Another stabbing murder in Germany that you'll never hear about anywhere else

Democrats: "We need to allow more pipo from third-world countries to come to the U.S!  Because Europe has welcomed in millions, and their nations have been 'culturally enriched.'"

Me: "How, exactly, do you claim Europe has been 'culturally enriched'?  You mean the thousands who have been stabbed to death or raped (or both) by demons from shithole nations?"

Democrats: "WHUT?  NOooo, dat fake newz!  Deez are guuuud pipo who become model citizens of Europe!  Doctors, physicists, political leaders!"

Me: "You're uninformed morons."  Latest example:

In Trier, Germany a week ago, a 22-year-old student was stabbed to death by a demon from Afghanistan.  The suspect was tracked down and arrested a short time later.

Why the Afghan demon chose to kill the German student isn't known, but here's a soothing, reassuring detail the cops told "journalists" to keep Germans from being upset: "A homicide squad is investigating the exact sequence of events, the weapon that was used, and the background."

Isn't that reassuring, citizen?

Enter the party of former rising star of the Young Communist's League of the now-vanished East Germany, Frau Angela Merkel.  She's the treasonous bitch who just days after East and West Germany were reunited became a rising star in the Christian Democratic Union (CDU)--the leading political party in West Germany.  Clever girl!

Like Obozo and bribem, comrade Merkel totally threw open Germany's borders to millions of invaders from Africa and Afghanistan.  Didn't bother asking the legislature or the German people, cuz...vee neffer had to do zat in za East, ja?  

So now the CDU--still ruled by camouflaged communists--bleats that they "see an urgent need for action”!

OHHHhhh, now you bleat there's an "urgent need for action"!

That sounds SO reassuring, comrade!  So what kind of "action" do you propose, eh?  Deporting 'em?  Or maybe actually putting 'em in prison for life?  No?  

Yeah, didn't think so.  You'll keep giving 'em free housing, food, medical care and cash for life, just like Democrats in the U.S. do for the invaders they allowed to come here.  No need to ask permission, cuz you rat-bastards do what you damn well please, knowing your corrupt leftist judges and the Media will defend anything you do.

So here's what the CDU in Trier did after the Afghan murdered the student:  they "expressed sadness with postings on social media."  “Our sympathy and deepest condolences to the family and friends of the victim. Another brutal knife attack in this country, which is inexcusable and shows the urgent need for action.”

Ahh, yes: a "knife attack."  Like a "gun crime" here.  The knife did it, not the Afghan killer using it.  Got it.

These stupid, corrupt rat-bastards simply REFUSE to admit the truth: that the leaders of the CDU invited millions of demons into the country.  And now, as the utterly predictable results keep piling up, the moronic pols blame...knives.

Just like U.S. Democrats blame guns.

Know what, sparky?  In all the years I've owned guns I've never had even ONE get up in the middle of the night and go shoot someone.

Not once. 

Eh, maybe I've just been lucky.

Finally, one more telltale from Trier:  "Police are requesting that no photos or videos of the terrible crime be disseminated."

See, we don't want people to see all the blood, and the fatally wounded student on the ground, right?  Cuz if we allowed pipo to see dat, lots mo' Germans might realize they'd been fucked by the CDU and comrade Merkel, eh?  

Just like here in the States: the Mainstream Media refuses to show any photos of the carnage caused by invaders (or insane thugs like the man who cut the girl's throat on the streetcar in Charlotte).  Wouldn't want anyone to be upset that Democrats opened the borders, and repeatedly refuse to imprison career criminals, and release thugs the same day they're arrested, without requiring bail.

It's a faaaabulous system, eh?  But as long as it doesn't hurt the wives and daughters of Democrat pols, they don't care.  

Source. 

How many of these people look even remotely sane?

Study the pics below.  They're all Democrats in congress.  Does even ONE of 'em look sane, rational?

 

Even the former astronaut looks crazy.  And yet this passes for "leaders" of the Democrat Partei.  

End.  Times. 

You don't live in Oregon, so...

 Consider the Democrat morons who've ruled Oregon for decades:

 

Democrats are morons, because they believe the way to improve education is to stop requiring students to actually, y'know, learn vital things.

So...the moronic Dem-ruled legislature passed a bill that would end the requirement that students pass minimum competency tests to get a highschool diploma.  The equally moronic Democrat governor signed it into law because she bleated that it would "help students of color."

Sure, because it tells 'em they do NOT have to study anything useful.  They graduate with no skills useful for legal employment.  What's left?  Sure: selling drugs, stealing and collecting welfare for life.  But the Dems believe that's totally great, cuz making "students of color" study is oppression!  

Democrats insist we learn from other cultures. Not getting it.

