China has been buying Venezuelan oil despite sanctions by EU and U.S.

After Maduro stole his most recent "election," MOST of the non-communist world imposed sanctions on Venezuelan oil.  So nations that agreed with the sanctions couldn't legally buy Venezuelan oil.  Even the moronic heads of the corrupt, thug-loving EU joined the sanctions.

But of course the communists LOVED Maduro--not only because he was a fellow communist but because he provided a huge foothold for them in the western hemisphere.  Prior to Chavez and Maduro taking over Vz the commies only had Cuba, which has been impoverished for decades.  

So Russia and China have been merrily defying the west's sanctions.  As a result, the main buyer of Venezuelan oil is China, and they've been buying about half a million barrels of Vz oil every DAY.

And because the Chinese know Maduro can't sell anywhere else, they've been able to strike a deal to buy Vz oil at about $9 per barrel less than the world price, saving them $4.5 million per DAY.

It's been such a lucrative deal that for the past year China has been buying far more oil than it needs and storing it for future use.  

Another telltale: The EU and U.S. have imposed sanctions on the sale of Russian oil due to its war on Ukraine.  In the past Russia has used tankers flying third-world flags to ship its oil, since the U.S. and EU are less likely to seize a ship registered in a 3rd-world nation. 

But in the last six months Lloyds of London reports that 42 such vessels have switched to sailing under the Russian flag, presumably on the theory that the U.S. would be less likely to seize ships openly owned or leased by Russia.

The Wall Street Journal reports that tankers filled with sanctioned crude oil totalling six million barrels per day are at sea but unable to find buyers.  That represents about six percent of the world's daily demand, which is a LOT.
====

In August of 2019, during Trump's first term, the U.S. and EU imposed sanctions on Vz selling oil.  China stopped buying Vz crude oil.  But Reuters reported that just over two weeks after the Democrats stole the 2020 U.S. presidential election for bribem--on November 24th of 2020--China resumed buying oil directly from Venezuela.

Yes, Trump was still president until Jan 20th of 2021, but China's leaders knew--as did Trump--that the courts and the Deep State would block any moves to punish either Vz or China for evading the sanctions.

Question is, why were the Chinese absolutely sure bribem wouldn't retaliate?

Ohh, that's right: $40 million in bribes, collected by Hunty for the whole bribem family.  Of course this was reported by Reuters at the time, yet "your" Mainstream Media totally ignored it: you never heard this tiny li'l tidbit until just now.

Porch pirates get glitter-bombed by booby-trapped packages

I never get tired of vids of porch pirates who steal booby-trapped boxes, with the glitter explosion caught on high-resolution doorbell cameras.  

Not only is it wildly funny, the videos give a great insight into the mindset of crooks:  Watch the number of thieves who are furious that they've been busted!

 

Watch how many scream "I'm calling the cops!"  Or "I'm an important public figure!"  They scream their outrage--as virtually every thief does.  The rest of us think, Dude, you were caught stealing and you're furious that you were caught?  Ah, of course.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Wk4_YNntSn4?feature=share 

How the communists are pitching the battle against Iran's Islamic regime

The text below is from "irannewsupdate.com"  I don't know who runs that site but they're clearly not in Iran--and while they're clearly against the ruling Islamic regime, about 8 'grafs down you see the classic slogan of the communist MEK: "Neither Shah nor mullahs."

For years the "Islamic state of Iran" regime and its supporters have constantly warned Iranians “If your government falls, the country will collapse.”

The regime constantly invoked fears of civil war, national breakup, or “becoming another Syria.”  Since everyone knew Syria was a total disaster, this threat was effective in scaring Iranians into passivity:  Any oppression by the regime was better than turning into Syria!

So predictably, the regime framed any protests as a dangerous step toward chaos. "Do you want to become like Syria?  Of course not!"  So no matter how oppressive the regime got, most Iranians saw it as better than the alternatives.

But as the regime became more oppressive, and the economy worsened, that began to change.  On the ground, the feared chaos didn't happen.  Instead of social breakdown, people showed solidarity across ethnic, religious, and social lines. Instead of disorder, a form of self-organization emerged—based on mutual care, trust, and practical cooperation.

Slogans such as “Neither Shah nor Mullahs” made this clear. Society was rejecting both forms of authoritarianism: monarchy and religious rule. Protesters were not looking backward; they were pointing toward a new idea—citizens governing themselves.

Of course this is the siren song of the communists: "You can govern yourselves."  And if true, that would be great--but the communists always rise to rule.

The mullahs have never tolerated protests, responding to protests with violence.  [The regime killed 36,500 Iranians in three days in January.]

Experience shows that when a regime responds to protests with force, it's a sign of declining legitimacy.

Slogans like “Death to oppressors, whether Shah or Supreme Leader” began appearing.

Another clue that this source is likely to be the communists.

While the regime's IRGC still holds all the weapons, the old fear stories that regime change will guarantee chaos are no longer persuasive.

What's emerging is a firm “No” to inherited power, religious rule, and authoritarianism in all its forms. 

"A firm no to inheirited power" is clearly a swipe at the son of the late Shah, which again suggests that the website that posted this is run by communists, since Reza Pahlavi is the biggest rival the communists have for ruling if the Islamic regime falls.

A reasonable question is, if you're trying to overthrow a repressive regime, should you ally with people who, if you succeed, are determined to seize total power?  Cuz history shows that the communists almost always win post-revolution power struggles because they're SO experienced at it.

One of the reasons they win is that the idealistic non-communist believers in freedom naively believe that other citizens want the same thing they do, so they're always surprised by how fast and ruthlessly the communists seize control--because the communists are totally organized, while the naive young men who have just overthrown the mullahs are still celebrating their historic win. 

Because the freedom-lovers are both naive and unorganized, they're easy pickins' for the disciplined, organized communists. 

And once the communists have flooded the new government with Party members, there's no way to ever get 'em out.  They steal elections, and use the courts to protect fellow communists and jail anyone who protests--much like the Islamic regime.

