In which I predict the future--yours and your kids'--with absolute certainty

Most people rarely try to anticipate the future consequences of ANY actions--either their own, or those of, say, governments.

There are many reasons, the 3 main ones being lack of ability to predict, or being too overwhelmed with keeping a job and food on your family's table, or finally...the very common belief that "I can't do anything about it, so why bother?

But you need to recognize that refusing to anticipate future consequences of current decisions--thus failing to base your future actions on your guess--prevents you from changing anything.  You might wanna think about that.

SO...Last Tuesday the socialists, Dem partei, communists and Muslims united to give the Dem/socialist/commie/Muzz partei huge majorities in both chambers--and by such huge margins that suggest they're certain to win the presidency in just two years.

Now: from the catastrophe of last Tuesday, dozens of things can be predicted with near certainty--and I'll spend the rest of this year predicting those, and explaining the reasoning.  But today I wanna show you just one thing:

As most Americans know, even though the Founders of this once-marvelous nation loved "democracy" (the idea that people should choose their rulers), they were smart enough to realize that if our new experiment elected presidents by the winner of the national popular vote, political parties would quickly realize that only states with large populations would matter.  And they wisely realized this would be bad.

If you don't see why that's true, stop reading, because you're too stupid to understand. 

Now: as everyone knows, despite what Dem politicians, socialists and communists claim, nothing pols promise to give pipo "for free" is actually free.  Someone obviously has to pay for it, eh?  So when power-hungry pols promise voters free shit, every voter should know it's not actually free, eh?  But of course stupid people don't realize that. 

Democrat voters don't care: their entire "thinking" ends with "It's free to ME, and that's all I care about."  As a result, all big U.S. cities are ruled by the Democrat partei [sic]--and always will be--because the Democrat partei [sic] learned decades ago that they could win every election by promising stupid, uneducated, gullible voters free shit--meaning "free to the Dem voter," but meaning someone else pays for it.

And over half of voters live in big Dem-ruled cities.

Now: as every U.S. highschool student should have learned (but didn't), the Electoral College was a brilliant compromise, negotiated to get states to support the newly-proposed Constitution.  By giving each state a number of electoral votes equal to the sum of its members of congress AND senators, it fractionally reduced the advantage of having more members of congress (since every state had two senators, eh?).  That brilliant compromise won enough support from small-population states to ratify the Constitution.  

This is why Democrats have always wanted to abolish the electoral college method and have presidents elected by the winner of the national popular vote--because that would enable big-population states (and huge Dem-ruled cities) to guarantee that Dems would win every presidential election.

But the Founders were really smart, and anticipated this, and responded by writing the Electoral College method into a two-century-old piece of paper once called "the supreme law of the land."

(If you wanna see how successfully the corrupt Democrats have succeeded in taking over the schools, ask your kids what the phrase "supreme law of the land" refers to.)

Now: As every American should know (but doesn't), the Constitution says it can only be changed by the Amendment process.  And for an amendment to become law, it must be "ratified" by two-thirds of the states.  And since electing presidents by the winner of the national popular vote would hugely disadvantage all small-population states, the "leaders" of the Democrat partei [sic] know they'll never get enough states to ratify a Constitutional Amendment to elect presidents by the winner of the national popular vote!

But if you thought that was the end of it, you don't know Democrats.

Twenty years ago two treasonous Democrat lawyers saw a way to force presidents to be chosen by the winner of the popular vote--without having to amend the Constitution.  

That is, they found a way to abolish the Electoral College despite that being in the Constitution, but without having to amend that document--which probably wouldn't be possible.  You'd think since this would violate "the supreme law of the land," it'd be seen (correctly) as treason.  And you might think the mainstream media--supposedly interested in ensuring that our laws are  obeyed--would have warned you about it, eh?

But have you ever heard a word about this scheme before now?  Probably not.

The reason, of course, is that virtually the entire mainstream media are eager fellators of the Democrat partei [sic], and hate conservatives, so they deliberately decided NOT to alert voters to this treasonous scheme.  Cuz if voters knew, a few tens of thousands might have stopped voting Democrat.

If you love America you can't hate the media enough.

Here's how the Democrat scheme to abolish the EC without amending the Constitution will work:  Just as the Dems claim the Constitution allows them to let illegal aliens vote, Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution allows states to cast their electoral votes any way their state legislators want.

The Democrats implicitly claim this clause means the Founders intended that if a majority of voters in a state vote for the Republican for president, a state with a majority-Democrat legislature could simply decide to cast all of its electoral votes for the Democrat.

"Wait," y'say..."that's crazy!  Impossible!  The Democrats can't really be serious about ordering that--are they?"
 
Yeah, they are.  Even the Founders never imagined such treachery.  It would have seemed impossible in 1789.  Sounds like a sure way to trigger a revolt, eh?  And yet the Dems really are on the verge of doing this.  And this isn't just speculation or a scare-story.

Watch as the Dems put on their demonic smiles and say "Duh provision dat makes dis legal beez right dere in duh Constitution, deplorables!  It sez 'Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors...  

"SEE?  'In such manner as the legislature...may direct."  Dat clearly means state lawmakers can decide to cast their state's electoral votes any way dey want!  So neener neener neener!"

That's the first part of the scheme.  The second piece is that the Constitution allows states to form "interstate compacts" for purposes never specified, but thought to be used to allow states to resolve disputes over, say, border rivers that change course, or to cooperate to solve problems without federal assistance.

So the Democrat plan is to create a thing called the "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact."  Democrat-ruled states can "join" it by passing a state law.  The compact declares that when states having a majority of the electoral votes have passed laws "joining" it, all joined states promise to cast their EVs for the winner of the national popular vote--even if voters in their state voted for the other candidate!

If you didn't get that, read it again.  It's almost impossible to believe they're serious.  And it gets Dem state legislators off the hook (escape blame) by letting 'em bleat "We din' have any choice, cuz an earlier legislature made dis a state law!  So yew cain't blame US!"

Dems: "See, deplorables?  Dis is how democracy is supposed to work!  We don't like the Electoral College method specified in the Constitution, so we'll replace it with the winner of the national popular vote!  And even better, we can do this without having to amend the Constitution!  Cuz we haz better lawyers!" 

"Yes, this will let us win every presidential election from now on.  Dat cuz we're just smahtah den yew, so shut up!"   

So...informed Americans know how many electoral votes there are.  Do you know?

Of course you do: 538.  And the NPVIC specifies that it will automatically take effect once states with a majority of EVs have joined.  For the maff-phobic that's 270 electoral votes.  SO...any idea how many states with how many EVs have "joined" this scheme?

As of today, states with 222 EVs have already joined the compact, and states with another 28 EVs have passed laws to join it, but the governors haven't signed.  But with so many GOP governors losing last Tuesday, those "pending" states are certain to join, giving 'em 250.

So the Democrats would only need states with another 20 EVs to join for the compact to take effect.  And with so many state legislatures and governors swinging to Democrat control last Tuesday, that's assured.  

Now, in the past there were still two safeguards against this level of treason:  First was that the Constitution specifies that interstate compacts must be approved by congress.  But the Democrat sweep last Tuesday ensures Dems will have the votes to approve the compact.  So the first "safeguard" is erased.

The second safeguard is the Supreme Court, which at the moment has a 6-3 conservative majority (though 3 of the 6 alleged "conservatives" often side with the liberals).  By law, striking down the compact as unconstitutional should be an easy decision, since there's a longstanding principle in contract law that provides that when a contract explicitly bars a specified act, the courts won't allow a party to accomplish by indirect means that which is directly prohibited by clear terms of the contract.

The problem is, as all Americans should know, the Constitution doesn't specify the number of judges on the Supreme Court, so the Democrats have vowed to "pack the court"--increasing the number of judges on the court.  And of course all the new judges would be nominated by the Dem president and confirmed by the huge Democrat majority in the senate, thanks to last Tuesday.

Wait...do I hear a few million Americans saying "Dat's absurd!  Voters would see packing the court as a naked power grab and would vote 'em out!"

Really, Sparky?  What do ya think the entire NPVIC is, eh?  Hello?

So after 2028, the new Democrat president won't veto the Dem-rammed law packing the court.  Then if the new Democrat-appointed judges are willing to ignore the legal principle noted above (and of course they will ignore it, since their party will benefit), the expanded, Democrat-controlled SC will uphold the NPVIC.

