sf says...: Think massive, brazen Democratic election fraud is a recent thing?

Think massive, brazen Democratic election fraud is a recent thing? Think again. I posted the piece below on December 21st, 2013, just over a year after Obama's "win."

When someone knows they can commit as much fraud as they want and will never be punished--or even called to account--they can get away with even a sloppy fraud or forgery. The fraudsters know they'll never be charged, let alone convicted.

Exhibit 38 in the Democrat fraud that gave you Barack Hussein Obama is a Selective Service registration card that the Selective Service Board itself says is Obama's draft registration.

Obama claimed to have been born in Honolulu, Hawaii. But college-age Americans have never heard that before the 2008 election, Obama refused to produce any sort of birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. No explanation was ever offered for this refusal. There had never been a fire that destroyed birth records. The hospital where he claimed to have been born was still a hospital. The refusal was arguably making voters leery. So why did Obama and his handlers continue to refuse to produce the document that would have ended the controversy?

As the 2012 election approached, inquiring minds started combing other public records to see if there were any other anomalies in Hussein's history. One area of inquiry was, had Obama registered for the draft, as all male U.S. citizens were required to do?

A month before the 2008 election--in October of 2008--retired federal agent Stephen Coffman made a FOIA request to the Selective Service Board, requesting a copy of Obama’s SS registration card. The SS sent him a copy of the document shown below. As far as Coffman could tell, this showed Obama had registered.

Three months after the election, on Feb. 9, 2009, a second American citizen (Kenneth Allen) submitted the same FOIA request as Mr. Coffman. On March 4, 2009 Allen received a response from Richard S. Flahavan, purporting to be the "associate director for public and intergovernmental affairs" for the Selective Service. Flahavan wrote that a copy of Obama’s SS registration was enclosed along with "the resultant automated file screen." Flahavan added, "Mr. Obama did indeed register with the Selective Service and was assigned Selective Service Number 61-1125539-1 on Sept. 4, 1980."

Here's an image of the card both Americans received:

For the rest of this story, keep in mind that the copy shown above was provided by the Selective Service, while Obama was president, to two different American citizens.

Once the images were in the hands of citizens, folks started comparing the images with some known-valid registration cards (there are millions around). And you may find this hard to believe, but the card that the Selective Service Board itself claims is Obama's has several oddities, as we'll explain below.

Both images of the alleged registration card are identical, and have the same 10-digit "document locator number" (DLN), 0897080632, printed or stamped across the top right- hand corner of the card. But the computer printout provided to Coffman shows a DLN of 8089 708 0632. Does it look identical? Look again.

The computer printouts provided to both Allen and Coffman--three months apart--are both dated Sept. 9, 2008, but despite having the same date they're not identical: The most significant difference is that they have two different DLNs. The one on the printout received by Allen is 0897 080 6320, which matches the DLN printed on "Obama's" SS registration form, but on the printout sent to Coffman the alleged DLN is 8089 708 0632.

The DLN on the first computer printout has an "8" added at the beginning, while the second has a zero added at the end. And only one matches the number on the registration card.

Needless to say, if a real document is assigned a document locator number, that number shouldn't change.

On the other hand, if the document was a forgery--something created and inserted into the Selective Service's computer system in 2008--some 28 years after it was supposedly entered--it wouldn't be surprising to find anomalies like the two different document locator numbers. For example, the forgers could have created their forgery based on a DLN numbering system in use today, only to later discover--too late--that a different system was used back in 1980.

The point is that if Obozo had actually registered for the draft in 1980--which all male U.S. citizens were required by law to do--then not only should that card have just one DLN, but all computer entries for that card should use the same DLN. There is no convincing reason why any Selective Service (draft board) computer should have shown a different number.

And note that while the two numbers contain the same 10-digit core, the differences between the two absolutely rule out typographical errors or mis-typed entries.

(As an aside: Before the internet, the chances of two different citizens, unknown to each other, being able to discover that the DLNs on two computer printouts each had received from the same government office didn't match would have been almost zero.)

But wait, there's more!

The second indication of forgery is even more damning: it's the USPS date stamp in the lower right corner of the registration form.

The body of this type of stamp--called a PICA stamp--has 3 rectangular recesses in it where the month, day and year are inserted. All three recesses are exactly the same width--as are the stamps--so the characters for month, day and year are always centered and locked upright.

Note that on the alleged Obama Selective Service form the month and day (JUL and 29) are perfectly centered. But note two things about the year of the "Post Office" stamp shown on Obama's alleged registration: First, it's offset far to the right--so much that it's obvious to the casual observer.

And second, it's just two digits: "80"

As Dana Carvey's "church lady" character used to say, "Well isn't that special?"

And that would be because in all *real* USPS "Pica" stamps the year is...four digits.

You may need to read that again, more slowly: Four. digits. for. the. year.
Like this:

(In this image "PICA" is mis-spelled)

Notice how the month, day and year are all perfectly centered.

You're thinking "But...but...but if real Pica stamps use four digits for the year, how could a forger think a two-digit year would ever fool anybody? Forgers would never be that stupid. So the image conservatives think proves Obama didn't register for the draft must itself be a forgery!!!"

Ah, well, see, there's a real insight into the way they think--because they knew the forgery didn't have to be perfect, since they knew they could count on the Lying Media to do two things: First, the media would *not* ask any uncomfortable questions, such as "Can we get the two men who supposedly requested and received these cards to provide the letters and computer printouts from the Selective Service?"

Second, they could count on the Mainstream Media to ridicule anyone who might start to question the obvious screwup: Call 'em "birthers! Conspiracy-mongers!" It's easy.

