Democrat leaders have whipped voters into a frenzy about higher gas prices

On February 26 of this year--2 days before Iran war started--West Texas Intermediate (a standard benchmark for U.S. oil price) was $65.21 per barrel.

By June 30 it had risen to $69.81, raising the price of gasoline.

You whiny fucking BITCHES in the mainstream media, and Democrat assholes in congress, go fuck yourselves.  You screamed bloody murder that Trump slapping the hell out the insane, murderous mullahs was gonna destroy the world economy by raising the price of oil.  And yeah, Friday's close (October 23) for WTI was $103 a barrel.

Yes that's $34 a barrel higher than pre-war.  And who are the biggest winners from higher oil prices?

Iran and Russia.  So if Trump were to surrender to the mullahs and withdraw all forces from the Strait, what do ya think will happen, eh?

You've never thought about it, so you almost certainly have no idea.  Totally understandable.

Answer: It's clear that the world is willing to pay that much for oil, so if the U.S. is forced (by Democrats, after they win control of the House) to withdraw U.S. forces, the mullahs will force all tankers owners to pay a "transit fee" of a few million per ship to keep the price of oil at current levels--which everyone knows the world will pay.  Cuz it's no secret that the world runs on oil, and needs every barrel it can get.

And now Democrats will bleat "If Drumpf hadn't started dis war with Iran, none of dis wud be happening!  Gas would be $3 a gallon instead of $4.30 !!!!" (national average price today, 10/25)

Okay, let's do some "maff" (even though Dems bleat "Maff beez raaacis'!): the *average* American car owner drives 15,000 miles per year.  If we assume 25 mpg average, that's 600 gallons per year, so at $1.30 *more* per gallon, that would be an extra $780 per *year*.

So IF the "conflict" with Iran isn't resolved until March 1st of next year (which is a good bet), that will have cost the average driver an extra $780, or a whopping $2.14  per day.

That's what you're paying in higher gas prices to keep the murderous Muslim mullahs of Iran from getting an atomic bomb.  How many of ya think that's a bargain, eh?

Democrats: "Dat jus' silly, deplorable!  Cuz even if Iran got a nuke, dey don' haz duh missile throw-weight to hit New York or DC!  So yew jus' stupid!"

Well certainly someone is.  Cuz unless you're as stupid as the average purple-haired, nose-ringed Democrat voter, you know you don't need a missile to get a nuke into New York harbor--or into Baltimore harbor (close enough to DC to be a good "warning shot," eh?).

Full disclosure: I don't give a damn if the IRGC nukes either NY or DC.  I don't own any real estate in either place, and while I'd feel sorry for the innocent people who'd be killed, that calculus is a commonplace today.

So: You'll never see the Mainstream Media tell ya that the extra cost of gas due to higher oil prices is just "$2.14 a day," because every leftist editor in the Media knows most Americans would think that was a bargain price to pay to keep Iran from getting a nuke.  So the Media have to say "Iran was never really trying to build an atom bomb!"

Horseshit.  They admitted to having "enriched" 447 kg of uranium to 60% fissionable U-235, and the ONLY KNOWN USE for enriching uranium beyond ten percent (needed to generate electricity) is to build an atomic bomb.

Next Media lie to get voters to oppose Trump: "Even if Iran were to be given an atom bomb, they don't have a way to get it to the U.S."

Again, horseshit.

See, unless you've studied nuclear physics, you know virtually nothing about how an atomic bomb actually works.  You've seen pics of the bombs dropped on Japan to end WW2, and they're huge.  But contrary to what you think, an atomic bomb can fit in a suitcase.  How many ways can you get a suitcase into the U.S, eh?

The Mainstream Media won't tell you any of this, because virtually every member of the Mainstream Media hates Trump and conservatives, so will tell ANY lie, no matter how brazen, to get voters to oppose Trump and elect Democrats to the presidency and control of congress.

To get an idea of what the Media is refusing to tell ya, consider this: Obozo ordered his EPA to issue a decree forcing coal-fired powerplants to close, and at the same time Democrats pressured utility companies to close nuclear powerplants.  Both things have caused the price of electricity in the northeast U.S. to increase roughly 40% in the last five years.

Take Connecticut:  In 2010 electricity cost 17.5 cents per kwh.  Today: 29 cents (other sources say 24.3 cents).  That's an increase of 66% in 16 years, and 88% higher than the national average.  The average household in CT uses about 760 kwh per month, which would produce a bill of $221 just for actual consumption, NOT including the myriad of taxes and fees packed on by the state and cities.  (Yet some Net sources say the average bill is "$125 to $145."  Someone's lying, eh?)

Here's the point:  The average electricity bill in CT has risen $74 a month since Obozo ordered his EPA to decree that CO2 was a "pollutant," thus giving the EPA the power to force all electric utilities to shut down their coal plants.  That's an increase of $888 a year, which is more than the increase in the annual cost of gasoline today.  But unlike the temporarily higher gas price, electricity will never drop back.

Did you ever read or see a single article or piece in the Mainstream Media about Obozo's order forcing utilities to close 200 coal-fired plants because they were suddenly rendered uneconomical due to massive fines if NOT closed?

Ever hear or read what that was guaranteed to do to the price of electricity?  No?

Wow, I'm...shocked!  Not.  Most of you never knew that the emperor ordered the EPA to declare CO2 (which everyone exhales) a "pollutant," and you never knew the EPA then decreed rules (no law needed) forcing utilities to shutter now-uneconomic coal-fired power plants.  And since those plants produced electricity at a lower cost than anything else, that the ordered shutdown would drastically raise the cost of electricity, eh?

You nevah heard about dat cuz duh Mainstream Media knew if dey tol' voters about it, Dems would lose votes.  Oooohhh, can't have THAT, eh?

Seriously, ask your friends and parents if they evah heard about any of that.

See, principle #1 for the Mainstream Media is, "If we don't report it, you nevah know about it!  So as far as you know, it nevah happened!"

Starting to see how it works yet?

No, you're not, cuz you literally refuse to believe it.  "Dat jus' a 'right-wing conspiracy story!'" 

Anyone remember 1990? No?

Back in 1990 Minnesota was rated the best state in America to start a business.  Lowest in state government corruption. 

Totally by coincidence, in 1990 it was also 94% White.  There wasn’t one Somali, or person of Somalian descent, living in all of Minnesota. Not one.

Now, 36 years later, almost 200,000 Somalis live in Minnesota.

Democrats (like MN governor Timmy Walz and his lieutenant governor--and now Dem candidate for the fucking U.S. senate, Peggy Flanagan): "Dis beez absolutely wunnerful!  Somalis are hard-working doctors and engineers an' cops.  We couldn't run this state wifout 'em!"  (Unintentional truth there.)

So it came as a total surprise when a few weeks ago the FBI announced that they'd arrested a Somali (Muslim) anchor baby who'd planned to shoot as many whites as possible at the popular Mall of America.

Surely you saw the reports on the network newz about it, right?  If you're skeptical, google "Sheikhdoon Abdullahi Mohamud."  

Of course if you're a Democrat, you won't--because you don't wanna know.  Your core mantra is "Die-versity iz ouah strength," eh?  You stupidly believe that "all cultures are equal" and that pipo raised in tribal shitholes make model American citizens!

Your naivete is stunning but totally understandable, cuz that's how you've been propagandized.

The U.S. Attorney for Minnesota said federal agents’ attempts to speak with Mohamud’s parents about his radicalization in 2025 were rebuffed.

So let's review: First, how many of you ever heard about this?

Second: In nature, what happens to animals who either refuse to learn or are too slow/stupid to learn?

If you're an adult Democrat you richly deserve what's coming...because as an adult you had the facts available to you, but deliberately chose virtue-signalling over rationality. 

You stupidly believed such utter bullshit as "The U.S. must open our borders to anyone in the world who wants to enter!  And then it is our job to give each one free housing, food, medical care, free college and thousands of dollars of cash per month!  Cuz...we Dems iz totally virtuous!" 

You believed Somalis and Nigerians and Algerians and Senegalese and Haitians were "just like us," so would make great next-door neighbors.

Well of course not next-door to you, eh?  But fine if next door to some poor conservative "deplorable" five miles away, eh?

So I don't feel a bit sorry for you.  I do feel sorry for your kids, cuz unlike you, they didn't have any choice in things: you helped elect Obozo, then his equally, utterly corrupt VP, Joey bribem.  Both opened the borders, setting us on the road to the death of America. 

So...enjoy the next decade or so, Democrats.  In nine days your beloved partei [sic] will win control of the House, and they already control the senate even without a majority, thanks to the filibuster.  Control ensures no good-for-America bill will be passed during the last two years of Trump's term.  Instead even the "must-pass" bills, like the Defense Appropriations Act, or extensions to food stamps or welfare or highway bills or tax laws, will contain fatal provisions inserted by Democrats--but will be forced to become law due to the "must-pass" nature of the bill.

Most of you Dems have no idea what I'm talking about.  Most of you want "free shit" and socialism and open borders--and thanks to a corrupt Media and stupid voters, you're gonna get all three.

