Merrick Garland: I let Biden's attorneys collect classifed docs in his home cuz I didn't want to "complicate the investigation"

As a few of you may recall, last August biden's attorney-general Merrick Garland sent 40 armed FBI agents to president Trump's Florida home to search for and confiscate declared classified documents.

But by sharp contrast, Garland is letting Biden's lawyers -- most of whom don't even have security clearances--search biden's homes for undeclared classified documents because...Garland says he doesn't want to "complicate the later stages of the investigation."

Conservatives and other crazy people seem to think that's some sort of "double standard"--like, two different sets of laws or something.  Fortunately Americans have the Mainstream Media to set them...um...straight.

Apologies, that's now a bad word, but you get the picture.

biden's supporters brush those claims aside by bleating that biden's legal team's is "cooperating."  The Media also invents what it claims is another *huge* difference: the fact that biden's lawyers quickly informed the Justice Department of the documents' discovery.

Of course that bleat is a deliberate mislead: The damn communist-run National Archives *knew* about all Trump's docs because they'd been exchanging letters about 'em for months.  But you didn't know that, so it sounds like a big difference to you, eh?

A "legal expert" (Dem shill) hired by the MSM claims "One reason not to involve the FBI at an early stage is that the Justice Department would preserve the ability to take a tougher line later, including executing a future search warrant, current and former law-enforcement officials said."

Oh, so the "expert" claims the DOJ/FBI isn't getting a search warrant *now* to preserve their legal right to get one *later* if they had to.  Because as everyone know, the law says you can only get one search warrant.  You knew that--recall that you can't be tried twice for the same crime, right?  Same principle.

Wait, that's not the law at all. You can get as many search warrants as you need.  So to say you can only get one is a flat lie.

So why would the Mainstream Media find a so-called "expert" to *imply* that the DOJFBI could only get one search warrant, eh?

Starting to see yet?

Okay, so what's the harm if Merrick Garland decides not to "complicate" the investigation by using FBI agents to search biden's homes for classified docs, and leaving the job of searching to biden's attorneys (many of which don't have security clearances)?

Well the obvious is that in their drive to protect Dear Leader, a hired attorney who found a TS/SCI doc might just slip it into his coat without informing the DOJ.

Democrat: "That's *absurd*.  Attorneys and high officials are super-ethical and would never do that!"
 
Your youth, naivete and stupidity amuse us.  Americans under 40 are too young to recall that Bill Clinton's "National Security Advisor"--a slimy rat-bastard named Sandy Berger--covered for Clinton's sale of U.S. atomic secrets to China.

In April of 1996 Berger was briefed by the Department of Energy (which builds and maintains our nuclear warheads) that the Chinese government had somehow acquired the designs of a number of U.S. nuclear warheads.  You'd think that would be of *huge* interest to a president, eh?

Oddly, Berger evidently didn't think so, as he didn't bother to officially notify Clinton until July of 1997--over a year later.  

When this outrageous negligence was discovered, Republicans called for Berger to resign or be fired, accusing him of ignoring the Chinese spying at the highest level.

Strangely, Clinton refused, saying "The record is that we acted aggressively.  Mr. Berger acted appropriately."

Wait..."The record is that we acted aggressively"?  No one was fired or jailed or punished.  It was all but ignored by the media, and eventually everyone forgot.

Relevance: In September of 2003--after Clinton was out of office--Berger went to the National Archives, used his security clearance to demand access to a Top-Secret document, used his clout to demand unmonitored access to the doc in a locked room, then stuffed the doc in his pants and just...walked out with it.

A week or so later someone told him the Archives also had four *copies* of the document, so he went back and used the same method to steal all four copies.

When questioned about the removal of the documents Berger lied to investigators.

If you lie to the FBI, you or I would be jailed.  It's a felony.  So what about Berger, eh?  Zero.

Do ya really think this corrupt, treasonous fuck was punished?  Well...for him, a slap on the wrist.  He pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor charge, was fined $50,000, sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, and stripped of his security clearance for a lousy three years.

You or I would have been in prison for a decade.

In classic Deep-State form the Justice Department initially said Berger only stole *copies* of classified documents,  not originals.  That was later shown to be a lie.  But hey, duh Justice Department don't lie, right?  Especially cuz Berger was sentenced during the GW Bush adminsitration.  But of course the Deep State persists regardless of who's president.

But hey, citizen, nothing like this could never happen now, right?  Cuz duh Berger "incident" showed corrupt Deep-Staters that you shouldn't do dat, eh?

So back to biden: Merrick Garland didn't think it would be prudent to have FBI agents search biden's homes, evidently because he didn't think biden's lackeys would steal classified documents..."cuz government officials don't do that kind of thing," eh?
The fewer TS/SCI docs found in biden homes, the easier it will be to do the "no harm, no foul" whitewash Merrick is planning.

And you don't believe a word of that, eh?

Let's just trust Biden's hand-picked Praetorian to do the evidence-collection for law enforcement agents who are, theoretically, making the decision whether or not to prosecute him, based partly upon the expansiveness of the evidence discovered. 

Source.