Platform of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)

One of the beauties of both written material and video is that the org or person who created it has a hard time disavowing it.

Thus you'll get a kick out of the current "program" posted by a bunch of drug-addled communist morons calling themselves the Democratic Socialists of America.  Some of their claims/positions/policies:

First they propose to eliminate the U.S. senate, and citizens voting to elect presidents.  Instead presidents would be chosen by...wait for it...congress.  Which the DSA plans to control.

Supreme Court judges would also be chosen by congress instead of being nominated by the president and sent to the senate for confirmation.  (Cuz no more senate.)  Other platform points:
  *an immediate end to all deportations,
  *amnesty for all illegal aliens
  *defunding the Department of War.
  *allowing non-U.S.-citizens to vote for members of congress.
  *32-hour work week with no reduction in either pay or benefits;
  *Medicare for all, regardless of age;
  *canceling all student loan debt (apparently tax dollars pay it)
  *nationwide rent control (rent freeze)

This is so extreme that you think it can't be real.  In that case go to program.dsausa.org.

Here's part of it: 

Imagine taking a day off from work in a future without capitalism.

[Without capitalism] you now enjoy your work; it’s interesting to you, and you’re well trained for it. You work as much as you are able and no more than needed, and you would control your own labor and see it going to good use. It’s not just a job to pay the bills.

Speaking of bills: you don’t really have them anymore. You have no debt. You don’t need health insurance. You don’t pay a mortgage or have a landlord, because comfortable housing is a human right.

Note the clear message: "You will have free healthcare and free housing."  Wow, what a hook for gullible Americans, eh? 

Your retirement is publicly funded. Food, education, energy, medicine, and transportation aren’t for-profit businesses; they are common goods and utilities.

OK, enough about bills.  What do you do on your day off?  [List of pleasurable things to do.] 

These are all familiar everyday activities. But what if you were free to spend your time as you liked without worrying about cost, or dreading going back to work?  What if you didn’t have to think about paying rent or loans at the end of the month, or saving for college, or affording groceries?

This totally seductive tale goes on for dozens of pages, all cutely illustrated with child-like drawings (how appropriate).  Below: what an ideal life looks like for communists.

 

Short answer: under the DSA plan "the gummint" gives you everything you ever wanted, for free.  Yes, you have a job, but suddenly it's "interesting" and you enjoy it!  Magic!  College?  Free to everyone, of course.  

Of course like everything else, college wouldn't really be free: someone has to pay the massive salaries of the endless army of $350,000-a-year adminishits and $150k-a-year professors, and the massive utility bills (gotta keep those campuses totally lit at night, eh?).  The numbers don't work.  Not even close.  And of course no one in the DSA even tried to make the numbers work, cuz neither DSA rulers nor their supporters (and potential voters) can do maff!  Which is why stupid, gullible Americans eat this shit up: they believe everything can be paid for by gummint.

What no one ever tries to explain is:  How will duh gummint get all the money needed to give every citizen all this faaabulous "free" stuff, eh? 

But the beauty of communism is that no one is ever called to answer that question-- because communism is built on the faaaaabulous maxim "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

You may have heard that line before.  It was popularized by Karl Marx, and it sounds SO reasonable, eh? 

The entire DSA platform--as quoted above--is such a tissue of outrageous lies as to be  unbelievable.  Except they really posted it.  Click on the link above to see for yourself.

25 years later, Americans have learned nothing

Five weeks ago the 25th anniversary of the deadliest terror attack on U.S. soil passed with barely a flicker of notice from the media.  There's a reason--and you won't like it.

Just over 25 years ago, 19 ghastly, fanatical rat-bastards armed with box-cutters hijacked four jet airliners loaded with passengers.  They flew two into the tallest skyscrapers in New York--the 110-story twin towers of the World Trade Center.  

They flew a third into the Pentagon.  Passengers on the hijacked fourth airliner learned of the first crashes by phone from the plane, so they realized they had nothing to lose by trying to re-take control.  They rushed the cockpit, but the hijacker at the controls pushed the plane into a vertical dive and it crashed in less than a minute.

Immediately, the pro-Democrat "Co-exist" crowd that infests the State Department--regardless of which party has the White House--went into damage-control mode: they should have stopped ALL Muslim migration for at least a decade while the government laboriously sorted out what failures allowed 19 Muzz to board the planes with box-cutters.

But of course the State Department would never permit that, and G.W. Bush didn't have the balls to order it.  So instead the U.S. government did...nothing useful.

Later we'd learn that the FBI had gotten reports of 19 Muslims showing up at flight schools wanting to learn to *fly* commercial jets--but oddly, didn't wanna learn how to *land 'em.*

Yeah, that should have been a clue.  But just like so many other novel attacks, no one in a position of power ever imagined...you get it.  And low-level agents who tried to alert their supervisors got nowhere.  Cuz, "Don't be silly, Stevens.  That would never happen."

So the first response by America’s politicians to the attack of Sept. 11, 2001, was to avoid blaming Muslims for killing 2,977 Americans.  Muslims instantly picked up on that clear sign of weakness, and coined the term "Islamophobia" to pummel Americans who justifiably hated Muslims for the attack.

Later, Democrat regimes under emperor Obozo and bribem would throw open our borders to allow anyone from anywhere to waltz into the U.S. and get flown to the U.S. city of their choice.

For those who haven't realized it yet: Islam commands followers to establish a world-wide "caliphate," meaning Muzz would rule every nation.  So the goal of "true believers" is to overthrow not just the U.S. government, but all western nations.

This should be clear.  But liberals are blinded by their suicidal empathy, their desperate desire to signal their moral superiority.  And they’ve created a growing headache:

The mayor and every member of the city council of Hamtramck, Michigan, are Muslim.  Seventy percent of the residents are Muslim.  They renamed one of city’s main streets "Palestine Avenue," as have other cities where Muslims have acquired political power.  The former police chief--Muslim Jamiel Altaheri--told his officers that domestic violence should be “handled through mosques following the tenets of Sharia law.  He added that under Sharia law, wife-beating is not a crime.

Suicidal empathy by Democrats has produced Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, Democrat candidate for the U.S. senate--again from Michigan.

Hasan Piker is a wealthy terrorist sympathizer who's said “America deserved 9/11.”  He's one of El-Sayed's most prominent supporters.

Piker has also said “We’re gonna keep bringing immigrants into this country so they can f*** your sister and maybe your daughter. We’re going to destroy the white race.”

Fifteen miles from Hamtramck is Dearborn, Michigan, whose Democratic mayor “has called for the annihilation of Israel.

Then there’s Paterson, New Jersey, which holds an annual Palestinian-flag-raising ceremony.  The majority-Muslim city council voted to change existing noise lawss to allow the city’s dozen mosques to blast out the Islamic call to prayer five times a day — starting before dawn.

Islamists also forced  few U.S. airports to install foot-washing stations for them.  

Islamists have no interest in supporting American values.  They hate the values that have produced free western societies, and believe Americans who support those values must either convert to Islam or submit to Islamic law and rules.

It seems clear that the Democrat and Democrat-Socialist parties totally support the Muslim takeover of the U.S, one town at a time.  Democrat-appointed judges clearly do.

When the Muslim hijackers attacked both our largest city, destroying both 110-story towers of the World Trade Center, then flew a passenger jet into the Pentagon in our capital city, that was clearly an act of war.  Had we responded with a small nuclear weapon on Mecca--demonstrating our determination--there would be no more Muslim attacks.  But of course wokeness prevailed...

America’s Democrats and progressives wail that Muslims are oppressed and the West are the oppressors, so Dems are determined to show how tolerant, understanding and noble they are.  But in truth, they're what Stalin called "useful idiots." 

Source 1.

Source 2. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/09/10/25-years-after-9-11-america-dotes-on-its-enemies/

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/mohamed-atta-25-years-911 

Democrat senator: "We must relentlessly prosecute Trump staffers, to make young people too scared to apply for jobs with conservatives"

Democrat senator Elissa Slotkin publicly said Democrats must "go after" and prosecute Trump's staffers, in order to make young conservatives thinking about working for the Trump administration too scared to apply.

