Eleven-minute clip shows you how they were all lying to scare you into taking the jab

Unless you paid close attention from the day the FDA and CDC approved Pfizer's so-called "vaccine," you've forgotten what a relentless avalanche of screaming, hateful propaganda was unleashed on Americans to get them to take the jab.

This for a "vaccine" the CDC and FDA and Pfizer--and biden's handlers--already knew was so ineffective at preventing the "vaccinated" from getting the Chyna virus that the CDC literally wrote a new definition for "vaccine" to get it to qualify!  And yet they NEVER stopped screaming at you that "this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated."  And "If you get vaccinated you canNOT get covid!"

SO...for the sake of your kids (or future kids) you need to watch this absolutely masterful eleven-minute compilation of every damn talking head on the alphabet nets, and every lying sack of shit in government, screaming at you that if you didn't take the ineffective jab you should be denied all medical care--and lots worse.  Every late-night talk-show host joined in the screaming condemnation.  Those two utter lying pieces of shit Don Lemon and bill gates were particularly bad.

Hell, they were all total Nazis--and utterly wrong about EVERYTHING.  They lied, innocent Americans died.  The Left's idol--that dumb-as-a-rock Democrat governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo ALONE killed 15,000 by ordering nursing homes to take infected people.  And yet no one was fired or went to prison, no one was executed.

All it cost Americans was our freedom, our businesses, the lives of loved ones who were prevented from getting approved drugs that cured the thing in two days, and thus died when they could SO EASILY have lived.

The key from the tyrants' standpoint was to scream that if you didn't obey 'em, you'd DIE, along with your loved ones.  So it was essentially the same as the Democrats are doing with Globull Worming: "Unless you do exactly as we order, ALL LIFE ON EARTH WILL BE DESTROYED BY RUNAWAY WARMING!"

SO...did you learn your lesson from the covid panic?  The "plandemic"?

No, most of you didn't.  The regime claims about 70% of Americans took the jab, even though 40% were essentially forced to by biden's ORDER that they'd be fired if they didn't.  And half the public (Democrats) think the Dem regime did nothing wrong AT ALL.  Hmmm....

Source. 

https://citizenfreepress.com/column-2/the-unvaccinated-nobody-is-safe/

Second source, unless YouTube takes it down. 

https://youtu.be/zI3yU5Z2adI

Check the large number of empty seats in Scranton yesterday to hear Porridgebrain

Yesterday the alleged preznit, Porridgebrain, spoke in his hometown, Scranton PA.  SO...since he's not just a REEEally popular preznit but also dis hiz hometown, errybudy in Scranton loves him, so he should have drawn huge crowd, right?  

Well...unless the Mainstream Media is lying to Americans.  So this is the "crowd" minutes before biden was scheduled to appear.  Take a look:

Notice anything?  Like, tons of empty seats?

Compare this half-empty room to the huge crowd outside the bodega Trump visited yesterday.

And yet all the polls show the *nationwide vote* for prez tied.  That's because places like California and New York are overwhelmingly Democrat.  But all that has to happen is for the polls to say it's "close" for the Dems to pull of a plausible steal in November.

And the Dems and the Media will laugh their asses off.

In 1984 a KGB defector exposed the Soviet plan to make the U.S. fail--without firing a shot

“America's continued success depends on its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.” – Joseph Stalin

All Americans who love this nation should read  the 1984 interview with Yuri Alexandrovich Bezhmenov, a member of the USSR's KGB who defected.  https://youtu.be/QuyYG4sDMV4

Bezhmenov described a four stage plan that would result in the U.S. falling to communism without having to fire a shot:

1. Demoralization
2. Destabilization
3. Crisis
4. Normalization

Keep in mind that he gave this interview 40 years ago:

The demoralization process in the United States is already complete:  Young Americans are being taught nothing about the nation's founding principles, but instead that their country was founded on racism, lies and theft.  No society can survive when its children believe those things.
   Demoralization was the process that took the most time because we had to totally change the schools, by taking over school boards and changing what the boards ordered taught.

“The next stage is destabilization. This happens fast--just 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation.  We paralyze your economy and foreign relations, and introduce waste and laziness in your armed forces.”

“The third stage is crisis.  Given a suitably deadly crisis it only takes a few weeks to get your politicians to take away your rights--"for your own good," of course.  And of course you never get them back.  After the purported crisis is over, the power structure will have radically changed.  Your leaders will have shut down your economy, and will only slowly and grudgingly re-open it.

"The last stage is normalization:  Your media and politicians assure you that the conditions you're now living under are just as they've always been--that nothing has changed.  Of course that's a lie, but people have no way to be sure.  Politicians then promise their supporters a huge amount of free goodies, which sink your government further into debt and fuel inflation.
  They eliminate free market competition, instead pouring tax dollars into corrupt companies while honest ones are penalized.  "Hate speech" becomes a crime punished by prison.  And of course only the government determines what's considered "hate speech."
   Your leftists--all these professors and self-styled "civil rights defenders" and U.N. supporters--are instrumental in this process.”

In countries where we tested this subversion, millions died.  The lucky ones were able to flee to Western countries hoping to find peace, only to find that same subversion plan--the same road to destruction--is now being followed here.

In particular, the vaunted UN is full of corrupt vultures eager to grab their share of the West's wealth.

 Wow.  He gave that interview 40 years ago.

NPR has a new CEO--who totally dismisses criticism that her network is biased

I used to listen to NPR.  My siblings and friends still do.  I eventually learned that they're liars who are committed to socialism and the Democrat party and will say and do literally anything to protect Democrats and hurt conservatives and Republicans (which are NOT the same thing!).

