventing would-be Dem voters from voting.  That claim is total horseshit.  

A far more plausible explanation is that even Democrats realized Cackles was a horrible person--and that her insurance policy, Tampon Timmy Walz, was equally bad.  But even so, after four years of non-stop anti-Trump stories in the Media ("Trump colluded with Putin to steal the 2020 election!" "Trump and Epstein were close friends!" "Trump hates immigrants!" etc) you'd think everyone who'd voted Dem in 2020 would have done the same four years later, eh?  

After four years of a non-stop barrage of anti-Trump stories, and a chance to vote for the party's hand-picked, historic "first black female" presidential nominee, you'd think everyone who voted Democrat in 2020 would have done the same in 2024, eh?

And with 3% more registered voters, you'd think the total Dem vote would be *roughly* 3% higher than four years earlier, eh?  Yet in 2024 the total Dem vote *dropped* 7.7% from 2020.

The only way such a huge drop makes sense is if bribem didn't get nearly the 81,283,501 votes officially reported in 2020.  A far more plausible number of Dem votes in 2020 would be 75,000,000, which would be 14% higher than 2016 (due to the huge wave of anti-Trump Media stories for four years).  Then the fact that in 2024 Cackles got virtually the same number--75,020,000--also makes more sense, because the 3% increase in registered Dem voters would be offset by the slight drop in voter enthusiasm, NOT because Dem voters didn't love Cackles and Timmy but because some were angered by the fact that Cackles was handed the nomination by Pelosi, without winning (or even entering) a single primary.

So apparently in 2024 the Democrat party didn't attempt the massive vote fraud that gave the utterly corrupt bribem the presidency in 2020.

Given the foregoing the logical question is, Since the past obviously can't be changed, why bother to cite evidence suggesting the Democrats engaged in truly  massive, brazen vote fraud in 2020, eh?  After all, after six years it's obvious no one will be charged, any more than Obozo will be charged for the infamous Oval Office meeting in which he directed his FBI to spend the next four years of undermining Trump. 

The reason is to prevent this from happening again.

Turns out there are *at least*  a dozen easy ways to rig an election in the U.S. 
  1. Scanning the same stack of known 99% Dem ballots multiple times.
  2. Mail carriers (99% Democrat) trashing mail-in ballots addressed to high-income neighborhoods (likely to vote GOP).  This was proven;
  3. Dem operatives paying up to $50 apiece for blank mail-in ballots.  Proven;
  4. Dem operatives "harvesting" ballots from nursing-home residents, filling 'em out for Democrat candidates and submitting em without a matching sig, or witness sigs.  Proven;
  5. Democrat poll workers telling voters their scanners were broken, so "to help workers," GOP voters were instructed to put their ballots in bag #1, while Democrats are told to put their ballots in bag #2.  One of those bags doesn't make it to the counting center.  Since polling places don't publish the number of votes cast (even though that number is known) no one ever compares it to the number of votes totaled by the counting center, so the discrepancy is never detected.
  6. Printing thousands more ballots than the number of registered voters, for the stated purpose of having extras in the central warehous in case unusually high turnout occurs at a few precincts, causing poll workers to ask the central authority for more ballots.  Ballots sent to a precinct are logged, but tens of thousands of the "reserve ballots" aren't logged in at the central warehouse since they haven't been sent to a precinct yet.  Thousands can be stolen by election workers.
  7.  Fake mail-in ballots:  For the elections office to mail ballots to voters, those ballots must be folded to fit in the envelope.  But surveillance cameras in counting centers show stacks of supposed mail-in ballots with no creases.  If they were mailed to voters, then back to the state, how can they not show any creases (folds)?
  8. Democrat-owned and -staffed commercial printing companies are paid by Dem state govts to print millions of mail-in ballots--legitimate contracts.  But after the "state run," they print an extra 50,000 or so that are never given to the state and never show up on any inventory.  
   Some election workers claim that these extra ballots are sometimes printed on thinner, lighter-weight paper that lacks the authenticating "watermark" on the official ballots.  Experienced paper experts claim they can tell the weight difference at a touch, but poll workers aren't told to check this, or look for watermarks.
  9. Voter impersonation: this was always the easy/obvious way: Someone shows up to vote claiming to be [name].  If there's no record that the  person they claim to be has voted, they're waved right thru.  But if the precinct received a mail-in ballot from person X, the fake who shows up in person is allowed to cast a "provisional ballot" which is only counted after an investigation to verify that the person who showed up in person was who they claimed to be.
   And in some Dem-ruled shithole states like Minnesomalia, provisional ballots are scanned and counted right away, so can never be removed from the total count even if the person is found to have lied about being eligible to vote.
   But in practice, few such investigations are made.  *At worst* for the fraudsters, both legal and fraudulent ballots are accepted, meaning either 2 Dem votes, or 1 of each, in which case the imposter has offset a GOP vote.  Win-win.

