The truth about the origin of covid--and why Fauci brazenly lied about it

In September of 2019 a mysterious respiratory disease began killing thousands in Wuhan, China.  Because the top priority of the Chinese communist party is to make its Chinese subjects believe it's always in control of everything, the Party tried to keep the outbreak secret, going so far as to weld the doors of infected victims shut.

But terrified citizens managed to send hundreds of cell-phone videos outside the country.

By November the pandemic was killing hundreds a day, and a spy from India managed to walk across the border between China and India with a vial of blood from an infected patient.  That sample was promptly "gene-sequenced" by Indian scientists, who discovered that it was a close match for a coronavirus common to bats, and usually harmless to humans.  But clearly something had changed the genetic code of the virus to make it lethal to humans.

And here we need a pause:  Virtually no one other than virus geeks knows that every known virus--even those only known to infect animals instead of humans--has been gene-sequenced, and the results stored in national databases.  So the Indian researchers used a computer to compare their gene sequence to all known viruses.

Hey, sometimes technology does things you didn't know it could, eh? 

The Indian scientists submitted a paper for publication showing their results--but it was withdrawn without explanation before being published.  Withdrawing papers before publication isn't unheard of, but in virtually every case of withdrawn papers there's a short explanation by the authors, like "We found a significant error in our work that invalidates our conclusions."  But in this case, not a word.  

Two months later--Jan 29th, 2020--the first case of what was being called "covid-19" was confirmed in the U.S.  And two days after that, I was reading the paper by the Indian scientists containing the genetic code of the spike protein.  It was on the internet and thus available to anyone.

If the researchers were telling the truth, their gene sequence showed that the new virus differed from the normally harmless bat virus because it had four new genes that weren't in the bat virus.

All four of the new genes were in a part of the virus called the "spike protein," and all four made the virus better able to bind to cells in the human airway--thus making the virus lethal to humans.

The question was, How did those four new genes--each of which made the virus better at infecting humans instead of bats--get into the genetic code?

Coronaviruses are members of a class called "retroviruses," and mutate like crazy.  Most of those mutations are non-lethal, and indeed many result in a virus that can't replicate.  So the first suspicious fact here was that all four genes had the same effect--they made the virus more lethal to humans.  That alone was very suspicious.

But if the Indian researchers were right, the second observation sealed the deal:  Their sequence clearly showed that in all four cases, instead of existing genes mutating, the genetic code of the bat virus had been cut, and the four new genes inserted.

This showed beyond reasonable doubt that the new virus had NOT evolved naturally, but had been modified by humans to make it lethal.

Since the first outbreak was in Wuhan, China, and since the Chinese military has a virus lab on the outskirts of that huge city, it was reasonable to guess that the virus had been modified in that lab and had somehow escaped. 

Background:  As some readers may know, viruses can only reproduce by infecting a cell in the host.  The virus inserts its genetic code into the host cell's DNA, which makes the cell produce copies of the virus.  To do this, viruses must drill thru the cell wall.  And to do that, it must first attach itself to the cell wall--a process called "binding."

"Natural" bat viruses evolved to bind to bat cells, and weren't very good at binding to human airway cells.  This was why "natural" bat viruses weren't particularly dangerous to humans.  But unlike natural bat coronaviruses, covid-19 was extremely good at binding to a particular site in human airway cells ("ACE-2 receptors").  The question was, how had the new virus gained that new ability.  

Enter the man responsible:  Anthony Fauci, head of one of the five multi-billion-dollar branches of the National Institutes of Health.  The U.S. Media portrayed him as a god.  As you're about to see, he's actually lying demon, and always has been. 

As head of NIAID Fauci controlled billions of dollars in grant money, so had a group of top university researchers who depended on him for grants.  These researchers read the same paper I noted above, and came to the same conclusion--which they told Fauci: that the virus had to have been modified by humans to make it lethal.

We have copies of emails from those researchers to Fauci in the first week of February, 2020, saying exactly that.

