Testimony Tuesday before House committee shows the fix was in to lie about origin of covid

From January of 2021 to Jan of 2023 the Democrat party controlled both chambers of congress.  As a result, no government agency or entity was permitted to investigate all the lies, corruption and horseshit that happened as the Democrats rolled out the covid lockdowns and all-mail voting.

But now that Republicans have a tiny, five-vote majority in the House, they can actually ask people to testify on how the brazen lies about the origin of the virus were allowed to become The Narrative, supported by every Media outlet.

The record is crystal clear that Fauci pressured or bribed researchers (via huge grants) to discredit the theory that a bat virus harmless to humans was modified in a Chinese lab to become lethal to humans.  

Since no one imagines the Chinese would have deliberately released the virus in Wuhan, this theory that the Chinese deliberately modified the virus to make it kill humans has been cunningly re-named the "lab-leak theory."  It's cunning because this naming obscures the truth: that the Chinese deliberately modified the virus to make it lethal.

Why would the U.S. government want to hide that truth?  Two reasons: First, Fauci knew very well that he'd arranged for a million dollars of taxpayer funds to be sent to the Wuhan lab, via a "cutout" called EcoHealth Alliance, to fund "gain of function" research-- the research that made the virus kill humans.  

And second:  After July of 2020 the Deep State--which already knew Joe Biden had taken millions in bribes from China--had a vested interest in hiding the truth about how the virus became lethal, since the truth would anger the Chinese who'd paid the biden family tens of millions in bribes.

For now let's just look at the evidence that Fauci pressured researchers to sneer that the "lab leak" theory was wrong.

Two days ago the House oversight committee asked the researchers who wrote papers sneering that the "lab leak" theory wasn't true to explain how they arrived at their supposedly totally objective conclusions.  You probably won't be surprised to hear that they had trouble explaining how they arrived at that supposedly totally objective, scientific conclusion.

The first clue that the papers and statements dismissing the "lab leak" theory were contrived--i.e. utter, unsupported horseshit--was that the first paper claiming the virus couldn't possibly have come from a Chinese lab was published just days after the first case of the virus reached the U.S.

For young Americans: there hadn't been even remotely enough time to do any research that could knock down the "modified in a lab" theory.  But these PhD researchers wrote a paper claiming that anyway.

The lead author of that paper claimed that he was NOT pressured by officials to reach the desired conclusion, and that he wasn't at all influenced by politics.  But the verified email record shows that's horseshit:  high-ranking federal officials clearly pressured the author to reach the conclusion Fauci wanted.

On Jan 31, 2020--just two days after the first case was confirmed in the U.S.--researcher Kristian Andersen told Fauci that SARS-CoV-2 "looks potentially engineered"--i.e. modified by humans--and that fellow experts agreed that the gene sequence was NOT consistent with the theory that the virus had evolved naturally.

(I'll explain this later.  The translation is that Andersen and others believed the virus had to have been modified by humans.)

We now know that on Feb 1 of 2020--just one day after Andersen's conversation with Fauci just described--NIH director Francis Collins had a conference call with two British researchers to discuss the "unusual genome" of the virus.

You have no idea what "unusual genome" means, nor should you.  Let me explain: Because covid emerged in Wuhan in November of 2019, and India shares a border with China, samples containing the virus had been smuggled from China to India.  By December of 2019 Indian researchers had completed the gene-sequencing of the novel "spike protein," and had published a "pre-print" paper of their findings.

The gene sequence showed--beyond any doubt--that a bat virus normally harmless to humans had been modified to make it lethal to humans.  (Click here to see the proof.)

By total coincidence I happened to read the Indian paper the day it was posted, and explained what the sequence meant.  So Collins, Fauci and their allies also had to have known this.

More explanation here.

But on the Feb 1 conference call all the participants agreed that if the unequivocal evidence that the virus was modified in a Chinese lab was allowed to become known, it would have "significant international political implications."

Let's look at that seemingly innocent phrase: It means U.S. officials were getting ready to roll out a massive lie--partly to protect the Chinese communist party.  Why would they do that?

As noted earlier: at the time, to protect Fauci.  Later they added the desire to protect biden and the Democrats.

One of the participants to the call--Andrew Rambaut--said that revealing that the Chinese government had modified the harmless virus to make it lethal would cause a "shit-show."

So on March 16th the journal Nature Medicine published a paper claiming the virus had managed--allegedly by a series of totally natural mutations--to insert four genes into itself, in exactly the right places to make it lethal to humans.  Billions-to-one odds against that.  So just bad luck, eh?

A month later (April 16) Collins complained to Fauci that some people still considered "this very destructive conspiracy"--that the virus was modified to make it lethal to humans--to be correct.  Collins asked Fauci "what more we can do" to "help put down" the theory.

Notice the word "more."  This implies that the NIH had previously taken steps to discredit the lab-modified theory.  The next day Fauci publicly promoted the lying "debunking paper" at a White House press conference.

Two days ago researcher Kristian Andersen told the House subcommittee that lawmakers just didn't understand the jargon of his emails about the research team's drafting of the paper.

"Jargon," eh?  One week after the damning Feb 1 conference call, Andersen emailed the call's participants "Our main work over the past couple of weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory."

No bias there, eh?  Andersen hoped that throwing out the word "jargon" would intimidate questioners.

Anderson claimed he was free to write a paper proving the lab-leak theory if the facts supported that.  But in another email from that time period he makes it clear that his purpose is to disprove the lab-leak theory, and that the facts "unfortunately" don't "help refute a lab origin."

For example, a few days later a senior editor of Nature Medicine asked Andersen about gene-sequence data that would be expected to shed light on the "lab leak" theory.  On Feb 20 Andersen responded "Unfortunately none of this helps refute a lab origin."  He added that  he and his coauthors "really, really wish that we could do that."

Again, he's saying they could NOT refute the theory that the virus had been modified.  And yet the official government Narrative claimed they'd absolutely ruled that out.

Starting to see how it fits together yet?

I took the time to write this because no one else will.  The Deep State has successfully conned 90% of Americans into believing the virus "just evolved naturally," when in fact it was deliberately modified by humans.  One can endlessly debate who modified the virus, but papers published by the Wuhan lab in 2015 showed their first success in inserting a single gene, so the ability has been proven.  

I wrote this post because if you think this is the only time the Deep State has lied to you, you're too naive to breathe.  They also lied about the "vax" preventing you from getting Covid, and in claiming it was safe.  

They also lied when they claimed the 2020 election wasn't rigged, and that biden will replenish the 348 million barrels of oil he ordered sold off from our Strategic Petroleum Reserve to win votes.  They lied when they denied blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines.

The list is damn near endless.  If you knew about these lies you probably be mad as hell--unless you're a Democrat, in which case you're thrilled.  But of course you never knew, so....