One author saw it all coming

"When you discover that to be allowed to produce anything, you must ask permission from men who produce nothing--and who don't know how to produce anything; when you see that money flows to people who deal not in goods but in arranging government favors; when you realize that men get far richer by graft and influence than by work, and that your laws don't protect you and your family against their rapacity, but protect them against you; when you see corruption lavishly rewarded...you know your society is doomed."
    --Ayn Rand, "Atlas Shrugged" (slightly edited)  

Hugo Chavez: "Nation builder, comrade!" Che Guevara: "Hero of the Revolution"

Socialism!  Cuz it's FAAaaabulous, comrade!  Paradise on Erf!

 

And while we're on the topic of FAAAbulous communist "liberators," let us not forget the inspirational face below, eh?  The face that smiled out from millions of red T-shirts worn by American college students and working-class welfare queens and would-be dictators!  This WAS the face of what U.S. leftists truly believed was Utopia--communist rule!

 

But sadly, over decades after his capture and death the true story of this insane, murderous son of a bitch slowly began to leak out: as the caption says, he murdered teachers, artists, blacks and gays--personally.  And yet U.S. leftists absolutely adored Che Guevara, believing him to be a great liberator and leader!

Hard to believe.  Oh wait, it's totally believable, because the Left owns the Media, and strives mightily to prevent the dirty truth from getting out.     

And of course it helps that Leftists are morons who know nothing of history.

On a lighter note...

A discussion was underway on a website about men dating younger women, an angry woman posted this:

"Women dating older men is normal. Men dating younger women is just weird."  

So to her, younger women deciding to date older men--whether because they found older men more physically attractive or to gain a more luxurious lifestyle--was perfectly reasonable.  After all, the women were freely choosing who they wanted to date, eh?  Perfectly reasonable.

So women freely choosing to date older, wealthier men was totally different from men freely choosing to date younger women.  The first was fine, but men freely choosing to date younger women was "weird"--outrageous.  

By her "reasoning," whenever there was a big difference in ages between a couple, the female was perfectly normal, but the man in the same relationship was "weird," eh?

This is why most women are Democrats: they don't see a thing wrong with the reasoning that "It's fine if our side does X, but outrageous if your side does it." 

Double-standard, certainly.  Also illogical, lunatic...and far too common.    

Muslim mullah says women are animals, not human. Seriously

For those American liberal women (and cuck male liberals) who bleat that  "All cultures are equally valid," try this:  Watch a 43-second video of an Iraniah mullah saying "Women are animals, just like cattle and sheep.  They're not human, but animals.  Allah made them look pleasing so they wouldn't frighten men."

Seriously.

 

Now, what was that liberal horseshit about "all cultures are equal"? 

Democrats in Pennsylvania withdraw resolution honoring women after someone asks...

In Pennsylvania, Democrats who run the state introduced a "resolution" to name March national women’s month in the state.

That ran into an unexpected snag after a Republican representative introduced an amendment to the resolution to define "woman."  The Republican amendment proposed "a person with two X chromosomes."

Seeing the trap, the Democrat Speaker promptly withdrew the resolution.

To repeat: Democrat lawmakers pulled the resolution honoring women, rather than allow "woman" to be defined in a way that would anger the tranny mafia that always, reliably votes Democrat. 

If you'd told Americans 20 years ago that in just 20 years the overarching policy goal of one of the nation's two historic political parties would be to avoid allowing "woman" to be defined, you would have been ruthlessly mocked.  And yet here we are.

You cannot make this stuff up. 

Trump-hating Media say Trump is clueless, claim we're "losing" in Iran

Headline from the leftists at NBC: "Inside Trump's daily video montage briefing on the Iran war"

Sub-head: "The [videos], which typically last about two minutes, have raised concerns among some of the president’s allies that he may not be receiving the complete picture of the war."

Ahh.  So who are these unnamed, so-called "allies" who are so concerned, eh?

As you all surely guessed, NBC doesn't name them because they can't even remotely be described as "the president's allies."  But we have one clue: the "former official" is almost certainly Joe Kent, who is a scum-sucking Trump-hating piece of shit.

Every day since the start of the war in Iran, U.S. military officials compile a video update for Trump showing the biggest, most successful strikes on Iranian targets over the past 48 hours, three current U.S. officials and a former U.S. official said.

The daily montage typically runs for about two minutes, the officials said. One described the daily video as "clips of stuff blowing up.”

The highlight reel of U.S. Central Command bombing Iranian equipment and military sites isn’t the only briefing Trump gets about the war. He’s also updated through conversations with top military and intelligence advisers, foreign leaders and news reports, the officials said.

But the video briefing is fueling concerns among some of Trump’s allies that he may not be receiving--or absorbing--the complete picture of the war, now in its fourth week, two of the current officials and the former official said. 

First, note the cunning anti-Trump propaganda: NBC claims (via unnamed alleged "allies" of the president) that Trump may not be "absorbing" what's really happening.  The Democrats--and their Dem-fellating allies at NBC--brazenly imply that even if Trump was getting an honest briefing, he isn't able to understand it.

Imagine if NBC and the rest of the treasonous Media had said that about president Franklin Roosevelt in the middle of WW2, eh?   That would have been unthinkable, rightly considered treasonous.  But now?  Routine.

Overall, the official said, the information Trump gets about the war tends to emphasize U.S. successes, with comparatively little detail about Iranian actions.

Ahh, the briefings "emphasize U.S. successes, with little detail about Iranian..." successes?  Wait, there haven't been any, so NBC deftly substitutes "actions," knowing no Democrat will notice the deliberate false equivalence.  (And be honest: you didn't notice.)

Some of Trump’s allies view his frustration [not mentioned before] as a sign of a constrained flow of information, two of the current U.S. officials and the former U.S. official said.

Among their concerns is that Trump may not be equipped to make critical decisions about options he’s presented with for possible next steps in the war if he’s not receiving a full scope of information about the status of the conflict, the former official and a person familiar with the concerns said.

NBC is deliberately trying to sabotage Trump by making voters believe he's senile--like the vegetable bribem before him--or even that his top advisors (like Hegseth and Rubio) aren't telling him the truth!  And because the lying rat-bastards who run NBC are part of the once-trusted U.S. Mainstream Media, all Democrats eat this crap up as if it's totally true.

Concerns about the war among some Trump supporters surfaced publicly last week when Joe Kent, who until recently led the National Counterterrorism Center, said internal gatekeeping had limited Trump’s access to a wider range of dissenting views during the war. “Some key decision-makers were not allowed to come express their opinion to the president,” Kent told Tucker Carlson in an interview after he left the administration. “There wasn’t a robust debate.”