So...best of luck to the people of Iran.  Cuz IF you succeed in overthrowing the ghastly, murderous, totalitarian mullahs, you're in for another fight with new demons who are just as determined to rule as the mullahs.  And if they win, you're in for another 40 or 50 years of oppression.

Ahh, I see American Democrats don't believe that.  You ignorant bastards: look at Cuba or Venezuela, or what happened to all of eastern Europe after WW2.  Any questions?

Actually you still don't have the faintest idea what really happened there, cuz your schools never taught you real history (by design) and you never thought to study it on your own.  Why am I not surprised?

Search "Solidarity" in Poland.  "Hungarian uprising 1956."  "1989 Czech uprising."  "Vaclav Havel."  "Romanian revolution."  If you don't know about all those, you're too uninformed to be a leader.  

Of course it's not your fault: "Your" schools and Mainstream Media have deliberately made those things vanish--intentionally.   

But why worry, eh?  There's no threat here, citizen!  No problem at all.  Go back to your favorite TV programs!  I hear "Dancing with the Stars" is good this season, as is "Nashville 9-1-1."  Yep yep yep.  Everything is just fine, tovarisch.  Excuse me: "citizen."   

A late comment on the U.S. capturing Venezuelan dictator Maduro

In five minutes a 30-year-old Venezuelan man--now living in the U.S.--explains the reality of the Chavez/Maduro/communist dictatorship of his country.  Yeah, five-and-a-half minutes, but it’s well worth your time to watch it.

Now: some nations are screaming bloody murder about the U.S. military seizing Maduro.  Can ya guess?

Sure: China and Russia.  What a hoot!  China has been getting roughly half a million barrels of oil a DAY from Venezuela--for way less than world prices--so was saving about $2 Billion a year by buying oil from Maduro.

Russia immediately used the U.S. capture of the communist Maduro to scream that the U.S. was again trying to force "regime change" in a much weaker communist country.  And I don't doubt that was a goal.

But we left the communist regime in place: Delcy Rodriguez--a hard-core “Chavista,” meaning a total communist--was Maduro's VP.  And after U.S. troops got Maduro she neatly took over as pres.
 
Democrats immediately began SCREAMING that Trump’s action was illegal, and the Lying Mainstream Media broadcast those people without a critical word--because the Media will do anything to make the GOP lose elections.

At 9 a.m. Saturday--just six hours after Maduro was captured--shithead Democrat senator (and Hilliary’s VP running-mate in 2016) Tim Kaine appeared on TV to say "the entire purpose of this operation was to *LOOT Venezuela’s oil.*"

Seriously, this motherfucking Democrat son of a bitch actually said that, and a dozen other top Dems in congress quickly started bleating the same thing.

At one time in the past there was a principle that said "politics stops at the water's edge."  For young Americans that meant that when our president took action, any disagreement by the opposing party in congress would NOT be bleated to the Media but would be discussed quietly, so our foreign adversaries wouldn't be able to exploit the disagreement.

But like most things that were once agreed on by both parties as good for our nation, the Dems abandoned that principle decades ago.  So now every enemy on the planet knows every exploitable wrinkle in policy fights between congress and the president, just as in Vietnam decades ago.

Hmmm.... 
 

Dems in Washington State pass a LAW ordering men can use women's locker rooms

Wokie Democrats have turned Washington state into a Dem-ruled shithole.

Most people intuitively dislike discriminatory rules.  So "non-discrimination" has become an unquestioned good thing, eh?  And Democrats have made that an art form:  In 2021 the Democrat shitheads who rule the legislature rammed through a law ordering all businesses and school locker rooms that had previously been for women to allow males claiming to be women to use those facilities, nude.

Within months a tranny--Haven Wilvitch--wailed to the wokies at the state's Human Rights Commission, demanding that the state order two spas--owned by Korean Christians, explicitly for women only--to admit him.  The state lackeys threatened to prosecute the owner for violating the Democrats' new anti-sex-discrimination law--newly expanded to include "sexual orientation."

Faced with the threat of endless fines and legal fees, the spa owners complied.

The spas soon began losing their female customers, who were understandably put off by men seeing them undressed--let alone the tranny also being nude.  So in 2022 the owners of the spas sued the state, claiming the law ORDERING them to allow nude men claiming to be women into their women-only spa was unconstitutional.

The owner claimed the settlement violated his first amendment rights to free speech and religion.  He claimed his spa had lost business after some patrons had seen "male genitals" and no longer felt safe.  He also said allowing trans-identifying men at his establishment violated his Christian beliefs.

The case finally got to court in 2023, where a Carter-appointed judge dismissed the case saying neither the state law nor the enforcement violated any of the owner's rights.

The owner of the spa appealed to the Ninth Circuit.  In a 2-1 ruling a panel rejected the appeal, RULING that Washington state's Democrat-rammed law ORDERING all businesses and schools to allow men to use all women's locker rooms and showers "does not impermissibly burden the owner's First Amendment rights to free speech, [freedom of religion] or free association.

The problem--as with SO MANY issues today--is that the Constitution is totally silent about this question.  Totally understandable: the brilliant men who wrote that magnificent document never imagined for a moment that 230 years later some woke virtue-signaling politicians would pass a LAW forcing women to allow men to watch them undress and shower.  

The Constitution's understandable silence on this is the key to the outrage, and you need to understand it.  If you're fine with this law, we need to talk--with your 14-year-old daughter present--nude.  I will also be nude.  We'll take a couple of hours to discuss the issue.  And since you must be fine with that law--since you support it--let me know and we'll meet to have a nice long discussion.

See, this is what your moronic, woke Dem pols ORDERED when they passed their LAW.  And if you're a Democrat parent you're totally fine with it, eh?

Dem voter: "NOOooo!  I din' vote fo' dat!"

Yeah, you did, cupcake.  You just didn't see the inevitable result of electing woke Dems to make laws.  Like so many other Democrats, you didn't think about it--not for a second.

If you don't see the connection between your vote and the inevitable consequences, imagine me sitting across from your daughter, both of us nude, and her being FORCED--by the LAW passed by the dipshits you elected--to be there, nude.

(To avoid the inevitable claim by Dems: I don't seriously expect any Democrat to take me up on this demonstration of Democrat hypocrisy.)