You never saw any of this coming, eh?  And barring a miracle (yeah), this result is virtually certain.

Keep in mind the enormity of the treason here: in their lust for perpetual control, the Democrats will a) get the last 3 states needed to make the NPVIC effective; b) pass a LAW ordering that the Supreme Court be expanded by 6 or 9 or 12 judges--all of which will be selected by the Dems, to ensure no law passed by the Dem-ruled congress will be ruled unconstitutional; and finally c) the new leftist judges will ignore the clear legal principle that cunning lawyers aren't allowed to do something by indirect means that an agreement explicitly says the parties can't do directly.

It's almost impossible to believe, and yet barring war, civil war or financial collapse it's a certainty.  

Of course now that the Dems control congress, they could pass a bill to pack the court early next year.  But they know Trump would almost certainly veto it, so they'll probably wait until after the 2028 election.  But after the Dems win the presidency in two years, one of the first laws they'll pass will be to pack the court--because they've sworn to do it.  

Then with the possibility of an adverse court ruling off the table (because of packing the court), the "compact" to elect presidents by the winner of the national popular vote will take effect--without a Constitutional amendment!  After which the Republicans will never win another presidential election, because there are more Dem voters in the big states. 

SO...last Tuesday voters gave Democrats control of both chambers of congress and control of enough state legislatures and enough governorships to enable three more states to pass laws joining the NPVIC, to elect presidents by the winner of the national popular vote.  My guess is that to avoid angering voters from smaller states, the Dem-ruled congress will DELAY approving the compact until after the 2028 election.  And after the Dems packed the Supreme Court with added Dem-appointed judges, the "compact" won't be ruled unconstitutional--even though it abolishes a provision specifically ordered in the Constitution, without an amendment!

How many of ya saw that coming, eh?

Of course not one of you believe any of this...but then, most of you'd never heard a word about the NPVIC until ten minutes ago, right?  And yet you think you know what's going on.

Don't feel bad: it's not your fault that you get all your "newz" from the Lying Mainstream Media, so since they never warned ya, how could you possibly know, eh?

Of course you could do your own research, but...yeah, who has the time, right?  I get it.  Really.  The only reason I can do this is that I don't have kids, so I have spare time.

And here's the hoot: changing our way of electing presidents to the winner of the national popular vote is just one of half a dozen fatal results assured by the Democrat wave last Tuesday.  In future posts I'll describe 'em to ya. 

Of course Democrats just laugh and sneer.  They're totally giddy about their new power and are hell-bent on using it:  A shithead Dem rep--Roberto Garcia--posted a video telling all GOP supporters "Lawyer up." 

Dems: "Shut up, deplorables!  Dis iz egzackly whut duh Founders envisioned: Democracy!  Duh partei wif duh mos' votes in duh whole country wins!  Nunna dis silliness where Democrats win duh national popular vote but Rethuglicans win the presidency cuz of dat stupid Electoral College silliness!"

"Same wif duh Supreme Court!  See, Trump packed duh court by appointing conservative judges!  He should have appointed leftists, as we wanted!  But he din'doo dat, so we haz duh absolute right to increase duh number of judges by appointing 6 or 9 leftist judges!  Yep yep yep!"

And the hoot is: Democrats--including your Dem neighbors--see nothing at all wrong with this.  They're totally fine with it, because the Media and Dems absolutely assure 'em it's totally legal, and none of 'em know fuck-all about the relevant legal principles.  So when the Media and Democrat leaders say "Dis perfekly legal cuz duh Constitution sez state legislators can cast dere votes any way dey want," and since it gives your neighbors what they want (no more Republican presidents), everything's fabulous as far as they're concerned. 

If anyone cares to dispute any of the inevitable steps in the predictions above, let me know. 

And if you doubt any of this, here's the gloating summary from the oldest leftist rag in the U.S., "The New Republic."  They're giddy, knowing it's a certainty, but carefully disguise much of their piece to avoid alarming the few conservative that read the rag.

Democrat wins Texas House race despite felony convictions. Media shrugs

November 5, 2026

In Tarrant County the Democrat candidate for the state House, Ericka Lomick, got more votes, despite having withdrawn from the race in September when someone discovered that in 2011 she'd been convicted of three felonies in North Carolina for mortgage fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. 

In other words, a perfect Dem pol.

Records show she was sentenced to 63 months in prison.  And Texas law says a convicted felon can't hold office in Texas unless they were pardoned. 

The head of the Dem partei in Tarrant County said "We are working closely with our lawyers, and those of the state Democratic Party, to try to interpret the law and determine the best path forward for voters."

Ahhh, "interpret the law," y'say?  Texas law is quite clear--no "interpretation" needed.  But for Dems, the law is nothing when it prevents them from getting power.  To Dems "the best path forward for voters" is the one that puts a Dem into power.  So bring on the lawyers, eh?  Let's "interpret" the law to allow what the Dems want.

Illegal aliens voting in federal elections?  "Eh, dere's only a few, so why make a fuss, deplorable?"

"An' y'know that state LAW that the Rethuglicans passed making it illegal to enter Texas illegally?  We gon' ignore dat now dat we gots a Hispanic female as ouah faaaabulous new governor!  We kin' get ouah Dem-ruled state supreme court to overturn it cuz it wuz passed on a day ending in Y!   So clearly illegal!"  

Lomick did not return messages for comment but told the Dallas Morning News on Thursday that she's waiting for guidance from legal counsel.

Of course Dems just laugh: "Dis beez a nuthin!  We Dems don' hafta obey silly laws we don't like!"

Source: CBS "newz"

https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/ericka-lomick-texas-house-district-93-election-felony-convictions-november-2026/ 

The future. Your kids' future. Enjoy.

This morning's forecast for the senate--not by me--shows Dems with 48 solid seats to 46 for Republicans.  The remaining six are considered toss-ups.  

Obviously if the Dems win just half of those, they win control of the senate.

Socialism, here we come.  

Democrats: "Yay!  Dis whut we want!  Take money from duh oppressors, like Elon Musk, and gibs it to ouah voters!  Dis will make duh U.S. a far bettah country!  Reeelly!

Enjoy. 

The Dem party has changed, totally--and for the worse

The Democrat Party has become truly horrific.  What was once the party of JFK now supports Islamic supremacy, racial grievance, class warfare, cultural Marxism, cultish communism, child sacrifice, child mutilation, sexual deviance, and pagan gods.  

How did the party of JFK morph into the partei we see today?

Answer: by promising endless "free shit" to dumb or uneducated or lazy voters, while bleating that they're the party of "working Americans."

Of course the claim that Dems are "the party of working Americans" is utter horseshit, but half of all Americans believe it--for one reason: the Lying Mainstream Media (NY Times, WaPo, LA Times, Chitcongo Tribune) all parrot that horseshit.  And since most Dems and independents get all their info from the Media, why would dey have any reason to question it, eh? 

At what point do voters start to realize that the Democrat Party now supports grotesque evils?
When an illegal alien rapes and/or murders an American girl, Democrat pols and Democrat/leftist “journalists” show more compassion for the illegal-alien rapist and/or murderer than they do for the broken victim.
  
Thirty years ago no American would have condoned these outrages.  Most of us over 50 can remember a time when Americans took care of and protected other Americans.  We beat back those who threatened our peace, hunted down monsters who raped and murdered American children.

But today's Democrat partei leaders describe the monsters among us as victims, and totally ignore murdered American girls and their heartbroken families.  And yet because of Media support--a constant barrage of stories blaming Trump for every problem--Dems are about to re-take control of the House. 

Prediction: if Democrat election fraud is limited to only 10,000 votes per battleground state, Dems will win control of the House 220 to 215.

Repubs may keep a bare 51-49 majority in the senate.  Of course in the senate a GOP majority is essentially useless, because Democrats used the filibuster to prevent the senate from passing most most reform bills, like the SAVE Act.  "See, dis iz how a democracy works, deplorables!  Duh Founding Pyrsyns intended that 41 votes out of 100 could overrule a majority.  It's right dere in duh constitution!"

Of course it's not. 

A second prediction: If Democrats succeed in the massive fraud they seem to be trying to achieve, Dems will win 225 to 210 instead of 220-215.

I'm posting this Monday evening before election day.  In two days we should know the likely results, although it'll take weeks before the last Dem-ruled shithole state will have counted all the late-arriving ballots.

But don't fret, citizen: Dere iz NO election fraud!  Reeelly! 

