The truth about the origin of covid--and why Fauci brazenly lied about it

Covid-19 began killing thousands in Wuhan, China, around September of 2019.  The Chinese communist party tried to keep the outbreak secret, but terrified citizens managed to send hundreds of cell-phone videos outside the country.

By November the pandemic was in full swing, and a spy from India managed to walk across the border between China and India with a vial of blood from an infected patient.  That vial contained the virus, which was promptly "sequenced" by Indian scientists.  They submitted a paper for publication showing their results--but it was withdrawn without explanation before being published.

This is odd, because in virtually every case of withdrawn papers there's a short explanation by the authors, like "We found an error in our work."  Here, not a word.  

Two months later--Jan 29th, 2020--the first case of covid was confirmed in the U.S.  And two days after that, I was reading the withdrawn paper by Indian scientists containing the genetic code of the spike protein.  It was on the internet and thus available to anyone.

That gene sequence showed beyond all doubt that the virus had been deliberately modified--in four places--by inserting four new genes in the code for the crucial "spike protein" that made the virus lethal to humans.  As you may know, in order to replicate, viruses penetrate the cell wall, find the nucleus, and insert their genetic material into that of the cell.  "Natural" bat viruses evolved to bind to bat cells, and aren't very good at binding to human airway cells ("ACE-2 receptors").  So "natural" bat viruses aren't particularly dangerous to humans.

But unlike natural bat coronaviruses, covid-19 was extremely good at binding to human airway cells.  The big question was, how had it gained that new ability.  The answer was that a "natural" bat virus had been modified to make the spike protein far better at binding to humans.  

Fauci claimed from the first week that this modification was totally natural.  Viruses mutate like crazy, typically because a particle hits the RNA strand and either destroys a single letter of the genetic code, or changes it to a new letter.  Most of these mutations don't work.  But by chance some do, and viruses with those changes are more successful at replicating.  But in covid-19 four completely functional genes had appeared, each of which consisted of up to eight "letters," and to work, they had to be the right letters in the right order.  And the gene had to be in the right place in the chain.

The chances of all this occurring by random mutations were virtually zero. 

Democrats: "Wait...how can you claim you know the alleged four new genes were added, let alone that they were added by humans instead of "natural mutation," eh?  Neener neener neener!" 

If you'd like to see why we're absolutely sure the genes were inserted, I'll show ya below.  It's not at all complicated, and you'll instantly see why it's obvious.  What that means is that Fauci and his co-conspirators were lying from the beginning when they claimed covid-19 was NOT modified in a lab.

Then after you see, ask yourself how Fauci could have gotten away with lying about it.

Read on and learn something--mainly about not trusting "your" lying Media.

You may be surprised to learn that every known coronavirus has been totally gene-sequenced.  Even more surprising, the U.S. government--specifically the National Institutes of Health, essentially run by Fauci (even though he wasn't the official head)--has all those sequences stored on computer.  And until recently anyone could access those sequences, because except for a couple of non-bat versions those viruses weren't thought to be dangerous to humans.  

A gene sequence is a long string of thousands of letters.  The Indian researchers used well-known computer tools to analyze all known bat coronaviruses to find the closest match to their sample from China.  The same tools also found a "consensus" sequence--the letters used by most members of that family.  Then they had the computers slide one sequence along the others, one letter at a time, until it found the best match.

And what they found was that almost all the letters in the three sequences matched--except for four contiguous groups of about six letters each.  And since all the other letters in the long strings still matched, it's clear that the four new genes insertions.

If that wasn't clear, the pic below will help a LOT:

  
Read this like sheet music: the top line in each row is the genetic code for covid-19.  The next line is the closest "natural" bat coronavirus.  The bottom line is the "consensus" of dozens of corona bat-virus variants.  Red letters mean all three lines were identical.  As you can easily see, in four places covid-19 doesn't match the other two--and yet all the letters to the RIGHT of those four places STILL match the closest matching bat coronavirus.

