Still MORE evidence of massive Democrat fraud--this time Georgia

Since the election I've been comparing the results of the OFFICIAL, REPORTED votes for president, to the total of Repub vs. Dem votes in other vital state-wide races, like the U.S. senate.  This is extremely informative since every Democrat who voted for Biden would presumably also want to help the Corrupt-Fraud party win the senate as well, eh?

And guess what:  in every "battleground state" so far where there was race for U.S. senator, the official reported vote totals show the Democrat candidate for the U.S. senate in those states got tens of thousands FEWER votes than Biden is OFFICIALLY reported to have received.

The point is so simple and obvious that even a Democrat should be able to understand it:  For these OFFICIAL, REPORTED vote results to be genuine we must believe that tens of thousands of Democrat voters who took the time to vote for Biden were unwilling to vote for the Democratic candidate for the U.S. senate--which has been the only impediment to Chuckie Schumer and Nancy Pelosi taking the country full socialist. 

In other words, control of the senate was hugely important to the Dems, and yet tens of thousands of ballots marked for Biden had no vote for the Dem senate candidate.

This defies logic.

So here's the newest example:  Unless you've been off-planet you've heard that Georgia is a huge battleground, with Biden reportedly leading by 12,670 votes.  So let's see what happened in the state's TWO U.S. senate races (one caused by a retirement and appointment to the remaining term):

In one, Democrat candidate John Osssoff officially got 2,374,519 votes, losing to Republican David Perdue, who reportedly got 2,462,617.  So by the official, reported totals, 90,000 MORE Georgia voters voted for the Republican for the senate.  Yet Biden supposedly won by 12,670 votes??  Do you really expect us to believe that?

But there's an even more damning comparison:  As noted above, according to the official, reported totals the Democrat senate candidate reportedly got 2,374,519 votes.  Yet Biden is reported to have received 2,474,507 votes--or nearly 100,000 MORE votes than the Democrats' senate candidate.

Does anyone with two neurons seriously believe that 100,000 Democrat voters who voted for the senile, corrupt moron, Slow Joe, didn't give a damn about helping their party win control of the U.S. senate?  It defies logic.

And if you think that "100,000 MORE for Biden" was caused by voters just not liking the particular Dem senate candidate, here's confirmation of the fraud from the OTHER race, involving Kelly Loeffler, Doug Collins and Dem Raphael Warnock:  Total votes for all the Republican candidates was 2,426,120.  Total for all Dem senate candidates combined was 2,378,312--a Repub margin of almost 48,000 .  Yet we're expected to believe Biden got 12,000 more votes than Trump?

But there's an even more damning comparison:  As noted above, the OFFICIAL, reported results show Biden with 2,474,507 alleged votes.  Yet as just noted in the paragraph above, the total of all votes for Democrat candidates in the OTHER senate race was 2,378,312.  So for the OFFICIAL results to NOT be fraudulent, we must believe that 96,195 people who voted for Slow Joe simply didn't care about helping their party win control of the senate. 

Just for a check, note that in the Ossoff senate race (4 paragraphs above), almost 100,000 MORE votes were officially tallied for Biden than for Ossoff.  (If you're picky, the actual difference was 98,888.) Compare that to 96,195 more OFFICIALLY reported votes for Biden than total Dem senate votes in the Loeffler/Warnock senate race.  See a pattern there?

So the obvious conclusion--although it clearly escapes all Democrats--is that somewhere between 96,000 and 100,000 fraudulent votes were added to the Democrats' presidential candidate, enabling the Dems to bank a fraudulent "win" by 12,000 votes.  

Hey you Hahvahd grads:  You're smart, right?  You understand math, right?  So let's hear your explanation for this...interesting...coincidence, in which Biden is reported to have received 96,000 or 100,000 more votes than the total votes for all the Democrats' senate candidates combined.

Go ahead, we'll wait. 

And while we're waiting, here's still another damning piece of data:  

As everyone American over the age of 15 should know, every two years every House seat is up for re-election.  So I totalled all the officially reported votes for House seats in Georgia's 14 congressional districts.  Total Repub votes 2,490,326.  Total Dem votes 2,393,089.  In other words, per the official reported results, Repub congressional candidates got 97,237 MORE votes than Dem candidates--which perfectly aligns with the 96,000 to 100,000 fraudulent votes seemingly added to Biden's total that was found in the two senate races.

So by the official, reported results, Georgia voters preferred Republican congressional candidates by 97,237 votes.  Yet we're expected to believe that these Republican voters supposedly preferred the corrupt, senile, basement-hiding Biden over Trump?

Finally, consider this: As noted above, the total of all votes for Democrat congressional candidates was 2,393,089.  But the total reported for Biden was 2,461,837.  That is, Biden was credited with 68,748 MORE votes than all Dem congressional candidates combined.  So once again we're expected to believe that 68,748 Democrats who took the time to vote for Biden didn't give a damn about helping their party retain its crucial majority (i.e. total control) in the House.  

Really?  Seriously?