SO...to overcome the dismissal by the woke lower court judge, the Christian, Korean-owned women-only spas had to show the Democrat judges in either leftist Seattle or at the equally leftist Ninth that the insane law rammed through by the woke Democrat shitheads who control the state legislature--was unConstitutional.

Problem is, since the Constitution doesn't directly address this insanity, the best the attorneys for the spa owners could come up with was "This violates our rights under the First Amendment."

A Dem/leftist judge in the Washington state--Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, appointed by the moronic Jimmy Carter on nomination by two Dem senators from the shithole state--dismissed the case (ruled against the spas).

Normally that would have been the end of it.  But in this case the spa owners appealed to the Ninth Circuit (based in California) on the grounds that the law violated their rights of freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of association.  

Most of the judges in the Ninth Circuit are ultra-left liberals, and by a 2-1 vote a majority-leftist 3-judge "panel" quickly affirmed the dismissal by the leftist lower-court judge in Washington state.  Case closed, and another win for leftists and trannies, eh?

Now read how the two leftists on the 3-judge panel rationalized their ruling:

We note that the Spa did not challenge [the law's definition of "sexual orientation"], nor the language of the statute.  They didn't argue that the law was vague or that the plaintiffs' conduct [refusing to allow nude men to use the womens' facility] was not within the statute’s definition of discrimination on the basis of gender expression or identity. Nor did they challenge the State's implementing regulations.
    Although the enforcement action is grounded in state law, the Spa sued on First Amendment grounds.  Because the enforcement action did not violate the Spa’s First Amendment rights, we affirm the district court’s dismissal.

Notice the italicized phrase above: the wokie leftists on the Ninth use "grounded in state law" as if it settles the matter, when the entire case was challenging the constitutionality of that law.

For those of you who don't track legal opinions: the courts have RULED that burning the American flag is "freedom of speech."  Lap dances are protected as freedom of speech.  Same for wearing a T-shirt bearing obscenities.

By stark contrast, the Ninth has ruled that schools can prohibit students from wearing T-shirts bearing the American flag--cuz dat could offend illegal alien invaders, and Lord knows we can't go doing that, eh? 

So as you all surely realize by now, freedom of speech is whatever a leftist judge on any given day DECREES it is--an infinitely elastic concept that judges can apply any way they wish.  

And the wokie judges ruled "freedom of speech" or religion or association does NOT bar woke Dem pols from passing LAWS ordering that men can use womens' locker rooms and showers.  See, duh Constitution doesn't explicitly prohibit such laws, eh citizen?  So because the Founders never imagined this needed to be addressed, wokie judges agree that pols can pass laws demanding it.  See? 

Wait, neither flag burning nor lap dances are explicitly allowed by that same document, yet woke judges RULED they're protected as freedom of speech.  Starting to get it yet?

Now, a longstanding legal principle is that laws are unconstitutional if they're "vague."  So the two woke leftists on the Ninth Circuit rationalized their upholding the dismissal by noting that the law passed by the Democrat rulers of Washington state was NOT vague.  So dat fine.  Then they noted the plaintiffs didn't claim the law didn't apply to them, so dat fine too.  Finally they noted that plaintiffs didn't challenge the "implementing regulations."  So again, fine.

So because those legal details were observed, everyt'ing beez fine, deplorables!

The two wokie judges of the Ninth never bothered to consider the fact that the Washington state law ORDERING that women-only locker rooms and Christian-owned spas MUST allow men unduly burdens women.  "Cuz duh Constitution duzn't explicitly bar such laws!"

Because the brilliant men who wrote that magnificent document never imagined for a moment that 230 years later some woke virtue-signaling dipshits would pass a LAW forcing women to allow men to watch them undress and shower.  

I'd ask if you're starting to understand what your moronic, woke Dem lawmakers have done yet, but if you're a Democrat, you'll deny that you understand the connection.  Cuz you're cool with your daughter being forced to be nude around nude men, eh?

At least you *claim* you're cool with it.  So again, let me repeat my offer that will let you know if you're kidding yourself.  Let's meet, with your daughter, nude.  Any takers?  Nah, didn't think so--and of course that's totally logical and reasonable.

And it gets worse:  After the two woke shitheads at the Ninth upheld the lower-court dismissal of the spa owners' lawsuit, the owners immediately petitioned for an "en banc hearing"--meaning they wanted the entire court to rule on the matter.  But of course most leftist judges don't want to go on the record pushing this woke bullshit.  So to keep their leftist friends from having to go on the record, the same judge who wrote the 2-1 opinion rejecting the appeal *also* denied the en banc rehearing.

The wokies here were Ninth judges Margaret McKeown--age 74--and Ron Gould, both appointed by Bill "cigar" Clinton, while the lower-court wokie was Carter-appointed Barbara Rothstein. 

(Seven years ago Margaret McKeown and Ron Gould ruled that a male prisoner who wanted to be a female had the absolute right to get sex-change hormones and surgery at taxpayer expense.  "Cuz dat whut duh Founders wuda wanted, citizen!  Dis po' prisoner iz entitled to sex-change, but don' gots duh cash t'pay fo' it, so yew gots t'pay fo' it--cuz duh Founders wanted dat!"
   Starting to see a pattern yet?  Sure: either the Founders DID envision this, or they didn't.  But you don't get to vote, citizen.
   And in February of last year Gould voted to overturn two proof-of-citizenship laws in Arizona.)

Now here's the ultimate test to prove that the three woke judges are corrupt (in the legal sense):  Ask 'em "Do you claim your ORDER is what the Founders intended?"

Obviously only two answers are possible:  Either the Founders intended this result, or they didn't. 

Clearly--at least to rational Americans--the Founders never imagined anyone  would demand that women be forced to undress in front of men.  So we're left with having to guess what the Founders would have said had they been asked this question back in 1789.

Democrat judges and voters:  "Easy!  Duh Founders wuz, like, *totally cool with dere wimmin bein' nude around men dey din' know!  My friend had a brother who once had a letter from Tom Jefferson to John Adams sayin' how he couldn't wait for the next sex party!  Unfortunately he lost the letter in a move, but yew kin believe him cuz he beez a judge!"