And in fact they did get away with that obvious forgery. Because I'll bet you the drink of your choice that you never heard a single word about the "two-digit year" anomaly on the Post Office stamp on what is purported to be Obama's Selective Service registration card, compared with the four-digit year used on all authentic USPS PICA stamps.

Am I right?

And you're like, "This cannot possibly be true--if only because it's such a terribly bad fake!" If this claim was true, the Media would have told us--if only to ridicule the card as being such a bad fake!"

Some of you are thinking "If this is really a true copy of Obama's Selective Service card, surely our ("our"?) news media would have discovered it and told us, right? They would have found it instead of being scooped by two ordinary citizens, right? Cuz the reporters would have looked for something like this, eh? "

Well given that the entire media managed to ignore the fact that for 16 years the company that published Obama's books also published a biographical summary of all their authors. That summary--written by Obama--said Obama was born in Kenya.

Normally authors write their own bio, and publishers require their authors to physically sign a form authorizing the text they wrote to be published (without change) in the publisher's publicity materials. Obama never corrected his bio stating his supposed birthplace--for 16 years.

The publisher's list of authors and bios was routine, and widely known. Yet the mainstream media never reported the stated birthplace, and the publisher refused to comment on it.

Still think the media would have exposed the draft registration forgery?

And remember, this is the card authenticated and furnished by the Selective Service.

Eh, so it goes.

"But...but...but...go back! If real Pica stamps do use four digits for the year (they do), that would be pretty easy to prove. In that case what in the world would make forgers use a two-digit year, since that would make the forgery so obvious? That just doesn't make sense, so your theory must be wrong!"

Well ya see, Dorothy, once it started becoming apparent that Obozo was gonna beat Hilly for the nomination, his Democrat/liberal/"progressive" supporters started taking a closer look at his paper trail--and started tryin' ta patch a whole slew of screamin'-obvious holes in the guy's record before the November election. The draft registration probably wasn't at the top of that list.

Now: 2008 was 28 years after the 1980 date they were trying to forge. All stamps from that date would have long-since been thrown away. And while anyone can buy current Pica date stamps in any big city, in 2008 it would have been virtually impossible to find a stamp kit with the year "1980."

So one of the bright, corrupt "progressives" who supported the treasonous Obozo came up with a fabulous, quick, easy fix: Take an easily-obtained stamp for the then-current year (2008), cut off the "20," rotate the remaining digits 180 degrees and...voila! "80" !

They must have busted a gut laughing at their own cleverness, and how this was gonna' fool the whole damn country--at least long enough that their boy would be crowned and impossible to remove. Which of course is exactly what it did.

Sure, using two digits for the year isn't how the USPS does it, but how many average voters know that--let alone would grasp the significance of a two-digit year on a purported USPS stamp? After all, we've fooled em about his name changes and lack of a paper trail from college, and this isn't any harder.

Just one tiny problem: After cutting the "2008" stamp in half, the remaining 2 digits were too narrow to fit the rectangular recess, so they wouldn't stay centered when the stamp was used. Any decent engineer or tinkerer would have suggested cutting shims off another year stamp and putting one on each side, to center the "80." But having bet that using just two digits would fool everyone, our forgers were probably even less concerned about whether the digits were centered, eh? So they simply pushed the "80" over to one side of the recess to make it stay upright.

Oh, you say, "you can't be serious! That's tinfoil-hat stuff!"

Okay, Dorothy, watch:

Note the matching width of recesses in the stamp body for the month, day and year parts of the stamp. The year should be the same width--which would just handle four digits, eh?

The black stamp is a copy of "Obama's" SS card, while the red stamp was made by cutting "2008" in half and rotating the last two digits. Virtually identical.

"No! I simply don't believe that! My party--my president--our Dear Leader, the King!--would never try to deceive his people! He's a Democrat, so he's gotta be one of the Good Guys! Besides, a *lot* of people would have had to know, and everyone knows you can't keep a big conspiracy secret because...because the Media says it's impossible!"

I hear ya.

Just keep in mind that no authentic "USPS" Pica stamp uses a two-digit year. Not anywhere. This isn't just a forgery, it's a bad forgery. As in, not even close.

But with the help of the Lying Media, and Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, it worked.

In fact, with the help of a complicit Democrat-loving media, what should be an obvious forgery was good enough it not only got 'em through the 2008 election but also got 'em through the lying bastard's re-election four years later.

But wait, there's more!

The last indicator of forgery--for now, anyway--is the zip code shown on the registration card alleged to have been created in 1980: 96826. That is indeed a valid Hawaiian zip code, and it matches the street address shown on the card: "1617 S. Beretania."

Well, at least the address on the card has that zip code today. But the USPS changes zip code boundaries a bit from time to time...and according to a pair of researchers, in 1980 the street address shown on the card had a different zip code.

If that's true, then to accept the Selective Service registration card as authentic, not only must we believe Obama didn't know the zip code where he supposedly lived, but also by amazing coincidence the one he just happened to incorrectly guess--supposedly in 1980--would just happen to be the real zip code when Obama decided to run for president 26 years later!

Wow, how lucky is that?

Okay, as the other leader of the Democrat party famously said, "At this point, what difference could it possibly make" whether Obozo's draft registration card is a forgery? After all, since the Constitution doesn't say you have to register for the draft to be president that wouldn't disqualify him from office. And we all know that the Supreme Court is reeeally big on honoring our wonderful Constitution, eh?

But if it's found to be a forgery it would show how willing the Democrats were to use fraud to win the presidency--and would also show that the media had to have been in on the fraud.