At an "event" last week at the leftist U of Chicago, Slotkin--who voted twice to impeach Trump--said this (actual quote):

I want young people coming out of school to say, 'Should I go work for the Trump administration? That sounds fun, I might get an opportunity.'  I want them to [think] 'That might be buying myself a ton of problems I don't want, and so let me avoid participating in that.'" 
    "I want that deterrence message sent."

"The people around Donald Trump who are doing his bidding...have no immunity.  And he couldn't do any of this stuff without all of those people saluting and supporting it. So you go after the people who do his bidding."

Slotkin was elected to the senate just two years ago, in 2024, and claimed to be a "moderate."  But within weeks she began to show her true colors.  And last week she told students at the University of Chicago how Democrats plan to use their power if they win control of the senate in the midterms in 15 days.

Slotkin claims she's "defending democracy." But the socialist left who control today's Democratic Party actually work by getting corrupt government officials to prosecute conservatives.  In a chilling speech in September Slotkin said she'd target Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, U.S. Attorney for DC Jeanine Pirro and then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for prosecutions "that would see them jailed for 20 years."

Slotkin: "We need to hold accountable the people and institutions who stole billions of our taxpayer dollars and weaponized the government against its people."

This is a particularly brazen lie, since the massive fraud is due to foreigners scamming Medicare, Medicaid and various home-healthcare programs for billions of dollars.  And the masters of "weaponizing the government" were Obozo and bribem, which had their lackeys decree that conservative moms who spoke at school-board meetings against schools that allowed boys to use girls' locker rooms were "terrorists." 

If Slotkin hadn't been caught on video saying all this, no one would believe she said any of it.  It's too on-point with how the communists do things: prosecute your opponents and then claim THEY did what your party just did.  Insane.

With Slotkin's remarks in mind, consider what the ghastly, hideous communist snake Susan Rice (Obozo's director of national security) said Democrats would do if they regained power:

In February Rice promised that Democrats will punish people, companies and institutions who have cooperated with Trump's policies:

"It's not going to end well for them.  If these corporations think that the Democrats, when they come back in power, are going to play by the old rules, they've got another think coming.
  "There will be an accountability agenda.  This is not going to be an instance of forgive and forget."

How many more examples does it take to convince Americans?  

Mark this answer well:  "There is no power on Earth that will make Democrat voters see the truth.  Literally.  If a high-quality video surfaced of Obozo or bribem or Susan Rice or Slotkin or Pelosi or Schumer or Hakeem or Hilliary cackling with glee about Dem plans to steal the election and jail all members of the Trump administration, not a single Dem would believe it.  They'd all claim it was "AI."

If a laptop provably belonging to one of the socialists above were to be found, describing Democrat bribery in explicit detail, Dem voters would claim it was "Russian disinformation" and thus must be ignored--which is exactly what Dems did with the damning information on Hunty bribem's laptop. 

So since the Democrat-fellating Media have turned so many Americans into mindless gimmee-crats, and Dems now outnumber conservatives by about one percent, in 15 days the Dems are likely to win control of at least one chamber of congress.  (At the moment, experts claim Dems will win 220 to 215.)

So what does that do?  It means not a single conservative bill can be passed in Trump's last two years--which has been the case in the senate because of the filibuster, even though Repubs have had a nominal majority there.  The filibuster allows the minority party to block any bill they don't like with just 41 votes.

Because of the corrupt, pro-Dem Media constantly pushing socialism, "die-versity," "equity" and all the other leftist bleating-points, it was inevitable that a majority of voters would become Democrats.  The Media succeeded by a) demonizing conservatives (Orange Hitler, wannabee Kang, etc); b) dangling the promise of "everything for free" to stupid voters; and c) supporting communist-ruled school boards that refused to teach the real results of socialism and "command economies" (dictatorial rule).  

So when young Americans were told, year after year after year, "Yew kin haz free shit, cuz we faaabulous socialists gon' take 95% of the income of duh rich capitalist exploiters!" it made perfect sense to 'em.  Totally plausible.  They'd never been taught real history, so were absolutely defenseless against socialist/Democrat/communist/"progressive" lies.

DSA will drag the Democrat party farther left. Dems: "We don't see a problem"

If you pay attention to events outside your immediate reach (spoiler: most of you don't, either because you're too busy or don't care), you may have heard that the Democrat Socialists of America recently won four Democrat primaries for House seats: 3 in the corrupt socialist wasteland of NYC, and the 4th in...Colorado?  Yes.  Interesting.

Clueless Americans: a) "I nevah heard dat, so mus' be fake newz!  b) "Okay, so the four won their primaries, but dat don' mean dey will win the seat in November!  c) "Even if dey do win, it's only four seats out of 435 or so, so nuthin' to be worried about, deplorable!" 

Ah.  Nice deflection, communist assholes.

Before this week the nastiest communist/DSA member to win was Darializa Avila Chevalier.  On her social media she actually bragged about being a Communist and praised mass murderer Joseph Stalin.  She actually wrote that her goal was "the total eradication of western civilization."

"The total eradication of western civilization," eh?  Try compromising with THAT goal, folks.

Because Chevalier's running in a shithole district in New York City, her election is assured.  So now she’ll be paid $178,000 a year, plus healthcare and generous lifetime pension to fuck up not only your life but the lives of your children and grandchildren.

But now even the communist Chevalier has been eclipsed by an Ethiopian immigrant named Mehlat Kiros, living in Colorado.  Melat has a law degree but was fired by her former law firm and has been working as a barista.  In her primary she defeated a female Democrat who'd been in congress for 29 years, meaning the district is solidly Democrat, meaning the Ethiopian is almost certain to win that House seat in November.

Republican analysts desperate to find a silver lining say this is bad for the Democrat Partei--that the DSA is pushing the Democrat Partei to be more radical, which (the analysts claim) will lose lots of votes in flyover country.  These so-called "expert analysts" claim the DSA isn’t really popular with most Democrat voters. 

Really?  In that case how did they win their primaries, eh?

Problem is, with such a narrow margin for the House majority, four DSA candidates will have far more influence than you think.  You don't believe that, so let me explain: When the Democrats win the House, even four America-hating communists will be able to force the Democrat party far more to the Left than they already are.  You don't realize this because you've never seen how tiny parties can use their leverage when the margin between D and R is tiny.

My American parents lived in London for 15 years.  Because the balance between Labour (socialists) and Tory in Parliament was usually very thin, the Greens and Muzz had a disproportionately large say in what became law there, since if those two groups didn't like a Labour bill, they could block it from passing.

In other words, no law pushed by the socialists could pass unless the Greens and Muzz supported it.  That may sound harmless, but what it ensured was that if the Labour government wanted to get anything passed, it was forced to include pro-green and pro-Muzz provisions in EVERY law.

Starting to see how it works yet?

So for example, among the hundreds of policies demanded by those two groups in the UK was that everyone who made it to the UK by sea would be welcomed in and given free homes, free food, free medical care and free cash.

Sound familiar?

A couple of years later the socialist government made that policy even worse for Brits: under the new policy "immigrants" didn't even have to make it to shore!  Instead UK coast patrols that intercepted invader boats would transfer the invaders to the UK vessel and take 'em ashore and begin giving 'em everything.

And the Left proudly chanted, in unison, "Dis iz whut democracy looks like!"

The grooming gangs started soon after.

So if you think the Democrats have been too far Left for the past 20 years, imagine how much worse their proposed laws will be after they're required to add all DSA demands to every bill, eh?

You still don't get it, because you haven't seen it in action.  I have, in London.  And you will.  It's absolutely certain.

Everything wrong with this country--all the pain, suffering, misery, dislocation, all the waste of blood, treasure and human potential--is directly the fault of, or has been exacerbated by, the compulsion of the Democrat/Left to seize power.

Young Americans were starting to wake up to the clear realities of communism, and polls showed 'em trending conservative.  But then three things happened that hugely inspired young, inexperienced Americans to stay Leftist: First was the attempted assassination at Butler, PA.  Literally missed killing candidate Trump by half an inch.  And deranged young people thought Wow, if I did that and succeeded, I'd be famous!