SOooo......two weeks before the 2020 election the New York Post broke a story about Hunty biden's abandoned laptop, which contained tens of thousands of pics of Hunty doing drugs and cavorting with hookers.  But hey, dat not a big deal cuz he not an elected official, right?

Right.  But then there were 35,000 texts and emails showing that Hunty had been the bagman for his dad and family.  For young Americans, "bagman" means the guy who collects the bribes and payoffs fo' da boss--or as hunty put it, "the big guy."  Gee, wonder what he meant by that phrase, eh?

It's a mystery, eh?

Now: this was likely the biggest news in decades: the fucking """preznit""" caught taking obvious bribes from the Chinese Communist Party--admittedly through the "cutout" of his crackhead son.  So you'd think the Media would have reported it, eh?

Hahahahahahaha!  Pardon me while I catch my breath from laughing.

The leftist media--which is to say all of 'em--sneered that the laptop story was a fake: either there WAS no laptop, or if there was, it was a Russian plant!  "A "disinformation operation," sneered the elites, with every single outlet parroting one or more of those Democrat talking points.

The sneer and coverup was so obvious, because no Media org bothered to actually ask the Post for details that might verify their story.  They didn't WANT to investigate, so they didn't.  Social media even deleted all posts that commented on the story. 

So it's no surprise that good ol' communist NPR was right up there with the pack.  But the so-called "public editor" at NPR--a lying socialist shithead named Terrence Samuels--went further than the Washington Post and New York Times and Associated Press, since he felt the need to *explain why his Dem propagandists spiked the story.  (For young Americans, "spiked" means killed it.)

Here's the "public editor's" very revealing excuse for spiking the story:

 

As you see, they didn't say "We investigated and found that the NY Post story was false," because they didn't do a single bit of investigating.  Instead they just parroted the Democrat talking points.

This is how the Democrats (the Left) control what you read and see: they put out the Party Line--the talking points; the Narrative--and every mainstream media outlet parrots it.

Next, one of the major networks broadcast a long one-on-one interview with Hunty, and one of the questions was "Is the laptop yours?"  Hunty replied "I honestly don't know.  It could be."  So...Dem talking point reinforced.

But later, in sworn court filings Hunty's attorneys sued the owner of the repair shop and the NY Post for revealing his personal communications from the laptop.

Wait...I though a week ago you said you weren't sure if this was your laptop.  And if it isn't, under what legal theory can you sue people for revealing your personal information if it's not your laptop, eh?   

Of course the FBI knew from day one that the laptop did belong to hunty, and was authentic.  They knew that because...wait for it...they had seized the laptop from the computer shop in December of 2019--ten months before the NY Post broke the story.

The bastards still have the thing, but refuse to either confirm or deny--and if congress says "You must give us the thing" the FBI just laughs.  Cuz dat where we are now, citizen:  Duh regime breaks the law anytime it wants, and no one can make them obey it. 

Finally, six months after the stolen election--after it was too late--both the WaPo and the NY Times had forensic analysts examine a copy of the laptop's hard drive, and admitted the obvious: the drive was authentic.

SO...the Media covered up the biggest story in decades to protect biden, to help him win the "official" vote.  And yet you didn't know fuck-all about it, because you're like mushrooms: you're kept in the dark and fed shit by the Media.

Now: obviously that's all "old news:" too late to do anything--past can't be changed, eh?  I write this because the leftists who run NPR just named a new (liberal, female) CEO.  And a few days later a 25-year veteran of NPR wrote a long op-ed admitting that the organization is totally dedicated to supporting the Democrat party.  Totally biased.

The new female CEO replied NOT by rebutting the author's points, but by essentially accusing the author of racism.

SO...if you're one of the millions of Democrat voters who continue to get your "news" from NPR, be aware that you're not getting real "news," but just Democrat talking points.  Of course if you're a Democrat that's perfectly fine: you don't want to know what's really happening, because it's barely possible that some of what's really happening would upset you.  Not the ten million illegals biden has allowed in in just three years, of course.  You're fine with that.

You're also not critical of the million lethal doses of fentanyl carried in by the illegals every year, since your kids don't do drugs, eh?

Not forcing every American to buy EVs by 2028--you're fine with that cuz your top priority is climate change, and even the EPA admits forcing all new cars to be EVs by 2028 is likely to produce a global temperature 0.01 degrees cooler than otherwise.

Not banning the use of coal and gas to make electricity, cuz "global worming" again.  So you're fine with that.  No, the key for Democrats is that it's better to listen to the soothing, dulcet tones of NPR's talent and not worry about anything.  Yeah, dat's it.

Source.

https://twitter.com/NPRpubliceditor/status/1319281101223940096

THIS is what guns are good for

THIS is what guns are good for:  Thug--armed with a gun, but no more lethal than a knife or club--walks up to a group of women and kids, clearly reaching to grab one of the women.

Without hesitating, one of the women draws and fires, downing the thug.

Suddenly the big bad thug, who moments ago was having his way, is on the ground crying, hands up near his face in that "Please don't shoot me again" whine.

The woman picks up his gun and then--keeping the muzzle of hers pointed at him--uses her foot to roll him onto his stomach.

Now pay attention: You liberals will NEVER eliminate thugs.  Never.  If any of you cutesy purple-haired snowflakes wants to argue with that, I'll be delighted.

And if you disarm everyone--as you have clearly said, many times, you want to do--then we get to the situation in the U.K., where killings by "knifemen" have become common.

(You won't believe this, but the stupid Brit government actually announced a program where you could bring in your kitchen knives and the regime would helpfully *grind off the pointy end so it couldn't stab.*  Seriously.)  

