July 13, 2018

FBI agent Strzok lies to House committee, stonewalls questioners

FBI agent Peter Strzok--the guy who texted his FBI mistress "Don't worry, we'll stop him" (referring to Trump possibly winning the election)--appeared before the House committee to supposedly be questioned on what he meant by the hundreds of anti-Trump texts.

As you may have heard, the hearing was a joke--a travesty--from start to finish.

First, Democrat congresswhores (my apologies for insulting honest working girls there), led by the ghastly Jerrold Nadler, deliberately diverted sabotaged the hearing by bloviating for 90 minutes by raising what they falsely claimed were "points of order," which by parliamentary rules have priority over all other business.

Next, the asshole was accompanied by an FBI attorney--not one he personally hired.  He asked the chair if he could consult with "his attorney" on several matters before answering questions.  The chair observed that by no stretch of the imagination was an FBI attorney--a government employee, paid with taxpayer dollars--"his" attorney, and declined to let him consult with the suit.

This drove the Dems crazy.  It just wasn't fair, they said, that the mean ol' republican chair wouldn't allow this turncoat to be represented by a government attorney, working for the FBI to conceal all wrongdoing.

Just.  Not.  Fair, comrade.

The Republicans did manage to get the witness to say he was still employed at the FBI, which by itself is an absolute outrage.  They also got him to say he even still has his Top-Secret security clearance.  Crucially, Attorney-general Jeff Sessions said the guy's security clearance had been revoked.

Who's telling the truth?  If Strzok does still have a clearance, why?

The fact that the FBI ordered a government attorney to advise Strzok during the hearing, helping him stonewall what would seem to be an absolutely KEY investigation into FBI corruption--corruption extending all the way to the highest officials of that agency--speaks to the corruption of the FBI, the DOJ and all of Washington.

If an FBI agent had vowed to block Barack Hussein Obama from winning his election, does anyone in the country think he or she would have lasted a week at his job, let alone over a year, after the discovery of the incontrovertible, written evidence that he indeed had stated a desire to do that?

One obvious instance of perjury by Strzok during the hearing was when he claimed that he “never” spoke to reporters about the investigation before election day.  But the FBI itself previously admitted that Strzok talked to reporters about the investigation. Strzok’s attorney wrote an Op-Ed in USA Today saying that “Peter and others” at the FBI “actively ensured that news reports didn’t overplay the seriousness of the investigation.” How could he have done that without talking to them?

The list of likely lies by Strzok, and his smug cockiness--knowing the Democrats will ensure that he won't be prosecuted even for the most blatant, obvious, brazen lie--shows how corrupt the Deep State is.  Judging by how successful the Democrats were in thwarting the questioning of Strzok, and the complete support of half the electorate (more than half if you count all the illegal votes), my guess is that none of the illegal acts by Deep-State Trump-haters will ever be punished.

If the 2018 midterms aren't an even bigger rebuke of the criminal Democrat-run establishment than was the 2016 election of Trump, America as it was bequeathed to us is over.  Our children will inherit a totally corrupt banana republic, run by arrogant criminals who will continue to break the law with utter impunity.

H/T American Spectator

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home