Democrats continue to try to block all deportations of illegal aliens, cuz "die-versity iz ouah strength, eh comrade?  See, they insist that Americans must "learn from other cultures."  Cuz if Americans were forced to depend on our own stunted creativity alone, we would never have invented the light bulb, the cell phone, computers, the airplane, the internet, or put men on the moon, or flown around the world non-stop, or put people into space on non-government rockets, or invented the laser, transistors, computer microchips with millions of transistors, or horizontal drilling, or nuclear powerplants, or...  

Wait...we did all those things and thousands more, before anyone else.  And of course once we showed the world how to do it, the rest of the world copied what Americans invented--which is how the world has made so much progress just since 1960.  

So what's all this horseshit about "cultural enrichment" and "die-versity"?  Sure, people who live in New York City can smirk that "die-versity" has given 'em a vast variety of exotic restaurants.  Great, but is that worth the price paid?  Somehow I doubt it.  So herewith, the clear lesson: 

 

(And yes, I realize we Americans came from brilliant, creative European "parent" nations that gave the world great cathedrals, St. Peter's, symphonies, science, math, the Magna Carta, optics, electricity, chemistry, physics.  Thanks!  Y'all did good, and most of us Americans greatly appreciate it!  And we've tried to live up to the legacy you gave the world.  But a quarter of Americans--"Democrats"--sneer at that legacy.  Hmmm...) 

What's the most valuable thing a man can teach his wife?

I would have accepted "When seconds count, police are only minutes away," but this one is better: 

 

Now here's the hoot: On the website that featured the above pic, half a dozen liberal females made comments to the effect of "That's horrible!"

Couldn't resist replying "If you're ever being attacked, hope you remember what you just wrote, and that if you hadn't been so woke you might have been able to defend yourself.  But don't worry, your attacker will be pleased with the choice you made." 

40-second interview with a member of a totally alien culture

The interview at this link is utterly sickening.  The African being interviewed raped a woman.  Worse, he knew he had HIV, and says he wants everyone to get it too.  And she tested positive for the virus.

 

It's hard to imagine this level of utterly depraved evil--not only to rape, but knowing he would likely give her a fatal disease.

Now here's a whole other level of depravity: ONE political party in the U.S. has invited millions of people just like this into the U.S, and immediately flew them to dozens of American cities, where they vanished into the crowd.  The government doesn't know where they are now, or even WHO they are, since many threw away their passports and other identification documents just before they crossed the border--presumably because they wanted to make it impossible to trace them.

It's hard to imagine this level of utterly depraved evil, to deliberately set in motion events easily predicted to result in the rape, murder, drug overdoses and drunk-driving deaths of tens of thousands of Americans.  

Who would deliberately do such a thing to the American people, eh?

Ohhh, that's right: Democrats.  Obozo, Bribem and their lackeys in congress.

Thanks, Democrats!   

AOC claims the U.S. senate was "founded on, uh, y'know, Jim Crow"

A few years ago I wouldn't have spent time writing about AOC.  But with the DSA having won half a dozen primaries in the last month, time to re-visit that.

DSA members don't know anything about U.S. history.  Fortunately that's one of AOC's areas of expertise.

Recently she enlightened us with this gem of leftist/DSA thinking:  "The U.S. Senate was founded on, uh, you know, Jim Crow."

"Jim Crow laws" emerged in the mid 1880s.  The character by that name existed in the 1820s as a minstrel routine.  By contrast, the senate was written into the Constitution in 1789.
   But now that the brilliant AOC--the leading DSA member for president--haz declared that the senate "was founded on, uh, you know, Jim Crow," guess the history books will have to be revised.  

These people want to take what's yours and promise it to their supporters

 

22 Democrat-run states refuse to allow federal govt to inspect SNAP payments

 

If Trump found a cure for cancer, Democrats would refuse it. 

How did this happen?

 

Cuz most voters in the city are communists or Muzz. 

When major networks choose not to broadcast the president's speech...

 

Cali company begins pumping CO2 deep underground--like magic!

Last May, in a totally parched desert in Kern County, California, a company called "California Resources Corporation" opened the state’s first "carbon capture and storage facility."

It's called "TerraVault 1," and is touted to pump millions of tons of deadly carbon dioxide gas deep underground, removing it from the atmosphere forever.  The company says it could be just the first of many such facilities they plan to open in the state.

See, for the past 40 years, brilliant, totally honest scientists have warned that carbon dioxide is gonna kill all life on Earth, by fatally warming the planet.  Globull Warming.

Wait, sorry:  Climate Change.  Ahh.

An' what better place to start saving the Earth than California, under the leadership of duh faaabulous Democrat future prezzy Gavin Newsom, eh?

So we sent our top reporter to Kern County to see how they're saving the planet.  It's Democrat leadership at it's best!

