Tim Walz pardoned non-citizen child rapist to shield him from deportation

Conservatives keep noting endless examples of Democrat rulers doing everything they can to prevent illegals and non-citizens invited to stay by Dem prezzies from being deported, even after they've been convicted of raping a child, or murder.

Democrats claim that's fake newz--just another "right-wing conspiracy story," eh?

Well here ya go:  An example from ten days ago, in the Peoples' Republic of Minnesota. 

A 42-year-old Laotian national convicted of repeatedly raping a child was given a total pardon by Minnesota's Democrat governor--and former Dem VP nominee--Tim Walz.

It started with Minnesota's utterly leftist, Dem-ruled "Clemency Review Commission," which voted 4-2 to grant a pardon to Laotian national Tou Lue Vang after he was convicted in 2006 of repeatedly raping a girl for 2 years, beginning when she was 10 years old.

Lest you think he was framed by eeeebil conservatives:  He admitted it.

Due to his conviction Vang was ordered deported in October 2006.  But because Laos at the time refused to accept returns of its deported nationals from the United States, Vang got to stay in the U.S.

However, under pressure from the U.S, last year Laos finally began accepting a limited number of deportees from the United States.

Uh-oh.  All moonbats on deck!  The Dems on the "clemency review commission" worried that duh po' child rapist might be deported.  Heaven forbid!  So they recommended the child rapist be pardoned by the governor due to...wait for it..."immigration concerns."  

Lest you think I made that up: documents show that each of the four members who urged he be pardoned actually wrote that they were worried that he might be deported.

Next stop was the state's "Board of Pardons."  If you naively think this is an actual "board" composed of ordinary citizens, guess again: The "board" consists of the utterly goofy communist Walz, the Muslim attorney-general Keith Ellison, and the chief justice of the state's supreme court, Natalie Hudson.  Apparently all three voted to give Vang a full pardon.  

For young Americans: This is how leftist-ruled states work: everything signed off by Dem-ruled boards, with the goal of protecting ALL illegals in the U.S. from being deported.  All perfectly legal, citizen!

Vang entered the U.S. in 1994 and was granted permission to stay by the Clinton administration. Between 2002 and 2004, when Vang was between 18 and 20 years old, he had sexual intercourse with the victim four to six times, beginning when the victim was ten years old.

After he was arrested, the family of the by-then 12-year-old victim pressured her not to cooperate with law enforcement.

A jury sentenced Vang to 12 years in prison.  But in yet another instance of never-identified forces intervening to release Democrat criminals, that seemingly reasonable sentence was..."stayed," meaning vaporized, replaced by ONE year of "local confinement" and 30 years of "supervised probation."

But then in yet another of those mysterious gifts to  non-citizen rapists, Vang ended up serving just eight months. 

Oh, and about the jury sentence of 30 years of "supervised probation"?  That was mysteriously vaporized early in 2019.  Nice to have unseen frenz in govt, eh?

None of this is by accident.

After he was arrested, Vang told police, "I made a mistake, but this is a minor thing.  It's a cultural thing in Thailand to marry and have sex with girls as young as 12." 

Note how Vang throws in "to marry," to win over moonbats who claim "all cultures are equal."

Vang also said the victim should ALSO be arrested..."because she was as much at fault."

Despite this, several commissioners noted that the victim was reported to support a pardon for Vang.  No pressure from the family, eh?

Commissioner Nadine Graves--who voted for the pardon--wrote, "The victim supports this pardon.  [Vang’s] wife stayed and has forgiven. He also [has] immigration concerns. He has remorse and was discharged from probation."  

Who ended his probation, and why?  Ooohhh, sorry, no record of dat--at least not that you'll be allowed to see, deplorable.

Graves wrote that Vang "retracted his prior statement about this being a result of culture. He admits this was wrong then and will always be wrong."  Ahhh, "retracted" his earlier real belief in favor of saying what he needed to say, eh?

In his application for a pardon, Vang wrote that he  was facing a final order of removal from the U.S. He said he was worried that because he left southeast Asia at age 12, if he was deported he "would be sent to a place entirely unfamiliar to me, with no family, no home, and no future."

Classic move: portray the rapist as victim if duh mean ol' oppressors deport him.

Vang wrote, "My fear is that if deported, my children will grow up without a father, like I did" and "I will do all I can to be here and to protect them from the outcomes of my deportation."

Ahh, even more heart-wrenching: if he's deported, his children will be victims.  Yes, we get it.  And after the midterm elections I predict the ACLU will sue the Trump administration for depriving dis po' man of his constitutional rights for not allowing him to take another 20 years to appeal his deportation. 

The ACLU would have sued already, except defending a child rapist might cost the Dems a few dozen votes.  Or would have if the story was widely known.  

Fortunately the Dems don't have to worry about that.

Source. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exposed-docs-reveal-why-tim-walz-board-awarded-repeat-child-rapist-pardon-no-future