In order for this to happen, the "natural" virus had to be cut apart, and a contiguous (consecutive) chunk of 8 letters--"codons"--was inserted.  And instead of the insertions being just random letters--as would be true of random mutations--all four insertions turn out to be perfectly functional new genes!  

If you think that happened by chance--an accident--you're not a serious person. 

And by total coincidence (sarc) all four of the inserted genes are from the HIV virus, and enable covid-19's "spike protein" to bind more tightly to target cells in the human airway.

WHAT a coincidence, eh?

The liars (Fauci et al) bleat that the differences between the closest matching bat virus and covid-19 are due to "natural mutations," in which a single letter in the genetic code isn't accurately duplicated.  And it's well known that those happen.  But again, these four groups are not just obvious insertions, but are totally functioning genes.  If just one letter is wrong, they wouldn't function.  

A second problem with Fauci's bullshit Narrative (cover story): he claimed that the virus had evolved naturally in animals and made the jump to humans after a Wuhan resident ate either an infected bat or a pangolin purchased at the local "wet market."  Problem is that if animals were infected there would be lots of other infected animals of the same species in the wild--a so-called "animal reservoir."  But no such animal reservoir has been found, despite intensive efforts.

Because the virus started in Wuhan and had clearly been modified from the closest "natural" (unmodified) bat virus, and the city has a biological weapons lab funded by the communist government, a reasonable theory was that the virus had been modified in that lab and had escaped.

But two very powerful forces didn't want you (or anyone else) to believe that.  Those forces were 1) the communist Chinese government; and 2) a fraudulent egomaniac named Anthony Fauci.  

Fauci had a HUGE reason for not wanting Americans to believe the virus had been modified by Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology:  He'd given them a grant of U.S. tax dollars, via a "cutout"--to fund "gain of function research."  If Americans ever found out, Fauci would be a dead man.

So Fauci was desperate to create a Narrative--a plausible cover story--to keep from being killed by Americans who'd lost beloved spouses to covid.  Thus the Narrative was that the virus had evolved by natural mutation from an animal virus, and then supposedly made the jump to humans after the infected animal was eaten by a Wuhan resident.  

A good Narrative must be superficially plausible, so the conspirators made the lie more plausible by naming two specific animals as likely sources: a bat, or a "pangolin," both of which were sold in Wuhan's "wet market."  (Unverifiable specificity makes bullshit Narratives more convincing, more plausible.  So to a lay-person this was a very plausible Narrative.)

Americans had no idea that "natural" bat viruses weren't dangerous to healthy humans.  By contrast, the covid-19 virus was lethal to humans, entirely because it was able to bind more effectively to specific "receptor cells" in the human airway. ("ACE-2" cells, if you're curious.)  But Fauci knew only a handful of people would know that, let alone the utterly unequivocal,damning evidence that four genes had been inserted.

Americans never heard about the four inserted genes.  Hmmm...

Fauci was desperate to discredit the idea that the virus was modified in a Chinese lab because his own agency--the one he'd headed for something like 30 years--had given the Wuhan Institute of Virology a grant--U.S. taxpayer dollars--to investigate precisely the question of how to modify natural viruses to make them lethal to humans--the infamous "gain-of-function research."

That type of research was considered so dangerous that congress had outlawed it in the U.S.  But the cunning, savvy Fauci knew how to get around that: instead of giving the money directly to the Wuhan Institute, he funneled it thru what's called a "cutout"--an organization called "EcoHealth Alliance," run by a crony named Peter Daszak, who was a big fan of that research.

So, returning to the first week of February of 2020: half a dozen top U.S. researchers told Fauci what you've just seen: that Covid's genetic code had obviously been modified in a lab.  But Fauci didn't want Americans to know that, so he insisted those researchers write a paper ("The proximal origin of Covid-19") saying exactly the opposite: that the virus had evolved naturally.  Hmmm...

