We need more mental-health care for...um... Wait, there's not enough money in the world.

 

x 

Newsom's wife is a total moonbat

Gavin Newsom's wife is--to put it mildly--totally disconnected from reality.  As is Gavin.

Of course you think that's just partisan snark.  Sure.  Understandable.  So watch this video of her talking about interviewing inmates at San Quentin (for young Americans that's a big prison on the San Francisco bay in California).  She mentions that when she was seven, she killed her sister in a golf-cart accident.  Because it was an accident, she (understandably) wasn't punished.  But watch her conclusion: "Their sentences were probably due to accidents too."

 

Now think about it: her "affect" in the vid shows she clearly feels guilty about killing her sister.  Of course.  Totally reasonable.  But her conclusion--"their sentences were probably due to accidents too"--is totally disconnected from reality.  But to Jennifer, the convicted murderers in San Quentin are surely just as innocent--thus undeserving of punishment--as she is.

This, of course, is irrational.  But her affect shows she needs this to assuage her guilt.

Problem is, this coping mechanism isn't harmless--because the next predictable move is to demand the release (parole) of the convicted killers.  And now the problem is that her husband--the governor of that poor Dem-ruled shithole--can do just that.

Source. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/newsoms-wife-san-quentin-convicts-crimes-were-probably-accidents/ 

Iranian leaders pull the "Bait and switch"

If you're an adult American you're probably familiar with the term "bait and switch:"  A store or on-line business offers what seems to be a faaaabulous deal, and you jump in, only to hear "Ohhh, sorry, that's not the actual deal."

The Islamic Republic of Iran was getting clobbered, and everyone knew it--including them.  They knew they couldn't win on the battlefield, so what was their only option?  Sure: find a way to delay:  String the U.S. along by demanding a ceasefire, using the two weeks to re-arm.  Then repeat, hoping to put off defeat until the mid-terms, when you hope Dems will win and thus block Trump from doing anything. 

Of course because the "bait" was perfect, Trump and company had to give it a try.  Surely they realized the mullahs would use a ceasefire to brag to their abused people that "We have forced the United States to beg for a ceasefire, because we're winning!" while actually re-arming and consolidating their rule over their angry citizens. 

So now Democrat shitheads--who yesterday were SCREAMING that Trump DARE NOT unleash the military to bomb Iran's powerplants--are NOW screaming that "Trump chickened out!"

• Joy Reid: "Donald Trump just caved, backing down from his fake deadline."
• Jimmy Kimmel: "It was the taco Tuesday of all taco Tuesdays."  ["taco" is cute Dem-crap for "Trump always chickens out."] 
• Jake Tapper: "It was obvious that the president was looking for an off-ramp."
• Dem senator Chris Murphy: "We just can't accept a president who wants to murder literally [literally?] hundreds of thousands of human beings."
• Dem senator Chris van Hollen: "We have a completely unhinged president who is thretening massive war crimes. 

Murphy, you lying, pig-ignorant motherfucker.  Blowing up bridges and powerplants might kill a dozen people, and if any aren't regime toadies, of course I sympathize.  But did you wail when the Islamic dictators' murderous IRGC gunmen murdered 40,000 thousand innocent women and men on the streets at point-blank range? "Literally" 40 THOUSAND innocent Iranian citizens--and neither you nor any of your lying Democrat comrades or media assholes said a fucking critical WORD.  

You and all the members of your ghastly partei [sic] and your Media allies and late-night propagandists posing as "comedians" all kept silent because the murders proved Trump's point: The mullahs are demons.  And you're a piece of shit, a demon, for supporting them.  Like all Democrats you're grotesquely ignorant, and apparently happy to be so.  

The only "logic" to be found in Dem minds is "If Trump wants to do anything, we're against it." 

Now for the "bait and switch:"  The Islamic regime knew they couldn't survive much longer if the "war" continued, so they did what you'd expect: ask for a ceasefire, promising to open the Strait of Hormuz and to stop firing missiles if Trump would agree.  And because he was being excoriated as a warmonger by U.S. Democrats in congress, and pilloried in the U.S. Media, Trump took the bait.

Then the instant switch, as the Islamic regime bleated "Ah, the U.S. has agreed to ALL our demands, which are:  1) We demand to continue enriching uranium; 2) that Israel cease all military operations in Lebanon; 3) that all sanctions be immediately lifted, not only on Iran but also on all its proxies. 4) that the U.S. promise no future military action, regardless.

Of course the U.S. didn't agree to any of that.  But the Democrats and Dem-fellating Mainstream Media will claim we did--and will use that lie to claim that "Trump broke the agreement."

You lying, pig-ignorant motherfuckers know the truth, but refuse to support it due to your hatred for Trump and your lust to win control in November, and again in 2028. 

So:  Done.  You and your Democrat comrades have chosen to defend the Islamic regime and demand that Trump be removed from office.  I'm not an unalloyed Trump supporter, but your choices have made you and I mortal enemies.  It is as if, after the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec 7, 1941, you'd not only sided with the Nazis in WW2 and demanded the U.S. not enter WW2, but also demanded the impeachment of FDR for entering the war.  Your demands are that insane, and show that we cannot coexist, period.

Here's what you've enabled:  The Islamic regime now sees a ray of hope, by getting Democrats to force Trump to quit with them still in power.  They've already broken the deal by re-closing the Strait, claiming the agreement with the U.S. included Israel being barred from taking military action against Hezbollah in Lebanon.  Your partei and the Media will carefully remain silent on this point, which will make the U.S. left believe it's true.

With the midterms barely over six months away, and public opinion--whipped by your portraying the U.S. as evil--turning against U.S. military action, the Islamic regime knows it can continue to propose one "ceasefire" after another, and that U.S. Dems will force Trump to accept each or be portrayed as Hitler.  And like magic, the Islamists (and Democrats) will gloat that they've "defeated the U.S."

Just watch. 

Your demands set all this in motion, Democrats, whether you realized it or not.  And now you've gotten what you demanded.  You've enabled a the leaders of a regime that's on a par with the Nazis to not only survive, but to claim to have defeated the U.S.  And worse, some of you knew this, and deliberately intended it.  

