Ex CIA director drafted letter, signed by 50 spies, claiming Hunter Biden laptop scandal was" Russian disinformation"

Three weeks before the 2020 election a seemingly huge story broke, damaging to the Democrat candidate.  But it was quickly dismissed by the Mainstream Media as "Russian disinformation."

You believed that dismissal--not because you're stupid, but because the Mainstream Media told you the story was "Russian disinformation."

And of course they would nevah lie to ya, cuz they're the Media, right?

Well the story just got a HUGE update.  So how much of the original story (below) do you remember?

On October 14th of 2020--roughly three weeks before the election--the New York Post published a story that a year earlier(2019) the son of the Democrat presidential candidate had dropped off a broken laptop at a computer repair shop a mile from biden's home in Wilmington, Delaware.

The store's owner repaired the laptop, and repeatedly called the number biden left on the repair ticket to notify him, but got no answer.  So per the standard terms on items left for repair, after no one picked up the laptop in 90 days, the owner took possession of it.

He then found that the laptop contained hundreds of images and videos showing Hunter smoking what appeared to be crack.  But of course Hunter's a private citizen, so no one would prosecute him for that today.  The real problem was roughly 30,000 emails, many of which described business deals in which Hunter was paid millions by foreign governments or companies, and stating that a portion of those millions would be paid to "the big guy."

Ooooh, what to do now, eh?  Since the shop owner was a life-long Democrat and didn't want to anger the most powerful family in the state, releasing the contents to the Media was out of the question.  Same with releasing it to Delaware state cops.  So...what to do?

So the obvious choice was to tell the FBI.  Cuz duh FBI beez totally un-corrupt, eh?  Just kidding: the owner knew what everyone with an IQ over room temperature knows: the FBI is TOTALLY corrupt, from top to bottom.  If an agent doesn't do whatever he's ordered to--regardless of whether it's legal--that's the end of your career.  

Knowing this, the owner was concerned that the FBI--supposedly the nation's "top law-enforcement agency"--would most likely simply make the evidence vanish.  So he did something virtually no one would think to do: he made a copy of the laptop's hard drive.

Ooooh.  "Throw him in jail," eh?

Realizing that the emails likely meant candidate (and sitting senator) Joe Biden was taking bribes from foreign nations, the owner notified the FBI.  Shortly thereafter FBI agents arrived, took detailed notes about the provenance of the laptop, then seized the laptop AND the repair ticket signed by Hunter.

Clever, clever thuggish Stasi agents, eh?

So, the evidence disappears, and thanks to fast work by what's amusingly billed as "the nation's top law enforcement agency," a potentially huge Democrat problem vanishes!

At least it almost vanished.  Would have vanished.  Except the shop owner prudently didn't trust the FBI.  "Throw him in jail!, eh?  "Must be one o' them 'violent domestic extremists," eh?

Time passed, and the shop owner heard nothing about the emails on laptop showing the biden family apparently taking bribes from foreign nationals.  So finally, realizing that the FBI was, like the biden family, also corrupt, the shop owner eventually contacted Rudy Giuliani.  From there a copy of the hard drive ended up at the NY Post.

Thanks to either FBI informants or wiretaps, during the summer of 2020 the FBI learned that "enemies" of the Deep State had a copy of the laptop's hard drive.  The FBI then contacted ALL social media companies, warning that the agency expected a "bombshell" story to drop just before the election, involving "a member of the biden family."  The FBI claimed the story was "Russian disinformation" and warned the media companies that they shouldn't mention the story.

[Democrat:  "Yew caint know dis!  Yew mus' be makin' dat up!"  Yeah, well...entirely because Elon Musk spent $44 BILLION of his own money to buy Twatter, we have copies of emails from the corruptocrats at the FBI telling Twatter exactly what I wrote above.  You just didn't know.  Typical.]

On the afternoon of October 13th, 2020, with the Post planning to publish the story the next morning, the editors contacted the White House, told them what they were planning to publish and asked if they had any comment.  (That's normal practice.)

"Uh...um...IF YOU PUBLISH THIS WE'LL DESTROY YOU!  WE'LL SUE YOU FOR EVERY PENNY YOU HAVE!!"  

Just kidding--the Post didn't reveal what the White House said.

Within minutes the Democrat/Deep State propaganda machine swung into action.  Biden campaign aide Tony Blinken (who would later be named Secretary of State) asked retired CIA chief Mike Morell to get several former intelligence chiefs to sign a letter discrediting the explosive story by claiming that the story looked like a smear campaign.  Morell then drafted a letter claiming the story "looked like Russian disinformation."