A House committee has emails from the researchers to Fauci, and then a week later the top researcher in that group reporting back to Fauci saying the paper was ready.  We have the damn emails.  Fauci deleted 'em from his computer, thinking that would erase all copies.  Like most non-tech people he didn't realize they were still in the system, stored elsewhere.

This is the end of material on the origin of the lies.  Below this is the disaster that happened after that:

Consider the so-called "vaccine."  Fauci, Rochelle Walensky (then head of CDC), the FDA and biden all claimed the jab was "safe, and effective."  But all involved (except for Porridgebrain) knew all along that neither claim was true.  And yet the FDA approved at least three "vaccines" from different makers, under an "emergency-use-only" exception to normal rules.

That exception allowed the FDA to approve a vaccine after only a fraction of the normal, lengthy testing for safety and effectiveness.  But the rules also said that to get the EUA exception there couldn't be any other effective treatment for that disease.

That brings us to the biden regime forbidding doctors from prescribing two inexpensive, effective medicines--both approved for human use--by our own FDA--decades earlier.  

The uses were obviously not to treat covid, which wasn't then known.  But by law, for over 20 years doctors have been allowed to prescribe approved drugs for so-called "off-label" uses.  So if either of the two drugs were effective that should have ruled out the use of the EUA for the jab.

So the Deep-Staters who run the FDA and CDC quickly responded by banning the use of both these tested, approved, totally safe drugs, and by refusing to run "controlled, double-blind" studies.. And as a backup, the regime also threatened to prosecute any pharmacist who filled such a prescription.  The Deep-Staters even got the Post Office to seize perfectly legal shipments of these two drugs from overseas makers, despite there being zero legal authority for doing that.  

If you didn't grasp the implications of the last 'graf, read it again: The biden regime barred American citizens from using two known-safe drugs approved by "your" FDA for human use, instead letting hundreds of thousands of Americans die.  And why?  Clearly it was NOT because either drug was dangerous, since both had been approved by the FDA for human use.  Instead it was to allow the FDA to claim there was no effective treatment for covid, which was the necessary condition to approve the non-vaccine under the "emergency-use-only" rule.

The FDA even created a sneering tweet implying that one of those safe drugs was only approved as a "horse de-wormer," which was a brazen lie.  While that was "a" well-known use, your own damn CDC had even published recommended dose levels for humans.  But even though all that was open-source knowledge, the Media didn't call the regime out on its lies.

Banning approved drugs and allowing hundreds of thousands of Americans to die should be a capital crime, yet the Media didn't say a word.  Didn't bat an eyelash.  The entire Democrat party was totally uninterested in anything that bucked the Party Line that NO effective treatment existed.

And wait, it gets worse: After Porridgebrain was installed, he was asked on camera if he would order everyone to take the (ineffective) vaccine.  He said he would never do that.  But just three weeks later he had his Labor Department order all Americans working for a company with 100 or more employees to take the jab or be fired.

At this point the CDC and FDA already knew the so-called "vaccine" did NOT prevent people from getting or transmitting the Chyna virus.  As a result, the jab didn't meet the legal definition of a "vaccine."  And yet biden, Fauci, Rochelle Walensky (CDC head) et al continued to lie that it was "totally safe and effective."  They also knew even then that thousands of people who took the jab had been killed or injured.

Trump said of the "vaccine" "If you're at high risk, take it."  The biden regime should never have ordered all Americans to take it--even allowing corrupt teachers' unions to force kids (who were virtually immune to covid) to take it in order to attend school.  

You'd think that if the CDC knew the jab was causing health problems--and thousands of deaths--they would have objected to school boards demanding that all public-school and university students take the jab.  Yet they didn't say a damn word.

What kind of government does this?  Lies, lies and more lies--all to benefit one party.

Everything above is in the public record.  You just never heard about it. And Democrats either don't believe any of this, or they're fine with it.

Hopefully you didn't have a loved one who died from either the virus or the jab.  Unfortunately no one responsible for this outrage will ever be punished.  They've all retired and are drawing their generous taxpayer-funded pensions.