Hope you enjoy what you've set in motion.  

Think you really understand the progress in computer performance? Take a look

In 1976 the Cray company introduced the world's first supercomputer.  The Cray-1 weighed 10,500 pounds and had a 115,000-watt power supply.  It was by far the fastest computer in the world.  

It cost over $40 million in 2024 dollars and used $35,000 of electricity per month.

Twenty-two years later (1998) the same company built a supercomputer that could perform one *trillion* "floating-point math operations per second," which techies shorten to "1 teraflop."

Unless you're a techie you have no idea what that means, but in 1998 it was really impressive.

Just four years later (2002) Cray rolled out the follow-on, which was 50 times faster.  So, a 50-fold increase in performance in just four years.  But the cost in today's dollars was still over $40 million.

Today a top-end desktop computer can do 80 to 100 teraflops, and costs maybe $2,000.  So it's about twice the speed of a multi-million-dollar supercomputer of 2002 and costs not just one percent of the price of the supercomputer of 2002, but less than one one-hundredth of one percent of that price.

Most of us are accustomed to leaps of computer technology, but such a huge improvement in the performance-to-cost ratio is stunning.  

That was a year ago. Today a single-board computer just 2.2" wide, weighing just three ounces, using five watts of power--is 4.5 times faster than the Cray 1.  It sells for $100.

Now let's look at storage:  Back in 1978 most personal computers stored data on 5-inch flexible disks, coated with the same material as magnetic recording tape.  These so-called "floppy disks" could typically store 360,000 characters.

Today a chip just over a quarter of an inch on a side can hold 256 BILLION characters--the equivalent of 700,000 floppies.

What does this mean to you?

We're slowly finding out. 

In January Iran murdered 40,000 of its citizens. Democrats said nothing. But NOW...

Office of the Speaker of Iran's parliament: "The U.S. has just 20 hours to surrender."

When the leaders of a murderous, thuggish regime see the Good Guys closing in, their usual response is a fascinating psychological coping mechanism:  "Actually we iz winning!  Yep yep yep!  We gots the other side on the ropes!  They'll be defeated in a matter of hours."

For young Americans (for whom nothing that happened before 1990 is useful): in the 1970s psychiatrist Elisabeth Kubler-Ross identified this as the first of five stages of coping mechanisms when someone starts to realize the end is near:  Denial.

Since virtually none of us has ever ruled a nation, it's hard to imagine how intensely thuggish assholes utterly refuse to accept that the end is approaching, with their overthrow and possible death--possibly being ripped apart by bereaved citizens finally getting their revenge.  So the leaders simply...deny there's a problem!

Thus in Iran: probably the highest-ranking survivor of the regime's leadership is the Speaker of Iran's parliament--a blowhard named Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.  As you'd guess, Ghalibaf is a hard-line thug who is perfectly happy executing women for showing their hair under the mandatory hijab.

(American Lying Mainstream Media: "NOOooo, dat not true!  Dat fake newz!  Islam beez duh religion of peace, an' totally respeks wimmens!  So dey would nevah doo dat!  ALL the hundreds of stories from citizens of Muslim nations saying dat happened are lies!  We knows dat cuz we iz smaaaaht!  Not like you dumb deplorables!  See, duh nice pipo running duh Islamic regime of Iran sed it nevah happened, so...dere ya go!
   "Okay...dey din' exactly say it din' happen, but dey assured us 'Islam iz "the religion of peace," right?  An' a peaceful religion would nevah execute a woman for merely showing her hair, right?  Right??"

Ohhh absolutely, cupcake. 

SO...now that you understand how the Islamic regime MUST lie as the end nears, consider: An adviser to the Speaker of Iran’s parliament--Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, a total thug and regime kingpin--said Iran is winning the war, and that Trump has "about 20 hours to submit to Iran” or face devastating consequences for US allies.

Mahdi Mohammadi wrote on X, “Trump has about 20 hours to either submit to Iran or his allies will return to the Stone Age.  Iran has clearly won the war and will only accept an ending that [we want.]  We will not back down.”

Now, for young Americans: way back before you were born--thus before the beginning of history (2003)--as American tanks rolled into Baghdad, on the other side of the city Iraq's "Minister of Information" (Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf) was being interviewed by a dozen journalists from all over the world.  He's famous for the resulting videos in which he proclaims there were no American troops in Baghdad--when they were actually just ten miles from the minister's location.

If you don't believe it, google "Baghdad Bob." 

This is where the "Islamic regime of Iran" is right now.  A hundred of so of the leaders of the regime have been killed in air-strikes, and the rest are beginning to sense that the end is near.  But human psychology--the coping mechanism--compels them to believe the reverse: that their regime is not only winning, but that the U.S. will be forced to surrender in just 20 hours or so.

Ohh, you bet, cupcake.

See, the regime rulers know that if they give up and try to flee, they could be ripped apart by citizens whose loved ones were murdered by the Islamists.  (For Americans who don't pay attention: in 3 days in January (8th thru 10th) the IRGC murdered 40,000 Iranian citizens.  Shot 'em in the streets with rifles, shotguns and automatic handguns.

Shooting fish in a barrel, as they say.  If you bother to look, you can find hours of video of those executions.  It's utterly chilling--almost beyond belief.  But there are SO many cell-phone videos that at some point even stupid Democrats are finally forced to realize "It would have cost a fortune to stage all this."

So why didn't Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf himself make the bragging, bullshit claim that Iran has the U.S. on the ropes, eh?

Cuz like all the top regime leaders, Ghalibaf is too busy trying to find a way to flee to...uh...Russia?  China?  Cuba?  Venezuela is out.  Life in Cuba sucks.  Leaves Russia and China, eh?

But in China, Muslims are "persona non-grata," eh?  Of course other Muzz-ruled nations are a possibility, but you need money to bribe the rulers to take you in.  And we've frozen the regime's bank accounts.

 Of course all the smaaaht regime kingpins have squirreled away as much gold and as many Euros as they could.  But getting either of those to the ruler of a Muzz nation you're trying to bribe takes planning, eh?  But don't worry, you've got time, right?