He found a line of about 20 railroad tank-cars marked "CO2" lined up to enter a large building.  Inside was a giant diesel engine, about the size of the engine in a container-ship.  It was growling--or purring, depending on your viewpoint--at idle, causing the entire concrete floor to vibrate.

One end of the giant engine was connected to a huge pump.  As each tank car pulled up, workers would hook up a foot-thick hose to the tank car, open a couple of valves and press some buttons.  The huge engine would speed up, and the workers would watch dials on a panel.

After a few minutes, the hose was removed and the line of tank cars advanced.

We asked what was happening, but none of the workers spoke English.  A company rep told us the pump had just pumped 100 tons of carbon dioxide down an injection well, trapping it over a mile underground, forever.    

We were amazed that saving the planet from the horror of Global Warming seemed so quick and easy.  When we asked how much it cost per ton, the rep said the company had a contract with the state of California for $20 per ton.  

We quickly did the math and realized the company had just made $2,000 in 15 minutes.  Looking at the 20 or so railcars waiting to be unloaded, and the four foreign workers, it seemed that the company was making $40,000 in just 5 hours.

We asked where the tank cars of CO2 came from.  He said another company was using a secret, proprietary process to strip the deadly poison out of the air.  He said this was done in California but he didn't know where.  He said the state was paying that company $20 a ton to do that, but at no cost to California voters because it was funded by a grant from Biden's EPA.  He added that with Trump as president it was likely this funding would soon end, but that senate Democrats planned to put that grant under the Defense Funding Act.

Before leaving we watched one more tank car being unloaded.  Except for the rumble of the huge engine it was so quiet!  The rep let us touch the big red pipe that disappeared into the concrete slab from the pump's outlet, and we could barely feel any vibration at all as another 100 tons of deadly CO2 was safely, quietly pumped deep underground.  

It was almost like magic.

Clearly we need to elect Newsom president, cuz he knows how to save the Earth from Globull Warming!  He feels so strongly about this that his wife is on the board of directors of the company!

Now, what part of the above is satire?

https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/california-carbon-project-22345041.php 

Last year in one state, 23,000 birds and bats were killed by this murderous scheme

Democrats: "Airplanes kill over 5,000 birds a year in the U.S.  So we need to ban private planes!"

Conservative: "In that case I'm guessing you'd REALLY wanna eliminate another modern high-tech gadget that killed 23,000 birds and bats just in one low-population state last year, eh?"

Democrats: "Wow, 23 THOUSAND?  That's AWFUL!  What terrible, murderous capitalist device is to blame for such a ghastly slaughter?  Nuclear powerplants?  Toxic emissions from some chemical plant?  Deadly carbon dioxide?  Whoever approved it should be executed!  Dis' beez a CRIME!

Conservative: "Windmills."

Democrats: "Nonsense!  That's another right-wing conspiracy story!  Some conservative nut-case just made that up!"

Conservative: "Actually last year in sparsely-populated Wyoming, 23,000 birds and bats were killed by windmills.  State workers collected the bodies and counted em.

Democrats [smoke pouring out of ears]: "Uhhh, windmills, y'say.  In that case everything's fine.  There are too many birds and bats in the U.S. anyway, so 'thinning the herd' is actually a good thing!" 

A tiny bit of raaacis' maff explains it: The tips of the blades are doing 200 miles an hour, far faster than any natural predator.  Birds and bats don't have a chance--the slightest contact either kills 'em or knocks 'em out of the sky and cripples 'em, which is fatal.

Actual quote from bizarre official: "They’re flying around and not paying attention to those blades."  SEE, citizen?  It's their own fault!

Later he explained, in essence, "We put big yellow signs on all the wind turbines warning about the blades, jus' like Biden's EPA ordered, but the dumb birds and bats jus' refuse to learn!"  

Summary:  If 5,000 birds and bats a year were killed in, say, Massachusetts, near a nuclear powerplant, leftist moonbats would be screaming dat it wuz a catastrophe an' demanding the plant be closed.  But when 23,000 a year are killed by windmills in Wyoming? "Nothing to get excited about, citizens!  Cuz dis beez duh faaabulous green energy!"

See, burning gas, coal, wood and gasoline gon' kill all life on duh planet--including birds an' bats!  So killing just 23,000 a year--in one state, an' multiply by 30 or so for the whole country--should REEally be looked on as sacrificing 700,000 a year to save the rest, eh?  So shut up!

It's called "Situational Ethics," citizen.  Just as when American women and girls are raped and/or murdered:  If the perp was a U.S. citizen, throw the book at him (and justifiably so), but if he's "undocumented," sentence him to 18 months and Dems refuse to let the government deport him.