Wheeee!  And on November 4th Chuckie Schumer and AOC and Fauxcahontas and Hakeem and Cory Booker and Newscum and Ro Khana and Ilhan Omar and Pelosi and that moronic Dem former astronaut from Arizona, and the Paleswinians and Somalis and lesbians and trannies--and the communists at CNN and MS-NOW and the alphabet nets--will all be absolutely gloating about winning control and being able to totally block all conservative bills and all Trump-backed policies--which is totally understandable.

You wanted it, you plotted it out, and it worked for ya.  So you should be happy about the result, eh?

And you will be.  Your kids?  Not so much.  But you'll tell 'em "Yes, the government seized 90% of the estate your mother and I had worked hard to give ya, but dat reeeally gud!  Cuz yew gon' feel way mo' virtuous to know dat most of our estate went to hep po' Somali and Mehican immigrants refugees!  An' yes, half of university admissions will go to refugee kids instead of you and your kids, but same argument, eh?  You and your kids will feel LOTS of virtue by going to a community college (or no college).

"See, dis beez duh new world order we virtuous Dems planned for ya.  Cuz we Dems wuz/iz smaaht!  Next comes electricity bills rising 40% per year, which you'll happily pay, cuz...virtue.  An' no air travel for your kids, cuz all dat CO2 kills duh Erf, eh?  But your kidz won' mind, cuz dey kin drive dere faaabulous electric cars coast-to-coast for pocket change, thanks to Joe Biden's faaabulous $7 BILLION dollar network of charging stations!

Paradise on Erf, eh? 

What did we learn from the French "student riots"? Apparently nothing

 

If you still believe the protests that burned and looted in many French cities (including the capital), you're too uninformed to breathe.

And if you think this same shit isn't coming here--like a damn freight train, in every Democrat-ruled shithole city--you're dreaming.

Oh wait...it already has: summer of 2020, even as the utterly corrupt Fauci warned people not to socialize, and Dem governors ordered a total lockdown, hundreds of thousands of protesters burned and looted U.S. cities.  It's now been a bit over six years and everyone's forgotten the endless hours of video, most taken by cell phones and seen by very few Americans.

But either you never saw the burning cities, or you've forgotten.  But it's coming, again, because the communists/socialists/DSA are following the same playbook as their comrades in Paris: convince everyone that they're entitled to everything they want, "for free," by taking whatever they want.

There are HOURS of videos of Americans in Paris interviewing residents, and you hear the same things over and over: the rioters hate anyone who owns a shop or a business of any kind.  The "solution"?  Loot it, burn it.  Vandalism as entertainment.

This is the totally inevitable result of socialists telling people they can have anything they want, "for free," and that anyone who disagrees is the enemy. 

In Cali, Federal investigators identify 20,000 mail-in ballots "likely from illegal aliens." Election officials refuse to hold those ballots to verify citizenship before counting 'em

One of the saddest lines heard in life is "It's too late."  

You got to the hospital minutes after your loved one died.  Or the mission to rescue a surrounded army brigade came too late to save them. Or you discover that your nation has been quietly invaded by a million "sleeper agents."  Lots more examples.

This is one of those stories.

It's too late to prevent massive election fraud in the midterm elections (in just 12 days): In California the Democrat officials who rule every state agency--including elections--have refused to sequester mail-in ballots from people who almost certainly were NOT U.S. citizens, after admitting in federal court, on the record, that election officials don't bother even trying to verify that voters are U.S. citizens before accepting and counting their ballots.  Instead the corrupt Democrat officials rely entirely on a voter's claim of citizenship.

Three days ago--just 15 days before Election Day--the federal government arrested 28 people in California for either already voting illegally, or being registered to vote despite not being American citizens.

And of course the shithead Dems bleat "Only 28 pipo?  Dat beez a nuffin!  Cain't possibly change any results!  So yew mus' ignore dis!"

Except the 28 are only one one-thousandth of the actual problem.

I'd yell "Wake the f*ck up" but it's too late: ALL the illegal votes WILL be counted, because Cali election officials have already refused to sequester the suspect ballots until each voter is confirmed to be a U.S. citizen.  And of course once a ballot is removed from its mail-in envelope there's no way to tell who cast it, eh?  "Secret ballot," right?

Senate Democrats cunningly blocked the SAVE Act from passing, by threatening to filibuster (which as everyone should know requires a "supermajority" of 60 votes to end).  The corrupt or merely stupid John Thune should have forced the Dems to do that, starting months before Election Day, since the corrupt Media would have HAD to cover it, and it would have shown Americans that the Dems were blocking a bill that would have made it harder for non-citizens to vote, period.

But Thune refused to force the Dems to show their ass to voters.  Stupid, stupid, stupid.  His excuse was "We don't have the votes to end a threatened filibuster!"  True, but the goal is to show all Americans that the Dems refuse to support a bill seeking to reduce election fraud.  Americans needed to see that, but Thune allowed the Dems to get away without revealing their true agenda.

Oh well...at least he's well-paid.

According to the DOJ, federal investigators used immigration databases, identity matching, multiple verification layers, manual USCIS reviews, supervisory oversight, and law-enforcement screening to identify more than 20,000 likely noncitizens on California's voter rolls.

Of course every flagged registration should be totally verified.  Unfortunately now...how does that sad saying go?  Oh yeah: "It's too late," because corrupt Cali state officials refuse to sequester the suspect mail-in ballots.  And remember that once they're out of their envelope, there's no way to tell who sent them.  So in effect they're already being counted by corrupt Cali election officials--all Democrats.

If you still don't see the problem, consider this:  If state officials believe there's no widespread voting by non-citizens, why would you resist verifying that registered voters are U.S. citizens, after federal investigators presented documented problems?

There's no innocent answer.  The real answer is that Dems WANT illegals to vote, so they claim that "Verifying election integrity is *voter suppression.* 

So if you didn't catch it earlier: In the Karen-Bass-ruled shithole of L.A, officials have confirmed to a federal court that the only way they decide if a person wishing to register or vote is a U.S. citizen depends solely on what the voter claims.

This should tell you everything you need to know about "election integrity" in that shithole state.

Here's the actual quote from LA officials to the court:

"The Registrar is not equipped or authorized to verify voter citizenship because it does not independently house citizenship-related information beyond the voter attestation as identified in federal and state law, and is certainly not equipped to do so within the election period."

That last phrase ("...and is certainly not equipped to do so within the election period") is a beautiful effort to appear totally reasonable: "Gee, if only yew feds had given us dis info sooner, maybe we could have cleaned up ouah precious, sacred voter rolls.  But yew gave us dis info too late! [There's that phrase again.]  So we simply could NOT have done anything in the remaining time befo' election day."

Spoiler: No matter when the feds advised the corrupt Dem election officials about the problem, there wouldn't have been enough time for corrupt officials to act.  Cuz the state would sue, and dat wud take MONTHS, eh?  Because it's all just an excuse for achieving the result Democrats want: illegals voting Democrat. 

Just for fun, consider this: if all illegals were known to vote Republican, there wouldn't be a single illegal registered to vote in Democrat-ruled states.  Dems: "Of course not, cuz ouah precious, cherished, sacred election laws MUST be enforced!  Duh integrity of ouah precious democracy depends on it!"

Wow that didn't take long, eh?

Unfortunately, as noted earlier, "it's too late."

Of course gullible people are comforted by the fact that federal law requires that states retain all ballots for 26 months after a federal election, so in theory you could go back months later and re-count all the ballots.  Problem: the totals won't match, cuz tens of thousands of ballots are missing.  Have mysteriously vanished--as they did in Georgia.  Just...vanished.

Gullible American: "Nah, dey iz jus' mis-filed, cuz no one would steal ballots cuz dat wud be against federal law, so no one would risk dat, right?"

Oh, "Against federal law," y'say?  Ya mean like counting the votes of non-citizens?  Which Cali officials are demonstrably doing.  Hmmmm....

You don't understand: no ballots were stolen.  They were never there to begin with.  Corrupt election officials counted a shit-ton of votes that never existed--knowing that in the totally unlikely event anyone was able to get a Democrat judge to order an inspection of ballots, Dem officials could fall back on "WHOA, some nefarious party seems to have stolen 50,000 ballots for ouah candidates!  Who wud doo such a thang, eh?  We needs t' investigate!"

Sorry.  It's too late--just as it was in 2020.

Source: Ace of Spades

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=421848 

Hit-piece by commie Washington Post: "U.S. officials privately advise states fearing Trump election meddling"

One of the oldest and most often used tricks in the communist/leftist/Democrat/"proggie" playbook sounds too simple to be true:  They accuse their opponents of doing something they themselves are doing.

The reason this always works is that if the Democrats are discovered to have been doing the exact thing they accused their opponents of doing--the instant response is 

"Today's totally false, baseless, malicious accusation by Republican dirty-tricks "operatives" against ouah totally honest party is nothing but a transparent effort by Republicans to deceive voters by accusing ouah party of doing exactly what we told you weeks ago that they were doing!
    "Surely ALL good, honest voters can easily see the Republicans are obviously just trying to deflect attention from what we told you weeks ago that we'd caught them doing!  And since Republicans have no imagination, they couldn't even invent some new charge, so dey merely accused US of what they were doing!  They're simply copying ouah true claim from weeks ago to try to deflect voter attention from their own crimes!
   "Of course American voters are too smart to fall for this obvious deflection!

