If you've been paying attention (spoiler: most of ya haven't cuz you're too busy) you may know that one of the HUGE avenues for election fraud in the U.S. is mail-in ballots.  There are two ways this happens:

First, before duh Chyna virus, people who wanted to vote by mail had to request a ballot by mail.  But *because the Chyna virus had everyone scared to death of a virus that was and is less lethal than the flu* (yes, that's a fact), Dem-ruled states began mailing ballots to every registered voter.  No request needed.  And now that covid is gone, they're still doing it.

Problem is that when people move, they almost never bother to tell the state election board their address changed.  So the state continues to mail ballots to the person at their old address--ballots which can easily be "voted" by fraudsters--because Democrat "vote counters" don't try to match signatures or enforce witness signatures or postmarks.

Another problem is that Dems know when the Post Office delivers big stacks of ballots to apartment houses, and crooks with postal "master keys" then steal dozens of ballots in a minute, and are paid $50 bucks per ballot by the fraudsters.

SO...Republicans introduced a bill called the SAVE Act to reduce election fraud.  But Democrat senators have threatened to use their minority to block it with the filibuster (which takes 60 votes to end).  And now that RINOs are assured that the Dems will continue to block it, four RINOs have joined the Dems, so the filibuster isn't needed. 

SO...Trump ordered the Postal Service to only deliver mail-in ballots to known registered voters.  This doesn't prevent ballots from being stolen, but at least keeps recipients from selling ballots to fraudsters.

Of course as you already guessed, the Democrats immediately sued to block dis AWFUL oppression of po' minorities an'...um...uhhh...Democrats.  And a leftist shit-head judge immediately agreed, and issued an injunction blocking the order.

See, although the Constitution says only citizens are allowed to vote in federal elections, duh leftist judge sey *it beez illegal to try to enforce dat!*  It beez "oppression!"  Besides, Orange Hitler din' to an Environmental Impact Statement!  An' besides, Orange Hitler's order wuz printed on NON-recycled paper!  Can you believe it?  Carelessly disregarding Global Warming!  

But finally yesterday, to the surprise of almost everyone, the Supreme Court voted 6-3 for Trump. 

The Court's ruling allows the Postal Service to check addressees of mail-in ballots against a list of citizens maintained by the Department of Homeland Security.  But the fraud partei has vowed to challenge the order in another lower court on different grounds.  Cuz under Dem-rules no order from any court is final unless the Democrats like it.

Here's the executive order the Dems got blocked:
 >>"Several Federal laws, including 18 U.S.C. 1015 and 611, prohibit foreign nationals from registering to vote or voting in Federal elections. Yet States fail adequately to vet voters' citizenship...

Obviously the three braindead woke women dissented.

Here's how the communist Associated Press wire service twisted the story:
>>  The decision leaves room for new court challenges [lawsuits] that could further slow [block] Trump's order, *and other similar cases have already been filed.*
    Time is running short to impose major changes. North Carolina is sending out ballots Sept. 4 overseas and to military voters, and other states will quickly follow suit in just a few weeks. 
    The three liberal-leaning justices publicly dissented, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson writing that the rule "lets another shoe drop in the Kafkaesque nightmare that our precedents have been steadily creating for certain plaintiffs who seek to bring election-related challenges."
    While the emergency order is not final, it does *have the potential to create chaos around voting across the country,* with Trump often questioning the integrity of elections and the nation's highest court again the possible arbiter of a political controversy."
   Mail-in voting has long been a favorite target for Trump, who has claimed that it breeds fraud *despite strong evidence to the contrary*...>>

<<Bullshit: there is NO evidence that there's NO fraud in mail-in voting.  None.  Cuz you can't prove a negative.  All you can say is no evidence has been found.  But even that's a lie, since many precincts in Dem-run shitholes *counted* more votes than not just *registered* voters, but more than the total number of people of legal age to vote!  Lots of voters who went to vote in person were told that they'd already voted by mail.  Of course since there's no sign-in log for mail-in ballots there's no way to check sigs to see if the sig on the mail-in ballot matches that of the person wanting to vote in person.

Trying to find an anonymized ballot among thousands could be done, but would be hugely time-consuming.  Plus, some Dem-ruled states have shredded their ballots in violation of federal law.  Many boxes of counted ballots are missing.

The Lying Media always quotes "experts" they know will support the Dem party, never one that alleges fraud.  The Media know which experts to ask for comments because the Media knows which side each expert supports.

In a dispute between experts, the Media almost never has the expertise to determine who's right.  Yet in case after case the media instantly *decides which experts are right,* and tells you.  And since the entire media supports the Dem party it's no surprise that all the "experts" they quote parrot every Democrat claim, eh?

A few stories are slowly emerging showing how brazenly the Media did this with covid: they always quoted Fauci--the "expert" they liked--without adding a single critical word.  Yet many experts knew the virus had been modified in a lab and did NOT jump to humans from a bat or pangolin.  You just never knew they existed, because the Media never told you about them.

Source: Ace of Spades

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=421110 

What a firing in Europe means for the U.S.

The creature below is named "Petra de Sutter."  You won't be surprised to learn that a) Petra is not its real name; and b) whoever this really is was a member of the Green partei of Belgium; and c) then became a member of the damn leftist European Parliament.  

 

After those exalted positions, "Petra" was named Deputy Prime Minister for Groen (Flemish green party) as well as Minister for Public Enterprises and Public Administration.  Once that party was out of power, "Petra" won some sort of election as "Rector" of the U. of Ghent.

Clearly "Petra" has lived a charmed life.  The Belgian press is absolutely crammed with fawning, slobbering articles about the creature's faaaabulousness.  But something seemed a bit...off, so I checked Wiki.  (I know.)

The Wiki piece was as fawning as the Belgian press, swooning over all of "Petra's" faaabulous positions.  Wiki predictably only failed to mention one small thing--and you obviously already guessed: "Petra" isn't a woman.  And "Petra" isn't really its name. 

Question is, why didn't Wiki mention this.  Try asking the communist sons of bitches.  Good luck.

So why would I take my precious damn time to introduce you to this mentally ill (but clearly "connected" twit?  Because unbelievable as it may seem, this "twit" has just defined a pivotal point for our society.  (Democrats: "You idiot, Petra isn't an American, so how can she [sic] have any possible relevance to U.S. society?  You're stupid...and deplorable!")

I'll explain: "Petra" and the Left demand that we all unquestioningly accept the claim of trannies and their Leftist supporters that "trans women ARE women."  And the entire Democrat-fellating, Lying Mainstream Media eagerly parrot that lie.  For example, the fawning, slobbering Wiki propaganda piece never mentions that "Petra" is a biological male claiming to be female.  There's even a piece in the Belgian press blasting some TV interviewer for even asking duh faaaabulous "Petra" "When someone asks about your 'dead name,' does that hurt you?"

"Just NOT DONE," huffed the press.  Cuz by even alluding to the tranny's real sex, you expose the lie, and that's just...well in Europe you can be imprisoned for that.

When your 5-year-old kid claims he's a dinosaur, that's amusing, and you can indulge that fantasy with no harm.  Or you could gently tell him that claiming he's something unreal doesn't make it true, eh?  The difference is that your 5-year-old can't throw you in prison if you don't eagerly agree that he IS a dinosaur.  