Second was the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a pencil-neck geek with a tranny boyfriend.  Same leftist response.

Finally the assassination of health-care CEO Brian Thompson--on camera--by the utterly reptilian Luigi Mangione.  Another instant shot of testosterone to leftists.

Young U.S. leftists suddenly began to realize anything was possible. Purple-haired, pencil-neck revolutionaries and their feminist counterparts suddenly saw a path to endless power--not by assassinating opponents (exciting but too risky, comrade!) but simply by voting for the party that promised to pass laws ORDERING taxpayers to give 'em whatever they demanded.

Before, that was the Democrat Partei.  But now the small but well-organized DSA popped up and was offering leftist voters way mo' free shit than the Democrat Partei had.  So to young Americans the question of who to vote for was (and is) a no-brainer.

Let me explain:  young leftists wail "I'll nevah be able to afford a home!!"

Of course in flyover country you can buy a starter home for $150,000.  By contrast, the same home anywhere in the Bay Area of Cali, or in northern Virginia, is ten times more.  So you CAN afford a home, just not in SF or LA or NY or DC.

Young leftist: "But I don't WANNA live in flyover country!  It's so BORING!  I wanna live in a hip, diverse, culturally-enriched city like NY or San Fran or LA or DC!  An' yew cain't make me do whut I don' wanna do!  So I'll vote for the party that promises to give me the cash I need for a down-payment, and a low-interest government loan to buy any house I want!  An' if I miss payments, a new DSA-sponsored law will make those payments for me, just like bribem promised to pay off my student loans that got me my faaabulous degree in Diversity Studies at Hahvahd!"

You think any of the above is absurd?  Un-possible?  Well how many Americans thought bribem and the Dems would DEMAND that federal tax dollars be used to pay off student loans for useless majors ("womens' studies")?  No one thought that was possible.  And yet they tried it.

How many of you predicted the Democrat Partei would block a bill requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register and photo-ID to vote?  Seemed impossible, eh?  And yet the Democrats did it.  And the mainstream media barely mentioned it.

How many of you thought leftist judges would block Trump from deporting illegal aliens who murdered U.S. citizens?  Or that Dem rioters would physically block ICE agents from arresting illegal invaders? 

Point is that as unbelievably destructive as the Dems have been in the last 12 years, now if the DSA wins just four seats in the House, as expected, then unless the Democrat Partei wins control of the House by more than four seats, the Democrat Partei will have to have the support of the DSA to pass their bills, which means they'll have to support DSA demands.  So things are about to get exponentially worse.

So let's review:
 * Will "hip" leftists ever wanna live in flyover states?  Not a chance.
 * Will home prices in the "hip, exciting, culturally-enriched" Dem-ruled cities ever drop?  Not a chance.
 * Do virtually all leftists want free shit?  Yes, obviously.
 * Will leftists vote for the party that promises to give 'em more of what they want?  Yes, certainly.
 * Which party is that today?  The DSA.
 * Does anyone believe Dem voters WON'T vote Dem if the Democrat candidate is a DSA communist?

If you're still not convinced that a tiny number of committed leftists can drag the Democrat party to do amazingly stupid, destructive shit, consider this:
   In 2024, after the Dems had already nominated bribem as their candidate, Democrat leaders--led by the ghastly Nancy Pelosi--made the decision that many Dem voters had already reached: that Joe was mentally incompetent.  This meant maybe 30,000 voters in each state were likely to stay home rather than vote for him.
   So Pelosi pressured bribem to relinquish the nomination and let delegates to the party's national convention select another nominee.  But the head of the congressional black caucus pitched a fit, telling Pelosi that if Harris wasn't the nominee, black voters would stay home.  Pelosi knew that was highly unlikely, but the head of the CBC was adamant.
   So Pelosi caved to the demand of a relatively tiny number of extremists who said "You must agree to our demands or we won't support the party."

Starting to see how it works yet?      

Rioters in France burn 140-year-old city hall in a small city far from Paris

If you're like most American voters--which is to say, you get all your "newz" from the lying mainstream media--you may have heard about some...um..."student demonstrations" in Paris.

Tell us: what do you think is true about those..."student demonstrations," eh?

If you're like most American voters, you may have heard something about schools in Paris, but that's all...cuz all duh Media has said about 'em is that they're...wait for it..."student demonstrations," apparently triggered by students wanting more teachers, or air conditioning, or better Internet, eh?

No.  Virtually every U.S. television network has a Paris bureau, so they'd go out on the street they'd instantly know who's behind these...wait for it..."student demonstrations."  Turns out that out of 50 organizations carrying their professionally-made 40-foot-wide banners in the streets, THREE are real student groups.

The other 47 orgs--the actual army of thugs burning cars, looting high-dollar stores, burning buildings--are communists, Muslims and "trade unions" (fronts for communists).  They couldn't care less about students' complaints but are eager to use the cover of "student protests"--The Narrative--to burn and steal everything they can burn or steal.

Example: Limoges is a small city over 200 miles from Paris.  Population 200,000.  Its schools have virtually nothing to do with those in Paris.  The city hall in Limoges was 143 years old and had survived both world wars.  
   Last night rioters set fire to it, essentially destroying it.
   When the building's clock tower fell, the leftist rioters cheered.
   The rioters weren't students from Paris, but communists and Muslims, eager to use the "student demonstrations"--in distant Paris--as a cover to burn, loot and destroy.

If you think this is an accident, or coincidence, you're too dumb to breathe without help. 

In classic pussy fashion, French President Emmanuel Macron both refused to take any strong action against the arsonists and looters, and ALSO refused to take any accountability for the massive orgy of arson and looting that's spreading like crazy.  Instead the weak prezzy carefully avoided naming the real problem: mass migration.

Like most EU nations, France opened its borders to anyone who could reach the country.  As a result, the country is overrun with Muslims and communists, who are salivating to take over the place.

Yesterday Macron addressed the country for the first time since the youth revolt began nearly a month ago.  As you could have predicted, after the most destructive riots in recent memory, resulting in historic buildings being torched, thousands of shops being looted, and hundreds of police officers, gendarmes, and firefighters being injured, Macron completely ignored the role of millions of foreigners his party allowed into the country.

Instead Macron asked, "How can French people do this to France?  Why burn down the town hall in Limoges, the tourist office in Lyon, storm the town hall in Marseille, or attack the prefect's residence in Bordeaux?  Nothing justifies it, nothing explains it, nothing excuses it. We all feel anger and shame tonight. Seeing the streets of our cities so ransacked is unbearable."

Macron is a woke liberal socialist, so naturally he tries to blame anything BUT the real problem: commies, Muslims, and a "woke," weak government that will never admit that unlimited immigration was a total disaster.

If you're not a marine engineer you may not know that ships loaded with too much weight on upper decks can suddenly roll over, even in calm seas.  They go from upright to inverted ("stable-2") in a few seconds.

Societies work the same way: when the revolutionaries (commies and Muzz) reach a certain strength, the cops and army suddenly switch sides, and the revolutionaries take over the government essentially overnight.

History repeatedly shows this is a deadly way to change governments:  the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia, the Russian revolution, Mao's takeover of China and on down to tiny islands taken over by communists: they execute their opponents.

But of course the revolutionaries couldn't care less, because 1) they know they're not the ones in danger of being executed; and 2) they're convinced that any change through voting would be far too slow and ineffective. 

Democrat voter: "Dat France.  Not my problem!  Why should I keer 'bout stuff over dere, eh?  Dat cud nevah happen here."

Here's what you don't understand--and won't until too late:  What's happening in France is a glimpse of our likely future in the U.S.  Reason is that once enough people fall for the commie lie that you'll get everything you need from "the government," for free, and no one will have any more than you, every dumb or lazy resident embraces that lie--and supports the revolution.

Thus we're seeing the ranks of the "Democratic Socialists of America" (DSA) starting to swell as more young Americans (and illegal immigrants) see a pathway to a life of ease, courtesy of "free stuff" from the government.

Problem, of course, is that virtually everything has to be produced by someone.  If no one has to work hard, how do socialists think all the goods and services demanded by people--and promised by the revolutionaries--will be produced?

