Facing possible IRS charges for failure to file, yesterday Hunter biden sued...wait for it...

If you don't pay close attention to what's going on in that cesspool of utter corruption called Washington D.C, you may not have heard of what I'm about to tell ya.

Short recap: Porridgebrain's crack-head, amoral, bribe-collecting son Hunty collected millions of dollars in bribes every year when daddy was Obozo's VP.  And *by his own admission, in an email to his daughter found on his abandoned laptop (which he never expected anyone outside the "family" to see), he had to give half of the bribe money to daddy, since daddy was the principal in this, and Hunty merely the bag-man.

Now, well-known tax law says legitimate business expenses can be deducted from your income.  BUT someone apparently advised Hunty that filing a tax return stating that you paid your daddy half of your income--for no discernible reason--would probably set off some alarms.

With that deduction blocked, Hunty realized he'd have to pay taxes on the entire bribe, instead of just half.  As you could guess, Hunty chafed at the obvious unfairness of this. Plus Hunty knew that because the bribes came from overseas, meaning no 1099s were filed, and were laundered through his web of 22 "shell companies," the chances of the bribes ever being found were so close to zero as to be neglible.

So Hunty...the most pampered princeling evah...simply chose not to file tax returns for at least four years, confident that even if the bribes were somehow discovered, the IRS would never come after him...because he was Porridgebrain's pampered prince.

Nice to be the "preznit's" son, eh?

WELL...there's a RULE that commands all U.S. banks to report "suspicious activities"--large amounts of money sent to or from accounts. Thanks to that RULE, the millions of dollars in "wire transfers" to Hunty's companies triggered over 200 "SARs" with U.S. banks.

So...the bank people had a good suspicious that Hunty was involved in something...odd.   The SARs are sent to both Treasury (corrupt) and the IRS (equally corrupt), so people in both agencies knew.  Someone (or several people) quietly informed GOP members of both the senate and congress, and those members obtained copies of the "wire transfers" from the overseas bribers to Hunty.

Those were displayed, in the well of the senate by Ron Johnson, well before the 2020 election.  But because the Media is totally in the tank for the Democrats, the Media totally ignored the senate revelation.  They couldn't refute it, so they just totally ignored it.

But when the GOP eked out a razor thin majority in the House, that won the ability to set a lot of the agenda.  Specifically, two IRS whistleblowers came forward, testifying that their supervisors prevented them from investigating Hunty for tax fraud.

Then the corrupt U.S. attorney for Delaware stalled his investigation until the statute of limitations ran out on two of Hunty's earlier refusals to file.  The DO"J" then offered Hunty a plea deal that refused to charge him for failure to file in two later years.  (He filed late, owing $2.3 MILLION in taxes, which amount was paid by a Hollywood "entertainment attorney/agent.")

Now, brace yourselves:

Yesterday Hunty sued the IRS, claiming agents "targeted and sought to embarrass" him, and that the IRS unlawfully disclosed Hunty's confidential tax information.

Now, it's extremely rare for a taxpayer to sue the IRS, cuz if you do you're painting a target on your back: the IRS will audit you again and again, as a warning to others.

But Hunty is speshul!  He kin doo dat, cuz he beez protektud by hiz daddy!

Those who follow corrupt biden politics will also recall that Hunty turned down a sweetheart plea deal last month that would have given him no punishment for lying on a federal gun-purchase form--something regular Americans are in prison for doing.

Hunty turned down the deal because at the last second a judge noticed a scam in the works, and asked the prosecution in open court--live, on the record--"Does this super deal cover other crimes you either know about or haven't discovered?"

The question caught the corrupt DOJ "prosecutor" off guard.  If he said it did cover "other crimes" or unknown prior crimes, it would expose the totally corrupt plea deal.  So after some mumble-stumble-bullshit, he was essentially forced to say it didn't cover everything Hunty did (the failure to file income taxes, and to pay $2.3 million in taxes--though it was belatedly paid by the 'friend') *or might have done.*  

But Hunty's understanding was that he'd been promised that he'd be given a *total* free pass on *everything.*  Since he wasn't getting the free pass on everything, he refused the deal.

So, since Hunty has sued the IRS, rather than go to trial, counsel for the IRS will recommend that the agency settle out of court, since the agency could be forced to pay tens of millions for its agents releasing private info to congress.  The director of agency will accept that recommendation "to save taxpayers money," of course!  And indeed, the terms of the settlement will involve Hunty agreeing to settle for a paltry million or so.

But buried in the settlement will be that in exchange for Hunty dropping his lawsuit--for a million in cash--the IRS will drop all charges pertaining to past failure to file and pay taxes.

Wheeee!  Think you could get a deal like that?

So that disposes of the charges for failure to file.  Now for the lying on fed firearms form charge, which Hunty is going to trial on:

When Hunty goes to trial on the firearms form case,
  1. His attorneys will claim a 2A right to own a gun.  Totally unobjectionable.
  2. Hunty's attorneys will then cite a ruling by the Supreme Court in June of last year, in a case shorthanded to "Bruen," in which the court ruled that states couldn't bar citizens from openly carrying firearms.  This *implies* (though does not explicitly state) that neither the states nor the federal gruberment can impose restrictions on buying and carrying firearms not imposed by the Constitution.
  3. The feds won't be able to cite any law or court decision from the Founders' era to support the charge against Hunty for lying on the federal form--because the Constitution doesn't give the government the power to force buyers to fill out a federal form. The idea that one has to fill out ANY government form to buy a gun did not exist in 1791.
  4. Hunty's attorneys will then move for "summary judgment"--meaning that even if every point of fact alleged by the prosecution is admitted, there's no crime.
  5. The judge will grant the motion.  Case dismissed.

Normally this would be a huge victory for gun-rights advocates.  But the hand-picked liberal/Democrat judge will specify that the ruling in this case is "ad hoc," meaning it ONLY applies to Hunty biden's case, meaning it can't be cited in any other suit claiming the fedrul gruberment lacks the Constitutional authority to regulate firearm sales in ANY way--including making you fill out a mother-may-I to buy a gun.

That is how the "JustUs" system works under the biden-harris, Merrick Garland and every Democrat congresswhore.

Thanks, Democrats.