"Situational Ethics," comrade.  It's what the "cool kidz" like Gavin Newsom and AOC an' JB Pritzker an' Brandon Johnson an' Kathy Hochul are doin', so it mus' be cool.

Source.

https://cowboystatedaily.com/2026/07/16/wyoming-wind-turbines-killed-more-than-23-000-birds-and-bats-last-year/
 

Summary of my posts on origins of the Chyna virus

My original post on alteration of a harmless (to humans) bat coronavirus to create covid is here.

In October of 2021 I posted a more detailed version tying lots of new pieces of evidence together.

And later, more evidence of the truth:  An investigator uncovered emails from the Chinese researcher who helped modify the virus to the NIH, asking the NIH to delete the gene sequences of the virus from NIH databanks.

And astonishingly, someone at NIH DID delete the stored genetic sequences!  And if that doesn't get your attention, the NIH refused to explain who did that or why it was done.  And the useless congress has never followed up.

Here's one of the crucial pieces of the puzzle that you've never seen: In 2015, at an international conference on viruses, the head researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology presented a paper announcing that they'd done something no one had ever done before: They'd managed to insert a gene into a bat coronavirus to give it new "functionality," and the virus still replicated itself.  

On the last page of the paper the Chinese authors thanked the NIH by name for funding their research, and even printed the grant number--which matches a grant in NIH files. 

I read that paper in February of 2020.  It contained enough technical details to suggest it wasn't a fake.  (The timing alone suggested it was true.)

Of course since the Chyna virus wouldn't be unleashed for five more years, no one in the U.S. even noticed.  

Source.

https://sfsays.blogspot.com/2022/07/2015-paper-on-govt-website-shows-niaid.html 

Does the fed govt have the power to ensure honest elections? If not, who does?

Back in 1965 the Democrats rammed through a law called the "Voting Rights Act."  Because in 1965 Democrats controlled the presidency and both chambers of congress, they could do anything they wanted (Repubs were afraid to filibuster because the alphabet networks would scream that they were "obstructing").  So one of the commands of that law was a provision that if a state didn't have enough black members of congress, either the DOJ's "voting rights division" or a federal judge would put that state on a "bad list."

States on the "bad list" were prohibited from making ANY changes to congressional districts or imposing ANY requirements to vote (like requiring proof of citizenship or even that the voter was who he or she claimed to be) without the permission of a federal judge.  This order was euphemistically called "pre-clearance."  Nice name, eh?

And of course when blacks sued a state, the case was always heard by a pro-Democrat fed judge, who always ruled for the plaintiffs.  It was a perfect formula for disaster.

Wait...when Trump tried to reduce vote fraud by requiring photo-ID to vote, and removing dead people from voter rolls, every damn Democrat screamed "The constitution says states have total control over how they run their elections!!!"  Yet back when the Dem-controlled congress wanted more blacks in congress (merely a coincidence that virtually all blacks were Democrats), Democrats pols insisted that congress had the power to force red states to draw boundaries of congressional districts to ensure a black won that district.

Democrat pols screamed that drawing nice square-ish districts was "diluting the voting power of blacks!!" 

As a result, some states were forced by federal judges to draw congressional districts to create the majority-black districts that ensured a black would win.  Problem was, to ensure a majority-black district often required drawing a district that stretched for a hundred miles but in places was only a mile wide!  (For young Americans this is called "gerrymandering" and the Dems have been doing it for over a century.)  But federal judges DEMANDED this, to guarantee more black members of congress.

And it worked: blacks are about 13% of the U.S. population, and comprise 14.5% of congress.

So when the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that drawing congressional districts to essentially ensure that blacks would win a seat was unconstitutional, the congressional black caucus (and every Democrat in congress) went ballistic:  "Duh RAAACIS' conservatives on duh court iz suppressing duh black vote!"

Horseshit, but useful propaganda for Democrats, so the Media ran with it--endlessly.

But this shouting match over how states must draw their congressional districts raises a more important principle: does the Constitution allow states to run their elections utterly corruptly--allowing non-citizens to vote, or having such lax procedures that fraudsters can vote several times--while barring the federal government from trying to ensure that elections are honest?

This is a HUGE question--and one the Dems hope you don't understand.

Scum-sucking Democrats claim "Dere iz no vote fraud!"  Then when it's proven, they instantly pivot to "Well dere wudn't enuf to change the result!"

Ahh, so if you lying sons of bitches really believe the horseshit you're spouting ("dere ain't no fraud"), you shouldn't have any problem with ensuring that only citizens vote, eh?  

Democrats: "REEEEEeeeee!  Yew iz suppressin' duh vote!!!" 