But if Iranian citizens (a.k.a. "deplorables") start to capture weapons, and the IRGC flees, that time expires.  So the most important thing for regime leaders is to keep the IRGC "imperial guard" and the public believing their lies that the U.S. will lose the war.

Now, most rational observers know the Islamic regime is on the ropes.  But the regime has an ace in the hole: U.S. Democrats and their Media allies.

If you've been paying attention, you know a dozen or more congressional Democrats have accused Trump of committing war crimes and are demanding that he be removed as president.

Think I'm kidding?  Click here.

Today is April 7th.  Yesterday the first Iranian member of the U.S. House--a Democrat--called for Trump to be removed via the 25th Amendment, and announced she was filing articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth.  And the U.S. Mainstream Media parrot this without a critical world: "War crimes." 

The mullahs and IRGC are totally confident that if they can just hold out for another few weeks, congressional Democrats and their Media allies will have enough public support to force Trump to end the war, leaving the mullahs and IRGC in power.  Hence the bluster from the new "Baghdad Bob:" "Duh U.S. is only 20 hours from surrendering!"

Wow.  The U.S. Media will win the war for the IRGC and their Democrat allies--ensuring the continued rule of the mullahs.  

Inmates in Cook County jail were dying with no signs of trauma. Mystery solved.

In the Cook County jail, inmates are dying from new drugs soaked into the pages of letters, books and legal documents

New York Times, March 21, 2026

How far have we fallen as a country?  Take a look below.  If the article is accurate, it should have been on national newzcasts, but I'll bet you never heard about this before now.

In January of 2023, in Chitcongo's Cook County jail, inmates began turning up dead in their cells, with no signs of trauma.  All investigators found were scraps of singed paper scattered on the floor.

For months, jail inmates had been "falling ill" with no known cause.  Officials said they'd heard rumors that deadly drugs were being smuggled in, but they didn't know how.

Finally officials concluded inmates were heating the scraps of paper and smoking the vapor.

Suppliers would spray a mix of drugs onto the pages of totally legal items like books, letters, legal documents, even photographs.

Inmates would then tear the drug-soaked sheets--worth thousands of dollars a page--into strips and use cigarette lighters to smoke the vapors.  The Times says inmates who smoked the stuff "went into crazed, exorcistic fits, as if possessed."

(Ever seen the word "exorcistic" before?)

To block the drugs the jail added 24-hour surveillance, searched more cells and beefed up the mail room, inspecting every item by hand.

But as always in competitions between drug smuggers and authorities, the smugglers had countermeasures for every move authorities made.  When officials began checking regular mail more closely, smugglers began delivering the drugs on "privileged" legal correspondence.  Officials began finding drug-laced books in sealed packages that appeared to have been shipped directly from Amazon.

Naive investigators claimed to be baffled that anyone would spray so many different--and potentially deadly--drugs onto a single piece of paper.  You have to know druggies: They'd inject goat urine if a friend claimed that would produce a high.  Druggies are not like the rest of us: they'll do literally anything for a high, no matter the risk.  You have to have known one to understand how obsessed they are.

I had a sister who was a druggie.  High IQ, law degree, high position in the courts.  Got into drugs and couldn't let go.  Or perhaps didn't want to.

Addictive drugs have been around as long as humans.  The opium trade goes back thousands of years.  As recently as the 20th century, officials still focused on three substances derived from plants: marijuana, cocaine and heroin.

Today, far more powerful "designer drugs" dominate the market.  And that shows up in the death toll:  In 1971 just under 7,000 Americans died of overdoses. Now, over 70,000 Americans die from overdoses each year.

An arms race for potency is underway.  Stronger drugs mean one kilogram can reap as much profit as 100 kilos of heroin. 

And the consequences aren't just death of the user:  Many drugs cause psychosis and unprovoked violence.

In prison, paper is a lifeline to parents, partners and children outside the walls.  After officials realized drugs were coming in on paper, the sheriff of Cook County (Tom Dart) called other jail officials grappling with the same problem. Some had decided to ban paper outright.

Sheriff Dart--being a good Democrat--refused, bleating that taking paper away from inmates would rob them of what they missed most:  connection to loved ones.  That seemed too harsh to the Democrat, and the Times says the reason is that most inmates in the jail hadn't been convicted yet, but were simply in jail awaiting trial.

As the death toll mounted in 2023, the jail taught inspectors to identify what unadulterated  paper smelled like and felt like, hoping to catch drug-laced paper.  But the drugs were so novel that even dogs couldn't detect them.

One official bleated “Inmates use paper for everything.  The schools inside use paper, the staff uses paper, and the inmates get paper in the mail every day.”  This is an excuse, designed to maintain the "We cain't do nuffin' about dis" status quo.

Almost everything the jail did seemed to spur more innovation by the smugglers.  “Every time we discovered a new trick, they’d make a change.”

The jail put up posters warning of the dangers of smoking drug-soaked paper.  “Don’t die in jail,” the posters warned.

But as anyone who's known a hard-core drug user knows, they're not worried about dying. 

As one former inmate put it, “A lot of us are facing life in prison, so you just want to leave that behind, even for a minute.  “Inmates think, ‘Just ’cause that guy died doesn’t mean I’m going to die. He was probably just weak.’”

Using is not cheap. A piece of drug-laced paper the size of a driver’s license can cost $800.  A whole sheet of such paper can reach $10,000. Inmates tell of begging family and friends for thousands of dollars over the years they spent in jail, to pay for drugs.

On the street, synthetic drugs are often far cheaper than traditional ones.  But inside jail the price reflects the well-known laws of supply and demand.

Oh wait, I forgot:  Democrats don't believe in those laws.  Oh well...

Since 2023 officials have arrested dozens of staffers and visitors for sneaking in drug-soaked paper. One corrections officer was caught with 48 pages in her home.

The team ran back through everything for new leads — and finally caught a break.

An inmate had been caught with drug-soaked paper, so investigators reviewed hours of video recordings of his visits to try to discover how he got it:  When his girlfriend came to see him, she slipped him a packet of papers while someone distracted officers.