With that in mind, consider this total hit-piece from the communist Washington Post, dated October 20, 2026 (two weeks before the mid-term elections) titled  

"U.S. officials privately advise states fearing Trump election meddling"

A small group of U.S. national security officials has been discreetly advising state governments and congressional lawmakers on how to prepare for the possibility that the Trump administration will attempt to interfere in November's midterm elections, according to people involved in the effort.

Note the phrase "will attempt to interfere..."  Not "may" or "might" or "could," but "will."  If you think that's just an accident, or trivial, you're too damn stupid to breathe.
   And unnamed "national security officials," y'say?  Would those be the same officials who signed the utterly lying open letter saying Hunty bribem's abandoned laptop was a "Russian disinformation op"-- without ever examining the laptop?  Without determining that the FBI had seized it (meaning it definitely existed)?

The group includes about 10 current and former officials with experience in the Defense Department, some of whom have previously focused on countering authoritarianism abroad.

Of course no names, even though the hit-piece says "current and former officials.  You'd think former officials wouldn't be worried about being fired, yet they still refused to put their names on this dastardly piece of shit lie.

Their efforts are motivated not by political bias, they say, but a growing sense of alarm that President Donald Trump will harm American democracy by undermining the integrity of the vote to keep the Republican Party in power.

Note the author (Tarasov) did NOT say "by massive vote fraud," because lots of Americans would think "Wait, that's exactly what Republicans accused the Democrats of doing in 2020--and yet the Mainstream Media sneered at that, claiming it couldn't possibly have been true.  "Wild conspiracy theory!"  But NOW when the Dems (the Post) make the same claim even before the election, they expect readers to believe it's totally credible?  What horseshit!"

Over the past several months the group has consulted with officials from 10 states, including governors, election officials and members of the House and Senate from both political parties who share a fear of federal intervention, two people involved in the effort said.

Notice the order of the phrasing: First a long list of officials, naming their positions, claiming members of both parties and their "fears of federal intervention" (NOT "massive vote fraud," eh?)--and then at the very end "...two people said."
  If the propagandist had started with "Two people said..." it would drastically weaken the 'graf.  So the miniscule, nameless "source" is placed at the end of the graf.  It's not an accident.

The effort...focuses on states and jurisdictions [??] where tightly contested races will determine control of Congress for the remainder of Trump's presidency. Members of the group remain in contact with congressional staffs, and at least one state has continued to meet with them as it works to address potential vulnerabilities.

"All of them have said we're concerned but we don't know what to do," one member of the group said of its meetings with lawmakers.

A magnificent appeal to emotion: "We po' state election officials iz hepless 'gainst duh rapacious Orange Kang an' we haz no idea whut to doo!  Pwease hep us, SuperDemocratMan!"

"This report is based on interviews, conducted over several months, with two officials involved in the effort."

Ahhh, a "report," y'say?  Guess saying "This propaganda piece" would have been too on-the-nose, eh?   And note that the original "group of ten" is now shown to be interviews with just two.  "Ohhh but the other 8 were in the group, we jus' din' interview 'em!  But we were able to count the heads in the room, so..."

They spoke on the condition of anonymity and that the lawmakers and state leaders with whom the group has met not be identified either, for fear of retaliation.

So, totally anonymous.  What a surprise.  Everyone in the hit-piece is unnamed.

In their discussions ahead of the midterms, the national security officials [many of whom have been shown to be lying, socialist/Dem rat-bastards] have detailed ways the Trump administration could use its federal powers to sway the upcoming vote, covering categories that include legal and illegal activity.  Among their concerns are that the administration could deploy troops or immigration agents to polling stations or seek to nullify results based on claims of voter fraud.

Just curious, WaPo shill: if illegal aliens aren't voting in national elections, why would anyone be even remotely concerned about "immigration agents" or troops being at voting locations?

Their meetings with lawmakers have mainly focused on raising awareness, especially among Republicans, of the potential for interference and on counseling them to be prepared to publicly oppose any such efforts. With state governments, they've focused more on how to harden election protocols that could be exploited by the federal government, the two members of the group said.

"...how to harden election protocols that could be exploited by the federal government," y'say?  That's an curiously vague phrase.  Would that be things like insisting that signatures on mail-in ballots match those on file from when the actual voter registered?  Or maybe refusing to count ballots that don't have required witness signatures?  Or maybe only mailing ballots to registered voters who request 'em after stating a valid reason?  Or is all that too arcane for your vague phrasing?

Their warnings are based on personal analysis of the administration's activities and public statements made by the president and his allies - not access to specific government intelligence or information to which they have access because of their positions within federal agencies, members of the group said. They described the meetings as a way to help state and federal officials secure the election and emphasized that their work has occurred outside of their official capacity as government employees.

Still, their efforts indicate an extraordinary level of concern that Trump may use his authority to influence the election or challenge the results, similar to his extended campaign to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election that culminated with a raid on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump's approval rating is at record lows only weeks ahead of the Nov. 3 midterms, with voters frustrated about the cost of living and the war in Iran. Democrats appear likely to flip the House and possibly the Senate, and have vowed to intensify oversight of the administration if they regain power.

Election officials, including some Republicans, have decried efforts by the Trump administration to assert federal control over a process that the Constitution entrusts to the states. Some GOP-led states, such as Utah, have refused to comply with the administration's efforts to access their voter rolls.

Interesting that the author did NOT mention Democrart-ruled shitholes like California, which has also refused.  Ohh, got it: the Post doesn't wanna make Dem-ruled shitholes look corrupt.  Of course.

"The threats that we're getting now are mostly from our own government," Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson told The Post earlier this month.

"Threats," shill?  You mean threats like "trying to enforce U.S. law that says only citizens can vote in federal elections?"  THAT kind of threat?  WOW, how DARE the president try to enforce valid U.S. law, eh?
   Y'know, the thing the Constitution commands him to do.
   Oh wait: you don't know jack-shit about the Constitution!  Apparently you've never read it, or you wouldn't be screaming that enforcing U.S. law was a "threat."

Good ol' Deidre is a either a RINO or stupid--and I'll go either way you want on that one.

In January the FBI raided an election office in Fulton County, Georgia, and seized voting materials in an investigation tied to Trump's debunked claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election. Trump told the New York Times in an interview earlier this year that he regretted not having the National Guard seize voting machines during that race.

As he has campaigned on behalf of Republicans, Trump has repeated his claims about the 2020 election and that Democrats are attempting mass voter fraud ahead of the midterms. In October, a group of nongovernmental organizations sued the administration, alleging that it unlawfully collected voting data from 47 states.

In the U.S. anyone can sue for anything.  Question is, did the Supreme Court agree with the Dems that it's illegal for the federal govt to insist that states follow federal law in only letting citizens vote in federal elections?  No?  Gosh, you'd think that would be highly relevant to a factual article, eh?     
   Oh wait...this is a hit-piece, which only uses selected facts--"a group of NGOs from 47 states sued"--without providing anything that would give context.  Classic.

Throughout the year [Trump] has unsuccessfully urged Congress to pass an election security bill--the SAVE America Act--that would give the federal government more authority over the voting process.

This is a Freudian slip:  Even the Democrat-fellating shitheads at the Post describe the Save America Act as an "election security bill."

The GOP-controlled Senate has not done so, as passing the bill would require ending the chamber's 60-vote threshold known as the filibuster.

This is a classic:  First, leading with "The GOP-controlled senate" implies that even the GOP doesn't want to pass the bill.  That's a lie: they just can't pass it--even though they have a majority--because the Dems have said they'll filibuster, meaning it would then take 60 votes to pass!  And the Dems refuse to provide the nine lousy votes needed!

Then an equally brazen lie, that passing the bill would "require ending the...60-vote threshold known as the filibuster."  Total lie.  If just nine corrupt Democrat monsters vote to make election fraud harder--voting a bill even the Post says is an "election security bill"--the filibuster would still remain.  But of course senate Democrats refuse to vote to pass the bill--precisely because it would make election fraud harder, by requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, and photo-ID to vote--both of which would cost the Democrats millions of illegal votes.  

Trump and some of his top Cabinet officials also have declined to rule out the possibility that they will send members of the military or immigration agents to polling stations, alarming Democrats.

Dems bleat that illegal alien invaders aren't voting.  If that's true, why would sending ICE to polling places be of ANY concern to Democrats, eh?  Gotcha, assholes.

During a combative Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in late April, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was asked whether he would refuse a presidential order to deploy troops to the polls or to collect voting machines. He dismissed the question, posed by Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Michigan), as a "hypothetical."

Wait, is this the same Slotkin who was videoed saying that she wanted to intimidate young Americans who might be considering applying for a job in the Trump administration to get them to decline, by threatening to prosecute them?  As she put it, she wanted to "send a "deterrent message" to 'em.  Wow, and that bitch is a senator!