By sharp contrast, trannies and their Leftist enablers have already passed laws giving them the power to throw YOU in prison if you deny their clearly unreal bleat that "trans women ARE women."

So far that's only happened in Europe and the U.K, but it's coming here fast. 

If you don't believe that (and you don't), consider this: ten days ago a mom and teen daughter were at a WNBA game, wearing T-shirts saying simply "XX is not XY."  Anything obscene there?  Of course not.  But arena staff ordered them to cover up what the staff called an "offensive message."  Wait, how was it offensive?  And to whom?

Sure: XX and XY refer to chromosomes, and are a way of saying men are not women.  So why would anyone be offended by this obvious truth (well, obvious to most rational adults)?  And in any event, since the message was obviously not obscene, by what alleged "right" did the WNBE order that they cover up?  Thought we had free speech (if not obscene), eh?

And why the hell would the "W" NBA be terminally upset by the obvious truth that men are not women? 

If you pay attention, you know why: one gal with courage.  Sophie Cunningham, a star WNBA player.  Remember the controversy she ignited?  She had the audacity to say biological men shouldn't compete against women.  Remember?

Not too long ago, that notion was so obvious and non-controversial that no one even bothered to say it.  But then leftists (yes) realized they could utterly fuck up the country NOT just by people changing sex (yeah, I know, "gender"), but by forcing all of us to agree with the lie that men who claim to be female really are.  And that if you deny that, you're somehow bad. 

Then within a couple of years, corrupt, glib shitheads like Gavin Newsom and Barky Obozo were forcing taxpayers to pay for sex-change operations for inmates, then for illegal aliens.  Democrat-ruled states passed LAWS allowing the state to take a child away from a parent who refused to eagerly embrace the lie, as by calling the child by their given name instead of their "dead name."  Ohhh the HORROR!  The states called it "child abuse."  Seriously.

If you get all your "newz" from the lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media you don't believe a word of that last paragraph.  But every word is true.  It all happened so gradually, with the full support of the Mainstream Media and all Dem pols, that only a few people noticed.  And their voices were silenced. 

So back to "Petra:"  Right now in the U.S. you can't be imprisoned for saying men can't become real women by merely claiming so.  In that case, why do I claim "Petra" represents a "pivot point" for our society?  

Because crazy leftist Democrats are about to regain power here.  Which means leftists will be able to pass any law they want.  And one of the first ones (after "free" medical care, housing, food and college for all, abolish ICE, cops and prisons, free childcare and reparations) will be to make saying or even implying that "men can't be women" "hate speech," punishable by prison.

Of course you don't believe that's remotely possible, cuz you think the First Amendment guarantees the right of free speech.  After all, the Supreme Court says even burning the American flag is protected by free speech, so how could uttering an absolute truth put someone in prison?

Answer: the Supreme Court long ago ruled that not all speech is "protected."  Meaning if "duh gruberment" doesn't like X, yew cain't say it.  And gradually, as our courts were taken over by leftist judges, hundreds of lawsuits ruled that wearing a T-shirt saying "Fuck [whatever]," or burning the flag, or nude dancing, were all "protected speech." 

But that can also work the other direction: Leftist judges will absolutely uphold any law that says you can be imprisoned for saying "men aren't women."  

Oh, you think that's ridiculous?  I'll be that until ten minutes ago not one of you would have bet that a mom and daughter could legally be thrown out of an arena for wearing shirts saying simply "XX is not XY," eh?

Be honest: you never believed that could happen, cuz an absolute truth and not obscene.

Obviously that's a long way from being imprisoned--but the point is that there are NO barriers to congress passing such a law.  Trump obviously would veto it, but after 2028 the Dem prezzy will absolutely sign it into law.

The fatal flaw of democracy is that when the crazies outnumber the sane, it's all over.  In our case the DSA communists are forcing "normal" Democrat pols to embrace their insane policies to be re-elected (THE obvious goal of every politician).  So it's not that the U.S. has more trannies than cis people, but that if the Left has a majority, they can do whatever they want--there is NO remaining barrier, because the courts have ruled that certain "speech" is criminal.  

I don't have any problem if someone claims to be Napoleon, or a dinosaur, or the opposite sex.  The problem all of us should have is when "woke" politicians, pandering for votes, pass laws establishing "Human Rights Commissions" and give 'em the power to sue you and fine you for disagreeing with the crazies.  Or to fire you.  Yeah, that's one helluva red line for me.

So why is "Petra" relevant here?  Because in the U.K the gullible dipshits at Cambridge had appointed a young mentally ill black male as "the youngest black professor in the university's history."  Problem was, not a word of his resume was true.  His dissertation was plagiarized, even copying erroneous punctuation marks.  He claimed to have run 30 marathons in 35 days, and 300 miles in 3 days.  Claimed to have raised 5 million pounds for charities, but later said this was part of a team effort.  When asked who the other team members were, he said he was prevented from saying due to signing NDAs.

Every question about a tall tale had an equally unbelievable response.  And he did it all seemingly effortlessly.

He claimed someone had left a pig's head on his porch.  He said he complained to the cops and that they investigated and found one butcher who had sold a whole pig on the morning in question.  But the cops said there was no investigation, and the butcher said the cops never came to his shop to inquire.  Arday was simply accustomed to never being questioned, nor to have anyone try to verify his bullshit stories.  

So...his field was "sociology of education."  Now I'm convinced that all "doctors of education" are phonies, and same for most of sociology.  Put both together and I suspect it pegs the bullshit meter.  That seems to have been Arday's main skill.  

So a researcher at U. Ghent--Cofnas--did put Arday's dissertation thru plagiarism-detecting software.  Bingo.  And then lots more followed.  Cofnas went public, and Cambridge screamed bloody murder.  "How DARE you!! It's UNFAIR to question duh masterful research of dis faaaabulous young academic!  Din' yew see he iz duh youngest black professor EVAH at Cambridge?  You can't possibly believe dat all duh distinguished, brilliant PhDs in charge of hiring new profs would have missed all dis evidence if it was real, right?  So since that's not possible, you must be lying!  And no, we don't need to actually examine your so-called 'evidence' cuz we already know we're right and you're a raaaaaaaccist!"

Now at last we come to "Petra"--didn't work at Cambridge, and not even in the UK, but in effing Belgium.  "Petra"--who should be very good at identifying fakes, eh?--used its power as "Rector" at the U to fire Cofnas for "harassing the youngest black professor in Cambridge's history" at a totally different university not even in Belgium.

See, according to "wokie" rules no one in academia is allowed to even discover--let alone reveal--that a PhD committed academic fraud.  Well, at least if the fraudster is black.  Whites, of course, are still fair game.  Gee, why are we not surprised?

And the hoot is the number of commenters on X who snarled that the investigator, Cofnas, was a bad person for exposing the total fraud Arday.  Wow.

It's coming here.  In fact it already IS here.  It's just that now all the left can do is fire you, not prison.

Not quite yet. 

Another illegal invader--in northern Virginia--fatally stabs a mother dozens of times

Hey, ya know that thing Democrats sneer never happens?  Well it happened again.

 

The killer invaded in April of 2024 and was immediately released into the U.S. by the open-borders, pro-invader bribem regime.  The invader then went to northern Virginia where he started a "relationship" with a 42-year-old mother with a young daughter.  Then last Monday he stabbed her dozens of times, killing her.  Then he poured gasoline on her body and set her on fire.