The communists who ruled the former USSR found a solution: they did it by rationing.  Five-year waiting lists to buy a washing machine.  Ten-year wait-lists to buy a car.  Market shelves were often bare.  You don't see that today only because after the Central Committee of the USSR dissolved that "union" in December of 1991, the new government (still communist) quietly stopped enforcing most of the economic diktats of the State, and let free markets take a much larger role.  
   Of course they couldn't actually SAY that, cuz that would be a major loss of face for communism, eh?  But that's what happened. 

So back to France: the commies and Muzz are using the so-called "student demonstrations" to get thugs into the streets to loot and burn, really to intimidate the government and get it to roll over for 'em.  They may not succeed this time, but each effort wins more dumb, lazy and/or angry people to the cause.  It also ruins any chance young revolutionaries had to advance to a well-paid job, because why bother studying hard and working hard if you believe a life of ease awaits, eh?  All you have to do is...steal what you like, burn what you want, just support the revolution, eh? 

Source.   

https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/students-tear-gassed-hit-batons-124656203.html 

Demon with a long criminal record repeatedly stabs a 2-year-old in the face

In the Democrat-ruled shithole of Rhode Island (run by Democrats for 50 years) a thug walked up to a 2-year-old in a stroller sitting with her mother at a school bus stop and stabbed the toddler multiple times in her face.

If you didn't quite comprehend that (since it's so seemingly impossible), read it again.  It really happened.  This is life in Democrat shitholes today.  All of 'em.

The mother was waiting for her other children to arrive on a school bus when a demon named Nelson Blanco, 46, approached them.  Immediately sensing the danger, the mother moved across the street, but Blanco followed and then attacked her daughter in the stroller.

The girl remains in critical condition.

As usual with demons, this one had a long criminal history: In September 2003 the demon was charged with stabbing two seven-year-old boys.  Of course he wasn't punished, cuz...wokiez.

More arrests followed, but every time, Democrat rulers would RULE that he was "incompetent," so could not stand trial.  So in a rational society, judge would order the demon confined to a mental hospital for life.  But instead, "woke" leftist judges kept releasing the demon back onto your street.

Prior to the stabbing attack on the 2-year-old girl, a wokie doctor had absolutely assured a woke judge that the demon was “not likely to imperil the peace and safety of the community or himself at this time.”

There's no record of the prosecution presenting an expert to counter the court-appointed (and taxpayer-funded) defense witness, so the woke judge released the demon back onto the streets, with the order that he attend "outpatient treatment."

If you have an IQ over 80 you may already have realized that
 * Demons don't go to "outpatient treatment"
 * It doesn't work anyway, since they're demented
 * Releasing the demon absolutely ensures that the demon will stab or shoot someone else. 

And of course the beauty of the Democrat/woke system is that neither the woke doctor nor the woke judge will be stabbed multiple times in the face by the demon.  Instead that suffering would fall on a helpless 2-year-old in a stroller.

But hey, it wasn't your daughter who's in critical condition in the hospital, eh?  So wokiez bleat that it's a perfectly reasonable price to pay (i.e. none falling on THEM) to allow demons to run free, eh? 

At some point you'd think a "civilizational survival instinct" might kick in.

Yeah, you might think that.  But even in the unlikely case that it did, leftist judges, mayors and Dem rulers would prosecute anyone who tried to protect their loved ones from the demons.

You think I'm kidding, but in the lawless U.K. cops and judges have imprisoned homeowners for trying to defend themselves against home invaders with swords or umbrellas.  Seriously.

Leftists/Dems/wokiez: "Dat jus' silly!  Cuz dat beez duh U.K.  Dat cud nevah happen here, cuz...um...reasons!"

The 2-year-old victim is traumatized for life, her beautiful, innocent face permanently scarred.  But to Democrats dis beez a *great* trade!  Cain't be imprisoning doze po' innocent demons!  Nope nope nope!  Gots t' let demons do dere thing!  Cuz after all, duh victim is never related to the judge or woke "doctor," right? 

Do we really have to keep living like this? 

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/maniac-with-a-record-stabs-2-year-old-in-face/ 

Yet more examples of corrupt, foolish grants from govt to insiders

Republican senator Rand Paul does an annual report on idiotic government grants.  Examples:

The corrupt wokies gave some shithead $4,600,000 of your tax dollars to find out whether getting drunk makes you FALL DOWN.

(Spoiler: yes.)

A $3,000,000 grant to study whether eating ants would reduce Global Warming.  Wait, dat now called "Climate Change."

$7,000,000 on a “smart toilet” that photographs your backside.

Corruptocrats even sent your money to other nations to teach foreigners how to game our system for grants.

Why does this sort of crap continue, year after year, even after it's obvious that our massive national debt will destroy us?

Because the corruptocrats know that the government declares bankruptcy there won't be any more chances to steal.  So the time to steal is now.

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/more-festivus-foolishness/ 

Liberal, "woke" judges strike again, releasing violent thug w/ no bail needed, and then....

Liberal, "woke" judges will get us all killed--and for no reason other than their stupidity.

In the Democrat-ruled shithole of Pittsburgh, two years ago a murderous piece of shit named "Delvin Dobbins" was arrested for burglary.  Because Dobbins was a juvenile, the "woke" judge refused to put him in prison.  But because the city's only Juvenile Detention Center had closed, the judge simply released this piece of shit--no bail demanded, no punishment.

Having learned that the system would let him get away with anything he did, two months later Dobbins was charged with shooting a convenience-store clerk in the chest.

Say, that worked well, eh?  But now that the shitty wokie System knew Dobbins was a monster, it wouldn't make the same mistake twice, right?

Hahahaha!  Just kidding!  Of course it would.  So on September 4th of this year, after Dobbins was charged with criminal trespass, breaking into the home of foster parents who had a protective order against him, Judge Olasz immediately released Dobbins on what the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media calls "non-monetary bail."  Translation: released without requiring even a dollar of bail.  

Smirking over the system's lenient stupidity, Dobbins promptly went out and stabbed two people a week apart.

You are paying judges to release repeatedly violent thugs.  Is it any wonder that this shit keeps happening, again and again?

We don't have to live like this.

Oh wait: in Democrat-ruled shitholes we DO have to, because Democrats run everything.

You'd think honest, law-abiding people would learn.  But of course they don't.  One reason is that the Mainstream Media never tells 'em about all the violent crimes committed by the same thugs, followed by no-bond-needed immediate releases after stabbing and shooting people.

Note to Dems: as much as you wanna believe everyone can be rehabilitated, it's not true.  Thugs need to be taken out of society for 20 or 30 years.  Of course wokie judges refuse to do that.  So here we are again.

For the hundredth time:  In nature, what happens to animals who are either too stupid to learn, or refuse to learn? 

Source.

https://modernity.news/2026/10/09/feral-youth-leaves-mans-intestines-hanging-out-judge-lets-him-walk-the-same-day/ 
 

Somali gang shootings in Minnesotastan. Predictably, Somalis and Democrats blame...guns!

Democrats brazenly lie about obvious reality--so much so that I truly doubt we can survive.  Latest example:

After several days of shootings by Somali gangs in Minneapolis suburbs, the town of Eden Prairie held a community meeting.  And guess who packed it?

Somalis.  Somali leader Asad Aliweyd said “This is not simply a Somali problem.  It’s a youth violence and gun violence problem.”

Aliweyd is the head of a nonprofit that was ordered to repay $1.1 million to the state for “fraudulent claims.”  He hasn't been charged with any crime.  The nonprofit just claimed entitlement to $1.1 million by accident.

No problem in a state that has Muslim corruptocrat Keith Ellison as attorney-general.

Aliweyd is described as a father of eight.  Somalis, like all invaders, have large families, so even if we were able to stop all immigration, in three generations they'll be the majority.

Aliweyd was just the start:  Consider Somali teacher Fardousa Yossuf, who said she couldn't believe children raised in the Muslim faith could shoot up suburban neighborhoods.

“Our children go to the Madrasa, which teaches Islamic values.  It's not possible that they would get guns,” she said.