When the committee's Republican chairman, Sen. Roger Wicker (Mississippi), urged Hegseth to provide a response, the secretary said, "I've never been ordered to do anything illegal, and I won't."

In August, Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote to Slotkin and said that there were no plans to deploy troops to the polls or seize voting records.

But the damage was done, exactly as the Dems intended, and the shitheads at the Post parroted: "Hegseth dismissed the question," planting the idea that he *might* send troops.  Mission accomplished for the Dems and their fellators at the Post.<<

Source: Washington Post.  If behind a paywall, use source 2

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/10/20/us-officials-quietly-advise-states-fearing-trump-election-meddling/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/u-officials-privately-advise-states-122930503.html 

Meta ordered to pay $25 BILLION in damages--down from $219 BILLION

Back in September a story slipped under my radar: a jury in New Mexico found social media giant Meta guilty of violating the state's "Fair Practices Act" by selling user data to other companies.  The original jury award was reportedly $219 Billion.

I didn't hear anything about that til today (21 October 2026) when CNBC (I know, lotsa' garbage propaganda bullshit) reported that the even though a "filing" showed that the jury had awarded $219.5 Billion, the judge had unilaterally reduced that to $25 Billion.

One wonders what basis the judge had for reducing the damage award to barely over one-tenth of the original figure, eh?  But surely there was a solid, rational reason.  

Surely.  Really.  Must be, eh?

And if you think the lower award is gonna stand, you're naive.  I'll be interested to learn if a court of appeals or the New Mexico supreme court reduces the amount of damages--currently $25 BILLION, down from $219 Billion--to a far friendlier one billion, or even less.  And of course Meta says they'll appeal.

Care to bet on the eventual outcome?

Spoiler:  If you're an attorney who's been asked to get the damage award reduced from $25 BILLION (and again that's down from the original $219 Billion), how much are you willing to do to reduce the damage award by, say, a mere two Billion?  It's a no-brainer: One percent of two billion dollars is...well you tell me, eh?  Cuz yew iz smaht, right?  Yew know maff.  So how much is one percent of two B? 

Twenty.  Million.  Dollars.  Hmmmm....

Source. 

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/21/meta-new-mexico-cambridge-analytica-penalty.html 

Platform of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)

One of the beauties of both written material and video is that the org or person who created it has a hard time disavowing it.

Thus you'll get a kick out of the current "program" posted by a bunch of drug-addled communist morons calling themselves the Democratic Socialists of America.  Some of their claims/positions/policies:

First they propose to eliminate the U.S. senate, and citizens voting to elect presidents.  Instead presidents would be chosen by...wait for it...congress.  Which the DSA plans to control.

Supreme Court judges would also be chosen by congress instead of being nominated by the president and sent to the senate for confirmation.  (Cuz no more senate.)  Other platform points:
  *an immediate end to all deportations,
  *amnesty for all illegal aliens
  *defunding the Department of War.
  *allowing non-U.S.-citizens to vote for members of congress.
  *32-hour work week with no reduction in either pay or benefits;
  *Medicare for all, regardless of age;
  *canceling all student loan debt (apparently tax dollars pay it)
  *nationwide rent control (rent freeze)

This is so extreme that you think it can't be real.  In that case go to program.dsausa.org.

Here's part of it: 

Imagine taking a day off from work in a future without capitalism.

[Without capitalism] you now enjoy your work; it’s interesting to you, and you’re well trained for it. You work as much as you are able and no more than needed, and you would control your own labor and see it going to good use. It’s not just a job to pay the bills.

Speaking of bills: you don’t really have them anymore. You have no debt. You don’t need health insurance. You don’t pay a mortgage or have a landlord, because comfortable housing is a human right.

Note the clear message: "You will have free healthcare and free housing."  Wow, what a hook for gullible Americans, eh? 

Your retirement is publicly funded. Food, education, energy, medicine, and transportation aren’t for-profit businesses; they are common goods and utilities.

OK, enough about bills.  What do you do on your day off?  [List of pleasurable things to do.] 

These are all familiar everyday activities. But what if you were free to spend your time as you liked without worrying about cost, or dreading going back to work?  What if you didn’t have to think about paying rent or loans at the end of the month, or saving for college, or affording groceries?

This totally seductive tale goes on for dozens of pages, all cutely illustrated with child-like drawings (how appropriate).  Below: what an ideal life looks like for communists.

 

Short answer: under the DSA plan "the gummint" gives you everything you ever wanted, for free.  Yes, you have a job, but suddenly it's "interesting" and you enjoy it!  Magic!  College?  Free to everyone, of course.  

Of course like everything else, college wouldn't really be free: someone has to pay the massive salaries of the endless army of $350,000-a-year adminishits and $150k-a-year professors, and the massive utility bills (gotta keep those campuses totally lit at night, eh?).  The numbers don't work.  Not even close.  And of course no one in the DSA even tried to make the numbers work, cuz neither DSA rulers nor their supporters (and potential voters) can do maff!  Which is why stupid, gullible Americans eat this shit up: they believe everything can be paid for by gummint.

What no one ever tries to explain is:  How will duh gummint get all the money needed to give every citizen all this faaabulous "free" stuff, eh? 

But the beauty of communism is that no one is ever called to answer that question-- because communism is built on the faaaaabulous maxim "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

You may have heard that line before.  It was popularized by Karl Marx, and it sounds SO reasonable, eh? 

The entire DSA platform--as quoted above--is such a tissue of outrageous lies as to be  unbelievable.  Except they really posted it.  Click on the link above to see for yourself.

25 years later, Americans have learned nothing

Five weeks ago the 25th anniversary of the deadliest terror attack on U.S. soil passed with barely a flicker of notice from the media.  There's a reason--and you won't like it.

Just over 25 years ago, 19 ghastly, fanatical rat-bastards armed with box-cutters hijacked four jet airliners loaded with passengers.  They flew two into the tallest skyscrapers in New York--the 110-story twin towers of the World Trade Center.  

They flew a third into the Pentagon.  Passengers on the hijacked fourth airliner learned of the first crashes by phone from the plane, so they realized they had nothing to lose by trying to re-take control.  They rushed the cockpit, but the hijacker at the controls pushed the plane into a vertical dive and it crashed in less than a minute.

Immediately, the pro-Democrat "Co-exist" crowd that infests the State Department--regardless of which party has the White House--went into damage-control mode: they should have stopped ALL Muslim migration for at least a decade while the government laboriously sorted out what failures allowed 19 Muzz to board the planes with box-cutters.

But of course the State Department would never permit that, and G.W. Bush didn't have the balls to order it.  So instead the U.S. government did...nothing useful.

Later we'd learn that the FBI had gotten reports of 19 Muslims showing up at flight schools wanting to learn to *fly* commercial jets--but oddly, didn't wanna learn how to *land 'em.*

Yeah, that should have been a clue.  But just like so many other novel attacks, no one in a position of power ever imagined...you get it.  And low-level agents who tried to alert their supervisors got nowhere.  Cuz, "Don't be silly, Stevens.  That would never happen."

So the first response by America’s politicians to the attack of Sept. 11, 2001, was to avoid blaming Muslims for killing 2,977 Americans.  Muslims instantly picked up on that clear sign of weakness, and coined the term "Islamophobia" to pummel Americans who justifiably hated Muslims for the attack.

Later, Democrat regimes under emperor Obozo and bribem would throw open our borders to allow anyone from anywhere to waltz into the U.S. and get flown to the U.S. city of their choice.

For those who haven't realized it yet: Islam commands followers to establish a world-wide "caliphate," meaning Muzz would rule every nation.  So the goal of "true believers" is to overthrow not just the U.S. government, but all western nations.

This should be clear.  But liberals are blinded by their suicidal empathy, their desperate desire to signal their moral superiority.  And they’ve created a growing headache:

The mayor and every member of the city council of Hamtramck, Michigan, are Muslim.  Seventy percent of the residents are Muslim.  They renamed one of city’s main streets "Palestine Avenue," as have other cities where Muslims have acquired political power.  The former police chief--Muslim Jamiel Altaheri--told his officers that domestic violence should be “handled through mosques following the tenets of Sharia law.  He added that under Sharia law, wife-beating is not a crime.

Suicidal empathy by Democrats has produced Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, Democrat candidate for the U.S. senate--again from Michigan.

Hasan Piker is a wealthy terrorist sympathizer who's said “America deserved 9/11.”  He's one of El-Sayed's most prominent supporters.

Piker has also said “We’re gonna keep bringing immigrants into this country so they can f*** your sister and maybe your daughter. We’re going to destroy the white race.”

Fifteen miles from Hamtramck is Dearborn, Michigan, whose Democratic mayor “has called for the annihilation of Israel.

Then there’s Paterson, New Jersey, which holds an annual Palestinian-flag-raising ceremony.  The majority-Muslim city council voted to change existing noise lawss to allow the city’s dozen mosques to blast out the Islamic call to prayer five times a day — starting before dawn.

Islamists also forced  few U.S. airports to install foot-washing stations for them.  

Islamists have no interest in supporting American values.  They hate the values that have produced free western societies, and believe Americans who support those values must either convert to Islam or submit to Islamic law and rules.