Of course that's a joke: There's no evidence at ALL that the Founders would have wanted this.  So we're left with having to guess.

Of course yew don' get to vote--cuz three leftist judges have decided that question FOR you.  Cuz dat how a cool socialist society works, right?  Dems rule, conservatives shut the fuck up and obey, eh?

Finally, to all you Democrats who claim to support this RULING: don't forget my earlier offer:  If you really support this insane RULING, bring your daughter to a meeting with me, all of us nude, eh?  But of course you don't support this at all--you just bleat that you do, cuz it's cool virtue-signaling.  And of course that's how Dems prove they're part of the team.

Source.

https://reason.com/volokh/2026/03/12/judge-vandyke-this-is-a-case-about-swinging-dicks/

"Someone" bombs an Iranian nuclear complex

You have no idea what the pic below is, because the Lying, Scum-sucking Democrat-fellating U.S. Mainstream Media won't show ya or tell ya.

Refusing to tell you what's really happening is how they're undermining Trump, which they hope will enable the Islamic rulers of Iran to win the war.  And of course Democrats will be delighted:  They're happy to pay any price if it gives them power and removes Trump.  It's how they roll.

So with that said, take a look: 

 

This is an Iranian nuclear research complex.  Fairly small--if you look at the vehicles in the parking lot you'll see it's barely 1,000 feet long--just a bit over 3 football fields, eh?  So how much of a threat can it be, right?

A few days ago "someone" dropped 3 "bunker-buster" bombs on this facility in Iran. 

The Lying Mainstream Media won't tell ya, but this war was not about Iran funding terror groups, or about the mullahs slaughtering 36,500 Iranian protesters, but about...nuclear weapons.  Always.  The pic above is of Iran’s Parchin complex, before and after U.S. strikes on 9-10 March.  

Way back in 2011--15 damn years ago!--the IAEA identified Parchin as the location of experiments consistent with nuclear weapon development.  In 2018 Israel released 55,000 pages from Iran’s Amad Plan archive showing Parchin’s role. 

In 2015 the IAEA made just one inspection of Parchin, and detected fissionable particles.  Iran then refused further access.  You don't do that if you're doing innocent things.

Short answer: the IAEA spent fifteen years trying to inspect Parchin, and Iran refused.  Obozo and bribem refused to act, allowing the mullahs to continue working on a bomb.  Trump (or maybe Israel) acted. 

Iran has two choices: surrender, or try to out-wait Trump, hoping the Democrats will force the U.S. to give up--which all Democrat congresswhores are trying to do.

The war cost $11.3 billion in six days. The only oil tankers using the Strait of Hormuz are carrying oil to China, nowhere else.  Dubai’s refineries burn from Iranian strikes.  

The war is about nuclear weapons.  Trump was determined Iran wouldn't get one.

https://x.com/shanaka86/status/2031993064756306055

 

Iran's new leader can't attend his inauguration, so regime presents a cardboard cutout

Last Tuesday Iran began showing photos of a large cardboard cutout of the new appointed head of the regime, Mojtaba Khamenei--son of the dead former ruler--at a ceremony celebrating his appointment as the country’s leader.

No one is sure why he didn't appear in person, but there's speculation that he was injured in the same strike that killed his father.

Of course the regime's other high officials understandably didn't want to admit the new ruler had been injured, since that might spur young Iranians to continue to protest.  So they needed Plan B. 

Their solution was...novel: The inauguration ceremony went on as planned, but without Mojtaba Khamenei.  Instead the high officials showed a full-size cardboard cutout of a man with a photo of Mojtaba’s face at the top.

This is what passes for strategic thinking by Islamic dictators.

But the cardboard stand-in doesn't mean the Islamic regime can't survive the U.S. attacks.  All American actions controlled by the "election cycle."  All adversaries know that as elections approach, the U.S. Left/Democrats/communists will scream that we MUST stop whatever the administration is doing to clean up the world.

So "Cardboard Khamenei" and his regime have a chance to remain in power for decades to come. All the need to do is survive for another two months, and Democrats in the U.S. will rescue them.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/cardboard-khamenei/ 

CBS headline says U.S. troops were killed *in Iran.* "SEE? Trump has invaded!"

Notice anything odd about this headline on the CBS "Newz" website? 

 

The Democrats are bleating that Trump is gonna put "boots on the ground," as we did in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They're counting on voter fear of another long war with U.S. troops on the ground in Iran.  So the headline is a "We WARNED you stupid Trump voters!"

But there aren't any U.S. troops in Iran.  The headline is a lie--deliberate, cunning.  "Oh we din' mean dey wuz akshually in Iran.  We wudn't wanna mislead voters by makin' em think Trump had already sent troops into Iran.  We wud NEVAH mislead voters!"  

Sure you didn't, lying sons of whores.

The Mainstream Media hates Trump and loves all Democrats, no matter how anti-American or just stupid.  The CBS headline is just another example.  

Source: CBS Newz 

Member of the British parliament: "Babies are born wifout sex and must decide for demselves."

Meet Dawn Butler.  Dawn has some...unusual ideas.  But dat okay, cuz ebrywun beez allowed to think anything dey want, right?  So Dawn's...unusual...ideas have no effect on you, eh? 

 

Oh wait...Dawn is a black member of the British parliament.  And she supports every nutty liberal position.  And the other liberals support everything she wants, because "Dere's strength in numbers, comrade!"

And in the U.K today if you criticize Islam or trannies, either verbally or on social media, you get thrown in jail.  Let that sink in for a minute. 

Source: 

"Atomic bombs for dummies"

Of course you're not a dummy!  You're a highly-educated, respected expert in whatever your field is...just like Katie Couric or Hakeem Jeffries or Chuckie Schumer, eh?  So you'll already know everything I've explained below, eh?

Nuclear physics is the key to atomic bombs.  And if you wanna understand what's going on with Iran, you need to understand nuclear physics.

