"Lawmakers" order AT&T to offer below-cost internet service to low-income; AT&T ends the service
"Lawmakers" are some of the dumbest sumbitches on the planet. Only one in a thousand knows anything about economics, or energy, or anything other than grift and getting re-elected.
Latest example is from the shithole state of New York, where telecom giant AT&T offered 5G home internet service for $60 a month for customers who didn't have cable or fiber internet.
Wokie NY lawmakers felt this was too pricey for low-income families. The woke "leaders" bleated dat "It jus' not FAIR dat duh eeeebil big company won't give dis service fo' what we think dey should!"
So duh woke lawmakerz passed a law--soothingly called the "Affordable Broadband Act"--ORDERING the company to provide its 5G home internet to low-income families for $15 a month.
"Yay! Problem solved! See, we kin use ouah wokie majority to make doze greedy companies do anything we want!"
So how'd that work out?
The company stopped offering that service in the whole state. And the wokiez are absolutely FURIOUS! "How dare they do dis!"
The wokiez arguments are sneering: "AT&T: 'The poor don't need internet.'" Of course the company never even remotely said that, but it's how leftists sway public opinion. Exactly like communism does it: "Your home has three bedrooms, comrade. The Committee has decided to assign two more families to live in your house."
Y'know, this would be a great chance for AT&T to make a point: Tell wokie customers they can sign up to pay the difference between $60 and $15 each month, for a specific family. That way the wokiez feel virtuous.
See, by ending the service in NY, AT&T will lose money. But they knew if they bent the knee, wokiez in EVERY state where the company offers the service would pass similar laws, which would cost the company a lot more than it'll lose in NY. Better to make the point now.
Source.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/01/att-complies-with-law-requiring-cheap-internet-by-ending-a-service-in-ny