She had been searched before visits, but no one realized drugs could be delivered on paper.

When the girlfriend was finally questioned, she told investigators everything.

At last, investigators began to map the outlines of a network. A dealer in the Chicago area seemed to be working with eight inmates and their girlfriends to bring in drug-laced paper.

They also discovered the dealer was in contact with inmates around the country, sending paper to correctional facilities all over the U.S.

In 2024 investigators presented their evidence to federal officials, hoping they would join the fight.  A few weeks later, they did.

By the end of 2024 several dealers were competing to get drug-laced paper into the jail.

“We don’t have dogs that can smell it, we don’t have test strips for it, we don’t have field test kits,” Mr. Murphy said. “So if we find paper on a guy, we have to send it to the lab, wait five to six weeks for it to come back and then say, ‘OK, now we’re going to arrest him.’”

By then the guy would be gone.


On a blustery evening in March 2025, Mr. Wilks was leaving the jail for the day when he spotted a beat-up sedan parked next to his car.

The driver got out, holding three small puffy packages that looked like they came from Amazon. The man did not speak much English, but was on the phone with a woman who did.

“I’m trying to make sure the book I’ve mailed to my husband gets to him,” the woman told Mr. Wilks over the driver’s cellphone.

The woman explained that the driver was supposed to take the packages to a shipping dock at the jail reserved for deliveries by Amazon, UPS and FedEx.

Suspicious, Mr. Wilks said he would take care of the packages himself.

Once inside, he opened the packages and found three books, one with pornography, and two others with the sticky texture he had learned to associate with drug-saturated paper.

It was a brazen scheme. People were sneaking in drug-laced paper by sending official-looking packages to the shipping dock used by UPS, Amazon and FedEx.  By dumb luck Wilks had stumbled on a driver who couldn't find the shipping dock.

Wilks and his team had always assumed that anything in an Amazon box or pouch had come from an Amazon warehouse and was therefore clean.

Now Wilks and his team got a tip that anyone could sign up with Amazon as "third-party booksellers."  Dealers would coat pages of a book in drugs, then offer it for sale on Amazon, complete with official-looking packaging.

Amazon claimed it hadn't found any information confirming that third-party sellers were in fact shipping drugs into Cook County correctional facilities.

The Times propagandist writes that Wilks and other investigators were "astounded" at this display of creativity by the drug sellers, implying that investigators didn't know Amazon and FedEx shipped packages to inmates without any inspection!

Clues were popping up that drug-soaked paper might be catching on outside jail. Tips had circulated that gas stations around the Chitcongo suburbs Illinois were selling gift cards soaked in drugs.

Finally in August of last year, after the tip from the imate's girlfriend, agents raided a house in the Chitcongo suburbs and found ONE of the wholesale operations making the drug-soaked paper.

Law enforcement had been surveilling the owner for months, and had intercepted shipments to jails in North Carolina, Indiana and Illinois. 

When authorities searched the trash for the house they found 14 sheets of printed labels addressed to inmates across the country, some with return addresses of *law offices.*

After the arrest, Wilks said "This is not going to stop.”  And of course he was right. Corrections officers kept finding drug-laced paper in the jail.  In the month after the bust, authorities confiscated 277 suspicious pages.

Of course this could be easily fixed: confiscate all matches and lighters from inmates.  But it's absolutely certain that some dipshit leftist judge would wail that that was "cruel and unusual punishment" and would block it.  See, the Founders believed inmates should have the same rights as non-criminals.  At least Democrat believe that's what the Founders wanted.  And for Democrats, "feelz" overrides all history, every time.    

Source: New York Times 

Democrats would rather let Iran build an atomic bomb than prevent that by force

 

Of course they don't literally say that, because most Americans would instantly recognize that the Dem policy is stupid.  So instead Dem "leaders" bleat "Dey wuzn't reeeeally tryin' t'build an atomic bomb!  Y'say they admitted to having 440 kg of uranium enriched to 60%?  Is dat suppos'ta mean somethin'?  Dat jus' math, which ebrywun know beez raaaaaacis!  So begone with your right-wing math tricks!  

"No, we don't know how much a 'kg' is.  Why does that matter?  And yew seem to think '60%' is significant.  Why do you mention that like that should worry us?  Dey sed dey jus' wanted to use duh stuff to make electricity!  Whut wrong wif dat?  

"No, we don't know whut percent of 'enrichment' is needed to do dat.  Why does that matter?  How can you order that peaceful pipo like those running Iran can't have nuclear powerplants?  Yew iz jus' tryin' to use your raaacist maff to justify going to war!"

Democrat stupidity knows no bounds.  They believe (or pretend to) that there's a use for 60%-enriched uranium other than atomic bombs.  There isn't.  Nuclear reactors only need 10%.  The Media could explain that to viewers/readers, but they never do, because that would show the enormity of the Dem lie that "Iran wuz nevah tryin' t'build an atomic bomb."

The next Democrat lie--obediently parroted by their allies in the Mainstream Media--is "And even if they had been working on an atomic bomb, that's no threat to the U.S. because they don't have missiles big enough to get it here!"

The flaw in that reasoning is that anyone can ship an atomic bomb into, say, New York harbor, or Jacksonville or Los Angeles or Oakland or Seattle on a container-ship, hidden among 12,000 other containers.

Democrats don't want you to even consider that.  They could bleat "NOOooo, dat not possible, cuz we inspek all duh containers befo' dey iz loaded!"  No, cupcake, we don't, and neither does anyone else.  Dems don't wanna discuss this because the truth would quickly destroy their bullshit claim that "we" inspect the contents of all or even most of the 12,000 containers on a big container-ship.

You'd think at least some reporter would have asked about this--and may have, but their Media bosses will never do an article about it because it would show that leading Democrats are totally full of shit about this being impossible.

Bottom line: Trump was right to say "We will not permit you to build a bomb."  But of course the Lying Mainstream Media will never admit Trump was right about anything. 

Small Minnesota town shows America’s awful future. Thanks, Democrats

Faribault, Minnesota:  Population 23,352.  In 1990 it was 98% white.  Virtually no crime.  Decent school.  No crime there either.  Good graduation rate and student proficiency.

