In Canada a "transgender man" sexually assaults toddler--after being released early for similar crime

Sep 4, 2025

In Canada a “transgender man" previously convicted of sexually assaulting a young boy but given early release after serving just six months in jail has just been arrested for the violent sexual assault of a female toddler.

Of course given the Media's f'ing DEMAND that everyone use the perp's preferred pronouns rather than the accurate ones, at this point you can't tell if the perp is male or female.  Thanks, Media.  

But we soon learn that the perp is a male, Daniel Sénécal, 25, who identifies as “Dani” and uses “she/her” pronouns, and allegedly broke into a Canadian family’s home on August 31 and sexually assaulted their little girl, who is under the age of 5. 

Sénécal is scheduled for a bail hearing September 10.

Even though the perp was previously convicted of anally raping a young boy, the pedo-loving Canadian governments' online record system isn't viewable by the public.

Sénécal has made social media posts joking about knocking kids unconscious with ether.

As noted above, this was not Sénécal’s first child sex assault.  A mother of a young boy said Sénécal had attacked her child four years ago.  After being free on the streets for over two years of endless court hearings, Sénécal was sentenced to 18 months in jail, but reportedly released after only six months, in early March.

The Dallas Express could not determine if Sénécal is on the government list of registered sex offenders, since the government refuses to allow ordinary citizens to see its list of convicted sex offenders!  So fat lot of good it does, eh? 

See, duh Canadian gruberment--which doesn't give a damn about ordinary citizens--don' wanna stigmatize doze po' unfortunate sex offenders, eh?  Cuz if yew deplorable "citizens" were to learn dat a convicted sex offender lived a couple of houses away, yew might not let your kiddies play at his house, eh?  An' duh socialist gruberment of Canada sez dat beez "discrimination!"  An' your liberal socialist rulers will NOT allow dat!

See, socialists insist dat sex offenders are entitled to equal access to your kidz.  Dat's only fair, eh?

Okay, sarc off.  I posted this ghastly story because if you think this isn't coming here you're too naive to breathe.  May even happen in a Dem-ruled state while Trump is still president, since sex-offender registries are kept by each state.  No federal law forces those lists to be made public, so states can do anything their pols want, jus' like "sanctuary states" can release illegal alien criminals before ICE agents can nab 'em, eh?  

Yes, if you ask AI if there's a "federal list" of sex offenders, duh leftist-programmed robot sez there is.  But it's actually just a list of links to state lists.  So if a Dem-ruled state wanted to make its list of convicted sex offenders unavailable to the public, there's no federal law prohibiting that.

Dem pols in some "enlightened" Dem-ruled shithole like Cali or NY or Illinois or Colorado (where the governor is married to a man) will WAIL dat making the list of registered sex offenders public "stigamatizes" po' sex offenders--like child rapists--so they'll introduce a bill to "end the stigma" by making the list non-public.

Signal dat virtue, sparky!  See, future victims don't matter to Democrats, cuz "It jus' not FAIR dat MAPs beez 'stigmatized' fo' merely bein' MAPs, eh?"

Wait...y'say yew nevah heard duh term "MAP" as an acronym?  It's short for "minor-attracted person"--which is SO much more soothing than "pedophile," eh?  Dems deliberately use acronyms to camouflage the true effect of their bills.  

Example: back in 2001 senate Dems introduced the "DREAM Act"--an acronym for "Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors."  Cuz who could oppose something called "the Dream Act," eh?  I suspect the staffer who came up with that acronym got an award for it. 

So in that vein the Dem bill to make a state's sex-offender registry non-public will be named the "Fairness to MAPs Act," which makes it sound faaabulous, and also makes it impossible for most citizens to know its real purpose.  I mean, who could be against "fairness," eh?

So start the clock.  I know what Dems will do even before they know--because I watch what liberals and communists do in other countries.  If some law or policy advances the liberal agenda in another country, U.S. Dems will try it here, sure as the sunrise.

Source.