U.K. muslim posts video saying infidels must submit to muslims--UK expecting riots and beheadings by infidels any minute now
Last January a Muslim living in the U.K. posted a video on the internet in which he claimed the U.N. charter is fundamentally in conflict with the core principles of Islam. Reason? Here are his exact words:
The actual article is considerably more detailed, describing how a Muslim man who doesn't want to go home at night can knock on the door of an infidel and demand to sleep in the owner's bed.
I can hear liberals now: "The fellow who made this video and posted it on the internet has to be be an extremist nut-case, who isn't speaking for the gazillion Muslims who are peaceful and just want to co-exist."
Bullshit. This guy is quoting "one of the greatest commentators on the Koran." This is how they think. It's what they're taught. It's what virtually all commentaries about the Koran--called the Hadith--say.
And if you think they're not working on this bullshit objective here in the U.S., you haven't been paying attention.
Democrats think Muslims are great, and that the real problem is that the mean ol' U.S. (mean before Our Lightworker took control, anyway) went and invaded Iraq. Which made some peaceful Muslims angry and virtually *forced* those normally-peaceful Muslims to hijack some planes and fly 'em into some buildings owned by greedy corporations that were blocking the sun from getting to peaceful union members demonstrating below. Or something like that.
Oh, wait, that's right: The planes weren't even hijacked by Muslims, cuz, you know, agents of the Bush administration did it. So see? Muslims are peaceful even after we invaded 'em.
See?
Article 2, paragraph 1, says that the organization is based on the principle of sovereignty and equality to all of its members. Equality to all of its members – is there such a thing in Islam? Is there equality of faith?
If a Muslim comes out on the day of ‘Eid and sees an infidel with nice clothes, the infidel has to take his clothes off and give them to the Muslim. When an infidel walks down the street, he has to wear a red belt around his neck, he has to have his forehead shaved, and he has to wear two shoes that are different from one another. He is not allowed to walk on the pavement. He has to walk in the middle of the road, and he has to ride on a mule.Translation: "Infidels"--that would be anyone who isn't Muslim--are second-class citizens who must be forced to humble themselves around Muslims.
The actual article is considerably more detailed, describing how a Muslim man who doesn't want to go home at night can knock on the door of an infidel and demand to sleep in the owner's bed.
I can hear liberals now: "The fellow who made this video and posted it on the internet has to be be an extremist nut-case, who isn't speaking for the gazillion Muslims who are peaceful and just want to co-exist."
Bullshit. This guy is quoting "one of the greatest commentators on the Koran." This is how they think. It's what they're taught. It's what virtually all commentaries about the Koran--called the Hadith--say.
And if you think they're not working on this bullshit objective here in the U.S., you haven't been paying attention.
Democrats think Muslims are great, and that the real problem is that the mean ol' U.S. (mean before Our Lightworker took control, anyway) went and invaded Iraq. Which made some peaceful Muslims angry and virtually *forced* those normally-peaceful Muslims to hijack some planes and fly 'em into some buildings owned by greedy corporations that were blocking the sun from getting to peaceful union members demonstrating below. Or something like that.
Oh, wait, that's right: The planes weren't even hijacked by Muslims, cuz, you know, agents of the Bush administration did it. So see? Muslims are peaceful even after we invaded 'em.
See?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home