Thanks, Democrats.  Imagine how much harder the life of the mother's now-orphaned young daughter will now be.  Thanks again, Democrats.  YOU voted this horror and cruelty into existence.  You approved all of it, and your fellators in the Media made sure Americans heard as little as possible about the mass invasion--and the murders and rapes that followed.  

Think about what you've done, and all the American kids growing up without one or both parents, thanks to your stupid desire to belong to the "woke" crowd. 

Democrats claim illegals aren't voting--so why are they screaming about ICE at polling places?

 

Where we stand on the eve of the mid-term elections

U.K. citizen and author Melanie Phillips is one of the very few people who understands what's happening.  I've edited her piece in the NY Post:

Labor Day weekend (ten days away), Islamic monsters are having the 63rd annual convention of the Islamic Society of North America.  One of the top speakers is a Muslim thug DSA candidate for the U.S. senate Abdul El-Sayed.

Other speakers include Siraj Wahhaj, who has called for the the U.S. to honor sharia law, including amputation, stoning and the execution of gay people.  He makes no secret of his aim to Islamize America.

Another scheduled speaker, Zaid Shakir, has said “Muslims could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.  We could take over this country in a very short time.”

How has America come to permit people who want to make the U.S. into a Muzz-ruled caliphate to freely promote such subversion?

Twenty years ago, in 2006, my best-selling book “Londonistan” described how the British establishment—politicians, government officials, even security and counter-intelligence officers—had totally submitted to the Islamic takeover of the U.K. 

Even after Islamic crazies flew loaded jetliners into the Twin Towers just five years earlier, and after the London Tube and bus bombings of 2005, U.K. pols and officials insanely denied that Islam was a threat.  Instead they corruptly, stupidly blamed it on...anything else:  anger over foreign conflicts such as “Israel-Palestine,” or on "Islamophobia."

A "phobia" is an irrational fear.  This was totally rational, so "Islamophobia" was horseshit.  The problem was--and is--Islam itself.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy to take over the U.K was to force the U.K (and all of Europe) to accept mass Muslim immigration, and to put all Muslim immigrants--including those with a dozen wives and several dozen children--on welfare.  Then use their bloc voting power to elect Muslim extremists to powerful positions, like mayor of London.  (Sound familiar?  Zohran Mamdani?)

Stupid, corrupt politicians deliberately ignored the jihadi strategy of demonstrating power to get corrupt pols to give them even more power.  So the pols ignored the mass Muslim prayer events that blocked entire streets; they rationalized the takeover of public spaces by jihadi demonstrations against Israel as “freedom of speech.”  

Sound familiar?

They deliberately ignored organized Muslim rape and grooming gangs, and the election of “Gaza First” members of Parliament.  Every warning sign was sanitized, dismissed, ignored.

In 2006 the BBC, academics and pols couldn't refute the facts in my book, so their defense was to sneer at it, to make the "cool kids" ignore it.  They screamed it was just "Islamophobia."  The "cool kids" got the message.

Meanwhile Americans shook their heads in astonishment at what was happening in the U.K, France, Germany, Sweden, Belgium and the Netherlands.  The few Americans who paid attention wondered when Europeans would wake up.

And now exactly the same thing is happening in America.  And not only is it being ignored by every Democrat pol, and by the Mainstream Media, it's being eagerly embraced.

New York City now has a communist Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani.  "Ohh, dat jus' one city, deplorable!  Not to worry!"

Muslims infest the House of Representatives, and now Abdul El-Sayed, from the Islamic-dominated shithole of Michigan, has a good chance of being the first Muslim elected to the U.S. senate.  "Don't worry, deplorable, dis jus' one guy!  And SO well spoken, eh?  Plus he fo' free college, national rent freeze, abolishing po-leece an' ICE, for open borders an' citizenship fo' millions of 'immigrants,' free food, free child-care, free government-run health care.  It'll be faaabulous!"

In the UK non-Muslims are so demoralized that virtually no one is even pushing back any longer.  The police arrest and jail anyone who so much as posts a comment on social media criticizing Islam.  The whole country is deep in decline and demoralization.  But in the U.S. at least a few states are fighting back.

Unfortunately (but totally predictably), every time a state legislature passes a law restricting Islamic takeovers in any way, Muslims and the ACLU have instantly sued.  And as far as I know leftist federal judges have overturned every such law.  

Events in the U.K. and Europe clearly show anyone who has eyes and a working brain how Islam is conquering one nation after another.

Of course you think "That can't happen here, cuz...um...reasons!  American women would nevah vote for a Muslim cuz they'd hate having to wear a black full-body bag, an' not being able to leave the house without a male family member, et cetera.  No woman I know would evah vote for that!"

Wake up, America, cuz they ARE voting for Islam--refusing to believe how women are treated in Islamic-ruled shit-holes.  Astonishingly, LOTS of liberal American women hate American men SO much that they'd vote for Joe Stalin just to have a chance to destroy what they see as "duh Patriarchy," eh?  [Parents: ask your kids who Stalin was.]

Bizarrely, the fatal failing is..."democracy."  Seriously.  When everyone gets to vote, and all votes are counted equally, you end up being ruled by stupid, corrupt politicians--because those who are stupid or lazy or angry at duh Patriarchy vote for candidates who promise 'em the most "free shit," or who promise to vote for laws that will "destroy duh Patriarchy."  Think about it.

The Founders of this great nation hoped to insulate us from that trap by having voters not pass laws directly, but by electing "representatives" the Founders hoped would be smarter and better educated, so wouldn't vote for clearly stupid policies.  Problem was, human nature: corrupt or merely stupid sons of whores started running for congress, and the presidency--and once they got elected by equally stupid voters, it was all over. 

Of course you're well educated, and not stupid, right?  But unfortunately you're now outnumbered by those who are dumb and uneducated.  And those people vote for candidates who promise to pass laws giving them ever more "free shit," or for laws that can clearly be predicted to eventually "destroy duh Patriarchy."  Like laws spending more money each year than the gruberment takes in.

Good luck, folks, cuz you're sure as hell gonna need it. 

 

You can't hate the Media enough

 

The Lying Mainstream Media: pushing sex-changes for illegal invaders and prison inmates for decades.

More on Satan's top lackey, Hasan Piker

The last poll before the Wisconsin gubernatorial primary had Piker's DSA candidate--radical leftist Francesca Hong, who'd said Thanksgiving should be cancelled--up by 22 percent.  Looked like a blowout, and Piker was gloating.

Strangely, the communist Hong ended up narrowly losing to the current lieutenant governor.

Piker responded by throwing a tantrum, lashing out at "the fucking national media" (that's a quote), accusing them of sabotaging Hong's campaign. 

Piker's response?  "Fuck 'em and fuck Thanksgiving," he huffed, referring to Hong's view that the holiday should be canceled because it "celebrates colonialism."  Then like all bullies do when punched in the mouth, Piker practically begged the Democratic Party to stop being so mean to him.

>>"I know we don't always see eye to eye on a lot of stuff, but you have to literally, at some point,  defend me," Piker whined. "Not because you love what I have to say, not because I'm part of this coalition, even though I am--whether you like it or not--but you are going to inevitably have to say, This is a ridiculous conversation that we're having..."

Millionaire Piker went on to say it would be helpful if Democrats could be "a little bit more honest about how I'm not this dangerous, toxic radical force." 

