August 02, 2018

Major liberal paper hires virulent, ghastly raaacist to their editorial board--you won't believe how bad!

Suppose some self-proclaimed "journalist" was looking to get hired as a member of the editorial board of a Mainstream Media paper.

Suppose that this same "journalist" had tweeted all of the following:
  • "Dumbass f*cking black people marking up the internet with their opinions, like dogs pissing on fire hydrants"
  • "Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old black men"
  • I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play 'Things black people can definitely take credit for.'  It's really hard!"
  • "Black men are bullshit"
  • "#Cancel black people"
  • "Have you ever tried to figure out the things black people are allowed to do that *aren't* cultural appropriation?  There's literally nothing."
Most rational people would instantly recognize this so-called "journalist" as an outrageous racist.  Accordingly, one would predict that no Mainstream Media paper would give her a job delivering the paper, let alone writing for it.

And no responsible paper would consider even for a moment hiring such a virulent racist to be on their editorial board, right?

Ah, I see you've just arrived on the planet.

One paper did hire this virulent raacist:  The New York Times.

At this point you're probably thinking "This has to be a fake--satire, cuz the Times would NEVER hire such an open, ghastly raaaacist!  A liberal, Democrat-loving paper would never hire a racist like this person!"

Except the Times did hire her--and yes, for their editorial board.  See here, and here, and here.  It's insane, right?  Unbelievable.   The Times has officially embraced racism.

And the paper released a statement saying they knew about the raacist tweets but hired her anyway, because...um..."we don't mind racism if it's directed against the people we don't like."

Because as most of you hae already figured out, the "journalist" in question was actually expressing her hatred for...whites.  Go back to her tweets and replace every "black" with "white."  That's what she actually tweeted.

Interesting:  When she was hating on blacks, everyone instantly recognized her as a racist, and agreed that no responsible media outlet should hire her.  But now that it's revealed that she was saying exactly the same things, but directed at whites, suddenly among leftists and Democrats and the "elites," all is forgiven.

Hypocrites, every one of 'em.  Which, of course, is exactly what we've all come to expect from the Lying Mainstream Media.

And still media elites profess to be utterly baffled as to why half the public hates 'em and doesn't trust a word they print or utter.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home