You knew that 13 months ago the CDC changed the offical, written definition of a "vaccine," right? Why?

 

Of course you heard about all this when it happened, a year ago, right? 

Wait...you say you did NOT hear about this 13 months ago, when the CDC changed the definition?

Gosh, that's...odd, eh?  Cuz when a supposed "expert" government agency changes an historic definition of some critical term, you'd think that would be a newsworthy story, eh?  If so, you'd think every mainstream media outlet would have run the story with a headline like this:  "CDC changes definition of 'vaccine.'  Why?"

Of course not a single Mainstream Media outlet ran a story on this.

Did their editors not consider the CDC changing the defnition of "vaccine" significant?

Was there not a SINGLE "reporter" who wondered "Why'd they do that?  Gotta be a reason.  What is it?

Mainstrean Media editor: "Hey there, li'l blogger-dude!  We determine what's considered 'important,' and if we don't do a story on something, it's not important.  Got it?  And if you claim something is critical that we didn't do a story on, then you're an "insurrectionist," or  perhaps a "domestic violent extremist!"   And if we tell the faaaabulous Justice Department who you are, they'll freeze your bank accounts and credit cards and will throw you in the DC jail without trial.  Cuz spreadin' dat "disinformation" is now a crime, eh?  SO...do you wanna reconsider your position?"

Dear Mainstream Media:  Go fuck yourselves.  You are male whores who fellate Democrat leaders for your paychecks.  In a rational world you wouldn't be able to leave your homes for fear of being torn apart by mobs in the street.  But I digress.

They can lie for the Dems all they want, but thanks to the internet the truth is readily available to anyone smart enough to search for it.

Source.

Gotta love it.