Now that we know the FBI is totally corrupt at the highest levels, let's look at Seth Rich's murder

Now that the clearly unethical (and almost certainly criminal) behavior of the upper management levels of the Department of Justice and FBI have been exposed by the emails between the main perps, another crimes that has been virtually ignored needs to be re-examined:  The the murder of young Democratic National Committee computer expert Seth Rich. 

The undisputed facts are

• Rich was an info-tech staff member for the Democrat National Committee; 
• In early July of 2016 someone downloaded several gigabytes of emails from the DNC email server; 
• In an effort to blame Russia (and thus to make the implausible claim that Trump "colluded" with the Russians to win the election), the Lying Media have repeatedly claimed this download was done by Russian agents via an internet connection; 
• The time it took to copy the data is known, and is too short to have been done via any overseas internet connection.  This suggests the download was made to a USB drive, thus by someone who had physical access a computer wired to the server; 
• On July 10, 2016, Rich was shot twice in the back two blocks from his home.   

D.C. cops claimed the murder was the result of a robbery "gone wrong,"  This is utter, brazen bullshit, since the alleged "robbers" didn't take his billfold, a $2,000 gold necklace, expensive watch or cell phone.
If nothing of value was stolen, why would an honest cop so implausibly claim the shooting was a "robbery gone wrong"?

Because calling it a botched robbery makes it almost a non-event, far less newsworthy.  With robberies a daily occurrence in DC, one more isn't a big deal, and no one is under any pressure to investigate the shooting.  And sure enough, no law enforcement agency is actively investigating the killing--because "everyone knows" "sometimes these things happen."

Since it clearly wasn't a robbery, why was he killed?  He didn't have any known enemies, which at least raises the possibility that he was specifically targeted.

Sources claim DC police have been told by higher-ups not to talk about the case. 


There's another twist:  In an Aug. 9, 2016 interview on Dutch television, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange implied that Rich was the source of the DNC emails that organization began posting in July of 2016.  Assange also offered a $20,000 reward leading to the arrest of Rich’s killers.

Since there's no evidence that Assange and Rich had ever met, it's very odd that Assange would offer a reward for finding who killed someone he didn't know from Adam--unless there was some other connection.

Immediately after Wiki began posting copies of the DNC emails, the FBI opened an investigation into how Wiki came into possession of those emails.  One absolutely logical, normal step in such an inquiry would be for FBI agents to examine the files on the server, looking for evidence of hacking. But this was never done, because the DNC refused to allow the FBI to examine the device.

If the FBI was honest, and actually wanted to learn if Russia or any other foreign power had stolen emails from one of our two main political parties, the agency would simply have subpoenaed the server.  But as we now know, all the top officials at the FBI wanted Hilliary to win, and hated Trump.  One super-sleuth even wrote that "they" needed an "insurance policy" to make sure Trump couldn't win.  So the FBI allowed the DNC to ship the server to a private firm with Democrat ties--Crowd Strike.

Interestingly, Crowd Strike was also the firm the Clinton campaign hired to examine her own private email server--the one she'd used to send hundreds of beyond-Top-Secret documents to--for evidence of hacking.

In both cases Crowd Strike wiped the server clean, after concluding that Hilliary's server wasn't hacked but the DNC’s was--supposedly by Russian hackers.  In fact the firm erased the hard drive on Hilliary's server even though they knew the contents had been subpoenaed by the House committee that was investigating the thing.

Anyone else who did this would be in jail.  But no one has even raised the idea of charging Crowd Strike with a crime.   Why not?

But even if the FBI had examined either server, who believes they's have been truthful about their findings?  The evidence of corruption at the highest levels of the DOJ and FBI--and their covering up for Hilliary--is clear.  They've become an arm of the Democrat party.