So...thug males will be with us always.  The beauty of guns is that they allow a smaller, weaker woman to level the playing field...IF the woman has a gun.

Imagine if every woman in the U.S. had a gun in her purse.  Imagine thugs might think twice before being thugs if they knew there was a good chance of being shot from the side by another female?  

And for thugs too stupid to think it through, if they get cut down in a hail of bullets, is society better off?  You're damn right it is.

Ever hear the phrase "An armed society is a polite society"?  If you're a Democrat you probably haven't.

But I don't know why I bother warning you.  You don't listen, don't know history, and Democrats believe if we just make it illegal for citizens to own guns, the thugs will be disarmed.  Wow, talk about dumb.

I'd love to debate any Democrat, on-stage, who'll take the position that if the Dems ban guns, thugs won't have any.

Source.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1779348493490131392 

Taxpayers will pay for Democrat get-out-the-vote drives again this year

U.S. law limits donations to political parties and candidates, but allows unlimited donations to supposedly non-partisan organizations that say they want to register voters.  And, donations to these organizations are tax-deductible, meaning donors pay lower taxes.

So these supposedly non-partisan organizations are raking in over half a BILLION dollars this year.  Nice, eh?

The organizations send their workers door to door with pre-filled registration and ballot-requesting forms.  All they need is the voter's signature.  Ballot is delivered, and it's now legal for organization workers to pick up those ballots and drop them off in unmonitored drop-boxes.

The big restriction is that by law, non-partisan registration organizations must be non-partisan--they're not allowed to only register voters who want to vote Democrat, for example.

But as Democrats always do, they've found an easy way around the above restriction: they simply focus their efforts on low-income census districts, since low-income people are far more likely to vote Democrat.

"We're not targeting Democrats! We're just trying to register 150% of the black population of blue cities in battleground states!!"

In other words, the full Detroit.

After the 2020 election Time magazine ran a long piece describing a "well-funded cabal of powerful people" who had worked behind the scenes in 2020  "to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information" to defeat Trump and other Republicans.  Time gushed that these "shadow campaigners were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it."

The biggest single donor was Mark Zuckerberg, whose wealthy foundation donated $400 MILLION to do exactly what was described above.  "Fortify the election."

That Orwellian phrase "fortifying the election became a dark joke after that.

This year the all-Democrat voter registration effort has even more money, and their scripts are better.  By contrast, the Republicans have no comparable effort.

Democrats have also found yet another loophole:  Tax law prohibits wealthy foundations from engaging in partisan political activity.  But there's no limit to how much a wealthy foundation can give to one of these so-called "non-partisan" registration outfits.  Hence Zuckerberg's $400 MILLION.

During the 2020 election an organization called the "Voter Participation Center" solicited millions of ballot applications in swing states -- many of them prefilled for residents.  The Center readily admits it isn't seeking out all potential voters but just "young people, people of color and single women"--likely Democrat voters.

And that effort continues this year, with half a billion dollars being spent to turn out Democrat voters.

And the donors get a tax break for it.

We're not ahead; we are desperately behind.

Plus: In states that require citizens to declare a party when registering to vote, what happens if a voter, visited at home and asked what party they'd like to register as, says "Republican"?  What are the odds that the signed registration and/or ballot request will be submitted?

If not submitted by the organization, no ballot would arrive in the mail, greatly reducing the chances of that person voting.  Hmmm...

Wait...that couldn't happen, because that would be fraud.  And we know the Dems would nevah consider such a thing.

Source.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2024/04/10/how_taxpayers_will_heavily_subsidize_democrat_boots_on_the_ground_this_election_1023475.html?mc_cid=824cd3fa38

Jane Fonda bleats "The climate crisis is a manifestation of misogyny, racism and the patriarchy!"

Jane Fonda is a fruitcake, which naturally means all liberals and Democrats love her.

Recently Fonda has been appearing at posh fundraisers held by Democrat "climate activists," who claim humans burning oil, gas and coal are dangerously warming the planet.

Fonda delighted the crowd by bleating,

"The climate crisis is a manifestation of racism, misogyny and patriarchy. It’s a mindset."

Notice that first sentence: In just 11 words Fonda managed to include three of the Media's current hot buzzwords:  raacism, misogyny and patriarchy.  If she'd just pushed a tiny bit more she could have added "homophobia," "transphobia" and "anti-immigrant" to win the buzzword olympics.

Assuming for a moment that there was a "climate crisis" it's not clear how that alleged "crisis" is "a manifestation of misogyny," as Fonda bleats, let alone how it's linked to the other two claims.  Women have reaped huge benefits from oil and gas, and their lives are immeasurably easier today than 150 years ago.

Also, for someone like Hanoi Jane who's been all over the world, that was only made practical because of either jet fuel or diesel.  Fonda is  surely smart enough (?) to know this, but that's the beauty of being a Democrat, whether a Hollywood star or a Media newsreader: no reporter or fan (voter) expects logic or consistency from liberals and Democrats.  

Liberal "star": "It's just AWFUL that you people drive your big SUVs and pickup trucks!  You should listen carefully to the speech I'll be giving at the climate conference in Cannes tomorrow!"

Reporter: "We'll be sure to watch.  By the way, how are you getting there?"

Fonda:  "One of my friends has offered his G-5 or some such.  I don't really know."

Reporter: "Ah, that beautiful, fast private jet.  How does the amount of CO2 emitted per passenger-mile compare with a fully-loaded commercial airliner?"

Fonda: "Whut?  Wow, look at the time!  I've gotta go!"

Of course no reporter would EVAH ask Hanoi Jane if people who cause FAR more CO2 to be emitted than the world average should be punished or penalized, eh?