Just five days after the Post's story was published, Morell's letter was published by Politico (October 19, 2020), under this headline:

"Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former officials say." 

Notice the headline omitted the huge qualifier "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation," instead saying "IS Russian disinformation."  So what version do ya think the Media picked up, eh?  Yep.

Just three days later during the presidential debate against President Trump, Biden cited that letter as proving that the story about his son's abandoned laptop was...wait for it..."Russian disinformation."

Now, Morell has just admitted to congress--under oath--that biden aide Tony Blinken asked him to write the letter, and that he did it to help biden win.  In other words, Morell had NO information suggesting it was Russian disinformation, but crafted a LIE to help biden make a HUGE problem go away.  Morell then asked four former CIA directors and 47 other former intel agents to sign it.  They had no information either, but did it to help biden win.  Here's a typical portion of the Morell letter published by Politico:

"Each of us believes deeply that American citizens should determine the outcome of elections, not foreign governments.  We agree with the founding fathers’ concern about the damage that foreign interference in our politics can do to our democracy.
    It is for all these reasons that we write to say that the arrival on the US political scene of emails, purportedly belonging to Vice President Biden’s son Hunter...has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."

The Mainstream Media translated the story as simply "IS Russian disinformation," and blanketed the airwaves--so the only media coverage of the story was the "Russian disinformation" aspect.  Twitter (pre-Musk) charged--with no basis whatsoever--that the story was based on“hacked materials.”

NPR's "public editor" claimed there are “many, many red flags in that New York Post investigation.”  Really, asshole?  Name one.  Just one.  But there were NO "red flags."  It was a lie--a Narrative, to cover for biden.

Of course NPR didn't have a shred of evidence for their claim, and in fact the Director of National Intelligence stated the story was NOT Russian disinformation.  But no Democrat believed the DNI.  Far better to believe NPR, cuz...dey luvs duh trannies so dey mus' be okay, eh?  

Another standard tactic is the Red Herring: "Don't pay attention to *that,* look at *this* instead." Here's NPR:

“Even if Russia can’t be positively connected to this information, the story of how Trump associates Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani came into a copy of this computer hard drive has not been verified and seems suspect."

If the copy of the hard drive was indeed a copy, how is the story of how the data was revealed relevant?  Of course it's not relevant, but voters took the bait--because they didn't want to believe what the laptop clearly showed.

[And even if that was resolved], "the NY Post did no forensic work to convince consumers that the emails and photos that are the basis for their report have not been altered.  But the biggest reason you haven’t heard much on NPR about the Post story is that the assertions don’t amount to much.”

So "the assertions don't amount to much," eh NPR?  Yeah, they only proved that the son of your current president collected millions of dollars for selling influence to other nations when his corrupt father was VP under emperor Obozo.

NPR also quoted its managing editor (Terence Samuel): 

“We don't want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don't want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions.  [The story about the laptop] was … a politically driven event and we decided to treat it that way.”

Notice that none of biden's defenders claimed the story was false, or that the laptop didn't exist.  And that segues neatly into the new revelation:

Morell--the corruptocrat liar who drafted the letter cunningly claiming the story was false--has now testified before the House Judiciary Committee--and has confirmed every single thing above.

Morell's sworn testimony confirms that the Biden campaign--which knew from the FBI's seizure of the laptop that the story was true--created a carefully crafted lie to trick voters into believing it was false, by using Morell to enlist the 51 former intel agents to claim the story "appeared to be Russian disinformation."  

That lie did what Morell and biden intended: it convinced millions of Americans that the story was false.  Opinion polls (yeah, I know) later found that something like 17 percent of voters said that if they'd known the story was true they wouldn't have voted for Biden.

SO:  naturally you Democrats don't believe any of this, because it's so utterly corrupt, on EVERY level.  Believing this story would damage your worldview--and Lord knows we can't have that, eh?  So let's give you some links.  Here's one of the better sources for U.S. news--from overseas.

Oh wait, I forgot:  Democrats have been told that the Daily Mail is disinformation--cuz dat whut Fakebook and pre-Musk Twatter told ya, wif' dere "trusted sources," eh?  Okay, try a U.S. paper:

Or this story is informative.

So is this one.

Oh wait, I forgot again: Democrats sneer that the Post isn't a "real" paper--like the NY Times and WaPo, eh?  Okay, try this:

What will it take for you to believe you've been lied to?  Utterly conned?  Oh, dat's right: You don't give a damn if your Democrat party brazenly LIED to Americans to steal the election--because as the notoriously corrupt Dem senator Harry Reid said after he accused the Republican pres candidate of not paying his taxes (a lie): "It worked, didn't it?"

Thanks, Democrats.