Democrat writes opinion piece at WaPo saying *neither* biden NOR Kami should run again

David Ignatius is a Democrat who writes for the Washington Post.  Five days ago he wrote an "opinion piece" for that rag on why biden shouldn't run again.

This probably doesn't strike you as strange or unusual, so let me explain.

As noted above, Ignatius has always been a reliable Democrat, and also appears to be a long-time asset used by the CIA to get the agency's Narrative to the public.  And since the Post doesn't print "opinions" its editors don't like, the piece is the Narrative dictated by both the Party and the CIA.
 
The piece begins by slobbering over how totally wonderful biden and all Dem policies are:

What I admire most about President Biden is that in a polarized nation, he has governed from the center out, as he promised in his victory speech. With an unexpectedly steady hand, he passed some of the most important domestic legislation in recent decades. In foreign policy, he managed the delicate balance of helping Ukraine fight Russia without getting America itself into a war. In sum, he has been a successful and effective president.

"Governed from the center out," y'say?  Dat soun' SO gud, eh?  Uh...whut it mean?  

You're not supposed to ask.  It's meaningless word-salad designed to make readers feel warm and fuzzy about this ghastly piece of shit that the Dems foisted on us by fraud.

And "Successful and effective president."  Oh, you bet, chiquita.  "Best economy evah!" y'say?  Nah, record low percentage of Americans with full-time jobs.  "Saved your kids and parents from duh totally NON-chinese virus," y'say?  Well, he did order virtually all Americans to take the ineffective, dangerous jab, but that almost certainly didn't save anyone, and has killed tens of thousands.

Ignatius quotes biden's inaugural address: “Our children’s children will say of us, 'They gave their best, they healed a broken land.'”

"Healed a broken land," eh?

All the above praises are utter horse-shit.

In any case: With those obligatory bits of pro-Democrat propaganda said, Ignatius gets to the point, saying neither biden NOR Kami should run next year.

For a Party to push this is totally unprecedented--because while everyone agrees biden is far too senile to run again, his so-called black female VP doesn't have that problem.  Yet the Dems want to dump her.  Again, while individuals may want to sink the VP, for the Party to do this is unprecedented.  And make no mistake: this IS the Democrat party talking via the WaPo.  Here's Iggy again:

[With biden out,] voters would reasonably focus on Harris. [BUT] she is less popular than Biden.  Harris has many laudable qualities but the simple fact is that she has failed to gain traction in the country or even within her own party.

"Has many laudable qualities."  Note that Ignatius failed to mention any, which tells you this is a hit-piece, meaning the Dem rulers have already decided to dump her.

Democrat strategists know voters despise Kami as a totally unqualified incompetent who was carefully chosen by biden's handlers because a) she'd attract black and female votes; and b) she'd be insurance against biden being impeached.  But she's a disaster, as the Dems well know.

The ruling Democrats want to nominate the brilliant, younger, well-spoken Gavin Newsom.  But unless Kami is far more perceptive than she's shown thus far, she's gonna want to be the nominee, eh?  And the Party can't let voters see it as forcing Kami out, because that would lose lots of black and female votes.  

Oooohhh, what to do, eh?

Answer: have a respected WaPo columnist introduce the party's Narrative, so that when all this comes up next year, Dem voters will already see Kami not running as totally reasonable, because a few days ago--almost a year before the convention--the WaPo said it was the smaht thing to do.

All this may seem pretty obvious.  The question has been how the Democrat rulers would pull it off--and Ignatius's op-ed seems to have been the first shot fired to answer that.

Iggy bleats that biden "should have resisted the choice of Harris, who was a colleague of his beloved son Beau when they were both state attorneys general."  Ah, you want us to believe he picked Kami because she and his dead son were "colleagues," eh?  It is to laugh.  See all those pics with Beau and Kami at attorney-general conventions?  Yeah, I don't either.  Kami and Beau were only "colleagues" in the most technical sense of the word.  This is the Party's effort to blame the choice of Kami on the dead son rather than on their own lust to win in 2020.  It's horse-shit.

Having performed the obligatory kiss to blacks and women by noting that Kami "has many laudable qualities," Iggy first suggests that if biden does run next year, he should replace Ms. Laudable Qualities with someone like corrupt black L.A. mayor Karen Bass, or the corrupt former governor of Rhode Island, now "commerce secretary" Gina Raimondo.  Yeah.

Iggy's entire piece is a thinly-disguised hit on Kami.  But the Dems need to get enough of their base to start talking up dumping Kama to persuade her to voluntarily bow out, to keep the party from having to be seen as dumping her.

Iggy bleats that "If biden were convinced that Trump were truly vanquished, he would feel he had accomplished his political mission" and could retire.  [But] that if biden believes Trump will be the GOP nominee he'll run again because he believes he has the best chance to defeat Trump *and save the country from the nightmare of a revenge presidency.*

"Nightmare" of a "revenge presidency," eh?  Wow, that'll motivate Dem voters!  People who don't care about Chinese bribery or senile leadership will jump right on the biden machine, eh?

SO...as I posted almost a month ago, the Dems have to get Kami to voluntarily bow out, so it doesn't look like they're dumping her. This will require...finesse.  Hence the Ignatius op-ed.

So they'll offer her a "prestige position"--likely a university presidency--along with a LOT of cash, probably over ten million.  I suspect she'll take the deal, which will allow the Party to nominate Newsom and a black female who's not obviously corrupt.  So see, voters?  We're keeping the vice-presidential nominee black and female, so there's no reason to be upset.  Your vote needs to stay on the Democrat plantation.

Finally: If you want to understand the forces dragging this country to its doom, click on this link and read the first 100 comments on Iggy's piece.  Regular WaPo readers are Democrats, so you'd expect they'd all sneer at the idea of biden not running--totally ignoring Iggy's points about Kami.  But when you read the comments you see 90% of the commenters saying "Best preznit EVAH!"  And "We gots ta keep him cuz duh Republicans are all corrupt--totally ignoring the unequivocal evidence (emails, bank wire transfers, IRS whistleblowers and dozens of other bits) that biden was totally corrupt during his entire term as Obozo's VP, and still is.

You also find 70% of the commenters fawning over biden forcing virtually all Americans to take the experimental, ineffective jab.  "Dat saved duh country!" they bleat.

These people are beyond moronic.  They're like robots, mindlessly bleating praise for the corrupt biden.

I did notice that not one commenter said anything in defense of the moronic Kamala.

Source.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/09/12/biden-trump-election-step-aside/