All the admissions of non-citizens voting in the midterms is coming out--after it's too late

All the evidence of Dem-ruled states deliberately mailing ballots to non-citizens is coming out--and now it's too late to do anything about it:  All the illegal votes will be counted.

In almost every state, elections are controlled by the "secretary of state."  In the Dem-ruled shit-hole of Washington State that's a Democrat (of course) named Steve Hobbs.  During a press conference last week Hobbs not only admitted there are non-citizens on the voter rolls, he admitted, “We don’t have a system that can identify if someone is actually a noncitizen.”

This admission didn't seem to bother Hobbs a bit.

The U.S. Attorney for the area said the state's deliberate refusal to check citizenship threatens election integrity.  Gee, ya think?

U.S. Attorney: “The state is knowingly mailing ballots to non-citizens."

Hobbs's statement admitting the state had no way to verify U.S. citizenship came after the DOJ showed his office evidence that over 400 suspected non-citizens had voted in prior elections, and asked Hobbs to sequester ballots from the suspected non-citizens until their citizenship could be verified.

As you could have guessed, Hobbs refused to sequester the ballots and verify citizenship.  Instead Hobbs disputed the accuracy of the list, saying it included some American citizens "and had other wrong entries."

A reporter quickly asked Hobbs how he could be sure the list included U.S. citizens when he'd just admitted the state had no way to verify citizenship.  Hobbs replied that an immigrant-rights group had said this was true, and that his office believed 'em without bothering to check.

Several reporters repeatedly asked Hobbs how he could confidently characterize non-citizen voting as rare if the state had never bothered to verify citizenship.  The classic:
>>“How can you claim voting by non-citizens is rare when by your own admission the state has no way of checking citizenship?” >>

Hobbs responded by changing the subject.

The reporter pressed: “If you have no idea if a ballot was cast by a non-citizen, how do you know it's not a widespread issue?  And if it's rare, as you claim, why do you refuse to share voter registration rolls with the DOJ as they asked, so they can do it, at their expense?”

Hobbs responded by claiming that releasing lists of registered voters would violate federal privacy protections, and pointed to court decisions (by leftist judges) supporting states rejecting demands for voter information.  He reiterated his refusal to allow federal investigators to have access to lists of registered voters.

He also described a state rule requiring registered  voters accused of not being U.S. citizens to have time to respond before being removed from the list of registered voters.  "Unfortunately five days before the election is too late to give them time to respond, so...better luck next election, suckers."

At least that was the gist of his response.

The reporter wouldn't be swatted down:  "You're still not answering the question, which is, how can you claim voting by non-citizens isn't a widespread issue when you just admitted the state doesn't bother to even try to confirm citizenship?"

Hobbs replied “Well, look, again, people attest to this every single time.” 

This was puzzling, since ballots have no check-box saying "I declare that I am a U.S. citizen."

Hobbs again admitted that noncitizens are registered to vote, but then waved it away, saying
>>“The question is, are they actually voting?  Merely being *registered to vote* when not a U.S. citizen is NOT a crime.  In fact many sanctuary cities and states allow non-citizens to vote in non-federal elections, so we have to allow this.”

Starting to see how it works yet?

Hobbs argued non-citizens know they're not allowed to vote in federal elections, so they don't--presumably because they always obey U.S. law, eh? 

The U.S. Attorney challenged that reasoning, saying “Non-citizens we've interviewed say they assumed that if the state sent them a ballot, they were allowed to vote.”

Starting to see how it works yet?  Nah,  you're not.

Hobbs’ October 28 written response said the federal list contained duplicate entries, inactive registrations and people who were no longer registered.  He demanded specific evidence before election officials would decline to count a voter’s ballot.

The U.S. Attorney said “There is no longer ANY doubt that ballots are being mailed to non-citizens,” he said. “The only questions are, how many illegal votes are being counted in Washington, and what will the state do about it.”

He concluded: “The state clearly has no intent, nor the ability, to identify non-citizens and remove them from voter registration rolls.”

Source.

https://thepostmillennial.com/news/us-attorney-blasts-wa-secretary-of-state-over-noncitizen-ballots-as-official-struggles-to 

Do Muslims want to "coexist"?

 

The Koran orders Muslims to take over the entire world.  The Muslim holy book instructs Muslims to give non-Muslims ("infidels") in Muslim-conquered countries just three choices: either convert to Islam, or pay Muslims a special tax on non-Muslims; or...be killed.

American leftists: "NOOooo, stupid deplorable, dey don' reeeally mean dat!  Dat jus' a mis-translation!  

Really?  Read Sahih Muslim 4294. 

Democrats have found the winning message to low-IQ voters

 

"And if you complain, we'll call you raaaacists and jail you for "hate speech!"

NY Times finally admits the truth (sort of) about the French "peaceful student riots"

The Left loves the riots in Paris.  They love any chaos--especially if it helps to destroy or weaken western nations.

The riots were an opportunistic effect of peaceful early protests by highschool students.  Those lasted about four days before black African "migrants" and also native French communists and members of the nation's largest labor union realized this was a great chance to steal everything in sight, and burn the rest, without being caught.

Owners of stores being attacked and robbed by the looters called the cops, but as everyone can guess, cops were nowhere to be found.

The Macron government quaked and made excuses for the looting and arson, blaming Trump.

SO...if you're an average American you don't believe a word of this, because you get all your newz from the Lying Mainstream Media, which has ALWAYS called the riots and looting and arson "student protests."  It's a lie, and they know it.  You don't, so you believe the Media.  After all, the Media have nevah lied to ya before, eh?

Well finally the vaunted NY Times has admitted that the riots totally crushed lots of honest, hard-working, good people in France.  Read their admission of the truth before it vanishes from the Internet. 

The story at the link is a rare admission by the Times.  It was written by two staffers who live in Paris and know what happened.  Normally you'd never read this in the Times, because leftist editors would quietly ignore the story.  This is out of character for the leftists who run the Times, and I suspect it'll be removed from the Net within a month.

If you don't think this is coming to every large Democrat-ruled U.S. city, you're naive.  

https://archive.ph/r0rol 

The CDC knew the jab for the Chyna virus was unsafe--but said the opposite

The first so-called "vaccination" for duh Chyna virus was administered on December 14, 2020.  By the end of 2020 only a few tens of thousands of people had taken the thing. 

The CDC had long had a totally voluntary system called "VAERS"--Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System--to monitor vaccine safety.  But reporting was totally voluntary.  And now, curiously, the agency outsourced the handling of reports from that system to a company called General Dynamics Information Technology.

The contract expected a maximum of a thousand "adverse effect reports" per day.  But on Jan 15, 2021--just a month after the first vax shot, and when the numbers of people who'd gotten the shot was quite low--GDIT wrote a memo to the CDC:

“The number of incoming COVID-19 reports has significantly exceeded the estimated maximum of 1,000 reports per day.  As a result, GDIT is unable to meet processing and other time-frames (data processing, telephone inquiries, clinical inquiries, etc.)."

Interesting.  Should have been a warning sign, eh?

The "vaccine" should have been pulled right then, for all Americans, as was done with previous vaccines that killed people.  But because of Fauci, that wasn't done. 

The CDC got the GDIT memo on Jan 15.  There's no indication that anyone did anything about it--cuz Fauci arranged with bribem to require almost all Americans to take the jab.
On February 19, 2021, two months after the first jab, with over 100,000 VAERS reports received (vs. a max of 60,000 in the contract), the contractor had only processed about 7,000 of the reported "adverse effects."

The CDC has a weekly newsletter called the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).  And on Feb 19, the CDC released its first MMWR on the jab. 

The primary author was Julianne Gee, an epidemiologist in the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office.  The senior author was Tom Shimabukuro, currently deputy director of the Influenza Division in the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases.  

After examining 6,994 reports of the 107,000 received, the pair concluded: “Monitoring...indicates reassuring safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines.”

Problem is, of the 107,000 reports of adverse effects, the authors of the report had only examined 6 percent of those.  And General Dynamics had told the CDC a month earlier that they could not process more than the stated “worst-case scenario” of 1,000 reports per day.  With tens of thousands of reports that hadn't been investigated, how complete was the picture?

It should be obvious that the conclusion of "reassuring safety profiles" couldn't be supported from the processed reports.  Yet the CDC report said "Monitoring...indicates reassuring safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines.” 