Kent is referring to himself, because he'd been suspected for months of leaking sensitive information.  To stop the leaks, Kent had been taken off the list of those invited to the classified briefings--which understandably infuriated Kent, who struck back.  Hmmm...

Days earlier Trump was asked about comments by his former "AI czar," David Sacks, who'd said the U.S. “should try to find the off ramp” and that “this is a good time to declare victory and get out.”  Trump told reporters that Sacks hadn’t shared his views with him.

Now, obviously there are different views among advisors about whether the Islamic regime was trying to make an atom bomb, and whether we should have struck Iran to prevent that.  The point is that the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media

• claims there is NO evidence at all that the Islamic regime of Iran--which constantly leads crowds of Iranian citizens in chants of "death to America--was trying to build an atomic bomb;
• apparently either don't believe or merely ignore that the Iranians admitted to having 440 kilograms (just under 1,000 pounds) of 60%-enriched uranium;
• either don't know or don't understand that the ONLY known use for enriching uranium above ten percent (the standard for nuclear electric powerplants) is an atomic bomb;
• claim that even if Iran was working on an atom bomb, the U.S. shouldn't have been concerned--because Iran didn't have a missile big enough to get a bomb to the U.S; and finally
• carefully don't mention the fact that it doesn't take a missile to get a bomb into New York harbor.

Conservatives:  Ask your moronic, unserious, airhead Democrat family members about the above points.  See what they know versus what they deny.
The Media--and the "leaders" of the shitty, anti-America Democrat partei--are fundamentally unserious: they're either stupid or lying.  But half the public believes their bullshit because they believe the Media tells the truth.

If we'd had this nightmarish combination of Dems and Media in 1941 they would have convinced the public that since "only" 2,900 Americans were killed by the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, and that going to war would surely cost 400,000 American deaths, we shouldn't declare war on Japan.

The Dems and Media would have convinced voters that there was no direct threat to us (sound familiar?) so going to war would be senseless.  Sure, Japan would take the Far East, and a few tiny Pacific islands of no strategic value, but how would that hurt us, eh?
   Dem apologists would bleat that Japan's huge population was "forced" to take Indonesia in order to ensure a supply of vital oil.  But why should Indonesia be any concern to us, eh?  "Not a direct threat, because we were protected by a vast ocean!  So we'd be FAR better off not fighting.
   And of course if we forgave Japan's attack, we certainly had no quarrel with Germany, right?   All smaaht Americans knew there we should nevah get involved in European wars.  After all, we'd done that in WW1, at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars and 116,500 deaths (53,400 in combat, and another 63,000 from disease and accidents), and that clearly hadn't accomplished much.

And here's the real kicker: If today's Democrats had been in power in 1940, and had succeeded in keeping the U.S. out of WW2--"not our fight, not a threat to us," eh?--and Germany and Japan had won easy victories and gone on to rule their empires for the foreseeable future, five years after their victories the same Democrats who had demanded that the U.S. not enter the war would have screamed that they had demanded that the U.S. join the fight and save the world, but that the Republicans were the ones who blocked Democrat efforts to intervene, probably to prop up the stock market! 

And you absolutely know that's true.  It's how the Democrats rock. 

So now for something completely different: in nature, what usually happens to animals that are slower or less intelligent and observant?  Sure. 

Democrats: "But humans are different.  The laws of nature don't apply to humans.  Really!  We smaaaht!"

If today's Democrat leaders and the left-wing Media shitheads had been in power in 1940 we'd all be speaking German or Japanese now.

Source.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-gets-daily-video-montage-briefing-iran-war-rcna263912
 

A murder in three acts in Minneapolis

Meet Melchizedek Erastuscorboi Kpaan.  (Name is popular in Liberia.)

 

Kpaan beez a guud boy.  Yep yep yep.  Oh shure, he'd had a couple of "involvements" wif what passes for a legal system in Minneaposomalia: a prior conviction for 1st degree aggravated robbery, then later two counts of "felon in possession of a gun."

But because Minneaposomalia is ruled entirely by Democrats, Kpaan's public defender was able to get the judge in the agg-robbery conviction to reduce the sentence to time served.  Then on the two counts of felon in possession of a gun, left/liberal wacko "judge" Sarah West--appointed by the equally left/lib Democrat former governor Mark Dayton--made a RULING: 

She ordered him released without making him post even a dollar of bond.

As rational people know, having to post bond normally keeps the average thug behind bars for at least a few more days, until they can post bond, then get released at trial.  Sarah West knows this, but "reasoned" (?) that he wasn't a threat to anyone, so she RULED--no appeal, no vote, just her amazing street smarts and legal background--dat dis guud boy needed to be out on the street. 

See, dis is how duh Founders intended ouah country to work: after thugs and murderers were arrested and charged, dey wanted judges to release 'em wifout bail, as fast as possible.  Cuz havin' to stay in jail til trial wuz hurtin' dere incomes!  Yep yep yep!  

Judge Sarah West, Minneapolis

West is alleged to have said "I recognized the 'spark of humanity' in his beautiful eyes.  He smiled at me, and I knew at once that such a beautiful soul didn't deserve to spend even a day in jail."

So...left/lib Sarah West released Kpaan so he'd be free to keep his rendezvous with the 17-year-old girl he'd murder.  Wait, not "murder," just "manslaughter."

Surveillance video shows the girl walking behind a man (identified as Kpaan) who's holding a backpack.  Kpaan then produces a gun, throws the backpack at the girl and shoots her.  She grabs her chest and doubles over, then picks up the backpack and runs a few yards away as the shooter flees.  A minute later the girl called 911 saying she'd been shot.  She was found and taken to the hospital where she died.

Now let's turn to the third player in this: the DA of Hennepin County (Minneaposomalia): Mary Moriarty is a lesbian who spent a staggering 31 years as a public defender.  She was so far left that she clashed with the state office of public defenders for her ultra-lenient treatment of criminals.  After 31 years she accused the state board of sexism, and they had taxpayers give her a $300,000 settlement, which included her resignation as a public defender.

 

Mary then realized she could do more damage if she could win the post of County Attorney (Minnesomalia's equivalent of DA), and in the leftist shithole she won handily. 

And the city's leftist voters got exactly what they wanted: She's notorious for reducing charges against blacks, and the murder charge against Kpaan followed that pattern: the first charge against Kpaan was 2nd-degree murder, but that was later reduced to the much less serious charge of manslaughter.  Kpaan pled guilty before trial in exchange for a lighter sentence.  As part of the deal the "felon in possession" charge was dismissed.

