Researchers find four gene sequences from HIV inserted in the current coronavirus. Hmmm...

I originally posted this on March 20th, 2020--just seven weeks after the first case of covid-19 hit the U.S.  Had it written by mid-February but spent several weeks confirming all the claims.  Since then I've expanded on it, as congress slowly recovered all the emails showing how how Fauci funded the research by the Wuhan lab, and ordered his underlings to write knowingly false papers claiming the virus could not have been modified in a lab.

Later updates show everything.  And congress has released all the emails showing it.  You just never heard about even ONE of them, even though this should have been the most explosive story in history, of how one megalomaniac funded the research that killed a few million people world-wide, and then fabricated a brazen lie to cover it up.  And with the crucial help of the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media, he got away with it!

============ 

Does the figure below ring any bells?  If not, don't feel bad.  It's a gene-sequence of the new coronavirus.  (Feel free to zoom in with your browser for easier reading!)  But what do those four little squares mean?

Those are genes which have been inserted into the original virus. 

And by vast coincidence those inserted genes are identical to genes that create a unique protein found on the HIV virus, that enables that virus to bind more effectively to a type of white blood cell.  But here the target is the "ACE-2 receptor" in the human airway.

Virus experts say it's astronomically unlikely that these four inserts could have happened by accident.  That suggests the genes were deliberately inserted, to make the virus more successful in infecting humans.  Here's the link to the paper.  That link has now become awfully hard to find!  And there's a reason. 

Of course you're way too busy to click on that link, so I'll show you the relevant parts below:

Introduction

Coronaviruses (CoV) are single-stranded positive-sense RNA viruses that infect animals and humans.  In December 2019, another outbreak of coronavirus was reported from Wuhan, China that also transmitted from animals to humans.

This new virus has been termed as 2019-novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). While there are several hypotheses about the origin of 2019-nCoV, the source of this ongoing outbreak remains elusive.

The transmission patterns of 2019-nCoV is similar to patterns of transmission documented in the previous outbreaks including by bodily or aerosol contact with persons infected with the virus.  This outbreak has spread rapidly to distant nations including France, Australia and USA among others. The number of cases within and outside China are increasing steeply. Our current understanding is limited to the virus genome sequences and modest epidemiological and clinical data. Comprehensive analysis of the available 2019- nCoV sequences may provide important clues that may help advance our current understanding to manage the ongoing outbreak. ****

Although the 4 inserts represent discontiguous short stretches of amino acids in spike glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV, the fact that all four share amino acid identity or similarity with HIV-1 gp120 and HIV-1 Gag suggests that this is not a random mutation.

One may sporadically expect a fortuitous match for a stretch of 6-12 contiguous amino acid residues in an unrelated protein. However, it is unlikely that all 4 inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein fortuitously match with 2 key structural proteins of an unrelated virus (HIV-1). The amino acid residues of inserts 1, 2 and 3 of 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein that mapped to HIV-1 were a part of the V4, V5 and V1 domains respectively in gp120 [Table 1]. Since the 2019-nCoV inserts mapped to variable regions of HIV-1, they were not ubiquitous in HIV-1 gp120, but were limited to selected sequences of HIV-1 [ refer S.File1] primarily from Asia and Africa.

Now unless you're into genetic coding of virii you probably didn't bother to wade through the five 'grafs above.  I just showed them to show that the discovery seems to have come from credible research.

But then something else happened:  The above excerpt was from a "pre-print" version of the paper.  And as soon as it appeared in "pre-print," the team that did the research withdrew their paper.  That sometimes happens, when early reviewers find a major error.  In that case the authors will say so.  But here's the ONLY explanation these authors gave for withdrawing their paper:

“It was not our intention to feed into the conspiracy theories…we appreciate the criticisms… and will get back with a revised version.”

See any mention of "error" there?  I don't either.

The team's findings suggest that it's astronomically unlikely that four totally functional HIV-like genes found their way into Covid-19 by random mutation.  The only other conclusion possible is that they were deliberately inserted.  If so, the obvious next question is, "by whom?"  And anyone who says it was done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology--operated by the Chinese military--is raaaacist!  Xenophobic!

Isn't that fabulous?  Scream "raaaaacism" and everyone dives for cover.  Honest research results are trashed, buried, because the communist Chinese government doesn't like the findings.

That's how honest science is supposed to work, right?

So, citizen, you're instructed to disregard the "uncanny similarity" paper.  Cuz...well, there's a very good reason.  And as soon as the Chinese government comes up with it, they'll tell you.