It seems clear that the Democrat and Democrat-Socialist parties totally support the Muslim takeover of the U.S, one town at a time.  Democrat-appointed judges clearly do.

When the Muslim hijackers attacked both our largest city, destroying both 110-story towers of the World Trade Center, then flew a passenger jet into the Pentagon in our capital city, that was clearly an act of war.  Had we responded with a small nuclear weapon on Mecca--demonstrating our determination--there would be no more Muslim attacks.  But of course wokeness prevailed...

America’s Democrats and progressives wail that Muslims are oppressed and the West are the oppressors, so Dems are determined to show how tolerant, understanding and noble they are.  But in truth, they're what Stalin called "useful idiots." 

Source 1.

Source 2. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/09/10/25-years-after-9-11-america-dotes-on-its-enemies/

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/mohamed-atta-25-years-911 

Democrat senator: "We must relentlessly prosecute Trump staffers, to make young people too scared to apply for jobs with conservatives"

Democrat senator Elissa Slotkin publicly said Democrats must "go after" and prosecute Trump's staffers, in order to make young conservatives thinking about working for the Trump administration too scared to apply.

At an "event" last week at the leftist U of Chicago, Slotkin--who voted twice to impeach Trump--said this (actual quote):

I want young people coming out of school to say, 'Should I go work for the Trump administration? That sounds fun, I might get an opportunity.'  I want them to [think] 'That might be buying myself a ton of problems I don't want, and so let me avoid participating in that.'" 
    "I want that deterrence message sent."

"The people around Donald Trump who are doing his bidding...have no immunity.  And he couldn't do any of this stuff without all of those people saluting and supporting it. So you go after the people who do his bidding."

Slotkin was elected to the senate just two years ago, in 2024, and claimed to be a "moderate."  But within weeks she began to show her true colors.  And last week she told students at the University of Chicago how Democrats plan to use their power if they win control of the senate in the midterms in 15 days.

Slotkin claims she's "defending democracy." But the socialist left who control today's Democratic Party actually work by getting corrupt government officials to prosecute conservatives.  In a chilling speech in September Slotkin said she'd target Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, U.S. Attorney for DC Jeanine Pirro and then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for prosecutions "that would see them jailed for 20 years."

Slotkin: "We need to hold accountable the people and institutions who stole billions of our taxpayer dollars and weaponized the government against its people."

This is a particularly brazen lie, since the massive fraud is due to foreigners scamming Medicare, Medicaid and various home-healthcare programs for billions of dollars.  And the masters of "weaponizing the government" were Obozo and bribem, which had their lackeys decree that conservative moms who spoke at school-board meetings against schools that allowed boys to use girls' locker rooms were "terrorists." 

If Slotkin hadn't been caught on video saying all this, no one would believe she said any of it.  It's too on-point with how the communists do things: prosecute your opponents and then claim THEY did what your party just did.  Insane.

With Slotkin's remarks in mind, consider what the ghastly, hideous communist snake Susan Rice (Obozo's director of national security) said Democrats would do if they regained power:

In February Rice promised that Democrats will punish people, companies and institutions who have cooperated with Trump's policies:

"It's not going to end well for them.  If these corporations think that the Democrats, when they come back in power, are going to play by the old rules, they've got another think coming.
  "There will be an accountability agenda.  This is not going to be an instance of forgive and forget."

How many more examples does it take to convince Americans?  

Mark this answer well:  "There is no power on Earth that will make Democrat voters see the truth.  Literally.  If a high-quality video surfaced of Obozo or bribem or Susan Rice or Slotkin or Pelosi or Schumer or Hakeem or Hilliary cackling with glee about Dem plans to steal the election and jail all members of the Trump administration, not a single Dem would believe it.  They'd all claim it was "AI."

If a laptop provably belonging to one of the socialists above were to be found, describing Democrat bribery in explicit detail, Dem voters would claim it was "Russian disinformation" and thus must be ignored--which is exactly what Dems did with the damning information on Hunty bribem's laptop. 

So since the Democrat-fellating Media have turned so many Americans into mindless gimmee-crats, and Dems now outnumber conservatives by about one percent, in 15 days the Dems are likely to win control of at least one chamber of congress.  (At the moment, experts claim Dems will win 220 to 215.)

So what does that do?  It means not a single conservative bill can be passed in Trump's last two years--which has been the case in the senate because of the filibuster, even though Repubs have had a nominal majority there.  The filibuster allows the minority party to block any bill they don't like with just 41 votes.

Because of the corrupt, pro-Dem Media constantly pushing socialism, "die-versity," "equity" and all the other leftist bleating-points, it was inevitable that a majority of voters would become Democrats.  The Media succeeded by a) demonizing conservatives (Orange Hitler, wannabee Kang, etc); b) dangling the promise of "everything for free" to stupid voters; and c) supporting communist-ruled school boards that refused to teach the real results of socialism and "command economies" (dictatorial rule).  

So when young Americans were told, year after year after year, "Yew kin haz free shit, cuz we faaabulous socialists gon' take 95% of the income of duh rich capitalist exploiters!" it made perfect sense to 'em.  Totally plausible.  They'd never been taught real history, so were absolutely defenseless against socialist/Democrat/communist/"progressive" lies.

DSA will drag the Democrat party farther left. Dems: "We don't see a problem"

If you pay attention to events outside your immediate reach (spoiler: most of you don't, either because you're too busy or don't care), you may have heard that the Democrat Socialists of America recently won four Democrat primaries for House seats: 3 in the corrupt socialist wasteland of NYC, and the 4th in...Colorado?  Yes.  Interesting.

Clueless Americans: a) "I nevah heard dat, so mus' be fake newz!  b) "Okay, so the four won their primaries, but dat don' mean dey will win the seat in November!  c) "Even if dey do win, it's only four seats out of 435 or so, so nuthin' to be worried about, deplorable!" 

Ah.  Nice deflection, communist assholes.

Before this week the nastiest communist/DSA member to win was Darializa Avila Chevalier.  On her social media she actually bragged about being a Communist and praised mass murderer Joseph Stalin.  She actually wrote that her goal was "the total eradication of western civilization."

"The total eradication of western civilization," eh?  Try compromising with THAT goal, folks.

Because Chevalier's running in a shithole district in New York City, her election is assured.  So now she’ll be paid $178,000 a year, plus healthcare and generous lifetime pension to fuck up not only your life but the lives of your children and grandchildren.

But now even the communist Chevalier has been eclipsed by an Ethiopian immigrant named Mehlat Kiros, living in Colorado.  Melat has a law degree but was fired by her former law firm and has been working as a barista.  In her primary she defeated a female Democrat who'd been in congress for 29 years, meaning the district is solidly Democrat, meaning the Ethiopian is almost certain to win that House seat in November.

Republican analysts desperate to find a silver lining say this is bad for the Democrat Partei--that the DSA is pushing the Democrat Partei to be more radical, which (the analysts claim) will lose lots of votes in flyover country.  These so-called "expert analysts" claim the DSA isn’t really popular with most Democrat voters. 

Really?  In that case how did they win their primaries, eh?

Problem is, with such a narrow margin for the House majority, four DSA candidates will have far more influence than you think.  You don't believe that, so let me explain: When the Democrats win the House, even four America-hating communists will be able to force the Democrat party far more to the Left than they already are.  You don't realize this because you've never seen how tiny parties can use their leverage when the margin between D and R is tiny.

My American parents lived in London for 15 years.  Because the balance between Labour (socialists) and Tory in Parliament was usually very thin, the Greens and Muzz had a disproportionately large say in what became law there, since if those two groups didn't like a Labour bill, they could block it from passing.

In other words, no law pushed by the socialists could pass unless the Greens and Muzz supported it.  That may sound harmless, but what it ensured was that if the Labour government wanted to get anything passed, it was forced to include pro-green and pro-Muzz provisions in EVERY law.

Starting to see how it works yet?

So for example, among the hundreds of policies demanded by those two groups in the UK was that everyone who made it to the UK by sea would be welcomed in and given free homes, free food, free medical care and free cash.

Sound familiar?

A couple of years later the socialist government made that policy even worse for Brits: under the new policy "immigrants" didn't even have to make it to shore!  Instead UK coast patrols that intercepted invader boats would transfer the invaders to the UK vessel and take 'em ashore and begin giving 'em everything.

And the Left proudly chanted, in unison, "Dis iz whut democracy looks like!"

The grooming gangs started soon after.

So if you think the Democrats have been too far Left for the past 20 years, imagine how much worse their proposed laws will be after they're required to add all DSA demands to every bill, eh?

You still don't get it, because you haven't seen it in action.  I have, in London.  And you will.  It's absolutely certain.

Everything wrong with this country--all the pain, suffering, misery, dislocation, all the waste of blood, treasure and human potential--is directly the fault of, or has been exacerbated by, the compulsion of the Democrat/Left to seize power.

Young Americans were starting to wake up to the clear realities of communism, and polls showed 'em trending conservative.  But then three things happened that hugely inspired young, inexperienced Americans to stay Leftist: First was the attempted assassination at Butler, PA.  Literally missed killing candidate Trump by half an inch.  And deranged young people thought Wow, if I did that and succeeded, I'd be famous!