Unfortunately the odds are 10,000 to one that you don't know jack-shit about nuclear physics--in which case your opinions about Iran are worth virtually nothing, because you know almost nothing relevant about nuclear weapons.

So read on to see how much you knew.  Trigger warning: If you're a Democrat you will deny every fact below, cuz "We reject any facts we find upsetting!"  Totally true.  And with that intro...

In highschool, or maybe freshman year in college, you may recall things called "isotopes," eh? Sure ya do!  They're atoms of the same element but with different neutrons, so different masses, eh?

Now: "natural" uranium consists almost entirely of two isotopes: U-235 and U-238.  The latter has 3 more neutrons.  About 99.28% of all the uranium on Earth is U-238, while less than one percent is U-235.  (If you're curious it's less than three-quarters of one percent.) 

Only one of those two atoms supports "fast fission" needed to make a bomb.  Fortunately for humans, it's the lighter U-235...the one that's less than one percent of all uranium atoms.

Humans also got another lucky break:  the *other* isotope--U-238--not only doesn't do "fast fission," it actually absorbs the particles that would have made the other isotope go boom.  So U-238 actually opposes the boom.

And in fact to build a bomb you have to remove almost all the "bad" isotope, so that your uranium is 90% U-235.

Econ majors: "What's the big deal?  Can't we just order U-235 instead of U-238?"

Fortunately you can't, cuz all uranium in the world is already pre-mixed to 99.28% unusable, less than one percent that'll go boom.

Journalism majors: "I din' take chem, cuz dat's fo' geeks, an' I wuz a cool kid, but lotsa pipo sed yew can do "chemical reactions" to do damn near anything!  So there should be a way to separate 'em using a simple chemical reaction, right?"

Thanks for playing, Katie Couric, but no, because even though one of the isotopes can go boom while the other can't, the two are chemically identical, which means they act exactly alike in chemical reactions.  (An atomic bomb is NOT a chemical reaction, unlike dynamite or TNT or gunpowder.)

So the only way to separate the two is to use their infinitesimal weight difference.

Film majors: "My nerdy sister dated another nerd (obviously) who had a really expensive scale that could weigh something to one one-thousandth of a gram.  Will that work?"

Not even close.  The difference in weights between the booming and boom-killing isotopes is 
0.0000000000000000000000005 (5 x 10^-24) grams.  That's not hyperbole, but literal.  Beginning to see the problem yet?

Since atom bombs exist, obviously there's a way to separate 'em, but it's unbelievably costly: you build thousands of expensive "gas centrifuges,"  turn U into gas, spin it at 100,000 revolutions per minute or so, and the heavier isotope gets thrown a thousandth of an inch wider than the lighter one.  But it's only slight, so you have to recover the "good" stream and do it again.  And again and again, to get it to the 90% U-235 to make a bomb.  Got it?

This process is called "enrichment," and the Islamic regime of Iran has been doing it for at least 15 years--deep under mountains where bombs couldn't reach.

Now: During the last round of negotiations between us and the Islamic regime, Iranian representatives told US officials they'd managed to enrich 460 kg of uranium to 60% of the explosive isotope.  They were reportedly proud of having evaded inspection "protocols" negotiated by the Obozo regime to prevent Iran from accumulating uranium enriched beyond 10%.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) agreed closely, reporting Iran had about 441 kg of 60% uranium, but that much of this material was reportedly buried under rubble after strikes in June 2025. 

Experts say it would only take about ten days to enrich 60% uranium to 90% (weapons-grade), able to produce about 11 atomic bombs.

And once uranium has been enriched to 90%, all physics people know making the actual bomb is trivially easy: you just slap two half-grapefruit-size hemispheres into each other.

SO...when Democrat morons on TV bleat that "Iran was no threat to the U.S, ask 'em 
   1) Has the Islamic state of Iran killed thousands of Americans in the past?
   2) They claim to be enriching uranium to fuel nuclear powerplants, which only need 10%. Have they been enriching uranium to way more than the 10% needed?
   3) Why do you think would they go to that huge expense and effort when powerplants only need 10%?

   4) Why do you think the Lying Mainstream Media hasn't made this clear? 

Source.

 https://www.google.com/search?q=did+iranian+negotiators+admit+to+having+400+kg+of+60%25+uranium

Democrat commenters: "Iranians are tricking U.S. military into bombing painted targets"

 

Wow, we wuz, like, TOTALLY fooled yet again!

"Leaders" of the Democrat partei [sic]: "SEE, voters?  Dis iz how stupid duh U.S. military is!  Duh clever Islamic regime of Iran has found a way to make the U.S. and Israel waste million-dollar missiles!  Dey haz painted pics of airplanes and helicopters on the ground, and the dumb military can't tell the difference, so wastes millions bombing the painted pics!  Hahahahaha!

"SO...dey iz wasting precious tax dollars, which coulda been used to fund more medical care for duh pipo we call undocumented Americans!  Or to pay for more of what we smaht Dems cleverly call 'transgender healthcare!'"

If you think I'm kidding, check out comments by pro-Iran-regime types on websites like CENTCOM.  Amazing.

For Democrat voters: In the pic directly above, notice the many black tire tracks looping around the crater.  If nothing but paint had been, why would locals be concerned enough to race around the impact point, eh?  Dem shill: "Uhh...cuz dey wuz reel excited dat dey'd fooled duh 'Mericans yet again, an' wanted to inspect duh impact reel fast!  Yep yep yep!"

Stupid people who know they're almost certain to be defeated understandably grasp at straws, so put out fakes that are easily proved as such.  Cuz their only chance at surviving is to get the American public to DEMAND that we stop taking out Iranian military assets. 

(For young Americans: "Grasping at straws" is from an old saying "A drowning man will grasp at a straw," hoping to survive.) 

NY attorney general demands hospital resume sexual mutilation of minor children

In January one of New York City’s largest hospitals stopped performing irreversible mutilations (and thus sterilizations) on minor children.  That halt came after the Trump administration said the government would consider ending research grants to any hospital that continued performing trans mutilations on minor children. 

Within days, the corrupt, satanic, black female attorney- general of New York state--fat, moronic Letitia James--ordered the hospital to resume sexual mutilation of MINOR children.