The killer's public defender bleated that "this was a crime of passion," apparently like a lover's quarrel?  And what was in the backpack that the killer was carrying before throwing it at the girl, that the fatally wounded girl thought so important that she picked it up before running around the corner and collapsing?

Not a word in the police report--even though the report included the detail that the fatally wounded girl bent over to pick up the backpack the killer had thrown at her.  She must have thought something in that bag was important, eh?

And of course nothing came out at trial because there wasn't one--the plea deal ensured that.

So what's the lesson here?  That "some" Liberians will murder Americans?  Nah, dat routine.  The lesson here is that two left/liberal women, in positions of power, released the future killer without bond on earlier charges, and thereby enabled the murder of the girl.  Then they allowed a plea deal that will get him out again in six years or less.  He'll be 31.  He'll kill again.

Thanks, Democrats.

 

Liberals, Democrats and the Mainstream Media are all crazy...and winning

If you think liberals are sane, consider this: In theoretically safe Iowa eight years ago, 20-year-old Mollie Tibbetts was abducted and brutally murdered by an illegal alien while going for a run.
  When her killer was found, tried and convicted, her liberal cuck father said this:

Sadly, some people have chosen to distort and corrupt Mollie’s tragic death [not "murder"] to advance a cause she vehemently opposed.  I encourage a debate on immigration; there is great merit in its reasonable outcome. But do not appropriate Mollie’s death [not "murder"] to advance views she believed were profoundly racist.
   To the Hispanic community, my family stands with you and offers its heartfelt apology: That you’ve been beset by the circumstances of Mollie’s death is wrong. We treasure the contribution you bring to the American tapestry in all its color and melody.

WHAT?  Apologizing "That you've been beset by the circumstances of Mollie's death," eh?  Lest we forget (and if you're a Democrat you already had), Mollie was abducted and brutally murdered, but the liberal cuck dad couldn't bring himself to say "You've been criticized for my daughter's murder by an illegal alien from Mexico," because he's a Democrat.  So instead he used the dainty, neutral phrase "beset by the circumstances of Mollie's death," as if she died by accident.  

"Circumstances."  What a worthless male.  But certainly this allows him to feel virtuous.  And certainly Christ urged forgiveness.

So let's examine that last part:  An obvious question is, did Christ--God's faithful servant--intend that good people should do nothing to physically fight evil, instead just trying to "understand it" and being good Christians?

That's not at all a facetious question.  Obviously Christ knew all about the eternal struggle between good and evil.  And when evil is in power, unless good people rise up and defeat it, they're doomed to either join the bad side or live in fear or be killed--like Mollie and so many others.  So unless God's plan is for all good people to eventually be killed off by evil ones, that means...wait for it...that good people have to do not just "some" fighting--and winning--but lots of it.

Yeah, war sucks, but sometimes it's better in the long run.  Think WW2. 

Apparently liberals and Democrats no longer believe war is ever necessary.  To liberals the only evil is...conservatives, Trump supporters, people who oppose open borders and sex-changes for 14-year-olds.  This is so obvious it shouldn't need explaining.  The rat-bastards openly brag about how faaaabulous all those things are, and that anyone who opposes even one of 'em is eeeeevil.  (Except they don't believe in eeeevil per se so they say "Orange Hitler" and "transphobic," and "Islamophobic" and "homophobic."

Congressional Democrats and their fellators in the corrupt Mainstream Media have convinced half of all Americans that all three of those "phobias" are hateful and irrational, and have gotten the Supreme Court to implicitly agree that it's a "hate crime" to make tire tracks over what the Media always calls "pride stripes" or tranny stripes painted on the street at intersections.  

It's a hoot: The court ruled decades ago that burning the American flag was totally legal, but then eight years ago ruled that state laws making burning a so-called "pride flag" a "hate crime" punishable by fines and jail time were perfectly Constitutional!

See any double-standard there, folks?  Of course.  Is that way beyond stupid?  Of course.  

Liberal Democrat: "Yew LIE!  Duh Supreme Court nevah agreed dat burning one of ouah faaabulous 'pride flags' was a hate crime!"  Except they did, by refusing to hear any appeal when American citizens were convicted and sentenced to PRISON for burning one, or for making tire marks on a street painted to look like a gay-pride flag.  Yeah, it's insane...and yet here we are.

You know almost none of this because the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media never tells ya, and you don't have time to keep up with court cases at every level.

SO...It's fabulous and uplifting that Mollie Tibbetts's father has been able to forgive the illegal alien who...maybe, perhaps, just possibly had some minor role in what he and the Mainstream Media absolutely ASSURE us is [her brutal murder] the almost certainly unintended loss of her life.

"Loss of life."  The way the Media and this cuck put it, it's like losing your car keys.  "Gosh, I know I had my life here just a few minutes ago, but I seem to have lost it.  Wonder where I put it?"

What you don't realize is that fully half of U.S. voters think like Mollie's dad.

This explains why ALL the polls [yes, they're fake, but they're rigged this way for a reason] claim a majority of Americans oppose the U.S. attack on Iran.  Liberals would side with the ghastly Islamic regime of Iran regardless of other facts, simply because Trump made the decision to attack--but would side with the U.S. if a Democrat president made the call, because whatever Dem presidents do must be faaabulous, eh?  (Like ORDERING all Americans "Yew vill take za experimental jab, or yew vill be fired!")

But even if a liberal Republican was prezzy, Dems would side with Iran due to a fundamental principle of psychology:  most people intuitively believe that other people have at least roughly the same beliefs and values we do.  It's the same principle that allows liberals to bleat--against all logic and evidence--that "All societies are equally good!"

If you believe that, you're a Democrat voter. 

While most "others" do have roughly the same values we do, most (not all) illegal aliens and Muslims don't seem to.  If you're hazy on that: 20 years ago Muslims began putting explosive vests--wired to radio detonators--on children, and telling 'em the nice Israeli soldiers manning a checkpoint would give 'em candy.

This worked for awhile, until the Israelis warned all soldiers about the tactic.

Would you do this to any child?  Of course not.  To most Americans it's literally unthinkable.  But some illegal aliens butcher teenage girls with machetes.  So as I said: we don't share the same values.

Of course we don't see illegal aliens strapping suicide vests on children, but just murdering several thousand Americans that you never hear about.  In rare instances a rape-murder is SO ghastly, like that of Laken Riley, or unprovoked throat-cutting, like that of the 23-year-old blonde Ukrainian refugee on the tram in Charlotte, NC, will be so heinous that even the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media can't ignore it.