Of course Piker is a total communist, totally radical.  He knows it--brags about it.  He just doesn't want YOU to know it.  For him to whine that establishment Democrats need to be "more honest" and agree with his brazen lie that he's NOT radical--when that's exactly his claim to power--is ludicrous.  Here's what he's explicitly said he's pushing:

• abolishing the senate; 
• packing the Supreme Court;
• abolishing the Electoral College and replacing it with...well the Dems' original idea was to elect the prez by the winner of the national popular vote, but now the Dems have an even better (i.e. worse) idea:
• having congress select the president!
• abolishing ICE;
• abolishing police and prisons;
• criminals to be immediately released without having to post bail; 
• free college (camouflaged as "free education for all...up through college," cuz all most people hear is "free education" and think highschool);
• "forgiving" all student loans (meaning taxpayers pay off student loans--cuz everyone loves "forgiveness," right?)
• "Medicare for all" (government controls all healthcare, as in the UK and Canada); 
• unlimited immigration and giving all illegals citizenship;
• ending U.S. use of oil, gas and nuclear power;  
• de-funding the armed forces;

Who wouldn't support ALL those, eh?  And notice all the "free shit" for lazy folks.

The future of the U.S. is riding on the outcome of maybe 4 races--and not just because those may win the Dems majority control of both chambers of congress--something they already effectively have now due to cowardly Republicans.  No, the more serious problem is that if even 2 or 3 DSA candidates win, Democrats will know they can't win without DSA/socialist votes.  So wins for even 2 or 3 of Piker's communists will make almost all future Democrat candidates adopt most DSA policies.

That's the real problem, because "your" public schools have indoctrinated almost all kids to believe a) you can get things for "free;" b) "If you don't have as much stuff as you want, it's because you're oppressed by the rich, and corporations; c) the U.S. is evil and built on stolen land, so we need to adopt socialism to atone for past wrongs; and d) if you're white, you deserve to be conquered by mo' deserving foreigners.

Both Karl Marx and Lenin explicitly believed that the key to communist domination was to take control of education, because once a kid firmly believes anything, it's really hard to get him or her to change their views.  So Dems are winning more voters every year.

If El-Sayed wins, Democrats will realize that the only way to win will be to adopt Piker's communist policies.  They'll adopt his instruction to candidates to seem to just want us to consider those policies, but of course Dems in congress will vote for 'em.  They'll cunningly insert one socialist program at a time into "must-pass" bills.  They'll trade support for some trivial GOP policy to get the GOP not to filibuster a major communist bill in the senate.  

You've seen the playbook dozens of times before, but you're so busy with work and keeping food on the table that you can't remember past a month or so.  And of course it wouldn't make any difference if you did recognize the cunning, destructive tactics, cuz congress-whores do anything they want to get re-elected.  You can't stop 'em.

In the distant past there was some stigma associated with living off welfare.  That's all in the past.  Forcing people who never went to college to pay off $250,000 in student loans for some "womens' studies" major at Columbia or Hahvahd?    "Of course, deplorable!  It's only FAIR that you pay off my student loan!  Dat my RIGHT!"

Seriously, how many people do you know who would turn down "free money" if almost everyone else is getting it too, eh?   

Weak Republican candidates will start supporting DSA programs to give more "free stuff" to voters, so more poisonous policies will become law.

Hopefully you're beginning to see why I'm convinced the future doesn't look good.  Wish I had an idea about how to change it.  Sorry to say I don't. 

 

My prediction: It's too late. Dem socialists will win in November--by lying

Hasan Piker--advisor to dozens of DSA communists--is the closest creature to satan that I've ever seen.  Here he explains the importance of DSA candidates lying to voters:

"Our politicians, whether AOC or anybody else, are NOT running away from progress.  So their pragmatism isn't to moderate their policies but to moderate their comms, their communication."

If you didn't get that, read it again.  Piker is saying "his" candidates are NOT changing their positions to get elected, but instead are merely being "pragmatic" by claiming they no longer support communist policies.  And that's exactly what you're seeing. 

Piker admits Muslim communist Abdul El-Sayed's true beliefs are "electoral poison," then tells his minions how to fix that: "You got to moderate your message, even if you don't want to temper your movement, in order to sell it to the public."

"Moderate your message even if you don't 'temper' your movement" is commie-babble for not being honest about their communist policies--things they've openly pushed before but now are seeming to re-think.  But it's horseshit.

You may have seen that surveys of Democrat voters show about 60% have a favorable view of socialism and a negative view of capitalism.  And white women with a college degree favor socialism even more--over 70%, with about the same percentage saying they dislike capitalism.

Clearly these women have never lived under socialism.  Instead they've simply swallowed the communist propaganda, like "In Cuba and Europe, health-care is absolutely free, and faaaabulous!  Same for housing, and food!"

So health-care is free, eh?  Only if you can get it.  In Canada and the UK it's normal to have to wait six months to get an MRI.  Rather than waiting, Canuks who fear they may have cancer come to the U.S. and pay cash to get an MRI in a day or two.  Nowhere in the rest of the world can you get that--unless you're "connected," part of the ruling party. 

Of course American liberals never heard about that, and wouldn't believe it if a Canadian or a Brit told 'em.  Stupid liberals--men as well as women--totally buy the lie that healthcare in the socialist world is faaaabulous--because it's "free."

But obviously it is NOT free.  Nothing is free but the air you breathe, and sunshine.  Your taxes pay for everything the government supposedly "gives" citizens.  And if you don't understand that (and liberals absolutely don't) you're too fucking stupid to breathe.

Stupid liberals are on the verge of handing over control of the entire U.S. government to socialists.  And if you know history of other countries (spoiler: you don't), you know they'll never relinquish that power.

Of course you don't believe that cuz you're smaaaht, right?  You know control of our government has bounced back and forth, so it's absurd to think that would end, eh?

That's because you naively think communists actually support democracy--because they endlessly bleat that they do, eh?  Well look at Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Spain: You can vote communism in, but can't vote it out.  The Party changes the constitution so the president can serve as long as he wants.  The Party rigs elections because The Party counts the votes.  (Sound familiar?)  The Party appoints all the judges.  Only Party members get hired as university professors, ensuring that all college grads only hear how totally wonderful socialism/communism is.  (We've been there for decades.)

When there are shortages "It's not the Party's fault, comrade!  It's doze eeebil American capitalists preventing us from trading!"  In the case of Cuba they call it a "blockade," but the truth is that even friendly communist countries will no longer GIVE fellow socialists nations billions of dollars of food or medicine.  The USSR did that for decades with Cuba and finally said "enough."  

Wait, we were always told that all socialists were big on "solidarity" with fellow socialist nations!  Guess that was also horseshit. 

SO...what does this all mean for the U.S. just 80 days from now, eh?  To understand it you have to know military history.  (Spoiler: you don't.)

One of the areas where Trump has NO knowledge or expertise is military conflict.  He stupidly believes the leaders of Iran would realize they were totally out-gunned and would surrender, to be able to regain the ability to sell the $400 MILLION worth of oil they sold to the world every DAY.  And from Trump's limited perspective, that makes perfect sense.

But the Muzz leaders of Iran refused, because they knew they could claim they had defeated the U.S. (which they claim every day, if you care to watch), and could string Trump along with bullshit negotiations until the mid-terms.  They knew that if they could con Trump into NOT bombing 'em into oblivion til then, the Democrat party would use the power of the purse to force the U.S. to end all operations in the region and withdraw all forces.  The world will understandably see that as surrender, and the loss of face to the U.S. will be devastating.

