Leftist piece of shit blames Trump for the attack at the Correspondents' dinner
There's a really squirrely POS named John Stoehr, who runs a far-left propaganda rag called "The Editorial Board" on BlueSky. Here's his piece on the dust-up at the dinner. I've edited it to remove as much fluff as possible.
How did this happen? The administration is run by moronsSome early facts and thoughts about last night.
● A man rushed through security at the White House Correspondents' Dinner last night. It was all caught on camera. Most of the "news" is news about the spectacle of it all.
● The suspect was apparently armed "with guns and knives." He was tackled after running through security. One security official was struck in the bullet proof vest.
● The president has already suggested he was the intended target. He believes his interests are the same as the country's.
● Allen is reportedly unaffiliated with a party. That won't matter to the president and his allies. Even if he were a registered Republican who voted for Trump three times, they'd still blame "the left," meaning the Democrats.
This is a masterpiece: a huge rule of propaganda is to get the lie into the public consciousness before anything else has made it, because without any contradictory information, most people will believe the first thing they read or hear, even if flatly, unequivocally contradicted later.
And in this case, we've found hundreds of posts from the attacker re-posting EVERY insane Democrat TDS talking point. He was thoroughly radicalized by the Democrats and their Media fellators to hate Trump and Republicans. Yet John Stoehr deliberately lies about the attacker's politics. And without contradiction, most Americans will believe it to their dying day.
● There's a lot of chatter online about the moment being staged. The same chatter accompanied the Butler assassination attempt. But the simplest explanation is probably the best: this administration is run by morons.
● Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was asked how the suspect was able to get guns into the Washington Hilton. He said he didn't know. That's what I mean by morons. The hotel was not secured by the Secret Service. Only the event was. It took place underneath the hotel in a massive ballroom. Allen broke through security on the floor above the ballroom.
Ah, so he was stopped mere yards after the first of several checkpoints? Doesn't sound like "morons" to me. And if the SS had locked down the entire hotel, imagine the screams from the Left about how Trump was forcing all the paying hotel guests to be HORRIBLY inconvenienced, eh?
● Hakeem Jeffries says polls show Trump and the Republicans are facing an "extinction-level" midterm wipeout in the midterms. The impulse will be to use last night as a chance to portray the president – and by extension America – as a victim of leftwing violence. Give the House to the Democrats, they will suggest, and you give in to people who hate America.
Wow, where would anyone get such a crazy notion, eh?
● While that may be true, let's not overlook media power. Journalists, who were already deferential to Trump, are going to act like they were also potential victims of political violence. They are going to make last night seem like "a turning point," or some such, which will cause lots of Americans to believe the attacker was violent, therefore siding with Trump.
Wait...this lying piece of shit bleats "Journalists...were already deferential to Trump"?? You can't be serious! But of course he's talking to moronic Democrats who actually believe that shit. It's like they're living in some bizarro-universe where every meaning is reversed.
● Remember that *the press corps is predisposed to giving Donald Trump endless benefit of the doubt.* [WHAT??] That's why even though he's an old man, he was never given the old-man treatment the way that President Biden was. Journalists have the incentive to play along with the GOP's bad faith.
Again, bizarro-world: Except for Fox, the press has never missed an opportunity to trash Trump over everything. Upholding immigration law to deport illegals just as Obozo did? The press didn't say a single word when Obozo or bribem did it, but NOW the press bleats that it's cruel, inhumane.
Arresting communist killer Maduro? Not a single word of approval, just scathing comments.
Taking out Iran's atom bomb program after saint Obozo gave 'em the green light to build one? Same: just scathing comments about how awful Orange Hitler was to do such an awful thing.
And what meaningful incentive does this lying sack of shit think "journalists" have to "play along with the GOP's bad faith"?
● Democrat Jamie Raskin suggests a strategy to counter the impact of last night's event. He brought the focus back to where it belongs, on Trump's choices, the results of which have been political violence. The suggestion is that the Democrats oppose him for legitimate, good-faith reasons.>>
<<Democrats want unlimited immigration, open borders. Time after time, they try to keep ICE from deporting even known rapists and killers. They fawn over "sanctuary cities and states" which hide illegal criminals and refuse to honor "detainer" requests from the feds. So the POS Stoehr claims this is a "legitimate, good-faith reason" to oppose Trump. Same with cutting brazen government waste and fraud: Democrats sue to block ALL such cuts. Hmm...>>
● Last night had lots of TV cameras, so we got to see Trump's feebleness. He struggles to get up from his chair as Secret Service agents rush to cover him. He stumbles badly before being brought to his feet and ushered offstage. This is a president of titanic vanity. A viral video of him falling to his knees under pressure would be beyond humiliation.>>
<<Wow, and yet never a word about *bribem's* feebleness or confusion, eh? Even piece of shit Dem-fellator Jake Tapper NOW admits they all knew bribem was a vegetable, but kept quiet cuz...dey beez reeel honest journos, eh? Gon' tell duh troof no mattah whut, eh?
What horseshit. The Mainstream Media is a pack of lying propagandists, and has been since their hero Walter Cronkeit ran things.
Commenter: "As with Butler, we'll simply *never* know 100% of what happened."
>>Significance: If the attacker is found to have parroted every Democrat talking point, and to have sent a long explanation of his derangement to his family, Dems know the best defense is to claim "We'll never *really* know what happened here, just as at Butler.
We're not even sure Trump was actually shot at Butler, eh? Coulda been hit by flying glass from the teleprompter. Or maybe the real target was the man killed in the bleachers, and Trump was just in the way. Yeh, dat cud be it. And of course every American has heard that the po' young man who was cruelly killed on the roof before he could get the due process to which he was entitled had actually registered as a Republican! So SEE??"
When your side is clearly responsible for this attack, the best plan is to prep the opinion battlespace by bleating a truth (that we can never know *everything*) that soon morphs into "You can't trust the claims of pipo you don't trust."
Remember how bribem's chief of staff got 50 "former U.S. intel officials" to sign a letter saying the laptop was fake--a Russian "propaganda ploy" to try to discredit bribem just before the election?
Did you see people on Dem websites claiming the guy who murdered Charlie Kirk--and admitted it to his family and tranny lover, and who wrote emails about hiding the murder rifle where it was later found--did NOT shoot Kirk? Lie, lie, lie, and most Americans will believe it simply because many don't want to believe their side would do such a thing.
Commenter: "The majority of white Americans are profoundly gullible. You see it everywhere; and white people believing that Trump was anywhere near anything like any kind of danger, well… the Board knows.
>>Significance: As John Stoehr wrote above, the Democrats need to trivialize this attack.
>>"He wudn't akshully in any danger at ALL, citizen! After all, he only had one shotgun and one handgun, and was facing hundreds of SS men *by himself!* So there was no way he could have actually been a threat, SEE? So SHUT UP about this! It wuz NO threat at all!"
The same Stoehr asshole who runs that Dem-fellating rag writes:
"The press corps is going to make last night seem like "a turning point," or some such pivotal event in The Narrative that will arise from this moment, and the result will be that lots of Americans will end up believing the same thing, therefore siding with Trump."
Really, you lying son of a whore? You piece of shit. Exactly the opposite: Here's a CBS gal already saying there was NO danger at all:
So which is it, piece of shit? Incompetence by the SS, or no danger at all because the would-be killer actually shot an SS agent a whole floor above the ballroom? Take your pick, shithead. You can't have it both ways.
