More on Sarah Jeong

If you're a normal American or college student or whatever, you've probably never heard of Sarah Jeong.  And fair enough.

Sarah is a thorough, unapologetic, unalloyed raaacist.  And sexist.  But because she hates whites and men, this actually makes her a hero of the Left.

Including the New York Times, which just hired her--not to deliver their birdcage liners, nor merely to write leftist crap for them, but--to be on their editorial board.

Yes, dear reader, the Times thinks her raacism and male-hating is just peachy.  Which surprises no one with an IQ above room temperature.

Leftists believe that no matter what people like Jeong may do, it literally cannot be racist, because she's both a woman and a racial minority.  As the Left sees it, it's impossible to be racist...against whites.  By the same "logic," while everyone agrees that "misogyny" (hating women for being female) is reprehensible, for a female to hate men is just fine, because...well, it just IS, citizen.  And shut up!

Scroll through left-Twitter and you find utter incredulity that demonizing white people could in any way be offensive. That's the extent to which loathing of and contempt for "white people"--even among white liberals!--has become de rigeur on the left.

According to the neo-Marxist analysis that now dominates liberalism, people who claim to be oppressed can't--by definition--be at fault for anything.

Cool, eh?

This is what allows the New York Times to hire and defend someone who expresses racial hatred.

Being a Leftist has the huge benefit of allowing you to voice hate for men and whites and still bask in the reassuring belief that you're on the side of the angels.