Jane was right about one thing though: The folks screaming that carbon is causing Global Worming do have a mindset.  

Source.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/jane-fonda-decries-inaction-climate-apologizes-young-sorry-weve-created-issue-you

Memphis: Officer fatally shot by perp who'd been released w/o bond weeks earlier

Yesterday in the ghastly shithole of Memphis, two police officers were walking up to a parked car when the two occupants of the car opened fire.

One of the officers was killed, as was one of the two occupants--an 18-year-old male.  The other shooter--17--was also shot but is expected to survive.

In 2023 the jungle that is Memphis today saw a record-breaking 398 homicides.

Now at this point in Dem-ruled cities this is "a day ending in 'Y' story"– young blacks in certain cities are killing police officers almost every week.  The twist here is that the dead  18-year-old had been arrested just a few weeks earlier for possessing two stolen cars, an illegal weapon and an electronic device used to steal cars.

Back in the old days he'd either have to post bail, or remain jailed until trial, meaning he wouldn't have been on the street to kill the officer.

But in accordance with the new rules of Democrat-ruled cities he was released without having to post a single dollar as bond.

Neither of the perps was named or pictured, in accordance with the Mainstream Media's policy of not naming minority killers nor publishing their photos.  That's especially goofy since naming the dead perp won't put him in any danger, eh?

The female chief of police noted that weeks earlier the now-dead perp had been arrested in a stolen vehicle, armed with a gun modified to be fully automatic--often termed a "machinegun."  In civilized cities stealing a car is considered a felony, eh?

The perp was also charged with having two stolen vehicles and having a programming device commonly used to steal cars.  BUT as you already guessed, he was still released without bond.

Equity, folks.  And really, citizen, a few thousand more stolen cars and a hundred or so dead police officers are a small price to pay for "equity," right?

Source.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/memphis-police-officer-killed-shootout-teens-one-whom-recently-released

"Ooohh, dat "Artificial Intelligence" is SOooo great! It always know the truth!" Really?

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/03/nycs-government-chatbot-is-lying-about-city-laws-and-regulations/

Naive people believe whatever the gummint and Mainstream Media tell 'em, without ever asking a single question.  It's an automatic response for 'em because they naively expect both sources always tell 'em the truth.

Pardon me while I catch my breath from laughing.

SO...for over a year now *both* the regime and the Mainstream Media have been bleating that "artificial intelligence" is duh newest, hottest thing EVAH!  Way hottah den cryptocurrency an' duh covid "vaccine" an' biden's open-borders an' screamin' that "the greatest threat to this nation is white supremacy."

So: because AI has been getting fawning press from the Media for a year, damn near every Democrat and young American--and a few RINOs--believe that whatever "AI" says must be the truth.

Hahahahahaha!

Got a shock for ya, folks: Even the most praised "AI" program was written by...wait for it...humans.  Hard to believe, eh?  And those human programmers write "rules" that a computer uses to decide what outside info to accept and what to ignore.

If you doubt that, ask any of the AI bots "Are trans women really women?" and be prepared for a ton of liberal dodges and rationalizations.

SO...that cesspool of graft and incompetence known as New York City just spent a fortune hiring people to create an AI chat-bot called "MyCity" that purports to have waded through tens of thousands of pages of city "laws" and rules, made by hundreds of agencies, to tell citizens what those myriad laws demand from all citizens.

The "MyCity" chatbot launched as a "pilot" program last October.  The press release touted the site as a way for business owners to "save time and money by instantly providing them with actionable and trusted information from more than 2,000 NYC Business webpages and articles on topics such as compliance with codes and regulations, available business incentives, and best practices to avoid violations and fines."

But two local nonprofit news sites found the MyCity chatbot giving totally wrong information about some basic city rules and policies.  Not gonna bother ya with the details cuz that's not the point.  The point is, AI is no more the arbiter of truth than the folks who programmed its rules.

Older Americans may recall when Wikipedia started getting big, and people started thinking it was the truth about everything?  And of course we now know it's run by leftists and lies constantly.  AI is the same way.

Of course you don't believe that.  I understand.

 

LA "astrology influencer" stabs boyfriend to death, throws kids on the highway, then...

Is the incidence of crazy people killing others increasing?  Serious question.  Example:

Two days ago in the psychic cesspool of Los Angeles a so-called "astrology influencer"--Danielle Cherakiyah Johnson-- fatally stabbed her boyfriend, then grabbed her two daughters--age 9 and an 8-month-old baby--jumped in her Porsche SUV and took off down the freeway.

After a few miles she slowed down and ordered her 9-year-old (who was holding the baby) out of the moving car--on the freeway.  When the daughter refused, the crazy bitch shoved the girl--still holding the baby--out of the moving car.  The baby was killed.

Johnson then drove at more than 100 mph before finally slamming into a tree, killing her.

She seems to have been freaked out by the recent solar eclipse, which she called "the epitome of spiritual warfare."  Several hours before killing her boyfriend and her baby she tweeted "Wake up, the apocalypse is here!  Repost to make the choice for the collective!"

Earlier she compared the small New Jersey earthquake to white supremacy.

I wish some agency was keeping track of killings by crazies, because from what I see those are increasing fast.  Might be just because more "local stories" that you normally wouldn't see are being reported on the internet.  Maybe.

Another possible cause is increasing drug use.  Beats me.

https://6abc.com/danielle-cherakiyah-johnson-murder-suicide-405-freeway-baby-killed/14641676/

https://www.citizen.digital/news/la-woman-stabs-boyfriend-to-death-throws-kids-on-the-highway-then-kills-self-during-total-solar-eclipse-n340149

Wokie fraudster in Cali gets the state to stop teaching algebra to 8th-graders

If you're over 35 or so and attended a decent school you probably took algebra in the 8th grade, maybe 9th.  Now a *very* odd, "wokie" female professor at Stanford has urged California to stop doing that--cuz it beez raaaacis'.