You don't even remember the name of the blonde refugee murdered by the schizophrenic in Charlotte.  The killer--repeatedly released from jail without bond after numerous arrests--stood up behind her and without any prior interaction at all, stabbed her in her throat three times.  It was all caught on surveillance video--which the female Democrat mayor of that shithole tried to prevent from being released.  

The expression on the fatally wounded 23-year-old's face as she realized she'd been fatally injured, should haunt you...but because the Mainstream Media delayed showing the still frames from the video for so long, her ghastly, totally unprovoked murder made no impression on you whatsoever--which was exactly what the Democrats wanted.  And it worked: you don't even recall her name.

The point is that most citizens of shit-hole countries--and schizophrenic or drug-addled Americans--have radically different values from ours.  And ignoring that will get you--or your family--killed. 

So back to the earlier question: Does God want good people to simply forgive and surrender to evil?

Consider this: Most rational people believe the Nazis were evil.  Same for the WW2 Japanese military chiefs, and for Mussolini's fascists in Italy.  The U.S. and half a dozen much smaller nations took on all three and defeated all in a bloody 5-year war.  But today all three former enemy nations are totally delightful and civilized (except for millions of Muslims invading Germany and Italy).

So: was fighting those nations in WW2 ultimately a good thing for humanity, or not?

Rational people know the answer--but make Democrats declare, because I suspect that if we were faced with the exact same threat today, congressional Democrats would block any action, bleating that 

• It's not our concern;
• It'll cost billions of dollars and thousands of American lives, so no outcome would be worth that cost;
• The situation is far too "nuanced" for us to understand, so we're better off not intervening;
• Those three nations are just trying to throw off the chains of colonialism, or capitalist exploitation, or raaacism, or corrupt leaders, see?  Dere's a reeeally good reason fo' dem takin' over places!  Nuance, deplorable!

That's where we are today with the Islamic regime ruling Iran: The Democrats are using every media interaction to scream "Another endless war!"  (It's been going on for four whole weeks.) 
  And "Look at how the price of oil has skyrocketed!"  (The price was WAY higher under Obozo.)
  They're even bleating--literally--that the mullahs of Iran are winning!  Seriously!

Eh, no worries, citizen.  The Democrats and their Media allies have it all under control:  They've already convinced Americans that the five-hour waiting time for airport screening is Trump's fault (cuz he won't agree to abolish ICE), and if the Dems and Media can get away with that bullshit, everything else is easy.

So regardless of how well the war ends, the Media and their Democrat heroes will bleat that

• The war was illegal; 
• It wasn't worth the huge cost; 
• Iran was never working on making an atomic bomb!  Perish the thought!
• "Even if the mullahs had been able to build at atomic bomb, Iran was NEVAH a threat to the U.S. cuz dey din' haz any missiles dat could get a bomb to the U.S!  An' of course dat beez duh only way to get a bomb to the U.S."

Uh...ever heard of a "container-ship," cupcake? 

Democrat: "Of course--cuz unlike yew deplorables, we're smaaaht.  Whut's yo' point?"

Well Sparky, if I wanted to strike the Great Satan as devastatingly as the 9/11 hijackers destroying the Twin Towers, I'd put a nuke in a shipping container, surrounded by lead, strontium and cobalt, and ship it to either NYC or Baltimore--along with 11,900 others on the same ship.  We don't have the resources to inspect more than one percent or so--and in any case we can't inspect anything until the ship docks.

The beauty of that method is that unlike a ballistic missile--which can be traced back to its origin by mathematically working the radar track backwards--no one would ever know which of the 12,000 containers held the bomb--so we could never be sure who sent it, eh?  So there could be no retaliation.

But of course since Democrats and their allies in the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media are smaaaht, they (and Dem voters) already knew all that, right?  It's so obvious.  So you'd think the argument--already made by the leaders of the Democrat partei--that an Iranian atom bomb isn't a threat to the U.S. cuz they don't have a big enough missile--is totally irrelevant.  And yet the Mainstream Media broadcasts that piece of absurdity as if the lack of a large enough missile removed the threat.

Wait...ya say yew hadn't thought about that?  Sure ya had, cupcake!  Cuz y'all are as smaaaht and sharp as the guy you constantly ASSURED us was "sharp as a tack:" Joe bribem.  

So where does that leave us?

No matter how well the war ends, and how fast the price of gas drops, the Dems and Media will scream that Trump was Hitler and we should never have attacked duh po' Iranian regime.  Dems will win the House in November, and that'll end any possibility of any good laws being passed for the rest of Trump's term.  Hell, even today the Democrats have refused to fund TSA (DHS), and Repub senate leader Thune refuses to make the Dems vote on a "talking filibuster."  So as long as the public doesn't figure out they're the cause of the delays, Democrats will be able to block funding for DHS until Repubs finally give up.

See, citizens, when duh Founders wrote duh Constitution, they wanted 41 votes by the minority in duh senate to prevent any law from being passed.  (For college students on the beach: the GOP has a majority in the senate, but the filibuster allows the Dems to block a bill forever with just 41 votes.  It's called "democracy," dude.  You jus' thought that meant "majority wins," eh?  Clearly it doesn't.) 

Now surely it's five o'clock somewhere. 

Oh:  Does "Irina" ring any bells?  Nah, didn't think so.

Democrat politicians *brag* about prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens

Democrat pols actually brag that they prioritize illegal aliens over U.S. citizens.  As proof, we see that they demonize ALL efforts to deport illegal alien invaders.

The main targets of Democrats are ICE agents, and we've watched for over a year as congressional Democrats have used their Media allies to demonize ICE.

The newest attack has emerged after the Dems have refused--for 45 days--to pay TSA agents.  After missing several paychecks, TSA agents are quitting and calling in sick, resulting in 5-hour-long lines at airport security and causing frustrated Americans to miss flights.

To reduce these delays, Trump ordered ICE agents to the airports to take some of the workload off overworked, unpaid TSA agents. ICE agents showed up to hand out water bottles and replace TSA in crowd control.

The lying Democrats immediately claimed ICE agents at airports would "brutalize and kill" you and your children.

Seriously, Connecticut Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate counterpart Chuck Schumer all claimed ICE agents helping TSA at airports were really there to “brutalize and kill” you and kidnap your children.