Fauci emailed back that he wanted the researchers to write a paper--which Fauci would arrange to have published in a prestige medical journal--saying exactly the opposite: that the virus had "evolved naturally." 

I understand your skepticism.  But the House Government Oversight Committee has the emails--and has published 'em.  And Fauci didn't deny or demand a retraction.  Didn't say a single word. 

Because the researchers depended on Fauci for millions of dollars in grants, they were willing to do as he instructed.  Their paper was written, submitted and published in something like three weeks--which is an astonishingly short time.

The paper claimed that the harmless bat virus had "evolved" totally naturally, via random mutations.  As noted earlier, retroviruses are known to mutate like crazy, typically because a high-energy particle hits the RNA strand and either destroys a single letter of the genetic code, or changes it to a new letter.  Most such mutations don't work.  But by chance some do, and some of the viruses with those changes are more successful at replicating.  But in covid-19 four completely functional genes had appeared, each of which consisted of up to eight "letters."  And to "function," all the mutated letters had to be the right letters in the right order.  And the gene had to be in the right place in the chain.

The chances of all this occurring four times--by chance--were hundreds of trillions to one.  So virtually zero. 

Democrats: "Wait, you stupid deplorable...how can you claim you know the alleged four new genes were added, let alone that they were added by humans instead of "natural mutation," eh?  Neener neener neener!" 

Fuck you.  Even after I show ya, you won't understand.  If you'd like to see why we're absolutely sure the genes were inserted, I'll show ya below.  It's not at all complicated, and you'll instantly see why it's obvious.  What that means is that Fauci and his co-conspirators were lying from the beginning when they claimed covid-19 was NOT modified in a lab.

Then after you see, ask yourself:  If other experts know what I've just related, how is it that this hasn't come out?  How could Fauci could have gotten away with lying about it?

Read on and learn something--mainly about not trusting "your" lying Media.

So go back:  Most Americans are surprised to learn that every known coronavirus has been totally gene-sequenced.  Even more surprising, the U.S. government--specifically the National Institutes of Health, essentially run by Fauci (even though he wasn't the official head)--has all those sequences stored, and available to anyone with internet access.  And until recently anyone could access those sequences, because except for a couple of non-bat versions those viruses weren't thought to be dangerous to humans.  

A gene sequence is a long string of thousands of letters.  The Indian researchers used well-known computer tools to analyze all known bat coronaviruses to find the closest match to their sample from China.  The same tools also found a "consensus" sequence--the letters used by most members of that family of bat coronaviruses.  Then they had a computer slide their "sample sequence" along the known codes, one letter at a time, until it found the best match.

And what they found was that almost all the letters in the three sequences matched--except for four contiguous groups of about six letters each.  And since all the other letters in the long strings still matched, it's clear that the four new genes insertions.

If that wasn't clear, the pic below will help a LOT.  And if it's too fuzzy you should be able to click on it to blow it up:

   

The top line in each row is the genetic code for covid-19.  The next line is the closest "natural" bat coronavirus.  The bottom line is the "consensus" of dozens of corona bat-virus variants.  Red letters mean all three lines match.  As you can easily see, in four places (shown by the black rectangles) covid-19 doesn't match the other two--and yet all the letters to the RIGHT of those four places STILL match the closest matching bat coronavirus.

The ONLY way this could happen is if the "natural" virus was cut apart, and a contiguous (consecutive) chunk of 8 letters--"codons"--was inserted.  And instead of the insertions being just random letters--as would be true of random mutations--all four insertions turn out to be perfectly functional new genes!  

If you think that happened by chance, you're not a serious person. 

And by total coincidence (sarc) all four of the inserted genes are from the HIV virus, and enable covid-19's "spike protein" to bind more tightly to target cells in the human airway.

WHAT a coincidence, eh?