Turns out the morons who run California have just adopted a new "math curriculum" for public schools.  It's got the trendy name "California Math Framework."

They call it a "framework" because the rubes know what "curriculum" is, but don't realize that "framework" is the same thing disguised.  And she's getting $5,000 per HOUR to explain it.
 
The main person responsible for this disaster is Jo Boaler, a Stanford professor of math education.  She urges that middle-schoolers not be taught algebra.  And you may well wonder why.

Did the lockdowns ordered by Dem governors make kids so dumb that 8th-graders can no longer understand algebra?  Or is this just a cunning move to cut K-12 spending by replacing algebra teachers with illegal aliens?

Jo Boaler explains that she made her "recommendation"--now adopted as the "framework" (i.e. policy for the whole state) "in the name of equity."

See, most people see "equity" and think it means "equality of opportunity."  Nope, it means equal *outcomes* regardless of effort (or lack of it).

Ever heard of anyone who charges $5,000 an HOUR for "consulting services"?  Yep, Jo Boaler.  That's how politically connected wokies like Jo pull down the big bucks, eh?

Though Jo has succeded in getting public schools to adopt her new curriculum, she sends her own children to a $48,000-a-year private school--that teaches its middle schoolers algebra.  That's called "double-standard," and the Dems excel at it.

As California goes, so goes the rest of the country, eventually.

Boaler's "guidelines" suggest delaying Algebra I until high school, instead teaching fuzzy “data science” courses as alternatives to calculus in the name of ensuring “equity.”

For years Boaler has somehow had the ear of administrators eager to do something about the fact that over 65% of public-school students can't do math at grade-level.

Boaler first made a name for herself in the early 2000s by urging schools to end “tracking,” under which they had advanced, average and remedial classes.  That allowed high-performing students to be challenged while underperforming students got help with basics.  

But so-called "brilliant" wokies like Jo pushed schools to have just one standard class, teaching the same content to all students. Problem was, to avoid classroom disaster, such classes had to be geared to the ability of the slowest students.  Boaler cunningly called her idea “heterogeneous classes” because that kept regular folks from knowing what she was proposing.  

Most rational adults instantly see that that one class for all won't produce the best results.  But as wokiez began to dominate all public schools, the idea of holding back the brightest students to cater to the dullest won, because it was so totally "woke."

Did we mention that Boaler's kids attend a $48,000-a-year private school?

In her hypocrisy Boaler matches the wokiez in DC, all of whom refuse to pass school-choice laws (opposed by the huge teachers' unions), but avoid the consequences of bad public schools by sending their kids to private schools.

Hypocrisy?  Perish the thought!

Boaler also seems to misrepresent her academic credentials, calling herself a “mathematics professor” at Stanford. Her promotional material describes her as a “Stanford mathematics professor.  But her Stanford webpage only shows her as ever being a part of the Education faculty.  She's never been a math professor, and there's a vast difference.

When accused of academic fraud in her "research" claiming her "one standard class" policy produced better results, she didn't respond to any of the actual charges, but instead claimed that her PhD critics "engaged in a range of tactics to discredit me and damage my work.”

Sounds like a typical wokie Democrat, eh?  If a policy fails it's never their fault.  "It failed cuz it wuz blocked by MAGA republicans!"

160-pound black "girl" bashes in the head of a 115-pound white girl; attacker's parents claim...

In the shithole Dem-ruled city of St. Louis a black female student named Maurnice DeClue attacked a white female, Kaylee Gain, bashing the victim's head into the pavement multiple times.

The victim was hospitalized with critical head injuries including a fractured skull and frontal lobe damage after DeClue smashed her head on the concrete sidewalk multiple times.  

Take a look at the photo from the security video.  You really think the 160-pound attacker was just "defending herself" against the 115-pound white victim?  Of course this is obviously just one frame from the complete viedo.  The entire video will show who's telling the truth, eh?  

Whoopsie!  Dat surveillance-camera footage dun been over-written!  All gone!  See, duh pipo who run duh skool wuz spose'ta save video of attacks like dis, but dey say dey din' know how.  An' dey din' know who to call who know how.  Beside, not dere job.  So go away!  Not our fault!

Now the attacker's family claims their daughter was merely defending herself against the smaller, lighter victim.  They started a petition to get the judge of the Juvenile Court to "consider Maurnice Declue's case with compassion."

The attacker's aunt said that Maurnice was not bullying the smaller girl in the "incident" [duh local paper absolutely refuses to call it an "attack"] and urged people to donate money to "help pay the legal bills" for Maurnice, who has been charged with felony assault.

Maurnice's aunt also said that the victim--who was hospitalized with skull fractures and brain damage--was actually "harassing and bullying" their far bigger, stronger daughter.  

Sure, looking at the photo that seems totally reasonable.  

In their petition the attacker's family asked the court to apply "restorative justice and rehabilitation" "to address the harm that occurred" in the incident.  "Restorative justice" is bafflegab for "Let ouah black chile off wif' no penalty, not even a juvenile record!  Cuz dat jus' fair, eh?"

And note the phrase, "the harm that...occurred" used by the family's attorney.  That's called "passive voice" cuz it makes it sound as though something bad happened all by itself.  Sounds so much better than saying "the brain damage our li'l 160-pound daughter inflicted on dat mean ol' 115-pound white bully," eh?  

California bureaucrats find a small error

Here's a story we never expected, eh?  Cuz dat Democrat/biden/harris economy beez BOOMIN', eh?