More crucial: Iran will be free to build the atomic bombs they've been working on for years.  They admitted to having roughly a thousand pounds of 60%-enriched uranium, enough for about 20 atomic bombs.

After the first time Iran's leaders bleated "We have defeated the U.S." Trump could have ended that bullshit by ordering our Air Force to bomb them until nothing remained--as we did to win WW2.  But he naively believed they'd opt for a negotiated settlement, since it would obviously be far less destructive.  Very logical.  But Iran's rulers didn't care.

Now, with just 80 days left, Iran's leaders know they've won: Trump no longer has the option to bomb 'em into oblivion, simply because doing that so close to the election would make it seem that he was doing it to save congressional seats for the GOP.  And the Mainstream Media would eagerly, endlessly bleat that this was the only reason.

SO...with Iran still bragging that they've defeated the U.S., conservative voters will be demoralized and will stay home, while U.S. leftists will turn out in record numbers to seize control of congress.  In fact I predict we'll see dozens of Dem precincts reporting more ballots cast than eligible voters, just as in 2020.  But no judge will hear the case, and there won't be time to investigate before the new congress is sworn in.

Skeptical Repub voter: "Nah, we'll still be fine cuz only 60% of Democrats will vote for socialists!"

No, you're naive: Dems will vote for the Democrat candidate, even if communist--cuz in the last few weeks before the election the Dem-fellating Mainstream Media will show endless video of all the communist candidates sounding EVER so moderate and reasonable.

Their communist DSA candidates won't renounce support for the dozen commie priorities, but will simply say things like "We need to consider abolishing the senate, having Medicare for all, abolishing police and prisons, making college free, forgiving all student loans, allowing unlimited immigration and giving 'em citizenship, ending our use of oil, gas and nuclear power, allowing criminals to be immediately released without having to post bail, de-funding the armed forces, packing the Supreme Court, abolishing the Electoral College and replacing it with the winner of the popular vote, and having congress choose ouah president."

"SEE, citizen?  Just consider doze things, right?  Where's the harm in dat?"

So there's my prediction.  And in 80 days or so we should know--though we may have to wait another two weeks for the Dems to inject enough fake ballots into the count.

And the hoot is, almost no one who reads this will believes a word of it. 

Axios: "OpenAI plans 3.2-gigawatt data center in Georgia"

Axios (leftists) ran this POS story:

OpenAI has announced plans to build a data center near Savannah, Georgia, with 3.2 gigawatts of power.

"With" is an interesting choice of words.  What it actually means is that the proposed project will USE 3.2 gigawatts.  Hmmm...
  The entire story is one big press release pushing the supposed fabulous benefits of this project.  Seriously, every word of this reads like a paid press release.

OpenAI says guarantees are in place that residential electricity prices won't increase, and also that OpenAI will reduce its power consumption during periods of high demand before others are impacted.

The "we guarantee the price of residential electricity won't increase" is utter horseshit.  If the state utility commission raises the rates, the company will claim their use had nothing at all to do with that.  And no one can prove otherwise.

OpenAI says it will provide $80 million in benefits to local priorities such as schools, public safety, health care, workforce training and housing.

Locals: "Wow!  $80 million!  Faabulous!"  But read more carefully: benefits "such as" "workforce training."  There's no breakdown, so the company could spend $78 mill on training its own workforce, eh?

The company says it expects to also pay hundreds of millions of dollars in state and local taxes and become the county's largest taxpayer.
    It will also provide up to $71 million in Codex credits for use by every student at a college in Georgia and pay for an independent auditor to verify it is following through on all of its commitments.

Effingham County Commissioner Jamie DeLoach issued a statement saying he and his colleagues posed tough questions about environmental impact and other issues.
    "What we found is a project that uses minimal water, won't increase energy costs for county residents, will generate new tax revenue to support our schools, and create new opportunities for local businesses," DeLoach said.

"What we *found*..."?  No.  What the county commissioner says "we found" is only what the company told 'em.  Nothing more than that.  And it gets WAY better:

The county says it estimates the average homeowner will see a 40% reduction in property taxes due to proceeds generated by OpenAI's data center."

WOW, a 40% cut in your property taxes, eh?  Sound like obozo's bullshit lie to get Obamacare passed: "The average family will SAVE $2,500 a year on health insurance!"  How'd THAT work out, eh?

I'm certain "the county" didn't say jack-shit.  No county worker would put their name on that.  Instead county commissioner DeLoach is claiming "the county" said this, so no one can be held responsible later.
   This isn't "reporting."  What it is is a press release by the company.  Not a single word of caution by the "reporter, nor any question about the impossible-to-guarantee claims by the company.  In other words, hogwash, designed to make local residents support the proposal cuz they believe they'll be getting millions in tax revenue, a 40% drop in their property taxes, and that their electricity bills won't go up.
    If this sounds WAY too good to be true, guess we'll find out.  And if it's not, there won't be any way to hold corrupt pols accountable for supporting the bullshit.

Source: Axios

https://www.axios.com/2026/07/22/openai-savannah-georgia-data-center-project


 

Ceuta update

If you pay attention [spoiler: you don't] you heard about 60,000 "migrants" from Morocco invading a Spanish city--Ceuta--on the north African coast.

The Times of London is leftist but pretty reputable.  Two days ago the Times updated this to 80,000.  Eh, estimates, right?

Here's the hoot: every Lying Mainstream Media propaganda outlet absolutely assured you that "almost all of the 'migrants' left and returned to Morocco."  But "almost all" is very vague, eh?  That's not an accident. 

But the Times tweaks that just a bit, saying "Although the vast majority of the immigrants have been returned to Morocco, 9,000 people are believed still to be in Ceuta.  [Note: "people," not "invaders."  And 9,000 still remain?  Is that what the cool media kids say is "almost all returned"?]

Authorities there are investigating 15 reported rapes by doze peaceful "refugees"--or as the Times calls 'em, "migrants."

The Times even admits ONE has been expelled back to Morocco.  Think about that for a second: invader crossed into Ceuta, rapes a girl, then gets a ride back to the border.  No punishment.  Got away with rape.  Think he won't brag about that to his homies?

The Times also admitted there was a second "influx" (the Left's term for invasion) of 300 or so this past weekend, but it was "mostly prevented."  Only 46 of the invaders were from Morocco, with the rest from elsewhere in Africa.

Define "mostly," assholes.

The Times joins the rest of the Left in describing the invasion in soothing, non-alarming terms.  Can't have Brits or other Euro-weenies getting worked up about these invasions, eh?  Just like the Democrats in the U.S. eh?  "Deez po' refugees not break ouah law at ALL, deplorables!  Dey iz "refugees" so we gots ta let 'em in, an' give 'em free housing, food, medical care and free university tuition!"

Source: Times of London

https://archive.ph/Ofwwh 

bribem sells off SPR oil: Media fawns. Trump does the same: Media screams!

The graph below shows the number of barrels of oil in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). 

Democrats and their "expert consultants" are screaming to high heaven that Trump using oil in the SPR to compensate for reduced world supply due to the Iran conflict is "damaging the salt caverns in the reserve!!!"  So...let's take a look at the numbers, eh? 

