"Two sets of laws," citizen. And the Democrats are totally fine with it

It's becoming more obvious every day that the entire biden regime is massively corrupt from top to bottom. 

• The House has authenticated emails on Hunty's own laptop, from him to his communist Chinese partners demanding cash, and wire transfers in that amount days later;
• The House has authenticated emails from dozens of aides to then-VP Joe to Hunty giving him inside info on official government positions, despite him a) not being in government; and b) being a crack addict;
• Those authenticated emails show that the now preznit (who some are now calling the "President in Name Only") knew all about Hunty's influence peddling, since Joe was raking in cash from it; 
• And of course the video from 2014 or so where Joe brags about threatening to withold a billion-dollar loan guarantee from Ukraine unless the president of that country fired a prosecutor that was closing in on Burisma.  Joe *bragged about it, on stage, on video.*  The audience--all connected Democrats--laughed heartily.

But more disturbing than those things is that the Democrats ruling this country, and their Media allies, couldn’t care less.  If anything, both those groups are delighted that their regime is getting away with everything.  If you've seen the first Democrat ad of the 2024 presidential campaign, they're actually bragging about saving Democracy.

Seriously.

One of the inevitable consequences of corruption at the top is that a corrupt regime is almost compelled to tolerate a huge amount of corruption by underlings.  One reason is that if the regime were to prosecute a low-level government lackey for, say, embezzlement, while ignoring the $40 million or so in bribes to the preznit's clan, too many Americans would smell the hypocrisy.

But a second reason is also at play: lots of low-level Democrat lackeys know the truth, and if the regime were to prosecute a low-level lackey, some of those truths might slip out--as is happening now, but on a larger scale.  Quite a deterrent to prosecuting crime.

So now lower-level officials can line their pockets without fear of being prosecuted.  

This is far beyond hypocrisy--now it's about hierarchy, showing you they have the power to do anything, break any laws, and there is nothing you can do about it.

"Wait...we can use the power of the ballot and vote them out!"

Really?  How'd that work out for ya in 2020, eh?  Think the Dems won't be even more brazen about stuffing ballot boxes in 2024, since they saw how totally the courts ignored the clear evidence in 2020?

So what's the sure end to all this corruption?  History provides the answer.  The corruption is like a poison, slow-acting but no less certain.  For those living through it, the decline will be so slow as to barely be perceptible.

How many times can the Media crow that "the Biden economy is great!  Inflation has stopped!" and still be believed when hamburger is $5 a pound and milk is $3.50 a gallon?  When a record number of Americans aren't even looking for work, so aren't counted in the unemployment figure touted by the liberal media?

People believe tomorrow will be virtually the same as today, and so on.  That tendency is so well known that it's got a name: "normalcy bias."  Oh sure, something you regularly buy may cost a bit more this month, but that's to be expected, right?  "Perfectly normal."

The average person needs to believe soothing but false sayings like "Everyone is equal under the law."  So when an "event" shows that to be obvious horseshit, the government and the Media allies go into overdrive to convince voters either that what you thought happened didn't really happen, or to explain that while it may have happened, this was a one-of-a-kind event.  A "black swan."  So any...um...exceptions to "all are equal under the law" were totally necessary.  

For example, consider the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.  By rule, the FDIC insures accounts to a limit of $250,000. I didn't just make that up: it's printed on all the fliers in every bank in the country.  If your li'l country bank in Gotebo goes under, and you had $300,000 in your account, and tried to get the Feds to pay you the entire amount, they'd just laugh you out of their office.

But strangely, when SVB went bust, a few "special" depositors got paid over ten times that amount.  Because...one of a kind event, we simply *must* make some totally necessary exceptions or the bank could go under.

Wait...it did.  The exceptions don't help the bank or the country.  And yet they were *ordered* by the corrupt regime.  Starting to see the pattern yet?
 
Similarly, if you or I knowingly lied on a federal firearms application, it's a felony.  The penalties aren't trivial.  But if you're Hunty, there's no significant penalty.  But hey, no corruption here.  "Everyone is equal under the law."

Except that's no longer true.

Where will this trend of "two sets of laws" and utter corruption end?

It's certain to get much, much worse--for the simple reason that no part of the government has the power to stop it.  For example, not a single judge in the country was willing to hear evidence of massive vote fraud in open court.  Even the supreme court refused--in an unsigned two-paragraph ruling that neither cited case law nor gave any legal reasoning.  The court was clearly scared to hold the "official" results in abeyance until evidence could be heard in open court.

When the department of "justice" itself, and the FBI that reports to it, are corrupt, no true justice is possible.

It's not beyond the realm of possibility that if Republicans nominate Trump as their candidate, the corrupt DOJ will  throw him in jail months before the election.  Hard to campaign from jail, eh?  And Democrats will either cheer or shrug, and half of Republican pols will sputter helplessly, as the other half says "We warned you not to nominate him."  

The Supreme Court may simply refuse to hear the case, insisting that the case work its way up through the glacial legal system.  Dems win because Trump can't campaign, and no court in the land dares to overturn the official results--just as in 2020.

Don't worry, there won't be a civil war just because the Democrats jailed the GOP nominee.  The reason is that no Trump supporter will be willing to go to jail for 30 years or more for picking up a gun and killing whoever deserves it.  Our side learned from the outrageous imprisonment of the J6 protesters without bail being offered, even to grandmothers.  No firearms present, but the Dems and Media have called it an "insurrection," which triggers the 14th Amendment.  

Cunning, cunning Democrats.

Some keen analysts have said a backlash is inevitable.  I'd like to think so, but it's not.  It's true that revolutions have happened all over the globe, but revolutions don't happen to sophisticated regimes (China, Russia today, or the U.S.) that have total control of what their people see and hear.

Conservative analysts say the idea that Americans will put up with corruption and two sets of laws forever is simply un-possible--that such a thing "simply goes against everything history teaches us."  

Comforting, perhaps, but the fact is that enough things in our society are fundamentally different enough from previous years that even if enough Americans were outraged, it will be nearly impossible for them to organize enough opposition to start a revolution to take back the country.  For example, the regime monitors every text message sent for key words. Hard to organize if the opponent is listening to every conversation.

Of course you don't believe that, which is fine--just like you don't believe FBI agents were leading the J6 protests, caught on video breaking out windows in the capitol right next to wide open doors where cops were welcoming protesters in.

Every mass peaceful protest from now on will be infiltrated by the feds, just as the J6 protest was.  All protests will be prosecuted as "insurrection," just as J6 was.

The biden/harris/Dem regime has "thrown down:" they've announced their intention to appeal the SC decisions on pressuring social media to censor any post the regime doesn't like.  And after the SC ruled that the preznit didn't have the authority to "cancel" (ha!) student loan debt, the regime announced their intent to find a way to do that without getting congress to pass a law authorizing it.

"Court decisions be damned," eh?

When the Democrats lose a fight at the SC, do they accept it and move on?  No. They find some other way to accomplish their goal--unlike the GOP.

Source: Kurt Schlicter at Front Page Magazine

https://www.frontpagemag.com/our-alleged-president-is-a-corrupt-scumbag-and-the-ruling-class-is-ok-with-that/