Politico posted a LONG piece listing the reasons for the wipeout. And they blame...

At 6:21 a.m. on the day after the election, Politico posted a piece trying to explain how their faaabulous candidate--who raised and spent over a BILLION dollars to win the presidency--lost to Orange fascist (HitlerStalinMussolini).

It's a masterpiece of rationalization--i.e. bullshit.  Blames everything except the Democrat rulerz, the party's shitty policies and their incredibly bad candidate.

Seriously.

Tiny example: Politico trivializes the coup by saying "...after Democrats excised biden from the ticket..."  Wow, "excised" is SO much nicer than "coup" or "forced out by party rulerz," eh?

Example of Politico's "keen analysis:"  Their very long piece mentions lots of issues voters didn't like, but doesn't mention open borders at all.  Or ending the use of oil and gas, gun confiscation, "green new deal," boys competing in girls' sports, schools pushing kids to change genders, "EV mandates," forcing taxpayers to pay for sex-change surgery for prisoners and illegal aliens, on and on.  Politco doesn't mention any of those policies.

"Voters LOVE our policies!  Really!  So the loss must have been due to...misogyny.  Raacism.  Russian disinformation!  Maybe voters are too stupid to understand how great our policies really are!"

When Trump pointed to her (and the Dems') positions on a few of those, her campaign would issue a statement that she no long supported that position.  It was a flipflop--and most voters saw it as such.  But Politico describes this as merely "how she could drift so far on issue after issue."  Ahh yes, "drift" instead of "flipflop."  Good cover!

Politico's propagandists sneered that Trump's campaign was run by a "band of MAGA activists and billionaire rebels."  So how the hell could he possibly have won, eh?

Below is a partial list of the excuses by Politico:

"Harris had so many official duties as VP of the whole country, and that prevented her from doing as many campaign events as Trump!  It wudn't fair!"

"Harris and her team were under an exceedingly compressed timeline to execute. She had to...assemble a core inner circle; channel the torrent of donations that started to flow into the campaign’s coffers; select a running mate; prepare for the debate with Trump; deliver an acceptance speech at the DNC and then execute on her debate plan.  All went according to plan."  So how could she have lost?"

See, dat why--with just 100 days before the election--she waited an entire month before giving a single interview with a major outlet: jus' too busy "channeling the torrent of donations," eh?  And then would only grant interviews with friendly outlets, like CBS, who could be counted on to edit her answers to make her look far better.  Nice when the Media will cover for your incompetence, eh?

"Everyone in the Media agreed that our party had a far 'better ground game' than the Trumpies!  We had a 'professional ground game, versus Trump’s band of MAGA activists and billionaire rebels.'  We were far better at registering new Dem voters and getting out the vote!  So she should have won!"

"Core to Harris’ pitch...was the idea that she represented the safer option."

"she represented the safer option"??  Define "safer."  Open borders, illegal aliens raping and murdering American girls?  You call that safe?  Of course not, so you ignored it.  All of it.

"It wasn't fair that our Partei forced the nomination on ouah faaabulous black female candidate so close to the election, which meant she didn't have as much time as Orange Man to prepare!  It wudn't fair!"

Wait, I thought Cackles absolutely assured us that bidumb was "sharp as a tack" right up until the day he withdrew.  But she had to have known he was senile, just as we all saw endlessly on unedited videos.  If she hadn't kept lying to us about his condition, the Partei could have forced him out at any time, eh?

"Kamala was forced to use Air Force Two to fly to campaign rallies.  It was painted in the standard, bland blue/white scheme.  But Trump had a plane with a far more dramatic paint job with his damn NAME on it!  But ouah faabulous candidate wasn't allowed to put her name on AF2.  So he had an unfair advantage!  It wudn't fair!"

"She lost because Americans hate the idea of a woman president!  Misogyny!!  And as Mark Cuban and others said, Trump is intimidated by smart, powerful women, which is why he avoids such women!"

"Because she was such a faaaabulous candidate, she and the party raised what we'll just call "eye-popping sums" from donors.  So by all past election history she should have won!  It wudn't fair!"

"Eye-popping sums," y'say?  Politico knew the number but didn't wanna tell ya:  The Dems actually raised--and spent--a BILLION dollars--three times more than Trump.  Her ads blanketed every college and pro football game.  Massive ad spending.  Should have worked, eh?

"Our Media allies constantly told Americans Trump was a raacist, sexist neanderthal.  By past election history that should have made Americans vote Democrat.  Only reason they didn't was misogyny."

"One of her key talking points was 'It's time to turn the page on the past!'  She repeated it at every rally, so voters should have believed it and voted for us.  We don't understand why voters were skeptical!"

"Given all the disadvantages forced on our totally faaabulous candidate, she did a great job 'moving battleground numbers in her favor and holding down Trump’s margins.' "

"A broad anti-incumbent fervor put her in a difficult, even impossible position."

"A harris aid said 'Joe Biden is the single reason Kamala and Democrats lost tonight.' ”

See, citizen?  The huge loss had nothing to do with Dem policies!  Nuh thing.  Voters LOVE our policies!

So to this point, based on Politico's excuses we see the Democrats are miles from understanding why they lost. They only thing they're sure of is that it wasn't their policies, or bad decisions by party rulerz, or *giving* the nomination to a woman who's lied about her entire life.

Source: Politico

https://archive.is/sNcUQ