A few telltale weasel-words helped: “The initial... safety profiles of the two COVID-19 vaccines in current use did not indicate evidence of unexpected serious adverse events.  These data provide reassurance and helpful information regarding what health care providers and vaccine recipients might expect after vaccination.”

So how many "serious adverse events," eh?  They didn't say.  And how serious were the effects?  Any deaths?  They didn't say, even though the indications were that hundreds had already died days after taking the jab.  But at least it's vaguely reassuring that any "serious adverse events" weren't unexpected.  Reassuring as defined by bureaucrats, eh?

Even from the small number of reports analyzed, the official report says 90.8% were not of serious injury.  Of course that suggests 9.2% did cause serious injury, eh?  And if that figure held for 107,000 reports, that would mean that on the day the MMWR was released, over 9,000 Americans had likely been seriously injured from the jab.  This is from CDC data, from a voluntary reporting system known by follow-up to under-report adverse effects by a factor of five or so. 

We now know from VAERS data alone that by mid-February of 2021 about 966 people had died, apparently from the shot.  But somehow the MWWR says "available information…did not suggest any causal relationship between vaccination and death.”

The MMWR also says “[From] December 14, 2020–January 13, 2021…VAERS received 6,994 reports.”  That’s not true, but is just what the report's authors say they evaluated. General Dynamics had already notified them that there had been far more reports than the contract's worst-case estimate of 30,000. 

There have now been over 2.74 million reported adverse effects, including 39,000 reports of death shortly after taking the jab, and countless debilitating injuries.  The data were so ghastly that CDC decided to only count "deaths of vaccinated persons" if a person who took the jab was decreed to be "fully vaccinated."  And since the CDC alone decided when that was, they decreed that people who took the jab would ONLY be declared "fully vaccinated" 14 days after taking the booster shot.

If you have an IQ above 80 you already realize that if a person died one day after taking the first shot, or the second, or any time less than 14 days after taking the booster shot, the CDC would NOT count that death as being caused by the jab! 

What do ya think that does to the official tally of vax-caused deaths, eh?

That decree by the CDC is part of the public record.  It's an undeniable truth, and yet you never heard of it until now.  That's because the bribem regime and the Lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media didn't want you to know.

The reports of injury and death only slowed once lots of Americans began hearing about the deaths, and the fact that the Chyna virus was less lethal than the normal seasonal flu.  So Americans started deciding NOT to take the jab.  So what happened next?  Bribem had his Dept of Labor order that everyone who worked for a company with more than 100 employees HAD to take the jab, or the company would be ordered to fire the refusing employees.

Hell of a hard decision, eh?  Take a jab that could kill or injure you, or lose your job and be unable to feed your family or keep up with mortgage payments or rent.  Sons of bitches!

(Yes, there was a "workaround" for employees who refused the jab: they had to take a weekly covid test, at their own expense.  No idea how many employees chose that route.)

I have yet to see a figure on how many Americans were fired because of bribem's order.  What we do know is that about 9,000 members of the military were kicked out for refusing to take the jab.

If just a few dozen jab victims had died, and the fatality rate for the chyna virus was, say, ten percent, the bribem decree might be understandable.  But jab deaths were in the tens of thousands, while the death rate from duh Chyna virus was less than a tenth of one percent!  (For your reference, that's about one-third of the death rate for the flu.)  So bribem's order can't be justified by "duh public health."  It's pure totalitarianism--which the Democrat partei loves.

In all this, keep in mind that the HHS admits that VAERS captures only a “small fraction” of actual injuries. 

The CDC never admitted that the number of adverse reports received just one month after the jab was released was twice the number their contractor could process and evaluate.

But instead of warning the public, the CDC said exactly the opposite--that nothing unusual was happening, that the shots were safe, that all reports were reassuring.  

And everyone who had a hand in crafting those lies still works there.

Source: Brownstone 

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-the-cdc-lied-about-shot-injury/ 

Once upscale hotel in downtown Portland sold at a huge loss. Why?

Democrat politicians, Dem judges, socialists:  "We must welcome unfortunate homeless pipo and allow them to camp in public spaces!  See, cruel Rethuglicans wanna chase 'em off ouah sidewalks, but sidewalks belong to ALL Americans, right?
   Duh Rethuglicans say 95% of the homeless are either druggies or mentally ill, but we know the REAL problem is capitalism, an' the outrageously high price of housing!  So we mus' not crack down on drug use, and shouldn't institutionalize the mentally ill, cuz...reasons!"

That is SO "woke," comradel!  Let's see how it worked out in that paradise of the northwest, Portland.

In the heart of downtown Portland is (was) an "upscale" 221-room hotel.  Supposedly a gem.  In 2016 it sold for $108.3 million. 

In 2020 the Left took over.

The entire downtown area turned to a drug-infested shithole.  No one wanted to stay at a hotel anywhere in that area.  But the "woke" Democrats who rule the place blocked every attempt to clean things up, so the area stayed a drug-infested shithole.  

Seeing no prospect of improvement, the owners chose to sell at a loss rather than continue to lose money on operations every year.  But because downtown Portland was now a shithole, they had to lower the asking price a bit.

They just sold it for...$6.8 million-- 94% below what they'd paid ten years earlier.

Democrats: "Capitalism is oppression!  So capitalists deserve to lose money!  Besides, this was a one-off.  Probably caused by the terrible economy under Trump!  Yeah, dat's it!"

Really, sparky?  A 360-room hotel in Minnesomalia recently sold for $5 million, 93% less than the purchase price.  Still say local conditions don't matter?

Dems: "That proves we were right!  It's because of the awful economy under Trump!" 

Say, wonder how much the stupid Dem-ruled city lost in tax revenue per year just from this one fire sale, eh?  If we assume the annual property tax in Dem-ruled shitholes is, say, 1.5% of value, that's $1.5 million a year.  With the new sale Portland lost $1.4 mill a year in tax revenue alone.  

And do ya think sales in every business in downtown Portland are about half of what they were before the druggies and schizoids took over the sidewalks? 

Democrats: "You don't own those businesses, so don't worry, citizen!  The price of private homes won't be affected by problems downtown.  Nope nope nope!  Just keep voting Democrat and we'll have things back to normal in no time!"

Now for the twist: watch as the corrupt Dem-ruled state gives the new owners a contract for $10 million a year to house...the homeless, illegals, druggies, schizoids.  They new owners make a massive profit.  The state of Oregon gets that money as part of a $500 million payoff from the Dem-ruled congress after the midterms. 

Source. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/luxury-hotel-one-americas-wokest-cities-sells-shocking-94-loss 

Comey produces a letter from 51 former U.S. intel officials saying...

 

This will only ring bells if you recall that when the story of Hunty bribem's abandoned laptop broke two weeks before the 2020 election, bribem's handlers got "51 former U.S. intelligence agents"--who'd never examined or even SEEN Hunty's laptop--to sign a letter saying that the story about the laptop had all the signs of a Russian disinformation op.

Oh wait, dat right: you either never heard that, or you've forgotten.  SO...another win for the Democrats, eh?  They win because they lie.

Dems discover winning strategy

 

And of course it's working for 'em, cuz half of all voters are totally dumb. 

You've already forgotten Fauci

Americans (like most humans) have astonishingly short memories for things outside their immediate reach, so almost no one remembers that in December of 2021 the utterly corrupt bribem went on TV to declare: 

“We are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated...for themselves, their families--and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm.  But if you’re vaccinated and you have your booster shot, you’re protected from severe illness and death.”

Of course bribem knew nothing about the Chyna virus--or to be perfectly frank, about anything else.  Instead he got all his instructions about duh Chyna virus from...Fauci.  And by December of 2021 Fauci and the CDC and NIH all knew the non-vaccine "jab" did NOT keep people from getting Covid.  And yet Fauci told bribem--and everyone else--that it DID.  

Lies on top of lies.

Even Fauci admitted in his diary--presumably recording his true beliefs--that "If you are vaccinated it protects somewhat against hospitalization."

Wait..."somewhat"??

If that's not clear enough, he goes on: for those who took the jab, "the durability of protection even against hospitalization does wane."

That's clearly admitting that people who took "the jab"--cuz by the formerly universally accepted definition it's NOT a vaccine--can get the virus.

So...lies on top of lies.

But at this point, why should anyone care, eh?  Covid is long gone, and all those stories about long-term injury from the untested mRNA "vaccine" are probably just "right-wing conspiracy stories," right?