The liars (Fauci et al) bleat that the differences between the closest matching bat virus and covid-19 are due to "natural mutations," in which a single letter in the genetic code is changed to a different one.  And it's well known that those happen.  But again, these four groups are not only obvious insertions, but are perfectly functioning genes.  

If just one letter was wrong, they wouldn't function.  

Once Fauci and his lackeys had written their paper claiming the virus evolved naturally, dozens of toadies in the Media came out of the woodwork to flesh out the "details" of how the virus had managed to make the jump from bats to humans:  The Narrative claimed it happened when a Wuhan resident ate an infected animal purchased at the local "wet market."  The Narrative proposed either a bat or a pangolin--which you've never heard of, which makes the Narrative more plausible, eh?

The fatal flaw in this Narrative (i.e. bullshit) is something the average person doesn't know: that if the source of the "jump" was eating an infected animal, there would be lots of other infected animals of the same species in the wild--a so-called "animal reservoir."  But despite intensive efforts, no such animal reservoir has been found.

Whoopsie!  But the bullshitters didn't care, because no layman knows that.  Like everything else, the liars could say anything they wanted, and the Lying Media would smile and nod and parrot every lie.

Because the virus started in Wuhan, and the city has a biological weapons lab funded by the communist government, a reasonable theory was that the virus had been modified in that lab and had escaped.  But two very powerful forces didn't want you (or anyone else) to believe that.  Those forces were 1) the communist Chinese government; and 2) the fraudulent egomaniac Anthony Fauci.  

Fauci had a HUGE reason for not wanting Americans to believe the virus had been modified by Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology:  He'd given them a grant of U.S. tax dollars, via a "cutout"--to fund "gain of function research."  If Americans ever found out, Fauci would be a dead man.

So Fauci was desperate to create a Narrative--a plausible cover story--to keep from being killed by Americans who'd lost beloved parents or spouses to covid.  Thus the Narrative was that the virus had evolved by natural mutation from an animal virus, and then supposedly made the jump to humans after the infected animal was eaten by a Wuhan resident.  

A good Narrative must be superficially plausible, so the conspirators made the lie more plausible by naming two specific animals as likely sources: a bat, or a "pangolin," both of which were sold in Wuhan's "wet market."  (Unverifiable specificity makes bullshit Narratives more convincing, more plausible.  So to a lay-person this was a very plausible Narrative.)

Americans had no idea that "natural" bat viruses weren't dangerous to healthy humans.  By contrast, the covid-19 virus was lethal to humans, entirely because it was able to bind more effectively to specific "receptor cells" in the human airway. ("ACE-2" cells, if you're curious.)  But Fauci knew only a handful of people would know that, let alone the utterly unequivocal, damning evidence that four genes had been inserted.

Americans never heard about the four inserted genes.  Hmmm...

Fauci was desperate to discredit the idea that the virus was modified in a Chinese lab because his own agency--the one he'd headed for something like 30 years--had given the Wuhan Institute of Virology a grant--U.S. taxpayer dollars--to investigate precisely the question of how to modify natural viruses to make them lethal to humans--the infamous "gain-of-function research."

That type of research was considered so dangerous that congress had outlawed it in the U.S.  But the cunning, savvy Fauci knew how to get around that: instead of giving the money directly to the Wuhan Institute, he funneled it thru what's called a "cutout"--an organization called "EcoHealth Alliance," run by a crony named Peter Daszak, who was a big fan of that research.

So, returning to the first week of February of 2020: half a dozen top U.S. researchers told Fauci what you've just seen: that Covid's genetic code had obviously been modified in a lab.  But Fauci didn't want Americans to know that, so he insisted those researchers write a paper ("The proximal origin of Covid-19") saying exactly the opposite: that the virus had evolved naturally.  Hmmm...

A House committee has emails from the researchers to Fauci, and then a week later the top researcher in that group reporting back to Fauci saying the paper was ready.  We have the damn emails.  Fauci deleted 'em from his computer, thinking that would erase all copies.  Like most non-tech people he didn't realize they were still in the system, stored elsewhere.