TSA workers just missed their third paycheck, *solely and entirely because for the past 3 months congressional Democrats have refused to fund DHS--in hopes of forcing Republicans and the president to submit to their demands to eliminate ICE.*  Democrat leaders have actually bragged that their goal in causing 5-hour delays in TSA screening is to punish Americans for voting for Trump.

Democrats always find a way to excuse the inexcusable, and flip the script.  They shamelessly lie, but get away with lying because the lying, Democrat-fellating Media never call 'em out on their lie, instead eagerly parroting every utterance, making Dems seem to beparagons of truthfulness.

The Media turn the American public against ICE agents by smearing them as ­Gestapo, white supremacists, ­Nazis and “secret police.” 

Trump putting ICE agents in airports to free up more TSA agents for screening--to cut waiting time for screening, thus ease the pain of travelers--is a challenge to the lies of the Media and Dem leaders, because now people can see the agents are not the monsters the Media has been claiming.

Democrat lawmakers like Jamie Raskin and Adam Schiff and their eager parrots in the Media tell the most brazen, outrageous lies, like "Iran is winning."  They cover up Democrat crimes like massive fraud made possible by non-existent oversight, and the most minimal controls.

Remember how the Media eagerly parroted the Democrat lie that “the border is closed,” and that the ghastly Afghanistan withdrawal was a success?  How about the  Democrat claim that defunding the police makes communities safer?  

Sheridan Gorman was walking with friends on the Chicago lakeshore.  A leftist city council woman  bleated that the murder victim and
her friends “might have unintentionally startled” a masked gun-toting Jose Medina-Medina into allegedly jumping out of the bushes and shooting Gorman in the back as she ran away.

In other words, you can’t blame Democrats for sanctuary city policies.  If you're murdered by an illegal alien, welcomed into the U.S. by the bribem regime, *it's your fault.*
 

What do all the creatures below have in common?

Recognize any of these strange creatures?  If you pay attention, you do. 

 

They're all Democrats and bribem supporters.  They ARE the Democrat party. 

After 18-y.o female college student is fatally shot in Chitcongo, Pritzker blames...Trump!

After the 18-year-old was fatally shot in the back by the illegal, governor Pritzker's office released this:

 

1. Conservatives warn Democrat rulers that allowing every third-world thug into the U.S. (faaabulously euphemized as "open borders") will result in thousands of innocent Americans being killed.

2. Democrats sneer and ignore the prediction/warning;

3. Thousands of innocent Americans are killed by illegal alien invaders allowed in by Democrats presidents and corrupt congresswhores;

4. Democrats sneer and ignore, claiming more Americans are killed by American citizens, so SEE?!

5. When families of Americans murdered by illegals beg Democrats to deport illegals (to prevent future murders of innocents), Democrat politicians sneer that conservatives are "politicizing a tragedy."

6. Moronic Democrat voters--who haven't had a family member murdered--keep electing the same Democrats to power for life (J.B. Pritzker, Brandon Johnson, Chuck Schumer, Eric Swalwell, Ilhan Omar, Hakeem Jeffries, Kathy Hochul, ad nauseum).

7. Innocent Americans (like the 18-year-old female college student recently killed in cold blood in Chitcongo by an illegal) continue to be murdered.  Democrats and the Media convince voters this is totally normal.

8. Murders continue; Democrats blame Trump.

9. Democrats take control of the House in November, threaten yet another govt shutdown unless borders are re-opened.

 

Mainstream Media: "Dis is whut duh Founders intended: anyone can come to the U.S, get on welfare, become a citizen and bring their relatives in.  And thank heavens we've now been able to block anything Trump wants!" 

Another young American girl murdered by an illegal. You'll never see it on the newz

Yet another 18-year-old American female college student murdered by an illegal alien criminal, this time in the utterly lawless Democrat-ruled shithole of Chitcongo.

 

Democrats: "Sad but your title beez totally unfair to undocumented Americans, since more Americans are killed by U.S. citizens den by undocumented Americans, deplorable!  Plus the REAL problem is...gunz!!!  What's important is that this young man not be punished by being deported back to his home country.  Instead he must be allowed to remain in the U.S. and become a U.S. citizen!  Yep yep yep!  NO 'undocumented Americans' should evah be deported!  ALL must be allowed to become U.S. citizens!  We need undocumented Americans!"

Source. 

36,500 innocent Iranians slaughtered by the mullahs' killers; U.S. media virtually silent

Those few of you who pay attention to things other than the ridiculous crap broadcast by the alphabet networks may have heard that in January Iranians were demonstrating in the streets, building the critical mass needed to re-take their country from the mullahs.

At that point the IRGC and their thug brownshirts--the basijis--killed somewhere around 36,500 of the demonstrators, typically by riding by on motorcycles and blasting away with shotguns or rifles at close range  Hundreds of women blinded by shotgun pellets to the face.  Watch the damn vid.

Still don't believe it?  Try this one, then another, then another. 

You never heard about this on U.S. Media, because it would have moved millions of voters to support Trump in his efforts to remove the threat the insane mullahs of Iran posed to the world.  The U.S. media hates Trump and fawns over morons like Chuckie Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, AOC and Bernie Sanders--idiot propagandists who would say and do anything to win power.

I watched an hour of video of endless body bags, in dozens of locations.  Yes, if you had weeks and hundreds of skilled AI fraudsters, that could probably be faked.  But this wasn't.  There are tiny telltales if you know how to spot 'em.  This was real--thousands of body bags.

So..."The Australian" is a reputable mag, and this was how it reported the slaughter.  But the U.S. media?  Crickets.  

 

The Australian also pointed out another fascinating thing: The usual so-called "human rights activists" were totally silent about the mass slaughter.  

Two anti-ICE, pro-illegal protesters killed in Minneapolis and the world's propagandists go crazy.  But 36,500 or so Iranian citizens slaughtered by thugs on motorcycles, and the bullshit "human rights" propagandists don't say a word.  And yes, it's because they didn't want Americans to support Trump.

Look at the cover above.  Study it.  Maybe the folks at The Australian got fooled, eh?  Yeh, dat probably it.  

The end of the game

One of the absolute, unequivocal signs of a doomed society is when politicians, looking to hand out money for votes, have passed laws that allow 40% of the population to live off dozens of types of welfare instead of working.

Oh, y'say that's NOT what's happening in the U.S?  Google "labor force participation rate."  It's the percentage of the civilian population aged 16 and older NOT in school who are either employed or actively seeking work. As of last month it was 62%. --slightly lower than the long-term average.  In other words, 38% of those who could get a job, don't.

Dem: "Dat not true!  Dat FAKE NEWZ!"  No, cupcake, it's not. 