Based on the monthly federal "jobs reports" from last year, the Dems who totally rule California claimed the state's businesses had added 325,000 jobs last year.

A month ago the state's lackeys revised that number a smidge.  "Uhhh...we *thought* state businesses had added 325,000 new jobs, but it turns out the actual number was a bit less: 50,000.  But hey, we wuz only off a tiny bit!  An' we din' have no reason at all to think the numbers duh biden regime wuz givin' us were off, right?  So we nevah checked against our own numbers.  Cuz dat would take way too much work!"

So...what does that mean for the future?

"Uhhh...um...uhhh...we think maybe that $73 billion deficit we estimated for this year may be just a tiny bit larger than we thought."

Gee, ya think?  And with rising unemployment, monthly taxes paid to the state will drop.  More laid-off workers will be drawing unemployment benefits, with many spending less, which will cut sales tax revenue.  Hmmm...like a vicious spiral, eh?

The only "industry" that added jobs was...wait for it...government, which accounted for nearly half of all jobs added in Cali (24,000 of 50,000).

The state also noted that the "professional services sector," which includes law firms, accounting firms, engineering and technical firms and management consulting firms, lost the most jobs (132,000).  That sector tends to have higher salaries.  And because the top 1% of earners pay 45% of state income taxes, declines in that sector are likely to cause state tax revenue to drop a lot more than expected.

California’s unemployment rate has been rising since August 2022.  The nationwide rate is 3.8%, but in January California's rate was 5.2%.

This was a big surprise to state law-rulers, since Cali has the largest economy in the country.  It didn't seem possible that its unemployment rate could be that much higher than the national average.

Oh wait, of course it's logical.  Businesses flee high-tax states if they possibly can.  And many of the massive wave of illegals are managing to draw unemployment benefits.

A GOP state rep noted “The Democrats are trying to recover from their budgeting blunders by shifting money and raising taxes, when they should be cutting wastes like high-speed rail and Project Roomkey that are costing taxpayers hundreds of billions, to no benefit.”

Facing a deficit of likely far more than the original $73 billion forecast, the state's Democrat-ruled legislature has proposed just $2.1 billion in spending cuts, with the governor (Gavin Newsom) proposing $8.5 billion in cuts. The tiny size of those cuts--less than a tenth of the likely deficit--shows that the ruling Dems aren't serious.  They're children, playing with the lives of people.

In 2004 state voters--angry that Democrat rulers always spent more than the state took in--passed a "ballot measure" (referendum) requiring the legislature to pass a balanced budget every year.  That law orders that if the legislature doesn't pass a balanced budget, it's barred from acting on any other bills or entering recess until a balanced budget is passed.

The Democrats who rule the state legislature have never passed a balanced budget, and no  rational adult in the country believes the Dems will ever obey the 2004 ballot measure and pass the balanced budget it demanded before acting on any other bill

The Democrats who rule Cali will ignore this law just as the biden regime ignores immigration law.  And no one will do a thing about it.

If the Republicans controlled the legislature and did this, the Dems would call their friends at the state supreme court and the chief judge would issue an injunction in an hour.  But with Dems in charge, nothing will happen.  The courts will blithely ignore the ballot measure.

This is hugely significant because if the ruling party starts ignoring laws--as the Dems have-- *there is no built-in natural stopping point.*

Democrat voter: "Dat jus' silly.  Duh Dems jus' *had to ignore dis one law,* cuz ev'ryone know good gummints gots ta spend mo' den dey take in!  We know dis' don' have no bad results cuz duh rulers in DC been doin' it fo' 80 years now."

"See, if dere wuz anything wrong wif doin' dat, duh Supreme Court woulda' said so.  Since dey din', mus' be okay, right?  If okay fo' duh whole country, mus' be okay fo' California, eh?  So see?  We smahtah den yew!"

"We always smahtah den yew."

Watch and see.
 

In NYC, thug brutally attacks and robs 68-year-old woman. There's more

In the Democrat-ruled shithole of New York City a 68-year-old woman was climbing the steps of her church when a male in a hoodie and facemask ran ahead of her, turned, and violently shoved her backwards, off the stairs.  You have to see this.

She fell on the concrete sidewalk and was badly injured.  She's in the hospital, reportedly fighting for her life.

The thug who attacked her stole her cell phone, purse and car keys, and sprinted off down the street.  He went to her car--likely because he'd watched her park it when he decided to attack her--and stole it.

Cops have now caught the thug.

Now, aside from the obvious--that this utter piece of worthless shit should be executed, terribly painfully, in public, both to end his useless life and to show all the other would-be thugs what will happen if they do crap like this--here's the twist:

When Kyle Rittenhouse used a gun to defend himself against a guy with a gun, the fucking media had his name and photo all over the newscasts within 24 hours.

But with the piece of shit who brutally attacked and critically injured a 68-year-old woman, *nothing.*  No name, no pics.

Democrat: "Well dat wuz cuz Rittenhouse was over 18, an' this po' boy is only 16."

Nice try, sparky.  Rittenhouse was 17, so still a minor, just like this thug.  But huge difference: Rittenhouse was defending himself, while this thug was brutally attacking an unarmed 68-year-old woman.  And yet...no pic or name.

Anyone care to hazard a guess as to why no name or pic of this thug in the lying Mainstream Media, when they were eager to post Rittenhouse's name, pic and hometown?  Anyone?

I predict this soul-less thug will turn out to be either black or an illegal alien invader, or both.

Is it any wonder no one trusts the lying media anymore?

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1778773056187683000

For the first time in decades, White House lackeys say NO to presidential debates

The corrupt lackeys who run the White House now say that for the first time in decades there won't be any presidential debates before the election.  Not even one.