This is the end of material on the origin of the lies.  If that's all you want, you can stop here.  Below this is the disaster that happened after that--again orchestrated by Fauci and his lackeys:

Consider the so-called "vaccine."  Fauci, Rochelle Walensky (then head of CDC), the FDA and biden all claimed the jab was "safe, and effective."  But all involved (except for Porridgebrain) knew all along that neither claim was true.  And yet the FDA approved at least three "vaccines" from different makers, under an "emergency-use-only" exception to normal rules.

That exception allowed the FDA to approve a vaccine after only a fraction of the normal, lengthy testing for safety and effectiveness.  But the rules also said that to get the EUA exception there couldn't be any other effective treatment for that disease.

That brings us to the biden regime forbidding doctors from prescribing two inexpensive, effective medicines--both approved for human use--by our own FDA--decades earlier.  

The uses were obviously not to treat covid, which wasn't then known.  But by law, for over 20 years doctors have been allowed to prescribe approved drugs for so-called "off-label" uses.  So if either of the two drugs were effective that should have ruled out the use of the EUA for the jab.

So the Deep-Staters who run the FDA and CDC quickly responded by banning the use of both these tested, approved, totally safe drugs, and by refusing to run "controlled, double-blind" studies.. And as a backup, the regime also threatened to prosecute any pharmacist who filled such a prescription.  The Deep-Staters even got the Post Office to seize perfectly legal shipments of these two drugs from overseas makers, despite there being zero legal authority for doing that.  

If you didn't grasp the implications of the last 'graf, read it again: The biden regime barred American citizens from using two known-safe drugs approved by "your" FDA for human use, instead letting hundreds of thousands of Americans die.  And why?  Clearly it was NOT because either drug was dangerous, since both had been approved by the FDA for human use.  Instead it was to allow the FDA to claim there was no effective treatment for covid, which was the necessary condition to approve the non-vaccine under the "emergency-use-only" rule.

The FDA even created a sneering tweet implying that one of those safe drugs was only approved as a "horse de-wormer," which was a brazen lie.  While that was "a" well-known use, your own damn CDC had even published recommended dose levels for humans.  But even though all that was open-source knowledge, the Media didn't call the regime out on its lies.

Banning approved drugs and allowing hundreds of thousands of Americans to die should be a capital crime, yet the Media didn't say a word.  Didn't bat an eyelash.  The entire Democrat party was totally uninterested in anything that bucked the Party Line that NO effective treatment existed.

And wait, it gets worse: After Porridgebrain was installed, he was asked on camera if he would order everyone to take the (ineffective) vaccine.  He said he would never do that.  But just three weeks later he had his Labor Department order all Americans working for a company with 100 or more employees to take the jab or be fired.

At this point the CDC and FDA already knew the so-called "vaccine" did NOT prevent people from getting or transmitting the Chyna virus.  As a result, the jab didn't meet the legal definition of a "vaccine."  And yet biden, Fauci, Rochelle Walensky (CDC head) et al continued to lie that it was "totally safe and effective."  They also knew even then that thousands of people who took the jab had been killed or injured.

Trump said of the "vaccine" "If you're at high risk, take it."  The biden regime should never have ordered all Americans to take it--even allowing corrupt teachers' unions to force kids (who were virtually immune to covid) to take it in order to attend school.  

You'd think that if the CDC knew the jab was causing health problems--and thousands of deaths--they would have objected to school boards demanding that all public-school and university students take the jab.  Yet they didn't say a damn word.

What kind of government does this?  Lies, lies and more lies--all to benefit one party.

Everything above is in the public record.  You just never heard about it. And Democrats either don't believe any of this, or they're fine with it.

Hopefully you didn't have a loved one who died from either the virus or the jab.  Unfortunately no one responsible for this outrage will ever be punished.  They've all retired and are drawing their generous taxpayer-funded pensions.