Dem influencer who writes blog on Supreme Court weighs in to make Dems look bettah

If you're a normal, hard-working, non-communist American you have absolutely no idea how many powerful forces are arrayed against us, hell-bent on destroying this nation as we've known it.

And as you could have predicted, those forces don't want you to realize they exist, because if most normal Americans knew, they'd fight back.  So one of the top goals of these forces is to keep you in the dark and feed you horseshit.  In fact this has been so well known that the intel community coined an amusing metaphor for the average American: 

"Mushrooms."  

"Keep the gullible American public in the dark and feed 'em horseshit."  And with the help of the Lying Mainstream Media, it works--every time.  The people who really run this country know that, and count on it.  It always works, because the people who really run things know human psychology, and the power of the Mainstream Media to mold what's amusingly called "public opinion." 

It's amusing because what's laughably called "public opinion" is ordered and created by the folks who really run things, working thru the Mainstream Media.  And I fully realize you won't and can't believe that--cuz it's just TOO crazy, eh?  Sure, I totally understand.

And with that preamble, here's episode #6,405,596.

One of the many influences on "public opinion" is a blog called "Scotusblog," which reports on Supreme Court cases.  As some of you may have heard, the corrupt Dem-ruled state of Virginia recently hosted a "ballot measure" to amend the state constitution to allow the Dem-controlled legislature to re-draw the borders of congressional districts to change the current House seats from 6-5 Democrat to 10-1 Dem, despite Virginia being just 53-47 Dem.

Winning control of the U.S. House is so crucial to the Dems that National Democrats dropped millions into this "ballot measure."  And it passed--from memory, something like 52-48.  The Dems were giddy!  But a couple of Republicans appealed to the VA supreme court, pointing to a number of violations of the state constitution.

Unexpectedly, the state SC agreed with the appellants.

The Democrats weren't gonna have that, so they filed an "emergency appeal" with the state SC, stating that the Dems were appealing to the US SC, asking the state SC to delay certifying their ruling until the US SC could rule on the Democrats' appeal.

As an indicator of their utter competence (yes, that's sarc), the notice to the VA SC had two typos in the top two inches of the first page:  they misspelled "Virgina" and "senator."  It was a perfect indicator of the incompetence of the Dem regime under attorney-general Jay Jones (who is on record as wishing for someone to put "two bullets in the head" of one of his Republican opponents.  Seriously.) 

SO...Democrat revolutionary moron Jones signed off on the appeal, and after deliberating for all of 15 minutes, in an unsigned opinion the US SC declined to hear the appeal--for the obvious reason that no federal or Constitutional issues were involved.  

Now let's see what Amy Howe--the one female who owns Scotusblog--wrote about this:

The Supreme Court on Friday evening turned down a request by Virginia’s attorney general and other Virginia Democrats to allow the state to use a new congressional map, which would have been expected to strongly favor Democrats, in the 2026 elections.

The denial came in a brief, unsigned order sent to reporters at 6:30 p.m. EDT on Friday – just 15 minutes after the court’s Public Information Office distributed the reply filed by Jay Jones, the Virginia attorney general, and Democratic legislators.

Not that it changes things, but what Amy Howe calls a "reply" was no such thing: it was the formal APPEAL by the Dems asking for relief from the ruling of the state's supreme court.  But describing it as a "reply" trivializes it--which was the entire point of using that word. 

The effects of the court’s order are likely relatively minimal, because Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger had already indicated earlier this week that the state would not use the 2026 map in the upcoming elections.

Absolute horseshit.  This is a face-saving measure created by Amy Howe to trivialize the US SC ruling:  She says "likely relatively minimal because" the new, corrupt female Dem governor, Spanberger, said the state would NOT use "the 2026 map" in the coming elections."

Utter horseshit:  If the US SC had ruled FOR the Dems, do ya think Spamburger would still have declared "We not gon' use deez new district boundaries which a majority of voterz has definitely approved"?  So the SC ruling was crucial.  But Howe wants to trivialize it, to minimize the damage to Virginia Democrats.  Cuz otherwise they look like the dumb, corrupt, partisan sons of bitches they are.  

Jones and the other Virginia Democrats came to the Supreme Court asking the justices to block a May 8 ruling by the Virginia Supreme Court that invalidated an amendment to the Virginia Constitution allowing the state’s Legislature to enact a new congressional map.

The Virginia General Assembly had adopted the new map in February. [Amy omits to say that the adoption by the majority-Democrat Assembly violated the state constitution.]  But before the state could actually use the map, it needed voters to approve an amendment to the state constitution that would give the General Assembly the power to draw a new congressional map outside of the normal cycle following the decennial census. 

In April, voters approved an amendment to the state’s constitution that gave the Assembly the power to do so. Nevertheless, a divided Virginia Supreme Court struck that amendment down on the ground that the Legislature had not followed the correct procedures when it put the new amendment on the ballot. The majority explained that under the state constitution, the Legislature must approve a proposed amendment to the constitution during two different legislative sessions, which must be separated by an election to the General Assembly’s House of Delegates. Although the Legislature had voted on the proposed amendment for the first time on Oct. 31, 2025, the majority said, more than 1.3 million votes had already been cast by then – and, therefore, “the General Assembly passed the proposed constitutional amendment for the first time well after voters had begun casting ballots during the 2025 general election.”

In their [appeal to the US SC] Jay [sic] and the Democrats argued that the Virginia supreme court’s ruling “overthrows [a] democratic outcome just days before the Commonwealth must begin its preparations to administer the 2026 midterm election.”

"Days before [the state] must begin preparations" sound like no problem, eh? 

Moreover, they contended, the dispute implicates “two critical issues of federal law:”  the meaning of the term “election” under federal law, and the idea that the state court so “impermissibly transgressed the ordinary bounds of judicial review” that its ruling should be reversed.

Soon after the filing was submitted on Friday, the court denied the request by Jones and the Virginia Democrats without comment.

"Soon" is right: 15 minutes.  Apparently the SC decided there were no issues worth considering.  Meaning the appeal was ridiculous on its face.  Meaning the Dems (like the utterly incompetent DEI place-filler Jay Jones) either knew they were grandstanding with an appeal that raised no federal issue--but was useful to save face, eh--or else were too dumb to realize it.

Now: I suspect most readers consider Amy Howe to be a neutral, unbiased "reporter."  As the above quotes show, she's not.  She's a total Dem shill and always has been, but pretends to be unbiased.  And she's one of literally hundreds of "influencers" of what's amusing considered "public opinion."

And as noted at the beginning: Americans have no idea how many of the Media articles and blogs and influencers they read are really bleating the "talking points" that help the Dem party look superficially competent.

Of course you don't believe a word of this.  Makes no difference to me.

People who believe horseshit like this goofy appeal are the same ones who believe "Iran was NEVAH trying to build an atom bomb!"  Which requires 'em to explain what use there is to go to the great expense of "enriching" uranium to 60% fissionable.  (Spoiler: there is NO known use for enriching uranium past ten percent except to make a bomb.) 

Source: Amy Howe's "Scotusblog"