Democrat politicians farm the stupid and lazy for their votes.  They bribe the dumb, the dependent, the easily led, the permanently aggrieved; those whose entire existence is funded by taxpayers--and money borrowed from China, paid back with interest.

It's a fatal trajectory because once Democrat voters/fraudsters/welfare leeches have a majority, there's no way to elect a congress that will fix it.  And if anyone tried, the Lying Mainstream Media would bleat one sob-story after another about po' innocents who are too traumatized to get jobs.  Scum would rather steal hundreds of millions, by opening fake daycare centers, or "autism treatment centers," or "hospices" (48 in one office complex--which was totally empty!).  SO much more lucrative than robbing banks, eh?  Cuz virtually no one is ever caught or punished.

If anyone tries to halt the fraud, Democrat pols and the Media scream bloody murder.  You've seen it, and will continue to see it, forever: "Dis talk of fraud beez RAAAaacis!  So it's wrong to investigate!"  And the Dems fire up their base to defeat any pol who tries to go after the fraudsters.

Eh, I don't really care. cuz I'm old and don't have kids, so I no longer have a dog in this hunt.  But you 50-year-olds who DO have kids and grandchildren should be absolutely furious, cuz the Democrats have doomed your nation in order to control the government.  The U.S. is circling the drain because of MASSIVE fraud and waste, funded by borrowed money (and ultimately by taxpayers).  You don't know a tenth of it, because your Lying Mainstream Media refuses to tell ya--cuz it would hurt the Democrat (communist) Partei [sic].

I actually get a laugh at the Media's lies, relying on your stupidity or lack of interest.

And here's the ultimate hoot: When the shit hits the fan--almost certainly within the next ten years--watch the Dems bleat "Duh 'situation' yew now see wuzn't ouah fault at ALL, citizen!  We've ALWAYS opposed fraud, and wasteful government programs!  If anyone was suspected of defrauding ouah faaabulous welfare programs, we always investigated and prosecuted, so others wouldn't do the same thing!  Yep yep yep!  We've always defended working pipo!

"So keep voting fo' us, cuz dat beez duh only way to keep duh gravy train rollin'!  See, yew don' need to worry about 'your' government constantly spending more than we take in, cuz we jus' borrow whutevah we need!  SEE?  We haz it all figured out, so yew don' hafta worry 'bout nuffin'!  So keep voting Democrat!" 

Of course the internet can prove they're lying, but they know voters won't bother trying to find the videos of ghastly corruptocrats like Kathy Hochul, J.B. Pritzker, Zohran Mamdani, Brandon Johnson (do you even know who that is?), AOC, Nancy Pelosi, Ilhan Omar, Eric Swalwell and hundreds of others.  They always escape punishment because they control the courts and the Deep State, and can quash any investigation they want.  Example: Judge Boasberg, DC.

One of the enduring mysteries of history is how the powerful Roman empire--which ruled the known world--crumbled.  Answer: just as is happening to the U.S.

Robert DeNiro supports communist mayor, sees his taxes rise, gets furious

This is truly heartwarming: Shithead leftist actor Robert DeNiro has a multi-million dollar home in New York City.  DeNiro is a total leftist who gave money to elect the Muslim communist mayor of that shithole, Mamdani.

And as anyone other than a Democrat could have easily predicted, one of the communist's first acts was to increase property taxes on wealthy city property owners. 

Predictably, DeNiro apparently believed donating to get a communist Muslim elected mayor would have no negative effect on HIM.

What a HOOT!  This is an absolute classic!  Stupid leftist virtue-signaler (DeNiro) has always supported leftist pols, without ever understanding what they really intended.  And when the utterly predictable happened, Bobby is left sputtering and fuming: "I nevah thought my gud fren' wud raise MY taxes!" 

 

This is the Democrat mind-set in a nutshell: "We wanna gibs mo' billions of dollahs to duh po'!  Cuz we iz compassionate, eh?  Cuz when a Democrat ruler orders that, duh money jus' magically appears!  We don' hafta pay nuffin'.  Instead we'll write duh laws so only Rethuglicans hafta pay more!  Cuz we are REALLY clever like dat!"  

Now, anyone wanna bet that NYC's "Board of Equalization" (may have a different name there, but it's the govt agency that dictates the tax on every dwelling every year) quietly reduces the assessed value of Bobby's mansion so his taxes don't rise?  Sure.  Then Bobby gets right back on the communist bandwagon.

Hell isn't hot enough for leftist morons like DeNiro. 

Wait, what am I thinking?  DeNiro will make a deal with Satan to get an air-conditioned apartment.  Cuz he beez "connected"!

Obama lie #457,970. And not a word of pushback by the Dem-fellating Media

Obozo lied.  Repeatedly.  Continuously.  And the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media never said a critical word, because they love the Democrat party, so simply refused to criticize a single thing Obozo did.

 

Watch this one-minute video of a woman being...um...

Watch this video of a woman tied with her arms above her head, forced to stand, helpless, as a man beats her with a whip in front of a huge crowd of men.

This isn't a street crime, like a mugging or rape, but instead is a punishment approved by that government, and that bullshit "How to conquer the world" manifesto masquerading as a religion that you know all too well.

The video of the beating of this helpless, tied woman has sound, so if you're a Democrat, turn the volume up loud so you and your wife and daughters can hear her screams.  You and your wives and teenage daughters need to see and hear her screaming to realize the ugly, horrible truth that "your" Lying Mainstream Media deliberately refuses to tell you.

The Media is hiding the truth about Islam for two reasons: First and foremost, because if they told the truth about Islam, it would cost the Muzz-fellating Democrats ten million votes.  And second, because the Mainstream Media hates Christianity.  And if Islam wins, Christians lose.  Simple as that.

Oh, I hear Democrats bleating that dis not true.  Read the fucking New York Times sometime.  They never miss a chance to lambast Christianity and praise Islam--which is why they supported the Muzz communist who is now the mayor of the largest city in the country.

In the video: Count the blows as the man beats the defenseless woman as hard as he can.  Your wife and daughters may demand that you turn it off, to make her screams stop.  But this poor woman didn't have that choice:  Instead the murderous fake religion of her country--a ghastly dictatorship masquerading as a religion, in which she and millions of other women and girls are forced to live--has sentenced her to obey every order by the mullahs or be beaten--or killed.

And the irony is, liberal American women--and virtually all Democrat women are liberal/socialist--support the brutal Iranian and Paki regimes, and scream that Trump is absolutely awful for trying to prevent the Islamic regime of Iran from getting an atomic bomb.  And if you're a Democrat, chances are your wife and daughters feel the same way.  