Source

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/louisiana-gov-on-supreme-court-decision-and-suspending-house-primary-elections-60-minutes-transcript/ 

A tale of water storage in the desert southwest--analogy for U.S. debt

Los Angeles gets 25% of its water from the Colorado River.  That river feeds the two largest man-made lakes in the U.S: Lake Mead and Lake Powell.  Lake Mead, created by the giant Boulder Dam, and supplies electricity to southern California.

Lake Powell is upstream from Lake Mead.  That will be important later. 

Finally, hundreds of miles downstream from Lake Mead another, smaller dam forms Lake Havasu, from which billions of gallons a year are pumped to Los Angeles via a staggeringly expensive 242-mile "conveyance system" of pumps, canals and siphons.

Powell is the first, highest-elevation reservoir in the chain.  When the water level in Lake Powell drops to 3,490 feet above sea level, it can no longer produce electricity.  

As of yesterday (July 17, 2026) the water level was 3,524.3 feet--just 34 feet above what's needed to make electricity.  But not to fret, deplorable: since that reservoir and dam are a long way from big cities, dat prolly no big deal, eh?

Lake Powell is formed by the Glen Canyon dam, operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.  You might think the Bureau would try to keep this upper reservoir at roughly 80% of capacity, so that in times of drought water could be released to replenish Lake Mead.  But increasing demand for water, and years of below-average rain and snow have consumed a lot of water Powell was designed to store.

Then three years ago, as Lake Mead reached a historic low level (1,040 feet above sea level), the Bureau released billions of gallons from the upper reservoir (Powell) to keep Lake Mead comfortable.  Okay, fabulous--but that's left the water level in that lake just 34 feet above the minimum to produce power.  But again, not to worry, eh?

Boulder Dam produces a vast amount of electricity, and 44% of that output goes to Los Angeles and the "Metropolitan Water District of Southern Cal."  Today the water level at Lake Mead is 90 feet above the minimum to produce power.  So hey, no problem, eh?  

But keep in mind that the water stored in the upper reservoir is approaching a critical level.  And Colorado reports that last winter's snowpack--the source for much of the water in the Colorado River, and thus in both reservoirs--was the smallest since they started comprehensive measuring in 1991--about half the median amount.  And now on July 17th all the water in the snowpack is gone, so for the rest of the year the lake levels will depend on rainfall.  Hmmm...

Hey, No problem, citizen!  Either Nature will save the day by suddenly deciding to rain a LOT more in that basin, OR the fucking Democrats will blame it all on Trump--and every fucking Democrat-fellating Media outlet will agree.  SO...no problem, deplorables!

Just like the national debt and yearly interest payments that are ALREADY more than our entire defense budget.  No problem, citizens!

Wait...why is this not a probem?  Oh, yeah: cuz the Dem-fellating Mainstream Media supports massive government spending on unnecessary shit--like USAID, foreign aid, endless government boards that aren't needed, massive payments to states to support illegal invaders, massive fraud a competent bunch could have prevented but didn't think to--and didn't want to even if it had occurred to 'em.

Your government is a total disaster.  You're being ruled by corrupt idiots.  But don't worry, cuz if it was serious, duh Mainstream Media wud surely tell ya, right? 

Can the past predict the future? Dems: "NOOooo, not possible, deplorable!"

The Democrats and their leftist thugs use violence to get what they want.  And always, this organized violence and terror is sneeringly dismissed by the Mainstream Media as partisan fiction.

The Media has repeated the horseshit claim that there is NO leftist violence again and again, until most Americans have accepted it as true.

See, admitting that the government is afraid to do what must be done to stop leftist violence scares most normal Americans, because when you follow that thought to its logical conclusion it means the Left can do literally anything it wants, with no fear of consequences/punishment.

Like that, do ya?

Example: during the riots after the drug-caused death of the criminal thug George Floyd in the summer of 2020, as black-led mobs burned and looted their way through American cities, Dem politicians in the raped cities utterly, totally refused to prosecute the arsonists, looters and killers.  In fact NYC awarded hundreds of looters $10,000 apiece to settle claims dat dey wuz treated badly by a few cops.

Democrat "leaders" were afraid to try to stop the burning and looting because they were afraid that if they did, the mob would come after them.  The Dem response was neatly captured by a Dem dipshit in Philly, who bleated "We have to give 'em room to riot."

Trump realized there were only two choices: either do nothing--i.e. surrender to the mob, leaving 'em free to burn and loot--or arrest and charge 'em.  Same with illegal invaders.  Problem is that lower courts have blocked EVERY attempt by Trump to start jailing people who firebomb federal buildings.  "Dis jus' protekted [sic] Free Speech," bleat the Dems.

And lower courts have agreed.  I'm not aware of any of these cases making it to the Supreme Court.  And unless that happens, lower courts will continue to block deportations of known illegal-alien rapists and murderers.  There are so many that you've forgotten the names of the victims.