Ahh, "Islam is the Religion of Peace™," eh?

Horseshit.  The entire history of Islam is one of war and conquest of one nation after another.  And conquest of much of the Christian world continues, thru 9/11/2001 to 10/7/2023 to right now on the streets of Mogadishu-west...aka Minneapolis.

Democrats: "NOOooo, deez shootings gots nuffin' to doo wif ouah scholarly Somali yutes!  Duh problem is gunz!  So duh solution iz to ban gunz!"

If you weren't convinced by that excuse, Somali teacher Yossuf offered another explanation for why some Somali youth are turning to gangs and guns: Their parents are working too hard to pay enough attention to them. 

"Working too hard," y'say.

But back to guns.  A leader of "Somali Youth Link" parrots “This is not a Somali community [issue]. This is a gun violence issue.”

The Democrat mayor of the Minneapolis suburb of St. Louis Park, Nadia Mohamed, confirmed that the solution to continued shooting by supposedly unknown yutes is to ban guns.

Of course guns no more cause shootings than cars cause carjacking, or jet airliners caused 9/11.  Instead the problem is lawless, thuggish Somali "youth" warring for loot and turf.  It's the Somali way of life in their lawless shithole country.

But of course Democrats foolishly believed thugs from a lawless shithole would quickly discard their lawless tribal way of life and become model Americans.  And of course Dems will never admit the real cause, since that might get lots of voters thinking "Why do we let these lawless, uneducated thugs into the U.S. in the first place?  Ohh, that's right...Democrat policies."  

Thomas Sowell nailed it

 

France's "student riots" are being pushed by communists, unions and a global propaganda network

A well-known principle of all revolutionaries is to make the rebelling group seem huge, making its victory seem inevitable.

Thus it is in France: the Media say the riots that have been going on for the past ten days are "students," because that's what the real organizers want everyone to believe.  Certainly students *are* rioting, but the real muscle, signage and organizing  is being provided by about 50 known, identifiable communist, union and Muslim front groups.

It's not at all secret: the real organizers are all carrying huge, professionally-made 30-foot-wide banners saying who they are.  But to the surprise of no one with a functioning brain, the U.S. Mainstream Media refuses to report ANY of that.

You may well wonder why, eh?

Answer: the Media doesn't want Americans to know, because the same groups pushing the French riots are also backing the Democrat Partei here, so if voters knew the truth about the riots in France, many would realize electing Democrats here was a really bad move.

The most visible backer is called "Breakthrough News"--a pro-communist propaganda outlet based in New York City, funded by an American-born, Shanghai-based communist tech tycoon, Neville Roy Singham, who's financed a network of communist and far-left groups in the U.S. that have pushed similar riots here for almost a decade. 

Photos and conversations with rioters have identified 50 organizations in the so-called "student protest movement."  Only 15 are student or youth groups, and those include several communist front groups and a Muslim student association.  So less than a third of the protesters are actually students.

The other 35 groups include eight communist or socialist organizations, a dozen labor unions, five so-called civil-rights groups, like pro-Palestinian resistance, and groups pushing environmental activism and "economic justice" (always a front for communist organizations).

Because Paris is about 30% Muslim there are thousands of pro-Palestinians among the demonstrators.  Schools in France have nothing to do with Gaza, but the Paleswinians never miss a chance to throw rocks at cops, smash windows and burn anything within reach.  The rioters provide excellent cover for all that.

Also, riots by communists, Muslims and labor unions (communists) don't draw much sympathy, but casting the rioters as "students" draws international sympathy for duh po' "students," which makes the government reluctant to do many things that would restore order.  Can't hurt dem po' "students," eh?  

 

Clicking on the pic above should enlarge it.  Look at all the communist flags in it.  The middle banner says "Against the imperialist wars," and "Class warfare!"  The bottom line says the banner is from the Young Communists.

The banner on the left--also from the Young Communists--says "Long live the youth revolution" and "This is the reason we revolt."  You will never see this pic on NBC, ABC, CBS or any other pro-leftist U.S. Media--because this is what the "Democrat Socialists of America" support.  

OOooohh, can't let voters know THAT, eh?  Might cost the Democrats a million votes!

 

U.S. Media: "NOooo, deez 'demonstrations' [riots] iz ALL jus' po' students upset cuz dey don' haz air conditioning in dere skools!  Ain't no communists or Palestinians!  All jus' po' young students desperate fo' mo' teachers so dey kin become doctors an' engineers!  Yep yep yep!"

Utter horseshit.   All this is right outta the communist playbook: when any group has a grievance, the communists support that group with bodies and banners, for two reasons: First that wins 'em allies and future supporters; and second, it makes the "revolutionaries" look far more powerful, increasing the likelihood that the government will cave to their demands. 

When governments cave, the communists win, because every citizen sees the government as weak, making the next win easier. 

If you don't believe it works, consider that less than 25 years after the most deadly attack on the U.S. ever (9/11), communists and Muslims were able to elect a Muslim communist as mayor of New York City.  (For young Americans NYC was where both the 110-story Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were destroyed by Muslims who flew hijacked passenger jets into both.)

In another 25 years no American under 25 will know that.

You don't believe that either.

In nature, what happens to animals who are either too stupid to learn, or simply refuse to, eh?

Democrat voter: "Dat is outrageous!  I iz reeeel smaht!  I learn!  So I learned dat 'Dieversity iz ouah strength!'  An' helping kids 'transition' makes 'em happier!  An' dat Donald Trump is tryin' to be a Kang!  While Barack Obama ("I have a pen and a phone") wuz duh bestest prezzy EVAH!  Duh Media all agree on dat, so mus' be true, right?  RIGHT?  Cuz duh Media NEVAH lie!"

In nature, what happens to...  Eh, nevermind.

Interest rates on French bonds 5%, CRISIS! Interest on U.S. T-bills? "No problem, citizen!"

With the Muslim/communist-backed riots in France continuing, articles are noting that France hasn't been able to pass a budget in two years, so things like schools are using the same appropriations as two years ago.  In the U.S. we call that a "continuing resolution," and it's how the corrupt, shitty, unresponsive congress has operated in many years since Obozo was crowned. 

So the French govt is just merrily borrowing money--money it is unable to re-pay.  And the markets are noticing:  Last week lenders demanded interest rates of "up to" 5% buy ten-year bonds issued by the French government.  And financial writers were wailing about this great crisis.

Ahhh, a "crisis," y'say?  So what does it mean that today the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds closed at 5.247%?  And that earlier in the week it reached a 24-year-high of 5.35%?

  • Daily range today: 5.223% to 5.283%
  • 52-week range: 3.923% to 5.368%

People who aren't good with math see the increase just in the interest rate in the last year has jumped barely 1.4%.  Yes, but the new rate is 36 percent higher than a year ago, meaning that if this holds, interest payments would eventually soar from a TRILLION a year to 1.3 Trillion.

"Dere's nuffin' to worry about, deplorable!  Oh sure, yew may have heard dat dis iz some kind of warning sign, but dat jus' silly conspiracy talk, citizen!  We in duh congress gots everyt'ing under control!  Reeeeally!  Cuz we iz reeeel smaht! 

"I mean, look at our leaders!  Who can possibly question the intelligence of leaders like AOC, Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and others.  Your Partei is in great hands!" 

And of course stupid Americans believe that shit.  So when French govt bonds top 5% it's a crisis, but when U.S. govt bonds top 5.2% it's "Everyt'ing's totally fine, citizen!  No worries!

Starting to understand it yet? 

Buildings are physical manifestations of ideas. So what's this idea?

Communists have an explicit command about the design/architecture of government buildings:  the rulers ordered that all such buildings be as ugly and dehumanizing as possible.

You may find that hard to believe, since you'd think rational rulers would want their buildings to be warm and welcoming, so people would think the dictators were friendly, but the communists went the opposite way: they wanted all the "proletariat" (the commie term for regular citizens--far colder than "comrade," eh?) to regard the state as all-powerful and cold, so no one would even consider trying to resist its orders.