Yep, they don't want to risk the utterly corrupt, senile piece of crap they so deftly handle getting confused and declaring World War 3 while trying to debate Trump.

Rumors are that the TV networks are banding together to beg the handlers to reverse that decision, but that's horseshit.  The networks are perfectly fine with no debates--which they'll blame on Trump, of course.  And they'll gush that not having debates is "perfectly normal, because...we say so."

The lackeys in the White House are putting out the quiet talking point that debates would "debase the president by putting him on-stage with a buffoon."

But everyone with a functioning brain knows this is horseshit--that the senile biden ("too old to be prosecuted for violating the law on mis-handling classified materials") is too mentally feeble to think on his feet.  His verbal gaffes are a major risk, so why take any chances if we don't have too, eh?

To help the Democrats out, a never-Trump fake-conservative site says "Trump is also a very old man but comes off as slightly more robust."
"Slightly more robust"?  Are you kidding? Putting aside your anti-Trump bias, it's clear that Trump seems at least 20 years more cogent and mentally acute than the stumbling, confused biden.

Now, since the Mainstream Media has loved presidential debates for decades, you might think they'd be upset that ONE of the two candidates is refusing to debate.  And of course if the roles were reversed the Media would be screaming 24/7 that Trump's refusal to debate showed he was unfit for the office, or some such.

"Presidential debates are crucial to let the public evaluate whether each candidate is fit to govern," they'd scream.  "They're a basic tool of our democracy!"

That's what the Media would be screaming if the roles were reversed.  But strangely, not a single member of the Media seems to be the least bit upset about biden refusing to debate.  Odd, eh?

Not at all: The Mainstream Media are all totally pro–Democrat, pro-Biden, so they aren't saying a critical word.  Like biden himself, they're hiding.  biden refusing to debate is fine with them.  

Here's some moron at CNN wearing a skin-suit claiming to be a "senior media reporter" (Oliver Darcy):

"While debates have played crucial roles in American elections for decades, we no long live in normal times.  We live in a world in which Trump uses 'sizable platforms' to lob nasty insults and spread lies and conspiracy theories..."

Gosh, shithead, is that anything like biden using the entire f-ing Mainstream Media to call Trump supporters "terrorists"?  Saying "The greatest threat this nation faces is...white supremacy"?

Is it like Hilliary calling people in flyover country "deplorables"?  Inventing the lie that "Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election from me"?  Insults, lies and conspiracy theories, eh?  Darcy, look in a mirror.   

So...like everything else controlled by the totally corrupt Democrats, all the prior rules are suddenly reversed (by them or their Media allies) when they determine those rules will hurt their party.  So, we've had debates for decades, but suddenly the Media will tell you they were never really needed cuz...um...uh... reasons.

Media: "Uhh, see...uh...debates used to be needed because no one knew anything about the challenger.  But you all know all about the raaacist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic Trump, right?  And you also know all about our wonderful, compassionate, totally generous, tolerant, climate-saving, global-thinking, U.N.-loving president.  So we don't need to have any debates this year."

But four years from now, suddenly the Media will be screaming that we simply must have debates, cuz "They're a basic tool of our democracy!"

Double standards.  Fits right in with that core principle laid down by the Founders: "One set of laws for little people, a more lenient set for the powerful, just like in our home, England."

Wait...I could have sworn we were taught that the Founders actually said "All men are equal under the law."  Is it possible we were all mistaken?

Ask the Democrats.  "Did the Founders write that "All men are equal under the law"?  And "Is that true today?" 

But of course no reporter would dare to do that.  Anyone who dared would immediately be taken off the invitation list for "A"-list parties!

"What border crisis? Duh biggest threat to the U.S. is 'white supremacy'!"

 

"You must vote Democrat in order to...um... 'Save our precious democracy!' Ayup yup yup"

 

Democrat voters are delighted with high grocery prices, cuz...fewer bags to carry out!

 

Dem-fellating L.A. Times uses Trump's name in O.J. obituary, claims it's a "typo"

Yesterday the pro-Democrat L.A. Times ran a story about on the death of the notorious double-murderer O.J. Simpson, who nearly beheaded his wife and Ron Goldman in 1994 and got away with it.

But in describing Simpson's release from prison in 2017 for a different crime, the Times substituted "Trump" for "Simpson."  Here's the original from the Times:

"Long before the city woke up on a fall morning in 2017, Trump walked out of Lovelock Correctional Center outside Reno, a free man for the first time in nine years."

When readers noticed, the editor of the Times called this merely a "typographical error."

Horseshit.  A "typo" is when your finger hits the wrong letter on the keyboard.  This wasn't even remotely a typo, but the deliberate substitution of Trump's name for Simpson's.

Hahahahahaha!  What a hoot!  So, Media liars, how did this obvious horseshit get past the "layers and layers of fact-checkers" you claim to have, eh? 

Times editor:  "Uh...um...well see, it was a rare 'quintuple typo,' in which our writer--trying to spell 'Simpson,' accidentally hit five wrong keys in a row, and then the space bar instead of the last letter.  See, on a standard keyboard the letters S and T are right next to each other, so that's a common typo.  Same with I and R--only four keys apart.  See?  Same with the M and U: one is almost directly above the other!  Only two rows away!  So...see?"

Hahahahaha!  So  the "rare quintuple typo" strikes again, eh?  

Nah, only your dumb Democrat readers will believe that utter horseshit.  Your "reporter" and editors did that deliberately, to get readers to view Trump--facing trial--as equivalent to O.J., who was guilty as hell but acquitted by black jurors who *knew* he was guilty but were determined to send a big F-you to whites.