Seriously, can you name even ONE American girl murdered (or "merely" raped) by an illegal invader?  I'll be surprised if most of you can name even one.  One reason is that most of you literally don't care:  The victim wasn't your daughter or wife, so it's like a death from an automobile crash:  "Sorry about that, but shit happens," eh?  

The second reason is that there have been SO many victims that normal people are overwhelmed by the evil that has been enabled by corrupt Democrats like Obozo and Bribem.  Far better for the "id" to simply stop paying attention to the atrocities, eh?

That's exactly where most Americans are.

Now consider this: Republican presidents obey the RULINGS of the corrupt Supreme Court.  But because that court sometimes sides with TrumpHitler, Democrats have a workaround: they want to "pack the court" with leftist judges.  They've admitted it.

Democrats: "Whut's duh problem, deplorable?  Your silly 'Constitution' doesn't say how many judges the court must have (and we would cheerfully ignore dat even if it did), so how kin yew possibly object if we decide to name a dozen leftist judges to the court?

"See, when we defeat yew stupid Rethuglicans, yew back off, but we insist on getting whut we want!  And because TrumpHitler refused to appoint faaabulous, totally neutral justices like duh faaabulous Merrick Garland, he din' leave us no choice!  We gots t' pack the court to get whut we want!  Yep yep yep!"

Note how many Democrat "leaders" bleat that the U.S. is both illegitimate and eeeebil, and must be replaced by a socialist government--by any means necessary.

Ahh, I hear you saying you don't believe that.  That's because the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media doesn't allow you to see and hear their own words, captured on video.  And if yew din' see it, it nevah happen, right?  Mission accomplished.

Wow, almost makes ya suspect the Media supports the corrupt Democrat partei and hates Trump, eh?

Here's the real hoot: Even if Democrats saw all the examples of their "leaders" bleating that they wanna pack the court or stop deportations or surrender to Iran or mobs, they wouldn't care.  "We want a socialist system, no matter whut."

Most of you people deserve what's about to happen to ya.  Your kids don't deserve it, but Democrat parents aren't concerned, because they believe a socialist, DEI-ruled government will be absolutely faaaaabulous!

This is how once-great societies end.  You Democrats will convince stupid people to vote for ya, and that will be the end of it.

And I'll laugh: it was all so totally obvious, predictable. 

 

 

UK judge RULES 17 members of "extended" Gaza family can come to the UK, because...

A woman from Gaza who came to the UK as a refugee and is now a British citizen demanded that 17 more members of her extended family be allowed to come to the UK and stay forever.

The 17 included her husband and 3 kids, both her parents parents, a brother, his wife and four children; a sister and four children; and another sister, her husband and three children.

They have no skills, so if they follow the path set by most other invaders from Muzz countries they'll likelybe on welfare for life, with all their food, housing and medical expenses paid by taxpayers.

The UK immigration court ordered all 17 extended-family members admitted.  The government appealed, but Upper Tribunal Judge Gemma Loughran ruled against the government, agreeing that not allowing the 17 members of the extended family to come to the UK violated the Labour Party's "Human Rights Act."

The judge agreed with the government that the extended family would be a net drain on British society, but ORDERED that they be admitted and added to welfare rolls right away.

Conservatives warned that the judge's ruling risked "opening the floodgates to thousands of Palestinians claiming asylum here."

Lawyers for the woman argued that under the European Convention on Human Rights, the family had a 'right to family life.'  Meaning that if a single person is admitted as a refugee, there is no limit to how many more extended family members the country can be forced to admit. 

The lower tribunal judge 'concluded that the applicants would require access to public funds', the ruling added.

Referring to the lower court's decision, Judge Loughran said refusing to allow the family to come to the UK would be "unjustifiably harsh."

So one stupid, suicidally empathetic bitch has opened the doors to an essentially unlimited number of invaders not just entering but also forcing UK taxpayers to pay for all their expenses for life.  

See THAT is not at all harsh, eh citizen?

Related: In France yet another African "migrant" raped French girl.  She was 4 years old. 

The rapist was sentenced to just 18 months in prison.  And leftists are angry that he got any sentence at all, cuz "Dis beez a cultural thing."

If the rapist had been a native French citizen, how many years do you think his sentence would be, eh?

Source.
 

