Walz: "The electoral college needs to go." Campaign: "Dat not our policy." Walz: "Uh...

Cackles's VP nominee is a habitual liar--which makes him a perfect match for Cackles "I worked at McDonalds," "I was raised in a middle-class family," "I lived in Oakland"--all of which are lies.

Walz has claimed he was "in China during the Tienanmin Square rebellion."  He wasn't.  He claimed he'd "carried weapons of war in war."  He didn't.  So yesterday (12 Oct) the Democrat-fellating propaganda outlet ABC interviewed Walz to rehabilitate his image.

And Walz explained that the reason he keeps lying about his past is because he wears his “emotions on [his] sleeve” and is passionate.

You can get a real insight into how Walz thinks by reading his exact words as he struggles to explain the interviewer's question about him lying about being in China during the rebellion:

“Well, look, 35 years ago I got the opportunity to be in Hong Kong — be in China, learned a lot about it.  Served 24 years in the National Guard. Passionately, in an instance talking about gun violence in schools — on an instance there.”

Does that sound like an explanation?

“Proud of the service that I have done. Proud to be a teacher in that classroom. Proud to have been very public all these years. And — and owning it when I — you know, when I said I was there in August of ’89. I think what you see here, you saw it in Minnesota. Been elected eight times here. These things have been very public for folks here. They see the results of things that we’ve passed.”

Again, does this sound even remotely like an explanation?  Of course not.

Walz went on to claim that despite his lies, "the people of Minnesota know who I am."

“Well, I — I said they know who I am. I know who I am. I know the work that I’ve done. I know things get — get spun in a political environment, but I think what they see is, if they want to compare that talking about immigration policy or seeing the things that Donald Trump would say, I think there’s a big difference than — than missing a date when you’re there and, again, spinning something for political reason. I’m very clear who I have been.”

“Yeah. Well, I did it, you know, even the other day of just speaking passionately about these gun violence situations and meeting with these survivors. I sat in the room with the Sandy Hook folks. I — a friend of David Hogg, who’s been an activist on this. People know in — that — and then it gets spun in that ‘he didn’t say something true.’ It was very clear that I was talking about these veterans.”

“Very clear that I wear — you know, my — I wear my emotions on my sleeve. And I do think in these positions, whether it be governor or being Vice President of the United States, you do need to be collect — careful. You do need to be a little more thoughtful on it. And I think that — what you see is someone who’s been in classrooms a lot. I have been around coaching a lot. I speak passionately and I — I think doing that, you need to combine the two and I think that’s what she’s — she’s referring to.”

Didja get all that horseshit?

The interviewer also asked Walz about a statement he made at a fundraiser a week ago that the electoral college “needs to go.”  Knowing this comment would cost votes, the Harris/Walz campaign quickly announced that Walz’s statement was not the campaign's position.

Asked to clarify, Walz said

“I have spoken about it in the past, that [Democratic nominee Harris has] been very clear on this, and the campaign. And my position is the campaign’s position.”

Wait...you said your position was that the electoral college "needs to go."  Now you say you and "the campaign" have identical positions, eh?  But which one?

Source.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/11/tim-walz-abc-news-michael-strahan-lies-gaffes/