biden regime considers forcing migrant families to remain in Texas

For young Americans who have no reason to pay attention to what the biden regime is doing, here ya go:  Valid U.S. law is supposed to govern how aliens can entire the U.S.  But from day 1 the biden regime has been violating U.S. immigration law by allowing virtually *every* illegal alien invader--now five million of 'em--to stay in the U.S., supposedly while waiting for a court date to decide if they really qualify as "refugees."

In practice that means illegal aliens can stay forever, since once they're released into the interior of the U.S. the regime can't find 'em.

The states on the Mexican border--mainly Texas and Arizona--were getting hammered by the flood of illegals.  (Same for New Mexico and California, but their governors were solid Democrats so they never objected.)  So after the governors of TX and AZ pleaded with the Dems running biden for 2.5 years to stop the flood of illegals--without any success--those governors had a great idea: bus a few thousand illegals to New York and D.C.

And that finally got the regime's attention--because that's where the Mainstream Media lives!  When the illegals were in TX and AZ--far away from the power centers of NY and DC-- the Media could (and did, except for Fox) ignore the problem.  But suddenly Democrats found 60,000 illegals invading NYC, and with the problem now affecting Democrats in NYC and DC, Democrat voters and mayors were suddenly a LOT less enthusiastic about illegals!

With the number of illegals entering the U.S. hitting an all-time high last month, you might think the sons of bitches who run the biden regime would see the light and close the damn border, eh?

Hahahahahaha!  Not even close!  Instead the  cunning bastards devised a new plan, to force illegals to stay in Texas and Arizona!

You may wonder how the regime can force TX and AZ to stop busing illegals to the power centers, since it makes it so obvious that hypocritical Democrat pols believe "illegals are wonderful--as long as they're far away," eh?  But the cunning bastards have found a way:  They're planning to order the illegals to stay at the border until their cases are heard (i.e. 20 years from now).  They'll enforce that by requiring the illegals to wear GPS ankle locators.  So the illegals won't wanna go to NYC and risk angering the regime.

Now, you'd think the f'ing ACLU would scream bloody murder at forcing duh po' "refugees" to wear ankle bracelets, eh?  But the ACLU won't say shit, cuz their top priority is supporting the Democrat party and the bribem/harris regime.

Of course the L.A. Times is a similarly Democrat-fellating outlet, so you might be puzzled at how the Times could report this.  The Times quickly lies that regime officials "have been considering the idea as a way to stem recent increases in the numbers of migrant families crossing the southern border, which reportedly reached an all-time high last month."

This is a brazen lie: the regime knows that as long as the regime keeps letting illegals enter the U.S., the idea of having to stay near the border for a year or so won't deter 'em one bit. They'll keep coming at the same rate as before.

Another lie from the Times:  "Supporters of the remain-in-Texas idea hope it will help the administration advance its goal of quickly deporting families who fail initial asylum screenings and deterring other families from crossing in the first place."

Bullshit.  The regime has explicitly made clear that it does NOT want to deport anyone, including known convicted criminals, let alone families.  So claiming they're using this cunning plan to "quickly deport families and deterring other families from crossing" is utter horse-shit.  The Times simply parrots what the regime tells 'em, to fool the rubes.

In case you didn't know, that's you.

The Times bleats, "If the families failed their initial screenings, they'd be easier to deport because they'd be close to the border."  Sounds SO plausible, eh?  That's why the regime's lackey told the Times reporter that: it makes the plan sound more plausible.

The Times again: "Migrant families are generally harder to arrest in the interior of the U.S. because of the complicated logistical planning needed to apprehend children and their parents."

Ohhhh, "complicated logistical planning needed to apprehend children and their parents," y'say.  Wow!  Dat soun' SO plausible, eh?  But again, horse-shit.  The reason it's harder to deport not just families but ALL illegals once they're released into the interior is:  you can't find them.

But by throwing up this bullshit smoke-screen, the regime gets dumbshit liberal voters to say "Dis beez a brilliant policy, cuz it keeps 'em near duh border where we kin find 'em to deport 'em if we needs ta."

"Administration officials had hoped that the proposed policy, together with videos and news releases highlighting families being deported, would help deter additional families from entering the U.S. without authorization."  Really?  Show us some families being deported.  You can't, and won't, cuz you don't deport any.  Your propaganda is utter horse-shit, designed to fool the rubes.

"In July the Border Patrol encountered more than 60,000 families crossing the border — making up almost half the number of those who crossed the southern border that month. Border Patrol has yet to release that number for August, but the Washington Post reported last week that it was more than 91,000, an all-time record."

Note that's families.  For a first hack let's assume a "family" has two kids.  So multiply 60,000 by four.  For the math-challenged that's 240,000 people.  Then consider that the Times reports those people are "almost half" of the total number of illegals entering the U.S. in July.  For the math-challenged that means something over 480,000 aliens illegally entered the U.S. in just one month.

Bet you never heard that on the nightly newz, eh?  And for the Dem-fellating Times to report that, it's an "admission against interest," suggesting it's true.

Again for the math-challenged: if we assume July is a primo month for illegal crossings, and that the monthly average for a whole year is a LOT lower--say 300,000 per month--that would be...um...3.6 MILLION in a single year.

So what happened in August?  According to the Times, the WaPo reported "more than 91,000 families" illegally entered--a staggering 50 percent more than in July.  Do the same math, and what do ya get?  Somewhere around 700,000 illegals in a single month.

So the earlier estimates of five MILLION illegals entering in the first 2.5 years of duh bribem regime sounds like it may actually be low.

Finally the Times completes the propaganda sweep by bleating that "immigrant advocates" say duh bribem regime is being too harsh on duh illegal-immigrant famblies, cuz it's not giving them enough free attorneys to help 'em
prepare their asylum cases.

Thanks, Democrats.

Source: L.A. Times

https://news.yahoo.com/biden-administration-considers-forcing-migrant-200551958.html