And Fauci?  He'll never be touched.  Ever.  No prison, no fines, no loss of his lavish $300,000-a-year taxpayer-funded pension.  He'll get away totally unpunished.

Is this a great country or what?  Unarmed citizens who walked past the Capitol on Jan 6 of 2021 were jailed for up to 3 years for some sort of imagined "insurrection," while Fauci killed tens of thousands by ordering everyone to take the untested mRNA "non-vaccine," and gets away with no punishment.  But who cares, right? 

Oh, and be sure to vote Democrat in five days, cuz we need MORE faaaabulous, dedicated, honest "public servants" like Fauci, looking after you.

Just kidding, obviously:  Fauci is a demon from hell, spawned by Satan.  Did what he was programmed to do, with the help of the Democrat party, and will die a very rich demon.

And will never be punished. 

Democrat leaders have whipped voters into a frenzy about higher gas prices

On February 26 of this year--2 days before Iran war started--West Texas Intermediate (a standard benchmark for U.S. oil price) was $65.21 per barrel.

By June 30 it had risen to $69.81, raising the price of gasoline.

You whiny fucking BITCHES in the mainstream media, and Democrat assholes in congress, go fuck yourselves.  You screamed bloody murder that Trump slapping the hell out the insane, murderous mullahs was gonna destroy the world economy by raising the price of oil.  And yeah, Friday's close (October 23) for WTI was $103 a barrel.

Yes that's $34 a barrel higher than pre-war.  And who are the biggest winners from higher oil prices?

Iran and Russia.  So if Trump were to surrender to the mullahs and withdraw all forces from the Strait, what do ya think will happen, eh?

You've never thought about it, so you almost certainly have no idea.  Totally understandable.

Answer: It's clear that the world is willing to pay that much for oil, so if the U.S. is forced (by Democrats, after they win control of the House) to withdraw U.S. forces, the mullahs will force all tankers owners to pay a "transit fee" of a few million per ship to keep the price of oil at current levels--which everyone knows the world will pay.  Cuz it's no secret that the world runs on oil, and needs every barrel it can get.

And now Democrats will bleat "If Drumpf hadn't started dis war with Iran, none of dis wud be happening!  Gas would be $3 a gallon instead of $4.30 !!!!" (national average price today, 10/25)

Okay, let's do some "maff" (even though Dems bleat "Maff beez raaacis'!): the *average* American car owner drives 15,000 miles per year.  If we assume 25 mpg average, that's 600 gallons per year, so at $1.30 *more* per gallon, that would be an extra $780 per *year*.

So IF the "conflict" with Iran isn't resolved until March 1st of next year (which is a good bet), that will have cost the average driver an extra $780, or a whopping $2.14  per day.

That's what you're paying in higher gas prices to keep the murderous Muslim mullahs of Iran from getting an atomic bomb.  How many of ya think that's a bargain, eh?

Democrats: "Dat jus' silly, deplorable!  Cuz even if Iran got a nuke, dey don' haz duh missile throw-weight to hit New York or DC!  So yew jus' stupid!"

Well certainly someone is.  Cuz unless you're as stupid as the average purple-haired, nose-ringed Democrat voter, you know you don't need a missile to get a nuke into New York harbor--or into Baltimore harbor (close enough to DC to be a good "warning shot," eh?).

Full disclosure: I don't give a damn if the IRGC nukes either NY or DC.  I don't own any real estate in either place, and while I'd feel sorry for the innocent people who'd be killed, that calculus is a commonplace today.

So: You'll never see the Mainstream Media tell ya that the extra cost of gas due to higher oil prices is just "$2.14 a day," because every leftist editor in the Media knows most Americans would think that was a bargain price to pay to keep Iran from getting a nuke.  So the Media have to say "Iran was never really trying to build an atom bomb!"

Horseshit.  They admitted to having "enriched" 447 kg of uranium to 60% fissionable U-235, and the ONLY KNOWN USE for enriching uranium beyond ten percent (needed to generate electricity) is to build an atomic bomb.

Next Media lie to get voters to oppose Trump: "Even if Iran were to be given an atom bomb, they don't have a way to get it to the U.S."

Again, horseshit.

See, unless you've studied nuclear physics, you know virtually nothing about how an atomic bomb actually works.  You've seen pics of the bombs dropped on Japan to end WW2, and they're huge.  But contrary to what you think, an atomic bomb can fit in a suitcase.  How many ways can you get a suitcase into the U.S, eh?

The Mainstream Media won't tell you any of this, because virtually every member of the Mainstream Media hates Trump and conservatives, so will tell ANY lie, no matter how brazen, to get voters to oppose Trump and elect Democrats to the presidency and control of congress.

To get an idea of what the Media is refusing to tell ya, consider this: Obozo ordered his EPA to issue a decree forcing coal-fired powerplants to close, and at the same time Democrats pressured utility companies to close nuclear powerplants.  Both things have caused the price of electricity in the northeast U.S. to increase roughly 40% in the last five years.

Take Connecticut:  In 2010 electricity cost 17.5 cents per kwh.  Today: 29 cents (other sources say 24.3 cents).  That's an increase of 66% in 16 years, and 88% higher than the national average.  The average household in CT uses about 760 kwh per month, which would produce a bill of $221 just for actual consumption, NOT including the myriad of taxes and fees packed on by the state and cities.  (Yet some Net sources say the average bill is "$125 to $145."  Someone's lying, eh?)

Here's the point:  The average electricity bill in CT has risen $74 a month since Obozo ordered his EPA to decree that CO2 was a "pollutant," thus giving the EPA the power to force all electric utilities to shut down their coal plants.  That's an increase of $888 a year, which is more than the increase in the annual cost of gasoline today.  But unlike the temporarily higher gas price, electricity will never drop back.

Did you ever read or see a single article or piece in the Mainstream Media about Obozo's order forcing utilities to close 200 coal-fired plants because they were suddenly rendered uneconomical due to massive fines if NOT closed?

Ever hear or read what that was guaranteed to do to the price of electricity?  No?

Wow, I'm...shocked!  Not.  Most of you never knew that the emperor ordered the EPA to declare CO2 (which everyone exhales) a "pollutant," and you never knew the EPA then decreed rules (no law needed) forcing utilities to shutter now-uneconomic coal-fired power plants.  And since those plants produced electricity at a lower cost than anything else, that the ordered shutdown would drastically raise the cost of electricity, eh?

You nevah heard about dat cuz duh Mainstream Media knew if dey tol' voters about it, Dems would lose votes.  Oooohhh, can't have THAT, eh?

Seriously, ask your friends and parents if they evah heard about any of that.

See, principle #1 for the Mainstream Media is, "If we don't report it, you nevah know about it!  So as far as you know, it nevah happened!"

Starting to see how it works yet?

No, you're not, cuz you literally refuse to believe it.  "Dat jus' a 'right-wing conspiracy story!'" 

Anyone remember 1990? No?

Back in 1990 Minnesota was rated the best state in America to start a business.  Lowest in state government corruption. 

Totally by coincidence, in 1990 it was also 94% White.  There wasn’t one Somali, or person of Somalian descent, living in all of Minnesota. Not one.

Now, 36 years later, almost 200,000 Somalis live in Minnesota.

Democrats (like MN governor Timmy Walz and his lieutenant governor--and now Dem candidate for the fucking U.S. senate, Peggy Flanagan): "Dis beez absolutely wunnerful!  Somalis are hard-working doctors and engineers an' cops.  We couldn't run this state wifout 'em!"  (Unintentional truth there.)

So it came as a total surprise when a few weeks ago the FBI announced that they'd arrested a Somali (Muslim) anchor baby who'd planned to shoot as many whites as possible at the popular Mall of America.

Surely you saw the reports on the network newz about it, right?  If you're skeptical, google "Sheikhdoon Abdullahi Mohamud."  

Of course if you're a Democrat, you won't--because you don't wanna know.  Your core mantra is "Die-versity iz ouah strength," eh?  You stupidly believe that "all cultures are equal" and that pipo raised in tribal shitholes make model American citizens!

Your naivete is stunning but totally understandable, cuz that's how you've been propagandized.

The U.S. Attorney for Minnesota said federal agents’ attempts to speak with Mohamud’s parents about his radicalization in 2025 were rebuffed.

So let's review: First, how many of you ever heard about this?

Second: In nature, what happens to animals who either refuse to learn or are too slow/stupid to learn?

