USAID has been funding "workshops" at Hahvahd training people to use violence. Seriously

Cunning Deep-State Democrat/socialists have been quietly pushing the violent overthrow of conservative U.S. presidents for years.  It's been happening right under your nose--and you've had no idea.

Example:  USAID is the grandly-named "Agency for International Development," right?  How noble!  In theory it would fund small-ish efforts in foreign countries to start businesses or otherwise help.

So why the hell is it funding communists in the U.S. pushing violence to overthrow the president, eh?

Seriously: USAID funded a Harvard institute to teach leftist "activists" how to use violence to overthrow regimes they don't like.  I could understand that if it was in a foreign country, but these revolutionaries were (are) teaching this in the U.S., to overthrow Trump.

To prevent voters from knowing what they were really doing (a standard Dem tactic, even extending to the totally misleading names they give to bills in congress) Harvard called their "institute" the "Nonviolent Action Lab."  It partnered with avowed communist congresswhore Pramila Jayapal on “Resistance Labs,” training "activists."

So even if you got this far, who could complain about training "non-violent" "activists," even if in the U.S., eh?

But it was a lie: Jayapal told reporters she wants protestors “strike ready,” suggesting "violence is coming.”

"Strike-ready," eh?

Enter Erica Chenoweth, billed as a "Nonviolent Action Lab leader."

Chenoweth has written several reports, paid for by 5-figure grants from USAID.  Some of the titles:

• "How to topple a dictator"
• "The role of violence in nonviolent resistance" (wait...that's an oxymoron)
• "Why terrorism does NOT destroy democracy"  (you're kidding, right?)
• "Terrorism: achievements and challenges ahead"
•  "Terrorism and democracy"

Chenoweth led a "public panel" (?) at Yale titled “Is Terrorism Ever Legitimate?”  Can you guess what her conclusion was?

And most revealing: she organized a “Paths to Violence Workshop” at Harvard.

Now: obviously we can't prevent wacko communists from urging the violent overthrow of a regime they hate--including here in the U.S.  But should taxpayer money be used to support communist rat-bastards like this?  

Rational Americans would instantly answer "Of course not."  But USAID did fund that, either because USAID was founded by Leftists (that's been suggested by many) or else because the Left took over the organization.

And the Dem congress kept funding it, and Republicans--fooled by the soothing, anodyne name--didn't object.

Multiply this by a thousand, and you can see the problem.  If all this corrupt, wasteful spending hadn't taken place, our national debt would be far lower.  

Democrats: "Dat crazy-talk!  All duh money we spent on dis stuff couldn't have amounted to more than a trillion dollars, which is barely a blip on our $36 TRILLION national debt, eh?  So...shut up!"

Here's another.

This last one is VERY informative: It's Jayapal on Rachel Madcow's leftist, pro-tranny shitshow, explaining exactly what Natalie has outlined above.  Jayapal is calling Trump a dictator and trying to enlist violent thugs to support overthrowing him.  

Of course you can't believe that.  I totally understand.  It seems impossible that the Democrats would fund communists at Hahvahd urging the overthrow of the government with violence...but they have.

https://x.com/nataliegwinters/status/1907036094345998376/video/3