 

Point here is that when bribem sold off 40% of the oil in the SPR--much of it to foreign nations--the Lying Mainstream Media didn't say a critical word--cuz the Media eagerly fawned over whatever the corrupt bribem did, eh?  But now that Trump is doing the same thing, the Media has their panties in a twist: "Dis is AWFUL!  It gon' destroy duh SPR!  Scream scream!!"  

Some women understand Islam and communism

Note the poll below: white women without a college degree favor Republican Rogers over El-Sayed by 22 percent, while white women WITH a degree--FAR more likely to be liberal--favor the Muslim DSA communist by 23 percentage points. 

 

What does that tell ya?

Democrats: "Why, it clearly shows that college-educated liberal women are reeeally smaht!"  

No. 

How many nations must be destroyed before free people wake up?

Some people only learn by experience. 

 

Only liberal women are this crazy.  Unfortunately there are tons of 'em. 

Once upon a time...

 

Percentage of leftist professors at top U.S. universities

Naive Americans don't believe all the professors at the "prestige" universities are between 99% and 90% Democrat/leftist/socialist.

 

Democrats: "Ouah faaabulous universities are NOT leftist!  Dis just another "right-wing conspiracy tale."

 

Those who refuse to learn from the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it

Jean-Luc Melenchon has been a communist for decades, before founding what's now the biggest far-left (communist) party in France. 

Stupid Democrat: "I don't live in France, so I don't care about anything that happens there!  It can't possibly have any relevance for ME or ouah faaabulous Democrat partei!"

You bet, sparky.

In France, as in most free countries, communism has attracted a small percentage of the population--the lazy, greedy and stupid--but are having a hard time expanding their following.  But communists like Melenchon see a way to take over, quite legally, which  he happily explains:  In a speech caught on video he explains that the solution is to ally with...wait for it... Muslims.

This is the same playbook being used by the left in all Western countries.

People who know history instantly spot the flaw:  It's classic.  In the flying business it's called "target fixation."  This "smaahht" pol is so fixated on ruling that he's happy to make a deal with the devil, confident that after their combined forces win total power, the devil will allow him and his fellow commies to run things.  Surprise!

The evidence is right there for anyone to see--but Leftists refuse to see it.  Iran: 47 years ago Iran had a communist party called the MEK.  Lots of college students.  Their goal was to overthrow duh eeeebil Shah an' gibs all duh powah to duh pipo!  Yep yep yep!

So when duh Muzz started the revolution, duh commies totally joined in!  It wuz gon' usher in duh start of a faaabulous new era, eh?

An' sure enuff, their combined forces forced duh Shah to flee.  And with him gone, his supporters and enforcers quietly melted away.

But to the dismay of the commie college students who'd helped the Muzz overthrow the Shah, within weeks the Muzz started executing the students 

Wow, who coulda' predicted *that,* eh?

Americans under 40 don't know jack-shit about any of this.  If our public skool boards weren't run by communists all Americans would learn these crucial lessons of history in highschools.  But not a single school teaches real history, cuz way mo' impo'tant to teach the faaabulous benefits of turning boyz into gurls, and vice-versa, eh?  So a few million American socialists are happily supporting duh Muzz to win power.  DSA, eh?  "Free Palestine!  Death to America," eh?

Anything to win power.

Now: why do young American socialists NOT know that the Muzz always execute the communists as soon as they take over, eh?  Because young socialists (communists) are naive idealists.  The young ones usually don't push killing their opponents, but are confident that everyone will see that communism is a faabulous system, right?  So no need to kill anyone.

Islam is similar up to a point: Like communists, Muslims believe their system isn't just "better" but is the only system allowed by Allah.  That's a big difference.  But even more crucial is that *from the very beginning,* Islam has ordered the faithful to execute unbelievers unless they convert to Islam or pay the special tax ("jizya") that "infidels" must pay to live.

Starting to get it yet?

No, you don't, because young Americans know nothing true about Islam.  All they know is the bullshit lie "Islam is the religion of peace."

Lambs led to the slaughter, cupcake.  

When morons like Melanchon are put against the wall to be executed, they literally won't believe it's really happening: "But...but...but...we helped you overthrow the eeebil infidels and capitalists!  So you should be sharing power wif' us!  But instead you're executing us?  How can this possibly be happening?" 

There's an old saying: "Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it."

Leftists: "Whut?  We don' see no silly 'lessons'!  An' we iz reeel smaaht, cuz we attend Columbia or Berkeley or Hahvahd or Stanford or Brown!  An' all ouah professors agree dat weez smaaht, an' dat communism is duh wave of duh future!  Errybudy gon' be, like, totally equal, comrade!"

Again: "Lambs to the slaughter."

Of course if you're a Democrat or DSA member, you don't believe a word of any of this, cuz all your professors--who are reel smaaht, jus' like you!--have told ya Islam and communists are natural allies, eh?  So dat mus' be true, right?  Why wud your profs lie about something so crucial, eh?

 

 

On such naivete, ignorance, stupidity the world hinges.

If I had kids, I'd wanna teach them that a) communism sucks; b) that college profs (who are considered smaahht) love communism;  c) that they'll urge you to ally with Islam to overthrow "unfair capitalism" and usher in a socialist world; and finally d) that it never works, because as soon as 'your' coalition takes over, the Muzz will kill their infidel supporters.

Of course if you're a Democrat, you don't believe a word of any of this. 

Sometime in the next seven days the U.S. national debt will top $40 TRILLION

And if that doesn't shock ya (and it doesn't), consider that since just paying the interest on that debt now cost us $1.5 Trillion every year--all of which must be borrowed!--that debt is growing like crazy.  

"How fast is it growing?"  You won't believe it.  Analysts say the debt will explode from $40 Trillion to $50 Trillion in less than three years.  

I've been warning y'all about this for years now, but since I'm not a government whiz-kid, people just shrug.  But finally the experts are starting to wake up.  This isn't a "conspiracy theory" or some random blogger guessing: Bank of America just predicted that the $50 trillion debt will be reached in July 2029. 

A tad under three years from now. 

Here's a piece from the shitheads at ABC, way back when the debt was just $31.4 Trillion.  When do ya think that was, eh?

It was $31.4 Trillion just over three years ago: May of 2023.  So since the debt provably, demonstrably, unequivocally grew by $8.6 TRILLION in just three years, the idea that it'll increase by another TEN Trillion in just three more years shouldn't strike you as hard to believe. 

 

Note how relatively flat the curve is until about 1970, when all the Dems' vast welfare state got into high gear.  Since then the curve has climbed at an ever-increasing rate, as pols realized they could buy votes by giving voters "free stuff."

As the debt continues to grow, we'll have to borrow even MORE money to pay the extra interest on the added debt--which we've been doing all along.  Plus, old U.S. debt is at a lower interest rate than current paper, so even if the corrupt, worthless congress were to magically stop spending more than the govt takes in, the amount we're forced to pay in interest would continue to increase.

Probably less than ten percent of Americans understand what you've just read.  Most of those don't care, and even fewer have any idea what's gonna happen.  So...what can we do about it?

First to be brutally honest:  It's too late to avoid the train wreck.  There are only three "relevant" responses: First is for congress to drastically cut spending. But of course they won't do that.  Never.  You show 'em the $8.6 TRILLION increase in the three years from  2023 to 2026, then the expert projections of another TEN trillion increase by July of 2029--less than three years away--and they'll literally run away rather than explain why this is either FAKE NEWZ or not a problem.

