Huge anomalies in both 2020 and 2016 races prove Democrats committed MASSIVE vote fraud in both

Vote fraud by Democrats--not just a few votes but *massive* vote fraud--has been happening for years.  And in the next ten minutes I'll show you what seems to me to be clear proof.

I shouldn't need to explain that if a political party wants to control the government, winning majority control of both chambers of congress is crucial.  So with vanishingly small exceptions, anyone voting for the Dem candidate for president would logically also vote for the Dem candidate for senate too, eh?

The only time someone who voted for a party's candidate for president would NOT also vote for their party's senate candidate would be the rare case where a voter personally knew that the party's senate candidate was corrupt, or had a grudge against him or her.  That should rarely affect more than a fraction of a percent of total votes.  

So with the rare exception just noted, we would expect almost all rational voters who vote for their party for president would also vote for their party's candidate for the senate.  Thus the number of votes for a party's senate candidate should be within a fraction of a percent of the total votes for that party's candidate for president.

This seems so obvious as to not need explaining, but then again....

SO...if the *officially reported vote results* showed a party'spresidential candidate in a given state got tens of thousands MORE votes than that party's senate candidate, then unless the official totals were wrong, a rational person would  conclude that a far greater number of votes for president was due to fraud.

Example: In 2016 (Trump vs. Hilliary) Florida's Democrat senator was running for re-election.  The official state election website reported Hilliary as having gotten 400,000 MORE votes than the Democrat senate candidate.

Think about that for a minute.  Why would a rational voter--who's already taken the time to show up to vote--NOT vote for the party's senate candidate as well?

Certainly a handful of confused Dem voters might not have known their party had a senator running for re-election, so we could expect the senate candidate might get a few thousand fewer votes than Hilliary.  But 400,000??  It's beyond implausible.  

But such a result is totally consistent with fraudsters hurriedly marking 400.000 fraudulent ballots for Hilliary for president, and not bothering to vote in the down-ballot races. 

Now, you don't believe Hilliary was reported to have gotten 400,000 more votes than the Democrat candidate for U.S. senate--and I don't blame you.  It seems impossible that such a glaring anomaly--400,000 more votes officially reported for Hilliary than for the Democrat candidate for senate-- wouldn't have been noticed, and wouldn't have generated hundreds of articles speculating on how that could have happened.  So let me explain why no one said anything about it.

No Repubican even noticed--because Trump won Florida.  By contrast, the Dems absolutely DID notice, because they were the ones who paid to create the 400,000 fake votes.  Of course since they were the guilty party they obviously wouldn't call attention to proof of their guilt, eh?
 
I suspect most of you still don't understand what's so unusual about this.  Never mind.  I think "Dancing With the Stars" comes on in 20 minutes or so.

But if you understand why this is so bizarre, so unlikely, let's look at election results from 2020:

In the Peoples' Republic of Minnesota, the OFFICIAL state vote results for 2020 show Biden with 1,716,207 votes.  Yet in that state's race for U.S. senate, the Democrat candidate reportedly got just 1,565,815 votes.  So by the official results, Biden supposedly got over 150,000 MORE votes than the Dem candidate for U.S. senate.

How likely is that to happen without fraud?  Because again, logically, every Dem voter who went to the effort of voting for Biden for president would also have voted for the Democrat candidate for senate, eh?

Those who claim there was no *massive* fraud expect you to believe that over 150,000 Democrat voters who voted for biden for president didn't give a damn about helping their party win the senate.

Does any rational person think that's believable?  Of course not.  

In Michigan the official state totals show Biden supposedly getting 2,804,040 votes.  But Michigan's Democrat senate candidate got just 2,737,431 votes.  So biden supposedly got over 67,000 MORE votes than the Democrat senate candidate.  Again, it's massively illogical.

To claim there was no fraud, Americans must believe that 67,000 Dem voters who took the time to vote for biden didn't care to help their party win a crucial senate race.

Do you really think that's plausible?  Believable by rational humans?  Of course not.

Let's try another one:  In 2020 the Dems were convinced North Carolina was "in play"--close enough to be worth cheating.  That state's official results show Biden getting 2,684,299 votes.