With that in mind, consider the building in the pic below.  Does it strike you as warm, welcoming, inviting, or as "the Death Star" (as many have called it)?  Yes, it's not technically a government building, but its designers were hand-picked by the Democrat emperor former prezzy himself.  The architects (designers) knew every detail had to be personally approved by the emperor--the man who famously declared that he didn't need congress to ram through orders because "I have a pen and a phone!"

Cool, eh?  Like, totally American, jus' like duh Founders intended, right? 

 

Now: Buildings aren't just structures.  They're really the physical manifestation of ideas.  Seriously.  Some of you may not see that right away, but if you sleep on it you'll understand.

Every detail of a building originated as an idea in the mind of the designer/architect, eh?  And the ugly, intimidating monstrosity in the pic above was designed by people wanting to please the emperor--and the governing commands of the Democrat Partei [sic].

So how are those policies working out for the entity that runs the Obozo prezidential center?  (That would be the "Obama Foundation.")

According to a UK publication employees are leaving in droves, and the rest are unionizing after they didn't get raises and bonuses they felt entitled to, due to the faaaabulous success of the thing, and the massive crowds of visitor it was attracting every day since in opened in June.

Workers say they were told that their healthcare costs would increase, promotions were suspended and paid time off was reduced.  AND that they wouldn't be getting raises this winter.

Whu...whu...dat beez totally unacceptable, comrade!  We iz duh pipo who akshully run dis place, so yew mus' gibs us whut we demand!  Cuz we iz at duh top of duh power pyramid!  Wif'out us dis place wudn't be able to educate duh thousands of pipo who come here every day to see the mighty works of ouah first Black prezzy!

SO...can you predict the future?  Sure ya can, citizen!  Obozo was SO powerful as prezzy, and for the first few years after he left office, that corporations would give his foundation cash if they wanted him to lean on Chuckie Schumer and bribem to get laws passed, or get huge government contracts or grants.  But now, a decade after he left, and after the Dems lost the White House, that influence is almost gone.  In another few years no one will give him or his Foundation a damn dime.

Then what do ya think will happen?

Who will pay the salaries of the army of leftist drones who staff the place?  And who will pay to maintain it?

Of course you already guessed: The Democrat partei.  Meaning taxpayers.  You.  Cuz a Democrat-ruled congress and a Dem prezzy will quickly pass a LAW appropriating, say, $50 million a year to run the place.  The noble stated purpose will be "Even though dis iz a private foundation, American citizens cain't allow dis faaaabulous monument to ouah first Black prezzy to suffer from a mysterious lack of funds!"

And the salary of the top lackey will be $400K per year.  His or her deputy lackeys--like the head of HR--will be paid $250K per year.  With retirement, paid health insurance, luxury car, a month of paid vacay every year.  Entry-level greeters will be taking home $120K.

Count on it.  Just as Gavin Newsom's "high-speed train to nowhere" got $20 BILLION of your parents' tax dollars.  For total corruption. 

 

Fuck you, Obozo--you communist son of a bitch.

 

Hamas disappointed that American Leftists don't believe they really killed 1,200 Jews on Oct 7

 

Communism is slowly taking over the U.S.--and has been for decades

Most Americans have only a vague idea of what communism is.  That includes most of the so-called "cool kidz" in U.S. universities on the coasts who say they prefer communism to capitalism, because their "knowledge" is pretty much limited to this:

"It's like, TOTALLY UNFAIR that some people have to work at jobs they don't like, to have a nice apartment and be able to go out to eat every night, while other pipo have rich parents who give them lots of money, so they have whatever they want without having to work!" 
  "So I feel oppressed, and demand that "society" give me whatever I want without working!  Or I might agree to work--but only in a job I reeeally like, like, um...writing reviews for video games!  Yeah, dat's it!  That should pay $150K a year, eh?"

The flaws in that "reasoning" are obvious and too numerous to list here.  Instead a summary:

During a meeting of the Communist League in London in 1847, the League asked Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to write a "platform" describing the League's position.  For the next 70 years not much happened.

Then in 1917 the communists took over Russia, overthrowing the czar and murdering him and his entire family--including four innocent daughters, a son and four loyal staffers.

Charming rat-bastards, those communists.

This was the Bolshevik revolution, and gave the communists their first base for taking over the world.  And in 1920 they came up with a plan to do that.  

Even before 1848 the communists were sure communism was a far better system than capitalism, so they saw it as their job to "set other nations free," eh?  But they felt they were being prevented from doing this by eeeebil "capitalist exploiters."

So beginning way back in 1920 they started sending really bright communists to the U.S. to infiltrate every institution of influence: universities, newspapers, magazines, radio networks, Hollywood, labor unions, school boards, public schools and the government--particularly the State Department.

After WW2 the U.S. was able to decipher coded messages to and from the USSR and its spies in the U.S. (the Venona Project).  Those messages uncovered 349 Soviet spies working in every government agency, including our atomic-bomb project.  And because Venona was only able to decode a fraction of the recorded Soviet messages, it's likely that the number of spies was actually greater.

One of the many goals of communism in the U.S. has been to destroy the "traditional nuclear family."  The stated reason was that communists viewed the traditional family as "an economic unit tied to capitalism and private property," where children were treated as the private property of parents--thus as exploited, unpaid workers.

In "The Communist Manifesto" (1848) Marx and Engels literally called for the "abolition of the family."

But cutesy rhetoric about "an economic unit tied to capitalism" was just a smokescreen:  The real reason was that the Bolsheviks (communist) leaders feared that traditional nuclear families might teach their kids individualist (i.e. freedom-loving) values to children.  If parents didn't like communism, letting the parents raise their children risked the parents telling their kids communism was shit.  Thus in "Principles of Communism" Engels demanded that all children be raised in government institutions. 

One of the clearest indicators of the communist hate for traditional families is that while western nations believe orphans adopted into loving families have a far better chance at happiness and success than otherwise, the communist rulers abolished adoption altogether, decreeing that orphans were to be raised by the warm, caring communist state--"to avoid exploitation, comrade!"

Starting to understand yet?

By 1926, roughly seven MILLION orphans roamed towns and countryside, because government didn't have the resources to house and feed them all.  An adopted child cost the state nothing, but feeding and housing seven MILLION consumed a LOT of resources.  So once again communist policies turned out to be shit.  Not only that, orphans--lacking any parental teaching and values--often turned out to be "difficult" adults.  

Ring any bells?  It should: Beginning in 1965, programs rammed thru by Democrats in congress--programs that replaced black fathers with "free" government dollars--led to the destruction of the black family in the U.S., followed by all the murders we've seen since then. 

So communists viewed the traditional "nuclear family" (husband and wife) as a danger to communist rule--and acted accordingly.  And since 1965 or so, the U.S. Mainstream Media and the "entertainment industry" have taken every opportunity to ridicule "traditional nuclear families."

The utter debasement of American culture since 1965 or so has been totally intentional.  

Our society has been so utterly debased that today, not only do mentally ill men claim to be women, the Media and the Democrat party demand that everyone agree that such mentally ill wackos ARE women.  And employees have been fired for refusing to go along with that lie.

Government employees never dare to refuse, because it's instant termination.  "Your refusal to use that pyrsyn's preferred pronouns was 'hate speech' and a violation of xir's human rights!" 

When a society has been so utterly debased, it should come as no surprise that large numbers of citizens don't believe that society is good.  If you point out to 'em that if their claim is true, why do millions of foreigners trek thousands of miles to get here, while no American citizen tries to sneak into another nation, they just scream and put their fingers in their ears.

It's a standard technique of people who hold ideas that are unsupportable: they refuse to let you speak, or scream over you.

The communists realized they didn't need to invade the U.S. with troops to destroy us.  Instead they knew how to get Americans to commit cultural suicide.

One subtle technique is to order that certain terms are now banned, replaced with anodyne terms that disguise what's really happening.  Thus Democrats now demand that prisoners convicted of ghastly murders be referred to as "justice-involved individuals."  

The Democrats/socialists/communists/proggies have decreed that the term "reproductive healthcare" now includes abortion.  Of course there's nothing "reproductive" about it, and yet the Democrat-fellating Media has parroted that label without a critical word.  