If you're an adult Democrat you richly deserve what's coming...because as an adult you had the facts available to you, but deliberately chose virtue-signalling over rationality. 

You stupidly believed such utter bullshit as "The U.S. must open our borders to anyone in the world who wants to enter!  And then it is our job to give each one free housing, food, medical care, free college and thousands of dollars of cash per month!  Cuz...we Dems iz totally virtuous!" 

You believed Somalis and Nigerians and Algerians and Senegalese and Haitians were "just like us," so would make great next-door neighbors.

Well of course not next-door to you, eh?  But fine if next door to some poor conservative "deplorable" five miles away, eh?

So I don't feel a bit sorry for you.  I do feel sorry for your kids, cuz unlike you, they didn't have any choice in things: you helped elect Obozo, then his equally, utterly corrupt VP, Joey bribem.  Both opened the borders, setting us on the road to the death of America. 

So...enjoy the next decade or so, Democrats.  In nine days your beloved partei [sic] will win control of the House, and they already control the senate even without a majority, thanks to the filibuster.  Control ensures no good-for-America bill will be passed during the last two years of Trump's term.  Instead even the "must-pass" bills, like the Defense Appropriations Act, or extensions to food stamps or welfare or highway bills or tax laws, will contain fatal provisions inserted by Democrats--but will be forced to become law due to the "must-pass" nature of the bill.

Most of you Dems have no idea what I'm talking about.  Most of you want "free shit" and socialism and open borders--and thanks to a corrupt Media and stupid voters, you're gonna get all three.

Wheeee!  And on November 4th Chuckie Schumer and AOC and Fauxcahontas and Hakeem and Cory Booker and Newscum and Ro Khana and Ilhan Omar and Pelosi and that moronic Dem former astronaut from Arizona, and the Paleswinians and Somalis and lesbians and trannies--and the communists at CNN and MS-NOW and the alphabet nets--will all be absolutely gloating about winning control and being able to totally block all conservative bills and all Trump-backed policies--which is totally understandable.

You wanted it, you plotted it out, and it worked for ya.  So you should be happy about the result, eh?

And you will be.  Your kids?  Not so much.  But you'll tell 'em "Yes, the government seized 90% of the estate your mother and I had worked hard to give ya, but dat reeeally gud!  Cuz yew gon' feel way mo' virtuous to know dat most of our estate went to hep po' Somali and Mehican immigrants refugees!  An' yes, half of university admissions will go to refugee kids instead of you and your kids, but same argument, eh?  You and your kids will feel LOTS of virtue by going to a community college (or no college).

"See, dis beez duh new world order we virtuous Dems planned for ya.  Cuz we Dems wuz/iz smaaht!  Next comes electricity bills rising 40% per year, which you'll happily pay, cuz...virtue.  An' no air travel for your kids, cuz all dat CO2 kills duh Erf, eh?  But your kidz won' mind, cuz dey kin drive dere faaabulous electric cars coast-to-coast for pocket change, thanks to Joe Biden's faaabulous $7 BILLION dollar network of charging stations!

Paradise on Erf, eh? 

What did we learn from the French "student riots"? Apparently nothing

 

If you still believe the protests that burned and looted in many French cities (including the capital), you're too uninformed to breathe.

And if you think this same shit isn't coming here--like a damn freight train, in every Democrat-ruled shithole city--you're dreaming.

Oh wait...it already has: summer of 2020, even as the utterly corrupt Fauci warned people not to socialize, and Dem governors ordered a total lockdown, hundreds of thousands of protesters burned and looted U.S. cities.  It's now been a bit over six years and everyone's forgotten the endless hours of video, most taken by cell phones and seen by very few Americans.

But either you never saw the burning cities, or you've forgotten.  But it's coming, again, because the communists/socialists/DSA are following the same playbook as their comrades in Paris: convince everyone that they're entitled to everything they want, "for free," by taking whatever they want.

There are HOURS of videos of Americans in Paris interviewing residents, and you hear the same things over and over: the rioters hate anyone who owns a shop or a business of any kind.  The "solution"?  Loot it, burn it.  Vandalism as entertainment.

This is the totally inevitable result of socialists telling people they can have anything they want, "for free," and that anyone who disagrees is the enemy. 

In Cali, Federal investigators identify 20,000 mail-in ballots "likely from illegal aliens." Election officials refuse to hold those ballots to verify citizenship before counting 'em

One of the saddest lines heard in life is "It's too late."  

You got to the hospital minutes after your loved one died.  Or the mission to rescue a surrounded army brigade came too late to save them. Or you discover that your nation has been quietly invaded by a million "sleeper agents."  Lots more examples.

This is one of those stories.

It's too late to prevent massive election fraud in the midterm elections (in just 12 days): In California the Democrat officials who rule every state agency--including elections--have refused to sequester mail-in ballots from people who almost certainly were NOT U.S. citizens, after admitting in federal court, on the record, that election officials don't bother even trying to verify that voters are U.S. citizens before accepting and counting their ballots.  Instead the corrupt Democrat officials rely entirely on a voter's claim of citizenship.

Three days ago--just 15 days before Election Day--the federal government arrested 28 people in California for either already voting illegally, or being registered to vote despite not being American citizens.

And of course the shithead Dems bleat "Only 28 pipo?  Dat beez a nuffin!  Cain't possibly change any results!  So yew mus' ignore dis!"

Except the 28 are only one one-thousandth of the actual problem.

I'd yell "Wake the f*ck up" but it's too late: ALL the illegal votes WILL be counted, because Cali election officials have already refused to sequester the suspect ballots until each voter is confirmed to be a U.S. citizen.  And of course once a ballot is removed from its mail-in envelope there's no way to tell who cast it, eh?  "Secret ballot," right?

Senate Democrats cunningly blocked the SAVE Act from passing, by threatening to filibuster (which as everyone should know requires a "supermajority" of 60 votes to end).  The corrupt or merely stupid John Thune should have forced the Dems to do that, starting months before Election Day, since the corrupt Media would have HAD to cover it, and it would have shown Americans that the Dems were blocking a bill that would have made it harder for non-citizens to vote, period.

But Thune refused to force the Dems to show their ass to voters.  Stupid, stupid, stupid.  His excuse was "We don't have the votes to end a threatened filibuster!"  True, but the goal is to show all Americans that the Dems refuse to support a bill seeking to reduce election fraud.  Americans needed to see that, but Thune allowed the Dems to get away without revealing their true agenda.

Oh well...at least he's well-paid.

According to the DOJ, federal investigators used immigration databases, identity matching, multiple verification layers, manual USCIS reviews, supervisory oversight, and law-enforcement screening to identify more than 20,000 likely noncitizens on California's voter rolls.

Of course every flagged registration should be totally verified.  Unfortunately now...how does that sad saying go?  Oh yeah: "It's too late," because corrupt Cali state officials refuse to sequester the suspect mail-in ballots.  And remember that once they're out of their envelope, there's no way to tell who sent them.  So in effect they're already being counted by corrupt Cali election officials--all Democrats.

If you still don't see the problem, consider this:  If state officials believe there's no widespread voting by non-citizens, why would you resist verifying that registered voters are U.S. citizens, after federal investigators presented documented problems?

There's no innocent answer.  The real answer is that Dems WANT illegals to vote, so they claim that "Verifying election integrity is *voter suppression.* 

So if you didn't catch it earlier: In the Karen-Bass-ruled shithole of L.A, officials have confirmed to a federal court that the only way they decide if a person wishing to register or vote is a U.S. citizen depends solely on what the voter claims.

This should tell you everything you need to know about "election integrity" in that shithole state.

Here's the actual quote from LA officials to the court:

"The Registrar is not equipped or authorized to verify voter citizenship because it does not independently house citizenship-related information beyond the voter attestation as identified in federal and state law, and is certainly not equipped to do so within the election period."

That last phrase ("...and is certainly not equipped to do so within the election period") is a beautiful effort to appear totally reasonable: "Gee, if only yew feds had given us dis info sooner, maybe we could have cleaned up ouah precious, sacred voter rolls.  But yew gave us dis info too late! [There's that phrase again.]  So we simply could NOT have done anything in the remaining time befo' election day."

Spoiler: No matter when the feds advised the corrupt Dem election officials about the problem, there wouldn't have been enough time for corrupt officials to act.  Cuz the state would sue, and dat wud take MONTHS, eh?  Because it's all just an excuse for achieving the result Democrats want: illegals voting Democrat. 