Faribault's only misfortune was that it was just an hour from Minneapolis, at a time when that Democrat-ruled shithole was being made the destination of 200,000 Somalis--entirely due to Democrat policies.  

Somalis invaded Minneapolistan, and Faribault became the epicenter of a $2.6 million Somali Medicaid-ride fraud, in which 8 Somalis stole hundreds of names to bill taxpayers for rides, interpreters and acupuncture services that never happened.

Somalis in the town were also part of the $250 million "Feeding Our Future" "free meals" scam--the first of the massive leftist/immigrant frauds in the state that are now estimated to have stolen about $9 BILLION--all of which was immediately moved to Somalia so is now unrecoverable.

To repeat: Somali fraud in Minnesota alone has likely cost taxpayers at least $9 BILLION. (And yes, I know one liberal white "female" was the nominal head of Feeding Our Future.) 

The ease with which Somalis stole tax dollars led to other fraud: because the purpose of the Democrat party is to give money to all immigrant fraudsters, somehow the tiny Faribault school system managed to snag a cool $1 million grant to "stop Somali drug abuse."

That grant was solicited by Lul Bashir Ali, initially identified only as a Somali mother.  Now investigators are trying to figure out where that million went, as it seems to have vanished without having done anything other than paying Lul Bashir Ali and family.

Today Faribault is 65% white, down from 98% in 1990.  Democrats: "Dis beez guuud!  Dis need t' happen all ovah duh country!  Cuz white iz bad!  Only Black and brown--and liberal whites, of course--are guuuud!"

Today 60% of the town's school students are Somalis. 

Democrats: "Wuz yew not lis'nin to whut we sed befo'?  Dis guuuud, citizen!"

Somali parents have been complaining about the possibility of their offspring becoming “English-dominant,” wailing that “parents and children might no longer share a common language, "weakening communication and cultural connections within families.”  So the town's school board--all liberal Democrats--is considering hiring Somali teachers to teach science, health and social studies in the Somali language.  

Wait...how many Somali teachers are certified in those subjects?  Virtually none.  Ooohhh.  So how can we do as ouah precious Somali neighbors demand?  Sure: we'll just get a state waiver from the normal requirements to teach.  Since Timmy is duh guv'ner, no prob!

See how neatly that works?

Why do ya think Democrats have imported millions of Somalis, eh?  Because they vote Democrat.  How the hell do ya think that POS Ilhan Omar continues to win elections, eh?  Or Minnesota's corrupt Muslim attorney-general Keith Ellison?

Today the town's graduation rate, attendance, test scores and every other metric are far below state standards:  Proficiency tests show less than 14% of students were proficient in math.  Just 30% were proficient in reading.

Note these results well, citizen: this is your future if the Dems continue to control immigration via their DeepState parasites.  Faribault is the "new normal" for Democrats.

Welfare dependence among Somali colonists is stratospheric.  One Somali interviewed by the Minnesota Post bragged “Faribault has become our city.”  And all the numbers confirm it.
Of course some "ordinary" Democrats may be rational.  But clearly the goal of leading Dem politicians--from Tim Walz up to Chuckie Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries--is to continue the policies that have essentially destroyed once-placid Faribault.

At that point Democrats won’t have to cheat to win every election.  That’s why they demonize border control and deporting illegals.

Source:

https://moonbattery.com/conquered-faribault-minnesota-shows-the-way-to-americas-fundamentally-transformed-future/ 

Comments on Artemis launch show lots of Americans *claim* they don't believe it's real

I watched the launch on a YouTube stream, and was stunned when scores of commenters on the stream claimed it was all fake.

Wait...tens of thousands of people in Florida were watching within a few dozen miles of the launch.  Were they fooled by Special Effects?  Or paid by mysterious conspirators to claim they'd watched a massive rocket launch?

Many commenters claimed it was done with "AI"--which could be done one video feeds but not for those watching live. 

The leftist critics claimed the "alleged" launch was a cunning distraction from their claim that "the U.S. is losing the war in Iran--BADLY!"  (That's an actual quote from a shithead Democrat senator.)  Or to distract from their claim that planet’s magnetic field is dying, or from alleged deadly new germs discovered buried in Antarctica, or from the Epstein files, or...something.

Some commenters even named a specific Hollywood studio as the real stage of the mission.  Made the claim totally believable, eh?

All the above strikes me as troubling:  More and more Americans are believing obviously absurd Narratives instead of accepting obvious facts--and I think that's a really bad sign.

Of course we've always had a lunatic fringe--folks who deny things that have massive proof, simply because denial gives them a political advantage.  For example, the WW2 Nazi concentration camps killed and cremated millions.  Once this became widely known, more people began to sympathize with the Jews.  Antisemites were eager to counter that, so began denying the Holocaust actually happened.

If your grandfather was with the U.S. Army in Germany at the end of the war and personally saw the starving prisoners, the piles of shoes, the tons of ashes, professional liars will claim that he was either lying, or repeating a Narrative told by an agent, or that he'd been shown an expensive, elaborate hoax.

If you try to counter that thousands of American soldiers saw the horrors of the death camps, or that Life Magazine ran pages of photos, the saboteurs counter that Life was in on the fake.  The saboteurs don't care that there's no rational motive.  That missing piece simply doesn't occur to the credulous--the gullible.

Same for the series of successful moon landings by Americans beginning in July of 1969 and continuing with five more landings over 3.5 years.

For young Americans: American men are the only humans to have EVER walked on the moon.  In the 57 years since we did it, no humans from any other country have been there.  And we did it 57 years ago..and not just once but SIX times.

It only took the communist/leftist saboteurs a few years to realize they could get morons to believe it never happened, by concocting the stunning claim that all six of the American moon landings were fake.

Now think: Who benefits from getting Americans--and citizens of other nations--to believe such a claim?

Sure: communists.  Several objectives: Most obvious is to make Americans believe their government would do anything, spend hundreds of millions on an elaborate fake, to make the U.S. seem more powerful.  And the secondary goal is to make people all over the world believe the beacon of freedom and free markets isn't as good as they make people believe--which makes communism seem more attractive by comparison.  Hmmm...