The Left has decreed that cutting off a child's reproductive organs is "gender-affirming surgery." 

Newpapers in Democrat-ruled cities never identify attackers, shooters or stabbers as black, even when they are.  By contrast, white criminals are identified as such.  The NY Times "stylebook" even demands that "black" be capitalized, while "white" isn't, even though "black" isn't a race but just a color, just as white is.  But don't you dare complain about lack of intellectual consistency!

The communist propagandists who infest the Media also know that feelings always overcome facts.  Thus 15 years ago the masculine qualities that have protected us since the 1770s suddenly got a new adjective added: "toxic." 

Soviet defector Yuri Bezhmenov warned us (ironically in 1984) that the communists explicitly planned to "demoralize" young Americans.  In English and the military "demoralize" means to make people believe there's no hope, but to the communists it means to so thoroughly debase morals and language that people can no longer distinguish truth from lies, good from evil.  

"Exposure to true information does not matter anymore.  A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information.  Facts tell him nothing.  Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it.  That is the tragedy of demoralization.
  This is why the bolshies [communists] exude unabashed ignorance: they're literally incapable of realizing they're wrong.  Instead they're certain anyone who resists communism is wrong.

If you were wondering why your purple-haired, moronic in-law is a violence-loving miscreant, Bezmenov says the communists encourage such crazies, motivate 'em and unleash them on civil society.  And when you study videos of big socialist/communist/DSA marches, you see the same sorts of creatures every time, purple hair and all.

Today the Left/Democrats claim facts are meaningless.  They claim even words they don't like are violence.  And anyone who disagrees with 'em is a Nazi and should be imprisoned or worse.  They even cheer the assassination of people they don't like, like Charlie Kirk.

Hundreds of food-stamp fraudsters own Ferraris and Maseratis. Here's how

Democrats constantly expand welfare programs that give your tax dollars to Democrat voters--many of whom are fraudsters.

Example: food stamps.  Because corrupt Dem-ruled shithole states don't even TRY to detect fraud, even rich fraudsters can now get taxpayer-subsidized food stamps (EBT cards)--often under several different names.  The industrious ones use  the cards to buy food that they sell for cash.  They lazy sell the benefits for 50 cents on the dollar.

This lucrative grift was enabled by the Democrat-ruled congress when Democrat Bill Clinton was president, and the Obozo regime supercharged it.

The federal government gives the states cash for a dizzying arrary of programs, including "food stamps" (cunningly disguised as "SNAP"), Medicaid and dozens of other welfare programs.

Since this is "free money," Democrat states devised ways to increase what they were given.  The most widespread is a thing cunningly shortened to "BBCE."  Unless you're a government official you have no idea what that means--which is intentional.  

It stands for "Broad-based Categorical Eligibility."  Does that help tell you what it means?  Of course not, and that's also intentional.  What it means is that while "standard law" says you can only get food stamps ("SNAP benefits"--the EBT card) if you pass strict asset tests, like bank balances and income below a certain level.  BUT "BBCE" allows states to give federal SNAP dollars to anyone who's getting benefits from any OTHER welfare program.

This allows people with $50,000 in the bank and a Maserati in the garage to get food stamps.

Currently 43 states and DC use BBCE to bypass federal eligibility limits on income, assets or both to get food stamps.  And Dem-ruled states have decreed that if someone is given something as minimal as a brochure describing welfare benefits, or a telephone number to the welfare agency, that qualifies as getting a welfare benefit.

That person is then treated as being “categorically eligible” for food stamps—making even wealthy fraudsters eligible.  Own a Lambo or Maserati?  No problem, noble citizen!

Welfare fraud isn’t an accident. It is by design. The more welfare (tax dollars) Democrats give to their base, the more power they achieve by enlisting an ever-larger army of freeloaders--and the faster the U.S. reaches inevitable bankruptcy.

How widespread is the abuse?  The Foundation for Government Accountability found that 14,000 EBT recipients bought new luxury vehicles like Maseratis or Ferraris in just one corrupt state.

Another invitation to fraud--eagerly exploited by fraudsters--is that Democrats ordered that people applying for food stamps ("SNAP benefits") don't have to confirm their identity in any serious way.  Something as flimsy as a library card will so.  And as a result, many SNAP recipients claim benefits from several states--or even from overseas, as shown by IP addresses.

A foreign fraudster can get food stamps faster than you can get through to the IRS helpline.

But congress refuses to close the BBCE loophole. 

Source.

https://moonbattery.com/maserati-food-stamp-moochers/#disqus_thread

If you're skeptical, search "meaning of bbce in welfare" 

"The barbarians are at the gates."

There's an old metaphor to denote a life-threatening emergency: "The barbarians are at the gates."

In the U.S. in 2026 the barbarians aren't just AT the gates, they are inside the gates.

• They have lifetime jobs in universities.
• Lifetime appointments as federal judges at every level.
• They control the Mainstream Media--virtually every television network, cable-TV channels and all newspapers.
• They control what's amusingly known as "the entertainment industry:"  movies, television and the music industry.
• They've used congress to wangle hundreds of billions in government (taxpayer-funded) grants, with no effective oversight as to how they spend the money.  Example: billions spent in California on "the homeless" with nothing to show for it except wealthy pols and directors of NGOs.
• Without exception, all the above organizations support the Democrat Partei and socialism.
• They control elections--registration and vote counting--in virtually every big city, even if the governor and legislature are conservative, because virtually all big cities are Democrat-run.
• They control what's known as the "permanent bureaucracy" of the federal government--the Deep State--civil service employees who essentially can't be fired, and who cunningly sabotage any efforts at reform, as with Fauci and his lackeys.
• They block all efforts to prosecute massive fraud in government programs like Medicare and Medicaid, because grifters kick back millions to Democrat officials.
• They've even gotten their people elected as "nominal" Republicans--RINOs--who routinely vote with the Democrats to block all but the most trivial reform.

If you've ever been puzzled by how clearly-guilty people like Fauci or Eric Swalwell or Nancy Pelosi or the Somali grift machine in Minnesotastan are never tried and imprisoned for their corruption, everything you just read explains it.

The same things explain why policies favored by a huge majority of Americans--like photo-ID to vote--never pass, even when nominal Republicans have a majority in both chambers of congress: fake Republicans (RINOs) vote with Dems to defeat the reforms.

Are you starting to understand yet?

(H/T Thomas Sowell)


 

Mamdani's corrupt NYC to *give* NON-citizens up to $100,000 from taxpayers to buy homes

Young Americans born in the U.S. can’t afford a starter home, so the mayor of NYC plans to give 'em $100,000 for a downpayment.

Just kidding!  Instead the communist Muslim mayor of New York City has unveiled a plan to give yet more tax dollars to NON-citizens--including illegal aliens.  And this time it's a whopper: up to $100,000 in taxpayer dollars to non-citizens for a downpayment and closing costs to buy a home.  And the city agency won’t even ask if applicants are here legally. 

Mamdani's lackeys made sure to tell non-citizens they don’t need a Social Security number--and no traditional credit check, but instead a thing called a "municipal credit check," at least initially.

The scheme will use federal as well as state tax dollars.  It's supposed to be a loan, but just like student "loans" as the Dems would have it, the borrower won't have to repay a dime if they stay in the home long enough.

Summary: it's an explicit plan to give the money to non-citizens, including those here illegally.

While you mull that over for a minute, consider that much the same thing was set in motion by Bill Clinton and his Democrat thieves in congress way back in 1992:

If you're under age 45 or so you probably don't remember the "mortgage meltdown" of 2008.  It was set in motion by Democrats (led by Bill Clinton) in 1992, when congress forced banks to make low-interest mortgage loans to people who had no income, no job and no assets.  As you could guess, once loafers learned about the new rule, such loans became so common that people in the lending biz gave 'em a catchy name: "Ninja loans:"  No income, job or assets.

Cute, eh?

Normally no bank would loan $200,000 or more to an applicant who seemed overwhelmingly likely to NOT be able to make their mortgage payments.  But Democrats are very cunning, so they passed a law or rule saying lenders could sell the loan to either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (the two giant federal home loan agencies), which were required to buy it.  So the fed agencies would repay the entire loan amount to the originating bank, and would then supposedly receive future payments, just as the originator would have.