The attorney-general’s office said the hospital’s decision to stop mutilating minor children--euphemized as a "Transgender Youth Health Program"--violated the state’s anti-discrimination laws by “jeopardizing access to medically necessary healthcare for some of the most vulnerable New Yorkers.”

This is legal horseshit, and anyone in this crazy, corrupt bitch's office should have known it.  There is NO evidence that mutilation is "medically necessary."  There was a fake study ten years ago that minors who got sex-change surgery were less likely to commit suicide that those who didn't.  The study was eventually found to be worthless--the corrupt "researchers"--pushers of the trans mania--had cherry-picked their data.  A wider study found there was no difference in suicide rates.

James’ office promised “further action” if the hospital didn't immediately resume offering hormone therapies, puberty blockers and other steps on the path to mutilation.

Also, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced a proposal to cut federal Medicaid and Medicare funding to hospitals that provide transgender steps--which ABC cunningly calls "gender-affirming care" to minors.

ABC "Newz" adds that this was "part of a suite of regulatory actions targeting transgender Americans."  No, you lying rat-fucking bastards: the "regulatory actions" were and are designed to save minor children from being permanently mutilated and sterilized because they're nervous about growing up it the body they were born with.  You didn't like that truth, and wanted to anger voters against Trump, so you cunningly, knowingly omitted the crucial words "minor children."

The extortionate demand letter from James bleated that the threat of losing funding didn't relieve any “medical institutions’ existing duties and obligations under New York law.” 

Roll that around in your head for a minute: what the tyrant James is demanding is that hospitals must continue providing sexual mutilation without payment--because she says NY state law requires it.  It doesn't, because the so-called "care" is NOT medically necessary--for anyone, let alone for minor children--some of whom aren't even old enough to drive yet.

The extortionate, unconstitutional letter continues:

“The sudden discontinuation of medically necessary transgender healthcare can have severe, negative health outcomes.  Accordingly, the Attorney General is extremely concerned by your institution’s decision to cease the provision of care to this vulnerable, minority population.”

The letter gives the hospital until March 11 to obey James's demands.

The heart of the tranny mafia is the "World Professional Association for Transgender Health."  One of its board members--a demon named Dr. Scott Leibowitz--bleated "This sets a very dangerous precedent for all areas of health care, if the government can cherry-pick one area of medicine to use to withhold necessary funding from entire groups of people.”  

Except: It ain't "medically necessary."  This is a scam, operated by demon docs and shrinks who are making a fortune off the backs of confused kids and parents, paid for by taxpayers.

So ABC "Newz"--ever on the side of Democrats and hating Trump--lies by omitting the crucial fact that the administration doesn't want hospitals using tax dollars to fund tranny mutiliation on minor children.  If an 18-year-old wants to be mutilated and sterilized, that isn't restricted in any way.

Source: ABC "Newz"

https://abcnews.com/amp/Business/wireStory/ny-attorney-general-demands-hospital-resume-gender-affirming-130725643 

Illegal alien demon with 30 arrests stabs woman to death at a bus stop. Dems yawn.

The demon below is Abdul Jalloh, 32, an illegal invader from Sierra Leone who entered the U.S. illegally in 2012.

 

In his 14 years here the demon managed to amass over 30 arrests, a rape charge, malicious wounding, assault, drug possession, and an ICE removal order.  So how did he end up free to stab a white woman to death at a Virginia bus stop? 

Because Democrats run Virginia.  They kept letting the guy skate--no punishment for numerous arrests, rape charge dropped.  Finally in 2020 a judge signed a "final removal order" and ICE filed a "detainer" with Virginia authorities--six years ago.  But since Virginia refuses to honor detainers, ICE was never able to find the demon and drag him onto an airplane back to his shithole.

And finally all that corrupt Democrat lawlessness resulted in the demon murdering a 41-year-old white woman.  No provocation, no warning.  She got off the bus, he followed, and started stabbing her.

Roll that around in your mind for a minute.

Yes, of course the demon is to blame for murdering her, but it was only able to kill her because the Democrats who rule Virginia refused to comply with the legal request to turn the demon over to ICE when he was in state custody for one of his many criminal charges.

If Virginia's ruling Democrats had complied with valid federal law--by which this demon was to be deported--the woman would not have been brutally murdered.  Thanks, Democrats.

Doesn't make the national news because...reasons.  The Mainstream Media doesn't want ruling Democrats to look bad, eh?  And Dem rulers yawn and sneer: "Neener neener neener!  We don't have to do NUFFIN' to hep Orange Hitler!  And if that means a few 'common people' 'lose their lives' due to some misunderstanding, dat not ouah fault!  So quit whining, deplorables!"

Start the clock: This will happen again in another few weeks.  Then again.  Then yet again, because Democrats love illegal aliens more than they love Americans, and constantly refuse to comply with federal law.

 

Double-standards from the Democrats, leftists and Mainstream Media--as usual

If you're under 30 or so, you almost certainly don't recall anything about international events from 2008 to 2016.  So when the Mainstream Media scream that Trump is a warmonger, you have no idea that Barky Obozo bombed seven countries--after being gifted the Nobel Peace Prize by the corrupt leftist Nobel committee.  

No Media organ ever said a critical word about Barky.  But when Trump stops the Iranian mullahs from getting an atom bomb, the Media screams bloody murder. 

 

 

It's on in Iran

WELL it's on in Iran, eh?  Hopefully Trump has better sense than Bush so will refuse to put American troops on the ground, which is stupid.  Take out the regime's weapons, navy, palaces and barracks, and let the Iranian people take it from there.  It's what we should have done in Iraq, but the Chief of Staff of the Army pushed the notion that we needed troops on the ground, and Bush didn't know enough to say No.

Now the hoot: Barky Obozo fucked the U.S. more than any other president, by talking big and then doing nothing when adversaries called his bluff.  If you think I'm exaggerating, google "Red line in Syria."