Second was the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a pencil-neck geek with a tranny boyfriend.  Same leftist response.

Finally the assassination of health-care CEO Brian Thompson--on camera--by the utterly reptilian Luigi Mangione.  Another instant shot of testosterone to leftists.

Young U.S. leftists suddenly began to realize anything was possible. Purple-haired, pencil-neck revolutionaries and their feminist counterparts suddenly saw a path to endless power--not by assassinating opponents (exciting but too risky, comrade!) but simply by voting for the party that promised to pass laws ORDERING taxpayers to give 'em whatever they demanded.

Before, that was the Democrat Partei.  But now the small but well-organized DSA popped up and was offering leftist voters way mo' free shit than the Democrat Partei had.  So to young Americans the question of who to vote for was (and is) a no-brainer.

Let me explain:  young leftists wail "I'll nevah be able to afford a home!!"

Of course in flyover country you can buy a starter home for $150,000.  By contrast, the same home anywhere in the Bay Area of Cali, or in northern Virginia, is ten times more.  So you CAN afford a home, just not in SF or LA or NY or DC.

Young leftist: "But I don't WANNA live in flyover country!  It's so BORING!  I wanna live in a hip, diverse, culturally-enriched city like NY or San Fran or LA or DC!  An' yew cain't make me do whut I don' wanna do!  So I'll vote for the party that promises to give me the cash I need for a down-payment, and a low-interest government loan to buy any house I want!  An' if I miss payments, a new DSA-sponsored law will make those payments for me, just like bribem promised to pay off my student loans that got me my faaabulous degree in Diversity Studies at Hahvahd!"

You think any of the above is absurd?  Un-possible?  Well how many Americans thought bribem and the Dems would DEMAND that federal tax dollars be used to pay off student loans for useless majors ("womens' studies")?  No one thought that was possible.  And yet they tried it.

How many of you predicted the Democrat Partei would block a bill requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register and photo-ID to vote?  Seemed impossible, eh?  And yet the Democrats did it.  And the mainstream media barely mentioned it.

How many of you thought leftist judges would block Trump from deporting illegal aliens who murdered U.S. citizens?  Or that Dem rioters would physically block ICE agents from arresting illegal invaders? 

Point is that as unbelievably destructive as the Dems have been in the last 12 years, now if the DSA wins just four seats in the House, as expected, then unless the Democrat Partei wins control of the House by more than four seats, the Democrat Partei will have to have the support of the DSA to pass their bills, which means they'll have to support DSA demands.  So things are about to get exponentially worse.

So let's review:
 * Will "hip" leftists ever wanna live in flyover states?  Not a chance.
 * Will home prices in the "hip, exciting, culturally-enriched" Dem-ruled cities ever drop?  Not a chance.
 * Do virtually all leftists want free shit?  Yes, obviously.
 * Will leftists vote for the party that promises to give 'em more of what they want?  Yes, certainly.
 * Which party is that today?  The DSA.
 * Does anyone believe Dem voters WON'T vote Dem if the Democrat candidate is a DSA communist?

If you're still not convinced that a tiny number of committed leftists can drag the Democrat party to do amazingly stupid, destructive shit, consider this:
   In 2024, after the Dems had already nominated bribem as their candidate, Democrat leaders--led by the ghastly Nancy Pelosi--made the decision that many Dem voters had already reached: that Joe was mentally incompetent.  This meant maybe 30,000 voters in each state were likely to stay home rather than vote for him.
   So Pelosi pressured bribem to relinquish the nomination and let delegates to the party's national convention select another nominee.  But the head of the congressional black caucus pitched a fit, telling Pelosi that if Harris wasn't the nominee, black voters would stay home.  Pelosi knew that was highly unlikely, but the head of the CBC was adamant.
   So Pelosi caved to the demand of a relatively tiny number of extremists who said "You must agree to our demands or we won't support the party."

Starting to see how it works yet?      

Rioters in France burn 140-year-old city hall in a small city far from Paris

If you're like most American voters--which is to say, you get all your "newz" from the lying mainstream media--you may have heard about some...um..."student demonstrations" in Paris.

Tell us: what do you think is true about those..."student demonstrations," eh?

If you're like most American voters, you may have heard something about schools in Paris, but that's all...cuz all duh Media has said about 'em is that they're...wait for it..."student demonstrations," apparently triggered by students wanting more teachers, or air conditioning, or better Internet, eh?

No.  Virtually every U.S. television network has a Paris bureau, so they'd go out on the street they'd instantly know who's behind these...wait for it..."student demonstrations."  Turns out that out of 50 organizations carrying their professionally-made 40-foot-wide banners in the streets, THREE are real student groups.

The other 47 orgs--the actual army of thugs burning cars, looting high-dollar stores, burning buildings--are communists, Muslims and "trade unions" (fronts for communists).  They couldn't care less about students' complaints but are eager to use the cover of "student protests"--The Narrative--to burn and steal everything they can burn or steal.

Example: Limoges is a small city over 200 miles from Paris.  Population 200,000.  Its schools have virtually nothing to do with those in Paris.  The city hall in Limoges was 143 years old and had survived both world wars.  
   Last night rioters set fire to it, essentially destroying it.
   When the building's clock tower fell, the leftist rioters cheered.
   The rioters weren't students from Paris, but communists and Muslims, eager to use the "student demonstrations"--in distant Paris--as a cover to burn, loot and destroy.

If you think this is an accident, or coincidence, you're too dumb to breathe without help. 

In classic pussy fashion, French President Emmanuel Macron both refused to take any strong action against the arsonists and looters, and ALSO refused to take any accountability for the massive orgy of arson and looting that's spreading like crazy.  Instead the weak prezzy carefully avoided naming the real problem: mass migration.

Like most EU nations, France opened its borders to anyone who could reach the country.  As a result, the country is overrun with Muslims and communists, who are salivating to take over the place.

Yesterday Macron addressed the country for the first time since the youth revolt began nearly a month ago.  As you could have predicted, after the most destructive riots in recent memory, resulting in historic buildings being torched, thousands of shops being looted, and hundreds of police officers, gendarmes, and firefighters being injured, Macron completely ignored the role of millions of foreigners his party allowed into the country.

Instead Macron asked, "How can French people do this to France?  Why burn down the town hall in Limoges, the tourist office in Lyon, storm the town hall in Marseille, or attack the prefect's residence in Bordeaux?  Nothing justifies it, nothing explains it, nothing excuses it. We all feel anger and shame tonight. Seeing the streets of our cities so ransacked is unbearable."

Macron is a woke liberal socialist, so naturally he tries to blame anything BUT the real problem: commies, Muslims, and a "woke," weak government that will never admit that unlimited immigration was a total disaster.

If you're not a marine engineer you may not know that ships loaded with too much weight on upper decks can suddenly roll over, even in calm seas.  They go from upright to inverted ("stable-2") in a few seconds.

Societies work the same way: when the revolutionaries (commies and Muzz) reach a certain strength, the cops and army suddenly switch sides, and the revolutionaries take over the government essentially overnight.

History repeatedly shows this is a deadly way to change governments:  the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia, the Russian revolution, Mao's takeover of China and on down to tiny islands taken over by communists: they execute their opponents.

But of course the revolutionaries couldn't care less, because 1) they know they're not the ones in danger of being executed; and 2) they're convinced that any change through voting would be far too slow and ineffective. 

Democrat voter: "Dat France.  Not my problem!  Why should I keer 'bout stuff over dere, eh?  Dat cud nevah happen here."

Here's what you don't understand--and won't until too late:  What's happening in France is a glimpse of our likely future in the U.S.  Reason is that once enough people fall for the commie lie that you'll get everything you need from "the government," for free, and no one will have any more than you, every dumb or lazy resident embraces that lie--and supports the revolution.

Thus we're seeing the ranks of the "Democratic Socialists of America" (DSA) starting to swell as more young Americans (and illegal immigrants) see a pathway to a life of ease, courtesy of "free stuff" from the government.

Problem, of course, is that virtually everything has to be produced by someone.  If no one has to work hard, how do socialists think all the goods and services demanded by people--and promised by the revolutionaries--will be produced?

The communists who ruled the former USSR found a solution: they did it by rationing.  Five-year waiting lists to buy a washing machine.  Ten-year wait-lists to buy a car.  Market shelves were often bare.  You don't see that today only because after the Central Committee of the USSR dissolved that "union" in December of 1991, the new government (still communist) quietly stopped enforcing most of the economic diktats of the State, and let free markets take a much larger role.  
   Of course they couldn't actually SAY that, cuz that would be a major loss of face for communism, eh?  But that's what happened. 

So back to France: the commies and Muzz are using the so-called "student demonstrations" to get thugs into the streets to loot and burn, really to intimidate the government and get it to roll over for 'em.  They may not succeed this time, but each effort wins more dumb, lazy and/or angry people to the cause.  It also ruins any chance young revolutionaries had to advance to a well-paid job, because why bother studying hard and working hard if you believe a life of ease awaits, eh?  All you have to do is...steal what you like, burn what you want, just support the revolution, eh? 

