*Surely* House Dems would agree to condemn vandalism by abortion supporters against churches, right?

The Left always wails that conservatives are violent and dangerous ("Your speech is violence!) while the Left claims to be peaceful.  (They claim any minor violence by them is merely "free speech.")  Okay, so since the announcement of the decision returning abortion laws to the states, how many incidents of vandalism against churches and "pregnancy counseling centers" specifically complaining about Roe v. Wade do you think there have been?

Half a dozen?  Two dozen?  Three dozen?  Over 50?

I can confidently predict you've only heard about possibly three, but the truth is, over 50.

SO...yesterday a Republican in the House introduced a resolution condemning violence against churches and "pregnancy centers."  I know you didn't hear anything about it, but what do you think happened, eh?

Democrats on the Judiciary committee voted against it preventing it from going to the full House.  Clever, eh?  Keeps it out of the newz and prevents Dems in the entire House from having to vote up or down on it.  Brilliant.

Separately, the f-ing speaker of the House, corrupto Pelosi, was asked if she would condemn that vandalism.  

She refused.

You'd think things like refusing to condemn vandalism against churches--and similar insanities endlessly repeated by Democrat politicians--would result in huge losses for them in the midterms.  And yet the latest polls (yeah, I know) show the race to control congress virtually tied.

Note to newbies: The polls could actually show the Republicans ahead by 20, but the news stories will report it as virtually tied, because if they reported the truth and then stole the election again, it would be too obvious.  

Source.

(This source claims the resolution was voted down by 219 Democrats in the entire House.  I find no record that the res ever made it to the floor of the House.)