Just for fun, consider this: if all illegals were known to vote Republican, there wouldn't be a single illegal registered to vote in Democrat-ruled states.  Dems: "Of course not, cuz ouah precious, cherished, sacred election laws MUST be enforced!  Duh integrity of ouah precious democracy depends on it!"

Wow that didn't take long, eh?

Unfortunately, as noted earlier, "it's too late."

Of course gullible people are comforted by the fact that federal law requires that states retain all ballots for 26 months after a federal election, so in theory you could go back months later and re-count all the ballots.  Problem: the totals won't match, cuz tens of thousands of ballots are missing.  Have mysteriously vanished--as they did in Georgia.  Just...vanished.

Gullible American: "Nah, dey iz jus' mis-filed, cuz no one would steal ballots cuz dat wud be against federal law, so no one would risk dat, right?"

Oh, "Against federal law," y'say?  Ya mean like counting the votes of non-citizens?  Which Cali officials are demonstrably doing.  Hmmmm....

You don't understand: no ballots were stolen.  They were never there to begin with.  Corrupt election officials counted a shit-ton of votes that never existed--knowing that in the totally unlikely event anyone was able to get a Democrat judge to order an inspection of ballots, Dem officials could fall back on "WHOA, some nefarious party seems to have stolen 50,000 ballots for ouah candidates!  Who wud doo such a thang, eh?  We needs t' investigate!"

Sorry.  It's too late--just as it was in 2020.

Source: Ace of Spades

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=421848 

Hit-piece by commie Washington Post: "U.S. officials privately advise states fearing Trump election meddling"

One of the oldest and most often used tricks in the communist/leftist/Democrat/"proggie" playbook sounds too simple to be true:  They accuse their opponents of doing something they themselves are doing.

The reason this always works is that if the Democrats are discovered to have been doing the exact thing they accused their opponents of doing--the instant response is 

"Today's totally false, baseless, malicious accusation by Republican dirty-tricks "operatives" against ouah totally honest party is nothing but a transparent effort by Republicans to deceive voters by accusing ouah party of doing exactly what we told you weeks ago that they were doing!
    "Surely ALL good, honest voters can easily see the Republicans are obviously just trying to deflect attention from what we told you weeks ago that we'd caught them doing!  And since Republicans have no imagination, they couldn't even invent some new charge, so dey merely accused US of what they were doing!  They're simply copying ouah true claim from weeks ago to try to deflect voter attention from their own crimes!
   "Of course American voters are too smart to fall for this obvious deflection!

With that in mind, consider this total hit-piece from the communist Washington Post, dated October 20, 2026 (two weeks before the mid-term elections) titled  

"U.S. officials privately advise states fearing Trump election meddling"

A small group of U.S. national security officials has been discreetly advising state governments and congressional lawmakers on how to prepare for the possibility that the Trump administration will attempt to interfere in November's midterm elections, according to people involved in the effort.

Note the phrase "will attempt to interfere..."  Not "may" or "might" or "could," but "will."  If you think that's just an accident, or trivial, you're too damn stupid to breathe.
   And unnamed "national security officials," y'say?  Would those be the same officials who signed the utterly lying open letter saying Hunty bribem's abandoned laptop was a "Russian disinformation op"-- without ever examining the laptop?  Without determining that the FBI had seized it (meaning it definitely existed)?

The group includes about 10 current and former officials with experience in the Defense Department, some of whom have previously focused on countering authoritarianism abroad.

Of course no names, even though the hit-piece says "current and former officials.  You'd think former officials wouldn't be worried about being fired, yet they still refused to put their names on this dastardly piece of shit lie.

Their efforts are motivated not by political bias, they say, but a growing sense of alarm that President Donald Trump will harm American democracy by undermining the integrity of the vote to keep the Republican Party in power.

Note the author (Tarasov) did NOT say "by massive vote fraud," because lots of Americans would think "Wait, that's exactly what Republicans accused the Democrats of doing in 2020--and yet the Mainstream Media sneered at that, claiming it couldn't possibly have been true.  "Wild conspiracy theory!"  But NOW when the Dems (the Post) make the same claim even before the election, they expect readers to believe it's totally credible?  What horseshit!"

Over the past several months the group has consulted with officials from 10 states, including governors, election officials and members of the House and Senate from both political parties who share a fear of federal intervention, two people involved in the effort said.

Notice the order of the phrasing: First a long list of officials, naming their positions, claiming members of both parties and their "fears of federal intervention" (NOT "massive vote fraud," eh?)--and then at the very end "...two people said."
  If the propagandist had started with "Two people said..." it would drastically weaken the 'graf.  So the miniscule, nameless "source" is placed at the end of the graf.  It's not an accident.

The effort...focuses on states and jurisdictions [??] where tightly contested races will determine control of Congress for the remainder of Trump's presidency. Members of the group remain in contact with congressional staffs, and at least one state has continued to meet with them as it works to address potential vulnerabilities.

"All of them have said we're concerned but we don't know what to do," one member of the group said of its meetings with lawmakers.

A magnificent appeal to emotion: "We po' state election officials iz hepless 'gainst duh rapacious Orange Kang an' we haz no idea whut to doo!  Pwease hep us, SuperDemocratMan!"

"This report is based on interviews, conducted over several months, with two officials involved in the effort."

Ahhh, a "report," y'say?  Guess saying "This propaganda piece" would have been too on-the-nose, eh?   And note that the original "group of ten" is now shown to be interviews with just two.  "Ohhh but the other 8 were in the group, we jus' din' interview 'em!  But we were able to count the heads in the room, so..."

They spoke on the condition of anonymity and that the lawmakers and state leaders with whom the group has met not be identified either, for fear of retaliation.

So, totally anonymous.  What a surprise.  Everyone in the hit-piece is unnamed.

In their discussions ahead of the midterms, the national security officials [many of whom have been shown to be lying, socialist/Dem rat-bastards] have detailed ways the Trump administration could use its federal powers to sway the upcoming vote, covering categories that include legal and illegal activity.  Among their concerns are that the administration could deploy troops or immigration agents to polling stations or seek to nullify results based on claims of voter fraud.

Just curious, WaPo shill: if illegal aliens aren't voting in national elections, why would anyone be even remotely concerned about "immigration agents" or troops being at voting locations?

Their meetings with lawmakers have mainly focused on raising awareness, especially among Republicans, of the potential for interference and on counseling them to be prepared to publicly oppose any such efforts. With state governments, they've focused more on how to harden election protocols that could be exploited by the federal government, the two members of the group said.

"...how to harden election protocols that could be exploited by the federal government," y'say?  That's an curiously vague phrase.  Would that be things like insisting that signatures on mail-in ballots match those on file from when the actual voter registered?  Or maybe refusing to count ballots that don't have required witness signatures?  Or maybe only mailing ballots to registered voters who request 'em after stating a valid reason?  Or is all that too arcane for your vague phrasing?

Their warnings are based on personal analysis of the administration's activities and public statements made by the president and his allies - not access to specific government intelligence or information to which they have access because of their positions within federal agencies, members of the group said. They described the meetings as a way to help state and federal officials secure the election and emphasized that their work has occurred outside of their official capacity as government employees.

Still, their efforts indicate an extraordinary level of concern that Trump may use his authority to influence the election or challenge the results, similar to his extended campaign to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election that culminated with a raid on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump's approval rating is at record lows only weeks ahead of the Nov. 3 midterms, with voters frustrated about the cost of living and the war in Iran. Democrats appear likely to flip the House and possibly the Senate, and have vowed to intensify oversight of the administration if they regain power.

Election officials, including some Republicans, have decried efforts by the Trump administration to assert federal control over a process that the Constitution entrusts to the states. Some GOP-led states, such as Utah, have refused to comply with the administration's efforts to access their voter rolls.

Interesting that the author did NOT mention Democrart-ruled shitholes like California, which has also refused.  Ohh, got it: the Post doesn't wanna make Dem-ruled shitholes look corrupt.  Of course.

"The threats that we're getting now are mostly from our own government," Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson told The Post earlier this month.

"Threats," shill?  You mean threats like "trying to enforce U.S. law that says only citizens can vote in federal elections?"  THAT kind of threat?  WOW, how DARE the president try to enforce valid U.S. law, eh?
   Y'know, the thing the Constitution commands him to do.
   Oh wait: you don't know jack-shit about the Constitution!  Apparently you've never read it, or you wouldn't be screaming that enforcing U.S. law was a "threat."