Source.   

https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/students-tear-gassed-hit-batons-124656203.html 

Demon with a long criminal record repeatedly stabs a 2-year-old in the face

In the Democrat-ruled shithole of Rhode Island (run by Democrats for 50 years) a thug walked up to a 2-year-old in a stroller sitting with her mother at a school bus stop and stabbed the toddler multiple times in her face.

If you didn't quite comprehend that (since it's so seemingly impossible), read it again.  It really happened.  This is life in Democrat shitholes today.  All of 'em.

The mother was waiting for her other children to arrive on a school bus when a demon named Nelson Blanco, 46, approached them.  Immediately sensing the danger, the mother moved across the street, but Blanco followed and then attacked her daughter in the stroller.

The girl remains in critical condition.

As usual with demons, this one had a long criminal history: In September 2003 the demon was charged with stabbing two seven-year-old boys.  Of course he wasn't punished, cuz...wokiez.

More arrests followed, but every time, Democrat rulers would RULE that he was "incompetent," so could not stand trial.  So in a rational society, judge would order the demon confined to a mental hospital for life.  But instead, "woke" leftist judges kept releasing the demon back onto your street.

Prior to the stabbing attack on the 2-year-old girl, a wokie doctor had absolutely assured a woke judge that the demon was “not likely to imperil the peace and safety of the community or himself at this time.”

There's no record of the prosecution presenting an expert to counter the court-appointed (and taxpayer-funded) defense witness, so the woke judge released the demon back onto the streets, with the order that he attend "outpatient treatment."

If you have an IQ over 80 you may already have realized that
 * Demons don't go to "outpatient treatment"
 * It doesn't work anyway, since they're demented
 * Releasing the demon absolutely ensures that the demon will stab or shoot someone else. 

And of course the beauty of the Democrat/woke system is that neither the woke doctor nor the woke judge will be stabbed multiple times in the face by the demon.  Instead that suffering would fall on a helpless 2-year-old in a stroller.

But hey, it wasn't your daughter who's in critical condition in the hospital, eh?  So wokiez bleat that it's a perfectly reasonable price to pay (i.e. none falling on THEM) to allow demons to run free, eh? 

At some point you'd think a "civilizational survival instinct" might kick in.

Yeah, you might think that.  But even in the unlikely case that it did, leftist judges, mayors and Dem rulers would prosecute anyone who tried to protect their loved ones from the demons.

You think I'm kidding, but in the lawless U.K. cops and judges have imprisoned homeowners for trying to defend themselves against home invaders with swords or umbrellas.  Seriously.

Leftists/Dems/wokiez: "Dat jus' silly!  Cuz dat beez duh U.K.  Dat cud nevah happen here, cuz...um...reasons!"

The 2-year-old victim is traumatized for life, her beautiful, innocent face permanently scarred.  But to Democrats dis beez a *great* trade!  Cain't be imprisoning doze po' innocent demons!  Nope nope nope!  Gots t' let demons do dere thing!  Cuz after all, duh victim is never related to the judge or woke "doctor," right? 

Do we really have to keep living like this? 

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/maniac-with-a-record-stabs-2-year-old-in-face/ 

Yet more examples of corrupt, foolish grants from govt to insiders

Republican senator Rand Paul does an annual report on idiotic government grants.  Examples:

The corrupt wokies gave some shithead $4,600,000 of your tax dollars to find out whether getting drunk makes you FALL DOWN.

(Spoiler: yes.)

A $3,000,000 grant to study whether eating ants would reduce Global Warming.  Wait, dat now called "Climate Change."

$7,000,000 on a “smart toilet” that photographs your backside.

Corruptocrats even sent your money to other nations to teach foreigners how to game our system for grants.

Why does this sort of crap continue, year after year, even after it's obvious that our massive national debt will destroy us?

Because the corruptocrats know that the government declares bankruptcy there won't be any more chances to steal.  So the time to steal is now.

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/more-festivus-foolishness/ 

Liberal, "woke" judges strike again, releasing violent thug w/ no bail needed, and then....

Liberal, "woke" judges will get us all killed--and for no reason other than their stupidity.

In the Democrat-ruled shithole of Pittsburgh, two years ago a murderous piece of shit named "Delvin Dobbins" was arrested for burglary.  Because Dobbins was a juvenile, the "woke" judge refused to put him in prison.  But because the city's only Juvenile Detention Center had closed, the judge simply released this piece of shit--no bail demanded, no punishment.

Having learned that the system would let him get away with anything he did, two months later Dobbins was charged with shooting a convenience-store clerk in the chest.

Say, that worked well, eh?  But now that the shitty wokie System knew Dobbins was a monster, it wouldn't make the same mistake twice, right?

Hahahaha!  Just kidding!  Of course it would.  So on September 4th of this year, after Dobbins was charged with criminal trespass, breaking into the home of foster parents who had a protective order against him, Judge Olasz immediately released Dobbins on what the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media calls "non-monetary bail."  Translation: released without requiring even a dollar of bail.  

Smirking over the system's lenient stupidity, Dobbins promptly went out and stabbed two people a week apart.

You are paying judges to release repeatedly violent thugs.  Is it any wonder that this shit keeps happening, again and again?

We don't have to live like this.

Oh wait: in Democrat-ruled shitholes we DO have to, because Democrats run everything.

You'd think honest, law-abiding people would learn.  But of course they don't.  One reason is that the Mainstream Media never tells 'em about all the violent crimes committed by the same thugs, followed by no-bond-needed immediate releases after stabbing and shooting people.

Note to Dems: as much as you wanna believe everyone can be rehabilitated, it's not true.  Thugs need to be taken out of society for 20 or 30 years.  Of course wokie judges refuse to do that.  So here we are again.

For the hundredth time:  In nature, what happens to animals who are either too stupid to learn, or refuse to learn? 

Source.

https://modernity.news/2026/10/09/feral-youth-leaves-mans-intestines-hanging-out-judge-lets-him-walk-the-same-day/ 
 

Somali gang shootings in Minnesotastan. Predictably, Somalis and Democrats blame...guns!

Democrats brazenly lie about obvious reality--so much so that I truly doubt we can survive.  Latest example:

After several days of shootings by Somali gangs in Minneapolis suburbs, the town of Eden Prairie held a community meeting.  And guess who packed it?

Somalis.  Somali leader Asad Aliweyd said “This is not simply a Somali problem.  It’s a youth violence and gun violence problem.”

Aliweyd is the head of a nonprofit that was ordered to repay $1.1 million to the state for “fraudulent claims.”  He hasn't been charged with any crime.  The nonprofit just claimed entitlement to $1.1 million by accident.

No problem in a state that has Muslim corruptocrat Keith Ellison as attorney-general.

Aliweyd is described as a father of eight.  Somalis, like all invaders, have large families, so even if we were able to stop all immigration, in three generations they'll be the majority.

Aliweyd was just the start:  Consider Somali teacher Fardousa Yossuf, who said she couldn't believe children raised in the Muslim faith could shoot up suburban neighborhoods.

“Our children go to the Madrasa, which teaches Islamic values.  It's not possible that they would get guns,” she said.

Ahh, "Islam is the Religion of Peace™," eh?

Horseshit.  The entire history of Islam is one of war and conquest of one nation after another.  And conquest of much of the Christian world continues, thru 9/11/2001 to 10/7/2023 to right now on the streets of Mogadishu-west...aka Minneapolis.

Democrats: "NOOooo, deez shootings gots nuffin' to doo wif ouah scholarly Somali yutes!  Duh problem is gunz!  So duh solution iz to ban gunz!"

If you weren't convinced by that excuse, Somali teacher Yossuf offered another explanation for why some Somali youth are turning to gangs and guns: Their parents are working too hard to pay enough attention to them. 

"Working too hard," y'say.

But back to guns.  A leader of "Somali Youth Link" parrots “This is not a Somali community [issue]. This is a gun violence issue.”

The Democrat mayor of the Minneapolis suburb of St. Louis Park, Nadia Mohamed, confirmed that the solution to continued shooting by supposedly unknown yutes is to ban guns.

Of course guns no more cause shootings than cars cause carjacking, or jet airliners caused 9/11.  Instead the problem is lawless, thuggish Somali "youth" warring for loot and turf.  It's the Somali way of life in their lawless shithole country.

But of course Democrats foolishly believed thugs from a lawless shithole would quickly discard their lawless tribal way of life and become model Americans.  And of course Dems will never admit the real cause, since that might get lots of voters thinking "Why do we let these lawless, uneducated thugs into the U.S. in the first place?  Ohh, that's right...Democrat policies."  

Thomas Sowell nailed it

 

France's "student riots" are being pushed by communists, unions and a global propaganda network

A well-known principle of all revolutionaries is to make the rebelling group seem huge, making its victory seem inevitable.

Thus it is in France: the Media say the riots that have been going on for the past ten days are "students," because that's what the real organizers want everyone to believe.  Certainly students *are* rioting, but the real muscle, signage and organizing  is being provided by about 50 known, identifiable communist, union and Muslim front groups.

