Federal judge rules Georgia county can't remove people who say they've moved out of state from voter rolls

In two counties in Georgia, citizens seeking to reduce vote fraud noted that over 4,000 people who were registered to vote in that county had submitted change-of-address notices to the Post Office saying they'd moved to another state.  Since Georgia law says you have to live in a county to vote there, the challengers asked their county election board to remove those voters from the voter registration rolls.

Instantly the national Democrat party sued to block that, claiming it was "voter suppression," and that someone filing a change-of-address notice with the post office saying they'd moved out of state didn't mean they'd really moved out of the state.

It's simple logic, citizen.

This was so logical to federal judge Leslie Abrams Gardner that she RULED that the two counties couldn't removing the 4,000 voters from the registration rolls.  And it's just bad luck for conservatives that in a week or so Georgia will hold a runoff election that will decide which party controls the U.S. senate. 

Many have claimed that the judge--Leslie Abrams Gardner--was appointed by Barack Obama and is the sister of Democrat former gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams.  Of course you can't believe that, because any judge who was the sister of a Dem candidate for governor, and a huge supporter of co-presidents-elect Harris and Biden would have been obliged to recuse herself, and Leslie Abrams Gardner didn't.  So this must be a fabrication, right?

Except the source is Politico, which is totally Democrat-supporting.  The judge is indeed Stacey Abrams' sister, and she was indeed appointed by Obama. 

Politico shows their support for the Dems in claiming the registrations were challenged "simply because the registrations appeared to match U.S. Postal Service change-of address records."  Democrats had warned that "postal data is not a reliable or conclusive indicator that a voter has given up their local residence."

Mark Elias's use of "appeared to match" is classic legal bullshit:  He uses that language to create doubt that the change-of-address records actually matched the voter registration data.  But if he'd found a case where that wasn't true, he would have noted it in the suit.  There's no "appeared" there--the records matched.

Oooh, wait!  I know!  Maybe some crafty GOP operatives took the time to submit fraudulent change-of-address cards for 4,000 voters who actually still lived in the county!  Yeh, dat's it!

No, it's not.  The people in question actually moved away, as could be detemined quite easily by simply asking them.  Elias knows this, but doesn't want to go to court where this could be easily determined.  He filed suit because he knew he and the Dems wouldn't have to go to court, cuz...judge is a huge Dem supporter and wouldn't recuse herself.

After Gardner’s ruling, Elias hailed the decision as a “blow to GOP voter suppression."  "We continue to monitor how other Georgia counties respond to the suppression scheme,” he added. “Where necessary, we will sue and we will win.”

Obviously allowing residents who've moved out of state to vote in Georgia is illegal, and could give the Democrat senate candidates thousands of illegal votes.  But who cares, right?   The Democrats are determined to win both senate seats on January 5th, because it will give them control of every branch of the government.

Gardner ruled that removing voters who had moved out of state from voter registration rolls in their former state appeared to violate federal law because those who'd moved were not given proper notice.  And because she claims federal law doesn't allow states to remove people from voter registration rolls within 90 days of a federal election.

So according to Stacey's sister, FEDERAL LAW says anyone who moves out of state within 90 days of an election involving federal office can't be removed from voter rolls?  Does anyone really believe that's what useless congresscreeps intended?

But again, who cares, right?  All that matters is that Democrats get to do whatever they want.

Source.