I'm a total cynic and skeptic, and well understand that governments lie--some rarely, others routinely.  And most adults have heard Hitler's maxim that if you tell a really big lie, people are MORE likely to believe it because it's so brazen that they think no one would be that bold, eh?

Example: the Chyna virus.  Fauci and bribem absolutely assured Americans that a harmless bat virus could not possibly have been modified in a Wuhan lab to make it lethal to humans. .  Yet we have the genetic code that shows it was unquestionably modified.

The saboteurs quickly countered that it was modified by the U.S. as part of a bio-warfare program.

Except I've read with my own eyes a paper given at an international conference in 2015, in which the female "bat lady" in charge of the Wuhan lab reported on their success in inserting a single gene into a bat coronavirus.  The last page of that paper thanked the U.S. NIH--specifically Fauci and his NIAID division--for funding the research.

This was in 2015, five years before the Chyna virus hit the world.  Yet Fauci has never been charged with lying to everyone.  Brazen, eh?

People are right to distrust authority. Years of media lies, government coverups, Narratives and stolen elections have conditioned people to assume they are being misled at least part of the time.  And when people feel lied to enough, they become cynical, and more likely to believe the most outrageous lies as a counter to what they understandably feel are lies by the Establishment.

The result is that lots of Americans deny the most basic facts, like whether the Earth is spherical.  And the Holocaust, and the six American moon landings.  They believe the World Trade Center was demolished by planted charges rather than by hijacked jetliners full of jet fuel.  

"Wait...what about the video from hundreds of pedestrian cell phones showing at least the second jet crashing into one of the towers?"  Easy: doze wuz all faked!  Computer graphics made to look like cell phone vids!

The sowers of lies and doubt have an answer for everything, no matter how absurd.

Way too many Americans believe vapor trails--condensed from cooling the water vapor produced by jet engines flying in -50 degree air--are really "chem-trails"--government planes spraying mysterious chemicals on helpless citizens below!  No idea what those mysterious chemicals might be, but it doesn't matter, eh?

And finally, too many believe the huge rocket NASA and the Media claim was just launched from the Cape was an elaborate, staged fake.

And the gullible, credulous morons are allowed to vote, and there are millions of 'em.
 

Democrats: "Maybe a few Americans are killed by thugs we release w/o bail, but so what?"

Leftist judges--all appointed by Democrats--kept letting the thugs out of jail without making 'em post bail--cuz dat beez duh Democrat demand.  See, it jus' beez TOTALLY unfair to keep thugs in jail until trial, eh?

Their victims--the innocent people they murdered in cold blood--would probably disagree.

Democrats: "So what?  We gets t'do what we wants, an' we wants liberal judges!  Deez pipo wuz jus' 'collateral damage.'  Not ouah fault!  It's like gettin' killed by plane crashes, eh?  Jus' their bad luck!  Not ouah fault!  We don't ban flying cuz some pipo get killed in crashes!  Got it?  Cuz whut mattahs is dat we don't keep deez po' men in jail til dere trials!" 

"No kings" demonstrators awaiting their next orders

 

Democrat *lawmakers* in Pennsylvania introduce resolution to honor women. Hilarity ensues...

Democrat lawmakers in Pennsylvania's Democrat-controlled legislature proposed a resolution to make March "national women’s month."

But after a Republican rep introduced an amendment to define "woman," the Dem fucktards withdrew the resolution.

That wasn't confusion.  Instead, the request to define "woman" revealed "the glitch in the Matrix" (if you saw that movie).

See, the Democrat script requires that no one question the Democrats' definition of "woman," which is "anyone who claims to be one."  That's obviously horseshit, but it's what the Democrats demand.

Hmmm.....

Asking 'em to define "woman" exposes the charade (which is exactly what it is).

Their script--their scam--can't survive the question.

Democrats in the PA legislature withdrew the resolution because having to define "woman" would have exposed the lie that's the core of "transgenderism."

One question and the hoax--the deliberate lie--was exposed.

The Democrats withdrew their resolution NOT because they suddenly no longer wanted to honor women.  They withdrew it because they were never talking about women at all. 

One author saw it all coming

"When you discover that to be allowed to produce anything, you must ask permission from men who produce nothing--and who don't know how to produce anything; when you see that money flows to people who deal not in goods but in arranging government favors; when you realize that men get far richer by graft and influence than by work, and that your laws don't protect you and your family against their rapacity, but protect them against you; when you see corruption lavishly rewarded...you know your society is doomed."
    --Ayn Rand, "Atlas Shrugged" (slightly edited)  

Hugo Chavez: "Nation builder, comrade!" Che Guevara: "Hero of the Revolution"

Socialism!  Cuz it's FAAaaabulous, comrade!  Paradise on Erf!

 

And while we're on the topic of FAAAbulous communist "liberators," let us not forget the inspirational face below, eh?  The face that smiled out from millions of red T-shirts worn by American college students and working-class welfare queens and would-be dictators!  This WAS the face of what U.S. leftists truly believed was Utopia--communist rule!

 

But sadly, over decades after his capture and death the true story of this insane, murderous son of a bitch slowly began to leak out: as the caption says, he murdered teachers, artists, blacks and gays--personally.  And yet U.S. leftists absolutely adored Che Guevara, believing him to be a great liberator and leader!

Hard to believe.  Oh wait, it's totally believable, because the Left owns the Media, and strives mightily to prevent the dirty truth from getting out.     

And of course it helps that Leftists are morons who know nothing of history.

On a lighter note...

A discussion was underway on a website about men dating younger women, an angry woman posted this:

"Women dating older men is normal. Men dating younger women is just weird."  

So to her, younger women deciding to date older men--whether because they found older men more physically attractive or to gain a more luxurious lifestyle--was perfectly reasonable.  After all, the women were freely choosing who they wanted to date, eh?  Perfectly reasonable.

So women freely choosing to date older, wealthier men was totally different from men freely choosing to date younger women.  The first was fine, but men freely choosing to date younger women was "weird"--outrageous.  