It's not at all secret: the real organizers are all carrying huge, professionally-made 30-foot-wide banners saying who they are.  But to the surprise of no one with a functioning brain, the U.S. Mainstream Media refuses to report ANY of that.

You may well wonder why, eh?

Answer: the Media doesn't want Americans to know, because the same groups pushing the French riots are also backing the Democrat Partei here, so if voters knew the truth about the riots in France, many would realize electing Democrats here was a really bad move.

The most visible backer is called "Breakthrough News"--a pro-communist propaganda outlet based in New York City, funded by an American-born, Shanghai-based communist tech tycoon, Neville Roy Singham, who's financed a network of communist and far-left groups in the U.S. that have pushed similar riots here for almost a decade. 

Photos and conversations with rioters have identified 50 organizations in the so-called "student protest movement."  Only 15 are student or youth groups, and those include several communist front groups and a Muslim student association.  So less than a third of the protesters are actually students.

The other 35 groups include eight communist or socialist organizations, a dozen labor unions, five so-called civil-rights groups, like pro-Palestinian resistance, and groups pushing environmental activism and "economic justice" (always a front for communist organizations).

Because Paris is about 30% Muslim there are thousands of pro-Palestinians among the demonstrators.  Schools in France have nothing to do with Gaza, but the Paleswinians never miss a chance to throw rocks at cops, smash windows and burn anything within reach.  The rioters provide excellent cover for all that.

Also, riots by communists, Muslims and labor unions (communists) don't draw much sympathy, but casting the rioters as "students" draws international sympathy for duh po' "students," which makes the government reluctant to do many things that would restore order.  Can't hurt dem po' "students," eh?  

 

Clicking on the pic above should enlarge it.  Look at all the communist flags in it.  The middle banner says "Against the imperialist wars," and "Class warfare!"  The bottom line says the banner is from the Young Communists.

The banner on the left--also from the Young Communists--says "Long live the youth revolution" and "This is the reason we revolt."  You will never see this pic on NBC, ABC, CBS or any other pro-leftist U.S. Media--because this is what the "Democrat Socialists of America" support.  

OOooohh, can't let voters know THAT, eh?  Might cost the Democrats a million votes!

 

U.S. Media: "NOooo, deez 'demonstrations' [riots] iz ALL jus' po' students upset cuz dey don' haz air conditioning in dere skools!  Ain't no communists or Palestinians!  All jus' po' young students desperate fo' mo' teachers so dey kin become doctors an' engineers!  Yep yep yep!"

Utter horseshit.   All this is right outta the communist playbook: when any group has a grievance, the communists support that group with bodies and banners, for two reasons: First that wins 'em allies and future supporters; and second, it makes the "revolutionaries" look far more powerful, increasing the likelihood that the government will cave to their demands. 

When governments cave, the communists win, because every citizen sees the government as weak, making the next win easier. 

If you don't believe it works, consider that less than 25 years after the most deadly attack on the U.S. ever (9/11), communists and Muslims were able to elect a Muslim communist as mayor of New York City.  (For young Americans NYC was where both the 110-story Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were destroyed by Muslims who flew hijacked passenger jets into both.)

In another 25 years no American under 25 will know that.

You don't believe that either.

In nature, what happens to animals who are either too stupid to learn, or simply refuse to, eh?

Democrat voter: "Dat is outrageous!  I iz reeeel smaht!  I learn!  So I learned dat 'Dieversity iz ouah strength!'  An' helping kids 'transition' makes 'em happier!  An' dat Donald Trump is tryin' to be a Kang!  While Barack Obama ("I have a pen and a phone") wuz duh bestest prezzy EVAH!  Duh Media all agree on dat, so mus' be true, right?  RIGHT?  Cuz duh Media NEVAH lie!"

In nature, what happens to...  Eh, nevermind.

Interest rates on French bonds 5%, CRISIS! Interest on U.S. T-bills? "No problem, citizen!"

With the Muslim/communist-backed riots in France continuing, articles are noting that France hasn't been able to pass a budget in two years, so things like schools are using the same appropriations as two years ago.  In the U.S. we call that a "continuing resolution," and it's how the corrupt, shitty, unresponsive congress has operated in many years since Obozo was crowned. 

So the French govt is just merrily borrowing money--money it is unable to re-pay.  And the markets are noticing:  Last week lenders demanded interest rates of "up to" 5% buy ten-year bonds issued by the French government.  And financial writers were wailing about this great crisis.

Ahhh, a "crisis," y'say?  So what does it mean that today the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds closed at 5.247%?  And that earlier in the week it reached a 24-year-high of 5.35%?

  • Daily range today: 5.223% to 5.283%
  • 52-week range: 3.923% to 5.368%

People who aren't good with math see the increase just in the interest rate in the last year has jumped barely 1.4%.  Yes, but the new rate is 36 percent higher than a year ago, meaning that if this holds, interest payments would eventually soar from a TRILLION a year to 1.3 Trillion.

"Dere's nuffin' to worry about, deplorable!  Oh sure, yew may have heard dat dis iz some kind of warning sign, but dat jus' silly conspiracy talk, citizen!  We in duh congress gots everyt'ing under control!  Reeeeally!  Cuz we iz reeeel smaht! 

"I mean, look at our leaders!  Who can possibly question the intelligence of leaders like AOC, Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and others.  Your Partei is in great hands!" 

And of course stupid Americans believe that shit.  So when French govt bonds top 5% it's a crisis, but when U.S. govt bonds top 5.2% it's "Everyt'ing's totally fine, citizen!  No worries!

Starting to understand it yet? 

Buildings are physical manifestations of ideas. So what's this idea?

Communists have an explicit command about the design/architecture of government buildings:  the rulers ordered that all such buildings be as ugly and dehumanizing as possible.

You may find that hard to believe, since you'd think rational rulers would want their buildings to be warm and welcoming, so people would think the dictators were friendly, but the communists went the opposite way: they wanted all the "proletariat" (the commie term for regular citizens--far colder than "comrade," eh?) to regard the state as all-powerful and cold, so no one would even consider trying to resist its orders.

With that in mind, consider the building in the pic below.  Does it strike you as warm, welcoming, inviting, or as "the Death Star" (as many have called it)?  Yes, it's not technically a government building, but its designers were hand-picked by the Democrat emperor former prezzy himself.  The architects (designers) knew every detail had to be personally approved by the emperor--the man who famously declared that he didn't need congress to ram through orders because "I have a pen and a phone!"

Cool, eh?  Like, totally American, jus' like duh Founders intended, right? 

 

Now: Buildings aren't just structures.  They're really the physical manifestation of ideas.  Seriously.  Some of you may not see that right away, but if you sleep on it you'll understand.

Every detail of a building originated as an idea in the mind of the designer/architect, eh?  And the ugly, intimidating monstrosity in the pic above was designed by people wanting to please the emperor--and the governing commands of the Democrat Partei [sic].

So how are those policies working out for the entity that runs the Obozo prezidential center?  (That would be the "Obama Foundation.")

According to a UK publication employees are leaving in droves, and the rest are unionizing after they didn't get raises and bonuses they felt entitled to, due to the faaaabulous success of the thing, and the massive crowds of visitor it was attracting every day since in opened in June.

Workers say they were told that their healthcare costs would increase, promotions were suspended and paid time off was reduced.  AND that they wouldn't be getting raises this winter.

Whu...whu...dat beez totally unacceptable, comrade!  We iz duh pipo who akshully run dis place, so yew mus' gibs us whut we demand!  Cuz we iz at duh top of duh power pyramid!  Wif'out us dis place wudn't be able to educate duh thousands of pipo who come here every day to see the mighty works of ouah first Black prezzy!

SO...can you predict the future?  Sure ya can, citizen!  Obozo was SO powerful as prezzy, and for the first few years after he left office, that corporations would give his foundation cash if they wanted him to lean on Chuckie Schumer and bribem to get laws passed, or get huge government contracts or grants.  But now, a decade after he left, and after the Dems lost the White House, that influence is almost gone.  In another few years no one will give him or his Foundation a damn dime.

Then what do ya think will happen?

Who will pay the salaries of the army of leftist drones who staff the place?  And who will pay to maintain it?

Of course you already guessed: The Democrat partei.  Meaning taxpayers.  You.  Cuz a Democrat-ruled congress and a Dem prezzy will quickly pass a LAW appropriating, say, $50 million a year to run the place.  The noble stated purpose will be "Even though dis iz a private foundation, American citizens cain't allow dis faaaabulous monument to ouah first Black prezzy to suffer from a mysterious lack of funds!"

And the salary of the top lackey will be $400K per year.  His or her deputy lackeys--like the head of HR--will be paid $250K per year.  With retirement, paid health insurance, luxury car, a month of paid vacay every year.  Entry-level greeters will be taking home $120K.

Count on it.  Just as Gavin Newsom's "high-speed train to nowhere" got $20 BILLION of your parents' tax dollars.  For total corruption. 

 

Fuck you, Obozo--you communist son of a bitch.

 

Hamas disappointed that American Leftists don't believe they really killed 1,200 Jews on Oct 7