September 06, 2023

My prediction for the 2024 presidential election

All the leading economic indicators--every damn one--says the shit is starting to hit the fan for the U.S. economy.  Normally that would result in the incumbent party losing.  But after the Dems discovered they could steal the 2020 election without a single judge actually examining the evidence in a TRIAL, complete with cross-examining election workers, they realized that will work every time.

So no matter who the Dems nominate, they'll certainly steal the election just as they did in 2020,  So the only question is, who will the Democrats nominate (and the fraudsters elect)?

Joe is deteriorating so fast both physically and mentally that there's no way he'll be able to last until 2028 (yes, 2028).  And if he either dies in office or strokes out, that means that on the current course, the ghastly Kumala would become prez.  And even though she's in good health, she's as dumb as biden.  Of course it's possible the Dems may be fine with her, since she brings along a lot of female and black votes.

But my bet is that the Dems see her as a liability.  She got the post not for her competence, but for two reasons: first, as a pandering move joe said he'd pick a black female.  Second, Kammie was joe's insurance policy against being impeached, just as joe was Obama's insurance policy.  So she's served her purpose, and now they'd like to get rid of her for 2024.  She's SO over-the-top goofy and incompetent that I don't think the Dems want her as prez (although they sure nominated the horribly corrupt, lying biden, so...).

My guess is they'll get her to bow out by finding her a prestige position so she doesn't lose face, along with a ten-million-dollar payoff to sweeten the deal.  President of an elite leftist university would be a good choice.  If necessary a mysterious party will quietly threaten her.  And of course the ol' "unspecified medical issue" will also do. Reporters would be told to "respect the VP's privacy."  She'll take the deal.

In that case, by law, biden then nominates as the new VP Gavin Newsom.  Then all he needs is a simple majority in both chambers of congress.

For those who don't follow politics, a yes vote by the senate is assured, since the Dems have a majority.  The House is more...interesting: Although the GOP has a tiny 4 or 5-vote majority in the House (depending on whether the GOP dumps the corrupt nutter George Santos), at least six RINO members of the House--and likely over ten--will vote with the Dems to confirm.  Their excuse will be that the country must have a VP, and Newsom is the preznit's nominee, so there ya go.

At that poing the Dems have the perfect setup regardless of what happens to biden:  If Joe is able to run next year, but resigns or dies before two years, Newsom can run again in 2028 for one term.  But the ideal for the Dems is if joe can last until January of 2026, because in that case Newsom would not only finish biden's term but would also be allowed to serve two terms on his own, giving the Dems control of the White House for a bit under ten years.

This is so overwhelmingly positive for the Dems that I'm confident it's what they'll do.

Oh, and for the GOP:  Are optical ballot scanners programmed to recognize write-in votes?  I'm pretty sure they're NOT.  And if that's true all GOP officials in battleground states had better start right now getting written RULES on how ballots with write-in votes are to be handled.  

Reason: corrupt Dems will succeed in keeping Trump off the ballot in at least one battleground state, if not several.  The hundreds of thousands or millions of voters in that state may write-in Trump's name for president.  Because I suspect scanners aren't programmed to deal with write-in votes, ballots with such votes will be sent to a special table or station to be "adjudicated."  

And I suspect we'll see the inverse of the situation with mail-in ballots in so many states, where the ballot contained an illegible scrawl that didn't remotely match the voter's sig on file.  With the 2024 election we'll see the reverse:  Democrat "poll workers" will see a ballot with "Donald J. Trump" written in, and will say "This ballot doesn't contain his middle name, so we must reject it."  Or "Hmm...'Donald Tru_p,' huh?  I can't make out that next to last letter, so since we're not sure who they meant to vote for, we must reject."

You gon' see a shit-load of that.  Count on it.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home