By her "reasoning," whenever there was a big difference in ages between a couple, the female was perfectly normal, but the man in the same relationship was "weird," eh?

This is why most women are Democrats: they don't see a thing wrong with the reasoning that "It's fine if our side does X, but outrageous if your side does it." 

Double-standard, certainly.  Also illogical, lunatic...and far too common.    

Muslim mullah says women are animals, not human. Seriously

For those American liberal women (and cuck male liberals) who bleat that  "All cultures are equally valid," try this:  Watch a 43-second video of an Iraniah mullah saying "Women are animals, just like cattle and sheep.  They're not human, but animals.  Allah made them look pleasing so they wouldn't frighten men."

Seriously.

 

Now, what was that liberal horseshit about "all cultures are equal"? 

Democrats in Pennsylvania withdraw resolution honoring women after someone asks...

In Pennsylvania, Democrats who run the state introduced a "resolution" to name March national women’s month in the state.

That ran into an unexpected snag after a Republican representative introduced an amendment to the resolution to define "woman."  The Republican amendment proposed "a person with two X chromosomes."

Seeing the trap, the Democrat Speaker promptly withdrew the resolution.

To repeat: Democrat lawmakers pulled the resolution honoring women, rather than allow "woman" to be defined in a way that would anger the tranny mafia that always, reliably votes Democrat. 

If you'd told Americans 20 years ago that in just 20 years the overarching policy goal of one of the nation's two historic political parties would be to avoid allowing "woman" to be defined, you would have been ruthlessly mocked.  And yet here we are.

You cannot make this stuff up. 

Trump-hating Media say Trump is clueless, claim we're "losing" in Iran

Headline from the leftists at NBC: "Inside Trump's daily video montage briefing on the Iran war"

Sub-head: "The [videos], which typically last about two minutes, have raised concerns among some of the president’s allies that he may not be receiving the complete picture of the war."

Ahh.  So who are these unnamed, so-called "allies" who are so concerned, eh?

As you all surely guessed, NBC doesn't name them because they can't even remotely be described as "the president's allies."  But we have one clue: the "former official" is almost certainly Joe Kent, who is a scum-sucking Trump-hating piece of shit.

Every day since the start of the war in Iran, U.S. military officials compile a video update for Trump showing the biggest, most successful strikes on Iranian targets over the past 48 hours, three current U.S. officials and a former U.S. official said.

The daily montage typically runs for about two minutes, the officials said. One described the daily video as "clips of stuff blowing up.”

The highlight reel of U.S. Central Command bombing Iranian equipment and military sites isn’t the only briefing Trump gets about the war. He’s also updated through conversations with top military and intelligence advisers, foreign leaders and news reports, the officials said.

But the video briefing is fueling concerns among some of Trump’s allies that he may not be receiving--or absorbing--the complete picture of the war, now in its fourth week, two of the current officials and the former official said. 

First, note the cunning anti-Trump propaganda: NBC claims (via unnamed alleged "allies" of the president) that Trump may not be "absorbing" what's really happening.  The Democrats--and their Dem-fellating allies at NBC--brazenly imply that even if Trump was getting an honest briefing, he isn't able to understand it.

Imagine if NBC and the rest of the treasonous Media had said that about president Franklin Roosevelt in the middle of WW2, eh?   That would have been unthinkable, rightly considered treasonous.  But now?  Routine.

Overall, the official said, the information Trump gets about the war tends to emphasize U.S. successes, with comparatively little detail about Iranian actions.

Ahh, the briefings "emphasize U.S. successes, with little detail about Iranian..." successes?  Wait, there haven't been any, so NBC deftly substitutes "actions," knowing no Democrat will notice the deliberate false equivalence.  (And be honest: you didn't notice.)

Some of Trump’s allies view his frustration [not mentioned before] as a sign of a constrained flow of information, two of the current U.S. officials and the former U.S. official said.

Among their concerns is that Trump may not be equipped to make critical decisions about options he’s presented with for possible next steps in the war if he’s not receiving a full scope of information about the status of the conflict, the former official and a person familiar with the concerns said.

NBC is deliberately trying to sabotage Trump by making voters believe he's senile--like the vegetable bribem before him--or even that his top advisors (like Hegseth and Rubio) aren't telling him the truth!  And because the lying rat-bastards who run NBC are part of the once-trusted U.S. Mainstream Media, all Democrats eat this crap up as if it's totally true.

Concerns about the war among some Trump supporters surfaced publicly last week when Joe Kent, who until recently led the National Counterterrorism Center, said internal gatekeeping had limited Trump’s access to a wider range of dissenting views during the war. “Some key decision-makers were not allowed to come express their opinion to the president,” Kent told Tucker Carlson in an interview after he left the administration. “There wasn’t a robust debate.”

Kent is referring to himself, because he'd been suspected for months of leaking sensitive information.  To stop the leaks, Kent had been taken off the list of those invited to the classified briefings--which understandably infuriated Kent, who struck back.  Hmmm...

Days earlier Trump was asked about comments by his former "AI czar," David Sacks, who'd said the U.S. “should try to find the off ramp” and that “this is a good time to declare victory and get out.”  Trump told reporters that Sacks hadn’t shared his views with him.

Now, obviously there are different views among advisors about whether the Islamic regime was trying to make an atom bomb, and whether we should have struck Iran to prevent that.  The point is that the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media

• claims there is NO evidence at all that the Islamic regime of Iran--which constantly leads crowds of Iranian citizens in chants of "death to America--was trying to build an atomic bomb;
• apparently either don't believe or merely ignore that the Iranians admitted to having 440 kilograms (just under 1,000 pounds) of 60%-enriched uranium;
• either don't know or don't understand that the ONLY known use for enriching uranium above ten percent (the standard for nuclear electric powerplants) is an atomic bomb;
• claim that even if Iran was working on an atom bomb, the U.S. shouldn't have been concerned--because Iran didn't have a missile big enough to get a bomb to the U.S; and finally
• carefully don't mention the fact that it doesn't take a missile to get a bomb into New York harbor.