CNN posts a piece "pre-debunking" Trump's speech for tonight

Trump is slated to give a speech tonight, and the betting is that it will involve massive election fraud by Democrats in 2020.  SO...CNN has already written the "pre-bunking" article:

President Donald Trump is expected to use his televised address Thursday to press what he will frame as new information on foreign efforts to influence US elections – the latest in what election observers have warned is a campaign to sow mistrust and try to undercut [?] his 2020 loss.  
   Trump has faced criticism for seeking to undermine faith in elections and denying results, and state elections officials told CNN they are watching closely, fearful he might use the prime-time speech to do so again. 
   The US intelligence community released a report assessing that the Russian government meddled with an influence campaign “denigrating” President Joe Biden and “supporting” Trump.
  Some say worry that Trump might sow doubt about future elections. [sic; either "say" or "worry" shouldn't be there]

Ohh, absolutely, morons: Given a choice between "denigrating" either Trump or bribem--meaning tacitly supporting the other--CNN wants you to believe Putin would rather support America-first Trump instead of the known bribe-taker bribem?

It is to laugh.  Utterly absurd horseshit.  Ask your Dem friends who is more pro-military, pro-America, Trump or bribem?  Then after they say Trump, ask which one Putin and Xi would rather have running the U.S.  Easy answer, but too hard for Democrats.

The secretary of state for the Democrat-ruled shithole state of Washington, Steve Hobbs, told CNN. “We can assume that he’s gonna say crazy things.”  

Oh, y'mean like claiming tens of thousands of fake ballots were counted?

Y'mean like claiming tens of thousands of mail-in ballots were counted that didn't have signatures matching those on file?  Or any sigs at ALL?  Those kinds of fraud?  Cuz we wouldn't want Americans to think there was any fraud in ouah presidential and congressional elections, right?

Iowa's secretary of state told CNN he hoped to tune out the speech.

The next Dem counter-move will be to bleat that IF there wuz any election fraud, it wuz done by the eeeebil Rethuglicans, by "suppressing minority votes!"  Yep yep yep!  See, actual U.S. citizens who weren't white were skeered into NOT dropping their ballot into a mailbox!  Cuz duh Rethuglican KKK might see 'em!

Not the real KKK, of course, which was founded and composed of Democrats.  Dat KKK is long gone, citizen, an' haz been replaced by  Rethuglicans!  The SPLC haz all duh proof!

Srsly y'all.  Look at the hundreds of sworn affidavits from 2020 alleging Rethuglican vote fraud!  Oh wait, there aren't any.  "Oh but there must have been!  Doze affidavits musta' been seized and shredded by pro-Rethuglican court officials!  Yep yep yep!"

AI sez in the 2008 election, Obozo got 69,498,516 votes, while in 2012 he got 62,611,250 votes.  By contrast, in 2020 bribem was credited with 81,283,000 votes.

For the maff-challenged that would mean bribem got almost 12 MILLION MORE votes than the wildly popular "first black president" got in hiz first election, and a staggering 18.5 MILLION more than barky got in his second election.  But dat perfekly reasonable, deplorable, cuz duh faaabulous Joe was SO much mo' popular den duh first black prezzy, right?  Joe was SO articulate an' smaht, so it totally reasonable dat he got so many mo' votes than barky.  No fraud needed!

In 2020 Trump had dozens of rallies that drew over 50,000 attendees, while bribem stayed in his basement.  When he timidly ventured out, it wasn't to crowds, but to literally 25 friendly Dem reporters who sat inside white circles 8 feet apart (bribem's staff wuz extra-careful).  

Dems claim bribem could have had rallies of 50,000-plus, but just chose not to--cuz he "believed duh Science," eh?

Ah, not to worry, citizen!  Duh Media an' duh Dems haz spoken, an' dey say dere wuz NO fraud in 2020!  So it does NOT mattah whut any investigation may find.  In fact duh Dems have tried to block EVERY investigation seeking to examine ballots for obvious fakes.  

And of course if Democrat pols and election workers had nothing to worry about, why not welcome all investigations, to reassure Americans that there was no fraud, eh?  Cuz now CNN just claimed Trump is trying to "sow doubt about future elections," which wouldn't be possible if the Dems hadn't blocked ALL investigations into fraud after 2020, eh?

Not to worry, comrade deplorable: Logic can't be allowed into this debate.  Dems an' duh Media haz decreed, an' yew will accept dere ruling.

Source: CNN

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/07/16/politics/trump-primetime-election-speech-debate 

NY Times blasts "profit" and capitalism for success of foreign EVs

The leftist, Democrat-fellating rat-bastards at the NY Times absolutely HATE capitalism, and profit--if made by an American company.

Profits made by foreign companies don't bother 'em.  And there you see the telltale: it ain't that the bastards hate profits, just profits made by American companies.  What does that tell ya?

SO...yesterday the Times ran a LONG piece wailing about the U.S. auto industry.  The piece starts by wailing that U.S. companies are realizing that Americans aren't dazzled by doze faaaabulous 'lectric cars, so U.S. companies have been losing money on each one they sell.  As a result, they're bailing out.

"OMG, dis beez absolutely AWFUL!" wails the Times propagandist.