Good ol' Deidre is a either a RINO or stupid--and I'll go either way you want on that one.

In January the FBI raided an election office in Fulton County, Georgia, and seized voting materials in an investigation tied to Trump's debunked claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election. Trump told the New York Times in an interview earlier this year that he regretted not having the National Guard seize voting machines during that race.

As he has campaigned on behalf of Republicans, Trump has repeated his claims about the 2020 election and that Democrats are attempting mass voter fraud ahead of the midterms. In October, a group of nongovernmental organizations sued the administration, alleging that it unlawfully collected voting data from 47 states.

In the U.S. anyone can sue for anything.  Question is, did the Supreme Court agree with the Dems that it's illegal for the federal govt to insist that states follow federal law in only letting citizens vote in federal elections?  No?  Gosh, you'd think that would be highly relevant to a factual article, eh?     
   Oh wait...this is a hit-piece, which only uses selected facts--"a group of NGOs from 47 states sued"--without providing anything that would give context.  Classic.

Throughout the year [Trump] has unsuccessfully urged Congress to pass an election security bill--the SAVE America Act--that would give the federal government more authority over the voting process.

This is a Freudian slip:  Even the Democrat-fellating shitheads at the Post describe the Save America Act as an "election security bill."

The GOP-controlled Senate has not done so, as passing the bill would require ending the chamber's 60-vote threshold known as the filibuster.

This is a classic:  First, leading with "The GOP-controlled senate" implies that even the GOP doesn't want to pass the bill.  That's a lie: they just can't pass it--even though they have a majority--because the Dems have said they'll filibuster, meaning it would then take 60 votes to pass!  And the Dems refuse to provide the nine lousy votes needed!

Then an equally brazen lie, that passing the bill would "require ending the...60-vote threshold known as the filibuster."  Total lie.  If just nine corrupt Democrat monsters vote to make election fraud harder--voting a bill even the Post says is an "election security bill"--the filibuster would still remain.  But of course senate Democrats refuse to vote to pass the bill--precisely because it would make election fraud harder, by requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, and photo-ID to vote--both of which would cost the Democrats millions of illegal votes.  

Trump and some of his top Cabinet officials also have declined to rule out the possibility that they will send members of the military or immigration agents to polling stations, alarming Democrats.

Dems bleat that illegal alien invaders aren't voting.  If that's true, why would sending ICE to polling places be of ANY concern to Democrats, eh?  Gotcha, assholes.

During a combative Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in late April, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was asked whether he would refuse a presidential order to deploy troops to the polls or to collect voting machines. He dismissed the question, posed by Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Michigan), as a "hypothetical."

Wait, is this the same Slotkin who was videoed saying that she wanted to intimidate young Americans who might be considering applying for a job in the Trump administration to get them to decline, by threatening to prosecute them?  As she put it, she wanted to "send a "deterrent message" to 'em.  Wow, and that bitch is a senator!

When the committee's Republican chairman, Sen. Roger Wicker (Mississippi), urged Hegseth to provide a response, the secretary said, "I've never been ordered to do anything illegal, and I won't."

In August, Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote to Slotkin and said that there were no plans to deploy troops to the polls or seize voting records.

But the damage was done, exactly as the Dems intended, and the shitheads at the Post parroted: "Hegseth dismissed the question," planting the idea that he *might* send troops.  Mission accomplished for the Dems and their fellators at the Post.<<

Source: Washington Post.  If behind a paywall, use source 2

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/10/20/us-officials-quietly-advise-states-fearing-trump-election-meddling/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/u-officials-privately-advise-states-122930503.html 

Meta ordered to pay $25 BILLION in damages--down from $219 BILLION

Back in September a story slipped under my radar: a jury in New Mexico found social media giant Meta guilty of violating the state's "Fair Practices Act" by selling user data to other companies.  The original jury award was reportedly $219 Billion.

I didn't hear anything about that til today (21 October 2026) when CNBC (I know, lotsa' garbage propaganda bullshit) reported that the even though a "filing" showed that the jury had awarded $219.5 Billion, the judge had unilaterally reduced that to $25 Billion.

One wonders what basis the judge had for reducing the damage award to barely over one-tenth of the original figure, eh?  But surely there was a solid, rational reason.  

Surely.  Really.  Must be, eh?

And if you think the lower award is gonna stand, you're naive.  I'll be interested to learn if a court of appeals or the New Mexico supreme court reduces the amount of damages--currently $25 BILLION, down from $219 Billion--to a far friendlier one billion, or even less.  And of course Meta says they'll appeal.

Care to bet on the eventual outcome?

Spoiler:  If you're an attorney who's been asked to get the damage award reduced from $25 BILLION (and again that's down from the original $219 Billion), how much are you willing to do to reduce the damage award by, say, a mere two Billion?  It's a no-brainer: One percent of two billion dollars is...well you tell me, eh?  Cuz yew iz smaht, right?  Yew know maff.  So how much is one percent of two B? 

Twenty.  Million.  Dollars.  Hmmmm....

Source. 

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/21/meta-new-mexico-cambridge-analytica-penalty.html 

Platform of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)

One of the beauties of both written material and video is that the org or person who created it has a hard time disavowing it.

Thus you'll get a kick out of the current "program" posted by a bunch of drug-addled communist morons calling themselves the Democratic Socialists of America.  Some of their claims/positions/policies:

First they propose to eliminate the U.S. senate, and citizens voting to elect presidents.  Instead presidents would be chosen by...wait for it...congress.  Which the DSA plans to control.

Supreme Court judges would also be chosen by congress instead of being nominated by the president and sent to the senate for confirmation.  (Cuz no more senate.)  Other platform points:
  *an immediate end to all deportations,
  *amnesty for all illegal aliens
  *defunding the Department of War.
  *allowing non-U.S.-citizens to vote for members of congress.
  *32-hour work week with no reduction in either pay or benefits;
  *Medicare for all, regardless of age;
  *canceling all student loan debt (apparently tax dollars pay it)
  *nationwide rent control (rent freeze)

This is so extreme that you think it can't be real.  In that case go to program.dsausa.org.

Here's part of it: 

Imagine taking a day off from work in a future without capitalism.

[Without capitalism] you now enjoy your work; it’s interesting to you, and you’re well trained for it. You work as much as you are able and no more than needed, and you would control your own labor and see it going to good use. It’s not just a job to pay the bills.

Speaking of bills: you don’t really have them anymore. You have no debt. You don’t need health insurance. You don’t pay a mortgage or have a landlord, because comfortable housing is a human right.

Note the clear message: "You will have free healthcare and free housing."  Wow, what a hook for gullible Americans, eh? 

Your retirement is publicly funded. Food, education, energy, medicine, and transportation aren’t for-profit businesses; they are common goods and utilities.

OK, enough about bills.  What do you do on your day off?  [List of pleasurable things to do.] 

These are all familiar everyday activities. But what if you were free to spend your time as you liked without worrying about cost, or dreading going back to work?  What if you didn’t have to think about paying rent or loans at the end of the month, or saving for college, or affording groceries?

This totally seductive tale goes on for dozens of pages, all cutely illustrated with child-like drawings (how appropriate).  Below: what an ideal life looks like for communists.

 

Short answer: under the DSA plan "the gummint" gives you everything you ever wanted, for free.  Yes, you have a job, but suddenly it's "interesting" and you enjoy it!  Magic!  College?  Free to everyone, of course.  

Of course like everything else, college wouldn't really be free: someone has to pay the massive salaries of the endless army of $350,000-a-year adminishits and $150k-a-year professors, and the massive utility bills (gotta keep those campuses totally lit at night, eh?).  The numbers don't work.  Not even close.  And of course no one in the DSA even tried to make the numbers work, cuz neither DSA rulers nor their supporters (and potential voters) can do maff!  Which is why stupid, gullible Americans eat this shit up: they believe everything can be paid for by gummint.

What no one ever tries to explain is:  How will duh gummint get all the money needed to give every citizen all this faaabulous "free" stuff, eh? 

But the beauty of communism is that no one is ever called to answer that question-- because communism is built on the faaaaabulous maxim "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

You may have heard that line before.  It was popularized by Karl Marx, and it sounds SO reasonable, eh? 

The entire DSA platform--as quoted above--is such a tissue of outrageous lies as to be  unbelievable.  Except they really posted it.  Click on the link above to see for yourself.