The man was already beating this poor woman before the video started, and was still beating her when the video ended.  We don't know how long it lasted. 

Imagine your daughter tied up, being beaten like this--sometimes for not wearing the mandatory face veil, or for showing her hair, or a wrist or ankle.

Moronic Democrat: "Dat jus' nonsense!  Dey wudn't nevah beat women jus' fo' doin' dat!"  Yes, they would--and do.  You just don't wanna believe it, because it would make you think.  And Allah forbid that you should think about what your vote is supporting! 

The all-male crowd watched the poor woman being beaten, but of course no one did anything to help her--because in their ghastly fake "religion" tying a woman to a tree branch with her arms stretched over her head and beating her with flails isn't just perfectly acceptable, but is explicitly prescribed in their book.

Think about what that implies.

Of course if you're a Democrat you refuse to think about what your party supports.  You'd rather claim this is fake, or ignore it.  Anything to make it vanish, eh?  "Dis can't be real cuz ebrywun know Islam is *the* religion of peace!"  

Horseshit.  This video reveals the essence of Islam.  You just prefer to ignore it--to pretend it's fake, or that it's not part of their ghastly "religion."  And they already run several U.S. cities.  And as everyone knows, the nation's largest city has a Muzz mayor.

Liberals support Islam.  That's stupid and naive beyond belief.  Democrats were--and are-- perfectly happy for Iran to have atomic bombs.  The excuses vary: "Dey weren't really working on a bomb!  Well no, I didn't hear about any '440 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium,' and I don't have any idea what that would mean if true.
  "And even if you claim it's somehow evidence against the Iranian government I wouldn't believe it, because dey sed dey wuz jus' tryin' to do nuclear powerplants!  Plus, the source of this claim is Trump's people!  Why would anyone believe a word Trump's people say?"

"SO...dere izn't no evidence Iran wuz tryin' to build an atomic bomb.  Besides, even if they made one, dey don't have a way to get it to the U.S!  We know dat cuz Joy Reid and Mika an' Andrea Mitchell an' Jimmy Fallon said dey din'!  No, I don't know anything about container-ships, or that the big ones can hold 12,000 40-foot shipping containers, or whether the government inspects every container.  Why would I care about that?  We were talking about the fact that Iran doesn't have a missile that can reach the U.S, so how are ships relevant to getting an atomic bomb on New York City?"

"Besides, the Iranian government doesn't want to kill Americans!  Such silly paranoia by you MAGGATS!  They've never been a threat to us.  Tulsi Gabbard sed dey weren't!  An' Joe Kent--appointed by Trump--just resigned cuz he sed Iran was nevah a threat to us!  Just because tens of thousands of Iranians gather in Tehran squares to chant 'Death to America' doesn't mean they actually mean it!"

You bet, moron.  And now for the liberals' final argument:

"Since WE have atomic bombs, how can we demand that another country can't have one too?!"

These are the same liberal morons who succeeded in getting the bribem regime to make taxpayers pay for sex-change operations for children under 18 (via Medicaid) and 70-year-olds (via Medicare) and prison inmates--even for illegal aliens!  

Democrat voter: "We support all doze things, cuz it's only FAIR, deplorable!  If poor people or inmates wanna change genders but can't afford it, why shouldn't the government pay for it?"

Hollywood and the U.S. media are working furiously to defeat Republicans seven months from now, and after November they'll almost certainly control the House.  Even with a minority in the senate, they already control that chamber because they can use the filibuster.  And the RINO called Thune won't even force 'em to do a "speaking filibuster," which would expose their stupidity and corruption to voters.

Top Democrat pols are now pushing the utterly absurd claim that Trump didn't anticipate that Iran would block oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz--and not ONE member of the Mainstream Media pushes back on that absurdity--because the lie helps the Democrat party by making Trump look incompetent.

The Lying Mainstream Media will parrot ANY lie that makes Trump and the GOP look bad.  Smartest thing Democrats did was to "dox" ICE agents--putting pics of their faces on "wanted" posters, with their names and home addresses.  To spare their families, agents quickly started wearing masks--which the Dems now use to call 'em "Trump's secret police"!

Of course protesters are free to wear masks to hide *their* identity, eh?  And not a single dipshit in the Mainstream Media has *ever* pointed out the hypocrisy, nor will.  

This, folks, is called "asymmetric warfare," and the Democrats have totally mastered it.  Of course this is easier when your party has the Lying Mainstream Media and Hollywood providing air cover.

SO...where does this leave us?   Last year Trump ordered the U.S. Air Force to destroy Iran's uranium enrichment facilities, which were deep underground--too deep to be destroyed by conventional bombs.  So we destroyed the entrances, and warned Iran not to try to recover their stock of enriched uranium.  Of course they immediately started trying to do just that.

Trump and Netanyahu were then faced with a choice: either do nothing, "kicking the can down the road" to leave the problem to a later president--the classic Democrat "solution"--or force an end to the Islamic regime in Iran.

Both chose the latter.

Now: today is 19 March.  The first day of military action was 28 Feb, so we're 20 days into this.  U.S. Democrats are already wailing that this is "another endless war."  (Try a google search for those three words in quotes.)  It's a very effective tactic that can't be countered until the Islamic regime either surrenders or is destroyed.  So Democrats have an "open field:" the ability to waltz to the endzone, ruling the airwaves with "another endless war."

And when it ends, all their claims of "another endless war" will conveniently be forgotten, morphing into "American consumers are still having to pay more for gas than before Trump's illegal, undeclared, cruel war!"

Then after another few months, with the oil situation returning to normal, the Democrats will be back to claiming "Republicans are responsible for shutting down TSA because they refused to agree to the Democrats' perfectly reasonable demand that ICE be de-funded or abolished.

Whatever good things happen, it's never enough:  the Democrats will always find something to scream bloody murder about.  And the Mainstream Media and late-night communist shitheads will continue to bombard Americans with withering "jokes" about Trump being a kang, or Orange Hitler, or a pedo, or a corrupt billionaire.

And so it goes. 

https://x.com/i/status/2033842796709224784

Watch this short video. What do you think it means?

Take a look at this video.   It's a compilation of responses by dozens of Americans who are asked if they prefer Muslims screaming 'Allahu Akbar' over MAGA supporters.  And they all say they'd prefer the Muzz screaming the Muzz war-cry.

Many Americans think this video is from Boston or Minneapolis or some other liberal shithole city where the vast majority of residents are just stupid.  But it isn't from a northern, majority-liberal shithole, but instead was filmed in... Tampa.  