Conservatives:  Ask your moronic, unserious, airhead Democrat family members about the above points.  See what they know versus what they deny.
The Media--and the "leaders" of the shitty, anti-America Democrat partei--are fundamentally unserious: they're either stupid or lying.  But half the public believes their bullshit because they believe the Media tells the truth.

If we'd had this nightmarish combination of Dems and Media in 1941 they would have convinced the public that since "only" 2,900 Americans were killed by the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, and that going to war would surely cost 400,000 American deaths, we shouldn't declare war on Japan.

The Dems and Media would have convinced voters that there was no direct threat to us (sound familiar?) so going to war would be senseless.  Sure, Japan would take the Far East, and a few tiny Pacific islands of no strategic value, but how would that hurt us, eh?
   Dem apologists would bleat that Japan's huge population was "forced" to take Indonesia in order to ensure a supply of vital oil.  But why should Indonesia be any concern to us, eh?  "Not a direct threat, because we were protected by a vast ocean!  So we'd be FAR better off not fighting.
   And of course if we forgave Japan's attack, we certainly had no quarrel with Germany, right?   All smaaht Americans knew there we should nevah get involved in European wars.  After all, we'd done that in WW1, at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars and 116,500 deaths (53,400 in combat, and another 63,000 from disease and accidents), and that clearly hadn't accomplished much.

And here's the real kicker: If today's Democrats had been in power in 1940, and had succeeded in keeping the U.S. out of WW2--"not our fight, not a threat to us," eh?--and Germany and Japan had won easy victories and gone on to rule their empires for the foreseeable future, five years after their victories the same Democrats who had demanded that the U.S. not enter the war would have screamed that they had demanded that the U.S. join the fight and save the world, but that the Republicans were the ones who blocked Democrat efforts to intervene, probably to prop up the stock market! 

And you absolutely know that's true.  It's how the Democrats rock. 

So now for something completely different: in nature, what usually happens to animals that are slower or less intelligent and observant?  Sure. 

Democrats: "But humans are different.  The laws of nature don't apply to humans.  Really!  We smaaaht!"

If today's Democrat leaders and the left-wing Media shitheads had been in power in 1940 we'd all be speaking German or Japanese now.

Source.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-gets-daily-video-montage-briefing-iran-war-rcna263912
 

A murder in three acts in Minneapolis

Meet Melchizedek Erastuscorboi Kpaan.  (Name is popular in Liberia.)

 

Kpaan beez a guud boy.  Yep yep yep.  Oh shure, he'd had a couple of "involvements" wif what passes for a legal system in Minneaposomalia: a prior conviction for 1st degree aggravated robbery, then later two counts of "felon in possession of a gun."

But because Minneaposomalia is ruled entirely by Democrats, Kpaan's public defender was able to get the judge in the agg-robbery conviction to reduce the sentence to time served.  Then on the two counts of felon in possession of a gun, left/liberal wacko "judge" Sarah West--appointed by the equally left/lib Democrat former governor Mark Dayton--made a RULING: 

She ordered him released without making him post even a dollar of bond.

As rational people know, having to post bond normally keeps the average thug behind bars for at least a few more days, until they can post bond, then get released at trial.  Sarah West knows this, but "reasoned" (?) that he wasn't a threat to anyone, so she RULED--no appeal, no vote, just her amazing street smarts and legal background--dat dis guud boy needed to be out on the street. 

See, dis is how duh Founders intended ouah country to work: after thugs and murderers were arrested and charged, dey wanted judges to release 'em wifout bail, as fast as possible.  Cuz havin' to stay in jail til trial wuz hurtin' dere incomes!  Yep yep yep!  

Judge Sarah West, Minneapolis

West is alleged to have said "I recognized the 'spark of humanity' in his beautiful eyes.  He smiled at me, and I knew at once that such a beautiful soul didn't deserve to spend even a day in jail."

So...left/lib Sarah West released Kpaan so he'd be free to keep his rendezvous with the 17-year-old girl he'd murder.  Wait, not "murder," just "manslaughter."

Surveillance video shows the girl walking behind a man (identified as Kpaan) who's holding a backpack.  Kpaan then produces a gun, throws the backpack at the girl and shoots her.  She grabs her chest and doubles over, then picks up the backpack and runs a few yards away as the shooter flees.  A minute later the girl called 911 saying she'd been shot.  She was found and taken to the hospital where she died.

Now let's turn to the third player in this: the DA of Hennepin County (Minneaposomalia): Mary Moriarty is a lesbian who spent a staggering 31 years as a public defender.  She was so far left that she clashed with the state office of public defenders for her ultra-lenient treatment of criminals.  After 31 years she accused the state board of sexism, and they had taxpayers give her a $300,000 settlement, which included her resignation as a public defender.

 

Mary then realized she could do more damage if she could win the post of County Attorney (Minnesomalia's equivalent of DA), and in the leftist shithole she won handily. 

And the city's leftist voters got exactly what they wanted: She's notorious for reducing charges against blacks, and the murder charge against Kpaan followed that pattern: the first charge against Kpaan was 2nd-degree murder, but that was later reduced to the much less serious charge of manslaughter.  Kpaan pled guilty before trial in exchange for a lighter sentence.  As part of the deal the "felon in possession" charge was dismissed.

The killer's public defender bleated that "this was a crime of passion," apparently like a lover's quarrel?  And what was in the backpack that the killer was carrying before throwing it at the girl, that the fatally wounded girl thought so important that she picked it up before running around the corner and collapsing?

Not a word in the police report--even though the report included the detail that the fatally wounded girl bent over to pick up the backpack the killer had thrown at her.  She must have thought something in that bag was important, eh?

And of course nothing came out at trial because there wasn't one--the plea deal ensured that.

So what's the lesson here?  That "some" Liberians will murder Americans?  Nah, dat routine.  The lesson here is that two left/liberal women, in positions of power, released the future killer without bond on earlier charges, and thereby enabled the murder of the girl.  Then they allowed a plea deal that will get him out again in six years or less.  He'll be 31.  He'll kill again.

Thanks, Democrats.