News flash: We're in this mess because the people who run congress are by turns stupid, corrupt, greedy, stubborn and useless. 

Second option: congress cranks up the printing presses and prints a few trillion in crisp new $100 bills.  Not only won't that help, it'll make things way worse because it will trigger "hyperinflation," like in Venezuela and every other nation that's tried it.  The problem there is that in two months--virtually overnight--the value of all savings will be driven to zero.  Hyperinflation means you're stupid to save even a dollar, since a month from now it'll be worth ten cents.  Everyone is wiped out.  AND it still doesn't solve the problem of congress INSISTING on spending more than it takes in, every year.

The third possibility is to default on the debt.  Of course this means no nation will loan us billions for 15 years or so.  At least that would eliminate $1.5 trillion a year in interest paid--though much of that will be to Americans.  And to banks.  And you can bet the banks will use bribes to get congress to continue to pay interest on their T-bills.  Oh yew bet.

But congress still spends more each year than we take in.  If no one will loan us money, where will that money come from?

That puts us back to the second option: print the cash, meaning hyperinflation.

Short answer: there's no way out.  Stupid, selfish, corrupt, power-hungry members of congress devised this disaster--and many of the ones in congress today have made it much worse.  And yes, we know the sons of bitches were elected (maybe) by voters, so the NY Times will blame...voters.  But the truth is that almost EVERY member of congress gets corrupted by the cesspool of DC.  By the power.  By lavish, fawning, slobbering praise--and even more lavish campaign contributions.

So...sadly we can't escape what's coming.  And it's gonna be ugly.  But I can tell you how to keep it from happening again:  Automatic ten-year prison terms for the ten most corrupt congresswhores grifters every year, along with forfeiture of pension and confiscation of all assets.  Yes, their families will suffer.  Sorry about that.  Maybe churches can start GoFundMe's to keep the families from starving.

 

 

No matter how crazy you think Leftists are...

 

"Why is there a push to ‘cancel’ one of the wealthiest Bay Area cities?"

The piece below (after needed background) is from the San Francisco Chronicle, Aug 10, 2026

Some things about the future are easy to predict: You find out who's running any entity--a city, state, company, country, "association"--and if they're liberal Democrats you can be absolutely certain the liberal shitheads will penalize whites for the sole purpose of giving free shit to minorities. "Cuz dat only FAIR, citizen!!"

Oh, y'say you think that's hyperbole?  Not possible in the U.S.?  Ahh, I see you just arrived on this planet.  Enjoy your stay.

Some background on the story below: It's from the left-liberal (pro-socialist) San Francisco Chronicle.  The leftist propagandist is writing about a tiny city across the bay--a tiny, beautiful, 1.7 square mile enclave named Piedmont, totally surrounded by the city of Oakland.
 
San Fran and Oakland have always been rivals.  Then slowly, Oakland turned into a crime-ridden shithole.  I won't bore you by explaining how that happened, cuz you already know.

After the 1906 earthquake that destroyed much of San Francisco, some of that city’s wealthiest families flocked to an unincorporated portion of the wooded foothills overlooking Oakland.  Months later, as Oakland tried to force their tiny community to become part of faaabulous Oakland, citizens voted to incorporate their own city.  By doing that, Piedmonters preserved their large lots and ensured control over their town's decisions about parks, schools, police and so on. 

So why would the Chron be concerned about this tiny city inside its cross-bay rival, eh?

Because the Chron is run by leftists.  The Chron piece is absolutely dripping with leftist/lib propaganda--all of which has one goal: if you're white, the Left demands that you not be allowed to have a tiny town with better housing, better parks, better city services than the mega-shithole that surrounds you--even though you pay for those things.

Instead you must be forced to build "low-income housing" inside your tiny, 1.7-square-mile jewel.  You're forced to do that by a state law, rammed through by the Democrat-ruled legislature.  What could possibly go wrong, eh?

Over a century after this wealthy suburban enclave rejected being "annexed" by Oakland, Piedmont remains one of the Bay Area’s most controversial cities.  To its 11,000 residents, their 1.7-square-mile swath of oak trees, ivy-covered mansions *and top-ranked schools* represents the zenith of the American dream. 

But to its critics, Piedmont is a prime symbol of the economic and racial divides that continue to plague the Bay Area. 

“It really is ridiculous that a place like Piedmont even exists,” says [leftist "transit planner," Oakland resident and protagonist for this propaganda piece] John Rosemoore, who has a punk-rock aesthetic. “What’s going on there says a lot about our society as a whole.”

Yes, and the Left hates everything about the place--because it represents freedom, which communists absolutely hate.

It’s not just that Piedmont’s median home price is more than 3½ times that of Oakland’s.  Despite being completely surrounded by one of the nation’s most diverse major cities, Piedmont is roughly 70% white and just 1% Black—a striking figure compared to Oakland, where 20% of residents are Black.

You may have noticed that the Chron doesn't capitalize "white," but does capitalize "black."  No kneeling, fawning, slobbering suck-ups at the Chron, eh?

The boundary between Piedmont and Oakland means one household might have access to a better-performing school district and police department than the home right beside it.

Yep, and that's intentional: it's not a plot, or "oppression," just the difference between a well-run, honest city government, chosen by residents who have high standards, versus Oakland.
  So now Chron propagandist inserts a pithy quote by the assistant director of UC Berkeley’s "Othering and Belonging Institute," and with a name like that you already know it's run by leftists: 

“Back in the day segregation was having white and Black neighborhoods in the same city, but now most segregation is felt between cities, rather than within them.”

In case you didn't get that, read it again: it's the thrust of the article:  'It beez a crime dat whites wanna run dere own cities, wif' good skoolz and cops an' parks an' stuff!  Yew only gots dat 1.7 square miles cuz yew stole it!  We not shure how, but gotta be true!  Or yew exploited us!  However yew did it, it not right, so we gon' use state law to force yew to build "low-income housing" so we kin have duh benefits of yo' skoolz an' parks an' shee-it.'

Enter “Cancel Piedmont.”  Transit planner Rosemoore has been handing out stickers and selling T-shirts with that slogan.  The professional transit planner now sees the campaign as a vehicle for challenging the Bay Area’s intertwined systems of race, wealth, housing and local governance.

That's some world-class wordsmithing there: the screech from Leftists like the Chron propagandist and Rosemoore is that "We will not ALLOW you to somehow have better schools, better cops, lower crime and bigger lots.  We demand that you build "low-income housing" so you'll become as magnificently DIE-verse as Oakland!
  The article then describes an admittedly awful incident from a hundred years ago:

By the mid-1920s, Piedmont touted the most millionaires per square mile of any U.S. city. [cuz it was only 1.7 square miles, eh?]  One of them was Sidney Dearing, who’d made a fortune running a popular jazz club in Oakland. Since he was Black Seminole, at a time when Black people weren’t allowed to buy homes in Piedmont, he gave his white mother-in-law $10,000 to purchase a four-bedroom house.

Some residents were outraged, and there were many aggressions against the Dearings.  The city eventually bought the property by claiming it needed it to build a road--which was never built.  Outrageous?  Clearly.  Problem is, liberal white guilt wants to turn Piedmont into Oakland to atone for the century-old outrage.  Sound familiar?  The "reparations movement" is well underway in California.

