Why did the Dems lose--resoundingly? (election post-mortem)

The rulerz of the Democrat party (and make no mistake, they DO rule it!) made the decision that despite the Media's best efforts to hide biden's long-worsening senility, voters were beginning to realize he was totally senile.

So the Dem rulerz decided bidumb had to go. Many analysts believe they wanted to hold an open "mini-primary" that would have allowed 'em to choose duh faabulous Gavin Newsom, who would have been a sure winner--far more popular than Cackles.

The Dem rulerz knew that if they held an open "mini-primary" at their convention Cackles would win the entire black vote, but that wouldn't be enough to win the nomination.  So the rulerz figured "No problem!  Forcing Joe to resign the nomination (ignoring the votes of 14 million primary voters, but who cares, eh?) is easy: threaten him with being removed by the 25th Amendment.  So it should be equally easy to offer Cackles ten million bucks and the presidency of a Dem-ruled university (like Howard) to stepp aside.  

"She'd lap it up!  Newsom wins easily, and our power continues."

But the Dem rulerz didn't anticipate two things: first and most significant, because members of the congressional black caucus knew Cackles couldn't win in an open nomination, they told the Dem rulerz "If you hold an open nomination to replace biden, we will "burn down the party."

That's a verbatim quote.

The Dem rulerz were like "You can't be serious!  Harris is a joke!  Joe chose her because to win the nomination he promised to choose a "minority female" as his VP, to win black and female votes (and as insurance against his being impeached, just as emperor Barack chose Joe for the same reason).  We rulerz allowed this because it was a clever strategy.

"But Harris as our nominee for president?  You're kidding."

The second factor was in that Cackles has a huge ego, rivaling Trump's.  Because her entire career has relied on using sex and race to "fail up," she'd come to believe all the flattery heaped on her--that she "really was faaabulous."  So rather than step aside gracefully, retiring with an unearned ten million and a guaranteed half-million a year in salary as president of Howard U for a decade or more, plus a lavish pension, she pushed the congressional black caucus to push the Dem rulerz to *give her* the nomination instead of opening it to a fair vote.

The Dem rulerz realized that IF Cackles was determined NOT to step aside, they couldn't open the nomination without alienating blacks (and white feminists), so
they surrendered.  

And in the Dems' rigging the nomination, millions of Americans saw how they rigged it--and how utterly fake and incompetent the new Dem nominee was--and indeed, had always been.  

This revelation pushed a million young Americans--who had always voted Democrat--to switch sides.  Same with blue-collar workers, and even a few tens of thousands of single women who saw the news reports of illegal alien invaders-- all of whom were allowed to enter the U.S. and stay, thanks to Cackles and bidumb--murdering and raping women, and thought "That's a policy I do NOT support."

And then it got worse, as harris chose as her nominee the equally moronic, equally fake Walz, who was already well known in his state as a weird, tyrannical doofus (although Minnesota Dems loved him--ironically for exactly the same reasons).

Cackles should have picked the governor of Pennsylvania, a smart, slick guy named Josh Shapiro.  But Cackles didn't want to pick Shapiro because a) he would have overshadowed her intellectually; and b) she suspected she'd need the same sort of insurance against impeachment that she provided to bidumb.  (There's some speculation that Shapiro indicated he wasn't interested, because he didn't think she could win.  I discount that because every poll initially showed her ahead.)

One other factor was that she was a loud supporter of Revolution, both black BLM supporters overthrowing cops and department stores, and for residents of Gaza to defeat Israel.  If she chose Shapiro she'd probably lose a lot of the Muslim vote.  So the better pick was off the list of choices.

The result of all the above appears to have been a Democrat disaster.

And I suspect you ain't seen nothin' yet, because the Democrats are so bent on NOT letting Trump take office that they've been planning the legal moves to block that for weeks now--maybe even months.  The two main plotters are Dem congresswhore Jamie Raskin and long-time Dem hotshot lawyer Marc Elias.

While they file lawsuit after lawsuit, their army of brownshirts--antifa and BLM--will be laying plans to riot on inauguration day.  What these two things will do is reveal that the Dems' bleating about an "insurrection" on Jan 6 of 2021 was all hypocritical--that they'll be doing worse.

This entire saga is a combination of Karma and hubris.  And while you'll never see a word of the anger from some Dems toward the "brilliant" rulerz who allowed the moronic Harris to be chosen as biden's VP--forcing the party to surrender four years later and gift her the nomination--you know there's gonna be a HUGE amount of blame being thrown around.

But don't be concerned, Dems: the people who really rule you will never be either blamed or even identified.

Is this a great country or what?

But if you believe the Dems will learn from last Tuesday, don't worry: One of the absolute truths about Democrats is that they never take the blame for *anything.*  So instead of learning from the massive defeat--even losing the national popular vote!--they'll blame it on some nefarious factor they couldn't *possibly* control!

So it was "Russian interference," just as in 2016!  Or maybe the phase of the moon.  Or the alignment of the planets.  Or Wall Street!  We're not sure how a huge surge in the Dow factors in, but they'll use it.

Wait, we got it!  It's the jobs report that came out on Nov 1st, that only 12,000 jobs were created when experts predicted 110,000!  Yeh, dat's it!

Whatever the cause of the massive loss last Tuesday, it was NOT due to Dem policies!  

Open borders?  Taxpayer-funded sex change surgery for illegals?  Ending all offshore drilling?  Taxing "unrealized capital gains"?  *Ordering* schools to allow men to conpete in womens' sports?  *Ordering* the armed forces to provide free sex-change surgery for trannies?  *Ordering* schools to allow boys to use girls' locker rooms?  Ordering schools and our armed forces to use "preferred pronouns"?  All totally pushed by the Democrats, and *surely* all gud Mericans mus' love all doze!

"Cuz we Dem leaderz do!  An' SURELY ebryone agree wif' us, right?"

SO...the Dems won't learn from 2024, and won't change their policies a bit.  Oh they'll *claim* they've "secured the border,* but that'll be a lie.  But like the Media absolutely refusing to ask Dougie Emhof if he slapped the fool out of his girlfriend in France, no member of the Mainstream Media will even ask the pointed question.

Just like "fracking," eh?  Cackles said "On my first day in office I will ban fracking."  Then to keep from losing votes in crucial Pennsylvania she had her *campaign lackeys* claim she was reversing that position.  But note *Cackles herself* didn't say shit.  Think that was an accident?