Barky was always a chickenshit.  Look at how he rose to power from his leftist base in Chitcongo.  The Democrats saw a chance to win big, and they did.  The U.S. lost all credibility in the world, ending up with Barky giving the Iranian regime $100 BILLION, of which a cool BILLION was in cash, subserviently flown into Tehran in a polyethylene-wrapped pallet in an unmarked CIA C-130.  It was a sweet bribe on top of the other $100 billion barky gave 'em--enough to finance all their terrorist proxies for 30 years.

Of course Democrats don't believe it, and don't care.  The $100 billion gift is a matter of public record.  The billion in cash--a mix of $100 bills and Euro banknotes--hasn't been admitted, but the flight crew leaked it.  They knew.

SO...my predictions: With U.S. missiles decimating the IRGC (the muscle protecting the mullahs), the mullahs who aren't able to flee will be ripped limb from limb by angry Iranian citizens who watched their friends slaughtered by the IRGC and the basij (the thuggish civilian volunteer enforcers for the regime, like Hitlers brownshirts).  If you doubt that, you don't know history: After the Nazis were defeated, German civilians turned on the regime's thugs and killed 'em in droves.  Same in France after the Nazis retreated.

Oppressed people tend to retaliate against their oppressors, eh?  So we'll see.

Unfortunately, Trump's ordering the strikes on Iran has ensured that the Democrats will win control of at least the House in November, and likely the presidency in 2028.  The big question is, will history show that trade-off (losing the U.S. govt to eliminate the tyrannical Islamic regime) was a worthwhile trade?  

It'll be a decade or so before we know.  

As always, the problem is that our enemies can either do nothing, or can try to exploit the chaos to their advantage.  Which choice to ya think they'll make, eh?

Of course: they'll almost certainly make the second choice.  It's the natural choice of tyrants.

Democrats first:  they'll accuse Trump of "wanting to rule Iran," or claim he wants to "steal their oil," or that he attacked to "give more money to defense contractors."

If you were over 25 in 2003 those bleats should sound familiar: the Dems used all of 'em to attack G.W. Bush for sending U.S. troops to both Iraq and Afghanistan.   And sure enough, not two hours after Trump's 3a.m. speech, the Dems were already using these attack points on the president's X account.

Of course history shows we didn't rule Iraq, and didn't steal a single barrel of their oil.  But since the Lying Mainstream Media never fact-checks Democrat bullshit, U.S. citizens (voters) never learn that all the Dem talking points were bullshit.

We should never have put boots on the ground in either Iraq or Afghanistan.  We put troops in because the 4-star Army chief of staff didn't want his service to lose appropriations, so insisted to Bush that we HAD to have troops on the ground to win.  Bush wasn't a student of military history, so he didn't know enough to buck the general.  And none of the other service chiefs were willing to contradict the guy.  That decision cost the lives of about 4,500 U.S. soldiers in Iraq and 2,500 in Afghanistan (along with about 3,000 "contract personnel."

So I predict we won't see U.S. boots on the ground in Iran during hostilities.  Problem is that after the mullahs are out, U.S. Democrats will insist that the U.S. do years of "nation-building" or reparations for the damage.  

This would be a complete disaster, and is NOT needed.  Just end the sanctions, allowing Iran to sell oil at world market prices.  Let Iranians engage in free trade.  Their economy will boom.  Maybe send 'em planeloads of medical supplies while their economy gets back up to speed.

 

One thing we can count on: Democrats and their allies in the Lying Mainstream Media will be screaming bloody murder for two years about this.   

Yet another illegal alien invader allowed in by bribem assaults American mother

Three weeks ago (Feb 4) in Louisville, Kentucky a criminal illegal alien from Cuba--Yordan Basilio Diaz Vera--was driving for Lyft.  A mother of 4 had requested a ride from the service.

The illegal picked her up, drove her to a secluded spot, pulled a gun and sexually assaulted her.

The illegal assailant was allowed into the U.S. in November of 2022 by the bribem regime.

The assault was reported on several conservative websites, but of course the Media ignored it cuz it would have made a few thousand voters re-think their support for Democrat treason.

As you could have predicted, within minutes of the details of the sexual assault being posted on conservative websites, Democrat commenters jumped in bleating "Dis FAKE NEWS!  Dis not happen!  The faaabulous Alejandro Mayorkas absolutely assured us dat duh southern border was, like, *totally* secure!"

Really, sparky?  Here's the official release from DHS.  Eat shit and die, stupid Democrats.

Yet another illegal alien sexual assaults an American mother

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2026/02/25/louisville-lyft-rapist-ice-asks-kentucky-authorities-not-release-criminal-illegal 

bribem and mayorkas allowed convicted rapists to board flights by showing their conviction papers as ID

Breanna Morello is one of the good guys (girls):

Back when bribem ruled, did you ever wonder who ordered the TSA to allow hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to board commercial flights without a SINGLE ID--while every American had to have one to board?

Breanna sued TSA to find out--and discovered that bribem’s corrupt "Department of Homeland Security" (headed by the total Cuban communist Alejandro Mayorkas) allowed CONVICTED sex offenders to board flights by...wait for it...showing their sex offender paperwork.

Yes, the bribem regime allowed convicted rapists to not just cross the border, but to be flown--at your expense--to any city in the U.S.  All they had to do was promise to attend "sexual deviancy counseling" and register as sex offenders.

And of course we all know illegal aliens will promise anything to get into the U.S, since they know no one will ever check to ensure they did as they promised.

Breanna sued TSA under FOIA and won.  The agency confirmed her suspicions.  And the comments to her post are fabulous!  A dozen or so are below.

The Democrat party is so totally, utterly corrupt that in a just world, they'd never be able to win another election.  But with Media air cover they can continue to lie merrily.  "Undocumented Americans commit fewer crimes than U.S. citizens!"  "We NEED undocumented American workers to be prosperous!"  Lies on top of lies.

So why would the Media lie to your face?  Because it benefits their Democrat masters.

* It irritated me to see illegal aliens had a special line at Newark Airport, breezing thru with no docs, meanwhile I had to show ID, take off my shoes, and submit to a full body scan.

* So Mayorkas was aware he was letting convicted sex offenders into our country!  They had an official policy to accommodate them!  Let that sink in.