One small problem: the pipo who applied for "ninja" loans rarely made more than a few payments (out of 240 or so) because they didn't have the income.  And they'd heard that even if you stopped making mortgage payments, because the borrower got free legal help from NGOs, evicting delinquent borrowers would take the federal agencies at least three years. 

That meant "ninja borrowers" got three years rent-free, with free legal provided by NGOs.  

As a result of this moronic plan, both federal lending agencies ended up losing tens of billions of dollars.  It was SO predictable--and SO dumb--that books were written about the stupidity.  There was even an acclaimed movie, "The Big Short." 

Worse yet, when the government agency finally succeeded in evicting the deadbeat borrowers, many of the homes were so torn up that investors would only pay a fraction of their original value.  In many cases copper pipes had been ripped out and sold for cash, along with all the appliances.  

These foreclosed, trashed homes became the notorious "HUD homes," as the fed lenders signed 'em all over to the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development.  So even auctioning off the foreclosed (trashed) homes only recovered a fraction of the loan amount the agencies paid the original lenders.

Such a deal, eh?  This is what passes for brilliant government policy, eh?  And now Mamdani is doing essentially the same thing: giving $100K to illegals.  Wow.

So once again the socialist/commie Muslim mayor panders to illegal aliens, giving $100K to each applicant, no questions asked.  But only to non-citizens.

"White privilege," huh?

https://moonbattery.com/illegal-aliens-to-be-handed-100000-to-buy-home-in-new-york/

Via Independent Sentinel:

https://www.independentsentinel.com/nyc-to-give-100k-city-federal-tax-dollars-to-noncitizens-for-1st-homes/
 

31 days til the elections

After the U.S. blew up some more air-defense radars far from big Iranian cities (meaning no Iranian citizens even hear about it), the cunning Democrats have once again demanded Trump STOP BOMBING, to give those totally sincere mullahs yet another chance to negotiate. 
   
And the mullahs are delighted to negotiate--endlessly.  They're just not serious about making a deal except on their terms.  They keep insisting that they control the Strait (they don't), and demand that they be allowed to "continue" that non-existent control.  So they'll keep playing this game as long as the Iranian people don't kill 'em, counting on "White House advisors" who know NOTHING about military history to get Trump to fall for this same fake for a just a few more days.  

History shows that after October 14th or so, NO revelation--no matter how damning--will change the minds of voters.  Look at the revelation on October 14th of 2020 that Hunter bribem had abandoned a dead laptop at a computer store, and that it contained thousands of emails showing Hunty was collecting millions from foreign governments for his father, good ol' "Uncle Joe."

That bombshell had no effect at all, in part because the Dems simply lied and said "Dis iz a classic Russian intel operation, designed to hurt ouah faaaabulous Democrat nominee and help Trump!"

Of course it didn't make sense that either Russia or China would want the "America-first," pro-military Trump as president instead of the corrupt bribem, but logic didn't enter into the thoughts of voters.  Duh Dems an' Media sed Hunty's laptop wuz a "Russian intelligence op"--even though NO intel official had examined the thing--and that was all Dem voters needed to hear.

Wait...if it was a Russian fake, how did the Democrats explain the hundreds of pics of Hunty nude, seemingly doing lines of coke with what appeared to be hookers?

They didn't have to, because the corrupt FBI pressured Twatter and Fakebook to spike (kill) links to the New York Post's cover story, so most Americans never saw the pics.  

But the Democrats had another deflection all ready too, and you're gonna love it: "Mr. Hunter Biden is not a government official."

Ahhh, so he can collect bribes (thinly disguised as "investments"), as long as he's not on the gummint payroll, eh?  And collecting bribes totally wifout his dad's knowledge, eh?

Utter horseshit, but it worked.  After bribem took office, one survey supposedly found that about a third of Dem voters surveyed said if they'd known  about the laptop story they wouldn't have voted for bribem.  Ahhh.
  
We're now 31 days from the mid-term elections, and all the polls show Dems leading.  Yes, I'm well aware that the polls are rigged to give Dems the lead, which makes it plausible when they steal just enough votes to win by a few hundred out of millions in a state.

Hoping for a miracle, but I've lived through way to many stolen elections to believe in one. 

Something very bad has been happening in the U.S. for the last few years--and it seems to be getting worse.

In Massachusetts in January of 2023 a married mother of three young children was struggling with postpartum psychosis.  She was briefly committed to a psych ward, but like most glib women she was able to talk 'em into releasing her.  She returned home, and days later when her husband went out to bring home dinner, she took her three young children--ages 5, 3 and 8 months--to the basement...and one by one, strangled them to death.

*She admitted killing her children,* saying a voice in her head ordered her to do it.  Her attorney didn't contest the admission of her confession--and if he believed it was invalid for some reason, he was obligated to say so at trial.  In any case, as everyone has surely heard, the trial ended in a hung jury after one juror refused to join the other 11 and find her "not guilty by reason of insanity."

The problem with the insanity defense was that all her actions showed careful planning and calculation.

But surprisingly, this story isn't about her.  It's about hundreds of American women posting videos on TikTok screaming that their astrological signs told 'em the husband had done it--even though the defendant *admitted killing all three of her children.*

Her crazy female supporters claim the husband did it, or somehow hypnotized his wife into killing their children.  They've been posting videos on TikTok screaming that the mom is innocent, even after she admitted killing her kids.  How the hell do you deal with people so totally untethered from reality?

If this was the only unhinged mass psychosis in the U.S. I wouldn't be too worried.  But it's far from it.

Tony Fauci funded the research that created Covid, then lied about it and deleted emails showing his lies.  Gavin Newsom locked his state down "to prevent the spread of covid," but then had a birthday dinner with friends at a fancy restaurant--maskless, of course.  He locked you down, but he's free to do whatever the hell he wants.

Newsom's lackeys ordered cops to arrest a man paddleboarding alone in the ocean--but when 500,000 people rioted in the streets, shoulder to shoulder, in the summer of 2020, with duh Chyna virus in full swing, Fauci didn't say a critical word--at exactly the same time Dem-ruled cops were arresting solo paddle-boarders in the ocean. 

"Cuz viruses don't spread during marches for social justice!  See, deplorable?"

Look at how many leftist "Americans" are openly celebrating murders of those they hate:

In NYC Luigi Mangione ran up behind a healthcare CEO and shot him in the back--and leftists fawned over him.  Slobbered over him.  Leftist women gushed over him--even after he pled guilty.  What does that tell you about them?

Watch a video of 60,000 African men (yes, 60,000) invading a Spanish city on the coast of Africa, and you see a crazy western woman gleefully waving the invaders in.  Is she crazy?  Absolutely.

The craze sweeping American women--and yes, almost entirely women--is called "suicidal empathy."  More U.S. women than ever are childless, so the empathy normally used to keep women from killing their kids is now used to fawningly support murderers, illegal invaders, 
drug addicts--the worst monsters on the planet.

Tens of thousands of depraved monsters celebrate the comrade who shot Charlie Kirk, demonizing a grieving widow, inventing all manner of insanity to explain how the killer was anyone except the goofy guy who did it--and confessed to buddies on social media.  And wrote his tranny lover roommate a note saying he was driving 3 hours up the road to kill Kirk. 

Some teachers have sneeringly mocked Kirk's assassination. Drag queens have put on assassination fashion shows.  What kind of monsters celebrate the assassination of a loving father?  

Who are these demons? 

Monsters have started celebrating murders of innocent people they hate.  That's us.

You have two choices: Do nothing, and die when they decide, or fight back and defend those you love.

I used to care.  But after watching so many so-called Americans ecstatic over the murder of innocents, I'm beginning to believe roughly a quarter of the people in this country are demons.  And because our so-called "democratic republic" has slowly morphed into merely a democracy (majority rules), and stupid Democrats will vote for anyone with a D on the ballot, they're about to win again. 

I don't think there's any way to recover short of civil war.

If anyone would care to debate this with me, have at it.