NY Times ridicules idea of Norks launching a nuke; says global warming a greater threat

The NY Times--as the entire Left--is doing all it can to ridicule the idea that North Korea poses any nuclear threat.  As an example, yesterday the Times tweeted this:

 

What’s a greater threat to Guam? North Korea, or climate change? http://nyti.ms/2fxxibd 

9:18 AM - Aug 11, 2017

 

Seems innocuous enough, until you realize that the Times is trying to make readers believe "climate change"--the political movement formerly known as "global warming" until everyone's personal experience made that too hard to believe--is a more dire threat than the threat by North Korea's crazy dictator to strike the U.S. with an atomic bomb.

 

Here's a plot of sea-level change--from a very CO2=disaster website: 

 

 

If we take the plot for 1870 as negative 70mm, and for 2008 as +130mm, that's a change of 200mm in 138 years, or about 15 mm per decade.  And of course our liberal friends will instantly recognize that 15 mm is about...how many inches?

It's a little over half an inch per decade.

But according to the Times that's a LOT more serious a threat than an atomic bomb being launched by peaceful, responsible North Korea.  Really.  Cuz according to the Times, the Norks would never launch.  I mean, the idea that the Norks would launch a missile with a nuke on it is as crazy as warning that 19 Saudi muslims would crash hijacked passenger jets into skyscrapers or the Pentagon.  Total lunacy, right? 

Wait...wasn't there some sort of attack on the home city of the NY Times many years ago?  Something about a "World Trade Center" or something.  Gee, if that's true a rational person would think the Times wouldn't be so eager to ridicule the possibility of something formerly considered highly unlikely.