* To Democrats there is no such thing as a "sexual deviant."  Democrats see pedophile rapists as heroes to march and fight for.

* I recall seeing signs in airports telling illegals that their arrest paperwork would suffice to get through security.  They didn't go through any medical screening either.  While your grandmother was getting cavity searched, all illegals were waved thru with no security.

* Never forget that Democrat "leaders" got together in a room and discussed this, then decided it was a good idea to import convicted sex offenders.  Why did they think that was good for the U.S? Insane.

* Wonder if that same paperwork would allow them to register to vote?

* Ghastly abuse of the American people by the Biden-Harris administration, leading to the rape of your wives and daughters.  Leftist judges who constantly block deportation of predators.  Mayorkas and Kamala should be in prison for life!

* Biden and his lackeys deliberately flew illegal- alien sex predators into our communities on a large scale in exchange for them *promising* to attended “counseling” class. The betrayal is almost unimaginable.

* Why would Democrats deliberately allow convicted rapists into the US?  [Good question.]

* You'd think Democrats would never be able to win another election.  But the Media won't publiish it, so Dems will continue to claim "Dis FAKE news!"

* Democrats are the party of importing foreign criminals and paying them to stay and vote Democrat forever.

Source.

https://x.com/BreannaMorello/status/2026465853970043229?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw  

What happens when politicians reverse "natural selection"?

Evolutionary biologists long ago identified a process called "natural selection," in which smarter, stronger creatures better adapted to survive reproduced in greater numbers, passing those traits to their offspring.  

But starting in the 1960s socialist/Democrat politicians began to interfere with that process for humans, by giving money, food, housing and other goodies--your tax dollars--to those unable to work.  This was fine.

Actually it was more than fine, as the socialist pols realized the people they gave freebies to would vote for 'em.  So they vastly expanded the giveaways to stupid or lazy people, enabling the stupid and lazy to live comfortably without having to work.  

This won even more votes, so the socialist politicians went on to pass laws that gave indigent women more money for each additional child--which, to the surprise of no one, resulted in a huge increase in the number of children born to the stupid or merely lazy.

Because the recipients didn't have to work, and got money for each child, they had the time and energy to have more children.  So in just a few decades the percentage of the population that was either lazy, less competent or both skyrocketed.

And naturally all the people who got freebies from the government continued to vote for politicians who promised them the most free shit.  And thus  the process which had once favored a slow but steady increase in human intelligence and creativity was replaced with one in which stupid or lazy people slowly became the majority.  

And at that point all politicians began pandering to them, since without their votes no pol could get elected.

Before this happened, most science fiction of the time had predicted the population would slowly grow more intelligent and civilized over time.  But thanks to the politicians replacing "natural selection" with "free stuff," as the years passed, things seemed to be heading in the opposite direction:  The population seemed to be getting dumber.  But it happened so gradually that only a few noticed--and anyone who pointed out the obvious was quickly shouted down by the mob demanding more freebies.

When one group has five children per female and the other averages 1.4, then if you start with equal numbers of each group, after just 50 years the first group will comprise 98% of the total population.  So more quickly than anyone ever imagined, much faster breeding by the group supported by taxpayers made the vast majority of the population just like their parents, leaving the slower-breeding group to become a tiny minority that could never win any elections.

This result was no accident, but was carefully planned by socialists who hated America.  One was Saul Alinsky (the communist about whom Hilliary Clinton wrote her capstone thesis).  But perhaps better known were two university professors, Richard Cloward and Francis Fox Piven--both socialists.  In 1966 the duo totally mapped out a strategy to bankrupt America by pushing ever-growing welfare programs and signing up every poor person for benefits.  They flew around the country pitching this faaabulous plan at universities, to rave reviews.

The goal was to destroy the U.S. without having to fire a shot.  And it's working. 

Tranny hangs trans flag on El Capitan in Yosemite, gets fired, sues

Defacing a national park is a crime.  If someone hung a pro-Trump or anti-Chinese flag on a popular and highly visible attraction in a national park, that person would be fined.

Well, unless the person is a member of a group beloved and protected by leftist judges, like a tranny who worked as a "ranger" at Yosemite National Park who hung a tranny flag on El Capitan. 

The person wasn't fined, but was fired--and has now sued the Department of the Interior, alleging that being fired for hanging a flag on one of the most prominent attractions in the park violated their freedom of speech. 

The lawsuit--filed in the notoriously left-wing DC district court--claims the firing violated the tranny’s First Amendment and Privacy Act rights. Joslin asked to get their job at Yosemite back, and for a guarantee that the right to free speech would be upheld in Yosemite. 

Yes, citizen, if this lawsuit succeeds, ALL citizens will have the right to hang signs and flags on public property without penalty.

The tranny told the Media that the Trump administration "wants to take away basic constitutional rights and ruin the lives of people who think or are different from them.”

If the tranny mafia get away with this, I suspect other "special" groups will sue for the right to spray-paint any public space without penalty--since that's a type of "speech," eh?

Source.

https://www.sfgate.com/national-parks/article/yosemite-national-park-ranger-sues-21884924.php 

Ex-CEO of homeless agency in California charged with "misappropriating" $1.2 million

 
The homeless–industrial complex is a lucrative target for professional grifters.  National Review reports that Gwendolyn Westbrook, former CEO of the United Council of Human Services--a San Francisco-based homelessness nonprofit--was charged Monday with nine felony counts for allegedly misappropriating more than $1.2 million in public funds.

In addition to the $1.2 million, court documents show that other large amounts of money are also missing from UCHS accounts.

This is likely just the tip of an iceberg:  The Democrat-ruled state of California spent $24 billion from 2019 to 2024 on "the homeless," but officials don't know how the money was spent, according to a state audit released last year, which found that no systems were in place to track spending.

Of course there weren't!  Cuz that would have made any theft easier to find, eh?  Can't have THAT, comrade.  

From the viewpoint of Gavin Newsom and his merry band of thieving Democrats in the state Assembly this is success--because it allows 'em to bleat that they need even more tax dollars to "continue to help the homeless," eh?

Laughing all the way to the bank