By the time the leftist transit planner began his "Cancel Piedmont" movement in June 2025, Piedmont was well into confronting complex questions: how to build more housing, reckon with its history of racial exclusion, diversify its schools and respond to growing scrutiny over whether a city so different from Oakland should remain that way.

 "So different from Oakland," eh?  Different HOW?  Ooohh, can't say!  And there ya have it:  If you live in a jewel and have a lick of sense you do NOT wanna "build more housing" or "diversify your schools."  Living in Piedmont beats the hell out of living in Oakland, and everyone knows it.  Which (and here comes the entire point) is the entire reason the Left wants to see Piedmont brought down to Oakland's level.
  Is dat clear enough for ya?

If not, consider this:  Back when the Berlin wall divided communist East Berlin from free West Berlin, why did thousands of residents of the East risk their lives to get to West Berlin--with hundreds shot to death on the barbed wire--and yet NO ONE ever went the other way, eh?
   Same climate, same natural resources, and yet all the daring escapes only went in one direction.

Or consider North Korea vs. South Korea:  Same deal: identical climate and resources, yet hundreds of residents of the North fled to South Korea, with scores shot to death as they tried to cross the DMZ--and yet not one person tried to go the other direction!

Why do ya think that was, eh?

I don't need to tell ya, cuz you already know.  Sadly, your kids don't know.  The communist-ruled public skoolz nevah told 'em, cuz "Dat not important, comrade.  Prolly FAKE NEWZ by duh capitalists!"

See, when two competing ideologies are operating right next to each other--as in Berlin, Korea or Piedmont/Oakland, the difference in the results becomes to obvious to ignore.  So leftists wanna make people ignore the better competing system, whether by putting up a wall or merely barbed wire and shooting anyone who tries to go to the better side.  Or in the case of Piedmont, forcing that tiny enclave to bulldoze parks to build low-income housing.

So back to Piedmont.  Leftists: "We don' wanna do hurt doze wipipo in Piedmont!  We jus wanna force 'em to build low-income housing!  An' to "diversify" their skoolz and police force.  Cuz die-versity iz ouah strength, citizen!  Dat beez obvious to ebrywun!"

Wait...if "die-versity" is so fucking great, why is die-verse Oakland--in exactly the same location as Piedmont, with the same great climate, views and access to...everything...such a crime-infested shithole compared to Piedmont, eh?
   When you have an answer for that, let me know.  Take all the time you like.

 But the more Piedmont has tried to atone for its divisive past through diversity initiatives and public apologies, the louder some of its detractors have become.

Wow, what a shock!  Give socialists/leftists an inch...

The city’s diversity efforts have included hiring a consulting firm to help it address implicit bias and organizing community discussions to promote racial equity, which critics  claim are little more than performative gestures. 

The state of California says only 200 of Piedmont’s 3,947 housing units are in multifamily buildings like duplexes or apartment complexes.

Heaven forbid!  So we--your betters--will force you to fix that!

Complicating matters [nice wording], the vast majority of the city’s zoning is for single-family homes, and there isn’t much room for more construction.

Why is this a problem?  If you don't have room for more, why on Earth would you try to build more, eh?  You've got a jewel there--but if you do as the Left demands, you get Oakland.  "But dat jus' FAIR, comrade!"

Faced with these constraints, the city has long struggled to translate its stated support for affordable housing into completed projects that enable more teachers, firefighters and other middle-income workers to call it home.

Again the communist goal is revealed: 'Effrywun shall liff in identical 1,200 square foot apartments!  If dat requires building apartments where there are now parks and tennis courts, tough shit.'  To communists "equity" is far more important.
    Of course dat don't apply to duh rulers, like duh faaabulous Gavin Newsom, cuz dey deserve 7,000 square foot mansions in gated communities!  But yew are ordered not to object to dat, cuz...Gavin iz special.

Even modest housing proposals [i.e. building low-income apartments on what are now parks--this is considered a "modest proposal"] can spark public debates about altering a cherished neighborhood character defined by large lot sizes, abundant greenery and quiet street-scapes. 

Caption in the Chron: "The city remains controversial because of its high-priced homes and lack of diversity."

The city’s latest housing project proposes turning a stretch of open space, sports fields and public facilities into at least 132 homes, including 60 units of low-income housing.

Victory for liberal Democrats.  They force the city to allow the sharp end of the wedge in.  But hey, what could possibly go wrong, eh?

Professional transit planner Rosemoore has nothing personally against Piedmonters.  For him, Piedmont’s ugly racial history >>The city’s most consequential housing project proposes to turn a city-owned stretch of open space, sports fields and public facilities into at least 132 homes, including 60 units of low-income housing.

As decades passed, Piedmont’s exclusionary housing practices became far less blatant. But local real estate agents’ penchant for “off-market” deals with friends and acquaintances still made it difficult for Black and working-class families to gain entry.

You need to be a realtor to decipher that line: that means not listing a property, but facilitating a sale between friendly realtors.  The left wants this to be illegal.

Now every year Piedmont High School holds an assembly to educate students about the horror the Dearings endured. The city even commissioned an Oakland artist to design a memorial near the Dearings’ old home. The project, which could be unveiled by the end of the year, cost around $400,000.

So there ya go, citizen.  We order that every city mus' be "die-verse."  Yew may not like that, but we leftists rule the state and the courts, so we don't care what yew want or think.

Yet another murder you'll never hear about from the Lying Mainstream Media

Another day, another black-on-white murder that you won't ever hear about from the Mainstream Media:

 

White husband and father Fredrick Lytton was working alongside black monster 23-year-old Devin Rice in Nashville.  And with only that much info you already know how this ends, eh?

The two were reportedly arguing about a soda when the older white father turned and walked away.  Moments later the black demon walked up behind the older man and emptied a handgun into the white father's back, killing him. 

It's been a week since this black-on-white murder, and unless you lived within TV range of Nashville, you never heard about it.  Not one national network mentioned it.

Of course local media had to cover it to avoid looking corrupt, and numerous local media published or broadcast the story--but not ONE showed you a pic of the white victim, nor mentioned that race of his murderer.

Leftist Media owners: "Wuh...why would we do dat?  Dat wud jus' make whites angry and suspicious of young black men, eh?  We woud NEVAH wanna do dat, eh?  Cuz dey ain't nuffin' to be alarmed about, deplorable!"  

The white dad walked away from the argument.  So duh black demon feel disrespekted, right?  So he totally wif'in his rights to murder duh white guy from behind, eh?

Now obviously, only a fraction of blacks are like this.  The problem is that that fraction still translates into a huge number of blacks who are pleased when blacks murder whites.  They don't worry about consequences because they expect white judges and DAs to tolerate their murdering whites cuz that's how today's leftist-ruled "justice system" works.  

Leftist judges and DAs go easy on black killers cuz "dey haz been so oppressed," eh?  It's how all leftists think, and how the Dem party works.

Whites aren't "out to get" blacks, we're just totally sick of the endless violence and social pathologies, the endless complaints, the bottomless well of grievances.  The endless excuses for murders, rapes and other violence.  The endless anger. 

Devin Rice's public defender will plea-bargain the ambush murder of the unarmed white father down to "assault."  The demon may be sentenced to a long term but will be out in two years.  "Cuz it wudn't hiz fault, see?  He felt disrespekted!  So yew cain't blame him, right?"  Put Devin Rice's name in Google Alerts and you'll see.