This is what we're facing just over seven months from now: millions of U.S. voters saying they'd prefer someone screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ over someone wearing a red MAGA hat.  This vid is a warning.  

Tens of thousands of Iranians--regime supporters, not the young trying to be free--gather and chant ‘Death to America,’ ‘Death to Israel,’ ‘Death to every Westerner who won’t kneel.’

Liberal Democrats couldn't care less--they keep saying "We think Trump supporters are more threatening than the 'Death to America' cultists." 

This is where we are today, thanks to the Mainstream Media--people like the four late-night talk-show hosts (Fallon, Kimmel, Seth Meyers and the moronic shithead Colbert) who blast Trump with every line.  And thanks to Democrat politicians who do the same.  

https://x.com/KaitMarieox/status/2033675929893937643 

How many people watched the Oscars? And where do most of 'em live?

In 1998 over 55 million Americans watched the liberal shit-fest called the Oscars.

In 2014 that number had dropped to a just over 40 million).

Last Sunday the Nielson folks claim just under 20 million (19.69, to be exact) tuned in.  

What does this tell ya?

If you're a Democrat, it's all great.  The committee fellated their leftist stars, leftist directors and leftist writers for their liberal bleats and roles, as they've done for the last 40 years.  The cock-sucking leftists at ABC aired dozens of interviews with Trump-hating leftist actors wailing about how AWFUL it was that Trump had attacked duh po' innocent bomb-builders of Iran, after he supported Israel attacking duh po' innocent Hamas killers in Gaza.  How dare he?

Here's a fun reality check for ya: How do ya think the Nielson ratings in big Democrat-ruled cities (a.k.a shithole cities) compare with the ratings in flyover country? 

Hollywood producer: "Why should we care about dat?  Our movies are hard-left for a reason, and we'd keep making leftist movies even if we didn't make as much money, because it keeps Democrats in power *even when Republicans have the White House and majorities in both chambers of congress!*  Yep, as long as we have 41 Dem senators the Republicans can't pass a single bill we unless we agree!
   "We can de-fund DHS--by claiming ICE are 'Trump's secret police'--and the Repubs can't stop us!  We can block all bills like the 'SAVE Act' that would require proof of citizenship to vote, and the Republicans can't stop us.  And as long as most big U.S. cities are ruled by Democrats we'll have at least 46 Dem senators.  What's not to love about that much power, eh?"
   "In fact we're slowly winning control of more states--and once they go Dem, we ensure they never go back.  For example, have you ever seen a Hollywood movie where a labor union was shown as corrupt and thuggish?  No, cuz labor unions vote Dem.  So every movie we make shows labor unions as 'fighting for the common man,'' eh?
   "Who's always the villain in our movies?  Sure: a white male, always.  That gets people to believe that white male politicians are corrupt--and that's not an accident.  By contrast, you'll never see a movie where a po' 'undocumented American' or a cute, adorable trans-gender is a killer, or a movie where an 'immigrant rapes a young American girl.  Never.  And you never will, cuz that hurts the Democrat party in their demand for open borders.
  "And the real hoot is that even lots of kids in flyover country eat this up, which wins us new Dem voters and makes up for the fact that conservative Americans have more kids than liberals.
  "But we're attacking that problem too, with movies like 'The Day After Tomorrow' warning of the dangers of 'climate change' due to Americans using so much oil and gas.  The 'cool kids' have always been rebels, so we've shown that opposing the use of oil and gas, and having fewer kids, is 'protecting the Earth' and really cool!  And sure enough, U.S. birthrates are continuing to fall, and we expect that soon the conservative advantage in births will vanish." 
   "And the hoot is that even though ALL of the above is totally obvious, no one (other than far-right groups) ever notices, let alone says a critical word.  We ensure that because our movies and TV shows ridicule conservative beliefs, and no cool kid--or adult commentator--wants to be ridiculed.
   "It's SUCH a hoot that maybe two thousand powerful Hollywood liberals, and another few thousand in DC and the liberal press, can control the entire country, even without having either the presidency or a majority in either chamber of congress!
   "Is this a great country or what?" 

China has been buying Venezuelan oil despite sanctions by EU and U.S.

After Maduro stole his most recent "election," MOST of the non-communist world imposed sanctions on Venezuelan oil.  So nations that agreed with the sanctions couldn't legally buy Venezuelan oil.  Even the moronic heads of the corrupt, thug-loving EU joined the sanctions.

But of course the communists LOVED Maduro--not only because he was a fellow communist but because he provided a huge foothold for them in the western hemisphere.  Prior to Chavez and Maduro taking over Vz the commies only had Cuba, which has been impoverished for decades.  

So Russia and China have been merrily defying the west's sanctions.  As a result, the main buyer of Venezuelan oil is China, and they've been buying about half a million barrels of Vz oil every DAY.

And because the Chinese know Maduro can't sell anywhere else, they've been able to strike a deal to buy Vz oil at about $9 per barrel less than the world price, saving them $4.5 million per DAY.

It's been such a lucrative deal that for the past year China has been buying far more oil than it needs and storing it for future use.  

Another telltale: The EU and U.S. have imposed sanctions on the sale of Russian oil due to its war on Ukraine.  In the past Russia has used tankers flying third-world flags to ship its oil, since the U.S. and EU are less likely to seize a ship registered in a 3rd-world nation. 

But in the last six months Lloyds of London reports that 42 such vessels have switched to sailing under the Russian flag, presumably on the theory that the U.S. would be less likely to seize ships openly owned or leased by Russia.

The Wall Street Journal reports that tankers filled with sanctioned crude oil totalling six million barrels per day are at sea but unable to find buyers.  That represents about six percent of the world's daily demand, which is a LOT.
====

In August of 2019, during Trump's first term, the U.S. and EU imposed sanctions on Vz selling oil.  China stopped buying Vz crude oil.  But Reuters reported that just over two weeks after the Democrats stole the 2020 U.S. presidential election for bribem--on November 24th of 2020--China resumed buying oil directly from Venezuela.

Yes, Trump was still president until Jan 20th of 2021, but China's leaders knew--as did Trump--that the courts and the Deep State would block any moves to punish either Vz or China for evading the sanctions.

Question is, why were the Chinese absolutely sure bribem wouldn't retaliate?

Ohh, that's right: $40 million in bribes, collected by Hunty for the whole bribem family.  Of course this was reported by Reuters at the time, yet "your" Mainstream Media totally ignored it: you never heard this tiny li'l tidbit until just now.