Yet the Dem senate candidate only got 2,569,968 votes--over 114,000 FEWER votes than biden.  Same argument as above: To claim no fraud one must believe 114,000 residents took the time to vote for president but didn't care about winning the senate.  

Does any rational adult think that's even REMOTELY plausible?  Yet you never heard about these results until this minute--because no Repubs noticed, and no Media outlet would blow the whistle.

If Americans knew about these results, many would recognize the obvious, massive fraud.

The same analysis can be applied to other statewide races.  So for example, in 2016 neither of Pennsylvania's U.S. senators was on the ballot, but there was a statewide election for "Auditor General." Biden officially got 3,454,523 votes.  But the Democrat running for Auditor-General only got 3,120,483.

Is it plausible that 334,000 Democrats would vote for their candidate for president but not support their party's candidate for Auditor-General?  

It's wildly implausible, even for Pennsylvania voters.  But for Democrats and their media supporters to claim there was no fraud, they expect you to believe 334,000 Biden voters--clearly pro-Democrat, who allegedly took the time to vote--chose NOT to vote for their party's down-ballot candidate.

And it's worth noting again that in 2016 Hilliary got nearly 400,000 MORE votes in Florida than the Democrat candidate for the U.S. senate.  That huge difference suggests the Dems have been committing election fraud ballots since at least 2016.
===

Of course it's not unusual for "split-ticket" voters not to vote in all the down-ballot races if they don't know much about the candidates.  But the vast majority of people who vote for president also vote on senate and congressional races. At least that's always been true in the past.

For example, compare the huge differentials between Dem votes for biden compared to the Dem senate candidate to a "normal" scenario: In 2020 South Carolina was considered to be solidly Republican, so the Dems didn't bother trying to cheat there, preferring to put their dollars into battleground states.  And sure enough, the totals show 2,514,124 votes for biden compared to 2,512,793 votes for the Dem candidate for Senate race--a difference of just 1,331 votes.

The 1,331-vote difference in South Carolina between the total votes for biden and votes for the Dem senate candidate is a normal figure.  It's what we'd expect if no fraud.  And when you compare that small number against the 150,000 to 350,000 more votes biden was officially reported as getting in various states compared to the Dem senate candidate, it suggests that something unusual is happening.  

Pennsylvania, 2020:  Biden allegedly got 3,458,229 votes.  But the Democrat running for the statewide post of "Auditor-General"--Nina Ahmad, a female "molecular biologist" without a blemish on her record, and who was endorsed by emperor Barack Obama--only got 3,129,131.  That's 329,000 people who voted for biden but didn't bother voting for the Democrat running for Auditor-General.

This pattern is also apparent in 2016:  In the 2016 election, in Georgia the official results show Hilliary got 1,877,963 votes, compared to just 1,599,726 for the Democrat senate candidate.  That's a surprising 278,000 more votes for Hilliary than for the party's senate candidate.

No Republican noticed this because in 2016 Trump won Georgia--despite the Democrats' almost certainly padding Clinton's total with 278,000 fraudulent votes.

One more example from 2016 shows the Democrats were submitting massive numbers of fake votes even then--meaning they had the massive fraud scheme already working even then: 

In 2016 everyone agreed that the presidential race in Florida was going to be extremely tight, so if a party wanted to pick a state to cheat, Florida wouldn't take many fake votes.  

So...the official vote count showed Hilliary with 4,504,975 votes. So you'd think the Democrat candidate for senate (Patrick Murphy) would have gotten within, say, 10,000 votes or so of that figure, since rational Hilliary voters (?) would surely want to also help win the senate for their party, which would give the Dems control of the entire government (which happened in 2020).

The official total on the state's website showed Murphy with 4,105,251 votes--meaning the Dem senate candidate got almost 400,000 FEWER votes than Hilliary.  

Does any rational human on the planet think 400,000 rabidly partisan Democrats would show up to vote for Hilliary but would NOT vote for the Dem senate candidate--especially when that could have given the Dems control of the senate???

It's delusional to believe that.  But no one caught the huge, glaring anomaly because in 2016 Trump eked out a bare win in Florida. So the glaring, screamingly obvious anomaly went unnoticed until now.

And when the Democrats got away with such a huge fraud--submitting 400,000 more ballots marked for Hilliary than for the Dem senate candidate--without anyone noticing, they realized they could steal every election with impunity.