  10. Drop boxes:  If you show up to vote in person, workers can't (and don't) ask for photo ID, since duh Dems haz sed dat wud be raaaaacis'!  But in most states you still have to sign in on some type of log book.
   In theory the precinct has the signature of the real voter on file, and in theory the two can be compared to determine if the person showing up to vote was who he or she claimed to be.  Problem is, by the time that can be done, that person's ballot has already been anonymized and scanned, so it's been counted. 
   Further, the Democrats DEMANDED hundreds of unattended, unguarded "drop boxes," so obviously there's no sign-in sig that can be compared.
   Of course ballots in drop-boxes are identical to mail-in ballots, and in theory workers at the counting center are supposed to check that signatures on mail-in ballots match the sig voters gave when registering.  But surveillance videos of the computer screens of the workers supposedly comparing sigs show that thousands of sigs were okayed even if they didn't remotely match the one on file.  
   This is how you wind up with ten or 20% more votes counted in a precinct than registered voters.
The Dem-fellating Media never ask Dems how that happened.

  11:  In Fulton County, Georgia, officials said they were halting vote counting, and everyone was to go home.  The alleged reason was a "water main" broke in a bathroom of the counting center.  
  Three problems with this: first, the alleged "water main" was actually a leaking 3/8ths-inch line feeding a single urinal, so wouldn't have been a threat in any case.  Second, maintenance logs show the leak was reported at around 8 a.m. and fixed by 9 a.m, so wouldn't have been causing any problem at 8 p.m. that night.
  The third problem is that after Democrat election officials supposedly stopped counting and told everyone to leave, surveillance video shows at least three workers kept scanning ballots for several more hours.  Two of these workers were Ruby Freeman and her adult daughter.  The latter was a supervisor at the counting center, and the two were seen feeding stack after stack of ballots into scanners for another hour or so after everyone else had been ordered to leave.  One of the two was seen feeding the same stack into a scanner at least three times, without making any new control inputs.

All of the above points are why simply re-adding counted votes is useless to detect fraud:  The problem is that if ballots themselves are fraudulent, simply counting 'em won't reveal the fraud.  Only a "forensic examination" of counted ballots will have any hope of identifying fraud--which is why Democrats have fought any attempt to do such examinations.

The Dems bleat that examining ballots will "violate voter privacy," and that they're heroically fighting to "protect the secret ballot!"  Horseshit.  The identifying info used to authenticate mail-in ballots is separate from the ballot itself, and once the voter info is supposedly authenticated it's separated from the ballot, in which case there's NO way to identify who cast that ballot.

So by lying, Democrats are able to pose as heroically defending ouah sacred right to a secret ballot, when in fact they're using the claim to defeat efforts to discover vote fraud!  

Wokie "influencer" on a NY Times-owned podcast urges pipo to steal from companies

Last April a leftist "influencer" named Hasan Piker appeared on a podcast owned by The New York Times, called "The Opinions."

Piker explicitly, literally urged people to steal from corporations.  He and the two smirking females with him used the cutesy hipster neologism "microlooting" to describe stealing from big companies taking small items, rationalizing it as merely a form of social protest--"a response to perceived structural injustice."

(Clever readers may notice Piker's cunning use of "perceived" there: so the issue isn't whether there actually IS any injustice, just that the thief feels there is.
    Fortunately looters only "perceive" "structural injustice" on days ending in "y."
 
In the too-cutesy hipster-bleat of all leftists, Piker also said he was "pro-piracy," saying he would even "pirate" (i.e. steal) a car "if it were technologically possible."  Of course that's done hundreds of times every day: car theft or even carjacking.  And this communist motherfucker is urging it.

But lest you think this piece of shit is "unethical" or some such for urging people to steal from high-end grocery stores like Whole Foods, Piker piously bleated that he would NOT steal from Mamdani's proposed city-owned grocery stores because those stores will use union labor and public funds.

For those who might have wondered: the communist-loving NY Times did NOT publish a critical word about what its wholly-owned podcast shat out.  Because they're stupid communists who actually support every bit of leftist/Cemocrat horseshit like Piker and his two female suckups spewed.

This is the doomed future under "woke" hipster Democrats who totally rule shitholes like NYC, Chitcongo, L.A., Portland, Seattle, Denver, Philly, Baltimore, Albany, Trenton, Oakland and a dozen other disasters.

Of course wokie hipster Dems like Piker won't be hurt by the famine and destruction, cuz they'll be safely burrowed into government, university and Media positions.  And "influencers" like Piker will still be stealing from the few remaining non-government-owned stores. 

They "influencers" and government employees and university profs and Media "experts" will eat steak.  Unfortunately most of us won't be similarly insulated, so you and your kids will be eating dried mealworms--because after you pay your taxes to support the government hipsters, that's all you'll be able to afford.
  
But don't worry, cuz every single day the Media will run a new story saying how totally healthy mealworms are.  And MSDNC will publish a tasty new recipe for mealworms every week.