Back when bloggers were starting to show the Mainstream Media for the constant liars they are, the Media constantly sneered that solo bloggers made tons of errors, but the vaunted Media had "layers and layers of fact-checkers" to ensure they didn't make mistakes.  "Layers and layers," eh?

Source:
 
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trumps-name-incorrectly-used-la-times-o-j-simpson-obituary-freud-lives

What happens when obvious oppressors continue to go unpunished?

History is full of stories of oppressed people rising and overcoming the tyrants who have horribly abused them.

Sometimes those stories end with the tyrants  peacefully agreeing to make changes, but other times it's ended at the guillotine.

Romania's despotic communist leader, Nicolae Ceausescu, had his brains relocated to a brick wall after Romanians had enough of his tyranny.

At the end of WW2 Italy's Fascist leader, Benito Mussolini, whose decision to ally with Hitler cost tens of thousands of Italian lives, was shot and hanged upside-down.

Top Nazi leaders were hanged.

[The author adds here that he is neither urging nor condoning violence, but that history shows that when dictators--including ones who kill you by decreeing that you and your kids must allow the regime to inject you with an untested, ineffective "vaccine"--aren't punished for their oppression, the oppressed often take matters into their own hands.]

When the regime throws grandmothers in prison for a year for peacefully walking into what was once called "the peoples' house" for ten minutes, while Antifa and BLM were allowed to burn cities without any charges, something's radically wrong.

When the FBI and other governmental agencies pressured social media companies to delete posts that challenged the regime's decree that COVID vaccines and masks were "safe and effective"--and no one in the FBI was fired for doing that (meaning they were told to by the regime), again...something's radically wrong.

When the FBI broke U.S. law by "improperly" eavesdropping on Americans without a warrantless--a staggering 278,000 times--and the corrupt head of the FBI (Christopher Wray) dismissed these abominations as just "errors," and no one was fired, let alone arrested--again, something's horribly wrong.

When we have copies of bank wire transfers from China to Hunty biden's shell companies in the amount of at least $40 million, with not even attempting to provide a legitimate service for those massive bribes, yet no one is charged, something's horribly wrong.

When the woman who found Ashley Biden's abandoned diary, where Ashley admits to taking "inappropriate" showers with Joe Biden when she was a kid, was sent away to prison for a month, no one even noticed.  Just one month, after all, eh?  But people do notice the message, which is: Don't reveal anything that hurts the regime, or you'll be punished.

When New York's then-governor Andrew Cuomo--a man the media loved so much that they gave him his own hour-long show every weekday opposite Trump's daily covid press conference--ORDERED nursing homes to admit people with the Chyna virus--essentially causing the deaths of 15,000 elderly residents of those homes who otherwise wouldn't have been infected, that fact was carefully buried for over six months.  biden's DOJ decided not to punish him, or anyone involved.

Something horribly wrong.  Democrats are never punished for anything.

Most Americans saw the enraging surveillance video of a dozen illegal immigrants beating two NYPD cops, yet not spending a night in jail.

Even worse, some of our nation's big blue toilet cities have actually paid Antifa and BLM rioters *ten thousand dollars apiece* after cunning attorneys claimed "excessive police force" as the darlings were burning buildings and fighting cops.

When the unarmed Ashli Babbitt was shot to death by a black Capitol Police officer on January 6, and when Rosanne Boyland was beaten to death by a female capitol cop, neither killer was charged, and neither family has received compensation for "excessive police force"--and won't, as long as the Democrats are in charge.

And if our new system of "two different sets of laws" doesn't outrage you, millions of struggling Americans are see millions of illegal immigrants getting paid generous benefits every month to replace them.

Have you seen the demonic video of Morelo screaming at his 150,000 YouTube followers that the law allows them to take over any vacant house they find?  You should.  The fact that he's still in the U.S after illegal entry and then bragging about never having to work because of the free stuff the regime gives him and his fellows is a clear indication that something's horribly wrong.

How much longer will Americans quietly accept things like this?  How bad do things have to get before voters decide they've had enough of the biden/Cackles regime and vote them out?

Apparently we're not there yet, as many polls show the race tied--if you believe the polls.

History shows that humans can only be pushed so far, and if the wrongdoers aren't punished, people have often gotten revenge.

Let us hope the tyrants who locked us down, brought us record crime and invited the invasion of America by unvetted illegals are voted out, and that a fair justice system mete out proper punishment.

Having said that, even if the Democrats lose in November, they control enough DAs and courts that no Democrat will even be charged, let alone brought to trial.

Special Counsel Robert Hur stumbled on the perfect defense in saying biden's memory was so bad that he couldn't be tried for a crime.  Fauci will jump on that one too as will every other Democrat.

We have hard evidence--the head of the Wuhan Institute of Virology thanking Fauci's NIAID for a research grant for genetically modifying a coronavirus--published in 2015, with the U.S. grant number!

Yet when Rand Paul asked Fauci if his agency had ever supported "gain of function research" at that lab, Fauci denied it.  That is, Fauci lied to congress.

Will Fauci ever face a jury for that?  Will Joe Biden face charges for selling access to the Chinese and Russians?

No, because we have two sets of laws now.  Powerful Democrats are never charged, and any low-level employee who threatens to provide evidence of wrongdoing to congress is threatened with firing.  

And through it all, every Mainstream Media outlet lies and covers for the Democrats.  Rachel Maddow makes Hitler's minister of propaganda look honest.

Source  (adapted from Kevin Downey Jr. at PJ Media)

https://pjmedia.com/kevindowneyjr/2024/04/11/can-america-survive-if-the-guilty-are-left-unpunished-n4928049