A list of "anomalies" in the election

 

Something very strange happened to our nation in the election, and it’s reasonable to want to find out what it was.

First some dry facts. President Trump received more votes than any previous incumbent seeking reelection, and 11 million more votes than in 2016.  By contrast, in 2012 when Obama was running for re-election he got 3.5 million fewer votes than in 2008.

Bellwether states swung further in Trump’s direction than in 2016.  Defying media polls, Florida, Ohio and Iowa gave huge wins for Trump.  From 1852 to 2012, only once has a candidate who won those three states not won the presidency.

In past elections midwestern states Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin have always voted in the same direction as Ohio and Iowa, their regional peers. Ohio likewise swings with Florida. Current tallies show that, outside of a few cities, the region voted for Trump.  Biden's alleged leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are entirely due to an alleged avalanche of black votes in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee. 

Interestingly, this huge alleged spike in Biden votes didn't happen in other cities, but just in battleground states.  To describe this as "highly unusual" is a huge understatement.

Per the officially reported results, Biden supposedly won more votes than any presidential candidate in history. But he won a record low of just 17 percent of the nation's counties--just 524, compared to 873 counties Obama won in 2008.  But despite winning 349 FEWER counties than Obama, we're expected to believe that Biden somehow got ten million more votes than Obama.  Does anyone think that's plausible?

One could make a case that the senile, corrupt Biden--whose "rallies" usually drew barely a dozen people--might out-do Obama by a percent or two because the Media had whipped up such huge anger at Trump among Democrats, but Biden's reported total was a whopping 14 percent MORE votes than Obama.  It's simply not believable--particularly since more first-time voters were registering as Republican.

Historically, the party that wins the presidency almost always wins more down-ballot races as well, like congressional races.  But Democrats got clobbered in down-ballot races--a fact that suggests a few million of the votes reported for Biden were fraudulent. The Republicans held the Senate and enjoyed a ‘red wave’ in the House, winning all 27 toss-up contests and gaining over 25 seats. 

Similarly, Republicans didn't lose a single state legislature and actually made gains at the state level.  Again, this is not consistent with a legitimate Biden/Harris win.

While media and academic polls were way off, just as in 2016, so-called non-poll metrics have a 100 percent record. Every non-polling metric forecast that Trump would win reelection. For Trump to lose this election, not only did one or more of these metrics have to be wrong for the first time ever, but every one of them had to be wrong, at the same time.  It's not impossible, but extremely unlikely, and yet another indicator that the officially reported vote talley is fraudulent.

Then consider the following peculiarities:

1. Late on election night, with Trump comfortably ahead, many swing states stopped counting ballots. In most cases, poll-watchers were ordered out of the counting facilities--but vote-counting generally continued, without the poll-watchers;

2. During these unmonitored counts, unusually large batches of votes were reported as being received in just the swing states. They had hundreds of thousands of reported votes, which were reported as breaking 90 percent in favor of Biden, in huge contrast to the virtual 50-50 ratio earlier in the evening;

3. Late arriving ballots were counted. In Pennsylvania, 23,000 absentee ballots have impossible postal return dates and another 86,000 have such extraordinary return dates they raise serious questions

4. Before GOP poll-watchers were ejected, many witnesses reported that election workers weren't even trying to match signatures on mail-in ballots. Signature matching is the main way to authenticate mail-in votes.  Also, many counting facilities immediately destroyed the envelopes in which the mail-in ballots arrived, making it impossible to determine how many mail-in ballots were fraudulent;

5. In many counting centers less than a tenth of one percent of mail-in and absentee ballots were rejected.  But historically about three percent of absentee ballots are rejected.  Two counties in Pennsylvania with over 100,000 mail-in ballots didn't reject a single ballot!

6. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 50,000 votes held on 47 USB cards are missing

7. In many battleground states, people who had moved out of those states reported that the state election board showed them as having requested a mail-in ballot (which they hadn't), and that the unrequested ballot was returned.  Matt Braynard’s Voter Integrity Project estimates that 20,312 people who no longer met residency requirements cast ballots in Georgia. Biden’s margin is 12,670 votes.  Record numbers of dead people are shown as having cast mail-in votes.

8. In one counting center witnesses reported seeing thousands of supposedly mailed-in ballots without any creases, indicating that they had never been folded in an envelope, as required by law.

9. In Georgia, Biden supposedly took the lead with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch.  

Finally, it's noteworthy that every reported irregularity and tabulation abnormality favored Biden/Harris.  Also noteworthy is the fact that because the signed envelopes were illegally destroyed by election workers, it's now impossible to prove how many mail-in ballots were fraudulent. 

Only two means of showing fraud remain: Eyewitnesses in the counting facilities, and computer forensic evidence.

Source.