Missouri 7th-grader forced to hide T-shirt message, threatened with suspension. "Disruptive"

A social studies teacher in Missouri was outraged by the sweatshirt worn by a 13-year-old student in her class.  She dragged the kid to the principal's office, and demanded that he wear the shirt inside-out for the rest of the day.

The principal later told the kid he'd be suspended if he tried to wear the "offensive" shirt again.

So what do you think the shirt depicted that so offended these so-called educators?  Was it "Trump 2020?"  How about "MAGA"?--back east, principals have suspended students for wearing hats with the acronym for "make America great again."  Seems hard to believe anyone could find that phrase offensive in any way--until you realize how utterly left-wing most K-12 teachers and principals are.  (Not all, of course.)

Little-Hitler wannabe's--actually principals--in California high schools have even suspended students for wearing the American flag on a tee-shirt, claiming it offends people from other countries (who comprise a majority in some Cali schools).

Similarly, the phrase that so offended the snowflakes in Missouri was..."Virginity rocks."

The local paper asked school district highnesses to explain, and was given the boilerplate 'graf from the policy manual:

The district's dress code does not allow students to wear clothing with statements advocating immoral, illegal, sexual, or violent behavior.

When reporters asked what part of the dress code they'd been handed was violated by "virginity rocks," the district spokesworms were puzzled, so they huddled and issued this statement:

The District’s policy regarding student dress provides opportunities for our administrators to address student attire that is potentially disruptive to the educational environment. We routinely have conversations with students around attire that may be inappropriate and by and large, our students and families work with our staff to address any concerns.

Wait, so "virginity rocks" is "potentially disruptive to the educational environment"?  Sez who?

The district can force your kid to sit through lectures on the marvelous benefits of a teen changing his or her "gender," but heaven forbid that the slightest bit of reasonable protest be allowed, eh?

"Freedom of speech?"  Not here, citizen.  We're good little proggies.  Party-line all the way.