Democrat hypocrisy ("two different sets of laws"), example # 4,978,382

If your kid goes to a public school you're forced by law to prove to the government that your kid has been vaccinated against 18 diseases.  But when New York City schools start in 3 days, not one of the 20,000 children of illegal immigrants who've arrived this year will be required to be vaccinated.

If your kid isn't vaxxed, your rulers won't let him or her go to school.  But for illegals it's just fine.  What does that tell you about the "rule of law"?  Answer: "Two sets of laws."

Clearly your rulers are fine with allowing 20,000 unvaxxed kids to attend public school--as long as they're children of illegal immigrants.  So either unvaccinated kids--regardless of origin--are NOT a risk, or it's a risk your rulers are willing to ignore to advance their goals.

And it’s not as if Democrats don’t understand the effects of their policies:  In April, NYC's health commissioner warned that because of illegal immigration they could be exposed to diseases that have been eradicated from the United States.

Specific worries are tuberculosis and polio.  But hey, not a problem, cuz...reasons.Source.

https://moonbattery.com/no-proof-of-vaccination-needed-for-alien-students-in-nyc/#disqus_thread