Hey cupcake, EVERY automaker outside of Chyna has been scrapping faaaabulous EV projects.  But you refuse to publish THAT, instead choosing to blame capitalism, and "duh crazy focus on profits."  Cuz profits beez eeeeebil!

Oh wait, only profits by American companies, eh?

Fuck you, you communist sons of whores.

Now, I'm not at ALL a fan of big corporations: Like ALL bureaucracies they're full of incompetent suck-ups who can barely spell "cat."  The execs are good at telling the boss whatever they think he wants to hear, so innovation is rare.

SO...starting around 1970 or so, Japanese car makers started making huge inroads into U.S. car sales.  Why?  Because they made great products that got good fuel economy and cost a bit less.  And the smaller size (4 passengers) matched the smaller size of younger American familes.

*No one saw that coming.*  Japan built small cars because Japanese families rarely had more than two children--which is why they've been below the "replacement rate" for decades.  They made what worked in Japan, and it happened to match an emerging U.S. trend that's now become almost universal.

[Ask AI "What was the first U.S. car-maker to make electric cars?"  AI answer:
   >>General Motors (GM) made the first modern, mass-produced electric vehicle (EV) from a major U.S. automaker. They released the two-seater GM EV1 in 1996. Drivers could only lease these cars in specific states. GM ended the EV1 program in 2003.]
[AI says Tesla sold its first EV five years later, in 2008.]

The NY Times quotes a communist "auto reporter" named Martin Padgett, about U.S. automakers cancelling EVs:  "We did a U-turn while the rest of the world was pushing forward.”  “It was blinkered thinking, of course. It was an attempt to maximize profits.”

There ya have it again: duh nutty U.S. companies wanted to make a profit!  How crazy, right?

Let's review: according to [propagandists], in 2025 a quarter of all cars sold around the world was electric.  Okay, fine.  But thanks to high union wages, U.S. carmakers can't make EVs as cheaply as foreign makers, including Chyna.  So as long as the imports are praised by "reporters"/reviewers, what do ya think happens, eh?

Of course: Americans buy the less-expensive imports.  Anyone shocked?  Yeah, didn't think so.

Now follow me here: "Be it ever thus!"  This is how everyone in the world benefits from innovation.  Excellent for the world, but challenging for high-skilled, high-cost societies like ours.

Imagine "auto reporter" Martin Padgett's employer emailing him: "Marty, baby, we're having to compete with foreign reporters, so we'd like you to take a ten percent pay cut to help out.  You're fine with that, right?"

Hahahahaha!  Of course not.  And U.S. carmakers are in the same situation: not only will the unions refuse to take a pay cut, they continue to demand annual raises.  Totally understandable.  And because they'll strike if they don't get their way, the employer caves--and all the others do too.

Where does this leave us?  Chyna's "BYD" carmaker makes tiny cars for far less than unionized U.S. companies can.  Those cars match the smaller U.S. family size (now averaging just 1.4 kids per white female over her lifetime).  Can anyone predict the outcome?

Yeah, thought ya could.  And yet the NY Times--and crack "auto reporter" Martin Padgett--blame capitalism and the profit motive.  Cuz duy Times won't blame rapacious unions, nor high taxes, nor absurd workplace rules.  Jus' "profits."

But just profits by *American companies.*

The Times quotes a "senior economist with a Washington-based nonprofit (Stephen Ezell) as estimating that as of 2024 only one-third of all new cars bought in the U.S. were built by the Big Three."  No surprise there.  But then the Times preaches this:
>>The EV revolution was seen as a way to reverse that trend--an opportunity for Detroit to rediscover its capacity for ingenuity and to re-establish credibility.>>

SEE, stupid capitalists?  Yew had dis faaabulous opportunity to "re-discover credibility," but instead yew cancelled yo' faaabulous EV projects!  Shame!

And then comes the predictable knife from the Times: They bleat that the cancellations come at a time "before the chaos in the Strait of Hormuz helped push the price of unleaded gasoline to a four-year high."

SEE, stupid U.S. car makers and voters?  It's all Trump's fault! 

The rest of the Times piece fellates Obozo and the Democrats for their fawning support for EVs--almost entirely driven by their goal of killing U.S. oil and gas production.  The Times credits the vegetable bribem for the $7,500 taxpayer-funded "credit" paid to EV makers to cut the sale price of their cars--meaning if you never buy an EV you still pay for the "credit" for those who do.

Are Democrats great or what?  See, it's perfectly fine for Democrats to subsidize (distort) markets to get what they want.  Conservatives aren't allowed to do that, of course, but dat perfekly fine wif Dems an' duh Media, eh?

Just another day ending in Y, eh citizen?

Source: shitty NY Times communists

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/magazine/electric-cars-american-evs.html